51
|
Nita LE, Chiriac AP, Rusu AG, Bercea M, Ghilan A, Dumitriu RP, Mititelu-Tartau L. New self-healing hydrogels based on reversible physical interactions and their potential applications. Eur Polym J 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
52
|
Evans BJ, Wolf SM. A FAUSTIAN BARGAIN THAT UNDERMINES RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS' PRIVACY RIGHTS AND RETURN OF RESULTS. FLORIDA LAW REVIEW 2019; 71:1281-1345. [PMID: 34305361 PMCID: PMC8302004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
A 2018 committee report published by the highly respected National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (the Report) recommends stripping research participants of crucial data privacy rights and discarding decades of carefully deliberated consensus guidelines for the ethical return of results and data from research. This Article traces these disturbing recommendations to three root causes: (1) a statement of task that blocked careful and impartial analysis of a disputed legal matter central to the Report; (2) a piecemeal legal analysis that omitted relevant strands of law; and (3) the inappropriate conflation of two distinct concepts-the return of individual research results (the stated subject of the Report) and privacy-enabling individual access rights, which have a nearly fifty-year legal history long predating the modern debate about return of results. The Report's recommendations would erect new barriers to the return of results and, simultaneously, dial back a core data privacy right that Americans-including many research participants-currently enjoy. We urge extreme caution in implementing this Report's flawed recommendations. Congress has elevated the right to see one's personal information to the status of a civil right in many different data environments. Diminishing individual access in the research context erodes its status as a right more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara J Evans
- Center for Biotechnology and Law, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston
| | - Susan M Wolf
- Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences, University of Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Lin JC, Hsiao WWW, Fan CT. Managing "incidental findings" in biobank research: Recommendations of the Taiwan biobank. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2019; 17:1135-1142. [PMID: 31462969 PMCID: PMC6709371 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this article, incidental findings (IF) refer to unforeseen findings made possible through biobanking research and advances in medical diagnostic technologies that raise issues regarding the obligation and/or responsibility of biobank-users and biobanks to return clinically significant information to participants. The World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Taipei (2016) highlights the possibility of encountering IF and requires that research on biospecimens address biobank feedback policies in their informed consent process, leaving open the possibility that the policy may be "no return". As clinicians and researchers begin to use these "resources", the possibility of finding clinically significant IF is becoming a reality. DISCUSSION In line with the WMA's Declaration of Taipei, a pragmatic approach is needed to deal with the issue of returning IF in biobank governance. Indeed, the impacts and concerns associated with the return of IF differ across different stakeholder groups and jurisdictions. Therefore, the framework governing IF return needs to be custom-built, taking into account the nature of each research project and the unique features of biobanks. To this end, in addition to facilitating biobank transparency, establishing an endurable and horizontal connection among biobanks and clinical institutions under a public health system will improve efficiency and effectiveness. Hence, subject to contemporary Taiwanese ethical and/or legal regulations, this article argues for the establishment of an updated framework for imaging-related and genetic-related IF return within the Taiwan Biobank (TWB), mainly based on a limited obligation to disclose life-threatening information revealed by imaging, but not genetic, information. SUMMARY After discussing some of the ethical, legal and social issues encountered by the TWB and accounting for the experiences of other international biobanks, we propose a systematic framework for returning IF, mainly on a "limited obligation" basis, which offers better and more comprehensive protection for biobank-participants' rights and health.
Collapse
Key Words
- Biobanks
- Bioethics
- EGF, Ethical Governance Framework
- ELSI, Ethical, Legal and Social Implications
- ESC, European Society of Cardiology
- Framework
- GNC, German National Cohort
- GP, General Practitioners
- IF, Incidental Findings
- IRBs, Institutional Review Boards
- Incidental finding
- MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- NHI, National Health Insurance
- NIH, National Institutes of Health
- P3G, Public Population Project in Genomics and Society
- TWB, Taiwan Biobank
- The WMA Declaration of Taipei (2016)
- UNESCO, United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization
- WMA, World Medical Association
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jui-Chu Lin
- College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Law & Technology Innovation Center, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Ethical, Legal and Social Implications (ELSI) of the Taiwan Biobank, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Wesley Wei-Wen Hsiao
- Law & Technology Innovation Center, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chien-Te Fan
- Institute of Law for Science and Technology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Prodromes and Preclinical Detection of Brain Diseases: Surveying the Ethical Landscape of Predicting Brain Health. eNeuro 2019; 6:ENEURO.0439-18.2019. [PMID: 31221862 PMCID: PMC6658915 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0439-18.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The future of medicine lies not primarily in cures but in disease modification and prevention. While the science of preclinical detection is young, it is moving rapidly. Preclinical interventions offer hope to decrease the severity of a disease or delay the development of a disorder. With such promise, the research and practice of detecting brain disorders at a preclinical stage present unique ethical challenges that must be addressed to ensure the benefit of these technologies. Direct brain interventions have the potential to impact not just what a patient has but who they are and who they could become. Further, receiving an assessment for a preclinical or prodromal state has potential to impact perceptions about capacity, autonomy and personhood and could become entangled with stigma and discrimination. Exploring ethical issues alongside and integrated into the experimental design and research of these technologies is critical. This review will highlight ethical issues attendant to the current and near future states of preclinical detection across the life span, specifically as it relates to autism spectrum disorder (ASD), schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease.
Collapse
|
55
|
Implementation of genomics in medical practice to deliver precision medicine for an Asian population. NPJ Genom Med 2019; 4:12. [PMID: 31231544 PMCID: PMC6555782 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-019-0085-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Whilst the underlying principles of precision medicine are comparable across the globe, genomic references, health practices, costs and discrimination policies differ in Asian settings compared to the reported initiatives involving European-derived populations. We have addressed these variables by developing an evolving reference base of genomic and phenotypic data and a framework to return medically significant variants to consenting research participants applicable for the Asian context. Targeting 10,000 participants, over 2000 Singaporeans, with no known pre-existing health conditions, have consented to an extensive clinical health screen, family health history collection, genome sequencing and ongoing follow-up. Genomic variants in a subset of genes associated with Mendelian disorders and drug responses are analysed using an in-house bioinformatics pipeline. A multidisciplinary team reviews the classification of variants and a research report is generated. Medically significant variants are returned to consenting participants through a bespoke return-of-result genomics clinic. Variant validation and subsequent clinical referral are advised as appropriate. The design and implementation of this flexible learning framework enables a cohort of detailed phenotyping and genotyping of healthy Singaporeans to be established and the frequency of disease-causing variants in this population to be determined. Our findings will contribute to international precision medicine initiatives, bridging gaps with ethnic-specific data and insights from this understudied population.
Collapse
|
56
|
Bombard Y, Brothers KB, Fitzgerald-Butt S, Garrison NA, Jamal L, James CA, Jarvik GP, McCormick JB, Nelson TN, Ormond KE, Rehm HL, Richer J, Souzeau E, Vassy JL, Wagner JK, Levy HP. The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 104:578-595. [PMID: 30951675 PMCID: PMC6451731 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The evidence base supporting genetic and genomic sequence-variant interpretations is continuously evolving. An inherent consequence is that a variant's clinical significance might be reinterpreted over time as new evidence emerges regarding its pathogenicity or lack thereof. This raises ethical, legal, and financial issues as to whether there is a responsibility to recontact research participants to provide updates on reinterpretations of variants after the initial analysis. There has been discussion concerning the extent of this obligation in the context of both research and clinical care. Although clinical recommendations have begun to emerge, guidance is lacking on the responsibilities of researchers to inform participants of reinterpreted results. To respond, an American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) workgroup developed this position statement, which was approved by the ASHG Board in November 2018. The workgroup included representatives from the National Society of Genetic Counselors, the Canadian College of Medical Genetics, and the Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors. The final statement includes twelve position statements that were endorsed or supported by the following organizations: Genetic Alliance, European Society of Human Genetics, Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors, American Association of Anthropological Genetics, Executive Committee of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Canadian College of Medical Genetics, Human Genetics Society of Australasia, and National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Bombard
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada.
