Identification of residues required for ligand binding to the beta-adrenergic receptor

Privileged Structures in GPCRs

Certain kinds of ligand substructures recur frequently in pharmacologically successful synthetic compounds. For this reason they are called privileged structures. In seeking an explanation for this phenomenon, it is observed that the privileged structure represents a generic substructure that matches commonly recurring conserved structural motifs in the target proteins, which may otherwise be quite diverse in sequence and function. Using sequence-handling tools, it is possible to identify which other receptors may respond to the ligand, as dictated on the one hand by the nature of the privileged substructure itself or by the rest of the ligand in which a more specific message resides. It is suggested that privileged structures interact with the partially exposed receptor machinery responsible for the switch between the active and inactive states. Depending on how they have been designed to interact, one can predispose these substructures to favour either one state or the other; thus privileged structures can be used to create either agonists or antagonists. In terms of the mechanism of recognition, the region that the privileged structures bind to are rich in aromatic residues, which explains the prevalence of aromatic groups and atoms such as sulphur or halogens in many of the ligands. Finally, the approach described here can be used to design drugs for orphan receptors whose function has not yet been established experimentally.

Role of group-conserved residues in the helical core of beta2-adrenergic receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) belonging to class A contain several highly conserved (>90%) amino acids in their transmembrane helices. Results of mutational studies of these highly conserved residues suggest a common mechanism for locking GPCRs in an inactive conformation and for their subsequent activation upon ligand binding. Recently, a second set of sites in the transmembrane helices has been identified in which amino acids with small side chains, such as Gly, Ala, Ser, Thr, and Cys, are highly conserved (>90%) when considered as a group. These group-conserved residues have not been recognized as having essential structural or functional roles. To determine the role of group-conserved residues in the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)-AR), amino acid replacements guided by molecular modeling were carried out at key positions in transmembrane helices H2-H4. The most significant changes in receptor expression and activity were observed upon replacement of the amino acids Ser-161 and Ser-165 in H4. Substitution at these sites by larger residues lowered the expression and activity of the receptor but did not affect specific binding to the antagonist ligand dihydroalprenolol. A second site mutation, V114A, rescued the low expression of the S165V mutant. Substitution of other group-conserved residues in H2-H4 by larger amino acids lowered receptor activity in the order Ala-128, Ala-76, Ser-120, and Ala-78. Together these data provide comprehensive analysis of group-conserved residues in a class A GPCR and allow insights into the roles of these residues in GPCR structure and function.

Current issues with beta2-adrenoceptor agonists: pharmacology and molecular and cellular mechanisms

Beta2-adrenoceptors are widely, almost ubiquitously, expressed. Activation of these receptors on bronchial smooth muscle by short- and long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists causes bronchodilation. Here, the beta2-adrenoceptor is linked by the G protein, Gs, to adenylyl cyclase, which increases cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), thus activating protein kinase A, which affects calcium levels and reduces the efficiency of myosin light-chain kinase, causing relaxation. Activation also entrains numerous acute and longer term downregulation responses affecting the number, location, and net efficiency of signaling of the receptor. Synthetic beta2-agonists are all "partial agonists," incompletely able to optimally stimulate cAMP signal transduction. However, compared with some cells (such as mast cells) involved in exercise- induced asthma induction, airway smooth muscle is privileged in that transduction efficiency is intrinsically high and the tissue is very resistant to complete downregulation. Glucocorticosteroids have broadly beneficial interactions with beta2-adrenoceptors. Researchers have recently discovered that the beta2-adrenoceptor may function as a homodimer and that it can form heterodimers with both the beta1- and beta3-adrenoceptors, and possibly other receptors. This further complicates interpretation of the effect of beta2-adrenoceptor polymorphisms, but it is unknown whether this occurs in humans in vivo. Researchers have known for some time that strong contraction involving receptors coupled to the Gq G protein (e.g., cholinergic and leukotriene receptors via negative biochemical crosstalk), virus infection (via uncoupling), and inflammation (via kinases) can impair relaxation. Most recently, researchers have discovered that the beta2-adrenoceptor can also send potentially adverse signals after "atypical coupling" to Gq rather than Gs. The clinical implications of these uncouplings, crosstalk, and atypical coupling possibilities are not well-understood.

The 7 TM G-protein-coupled receptor target family

Chemical biology approaches have a long history in the exploration of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, which represents the largest and most important group of targets for therapeutics. The analysis of the human genome revealed a significant number of new members with unknown physiological function which are today the focus of many reverse pharmacology drug-discovery programs. As the seven hydrophobic transmembrane segments are a defining common structural feature of these receptors, and as signaling through heterotrimeric G proteins is not demonstrated in all cases, these proteins are also referred to as seven transmembrane (7 TM) or serpentine receptors. This review summarizes important historic milestones of GPCR research, from the beginning, when pharmacology was mainly descriptive, to the age of modern molecular biology, with the cloning of the first receptor and now the availability of the entire human GPCR repertoire at the sequence and protein level. It shows how GPCR-directed drug discovery was initially based on the careful testing of a few specifically made chemical compounds and is today pursued with modern drug-discovery approaches, including combinatorial library design, structural biology, molecular informatics, and advanced screening technologies for the identification of new compounds that activate or inhibit GPCRs specifically. Such compounds, in conjunction with other new technologies, allow us to study the role of receptors in physiology and medicine, and will hopefully result in novel therapies. We also outline how basic research on the signaling and regulatory mechanisms of GPCRs is advancing, leading to the discovery of new GPCR-interacting proteins and thus opening new perspectives for drug development. Practical examples from GPCR expression studies, HTS (high-throughput screening), and the design of monoamine-related GPCR-focused combinatorial libraries illustrate ongoing GPCR chemical biology research. Finally, we outline future progress that may relate today's discoveries to the development of new medicines.

Structure-function of alpha1-adrenergic receptors

The Easson-Stedman hypothesis provided the rationale for the first studies of drug design for the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor. Through chemical modifications of the catecholamine core structure, the need was established for a protonated amine, a beta-hydroxyl on a chiral center, and an aromatic ring with substitutions capable of hydrogen bonding. After the receptors were cloned and three alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes were discovered, drug design became focused on the analysis of receptor structure and new interactions were uncovered. It became clear that alpha(1)- and beta-adrenergic receptors did not share stringent homology in the ligand-binding pocket but this difference has allowed for more selective drug design. Novel discoveries on allosterism and agonist trafficking may be used in the future design of therapeutics with fewer side effects. This review will explore past and current knowledge of the structure-function of the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtypes.

Orthogonal activation of the reengineered A3 adenosine receptor (neoceptor) using tailored nucleoside agonists

An alternative approach to overcome the inherent lack of specificity of conventional agonist therapy can be the reengineering of the GPCRs and their agonists. A reengineered receptor (neoceptor) could be selectively activated by a modified agonist, but not by the endogenous agonist. Assisted by rhodopsin-based molecular modeling, we pinpointed mutations of the A(3) adenosine receptor (AR) for selective affinity enhancement following complementary modifications of adenosine. Ribose modifications examined included, at 3': amino, aminomethyl, azido, guanidino, ureido; and at 5': uronamido, azidodeoxy. N(6)-Variations included 3-iodobenzyl, 5-chloro-2-methyloxybenzyl, and methyl. An N(6)-3-iodobenzyl-3'-ureido adenosine derivative 10 activated phospholipase C in COS-7 cells (EC(50) = 0.18 microM) or phospholipase D in chick primary cardiomyocytes, both mediated by a mutant (H272E), but not the wild-type, A(3)AR. The affinity enhancements for 10 and the corresponding 3'-acetamidomethyl analogue 6 were >100-fold and >20-fold, respectively. 10 concentration-dependently protected cardiomyocytes transfected with the neoceptor against hypoxia. Unlike 10, adenosine activated the wild-type A(3)AR (EC(50) of 1.0 microM), but had no effect on the H272E mutant A(3)AR (100 microM). Compound 10 was inactive at human A(1), A(2A), and A(2B)ARs. The orthogonal pair comprising an engineered receptor and a modified agonist should be useful for elucidating signaling pathways and could be therapeutically applied to diseases following organ-targeted delivery of the neoceptor gene.

