2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol

Safety of bempedoic acid in patients at high cardiovascular risk and with statin intolerance

BACKGROUND

Bempedoic acid is an oral adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor that lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) blood levels. The Cholesterol Lowering via Bempedoic acid, an ACL-Inhibiting Regimen (CLEAR) Outcomes study demonstrated that bempedoic acid reduced cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients at high risk for CV events who were unwilling or unable to take guideline-recommended doses of statins.

OBJECTIVE

To describe detailed safety information from CLEAR Outcomes, including events in the United States (US) prescribing information based on previous phase 3 hyperlipidemia studies.

METHODS

CLEAR Outcomes was a double-blind trial conducted in 13,970 patients randomized to oral bempedoic acid 180 mg daily or placebo and followed for a median of 3.4 years.

RESULTS

In patients who received at least one dose (7,001 bempedoic acid, 6,964 placebo), treatment emergent adverse events (AE) occurred in 86.3 % and 85 % of patients, respectively. COVID-19 was the most frequently reported AE in both groups. Changes in serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, hemoglobin, aminotransaminases, and uric acid were consistent with the known safety profile of bempedoic acid. Gout or gouty arthritis occurred in 3.2 % of bempedoic acid and 2.2 % of placebo patients. AE associated with tendinopathies, including tendon rupture, occurred in 2 % of patients in both treatment groups. Cholelithiasis occurred in 2.2 % of bempedoic acid and 1.2 % of placebo patients; AE related to gallbladder disease were similar between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Bempedoic acid was well-tolerated compared with placebo. Safety data from the long-term CLEAR Outcomes study reinforce the positive benefit-risk profile of bempedoic acid.

Non-HDL cholesterol and residual risk of cardiovascular events in patients with ischemic heart disease and well-controlled LDL cholesterol: a cohort study

Background

Identifying patients at high residual risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) despite statin-treatment is of paramount clinical importance. We aim to investigate if non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) identifies residual risk of ASCVD and death in statin-treated patients with ischemic heart disease and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≤ 1.8 mmol/L.

Methods

Leveraging Danish regional and national registries, we identified statin-treated patients with ischemic heart disease who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) and attained LDL-C ≤ 1.8 mmol/L within a year post-CAG. Outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), ASCVD (MI or ischemic stroke), and all-cause death occurring from one year after CAG to end of follow-up. Cox regression analyses obtained adjusted hazard ratios (HR).

Findings

Between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, we included 23,641 statin-treated patients with ischemic heart disease and LDL-C ≤ 1.8 mmol/L. During median follow-up of 4.1 years (IQR 2.4-6.1), 893 (3.8%) patients developed MI, 1207 (5.1%) ASCVD, and 3054 (12.9%) patients died. For ASCVD the adjusted HRs (95% confidence interval) for non-HDL-C < 25th percentile (<1.7 mmol/L) versus 25th-74th (1.7-2.1 mmol/L), 75th-94th (2.2-2.6 mmol/L), and ≥95th (≥2.7 mmol/L) percentile were 1.1 (0.9-1.3), 1.4 (1.1-1.7), and 1.8 (1.4-2.4), and for all-cause death 1.0 (0.9-1.1), 1.2 (1.1-1.4), and 1.4 (1.2-1.7), respectively.

Interpretation

In a contemporary secondary prevention cohort of patients with well-managed LDL-C, non-HDL-C emerges as an easily accessible marker to detect patients facing high residual risk of ASCVD and death. These findings are important for preventive strategies extending beyond LDL-C targets.

Funding

Research grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Beyond cardiovascular risk: Implications of Familial hypercholesterolemia on cognition and brain function

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a metabolic condition caused mainly by a mutation in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene (LDLR), which is highly prevalent in the population. Besides being an important causative factor of cardiovascular diseases, FH has been considered an early risk factor for Alzheimer's disease. Cognitive and emotional behavioral impairments in LDL receptor knockout (LDLr-/-) mice are associated with neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, impaired neurogenesis, brain oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Notably, today, LDLr-/- mice, a widely used animal model for studying cardiovascular diseases and atherosclerosis, are also considered an interesting tool for studying dementia. Here, we reviewed the main findings in LDLr-/- mice regarding the relationship between FH and brain dysfunctions and dementia development.

Prevalence of Aortic Valve Calcium and the Long-Term Risk of Incident Severe Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is a principal mechanism underlying aortic stenosis (AS).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the prevalence of AVC and its association with the long-term risk for severe AS.

METHODS

Noncontrast cardiac computed tomography was performed among 6,814 participants free of known cardiovascular disease at MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) visit 1. AVC was quantified using the Agatston method, and normative age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific AVC percentiles were derived. The adjudication of severe AS was performed via chart review of all hospital visits and supplemented with visit 6 echocardiographic data. The association between AVC and long-term incident severe AS was evaluated using multivariable Cox HRs.

RESULTS

AVC was present in 913 participants (13.4%). The probability of AVC >0 and AVC scores increased with age and were generally highest among men and White participants. In general, the probability of AVC >0 among women was equivalent to men of the same race/ethnicity who were approximately 10 years younger. Incident adjudicated severe AS occurred in 84 participants over a median follow-up of 16.7 years. Higher AVC scores were exponentially associated with the absolute risk and relative risk of severe AS with adjusted HRs of 12.9 (95% CI: 5.6-29.7), 76.4 (95% CI: 34.3-170.2), and 380.9 (95% CI: 169.7-855.0) for AVC groups 1 to 99, 100 to 299, and ≥300 compared with AVC = 0.

CONCLUSIONS

The probability of AVC >0 varied significantly by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The risk of severe AS was exponentially higher with higher AVC scores, whereas AVC = 0 was associated with an extremely low long-term risk of severe AS. The measurement of AVC provides clinically relevant information to assess an individual's long-term risk for severe AS.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Testing Following Myocardial Infarction Hospitalization Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Background

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is used to guide lipid-lowering therapy after a myocardial infarction (MI). Lack of LDL-C testing represents a missed opportunity for optimizing therapy and reducing cardiovascular risk.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to estimate the proportion of Medicare beneficiaries who had their LDL-C measured within 90 days following MI hospital discharge.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries ≥66 years of age with an MI hospitalization between 2016 and 2020. The primary analysis used data from all beneficiaries with fee-for-service coverage and pharmacy benefits (532,767 MI hospitalizations). In secondary analyses, we used data from a 5% random sample of beneficiaries with fee-for-service coverage without pharmacy benefits (10,394 MI hospitalizations), and from beneficiaries with Medicare Advantage (176,268 MI hospitalizations). The proportion of beneficiaries who had their LDL-C measured following MI hospital discharge was estimated accounting for the competing risk of death.

Results

In the primary analysis (mean age 76.9 years, 84.4% non-Hispanic White), 29.9% of beneficiaries had their LDL-C measured within 90 days following MI hospital discharge. Among Hispanic, Asian, non-Hispanic White, and non-Hispanic Black beneficiaries, the 90-day postdischarge LDL-C testing was 33.8%, 32.5%, 30.0%, and 26.0%, respectively. Postdischarge LDL-C testing within 90 days was highest in the Middle Atlantic (36.4%) and lowest in the West North Central (23.4%) U.S. regions. In secondary analyses, the 90-day postdischarge LDL-C testing was 26.9% among beneficiaries with fee-for-service coverage without pharmacy benefits, and 28.6% among beneficiaries with Medicare Advantage coverage.

Conclusions

LDL-C testing following MI hospital discharge among Medicare beneficiaries was low.

Evaluation of Flavonoid-rich Fraction of Portulaca Grandiflora Aerial Part Extract in Atherogenic Diet-induced Atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Portulaca grandiflora is a tiny, upright herb that contains a variety of chemical components, including alkaloids, glycosides, mucilage, proteins, tannins, flavonoids, saponins, polysaccharides, and triterpenoids possessing properties that may help with atherosclerosis. The reported pharmacological properties of Portulaca grandiflora are antioxidant, antidiabetic, antiasthmatic, antibacterial, antiulcer and anti-inflammatory properties.

OBJECTIVES

The yield of methanol extract is higher than that of ethanol and acetone, and its phytoconstituents, like flavonoids and polyphenols, and has potent antioxidant properties. In order to determine the effectiveness of Portulaca grandiflora methanol extract fraction against high-fat diet (HFD)-induced hyperlipidemia, hemodynamic change, antioxidant levels, and vascular dysfunction in rats, a study was carried out on a flavonoid-rich methanol extract fraction of the aerial part of Portulaca grandiflora Hook.