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Sara Fitzgerald-Butt
- National Society of Genetic Counselors, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Nanibaa' A Garrison
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Leila Jamal
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; National Society of Genetic Counselors, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Cynthia A James
- National Society of Genetic Counselors, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Executive Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Departments of Medicine (Medical Genetics) and Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jennifer B McCormick
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Department of Humanities, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Tanya N Nelson
- Canadian College of Medical Geneticists, Kingston, ON K7K 1Z7, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada; Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Medical and Populations Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Julie Richer
- Canadian College of Medical Geneticists, Kingston, ON K7K 1Z7, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada; University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Souzeau
- Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors, Oakville, ON L6J 7N5, Canada; Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Jason L Vassy
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA
| | - Jennifer K Wagner
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Howard P Levy
- Social Issues Committee, American Society of Human Genetics, Rockville, MD 20852, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Evaluation of the cost and effectiveness of diverse recruitment methods for a genetic screening study. Genet Med 2019; 21:2371-2380. [PMID: 30930462 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0497-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Recruitment of participants from diverse backgrounds is crucial to the generalizability of genetic research, but has proven challenging. We retrospectively evaluated recruitment methods used for a study on return of genetic results. METHODS The costs of study design, development, and participant enrollment were calculated, and the characteristics of the participants enrolled through the seven recruitment methods were examined. RESULTS A total of 1118 participants provided consent, a blood sample, and questionnaire data. The estimated cost across recruitment methods ranged from $579 to $1666 per participant and required a large recruitment team. Recruitment methods using flyers and staff networks were the most cost-efficient and resulted in the highest completion rate. Targeted sampling that emphasized the importance of Latino/a participation, utilization of translated materials, and in-person recruitments contributed to enrolling a demographically diverse sample. CONCLUSIONS Although all methods were deployed in the same hospital or neighborhood and shared the same staff, each recruitment method was different in terms of cost and characteristics of the enrolled participants, suggesting the importance of carefully choosing the recruitment methods based on the desired composition of the final study sample. This analysis provides information about the effectiveness and cost of different methods to recruit adults for genetic research.
Collapse
|
58
|
Al-Khatib A, Kalichman M. Responsible Conduct of Human Subjects Research in Islamic Communities. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2019; 25:463-476. [PMID: 29127672 PMCID: PMC6310657 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9995-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In order to increase understanding of the ethical implications of biomedical, behavioral and clinical research, the Fogarty International Center, part of the United States National Institutes of Health, established an International Research Ethics Education and Curriculum Development Award (R25) to support programs in low- and middle-income countries. To develop research ethics expertise in Jordan, the University of California San Diego fellowship program in collaboration with Jordan University of Science and Technology provides courses that enable participants to develop skills in varied research ethics topics, including research with human subjects. The program provides a master's level curriculum, including practicum experiences. In this article we describe a practicum project to modify an existing introduction to human subjects research for a US audience to be linguistically and culturally appropriate to Arabic-speaking-Islamic communities. We also highlight key differences that guided the conversion of an English version to one that is in Arabic. And finally, as Institutional Review Boards follow the ethical principles of the Belmont Report in evaluating and approving biomedical and behavioral human subjects research proposals, we provide observations on the conformity of the three ethical principles of the Belmont Report with Islam.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aceil Al-Khatib
- Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P. O. Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
| | - Michael Kalichman
- Research Ethics Program 0612, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Abul-Husn NS, Kenny EE. Personalized Medicine and the Power of Electronic Health Records. Cell 2019; 177:58-69. [PMID: 30901549 PMCID: PMC6921466 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Personalized medicine has largely been enabled by the integration of genomic and other data with electronic health records (EHRs) in the United States and elsewhere. Increased EHR adoption across various clinical settings and the establishment of EHR-linked population-based biobanks provide unprecedented opportunities for the types of translational and implementation research that drive personalized medicine. We review advances in the digitization of health information and the proliferation of genomic research in health systems and provide insights into emerging paths for the widespread implementation of personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noura S Abul-Husn
- The Center for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- The Center for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Wong CS, Kogon AJ, Warady BA, Furth SL, Lantos JD, Wilfond BS. Ethical and Policy Considerations for Genomic Testing in Pediatric Research: The Path Toward Disclosing Individual Research Results. Am J Kidney Dis 2019; 73:837-845. [PMID: 30879919 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
DNA is now commonly collected in clinical research either for immediate genomic analyses or stored for future studies. Many genomic studies were previously designed without awareness of the ethical issues that might arise regarding the disclosure of genomic test results. At the start of the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) Cohort Study in 2004, we did not foresee the advent of genomic technology or the associated ethical issues pertaining to genetic research in children. Recent genomic studies and ancillary proposals using genomic technology stimulated the CKiD investigators to reassess the current ethical and policy environment pertaining to genomic testing and results disclosure. We consider the issues pertaining to next generation sequencing and individual results disclosure that may guide current and future research practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig S Wong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico Health Systems, Albuquerque, NM.
| | - Amy J Kogon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bradley A Warady
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City
| | - Susan L Furth
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John D Lantos
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital and Medical Center, Kansas City, MO
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Brothers KB, Rivera SM, Cadigan RJ, Sharp RR, Goldenberg AJ. A Belmont Reboot: Building a Normative Foundation for Human Research in the 21st Century. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2019; 47:165-172. [PMID: 30994072 PMCID: PMC6587582 DOI: 10.1177/1073110519840497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle B. Brothers
- University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, Division of Pediatric Clinical and Translational Research, 231 East Chestnut Street, N-97, Louisville, KY 40202
- University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, Institute for Bioethics, Health Policy, and Law, 501 E. Broadway, Ste 310, Louisville, KY 40202
| | - Suzanne M. Rivera
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, School of Medicine, TA200, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland OH 44106-4976
| | - R. Jean Cadigan
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, Department of Social Medicine, CB #7240, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7240
| | - Richard R. Sharp
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Biomedical Ethics Research Program, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Aaron J. Goldenberg
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, School of Medicine, TA200, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland OH 44106-4976
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Thorogood A, Dalpé G, Knoppers BM. Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step? Eur J Hum Genet 2019; 27:535-546. [PMID: 30622328 PMCID: PMC6460582 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0311-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Revised: 09/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Efforts are underway to harmonise the return of individual results and incidental findings from whole genome sequencing (WGS) across research contexts and countries. We reviewed international, regional and national laws and policies applying to return across 20 countries to identify areas of convergence and divergence. Discrepancies between laws and policies are most problematic where they cannot be reconciled through harmonisation of project-level governance. Rules for the return of results apply at different levels in different jurisdictions (e.g., human subjects research, biobanks, clinical trials, genomic sequencing, and genetic/personal data), complicating comparison. A particular concern for harmonisation are the (often contradictory) rules about when results must, should, may, or must not be returned. Adding confusion are different thresholds for utility (medical, familial, reproductive, and/or personal). The importance of respecting individual choices to know or not know is widely recognised, though some norms emphasise respect for personal preferences. Another troubling observation is that requirements for data quality, variant assessment, and the effective communication of results are evolving in uneven ways. There is a growing gap between researchers with the expertise, infrastructure, and resources to meet these requirements and those without, threatening international collaboration. Best practices for the return of individual genomic results are sorely needed to inform not only the ethical return of results, but also future legislative and policy efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Thorogood
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, 740 avenue Dr. Penfield, suite 5200, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G1, Canada.
| | - Gratien Dalpé
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, 740 avenue Dr. Penfield, suite 5200, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Bartha Maria Knoppers
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, 740 avenue Dr. Penfield, suite 5200, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Evans BJ. THE GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT AT AGE 10: GINA'S CONTROVERSIAL ASSERTION THAT DATA TRANSPARENCY PROTECTS PRIVACY AND CIVIL RIGHTS. WILLIAM AND MARY LAW REVIEW 2019; 60:2017-2109. [PMID: 33953451 PMCID: PMC8095822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The genomic testing industry is an edifice built on data transparency: transparent and often unconsented sharing of our genetic information with researchers to fuel scientific discovery, transparent sharing of our test results to help regulators infer whether the tests are safe and effective, and transparent sharing of our health information to help treat other patients on the premise that we gain reciprocity of advantage when each person's health care is informed by the best available data about all of us. Transparency undeniably confers many social benefits but creates risks to the civil rights of the people whose genetic information is shared. Touted as a major civil rights law at the time of its passage, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) has endured ten years of criticism that its protections are ineffectual, insufficient, or even unethical and overtly unsafe for the people it aims to protect. At the center of this controversy are provisions of GINA that expand people's access to genetic information that others store about them-a heavily contested assertion that data transparency implies sharing data not just with third parties, but with the people whose data are being shared. This Article traces the decades-long roots of this assertion and explores pathways to resolve the controversy that engulfs it. It is important to resolve this controversy. As GINA enters its second decade, genomics is finally starting to gain sufficient predictive power to support discriminatory and other nefarious uses that GINA was designed to prevent. We are entering a positive feedback loop in which the genomic research that exposes us to risk of unwanted data disclosures simultaneously fuels discoveries that make such disclosures potentially more damaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara J Evans
- Center for Biotechnology & Law, University of Houston Law Center; Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Garrison NA, Brothers KB, Goldenberg AJ, Lynch JA. Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2019; 19:51-63. [PMID: 30676903 PMCID: PMC6397766 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1544304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
As genomic science has evolved, so have policy and practice debates about how to describe and evaluate the ways in which genomic information is treated for individuals, institutions, and society. The term genetic exceptionalism, describing the concept that genetic information is special or unique, and specifically different from other kinds of medical information, has been utilized widely, but often counterproductively in these debates. We offer genomic contextualism as a new term to frame the characteristics of genomic science in the debates. Using stasis theory to draw out the important connection between definitional issues and resulting policies, we argue that the framework of genomic contextualism is better suited to evaluating genomics and its policy-relevant features to arrive at more productive discussion and resolve policy debates.
