1401
|
Sikkema KJ, Mulawa MI, Robertson C, Watt MH, Ciya N, Stein DJ, Cherenack EM, Choi KW, Kombora M, Joska JA. Improving AIDS Care After Trauma (ImpACT): Pilot Outcomes of a Coping intervention Among HIV-Infected Women with Sexual Trauma in South Africa. AIDS Behav 2018; 22:1039-1052. [PMID: 29270789 PMCID: PMC5828984 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-017-2013-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Improving AIDS Care after Trauma (ImpACT), a coping intervention for HIV-infected women with sexual abuse histories, was evaluated for feasibility and potential efficacy in a public clinic in Cape Town, South Africa. Sixty-four participants were enrolled prior to starting antiretroviral therapy (ART). After completing baseline assessments, participants were randomly assigned to standard of care (SoC: three adherence counseling sessions) or ImpACT (SoC plus four individual and three group sessions). Participants completed assessments at 3 months (after individual sessions) and 6 months post-baseline. In exploratory analysis of primary outcomes, ImpACT participants, compared to SoC, reported greater reductions in avoidance and arousal symptoms of PTSD and greater increases in ART adherence motivation at 3 months. Clinically significant decreases in overall PTSD symptoms were also demonstrated at 3 months. These effects continued as trends at the 6-month assessment, in addition to increases in social/spiritual coping. In analysis of secondary outcomes, high levels of non-adherence to ART and poor care engagement were evident at 6 months, with no differences between study arms. A trauma-focused, culturally-adapted individual intervention delivered by a non-specialist in the HIV care setting is feasible and acceptable. Preliminary findings suggest ImpACT has potential to reduce PTSD symptoms and increase ART adherence motivation, but a more intensive intervention may be needed to improve and maintain care engagement among this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02223390.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen J Sikkema
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, 417 Chapel Drive, Box 90086, Durham, NC, 27708-0086, USA.
| | - Marta I Mulawa
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Corne Robertson
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Melissa H Watt
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nonceba Ciya
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Dan J Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Emily M Cherenack
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Karmel W Choi
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matapelo Kombora
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - John A Joska
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
1402
|
Marsden J, Goetz C, Meynen T, Mitcheson L, Stillwell G, Eastwood B, Strang J, Grey N. Memory-Focused Cognitive Therapy for Cocaine Use Disorder: Theory, Procedures and Preliminary Evidence From an External Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial. EBioMedicine 2018; 29:177-189. [PMID: 29478874 PMCID: PMC5925454 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a debilitating condition with no NICE-recommended medication or specific psychosocial interventions. In the United Kingdom (UK), general counselling (treatment-as-usual; TAU) is widely delivered, but has limited effectiveness. We tested the feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of a novel, adjunctive psychosocial intervention for CUD, called 'memory-focused cognitive therapy' (MFCT). METHODS We did a two-arm, external pilot randomised controlled trial at a specialist community National Health Service addictions clinic in London, UK. 30 adults (≥18years), voluntarily seeking treatment for CUD (enrolled ≥14days; all with moderate-to-severe DSM5 CUD), were individually randomised (1:1) to a control group (ongoing TAU; 3×90min CUD cognitive conceptualisation assessments; 2×30min cocaine-related cue-induction procedures; and 3×30min research follow-ups); or to an intervention group (ongoing TAU; 3×90min cognitive conceptualisation assessments; 2×30min cocaine-related cue-induction procedures; 5×120min, one-to-one, MFCT sessions [in 1week]; and 3×60min research follow-ups and MFCT-relapse prevention). The primary outcome was the total percentage score on the frequency version of the Craving Experiences Questionnaire (CEQ-F) at 1-month follow-up after the intensive intervention week (clinical endpoint; recall period past 2weeks; higher score indicating greater craving). Secondary outcomes at the 1-month follow-up were percentage days abstinent (PDA) from cocaine, and longest period (days) of continuous abstinence (LPA) in the prior 28days. Outcomes were analysed as an unadjusted group mean difference (with Hedge's g effect size [ES]) and a 95% Confidence Interval [CI] for the primary outcome and a 90% CI for the secondary outcomes. Exploratory, multivariable linear (primary outcome) and Poisson regression models (secondary outcomes), with sex, age, months of regular cocaine use, baseline outcome score, and group estimated the effectiveness of the intervention. The trial is registered with the ISCRTN (ISRCTN16462783). FINDINGS Between July 15, 2015, and November 27, 2016, 58 patients were assessed for eligibility and 30 participants were randomised (14 to the control group and 16 to the intervention). With outcome data collected for all participants at the endpoint, the intervention group mean CEQ-F score (14·77; SD 21·47) was lower than the control group mean (51·75; SD 22·72); ES -1·62; 95% CI -2·45 to -0·80. MFCT was associated with more cocaine abstinence in the intervention group (PDA 85·94; SD 18·96) than the control group (PDA 54·59; SD 30·29); ES 1·19; 90% CI 0·54 to 1·84. There was also greater maximum abstinence in the intervention group (LPA 15·69; SD 10·10) than the control group (6·00; SD 7·36); ES 1·06; 90% CI 0·41 to 1·70. Exploratory, confounder-adjusted regression models for this preliminary effect supported the treatment association for reduced craving experiences (CEQ-F Coef. -28·25; 95% CI -45·15 to -11·35); more abstinence (PDA Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR] 1·56; 95% CI 1·31 to 1·88); and greater maximum abstinence (LPA IRR 2·56; 95% CI 1·96 to 3·35), although relative weak unmeasured confounding could overturn these model-adjusted exposure-outcome associations. There were four serious adverse events (among three participants). None were judged related to study procedures or interventions. INTERPRETATION In this first external pilot randomised controlled trial of MFCT for CUD, we have shown that the intervention and control procedures and acceptable feasible and safe, and report preliminary evidence that MFCT is associated with reduced craving and increased abstinence. These findings support progression to a substantive trial. FUNDING SOURCE UK National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Marsden
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
| | - Camille Goetz
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Meynen
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Luke Mitcheson
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Garry Stillwell
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Brian Eastwood
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - John Strang
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom; South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Grey
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
1403
|
Dean SG, Poltawski L, Forster A, Taylor RS, Spencer A, James M, Allison R, Stevens S, Norris M, Shepherd AI, Landa P, Pulsford RM, Hollands L, Calitri R. Community-based rehabilitation training after stroke: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (ReTrain) investigating acceptability and feasibility. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e018409. [PMID: 29449290 PMCID: PMC5829775 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Revised: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess acceptability and feasibility of trial processes and the Rehabilitation Training (ReTrain) intervention including an assessment of intervention fidelity. DESIGN A two-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial with parallel mixed methods process and economic evaluations. SETTING Community settings across two sites in Devon. PARTICIPANTS Eligible participants were: 18 years old or over, with a diagnosis of stroke and with self-reported mobility issues, no contraindications to physical activity, discharged from National Health Service or any other formal rehabilitation programme at least 1 month before, willing to be randomised to either control or ReTrain and attend the training venue, possessing cognitive capacity and communication ability sufficient to participate. Participants were individually randomised (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation sequence minimised for time since stroke and level of functional disability. Only outcome assessors independent of the research team were blinded to group allocation. INTERVENTIONS ReTrain comprised (1) an introductory one-to-one session; (2) ten, twice-weekly group classes with up to two trainers and eight clients; (3) a closing one-to-one session, followed by three drop-in sessions over the subsequent 3 months. Participants received a bespoke home-based training programme. All participants received treatment as usual. The control group received an exercise after stroke advice booklet. OUTCOME MEASURES Candidate primary outcomes included functional mobility and physical activity. RESULTS Forty-five participants were randomised (ReTrain=23; Control=22); data were available from 40 participants at 6 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=19) and 41 at 9 months of follow-up (ReTrain=21; Control=20). We demonstrated ability to recruit and retain participants. Participants were not burdened by the requirements of the study. We were able to calculate sample estimates for candidate primary outcomes and test procedures for process and health economic evaluations. CONCLUSIONS All objectives were fulfilled and indicated that a definitive trial of ReTrain is feasible and acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02429180; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anne Forster
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | | | | | - Martin James
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Rhoda Allison
- Torbay and Southern Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK
| | | | - Meriel Norris
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Brunel University London, London, UK
| | - Anthony I Shepherd
- Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Paolo Landa
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
1404
|
Downing KL, Salmon J, Hinkley T, Hnatiuk JA, Hesketh KD. Feasibility and Efficacy of a Parent-Focused, Text Message-Delivered Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in 2- to 4-Year-Old Children (Mini Movers): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6:e39. [PMID: 29426816 PMCID: PMC5889816 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite public health guidelines to limit sedentary behavior, many young children spend large amounts of time sedentary (eg, screen and sitting time) during waking hours. Objective The objective of this study was to test the feasibility and efficacy of a parent-focused, predominantly text message–delivered intervention to support parents to reduce the amount of time their children spend in sedentary behavior. Methods Mini Movers was a pilot randomized controlled trial delivered to parents of 2- to 4-year-old children in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were recruited through playgroups, social media, and snowball sampling. Eligibility criteria were having an ambulatory child (2-4 years), English literacy, and smartphone ownership. Participants were randomized to intervention or wait-list control on a 1:1 ratio after baseline data collection. The 6-week intervention was predominantly delivered via text messages, using a Web-based bulk text message platform managed by the interventionist. Intervention strategies focused on increasing parental knowledge, building self-efficacy, setting goals, and providing reinforcement, and were underpinned by the Coventry, Aberdeen & London-Refined taxonomy of behavior change techniques and social cognitive theory. The primary outcome was intervention feasibility, measured by recruitment, retention, intervention delivery, and fidelity; process evaluation questionnaires; and qualitative interviews with a subsample of participants. Secondary outcomes were children’s screen and restraint time (parent report), sitting time (parent report, activPAL), and potential mediators (parent report). Linear regression models were used to determine intervention effects on secondary outcomes, controlling for the child’s sex and age and clustering by playgroup; effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated. Results A total of 57 participants (30 intervention; 27 wait-list control) were recruited, and retention was high (93%). Process evaluation results showed that the intervention was highly acceptable to parents. The majority of intervention components were reported to be useful and relevant. Compared with children in the control group, children in the intervention group had significantly less screen time postintervention (adjusted difference [95% CI]=−35.0 [−64.1 to −5.9] min/day; Cohen's d=0.82). All other measures of sedentary behavior were in the expected direction, with small to moderate effect sizes. Conclusions Mini Movers was shown to be a feasible, acceptable, and efficacious pilot intervention for parents of young children, warranting a larger-scale randomized control trial. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials registry: ACTRN12616000628448; https://www.anzctr.org.au/ Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12616000628448p (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/ 6wZcA3cYM)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine L Downing
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Jo Salmon
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Trina Hinkley
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Jill A Hnatiuk
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Kylie D Hesketh
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
1405
|
Rahn A, Köpke S, Backhus I, Kasper J, Anger K, Untiedt B, Alegiani A, Kleiter I, Mühlhauser I, Heesen C. Nurse-led immunotreatment DEcision Coaching In people with Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) – Feasibility testing, pilot randomised controlled trial and mixed methods process evaluation. Int J Nurs Stud 2018; 78:26-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Revised: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
1406
|
McCaughan E, Curran C, Northouse L, Parahoo K. Evaluating a psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners: Outcomes and lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial. Appl Nurs Res 2018; 40:143-151. [PMID: 29579490 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2017] [Revised: 01/08/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study evaluated the process and outcome of a psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners. As more men survive prostate cancer, they and their partners need help and support to help them cope with the physical and psychosocial effects of the disease and treatment. There is a lack of psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer and their partners. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 34 participants to measure the effects of the intervention on selected psychosocial outcomes, post-intervention and at one month' follow-up. The nine-week program (CONNECT) consisted of three group and two telephone sessions. It focused on symptom management, sexual dysfunction, uncertainty management, positive thinking and couple communication. The outcomes, measured by validated tools were: self-efficacy, quality of life, symptom distress, communication, uncertainty and illness benefits. RESULTS The men in the intervention group did better on two outcomes (communication and support) than controls. Partners in the intervention group did better than controls on most outcomes. Less participants than expected participated in the trial. The reasons for non-participation included partners not wishing to participate, men not interested in group work, and not understanding the core purpose of the intervention. The cost of training facilitators and for delivering the intervention appeared to be low. CONCLUSION The knowledge generated from this study will be beneficial for all those grappling with the challenges of developing, implementing and evaluating complex psychosocial interventions. This study has also highlighted the difficulties in recruiting men and their partners in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eilis McCaughan
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK.