METHODS

This method involves a study of 30 days involving male Wistar rats (240-250 g) (n=5) that were fed with an Ath diet. Study groups were divided into (i) The Control Group, (ii) the Diseases Control Group, (iii) Disease + Standard drug (Atorvastatin 20mg/kg, orally, (iv) Disease + Test Extract dose 1 (Portulaca grandiflora 200 mg/kg orally), and (v) Disease + Test Extract dose 2 (Portulaca grandiflora 400 mg/kg orally). Both the test drug Portulaca grandiflora and the standard drug Atorvastatin were given orally for 30 days.

RESULTS

At the end of the study, blood samples were taken to measure the serum lipid profile, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and levels of oxidative tissue stress. Hemodynamic parameters and aortic staining were performed. Portulaca grandiflora treatment improved the lipid profile and considerably reduced oxidative stress levels. Aortic staining examination revealed a marked reduction in atherosclerotic lesions.

CONCLUSION

These results revealed that Portulaca grandiflora is an effective treatment approach in preventing atherosclerotic lesion progression, which is attributed to its protection against oxidative stress and various enzymatic activities in the Atherogenic model.

Moderate-Intensity Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Combination versus Quadruple-Dose Rosuvastatin Monotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review

PURPOSE

There are few studies in the literature on the dosage of statin that equivalently reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) compared to an ezetimibe combination and whether such regimens have differences in safety. We compared the lipid-modifying efficacy and safety of 5 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe to those of 20 mg rosuvastatin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Sciences, and SCOPUS databases up to December 2021. Human studies investigating the two aforementioned regimens with a randomized controlled design were selected. Outcome variables included the percentage reduction in LDL-C and other lipid parameters and rates of composite adverse events (AEs), including muscle-related symptoms. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed after heterogeneity testing between studies.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The percentage LDL-C reduction did not differ between the combination and monotherapy groups [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to 0.26; p=0.35]. The risk of composite AEs (odds ratio 0.50; 95% CI 0.15 to 1.72; p=0.27) of the combination was not different compared to the monotherapy group. The percentage of total cholesterol reduction was greater in the combination group (SMD 0.22; p=0.02), whereas that of triglyceride reduction and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol elevation did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that 5 mg rosuvastatin/10 mg ezetimibe had largely comparable lipid-modifying efficacy and tolerability as 20 mg rosuvastatin.

Optimization of time interval for the measurement of plasma lipids for cardiovascular disease risk assessment

BACKGROUND

Lipid testing for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk is often performed every 4-6 years, but we hypothesized that the optimum time interval may vary depending on baseline risk.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using lipid values and other risk factors from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (n = 9,704), we calculated a 10-year risk score with the pooled-cohort equations. Future risk scores were predicted by increasing age and projecting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and lipid changes, using the mean-percentile age group change in NHANES for SBP (n = 17,329) and the Lifelines Cohort study for lipids (n = 133,540). The crossing of high and intermediate-risk thresholds were calculated by time to determine optimum intervals for lipid testing.

RESULTS

Time to crossing risk thresholds depends on baseline risk, but the mean increase in the risk score plateaus at 1% per year for those with a baseline 10-year risk greater than 15%. Based on these findings, we recommend the following maximum time intervals for lipid testing: baseline risk < 15%: 5-years, 16%: 4-years, 17%: 3-years, 18%: 2-years, and 19%: ≤1-year.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing patients for lipids who have a higher baseline risk more often could identify high-risk patients sooner, allowing for earlier and more effective therapeutic intervention.

Improving cardiovascular risk prediction through machine learning modelling of irregularly repeated electronic health records

Aims

Existing electronic health records (EHRs) often consist of abundant but irregular longitudinal measurements of risk factors. In this study, we aim to leverage such data to improve the risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) by applying machine learning (ML) algorithms, which can allow automatic screening of the population.

Methods and results

A total of 215 744 Chinese adults aged between 40 and 79 without a history of cardiovascular disease were included (6081 cases) from an EHR-based longitudinal cohort study. To allow interpretability of the model, the predictors of demographic characteristics, medication treatment, and repeatedly measured records of lipids, glycaemia, obesity, blood pressure, and renal function were used. The primary outcome was ASCVD, defined as non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease death, or fatal and non-fatal stroke. The eXtreme Gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression models were derived to predict the 5-year ASCVD risk. In the validation set, compared with the refitted Chinese guideline-recommended Cox model (i.e. the China-PAR), the XGBoost model had a significantly higher C-statistic of 0.792, (the differences in the C-statistics: 0.011, 0.006-0.017, P < 0.001), with similar results reported for LASSO regression (the differences in the C-statistics: 0.008, 0.005-0.011, P < 0.001). The XGBoost model demonstrated the best calibration performance (men: Dx = 0.598, P = 0.75; women: Dx = 1.867, P = 0.08). Moreover, the risk distribution of the ML algorithms differed from that of the conventional model. The net reclassification improvement rates of XGBoost and LASSO over the Cox model were 3.9% (1.4-6.4%) and 2.8% (0.7-4.9%), respectively.

Conclusion

Machine learning algorithms with irregular, repeated real-world data could improve cardiovascular risk prediction. They demonstrated significantly better performance for reclassification to identify the high-risk population correctly.

Assessment of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic People In Vivo: Measurements Suitable for Biomarker and Mendelian Randomization Studies

BACKGROUND

One strategy to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease is the early detection and treatment of atherosclerosis. This has led to significant interest in studies of subclinical atherosclerosis, using different phenotypes, not all of which are accurate reflections of the presence of asymptomatic atherosclerotic plaques. The aim of part 2 of this series is to provide a review of the existing literature on purported measures of subclinical disease and recommendations concerning which tests may be appropriate in the prevention of incident cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

We conducted a critical review of measurements used to infer the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis in the major conduit arteries and focused on the predictive value of these tests for future cardiovascular events, independent of conventional cardiovascular risk factors, in asymptomatic people. The emphasis was on studies with >10 000 person-years of follow-up, with meta-analysis of results reporting adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. The arterial territories were limited to carotid, coronary, aorta, and lower limb arteries.

RESULTS

In the carotid arteries, the presence of plaque (8 studies) was independently associated with future stroke (pooled HR, 1.89 [1.04-3.44]) and cardiac events (7 studies), with a pooled HR, 1.77 (1.19-2.62). Increased coronary artery calcium (5 studies) was associated with the risk of coronary heart disease events, pooled HR, 1.54 (1.07-2.07) and increasing severity of calcification (by Agaston score) was associated with escalation of risk (13 studies). An ankle/brachial index (ABI) of <0.9, the pooled HR for cardiovascular death from 7 studies was 2.01 (1.43-2.81). There were insufficient studies of either, thoracic or aortic calcium, aortic diameter, or femoral plaque to synthesize the data based on consistent reporting of these measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of carotid plaque, coronary artery calcium, or abnormal ankle pressures seems to be a valid indicator of the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis and may be considered for use in biomarker, Mendelian randomization and similar studies.

Real-World Insights into Evolocumab Use in Patients with Hyperlipidemia Across Five Countries: Analysis from the ZERBINI Study

INTRODUCTION

This study characterizes patients receiving evolocumab in clinical practice and assesses treatment effectiveness, safety and persistence outcomes across five countries.

METHODS

This retrospective and prospective observational study enrolled patients initiated on evolocumab during August 2017 to July 2019 at 49 sites across Canada, Mexico, Colombia, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Medical records data were extracted within 6 months prior to (baseline) and every 3 months for 12 months post evolocumab initiation and reported as available.

RESULTS

A total of 578 patients were enrolled (40.1% female, median age 60 [interquartile range (IQR) 51-68] years); 83.7% had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and/or familial hypercholesterolemia. Median low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at baseline was 3.4 (IQR 2.7-4.2) mmol/L (131.5 [IQR 104.4-162.4] mg/dL), with 75.6% of patients receiving a statin (59.2% high intensity). Compared to baseline, the median lowest LDL-C was reduced by 70.2% and remained stable over 12 months of treatment. Guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds < 1.8, < 1.4 and < 1.0 mmol/L (< 70, < 55 and < 40 mg/dL) were achieved by 75.3%, 63.6% and 47.4% of patients. LDL-C outcomes were consistent across high- and very high-risk patients. Background lipid-lowering therapy remained relatively stable. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, and persistence to evolocumab was 90.2% at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide real-world evidence that evolocumab use is in accordance with its international guideline-recommended place in dyslipidemia therapy, as well as confirmation of its effectiveness and safety in a heterogeneous population. Evolocumab can address a healthcare gap in the management of dyslipidemia by increasing the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C goals recommended to lower cardiovascular risk.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Atorvastatin with Rosuvastatin in Preventing Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis

The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of atorvastatin with rosuvastatin in preventing cardiovascular events among patients already diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD). We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Two investigators independently searched online databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Excerpta Medica database (Embase), from the inception of databases until November 2023. The primary outcome assessed in the meta-analysis included cardiovascular mortality and a composite of cardiovascular events. Other outcomes included myocardial infarction and stroke. A total of four studies were selected for our meta-analysis. A total of 7,378 patients were enrolled, including 3,721 in the atorvastatin group and 3,657 in the rosuvastatin group. Pooled analysis showed that the incidence of composite cardiovascular events was not significantly different in patients receiving atorvastatin and patients receiving rosuvastatin (risk ratio (RR): 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79 to 1.09, p-value: 0.38, I-square: 0%). Pooled analysis showed that the risk of cardiovascular mortality was not significantly different between the two study groups (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.81, p-value: 0.93, I-square: 0%). In conclusion, our meta-analysis, based on four selected studies, found no significant disparities in composite cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke between patients administered atorvastatin and those receiving rosuvastatin. This outcome underscores the comparable efficacy of these statins in mitigating cardiovascular risks, highlighting their clinical equipoise in the realm of secondary prevention.