Collapse
|
65
|
Abstract
Precision medicine is an approach in which the characteristics of patients as well as their diseases are used to identify optimal therapy; it links researchers, patients, health care providers, and clinical laboratories. In precision medicine, specific molecular characteristics of an untreatable cancer can be targeted by specific molecular-based therapy. Access to high-quality human tissues is necessary to determine many characteristics of patients and their diseases (such as targetable molecules). There are ethical issues in using human tissues in precision medicine, including informed consent and confidentiality, optimal utilization, quality of tissues, and minimization of bias. When human tissues are obtained for patient therapy, the bioresource should be a component certified by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. For precision medicine to benefit medically underserved populations requires extensive focused research, planning, and resources, some of which are currently unavailable at rural and other sites where care is provided to underserved populations.
Collapse
|
66
|
Gordon DR, Radecki Breitkopf C, Robinson M, Petersen WO, Egginton JS, Chaffee KG, Petersen GM, Wolf SM, Koenig BA. Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2018; 10:1-22. [PMID: 30596322 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1546241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic analysis may reveal both primary and secondary findings with direct relevance to the health of probands' biological relatives. Researchers question their obligations to return findings not only to participants but also to family members. Given the social value of privacy protection, should researchers offer a proband's results to family members, including after the proband's death? METHODS Preferences were elicited using interviews and a survey. Respondents included probands from two pancreatic cancer research resources, plus biological and nonbiological family members. Hypothetical scenarios based on actual research findings from the two cancer research resources were presented; participants were asked return of results preferences and justifications. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed; survey data were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS Fifty-one individuals (17 probands, 21 biological relatives, 13 spouses/partners) were interviewed. Subsequently, a mailed survey was returned by 464 probands, 1,040 biological family members, and 399 spouses/partners. This analysis highlights the interviews, augmented by survey findings. Probands and family members attribute great predictive power and lifesaving potential to genomic information. A majority hold that a proband's genomic results relevant to family members' health ought to be offered. While informants endorse each individual's choice whether to learn results, most express a strong moral responsibility to know and to share, particularly with the younger generation. Most have few concerns about sharing genetic information within the family; rather, their concerns focus on the health consequences of not sharing. CONCLUSIONS Although additional studies in diverse populations are needed, policies governing return of genomic results should consider how families understand genomic data, how they value confidentiality within the family, and whether they endorse an ethics of sharing. A focus on respect for individual privacy-without attention to how the broad social and cultural context shapes preferences within families-cannot be the sole foundation of policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah R Gordon
- a Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine , University of California, San Francisco
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Barbara A Koenig
- g Program in Bioethics , University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Wolf
- Law School, Medical School, Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Barbara J Evans
- Law Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Center on Biotechnology and Law, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Beskow LM, Hammack CM, Brelsford KM. Thought leader perspectives on benefits and harms in precision medicine research. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0207842. [PMID: 30475858 PMCID: PMC6258115 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine research is underway to identify targeted approaches to improving health and preventing disease. However, such endeavors raise significant privacy and confidentiality concerns. The objective of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits and harms associated with precision medicine research through in-depth interviews with a diverse group of thought leaders, including primarily U.S.-based experts and scholars in the areas of ethics, genome research, health law, historically-disadvantaged populations, informatics, and participant-centric perspectives, as well as government officials and human subjects protections leaders. The results suggest the prospect of an array of individual and societal benefits, as well as physical, dignitary, group, economic, psychological, and legal harms. Relative to the way risks and harms are commonly described in consent forms for precision medicine research, the thought leaders we interviewed arguably emphasized a somewhat different set of issues. The return of individual research results, harm to socially-identifiable groups, the value-dependent nature of many benefits and harms, and the risks to the research enterprise itself emerged as important cross-cutting themes. Our findings highlight specific challenges that warrant concentrated care during the design, conduct, dissemination, and translation of precision medicine research and in the development of consent materials and processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. Beskow
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Catherine M. Hammack
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Kathleen M. Brelsford
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Paskal W, Paskal AM, Dębski T, Gryziak M, Jaworowski J. Aspects of Modern Biobank Activity - Comprehensive Review. Pathol Oncol Res 2018; 24:771-785. [PMID: 29728978 PMCID: PMC6132819 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-018-0418-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Biobanks play an increasing role in contemporary research projects. These units meet all requirements to regard them as a one of the most innovative and up-to-date in the field of biomedical research. They enable conducting wide-scale research by the professional collection of biological specimens and correlated clinical data. Pathology units may be perceived roots of biobanking. The review aims at describing the concept of biobanks, their model of function and scientific potential. It comprises the division of biobanks, sample preservation methods and IT solutions as well as guidelines and recommendations for management of a vast number of biological samples and clinical data. Therefore, appropriate standard operating procedures and protocols are outlined. Constant individualization of diagnostic process and treatment procedures creates the niche for translational units. Thus, the role of biobanks in personalized medicine was also specified. The exceptionality of biobanks poses some new ethical-legal issues which have various solutions, in each legal system, amongst the world. Finally, distribution and activity of European biobanks are mentioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiktor Paskal
- The Department of Histology and Embryology, Laboratory of Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1B, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
- Plastic Surgery Department, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
- The Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Adriana M Paskal
- The Department of Histology and Embryology, Laboratory of Centre for Preclinical Research, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1B, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Dębski
- Plastic Surgery Department, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maciej Gryziak
- The Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Janusz Jaworowski
- The Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Karbwang J, Koonrungsesomboon N, Torres CE, Jimenez EB, Kaur G, Mathur R, Sholikhah EN, Wanigatunge C, Wong CS, Yimtae K, Abdul Malek M, Ahamad Fouzi L, Ali A, Chan BZ, Chandratilake M, Chiew SC, Chin MYC, Gamage M, Gitek I, Hakimi M, Hussin N, Jamil MFA, Janarsan P, Julia M, Kanungo S, Karunanayake P, Kollanthavelu S, Kong KK, Kueh BL, Kulkarni R, Kumaran PP, Kumarasiri R, Lim WH, Lim XJ, Mahmud F, Mantaring JBV, Md Ali SM, Mohd Noor N, Muhunthan K, Nagandran E, Noor M, Ooi KH, Pradeepan JA, Sadewa AH, Samaranayake N, Sri Ranganathan S, Subasingha W, Subramaniam S, Sulaiman N, Tay JF, Teng LH, Tew MM, Tharavanij T, Tok PSK, Weeratna J, Wibawa T, Wickremasinghe R, Wongwai P, Yadav S. What information and the extent of information research participants need in informed consent forms: a multi-country survey. BMC Med Ethics 2018; 19:79. [PMID: 30219106 PMCID: PMC6139128 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0318-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of lengthy, detailed, and complex informed consent forms (ICFs) is of paramount concern in biomedical research as it may not truly promote the rights and interests of research participants. The extent of information in ICFs has been the subject of debates for decades; however, no clear guidance is given. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the perspectives of research participants about the type and extent of information they need when they are invited to participate in biomedical research. Methods This multi-center, cross-sectional, descriptive survey was conducted at 54 study sites in seven Asia-Pacific countries. A modified Likert-scale questionnaire was used to determine the importance of each element in the ICF among research participants of a biomedical study, with an anchored rating scale from 1 (not important) to 5 (very important). Results Of the 2484 questionnaires distributed, 2113 (85.1%) were returned. The majority of respondents considered most elements required in the ICF to be ‘moderately important’ to ‘very important’ for their decision making (mean score, ranging from 3.58 to 4.47). Major foreseeable risk, direct benefit, and common adverse effects of the intervention were considered to be of most concerned elements in the ICF (mean score = 4.47, 4.47, and 4.45, respectively). Conclusions Research participants would like to be informed of the ICF elements required by ethical guidelines and regulations; however, the importance of each element varied, e.g., risk and benefit associated with research participants were considered to be more important than the general nature or technical details of research. Using a participant-oriented approach by providing more details of the participant-interested elements while avoiding unnecessarily lengthy details of other less important elements would enhance the quality of the ICF. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-018-0318-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juntra Karbwang
- Department of Clinical Product Development, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan.