Molecular evolution of adrenoceptors and dopamine receptors: implications for the binding of catecholamines

We derived homology models for all human catecholamine-binding GPCRs (CABRs; the alpha-1, alpha-2, and beta-adrenoceptors and the D1-type and D2-type dopamine receptor) using the bovine rhodopsin-11-cis-retinal X-ray structure. Interactions were predicted from the endogenous ligands norepinephrine or dopamine and from the binding site and were used to optimize receptor-ligand interactions. Similar binding modes in the complexes agree with a large "binding core" conserved across the CABRs, that is, D3.32, V(I)3.33, T3.37, S5.42, S(A/C)5.43, S5.46, F6.51, F6.52, and W6.48. Model structures and docking simulations suggest that extracellular loop 2 could provide a common attachment point for the ligands' beta-hydroxyl via a hydrogen bond donated by the main-chain NH group of residue xl2.52. The modeled CABRs and docking modes are in good agreement with published experimental studies. Complementarity between the ligand and the binding site suggests that the bovine rhodopsin structure is a suitable template for modeling agonist-bound CABRs.

A two model receptor system of the alpha1D adrenergic receptor to describe interactions with epinephrine and BMY7378

In this study, we have developed a two receptor model system to describe the R and R states of G-protein coupled receptors, specifically the alpha(1D) adrenergic receptor. The two models interact with agonist (epinephrine) and antagonist (BMY7378) differently. The active model has increased interactions with epinephrine. The inactive model has increased interactions with BMY7378. We also explored the protonation state of the ligands. When the most basic amine was protonated, we found increased hydrogen bonding and increased aromatic interactions. Protonated epinephrine hydrogen bonds with Asp176 and has aromatic residues Trp172, Trp235, Trp361, and Phe388 within 3 Angstroms. Protonated BMY7378 hydrogen bonds with Trp172 and Lys236 and has aromatic residues Trp172, Trp254, Phe364, Phe384, and Phe388 within 3 Angstroms. We conclude that the two model system is required to represent the two states of the receptor and that protonation of the ligand is also critical.

Molecular mechanism of 7TM receptor activation--a global toggle switch model

The multitude of chemically highly different agonists for 7TM receptors apparently do not share a common binding mode or active site but nevertheless act through induction of a common molecular activation mechanism. A global toggle switch model is proposed for this activation mechanism to reconcile the accumulated biophysical data supporting an outward rigid-body movement of the intracellular segments, as well as the recent data derived from activating metal ion sites and tethered ligands, which suggests an opposite, inward movement of the extracellular segments of the transmembrane helices. According to this model, a vertical see-saw movement of TM-VI-and to some degree TM-VII-around a pivot corresponding to the highly conserved prolines will occur during receptor activation, which may involve the outer segment of TM-V in an as yet unclear fashion. Small-molecule agonists can stabilize such a proposed active conformation, where the extracellular segments of TM-VI and -VII are bent inward toward TM-III, by acting as molecular glue deep in the main ligand-binding pocket between the helices, whereas larger agonists, peptides, and proteins can stabilize a similar active conformation by acting as Velcro at the extracellular ends of the helices and the connecting loops.

Location and nature of the residues important for ligand recognition in G-protein coupled receptors

The overall structure of the biogenic amine subclass of the G-protein-coupled receptors, and of their ligand binding sites, is discussed with the aim of highlighting the major structural features of these receptors that are responsible for ligand recognition. A comparison is made between biogenic amine receptors, peptide receptors of the rhodopsin class, and the secretin receptors which all have peptide ligands. The question of where the peptide ligands bind, whether at extracellular sites or within the transmembrane helix bundle, is discussed. The suitability of the rhodopsin crystal structure as a template for construction of homology models is discussed and it is concluded that there are many reasons why a caution should be issued against using it uncritically.

Novel human alpha1a-adrenoceptor single nucleotide polymorphisms alter receptor pharmacology and biological function

We identified nine naturally-occurring human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the alpha(1a)-adrenoceptor (alpha(1a)AR) coding region, seven of which result in amino acid change. Utilizing rat-1 fibroblasts stably expressing wild type alpha(1a)AR or each SNP at both high and low levels, we investigated the effect of these SNPs on receptor function. Compared with wild type, two SNPs (R166K, V311I) cause a decrease in binding affinity for agonists norepinephrine, epinephrine, and phenylephrine, and also shift the dose-response curve for norepinephrine stimulation of inositol phosphate (IP) production to the right (reduced potency) without altering maximal IP activity. In addition, SNP V311I and I200S display altered antagonist binding. Interestingly, a receptor with SNP G247R (located in the third intracellular loop) displays increased maximal receptor IP activity and stimulates cell growth. The increased receptor signaling for alpha(1a)AR G247R is not mediated by altered ligand binding or a deficiency in agonist-mediated desensitization, but appears to be related to enhanced receptor-G protein coupling. In conclusion, four naturally-occurring human alpha(1a)AR SNPs induce altered receptor pharmacology and/or biological activity. This finding has potentially important implications in many areas of medicine and can be used to guide alpha(1a)AR SNP choice for future clinical studies.

Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function

The superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) could be subclassified into 7 families (A, B, large N-terminal family B-7 transmembrane helix, C, Frizzled/Smoothened, taste 2, and vomeronasal 1 receptors) among mammalian species. Cloning and functional studies of GPCRs have revealed that the superfamily of GPCRs comprises receptors for chemically diverse native ligands including (1) endogenous compounds like amines, peptides, and Wnt proteins (i.e., secreted proteins activating Frizzled receptors); (2) endogenous cell surface adhesion molecules; and (3) photons and exogenous compounds like odorants. The combined use of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling approaches have provided detailed insight into molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, receptor folding, receptor activation, G-protein coupling, and regulation of GPCRs. The vast majority of family A, B, C, vomeronasal 1, and taste 2 receptors are able to transduce signals into cells through G-protein coupling. However, G-protein-independent signaling mechanisms have also been reported for many GPCRs. Specific interaction motifs in the intracellular parts of these receptors allow them to interact with scaffold proteins. Protein engineering techniques have provided information on molecular mechanisms of GPCR-accessory protein, GPCR-GPCR, and GPCR-scaffold protein interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations have revealed that the inactive state conformations are stabilized by specific interhelical and intrahelical salt bridge interactions and hydrophobic-type interactions. Constitutively activating mutations or agonist binding disrupts such constraining interactions leading to receptor conformations that associates with and activate G-proteins.