| | - Carol Curran
- Faculty of Life Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK.
| | | | - Kader Parahoo
- Institute of Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
1407
|
Cro S, Mehta S, Farhadi J, Coomber B, Cornelius V. Measuring skin necrosis in a randomised controlled feasibility trial of heat preconditioning on wound healing after reconstructive breast surgery: study protocol and statistical analysis plan for the PREHEAT trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:34. [PMID: 29375891 PMCID: PMC5773051 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0223-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Essential strategies are needed to help reduce the number of post-operative complications and associated costs for breast cancer patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery. Evidence suggests that local heat preconditioning could help improve the provision of this procedure by reducing skin necrosis. Before testing the effectiveness of heat preconditioning in a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT), we must first establish the best way to measure skin necrosis and estimate the event rate using this definition. Methods PREHEAT is a single-blind randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing local heat preconditioning, using a hot water bottle, against standard care on skin necrosis among breast cancer patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery. The primary objective of this study is to determine the best way to measure skin necrosis and to estimate the event rate using this definition in each trial arm. Secondary feasibility objectives include estimating recruitment and 30 day follow-up retention rates, levels of compliance with the heating protocol, length of stay in hospital and the rates of surgical versus conservative management of skin necrosis. The information from these objectives will inform the design of a larger definitive effectiveness and cost-effectiveness RCT. Discussion This article describes the PREHEAT trial protocol and detailed statistical analysis plan, which includes the pre-specified criteria and process for establishing the best way to measure necrosis. This study will provide the evidence needed to establish the best way to measure skin necrosis, to use as the primary outcome in a future RCT to definitively test the effectiveness of local heat preconditioning. The pre-specified statistical analysis plan, developed prior to unblinded data extraction, sets out the analysis strategy and a comparative framework to support a committee evaluation of skin necrosis measurements. It will increase the transparency of the data analysis for the PREHEAT trial. Trial registration ISRCTN ISRCTN15744669. Registered 25 February 2015 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-017-0223-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzie Cro
- 1Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Saahil Mehta
- 2Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jian Farhadi
- 2Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Victoria Cornelius
- 1Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1408
|
Westgård T, Ottenvall Hammar I, Holmgren E, Ehrenberg A, Wisten A, Ekdahl AW, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Wilhelmson K. Comprehensive geriatric assessment pilot of a randomized control study in a Swedish acute hospital: a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:41. [PMID: 29423259 PMCID: PMC5789623 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-018-0228-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) represent an important component of geriatric acute hospital care for frail older people, secured by a multidisciplinary team who addresses the multiple needs of physical health, functional ability, psychological state, cognition and social status. The primary objective of the pilot study was to determine feasibility for recruitment and retention rates. Secondary objectives were to establish proof of principle that CGA has the potential to increase patient safety. METHODS The CGA pilot took place at a University hospital in Western Sweden, from March to November 2016, with data analyses in March 2017. Participants were frail people aged 75 and older, who required an acute admission to hospital. Participants were recruited and randomized in the emergency room. The intervention group received CGA, a person-centered multidisciplinary team addressing health, participation, and safety. The control group received usual care. The main objective measured the recruitment procedure and retention rates. Secondary objectives were also collected regarding services received on the ward including discharge plan, care plan meeting and hospital risk assessments including risk for falls, nutrition, decubitus ulcers, and activities of daily living status. RESULT Participants were recruited from the emergency department, over 32 weeks. Thirty participants were approached and 100% (30/30) were included and randomized, and 100% (30/30) met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen participants were included in the intervention and 14 participants were included in the control. At baseline, 100% (16/16) intervention and 100% (14/14) control completed the data collection. A positive propensity towards the secondary objectives for the intervention was also evidenced, as this group received more care assessments. There was an average difference between the intervention and control in occupational therapy assessment - 0.80 [95% CI 1.06, - 0.57], occupational therapy assistive devices - 0.73 [95% CI 1.00, - 0.47], discharge planning -0.21 [95% CI 0.43, 0.00] and care planning meeting 0.36 [95% CI-1.70, -0.02]. Controlling for documented risk assessments, the intervention had for falls - 0.94 [95% CI 1.08, - 0.08], nutrition - 0.87 [95% CI 1.06, - 0.67], decubitus ulcers - 0.94 [95% CI 1.08, - 0.80], and ADL status - 0.80 [95% CI 1.04, - 0.57]. CONCLUSION The CGA pilot was feasible and proof that the intervention increased safety justifies carrying forward to a large-scale study. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials ID: NCT02773914. Registered 16 May 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Westgård
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens backe, House 2, Box 455, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre of Aging and Health-AGECAP, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Isabelle Ottenvall Hammar
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens backe, House 2, Box 455, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, The Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre of Aging and Health-AGECAP, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva Holmgren
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens backe, House 2, Box 455, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre of Aging and Health-AGECAP, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Ehrenberg
- School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
| | - Aase Wisten
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Geriatric Medicine, Sunderby Research Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Anne W. Ekdahl
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Division of Clinical geriatrics, Karolinska Institute (KI), Solna, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Helsingborg, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Synneve Dahlin-Ivanoff
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens backe, House 2, Box 455, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre of Aging and Health-AGECAP, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Katarina Wilhelmson
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Arvid Wallgrens backe, House 2, Box 455, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Centre of Aging and Health-AGECAP, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Geriatrics, The Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
1409
|
Wilson C, Rooshenas L, Paramasivan S, Elliott D, Jepson M, Strong S, Birtle A, Beard DJ, Halliday A, Hamdy FC, Lewis R, Metcalfe C, Rogers CA, Stein RC, Blazeby JM, Donovan JL. Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework. Trials 2018; 19:50. [PMID: 29351790 PMCID: PMC5775609 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2413-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research has shown that recruitment to trials is a process that stretches from identifying potentially eligible patients, through eligibility assessment, to obtaining informed consent. The length and complexity of this pathway means that many patients do not have the opportunity to consider participation. This article presents the development of a simple framework to document, understand and improve the process of trial recruitment. METHODS Eight RCTs integrated a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) into the main trial, feasibility or pilot study. Part of the QRI required mapping the patient recruitment pathway using trial-specific screening and recruitment logs. A content analysis compared the logs to identify aspects of the recruitment pathway and process that were useful in monitoring and improving recruitment. Findings were synthesised to develop an optimised simple framework that can be used in a wide range of RCTs. RESULTS The eight trials recorded basic information about patients screened for trial participation and randomisation outcome. Three trials systematically recorded reasons why an individual was not enrolled in the trial, and further details why they were not eligible or approached, or declined randomisation. A framework to facilitate clearer recording of the recruitment process and reasons for non-participation was developed: SEAR - Screening, to identify potentially eligible trial participants; Eligibility, assessed against the trial protocol inclusion/exclusion criteria; Approach, the provision of oral and written information and invitation to participate in the trial, and Randomised or not, with the outcome of randomisation or treatment received. CONCLUSIONS The SEAR framework encourages the collection of information to identify recruitment obstacles and facilitate improvements to the recruitment process. SEAR can be adapted to monitor recruitment to most RCTs, but is likely to add most value in trials where recruitment problems are anticipated or evident. Further work to test it more widely is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Wilson
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Sangeetha Paramasivan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Daisy Elliott
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Marcus Jepson
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Sean Strong
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Alison Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Land North, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire PR2 9HT UK
| | - David J. Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Alison Halliday
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| | - Freddie C. Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| | - Rebecca Lewis
- Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, SM2 5NG UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration University of Bristol, School of Social and Community Medicine, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Chris A. Rogers
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 7 Queens Building, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW UK
| | - Robert C. Stein
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7DN UK
| | - Jane M. Blazeby
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Jenny L. Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West, University Hospitals Bristol, 9th Floor, Whitefriars Lewins, Bristol, BS1 2NT UK
| |
Collapse
|
1410
|
Bell ML, Whitehead AL, Julious SA. Guidance for using pilot studies to inform the design of intervention trials with continuous outcomes. Clin Epidemiol 2018; 10:153-157. [PMID: 29403314 PMCID: PMC5779280 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s146397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A pilot study can be an important step in the assessment of an intervention by providing information to design the future definitive trial. Pilot studies can be used to estimate the recruitment and retention rates and population variance and to provide preliminary evidence of efficacy potential. However, estimation is poor because pilot studies are small, so sensitivity analyses for the main trial’s sample size calculations should be undertaken. Methods We demonstrate how to carry out easy-to-perform sensitivity analysis for designing trials based on pilot data using an example. Furthermore, we introduce rules of thumb for the size of the pilot study so that the overall sample size, for both pilot and main trials, is minimized. Results The example illustrates how sample size estimates for the main trial can alter dramatically by plausibly varying assumptions. Required sample size for 90% power varied from 392 to 692 depending on assumptions. Some scenarios were not feasible based on the pilot study recruitment and retention rates. Conclusion Pilot studies can be used to help design the main trial, but caution should be exercised. We recommend the use of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the design assumptions for a main trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie L Bell
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Amy L Whitehead
- Medical Statistics Group, Design, Trials and Statistics, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Steven A Julious
- Medical Statistics Group, Design, Trials and Statistics, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1411
|
Nikles J, Keijzers G, Mitchell G, Schug S, Ware R, McLean SA, Connelly L, Gibson S, Farrell SF, Sterling M. Pregabalin versus placebo in targeting pro-nociceptive mechanisms to prevent chronic pain after whiplash injury in at-risk individuals - a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:44. [PMID: 29343280 PMCID: PMC5773126 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2450-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) are an enormous and costly burden to Australian society. Up to 50% of people who experience a whiplash injury will never fully recover. Whiplash is resistant to treatment and no early management approach has yet been shown to prevent chronic pain. The early presence of central sensitization is associated with poor recovery. Pregabalin's effects on central sensitization indicate the potential to prevent or modulate these processes after whiplash injury and to improve health outcomes, but this has not been investigated. This paper describes the protocol for a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial of pregabalin plus evidence-based advice compared to placebo plus evidence-based advice for individuals with acute whiplash injury who are at risk of poor recovery. METHODS This double blind, placebo-controlled randomised feasibility study will examine the feasibility and potential effectiveness of pregabalin and evidence-based advice (intervention) compared to placebo and evidence-based advice (control) for individuals with acute whiplash injury at risk of poor recovery. Thirty participants (15 per group) aged 18-65 years with Grade II WAD, within 48 hours of injury and currently experiencing at least moderate pain (NRS: ≥ 5/10) will be recruited from Emergency Departments of public hospitals in Queensland, Australia. Pregabalin will be commenced at 75 mg bd and titrated up to 300 mg bd as tolerated for 4 weeks followed by 1 week of weaning. RESULTS The feasibility of trial procedures will be tested, as well as the potential effect of the intervention on the outcomes. The primary outcome of neck pain intensity at 3 months from randomisation will be compared between the treatment groups using standard analysis of variance techniques. DISCUSSION Feasibility and potential effectiveness data will inform an appropriately powered full trial, which if successful, will provide an effective and cost-effective intervention for a costly and treatment resistant condition. It will also have implications for the early management of other traumatic conditions beyond whiplash. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials Primary Registry: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12617000059369 . Date of Registration: 11/01/2017. Primary Trial Sponsor: The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Nikles
- Recover Injury Research Centre, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Recovery Following Road Traffic Injuries, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - G. Keijzers
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, Queensland Australia
- School of Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD Australia
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD Australia
| | - G. Mitchell
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - S. Schug
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - R. Ware
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - S. A. McLean
- Institute for Trauma Recovery, Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - L. Connelly
- Recover Injury Research Centre, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Recovery Following Road Traffic Injuries, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
- Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Dipartimento di Sociologia e Diritto dell’Economia, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S. Gibson
- Caulfield Pain Management and Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S. F. Farrell
- Recover Injury Research Centre, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Recovery Following Road Traffic Injuries, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - M. Sterling
- Recover Injury Research Centre, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Recovery Following Road Traffic Injuries, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
1412
|
