Adenosine-dopamine interactions in the brain

Adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 heteromeric receptor complexes and their function

The existence of A2A-D2 heteromeric complexes is based on coimmunoprecipitation studies and on fluorescence resonance energy transfer and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analyses. It has now become possible to show that A2A and D2 receptors also coimmunoprecipitate in striatal tissue, giving evidence for the existence of A2A-D2 heteromeric receptor complexes also in rat striatal tissue. The analysis gives evidence that these heteromers are constitutive, as they are observed in the absence of A2A and D2 agonists. The A2A-D2 heteromers could either be A2A-D2 heterodimers and/or higher-order A2A -D2 hetero-oligomers. In striatal neurons there are probably A2A-D2 heteromeric complexes, together with A2A-D2 homomeric complexes in the neuronal surface membrane. Their stoichiometry in various microdomains will have a major role in determining A2A and D2 signaling in the striatopallidal GABA neurons. Through the use of D2/D1 chimeras, evidence has been obtained that the fifth transmembrane (TM) domain and/or the I3 of the D2 receptor are part of the A2A-D2 receptor interface, where electrostatic epitope-epitope interactions involving the N-terminal part of I3 of the D2 receptor (arginine-rich epitope) play a major role, interacting with the carboxyl terminus of the A2A receptor. Computerized modeling of A2A-D2 heteromers are in line with these findings. It seems likely that A2A receptor-induced reduction of D2 receptor recognition, G protein coupling, and signaling, as well as the existence of A2A-D2 co-trafficking, are the consequence of the existence of an A2A-D2 receptor heteromer. The relevance of A2A-D2 heteromeric receptor complexes for Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia is emphasized as well as for the treatment of these diseases. Finally, recent evidence for the existence of antagonistic A2A-D3 heteromeric receptor complexes in cotransfected cell lines has been summarized.

Determination of caffeine and its metabolites in urine by capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry

The caffeine content of foods and beverages varies considerably, interfering with our ability to obtain valid interpretations in many human studies with regard to the mechanism of action(s) of caffeine and/or its metabolites. The rate of metabolism of caffeine and other xanthine drugs also varies greatly from one individual to another. Therefore, it is extremely important to develop accurate, reliable analytical methods to quantify caffeine and its metabolites in simple and complex matrixes. A simple method is described for the separation and characterization of caffeine and its major metabolites employing capillary electrophoresis (CE) coupled to ultraviolet-absorption and mass spectrometry (MS) detection. After optimization of the electrophoresis separation conditions, a reliable separation of caffeine and 11 of its major metabolites was achieved in 50 mM ammonium carbonate buffer, pH 11.0. The volatile aqueous electrolyte system used with a normal electroosmotic flow polarity also provided an optimal separation condition for the characterization of the analytes by MS. The CE method achieved baseline resolution for all 12 compounds in less than 30 min. The CE-MS method is suitable for use as a routine procedure for the rapid separation and characterization of caffeine and its metabolites. The usefulness of this method was demonstrated by the extraction, separation, and identification of caffeine and its 11 metabolites from normal urine samples. The urine specimens were first acidified to obtain optimum binding efficiency to the sorbents of the off-line, solid-phase extraction procedure employed here, and an acidified eluent solvent was employed for the desorption step to maximize the recovery of the bound analytes.

Caffeine induces differential cross tolerance to the amphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects of dopaminergic agonists

The purpose of this study was to determine if caffeine induces cross tolerance to the amphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects of dopaminergic drugs that act through distinct mechanisms (e.g., release, uptake inhibition, direct activation of dopamine D(1)- or D(2)-family receptors). Rats were trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine from saline in a two-choice discrete-trial procedure. Stimulus-generalization curves were generated by cumulative dosing for d-amphetamine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), methylphenidate (0.3-5.6 mg/kg), SKF 81297 (0.3-3.0 mg/kg), and R-(-)-propylnorapomorphine (NPA; 0.001-1.78 mg/kg), as well as for caffeine (3.0-56 mg/kg); curves were re-determined after twice daily injections of caffeine (30 mg/kg) for 3.5 days. The rats generalized dose dependently to the four dopaminergic drugs, but only to a limited extent to caffeine. Twice daily injections of caffeine induced significant cross tolerance (i.e., increased ED(50)) to the amphetamine-like discriminative effects of methylphenidate and SKF 81297, attenuated non-significantly the effects of NPA, and did not alter the effects of amphetamine. Thus, caffeine produces differential cross tolerance to the amphetamine-like discriminative effects of dopaminergic drugs, a phenomenon in which the dopamine D(1) receptor appears to have an important role.

Effects of caffeine on prospective duration judgements of various intervals depend on task difficulty

The effects of caffeine on prospective duration judgements were investigated in two double-blind placebo-controlled experiments. After taking either 200 mg of caffeine or a placebo, participants performed a task that demanded considerable attention, driving a car in a simulator (Experiment 1) or a task that demanded relatively little attention, watching a videotaped scene from a driven car (Experiment 2). Each participant made duration judgements of three target intervals: 15 s, 60 s and 300 s. Actively driving participants in the caffeine condition judged it as shorter than did those in the placebo condition. Caffeine had no effect on duration judgements following passive viewing. When people must perform a relatively difficult task, caffeine causes participants to allocate relatively more of their attentional resources to the task and relatively less to duration timing. Although caffeine may increase the pacemaker rate of an internal clock (via dopamine D(1) agonism), when external events are attention-demanding, caffeine mainly influences the relative allocation of attention to external events or to time (via dopamine D(2) agonism) in cerebral areas subserving the executive control of attention.

Involvement of adenosine A1 receptors in the discriminative-stimulus effects of caffeine in rats

RATIONALE

Caffeine is a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist in vitro, but involvement of different adenosine receptor subtypes, particularly adenosine A1 and A 2A receptors, in the central effects of caffeine remains a matter of debate.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the role of adenosine A1 and A 2A receptors in the discriminative-stimulus effects of caffeine.

METHODS

Rats were trained to discriminate an injection of 30 mg/kg (i.p.) caffeine from saline. The selective A1 receptor antagonist CPT, the selective A 2A receptor antagonist MSX-3 and the non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist DMPX were assessed for their ability to produce caffeine-like discriminative effects. The ability of CPT, MSX-3, the A1 receptor agonist CPA and the A 2A receptor agonist CGS21680 to reduce the discriminative effects of caffeine was also tested. Radioligand binding experiments with membrane preparations from rat striatum and transfected mammalian cell lines were performed to characterize binding affinity profiles of the different adenosine antagonists used in the present study (caffeine, DMPX, CPT and MSX-3) in relation to all known adenosine receptors (A1, A 2A, A 2B, A3).

RESULTS

DMPX and CPT, but not MSX-3, produced significant caffeine-like discriminative effects. MSX-3, but not CPT, markedly reduced the discriminative effects of caffeine and the caffeine-like discriminative effects of CPT. Furthermore, the A1 receptor agonist CPA, but not the A 2A agonist CGS21680, reduced caffeine's discriminative effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Adenosine A1 receptor blockade is involved in the discriminative-stimulus effects of behaviorally relevant doses of caffeine; A 2A receptor blockade does not play a central role in caffeine's discriminative effects and counteracts the A1 receptor-mediated discriminative-stimulus effects of caffeine.