Strategies of improving adherence to lipid-lowering therapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lowering LDL-C has been shown to reduce ASCVD events, yet many ASCVD patients do not achieve their guideline-directed LDL-C goals leaving patients at increased risk of another ASCVD event. This review discusses implementation strategies to improve guideline-directed lipid management in patients with ASCVD focusing on the provider, patient, and system level.

RECENT FINDINGS

At a provider level, under-prescribing of statin intensity due most often to statin intolerance, clinical inertia, insufficient monitoring of LDL-C levels, and the difficulty and cost of prescribing other lipid-lowering therapies such as the PCSK9 inhibitors leads to suboptimal cholesterol management in ASCVD patients. Patients concerns about medication side effects and lack of understanding of their ASCVD risk are causes of poor adherence to their lipid-lowering therapy as are barriers at a system level.

SUMMARY

To improve cholesterol management in ASCVD patients will require an integrated approach targeting the provider, the patient and the system. There is a need for further education of clinicians on the importance of intensive LDL-C lowering in ASCVD patients and greater use of nonstatin LDL-C-lowering therapies for those patients on a maximally tolerated statin who have not achieved their guideline-directed LDL-C goal. This will require shared decision-making with a focus on patient education and patient-clinician communication so that the clinician's goals and aims align with that of the patient.

Lipid-lowering therapy and LDL-C control for primary prevention in persons with diabetes across 90 health systems in the United States

Objective

National guidelines recommend statin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. We assessed the extent of moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy utilization in community practice.

Methods

We evaluated lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at baseline and 1-year follow-up in patients aged 40-75 years with type 2 diabetes but without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), across 90 health systems in the United States participating in an electronic health record-derived dataset, Cerner Real-World Data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with utilization of moderate- to high-intensity statin.

Results

We identified 241,232 patients with type 2 diabetes (58.1 % on moderate- to high-intensity statin, 7.0 % on low-intensity statin, and 34.9 % on no statin). Predictors of moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy included retinopathy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.26; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.38), hypertension (aOR, 1.52; 95 % CI, 1.43-1.61), and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (aOR, 1.14; 95 % CI, 1.07-1.21). Women (aOR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.82-0.87), and those with rheumatoid arthritis (aOR, 0.79; 95 % CI, 0.71-0.87), psoriasis (aOR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.75-0.96), and hepatitis C (aOR, 0.40; 95 % CI, 0.39-0.46), had reduced odds of moderate- to high-intensity statin treatment. Utilization of ezetimibe was rare (2.0 %). LDL-C control was suboptimal at baseline (37.0 % and 27.9 % had LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL, respectively). At 1-year follow-up, the rate of moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy utilization was 65.3 %.

Conclusion

Increased efforts are needed to improve LDL-C control and LLT use for primary prevention of ASCVD in adults with type 2 diabetes, in particular among women and those with risk-enhancing inflammatory conditions.

Impact of Active vs Passive Statin Selection for Primary Prevention: The CorCal Vanguard Trial

Background

Statins can improve outcomes in high-risk primary prevention populations. However, application in clinical practice has lagged.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to compare an active vs a passive strategy (ie, usual care) to statin prescription for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

Methods

A total of 3,770 patients ≥50 years of age without a history of ASCVD or statin use were invited to enroll in CorCal, with 601 consenting to participate. These patients were randomized 1:1 to statin initiation guided by the pooled cohort equation or by coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS). Outcomes (2.8-year follow-up) compared patients managed actively vs passively (randomly invited but declined or did not respond).

Results

Patient demographics were well matched. Statin recommendation was common among enrolled patients (41.7%). During follow-up, 25.3% of active patients were taking a statin vs 9.8% managed passively (P < 0.0001). Active patients had more lipid panels (median 2.0 vs 1.0), lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (109 vs 117 mg/dL) (both P < 0.0001), and a low rate of major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up (0.6% vs 1.0%, P = 0.47). Statistical comparisons included t-tests, chi-squared tests, nonparametric tests, and time-to-event tests as appropriate.

Conclusions

An active approach to statin selection for primary ASCVD prevention identified a large treatment opportunity and led to over twice as many patients on statins compared to passive (usual care) management. A large CorCal Outcomes Trial is underway to more definitively assess the impact on outcomes of active management of statins for primary prevention.

Development and Validation of the CANHEART Population-Based Laboratory Prediction Models for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND

Prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in primary prevention assessments exclusively with laboratory results may facilitate automated risk reporting and improve uptake of preventive therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate sex-specific prediction models for ASCVD using age and routine laboratory tests and compare their performance with that of the pooled cohort equations (PCEs).

DESIGN

Derivation and validation of the CANHEART (Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team) Lab Models.

SETTING

Population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

A derivation and internal validation cohort of adults aged 40 to 75 years without cardiovascular disease from April 2009 to December 2015; an external validation cohort of primary care patients from January 2010 to December 2014.

MEASUREMENTS

Age and laboratory predictors measured in the outpatient setting included serum total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, platelets, leukocytes, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and glucose. The ASCVD outcomes were defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from ischemic heart or cerebrovascular disease within 5 years.

RESULTS

Sex-specific models were developed and internally validated in 2 160 497 women and 1 833 147 men. They were well calibrated, with relative differences less than 1% between mean predicted and observed risk for both sexes. The c-statistic was 0.77 in women and 0.71 in men. External validation in 31 697 primary care patients showed a relative difference less than 14% and an absolute difference less than 0.3 percentage points in mean predicted and observed risks for both sexes. The c-statistics for the laboratory models were 0.72 for both sexes and were not statistically significantly different from those for the PCEs in women (change in c-statistic, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.03 to 0.01]) or men (change in c-statistic, -0.01 [CI, -0.04 to 0.02]).

LIMITATION

Medication use was not available at the population level.

CONCLUSION

The CANHEART Lab Models predict ASCVD with similar accuracy to more complex models, such as the PCEs.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Longitudinal Control of Lipid Levels in Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease

Background

Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is a central aspect of the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and the benefits of LLT accrue over time. However, there are limited real-world data on longitudinal lipid control in patients with premature CAD.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess longitudinal attainment of guideline-recommended lipid goals and outcomes in a contemporary cohort of patients with premature CAD.

Methods

We enrolled males younger than 50 years and females younger than 55 years with coronary stenosis of >50% and examined achievement of lipid goals, LLT characteristics, and cardiovascular outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE]).

Results

Of 476 patients who presented with acute coronary syndrome (ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina) (68%), stable angina (28%), or other symptoms, 73.2% achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <1.8 mmol/L on at least 1 occasion, but only 27.3% consistently stayed in the target range for 3 years after diagnosis. Although 73.9% of patients received high-intensity LLT at the time of diagnosis, only 43.5% had good adherence over the following 3 years. In multivariable analysis, 1 mmol/L increase in time-weighted average exposure to LDL-C, but not the lowest achieved LDL-C, was associated with a higher risk of MACE, hazard ratio 2.02 (95% CI: 1.48-2.76), when adjusted for sex, age, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking.

Conclusions

We found low rates of longitudinal lipid target achievement in patients with premature CAD. Cumulative LDL-C exposure, but not lowest achieved LDL-C, was associated with risk of MACE. This highlights the critical importance of longitudinal control of lipids levels and identifies opportunities to improve LLT and maximize the time-dependent benefits of lipid-lowering.