Amino acid residues involved in interaction with tyramine in the Bombyx mori tyramine receptor

To identify amino acid residues interacting with tyramine (TA) in the Bombyx mori TA (BmTA) receptor, several mutant receptors were expressed in HEK-293 cells and examined for their abilities to bind TA and to attenuate forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in response to TA. The D134A BmTA receptor showed no specific [3H]TA binding and no TA-attenuation of cAMP levels. Although the S218A and S222A BmTA receptors showed no specific [3H]TA binding, they still had the ability to mediate the attenuation of cAMP levels in response to the high concentration (100 microM) of TA. The double mutation of Ser218 and Ser222 to Ala, however, led to the loss of TA-attenuation of cAMP levels. The present study thus confirms that at least three amino acid residues play key roles in interaction with TA in the BmTA receptor.

Ligand-Binding Modes in Cationic Biogenic Amine Receptors

The binding site in G protein-coupled cationic biogenic amine receptors is formed in the cleft of the seven transmembrane segments. Upon binding the ligand, the receptors are activated or inactivated through the conformational changes of the transmembrane segments. G protein-coupled receptors bind four functionally distinct ligands; inverse agonists, antagonists, partial agonists, and full agonists. Hence, putative structural models for biogenic amine receptors corresponding to the ligand function (inverse agonist-, antagonist-, partial agonist-, and full agonist-bound receptor models) were built by using photointermediate models in the rhodopsin photocascade (M. Ishiguro et al. ChemBioChem. 2004, 5, 298-310). The ligand-receptor recognition of each was examined by modeling receptor-ligand complexes with functional ligands. The complex models suggested that each functional ligand binds the corresponding receptor structure and that ligand-specific interactions contribute to stabilization of the corresponding receptor structure.

“Induced-Fit” Mechanism for Catecholamine Binding to the β2-Adrenergic Receptor

We engineered single and multiple mutations of serines 203, 204, and 207 in the fifth transmembrane domain of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor, a region known to interact with hydroxyl groups of the catechol ring. Using such mutants, we measured the binding affinities of a panel of six catecholamine agonists differing only in the presence of substituents in the ethanolamine tail of the molecule. Although all ligands shared an intact catechol ring, they exhibited different losses of binding energy in response to the mutations. For all mutations, we found a clear relationship between the loss of binding caused by receptor mutation and that caused by the ligand modification. This indicates that the catechol ring and the ethanolamine tail synergistically influence their respective interactions when binding to the receptor. To verify this idea by a formal thermodynamic test, we used a double-mutant cycle analysis. We compared the effects of each receptor mutation with those induced by the modifications of the ligand's tail. Because such changes disrupt interactions occurring at different receptor domains, they should produce cumulative losses. In contrast, we found positive cooperativity between such effects. This means that the binding of each side of the catecholamine can enhance the binding of the other, through an effect that is probably propagated via a conformational change. We suggest that the agonist-binding pocket is not rigid but is dynamically formed as the ligand builds an increasing number of contacts with the receptor.

Dopamine transporter: basic science and human variation of a key molecule for dopaminergic function, locomotion, and parkinsonism

We review the basic science of the dopamine transporter (DAT), a key neurotransmitter for locomotor control and reward systems, including those lost or deranged in Parkinson's disease (PD). Physiology, pharmaceutical features, expression, cDNA, protein structure/function relationships, and phosphorylation and regulation are discussed. The localization of DAT provides the best marker for the integrity of just the pre-synaptic dopaminergic systems that are most affected in PD. Its function is key for the actions of several toxins that provide some of the best current models for idiopathic parkinsonism, and its variation can clearly alter movement. The wealth of information about this interesting molecule that has been developed over the last 12 years has led to increased interest in DAT among workers interested in both normal and abnormal movement.

Recognition of Privileged Structures by G-Protein Coupled Receptors

Privileged structures are ligand substructures that are widely used to generate high-affinity ligands for more than one type of receptor. To explain this, we surmised that there must be some common feature in the target proteins. For a set of class A GPCRs, we found a good correlation between conservation patterns of residues in the ligand binding pocket and the privileged structure fragments in class A GPCR ligands. A major part of interior surface of the common ligand binding pocket of class A receptors, identified in many GPCRs, is lined with variable residues that are responsible for selectivity in ligand recognition, while other regions, typically located deeper into the binding pocket, are more conserved and retain a predominantly hydrophobic and aromatic character. The latter is reflected in the chemical nature of most GPCR privileged structures and is proposed to be the common feature that is recognized by the privileged structures. Further, we find that this subpocket is conserved even in distant orthologs within the class A family. Three pairs of ligands recognizing widely different receptor types were docked into receptor models of their target receptors utilizing available structure- activity relationships and mutagenesis data. For each pair of ligands, the ligand-receptor complexes reveal that the nature of the privileged structure binding pocket is conserved between the two complexes, in support of our hypothesis. Only part of the privileged structures can be accommodated within the conserved subpocket. Some contacts are established between the privileged structure and the nonconserved parts of the binding pocket. This implies that any one particular privileged structure can target only a subset of receptors, those complementary to the full privileged structure. Our hypothesis leads to a valuable novelty in that ligand libraries can be designed without any foreknowledge of the structure of the endogenous ligand, which in turn means that even orphan receptors can in principle now be addressed as potential drug targets.

Application of thin-layer chromatographic data in quantitative structure-activity relationship assay of thiazole and benzothiazole derivatives with H1-antihistamine activity. I

A quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of H1-antihistamine activity and chromatographic data of 2-[2-(phenylamino)thiazol-4-yl]ethanamine; 2-(2-benzyl-4-thiazolyl)ethanamine; 2-(2-benzhydrylthiazol-4-yl)ethylamine derivative; 2-(1-piperazinyl- and 2-(hexahydro-1H-1,4-diazepin-1-yl)benzothiazole derivatives was made. The RP2 thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates (silica gel RP2 60F254 silanised precoated), impregnated with solutions of selected amino acid mixtures (L-Asp, L-Asn, L-Thr and L-Lys), were used in two developing solvents as hH1R antagonistic interaction models. Using regression analysis, the relationships between chromatographic and biological activity data were found. The correlations obtained in regression analysis for the examined thiazole and benzothiazole derivatives with H1-antihistamine activity [pA2(H1)] represent their interaction with all the proposed biochromatographic models (S1-S7). Some of the calculated equations can be applied to predict the pharmacological activity of new drug candidates. The best multivariate relationships useful in predicting the pharmacological activity of thiazole and benzothiazole derivatives were obtained under the condition of experiment with RP2 TLC plates using the developing solvent acetonitrile-methanol-buffer (40:40:20, v/v). The log P values of particular compounds are extremely important for this kind of activity.

Conformational features of human melanin-concentrating hormone: an NMR and computational analysis

The conformational features of human melanin-concentrating hormone (hMCH) [Asp1-Phe2-Asp3-Met4-Leu5-Arg6-cyclo(S[bond]S)(Cys7-Met8-Leu9-Gly10-Arg11-Val12-Tyr13-Arg14-Pro15-Cys16)-Trp17-Gln18-Val19], in water and in a CD(3)CN/H(2)O (1:1 v/v) mixture at 298 K, have been determined by NMR spectroscopy followed by simulated annealing and molecular dynamics analyses to identify conformer populations. Backbone clustering analysis of NMR-spectroscopy-derived structures in the 7-16 peptide region led to the identification of a single representative structure in each solvent. Both root mean square deviation clustering and secondary structure analysis of the final conformers in both solvents show substantial convergence of most conformers into a single fold in the 4-17 region, with a limited variability around Gly10 and Tyr13 on going from CD(3)CN/H(2)O to pure water. The main feature deduced from the analysis of secondary structures is the occurrence of an N-terminal alpha helix of variable length, which spans an overall residue range of 2-9. A comparative analysis in the two solvents highlights that these structures are substantially different from that reported in the literature for the cyclic MCH(5-14) subunit of salmon MCH, which was used to perform a molecular characterization of the MCH/receptor complex. Our conformational data call for a critical revision of the proposed MCH/receptor complex model.

