Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

Caprini assessment utilization and impact on patient safety in gynecologic surgery

PURPOSE

Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) can potentially be associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to determine the utilization of Caprini guideline indicated VTE in elective gynecologic surgery patients and its impact on postoperative VTE and bleeding complications.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of elective gynecologic surgical procedures performed between January 1, 2016, and May 31, 2021. Two study cohorts were generated: (1) those who received and (2) those who did not receive VTE prophylaxis based on Caprini score risk stratification. Outcome measures were then compared between the study cohorts and included the development of a VTE up to 90-days postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative bleeding events.

RESULTS

A total of 5471 patients met inclusion criteria and the incidence of VTE up to 90 days postoperatively was 1.04%. Overall, 29.6% of gynecologic surgery patients received Caprini score-based guideline VTE prophylaxis. 39.2% of patients that met high-risk VTE criteria (Caprini > 5) received appropriate Caprini score-based prophylaxis. In multivariate regression analysis, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 2.37, CI 1.27-4.45, p < 0.0001) and Caprini score (OR 1.13, CI 1.03-1.24, p = 0.008) predicted postoperatively VTE occurrence. Increasing Charlson comorbidity score (OR 1.39, CI 1.31-1.47, P < 0.001) ASA score (OR 1.36, CI 1.19-1.55, P < 0.001) and Caprini score (OR 1.10, CI 1.08-1.13, P < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of receiving appropriate inpatient VTE prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

While the overall incidence of VTE was low in this cohort, enhanced adherence to risk-based practice guidelines may provide more patient benefit than harm to postoperative gynecologic patients.

Management of surgical diseases of thyroid gland indications of the United Italian Society of Endocrine Surgery (SIUEC)

A task force of the United Italian society of Endocrine Surgery (SIUEC) was commissioned to review the position statement on diagnostic, therapeutic and health‑care management protocol in thyroid surgery published in 2016, at the light of new technologies, recent oncological concepts, and tailored approaches. The objective of this publication was to support surgeons with modern rational protocols of treatment that can be shared by health-care professionals, taking into account important clinical, healthcare and therapeutic aspects, as well as potential sequelae and complications. The task force consists of 13 members of the SIUEC highly trained and experienced in thyroid surgery. The main topics concern clinical evaluation and preoperative workup, patient preparation for surgery, surgical treatment, non-surgical options, postoperative management, prevention and management of major complications, outpatient care and follow-up.

The Caprini Risk Score for Early Prediction of Mortality in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The Caprini Risk Score (CRS) is a validated predictive instrument for venous thrombosis. Previous investigators have shown that a high CRS is associated with a higher risk of mortality from thrombotic diseases.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the association between the CRS and prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

Secondary analysis of data from a retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients were classified into 3 CRS-based categories (CRS ≤ 2, CRS = 3-4, and CRS ≥ 5, indicating low, medium, and high, respectively). Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used to assess the prognosis of patients with ACS. All-cause mortality and cardiac mortality were the end points.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-four patients (12.8%) died during follow-up. Multivariate Cox regression models identified CRS as an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality among patients with ACS (CRS = 3-4 vs CRS ≤ 2, hazard ratio: 3.268, 95% confidence interval: 1.396-7.647, P = .006; CRS ≥ 5 vs CRS ≤ 2, hazard ratio: 4.099, 95% confidence interval: 1.708-9.841, P = .002). Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between CRS and fibrinogen level ( r = 0.486, R2 = 0.765, P < .001) as well as D-dimer level ( r = 0.480, R2 = 0.465, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The CRS is a useful prognostic assessment instrument for patients with ACS, and the risk stratification of patients with ACS can be achieved based on their CRS at admission.

Considerations for pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis following inpatient brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy irradiation carries risks of both bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE). No screening or management recommendations for VTE in this setting have been developed. Our study aims to understand the incidence of VTE, compile published anticoagulation guidelines, and call for future guidelines to address thromboprophylaxis in this population.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective, single institution study of patients undergoing brachytherapy irradiation between 2012 and 2022 was undertaken. We analyzed 2 cohorts: 87 patients undergoing brachytherapy with an inpatient admission, and 66 patients assessed for risk of VTE or bleeding after discharge from an inpatient admission for brachytherapy. Caprini risk scores were calculated for each patient, and statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were included, and 25% had a VTE diagnosis. Forty-seven (54%) of patients included underwent brachytherapy as definitive treatment of cervical cancer, and 16 (18%) received brachytherapy irradiation to treat recurrent endometrial cancer. In the cohort of 66 patients assessed for risk of VTE or bleeding after brachytherapy discharge, 23 (34.8%) were discharged with thromboprophylaxis, and 43 (65.2%) were discharged without thromboprophylaxis. None of the patients discharged on thromboprophylaxis were diagnosed with a VTE within 90 days of discharge after brachytherapy, whereas 3 of 43 (7%) discharged without thromboprophylaxis were diagnosed with a VTE, OR and 95% CI: 0.25 (0.01-5.29), p = 0.37. Of the 23 patients discharged on thromboprophylaxis, 1 was readmitted for bleeding OR and 95% CI: 5.8 (0.22-155.18), p = 0.29. The median Caprini score was 11.

CONCLUSIONS

VTE is a common occurrence in patients undergoing brachytherapy. Patients undergoing brachytherapy irradiation who require inpatient admission represent a unique population, and specialty organizations should develop consensus recommendations to address these clinical challenges.

Risk of venous thromboembolism in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT): A systematic review and meta-analysis

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is not fully understood and the optimal strategy for thromboprophylaxis remains unclear. This systematic review investigated the incidence of VTE in OPAT settings (PROSPERO CRD42022381523). MEDLINE, CINAHL, Emcare, Embase, Cochrane Library and grey literature were searched from earliest records to 18 January 2023. Primary studies reporting non-catheter-related VTE or catheter-related thromboembolism (CRT) events in adults who received parenteral antibiotics in home or outpatient settings were eligible. In total, 43 studies involving 23 432 patient episodes were reviewed, of which 4 studies reported non-catheter-related VTE and 39 included CRT. Based on generalised linear mixed-effects models, pooled risk estimates of non-catheter-related VTE and CRT were 0.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0-0.7%] and 1.1% [95% CI 0.8-1.5%; prediction interval (PI) 0.2-5.4%]. Heterogeneity was largely attributed to risk of bias by meta-regression (R2 = 21%). Excluding high-risk-of-bias studies, CRT risk was 0.8% (95% CI 0.5-1.2%; PI 0.1-4.5%). From 25 studies, the pooled CRT rate per 1000 catheter-days was 0.37 (95% CI 0.25-0.55; PI 0.08-1.64). These findings do not support universal thromboprophylaxis or routine use of an inpatient VTE risk assessment model in the OPAT setting. However, a high index of suspicion should be maintained, especially for patients with known risk factors for VTE. An optimised protocol of OPAT-specific VTE risk assessment should be sought.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Is it time for thromboprophylaxis?

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to determine the incidence, timing, and risk factors for venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) in patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We explored the utilization of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for VTE treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with advanced stage EOC receiving NACT followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) at a single institution. Risk factors were compared between patients with versus without VTE between EOC diagnosis and 180 days after ICS. Bleeding complications were compared between patient who received a DOAC versus non-DOAC.

RESULTS

VTE cases occurred amongst 33 of the 154 (21.4%) patients with 4 (2.6%) concurrent with EOC diagnosis, 9 (5.8%) between EOC diagnosis and NACT start, 13 (8.4%) between NACT start and ICS, and 7 (4.5%) within 180 days after ICS. There were no statistically significant differences in risk factors assessed (age, body mass index, functional status, histology, Khorana score, and smoking history) between patients with versus without VTE. Eleven patients (33.3%) received a DOAC for VTE treatment. There were no significant differences in number of intraoperative blood transfusions (p = 0.38), blood loss (p = 0.95), or bleeding complications (p = 0.53) between patients treated with a DOAC versus a non-DOAC.

CONCLUSION

There is a high incidence of VTE events (21.4%) in patients with advanced stage EOC undergoing NACT. Two-thirds of the VTEs may have been prevented with thromboprophylaxis as they occurred between EOC diagnosis and ICS. These data support consideration of thromboprophylaxis in all patients with advanced stage EOC undergoing NACT.