The lack of association between different LDL-C levels and oxidized LDL in patients with type 2 diabetes

Background

High concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) have been a known risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Also, the role of oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) in forming atherosclerosis plaque has been proven. However, it has not yet been proven that atherogenic LDL-C by-products like ox-LDL will decrease by keeping the LDL levels at the desired level. This study aimed to examine the relationship between LDL-C and ox-LDL in different LDL-C values in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 347 patients with T2D who received statins were enrolled. LDL-C values were defined into four groups as LDL-C < 55 mg/dL, 55 mg/dL ≤ to <70 mg/dL, 70 mg/dL ≤ to <100 mg/dL and LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL. Total cholesterol, triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and ox-LDL were studied in the four defined groups.

Results

Ox-LDL levels were not different among the four groups (p = 0.30). In addition, LDL-C and ox-LDL levels had no significant correlation (r = 0.480, p = 0.376). Additionally, based on this study analysis, ox-LDL levels were significantly correlated with TG levels (r = 0.119, p < 0.05) and TG/HDL ratio (r = 0.390, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

It is concluded that ox-LDL levels were not associated with different LDL-C level categories from <55 mg/dL to >100 mg/dL in patients with T2D. However, the revealed association of ox-LDL with TG level and TG/HDL ratio may be considered in the clinic.

International Atherosclerosis Society guidance for implementing best practice in the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia

This contemporary, international, evidence-informed guidance aims to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) across different countries. FH, a family of monogenic defects in the hepatic LDL clearance pathway, is a preventable cause of premature coronary artery disease and death. Worldwide, 35 million people have FH, but most remain undiagnosed or undertreated. Current FH care is guided by a useful and diverse group of evidence-based guidelines, with some primarily directed at cholesterol management and some that are country-specific. However, none of these guidelines provides a comprehensive overview of FH care that includes both the lifelong components of clinical practice and strategies for implementation. Therefore, a group of international experts systematically developed this guidance to compile clinical strategies from existing evidence-based guidelines for the detection (screening, diagnosis, genetic testing and counselling) and management (risk stratification, treatment of adults or children with heterozygous or homozygous FH, therapy during pregnancy and use of apheresis) of patients with FH, update evidence-informed clinical recommendations, and develop and integrate consensus-based implementation strategies at the patient, provider and health-care system levels, with the aim of maximizing the potential benefit for at-risk patients and their families worldwide.

Primary Prevention of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Young Adults: JACC Review Topic of the Week

There is growing evidence that the atherosclerotic process that leads to symptomatic cardiovascular disease (CVD) starts at an early age. In young adults, exposure to low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and other cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF) mediators, even at levels considered within normal limits, increases the prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis and is associated with greater risk of cardiovascular events later in life. The optimal CVRF targets to prevent CVD in asymptomatic young individuals (<40 years) are unknown. The randomized controlled PRECAD (Prevent Coronary Artery Disease) trial has been developed to assess the potential benefit of an aggressive control of CVRF in otherwise healthy young adults. The hypothesis of PRECAD is that in subjects aged 20 to 39 years without known CVD, maintaining low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol <70 mg/dL and strict control of blood pressure and glucose will prevent the onset of atherosclerosis and/or its progression. The primary endpoint will be the change in total atherosclerosis burden, a surrogate for CVD.

Discordance Between Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein to Predict Clinical Events in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Large-Scale Cohort Study

Purpose

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a novel inflammatory biomarker, has been shown to positively predict prognosis independent of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to use discordance analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of NLR and hsCRP to predict adverse events in patients with stable CAD.

Patients and Methods

This observational cohort study included 7827 consecutive CAD patients at Fuwai Hospital from March 2011 to April 2017. Discordant NLR with hsCRP was defined by the highest quartiles and medians. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and unplanned revascularization.

Results

During a median 36-month follow-up, 624 (8.0%) MACCEs occurred. Compared with the lowest NLR quartile, a significantly higher risk of MACCEs was observed in the highest NLR quartile after adjusting for confounding factors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.71). High NLR and low hsCRP discordance were also associated with an increased risk of MACCEs in the fully adjusted model (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.05-1.84).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that discordantly elevated NLR levels were associated with a greater risk of adverse clinical events in patients with stable CAD, suggesting the potential clinical significance of NLR as a goal of inflammatory risk management.

Effect of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination vs. high-intensity statin therapy according to sex in patients with atherosclerosis

We aimed to evaluate sex differences in the effects of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy (rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe) versus high-intensity statin (rosuvastatin 20 mg) monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This was a sex-specific subgroup analysis of the RACING trial that evaluated the interaction between sex and treatment strategies for the primary outcome (composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular events, or nonfatal stroke at 3 years). Of 3780 patients in the RACING trial, 954 (25.2%) were women. Regardless of sex, the effect of moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy on primary outcome compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy was similar (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98 [0.63-1.52] in women; HR 0.90 [0.71-1.14] in men). The rate of discontinuation or dose reduction of study drugs due to intolerance was lower in the ezetimibe combination group than in the high-intensity statin monotherapy group in both women (4.5% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.014) and men (4.8% vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001). LDL cholesterol levels of < 70 mg/dL at 1, 2, and 3 years were more frequently achieved in the ezetimibe combination group than in the high-intensity statin monotherapy group (all P < 0.001) in both sexes. There were no significant interactions between sex and treatment groups regarding the primary outcome, discontinuation, or dose reduction of study drugs, or the proportion of achievement of LDL cholesterol levels < 70 mg/dL. The effect of ezetimibe combination therapy for the 3-year composite outcomes was not different in both men and women. The benefits of ezetimibe combination therapy on LDL cholesterol lowering and drug tolerance were similarly observed regardless of sex.Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03044665.

Clinical practice recommendations on lipoprotein apheresis for children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: an expert consensus statement from ERKNet and ESPN

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia is a life-threatening genetic condition, which causes extremely elevated LDL-C levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease very early in life. It is vital to start effective lipid-lowering treatment from diagnosis onwards. Even with dietary and current multimodal pharmaceutical lipid-lowering therapies, LDL-C treatment goals cannot be achieved in many children. Lipoprotein apheresis is an extracorporeal lipid-lowering treatment, which is well established since three decades, lowering serum LDL-C levels by more than 70% per session. Data on the use of lipoprotein apheresis in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia mainly consists of case-reports and case-series, precluding strong evidence-based guidelines. We present a consensus statement on lipoprotein apheresis in children based on the current available evidence and opinions from experts in lipoprotein apheresis from over the world. It comprises practical statements regarding the indication, methods, treatment targets and follow-up of lipoprotein apheresis in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and on the role of lipoprotein(a) and liver transplantation.

How do patients with high cardiovascular risk evaluate online health information? A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

People are exposed to variable health information from the Internet, potentially influencing their health decision-making and behaviour. It remains a challenge for people to discern between good- and poor-quality online health information (OHI). This study explored how patients evaluate and determine trust in statin-related OHI in patients with high cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

This qualitative study used vignettes and think-aloud methods. We recruited patients from a primary care clinic who were at least 18 years old, had high cardiovascular risk and had previously sought OHI. Participants were given two statin-related vignettes: Vignette 1 (low-quality information) and Vignette 2 (high-quality information). Participants voiced their thoughts aloud when reading the vignettes and determined the trust level for each vignette using a 5-point Likert scale. This was followed by a semi-structured interview which was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were coded and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 20 participants were recruited, with age ranging from 38-74 years. Among all the high cardiovascular-risk participants, eight had pre-existing cardiovascular diseases. For Vignette 1 (low-quality information), five participants trusted it while nine participants were unsure of their trust. 17 participants (85%) trusted Vignette 2 (high-quality information). Five themes emerged from the analysis of how patients evaluated OHI: (1) logical content, (2) neutral stance and tone of OHI content, (3) credibility of the information source, (4) consistent with prior knowledge and experience, and (5) corroboration with information from other sources.

CONCLUSION

Patients with high cardiovascular risks focused on the content, source credibility and information consistency when evaluating and determining their trust in statin-related OHI. Doctors should adopt a more personalised approach when discussing statin-related online misinformation with patients by considering their prior knowledge, beliefs and experience of statin use.