| | - Nut Koonrungsesomboon
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Muang Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
| | - Cristina E Torres
- Forum for Ethical Review Committees in the Asian and Western Pacific region, WHO-TDR Clinical Coordination and Training Center, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.,National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Edlyn B Jimenez
- National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Gurpreet Kaur
- Selangor State Health Department, Ministry of Health, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Roli Mathur
- ICMR Bioethics Unit, National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Bangalore, India
| | - Eti N Sholikhah
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Chandanie Wanigatunge
- Forum for Ethics Review Committees in Sri Lanka and Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardanepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
| | - Chih-Shung Wong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kwanchanok Yimtae
- Academic Clinical Research Office, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | | | | | - Aisyah Ali
- Sultan Ismail Hospital, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
| | | | | | - Shoen C Chiew
- Seri Manjung Hospital, Seri Manjung, Perak, Malaysia
| | | | - Manori Gamage
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
| | | | - Mohammad Hakimi
- Medical and Health Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | | | | | | | - Madarina Julia
- Department of Pediatric, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Suman Kanungo
- Division of Epidemiology, National Institute of Cholera & Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India
| | | | | | - Kian K Kong
- Duchess of Kent Hospital, Sandakan, Malaysia
| | | | - Ragini Kulkarni
- Department of Operational Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India
| | - Paul P Kumaran
- National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, India
| | | | - Wei H Lim
- Sibu Hospital, Sibu, Sarawak, Malaysia
| | - Xin J Lim
- Raja Permaisuri Bainun Hospital, Ipoh, Malaysia
| | | | | | - Siti M Md Ali
- Sultanah Bahiyah Hospital, Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia
| | | | | | | | | | - Kim H Ooi
- Tuanku Fauziah Hospital, Kangar, Perlis, Malaysia
| | | | - Ahmad H Sadewa
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ju F Tay
- Selayang Hospital, Shah Alam, Malaysia
| | | | - Mei M Tew
- Sultan Abdul Halim Hospital, Sungai Petani, Kedah, Malaysia
| | - Thipaporn Tharavanij
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| | | | - Jayanie Weeratna
- Institute of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Tri Wibawa
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Renu Wickremasinghe
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
| | - Phanthipha Wongwai
- Department of Opthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Subhash Yadav
- Department of Endocrinology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
71
|
Lockhart NC, Weil CJ, Carithers LJ, Koester SE, Little AR, Volpi S, Moore HM, Berkman BE. Development of a consensus approach for return of pathology incidental findings in the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2018; 44:643-645. [PMID: 29903854 PMCID: PMC6740237 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The active debate about the return of incidental or secondary findings in research has primarily focused on return to research participants, or in some cases, family members. Particular attention has been paid to return of genomic findings. Yet, research may generate other types of findings that warrant consideration for return, including findings related to the pathology of donated biospecimens. In the case of deceased biospecimen donors who are also organ and/or tissue transplant donors, pathology incidental findings may be relevant not to family members, but to potential organ or tissue transplant recipients. This paper will describe the ethical implications of pathology incidental findings in the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, the process for developing a consensus approach as to if/when such findings should be returned, possible implications for other research projects collecting postmortem tissues and how the scenario encountered in GTEx fits into the larger return of results/incidental findings debate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole C Lockhart
- Division of Genomics and Society, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Carol J Weil
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Latarsha J Carithers
- Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Susan E Koester
- Division of Neuroscience and Basic Behavioral Science, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - A Roger Little
- Division of Neuroscience and Behavior, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Simona Volpi
- Division of Genomic Medicine, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Helen M Moore
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Benjamin E Berkman
- Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Bioethics Core, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Porter KM, Kauffman TL, Koenig BA, Lewis KL, Rehm HL, Richards CS, Strande NT, Tabor HK, Wolf SM, Yang Y, Amendola LM, Azzariti DR, Berg JS, Bergstrom K, Biesecker LG, Biswas S, Bowling KM, Chung WK, Clayton EW, Conlin LK, Cooper GM, Dulik MC, Garraway LA, Ghazani AA, Green RC, Hiatt SM, Jamal SM, Jarvik GP, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Approaches to carrier testing and results disclosure in translational genomics research: The clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium experience. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2018; 6:898-909. [PMID: 30133189 PMCID: PMC6305639 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) is primarily used to address specific clinical concerns by detecting risk of future disease, clarifying diagnosis, or directing treatment. Additionally, CGES makes possible the disclosure of autosomal recessive and X‐linked carrier results as additional secondary findings, and research about the impact of carrier results disclosure in this context is needed. Methods Representatives from 11 projects in the clinical sequencing exploratory research (CSER) consortium collected data from their projects using a structured survey. The survey focused on project characteristics, which variants were offered and/or disclosed to participants as carrier results, methods for carrier results disclosure, and project‐specific outcomes. We recorded quantitative responses and report descriptive statistics with the aim of describing the variability in approaches to disclosing carrier results in translational genomics research projects. Results The proportion of participants with carrier results was related to the number of genes included, ranging from 3% (three genes) to 92% (4,600 genes). Between one and seven results were disclosed to those participants who received any positive result. Most projects offered participants choices about whether to receive some or all of the carrier results. There were a range of approaches to communicate results, and many projects used separate approaches for disclosing positive and negative results. Conclusion Future translational genomics research projects will need to make decisions regarding whether and how to disclose carrier results. The CSER consortium experience identifies approaches that balance potential participant interest while limiting impact on project resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Barbara A Koenig
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Katie L Lewis
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch of the National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.,Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Carolyn Sue Richards
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories and Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Natasha T Strande
- Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Holly K Tabor
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Palo Alto, California
| | - Susan M Wolf
- University of Minnesota Law School, Medical School and Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Yaping Yang
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Laura M Amendola
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Danielle R Azzariti
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Katie Bergstrom
- Texas Children's Cancer Center and the Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Leslie G Biesecker
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch of the National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sawona Biswas
- Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin M Bowling
- Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New York.,Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Ellen W Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Laura K Conlin
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Matthew C Dulik
- Division of Genomic Diagnostics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Arezou A Ghazani
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology and Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert C Green
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susan M Hiatt
- Hudson Alpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama
| | - Seema M Jamal
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | | |
Collapse
|
73
|
Kalatharan V, Lemaire M, Lanktree MB. Opportunities and Challenges for Genetic Studies of End-Stage Renal Disease in Canada. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2018; 5:2054358118789368. [PMID: 30046452 PMCID: PMC6056781 DOI: 10.1177/2054358118789368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose of review: Genetic testing can improve diagnostic precision in some patients with
end-stage renal disease (ESRD) providing the potential for targeted therapy
and improved patient outcomes. We sought to describe the genetic
architecture of ESRD and Canadian data sources available for further genetic
investigation into ESRD. Sources of information: We performed PubMed searches of English, peer-reviewed articles using
keywords “chronic kidney disease,” “ESRD,” “genetics,” “sequencing,” and
“administrative databases,” and searched for nephrology-related Mendelian
diseases on the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database. Methods: In this narrative review, we discuss our evolving understanding of the
genetic architecture of kidney disease and ESRD, the risks and benefits of
using genetic data to help diagnose and manage patients with ESRD, existing
public Canadian biobanks and databases, and a vision for future genetic
studies of ESRD in Canada. Key findings: ESRD has a polygenic architecture including rare Mendelian mutations and
common small effect genetic polymorphism contributors. Genetic testing will
improve diagnostic accuracy and contribute to a precision medicine approach
in nephrology. However, the risk and benefits of genetic testing needs to be
considered from an individual and societal perspective, and further research
is required. Merging existing health data, linking biobanks and
administrative databases, and forming Canadian collaborations hold great
potential for genetic research into ESRD. Large sample sizes are necessary
to perform the suitably powered investigations required to bring this vision
to reality. Limitations: This is a narrative review of the literature discussing future directions and
opportunities. It reflects the views and academic biases of the authors. Implications: National collaborations will be required to obtain sample sizes required for
impactful, robust research. Merging established datasets may be one approach
to obtain adequate samples. Patient education and engagement will improve
the value of knowledge gained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinusha Kalatharan
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Mathieu Lemaire
- Division of Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Cell Biology Program, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew B Lanktree
- Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Wynn J, Martinez J, Bulafka J, Duong J, Zhang Y, Chiuzan C, Preti J, Cremona ML, Jobanputra V, Fyer AJ, Klitzman RL, Appelbaum PS, Chung WK. Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:709-722. [PMID: 29168042 PMCID: PMC5945295 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0172-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The impact of returning secondary results from exome sequencing (ES) on patients/participants is important to understand as ES is increasingly utilized in clinical care and research. Participants were recruited from studies using ES and were separated into two arms: 107 who had ES and were offered the choice to learn secondary results (ES group) and 85 who had not yet had ES (No ES group). Questionnaires were administered at baseline and 1 and 12 months, following results disclosure (ES group) or enrollment (No ES group). While the majority (65%) elected to learn all results following pre-test counseling, it was reduced from the 76% who indicated a desire for all results at baseline. Thirty-seven percent received results associated with an increased personal disease risk. There were no differences in changes in any of the psychological and social measures from baseline to post-results disclosure between the ES and No ES groups. Receiving a wide range of secondary findings appeared to have little measurable impact on most participants. The experience of learning secondary results may be related to participants' previous experiences with genetics, as well as the genetic counseling provided. Future research with a more diverse, genetically naïve group, as well as scalable methods of delivery, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Josue Martinez
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Bulafka
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jimmy Duong
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Codruta Chiuzan
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jain Preti
- Department of Genetic, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Abby J Fyer
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert L Klitzman
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul S Appelbaum
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 1150 St. Nicholas Ave., Russ Berrie Pavilion, 6th Fl, Rm, New York, NY, 620, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Radecki Breitkopf C, Wolf SM, Chaffee KG, Robinson ME, Lindor NM, Gordon DR, Koenig BA, Petersen GM. Attitudes Toward Return of Genetic Research Results to Relatives, Including After Death: Comparison of Cancer Probands, Blood Relatives, and Spouse/Partners. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018; 13:295-304. [PMID: 29701109 DOI: 10.1177/1556264618769165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Genetic research generates results with implications for relatives. Recommendations addressing relatives' access to a participant's genetic research findings include eliciting participant preferences about access and choosing a representative to make decisions about access upon participant incapacity/death. Representatives are likely to be blood relatives or spouse/partners (who may share genetically related children). This raises the question of whether relatives hold similar attitudes about access or divergent attitudes that may yield conflict. We surveyed pancreatic cancer biobank participants (probands) and relatives in a family registry (blood relatives and spouse/partners of probands); 1,903 (>55%) surveys were returned. Results revealed few attitudinal differences between the groups. A slightly higher proportion of blood relatives agreed with statements reflecting proband privacy. In conclusion, probands' decisions on access are likely to be accepted by relatives; in choosing a representative, probands may not face major differences in attitudes about privacy/sharing between a blood relative and a spouse/partner.
