Effect of troglitazone in insulin-treated patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Troglitazone and Exogenous Insulin Study Group

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of tesaglitazar when added to the therapeutic regimen of poorly controlled insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study assessed the effects of addition of the dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha/gamma agonist, tesaglitazar, for 24 weeks to the therapeutic regimen of 392 poorly controlled (glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1C] 7.5-10%) insulin-treated, type 2 diabetes patients. At 24 weeks, tesaglitazar 0.5 mg resulted in a 0.66% (95% confidence intervals: -0.85, -0.47; p<0.0001) reduction from baseline in HbA1C, and reduced fasting plasma glucose (p<0.0001) and daily insulin dose (p=0.014) versus placebo. After 24 weeks, tesaglitazar caused greater improvements from baseline in triglycerides (p<0.0001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (p<0.001), non-HDL-C (p<0.05), apolipoprotein (apo)A-I (p<0.05) and apoB levels (p<0.01) than placebo. Tesaglitazar was generally well tolerated but was associated with a greater increase in serum creatinine level than placebo. The clinical development of tesaglitazar is no longer continuing; its effects on the glucose and lipid abnormalities of type 2 diabetes suggest that the concept of dual PPARalpha/gamma agonism is worthy of further investigation.

Effect of pioglitazone in combination with insulin therapy on glycaemic control, insulin dose requirement and lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy

AIM

The aim of this randomized placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pioglitazone administered alone or in combination with metformin in reducing insulin dosage requirements for improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy.

METHODS

In this multicentre, double-blind study, 222 patients with haemoglobin A1c (HbA(1c))>8.0% at screening treated with combination therapy initially were given titrated insulin therapy (to fasting plasma glucose <140 mg/dl) and then were randomly assigned to 20-week treatment with pioglitazone or placebo in combination with insulin, with or without concurrent metformin therapy. More than 98% of patients were taking metformin prior to and during the study.

RESULTS

Pioglitazone significantly reduced (p < 0.05) insulin dose requirements 2 weeks after treatment initiation. At study end relative to baseline, pioglitazone reduced daily insulin dosages by 12.0 units (p < 0.001), a 21.5% (12.0/55.8 units at baseline) group mean average reduction. Relative to placebo, pioglitazone reduced daily insulin dosages by 12.7 units [95% confidence interval [CI]: -17.5, -8.0], while improving mean HbA(1c) levels [adjusted mean HbA(1c) change: pioglitazone, -1.6% vs. placebo, -1.4% (not statistically different)]. Pioglitazone also significantly increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels [adjusted mean difference: +4.5 (95% CI: 2.6-6.5) mg/dl], decreased triglyceride levels [-43.9 (-69.2, -18.6) mg/dl], shifted low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle concentrations from small [pattern B, -13.6% (-17.7%, -9.5%)] to large [pattern A, +15.1% (10.8%, 19.5%)] and increased mean LDL particle size [+3.8 (2.6, 4.9) A]. More pioglitazone-treated patients experienced oedema (9.0 vs. 4.5%) and weight gain (9.1 vs. 2.7%) than placebo patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pioglitazone in combination with insulin therapy improved glycaemic control, reduced insulin dose requirements and improved lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes previously poorly controlled with combination therapy.

Insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and diabetes mellitus in HIV-infected patients

An increased prevalence of insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and diabetes has been reported in HIV infection in the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era. This development might be clinically significant because of its association with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as the therapeutic challenges of managing polypharmacy. The development of insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and diabetes could be related to the underlying HIV infection, the contribution of different antiretroviral agents, treatment-associated weight gain, immune restoration, as well as the non-HIV related factors. Dissecting these factors in clinical practice might be difficult. Clinical studies include short-term treatments in healthy, non-HIV-infected individuals; randomized, controlled trials; comparative studies of different HAART regimens; and randomized studies of switching regimens in patients with viral suppression and stable immune function. This article reviews the latest knowledge regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and diabetes mellitus in HIV-infected individuals.

Control of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor fate by the ubiquitinproteasome system

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha, gamma, and delta belong to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors. PPARs regulate metabolic, developmental, and differentiation pathways and play important roles in human diseases, such as diabetes, atherosclerosis, cancer, and chronic inflammation. PPARs are the targets of drugs of widespread clinical use and represent promising targets for discovery of new therapeutics. The interaction of PPARs with the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) has been the subject of limited investigation. The UPS plays an important role in regulating the levels and modulating ligand-dependent and-independent activity of nuclear receptors. This review highlights the current knowledge regarding the interactions of the UPS with PPARs and focuses on the differential regulation of the level and activity of the PPAR isotypes by the UPS in response to selective ligands. Understanding the connections between the UPS and PPARs can provide insights in the actions of existing drugs and raise the possibilities for development of more effective PPAR-based therapeutics.

Effects of metformin and rosiglitazone in HIV-infected patients with hyperinsulinemia and elevated waist/hip ratio

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of metformin and rosiglitazone, alone or in combination, on fat distribution, insulin sensitivity, and lipids in HIV-infected patients with insulin resistance and changes in fat distribution.

METHODS

A total of 105 subjects were randomly assigned to receive metformin (500 mg twice a day increasing to 1000 mg twice a day after 2 weeks) with rosiglitazone placebo (Met/P, N = 26); rosiglitazone (4 mg/day) with metformin placebo (Rosi/P, N = 27); rosiglitazone (4 mg/day) plus metformin (500 mg twice a day increasing to 1000 mg twice a day after 2 weeks; Met/Rosi, N = 25); or dual placebo (P/P, N = 27) for 16 weeks. Efficacy assessments included oral glucose tolerance testing, abdominal computed tomography, whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and the measurement of fasting lipids and other biochemical indices. Safety was monitored throughout. Intent-to-treat analyses were performed using non-parametric methods.

RESULTS

The median insulin area under the curve (AUC) decreased significantly compared with baseline in both groups randomly assigned to rosiglitazone (Rosi/P -25.7 microIU/ml, P = 0.012; Met/Rosi -17.7 microIU/ml, P = 0.002); and tended to decrease in the Met/P group (-11.1 microIU/ml, P = 0.058). The change in AUC with combination therapy was significant compared with placebo (P = 0.032). No treatment was associated with significant changes in visceral or subcutaneous abdominal fat. Leg fat increased in subjects on Rosi/P compared with placebo (+4.8 versus -8.3%, P = 0.034). Rosiglitazone, but not metformin, increased adiponectin but also increased LDL-cholesterol and decreased HDL-cholesterol. Gastrointestinal effects occurred frequently in subjects on metformin.

CONCLUSION

Both treatments improved insulin sensitivity, but neither reduced visceral fat. Rosiglitazone may increase subcutaneous fat in some individuals.

Impact of thiazolidenediones on serum lipoprotein levels

The thiazolidinediones, acting through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor chi (PPARchi), affect multiple areas of metabolism. Of increasing importance is the recognition that these agents affect lipoprotein metabolism and cause changes in serum lipid and lipoprotein levels. All three thiazolidinediones, including troglitazone (which was withdrawn in the year 2000), rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone, tend to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, increase the size/decrease the density of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, and raise the level of lipoprotein(a). In addition, troglitazone and pioglitazone, but not rosiglitazone, lower triglyceride levels modestly, thereby further contributing to increases in LDL and HDL size. The mechanism for these effects is still being clarified, but may involve enhancement of triglyceride clearance (in the case of pioglitazone), alteration of apolipoprotein C-III levels, reduction of hepatic lipase, and increase in ATP binding cassette A1 (ABCA1) activity. The clinical implications of these effects need further exploration.