Mutation of Asn293 to Asp in transmembrane helix VI abolishes agonist-induced but not constitutive activity of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor

The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor has been shown to display significant constitutive activity (i.e., in the absence of agonist) in addition to agonist-induced activation. Various studies have suggested that a movement in transmembrane helix VI plays a role in activation of various G-protein-coupled receptors. Here we show that a mutation in this domain of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor abolishes agonist activation but not constitutive activity. An Asn293Asp mutant of the human beta(2)-adrenergic receptor was expressed either transiently in COS-7 cells or stably in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The mutant receptors were unable to couple to G(s), as seen by the lack of high-affinity agonist binding as well as a reduction of the affinities of several agonists correlating with their intrinsic activities. The mutant receptors caused only minimal activation of adenylyl cyclase (2.5% of wild-type activity) and also failed to show agonist-induced phosphorylation by G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. In contrast, the mutant receptors were much less affected in their constitutive activity: transient transfection of wild-type and mutant receptors into COS-7 cells caused an increase in intracellular cAMP-levels that was dependent on the level of receptor expression and was maximally 5.4-fold for the mutant and 6.8-fold for the wild-type receptors (67% of wild-type activity). Introduction of the Asn293Asp mutation into a constitutively active mutant receptor did not affect the constitutive activity of this mutant. These results underscore the importance of transmembrane helix VI in controlling agonist-induced activation of the receptor and suggest that constitutive activity is different from agonist-induced activity. Furthermore, they indicate that Asn293 is a key residue in transferring conformational information from the agonist-binding site to the intracellular surface.

Molecular modeling and site-specific mutagenesis of the histamine-binding site of the histamine H4 receptor

The histamine H4 receptor is a novel G-protein-coupled receptor with a unique pharmacological profile. The distribution of H4 mRNA suggests that it may play a role in the regulation of immune function, particularly with respect to allergy and asthma. To define the histamine-binding site of this receptor, molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis were used to predict and alter amino acids residing in the histamine-binding pocket. The effects of these alterations on histamine binding and receptor activation were then assessed. Our results indicate that Asp94 (3.32) in transmembrane region (TM) 3 and Glu182 (5.46) in TM5 are critically involved in histamine binding. Asp94 probably serves as a counter-anion to the cationic amino group of histamine, whereas Glu182 (5.46) interacts with the N(tau) nitrogen atom of the histamine imidazole ring via an ion pair. In contrast, Thr178 (5.42) and Ser179 (5.43) in TM5 are not significantly involved in either histamine binding or receptor activation. These results resemble those for the analogous residues in the H1 histamine receptor but contrast with findings regarding the H2 histamine receptor. Our results also demonstrate that Asn147 (4.57) in TM4 and Ser320 (6.52) in TM6 play a role in receptor activation but are not involved in histamine binding. Taken together, these data indicate that although histamine seems to bind to the H4 receptor in a fashion similar to that predicted for the other histamine receptor subtypes, there are also important differences that can probably be exploited for the discovery of novel H4-selective compounds.

The binding site of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors: the transmembrane segments and second extracellular loop

In the current chapter, we review approaches to the identification of the residues forming the binding sites for agonists, antagonists, and allosteric modulators in the family of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). We then review the structural bases for ligand binding and pharmacological specificity based on the application of these methods to muscarinic cholinergic, adrenergic, dopaminergic, serotonergic, and histaminergic receptors, using the high resolution rhodopsin structure as a template. Furthermore, we propose a critical role of the second extracellular loop in forming the binding site for small molecular weight aminergic ligands, much as this loop dives down into the binding-site crevice and contacts retinal in rhodopsin.

Novel G-protein-coupled receptor genes expressed in the brain: continued discovery of important therapeutic targets

The rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the largest known group of cell-surface mediators of signal transduction. The vast majority of these receptors were discovered by methods based upon shared sequence homologies found throughout this family. While such efforts identified a multitude of receptor subtypes for previously known ligands, numerous receptors have been discovered for which endogenous ligands were unknown. These receptors are commonly referred to as orphan receptors. One of the most important tasks of modern pharmacology lies in elucidating the functions of these receptors. Of particular interest are receptors with recognised expression in the central nervous system, given that many psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders are mediated by unknown mechanisms. Hence, this collection of putative neurotransmitter and neuromodulator signal mediators represents a substantial and untapped resource for novel drug discovery. Recently, various methodologies have accelerated the discovery of novel ligands for these orphan receptors, identifying the basic components required for further physiological ligand/receptor system characterisation. Equipped with proven ligand identification strategies, the characterisation of all orphan GPCRs and the exploitation of their exciting potential as targets for the discovery of novel drugs is anticipated.

Beta(1)-selective agonist (-)-1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenetylamino)-3-(3,4-dihydroxy)-2-propanol [(-)-RO363] differentially interacts with key amino acids responsible for beta(1)-selective binding in resting and active states

(-)-1-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenetylamino)-3-(3,4-dihydroxy)-2-propanol [(-)-RO363] is a highly selective beta(1)-adrenergic receptor (beta(1)AR) agonist. To study the binding site of beta(1)-selective agonist, chimeric beta(1)/beta(2)ARs and Ala-substituted beta(1)ARs were constructed. Several key residues of beta(1)AR [Leu(110) and Thr(117) in transmembrane domain (TMD) 2], and Phe(359) in TMD 7] were found to be responsible for beta(1)-selective binding of (-)-RO363, as determined by competitive binding. Based on these results, we built a three-dimensional model of the binding domain for (-)-RO363. The model indicated that TMD 2 and TMD 7 of beta(1)AR form a binding pocket; the methoxyphenyl group of N-substituent of (-)-RO363 seems to locate within the cavity surrounded by Leu(110), Thr(117), and Phe(359). The amino acids Leu(110) and Phe(359) interact with the phenyl ring of (-)-RO363, whereas Thr(117) forms hydrogen bond with the methoxy group of (-)-RO363. To examine the interaction of these residues with beta(1)AR in an active state, each of the amino acids was changed to Ala in a constitutively active (CA)-beta(1)AR mutant. The degree of decrease in the affinity of CA-beta(1)AR for (-)-RO363 was essentially the same as that of wild-type beta(1)AR when mutated at Leu(110) and Thr(117). However, the affinity was decreased in Ala-substituted mutant of Phe(359) compared with that of wild-type beta(1)AR. These results indicated that Leu(110) and Thr(117) are necessary for the initial binding of (-)-RO363 with beta(1)-selectivity, and interaction of Phe(359) with the N-substituent of (-)-RO363 in an active state is stronger than in the resting state.