O'Dolan C, Grant M, Lawrence M, Dall P. A randomised feasibility study to investigate the impact of education and the addition of prompts on the sedentary behaviour of office workers. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2018; 4:33. [PMID: 29372071 PMCID: PMC5769488 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0226-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Office workers have been identified as being at risk of accumulating high amounts of sedentary time in prolonged events during work hours, which has been associated with increased risk of a number of long-term health conditions. There is some evidence that providing advice to stand at regular intervals during the working day, and using computer-based prompts, can reduce sedentary behaviour in office workers. However, evidence of effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability for these types of intervention is currently limited. Methods A 2-arm, parallel group, cluster-randomised feasibility trial to assess the acceptability of prompts to break up sedentary behaviour was conducted with office workers in a commercial bank (n = 21). Participants were assigned to an education only group (EG) or prompt and education group (PG). Both groups received education on reducing and breaking up sitting at work, and the PG also received hourly prompts, delivered by Microsoft Outlook over 10 weeks, reminding them to stand. Objective measurements of sedentary behaviour were made using activPAL monitors worn at three time points: baseline, in the last 2 weeks of the intervention period and 12 weeks after the intervention. Focus groups were conducted to explore the acceptability of the intervention and the motivations and barriers to changing sedentary behaviour. Results Randomly generated, customised prompts, delivered by Microsoft Outlook, with messages about breaking up sitting, proved to be a feasible and acceptable way of delivering prompts to office workers. Participants in both groups reduced their sitting, but changes were not maintained at follow-up. The education session seemed to increase outcome expectations of the benefits of changing sedentary behaviour and promote self-regulation of behaviour in some participants. However, low self-efficacy and a desire to conform to cultural norms were barriers to changing behaviour. Conclusions Prompts delivered by Microsoft Outlook were a feasible, low-cost way of prompting office workers to break up their sedentary behaviour, although further research is needed to determine whether this has an additional impact on sedentary behaviour, to education alone. The role of cultural norms, and promoting self-efficacy, should be considered in the design of future interventions. Trial registration This study was registered retrospectively as a clinical trial on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID no. NCT02609282) on 23 March 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona O'Dolan
- Institute for Applied Health Research, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 OBA UK
| | - Margaret Grant
- Institute for Applied Health Research, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 OBA UK
| | - Maggie Lawrence
- Institute for Applied Health Research, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 OBA UK
| | - Philippa Dall
- Institute for Applied Health Research, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 OBA UK
| |
Collapse
|
1413
|
Patterson JM, Fay M, Exley C, McColl E, Breckons M, Deary V. Feasibility and acceptability of combining cognitive behavioural therapy techniques with swallowing therapy in head and neck cancer dysphagia. BMC Cancer 2018. [PMID: 29291726 DOI: 10.1186/s12885‐017‐3892‐2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma (HNSSC) patients report substantial rates of clinically significant depression and/or anxiety, with dysphagia being a predictor of distress and poorer quality of life. Evidence-based dysphagia interventions largely focus on the remediation of physical impairment. This feasibility study evaluates an intervention which simultaneously uses a psychological therapy approach combined with swallowing impairment rehabilitation. METHODS This prospective single cohort mixed-methods study, recruited HNSCC patients with dysphagia, from two institutions. The intervention combined Cognitive Behavioural Therapy with swallowing therapy (CB-EST), was individually tailored, for up to 10 sessions and delivered by a speech and language therapist. Primary acceptability and feasibility measures included recruitment and retention rates, data completion, intervention fidelity and the responsiveness of candidate outcome measures. Measures included a swallowing questionnaire (MDADI), EORTC-QLQH&N35, dietary restrictions scale, fatigue and function scales and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), administered pre-, post-CB-EST with three month follow-up and analysed using repeated measures ANOVA. Qualitative interviews were conducted to evaluate intervention processes. RESULTS A total of 30/43 (70%) eligible patients agreed to participate and 25 completed the intervention. 84% were male, mean age 59 yrs. Patients were between 1 and 60 months (median 4) post-cancer treatment. All patients had advanced stage disease, treated with surgery and radiotherapy (38%) or primary chemoradiotherapy (62%). Pre to post CB-EST data showed improvements in MDADI scores (p = 0.002), EORTC-QLQH&N35 (p = 0.006), dietary scale (p < 0.0001), fatigue (p = 0.002) but no change in function scales or HADS. Barriers to recruitment were the ability to attend regular appointments and patient suitability or openness to a psychological-based intervention. CONCLUSIONS CB-EST is a complex and novel intervention, addressing the emotional, behavioural and cognitive components of dysphagia alongside physical impairment. Preliminary results are promising. Further research is required to evaluate efficacy and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Patterson
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, The Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK. .,Speech & Language Therapy Department, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK.
| | | | - C Exley
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - E McColl
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, The Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - M Breckons
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, The Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - V Deary
- Psychology Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1414
|
Feasibility and acceptability of combining cognitive behavioural therapy techniques with swallowing therapy in head and neck cancer dysphagia. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1. [PMID: 29291726 PMCID: PMC5748941 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3892-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma (HNSSC) patients report substantial rates of clinically significant depression and/or anxiety, with dysphagia being a predictor of distress and poorer quality of life. Evidence-based dysphagia interventions largely focus on the remediation of physical impairment. This feasibility study evaluates an intervention which simultaneously uses a psychological therapy approach combined with swallowing impairment rehabilitation. Methods This prospective single cohort mixed-methods study, recruited HNSCC patients with dysphagia, from two institutions. The intervention combined Cognitive Behavioural Therapy with swallowing therapy (CB-EST), was individually tailored, for up to 10 sessions and delivered by a speech and language therapist. Primary acceptability and feasibility measures included recruitment and retention rates, data completion, intervention fidelity and the responsiveness of candidate outcome measures. Measures included a swallowing questionnaire (MDADI), EORTC-QLQH&N35, dietary restrictions scale, fatigue and function scales and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), administered pre-, post-CB-EST with three month follow-up and analysed using repeated measures ANOVA. Qualitative interviews were conducted to evaluate intervention processes. Results A total of 30/43 (70%) eligible patients agreed to participate and 25 completed the intervention. 84% were male, mean age 59 yrs. Patients were between 1 and 60 months (median 4) post-cancer treatment. All patients had advanced stage disease, treated with surgery and radiotherapy (38%) or primary chemoradiotherapy (62%). Pre to post CB-EST data showed improvements in MDADI scores (p = 0.002), EORTC-QLQH&N35 (p = 0.006), dietary scale (p < 0.0001), fatigue (p = 0.002) but no change in function scales or HADS. Barriers to recruitment were the ability to attend regular appointments and patient suitability or openness to a psychological-based intervention. Conclusions CB-EST is a complex and novel intervention, addressing the emotional, behavioural and cognitive components of dysphagia alongside physical impairment. Preliminary results are promising. Further research is required to evaluate efficacy and effectiveness.
Collapse
|
1415
|
Shrier LA, Burke PJ, Kells M, Scherer EA, Sarda V, Jonestrask C, Xuan Z, Harris SK. Pilot randomized trial of MOMENT, a motivational counseling-plus-ecological momentary intervention to reduce marijuana use in youth. Mhealth 2018; 4:29. [PMID: 30148142 PMCID: PMC6087802 DOI: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.07.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) influence behavior in real time, in real life. We evaluated trial feasibility and preliminary efficacy of MOMENT, a counseling-plus-EMI to reduce frequent marijuana use in youth in primary care. METHODS Primary care patients age 15-24 years using marijuana at least 3 times/week were randomized to MOMENT [motivational enhancement therapy (MET)/smartphone-based momentary assessment/responsive motivational messaging] vs. No-messages (MET/momentary assessment) vs. MET-only. In MOMENT, two MET sessions were followed by 2 weeks of momentary assessment of marijuana use and factors related to use, with motivational messaging displayed after report of marijuana triggers, desire, use, and effort to avoid use. We evaluated study feasibility (recruitment, retention, and response rates; feedback survey responses) and explored intervention effects on marijuana desire and use at three months with linear mixed effects modeling. RESULTS Seventy youth [mean (M) =20.7 years, 60% female] were assigned to MOMENT (n=27), No-messages (n=15; assignment suspended to enrich other arms), or MET-only (n=28). Most attrition occurred during baseline, before MET. Of those completing MET session 1, 82% completed their assigned treatment and 79% provided 3-month data. Participants highly rated acceptability; comments reflected changing motivation and behavior. Across arms, participants reported significantly lower marijuana use, desire, and problems at follow-up vs. baseline. Momentary marijuana desire declined more in MOMENT vs. MET-only. Marijuana use following a targeted context or behavior was less likely in MOMENT and No-messages, vs. MET-only. CONCLUSIONS The MOMENT intervention is feasible to deliver, acceptable, and potentially efficacious in reducing marijuana desire and use among adolescent and young adults in primary care. A larger randomized trial to evaluate efficacy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia A. Shrier
- Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Pamela J. Burke
- Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- School of Nursing, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Meredith Kells
- Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Emily A. Scherer
- Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Vishnudas Sarda
- Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cassandra Jonestrask
- Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ziming Xuan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| | - Sion Kim Harris
- Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1416
|
Health services research as a framework for expanding a whole systems research agenda in complementary and integrative medicine: The example of intestinal permeability. Eur J Integr Med 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
1417
|
Story DA, Leslie K, French C. Feasibility and Pilot Studies: Small Steps before Giant Leaps. Anaesth Intensive Care 2018; 46:11-12. [DOI: 10.1177/0310057x1804600103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D. A. Story
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria
| | - K. Leslie
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria
| | - C. French
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria
| |
Collapse
|
1418
|
Saito G, Zapata R, Rivera R, Zambrano H, Rojas D, Acevedo H, Ravera F, Mosquera J, Vásquez JE, Mura J. Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A randomized pilot trial of pharmaconutrition. Surg Neurol Int 2017; 8:304. [PMID: 29404191 PMCID: PMC5764917 DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_266_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional recovery after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains a significant problem. We tested a novel therapeutic approach with long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) to assess the safety and feasibility of an effectiveness trial. METHODS We conducted a multicentre, parallel, randomized, open-label pilot trial. Patients admitted within 72 hours after SAH with modified Fisher scale scores of 3 or 4 who were selected for scheduled aneurysm clipping were allocated to receive either n-3 PUFA treatment (parenteral perioperative: 5 days; oral: 8 weeks) plus usual care or usual care alone. Exploratory outcome measures included major postoperative intracranial bleeding complications (PIBCs), cerebral infarction caused by delayed cerebral ischemia, shunt-dependent hydrocephalus, and consent rate. The computed tomography evaluator was blinded to the group assignment. RESULTS Forty-one patients were randomized, but one patient had to be excluded after allocation. Twenty patients remained for intention to treat analysis in each trial arm. No PIBs (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.00 to 0.16) or other unexpected harm were observed in the intervention group (IG). No patient suspended the intervention due to side effects. There was a trend towards improvements in all benefit-related outcomes in the IG. The overall consent rate was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.78 to 0.96), and there was no consent withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS Although the balance between the benefit and harm of the intervention appears highly favourable, further testing on SAH patients is required. We recommend proceeding with amendments in a dose-finding trial to determine the optimal duration of parenteral treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geisi Saito
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Instituto de Neurocirugía Asenjo, Providencia, Santiago, Chile
| | - Rodrigo Zapata
- Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Regional Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins, Rancagua, Santiago, Chile
| | - Rodrigo Rivera
- Chief of Neuroradiology Service, Instituto de Neurocirugía Asenjo, Providencia, Santiago, Chile
| | - Héctor Zambrano
- Neurology Service, Hospital Regional Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins, Rancagua, Santiago, Chile
| | - David Rojas
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Neurosurgery Service, Instituto de Neurocirugía Asenjo, Providencia, Santiago, Chile
| | - Hernán Acevedo
- Neurosurgery Service, Instituto de Neurocirugía Asenjo, Providencia, Santiago, Chile
| | - Franco Ravera
- Chief of Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Regional Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins, Rancagua, and Department of Neurosurgery, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - John Mosquera
- Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Regional Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins, Rancagua, Santiago, Chile
| | - Juan E. Vásquez
- Neurosurgery Service, Hospital Regional Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins, Rancagua, Santiago, Chile
| | - Jorge Mura
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Chief of Cerebrovascular and Skull Base Surgery, Instituto de Neurocirugía Asenjo, Providencia, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
1419
|
Heron N, Kee F, Mant J, Reilly PM, Cupples M, Tully M, Donnelly M. Stroke Prevention Rehabilitation Intervention Trial of Exercise (SPRITE) - a randomised feasibility study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017; 17:290. [PMID: 29233087 PMCID: PMC5727948 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-017-0717-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke is untested despite these conditions sharing similar pathology and risk factors to coronary heart disease. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a trial of an adapted home-based CR programme, 'The Healthy Brain Rehabilitation Manual', for patients following a TIA/minor stroke, participants' views on the intervention and, to identify the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) used. METHODS Clinicians were asked to identify patients attending the Ulster Hospital, Belfast within 4 weeks of a first TIA or minor stroke. Those who agreed to participate underwent assessments of physical fitness, cardiovascular risk, quality of life and mental health, before random allocation to: Group (1) standard/usual care; (2) rehabilitation manual or (3) manual plus pedometer. All participants received telephone support at 1 and 4 weeks, reassessment at 6 weeks and an invitation to a focus group exploring views regarding the study. Two trained review authors independently assessed the manual to identify the BCTs used. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients were invited to participate, with 15 (10 men, 5 women; 9 TIA, 6 minor stroke; mean age 69 years) consenting and completing the study. Mean time to enrolment from the TIA/stroke was 20.5 days. Participants completed all assessment measures except VO2max testing, which all declined. The manual and telephone contact were viewed positively, as credible sources of advice. Pedometers were valued highly, particularly for goal-setting. Overall, 36 individual BCTs were used, the commonest being centred around setting goals and planning as well as social support. CONCLUSION Recruitment and retention rates suggest that a trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel home-based CR programme, implemented within 4 weeks of a first TIA/minor stroke is feasible. The commonest BCTs used within the manual revolve around goals, planning and social support, in keeping with UK national guidelines. The findings from this feasibility work have been used to further refine the next stage of the intervention's development, a pilot study. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02712385 . This study was registered prospectively on 18/03/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Heron