The thiazolidinedione drug troglitazone up-regulates nitric oxide synthase expression in vascular endothelial cells

Endothelial dysfunction is a phenomenon often observed in diabetic patients, which is a cause for vascular complications of diabetes mellitus. Endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) is responsible for vasodilatation, and NO-dependent vasodilatation is diminished in diabetic patients. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of thiazolidinediones (TZDs), antidiabetic drugs known to improve insulin resistance and to have vasodilating properties, on endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) expression in cultured vascular endothelial cells. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were treated with the TZDs troglitazone and pioglitazone, or the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma activator 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) (15-dPGJ2). The expression of eNOS protein and its mRNA was determined by Western and Northern blot analyses, respectively. The effect of alpha-tocopherol that possesses structural similarity to troglitazone was also examined. Troglitazone up-regulated eNOS protein and its mRNA levels, whereas pioglitazone and 15-dPGJ2 failed to increase their levels. By contrast, alpha-tocopherol also increased in eNOS protein and mRNA. These results suggest that troglitazone up-regulates eNOS expression probably through its 6-hydroxychromanes structure but not activating PPARgamma.

Troglitazone acutely inhibits protein synthesis in endothelial cells via a novel mechanism involving protein phosphatase 2A-dependent p70 S6 kinase inhibition

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs), synthetic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) ligands, have been implicated in the inhibition of protein synthesis in a variety of cells, but the underlying mechanisms remain obscure. We report that troglitazone, the first TZD drug, acutely inhibited protein synthesis by decreasing p70 S6 kinase (p70S6K) activity in bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC). This inhibition was not accompanied by decreased phosphorylation status or in vitro kinase activity of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Furthermore, cotreatment with rapamycin, a specific mTOR inhibitor, and troglitazone additively inhibited both p70S6K activity and protein synthesis, suggesting that the inhibitory effects of troglitazone are not mediated by mTOR. Overexpression of the wild-type p70S6K gene significantly reversed the troglitazone-induced inhibition of protein synthesis, indicating an important role of p70S6K. Okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, partially reversed the troglitazone-induced inhibition of p70S6K activity and protein synthesis. Although troglitazone did not alter total cellular PP2A activity, it increased the physical association between p70S6K and PP2A, suggesting an underlying molecular mechanism. GW9662, a PPARgamma antagonist, did not alter any of the observed inhibitory effects. Finally, we also found that the mTOR-independent inhibitory mechanism of troglitazone holds for the TZDs ciglitazone, pioglitazone, and rosiglitazone, in BAEC and other types of endothelial cells tested. In conclusion, our data demonstrate for the first time that troglitazone (and perhaps other TZDs) acutely decreases p70S6K activity through a PP2A-dependent mechanism that is independent of mTOR and PPARgamma, leading to the inhibition of protein synthesis in endothelial cells.

PPARgamma antagonists reverse the inhibition of neural antigen-specific Th1 response and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by Ciglitazone and 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-prostaglandin J2

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates cell growth, differentiation and homeostasis. PPARgamma agonists have been used to treat obesity, diabetes, cancer and inflammation and recent studies have shown the protective effects of PPARgamma agonists on experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), a Th1 cell-mediated autoimmune disease model of multiple sclerosis (MS). Our studies have further demonstrated that the PPARgamma agonists, 15d-PGJ2 and Ciglitazone, inhibit EAE through blocking IL-12 signaling leading to Th1 differentiation and the PPARgamma deficient heterozygous mice (PPARgamma+/-) or those treated with PPARgamma antagonists develop an exacerbated EAE in association with an augmented Th1 response. In this study, we show that the PPARgamma antagonists, Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE) and 2-chloro-5-nitro-N-(4-pyridyl)benzamide (T0070907), reverse the inhibition of EAE by the PPARgamma agonists, Ciglitazone and 15-Deoxy-Delta(12,14)-Prostaglandin J2, in C57BL/6 wild-type and PPARgamma+/- mice. The reversal of EAE by BADGE and T0070907 was associated with restoration of neural antigen-induced T cell proliferation, IFNgamma production and Th1 differentiation inhibited by Ciglitazone and 15d-PGJ2. These results suggest that Ciglitazone and 15d-PGJ2 ameliorate EAE through PPARgamma-dependent mechanisms and further confirm a physiological role for PPARgamma in the regulation of CNS inflammation and demyelination in EAE.

Rationale, design, and methods for glycemic control in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) Trial

A major therapeutic question in considering accelerated atherogenesis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is whether reducing insulin resistance, as a proximal defect of a host of proatherogenic abnormalities including hyperglycemia, will be superior for decreasing mortality and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk compared with treating hyperglycemia to overcome insulin resistance with insulin-providing agents. This question is highly relevant, since earlier targeted glycemic control trials utilizing conventional glucose-lowering strategies that increase insulin levels have generally failed to reduce CAD risk despite markedly reducing microvascular risk. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial seeks to determine whether primarily using an insulin-sensitizing strategy for treatment of type 2 diabetes is superior when compared with primarily using an insulin-providing strategy with regard to cardiovascular outcomes. This article presents the rationale, design, and methods being used to test the glycemic control hypothesis in BARI 2D.

The 11482G >A polymorphism in the perilipin gene is associated with weight gain with rosiglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of perilipin gene (PLIN) polymorphisms on weight gain with rosiglitazone treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 160 type 2 diabetic patients were treated with rosiglitazone (4 mg/day) for 12 weeks in addition to their previous medications, which were unchanged. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the PLIN locus were genotyped: PLIN 6209T>C, PLIN 11482G>A, PLIN 13041A>G, and PLIN 14995A>T.

RESULTS

Although fasting plasma glucose and HbA(1c) levels decreased; mean body weight increased significantly after rosiglitazone treatment. Among the four SNPs tested, only the PLIN 11482G>A polymorphism was associated with weight gain from rosiglitazone treatment. In addition, there was a significant difference in the increase in the body weight among the genotypes. Patients with the 11482A/A genotype showed less increase in body weight than those with other genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that genetic variations in the perilipin gene can affect weight gain associated with rosiglitazone treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Comparative efficacy of glimepiride and/or metformin with insulin in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The data regarding comparison of efficacy of metformin with glimepiride, newest Sulfonylurea, or with the use of both drugs in combination with insulin is rare in the literature. Therefore, we assessed the daily insulin dose, hypoglycemic events and body weight on achieving desirable glycemic control after addition of insulin, to glimepiride 8 mg and/or metformin 2500 mg, in subjects with type 2 DM manifesting lapse of glycemic control.

METHODS

S.C. insulin Novolog Mix [70/30], pre-supper was initiated in 12 subjects on metformin, 14 subjects on glimepiride, and 12 subjects receiving both drugs, with HbA1C > 7.5% and eight subjects receiving placebo. Insulin dose was increased by 4 U at weekly interval until fasting blood sugar [FBS] between 6.6 and 8 mM/l was attained and then further titrated by 2 U every week to attain and maintain FBS between 4.5 and 6.7 mM/l over the next 4 months. The comparisons were conducted between these groups for HbA1C, the daily insulin dose, body weight noted at the end of this study period as well as the hypoglycemic episodes per patient during the last 4 weeks of the study period.

RESULTS

HbA1C levels were < 7.0% in all subjects at the end of the study. The daily insulin dose (units), total and per kg/BW was significantly lower [p < 0.001] with metformin (51 +/- 5, 0.51 +/- 0.10), glimepiride (40 +/- 4, 0.42 +/- 0.09) as well as with both drugs (23 +/- 7, 0.21 +/- 0.07) in comparison to placebo (82 +/- 10, 0.82 +/- 0.12). The insulin dose was also significantly lower [p < 0.05] in subjects on both drugs than subjects receiving them individually. Weight gain was less [p < 0.001] with metformin [2.5 +/- 0.74 kg], glimepiride [2.3 +/- 0.7 kg], and both drugs [2.2 +/- 0.61 kg] in comparison to placebo [5.2 +/- 1.4 kg] whereas the hypoglycemic episodes were lesser with metformin (3.8 +/- 1.2) and glimepiride (3.3 +/- 0.9) and least with both drugs (2.5 +/- 0.6) in comparison to placebo (5.2 +/- 1.0).