Decreased adenosine receptor binding in dystonic brains of the dtsz mutant

In patients with paroxysmal non-kinesigenic dyskinesias, episodes of dystonia can be provoked by stress and also by methylxanthines (e.g. caffeine), which inhibit adenosine A(1)/A(2A) receptors. In the dt(sz) mutant hamster, a model of this movement disorder, adenosine A(1) receptor antagonists were previously found to worsen dystonia, while adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor agonists exerted pronounced beneficial effects. Therefore, in the present study, adenosine receptor A(1) and A(2A) binding was determined by autoradiographic analyses in dt(sz) hamsters under basal conditions, i.e. in the absence of a dystonic attack, and in a group of mutant hamsters which exhibited severe stress-induced dystonic attacks prior to kill. In comparison with non-dystonic control hamsters, [(3)H]DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine) binding to adenosine A(1) receptors and [(3)H]CGS 21680 (2p-(2carboxyethylphen-ethylamino-5'-N-ethlycarboxamindoadenosine) binding to adenosine A(2A) receptors were significantly lower throughout the brain of dystonic animals. Under normal resting conditions, mutant hamsters showed significant decreases in adenosine A(1) (-12 to-42%) and in A(2A) (-19 to-34%) receptor binding compared with controls. Stressful stimulation increased adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor binding in almost all brain regions in both control and dystonic hamsters. The stress-induced increase was more marked in mutant hamsters, leading to a disappearance of differences in most regions compared with stimulated controls, except the striatum. In view of previous findings of striking beneficial effects of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor agonists and of striatal dysfunctions in the dt(sz) mutant, the reduced adenosine receptor binding may be an important factor in the pathogenesis of paroxysmal dystonia.

Striatal plasticity at the network level. Focus on adenosine A2A and D2 interactions in models of Parkinson's Disease

Behavioral and microdialysis studies have been performed on antagonistic A(2A)/D(2) interactions in animal models of Parkinson's Disease. The behavioral analysis involved studies on locomotor activity in reserpinized mice, haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rats and rotational behavior in rats with unilateral 6-OHDA lesions of the ascending DA pathways (Ungerstedt model). Dual probe microdialysis studies were indirectly performed on the striatopallidal GABA neurons by studying extracellular glutamate levels in the striatum and globus pallidus of the awake freely moving rat. The striatum was perfused with A(2A) and/or D(2) agonists via reverse microdialysis. The results show that the A(2A) antagonists SCH58261 and KF17837 can increase locomotor activity in reserpinized mice and produce contralateral rotational behavior only after administration of subthreshold doses of l-DOPA or the D(2) like agonist quinpirole. Furthermore, antagonizing the A(2A) receptor (R) reduced haloperidol induced catalepsy. The behavioral results underline the view that A(2A) antagonists act by blocking A(2A) R in A(2A)/D(2) heterodimers where A(2A) R inhibits the D(2) R transduction and D(2) inhibits the adenylate cyclase (AC) activated by A(2A) R. The microdialysis studies show that the A(2A) agonist CGS21680 striatally coperfused with the D(2) agonist quinpirole more potently counteract the D(2) agonist (quinpirole) induced reduction of pallidal glutamate levels in the DA denervated vs the control striatum indicating an enhancement of the inhibitory A(2A)/D(2) interaction. In the DA denervated but not in the control striatum the A(2A) agonist CGS21680 could strongly increase striatal glutamate levels, indicating an increased receptor signaling in the A(2A) R located on the striatal glutamate terminals, where also D(2) like R exist, here probably as D(4). Thus, the signaling of this A(2A) R may be set free by the loss of D(4) tone on the AC activated by A(2A) in this postulated A(2A)/D(4) heteromer on the glutamate terminals. Taken together, the results indicate that the antiparkinsonian actions of A(2A) antagonists probably are produced by blockade of A(2A) R in the A(2A)/D(2) heterodimers mainly located in the striatopallidal GABA neurons.

Effects of adenosine A1, dopamine D1 and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors-modulating agents on locomotion of the reserpinised rats

The pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease and l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia are characterised by an imbalance between activity of the direct and indirect pathways regulated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors, respectively. In this study, we investigated the effects of treatments combining adenosine A(1) and metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptors modulators on locomotion induced by dopamine D1 receptor activation in the reserpine-treated rats. Administration of the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist and mGlu5 receptor antagonist resulted in the significant reduction of dopamine D1 receptor agonist-induced locomotion. The combination of adenosine A(1) receptor agonist with mGlu5 receptor antagonist had no greater effect than these compounds alone. However, the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist attenuated the inhibitory effect of mGlu5 receptor antagonist. The data suggest that the effect of mGlu5 receptor blockade on locomotion elicited by dopamine D1 receptor stimulation involves activation of adenosine A(1) receptors. This interaction can improve our understanding of pathophysiology of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia.

Neuroprotective effect of L-DOPA co-administered with the adenosine A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease

Adenosine A2A receptors are a new target for drug development in Parkinson's disease. Some experimental and clinical data suggest that A2A receptor antagonists can provide symptomatic improvement by potentiating the effects of L-DOPA as well as a decrease in secondary effects such as L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. L-DOPA-induced behavioral sensitization in unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats is frequently used as an experimental model of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. In the present work this model was used to evaluate the effect of the A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 and the A2A receptor antagonist MSX-3 on L-DOPA-induced behavioral sensitization and 6-hydroxydopamine-induced striatal dopamine denervation. L-DOPA-induced behavioral sensitization was determined as an increase in L-DOPA-induced abnormal involuntary movements and enhancement of apomorphine-induced turning behavior. Striatal dopamine innervation was determined by measuring tyrosine-hydroxylase immunoreactivity. Chronic administration of MSX-3 was not found to be effective at counteracting L-DOPA-induced behavioral sensitization. On the other hand, CGS 21680 completely avoided the development of L-DOPA-induced behavioral sensitization. The analysis of the striatal dopamine innervation showed that L-DOPA-CGS 21680 co-treatment conferred neuroprotection to the toxic effects of 6-hydroxydopamine. This neuroprotective effect was dependent on A2A and D2 receptor stimulation, since it was counteracted by MSX-3 and by the D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol. These results open new therapeutic avenues in early events in Parkinson's disease.

Adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor–receptor heteromers. Targets for neuro-psychiatric disorders

Emerging evidence shows that G protein-coupled receptors can form homo- and heteromers. These include adenosine A(2A) receptor-dopamine D(2) receptor heteromers, which are most probably localized in the dendritic spines of the striatopallidal GABAergic neurons, where they are in a position to modulate glutamatergic neurotransmission. The discovery of A(2A) receptor-dopamine D(2) receptor heteromers gives a frame for the well-known antagonistic interaction between both receptors, which is the bases for a new therapeutic approach for neuro-psychiatric disorders, such as Parkinson's disease and schizoprenia. The present review deals mainly with the biochemical and molecular aspects of A(2A) receptor-dopamine D(2) receptor interactions. Recent results at the molecular level show that A(2A) receptor-dopamine D(2) receptor heteromers represent the first example of epitope-epitope electrostatic interaction underlying receptor heteromerization. Most probably A(2A) receptor-D(2) receptor heteromerization is not static, but subject to a dynamic regulation, related to the phosphorylation dependence of the A(2A) receptor epitope and to the ability of the D(2) receptor epitope to bind different partners. Finding out the mechanisms involved in this dynamic regulation can have important implications for the treatment of basal ganglia disorders, schizophrenia and drug addiction.