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
- Centre for Public Health Research, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
- UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Belfast, Northern Ireland
- Department of General Practice, Queen’s University, Dunluce Health Centre, Level 4, 1 Dunluce Avenue, Belfast, BT9 7HR UK
| | - Frank Kee
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
- Centre for Public Health Research, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
- UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Jonathan Mant
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip M. Reilly
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Representative for SPRITE Studies, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Margaret Cupples
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
- Centre for Public Health Research, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
- UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Mark Tully
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
- Centre for Public Health Research, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
- UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
- Centre for Public Health Research, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
- UKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health Research (NI), Belfast, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
1420
|
Tibbitts B, Porter A, Sebire SJ, Metcalfe C, Bird E, Powell J, Jago R. Action 3:30R: protocol for a cluster randomised feasibility study of a revised teaching assistant-led extracurricular physical activity intervention for 8- to 10-year-olds. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 3:69. [PMID: 29225913 PMCID: PMC5719560 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0213-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately half of 7-year-old children do not meet physical activity (PA) recommendations. Interventions targeting primary school children’s afterschool discretionary time could increase PA. Teaching assistants (TAs) are a school resource and could be trained to deliver after-school PA programmes. Building on earlier work, this paper describes the protocol for a cluster randomised feasibility study of a teaching assistant-led after-school intervention aimed at increasing PA levels of year 4 and 5 children (8–10 years old). Methods Phase 1—pre-baseline: 12 schools will be recruited. In all schools, self-reported PA will be measured in all consenting year 3 and 4 children. In four schools, pupils will additionally wear a waist-worn Actigraph accelerometer for 7 days. Phase 2—baseline: schools will be randomised to one of two enhanced recruitment strategies being tested for children: (1) a club briefing and (2) the briefing plus a taster Action 3:30 session. Up to 30 children per school will be able to attend Action 3:30 sessions and will provide baseline data on height, weight, psychosocial variables and accelerometer-measured PA. Phase 3—intervention and follow-up: Schools randomised into intervention or control arm. Intervention schools (n = 6) will receive a 15-week after-school programme when children are in years 4 and 5, run by TAs who have attended a 25-h Action 3:30 training programme. Control schools (n = 6) will continue with normal practice. Follow-up measures will be a repeat of baseline measures at the end of the 15-week intervention. Phase 4—process evaluation: session attendance, perceived enjoyment and perceived exertion will be assessed during the intervention, as well as the economic impact on schools. Post-study qualitative assessments with TAs, school contacts and pupils will identify how the programme could be refined. Accelerometer-determined minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day will be calculated as this is likely to be the primary outcome in a future definitive trial. Discussion The Action 3:30 cluster randomised feasibility trial will assess the public health potential of this intervention approach and provide the information necessary to progress to a definitive cluster randomised controlled trial. Trial registration ISRCTN34001941. Registered 01/12/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byron Tibbitts
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ UK
| | - Alice Porter
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ UK
| | - Simon J Sebire
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emma Bird
- Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane Powell
- Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
| | - Russell Jago
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, 8 Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TZ UK.,The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1421
|
A multi-center pragmatic, randomized, feasibility trial comparing standard of care schedules of filgrastim administration for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 168:371-379. [PMID: 29214415 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4604-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The most effective duration of filgrastim as primary febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis in early breast cancer (EBC) patients is unknown. Despite significant differences in cost and toxicity, no prospective trial has been performed to optimize practice. We assessed the feasibility of using a novel pragmatic trial model to compare the most commonly used schedules of filgrastim. METHODS Early breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy were randomized to 5, 7, or 10 days of filgrastim as primary FN prophylaxis. The trial methodology integrated broad eligibility criteria, simply defined endpoints, an integrated consent model incorporating oral consent, and web-based randomization in the clinic. Feasibility was reflected through a combination of primary endpoints including patient and physician engagement (if > 50% of appropriate patients approached agree to participate, and if > 50% of physicians approached patients for the study). Secondary endpoints included the first occurrence rates of FN, treatment-related hospital admission, or chemotherapy dose reductions/delays/discontinuation. RESULTS From May 2015 to August 2016, 142/149 (95.3%) patients approached agreed to participate and were randomized. Seventeen of 24 (70.8%) medical oncologists approached and randomized patients. The 142 patients received a total of 495 cycles of chemotherapy. Aggregate incidences of a first event by patient were FN (8/142, 5.6%), treatment-related hospitalization (6/142, 4.2%), chemotherapy discontinuation (7/142, 4.9%), chemotherapy delays (5/142, 3.5%), and chemotherapy dose reduction (18/142, 12.7%). Overall, 31.7% (45/142) of patients and 9.0% (45/495) of chemotherapy cycles were associated with one of these first events. CONCLUSION This study met its feasibility endpoints. This novel pragmatic trial approach offers a means of comparing standard of care treatments in a practical and cost-effective manner. The trial will now be expanded to compare rates of FN between the three filgrastim schedules. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02428114.
Collapse
|
1422
|
Abstract
This paper presents ‘Tips’ for researchers of brain impairment who are interested in conducting randomised controlled trials. The paper is intended for researchers who are planning to undertake their first trial, but may also be of interest to more experienced trialists or clinicians who want to further their understandings of clinical trials. The Tips include suggestions for how to design, conduct, analyse and report clinical trials.
Collapse
|
1423
|
Russell A, Cooper K, Barton S, Ensum I, Gaunt D, Horwood J, Ingham B, Kessler D, Metcalfe C, Parr J, Rai D, Wiles N. Protocol for a feasibility study and randomised pilot trial of a low-intensity psychological intervention for depression in adults with autism: the Autism Depression Trial (ADEPT). BMJ Open 2017; 7:e019545. [PMID: 29203509 PMCID: PMC5736092 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Revised: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High rates of co-occurring depression are reported in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a neurodevelopmental condition characterised by social communication impairments and repetitive behaviours. Cognitive-behavioural interventions adapted for ASD have been effective for anxiety problems. There have been evaluation studies of group cognitive-behavioural therapy for co-occurring depression, but no randomised trials investigating low-intensity psychological interventions as recommended in clinical guidelines for mild-moderate depression. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A feasibility study comprising a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and nested qualitative evaluation is under way as preparation for a definitive RCT. Participants (n=70) will be randomised to Guided Self-Help: a low-intensity psychological intervention based on behavioural activation adapted for ASD or treatment as usual. Outcomes including depression symptoms, anxiety, social function and service use will be measured at 10, 16 and 24 weeks postrandomisation and will be blind to group allocation for measures that are not self-administered. The analysis will aim to establish the rates of recruitment and retention for a larger-scale RCT as well as the most appropriate measure of depression to serve as primary outcome. The qualitative study will purposively sample up to 24 participants from each treatment group to consider the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention and the trial design. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been received from WALES REC 3 (IRAS project ID: 191558) and the Health Research Authority with R&D approval from Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership and Northumberland, Tyne and Wear Foundation NHS Trusts. To our knowledge, this is the first study of a low-intensity intervention for depression in adults with autism. The results will inform the design of a definitive RCT. Dissemination will include peer-reviewed journal publications reporting the quantitative and qualitative research findings of the study and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN54650760; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ailsa Russell
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Kate Cooper
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Stephen Barton
- Newcastle Cognitive and Behaviour Therapies (CBT) Centre, Northumberland Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- School of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingtom
| | - Ian Ensum
- Bristol Adult Autism Services, Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Chippenham, UK
| | - Daisy Gaunt
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeremy Horwood
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Barry Ingham
- Northumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Northumberland, UK
- Institute of Neuroscience, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
| | - David Kessler
- Population Health Sciences, School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeremy Parr
- Institute of Neuroscience, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
| | - Dheeraj Rai
- Population Health Sciences, School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Wiles
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1424
|
Marsden J, Goetz C, Meynen T, Mitcheson L, Stillwell G, Eastwood B, Strang J, Grey N. Memory-focused cognitive therapy for cocaine use disorder: Rationale, design and protocol for an external pilot randomised controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2017; 8:264-273. [PMID: 29696218 PMCID: PMC5898541 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a debilitating condition characterised by maladaptive cocaine-related memories and impaired cognitive and behavioural control. There are no evidence-supported pharmacotherapies and only weakly effective psychological interventions specific for CUD. Our novel Memory-focused Cognitive Therapy (MFCT) aims to modify cocaine-related memories to reduce craving and drug use. METHODS This is a single-centre (outpatient), 15-week, two-arm, pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) to address feasibility, safety, quality and preliminary efficacy. Thirty participants (adults ≥18 years; current CUD) will receive ongoing standard care (treatment-as-usual [TAU]) during the study and will be randomised (1:1) to a control or intervention group. The control group will receive 3 × 90min CUD cognitive case conceptualisation assessments and 2 × 30min cocaine-related cue-induction procedures (in vivo presentation of images and objects). Experimental group participants will receive 3 × 90min CUD cognitive case conceptualisation assessments; 2 × 30min cue-induction procedures; and individual MFCT (5 × 120min; daily for 1 week; with 3 relapse prevention follow-ups over 3-months). All study participants will complete research follow-ups at 1-week, 1-month and 3-months. The experimental and control groups will be compared on the mean score on the frequency version of the Craving Experience Questionnaire at 1-month (primary outcome measure). Secondary outcomes include: percentage of days abstinent and longest period of continuous abstinence from cocaine (past 28-days at 1-month follow-up); urine drug screen and CUD diagnosis (DSM-5). CONCLUSIONS We will conduct a full external pilot RCT of a novel, MFCT for CUD. The findings will inform the case, and necessary modifications, for a substantive study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Marsden
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Camille Goetz
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Meynen
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Luke Mitcheson
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Garry Stillwell
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Brian Eastwood
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - John Strang
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Grey
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
1425
|
Barton CJ, Merolli MA. It is time to replace publish or perish with get visible or vanish: opportunities where digital and social media can reshape knowledge translation. Br J Sports Med 2017; 53:594-598. [PMID: 29146754 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christian J Barton
- La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark A Merolli
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Health and Biomedical Informatics Centre, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
1426
|
Webster GA, Sim DA, La Flamme AC, Mayo NE. Evaluation of neurological changes in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients treated with immune modulator MIS416: results from a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 3:60. [PMID: 29177070 PMCID: PMC5689160 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0201-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While disease progression can be readily monitored in early stage relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), it is more challenging for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). This advanced stage of disease has distinct pathophysiology due to compartmentalization of neuroinflammatory activity within the central nervous system, resulting in increased incidence and severity of cognitive dysfunction. The shift in the dominant disease pathways is underscored by the failure of relapsing therapies to benefit SPMS patients, highlighting the need for novel treatment strategies and clinical trial endpoints that are well-aligned with potential benefits. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is widely used but is weighted towards ambulatory ability, lacking sensitivity to other aspects of neurological impairment experienced in more severely disabled SPMS patients, so may not effectively capture their clinical status.To investigate the feasibility of an alternative clinical trial endpoint model for a phase 2B trial of an immune modulator for SPMS, the potential for treatment efficacy-based patient-centered outcomes was assessed within the context of a before and after, 12-week clinical trial of safety and tolerability. METHODS Patients treated with MIS416 for 12 weeks were evaluated for clinical status at baseline and end of dosing, using the established Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite, Short Form Health Survey, and Expanded Disability Status Scale. Responder status was determined for eight outcome measures based on minimally important change, defined using published studies. To evaluate the patients' immune response to MIS416, blood plasma samples collected at baseline and pre- and 24-h post doses 1-4 were analyzed using multiplex cytokine quantification assays. RESULTS Using a combination of patient-centered outcomes, MIS416 treatment was associated with improved clinical status for 10/11 patients: eight patients showed improvement on two to five outcome measures, five of which also showed improvement by EDSS. Multi-dimensional scaling analysis of MIS416-induced factors quantified in individual patients, revealed immune response patterns which had a strong concordance with the extent of the patients' clinical response. CONCLUSIONS The data support the feasibility of using patient-centered outcomes as additional clinical trial endpoints, for determining the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies, in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01191996.