CONCLUSION

Glimepiride and metformin are effective individually in achieving a glycemic goal with a less daily insulin dose, weight gain, and hypoglycemic episodes in comparison to insulin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus with further marked reduction in these parameters when used concurrently.

Muraglitazar: beneficial or detrimental in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes?

Hyperglycaemia in Type 2 diabetes has a major role in the development of microvascular complications, whereas the dyslipidaemia is the major cause of macrovascular complications. In patients with Type 2 diabetes, activation of PPAR-alpha and PPAR-gamma with the fibrates and glitazones improves dyslipidaemia and increases insulin sensitivity, respectively. Muraglitazar is an agonist at both of these receptors and has been shown to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, decrease triglycerides and improve insulin sensitivity. However, there is also some evidence that muraglitazar has detrimental effects on the cardiovascular system. Before muraglitazar is widely used in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes, more safety testing needs to be undertaken.

Emerging drugs for diabetic nephropathy

There is an increasing number of patients with diabetes mellitus in many countries. Diabetic kidney disease, one of its microvascular complications, is also increasing markedly and has become a major cause of end stage renal disease worldwide. Intervention for preventing and delaying the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease is not only a medical concern, but also a social issue. Despite extensive efforts, however, medical interventions thus far are not effective enough to prevent the progression of the disease and the development of end stage renal disease. This justifies attempts to develop novel therapeutic approaches for diabetic nephropathy. Recent insights on its pathogenesis and progression have suggested new targets for the specific treatment of this disease. They include aldosterone, aldose reductase, arachidonic acid metabolites, growth factors, advanced glycosylation end-products, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and endothelin. Several other biochemical mediators have been targeted in experimental animal models with the goal to prevent diabetic nephropathy progression, but translation to clinics of these experimental achievements are still limited or lacking.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha selective ligand reduces adiposity, improves insulin sensitivity and inhibits atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-deficient mice

Fenofibrate, a selective (1)PPAR-alpha activator, is prescribed to treat human dyslipidemia. The aim of this study was to delineate the mechanism of fenofibrate-mediated reductions in adiposity, improvements in insulin sensitivity, and lowering of triglycerides (TG) and free fatty acids (FFA) and to investigate if these favorable changes are related to the inhibition of lipid deposition in the aorta. To test this hypothesis we used male LDLr deficient mice that exhibit the clinical features of metabolic syndrome X when fed a high fat high cholesterol (HF) diet. LDLr deficient mice fed HF diet and simultaneously treated with fenofibrate (100 mg/kg body weight) prevented development of obesity, lowered serum triglycerides and cholesterol, improved insulin sensitivity, and prevented accumulation of lipids in the aorta. Lowering of circulating lipids occurred via down-regulation of lipogenic genes, including fatty acid synthase, acetyl CoA carboxylase and diacyl glycerol acyl transferase-2, concomitant with decreased liver TG and cholesterol, and TG output rate. Fenofibrate also suppressed liver apoCIII mRNA levels and markedly increased lipoprotein lipase mRNA levels, known to enhance serum TG catabolism. In addition, fenofibrate profoundly reduced epididymal fat and mesenteric fat mass to the levels seen in lean mice. The reductions in body weight were associated with elevation of hepatic uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) mRNA, a concomitant increase in the ketone body formation, and improved insulin sensitivity associated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha reductions and phosphoenol pyruvate carboxykinase down-regulation. These results demonstrate that fenofibrate improves lipid abnormalities partly via inhibition of TG production and partly via clearance of TG-rich apoB particles by elevating LPL and reduced apoCIII. The prevention of obesity development occurred via energy expenditure. Fenofibrate-mediated hypolipidemic effects together with improved insulin sensitivity and loss of adiposity led to the reductions in the aortic lipid deposition by inhibiting early stages of atherosclerosis possibly via vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) modulation. These results suggest that potent PPAR-alpha activators may be useful in the treatment of syndrome X.

Modulation of food intake by glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

A gain in body weight is a common adverse effect of glucose-lowering therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes, the mechanisms of which are not completely understood. Blood glucose is considered to play a crucial role in the regulation of food intake. On this background, we hypothesized that a short-term reduction of blood glucose concentration to normal values acutely increases food intake in type 2 diabetic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

To test this hypothesis, 12 patients with type 2 diabetes were examined twice, once during a euglycemic (5.0 mmol/l) clamp experiment and another time during a hyperglycemic (10.5 mmol/l) clamp. The experiments were performed in a single-blind fashion with the order of conditions balanced across patients. On both clamp conditions, insulin was infused at a constant rate of 2.5 mU/kg per min for 125 min. Simultaneously, a glucose solution was infused at a variable rate to achieve target glycemic levels. During the final 30 min of the clamps, the patients were allowed to eat as much as they liked from a standard breakfast buffet.

RESULTS

Compared with the hyperglycemic condition, the patients ingested on average 25 +/- 10% more energy during euglycemia (645 +/- 75 vs. 483 +/- 37 kcal; P = 0.029). The increased energy intake during euglycemia was equally distributed across macronutrient components, i.e., during euglycemia the patients ate more carbohydrates (+27.1 +/- 11.4%; P = 0.037), fat (+22.5 +/- 10.0%; P = 0.046), and proteins (+25.2 +/- 11.2%; P = 0.046) than during hyperglycemia. Circulating levels of insulin, amylin, leptin, ghrelin, and glucagon-like peptide-1 did not differ between the euglycemic and hyperglycemia clamp, excluding a major contribution of these hormones to the difference in food intake. Summing up the glucose administered intravenously and the food ingested yielded a remarkably similar total energy influx in both conditions (794 +/- 64 vs. 790 +/- 53 kcal; P = 0.961).

CONCLUSIONS

Together our data suggest that total energy supply to the organism is tightly regulated on a short-term basis independent of the route of influx. Alternatively, it can be hypothesized that euglycemia stimulated or that hyperglycemia suppressed food intake at the subsequent buffet meal in our type 2 diabetic patients. Regardless of these different interpretations, our data indicate an important regulatory role of glucose for food intake in type 2 diabetic patients that is of considerable clinical relevance.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth: the complete picture to date

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous condition in which the clinical manifestation of hyperglycemia is a reflection of the impaired balance between insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. Clinical experience and research in youth type 2 diabetes mellitus are in an early stage because of the relative novelty of the condition in pediatrics. This article discusses the amassed information in type 2 diabetes mellitus of youth to date with respect to the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, screening, and management strategies.

Combination therapy using metformin or thiazolidinediones and insulin in the treatment of diabetes mellitus

The biguanide, metformin, sensitizes the liver to the effect of insulin, suppressing hepatic glucose output. Thiazolidinediones such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone enhance insulin-mediated glucose disposal, leading to reduced plasma insulin concentrations. These classes of drugs may also have varying beneficial effects on features of insulin resistance such as lipid levels, blood pressure and body weight. Metformin in combination with insulin has been shown to significantly improve blood glucose levels while lowering total daily insulin dose and body weight. The thiazolidinediones in combination with insulin have also been effective in lowering blood glucose levels and total daily insulin dose. Triple combination therapy using insulin, metformin and a thiazolidinedione improves glycaemic control to a greater degree than dual therapy using insulin and metformin or insulin and a thiazolidinedione. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of metformin or thiazolidinediones in type 1 diabetic patients. Although these agents are largely well tolerated, some subjects experience significant gastrointestinal problems while using metformin. Metformin is associated with a low risk of lactic acidosis, but should not be used in patients with elevated serum creatinine or those being treated for congestive heart failure. The thiazolidinediones are associated with an increase in body weight, although this can be avoided with careful lifestyle management. Thiazolidinediones may also lead to oedema and are associated with a low incidence of hepatocellular injury. Thiazolidinediones are contraindicated in patients with underlying heart disease who are at risk of congestive heart failure and in patients who have abnormal hepatic function. The desired blood glucose-lowering effect and adverse event profiles of these agents should be considered when recommending these agents to diabetic patients. The potential for metformin or the thiazolidinediones to impact long-term cardiovascular outcomes remains under investigation.