Stimulation of adenosine A2A receptors elicits zif/268 and NMDA epsilon2 subunit mRNA expression in cortex and striatum of the "weaver" mutant mouse, a genetic model of nigrostriatal dopamine deficiency

Interaction between basal ganglia and cerebral cortex is critical for normal goal-directed behavior. In the present study we have used the immediate early gene zif/268, as functional marker to investigate how the stimulation of adenosine A2A receptors, i.e. of the "indirect" striatal output pathway, affects striatal and cortical function in "weaver" mouse, a genetic model of dopamine deficiency. Furthermore, we have examined the effect of A2A receptor stimulation on glutamate receptor expression in the "weaver" brain. A single injection of CGS21680 (A2A receptor agonist), induced strong expression of zif/268 mRNA, detected by in situ hybridization, not only in striatum but also in the motor cortex of the "weaver" mutant. This cortical response seems to be elicited through the basal-ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuit, rather than through a direct cortical effect, since A2A receptors are not detectable in cortex according to our autoradiographic study. Co-administration of CGS21680 and quinpirole (D2 receptor agonist) attenuated the expression of zif/268 mRNA in dorsal striatum but not in motor cortex, indicating that the cortical response is dopamine-D2-receptor-independent. However, this co-administration induced an increase in zif/268 mRNA expression in somatosensory cortex, which could rely on disinhibition of the thalamo-cortical pathway. The motor cortical response could be of clinical interest, as it would further stimulate the "indirect" striatal pathway in a feed forward circuit, thus worsening the parkinsonian symptoms. Furthermore, the up-regulation of epsilon2 subunit mRNA of the NMDA receptor, induced by CGS21680 administration, seen in striatum and cortex of the "weaver" mouse, would lead to overactivity of these receptors worsening dyskinesias. These results suggest adenosine to play a significant role in regulating striatal and cortical neurochemistry in a dopamine-depleted mouse. Blockade of these receptors by specific A2A antagonists could ameliorate parkinsonian symptoms.

Effect of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine on l-DOPA biotransformation in rat striatum

In the present study, we investigated effects of the new selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC) on L-DOPA-induced dopamine (DA) release in the striatum of intact and reserpine-treated rats. CSC given in a pharmacologically effective dose of 5 mg/kg i.p. significantly increased striatal DA release after joint administration of L-DOPA (100 mg/kg, i.p.) and benserazide (50 mg/kg, i.p.) to intact and reserpine (2.5 mg/kg, s.c.)-injected rats. CSC did not change the elevated level of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) in intact rats, but raised it in DA-depleted animals. The availability of exogenous L-DOPA in the extracellular space was similar and equally increased by CSC in both intact and reserpinized rats. Our results suggest that the observed effects may be mediated by striatal adenosine A2A receptors, and are probably related to the CSC action on DA metabolism and the increased transport of exogenous L-DOPA into the brain. These observations might be of relevance, considering the use of selective A2A antagonists as potential supplements to L-DOPA therapy of Parkinson's disease.

PAP 9704, a Korean Herbal Medicine Attenuates Methamphetamine-Induced Hyperlocomotion via Adenosine A2A Receptor Stimulation in Mice

The effect of PAP 9704, a traditional prescription in Korea consisting of Polygala tenuifolia, Acorus gramineus, and Poria cocos at a ratio of 1:1:1 (dry weight), on methamphetamine (MA)-induced hyperlocomotion was examined in mice. The increased locomotor activity induced by MA (1 mg/kg/d, i.p. x 7) was significantly attenuated by co-administration with PAP 9704 (100 or 200 mg/kg/d, p.o. x 7) in a dose dependent manner. Consistently, it was found that the hyperlocomotor activity occurred in parallel with the expression of striatal fos-related antigen immunoreactivity. The adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist, 1,3,7-trimethyl-8-(3-chlorostyryl)xanthine (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg, i.p.), significantly reversed the pharmacological action of PAP 9704 in a dose related manner, but the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) and the A(2B) receptor antagonist alloxazine (1.5 or 3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) did not significantly affect this pharmacological action. Our results suggest that PAP 9704 prevents MA-induced hyperlocomotion, at least in part, via the stimulation of the adenosine A(2A) receptor.

The biochemical basis of the neurobehavioral abnormalities in the Lesch–Nyhan syndrome: a hypothesis

Lesch-Nyhan syndrome (LNS) is a rare X-recessive disorder that leads to virtually complete deficiency of the purine salvage enzyme hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT). Partial HPRT deficiency results in uric acid overproduction with subsequent hyperuricemia, nephrolithiasis, renal failure and gouty arthritis. In contrast, at complete HPRT deficiency, besides overproduction of uric acid neurological problems appear including spasticity, choreoathetosis, mental retardation, and compulsive self-mutilation. The cause for the uric acid overproduction has been clarified, but the connection between the enzyme deficiency and the neurological manifestations in LNS remains unclear. A hypothesis, which explains this relation, is proposed in the paper. The hypothesis has several important points most substantial of which is the accelerated biosynthesis of semiessential amino acid histidine that against the background of accelerated purine de novo biosynthesis results in 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamideribotide (AICAR) and histamine accumulation. The histamine and AICAR were determined to be the compounds that cause the neurobehavioral symptoms of LNS for several reasons. First, in the basal ganglia a balance between the direct (activating) and the indirect (inhibiting) pathways arising on the basis of the antagonistic and reciprocal dopamine-adenosine interactions normally exists. This balance can tonically regulate smooth voluntary movements and the activity of the thalamus, which, in turn, processes the afferent sensorimotor signals from the whole body to the all areas of the cerebral cortex and is concerned to modulate mental development and bring sensory information into awareness. Second, histamine is known to induce a selective damage in dopaminergic neurons inhibiting the direct dopaminergic pathway, which could lead to muscular rigidity, and slowness in initiating movements as well as tremor that are characteristic of Parkinsonism in LNS. Third, AICAribosid (AICAR breakdown product) is a potent adenosine A2a receptor antagonist inhibiting the indirect dopamine-adenosinergic pathway and, therefore, could be responsible for the choreoathetosis, dystonia and ballismus found in LNS. The excitatory-inhibitory disbalance in the basal ganglia could result in inadequate modification of the thalamus activity with subsequent mental retardation and symptoms that include the patients not being aware for their own bodies that could give rise to self-mutilation. Finally, a possibility for the creation of a new animal model that could exactly match the human LNS is proposed in the paper.

Possible therapeutic benefits of adenosine-potentiating drugs in reducing age-related degenerative disease in dogs and cats

Adenosine is a ubiquitous, biologically important molecule that is a precursor of other biologically active molecules. It also is a component of some co-factors and has distinct physiological actions in its own right. Levels are maintained by synthesis from dietary precursors and re-cycling. The daily turnover of adenosine is very high. Adenosine can act either as a hormone by binding to adenosine receptors, four adenosine receptor subtypes have been identified, and as an intracellular modulator, after transport into the cell by membrane transporter proteins. One of the principal intracellular actions of adenosine is inhibition of the enzyme phosphodiesterase. Extracellular adenosine also has specific neuromodulatory actions on dopamine and glutamate. Selective and nonselective agonists and antagonists of adenosine are available. The tasks of developing, evaluating and exploiting the therapeutic potential of these compounds is still in its infancy. Adenosine has actions in the central nervous system (CNS), heart and vascular system, skeletal muscle and the immune system and the presence of receptors suggests potential actions in the gonads and other organs. Adenosine agonists improve tissue perfusion through actions on vascular smooth muscle and erythrocyte fluidity and they can be used to improve the quality of life in aged dogs. This article reviews the therapeutic potential of adenosine-potentiating drugs in the treatment of age-related conditions in companion animals, some of which may be exacerbated by castration or spaying at an early age.

Caffeine, fatigue, and cognition

Effects of caffeine and fatigue are discussed with special attention to adenosine-dopamine interactions. Effects of caffeine on human cognition are diverse. Behavioural measurements indicate a general improvement in the efficiency of information processing after caffeine, while the EEG data support the general belief that caffeine acts as a stimulant. Studies using ERP measures indicate that caffeine has an effect on attention, which is independent of specific stimulus characteristics. Behavioural effects on response related processes turned out to be mainly related to more peripheral motor processes. Recent insights in adenosine and dopamine physiology and functionality and their relationships with fatigue point to a possible modulation by caffeine of mechanisms involved in the regulation of behavioural energy expenditure.