Collapse
|
1427
|
Chan CL, Leyrat C, Eldridge SM. Quality of reporting of pilot and feasibility cluster randomised trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016970. [PMID: 29122791 PMCID: PMC5695336 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Revised: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review the quality of reporting of pilot and feasibility of cluster randomised trials (CRTs). In particular, to assess (1) the number of pilot CRTs conducted between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2014, (2) whether objectives and methods are appropriate and (3) reporting quality. METHODS We searched PubMed (2011-2014) for CRTs with 'pilot' or 'feasibility' in the title or abstract; that were assessing some element of feasibility and showing evidence the study was in preparation for a main effectiveness/efficacy trial. Quality assessment criteria were based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extensions for pilot trials and CRTs. RESULTS Eighteen pilot CRTs were identified. Forty-four per cent did not have feasibility as their primary objective, and many (50%) performed formal hypothesis testing for effectiveness/efficacy despite being underpowered. Most (83%) included 'pilot' or 'feasibility' in the title, and discussed implications for progression from the pilot to the future definitive trial (89%), but fewer reported reasons for the randomised pilot trial (39%), sample size rationale (44%) or progression criteria (17%). Most defined the cluster (100%), and number of clusters randomised (94%), but few reported how the cluster design affected sample size (17%), whether consent was sought from clusters (11%), or who enrolled clusters (17%). CONCLUSIONS That only 18 pilot CRTs were identified necessitates increased awareness of the importance of conducting and publishing pilot CRTs and improved reporting. Pilot CRTs should primarily be assessing feasibility, avoiding formal hypothesis testing for effectiveness/efficacy and reporting reasons for the pilot, sample size rationale and progression criteria, as well as enrolment of clusters, and how the cluster design affects design aspects. We recommend adherence to the CONSORT extensions for pilot trials and CRTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire L Chan
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Clémence Leyrat
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sandra M Eldridge
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1428
|
Lione R, Brunelli V, Franchi L, Pavoni C, Quiroga Souki B, Cozza P. Mandibular response after rapid maxillary expansion in class II growing patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod 2017; 18:36. [PMID: 29105023 PMCID: PMC5673058 DOI: 10.1186/s40510-017-0189-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 09/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the sagittal mandibular response induced by rapid maxillary expansion (RME) therapy in mixed dentition patients with class II malocclusion, comparing the effects of bonded RME and banded RME with a matched untreated class II control group. Methods This RCT was designed in parallel with an allocation ratio of 1:1:1. The sample consisted of 30 children with a mean age of 8.1 ± 0.6 years who were randomly assigned to three groups: group 1 treated with bonded RME, group 2 treated with banded RME, and group 3 the untreated control group. All patients met the following inclusion criteria: early mixed dentition, class II molar relationship, transverse discrepancy ≥ 4 mm, overjet ≥ 5 mm, and prepubertal skeletal maturity stage (CS1–CS2). The expansion screw was activated one quarter of a turn per day (0.25 mm) until overcorrection was reached. For each subject, lateral cephalograms and plaster casts were obtained before treatment (T1) and after 1 year (T2). A randomization list was created for the group assignment, with an allocation ratio of 1:1:1. The observer who performed all the measurements was blinded to group assignment. The study was single-blinded in regard to statistical analysis. Results RME was effective in the correction of maxillary deficiency. Class II patients treated with both types of RME showed no significant improvement of the anteroposterior relationship of the maxilla and the mandible at both skeletal and occlusal levels. The acrylic splint RME had significant effects on reducing the skeletal vertical dimension and the gonial angle. Conclusions The orthopedic expansion did not affect the sagittal relationship of class II patients treated in the early mixed dentition when compared with the untreated control group. Additional studies with a larger sample are warranted to elucidate individual variations in dento-skeletal mandibular response to the maxillary expansion protocol in class-II-growing patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT03159962.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Lione
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy. .,Department of Dentistry UNSBC, Tirana, Albania.
| | - Valerio Brunelli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.,Department of Dentistry UNSBC, Tirana, Albania
| | - Lorenzo Franchi
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Thomas M. Graber Visiting Scholar, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Chiara Pavoni
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.,Department of Dentistry UNSBC, Tirana, Albania
| | - Bernardo Quiroga Souki
- School of Dentistry, Orthodontics, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Paola Cozza
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford, 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.,Department of Dentistry UNSBC, Tirana, Albania
| |
Collapse
|
1429
|
Clay PG. Do you want to matter? J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2017; 57:755. [PMID: 29092767 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
1430
|
Kuk NO, Bours GJ, Hamers JP, Kempen GI, Zijlstra GR. Feasibility of the Translating Innovations into Practice-toolbox (TIP-toolbox): A mixed-methods study for implementing activity innovations in nursing homes. Geriatr Nurs 2017; 38:498-504. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Revised: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
1431
|
Feasibility of a multi-modal exercise program on cognition in older adults with Type 2 diabetes - a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17:237. [PMID: 29037162 PMCID: PMC5644140 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0635-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased risk of dementia. We aimed to determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the efficacy of exercise on cognition and brain structure in people with T2D. METHODS A 6-month pilot parallel RCT of a progressive aerobic- and resistance-training program versus a gentle movement control group in people with T2D aged 50-75 years (n = 50) at the University of Tasmania, Australia. Assessors were blinded to group allocation. Brain volume (total, white matter, hippocampus), cortical thickness and white matter microstructure (fractional anisotrophy and mean diffusivity) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging, and cognition using a battery of neuropsychological tests. Study design was assessed by any changes (during the pilot or recommended) to the protocol, recruitment by numbers screened and time to enrol 50 participants; randomisation by similarity of characteristics in groups at baseline, adherence by exercise class attendance; safety by number and description of adverse events and retention by numbers withdrawn. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 66.2 (SD 4.9) years and 48% were women. There were no changes to the design during the study. A total of 114 people were screened for eligibility, with 50 participants with T2D enrolled over 8 months. Forty-seven participants (94%) completed the study (23 of 24 controls; 24 of 26 in the intervention group). Baseline characteristics were reasonably balanced between groups. Exercise class attendance was 79% for the intervention and 75% for the control group. There were 6 serious adverse events assessed as not or unlikely to be due to the intervention. Effect sizes for each outcome variable are provided. CONCLUSION This study supports the feasibility of a large scale RCT to test the benefits of multi-modal exercise to prevent cognitive decline in people with T2D. Design changes to the future trial are provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR 12614000222640 ; Registered 3/3/2014; First participant enrolled 26/6/2014, study screening commenced 1/9/2014; Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry.
Collapse
|
1432
|
Randomized feasibility trial of the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network hand exercise program (SPIN-HAND): Study protocol. JOURNAL OF SCLERODERMA AND RELATED DISORDERS 2017; 3:91-97. [DOI: 10.5301/jsrd.5000263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: Significant functional impairment of the hands is nearly universal in systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma). Hand exercises may improve hand function, but developing, testing and disseminating rehabilitation interventions in SSc is challenging. The Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) was established to address this issue and has developed an online hand exercise program to improve hand function for SSc patients (SPIN-HAND). The aim of the proposed feasibility trial is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the SPIN-HAND intervention. Design and methods: The SPIN-HAND feasibility trial will be conducted via the SPIN Cohort. The SPIN Cohort was developed as a framework for embedded pragmatic trials using the cohort multiple RCT design. In total, 40 English-speaking SPIN Cohort participants with at least mild hand function limitations (Cochin Hand Function Scale ≥3) and an indicated interest in using an online hand-exercise intervention will be randomized with a 1:1 ratio to be offered to use the SPIN-HAND program or usual care for 3 months. The primary aim is to evaluate the trial implementation processes, required resources and management, scientific aspects, and participant acceptability and usage of the SPIN-HAND program. Discussion: The SPIN-HAND exercise program is a self-help tool that may improve hand function in patients with SSc. The SPIN-HAND feasibility trial will ensure that trial methodology is robust, feasible, and consistent with trial participant expectations. The results will guide adjustments that need to be implemented before undertaking a full-scale RCT of the SPIN-HAND program. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03092024.