Fenofibrate prevents Rosiglitazone-induced body weight gain in ob/ob mice

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Fibrates and thiazolidinediones are commonly used for the treatment of dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects on body weight as well as on glucose and lipid homeostasis of ligands for PPARalpha and PPARgamma, Fenofibrate and Rosiglitazone, alone or in association.

METHODS

Ob/ob mice were divided into four groups: control, and mice daily injected (intraperitoneally), either with 10 mg/kg Rosiglitazone, 100 mg/kg Fenofibrate or both molecules. Body weight and food intake were monitored daily. After 13 days of treatment, mice were killed, and blood samples were collected for posterior metabolite quantification. The liver and adipose tissues were dissected and weighed.

RESULTS

Body weight was significantly reduced or increased by Fenofibrate and Rosiglitazone, respectively. The effect of Rosiglitazone was prevented by coadministration of Fenofibrate. This was accompanied by a normalization of the daily food efficiency. Compared to those treated with Rosiglitazone, animals treated with Fenofibrate alone or in combination presented a decreased white adipose tissue mass. Fenofibrate or Rosiglitazone alone significantly reduced the levels of plasma lipid parameters. Surprisingly, Fenofibrate also decreased blood glucose levels in ob/ob mice, despite having no effect on insulin levels. By contrast, both glucose and insulin levels were decreased by Rosiglitazone treatment. Coadministration of both drugs improved all parameters as with Rosiglitazone. Fenofibrate restored almost normal hepatocyte morphology and significantly reduced the triglyceride content of the liver. This was accompanied by an increase in fatty acid oxidation in the liver in all groups receiving Fenofibrate.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

These biological effects suggest that combined therapy with a PPARalpha and a PPARgamma ligand is more effective in ameliorating, specifically, lipid homeostasis than in activating any of this receptor separately. Furthermore, Fenofibrate prevents one of the most undesirable effects of Rosiglitazone, namely increased adiposity and body weight gain.

Rosiglitazone Reduces Insulin Requirement and C-Reactive Protein Levels in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Glycemic control is important in determining the outcome of patients with diabetes on dialysis therapy. However, the choice of oral hypoglycemia agent is limited in these patients. Very often, a high dose of insulin is required because of the uremia-associated insulin-resistant state. Rosiglitazone (RSG), a thiazolidinedione, can improve insulin resistance, and its excretion does not rely on renal function. Moreover, it has an anti-inflammatory effect that might be beneficial in patients with renal failure.

METHODS

An open-label randomized study was performed in which 52 patients with type 2 diabetes on peritoneal dialysis therapy administered a constant dosage of subcutaneous insulin with stable glycemic control were randomly assigned to the administration of either RSG (fixed dose, 4 mg) plus insulin or insulin alone. Insulin was titrated to maintain hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood glucose at pretreatment levels. Study duration was 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar baseline demographic characteristics, HbA1c and glucose levels, insulin requirement, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Insulin requirement was decreased significantly in the RSG group (27.88 +/- 17.6 to 22.4 +/- 15.21 U/d; P < 0.001). There was a significantly greater decrease in insulin dosage in the RSG than control group (-21.5% versus +0.5%; P = 0.03), whereas glycemic control was similar between groups. At the end of the study, the RSG group also had significantly lower CRP levels than the control group (2.21 versus 8.59 mg/L; P = 0.03). No significant increase in such adverse effects as hypoglycemia, liver impairment, and fluid overload was observed in the RSG group. However, the RSG group was associated with more weight gain. Multivariate regression analysis (using decrease in HbA1c and lipid levels, change in insulin dosage, and treatment with RSG, with lipid-lowering agents) showed that only treatment with RSG was an independent predictor for posttreatment CRP level (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

RSG in combination with insulin is well tolerated and beneficial in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes on peritoneal dialysis therapy by improving insulin sensitivity and decreasing inflammatory response.

PPARγ antagonists exacerbate neural antigen-specific Th1 response and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates cell growth, differentiation and homeostasis. PPARgamma agonists have been used in the treatment of obesity, diabetes, cancer and inflammation. We and others have shown recently that PPARgamma agonists ameliorate experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), a Th1 cell-mediated autoimmune disease model of multiple sclerosis (MS). We have further shown that PPARgamma agonists inhibit EAE through blocking IL-12 signaling leading to Th1 differentiation and the PPARgamma-deficient heterozygous mice (PPARgamma(+/-)) develop an exacerbated EAE. In this study, we show that in vivo treatment (i.p.) with 100 mug PPARgamma antagonists, Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE) or 2-Chloro-5-nitro-N-(4-pyridyl)benzamide (T0070907), on every other day from day 0 to 30, increased the severity and duration of EAE in C57BL/6 wild-type and PPARgamma(+/-) mice. The exacerbation of EAE by PPARgamma antagonists associates with an augmented neural antigen-induced T cell proliferation, IFNgamma production or Th1 differentiation. These results further suggest that PPARgamma is a critical physiological regulator of CNS inflammation and demyelination in EAE.

Efficacy of glimepiride in patients with poorly controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus

We retrospectively investigated the effects of adding glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes showing suboptimal control by insulin therapy. Of 63 patients with poorly controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (baseline HbA1c, 8.4 +/- 0.6%), 32 were treated with insulin alone and 31 were given glimepiride in addition to insulin. HbA1c values, daily insulin dose, body weight, blood pressure, plasma lipid concentrations, and the number of hypoglycemic events were recorded at weeks 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72. HbA1c decreased by 1.1%, from 8.5 +/- 0.6% to 7.4 +/- 0.8% (P<0.0001) in patients treated with insulin plus glimepiride at 12 weeks, and improved glycemic control continued throughout the study. Required insulin dose was reduced significantly in patients treated with insulin plus glimepiride (from 29.4 +/- 14.5 to 22.3 +/- 12.1 units/day, P = 0.0187). Body weight increased significantly in patients treated with insulin plus glimepiride (from 57.0 +/- 8.7 to 59.5 +/- 9.2 kg, P = 0.0232). Adding glimepiride showed little effect on blood pressure, plasma total cholesterol, triglyceride, or HDL-cholesterol. Serum C peptide concentrations increased significantly in patients treated with insulin plus glimepiride (from 1.01 +/- 0.71 to 1.28 +/- 0.65 ng/ml, P = 0.0367). The number of hypoglycemic events did not differ between groups. Adding glimepiride to insulin therapy resulted in sustained improvement of glycemic control in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

The effect of pramlintide on hormonal, metabolic or symptomatic responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in patients with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Pramlintide, a human amylin analogue, is a potential new adjunctive therapy to insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes and insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes. Early clinical trials have shown a transient increased risk of hypoglycaemia in some patients at the time of initiating pramlintide therapy. This may be the result of combining the postprandial glucose, lowering effect of pramlintide with the existing hypoglycaemic potential of insulin without appropriate adjustment of insulin doses. However, the possibility that pramlintide may exert an independent detrimental effect on the physiological responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia needs to be excluded.

METHODS

We conducted three separate randomized, placebo-controlled studies in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with adjunctive pramlintide. These studies utilized pramlintide at high doses (either 0.1-1 mg pramlintide daily or 0.1-0.8 mg pramlintide four times a day for 5 or 6 days) as well as doses closer to those anticipated for therapeutic usage (30, 100 or 300 microg three times daily for 14 days), and examined the hormonal, metabolic and symptomatic responses to an insulin-infusion hypoglycaemic challenge conducted at baseline and after days of therapy.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Pramlintide had no effect on the counter-regulatory hormonal, metabolic and symptomatic responses to hypoglycaemia. These findings demonstrated that pramlintide, when used as adjunctive therapy to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes, has no independent effect on the response to hypoglycaemia.