Caffeine and central noradrenaline: effects on mood, cognitive performance, eye movements and cardiovascular function

There have been numerous studies on the effects of caffeine on behaviour and cardiovascular function. It is now important to clarify the mechanisms that underlie such effects, and the main objective of the present study was to investigate whether changes in central noradrenaline underlie some of the behavioural and cardiovascular effects of caffeine. This was examined using a clonidine challenge paradigm. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were assigned to one of four conditions: (i) clonidine/caffeine; (ii) clonidine/placebo; (iii) placebo/caffeine: (iv) placebo/placebo. Baseline measurements of mood, cognitive performance, saccadic eye movements and cardiovascular function were recorded. Subsequently, volunteers were given either clonidine (200 microg) or placebo and consumed coffee containing caffeine (1.5 mg/kg) or placebo. The test battery was then repeated 30 min, 150 min and 270 min later. A second cup of coffee (with the same amount of caffeine as the first) was consumed 120 min after the first cup. The results showed that clonidine reduced alertness, impaired many aspects of performance and slowed saccadic eye movements; caffeine removed many of these impairments. Both clonidine and caffeine influenced blood pressure (clonidine reduced it, caffeine raised it) but the effects appeared to be independent, suggesting that separate mechanisms were involved. In addition, there were some behavioural effects of caffeine that were independent of the clonidine effect (e.g. effects on speed of encoding of new information) and these may reflect other neurotransmitter systems (e.g cholinergic effects). Overall, the results suggest that caffeine counteracts reductions in the turnover of central noradrenaline. This mechanism may underlie the beneficial effects of caffeine seen in low alertness states.

Molecular mechanisms and therapeutical implications of intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors with examples from the striatopallidal GABA neurons

The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among G protein-coupled receptors was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype-specific interactions between different types of receptor homomers. The discovery of GABAB heterodimers started this field rapidly followed by the discovery of heteromerization among isoreceptors of several G protein-coupled receptors such as delta/kappa opioid receptors. Heteromerization was also discovered among distinct types of G protein-coupled receptors with the initial demonstration of somatostatin SSTR5/dopamine D2 and adenosine A1/dopamine D1 heteromeric receptor complexes. The functional meaning of these heteromeric complexes is to achieve direct or indirect (via adapter proteins) intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions in the complex. G protein-coupled receptors also form heteromeric complexes involving direct interactions with ion channel receptors, the best example being the GABAA/dopamine D5 receptor heteromerization, as well as with receptor tyrosine kinases and with receptor activity modulating proteins. As an example, adenosine, dopamine, and glutamate metabotropic receptor/receptor interactions in the striatopallidal GABA neurons are discussed as well as their relevance for Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and drug dependence. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex, and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist. These complexes may assist in the process of linking G protein-coupled receptors and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for some forms of learning and memory.

The adenosine receptor antagonist CGS15943 reinstates cocaine-seeking behavior and maintains self-administration in baboons

RATIONALE

Caffeine and the adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor antagonist CGS15943 produce many behavioral effects that are similar to those produced by classic stimulant drugs (e.g. cocaine and amphetamines).

OBJECTIVES

The current study evaluated whether CGS15943 would maintain self-administration and reinstate extinguished lever responding previously maintained by cocaine (i.e. cocaine-seeking) or by food (i.e. food-seeking). Reinstatement with CGS15943 was compared to cocaine, caffeine, and alprazolam.

METHODS

Up to 30 injections of 0.032 mg/kg cocaine or 30 deliveries of 1-g food pellets were available under a fixed ratio (FR10) schedule of reinforcement during daily 2-h sessions. For reinstatement tests, lever responses were extinguished by substituting saline for cocaine or by removing pellets from the mechanical feeder. After extinction of lever responding, acute "priming" doses (mg/kg, IV) of cocaine (0.1-3.2), the adenosine receptor antagonists caffeine (0.1-1.8) and CGS15943 (0.032-0.32) or the benzodiazepine receptor agonist alprazolam (0.1-1.8 mg/kg) were administered. The intravenous reinforcing effects of CGS15943 were also evaluated; each dose of CGS15943 (0.001-0.032 mg/kg) was substituted for cocaine for at least 10 days and until self-injection was relatively stable.

RESULTS

Cocaine, caffeine and CGS15943, dose-dependently increased cocaine-seeking, where as alprazolam did not. Cocaine, caffeine and CGS15943 did not increase food-seeking. CGS15943 reinstated cocaine-seeking at rates that were comparable to those produced by cocaine. Pretreatment with the adenosine A(2) agonist CGS21680 decreased CGS15943-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking. In self-injection testing, CGS15943 was self-administered at levels greater than vehicle. An inverted U-shaped dose-effect function was obtained with peak mean rates maintained by 0.01 mg/kg CGS15943.

CONCLUSIONS

The adenosine antagonist CGS15943 reinstated cocaine-seeking and functioned as an intravenous reinforcer. The finding that CGS21680 produced a rightward shift in the CGS15943 reinstatement dose-effect curve supports a role of adenosine mechanisms in the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior.

Involvement of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in the motor effects of caffeine after its acute and chronic administration

The involvement of adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors in the motor effects of caffeine is still a matter of debate. In the present study, counteraction of the motor-depressant effects of the selective A(1) receptor agonist CPA and the A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 by caffeine, the selective A(1) receptor antagonist CPT, and the A(2A) receptor antagonist MSX-3 was compared. CPT and MSX-3 produced motor activation at the same doses that selectively counteracted motor depression induced by CPA and CGS 21680, respectively. Caffeine also counteracted motor depression induced by CPA and CGS 21680 at doses that produced motor activation. However, caffeine was less effective than CPT at counteracting CPA and even less effective than MSX-3 at counteracting CGS 21680. On the other hand, when administered alone in habituated animals, caffeine produced stronger motor activation than CPT or MSX-3. An additive effect on motor activation was obtained when CPT and MSX-3 were coadministered. Altogether, these results suggest that the motor-activating effects of acutely administered caffeine in rats involve the central blockade of both A(1) and A(2A) receptors. Chronic exposure to caffeine in the drinking water (1.0 mg/ml) resulted in tolerance to the motor effects of an acute administration of caffeine, lack of tolerance to amphetamine, apparent tolerance to MSX-3 (shift to the left of its 'bell-shaped' dose-response curve), and true cross-tolerance to CPT. The present results suggest that development of tolerance to the effects of A(1) receptor blockade might be mostly responsible for the tolerance to the motor-activating effects of caffeine and that the residual motor-activating effects of caffeine in tolerant individuals might be mostly because of A(2A) receptor blockade.

Effects of chronic caffeine pre-exposure on conditioned and unconditioned psychomotor activity induced by nicotine and amphetamine in rats

Three experiments examined the effects of chronic pre-exposure to caffeine on the subsequent conditioned and unconditioned locomotor activating effects of nicotine or amphetamine in rats. Rats were given daily intraperitoneal injections of caffeine anhydrous (0, 10 or 30 mg/kg base) for 30 days. Conditioning (environment-drug pairings) began after the last day of caffeine pre-exposure. Pre-exposure to 30 mg/kg of caffeine enhanced the acute and chronic locomotor effects of amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg). A similar enhancement of activity was not seen with the high (0.421 mg/kg base) or low dose (0.175 mg/kg) of nicotine. In a drug-free test, the distinct environment paired with amphetamine and the high dose of nicotine evoked increases in activity relative to controls. Caffeine pre-exposure did not affect expression of this conditioned hyperactivity. These effects of caffeine pre-exposure on amphetamine-induced activity could not be attributed to non-specific effects of caffeine.