Impact of a Food Rebalancing Program Associated with Plant-Derived Food Supplements on the Biometric, Behavioral, and Biological Parameters of Obese Subjects

Between 2021 and 2023, the Scientific Council of Dietplus®, a group specialized in overweight and obesity management, conducted a clinical study on 170 volunteer subjects with a BMI > 29 Kg/m2 consecutively recruited. The Dietplus® program comprises nutritional education, intensive, personalized coaching, and consuming food supplements rich in plant derivatives. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the Dietplus® program on biometric, behavioral, and biological parameters. A control group of 30 obese patients was followed for a similar 12-week period. Mean weight loss reached 9 ± 2.1 kg in the Dietplus® test group versus a 1 ± 0.1 kg weight gain in the control group. Excess weight loss reached 33 ± 13%, and fat mass loss was 7.6% (p < 0.001); waist circumference was reduced by 30%. Quality of Life, Nutriscore, and Prochaska di Clemente scale significantly improved (p < 0.001). Biological parameters showed substantial improvements in the carbohydrate profile and insulin resistance (HOMA index) and in the lipid profile with lower plasma triglyceride (p < 0.01) and VLDL (p < 0.01) concentrations. Inflammatory parameters (orosomucoid, ultrasensitive C-reactive protein, and PINI indices) were also substantially reduced. These results indicate a substantial benefit in subjects who followed the Dietplus® program. (Dietplus® 116 Rue Robert Bunsen, 57460 Behren-lès-Forbach, France is active in France Belgium and Spain. Plant Derived Food Supplements are produced in France). Indeed, improvements were observed in all biometric, behavioral, and metabolic parameters.

Prevalence, patterns and associated risk factors for dyslipidaemia among individuals attending the diabetes clinic at a tertiary hospital in Central Malawi

BACKGROUND

Dyslipidaemia among individuals with diabetes is a significant modifiable risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). ASCVDs are a major cause of mortality and morbidity globally, especially in people with diabetes. In Malawi, limited data exist on the prevalence and biochemical characteristics of diabetic dyslipidaemia. This study investigated the prevalence and biochemical characteristics of dyslipidaemia in individuals attending the diabetes clinic at Kamuzu Central Hospital, the largest tertiary referral hospital in Central Malawi.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional design, sociodemographic, medical and anthropometric data were collected from 391 adult participants who were enrolled in the study. Blood samples were analysed for glycosylated haemoglobin (HBA1c) and fasting lipid profiles. The prevalence of dyslipidaemia was calculated, and the biochemical characteristics of the dyslipidaemia were defined. The associations between dyslipidaemia and risk factors such as sociodemographic characteristics, obesity, and HBA1c levels were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Prevalence of dyslipidaemia was observed in 71% of the participants, and elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was the most frequent lipid abnormality among the study participants. None of the participants were receiving any lipid-lowering therapy. On bivariate analysis, dyslipidemia was positively associated with female sex [OR 1.65 (95% CI 1.05- 2.58); p = 0.09], age ≥ 30 years [OR 3.60 (95% CI 1.17-7.68); p = 0.001] and overweight and obesity [OR 2.11 (95% CI 1.33-3.34); p = 0.002]. On multivariate analysis, being overweight or obese was an independent predictor of dyslipidaemia [AOR 1.8;(95% CI 1.15- 3.37); p = 0.04].

CONCLUSION

Dyslipidaemia was highly prevalent among individuals with diabetes in this study, and elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was the most frequent lipid abnormality. Overweight and obesity were also highly prevalent and positively predicted dyslipidaemia. This study highlights the importance of appropriately addressing dyslipidaemia, overweight and obesity among individuals with diabetes in Malawi and other similar settings in Africa as one of the significant ways of reducing the risk of ASCVDs among this population.

Measurement of cholesterol levels of lipoprotein subclasses in human serum using anion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography with a linear concentration gradient of sodium perchlorate

BACKGROUND

Relationships between the subclasses of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease have been studied, and using various methods, such as ultracentrifugation, electrophoresis, and nuclear magnetic resonance, for analysing lipoprotein subclasses. We established a method for HDL and LDL subclasses using anion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (AEX-HPLC) with a linear concentration gradient of sodium perchlorate (NaClO4).

METHOD

In the AEX-HPLC, the subclasses of HDL and LDL were separated, and detected using a post-column reactor with an enzymatic cholesterol reagent, that contained cholesterol esterase, cholesterol oxidase, and peroxidase as major ingredients. LDL subclasses were divided based on the absolute value of first-derivative chromatogram.

RESULT

Three HDL subclasses, HDL-P1, HDL-P2, and HDL-P3, and three LDL subclasses, LDL-P1, LDL-P2, and LDL-P3, were separated by AEX-HPLC, and detected in order. The major components of HDL-P2 and HDL-P3 were HDL3 and HDL2, respectively. The linearity was determined for each lipoprotein subclass. The coefficients of variation of cholesterol concentration of the subclasses for within-day assay (n = 10) and between-day assay (n = 10) ranged between 3.08-8.94% and 4.52-9.97%, respectively. Cholesterol levels in HDL-P1 of diabetic patients were positively correlated with oxidized LDL levels (r = 0.409, p = 0.002). Moreover, cholesterol levels in LDL-P2 and LDL-P3 were positively correlated with oxidized LDL levels (r = 0.393, p = 0.004 and r = 0.561, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

AEX-HPLC may be highly suitable as an assay to clinically assess lipoprotein subclasses.

Achievement Rates for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goals in Patients at High Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in a Real-World Setting in Japan

AIMS

The study aimed to investigate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement rates in patients receiving LDL-C-lowering therapy using recent real-world data, following the 2017 revision of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases (JAS GL2017).

METHODS

Patients with documented LDL-C test results were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database between July 2018 and June 2021 and divided into three groups according to JAS GL2017: primary prevention high risk (Group I, LDL-C goal ＜120 mg/dL), secondary prevention (Group II, LDL-C goal ＜100 mg/dL), and secondary prevention high risk (Group III, LDL-C goal ＜70 mg/dL).

RESULTS

The mean LDL-C value was 108.7 mg/dL (n=125,235), 94.4 mg/dL (n=57,910), and 90.6 mg/dL (n=33,850) in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Intensive statin monotherapy (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, or atorvastatin) was the most frequently prescribed lipid-lowering treatment (21.6%, 30.8%, and 42.7% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively), followed by ezetimibe (2.5%, 7.1%, and 8.5% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively). LDL-C goals were achieved by 65.5%, 60.6%, and 25.4% of patients overall in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Achievement rates were 83.9%, 75.3%, and 29.5% in patients prescribed intensive statin monotherapy and 82.3%, 86.4%, and 46.4% in those prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. In Group III, the proportion of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations achieving LDL-C goals was low (32.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients achieving LDL-C goals for secondary prevention in the high-risk group remains low even with statin and ezetimibe combination therapy.

Premature atherosclerosis: An analysis over 39 years in the Netherlands. Implications for young individuals in high-risk families

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), is one of the most important disease problems in the world accounting for an estimated 18.6 million deaths globally. Although older individuals are more often affected, ASCVD event at a young age is of particular importance because of more healthy years lost. Therefore, it is important to identify young individuals correctly at risk of ASCVD events in an early stage. Unfortunately, current risk score algorithms underestimate ASCVD event risk at a younger age. Both coronary artery calcium scoring (CACs) and family history of premature ASCVD (FH-PASCVD) have emerged as reliable screening tools to be able to identify individuals at risk for ASCVD events. Positive FH-PASCVD is associated with higher absolute CAC scores in first-degree 'healthy' family members and the proportion of individuals above the CACs percentile threshold to warrant treatment is also higher as compared to the general population. Therefore, a positive FH-PASCVD identifies so-called high-risk families and adding CAC scoring within these families identifies individuals at increased risk for ASCVD events. In individuals from high-risk families with an elevated CAC score, ASCVD events can be prevented when treated with statins and aspirin. Therefore, we suggest assessing FH-PASCVD in young 'healthy' individuals as a first screening step and subsequently performing CAC scoring to be able to start treatment at an early stage, since not only the lower is better, but also the earlier is better.

Inclisiran for the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia and for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE

Inclisiran is a novel nonstatin therapy providing significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as well as improvements in other lipid biomarkers. This review summarizes data from postapproval publications regarding the impact of inclisiran on lipids and cardiovascular risk reduction, as well as its tolerability and cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

A search of PubMed for inclisiran was used to identify articles published since its approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Clinical research studies reporting meta-analysis; pooled patient-level trial analyses; cost-effectiveness analyses; new human data; prespecified, post-hoc, or subgroup trial analyses; and clinical trial extensions were included.

FINDINGS

The search identified 153 citations; 16 studies were included. FDA-approval trials, subsequent pooled patient-level trial analyses, and extension studies found that inclisiran, administered with and without maximally tolerated statin therapy, reduced LDL-C by ≈50%, with the reduction sustained for 4 years. Inclisiran appeared to be well tolerated, even long-term, with injection-site reactions being the most common adverse effect. A patient-level pooled analysis of data from Phase III trials suggested that cardiovascular events were reduced with inclisiran versus placebo (7.1% vs 9.4%; odds ratio = 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58-0.94]). Inclisiran is suggested to be cost-effective based the presumed cardiovascular benefit commensurate with LDL-C reduction.