Collapse
|
76
|
Wurst T, Terry SF. Beyond Recommendation: Requiring Returning Findings to Research Participants. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2018; 22:141-142. [PMID: 29565740 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2018.0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Wurst
- Genetic Alliance , Washington, District of Columbia
| | | |
Collapse
|
77
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and is the focus of extensive biomedical research. Large genetic consortia combining data from many traditional prospective cohort and ascertained case-control study designs have facilitated the discovery of genetic associations for a variety of cardiovascular diseases including diabetes, coronary artery disease, and hypertension. Biobank-based genetic studies offer an alternative whereby large populations are genotyped and linked to electronic health records. RECENT FINDINGS Biobank sample sizes worldwide have surpassed even the largest genetic consortia and have yielded key insights into the genetic determinants of both common and rare cardiovascular phenotypes. Herein, we provide an overview of the largest genomic biobanks and discuss the relevant advantages and challenges inherent to the biobank model of cohort generation and genomic study design.
Collapse
|
78
|
Brunfeldt M, Teare H, Soini S, Kääriäinen H. Perceptions of legislation relating to the sharing of genomic biobank results with donors-a survey of BBMRI-ERIC biobanks. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:324-329. [PMID: 29330544 PMCID: PMC5839019 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0049-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2017] [Revised: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Biobanks accumulate huge amounts of research findings, including participants' genomic data. Increasingly this leads to biobanks receiving research results that could be of clinical significance to biobank participants. The EU Horizon 2020 Project 'Genetics Clinic of the Future' surveyed European biobanks' perceptions of the legal and regulatory requirements for communicating individual research results to donors. The goal was to gain background knowledge for possible future guidelines, especially relating to the consent process. The Survey was implemented using a web-based Webropol tool. The questionnaire was sent at the end of 2015 to 351 European biobanks in 13 countries that are members of BBMRI-ERIC (Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure-European Research Infrastructure Consortium). Seventy-two biobanks responded to the survey, representing each of the 13 BBMRI Member States. Respondents were mainly individuals responsible for the governance of biobanks. The replies indicate that the majority of the respondents thought that their national legislation allowed them to contact participants to communicate results, and that research participants had the right to request their results. However, respondents' understanding of their national legislation varied even within member states. Our results indicate that legislation applied to biobanks in many countries may be scattered and difficult to interpret. In BBMRI-ERIC, there is an ongoing discussion about the need for European recommendations on sharing genomic biobank results with donors, which may pave the way for more coherent global guidelines. Our results form a basis for this work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minna Brunfeldt
- Genomics and Biomarkers Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Haartmaninkatu 8, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Harriet Teare
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Helena Kääriäinen
- Genomics and Biomarkers Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Haartmaninkatu 8, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Vermeulen E, Rebers S, Aaronson NK, Brandenburg AP, van Leeuwen FE, Schmidt MK. Patients' Attitudes Towards the Return of Incidental Findings After Research with Residual Tissue: A Mixed Methods Study. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2018; 22:178-186. [PMID: 29461872 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2017.0222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the attitudes of patients toward the return of individual research results from scientific research with residual tissue. METHODS AND FINDINGS We recruited 1319 patients from 6 Dutch hospitals. In total, 673 patients (51% response rate) completed the questionnaire and 146 were interviewed. Based on the questionnaire data, the majority of respondents (92%) wanted to be informed of incidental findings about both a curable (92%) and an incurable (76%) disease. Respondents' wishes to be informed about incidental findings did not vary significantly as a function of patient demographics or type of disease. The interview data show that respondents wished to be informed about incidental findings because they considered it to be normal practice; they expected the information to be of benefit for their health. Information should be provided by their physician. Yet, most respondents (84%) would consent to research even if they would not be informed about incidental findings, primarily because they recognized that there might be practical problems in providing such information, and because they valued scientific research highly. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that, while the majority of patients want to be informed about incidental findings, they also recognize that this may be difficult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Vermeulen
- 1 Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, the Netherlands .,2 VSOP, Dutch Alliance for Rare and Genetic Diseases, Soest, the Netherlands
| | - Susanne Rebers
- 1 Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, the Netherlands .,3 Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- 1 Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander P Brandenburg
- 1 Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, the Netherlands .,4 KWF-Dutch Cancer Society , Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- 1 Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- 1 Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, the Netherlands .,3 Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute , Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Thorogood A, Bobe J, Prainsack B, Middleton A, Scott E, Nelson S, Corpas M, Bonhomme N, Rodriguez LL, Murtagh M, Kleiderman E. APPLaUD: access for patients and participants to individual level uninterpreted genomic data. Hum Genomics 2018; 12:7. [PMID: 29454384 PMCID: PMC5816450 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0139-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 02/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing support for the stance that patients and research participants should have better and easier access to their raw (uninterpreted) genomic sequence data in both clinical and research contexts. MAIN BODY We review legal frameworks and literature on the benefits, risks, and practical barriers of providing individuals access to their data. We also survey genomic sequencing initiatives that provide or plan to provide individual access. Many patients and research participants expect to be able to access their health and genomic data. Individuals have a legal right to access their genomic data in some countries and contexts. Moreover, increasing numbers of participatory research projects, direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies, and now major national sequencing initiatives grant individuals access to their genomic sequence data upon request. CONCLUSION Drawing on current practice and regulatory analysis, we outline legal, ethical, and practical guidance for genomic sequencing initiatives seeking to offer interested patients and participants access to their raw genomic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Thorogood
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1 Canada
| | - Jason Bobe
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Global Health & Social Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Middleton
- Society and Ethics Research, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK
- Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Erick Scott
- Icahn Institute for Genomics & Multiscale Biology, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Laura Lyman Rodriguez
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | | | - Erika Kleiderman
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1 Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
81
|
Abstract
The majority of rare diseases affect children, most of whom have an underlying genetic cause for their condition. However, making a molecular diagnosis with current technologies and knowledge is often still a challenge. Paediatric genomics is an immature but rapidly evolving field that tackles this issue by incorporating next-generation sequencing technologies, especially whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing, into research and clinical workflows. This complex multidisciplinary approach, coupled with the increasing availability of population genetic variation data, has already resulted in an increased discovery rate of causative genes and in improved diagnosis of rare paediatric disease. Importantly, for affected families, a better understanding of the genetic basis of rare disease translates to more accurate prognosis, management, surveillance and genetic advice; stimulates research into new therapies; and enables provision of better support.