Adenosine A1 receptors control dopamine D1-dependent [(3)H]GABA release in slices of substantia nigra pars reticulata and motor behavior in the rat

Abnormalities in dopaminergic control of basal ganglia function play a key role in Parkinson's disease. Adenosine appears to modulate the dopaminergic control in striatum, where an inhibitory interaction between adenosine and dopamine receptors has been demonstrated. However the interaction has not been established in substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) where density of both receptors is high. Here we have explored the interaction between A1/D1 receptors in SNr. In SNr slices, SKF 38393, a selective D1 receptor agonist, produced a stimulation of depolarization-induced Ca(2+)-dependent [(3)H]GABA release that was inhibited by adenosine. The adenosine inhibition was abolished by 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist. DPCPX per se enhanced GABA release, indicating inhibition of the release by endogenous adenosine. When D1 receptors were blocked with SCH 23390 or the slices were depleted of dopamine, the effect of DPCPX was suppressed, showing that activation of dopamine receptors was necessary for the adenosine inhibition. In normal slices, 2-chloro-n(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), a selective A1 agonist, inhibited GABA release, but the inhibition was prevented by the blockade of D1 receptors with SCH 23390. Superperfusion with 8-bromo-cAMP produced a stimulation of GABA release that was not blocked by CCPA: this finding indicates that the blockade of D1 effects caused by activation of A1 receptors is specific. To see if these actions on GABA release were correlated with changes in motor behavior we studied the effect of unilateral intranigral injections of modifiers of adenosine A1 and dopamine D1 receptors in rats challenged with systemic methamphetamine. Both the A1 agonist CCPA and the D1 antagonist SCH 23390 produced ipsilateral turning whereas the A1 antagonist DPCPX caused contralateral turning. These motor effects are consistent with the findings on GABA release. The results indicate the presence of an inhibitory A1/D1 receptor interaction in SNr. The inhibition exerted by A1 adenosine receptors on GABAergic striatonigral transmission would be due exclusively to blockade of the facilitation resulting from activation of D1 dopamine receptors. The data permit to better understand the action of adenosine antagonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Gene expression in peripheral arterial chemoreceptors

The peripheral arterial chemoreceptors of the carotid body participate in the ventilatory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia, the arousal responses to asphyxial apnea, and the acclimatization to high altitude. In response to an excitatory stimuli, glomus cells in the carotid body depolarize, their intracellular calcium levels rise, and neurotransmitters are released from them. Neurotransmitters then bind to autoreceptors on glomus cells and postsynaptic receptors on chemoafferents of the carotid sinus nerve. Binding to inhibitory or excitatory receptors on chemoafferents control the electrical activity of the carotid sinus nerve, which provides the input to respiratory-related brainstem nuclei. We and others have used gene expression in the carotid body as a tool to determine what neurotransmitters mediate the response of peripheral arterial chemoreceptors to excitatory stimuli, specifically hypoxia. Data from physiological studies support the involvement of numerous putative neurotransmitters in hypoxic chemosensitivity. This article reviews how in situ hybridization histochemistry and other cellular localization techniques confirm, refute, or expand what is known about the role of dopamine, norepinephrine, substance P, acetylcholine, adenosine, and ATP in chemotransmission. In spite of some species differences, review of the available data support that 1). dopamine and norepinephrine are synthesized and released from glomus cells in all species and play an inhibitory role in hypoxic chemosensitivity; 2). substance P and acetylcholine are not synthesized in glomus cells of most species but may be made and released from nerve fibers innervating the carotid body in essentially all species; 3). adenosine and ATP are ubiquitous molecules that most likely play an excitatory role in hypoxic chemosensitivity.

Dopamine modulates the function of group II and group III metabotropic glutamate receptors in the substantia nigra pars reticulata

Recent findings have shown that dendritically released dopamine (DA) plays an important modulatory role in the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr). It is therefore possible that the loss of DA observed in Parkinson's disease (PD) could hold important consequences for nigral function. Previously, we have shown that activation of presynaptically localized group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) inhibits excitatory transmission at the subthalamic nucleus (STN)-SNr synapse and that activation of presynaptically localized group III mGluRs decreases excitatory and inhibitory transmission in the SNr. To test the hypothesis that nigral DA can modulate mGluR function in the SNr, we performed whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from gamma-aminobutyric acidergic SNr neurons in slices obtained from rats that were acutely reserpinized. In slices obtained from reserpinized animals, the effect of group II mGluR activation by the selective agonist (+)-2-aminobicyclo[3.1.0]-hexane-2,6-dicarboxylate monohydrate (LY354740) (100 nM), but not group III mGluR activation [L-(+)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid, L-AP4, 500 microM], at STN-SNr synapses is significantly decreased. This effect could be mimicked in control slices by prior bath application of haloperidol (20 microM) and R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SCH23390) (20 microM) but not sulpiride (50 microM). Furthermore, application of dopamine (100 microM) and (+/-)-6-chloro-7,8-dyhydroxy-3allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetra-hydro-1H-benzazepine (SKF82958) (1 microM) but not quinpirole (10 microM) could rescue the group II mGluR effect in reserpinized slices. The effect of group III mGluR activation (L-AP4, 100 microM) on inhibitory synaptic transmission was also significantly reduced in slices from reserpine-treated animals. This effect was mimicked by haloperidol (20 microM), SCH23390 (20 microM), and sulpiride (50 microM) in control slices. Thus, in a Parkinsonian state, the loss of nigral DA may add to the overall pathophysiological changes in basal ganglia output.

Evaluation of [4-O-methyl-(11)C]KW-6002 as a potential PET ligand for mapping central adenosine A(2A) receptors in rats

KW-6002, a xanthine-based adenosine A(2A) antagonist, was labelled with the positron emitter carbon-11 by O-methylation of its precursor, KF23325, using [(11)C]iodomethane and was evaluated in rats as a putative in vivo radioligand for positron emission tomography (PET). Following intravenous injection of [(11)C]KW-6002, radioactivity was measured in blood, plasma, peripheral tissues, and in discrete brain tissues over a 2-h time period commensurate with PET scanning. In brain, [(11)C]KW-6002 showed highest retention in striata, with evidence of saturable binding, and lowest retention in frontal cortex (a tissue low in adenosine A(2A) receptors). PET scanning with [(11)C]KW-6002 demonstrated a specific signal in the striata which could be described using compartmental modelling. Specific binding was, however, also detected in extrastriatal regions, including brain areas reported to have low adenosine A(2A) receptor density. Blocking studies with the A(1) selective antagonist KF15372 and the non xanthine-type A(2A) antagonist ZM 241385 failed to elucidate the nature of this binding. Thus, although [(11)C]KW-6002 shows some potential for development as a PET ligand for quantifying striatal adenosine A(2A) receptor function, its in vivo selectivity requires further investigation.

Distinct pharmacological mechanisms leading to c-fos gene expression in the fetal suprachiasmatic nucleus

Maternal treatment with cocaine or a D1-dopamine receptor agonist induces c-fos gene expression in the fetal suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). Other treatments that induce c-fos expression in the fetal SCN include caffeine and nicotine. In the current article, the authors assessed whether these different pharmacological treatments activate c-fos expression by a common neurochemical mechanism. The results indicate the presence of at least two distinct pharmacological pathways to c-fos expression in the fetal rat SCN. Previous studies demonstrate that prenatal activation of dopamine receptors affects the developing circadian system. The present work shows that stimulant drugs influence the fetal brain through multiple transmitter systems and further suggests that there may be multiple pathways leading to entrainment of the fetal biological clock.

Modulation of ionotropic glutamate receptor channels

Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain. It acts at ligand-gated cationic channels (NMDA, AMPA and kainate receptors) and at G protein-coupled metabotropic glutamate receptors as well. The glutamatergic transmission is suggested to be involved in development, learning and memory. Its dysfunction can be detected in epilepsy, stroke, neurodegenerative disorders and drug abuse. This paper summarizes the present knowledge on the modulation of glutamate-gated ion channels in the central nervous system by phosphorylation. An inhibitory interaction between adenosine A2A receptors and NMDA receptors in the neostriatum is described as an example. mediated by the phospholipase C/inositol trisphosphate/calmodulin and calmodulin kinase II pathway.