Effect of thiazolidinediones on equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 in human aortic smooth muscle cells

Thiazolidinediones are a new class of anti-diabetic agents which increase insulin sensitivity by binding to the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR(gamma)) and stimulating the expression of insulin-responsive genes involved in glucose and lipid metabolism. These drugs also have vasodilatory and anti-proliferative effects on vascular smooth muscle cells. However the mechanisms for these actions are not fully understood. Adenosine is a vasodilator and a substrate of equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENT). The present study studied the effects of three thiazolidinediones, troglitazone, pioglitazone and ciglitazone, on ENT1 in the human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs). Although incubating HASMCs for 48h with thiazolidinediones had no effect on ENT1 mRNA and protein levels, troglitazone acutely inhibited [3H]adenosine uptake and [3H]NBMPR binding of HASMCs with IC50 values of 2.35+/-0.35 and 3.99+/-0.57microM, respectively. The effect of troglitazone on ENT1 was PPAR(gamma)-independent and kinetic studies revealed that troglitazone was a competitive inhibitor of ENT1. In contrast, pioglitazone and ciglitazone had minimal effects on [3H]adenosine uptake by HASMCs. Troglitazone differs from pioglitazone and ciglitazone in that its side-chain contains a Vitamin E moiety. The difference in structure of troglitazone did not account for its inhibitory effect on ENT1 because Vitamin E did not inhibit [3H]adenosine uptake by HASMCs. Using the nucleoside transporter deficient PK15NTD cells stably expressing ENT1 and ENT2, it was found that troglitazone inhibited ENT1 but had no effect on ENT2. From these results, it is suggested that troglitazone may enhance the vasodilatory effect of adenosine by inhibiting ENT1. Pharmacologically, troglitazone is a novel inhibitor of ENT1.

Childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus

Until recently, the majority of cases of diabetes mellitus among children and adolescents were immune-mediated type 1a diabetes. Obesity has led to a dramatic increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) among children and adolescents over the past 2 decades. Obesity is strongly associated with insulin resistance, which, when coupled with relative insulin deficiency, leads to the development of overt T2DM. Children and adolescents with T2DM may experience the microvascular and macrovascular complications of this disease at younger ages than individuals who develop diabetes in adulthood, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, stroke, myocardial infarction, and sudden death; renal insufficiency and chronic renal failure; limb-threatening neuropathy and vasculopathy; and retinopathy leading to blindness. Health care professionals are advised to perform the appropriate screening in children at risk for T2DM, diagnose the condition as early as possible, and provide rigorous management of the disease.

Pathogenesis and management of diabetic dyslipidemia

Patients with diabetes mellitus have a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular, peripheral vascular, and cerebrovascular disease, which are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in this population. Several epidemiological studies have shown an association between diabetic dyslipidemia, which is characterized by hypertriglyceridemia, low levels of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, postprandial lipemia and small, dense low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) particles, and the occurrence of cardiovascular disease. Other studies have established the beneficial effects of lipid lowering on the reduction of major coronary events in diabetic patients. The recent National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines emphasize diabetes as a coronary heart disease risk equivalent. The NCEP ATP III states that elevated LDL-C is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease, and the primary goal of risk-reduction therapy is the reduction of LDL-C levels to 100 mg/dL. This article defines and describes diabetic dyslipidemia and its etiology and pathogenesis, as well as reviewing guidelines and recommendations for treatment of this disorder. Treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia includes 1) lifestyle modifications: physical activity and a diet low in saturated fats and cholesterol and high in complex carbohydrates and fiber; and 2) pharmacological treatment with (i) oral antihyperglycemic agents: metformin and thiazolidinediones; (ii) weight reduction drugs: orlistat and sibutramine and; (iii) lipid-lowering drugs: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, fibric acid derivatives, nicotinic acid, and bile acid sequestrants.

Combined thiazolidinedione-insulin therapy: should we be concerned about safety?

Thiazolidinediones, also called glitazones, are insulin sensitisers that act as agonists of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma (PPARgamma). After the withdrawal of troglitazone due to hepatotoxicity, only pioglitazone and rosiglitazone can be used for treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, either as monotherapy or in combination with metformin or with sulphonylureas (or glinides). The combination of glitazones with insulin is also appealing, as it allows improvement of glycaemic control while decreasing the daily insulin requirement. Insulin dosage has to be adjusted regularly to avoid hypoglycaemic episodes. However, some concerns have been raised about such combined glitazone-insulin therapy because it may favour weight gain due to both enhanced adipogenesis and fluid retention. Such adverse effects are commonly observed in all diabetic individuals receiving glitazones, whatever the mode of use, but they appear to be exacerbated in insulin-treated patients. Body fat gain is a major drawback of treatment with adipogenic compounds such as glitazones. However, some evidence suggests that the fat is redistributed in a favourable direction, that is, from visceral to subcutaneous depots, although no long-term follow-up is yet available. An estimated 2-5% of patients receiving glitazone monotherapy and 5-15% receiving concomitant insulin therapy experience peripheral oedema. Some anecdotal cases of pulmonary oedema have also been reported, especially in insulin-treated patients, although the actual incidence of this complication is unknown. All glitazones increase the intravascular volume by approximately 6-7% in a dose-dependent manner. Rather than a direct effect on cardiac or renal function, fluid retention and tissue oedema seem to be part of a vascular 'leak' syndrome. Such a phenomenon may have greater consequences in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin because such patients are usually older, have had the disease long-term and have worse cardiac or renal function. Additionally, glitazones may potentiate the renal effects of insulin on sodium and water retention. Regardless of the mechanism, it is conceivable that additional fluid retention caused by glitazones may alter the already precarious volume status in patients with underlying cardiac or renal dysfunction, thus leading to oedema and congestive heart failure. Thus, it is prudent to either avoid glitazones or use them cautiously in individuals with impaired cardiac function. Further studies are clearly needed to define the mechanisms of fluid retention associated with glitazone use and to determine the safety of cautious use of these new insulin sensitisers in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.

The effect of rosiglitazone on overweight subjects with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rosiglitazone in the treatment of overweight subjects with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 50 adult type 1 diabetic subjects with a baseline BMI > or =27 kg/m(2) were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to take insulin and placebo (n = 25) or insulin and rosiglitazone 4 mg twice daily (n = 25) for a period of 8 months. Insulin regimen and dosage were modified in all subjects to achieve near-normal glycemic control.

RESULTS

Both groups experienced a significant reduction in HbA(1c) (A1C) level (rosiglitazone: 7.9 +/- 1.3 to 6.9 +/- 0.7%, P < 0.0001; placebo: 7.7 +/- 0.8 to 7.0 +/- 0.9%, P = 0.002) and a significant increase in weight (rosiglitazone: 97.2 +/- 11.8 to 100.6 +/- 16.0 kg, P = 0.008; placebo: 96.4 +/- 12.2 to 99.1 +/- 15.0, P = 0.016). Baseline measures of BMI (P = 0.001), total daily insulin dose (P = 0.002), total cholesterol (P = 0.005), HDL cholesterol (P = 0.001), and LDL cholesterol (P = 0.02) were predictors of improvement in A1C level only in the group treated with rosiglitazone. Total daily insulin dose increased in subjects taking placebo (74.0 +/- 33.8 to 82.0 +/- 48.9 units, P < 0.05 baseline vs. week 32), but it decreased slightly in subjects taking rosiglitazone (77.5 +/- 28.6 to 75.3 +/- 33.1 units). Both systolic blood pressure (137.4 +/- 15.6 vs. 128.8 +/- 14.8 mmHg, baseline vs. week 32, P < 0.02) and diastolic blood pressure (87.2 +/- 9.4 vs. 79.4 +/- 7.2 mmHg, P < 0.0001) improved in the group treated with rosiglitazone. The total incidence of hypoglycemia did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Rosiglitazone in combination with insulin resulted in improved glycemic control and blood pressure without an increase in insulin requirements, compared with insulin- and placebo-treated subjects, whose improved glycemic control required an 11% increase in insulin dose. Weight gain and hypoglycemia were similar in both groups at the end of the study. The greatest effect of rosiglitazone occurred in subjects with more pronounced markers of insulin resistance.