Cloning, expression, and regulation of a glucocorticoid-induced receptor in rat brain: effect of repetitive amphetamine

Behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants involves neuroadaptation of stress-responsive systems. We have identified and sequenced a glucocorticoid-induced receptor (GIR) cDNA from rat prefrontal cortex. The full-length GIR cDNA encodes a 422 amino acid protein belonging to G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Although the ligand for GIR is still unknown, the dendrogram construction indicates that GIR may belong to peptide receptor subfamily (e.g., substance P receptor), with more distant relationship to subfamilies of glycoprotein hormone receptors (e.g., thyrotropin receptor) and biogenic amine receptors (e.g., dopamine receptor). GIR shares 31-34% amino acid identity to the tachykinin receptors (substance P receptor, neurokinin A receptor, and neurokinin B receptor). GIR mRNA is expressed preferentially in brain, and its neuronal expression is relegated to limbic brain regions, particularly in forebrain. GIR transcript levels are increased significantly and persistently in prefrontal cortex for 7 d after discontinuation of chronic amphetamine exposure. The induction of GIR expression by amphetamine is associated with augmented behavioral activation. These findings suggest that modulation of GIR expression may be involved in behavioral sensitization, and GIR may play a role at the interface between stress and neuroadaptation to psychostimulants.

Cloning, expression, and regulation of a glucocorticoid-induced receptor in rat brain: effect of repetitive amphetamine

Behavioral sensitization to psychostimulants involves neuroadaptation of stress-responsive systems. We have identified and sequenced a glucocorticoid-induced receptor (GIR) cDNA from rat prefrontal cortex. The full-length GIR cDNA encodes a 422 amino acid protein belonging to G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Although the ligand for GIR is still unknown, the dendrogram construction indicates that GIR may belong to peptide receptor subfamily (e.g., substance P receptor), with more distant relationship to subfamilies of glycoprotein hormone receptors (e.g., thyrotropin receptor) and biogenic amine receptors (e.g., dopamine receptor). GIR shares 31-34% amino acid identity to the tachykinin receptors (substance P receptor, neurokinin A receptor, and neurokinin B receptor). GIR mRNA is expressed preferentially in brain, and its neuronal expression is relegated to limbic brain regions, particularly in forebrain. GIR transcript levels are increased significantly and persistently in prefrontal cortex for 7 d after discontinuation of chronic amphetamine exposure. The induction of GIR expression by amphetamine is associated with augmented behavioral activation. These findings suggest that modulation of GIR expression may be involved in behavioral sensitization, and GIR may play a role at the interface between stress and neuroadaptation to psychostimulants.

Dopamine induces intracellular Ca2+ signals mediated by alpha1B-adrenoceptors in rat pineal cells

We have studied the functional interaction of dopamine with alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes by measuring intracellular Ca2+ levels in pineal cells, a cell type where adrenoceptors are well characterized. We show that dopamine induces transient intracellular Ca2+ signals in only 70% of cells responding to phenylephrine. Dopamine-induced Ca2+ signals desensitise faster than Ca2+ transients elicited with phenylephrine and are selectively blocked by desipramine, imipramine, and alpha1B-adrenoceptor antagonists. These results suggest that dopamine induced Ca2+ signals are mainly due to the activation of one subtype of alpha-adrenoceptor, the alpha1B.

Regulation of agonist binding to rat ET(B) receptors by cations and GTPgammaS

Endothelins exert their physiological effects through interaction with cell surface receptors that are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. The endothelin receptor subtype B (ET(B) receptor) is abundantly expressed in rat cerebellum. Since agonist binding to G-protein-coupled receptors may be modulated by cations and guanine nucleotides, we investigated the effects of cations and guanosine 5'-O-(2-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) on 125I-endothelin-1 (125I-ET-1) binding to rat cerebellar membranes. Both Na+ and Mg2+-stimulated 125I-ET-1 binding causing an increase in receptor affinity for the agonist. While the effect of the divalent cation was evident at relatively low concentrations (5-10 mM), the stimulatory activity of the monovalent cation appeared at relatively high concentrations (50 mM). Additive activities of 25-50 mM NaCl and 1 mM MgCl2 suggested that monovalent and divalent cations increased receptor affinity for ET-1 by different mechanisms. In the presence of 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NaCl caused an additional modest reduction of the Kd value. Whereas 5 mM MgCl2 affected the displacement curves of both ET-3 and suc-[Glu9, Ala11,15]-endothelin-1 (8-21) (IRL 1620), the influence of 50 mM NaCl on these curves was less substantial. All together, these results suggest that modulation of receptor affinity by NaCl depends on the nature of the displacing agonist. In the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 or 50 mM NaCl, a partial regulation of 125I-ET-1 binding by GTPgammaS was detectable, while in the absence of cations no GTPgammaS-dependent inhibition was evident.

Phe-308 and Phe-312 in transmembrane domain 7 are major sites of alpha 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist binding. Imidazoline agonists bind like antagonists

Although agonist binding in adrenergic receptors is fairly well understood and involves residues located in transmembrane domains 3 through 6, there are few residues reported that are involved in antagonist binding. In fact, a major docking site for antagonists has never been reported in any G-protein coupled receptor. It has been speculated that antagonist binding is quite diverse depending upon the chemical structure of the antagonist, which can be quite different from agonists. We now report the identification of two phenylalanine residues in transmembrane domain 7 of the alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor (Phe-312 and Phe-308) that are a major site of antagonist affinity. Mutation of either Phe-308 or Phe-312 resulted in significant losses of affinity (4-1200-fold) for the antagonists prazosin, WB4101, BMY7378, (+) niguldipine, and 5-methylurapidil, with no changes in affinity for phenethylamine-type agonists such as epinephrine, methoxamine, or phenylephrine. Interestingly, both residues are involved in the binding of all imidazoline-type agonists such as oxymetazoline, cirazoline, and clonidine, confirming previous evidence that this class of ligand binds differently than phenethylamine-type agonists and may be more antagonist-like, which may explain their partial agonist properties. In modeling these interactions with previous mutagenesis studies and using the current backbone structure of rhodopsin, we conclude that antagonist binding is docked higher in the pocket closer to the extracellular surface than agonist binding and appears skewed toward transmembrane domain 7.

A monoclonal antibody against the immunodominant epitope of the ribosomal P2beta protein of Trypanosoma cruzi interacts with the human beta 1-adrenergic receptor

Monoclonal antibodies were raised against a recombinant ribosomal P2beta protein of Trypanosoma cruzi. One of these reacted with the C terminus of this protein (peptide R13, EEEDDDMGFGLFD) and epitope mapping confirmed that this epitope was the same as the one defined by the serum of immunized mice, and similar to the previously described chronic Chagas' heart disease (cChHD) anti-P epitope. Western blotting showed that the monoclonal antibody recognized the parasite ribosomal P proteins, as well as the human ribosomal P proteins. Electron microscopy showed that it stained different structures in parasite and human cells. Interestingly, surface plasmon resonance measurements indicated that the affinity for the parasite ribosomal P protein epitope (R13) was five times higher than for its human counterpart (peptide H13, EESDDDMGFGLFD). Since the human epitope contained an acidic region (EESDD) similar to the AESDE peptide recognized by cChHD patients in the second extra-cellular loop of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor, the biological activity of the antibody was assessed on neonatal rat cardiomyocytes in culture. The monoclonal antibody had an agonist-like effect. These results, together with the fact that the monoclonal reacted in Western blots with the different isoforms of the heart beta1-adrenergic receptor, confirm the possible pathogenic role of antibodies against the parasite ribosomal P protein based on their cross-reaction with the human beta1-adrenergic receptor.