Effects of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists in a genetic animal model of primary paroxysmal dystonia

1. Recent studies have shown beneficial effects of an adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist in dt(sz) mutant hamsters, an animal model of paroxysmal dystonia, in which stress and consumption of coffee can precipitate dystonic attacks. This prompted us to examine the effects of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists on severity of dystonia in dt(sz) hamsters in more detail. 2. The non-selective adenosine A(1)/A(2A) receptor antagonists, caffeine (10 - 20 mg kg(-1) i.p.) and theophylline (10 - 30 mg kg(-1) s.c.), worsened the dystonia in dt(sz) hamsters. 3. Aggravation of dystonia was also caused by the selective adenosine A(1)/A(2A) antagonist CGS 15943 (9-chloro2-2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]quinazolin-5-amine) at a dose of 30 mg kg(-1) i.p. and by the adenosine A(1) antagonist DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine; 20 - 30 mg kg(-1) i.p.), while the A(2) antagonist DMPX (3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine; 2 - 4 mg kg(-1) i.p.) and the highly selective A(2A) antagonist ZM 241385 (4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol; 2 - 5 mg kg(-1) i.p.) failed to exert any effects on dystonia. 4. In contrast to the antagonists, both the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist CPA (N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine; 0.1 - 1.0 mg kg(-1) i.p.) and the A(2A) agonist CGS 21680 (2p-(2carboxyethylphen-ethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamindoadenosine; 0.1 - 2.0 mg kg(-1) i.p.) exerted a striking improvement of dystonia. 5. These data suggest that the precipitating effects of methylxanthines are, at least in part, related to their adenosine receptor antagonistic action. 6. Although adenosine receptor agonists can be regarded as interesting candidates for the therapy of paroxysmal dystonia, adverse effects may limit the therapeutic potential of adenosine A(1) agonists, while beneficial effects of the adenosine A(2A) agonist CGS 21680 were already found at well tolerated doses.

SCH 58261, an A(2A) adenosine receptor antagonist, counteracts parkinsonian-like muscle rigidity in rats

The aim of the present study was to find out whether blockade of adenosine A(2A) receptors by a selective antagonist, SCH 58261, influenced parkinsonian-like muscle rigidity. Muscle tone was examined using a combined mechano- and electromyographic method which simultaneously measured muscle resistance (MMG) of a rat hindfoot to passive extension and flexion in the ankle joint and electromyographic activity (EMG) of the antagonistic muscles of that joint: gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior. Muscle rigidity produced by reserpine (5 mg/kg + alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine, 250 mg/kg) was antagonized by SCH 58261 (0.1-5 mg/kg). SCH 58261 (5 mg/kg) also reduced reserpine-enhanced tonic and reflex EMG activities in both the gastrocnemius and the tibialis muscles. Moreover, SCH 58261 in doses of 1 and 5 mg/kg abolished muscle resistance induced by haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg). However, only the highest dose of SCH 58261 (5 mg/kg) decreased tonic EMG activity enhanced by haloperidol. Administration of L-DOPA (75 and 100 mg/kg) dose-dependently decreased the muscle resistance as well as tonic EMG activity evoked by haloperidol. Combined administration of SCH 58261 (0.1 mg/kg) and L-DOPA (50 mg/kg) in doses which did not affect the haloperidol-induced muscle rigidity produced a pronounced synergistic effect. The ability of SCH 58261 to diminish the parkinsonian-like muscle rigidity and to potentiate the effect of L-DOPA in this model seems to indicate a therapeutic value of this compound in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination by mouse striatal A(1) adenosinergic receptor

We have demonstrated that ethanol-induced motor incoordination is modulated by cerebellar adenosine A(1) receptor. This study represents an extension into another important brain motor area, the striatum that, unlike cerebellum, has high density of both A(1) and A(2A) receptors. Direct intra-striatal micro-infusion of Ro15-4513 (0.05, 0.5, 1 ng), a partial inverse-agonist of benzodiazepine, significantly and nearly dose-dependently attenuated ethanol-induced motor incoordination indicating mediation of ethanol's motor incoordination by striatum. Intra-striatal A(1)-selective agonist N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; 1, 2, 4 ng), A(1) = A(2A) non-selective agonist, 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA; 1.5, 3, 6 ng), and A(1)-selective antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX; 25, 50, 100 ng) dose-dependently accentuated and attenuated, respectively, ethanol-induced motor incoordination, strongly suggesting modulation by striatal adenosine A(1) receptor. Intra-striatal DPCPX significantly antagonized not only ethanol-induced motor incoordination but also its potentiation by intra-striatal CHA, R-(+)-N(6)-(2-phenylisopropyladenosine) (R-PIA), or NECA. No change in motor coordination occurred after the highest dose of CHA, R-PIA, or NECA followed by saline. Similarly, the highest intra-striatal dose of Ro15-4513 or DPCPX neither altered motor coordination or locomotor activity indicating relative selectivity of interaction with ethanol. Nearly 25-fold higher dose of A(2A)-selective agonist, CGS-21680, compared to CHA was necessary to produce a comparable potentiation of ethanol's motor incoordination perhaps suggesting a lack of or less significant striatal A(2A) involvement. Intra-striatal pertussis toxin (0.5 microg) pre-treatment markedly attenuated ethanol-induced motor incoordination as well as its potentiation by intra-striatal CHA. These results support that striatum is one of the brain motor areas mediating the motor impairing effects of acute ethanol and that the latter's modulation occurs via A(1)-selective receptors coupled to pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins.

Adenosine/dopamine interaction: implications for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Evidence for a role of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the motor effects of adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine, is reviewed, based on the existence of specific antagonistic interactions between specific subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the striatum. Both adenosine A(1) and adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists induce motor activation in rodents. At least a certain degree of dopaminergic activity is required to obtain adenosine antagonist-induced motor activation, with adenosine A(1) antagonists being the most sensitive and non-selective adenosine antagonists the most resistant to striatal dopamine depletion. When considering long-term treatment with adenosine antagonists concomitant administration of dopamine agonists might be required in order to obtain strong motor effects (cross-sensitization) and to avoid the development of telerance.

Blunted adenosine A2a receptor function in platelets in patients with major depression

There is provisional evidence of involvement of adenosine in depression. In this study, the second messenger intracellular calcium response in platelets was measured in patients with major depression and controls using spectrofluorometry. The primary result of this study was a statistically significantly blunted second messenger response to agonist stimulation in the depressed group compared to the control group at the 50 and 100 nM and 1 microM dosage levels. This suggests that dysregulation of the adenosine A2a receptor may be present in depression.