Collapse
|
1433
|
Forster AS, Cornelius V, Rockliffe L, Marlow LAV, Bedford H, Waller J. A cluster randomised feasibility study of an adolescent incentive intervention to increase uptake of HPV vaccination. Br J Cancer 2017; 117:1121-1127. [PMID: 28829766 PMCID: PMC5674104 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2017] [Revised: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is suboptimal among some groups. We aimed to determine the feasibility of undertaking a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of incentives to improve HPV vaccination uptake by increasing consent form return. METHODS An equal-allocation, two-arm cluster RCT design was used. We invited 60 London schools to participate. Those agreeing were randomised to either a standard invitation or incentive intervention arm, in which Year 8 girls had the chance to win a £50 shopping voucher if they returned a vaccination consent form, regardless of whether consent was provided. We collected data on school and parent participation rates and questionnaire response rates. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS Six schools completed the trial and only 3% of parents opted out. The response rate was 70% for the girls' questionnaire and 17% for the parents'. In the intervention arm, 87% of girls returned a consent form compared with 67% in the standard invitation arm. The proportion of girls whose parents gave consent for vaccination was higher in the intervention arm (76%) than the standard invitation arm (61%). CONCLUSIONS An RCT of an incentive intervention is feasible. The intervention may improve vaccination uptake but a fully powered RCT is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice S Forster
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Victoria Cornelius
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Stadium House, 68 Wood Lane, London W12 7RH, UK
| | - Lauren Rockliffe
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Laura AV Marlow
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Helen Bedford
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1434
|
Schmidt CA, Romine JK, Bell ML, Armin J, Gordon JS. User Participation and Engagement With the See Me Smoke-Free mHealth App: Prospective Feasibility Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017; 5:e142. [PMID: 28993302 PMCID: PMC5653904 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.7900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The See Me Smoke-Free (SMSF) mobile health (mHealth) app was developed to help women quit smoking by targeting concerns about body weight, body image, and self-efficacy through cognitive behavioral techniques and guided imagery audio files addressing smoking, diet, and physical activity. A feasibility trial found associations between SMSF usage and positive treatment outcomes. This paper reports a detailed exploration of program use among eligible individuals consenting to study participation and completing the baseline survey (participants) and ineligible or nonconsenting app installers (nonparticipants), as well as the relationship between program use and treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine whether (1) participants were more likely to set quit dates, be current smokers, and report higher levels of smoking at baseline than nonparticipants; (2) participants opened the app and listened to audio files more frequently than nonparticipants; and (3) participants with more app usage had a higher likelihood of self-reported smoking abstinence at follow up. METHODS The SMSF feasibility trial was a single arm, within-subjects, prospective cohort study with assessments at baseline and 30 and 90 days post enrollment. The SMSF app was deployed on the Google Play Store for download, and basic profile characteristics were obtained for all app installers. Additional variables were assessed for study participants. Participants were prompted to use the app daily during study participation. Crude differences in baseline characteristics between trial participants and nonparticipants were evaluated using t tests (continuous variables) and Fisher exact tests (categorical variables). Exact Poisson tests were used to assess group-level differences in mean usage rates over the full study period using aggregate Google Analytics data on participation and usage. Negative binomial regression models were used to estimate associations of app usage with participant baseline characteristics after adjustment for putative confounders. Associations between app usage and self-reported smoking abstinence were assessed using separate logistic regression models for each outcome measure. RESULTS Participants (n=151) were more likely than nonparticipants (n=96) to report female gender (P<.02) and smoking in the 30 days before enrollment (P<.001). Participants and nonparticipants opened the app and updated quit dates at the same average rate (rate ratio [RR] 0.98; 95% CI 0.92-1.04; P=.43), but participants started audio files (RR 1.07; 95% CI 1.00-1.13; P<.04) and completed audio files (RR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.18; P<.003) at significantly higher rates than nonparticipants. Higher app usage among participants was positively associated with some smoking cessation outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests potential efficacy of the SMSF app, as increased usage was generally associated with higher self-reported smoking abstinence. A planned randomized controlled trial will assess the SMSF app's efficacy as an intervention tool to help women quit smoking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris A Schmidt
- College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - James K Romine
- College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Melanie L Bell
- College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Julie Armin
- Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Judith S Gordon
- College of Nursing, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
1435
|
Thomas S, Fazakarley L, Thomas PW, Collyer S, Brenton S, Perring S, Scott R, Thomas F, Thomas C, Jones K, Hickson J, Hillier C. Mii-vitaliSe: a pilot randomised controlled trial of a home gaming system (Nintendo Wii) to increase activity levels, vitality and well-being in people with multiple sclerosis. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016966. [PMID: 28954791 PMCID: PMC5623500 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES While the health and well-being benefits of physical activity are recognised, people with multiple sclerosis (MS) often face greater barriers than the general population. The Nintendo Wii potentially offers a fun, convenient way of overcoming some of these. The aim was to test the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Mii-vitaliSe; a home-based, physiotherapist-supported Nintendo Wii intervention. DESIGN A single-centre wait-list randomised controlled study. SETTING MS service in secondary care. PARTICIPANTS Ambulatory, relatively inactive people with clinically confirmed MS. INTERVENTION Thirty participants were randomised to receive Mii-vitaliSe either immediately (for 12 months) or after a 6-month wait (for 6 months). Mii-vitaliSe consisted of two supervised Nintendo Wii familiarisation sessions in the hospital followed by home use (Wii Sports, Sports Resort and Fit Plus software) with physiotherapist support and personalised resources. OUTCOMES Included self-reported physical activity levels, quality of life, mood, self-efficacy, fatigue and assessments of balance, gait, mobility and hand dexterity at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Interviews (n=25) explored participants' experiences and, at study end, the two Mii-vitaliSe facilitators' experiences of intervention delivery (main qualitative findings reported separately). RESULTS Mean (SD) age was 49.3 (8.7) years, 90% female, with 47% diagnosed with MS <6 years ago and 60% new to active gaming. The recruitment rate was 31% (95% CI 20% to 44%). Outcome data were available for 29 (97%) at 6 months and 28 (93%) at 12 months. No serious adverse events were reported during the study. Qualitative data indicated that Mii-vitaliSe was well-received. Mean Wii use across both groups over the initial 6-month intervention period was twice a week for 27 min/day. Mean cost of delivering Mii-vitaliSe was £684 per person. DISCUSSION Mii-vitaliSe appears acceptable and a future trial feasible and warranted. These findings will inform its design. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN49286846.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Thomas
- Bournemouth University, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK
| | - Louise Fazakarley
- Bournemouth University, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK
| | - Peter W Thomas
- Bournemouth University, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK
| | - Sarah Collyer
- Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset Multiple Sclerosis Service, Poole, Dorset, UK
| | - Sarah Brenton
- Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset Multiple Sclerosis Service, Poole, Dorset, UK
| | - Steve Perring
- Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Medical Physics, Poole, Dorset, UK
| | - Rebecca Scott
- National Star College, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - Fern Thomas
- Bournemouth University, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK
| | - Charlotte Thomas
- Bournemouth University, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK
| | | | | | - Charles Hillier
- Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset Multiple Sclerosis Service, Poole, Dorset, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1436
|
Watt MH, Mosha MV, Platt AC, Sikkema KJ, Wilson SM, Turner EL, Masenga GG. A nurse-delivered mental health intervention for obstetric fistula patients in Tanzania: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 3:35. [PMID: 28912958 PMCID: PMC5594501 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0178-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Obstetric fistula has severe psychological consequences, but no evidence-based interventions exist to improve mental health in this population. This pilot trial evaluated a psychological intervention for women receiving surgical care for obstetric fistula. Methods A parallel two-armed pilot RCT was conducted between 2014 and 2016. The intervention was six individual sessions, based on psychological theory and delivered by a nurse facilitator. The study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Moshi, Tanzania. Women were eligible if they were over age 18 and admitted to the hospital for surgical repair of an obstetric fistula. Sixty participants were randomized to the intervention or standard of care. Surveys were completed at baseline, post-treatment (before discharge), and 3 months following discharge. Standardized scales measured depression, anxiety, traumatic stress, and self-esteem. Feasibility of an RCT was assessed by participation and retention. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were assessed by fidelity, attendance, and participant ratings. Potential efficacy was assessed by exploratory linear regression and clinical significance analysis. Results Eighty-five percent met criteria for mental health dysfunction at enrollment. All eligible patients enrolled, with retention 100% post and 73% at 3 months. Participants rated the intervention acceptable and beneficial. There were sharp and meaningful improvements in mental health outcomes over time, with no evidence of differences by condition. Conclusions A nurse-delivered mental health intervention was feasible to implement as part of in-patient clinical care and regarded positively. Mental health treatment in this population is warranted given high level of distress at presentation to care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT01934075.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa H Watt
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Duke Box 90519, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Mary V Mosha
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
| | - Alyssa C Platt
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC USA.,Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Duke Box 90519, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Kathleen J Sikkema
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC USA.,Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Duke Box 90519, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Sarah M Wilson
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC USA.,Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Duke Box 90519, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | - Elizabeth L Turner
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC USA.,Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Duke Box 90519, Durham, NC 27708 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
1437
|
Bandholm T, Christensen R, Thorborg K, Treweek S, Henriksen M. Preparing for what the reporting checklists will not tell you: the PREPARE Trial guide for planning clinical research to avoid research waste. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51:1494-1501. [PMID: 28882839 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Bandholm
- Department of Occupational and Physical Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research - Copenhagen (PMR-C), Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Clinical Research Centre, Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Robin Christensen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian Thorborg
- Department of Occupational and Physical Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research - Copenhagen (PMR-C), Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sports Orthopedic Research Centre - Copenhagen (SORC-C), Amager-Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Marius Henriksen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
1438
|
Harrison E, Tan W, Mills N, Karantana A, Sprange K, Duley L, Elliott D, Blazeby J, Hollingworth W, Montgomery AA, Davis T. A feasibility study investigating the acceptability and design of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of needle fasciotomy versus limited fasciectomy for the treatment of Dupuytren's contractures of the fingers (HAND-1): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:392. [PMID: 28841903 PMCID: PMC5574125 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2127-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2016] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dupuytren's contractures are fibrous cords under the skin of the palm of the hand. The contractures are painless but cause one or more fingers to curl into the palm, resulting in loss of function. Standard treatment within the NHS is surgery to remove (fasciectomy) or divide (fasciotomy) the contractures, and the treatment offered is frequently determined by surgeon preference. This study aims to determine the feasibility of conducting a large, multicentre randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of needle fasciotomy versus limited fasciectomy for the treatment of Dupuytren's contracture. METHODS/DESIGN HAND-1 is a parallel, two-arm, multicentre, randomised feasibility trial. Eligible patients aged 18 years or over who have one or more fingers with a Dupuytren's contracture of more than 30° in the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and/or proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints, well-defined cord(s) causing contracture, and have not undergone previous surgery for Dupuytren's on the same hand will be randomised (1:1) to treatment with either needle fasciotomy or limited fasciectomy. Participants will be followed-up for up to 6 months post surgery. Feasibility outcomes include number of patients screened, consented and randomised, adherence with treatment, completion of follow-up and identification of an appropriate patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to use as primary outcome for a main trial. Embedded qualitative research, incorporating a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention, will focus on understanding and optimising the recruitment process, and exploring patients' experiences of trial participation and the interventions. DISCUSSION This study will assess whether a large multicentre trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of needle fasciotomy and limited fasciectomy for the treatment of Dupuytren's contractures is feasible, and if so will provide data to inform its design and successful conduct. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Registered Clinical/soCial sTudy Number: ISRCTN11164292 . Registered on 28 August 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Harrison
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, C Floor, South Block, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Wei Tan
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, C Floor, South Block, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Nicola Mills