Recommendations for assessing the risk of cardiovascular disease and venous thromboembolism before the initiation of targeted therapies for chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other chronic inflammatory rheumatic disorders have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with the general population. Moreover, recent data have raised concerns around a possible increased risk of major CV events (MACE) and VTE in patients treated with JAK inhibitors (JAKi). In October 2022, the PRAC has recommended measures to minimize the risk of serious side effects, including CV conditions and VTE, associated with all approved in chronic inflammatory diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an adequate and feasible strategy to evaluate, at the individual level, the risk of CVD and VTE in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary steering committee comprised 11 members including rheumatologists, a cardiologist, a hematologist expert in thrombophilia and fellows. Systematic literature searches were performed and evidence was categorized according to standard guidelines. The evidence was discussed and summarized by the experts in the course of a consensus finding and voting process.

RESULTS

Three overarching principles were defined. First, there is a higher risk of MACE and VTE in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases compared with the general population. Second, the rheumatologist has a central role in the evaluation of the risk of CVD and VTE in patient with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Third, the risk of MACE and VTE should be regularly assessed in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, particularly before initiating targeted therapies. Eleven recommendations were defined to prevent potentially life-threatening complications of CVD and VTE in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, providing practical assessment of CVD and VTE before considering the prescription of targeted therapies, and especially JAKi.

CONCLUSION

These practical recommendations based on expert opinion and scientific evidence provide consensus for the prevention and the assessment of CVD and VTE.

Association of Intraoperative Red Blood Cell Transfusions With Venous Thromboembolism and Adverse Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

We determined whether intraoperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion was associated with a higher incidence of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolic (HA-VTE) complications and adverse outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative PRBC has been associated with increased risk for postoperative deep venous thrombosis after cardiac surgery, but validation of these findings in a large, multi-institutional, national cohort of cardiac surgery patients has been lacking.

METHODS

A registry-based cohort study of 751,893 patients with isolated CABG between January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Using propensity score-weighted regression analysis, we analyzed the effect of intraoperative PRBC on the incidence of HA-VTE and adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Administration of 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 units of PRBC transfusion was associated with increased odds for HA-VTE [odds ratios (ORs): 1.27 (1.22-1.32), 1.21 (1.16-1.26), 1.93 (1.85-2.00), 1.82 (1.75-1.89)], deep venous thrombosis [ORs: 1.39 (1.33-1.46), 1.38 (1.32-1.44), 2.18 (2.09-2.28), 1.82 (1.74-1.91], operative mortality [ORs: 1.11 (1.08-1.14), 1.16 (1.13-1.19), 1.29 (1.26-1.32), 1.47 (1.43-1.50)], readmission within 30 days [ORs: 1.05 (1.04-1.06), 1.16 (1.13-1.19), 1.29 (1.26-1.32), 1.47 (1.43-1.50)], and a prolonged postoperative length of stay [mean difference in days, 0.23 (0.19-0.27), 0.34 (0.30-0.39), 0.69 (0.64-0.74), 0.77 (0.72-0.820]. The odds of pulmonary venous thromboembolism were lower for patients transfused with 1 or 2 units [ORs: 0.98 (0.91-1.06), 0.75 (0.68-0.81)] of PRBC but remained significantly elevated for those receiving 3 and ≥4 units [ORs: 1.19 (1.09-1.29), 1.35 (1.25-1.48)].

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative PRBC transfusion was associated with HA-VTE and adverse outcomes after isolated CABG surgery.

Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis: current practice of surgeons in Australia and New Zealand for major abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgical prophylaxis for venous thrombo-embolic disease (VTE) includes risk assessment, chemical prophylaxis and mechanical prophylaxis (graduated compression stockings [GCS] and/or intermittent pneumatic compression devices [IPCD]). Although there is overwhelming evidence for the need and efficacy of VTE prophylaxis in patients at risk, only about a third of those who are at risk of VTE receive appropriate prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

There is debate as to the best combination of VTE prophylaxis following abdominal surgery due to lack of evidence. The aim of this survey was to understand this gap between knowledge and practice.

METHODS

In 2019 and 2020, a survey was conducted to investigate the current practice of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for major abdominal surgery, with a focus on colorectal resections. The study received ethics approval and involved distributing an 11-item questionnaire to members of two professional surgical societies: the Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) and the General Surgeons Australia (GSA).

RESULTS

From 214 surgeons: 100% use chemical prophylaxis, 68% do not use a risk assessment tool, 27% do not vary practice according to patient risk factors while > 90% use all three forms of VTE prophylaxis at some stage of treatment. Most surgeons do not vary practice between laparoscopic and open colectomy/major abdominal surgery and only 33% prescribe post-discharge chemical prophylaxis. 42% of surgeons surveyed had equipoise for a clinical trial on the use of IPCDs and the vast majority (> 95%) feel that IPCDs should provide at least a 2% improvement in VTE event rate in order to justify their routine use.

CONCLUSION

Most surgeons in Australia and New Zealand do not use risk assessment tools and use all three forms of prophylaxis regardless. Therfore there is a gap between practice and VTE prophylaxis for the use of mechanical prophylaxis options. Further research is required to determine whether dual modality mechanical prophylaxis is incrementally efficacious. Trial Registration- Not Applicable.

Thromboembolic outcomes are decreased with the use of a standardized venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing superficial venous procedures

OBJECTIVE

Patients with venous insufficiency can be treated with ablation or phlebectomy, or both. Patients undergoing superficial venous procedures have an elevated risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). At our institution, we initiated a standardized protocol in which patients with a Caprini score (2005 version) of ≥8 are treated with 1 week of prophylactic anticoagulation after the procedure. Duplex ultrasound was performed at 1 week and then within 90 days after the procedure. This aim of the present study was to determine the thrombotic and clinical outcomes after superficial vein procedures using a standardized protocol for DVT/PE risk assessment and prophylaxis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of superficial vein procedures from 2015 to 2021 at a single center. The patient demographics, CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) clinical class, venous clinical severity score, patient-reported outcomes, treatment type, Caprini scores, pre- and postoperative anticoagulation use, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for the patient demographics, procedure details, and unadjusted surgical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between procedure type and DVT and PE after adjusting for patient characteristics, disease severity, periprocedural anticoagulation, and Caprini score.

RESULTS

A total of 1738 limbs were treated with ablation (n = 820), phlebectomy (n = 181), or ablation and phlebectomy (n = 737). More patients were women (67.1%) and White (90.9%). The overall incidence of DVT/PE was 1.4%. Patients undergoing ablation with phlebectomy had higher rates of DVT/PE (2.7%) than those undergoing ablation (0.2%) or phlebectomy alone (1.7%; P < .01). However, only 30% of DVTs were above the knee. On multivariate analysis, only the procedure type predicted for DVT/PE. However, patients undergoing ablation and phlebectomy achieved better patient-reported outcomes (Caprini score, 5.9) compared with those undergoing ablation (Caprini score, 7.2) or phlebectomy (Caprini score, 7.9) alone (P < .01). The best improvement in the venous clinical severity score was seen with phlebectomy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The expected difference in the DVT/PE rates between high- and low-risk groups did not materialize in our patients, perhaps secondary to the additional chemoprophylaxis prescribed for the high-risk cohort (Caprini score, ≥8). These results call for a randomized trial to assess the efficacy of a standardized protocol in the reduction of DVT/PE after superficial vein procedures.

Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis in People with Hemophilia Experiencing Orthopedic Surgery: What Does the Literature Say in 2023?

This narrative review of the literature, consisting of papers found in PubMed and The Cochrane Library published up to 31 July 2023, analyzed those that were deemed to be closely related to the title of this paper. It was encountered that the peril of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in people with hemophilia (PWH) after orthopedic surgery is very small, such that pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is not necessary in most cases. The hemophilia literature states that the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis should only be performed in PWH undergoing major orthopedic surgery (total-knee arthroplasty, total-hip arthroplasty, ankle arthrodesis) who have additional venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factors, such as old age, prior VTE, varicose veins, general anesthesia, cancer, factor V (Leiden) mutation, overweight, and treatment with the oral contraceptive pill (in females with von Willebrand's illness). If we notice various risk factors for VTE in PWH who experience orthopedic surgery, theoretically, we should perform the identical type of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis advised for non-hemophilia patients: low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), such as enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneous/24 h); or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), either thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran, 150 mg oral/12 h) or activated factor X (FXa) inhibitors (rivaroxaban, 20 mg oral/24 h; apixaban, 5 mg oral/24 h), or subcutaneous fondaparinux (2.5 mg/24 h subcutaneously). However, the review of the literature on hemophiliac patients has shown that only a few authors have used pharmacological prophylaxis with LMWH (subcutaneous enoxaparin) for a short period of time (10-14 days) in some patients who had risk factors for VTE. Only one group of authors used a low dose of DOAC in the dusk after the surgical procedure and the next day, specifically in individuals at elevated risk of VTE and elevated risk of bleeding after the surgical procedure.