IMPLICATIONS

The cardiovascular benefit and cost-effectiveness of inclisiran are promising, though not definitive. The results of a large-scale study of the effects of inclisiran on cardiovascular outcomes are expected in 2026; until then, the nonstatin therapies primarily prescribed for LDL-C reduction remain proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin (PCSK)-9 inhibitors and ezetimibe. However, inclisiran is a reasonable alternative to, PCSK-9 inhibitors, in patients who struggle with the self-injection of or adherence to PCSK-9 inhibitors as inclisiran maintenance therapy is administered twice yearly by a health care professional.

Performance evaluation of Barozen Lipid Plus for point-of-care testing of lipid profiles: a method comparison study

BACKGROUND

The quick and easy nature of point-of-care (POC) testing devices allows regular monitoring of serum lipid levels to increase efficiency. The purpose of this study was to assess a POC lipid analyzer, Barozen Lipid Plus (MICO Biomed Co., Ltd.), which uses capillary blood to measure total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TGs), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C).

METHODS

Capillary and venous blood samples were collected from 110 participants at a single center in Korea between June 10 and June 26, 2021. TC, TG, and HDL-C measurements using Barozen Lipid Plus were compared with measurements using our reference device, the Roche-Hitachi Cobas 8000 c702 (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation). This study followed the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. We surveyed participants regarding the convenience of the POC device using a questionnaire following the completion of blood collection.

RESULTS

When compared to the reference equipment, the measurements obtained using Barozen Lipid Plus were more than 95% satisfactory within TC±10%, TG±25%, and HDL-C±30%. The coefficient of variation in the repeatability testing was within 5% for TC, 5% for TGs, and 7% for HDL-C. The survey results indicated high levels of satisfaction. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that Barozen Lipid Plus is reliable for measuring lipid profiles and can therefore be used to monitor lipid levels at the time and place of patient care.

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Providing Protection With Lipid-altering Agents

PURPOSE

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death in women, yet it remains underdiagnosed, undertreated, and understudied in women compared with men. Although estrogen has provided observational evidence of cardioprotection, randomized controlled trials using hormone replacement therapy have generally produced unfavorable results.

METHODS

For this narrative review, a literature search was performed using the key words cardiovascular disease, women, and dyslipidemia in PubMed and Google Scholar with no date limitations. References within each article were also reviewed for additional relevant articles.

FINDINGS

Sex-specific risk factors and underrecognized conditions more predominant in women elevate ASCVD risk, creating further clinical challenges, such as the need for accurate risk stratification, compared with in men. Dyslipidemia frequently manifests or worsens during the menopausal transition. Therefore, identification during midlife and implementing lipid-lowering strategies to reduce ASCVD risk is imperative. Women have historically been poorly represented in cardiovascular (CV) outcome trials. However, more recent studies and meta-analyses have indicated that lipid-lowering therapies are equally effective in women and produce similar reductions in CV events and total mortality. Major cholesterol guidelines address many of the challenges that clinicians face when assessing ASCVD risk in women. Key points specific to women include obtaining a detailed history of pregnancy-related conditions, identification of common autoimmune disorders associated with systemic inflammation, and use of 10-year ASCVD risk calculators and imaging modalities (coronary artery calcium) to optimize ASCVD assessment. In terms of treatment, similar to men, women with existing ASCVD or high-risk primary prevention patients should be treated aggressively to achieve ≥50% LDL-C reductions and/or LDL-C goals as low as <55 mg/dL. Appropriate lipid-lowering therapies include high-intensity statins with or without ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin/type 9 inhibitors. Women with lower ASCVD risk may be considered for low- to moderate-intensity statin therapy (approximately 30%-50% LDL-C reduction). All women, regardless of ASCVD risk category, should implement therapeutic lifestyle changes, which improve many common age-related cardiometabolic conditions.

IMPLICATIONS

Although ASCVD and current risk factor trends in women are concerning, numerous evidence-based approaches are available to protect women with ASCVD risk from life-changing CV events.

Remnant cholesterol in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence suggests a substantial contribution of remnant cholesterol (RC) to residual risk for the development or relapse of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We aimed to evaluate the association of RC levels with ASCVD risk by different risk categories and methods of RC assessment. We also assessed available evidence of the effects of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) on RC levels.

METHODS

English-language searches of Medline, PubMed, and Embase (inception to 31 January 2023); ClinicalTrials.gov (October 2022); and reference lists of studies and reviews. Studies reporting on the risk of the composite endpoint [all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE)] by RC levels were included. Moreover, we searched for studies reporting differences in RC levels after the administration of LLT(s).

RESULTS

Among n = 29 studies with 257,387 participants, we found a pooled linear (pooled HR: 1.27 per 1-SD increase, 95% CI: 1.12-1.43, P < 0.001, I2 = 95%, n = 15 studies) and non-linear association (pooled HR: 1.59 per quartile increase, 95% CI: 1.35-1.85, P < 0.001, I2 = 87.9%, n = 15 studies) of RC levels and the risk of M ACE both in patients with and without established ASCVD. Interestingly, the risk of MACE was higher in studies with directly measured vs. calculated RC levels. In a limited number of studies and participants, LLTs reduced RC levels.

CONCLUSION

RC levels are associated with ASCVD risk both in primary and secondary prevention. Directly measured RC levels are associated with ASCVD risk more evidently. Available LLTs tend to decrease RC levels, although the clinical relevance of RC decrease merits further investigation.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42022371346.

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Prescription drug usage as measure of comorbidity resolution after bariatric surgery: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a chronic and progressive disease associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs. Bariatric surgery is the most effective intervention for sustainable weight loss and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities. Studies examining comorbidity resolution largely rely on individual self-reported outcomes and electronic record reviews. We present a population-based study looking at prescription medication utilization before and after bariatric surgery as a measure of comorbidity resolution.

METHODS

All patients enrolled in the Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery who underwent either gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between 2013 and 2019 in Manitoba were included. Demographic information, follow up, and outpatient prescription dispensation data were obtained from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository housed at the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy for 5 years pre- and post-surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 1184 patients were included. Antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed classes, and along with thyroid medication, utilization remained stable after bariatric surgery. Proton pump inhibitors and opioid class drugs increased at 1 year after surgery then returned to baseline. Glucose and lipid-lowering medications, including statins, biguanides, sulfonylureas, and insulin, were decreased. Antihypertensives, including ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin receptors blockers, thiazides, and beta blockers, similarly decreased.

CONCLUSION

This is the first Canadian study employing a provincial-wide prescription database to measure long-term comorbidity resolution after bariatric surgery. The use of administrative data eliminates potential biases and inaccuracies in follow up and self-reported outcomes. Consistent with the literature, prescriptions for the treatment of metabolic syndrome all decreased and were sustained at long-term follow up. Further studies are needed to delineate the effects of altered pharmaceutical utilization on patient quality of life and health-care expenditures.

Remnant cholesterol, but not low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, is associated with intra-pancreatic fat deposition

AIM

To investigate the associations of components of the lipid panel (and its derivatives) with intra-pancreatic fat deposition (IPFD).

METHODS

All participants underwent abdominal magnetic resonance imaging on the same 3.0-Tesla scanner and IPFD was quantified. Blood samples were collected in the fasted state for analysis of lipid panel components. A series of linear regression analyses was conducted, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, and liver fat deposition.

RESULTS

A total of 348 participants were included. Remnant cholesterol (P = 0.010) and triglyceride levels (P = 0.008) were positively, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (P = 0.001) was negatively, associated with total IPFD in the most adjusted model. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol were not significantly associated with total IPFD. Of the lipid panel components investigated, remnant cholesterol explained the greatest proportion (9.9%) of the variance in total IPFD.

CONCLUSION

Components of the lipid panel have different associations with IPFD. This may open up new opportunities for improving outcomes in people at high risk for cardiovascular diseases (who have normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) by reducing IPFD.

Impact of early initiation of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Scant data is available on the efficacy and safety of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) for early and rapid reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) within 4-8 weeks of an acute event in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge-gap.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving patients with ACS receiving PCSK9i in intervention arm, and placebo/active comparator in control arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate changes in 1-month LDL-C post ACS. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in other lipid parameters and adverse events.