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Alexia Karantana
- Department of Academic Orthopaedics, Trauma and Sports Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Kirsty Sprange
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, C Floor, South Block, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Lelia Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, C Floor, South Block, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Daisy Elliott
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Jane Blazeby
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - William Hollingworth
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Alan A Montgomery
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, C Floor, South Block, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Tim Davis
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
1439
|
Hamilton FL, Hornby J, Sheringham J, Linke S, Ashton C, Moore K, Stevenson F, Murray E. DIAMOND (DIgital Alcohol Management ON Demand): a mixed methods feasibility RCT and embedded process evaluation of a digital health intervention to reduce hazardous and harmful alcohol use. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 3:34. [PMID: 28879021 PMCID: PMC5583751 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0177-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Alcohol is a major risk factor for preventable illness, with huge cost to healthcare economies. There is a role for alcohol-specific digital health interventions (DHI), but there have been few randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing DHI with face-to-face treatment. Such trials are complex and face obstacles in recruitment and retention. Methods Mixed-methods feasibility RCT of an alcohol DHI, testing recruitment, online data-collection and randomisation processes, with an embedded process evaluation. Recruitment ran from October 2014 for 9 months. Participants were adults drinking at hazardous and harmful levels, attending four community drug and alcohol services (CDAS) in London. Participants completed baseline demographic, alcohol-related and other psychological questionnaires online and were randomised to HeLP-Alcohol, a six-module DHI with weekly reminder prompts (phone, email or text message), which mirrors face-to-face treatment, or to face-to-face treatment at CDAS. Alcohol counsellors took part in qualitative interviews at the end of the study. Results Alcohol counsellors screened 1253 patients. One thousand one hundred eighty-nine did not meet inclusion criteria so were excluded: 579 were dependent drinkers, 548 had health conditions that made them ineligible to take part and 62 were ineligible for other reasons including homelessness. Of the 64 patients who were eligible to take part, 54 declined to participate, with 36 stating a preference for face-to-face treatment, 13 gave no reason, and 5 gave other reasons including not wanting to use a computer. Ten consented but then 3 changed their minds, so we were able to randomise 7 participants to the study (11% of eligible). Five alcohol counsellors agreed to be interviewed for the process evaluation and provided the following feedback: Although most of their colleagues were enthusiastic about the trial, some were not at equipoise in recruiting; potential participants also declared strong preference to intervention arm from the outset. These factors affected recruitment. Counsellors also lacked time to undertake the data inputting and follow-up of participants in addition to their everyday work. Conclusions This feasibility study aimed to test recruitment, randomisation, retention and data collection methods but recruited only 7 participants so these aims were not fully achieved. This illustrates to all researchers of complex interventions the importance of conducting feasibility studies and is generalisable to areas other than alcohol research. CDAS were seeing larger numbers of non-dependent drinkers with complex additional problems than alcohol commissioners expected. CDAS clients and some counsellors were not at equipoise for recruitment. Alternative settings for recruitment need to be explored in future trials. Trial registration International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN31789096, DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN31789096
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona L Hamilton
- eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | - Jo Hornby
- eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | | | - Stuart Linke
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Kevin Moore
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, UCL, London, UK
| | - Fiona Stevenson
- eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- eHealth Unit, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Upper 3rd Floor, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF UK
| |
Collapse
|
1440
|
Nyberg A, Wadell K, Lindgren H, Tistad M. Internet-based support for self-management strategies for people with COPD-protocol for a controlled pragmatic pilot trial of effectiveness and a process evaluation in primary healthcare. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016851. [PMID: 28765136 PMCID: PMC5642786 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Revised: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of adequate self-management strategies for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reduces healthcare use, improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and recovery after acute exacerbations. However, not many people with COPD receive support that promotes the use of such strategies and therefore new methods to facilitate and promote the use of self-management strategies are highly warranted. This pilot trial aims to evaluate the feasibility of the study design and study procedures considering effectiveness of the novel intervention, the COPD-web. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The overall design is a pragmatic controlled pilot trial with preassessments and postassessments and a parallel process evaluation. Patients with the diagnosis of COPD will be eligible for the study. The intervention group will be recruited when visiting one of the six participating primary care units in Sweden. The control group will be identified from the unit's computerised registers. The intervention, the COPD-web, is an interactive web page with two sections; one directed at people with COPD and one at healthcare professionals. The sections aim to support patients' self-management skills-and to facilitate the provision of support for self-management strategies, respectively. Effectiveness with regard to patients' symptoms, HRQoL, knowledge of and readiness for COPD-related self-management, health literacy, self-efficacy for physical activity and time spent in physical activity and time being sedentary, and further, healthcare professionals' knowledge of and readiness to support COPD-related self-management strategies will be assessed using questionnaires at 3 and 12 months. The process evaluation will include observations and interviews. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been obtained. Findings will be presented at conferences, submitted for publication in peer-reviewed publications and presented to the involved healthcare professionals, patients and to patient organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02696187.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Nyberg
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Karin Wadell
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Helena Lindgren
- Department of Computing Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Malin Tistad
- Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
1441
|
van der Scheer JW, Martin Ginis KA, Ditor DS, Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Hicks AL, West CR, Wolfe DL. Effects of exercise on fitness and health of adults with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Neurology 2017; 89:736-745. [PMID: 28733344 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize and appraise research testing the effects of exercise interventions on fitness, cardiometabolic health, and bone health among adults with spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS Electronic databases were searched (1980-2016). Included studies employed exercise interventions for a period ≥2 weeks, involved adults with acute or chronic SCI, and measured fitness (cardiorespiratory fitness, power output, or muscle strength), cardiometabolic health (body composition or cardiovascular risk factors), or bone health outcomes. Evidence was synthesized and appraised using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS A total of 211 studies met the inclusion criteria (22 acute, 189 chronic). For chronic SCI, GRADE confidence ratings were moderate to high for evidence showing exercise can improve all of the reviewed outcomes except bone health. For acute SCI, GRADE ratings were very low for all outcomes. For chronic SCI, there was low to moderate confidence in the evidence showing that 2-3 sessions/week of upper body aerobic exercise at a moderate to vigorous intensity for 20-40 minutes, plus upper body strength exercise (3 sets of 10 repetitions at 50%-80% 1-repetition maximum for all large muscle groups), can improve cardiorespiratory fitness, power output, and muscle strength. For chronic SCI, there was low to moderate confidence in the evidence showing that 3-5 sessions per week of upper body aerobic exercise at a moderate to vigorous intensity for 20-44 minutes can improve cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, body composition, and cardiovascular risk. CONCLUSIONS Exercise improves fitness and cardiometabolic health of adults with chronic SCI. The evidence on effective exercise types, frequencies, intensities, and durations should be used to formulate exercise guidelines for adults with SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan W van der Scheer
- From the School for Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences (J.W.v.d.S., V.L.G.-T.), Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, UK; School of Health and Exercise Sciences (K.A.M.G.), University of British Columbia, Kelowna; ICORD (K.A.M.G., C.R.W.) and School of Kinesiology (C.R.W.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Kinesiology (D.S.D.), Brock University, St. Catharines; Department of Kinesiology (A.L.H.), McMaster University, Hamilton; and Parkwood Institute (D.L.W.), Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
| | - Kathleen A Martin Ginis
- From the School for Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences (J.W.v.d.S., V.L.G.-T.), Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, UK; School of Health and Exercise Sciences (K.A.M.G.), University of British Columbia, Kelowna; ICORD (K.A.M.G., C.R.W.) and School of Kinesiology (C.R.W.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Kinesiology (D.S.D.), Brock University, St. Catharines; Department of Kinesiology (A.L.H.), McMaster University, Hamilton; and Parkwood Institute (D.L.W.), Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada.
| | - David S Ditor
- From the School for Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences (J.W.v.d.S., V.L.G.-T.), Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, UK; School of Health and Exercise Sciences (K.A.M.G.), University of British Columbia, Kelowna; ICORD (K.A.M.G., C.R.W.) and School of Kinesiology (C.R.W.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Kinesiology (D.S.D.), Brock University, St. Catharines; Department of Kinesiology (A.L.H.), McMaster University, Hamilton; and Parkwood Institute (D.L.W.), Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
| | - Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
- From the School for Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences (J.W.v.d.S., V.L.G.-T.), Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, UK; School of Health and Exercise Sciences (K.A.M.G.), University of British Columbia, Kelowna; ICORD (K.A.M.G., C.R.W.) and School of Kinesiology (C.R.W.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Kinesiology (D.S.D.), Brock University, St. Catharines; Department of Kinesiology (A.L.H.), McMaster University, Hamilton; and Parkwood Institute (D.L.W.), Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
| | - Audrey L Hicks
- From the School for Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences (J.W.v.d.S., V.L.G.-T.), Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, UK; School of Health and Exercise Sciences (K.A.M.G.), University of British Columbia, Kelowna; ICORD (K.A.M.G., C.R.W.) and School of Kinesiology (C.R.W.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Kinesiology (D.S.D.), Brock University, St. Catharines; Department of Kinesiology (A.L.H.), McMaster University, Hamilton; and Parkwood Institute (D.L.W.), Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
| | - Christopher R West
- From the School for Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences (J.W.v.d.S., V.L.G.-T.), Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, UK; School of Health and Exercise Sciences (K.A.M.G.), University of British Columbia, Kelowna; ICORD (K.A.M.G., C.R.W.) and School of Kinesiology (C.R.W.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Kinesiology (D.S.D.), Brock University, St. Catharines; Department of Kinesiology (A.L.H.), McMaster University, Hamilton; and Parkwood Institute (D.L.W.), Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
| | - Dalton L Wolfe
- From the School for Sports, Exercise and Health Sciences (J.W.v.d.S., V.L.G.-T.), Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, UK; School of Health and Exercise Sciences (K.A.M.G.), University of British Columbia, Kelowna; ICORD (K.A.M.G., C.R.W.) and School of Kinesiology (C.R.W.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Department of Kinesiology (D.S.D.), Brock University, St. Catharines; Department of Kinesiology (A.L.H.), McMaster University, Hamilton; and Parkwood Institute (D.L.W.), Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
1442
|
Zunza M, Cotton MF, Mbuagbaw L, Lester R, Thabane L. Interactive weekly mobile phone text messaging plus motivational interviewing in promotion of breastfeeding among women living with HIV in South Africa: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:331. [PMID: 28716146 PMCID: PMC5513395 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2079-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2016] [Accepted: 07/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND South Africa recently phased out access to free formula milk in the public sector in support of breastfeeding for women living with HIV. Few women living with HIV in South Africa choose breastfeeding and among those who do, many stop breastfeeding early. We sought to explore the feasibility of using mobile phone text messaging coupled with motivational interviewing to enhance adherence to breastfeeding practices. METHODS AND DESIGN A randomized, parallel group, single-center pilot trial. Electronic sequence generation and random allocation will be done centrally. Women of low socioeconomic status, from Cape Town, South Africa will be randomly assigned within 24 h of giving birth at a primary healthcare clinic to a structured weekly text message plus motivational interviewing and usual standard of care, using a permutation of different block sizes. Criteria for feasibility success will include: five participants recruited per week (over 12 weeks), about 75% of all eligible participants consent for study participation, complete evaluation of outcomes in at least 70% of all recruited participants, breastfeeding adherence rates of at least 70% in the intervention group, six months after delivery. Participants will be evaluated soon after giving birth and post-delivery at weeks 2, 6, 10, and 24. Primary analysis will follow the "intention-to-treat" principle. Sub-group analysis will be used to assess sub-group effects. DISCUSSION This pilot trial will evaluate the feasibility of conducting a larger trial on communication and support approaches to improve adherence to breastfeeding by HIV-infected women. Text messaging and motivational interviewing are simple interventions which may allow participants to access personalized adherence advice and support. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02949713 . Registered on 26 October 2016; Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR201611001855404 . Registered on 8 November 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moleen Zunza
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Global Health, Centre for Evidence Based Health Care, Stellenbosch University, Francie Van Zyl Drive, PO Box 241, Cape Town, 8000 South Africa
- Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC Canada
- CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network, 588-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 3E6 Canada
| | - Mark F. Cotton