Strategies for insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes

Chronic hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes is responsible for an array of microvascular and macrovascular complications that can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Several well-conducted large clinical studies have shown that normalizing blood glucose levels can help prevent the onset and slow the progression of complications from diabetes. As many as 25% of patients treated with oral hypoglycemic agents require the addition of insulin therapy to compensate for the progression of beta-cell failure and an inability to maintain glycemic control. Various strategies incorporating the use of insulin early in the course of the disease have been developed to meet this goal, and include the use of basal-bolus insulin regimens as well as bedtime insulin injections. The pharmacokinetic properties of the new insulin analogs (eg, insulin lispro, insulin aspart, insulin glargine) offer significant advantages, such as improved control of nocturnal hypoglycemia with basal insulin glargine, and improved postprandial glucose control, with insulin lispro or insulin aspart.

Hepatotoxicity of thiazolidinediones

Thiazolidinediones are insulin sensitisers now widely used for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The initial marketed drug in this class, troglitazone, was removed from the market worldwide after approximately 3 years of use due to rare but severe hepatotoxicity, which sometimes resulted in liver failure leading to the need for liver transplantation, or even death. The unpredictability of such liver toxicity made the use of troglitazone highly problematic. Fortunately, the two newer drugs in this class, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, have a much larger margin of safety for liver toxicity. Very rare reports of liver toxicity, usually milder and reversible, have been seen with these drugs. Therefore, whilst pharmacovigilance for hepatotoxicity is probably still warranted, the practitioner and patient can be fairly confident that these drugs are safe from a liver standpoint. Finally, recent work would suggest that these agents may prove useful to reduce hepatic fat in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and may possibly protect against adverse metabolic consequences and the ultimate development of cirrhosis in patients with fatty livers.

Thiazolidinediones and Insulin

The range of therapeutic modalities to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus has broadened in recent years. Biguanides and thiazolidinediones are the two currently available classes of anti-hyperglycemic agents with insulin-sensitizing properties. Thiazolidinediones, in particular, have received much attention, not only for the well documented hepatotoxicity of troglitazone that led to its removal from the market in 2000, but also for the emerging data that support the beneficial effects of the thiazolidinedione class of drugs on beta-cell rejuvenation and cardiovascular risk reduction. In the US, thiazolidinediones are indicated either as monotherapy or in combination with a sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in cases where diet, exercise, and a single drug fail. In contrast, the UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence included in its re-appraisal of 'glitazones' in August 2003 the continued exclusion from licensed use in the UK of combination therapy with thiazolidinediones and insulin. When added to insulin therapy, thiazolidinediones appear to effectively lower glucose levels and reduce insulin dosage in clinical trials involving individuals with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. However, weight gain, hypoglycemia, and fluid retention pose problems in certain patients. The fluid retention may exacerbate or even precipitate congestive heart failure, which usually necessitates discontinuation of the drug. Risk stratification and careful management of patients at risk for heart failure, including those taking insulin concomitantly, allow healthcare providers to safely administer combination therapy with thiazolidinediones in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hepatic toxicity with currently available thiazolidinediones has been found to be minimal overall.

Effect of pioglitazone on the early stage of type 2 diabetic nephropathy in KK/Ta mice

Pioglitazone (PIO) has preventive effects on impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and urinary albumin excretion in diabetes. These effects in the early stage of diabetic nephropathy have not been fully described. Endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase (ecNOS) might be one of the mechanisms of glomerular hyperfiltration. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of PIO, including the role of ecNOS on the early stage of diabetic nephropathy in KK/Ta mice. KK/Ta mice were given PIO (10 mg/kg/d) started at 12 or 16 weeks of age for 8 or 4 weeks, respectively. They were divided into 3 groups as follows: early treatment (n = 8), late treatment (n = 8), and control group (n = 12). The urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), fasting and casual blood glucose levels, ratio of glomerular and Bowman's capsule volume (GB ratio), and systemic blood pressure were measured as phenotypic characterizations. The ecNOS and iNOS protein expression in glomeruli were evaluated by immunofluorescence. PIO, especially early treatment, improved the ACR and the GB ratio, and ecNOS protein expression was decreased in the endothelium of glomerular vessels. The iNOS protein was not detectable. There were no significant changes in the levels of fasting and casual blood glucose and systemic blood pressure among all groups. We conclude that the effect of PIO on microalbuminuria might not be due to changing systemic blood pressure and blood glucose levels. It appears that the decrease of urinary albumin excretion might be related to improvement of glomerular enlargement, including hyperfiltration, since the levels of ecNOS protein were reduced by PIO in the glomerular vessels.

Insulin monotherapy versus combinations of insulin with oral hypoglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether patients with type 2 diabetes who have poor glycaemic control despite maximal oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) should be commenced on insulin as monotherapy, or insulin combined with oral hypoglycaemic agents (insulin-OHA combination therapy).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of insulin monotherapy versus insulin-OHA combinations therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. Date of last search: May 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 2 months minimum follow-up duration comparing insulin monotherapy (all schemes) with insulin-OHA combination therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and assessment of study quality were undertaken by three reviewers in pairs.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty RCTs (mean trial duration 10 months) including 1,811 participants, with mean age 59.8 years and mean known duration of diabetes 9.6 years. Overall, study methodological quality was low. Twenty-eight comparisons in 20 RCTs were ordered according to clinical considerations. No studies assessed diabetes-related morbidity, mortality or total mortality. From 13 studies (21 comparisons), sufficient data were extracted to calculate pooled effects on glycaemic control. Insulin-OHA combination therapy had statistically significant benefits on glycaemic control over insulin monotherapy only when the latter was applied as a once-daily injection of NPH insulin. Conversely, twice-daily insulin monotherapy (NPH or mixed insulin) provided superior glycaemic control to insulin-OHA combination therapy regimens where insulin was administered as a single morning injection. In more conventional comparisons, regimens utilising OHAs with bedtime NPH insulin provided comparable glycaemic control to insulin monotherapy (administered as twice daily, or multiple daily injections). Overall, insulin-OHA combination therapy was associated with a 43% relative reduction in total daily insulin requirement compared to insulin monotherapy. Of the 14 studies (22 comparisons) reporting hypoglycaemia, 13 demonstrated no significant difference in the frequency of symptomatic or biochemical hypoglycaemia between insulin and combination therapy regimens. No significant differences in quality of life related issues were detected. Combination therapy with bedtime NPH insulin resulted in statistically significantly less weight gain compared to insulin monotherapy, provided metformin was used +/-sulphonylurea. In all other comparisons no significant differences with respect to weight gain were detected.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Bedtime NPH insulin combined with oral hypoglycaemic agents provides comparable glycaemic control to insulin monotherapy and is associated with less weight gain if metformin is used.

Lipolytic PPAR activation: new insights into the intersection of triglycerides and inflammation?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine connections between triglyceride metabolism and inflammation, especially as they relate to transcriptional regulation through peroxisomal proliferator activated receptors activation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Peroxisomal proliferator activated receptors, members of the steroid hormone nuclear receptor family, have been of particular interest as a mechanism through which different dietary components might control gene expression. Extensive prior work has defined the central role peroxisomal proliferator activated receptors play in many key metabolic responses, including glucose control and lipid metabolism. Emerging evidence suggests peroxisomal proliferator activated receptor activation may limit inflammation and atherosclerosis. The demonstration that certain fatty acids can activate peroxisomal proliferator activated receptors belies the potential link between nutritional components and peroxisomal proliferator activated receptor responses. Interest in this connection had been heightened by recent evidence that lipolysis in certain situations can both generate peroxisomal proliferator activated receptor ligands and limit some known inflammatory responses.