RESULTS

From initially screened 194 articles, data from 3 studies was analyzed. After 4-weeks therapy, patients receiving PCSK9i had lower LDL-C [MD -0.95 mmol/L (95%CI:-1.51 to -0.40); P = 0.0007; I2 = 96%, total cholesterol (TC) [MD-1.05 mmol/L (95%CI:-1.83 to -0.27); P = 0.009; I2 = 94%] and triglycerides (TG) [MD-0.27 mmol/L (95%CI:-0.44 to -0.10); P = 0.002; I2 = 0%] compared to controls. After 4-8 weeks therapy, patients receiving PCSK9i has lower apolipoprotein B [MD-27.74% (95%CI:-42.59 to -12.89); P = 0.0003; I2 = 89%] as compared to controls. High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [MD 0.05 mmol/L (95%CI:-0.00-0.11); P = 0.05; I2 = 0%], lipoprotein(a) [MD-20.63 mmol/L (95%CI:-41.86- 0.59); P = 0.06; I2 = 54%] and apolipoprotein A1 [MD 0.02 g/L (95%CI:-0.02-0.07); P = 0.32; I2 = 0%] were comparable between groups. Hospital readmission for ACS was significantly lower in group receiving PCSK9i compared to controls [OR0.25 (95%CI:0.07-0.85); P = 0.03; I2 = 0%]. Occurrence of cardiac death [OR3.75 (95%CI:0.41-34.22); P = 0.24; I2 = 0%], serious adverse events [OR0.71 (95% CI:0.13-3.83); P = 0.69; I2 = 70%] and total adverse events [OR1.01 (95%CI: 0.19-5.30); P = 0.99; I2 = 92%] was comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

PCSK9i are highly effective in early reduction of LDL-C along with reduction of early hospital readmissions post-ACS.

Discordance between remnant cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol predicts arterial stiffness progression

BACKGROUND

Cross-sectional studies have shown that remnant cholesterol (RC) was associated with arterial stiffness. The present study evaluated the association of RC and the discordance between RC and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with arterial stiffness progression.

METHODS

Data were derived from the Kailuan study. RC was calculated as total cholesterol - high-density lipoprotein cholesterol - LDL-C. Discordant RC with LDL-C were defined by residuals, cutoff points, and median values. Arterial stiffness progression was assessed by the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) change, baPWV change rate, and increase/persistently high baPWV. Multivariable linear regression models and logistic regression models were used to explore the association of RC and discordant RC versus LDL-C with the arterial stiffness progression.

RESULTS

A total of 10,507 participants were enrolled in this study, with the mean age of 50.8 ± 11.8 years, 60.9% (6,396) of male. Multivariable regression analyses showed that, each 1 mmol/L increase in the RC level was associated with a 12.80 cm/s increase in baPWV change, a 3.08 cm/s/year increase in the baPWV change rate, and 13% (95% CI, 1.05-1.21) of increase in the risk for increase in/persistently high baPWV. Discordant high RC was associated with a 13.65 cm/s increase in baPWV change and 19% (95% CI, 1.06-1.33) of increase in the risk for increase in/persistently high baPWV compared to those with concordant group.

CONCLUSION

Discordantly high RC with LDL-C was associated with an increased risk of arterial stiffness progression. The findings demonstrated that RC may be an important marker of future coronary artery disease risk.

Acute effect of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor on oxidized low-density lipoprotein and lipid profile in patients at cardiovascular risk

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are a new class of potent lipid-lowering drugs. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) is the key pathogenic factor leading to atherosclerosis. However, its effect on ox-LDL levels has not been clinically reported. The clinical data of 290 very high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients diagnosed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from May 2022 to October 2022 were collected retrospectively. According to whether evolocumab (a PCSK9 inhibitor) was used after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), they were divided into evolocumab group (153 cases) and statin monotherapy group (137 cases). At hospital admission, ox-LDL, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoproteinA1 (apoA1), apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB), lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], and high-sensitivity reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were collected and used as baseline data. After two weeks of treatment, ox-LDL in the evolocumab group and statin monotherapy group were significantly lower than those before treatment (p<0.05). The decrease of ox-LDL in the evolocumab group was more than in the stain monotherapy group (p<0.05). In conclusion, PCSK9 inhibitors reduce ox-LDL levels in very high-risk ASCVD patients in a short time.

[Does aspirin have a place in primary cardiovascular prevention by the polypill ? Simulation study on a realistic virtual population]

BACKGROUND

The polypill strategy could become widely accepted in cardiovascular prevention due to reduced costs and its simplicity, which promote compliance. Aspirin is often included as a component of the polypill for primary prevention, but three powerful recent trials failed to show any favorable net benefit even in high-risk subgroups. Our objective is to estimate the net benefit associated with aspirin in primary cardiovascular prevention.

METHODS

We simulated the impact of different polypill compositions combining pravastatin, ramipril, hydrochlorothiazide, with or without aspirin, on a realistic French virtual population between 35 and 65 years old. We assessed how this impact on myocardial infarction and stroke varied according to gender, diabetes, and arterial hypertension. We identified the subgroup of individuals whose specific benefit from aspirin was greater than twice the risk of serious bleeding it induced.

RESULTS

The absolute benefit associated with aspirin was reduced by co-prescriptions. No subgroup of women benefited from aspirin, and the subgroup of women with a clear net benefit represented 128 women out of 529,421. Men at high risk of cardiovascular death, or with diabetes and hypertension, had a benefit from aspirin exceeding the risk of bleeding induced, but this risk represented more than half of the benefit. No subgroup analyzed did show a benefit greater than twice the risk of bleeding. The proportion of men whose expected benefit from aspirin was greater than twice the risk of bleeding represented 3% of all men. An optimal polypill strategy in primary prevention between the ages of 35 and 65, combining three drugs but not aspirin, can hope to save two out of three strokes and more than one out of two myocardial infarctions. It would prevent a major cardiovascular accident every 16 to 193 individuals treated according to the subgroups considered.

CONCLUSION

Until proven otherwise, aspirin has only a limited place in individuals between 35 and 65 years without a cardiovascular history. We showed how simulating therapeutic strategies on a realistic virtual population could be used for best applying available evidence.

The Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Evinacumab in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Background

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is characterized by early-onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease due to the high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) burden. Patients with null-null low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) variants respond poorly, if at all, to statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, which act by upregulating LDLR expression. The 24-week double-blind treatment period (DBTP) of the phase 3 ELIPSE HoFH (Evinacumab Lipid Studies in Patients with Homozygous Familial hypercholesterolemia; NCT03399786) study demonstrated significant LDL-C reductions in patients with HoFH; LDL-C reductions were also observed in those with null-null LDLR mutations.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate longer-term efficacy and safety of evinacumab in patients with HoFH from the ELIPSE HoFH study.

Methods

Patients with HoFH on stable lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) ± lipoprotein apheresis and screening LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL who completed the DBTP entered the 24-week open-label treatment period (OLTP) and received intravenous evinacumab 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks. OLTP results were summarized descriptively.

Results

A total of 64 patients completed the DBTP and received open-label evinacumab. Despite multiple LLTs, the mean baseline LDL-C at DBTP entry was 250.5 ± 162.3 mg/dL. From baseline to week 48 (end of OLTP), evinacumab reduced mean LDL-C by 46.3% (mean reduction, 134.3 ± 117.3 mg/dL), with similar mean LDL-C reductions for patients with null-null (47.2%) and non-null variants (45.9%). Adverse events occurred in 47 (73.4%) patients; 4 (6.3%) patients experienced adverse events considered evinacumab-related (drug hypersensitivity, infusion-related reaction and asthenia, generalized pruritis, and muscle spasms).

Conclusions

In patients with HoFH, evinacumab demonstrated substantial and sustained LDL-C reduction regardless of LDLR function, and was generally well tolerated.

Effects of Vitamin D Levels on Long-Term Coronary Events in Patients with Proven Coronary Artery Disease: Six-Year Follow-Up

Although some clinical studies have claimed that low-dose vitamin D (Vit-D) increases the risk of long-term cardiac events, in others, no association was found. To better understand the impact of Vit-D levels on long-term cardiac events in coronary artery disease patients, this study was designed. There were 408 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The patients were separated into three groups based on their Vit-D levels: group 1 had levels below 10 ng/mL, group 2 had levels between 10 and 20, and group 3 had levels above 20 ng/mL. Six years were spent monitoring the patients for non-fatal MI, death, vascular revascularization, and stable course data. Mortality was found to be similar between groups (group 1: 24.5%; group 2: 13.8%; group 3: 17.4%; p > 0.05). In group 3, 47.8% of the patients did not experience any cardiac event, while 28.7% in group 2 and 27.6% in group 1 did not experience any cardiac event, and these values were found to be significant in favor of group 3 (p = 0.006). Group 3 was found to have considerably lower rates of non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) and unstable angina (UA) than the other groups did (group 1: 49%; group 2: 38%; group 3: 27%; p = 0.001). In conclusion, although vitamin D deficiency does not accompany an increase in mortality, it is associated with an increase in non-STEMI and UA in patients who have previously been diagnosed with CAD.