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Francie Van Zyl Drive, PO Box 241, Cape Town, 8000 South Africa
| | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Biostatistics Unit, Father Sean O’Sullivan Research Centre, St Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Richard Lester
- Global Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Biostatistics Unit, Father Sean O’Sullivan Research Centre, St Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
1443
|
A pilot randomised clinical trial of physiotherapy (manual therapy, exercise, and education) for early-onset hip osteoarthritis post-hip arthroscopy. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 4:16. [PMID: 28694995 PMCID: PMC5500950 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0157-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the increasing use of hip arthroscopy for hip pain, there is no level 1 evidence to support physiotherapy rehabilitation programs following this procedure. The aims of this study were to determine (i) what is the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating a targeted physiotherapy intervention for early-onset hip osteoarthritis (OA) post-hip arthroscopy? and (ii) what are the within-group treatment effects of the physiotherapy intervention and a health-education control group? Methods This study was a pilot single-blind RCT conducted in a private physiotherapy clinic in Hobart, Australia. Patients included 17 volunteers (nine women; age 32 ± 8 years; body mass index = 25.6 ± 5.1 kg/m2) who were recruited 4–14 months post-hip arthroscopy, with chondropathy and/or labral pathology at the time of surgery. Interventions included a physiotherapy treatment program that was semi-standardised and consisted of (i) manual therapy; (ii) hip strengthening and functional retraining; and (iii) health education. Control treatment encompassed individualised health education sessions. The primary outcome measure was feasibility, which was reported as percentage of eligible participants enrolled, adherence with the intervention, and losses to follow-up. The research process was evaluated using interviews, and an estimated sample size for a definitive study is offered. Secondary outcomes included the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and the International Hip Outcome Tool (IHOT-33) patient-reported outcomes. Results Seventeen out of 48 eligible patients (35%) were randomised. Adherence to the intervention was 100%, with no losses to follow-up. The estimated sample size for a full-scale RCT was 142 patients. The within-group (95% confidence intervals) change scores for the physiotherapy group were HOOS-Symptoms 6 points (−4 to 16); HOOS-Pain 10 points (−2 to 22); HOOS-Activity of Daily Living 8 points (0 to 16); HOOS-Sport 3 points (−12 to 19); HOOS-Quality of Life 3 points (−7 to 13); and IHOT-33 7 points (−10 to 25). The within-group (95% confidence intervals) change scores for the control group were HOOS-Symptoms −4 points (−17 to 9); HOOS-Pain −2 points (−18 to 13); HOOS-Activity of Daily Living −7 points (−17 to 4); HOOS-Sport 4 points (−16 to 23); HOOS-Quality of Life −5 points (−18 to 9); and IHOT-33 −4 points (−27 to 19). Suggestions to improve study design included greater supervision of exercises and increased access to physiotherapy appointments. Conclusions Results support the feasibility of a full-scale RCT, and recommendations for an adequately powered and improved study to determine the efficacy of this physiotherapy intervention post-hip arthroscopy to reduce pain and improve function are provided. Trial registration Australian Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12614000426684
Collapse
|
1444
|
Haste A, Adamson AJ, McColl E, Araujo-Soares V, Bell R. Web-Based Weight Loss Intervention for Men With Type 2 Diabetes: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Diabetes 2017; 2:e14. [PMID: 30291100 PMCID: PMC6238853 DOI: 10.2196/diabetes.7430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Revised: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rising obesity levels remain a major public health concern due to the clear link with several comorbidities such as diabetes. Diabetes now affects 6% of the UK population. Modest weight loss of 5% to 10% has been shown to be associated with significant reductions in blood sugar, lipid, and blood pressure levels. Men have been shown to be attracted to programs that do not require extensive face-to-face time commitments, illustrating the potential audience available for health behavior change via the Web. OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a Web-based weight loss intervention in men with type 2 diabetes. METHODS We conducted a pilot, parallel 2-arm, individually randomized controlled trial with embedded process evaluation. Participants were randomly assigned in a one-to-one ratio to the usual care group or the 12-month Web-based weight loss intervention, including dietitian and exercise expert feedback. Face-to-face recruitment and assessment were performed by the researcher unblinded. Data collected included weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference, together with an audit trail of eligibility, recruitment, retention, and adherence rates. A process evaluation (website use data and qualitative interviews) monitored adherence, acceptability, and feasibility of the intervention. RESULTS General practice database searches achieved the recruitment target (n=61) for the population of men with type 2 diabetes, of whom 66% (40/61) completed 3-month follow-up measurements. By 12 months, the retention rate was 52% (32/61), with 12 of the 33 men allocated to the intervention group still active on the website. The intervention was seen as acceptable by the majority of participants. We gained insights about acceptability and use of the website from the parallel process evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Recruitment to the Web-based weight loss intervention was successful. Results are descriptive, but there were positive indications of increased weight loss (in kilograms and as a percentage), and reduced waist circumference and BMI for the intervention group from 3 to 12 months, in comparison with control. This research adds to the evidence base in relation to incorporating a Web-based weight loss intervention within the UK National Health Service (NHS). NHS weight loss services are struggling to provide sufficient referrals. Therefore, alternative modes of delivery, with the potential to reduce health professional input and time per patient while still enabling individual and tailored care, need to be investigated to identify whether they can be effective and thus benefit the NHS. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 48086713; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN48086713 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6rO4xSlhI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Haste
- Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Fuse-UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Ashley J Adamson
- Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- Fuse-UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine McColl
- Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Vera Araujo-Soares
- Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Bell
- Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
1445
|
Thabane L, Lancaster G. Improving the efficiency of trials using innovative pilot designs: the next phase in the conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 4:14. [PMID: 28694993 PMCID: PMC5501345 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0159-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
With continuously increasing costs of conducting trials, use of innovative approaches—such as pragmatic trials, registry-based randomised trials, adaptive trials, personalised medicine trials, platform trials, and basket trials—to the design and conduct of clinical trials has been advocated as one of the most promising solutions. In this editorial, we propose that the next wave of feasibility or pilot studies should focus on assessing the feasibility of trials using these designs, which we see as an imperative in order to unleash their potential to reduce trial costs and accelerate the drug development process and the search for best treatments, so that the right treatments can be delivered as soon as possible to the right patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Gillian Lancaster
- Professor Gillian Lancaster, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1446
|
Albrecht J, Kirtschig G, Matin RN, Samimi M, Batchelor JM. Positive about negative: no need for a pink cloud of fluff and justifications. Br J Dermatol 2017; 177:1-3. [PMID: 28731247 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J Albrecht
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, J.H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, 1900 West Polk Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, U.S.A.,Department of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, 1900 West Polk Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, U.S.A
| | - G Kirtschig
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Gießen & Marburg GmbH, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, 35043, Germany
| | - R N Matin
- Department of Dermatology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7LE, U.K
| | - M Samimi
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Tours, University Francois Rabelais, Tours, France.,ISP 1282 INRA-University of Tours, Tours, France
| | - J M Batchelor
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, King's Meadow Campus, Lenton Lane, Nottingham, NG7 2NR, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
1447
|
Learmonth YC, Motl RW. Important considerations for feasibility studies in physical activity research involving persons with multiple sclerosis: a scoping systematic review and case study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 4:1. [PMID: 28616252 PMCID: PMC5466777 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0145-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 05/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Much research has been undertaken to establish the important benefits of physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). There is disagreement regarding the strength of this research, perhaps because the majority of studies on physical activity and its benefits have not undergone initial and systematic feasibility testing. We aim to address the feasibility processes that have been examined within the context of physical activity interventions in MS. METHOD A systematic scoping review was conducted based on a literature search of five databases to identify feasibility processes described in preliminary studies of physical activity in MS. We read and extracted methodology from each study based on the following feasibility metrics: process (e.g. recruitment), resource (e.g. monetary costs), management (e.g. personnel time requirements) and scientific outcomes (e.g. clinical/participant reported outcome measures). We illustrate the use of the four feasibility metrics within a randomised controlled trial of a home-based exercise intervention in persons with MS. RESULTS Twenty-five studies were identified. Resource feasibility (e.g. time and resources) and scientific outcomes feasibility (e.g. clinical outcomes) methodologies were applied and described in many studies; however, these metrics have not been systematically addressed. Metrics related to process feasibility (e.g. recruitment) and management feasibility (e.g. human and data management) are not well described within the literature. Our case study successfully enabled us to address the four feasibility metrics, and we provide new information on management feasibility (i.e. estimate data completeness and estimate data entry) and scientific outcomes feasibility (i.e. determining data collection materials appropriateness). CONCLUSION Our review highlights the existing research and provides a case study which assesses important metrics of study feasibility. This review serves as a clarion call for feasibility trials that will substantially strengthen the foundation of research on exercise in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne C. Learmonth
- Department of Psychology and Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150 Australia
| | - Robert W. Motl
- School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
| |
Collapse
|
1448
|
Primary endpoint discrepancies were found in one in ten clinical drug trials. Results of an inception cohort study. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 89:199-208. [PMID: 28535887 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Revised: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the occurrence and determinants of protocol-publication discrepancies in clinical drug trials. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING All published clinical drug trials reviewed by the Dutch institutional review boards in 2007 were analyzed. Discrepancies between trial protocols and publications were measured among key reporting aspects. We evaluated the association of trial characteristics with discrepancies in primary endpoints by calculating the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Of the 334 published trials, 32 (9.6%) had a protocol/publication discrepancy in the primary endpoints. Among the subgroup of randomized controlled trials (RCTs; N = 204), 12 (5.9%) had a discrepancy in the primary endpoint. Investigator-initiated trials with and without industry (co-) funding were associated with having discrepancies in the primary endpoints compared with industry-sponsored trials (RR 3.7; 95% CI 1.4-9.9 and RR 4.4; 95% CI 2.0-9.5, respectively). Furthermore, other than phase 1-4 trials (vs. phase 1; RR 4.6; 95% CI 1.1-19.3), multicenter trials were also conducted outside the European Union (vs. single center; RR 0.2; 95% CI 0.1-0.6), not prospectively registered trials (RR 3.3; 95% CI 1.5-7.5), non-RCTs (vs. superiority RCT; RR 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-4.8) and, among the RCTs, crossover compared with a parallel group design (RR 3.7; 95% CI 1.1-12.3) were significantly associated with having discrepancies in the primary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS Improvement in completeness of reporting is still needed, especially among investigator-initiated trials and non-RCTs. To eliminate undisclosed discrepancies, trial protocols should be available in the public domain at the same time when the trial is published.
Collapse
|
1449
|
Pediatric intensive care stress ulcer prevention (PIC-UP): a protocol for a pilot randomized trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 3:26. [PMID: 28533916 PMCID: PMC5438532 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0142-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite sparse pediatric data on effectiveness, the majority of critically ill children receive medications to prevent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Stress ulcer prophylaxis may have unintended consequences—increasing the risk of nosocomial infections—which may be more serious and common than the bleeding which these drugs are prescribed to prevent. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric critical care are exceptionally challenging to complete, thus a rigorous pilot RCT is crucial. The objective of this pilot RCT is to assess the feasibility of a large multicentre RCT of stress ulcer prophylaxis with pantoprazole to prevent upper GI bleeding vs. placebo. Methods A multi-centre blinded pilot RCT of 120 children in six Canadian PICUs. Children expected to require mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h will be randomized to receive intravenous pantoprazole 1 mg/kg or identical placebo once daily until they no longer need mechanical ventilation. We have four feasibility outcomes and will consider the trial successful if we achieve:Effective screening: If >80% of eligible patients are approached for consent. Timely enrollment: if >80% of participants receive their first dose of the assigned study drug within 1 day of becoming eligible. Participant accrual: If the average monthly enrolment is two or more participants per centre per month. Protocol adherence: if >90% of doses are administered according to the protocol.
Discussion There are many uncertainties about the risks and benefits of stress ulcer prophylaxis. In an era of widespread use—where clinicians prescribe prophylaxis to the more severely ill—a large, rigorous RCT is required. A trial to determine if a strategy of withholding stress ulcer prophylaxis is not inferior to a strategy of routine stress ulcer prophylaxis will be challenging. A carefully designed and implemented pilot trial is essential. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02929563 (Registered October 3, 2016).
Collapse
|
1450
|
Wilkie M. Improving the Impact of Peritoneal Dialysis Research. Perit Dial Int 2017; 37:245-246. [PMID: 28512160 DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|