Education and clinical pharmacist-led management strategies for the risk and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in general surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite the risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in surgical patients are well defined, primary thromboprophylaxis (TP) can be neglected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of VTE and appropriateness of TP and to assess the effects of education and clinical pharmacy (CP) services.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a total of 3 periods (n = 800): pre-education (n = 340), post-education (n = 269) and CP intervention period (n = 191) and the risk of VTE and the appropriateness of TP were evaluated. At the end of pre-education period, patients were re-evaluated after education was given about the guidelines on TP and an educative poster was posted in the services (post-education period). During the CP intervention period, the CP made recommendations in terms of optimal TP use to the physicians in charge.

RESULTS

While there was no significant difference in the optimal TP rate administered to the patients before and after education (138/340, 40.6% vs. 122/269, 45.4%; p = 0.238); this rate was increased to 113/191 (59.2%) in the CP intervention period (p = 0.004). High-risk patients who received one type of TP constituted the majority of patients who did not receive optimal TP. While the ratio of high-risk patients undergoing a single type of TP in the pre- and post-education periods (104/340, 30.6% vs. 83/269, 30.9%), was similar (p = 0.819); with the CP interventions, this rate was reduced to 35/191 (18.3%) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Even though education has positive influence on surgeons, the implementation of CP practices is more effective especially in terms of maintaining optimal TP.

Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Part 2-Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care

BACKGROUND

This is Part 2 of the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL) using an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach. This paper addresses intra- and postoperative aspects of care.

METHODS

Experts in aspects of management of high-risk and emergency general surgical patients were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline database searches were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies on each item were selected with particular attention to randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and large cohort studies and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on elective patients when appropriate. A modified Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. Some ERAS® components covered in other guideline papers are outlined only briefly, with the bulk of the text focusing on key areas pertaining specifically to EL.

RESULTS

Twenty-three components of intraoperative and postoperative care were defined. Consensus was reached after three rounds of a modified Delphi Process.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines are based on best available evidence for an ERAS® approach to patients undergoing EL. These guidelines are not exhaustive but pull together evidence on important components of care for this high-risk patient population. As much of the evidence is extrapolated from elective surgery or emergency general surgery (not specifically laparotomy), many of the components need further evaluation in future studies.

Deep vein thrombosis and validation of the Caprini risk assessment model in Chinese orthopaedic trauma patients: a multi-center retrospective cohort study enrolling 34,893 patients

BACKGROUND

The risk of venous thromboembolism among orthopaedic trauma patients is high, but prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains unknown. In addition, the Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) score in orthopaedic trauma patients is undetermined in previous research. This study is aimed to determine the incidence of DVT and then validate the Caprini RAM in orthopaedic trauma patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study enrolling orthopaedic trauma inpatients from seven tertiary and secondary hospitals during a 3-year period (from April 1, 2018 through April 30, 2021). Caprini RAM scores were assessed by experienced nurses on admission. The patients with suspected DVT were verified through duplex ultrasonography by qualified radiologists, and then prospectively followed once a year after discharge.

RESULTS

In total, 34,893 patients were enrolled in our study. The Caprini RAM identified 45.7% of patients at low risk (Caprini score 0-2), 25.9% at medium risk (3-4), and 28.3% at high risk (5-6), highest risk (7-8), and superhigh risk (> 8). Patients with Caprini score > 5 were likely to be older, female, and with longer length of hospital stay. Moreover, 8695 patients had received ultrasonography to detect DVT. The prevalence of DVT was determined to be 19.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.2-19.9%], which significantly increased with Caprini score. The area under curve of the Caprini RAM for DVT was 0.77 (95% CI 0.76-0.78) with a threshold of 4.5. Furthermore, 6108 patients who had received ultrasonography completed the follow-up. DVT patients had a hazard ratio of 1.75 (95% CI 1.11-2.76; P = 0.005) in the mortality, compared to non-DVT ones. Caprini scores were significantly associated with increase in the mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.14; 95% CI 1.07-1.21; P < 0.001]; DVT remained an independent effect (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.02-2.26; P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

The Caprini RAM may be valid in Chinese orthopaedic trauma patients. Prevalence of DVT and higher Caprini score were significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality among orthopaedic trauma patients after discharge. Further study is warranted to explore the causes of higher mortality in patients with DVT.

Unmet clinical needs in the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Based on accumulating evidence, the prophylaxis and treatment of cancer-associated VTE have been changed over the years. Recently, the introduction in clinical practice of the direct oral anticoagulants has radically changed the management of cancer-associated VTE for their easier use and non-inferior efficacy-safety profile compared to low-molecular-weight heparins. However, the heterogeneity of the cancer population in terms of site, type and stage of the malignancy, the presence of comorbidities, and the variability in cancer treatment and prognosis represent major challenges in the management of VTE in patients with cancer. In the present review, we will discuss clinical questions that represent unsolved issues in the setting of cancer-associated VTE and provide an overview on recent evidence on this topic: primary prophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and in cancer surgical patients, need of long-term anticoagulation in cancer patients, treatment of VTE in cancer patients at increased bleeding risk and in special categories such as incidental VTE, splanchnic vein thrombosis or catheter-related thrombosis.

Revisiting Anticoagulation in Spine Surgery: Balancing Venous Thromboembolic Events and Epidural Hematoma

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and post-operative epidural hematoma (EDH) are significant complications after spine surgery. Guidelines for chemoprophylaxis are controversial and variability amongst surgeons remains. The objective of this study was to establish the incidence of clinical VTE and EDH at our institution and evaluate the association of chemoprophylaxis with clinical VTE and EDH.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing spine surgery at a high-volume tertiary care center in Seattle, WA between January 2016 and December 2019. The Premier Health Care Database and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) patient indicators PSI-9 (Perioperative hemorrhage and hematoma) and PSI-12(Perioperative PE or DVT) were used to identify patients experiencing VTE and/or post-operative EDH. The primary outcome was the incidence of clinical VTE and EDH in post-operative spine patients. Secondary outcomes included the association of chemoprophylaxis with clinical VTE and EDH.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2019, 4587 patients underwent spine surgery, totaling 4764 hospital stays. The incidence of clinical VTE was .21% (10/4764) and the incidence of EDH was .10% (5/4764). Most hemorrhages occurred prior to the initiation of chemoprophylaxis. One patient with EDH received chemoprophylaxis prior to hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of post-operative clinical VTE and EDH in spine surgery is low. Despite early initiation of chemoprophylaxis after major spine surgery we did not appreciate a high rate of EDH. We attribute our low rate of clinical VTE to multimodal prophylaxis with SCDs, early mobilization and chemoprophylaxis on post-operative day 1.

Preventive strategies for hypercoagulation in Cushing's syndrome: when and how

PURPOSE

The endogenous hypercortisolism that characterizes Cushing's syndrome (CS) is associated with a state of hypercoagulability that significantly increases the risk of thromboembolic disease, especially, venous events. Despite this certainty, there is no consensus on the best thromboprophylaxis strategy (TPS) for these patients. Our aim was to summarize the published data about different thromboprophylaxis strategies, and to review available clinical tools assisting thromboprophylaxis decision making.

METHODS

Narrative review of thromboprophylaxis strategies in patients with Cushing's syndrome. A search was carried out on PubMed, Scopus and EBSCO until November 14th, 2022, and articles were selected based on their relevance and excluded in case of redundant content.

RESULTS

Literature is scarce regarding thromboprophylaxis strategies to be adopted in the context of endogenous hypercortisolism, most often being a case-by-case decision according to the centre expertise. Only three retrospective studies, with a small number of patients enrolled, evaluated the use of hypocoagulation for the thromboprophylaxis of patients with CS in the post-operative period of transsphenoidal surgery and/or adrenalectomy, but all of them with favourable results. The use of low molecular weight heparin is the most frequent option as TPS in CS context. There are numerous venous thromboembolism risk assessment scores validated for different medical purposes, but just one specifically developed for CS, that must be validated to ensure solid recommendations in this context. The use of preoperative medical therapy is not routinely recommended to decrease the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolic events. The peak of venous thromboembolic events occurs in the first three months post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

The need to hypocoagulate CS patients, mainly in the post-operative period of a transsphenoidal surgery or an adrenalectomy, is undoubtable, especially in patients with an elevated risk of venous thromboembolic events, but the precise duration and the hypocoagulation regimen to institute is yet to be determined with prospective studies.