SUMMARY

Lipolytic peroxisomal proliferator activated receptor activation suggests new ways in which to reconsider triglycerides and the distal consequences of their metabolism, including the possible effects on inflammation and atherosclerosis.

Improved glycemic control without weight gain using triple therapy in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of triple therapy using insulin, metformin, and a thiazolidinedione following a course of dual therapy using insulin and metformin or insulin and a thiazolidinedione in type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-eight type 2 diabetic subjects using insulin monotherapy (baseline HbA(lc) level 8.5%) who had been randomly assigned to insulin (INS) and metformin (MET) (INS + MET, n = 14) or INS and the thiazolidinedione troglitazone (TGZ) (INS + TGZ, n = 14) (dual therapy) for 4 months were given INS, MET, and TGZ (triple therapy: INS + MET, add TGZ; or INS + TGZ, add MET) for another 4 months. The INS dose was not increased.

RESULTS

HbA(1c) levels decreased in both groups during dual therapy and improved further during triple therapy (INS + MET 7.0 +/- 0.8, INS + TGZ 6.2 +/- 0.8, P < 0.0001; INS + MET, add TGZ 6.1 +/- 0.4%, P < 0.001; INS + TGZ, add MET 5.8 +/- 0.6%, P < 0.05; and INS + TGZ vs. INS + MET, P = 0.02). Significant reductions in total daily insulin dose occurred in the INS + TGZ (-14.1 units, P < 0.0001), INS + TGZ add MET (-13.7 units, P < 0.01), and the INS + MET add TGZ groups (-17.3 units, P < 0.003), but not in the INS + MET group (-3.2 units) (INS + TGZ vs. INS + MET P < 0.05). Subjects in the INS + TGZ group experienced significant weight gain (4.4 +/- 2.7 kg, P < 0.0005). No weight gain occurred in the INS + MET, INS + MET add TGZ, and INS + TGZ add MET groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple therapy using INS, MET, and TGZ resulted in lower HbA(lc) levels and total daily insulin dose than during dual therapy. The use of triple therapy resulted in 100% of subjects achieving an HbA(lc) <7.0%, while decreasing the dose of INS. Weight gain was avoided when MET therapy preceded the addition of TGZ therapy. The addition of TGZ resulted in the greatest reductions in HbA(lc) levels and insulin dose. Triple therapy using INS, MET, and a thiazolidinedione (such as TGZ) can be a safe and effective treatment in type 2 diabetes.

First dose of potential new medicines to humans: how animals help

The need for careful testing of new drugs in animal models before study in humans has been recognised by physicians since the First World War. Now, first human studies on new drugs are subject to detailed government guidelines, which in the European Union are presently being reinforced through the wide-ranging Clinical Trials Directive. However, despite their long history and widespread application, these guidelines are empirical and have been formulated with a paucity of critical scientific evidence. Here, we review the principles and the available, albeit limited, evidence that support the design and conduct of preclinical studies in a way that permits effective and safe first-dose studies of potential new medicines in humans.

Treating diabetes using oral agents

Since the development and release of sulfonylureas for the treatment of T2DM, additional oral glycemic control agents with different mechanisms of action have allowed for more flexibility in targeting drug to patient. Based on available evidence, metformin monotherapy is preferred for the vast majority of T2DM patients who are overweight or obese. Combination therapy has further improved glycemic control. However, limitations in use, including the challenges of side effects, to that of secondary oral agent failure will inevitably occur over time. These challenges leave ample room for the development of agents that address the pathophysiology not only of treating insulin resistance and decreasing insulin production but also of preventing or delaying the development of diabetes in populations at risk.

Pioglitazone is Effective Therapy for Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

Pioglitazone as monotherapy and in combination with sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin has consistently demonstrated improved glycaemic and lipid parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a subanalysis to examine the effect of pioglitazone on glycaemia and lipids in patients <65 and > or =65 years of age in two double-blind, placebo-controlled monotherapy studies and in three separate multi-centre trials.

METHOD

In Study 1, 197 patients were randomised to receive pioglitazone 30 mg/day or placebo for 16 weeks. Study 2 was a forced dose-titration trial in patients randomised to receive pioglitazone 7.5/15/30 mg/day, pioglitazone 15/30/45 mg/day, or placebo daily for 26 weeks. Each of the lower dosages was given for at least 4 weeks and the highest dosage for 16 weeks. The three combination studies evaluated efficacy of pioglitazone 30 or 45 mg/day over a 24-week period in combination with sulfonylureas, metformin, or insulin.

RESULTS

In both placebo-controlled monotherapy studies, at 16 weeks, and at maximum pioglitazone dosage, 0.53-0.55% and 0.57-1.27% mean reductions from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were seen in patients aged <65 (n = 225) and > or =65 (n = 45) years, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the placebo and pioglitazone groups in each age cohort. Similar effects were observed in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels, with 2.03-2.59 mmol/L and 3.20-4.44 mmol/L mean reductions from baseline, respectively, which were significantly different from the changes in the placebo group, but there was no difference between pioglitazone groups. At treatment endpoint in combination trials, pioglitazone added to sulfonylurea produced a mean decrease in HbA(1c) of 0.78-1.61%, and 1.64-1.96% in patients aged <65 (n = 557) and > or =65 (n = 115) years, respectively. Pioglitazone added to metformin produced a mean decrease in HbA(1c) of 0.78-1.03% and 0.78-0.98% in patients aged <65 (n = 686) and > or =65 (n = 112) years, respectively. Pioglitazone added to insulin produced a mean decrease in HbA(1c) of 1.13-1.37% and 1.39-1.66% in patients aged <65 (n = 500) and > or =65 (n = 156) years, respectively. In patients aged > or =65 years, hypoglycaemia was observed in 1 of 14 patients and in 0 of 13 patients in the two monotherapy studies. In the combination studies, the incidence of hypoglycaemia among patients aged > or =65 years was as follows: 26.7-28.8% combined with sulfonylurea; 0-4.4% combined with metformin; and 53.4-56.4% combined with insulin.

CONCLUSION

Pioglitazone monotherapy, or added to a sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin demonstrated no significant differences in effectiveness while exhibiting similar adverse events in patients aged > or =65 years compared with patients aged <65 years. Well-controlled randomised clinical trials are recommended to confirm the impact of pioglitazone therapy on the glycaemic and lipid control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.

Substitution of Pioglitazone for Troglitazone in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical utility of pioglitazone therapy in patients who previously received troglitazone.

METHODS

We undertook an observational study involving patients with type 2 diabetes, who were originally treated with troglitazone and subsequently converted to pioglitazone therapy. Drug efficacy was evaluated by comparing baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, weight, blood pressure, and lipid profiles (during troglitazone treatment) with corresponding values 6 months after final pioglitazone dose titration. Drug safety was evaluated by review of hepatic enzyme levels and documented reports of side effects.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 316 patients in whom pioglitazone therapy was initiated after they had received troglitazone for at least 1 year. Discontinuation of pioglitazone treatment subsequently occurred in 43 patients; in 7 additional patients, no follow-up occurred. We found no significant difference between baseline and follow-up mean HbA1c values. Aspartate aminotransferase levels did not significantly change after 6 months of pioglitazone therapy; however, alanine aminotransferase levels increased by a statistically significant 3.8 U/L (95% confidence interval, 2.6 to 4.9). Pioglitazone treatment was discontinued because of edema in 29 of the 309 evaluable patients (9.4%).

CONCLUSION

Pioglitazone was as effective as troglitazone in maintaining HbA1c levels. The hepatic safety of pioglitazone was also demonstrated.