The role of the D(2) dopamine receptor (D(2)R) in A(2A) adenosine receptor (A(2A)R)-mediated behavioral and cellular responses as revealed by A(2A) and D(2) receptor knockout mice

The A(2A)R is largely coexpressed with D(2)Rs and enkephalin mRNA in the striatum where it modulates dopaminergic activity. Activation of the A(2A)R antagonizes D(2)R-mediated behavioral and neurochemical effects in the basal ganglia through a mechanism that may involve direct A(2A)R-D(2)R interaction. However, whether the D(2)R is required for the A(2A)R to exert its neural function is an open question. In this study, we examined the role of D(2)Rs in A(2A)R-induced behavioral and cellular responses, by using genetic knockout (KO) models (mice deficient in A(2A)Rs or D(2)Rs or both). Behavioral analysis shows that the A(2A)R agonist 2-4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine reduced spontaneous as well as amphetamine-induced locomotion in both D(2) KO and wild-type mice. Conversely, the nonselective adenosine antagonist caffeine and the A(2A)R antagonist 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine produced motor stimulation in mice lacking the D(2)R, although the stimulation was significantly attenuated. At the cellular level, A(2A)R inactivation counteracted the increase in enkephalin expression in striatopallidal neurons caused by D(2)R deficiency. Consistent with the D(2) KO phenotype, A(2A)R inactivation partially reversed both acute D(2)R antagonist (haloperidol)-induced catalepsy and chronic haloperidol-induced enkephalin mRNA expression. Together, these results demonstrate that A(2A)Rs elicit behavioral and cellular responses despite either the genetic deficiency or pharmacological blockade of D(2)Rs. Thus, A(2A)R-mediated neural functions are partially independent of D(2)Rs. Moreover, endogenous adenosine acting at striatal A(2A)Rs may be most accurately viewed as a facilitative modulator of striatal neuronal activity rather than simply as an inhibitory modulator of D(2)R neurotransmission.

Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence for an antagonistic modulatory role of adenosine A2A receptors in dopamine D2 receptor regulation in the rat dopamine-denervated striatum

It has been shown that striatal adenosine A2A receptors can antagonistically interact with dopamine D2 receptors at the membrane level leading to a decrease in the affinity and efficacy of D2 receptors. Extracellular recordings and rotational behaviour were employed to obtain a correlate to these findings in an animal model of Parkinson's disease (PD). The recordings were performed in rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-induced catecholamine depletion. While recording in the dopamine-depleted striatum, local applications of the dopamine D2 agonist quinpirole reduced neuronal activity. However, when the adenosine A2A antagonist MSX-3 was applied simultaneously with quinpirole, the inhibition of neuronal firing seen after quinpirole alone was significantly potentiated (P< 0.001, n = 11). In contrast, local application of CGS 21680 attenuated the effect of quinpirole. The doses of MSX-3 and CGS 21680 used to achieve the modulation of quinpirole action had no effect per se on striatal neuronal firing. Furthermore, rotational behaviour revealed that MSX-3 dose-dependently increased the number of turns when administrated together with a threshold dose of quinpirole while no enhancement was achieved when MSX-3 was combined with SKF 38393. MSX-3 alone did not induce rotational behaviour. In conclusion, this study shows that low ineffective doses of MSX-3 enhance the effect of quinpirole on striatal firing rate, while the A2A agonist exerts the opposite action. This mechanism gives a therapeutic potential to A2A antagonists in the treatment of PD by enhancing D2 receptor function.

Lack of tolerance to motor stimulant effects of a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist

It is well known that tolerance develops to the actions of caffeine, which acts as an antagonist on adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors. Since selective adenosine A(2A) antagonists have been proposed as adjuncts to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) therapy in Parkinson's disease we wanted to examine if tolerance also develops to the selective A(2A) receptor antagonist 5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2, 4-triazolo [1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH 58261). SCH 58261 (0.1 and 7.5 mg/kg) increased basal locomotion and the motor stimulation afforded by apomorphine. Neither effect was subject to tolerance following long-term treatment with the same doses given intraperitoneally twice daily. There were no adaptive changes in A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors or their corresponding messenger RNA or in dopamine D(1) or D(2) receptors. These results demonstrate that the tolerance that develops to caffeine is not secondary to its inhibition of adenosine A(2A) receptors. The results also offer hope that long-term treatment with an adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist may be possible in man.

Catecholamine systems in the brain of vertebrates: new perspectives through a comparative approach

A comparative analysis of catecholaminergic systems in the brain and spinal cord of vertebrates forces to reconsider several aspects of the organization of catecholamine systems. Evidence has been provided for the existence of extensive, putatively catecholaminergic cell groups in the spinal cord, the pretectum, the habenular region, and cortical and subcortical telencephalic areas. Moreover, putatively dopamine- and noradrenaline-accumulating cells have been demonstrated in the hypothalamic periventricular organ of almost every non-mammalian vertebrate studied. In contrast with the classical idea that the evolution of catecholamine systems is marked by an increase in complexity going from anamniotes to amniotes, it is now evident that the brains of anamniotes contain catecholaminergic cell groups, of which the counterparts in amniotes have lost the capacity to produce catecholamines. Moreover, a segmental approach in studying the organization of catecholaminergic systems is advocated. Such an approach has recently led to the conclusion that the chemoarchitecture and connections of the basal ganglia of anamniote and amniote tetrapods are largely comparable. This review has also brought together data about the distribution of receptors and catecholaminergic fibers as well as data about developmental aspects. From these data it has become clear that there is a good match between catecholaminergic fibers and receptors, but, at many places, volume transmission seems to play an important role. Finally, although the available data are still limited, striking differences are observed in the spatiotemporal sequence of appearance of catecholaminergic cell groups, in particular those in the retina and olfactory bulb.

Functional uncoupling of adenosine A(2A) receptors and reduced responseto caffeine in mice lacking dopamine D2 receptors

Dopamine D(2) receptors (Rs) and adenosine A(2A)Rs are coexpressed on striatopallidal neurons, where they mediate opposing actions. In agreement with the idea that D(2)Rs tonically inhibit GABA release from these neurons, stimulation-evoked GABA release was significantly greater from striatal/pallidal slices from D(2)R null mutant (D(2)R(-/-)) than from wild-type (D(2)R(+/+)) mice. Release from heterozygous (D(2)R(+/-)) slices was intermediate. However, contrary to predictions that A(2A)R effects would be enhanced in D(2)R-deficient mice, the A(2A)R agonist CGS 21680 significantly increased GABA release only from D(2)R(+/+) slices. CGS 21680 modulation was observed when D(2)Rs were antagonized by raclopride, suggesting that an acute absence of D(2)Rs cannot explain the results. The lack of CGS 21680 modulation in the D(2)R-deficient mice was also not caused by a compensatory downregulation of A(2A)Rs in the striatum or globus pallidus. However, CGS 21680 significantly stimulated cAMP production only in D(2)R(+/+) striatal/pallidal slices. This functional uncoupling of A(2A)Rs in the D(2)R-deficient mice was not explained by reduced expression of G(s), G(olf), or type VI adenylyl cyclase. Locomotor activity induced by the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine was significantly less pronounced in D(2)R(-/-) mice than in D(2)R(+/+) and D(2)R(+/-) mice, further supporting the idea that D(2)Rs are required for caffeine activation. Caffeine increased c-fos only in D(2)R(-/-) globus pallidus. The present results show that a targeted disruption of the D(2)R reduces coupling of A(2A)Rs on striatopallidal neurons and thereby responses to drugs that act on adenosine receptors. They also reinforce the ideas that D(2)Rs and A(2A)Rs are functionally opposed and that D(2)R-mediated effects normally predominate.