Assessing the use of Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis on the Rates of Venous Thromboembolism and Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage Following Pancreatectomy for Malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) in patients with pancreatic or periampullary malignancy preimplementation and postimplementation of routine extended VTE prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend up to 28 days of VTE prophylaxis following major abdominal cancer operations. There is a paucity of data examining rates of VTE and PPH in patients who receive extended VTE prophylaxis following pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Single-institution analysis of patients who underwent pancreatectomy for malignancy (2004-2021). VTE and PPH rates within 90 days of discharge were compared based on receipt of extended VTE prophylaxis with enoxaparin.

RESULTS

A total of 478 patients were included. Twenty-two (4.6%) patients developed a postoperative VTE, 12 (2.5%) of which occurred postdischarge. Twenty-five (5.2%) patients experienced PPH, 13 (2.7%) of which occurred postdischarge. There was no associated difference in the development of postdischarge VTE between patients who received extended VTE prophylaxis and those who did not (2.3% vs 2.8%, P =0.99). There was no associated difference in the rate of postdischarge PPH between patients who received extended VTE prophylaxis and those who did not (3.4% vs 1.9%, P =0.43). In the subset of patients on antiplatelet agents, the addition of enoxaparin did not appear to be associated with higher VTE (3.9 vs. 0%, P =0.31) or PPH (3.0 vs. 4.5%, P =0.64) rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended VTE prophylaxis following pancreatectomy for malignancy was not associated with differences in postdischarge VTE and PPH rates. These data suggest extended VTE prophylaxis is safe but may not be necessary for all patients following pancreatectomy.

The Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Korean Patients with Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

The relationship between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has long been described. The risk of VTE in Asian patients with breast cancer remains largely unknown. This study described the incidence and risk factors of VTE in Korean patients with breast cancer. Data were collected from a retrospective database of patients who underwent breast cancer surgery between 2011 and 2020 at a single institution. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify factors associated with VTE occurrences. Among the 2246 patients with breast cancer, 48 (2.1%) developed VTE during a median follow-up period of 53 months. The average incidence of VTE was 459 per 100,000 person-years. Age ≥ 60 years, male sex, chronic kidney disease, reconstructive procedures, and stage II or higher were independent predictive factors for VTE. VTE was associated with poor disease-free survival (hazard ratio (HR), 6.140; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.480-10.835), and overall survival (HR, 8.842; 95% CI 4.386-17.824). Most VTE events were manageable with anticoagulation; three (6.3%) patients died of VTE, despite intensive care. The incidence of VTE was significantly elevated in Korean patients with breast cancer. Since VTE has a negative effect on oncologic outcomes of breast cancer, clinicians should manage its risk throughout their lifetime.

The Thresholds of Caprini Score Associated With Increased Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Across Different Specialties: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Estimation of the specific thresholds of the Caprini risk score (CRS) that are associated with the increased incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) across different specialties, including identifying the highest level of risk.

BACKGROUND

Accurate risk assessment remains an important but often challenging aspect of VTE prophylaxis. One well-established risk assessment model is CRS, which has been validated in thousands of patients from many different medical and surgical specialties.

METHODS

A search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library was performed in March 2022. Manuscripts that reported on (1) patients admitted to medical or surgical departments and (2) had their VTE risk assessed by CRS and (3) reported on the correlation between the score and VTE incidence, were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 4562 references were identified, and the full text of 202 papers was assessed for eligibility. The correlation between CRS and VTE incidence was reported in 68 studies that enrolled 4,207,895 patients. In all specialties, a significant increase in VTE incidence was observed in patients with a CRS of ≥5. In most specialties thresholds of ≥7, ≥9, and ≥11 to 12 were associated with dramatically increased incidences of VTE. In COVID-19, cancer, trauma, vascular, general, head and neck, and thoracic surgery patients with ≥9 and ≥11 to 12 scores the VTE incidence was extremely high (ranging from 13% to 47%).

CONCLUSION

The Caprini score is being used increasingly to predict VTE in many medical and surgical specialties. In most cases, the VTE risk for individual patients increases dramatically at a threshold CRS of 7 to 11.

Ten-Year Multicenter Retrospective Study Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms to Identify Patients at High Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Radical Gastrectomy

Purpose

This study aims to construct a machine learning model that can recognize preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative high-risk indicators and predict the onset of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients.

Patients and Methods

A total of 1239 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study, among whom 107 patients developed VTE after surgery. We collected 42 characteristic variables of gastric cancer patients from the database of Wuxi People's Hospital and Wuxi Second People's Hospital between 2010 and 2020, including patients' demographic characteristics, chronic medical history, laboratory test characteristics, surgical information, and patients' postoperative conditions. Four machine learning algorithms, namely, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN), were employed to develop predictive models. We also utilized Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) for model interpretation and evaluated the models using k-fold cross-validation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and external validation metrics.

Results

The XGBoost algorithm demonstrated superior performance compared to the other three prediction models. The area under the curve (AUC) value for XGBoost was 0.989 in the training set and 0.912 in the validation set, indicating high prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the AUC value of the external validation set was 0.85, signifying good extrapolation of the XGBoost prediction model. The results of SHAP analysis revealed that several factors, including higher body mass index (BMI), history of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, T-stage of the tumor, lymph node metastasis, central venous catheter use, high intraoperative bleeding, and long operative time, were significantly associated with postoperative VTE.

Conclusion

The machine learning algorithm XGBoost derived from this study enables the development of a predictive model for postoperative VTE in patients after radical gastrectomy, thereby assisting clinicians in making informed clinical decisions.

Rivaroxaban versus nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis following thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A randomized, noninferiority trial

The benefit of rivaroxaban in thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery remains unknown. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, patients who underwent thoracic surgery for lung cancer were enrolled, and randomly assigned to rivaroxaban or nadroparin groups in a 1:1 ratio; anticoagulants were initiated 12-24 h after surgery and continued until discharge. Four hundred participants were required according to a noninferiority margin of 2%, assuming venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence rates of 6.0% and 12.6% for patients in the rivaroxaban and nadroparin groups, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome was any VTE during the treatment and 30-day follow-up periods. The safety outcome was any on-treatment bleeding event. Finally, 403 patients were randomized (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), with 381 included in per-protocol (PP) population. The primary efficacy outcomes occurred in 12.5% (25/200) of the rivaroxaban group and 17.7% (36/203) of the nadroparin group (absolute risk reduction, -5.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], [-12.2-1.7]), indicating the noninferiority of rivaroxaban in ITT population. Sensitivity analysis was performed in the PP population and yielded similar results, confirming the noninferiority of rivaroxaban. In the safety analysis population, the incidence of any on-treatment bleeding events did not differ significantly between the groups (12.2% for rivaroxaban vs. 7.0% for nadroparin; relative risk [RR], 1.9; 95% CI, [0.9-3.7]; p = .08), including major bleeding (9.7% vs. 6.5%; RR, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.9-3.7]; p = .24), and nonmajor bleeding (2.6% vs. 0.5%; RR, 5.2 [95% CI, 0.6-45.2]; p = .13). Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery was shown to be noninferior to nadroparin.

A framework for perioperative care for lower extremity vascular bypasses: A Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) Society and Society for Vascular Surgery

The Society for Vascular Surgery and the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society formally collaborated and elected an international, multi-disciplinary panel of experts to review the literature and provide evidence-based suggestions for coordinated perioperative care for patients undergoing infrainguinal bypass surgery for peripheral artery disease. Structured around the ERAS core elements, 26 suggestions were made and organized into preadmission, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative sections.

Kasr Alainy simplified uterine preserving surgery for conservative management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS): A modified surgical approach

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is rising rapidly due to the global surge in Caesarean delivery. It is associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality. It is usually managed with Caesarean hysterectomy. However, uterine preserving surgeries can have advantages over Caesarean hysterectomy and intentional placental retention techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

We present a modified technique of uterine preserving surgery that uses a safe approach for placental bed surgical devascularization. This is followed by resection of the invaded uterine segment and uterine wall reconstruction.