Collapse
|
82
|
Rothstein MA. Reconsidering the duty to warn genetically at-risk relatives. Genet Med 2018; 20:285-290. [PMID: 29388945 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The duty to warn genetically at-risk relatives of patients is one of the most misunderstood legal and ethical issues affecting clinical genetics. The legal doctrines are often associated with three state appellate court cases beginning in the mid-1990s. Since the HIPAA Privacy Rule went into effect in 2003, the duty to warn must be accomplished by warning the patient of the genetic nature of a diagnosed disorder or genetic risk and the necessity of warning at-risk relatives. Health-care providers are neither required nor permitted to warn at-risk relatives without the consent of their patients. Having warnings issued by the patient most closely aligns with traditional ethical principles and the interests of the parties. Physicians and other health-care providers can assist their patients by preparing jargon-free explanations of the genetic risk and offering consultation or referral services. In the future, the need for warnings is less likely to be triggered by diagnoses and more likely to be based on predictive information derived from genome sequencing and other technologies and data sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Rothstein
- Institute for Bioethics, Health Policy, and Law, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
|
84
|
Fossey R, Kochan D, Winkler E, Pacyna JE, Olson J, Thibodeau S, Connolly JJ, Harr M, Behr MA, Prows CA, Cobb B, Myers MF, Leslie ND, Namjou-Khales B, Milo Rasouly H, Wynn J, Fedotov A, Chung WK, Gharavi A, Williams JL, Pais L, Holm I, Aufox S, Smith ME, Scrol A, Leppig K, Jarvik GP, Wiesner GL, Li R, Stroud M, Smoller JW, Sharp RR, Kullo IJ. Ethical Considerations Related to Return of Results from Genomic Medicine Projects: The eMERGE Network (Phase III) Experience. J Pers Med 2018; 8:jpm8010002. [PMID: 29301385 PMCID: PMC5872076 DOI: 10.3390/jpm8010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined the Institutional Review Board (IRB) process at 9 academic institutions in the electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network, for proposed electronic health record-based genomic medicine studies, to identify common questions and concerns. Sequencing of 109 disease related genes and genotyping of 14 actionable variants is being performed in ~28,100 participants from the 9 sites. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in actionable genes are being returned to study participants. We examined each site’s research protocols, informed-consent materials, and interactions with IRB staff. Research staff at each site completed questionnaires regarding their IRB interactions. The time to prepare protocols for IRB submission, number of revisions and time to approval ranged from 10–261 days, 0–11, and 11–90 days, respectively. IRB recommendations related to the readability of informed consent materials, specifying the full range of potential risks, providing options for receiving limited results or withdrawal, sharing of information with family members, and establishing the mechanisms to answer participant questions. IRBs reviewing studies that involve the return of results from genomic sequencing have a diverse array of concerns, and anticipating these concerns can help investigators to more effectively engage IRBs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Fossey
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - David Kochan
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Erin Winkler
- Center for Individualized Medicine and Department of Medical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Joel E Pacyna
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Janet Olson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Stephen Thibodeau
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - John J Connolly
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Center for Applied Genomics, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Margaret Harr
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Center for Applied Genomics, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Meckenzie A Behr
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Center for Applied Genomics, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | - Beth Cobb
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | - Melanie F Myers
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | - Nancy D Leslie
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| | | | - Hila Milo Rasouly
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | - Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Alexander Fedotov
- Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | - Ali Gharavi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10027, USA.
| | | | - Lynn Pais
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Ingrid Holm
- Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Sharon Aufox
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | - Maureen E Smith
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| | | | | | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | - Georgia L Wiesner
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genomic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
| | - Rongling Li
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Rockville, MD 20892, USA.
| | - Mary Stroud
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
| | - Jordan W Smoller
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Iftikhar J Kullo
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Natarajan P, Gold NB, Bick AG, McLaughlin H, Kraft P, Rehm HL, Peloso GM, Wilson JG, Correa A, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Kathiresan S, Green RC. Aggregate penetrance of genomic variants for actionable disorders in European and African Americans. Sci Transl Med 2017; 8:364ra151. [PMID: 27831900 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2016] [Accepted: 09/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
In populations that have not been selected for family history of disease, it is unclear how commonly pathogenic variants (PVs) in disease-associated genes for rare Mendelian conditions are found and how often they are associated with clinical features of these conditions. We conducted independent, prospective analyses of participants in two community-based epidemiological studies to test the hypothesis that persons carrying PVs in any of 56 genes that lead to 24 dominantly inherited, actionable conditions are more likely to exhibit the clinical features of the corresponding diseases than those without PVs. Among 462 European American Framingham Heart Study (FHS) and 3223 African-American Jackson Heart Study (JHS) participants who were exome-sequenced, we identified and classified 642 and 4429 unique variants, respectively, in these 56 genes while blinded to clinical data. In the same participants, we ascertained related clinical features from the participants' clinical history of cancer and most recent echocardiograms, electrocardiograms, and lipid measurements, without knowledge of variant classification. PVs were found in 5 FHS (1.1%) and 31 JHS (1.0%) participants. Carriers of PVs were more likely than expected, on the basis of incidence in noncarriers, to have related clinical features in both FHS (80.0% versus 12.4%) and JHS (26.9% versus 5.4%), yielding standardized incidence ratios of 6.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.7 to 16.5; P = 7 × 10-4) in FHS and 4.7 (95% CI, 1.9 to 9.7; P = 3 × 10-4) in JHS. Individuals unselected for family history who carry PVs in 56 genes for actionable conditions have an increased aggregated risk of developing clinical features associated with the corresponding diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pradeep Natarajan
- Center for Human Genetic Research, Cardiovascular Research Center, and Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Nina B Gold
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Alexander G Bick
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Heather McLaughlin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Gina M Peloso
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - James G Wilson
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Adolfo Correa
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Jonathan G Seidman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Christine E Seidman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Sekar Kathiresan
- Center for Human Genetic Research, Cardiovascular Research Center, and Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. .,Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.,Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Ma Y, Chen H, Lei R, Ren J. Biobanking for human microbiome research: promise, risks, and ethics. Asian Bioeth Rev 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s41649-017-0033-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
87
|
Coors ME, Westfall N, Zittleman L, Taylor M, Westfall JM. Translating Biobank Science into Patient-Centered Language. Biopreserv Biobank 2017; 16:59-63. [PMID: 29190122 PMCID: PMC5808390 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2017.0089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: This project used Boot Camp Translation (BCT) to translate the complex medical jargon of biobanking into locally relevant evidence-based messages and materials to support increased knowledge and understanding in the local community. Methods: Biobank BCT was a partnership of 16 community members and 5 academic researchers. The partnership met for 8 months. Results: The partnership developed five main and seven submessages to assist patients and community members in making an informed decision about enrollment in a biobank. Discussion: The resulting messages balance an individual's right to privacy and choice, while encouraging participation for the greater good.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn E. Coors
- Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
- Colorado Clinical Translational Sciences Institute, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Noah Westfall
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Linda Zittleman
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Matthew Taylor
- Adult Medical Genetics Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - John M. Westfall
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Laurino MY, Truitt AR, Tenney L, Fisher D, Lindor NM, Veenstra D, Jarvik GP, Newcomb PA, Fullerton SM. Clinical verification of genetic results returned to research participants: findings from a Colon Cancer Family Registry. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2017; 5:700-708. [PMID: 29178651 PMCID: PMC5702564 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2017] [Revised: 07/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent to which participants act to clinically verify research results is largely unknown. This study examined whether participants who received Lynch syndrome (LS)-related findings pursued researchers' recommendation to clinically verify results with testing performed by a CLIA-certified laboratory. METHODS The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center site of the multinational Colon Cancer Family Registry offered non-CLIA individual genetic research results to select registry participants (cases and their enrolled relatives) from 2011 to 2013. Participants who elected to receive results were counseled on the importance of verifying results at a CLIA-certified laboratory. Twenty-six (76.5%) of the 34 participants who received genetic results completed 2- and 12-month postdisclosure surveys; 42.3% of these (11/26) participated in a semistructured follow-up interview. RESULTS Within 12 months of result disclosure, only 4 (15.4%) of 26 participants reported having verified their results in a CLIA-certified laboratory; of these four cases, all research and clinical results were concordant. Reasons for pursuing clinical verification included acting on the recommendation of the research team and informing future clinical care. Those who did not verify results cited lack of insurance coverage and limited perceived personal benefit of clinical verification as reasons for inaction. CONCLUSION These findings suggest researchers will need to address barriers to seeking clinical verification in order to ensure that the intended benefits of returning genetic research results are realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercy Y. Laurino
- Cancer Prevention ProgramSeattle Cancer Care AllianceSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Anjali R. Truitt
- Department of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Lederle Tenney
- Public Health Sciences DivisionFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Douglass Fisher