The roles of insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and thiazolidinediones in cardiovascular disease

Although it is difficult to distinguish between the relative effects of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance is clearly associated with significantly increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk. This effect is consistent across the spectrum of worsening glycemic control, from the onset of impaired glucose tolerance to the development of clinical diabetes. It is more difficult to discriminate between the roles of elevated circulating insulin and proinsulin levels; the association between insulin levels and cardiovascular risk is weak. The thiazolidinediones (TZDs) significantly improve insulin sensitivity and exert numerous effects on the vascular bed, including improved endothelial function, decreased vascular inflammation, decreased plasma free fatty acid levels, improved dyslipidemic profiles, and inhibition of vascular smooth muscle proliferation. These findings provide increasing evidence to suggest that the TZDs may have a beneficial effect on atherosclerosis and may reduce the incidence and severity of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. These effects remain to be substantiated by the results of large outcomes studies to evaluate the impact of glycemic control and reversal of insulin resistance on cardiovascular events.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ-Deficient Heterozygous Mice Develop an Exacerbated Neural Antigen-Induced Th1 Response and Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates cell growth, differentiation, and homeostasis. PPARgamma agonists are potent therapeutic agents for type 2 diabetes, obesity, and inflammation. Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) is a Th1 cell-mediated inflammatory demyelinating autoimmune disease model of multiple sclerosis. We have shown recently that PPARgamma agonists inhibit EAE by blocking IL-12 production, IL-12 signaling, and neural Ag-induced Th1 differentiation. In this study, we show that the PPARgamma-deficient heterozygous mice develop an exacerbated EAE with prolonged clinical symptoms than the wild-type littermates, following immunization with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) p35-55 peptide. The exacerbation of EAE in PPARgamma(+/-) mice associates with an increased expansion of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and expression of CD40 and MHC class II molecules in response to MOGp35-55 Ag. The PPARgamma(+/-) mice also showed an increase in T cell proliferation and Th1 response to MOGp35-55 Ag than the wild-type littermates. These findings suggest that PPARgamma be a critical physiological regulator of CNS inflammation and demyelination in EAE and perhaps multiple sclerosis and other Th1 cell-mediated autoimmune diseases.

The management of the obese diabetic patient

The prevalence of obesity and diabetes is increasing in the United States and worldwide. These diseases are predicted to explode to epidemic proportions, unless appropriate counteractive measures are taken. Several large studies (DCCT, UKPDS, Kumamoto) clearly showed that intensive glycemic control in the diabetic patient reduced microvascular complications and improved mortality. Despite this, the NHANES III showed that only 50% of diabetics have been able to achieve a HgbAic level that is less than 7%; this suggests the need for a re-evaluation of our approach to these patients. The management of the obese diabetic patient involves glycemic control and weight reduction. These goals are particularly difficult to achieve in the obese diabetic patient because progressive beta-cell dysfunction and increasing insulin resistance necessitates the administration of increasingly higher dosages of insulin, which, in turn, promotes weight gain. A vicious cycle may ensue. Lifestyle modifications with diet and exercise are an essential part of the management of the obese diabetic patient. These measures alone are often insufficient and concomitant pharmacologic therapy is usually required to achieve glycemic and weight control. Oral agents that improve glycemia, decrease insulin resistance, and limit weight gain are desirable. Because of the progressive nature of diabetes, glycemic control with monotherapy often deteriorates over time, which necessitates the addition of other pharmacologic agents, including insulin. When insulin therapy is required in the treatment of the obese diabetic patient, combinations with oral agents that have been shown to minimize the amount of exogenous insulin that is required, may minimize weight gain. In addition, the obese diabetic patient who is poorly controlled with maximum oral hypoglycemic therapy may benefit from weight-reducing agents, such as sibutramine or orlistat. The introduction of these agents at other points in the management of the obese diabetic patients have been successful. Finally, for the severely obese diabetic patient, bariatric surgery may be the only effective treatment. Gastric bypass has been unequivocally shown to produce significant weight loss and improve glycemic control on a long-term basis in the obese diabetic patient. It is recommended that physicians avail themselves of all of these strategies in the management of the obese patient who has type 2 diabetes.

Nitric oxide production and regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase phosphorylation by prolonged treatment with troglitazone: evidence for involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma-dependent and PPARgamma-independent signaling pathways

Recently, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) ligands have been reported to increase endothelial NO, but the signaling mechanisms involved are unknown. Using troglitazone, a PPARgamma ligand known as an antidiabetic compound, we investigated the molecular mechanism of its effect on NO production in bovine aortic endothelial cells. Troglitazone increased endothelial NO production in a dose- and time-dependent manner with no alteration in endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) expression. The maximal increase ( approximately 3.1-fold) was achieved with 20 microm troglitazone treatment for 12 h, and this increase was accompanied by increases in the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor, KDR/Flk-1, and in Akt phosphorylation. Analysis with antibodies specific for each phosphorylated site demonstrated that troglitazone (20 microm treatment for 12 h) significantly increased both the phosphorylation of Ser(1179) of eNOS (eNOS-Ser(1179)) and the dephosphorylation of eNOS-Ser(116) but did not alter eNOS-Thr(497) phosphorylation. Treatment with anti-VEGF antibody to scavenge the increased VEGF induced by troglitazone partially inhibited troglitazone-stimulated NO production. This was accompanied by the attenuation of troglitazone-stimulated increases in the phosphorylation of Akt and eNOS-Ser(1179) with no alteration in eNOS-Ser(116) dephosphorylation. We also found that bisphenol A diglycidyl ether, a PPARgamma antagonist, partially inhibited troglitazone-stimulated NO production with a concomitant reduction in VEGF-KDR/Flk-1-Akt-mediated eNOS-Ser(1179) phosphorylation but with no alteration in eNOS-Ser(116) dephosphorylation induced by troglitazone. Taken together, our results demonstrate that prolonged treatment with troglitazone increases endothelial NO production by at least two independent signaling pathways: PPARgamma-dependent, VEGF-KDR/Flk-1-Akt-mediated eNOS-Ser(1179) phosphorylation and PPARgamma-independent, eNOS-Ser(116) dephosphorylation.

Thiazolidinediones in type 2 diabetes mellitus: current clinical evidence

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterised by insulin resistance as well as progressive pancreatic beta cell dysfunction. The cornerstone of current oral blood-glucose lowering therapy consists of metformin, which primarily lowers hepatic glucose production, and the sulphonylureas that act by stimulating pancreatic beta-cells to secrete insulin. Recently, a novel class of agents, the thiazolidinediones, has been introduced that favourably influence insulin sensitivity and possibly also pancreatic beta-cell function. The thiazolidinediones are synthetic ligands that bind to the nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and exert their action by activating transcription of genes that, among others, regulate adipocyte differentiation and adipogenesis as well as glucose and lipid metabolism. To date, the precise mechanisms underlying the actions of thiazolidinediones are largely unknown. When given as monotherapy or in combination with sulphonylureas, metformin or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes, the currently available thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) ameliorate glycaemic control, by lowering fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels, and improve insulin sensitivity in placebo-controlled trials. They seem to have differential effects on dyslipidaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes; rosiglitazone increases total cholesterol as well as high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and affects plasma triglyceride levels depending on the baseline values, whereas pioglitazone lowers triglycerides and increases HDL cholesterol levels. The adverse events of both agents that occur with greater frequency than in patients treated with placebo are fluid retention and oedema. As demonstrated, mainly in preclinical studies to date, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone possess beneficial effects on other cardiovascular risk factors associated with the insulin resistance syndrome. Thus, these agents were shown to decrease blood pressure, enhance myocardial function and fibrinolysis, as well as possess anti-inflammatory and other beneficial vascular effects. Long-term efficacy and surveillance of this promising class of drugs in patients, however, still need to be demonstrated in outcome trials.