RESULTS

The technique was used in the management of 20 patients with antenatally suspected PAS that were confirmed at laparotomy. It was successful in preserving the uterus in 18/20 (90 %) women. The mean intraoperative blood loss in was 1305 CC (SD: +361.6) with a mean operative time of 123 min (SD: ±38.7). There was only one urinary bladder injury and no other maternal morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Our surgical technique is safe and may be useful for conservative surgical management of PAS, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where access to complex resources, such as interventional radiology, is limited.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: Addressing implementation challenges - 2023 update

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence supporting its use, many Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recommendations remain poorly adhered to and barriers to ERAS implementation persist. In this second updated ERAS® Society guideline, a consensus for optimal perioperative care in gynecologic oncology surgery is presented, with a specific emphasis on implementation challenges.

METHODS

Based on the gaps identified by clinician stakeholder groups, nine implementation challenge topics were prioritized for review. A database search of publications using Embase and PubMed was performed (2018-2023). Studies on each topic were selected with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. These studies were then reviewed and graded by an international panel according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

All recommendations on ERAS implementation challenge topics are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated evidence base and recommendations for stakeholder derived ERAS implementation challenges in gynecologic oncology are presented by the ERAS® Society in this consensus review.

Timing of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after surgery: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The timing at which venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs after major surgery has major implications for the optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the timing of postoperative VTE up to 4 weeks after surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and CINAHL databases was performed between 1 January 2009 and 1 April 2022. Prospective studies that recruited patients who underwent a surgical procedure and reported at least 20 symptomatic, postoperative VTE events by time were included. Two reviewers independently selected studies according to the eligibility criteria, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Data were analysed with a Poisson regression model, and the GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Some 6258 studies were evaluated, of which 22 (11 general, 5 urological, 4 mixed, and 2 orthopaedic postoperative surgical populations; total 1 864 875 patients and 24 927 VTE events) were eligible. Pooled evidence of moderate certainty showed that 47.1 per cent of the VTE events occurred during the first, 26.9 per cent during the second, 15.8 per cent during the third, and 10.1 per cent during the fourth week after surgery. The timing of VTE was consistent between individual studies.

CONCLUSION

Although nearly half of symptomatic VTE events in first 4 weeks occur during the first postoperative week, a substantial number of events occur several weeks after surgery. These data will inform clinicians and guideline developers about the duration of postoperative thromboprophylaxis.

The risk of venous thromboembolism after minor surgical procedures: A population-based case-control study

BACKGROUND

Surgery is a well-known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, for several minor surgical procedures, thromboprophylaxis is not advised.

OBJECTIVES

These "low-risk" procedures include a wide variation of interventions for which we estimated the VTE risk to verify their "low-risk" status.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We used data from a large population-based case-control study (Multiple Environment and Genetic Assessment study) into causes of VTE, and linked these to the Dutch Hospital Data Registry to identify exposure to surgical procedures. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for the 90-day and 1-year relative risks of VTE following these procedures, which were adjusted for body mass index (BMI), sex, age, comorbidities, and infection/inflammation.

RESULTS

We included 4247 patients with VTE and 5538 control subjects. Median age and BMI were 48.5 years and 25.5 m²/kg, respectively. Nine unique procedures or groups of procedures were analyzed. One hundred twenty-three participants-90 cases and 33 controls-had undergone a minor procedure within 90 days of the index date, resulting in a 3.5-fold (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.3-5.3) overall increased VTE risk. Furthermore, venous stripping (OR, 7.2; 95% CI, 2.4-21.2), open abdominal/inguinal hernia repair (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.2-11.6), and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.0-10.6) were associated with an increased risk. Other minor procedures were less strongly or not associated with an increased risk. In the 1-year period before the index date, all odds ratios were lower.

CONCLUSION

Of the "low-risk" procedures, we found that venous stripping, open abdominal/inguinal hernia repair, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy were associated with a clearly increased risk of VTE within 90 postoperative days.

Timing of Bariatric Surgery and COVID-19 Vaccination: Experience From a High-volume Single Center

BACKGROUND

During the last year, there was a large COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Italy. Concurrently, metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) restarted after a long period of discontinuity. No data are currently available on the best timing of COVID-19 vaccination for MBS candidates. The aim of this study was to report MBS outcomes in relation to the timing of COVID-19 vaccine administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was utilized to locate patients undergoing MBS between January 1 and December 31, 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients receiving a vaccine dose within 30 days before or after surgery (Group±30); and patients with a longer time interval of vaccine dose before or after surgery (Group>±30). Postoperative outcomes were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were included: 33 (30.6%) of whom were in Group±30 and 74(69.4%) in Group>30. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. Findings revealed that postoperative outcomes (ie, 30-d complications and length of stay postoperatively) were comparable between groups. Two patients in the ±30 group had mesenteric vein thrombosis after sleeve gastrectomy (SG); however, the rate of thrombosis events was comparable between groups ( P =0.09). Thrombosis between SG patients were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 vaccination within 30 days of MBS does not impact complication rates and length of stay. COVID-19 vaccination may have a negative impact on venous thrombosis after SG, but this study is underpowered to draw this conclusion. Larger studies should be conducted to replicate current study findings.

Assessing and Addressing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Across the Spectrum of Gender Affirming Care: A Review

OBJECTIVE

Accumulating evidence demonstrates that gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) improves mental health outcomes in transgender persons. Data specific to the risks associated with GAHT for transgender persons continue to emerge, allowing for improvements in understanding, predicting, and mitigating adverse outcomes while informing discussion about desired effects. Of particular concern is the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the context of both longitudinal GAHT and the perioperative setting. Combining what is known about the risk of VTE in cisgender individuals on hormone therapy (HT) with the evidence for transgender persons receiving HT allows for an informed approach to assess underlying risk and improve care in the transgender community.

OBSERVATIONS

Hormone formulation, dosing, route, and duration of therapy can impact thromboembolic risk, with transdermal estrogen formulations having the lowest risk. There are no existing risk scores for VTE that consider HT as a possible risk factor. Risk assessment for recurrent VTE and bleeding tendencies using current scores may be helpful when assessing individual risk. Gender affirming surgeries present unique perioperative concerns, and certain procedures include a high likelihood that patients will be on exogenous estrogens at the time of surgery, potentially increasing thromboembolic risk.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Withholding GAHT due to potential adverse events may cause negative impacts for individual patients. Providers should be knowledgeable about the management of HT in transgender individuals of all ages, as well as in the perioperative setting, to avoid periods in which transgender individuals are off GAHT. Treatment decisions for both anticoagulation and HT should be individualized and tailored to patients' overall goals and desired outcomes, given that the physical and mental health benefits of gender affirming care may outweigh the risk of VTE.

Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Colon and Rectal Cancer: Do Tumor Location and Operation Matter?

BACKGROUND

Existing venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk scores help identify patients at increased risk of postoperative VTE who warrant extended prophylaxis in the first 30 days. However, these methods do not address factors unique to colorectal surgery, wherein the tumor location and operation performed vary widely. VTE risk may extend past 30 days. Therefore, we aimed to determine the roles of tumor location and operation in VTE development and evaluate VTE incidence through 90 days postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

Adult patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2021, at a single institution were identified. Patients were then stratified by cancer location and by operative extent. VTEs were identified using diagnosis codes in the electronic medical record and consisted of extremity deep venous thromboses, portomesenteric venous thromboses, and pulmonary emboli.

RESULTS

A total of 6,844 operations were identified (72% segmental colectomy, 22% proctectomy, 6% total (procto)colectomy), and tumor location was most commonly in the ascending colon (32%), followed by the rectum (31%), with other locations less common (sigmoid 16%, rectosigmoid junction 9%, transverse colon 7%, descending colon 5%). The cumulative incidence of any VTE was 3.1% at 90 days with a relatively steady increase across the entire 90-day interval. Extremity deep venous thromboses were the most common VTE type, accounting for 37% of events, and pulmonary emboli and portomesenteric venous thromboses made up 33% and 30% of events, respectively. More distal tumor locations and more anatomically extensive operations had higher VTE rates.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering extended VTE prophylaxis after colorectal surgery, clinicians should account for the operation performed and the location of the tumor. Further study is necessary to determine the optimal length of VTE prophylaxis in high-risk individuals.