Identification and characterization of a second melanin-concentrating hormone receptor, MCH-2R

Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is a 19-aa cyclic neuropeptide originally isolated from chum salmon pituitaries. Besides its effects on the aggregation of melanophores in fish several lines of evidence suggest that in mammals MCH functions as a regulator of energy homeostasis. Recently, several groups reported the identification of an orphan G protein-coupled receptor as a receptor for MCH (MCH-1R). We hereby report the identification of a second human MCH receptor termed MCH-2R, which shares about 38% amino acid identity with MCH-1R. MCH-2R displayed high-affinity MCH binding, resulting in inositol phosphate turnover and release of intracellular calcium in mammalian cells. In contrast to MCH-1R, MCH-2R signaling is not sensitive to pertussis toxin and MCH-2R cannot reduce forskolin-stimulated cAMP production, suggesting an exclusive G(alpha)q coupling of the MCH-2R in cell-based systems. Northern blot and in situ hybridization analysis of human and monkey tissue shows that expression of MCH-2R mRNA is restricted to several regions of the brain, including the arcuate nucleus and the ventral medial hypothalamus, areas implicated in regulation of body weight. In addition, the human MCH-2R gene was mapped to the long arm of chromosome 6 at band 6q16.2-16.3, a region reported to be associated with cytogenetic abnormalities of obese patients. The characterization of a second mammalian G protein-coupled receptor for MCH potentially indicates that the control of energy homeostasis in mammals by the MCH neuropeptide system may be more complex than initially anticipated.

Molecular cloning and functional characterization of MCH2, a novel human MCH receptor

Melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) is involved in the regulation of feeding and energy homeostasis. Recently, a 353-amino acid splice variant form of the human orphan receptor SLC-1 () (hereafter referred to as MCH(1)) was identified as an MCH receptor. This report describes the cloning and functional characterization of a novel second human MCH receptor, which we designate MCH(2), initially identified in a genomic survey sequence as being homologous to MCH(1) receptors. Using this sequence, a full-length cDNA was generated with an open reading frame of 1023 base pairs, encoding a polypeptide of 340 amino acids, with 38% identity to MCH(1) and with many of the structural features conserved in G protein-coupled receptors. This newly discovered receptor belongs to class 1 (rhodopsin-like) of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. HEK293 cells transfected with MCH(2) receptors responded to nanomolar concentrations of MCH with an increase in intracellular Ca(2+) levels and increased cellular extrusion of protons. In addition, fluorescently labeled MCH bound with nanomolar affinity to these cells. The tissue localization of MCH(2) receptor mRNA, as determined by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, was similar to that of MCH(1) in that both receptors are expressed predominantly in the brain. The discovery of a novel MCH receptor represents a new potential drug target and will allow the further elucidation of MCH-mediated responses.

Stepwise Modulation of Neurokinin-3 and Neurokinin-2 Receptor Affinity and Selectivity in Quinoline Tachykinin Receptor Antagonists

A stepwise chemical modification from human neurokinin-3 receptor (hNK-3R)-selective antagonists to potent and combined hNK-3R and hNK-2R antagonists using the same 2-phenylquinoline template is described. Docking studies with 3-D models of the hNK-3 and hNK-2 receptors were used to drive the chemical design and speed up the identification of potent and combined antagonsits at both receptors. (S)-(+)-N-(1-Cyclohexylethyl)-3-[(4-morpholin-4-yl)piperidin-1-yl]methyl-2-phenylquinoline-4-carboxamide (compound 25, SB-400238: hNK-3R binding affinity, K(i) = 0.8 nM; hNK-2R binding affinity, K(i) = 0.8 nM) emerged as the best example in this approach. Further studies led to the identification of (S)-(+)-N-(1,2,2-trimethylpropyl)-3-[(4-piperidin-1-yl)piperidin-1-yl]methyl-2-phenylquinoline-4-carboxamide (compound 28, SB-414240: hNK-3R binding affinity, K(i) = 193 nM; hNK-2R binding affinity, K(i) = 1.0 nM) as the first hNK-2R-selective antagonist belonging to the 2-phenylquinoline chemical class. Since some members of this chemical series showed a significant binding affinity for the human mu-opioid receptor (hMOR), docking studies were also conducted on a 3-D model of the hMOR, resulting in the identification of a viable chemical strategy to avoid any significant micro-opioid component. Compounds 25 and 28 are therefore suitable pharmacological tools in the tachykinin area to elucidate further the pathophysiological role of NK-3 and NK-2 receptors and the therapeutic potential of selective NK-2 (28) or combined NK-3 and NK-2 (25) receptor antagonists.

Serine residues 110 and 114 are required for agonist binding but not antagonist binding to the melatonin MT(1) receptor

Site-directed mutation of serine 110 (Ser(3.35)) and serine 114 (Ser(3.39)) in the human melatonin MT(1) receptor to alanine residues reduced ligand binding affinities of seven known melatonin receptor agonists and partial agonists by 3- to 15-fold. These mutants also displayed a relative reduction in their affinities for melatonin-mediated functional responses of 30- and 14-fold, respectively. In contrast to the observed effects of the agonists and partial agonists, the melatonin receptor antagonist luzindole was found to bind to mutants Ser(3.35)Ala and Ser(3.39)Ala with affinities equivalent to that determined for the wild-type melatonin MT(1) receptor. Luzindole was subsequently confirmed as an antagonist of melatonin-mediated functional responses for both mutant receptors. These studies have identified that in the human melatonin MT(1) receptor, Ser(3.35) and Ser(3.39), in transmembrane domain 3, are critical for the formation of the high-affinity ligand binding site for agonists and partial agonists but not for the antagonist luzindole.

The ligand-receptor-G-protein ternary complex as a GTP-synthase. steady-state proton pumping and dose-response relationships for beta -adrenoceptors

Steady-state solutions are developed for the rate of G alpha.GTP production in a synthase model of the ligand-receptor-G-protein ternary complex activated by a ligand-receptor proton pumping mechanism. The effective rate, k(31), defining the proton transfer, phosphorylation and G alpha.GTP release is a controlling rate of the synthase in the presence of a ligand with an efficient mode of signal activation, the ligand-receptor interaction taking place under effectively equilibrium conditions. The composite rate, however, becomes an amplifying factor in any dose-response relationship. The amplification is a triple product of the rate, k(31), the equilibrium constant associated with the activation of the proton signal, K(act)and the fraction of agonist conformer transmitting the signal, f(*). Where the rate of activation of the proton signal becomes critically inefficient, the rate of activation, k(act 1)replaces k(31)K(act). A correlation between beta(1)-adrenergic receptor-stimulated GDP release and adenylate cyclase activation shows that this correlation is not unique to an exchange reaction. Within the initiating Tyr-Arg-Tyr receptor proton shuttle mechanism, the position of Arg(r156) paralleldictates the high-(R(p)) and low-(R(u)) ligand-binding affinities. These states are close to R(*)and R(0)of the equilibrium model (De Lean et al., 1980, J. Biol. Chem.255, 7108-7117). An increased rate of hydrogen ion diffusion into a receptor mutant can give rise to constitutive activity while increased rates of G-protein release and changes in receptor state balance can contribute to the resultant level of action. Constitutive action will arise from a faster rate of G-protein release alone if proton diffusion in the wild-type receptor contributes to a basal level of G-protein activation. Competitive ligand-receptor occupancy for constitutive mutants shows that, where the rate of G-protein activation from the proportion of ligand-occupied receptors is less than the equivalent rate that would be generated from this fraction by proton diffusion, inverse agonism will occur. Rate-dependent dose-responses developed for the proposed synthase mechanism give explicit definition to the operational model for partial agonism (Black & Leff, 1983, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B220, 141-162). When comparable ligands have effectively identical conformational states at the transition state for signal activation, the antagonist component of the binding "in vitro" can be derived by multiplying the apparent binding constant by (1-e) where e is the maximum stimulatory response. This component should be consistent throughout the tissues.