The Effects of Statins on Cognitive Performance Are Mediated by Low-Density Lipoprotein, C-Reactive Protein, and Blood Glucose Concentrations

Statins are widely used for cardiovascular disease prevention but their effects on cognition remain unclear. Statins reduce cholesterol concentration and have been suggested to provide both beneficial and detrimental effects. Our aim was to investigate the cross-sectional and longitudinal association between statin use and cognitive performance, and whether blood low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, glucose, C-reactive protein, and vitamin D biomarkers mediated this association. We used participants from the UK biobank aged 40-69 without neurological and psychiatric disorders (n = 147 502 and n = 24 355, respectively). We performed linear regression to evaluate the association between statin use and cognitive performance and, mediation analysis to quantify the total, direct, indirect effects and the proportion meditated by blood biomarkers. Statin use was associated with lower cognitive performance at baseline (β = -0.40 [-0.53, -0.28], p = <.0001), and this association was mediated by low-density lipoprotein (proportion mediated = 51.4%, p = .002), C-reactive protein (proportion mediated = -11%, p = .006) and blood glucose (proportion mediated = 2.6%, p = .018) concentrations. However, statin use was not associated with cognitive performance, measured 8 years later (β = -0.003 [-0.11, 0.10], p = .96). Our findings suggest that statins are associated with lower short-term cognitive performance by lowering low-density lipoprotein and raising blood glucose concentrations, and better performance by lowering C-reactive protein concentrations. In contrast, statins have no effect on long-term cognition and remain beneficial in reducing cardiovascular risk factors.

Decreasing trend of blood lipid profile in type 2 diabetes: Not a promising change in HDL-C, a serial cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been reported to be relatively high. The current study aimed to investigate the trend of serum lipid levels and the prevalence of dyslipidemia in patients with T2D.

METHODS

Data were extracted from a cohort of patients with T2D who had regular follow-ups every year for three years. TG, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, and non-HDL-C were analyzed. The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) was calculated using log (TG/HDL-C).

RESULTS

A total of 747 patients with T2D were included in this study, consisting of 469 (62.8%) women and 278 (37.2%) men. There was a significant downward trend in mean TG, TC, LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and AIP levels. The trend of mean HDL-C levels showed no significant change. The prevalence of high TG, high TC, high LDL-C, and high non-HDL-C significantly decreased from the first to the last visit. There was no significant change in the trend of prevalence of low HDL-C. The prevalence of high AIP significantly decreased in women and showed no significant changes in men.

CONCLUSIONS

A decreasing trend was observed in the mean levels and prevalence of TG, TC, LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and AIP. HDL-C did not change significantly. The success rate in achieving a complete normal lipid profile during follow-up years was not promising and continues to be challenging.

Association of oxidized ApoB and oxidized ApoA-I with high-risk coronary plaque features in cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Oxidized apolipoprotein B (oxLDL) and oxidized ApoA-I (oxHDL) are proatherogenic. Their prognostic value for assessing high-risk plaques by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is missing.

METHODS

In a prospective, observational study, 306 participants with cardiovascular disease (CVD) had extensive lipoprotein profiling. Proteomics analysis was performed on isolated oxHDL, and atherosclerotic plaque assessment was accomplished by quantitative CCTA.

RESULTS

Patients were predominantly White, overweight men (58.5%) on statin therapy (43.5%). Increase in LDL-C, ApoB, small dense LDL-C (P < 0.001 for all), triglycerides (P = 0.03), and lower HDL function were observed in the high oxLDL group. High oxLDL associated with necrotic burden (NB; β = 0.20; P < 0.0001) and fibrofatty burden (FFB; β = 0.15; P = 0.001) after multivariate adjustment. Low oxHDL had a significant reverse association with these plaque characteristics. Plasma oxHDL levels better predicted NB and FFB after adjustment (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.27-3.88, and OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.71-4.58) compared with oxLDL and HDL-C. Interestingly, oxHDL associated with fibrous burden (FB) change over 3.3 years (β = 0.535; P = 0.033) when compared with oxLDL. Combined Met136 mono-oxidation and Trp132 dioxidation of HDL showed evident association with coronary artery calcium score (r = 0.786; P < 0.001) and FB (r = 0.539; P = 0.012) in high oxHDL, whereas Met136 mono-oxidation significantly associated with vulnerable plaque in low oxHDL.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the investigated oxidized lipids are associated with high-risk coronary plaque features and progression over time in patients with CVD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CLINICALTRIALS

gov NCT01621594.

FUNDING

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the NIH Intramural Research Program.

ACC/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ASPC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2023 Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Chronic Coronary Disease

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) Foundation, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriate use review of stress testing and anatomic diagnostic procedures for risk assessment and evaluation of known or suspected chronic coronary disease (CCD), formerly referred to as stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). This document reflects an updating of the prior Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) published for radionuclide imaging, stress echocardiography (echo), calcium scoring, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and invasive coronary angiography for SIHD. This is in keeping with the commitment to revise and refine the AUC on a frequent basis. As with the prior version of this document, rating of test modalities is provided side-by-side for a given clinical scenario. These ratings are explicitly not considered competitive rankings due to the limited availability of comparative evidence, patient variability, and the range of capabilities available in any given local setting1-4.This version of the AUC for CCD is a focused update of the prior version of the AUC for SIHD4. Key changes beyond the updated ratings based on new evidence include the following: 1. Clinical scenarios related to preoperative testing were removed and will be incorporated into another AUC document under development. 2. Some clinical scenarios and tables were removed in an effort to simplify the selection of clinical scenarios. Additionally, the flowchart of tables has been reorganized, and all clinical scenario tables can now be reached by answering a limited number of clinical questions about the patient, starting with the patient's symptom status. 3. Several clinical scenarios have been revised to incorporate changes in other documents such as pretest probability assessment, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment, syncope, and others. ASCVD risk factors that are not accounted for in contemporary risk calculators have been added as modifiers to certain clinical scenarios. The 64 clinical scenarios rated in this document are limited to the detection and risk assessment of CCD and were drawn from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines.5 These clinical scenarios do not specifically address patients having acute chest pain episodes. They may, however, be applicable in the inpatient setting if the patient is not having an acute coronary syndrome and warrants evaluation for CCD.Using standardized methodology, clinical scenarios were developed to describe common patient encounters in clinical practice focused on common applications and anticipated uses of testing for CCD. Where appropriate, the scenarios were developed on the basis of the most current ACC/American Heart Association guidelines. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios in this document on a scale of 1 to 9, following a modified Delphi process consistent with the recently updated AUC development methodology. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that a modality is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented, midrange scores of 4 to 6 indicate that a modality may be appropriate for the clinical scenario, and scores of 1 to 3 indicate that a modality is rarely appropriate.

Rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin treatment in adults with coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the randomised LODESTAR trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long term efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin with atorvastatin treatment in adults with coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

Randomised, open label, multicentre trial.

SETTING

12 hospitals in South Korea, September 2016 to November 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

4400 adults (age ≥19 years) with coronary artery disease.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were assigned to receive either rosuvastatin (n=2204) or atorvastatin (n=2196) using 2×2 factorial randomisation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was a three year composite of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularisation. Secondary outcomes were safety endpoints: new onset diabetes mellitus; hospital admissions due to heart failure; deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism; endovascular revascularisation for peripheral artery disease; aortic intervention or surgery; end stage kidney disease; discontinuation of study drugs owing to intolerance; cataract surgery; and a composite of laboratory detected abnormalities.

RESULTS

4341 of the 4400 participants (98.7%) completed the trial. Mean daily dose of study drugs was 17.1 mg (standard deviation (SD) 5.2 mg) in the rosuvastatin group and 36.0 (12.8) mg in the atorvastatin group at three years (P<0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 189 participants (8.7%) in the rosuvastatin group and 178 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin group (hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.30; P=0.58). The mean low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level during treatment was 1.8 mmol/L (SD 0.5 mmol/L) in the rosuvastatin group and 1.9 (0.5) mmol/L in the atorvastatin group (P<0.001). The rosuvastatin group had a higher incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus requiring initiation of antidiabetics (7.2% v 5.3%; hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.87; P=0.03) and cataract surgery (2.5% v 1.5%; 1.66, 1.07 to 2.58; P=0.02). Other safety endpoints did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with coronary artery disease, rosuvastatin and atorvastatin showed comparable efficacy for the composite outcome of all cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularisation at three years. Rosuvastatin was associated with lower LDL cholesterol levels but a higher risk of new onset diabetes mellitus requiring antidiabetics and cataract surgery compared with atorvastatin.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02579499.