Deep vein thrombosis after open hepatectomy or other major upper abdominal surgery in Taiwan: A prospective and cross-sectional study relevant to the issue of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis

BACKGROUD/PURPOSE

Venous thromboembolism, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is an important complication in patients who underwent open hepatic surgery as well as other major upper abdominal surgery. This study aims to investigate the occurrence of postoperative DVT without pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in such cohorts in Taiwan.

METHODS

This is a prospective, cross-sectional cohort study conducted from March 2010 to December 2011. Patients who underwent major upper abdominal surgery, including open hepatectomy, were enrolled. Color duplex compression ultrasonography (CUS) was used to detect DVT. Symptomatic PE was excluded if there were no suggestive respiratory symptoms or sudden death. Relevant clinicopathological and surgical information of each patient was collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

195 patients (118 male and 77 female) were enrolled, with a median age of 63.6 years. The majority (169/195, 88.7%) were treated for active malignancy. Totally 147 patients received open hepatectomy. Only one asymptomatic and distal postoperative DVT event was identified by CUS, which occurred on a 73-year-old female patient who received a left lateral segmental hepatectomy for removing the advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (pathologic stage, T3aN0M0). No cases of symptomatic PE or sudden death were observed. No correlation between DVT and precipitating factor was demonstrated in our cohort.

CONCLUSION

Without pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, a low rate of postoperative DVT among patients undergoing open hepatectomy (0.7%, 1/147) or major upper abdominal surgery (0.5%, 1/195) in Taiwan was reported. A distinctively regional role of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for hepatic surgery was also suggested by our data.

Ability of Caprini and Padua Risk-Assessment Models to Predict Venous Thromboembolism in a Nationwide Study

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable complication of hospitalization. Risk-stratification is the cornerstone of prevention. The Caprini and Padua are the most commonly used risk-assessment models to quantify VTE risk. Both models perform well in select, high-risk cohorts. While VTE risk-stratification is recommended for all hospital admissions, few studies have evaluated the models in a large, unselected cohort of patients.

Methods

We analyzed consecutive first hospital admissions of 1,252,460 unique surgical and non-surgical patients to 1,298 VA facilities nationwide between January 2016 and December 2021. Caprini and Padua scores were generated using the VA's national data repository. We first assessed the ability of the two RAMs to predict VTE within 90 days of admission. In secondary analyses, we evaluated prediction at 30 and 60 days, in surgical versus non-surgical patients, after excluding patients with upper extremity DVT, in patients hospitalized ≥72 hours, after including all-cause mortality in the composite outcome, and after accounting for prophylaxis in the predictive model. We used area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) as the metric of prediction.

Results

A total of 330,388 (26.4%) surgical and 922,072 (73.6%) non-surgical consecutively hospitalized patients (total n=1,252,460) were analyzed. Caprini scores ranged from 0-28 (median, interquartile range: 4, 3-6); Padua scores ranged from 0-13 (1, 1-3). The RAMs showed good calibration and higher scores were associated with higher VTE rates. VTE developed in 35,557 patients (2.8%) within 90 days of admission. The ability of both models to predict 90-day VTE was low (AUCs: Caprini 0.56 [95% CI 0.56-0.56], Padua 0.59 [0.58-0.59]). Prediction remained low for surgical (Caprini 0.54 [0.53-0.54], Padua 0.56 [0.56-0.57]) and non-surgical patients (Caprini 0.59 [0.58-0.59], Padua 0.59 [0.59-0.60]). There was no clinically meaningful change in predictive performance in patients admitted for ≥72 hours, after excluding upper extremity DVT from the outcome, after including all-cause mortality in the outcome, or after accounting for ongoing VTE prophylaxis.

Conclusions

Caprini and Padua risk-assessment model scores have low ability to predict VTE events in a cohort of unselected consecutive hospitalizations. Improved VTE risk-assessment models must be developed before they can be applied to a general hospital population.

Prophylactic Inferior Vena Cava Filters for Venous Thromboembolism in Adults With Trauma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Trauma is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Due to contraindications or delay in starting pharmacological prophylaxis among trauma patients with a high risk of bleeding, the inferior vena cava (IVC) filter has been utilized as alternative prevention for pulmonary embolism (PE). Albeit, its clinical efficacy has remained uncertain. Therefore, we performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic IVC filters in severely injured patients. Methods: Three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane) were searched from August 1, 2012, to October 27, 2021. Independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Relative risk (RR) at 95% confidence interval (CI) pooled in a randomized meta-analysis. A parallel clinical practice guideline committee assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. The outcomes of interest included VTE, PE, deep venous thrombosis, mortality, and IVC filter complications. Results: We included 10 controlled studies (47 140 patients), of which 3 studies (310 patients) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 7 were observational studies (46 830 patients). IVC filters demonstrated no significant reduction in PE and fatal PE (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.06-1.28 and RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.01-7.84, respectively) by pooling RCTs with low certainty. However, it demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of PE and fatal PE (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.55 and RR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.011-0.81, respectively) by pooling observational studies with very low certainty. IVC filter did not improve mortality in both RCTs and observational studies (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.86-2.43 and RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.3-1.31, respectively). Conclusion: In trauma patients, moderate risk reduction of PE and fatal PE was demonstrated among observational data but not RCTs. The desirable effect is not robust to outweigh the undesirable effects associated with IVC filter complications. Current evidence suggests against routinely using prophylactic IVC filters.

Sclerotherapy of lower limb veins: Indications, contraindications and treatment strategies to prevent complications - A consensus document of the International Union of Phlebology-2023

BACKGROUND

Sclerotherapy is a non-invasive procedure commonly used to treat superficial venous disease, vascular malformations and other ectatic vascular lesions. While extremely rare, sclerotherapy may be complicated by serious adverse events.

OBJECTIVES

To categorise contraindications to sclerotherapy based on the available scientific evidence.

METHODS

An international, multi-disciplinary panel of phlebologists reviewed the available scientific evidence and developed consensus where evidence was lacking or limited.

RESULTS

Absolute Contraindications to sclerotherapy where the risk of harm would outweigh any benefits include known hypersensitivity to sclerosing agents; acute venous thromboembolism (VTE); severe neurological or cardiac adverse events complicating a previous sclerotherapy treatment; severe acute systemic illness or infection; and critical limb ischaemia. Relative Contraindications to sclerotherapy where the potential benefits of the proposed treatment would outweigh the risk of harm or the risks may be mitigated by other measures include pregnancy, postpartum and breastfeeding; hypercoagulable states with risk of VTE; risk of neurological adverse events; risk of cardiac adverse events and poorly controlled chronic systemic illness. Conditions and circumstances where Warnings and Precautions should be considered before proceeding with sclerotherapy include risk of cutaneous necrosis or cosmetic complications such as pigmentation and telangiectatic matting; intake of medications such as the oral contraceptive and other exogenous oestrogens, disulfiram and minocycline; and psychosocial factors and psychiatric comorbidities that may increase the risk of adverse events or compromise optimal treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Sclerotherapy can achieve safe clinical outcomes provided that (1) patient-related risk factors and in particular all material risks are (1a) adequately identified and the risk benefit ratio is clearly and openly discussed with treatment candidates within a reasonable timeframe prior to the actual procedure; (1b) when an individual is not a suitable candidate for the proposed intervention, conservative treatment options including the option of 'no intervention as a treatment option' are discussed; (1c) complex cases are referred for treatment in controlled and standardised settings and by practitioners with more expertise in the field; (1d) only suitable individuals with no absolute contraindications or those with relative contraindications where the benefits outweigh the risks are offered intervention; (1e) if proceeding with intervention, appropriate prophylactic measures and other risk-mitigating strategies are adopted and appropriate follow-up is organised; and (2) procedure-related risk factors are minimised by ensuring the treating physicians (2a) have adequate training in general phlebology with additional training in duplex ultrasound, procedural phlebology and in particular sclerotherapy; (2b) maintain their knowledge and competency over time and (2c) review and optimise their treatment strategies and techniques on a regular basis to keep up with the ongoing progress in medical technology and contemporary scientific evidence.

Prescribing patterns of thromboprophylaxis post-bariatric surgeries: no additional benefits of extended prophylaxis

Background

Venous thromboembolism is one of the critical complications of bariatric surgeries resulting in life-threatening outcomes. The benefits and duration of appropriate thromboprophylaxis in the morbidly obese patients stay unclear. The study aims to compare the benefits of in-hospital thromboprophylaxis versus extended thromboprophylaxis post-bariatric surgery among a cohort with a high prevalence of morbid obesity.