Conserved aromatic residues in the transmembrane region VI of the V1a vasopressin receptor differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding

Despite their opposite effects on signal transduction, the nonapeptide hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and its V1a receptor-selective cyclic peptide antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP display homologous primary structures, differing only at residues 1 and 2. These structural similarities led us to hypothesize that both ligands could interact with the same binding pocket in the V1a receptor. To determine receptor residues responsible for discriminating binding of agonist and antagonist ligands, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of conserved aromatic and hydrophilic residues as well as nonconserved residues, all located in the transmembrane binding pocket of the V1a receptor. Mutation of aromatic residues of transmembrane region VI (W304, F307, F308) reduced affinity for the d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP and markedly decreased affinity for the unrelated strongly hydrophobic V1a-selective nonpeptide antagonist SR 49059. Replacement of these aromatic residues had no effect on AVP binding, but increased AVP-induced coupling efficacy of the receptor for its G protein. Mutating hydrophilic residues Q108, K128 and Q185 in transmembrane regions II, III and IV, respectively, led to a decrease in affinity for both agonists and antagonists. Finally, the nonconserved residues T333 and A334 in transmembrane region VII, controlled the V1a/V2 binding selectivity for both nonpeptide and cyclic peptide antagonists. Thus, because conserved aromatic residues of the V1a receptor binding pocket seem essential for antagonists and do not contribute at all to the binding of agonists, we propose that these residues differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.

Molecular and regional targets of cocaine in primate brain: liberation from prosaic views

Abstract The neurochemical processes underlying initial exposure to and reinforcing effects of cocaine are not fully understood. An enduring hypothesis of cocaine addiction is based on an underlying premise that dopamine is the acute mediator of the rewarding effects of cocaine and this nefarious role extends through each phase of addiction. Cocaine is an effective inhibitor of the dopamine transporter, thereby increasing extracellular dopamine levels. Euphoria is attributed to the cocaine-induced inundation of extracellular dopamine and the withdrawal and craving for cocaine after cessation of drug use are attributed to neuroadaptive processes to dampen dopaminergic transmission. Nevertheless, our understanding of the role of dopamine transporter blockade in cocaine addiction is not fully understood. The objectives of this laboratory are to investigate the primary targets of cocaine in the brain, those associated with the initial phase of cocaine use and that can provide leads for investigating neuroadaptive processes that may trigger addiction. Two prosaic views of the neurobiology of cocaine addiction are examined in this review. The first is based on the assumption that the dopamine transporter contributes significantly to the stimulant and reinforcing effects of cocaine, and focuses on how stimulant drugs of abuse such as cocaine bind to the dopamine transporter. We present evidence that the widespread assumption that dopamine transporter blockers require an amine nitrogen in their structure is incorrect as non-amines are effective blockers of transporters. The second prosaic view, based on the assumption that the dopamine transporter fulfills a paramount role in cocaine addiction, is assessed in view of mounting evidence that the transporter may not account for the full spectrum of cocaine's effects. Other targets of cocaine, which may be relevant to the acute and chronic effects of cocaine, are presented.

Export from the endoplasmic reticulum represents the limiting step in the maturation and cell surface expression of the human delta opioid receptor

Synthesis and maturation of G protein-coupled receptors are complex events that require an intricate combination of processes that include protein folding, post-translational modifications, and transport through distinct cellular compartments. Relatively little is known about the nature and kinetics of specific steps involved in these processes. Here, the human delta opioid receptor expressed in human embryonic kidney 293S cells is used as a model to delineate these steps and to establish the kinetics of receptor synthesis, glycosylation, and transport. We found that the receptor is synthesized as a core-glycosylated M(r) 45,000 precursor that is converted to the fully mature M(r) 55,000 receptor with a half-time of about 120 min. In addition to trimming and processing of two N-linked oligosaccharides, maturation involves addition of O-glycans containing N-acetylgalactosamine, galactose, and sialic acid. In contrast to N-glycosylation, which is initiated co-translationally and is completed when the protein reaches the trans-Golgi network, O-glycosylation was found to occur only after the receptor exits from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and was terminated as early as the trans-Golgi cisternae. Once the carbohydrates are fully processed and the receptor reaches the trans-Golgi network, it is transported to the cell surface in about 10 min. The exit from the ER was found to be the limiting step in overall processing of the receptor. This indicates that early events in the folding of the receptor are probably rate-limiting and that receptor folding intermediates are retained in the ER until they can adopt the correct conformation. The overall low efficiency of receptor maturation, less than 50% of the precursor being processed to the fully glycosylated protein, further suggests that only a fraction of the synthesized receptors attain properly folded conformation that allows exit from the ER. This indicates that folding and ER export are key events in control of receptor cell surface expression. Whether or not the low efficiency of the ER export is a general feature among G protein-coupled receptors remains to be investigated.

Novel aromatic residues in transmembrane domains IV and V involved in agonist binding at alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors

We examined the role that aromatic residues located in the transmembrane helices of the alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor play in promoting antagonist binding. Since alpha(1)-antagonists display low affinity binding at beta(2)-adrenergic receptors, two phenylalanine residues, Phe-163 and Phe-187, of the alpha(1a)-AR were mutated to the corresponding beta(2)-residue. Neither F163Q nor F187A mutations of the alpha(1a) had any effect on the affinity of the alpha(1)-antagonists. However, the affinity of the endogenous agonist epinephrine was reduced 12.5- and 8-fold by the F163Q and F187A mutations, respectively. An additive loss in affinity (150-fold) for epinephrine was observed at an alpha(1a) containing both mutations. The loss of agonist affinity scenario could be reversed by a gain of affinity with mutation of the corresponding residues in the beta(2) to the phenylalanine residues in the alpha(1a). We propose that both Phe-163 and Phe-187 are involved in independent aromatic interactions with the catechol ring of agonists. The potency but not the efficacy of epinephrine in stimulating phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis was reduced 35-fold at the F163Q/F187A alpha(1a) relative to the wild type receptor. Therefore, Phe-163 and Phe-187 represent novel binding contacts in the agonist binding pocket of the alpha(1a)-AR, but are not involved directly in receptor activation.

A monoclonal antibody directed against an autoimmune epitope on the human beta1-adrenergic receptor recognized in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

A monoclonal antibody (MAb M16) was obtained by immunizing Balb/C mice with free peptide H26R, corresponding to the second extracellular loop of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor (beta1AR), against which functional autoantibodies have been detected in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The MAb was found to be of IgG2b type and directed against a conformational epitope, encompassing the sequence recognized by the human autoantibodies. BIAcore measurements yielded an equilibrium constant of 6.5 X 10(7) M1 with an association rate constant (kon) of 6.5 X 10(4) M(-1) sec(-1) and a dissociation rate constant (koff) of 1.0 X 10(-3) sec(-1). It immunoprecipitated only poorly the solubilized beta1AR of Sf9 cell membranes. Functionally, the MAb was capable of not only reducing the number of the maximal binding sites to the beta1-adrenergic receptor of transfected Sf9 cell membranes, but also of displaying a positive chronotropic effect on cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. These properties, which the MAb shares with the human autoantibodies, makes it an interesting tool for passive transfer studies in mice.