- Public Health Sciences DivisionFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | | - David Veenstra
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy ProgramSchool of PharmacyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Gail P. Jarvik
- Division of Medical GeneticsDepartment of Genome SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Polly A. Newcomb
- Public Health Sciences DivisionFred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
89
|
Nestor JG, Groopman EE, Gharavi AG. Towards precision nephrology: the opportunities and challenges of genomic medicine. J Nephrol 2017; 31:47-60. [PMID: 29043570 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-017-0448-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The expansion of genomic medicine is furthering our understanding of many human diseases. This is well illustrated in the field of nephrology, through the characterization, discovery, and growing insight into various renal diseases through use of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. This review will provide an overview of the diagnostic opportunities of using genetic testing in the clinical setting by describing notable discoveries regarding inherited forms of renal disease that have advanced the field and by highlighting some of the potential benefits of establishing a molecular diagnosis in a clinical practice. In addition, it will discuss some of the challenges associated with the expansion of genetic testing into the clinical setting, including clinical variant interpretation and return of genetic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan G Nestor
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1150 St. Nicholas Ave, Room 413, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Emily E Groopman
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1150 St. Nicholas Ave, Room 413, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Ali G Gharavi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1150 St. Nicholas Ave, Room 413, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Lacaze P, Ryan J, Woods R, Winship I, McNeil J. Pathogenic variants in the healthy elderly: unique ethical and practical challenges. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2017; 43:714-722. [PMID: 28341755 PMCID: PMC5629947 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
: Genetic research into ageing, longevity and late-onset disease is becoming increasingly common. Yet, there is a paucity of knowledge related to clinical actionability and the return of pathogenic variants to otherwise healthy elderly individuals. Whether or not genetic research in the elderly should be managed differently from standard practices adapted for younger populations has not yet been defined. In this article, we provide an overview of ethical and practical challenges in preparing for a genetic study of over 14 000 healthy Australians aged 70 years or older enrolled in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) Healthy Ageing Biobank. At the time of consent, all participants in this study were free of life-threatening illness, cardiovascular disease or cognitive impairment. ASPREE is thus a cohort of healthy elderly individuals with seemingly minimal burden of genetic disease recruited without ascertainment bias. The cohort presents a unique opportunity to address the penetrance of known pathogenic variants in a population without disease symptoms; however, it also raises a number of ethical concerns regarding the interpretation and disclosure of variants with known clinical actionability. Some of the challenges include (a) how to manage the interpretation, disclosure and actioning of pathogenic variants found in otherwise healthy elderly adults without disease symptoms, (b) whether or not to disclose findings for the benefit of family members rather than elderly consented donors themselves, (c) how to manage the return of genetic findings to the elderly individuals who are now in severe cognitive decline or terminal illness, (d) how to ensure quality of information and clinical service upon disclosure of results to this demographic and (e) how to prepare for the insurance implications of disclosing genetic information under Australian law. We discuss these and other dilemmas and propose a defensible plan of management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN83772183.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Lacaze
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, ASPREE - Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joanne Ryan
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, ASPREE - Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robyn Woods
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, ASPREE - Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - John McNeil
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, ASPREE - Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Yamamoto K, Hachiya T, Fukushima A, Nakaya N, Okayama A, Tanno K, Aizawa F, Tokutomi T, Hozawa A, Shimizu A. Population-based biobank participants' preferences for receiving genetic test results. J Hum Genet 2017; 62:1037-1048. [PMID: 28794501 PMCID: PMC5709720 DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2017.81] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
There are ongoing debates on issues relating to returning individual research results (IRRs) and incidental findings (IFs) generated by genetic research in population-based biobanks. To understand how to appropriately return genetic results from biobank studies, we surveyed preferences for returning IRRs and IFs among participants of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project (TMM). We mailed a questionnaire to individuals enrolled in the TMM cohort study (Group 1; n=1031) and a group of Tohoku region residents (Group 2; n=2314). The respondents were required to be over 20 years of age. Nearly 90% of Group 1 participants and over 80% of Group 2 participants expressed a preference for receiving their genetic test results. Furthermore, over 60% of both groups preferred to receive their genetic results ‘from a genetic specialist.’ A logistic regression analysis revealed that engaging in ‘health-conscious behaviors’ (such as regular physical activity, having a healthy diet, intentionally reducing alcohol intake and/or smoking and so on) was significant, positively associated with preferring to receive their genetic test results (odds ratio=2.397 (Group 1) and 1.897 (Group 2)). Our findings provided useful information and predictors regarding the return of IRRs and IFs in a population-based biobank.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayono Yamamoto
- Division of Innovation and Education, Iwate Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Disaster Reconstruction Center, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.,Department of Clinical Genetics, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hachiya
- Division of Biomedical Information Analysis, Iwate Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Disaster Reconstruction Center, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Akimune Fukushima
- Division of Innovation and Education, Iwate Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Disaster Reconstruction Center, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.,Department of Clinical Genetics, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakaya
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Akira Okayama
- Research Institute of Strategy for Prevention, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kozo Tanno
- Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.,Division of Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Iwate Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Disaster Reconstruction Center, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Fumie Aizawa
- Center for Liberal Arts and Sciences, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Tokutomi
- Division of Innovation and Education, Iwate Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Disaster Reconstruction Center, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.,Department of Clinical Genetics, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Atsushi Hozawa
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - Atsushi Shimizu
- Division of Biomedical Information Analysis, Iwate Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Disaster Reconstruction Center, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Murtaugh MP, Steer CJ, Sreevatsan S, Patterson N, Kennedy S, Sriramarao P. The science behind One Health: at the interface of humans, animals, and the environment. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2017; 1395:12-32. [PMID: 28505393 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Humans face a grand quality-of-life challenge as growing demands for resources for an ever-expanding population threaten the existence of wildlife populations, degrade land, and pollute air and water. Public investment and policy decisions that will shape future interactions of humans, animals, and the environment need scientific input to help find common ground for durable and sustainable success. The Second International Conference on One Medicine One Science brought together a broad range of scientists, trainees, regulatory authorities, and health experts from 34 countries to inform and discuss the human impacts of air quality; the complexities of water quality, access, and conflicts; the opportunities and uncertainties in precision medicine; and the role of science communication in health policy formulation. Workshops focused on the roles and development of physician-scientists and multidisciplinary teams in complex problem solving, Big Data tools for analysis and visualization, international policy development processes, and health models that benefit animals and humans. Key realizations were that local and regional health challenges at the interface of humans, animals, and the environment are variations of the same overarching conflicts and that international gatherings provide new opportunities for investigation and policy development that are broadly applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Murtaugh
- Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
| | - Clifford J Steer
- Departments of Medicine and Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Srinand Sreevatsan
- Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
| | - Ned Patterson
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
| | - Shaun Kennedy
- Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.,The Food System Institute, LLC, St. Paul, Minnesota
| | - P Sriramarao
- Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Critchley C, Nicol D, McWhirter R. Identifying public expectations of genetic biobanks. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (BRISTOL, ENGLAND) 2017; 26:671-687. [PMID: 26769748 DOI: 10.1177/0963662515623925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Understanding public priorities for biobanks is vital for maximising utility and efficiency of genetic research and maintaining respect for donors. This research directly assessed the relative importance the public place on different expectations of biobanks. Quantitative and qualitative results from a national sample of 800 Australians revealed that the majority attributed more importance to protecting privacy and ethical conduct than maximising new healthcare benefits, which was in turn viewed as more important than obtaining specific consent, benefit sharing, collaborating and sharing data. A latent class analysis identified two distinct classes displaying different patterns of expectations. One placed higher priority on behaviours that respect the donor ( n = 623), the other on accelerating science ( n = 278). Additional expectations derived from qualitative data included the need for biobanks to be transparent and to prioritise their research focus, educate the public and address commercialisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Critchley
- Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
- University of Tasmania, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
94
|