Results

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on 229 morbidly obese patients who had undergone bariatric surgery in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia. Upon discharge, the patients were split either to receive no thromboprophylaxis or enoxaparin 40 mg once or twice daily for 14–21 days post-discharge. Primary outcomes were the clinical difference between the study groups in the percentage of patients who developed a symptomatic venous thromboembolic event during postoperative hospitalization or after discharge. Among patients who received no thromboprophylaxis (n = 119), no one developed a venous thromboembolic event, while, in the extended prophylaxis group (n = 110), 1.82% developed a non-fatal one (P = 0.23). Additionally, no significant difference in percentages of bleeding events occurred in both groups (p = 0.054).

Conclusions

The incidence of venous thromboembolism and bleeding events that occurred with extended thromboprophylaxis were deemed comparable and non-significant to the conventional in-hospital thromboprophylaxis. However, portal thrombosis stays an enigmatic complication despite its documented sparsity in literature.

Improving thromboprophylaxis in the medical inpatients: The role of the resident in an academic hospital

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the main causes of preventable in-hospital death. It is recommended for hospitals to have an appropriate thromboprophylaxis (TP) protocol to avoid VTE complications.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of the resident physician feedback to the staff physician in TP appropriateness after the Caprini RAM score implementation.

METHODS

Caprini RAM was implemented by the residents in medical patients. Patients were divided in low, moderate, high, and highest-risk groups, with TP recommendation accordingly. In cases with inadequate TP, the resident provided feedback to the staff physician for adjustment. Change to appropriate TP was assessed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 265 records were included. Before intervention, 193 (72.8%) patients had appropriate TP and post-intervention, 207 (78.1%) patients received adequate TP (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Feedback from the internal medicine resident to staff physician improves appropriate TP in medical inpatients as a quality of care strategy.

Implementation science approaches to optimizing venous thromboembolism prevention in patients with traumatic injuries: Findings from the 2022 Consensus Conference to Implement Optimal Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma

ABSTRACT

Disease burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE) without pharmacologic prophylaxis is high in trauma patients. Although VTE prophylaxis guidelines exist, studies on real-world use of VTE prophylaxis in trauma shows limited uptake of guideline recommendations. Despite existing guidelines, reports indicate that VTE prophylaxis implementation across trauma centers is lagging. Implementation barriers of VTE prophylaxis in trauma are multifactorial, and VTE prescribing practices require further optimization. Implementation science methods can help standardize and improve care; well-established approaches in medical and surgical hospitalized patients and their effects on clinical outcomes such as VTE and bleeding complications must be investigated because they apply to trauma patients. Nonadministration of VTE prophylaxis medications in hospitalized patients is associated with VTE events and remains a barrier to providing optimal defect-free care. Further investigations are required for VTE prophylaxis implementation across all trauma populations.

Joint 2022 European Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a potentially fatal but preventable postoperative complication. Thoracic oncology patients undergoing surgical resection, often after multimodality induction therapy, represent among the highest risk groups for postoperative VTE. Currently there are no VTE prophylaxis guidelines specific to these thoracic surgery patients. Evidenced-based recommendations will help clinicians manage and mitigate risk of VTE in the postoperative period and inform best practice.

OBJECTIVE

These joint evidence-based guidelines from The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons aim to inform clinicians and patients in decisions about prophylaxis to prevent VTE in patients undergoing surgical resection for lung or esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included broad membership to minimize potential bias when formulating recommendations. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 24 recommendations focused on pharmacological and mechanical methods for prophylaxis in patients undergoing lobectomy and segmentectomy, pneumonectomy, and esophagectomy, as well as extended resections for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The certainty of the supporting evidence for the majority of recommendations was judged as low or very low, largely due to a lack of direct evidence for thoracic surgery. The panel made conditional recommendations for use of parenteral anticoagulation for VTE prevention, in combination with mechanical methods, over no prophylaxis for cancer patients undergoing anatomic lung resection or esophagectomy. Other key recommendations include: conditional recommendations for using parenteral anticoagulants over direct oral anticoagulants, with use of direct oral anticoagulants suggested only in the context of clinical trials; conditional recommendation for using extended prophylaxis for 28 to 35 days over in-hospital prophylaxis only for patients at moderate or high risk of thrombosis; and conditional recommendations for VTE screening in patients undergoing pneumonectomy and esophagectomy. Future research priorities include the role of preoperative thromboprophylaxis and the role of risk stratification to guide use of extended prophylaxis.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Admitted for IBD: An Enterprise-Wide Experience of 86,000 Hospital Encounters

BACKGROUND

Recommendations regarding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients admitted to the hospital for IBD continue to evolve.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the 90-day rate and risk factors of deep venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism in cohorts of patients with IBD admitted to medical and surgical services.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective review.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a quaternary IBD referral center.

PATIENTS

The study included adult patients ( > 18 y of age) with a known diagnosis of either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease who had an inpatient hospital admission for IBD between January 1, 2002, and January 1, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were 90-day rate of deep venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism among admitted patients.

RESULTS

A total of 86,276 hospital admissions from 16,551 patients with IBD occurred between January 1, 2002, and January 1, 2020. A total of 35,992 patients (41.7%) were given subcutaneous heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and 8188 patients (9.49%) were given enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during the inpatient hospital admission. From the date of hospital admission, the 90-day rate of deep venous thromboembolism was 4.3% (n = 3664); of these, 1731 patients (47%) were diagnosed during the admission and 1933 patients (53%) were diagnosed after discharge. From the date of hospital admission, the 90-day rate of pulmonary embolism was 2.4% (n = 2040); of these, 960 patients (47%) were diagnosed during admission and 1080 patients (53%) were diagnosed after discharge.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective nature and unmeasured severity of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients admitted for IBD had a 90-day deep venous thromboembolism event rate of 4.3% and pulmonary embolism event rate of 2.4%. More than half of the events occurred after discharge, and venous thromboembolism events were higher among patients with IBD admitted to a medical service than those admitted to a surgical service. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B947 .

TROMBOEMBOLIA VENOSA EN PACIENTES INGRESADOS CON ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL UNA EXPERIENCIA EN TODA LA EMPRESA DE ENCUENTROS HOSPITALARIOS

ANTECEDENTES:Recomendaciones sobre la profilaxis de tromboembolia venosa en pacientes ingresados con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) continúa evolucionando.OBJETIVO:Determinar la tasa a 90 días y los factores de riesgo de tromboembolia venosa profunda y embolia pulmonar en cohortes de pacientes ingresados con EII médico y quirúrgico.DISEÑO:Esta fue una revisión retrospectiva.AJUSTE:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un centro cuaternario de derivación de EII.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes adultos (> 18 años) con diagnóstico conocido de colitis ulcerosa o enfermedad de Crohn que fueron hospitalizados por EII entre el 1 de Enero de 2002 y el 1 de Enero de 2020.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Las medidas principales fueron la tasa de tromboembolia venosa profunda a 90 días y la embolia pulmonar entre los pacientes ingresados.RESULTADOS:Un total de 86.276 ingresos hospitalarios de 16.551 pacientes con EII ocurrieron entre el 1 de Enero de 2002 y el 1 de Enero de 2020. A un total de 35.992 (41,7%) se les administró heparina subcutánea para profilaxis de tromboembolia venosa y a 8.188 (9,49%) se les administró enoxaparina para profilaxis de tromboembolia venosa durante el ingreso hospitalario. A partir de la fecha de ingreso hospitalario, la tasa de tromboembolia venosa profunda a 90 días fue del 4,3% (n = 3.664); de estos 1.731 (47%) se diagnosticaron durante el ingreso y 1.933 (53%) se diagnosticaron después del alta. Desde la fecha de ingreso hospitalario, la tasa de embolia pulmonar a los 90 días fue de 2,4% (n = 2.040); De estos, 960 (47%) fueron diagnosticados durante el ingreso y 1.080 (53%) fueron diagnosticados después del alta.LIMITACIONES:El estudio fue retrospectivo y no se midió la gravedad de la enfermedad.CONCLUSIÓNES:Los pacientes ingresados por EII tuvieron una tasa de tromboembolia venosa profunda y de eventos de embolia pulmonar de 4,3% y 2,4%, respectivamente, a 90 días. Más de la mitad de los eventos ocurrieron después del alta y los eventos de TEV fueron más altos entre los pacientes de EII médicos que quirúrgicos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B947 . (Traducción- Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Validation of the IMPROVE bleeding risk assessment model in surgical patients: Results from the DissolVE-2 Study

INTRODUCTION

IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Score (BRS) is known to be validated and widely accepted in medical patients. However, its relevance in surgical patients has so far not been explored. External validation of the IMPROVE BRS on bleeding in surgical patients can hopefully improve clinical practice (for surgical patients).