Biochemical and functional characterization of 1-benzyl substituted trimetoquinol affinity analogs on rat and human beta-adrenoceptors

The site of interaction for the 1-(3',4',5'-trimethoxybenzyl) group of trimetoquinol (TMQ) with beta-adrenoceptors (beta-ARs) is important for the rational design of highly potent and beta3-AR-selective analogs. 1-Benzyl ring-substituted TMQ analogs were evaluated for binding affinities and biochemical activities (cyclic AMP accumulations) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the rat and human beta3-AR, and for functional activities on isolated rat tissues. Binding affinities (K1 approximately 0.055 to 1.5 microM) for the rat beta3-AR and potencies for adenylyl cyclase activation (K(act) approximately 0.43 to 2;5 nM) of the 3'-monoiodo or 3',5'-diiodo derivatives with 4'-isothiocyanato-, 4'-amino, 4'-acetamido, or 4'-alpha-haloacetamido substitutions were higher than those of (-)-isoproterenol, and comparable to those of BRL 37344 [(+/-)-(R*,R*-[4-[2-[[2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-hydroxy-ethyl]amino]propyl]ph enoxy]-acetic acid sodium]. A similar rank order of binding affinities (K(i) approximately 0.11 to 2.5 microM) and potencies (K(act) approximately 0.45 to 9.5 nM) was obtained for TMQ analogs on the human beta3-AR. The 4'-acetamido and 4'-alpha-chloroacetamido analogs of 3',5'-diiodoTMQ were more potent than (-)-isoproterenol in rat atria (beta1-AR) and rat trachea (beta2-AR) and exhibited partial agonist activities, whereas full agonist activities were observed in rat esophageal smooth muscle (EC50 approximately 2-8 nM, beta3-AR). 4'-alpha-Chloroacetamido-3',5'-diiodoTMQ-mediated chronotropic responses in atria were sustained and resistant to washout. Further, the 4'-alpha-chloroacetamido and 4'-alpha-bromoacetamido analogs of 3',5'-diiodoTMQ demonstrated significant concentration-dependent irreversible binding to the rat beta3-AR. Reversible beta-AR agonists such as (-)-isoproterenol, BRL 37344, and 4'-acetamido-3',5'-diiodoTMQ or nucleophilic 1-amino acids (lysine, glutathione, cysteine) did not protect against this irreversible binding. Thus, the lipophilic 1-benzyl ring of TMQ analogs interacts with a hydrophobic region of the beta-AR that may represent an exo-site or an allosteric binding site.

Novel ligands lacking a positive charge for the delta- and mu-opioid receptors

Recently we reported using minilibraries to replace Lys(9) [somatostatin (SRIF) numbering] of the potent somatostatin agonist L-363,301 (c[-Pro-Phe-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Phe-]) to generate the potent neurokinin receptor (NK-1) antagonist c[-Pro-Phe-D-Trp-p-F-Phe-Thr-Phe-]. This novel cyclic hexapeptide did not bind the SRIF receptor. Thus, a single mutation converted L-363,301, a SRIF agonist with potency ca. 2-8 times the potency of SRIF in laboratory animals,(24) into a selective NK-1 receptor antagonist with an IC(50) of 2 nM in vitro. During the screening of the same libraries for ligands of the delta-opioid receptor, we identified four compounds (1-4) which represent a new class of delta-opioid antagonists, some of which were also NK-1 receptor antagonists. The most potent delta-opioid antagonist, c[-Pro-1-Nal-D-Trp-Tyr-Thr-Phe-] (2), showed a K(e) value of 128 nM in the mouse vas deferens assay and a delta-receptor binding affinity constant of 152 nM in the rat brain membrane binding assay. These results are of interest because they represent a novel class of delta-opioid antagonists and, like two previously reported delta-opioid antagonists, they lack a positive charge. To examine further the requirement for a positive charge in the delta-opioid ligands, we prepared two analogues of the beta-casomorphin-derived mixed mu-agonist/delta-antagonist, H-Dmt-c[-D-Orn-2-Nal-D-Pro-Gly-] (7), in which we eliminated the positive charge either through formylation of the primary amino group (5) or by the deletion of this N-terminal amino group (6). These latter compounds proved to be delta-opioid antagonists with K(e) values in the 16-120 nM range, as well as fairly potent mu-opioid antagonists (K(e) approximately 200 nM). These six compounds provide the most convincing evidence to date that there is no requirement for a positive charge in mu- and delta-opioid receptor antagonists. In addition, cyclic hexapeptide 4 lacks a phenolic hydroxyl group. Taken together, these data suggest that the prevailing assumptions about delta- and mu-opioid receptor binding need revision and that the receptors for these opioid ligands have much in common with the NK-1 and somatostatin receptors.

The human desipramine-sensitive noradrenaline transporter and the importance of defined amino acids for its function

1. This article gives a short overview of the physiology, pharmacology and the molecular biology of the human Na+/Cl(-)-dependent noradrenaline transporter (hNAT) and its gene. 2. Furthermore, naturally occurring variants of the hNAT are described and new results obtained through site-directed mutagenesis of the hNAT are presented, which increase our understanding about structural domains and amino acids critically involved in substrate, cosubstrate and inhibitor binding to the hNAT.

Modelling G-protein-coupled receptors for drug design

The G-protein coupled receptors form a large and diverse multi-gene superfamily with many important physiological functions. As such, they have become important targets in pharmaceutical research. Molecular modelling and site-directed mutagenesis have played an important role in our increasing understanding of the structural basis of drug action at these receptors. Aspects of this understanding, how these techniques can be used within a drug-design programme, and remaining challenges for the future are reviewed.

beta(1)- and beta(2)-Adrenoceptor antagonist activity of a series of para-substituted N-isopropylphenoxypropanolamines

To further explore the structure-activity relationships of beta-adrenoceptor (beta-AR) antagonists, a series of 25 para-substituted N-isopropylphenoxy-propanolamines were synthesised, nine of which are new compounds. All have been examined for their ability to antagonise beta(1)-ARs in rat atria and beta(2)-ARs in rat trachea. Substitution in the para-position of the phenyl ring is thought to confer beta(3)-specificity and the selectivity of these compounds for the beta(1)-AR ranges from 1.5-234. None of the compounds tested were selective for the beta(2)-AR. Of the 25 compounds studied, 22 had reasonable (pA(2) > 7) potencies for the rat beta(1)-AR. Only compound 1 displayed reasonable (pA(2) > 7) potency for the rat beta(2)-AR. Twenty two compounds were used as the training set for comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) of antagonist potency (pA(2)) at the rat beta(1)- and beta(2)-ARs. The inclusion of a number of additional physical characteristics improved the QSAR analysis over models derived solely using the CoMFA electrostatic and steric fields. The final models predicted the beta(1)- and beta(2)-AR potency of the compounds in the training set with high accuracy (r(2) = 0.93 and 0.86 respectively). The final beta(1)-AR model predicted the beta(1)-potencies of two out of the three test compounds, not included in the training set, with residual pA(2) values < -0.14, whereas the test compounds were not as well predicted by our final beta(2)-AR model (residual pA(2) values < -0.38).