Effect of adenosine kinase, adenosine deaminase and transport inhibitors on striatal dopamine and stereotypy after methamphetamine administration

The effect of adenosine kinase (AKA), adenosine deaminase (ADA) and transport inhibitors on the release of dopamine (DA) induced by methamphetamine (MTH) in rat striatum was assessed using in vivo microdialysis in freely moving rats. MTH injected in a dose of 3 x 5 mg/kg i.p. at 2-hour intervals produced a massive release of DA. This excessive release of DA was inhibited by the ADA inhibitor 2'-deoxycoformycin (DCF), the AKA inhibitor 5'-iodotubercidin (IOT) and the adenosine uptake inhibitor dilazep (DIL), each of them given locally to the striatum via a microdialysis probe at a concentration of 100 microM. Perfusion with the same concentrations of erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine (EHNA) and 5'-amino-5'-deoxyadenosine (NH(2)dAD), ADA and AKA inhibitors, respectively, induced a considerably weaker effect on DA release. The non-selective antagonist of adenosine A(1)/A(2A) receptor caffeine (75 microM) significantly prevented the inhibitory effect of DCF, IOT and DIL on the MTH-induced DA release. Intrastriatal administration of DCF, IOT and DIL (5 nmol/microl before each injection of MTH) inhibited the stereotypy induced by MTH. The striatal content of DA and its metabolites 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA), decreased by MTH administration and measured 5 days after treatment with the toxin, was reversed by all the inhibitors at the order of potency as follows: IOT>DCF>DIL. Direct agonists of adenosine A(1) and A(1)/A(2A) receptors, N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), respectively, given intrastriatally (5 nmol/microl) completely abolished the MTH-induced stereotypy and the fall in the striatal content of DA, DOPAC and HVA. The above results show that augmentation of endogenous adenosine in rat striatum by inhibition of its metabolism or uptake-despite the differences in the efficacy of various inhibitors-may provide neuroprotection against a toxic action of MTH.

Rescue of locomotor impairment in dopamine D2 receptor-deficient mice by an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist

In Parkinson's disease a degeneration of dopaminergic neurons of the nigrostriatal pathway is observed. Loss of dopaminergic regulation of striatal neuron activity results in altered motor functions. Adenosine A2A (A2AR) and dopamine D2 (D2R) receptors are colocalized in striatal medium spiny neurons. It has been proposed that adenosine binding to A2AR lowers the affinity of dopamine for D2R, thus modulating the function of this receptor. Absence of D2R in knockout mice (D2R-/-) results in impaired locomotion and coordinated movements. This indicates that absence of dopamine in Parkinson's disease might principally affect D2R-mediated effects with regard to locomotor functions. A2AR-selective antagonists have been demonstrated to have anti- parkinsonian activities in various models of Parkinson's disease in rodents and nonhuman primates. In this article, D2R-/- mice were used to explore the possibility that an A2AR antagonist might reestablish their motor impairment. Interestingly, blockade of A2AR rescues the behavioral parameters altered in D2R-/- mice. In addition, the level of expression of enkephalin and substance P, which were altered in D2R-/-, were also reestablished to normal levels after A2AR antagonist treatment. These results show that A2AR and D2R have antagonistic and independent activities in controlling neuronal and motor functions in the basal ganglia. They also provide evidence that selective A2AR antagonists can exhibit their anti-parkinsonian activities through a nondopaminergic mechanism.

Maternal caffeine intake has minor effects on adenosine receptor ontogeny in the rat brain

Maternal caffeine intake has been suggested to influence the offspring. We have studied the effects of maternal caffeine intake on adenosine and GABA receptors, targets for caffeine, during development of the rat brain. Caffeine (0.3 g/L) was added to the drinking water of rat dams during pregnancy and early postnatal life. Adenosine A1 and A2A and GABAA receptor development was studied using receptor autoradiography and in situ hybridization. Pups were examined on embryonic d 14 (E14), E18, E21, 2 h after birth (P2h), P24h, postnatal d 3 (P3), P7, P14, and P21. Adenosine A, receptor mRNA was detected at E14 and receptors at E18. A1 mRNA levels increased from the level reached at E18 between P3 and P14 (maximally a doubling), whereas A, receptors, studied by [3H]-1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentyl xanthine binding, increased later and to a much larger extent (about 10-fold) postnatally. Caffeine treatment had no significant effect on adenosine A1 receptors or on A1 receptor mRNA. A2A mRNA had reached adult levels by E18, whereas receptor levels were low or undetectable before birth and increased dramatically until P14. Caffeine did not influence A2A receptors or A2A receptor mRNA at any stage during development. [3H]-flunitrazepam binding, representing GABAA receptors, showed large regional variations during ontogeny, but there were no clear differences between the caffeine-exposed and the nonexposed pups. Thus, exposure to a low dose of caffeine during gestation and postnatal life had only minor effects on development of adenosine A, and A2A receptors and GABAA receptors in the rat brain.

Differential expression of a(2a), A(1)-adenosine and D(2)-dopamine receptor genes in rat peripheral arterial chemoreceptors during postnatal development

The sensitivity of peripheral arterial chemoreceptors in the carotid body to hypoxia increases with postnatal maturation. Carotid sinus nerve activity is augmented by adenosine binding to A(2a)-adenosine receptors and attenuated by dopamine binding to D(2)-dopamine receptors. In this study, we used in situ hybridization histochemistry to determine the change in the levels of mRNA expression for A(2a) and A(1)-adenosine receptors and D(2)-dopamine receptors in the rat carotid body. We also investigated the cellular distribution and possible colocalization of these receptor mRNAs and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNAs during the first 2 weeks of postnatal development. By using immunohistocytochemistry, we detected A(2a)-adenosine receptor protein in the carotid body and petrosal ganglion. We found that A(2a)-adenosine receptor mRNA and protein are expressed in the carotid body in animals at 0, 3, 6 and 14 postnatal days. The level of A(2a)-adenosine receptor mRNA expression significantly decreased by 14 postnatal days (P<0.02 vs. day 0) while D(2)-dopamine receptor mRNA levels significantly increased by day 3 and remained greater than D(2)-dopamine receptor mRNA levels at day 0 (P<0.001 all ages vs. day 0). TH mRNA was colocalized in cells in the carotid body with A(2a) adenosine receptor and D(2)-dopamine receptor mRNAs. A(1)-adenosine receptor mRNA was not expressed in the carotid body at any of the ages examined. In the petrosal ganglion, A(1)-adenosine receptor mRNA was abundantly expressed in numerous cells, A(2a)-adenosine receptor mRNA was expressed in a moderate number of cells while D(2)-dopamine receptor mRNA was seen in a few cells in the rostral petrosal ganglion. In conclusion, using in situ hybridization histochemistry, we have shown that mRNA for both the excitatory, A(2a)-adenosine receptor, and the inhibitory, D(2)-dopamine receptor, is developmentally regulated in presumably type I cells in the carotid body which may contribute to the maturation of hypoxic chemosensitivity. Furthermore, the presence A(1)-adenosine receptor mRNAs in cell bodies of the petrosal ganglion suggests that adenosine might also have an inhibitory role in hypoxic chemotransmission.

Selective attenuation of psychostimulant-induced behavioral responses in mice lacking A(2A) adenosine receptors

A(2A) adenosine receptors are highly expressed in the striatum where they modulate dopaminergic activity. The role of A(2A) receptors in psychostimulant action is less well understood because of the lack of A(2A)-selective compounds with access to the central nervous system. To investigate the A(2A) adenosinergic regulation of psychostimulant responses, we examined the consequences of genetic deletion of A(2A) receptors on psychostimulant-induced behavioral responses. The extent of dopaminergic innervation and expression of dopamine receptors in the striatum were indistinguishable between A(2A) receptor knockout and wild-type mice. However, locomotor responses to amphetamine and cocaine were attenuated in A(2A) knockout mice. In contrast, D(1)-like receptor agonists SKF81297 and SKF38393 produced identical locomotor stimulation and grooming, respectively, in wild-type and A(2A) knockout mice. Similarly, the D(2)-like agonist quinpirole produced motor-depression and stereotypy that were indistinguishable between A(2A) knockout and wild-type mice. Furthermore, attenuated amphetamine- (but not SKF81297-) induced locomotion was observed in pure 129-Steel as well as hybrid 129-SteelxC57BL/6 mice, confirming A(2A) receptor deficiency (and not genetic background) as the cause of the blunted psychostimulant responses in A(2A) knockout mice. These results demonstrate that A(2A) receptor deficiency selectively attenuates psychostimulant-induced behavioral responses and support an important role for the A(2A) receptor in modulating psychostimulant effects.