METHODS

Data from 6986 surgical patients were collected from the DissolVE-2 cohort. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the incidences of major bleeding and any bleeding among surgical patients within 14 days of admission. A cut-off value of BRS ≥7 indicated a higher risk of bleeding. Risk factors associated with major and any bleeding were analysed by the Cox regression method. Model discrimination was evaluated by area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC). Calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow χ² statistics were used to measure the difference between predicted and observed bleeding risks.

RESULTS

A total of 6399 surgical patients were included in the final validation cohort. The cumulative incidence rate of any bleeding was 3.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 3.4-4.5), of which the incidence rate of major bleeding was 1.2 % (95 % CI, 0.9-1.6). Among patients with a BRS of ≥7, 16.3 % reported any bleeding, and 26.3 % reported major bleeding. The IMPROVE BRS had a better discriminative power (AUC = 0.69) and excellent goodness of fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.208) for the prediction of major bleeding events as compared with any bleeding (AUC = 0.55; Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.004). The calibration plot suggested a more accurate prediction for major bleeding events. Moreover, the IMPROVE BRS had a higher AUC value of 0.83 and better goodness of fit (P = 0.2616) for major bleeding in patients undergoing abdominal surgery than other surgery types.

CONCLUSION

The IMPROVE BRS is a simple and practical technique that can help in predicting the risk of major bleeding in surgical patients, improving functional and safety outcomes of hospitalized patients with surgery.

Assessing the need for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at the time of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: A literature review

OBJECTIVE

Gynecologic cancers, especially ovarian cancer, are associated with a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recent data have shown the risk of VTE development is not only limited to the postoperative period; there also appears to be an increased risk during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) administration, prompting the need for better risk stratification in this setting. We sought to assess the risk of VTE development in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing NACT.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed literature review using the following medical terms: advanced ovarian cancer, advanced peritoneal cancer, advanced fallopian tube cancer, thrombosis, thromboembolic events, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eligible studies included patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer who underwent NACT and had VTE. VTE was defined as either a deep venous thrombosis or a pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

Seven relevant studies were identified; all 7 were published between 2017 and 2021. Across these studies, we identified 1427 patients who underwent NACT and either had VTE at presentation or developed VTE during their treatment course. Of these patients, 1171 underwent NACT and were at risk for VTE development and were included in our pooled analysis. Of these patients, 144 (12.3%) developed VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

VTE prophylaxis may be considered in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing NACT.

Experimental venous thrombus resolution is driven by IL-6 mediated monocyte actions

Deep venous thrombosis and residual thrombus burden correlates with circulating IL-6 levels in humans. To investigate the cellular source and role of IL-6 in thrombus resolution, Wild type C57BL/6J (WT), and IL-6-/- mice underwent induction of VT via inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis or stasis. Vein wall (VW) and thrombus were analyzed by western blot, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry. Adoptive transfer of WT bone marrow derived monocytes was performed into IL6-/- mice to assess for rescue. Cultured BMDMs from WT and IL-6-/- mice underwent quantitative real time PCR and immunoblotting for fibrinolytic factors and matrix metalloproteinase activity. No differences in baseline coagulation function or platelet function were found between WT and IL-6-/- mice. VW and thrombus IL-6 and IL-6 leukocyte-specific receptor CD126 were elevated in a time-dependent fashion in both VT models. Ly6Clo Mo/MØ were the predominant leukocyte source of IL-6. IL-6-/- mice demonstrated larger, non-resolving stasis thrombi with less neovascularization, despite a similar number of monocytes/macrophages (Mo/MØ). Adoptive transfer of WT BMDM into IL-6-/- mice undergoing stasis VT resulted in phenotype rescue. Human specimens of endophlebectomized tissue showed co-staining of Monocyte and IL-6 receptor. Thrombosis matrix analysis revealed significantly increased thrombus fibronectin and collagen in IL-6-/- mice. MMP9 activity in vitro depended on endogenous IL-6 expression in Mo/MØ, and IL-6-/- mice exhibited stunted matrix metalloproteinase activity. Lack of IL-6 signaling impairs thrombus resolution potentially via dysregulation of MMP-9 leading to impaired thrombus recanalization and resolution. Restoring or augmenting monocyte-mediated IL-6 signaling in IL-6 deficient or normal subjects, respectively, may represent a non-anticoagulant target to improve thrombus resolution.

Postoperative Timing of Chemoprophylaxis and Its Impact on Thromboembolism and Bleeding Following Major Abdominal Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Major abdominal surgery is associated with bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risks. Chemoprophylaxis prevents VTE but increases bleeding risk. When compared with pre- and intra-operative chemoprophylaxis, recent evidence suggests that starting chemoprophylaxis postoperatively lowers the risk of bleeding without compromising VTE protection. This study investigates whether an optimal window exists in the postoperative period for initiating chemoprophylaxis in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

Analysis of pooled data from four multicenter PROTECTinG studies, which investigated the timing of perioperative chemoprophylaxis on bleeding and VTE outcomes following major abdominal surgery. Patients that commenced chemoprophylaxis postoperatively were separated into quartiles based on timing of administration within the first 24 h post-surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 4729 (Abdominal visceral resection N = 668, cholecystectomies N = 573, major ventral hernia repair N = 1701, antireflux surgery N = 1787) consecutive patients had chemoprophylaxis commenced within 24 h following elective surgery. Baseline characteristics were comparable between quartiles. Across quartiles and within each procedural type, the timing of starting chemoprophylaxis was not associated with bleeding (2.6, 1.7, 2.7 and 3.2%, p = 0.130) or clinical VTE (0.8, 0.2, 0.8 and 0.5%, p = 0.131), and did not predict their occurrences on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Chemoprophylaxis can be safely started at any time within 24 h post-skin closure in major abdominal surgery, without affecting bleeding or VTE risks. This finding encourages the standardization of chemoprophylaxis timing in the postoperative period to pre-defined times during the day to improve workflow efficiency and chemoprophylaxis compliance.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the treatment of respiratory compromise

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the purpose of intervening upon profound cardiovascular or pulmonary compromise has proven to be a worthy intervention. Technological advancements have allowed this mode of therapy to become more effective and widespread. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a commonly used strategy to help manage patients with pulmonary dysfunction refractory to traditional management methods. This review intends to focus upon common indications and the clinical considerations for the institution of VV-ECMO as well as some of its known complications.

Association of Prophylaxis and Length of Stay With Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominopelvic Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (eVTEp) is recommended for select patients who have undergone major abdominopelvic surgery to prevent postdischarge venous thromboembolism (pdVTE). Criteria for selection of these patients are untested for this purpose and may be ineffective. To address this gap, we investigated the effectiveness of eVTEp on pdVTE rates.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery from January 2016 to February 2020 was performed using data from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. pdVTE was the main outcome. Our exposure variable, eVTEp, was compared dichotomously. Length of stay (LOS) was compared categorically using clinically relevant groups. Age, race, cancer occurrence, inflammatory bowel disease, surgical approach, and surgical time were covariates among other variables. Descriptive statistics, propensity score matching, and multivariable logistic regression were performed to compare pdVTE rates.

RESULTS

A total of 45,637 patients underwent abdominopelvic surgery. Of which, 3063 (6.71%) were prescribed eVTEp. Two hundred eighty-five (0.62%) had pdVTE. Of the 285, 59 (21%) patients received eVTEp, while 226 (79%) patients did not. After propensity score matching, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed pdVTE was associated with eVTEp and LOS of 5 d or more (P < 0.001). eVTEp was not associated with LOS. Further analysis showed increased risk of pdVTE with increasing LOS independent of prescription of eVTEp based on known risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

pdVTE was associated with increasing LOS but not with other VTE risk factors after propensity score matching. Current guidelines for eVTEp do not include LOS. Our findings suggest that LOS >5 d should be added to the criteria for eVTEp.