Dick DM, Barr P, Guy M, Nasim A, Scott D. Review: Genetic research on alcohol use outcomes in African American populations: A review of the literature, associated challenges, and implications. Am J Addict 2017; 26:486-493. [PMID: 28240821 PMCID: PMC5884102 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.12495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Revised: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There have been remarkable advances in understanding genetic influences on complex traits; however, individuals of African descent have been underrepresented in genetic research. METHODS We review the limitations of existing genetic research on alcohol phenotypes in African Americans (AA) including both twin and gene identification studies, possible reasons for underrepresentation of AAs in genetic research, the implications of the lack of racially diverse samples, and special considerations regarding conducting genetic research in AA populations. RESULTS There is a marked absence of large-scale AA twin studies so little is known about the genetic epidemiology of alcohol use and problems among AAs. Individuals of African descent have also been underrepresented in gene identification efforts; however, there have been recent efforts to enhance representation. It remains unknown the extent to which genetic variants associated with alcohol use outcomes in individuals of European and African descent will be shared. Efforts to increase representation must be accompanied by careful attention to the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic research. This is particularly true for AAs due to the history of abuse by the biomedical community and the persistent racial discrimination targeting this population. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE Lack of representation in genetic studies limits our understanding of the etiological factors that contribute to substance use and psychiatric outcomes in populations of African descent and has the potential to further perpetuate health disparities. Involving individuals of diverse ancestry in discussions about genetic research will be critical to ensure that all populations benefit equally from genetic advances. (Am J Addict 2017;26:486-493).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Dick
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
- Department of African American Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Peter Barr
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
- Department of African American Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Mignonne Guy
- Department of African American Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Aashir Nasim
- Department of African American Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Denise Scott
- Department of Pediatrics and Human Genetics and Alcohol Research Center, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Abstract
Prompted by developments in human genetics, a recurrent bioethical question concerns a person’s ‘right to know’ and ‘right not to know’ about genetic information held that is intrinsically related to or linked to them. In this paper, we will revisit the claimed rights in relation to two particular test cases. One concerns the rights of the 500,000 participants in UK Biobank (UKB) whose biosamples, already having been genotyped, will now be exome sequenced, and the other concerns the rights of pregnant women (and their children) who undergo non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)—a simple blood test that can reveal genetic information about both a foetus and its mother. This two-part paper is in four principal sections. First, we sketch the relevant features of our two test cases. Secondly, we consider the significance of recent legal jurisprudence in the UK and Singapore. Thirdly, we consider how, the jurisprudence apart, the claimed rights might be grounded. Fourthly, we consider the limits on the rights. We conclude with some short remarks about the kind of genetically aware society that we might want to be and how far there is still an opportunity meaningfully to debate the claimed rights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Brownsword
- King’s College London, London, UK
- Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
96
|
Ploug T, Holm S. Clinical genome sequencing and population preferences for information about 'incidental' findings-From medically actionable genes (MAGs) to patient actionable genes (PAGs). PLoS One 2017; 12:e0179935. [PMID: 28671958 PMCID: PMC5495206 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Whole genome or exome sequencing is increasingly used in the clinical contexts, and ‘incidental’ findings are generated. There is need for an adequate policy for the reporting of these findings to individuals. Such a policy has been suggested by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). We argue that ACMG’s policy is overly paternalistic, and that an adequate policy must take into account population preferences. We conducted a choice based conjoint survey of population preferences for reporting in a representative sample of the Danish population. In a 12 task survey respondents were asked about their preference for reporting in relation to three scenarios with seven different attributes. Of 1200 respondents 66.4% participated. We show that population preferences for reporting differs from ACMG’s recommendations, and suggest a new policy based on both medically and patient actionable genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Ploug
- Aalborg University Copenhagen, Centre for Applied Ethics and Philosophy of Science, Department of Communication, Kbh. SV, Denmark
- * E-mail:
| | - Søren Holm
- University of Manchester, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Center for Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Applied Ethics, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Mackley MP, Capps B. Expect the unexpected: screening for secondary findings in clinical genomics research. Br Med Bull 2017; 122:109-122. [PMID: 28398474 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldx009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to decreasing cost, and increasing speed and precision, genomic sequencing in research is resulting in the generation of vast amounts of genetic data. The question of how to manage that information has been an area of significant debate. In particular, there has been much discussion around the issue of 'secondary findings' (SF)-findings unrelated to the research that have diagnostic significance. SOURCES OF DATA The following includes ethical commentaries, guidelines and policies in respect to large-scale clinical genomics studies. AREAS OF AGREEMENT Research participant autonomy and their informed consent are paramount-policies around SF must be made clear and participants must have the choice as to which results they wish to receive, if any. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY While many agree that clinically 'actionable' findings should be returned, some question whether they should be actively sought within a research protocol. GROWING POINTS SF present challenges to a growing field; diverse policies around their management have the potential to hinder collaboration and future research. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH The impact of returning SF and accurate estimates of their clinical utility are needed to inform future protocol design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Mackley
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Level 6 West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Benjamin Capps
- Department of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 5849 University Avenue, Room C-312, CRC Bldg, PO Box 15000, Halifax NS, Canada B3H 4R2
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Tissue lithography: Microscale dewaxing to enable retrospective studies on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176691. [PMID: 28493979 PMCID: PMC5426611 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We present a new concept, termed tissue lithography (TL), and its implementation which enables retrospective studies on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Tissue lithography uses a microfluidic probe to remove microscale areas of the paraffin layer on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy samples. Current practices in sample utilization for research and diagnostics require complete deparaffinization of the sample prior to molecular testing. This imposes strong limitations in terms of the number of tests as well as the time when they can be performed on a single sample. Microscale dewaxing lifts these constraints by permitting deprotection of a fraction of a tissue for testing while keeping the remaining of the sample intact for future analysis. After testing, the sample can be sent back to storage instead of being discarded, as is done in standard workflows. We achieve this microscale dewaxing by hydrodynamically confining nanoliter volumes of xylene on top of the sample with a probe head. We demonstrate micrometer-scale, chromogenic and fluorescence-based immunohistochemistry against multiple biomarkers (p53, CD45, HER2 and β-actin) on tonsil and breast tissue sections and microarrays. We achieve stain patterns as small as 100 μm × 50 μm as well as multiplexed immunostaining within a single tissue microarray core with a 20-fold time reduction for local dewaxing as compared to standard protocols. We also demonstrate a 10-fold reduction in the rehydration time, leading to lower processing times between different stains. We further show the potential of TL for retrospective studies by sequentially dewaxing and staining four individual cores within the same tissue microarray over four consecutive days. By combining tissue lithography with the concept of micro-immunohistochemistry, we implement each step of the IHC protocol—dewaxing, rehydration and staining—with the same microfluidic probe head. Tissue lithography brings a new level of versatility and flexibility in sample processing and budgeting in biobanks, which may alleviate current sample limitations for retrospective studies in biomarker discovery and drug screening.
Collapse
|
99
|
Moret C, Mauron A, Fokstuen S, Makrythanasis P, Hurst SA. Defining categories of actionability for secondary findings in next-generation sequencing. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2017; 43:346-349. [PMID: 28039284 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Revised: 09/13/2016] [Accepted: 12/09/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing is increasingly used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of Mendelian diseases. Because of the high likelihood of secondary findings associated with this technique, the process of informing patients is beset with new challenges. One of them is regarding the type of secondary findings that ought to be disclosed to patients. The aim of this research is to propose a practical implementation of the notion of actionability, a common criteria justifying the disclosure of secondary findings but whose interpretation varies greatly among professionals. We distinguish three types of actionability corresponding to (1) well-established medical actions, (2) patient-initiated health-related actions and (3) life-plan decisions. We argue that actionability depends on the characteristics of the mutation or gene and on the values of patients. In discussing the return of secondary findings, it is important that the physician tries to get an impression of the specific situation and values of patients. Regarding variants of uncertain clinical significance in actionable genes, we found that different understandings of autonomy lead to different conclusions and that, for some of them, it may be legitimate to refrain from returning uncertain information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celine Moret
- Institute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alex Mauron
- Institute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Siv Fokstuen
- Division of Medical Genetics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Periklis Makrythanasis
- Division of Medical Genetics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Samia A Hurst
- Institute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Abstract
The past 15 years has seen considerable changes in the research environment. These changes include the development of new sophisticated genetic and genomic technologies, a proliferation of databases containing large amount of genotypic and phenotypic data, and wide-spread data sharing among many institutions, nationally and internationally. These changes have raised new questions regarding how best to protect the participants of biobanking research. In response to these questions, best practices for addressing the legal, ethical, and social issues of biobanking have been developed. In addition, new ethical guidelines related to biobanking have been established, as well as new regulations regarding privacy and human subject protections. Finally, changes in the science and the research environment have raised complex ethical issues related to biobanking, such as questions about the most appropriate consent models to use for biobanking research, commercial use and ownership issues, and whether and how to return individual research results to biobank participants. This article reviews some of the developments over the past 15 years related to the ELSI of biobanking with a look toward the future.
Collapse
|