Antidepressant prescribing in five European countries: application of common definitions to assess the prevalence, clinical observations, and methodological implications

Mental health landscape in Kosova from 2017 to 2022: A retrospective study of antidepressant and anxiolytic market trends and the impact of COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

This study explores the mental health situation in Kosova and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Marketed quantities of antidepressants (N06A) and anxiolytics (N05B) from 2017 to 2022 were analyzed using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Doses (ATC/DDD) methodology. Caution is advised as these quantities may not directly reflect patient usage and could include uses for conditions outside their primary indications.

RESULTS

Prior to the pandemic, antidepressant quantities remained relatively stable, but rose from 6.8 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day in 2019 to 9.7 in 2020 and 12.4 in 2021, before returning to pre-pandemic levels of 6.8 DDD in 2022. Over 80 % of these were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Meanwhile, anxiolytic quantities initially decreased from 17.4 DDD in 2017 to 9.9 in 2019, then rebounded to 17.9 DDD in 2020. Notably, alprazolam usage surged from 2.9 in 2017 to 6.9 in 2021, subsequently dropping to 2.0 in 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

The volatile trends in medication quantities during the pandemic suggest a fragile mental health landscape in Kosova-a developing, post-conflict country with a youthful population-underscoring the need for proactive interventions in similar contexts globally.

Own depression, partner's depression, and childlessness: A nationwide register-based study

Depression and other mental health disorders are increasing while childlessness is increasing. However, this relationship has rarely been studied. We examine how depression, as measured by antidepressant use, is related to childlessness. We add to the previous research by examining both the role of current partnership status and having a partner with depression as a mechanism. We use Finnish total population register data for cohorts born in 1977-1980. We estimate discrete time event history models for the likelihood of having a child with average marginal effects separately for men and women. Depression was measured annually with a time-varying indicator of having at least one purchase of antidepressants in the preceding year. We find a positive association between depression and childlessness; the annual probability of having a child was 2.7 percentage points lower for women with depression and 1.6 percentage points for men with depression in age-controlled models. When controlling for all background variables such as education, the likelihood of having a child was 1.9 percentage points lower for women with depression and 0.3 percentage points lower for men with depression. In total, 41% of men and 26% of women who had used antidepressant medication between ages 18-38 remained childless at age 39, compared to 30% of men and 22% of women who had not used antidepressant medication. We also find that a partner's depression increases the probability of being childless, and the likelihood of being childless is even higher if both an individual and their partner had depression.

DNA methylation of serotonin genes as predictive biomarkers of antidepressant treatment response

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are frequently ineffective in treating depressive episodes and biomarkers are needed to optimize antidepressant treatment outcomes. DNA methylation levels of serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) and tryptophan hydroxylase 2 genes (TPH2) have been suggested to predict antidepressant clinical outcomes but their applicability remains uncertain. In this study, we: 1) evaluated SLC6A4/TPH2 methylation biomarker potential for predicting clinical outcomes after escitalopram treatment; 2) evaluated whether changes in SLC6A4/TPH2 methylation are informative of treatment mechanisms. We used a cohort of 90 unmedicated patients with major depressive disorder that were part of a 12-week open-label longitudinal trial and compared our observations with previous findings. Depressive symptoms were measured at baseline and after 8 and 12 weeks of treatment using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD6/17). We found an association between baseline TPH2 methylation and both clinical response (β:3.43; p = 0.01; 95 % CI:[0.80; 6.06]) and change in depressive symptoms after 8 weeks (β:-45.44; p = 0.01; 95 %CI:[- -78.58; -12.30]). However, we found no evidence for predictive value of any gene (TPH2 AUC: 0.74 95 % CI:[0.42;0.79]; SLC6A4: AUC: 0.61; 95 % CI: [0.48-0.78]). Methylation levels changed at the trend level for CpG sites of SLC6A4 and TPH2 over the course of 12 weeks of treatment. In addition, similar to previous observations, we found a trend for an association between methylation of SLC6A4 CpG2 (chr17:30,236,083) and HAMD17 change after 12 weeks. Our findings suggest that although TPH2 and SLC6A4 methylation may be informative of antidepressant treatment outcome, they are unlikely to prove useful as clinical predictor tools.

Paternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and adverse health outcomes: A nationwide cohort study on 13,547 exposed children

BACKGROUND

The use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) has increased over time. Several studies indicate that paternal use of medication may adversely affect the developing fetus. Only a few studies have investigated the association between preconceptional paternal exposure to SSRIs and the risks of adverse health outcomes in children.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess adverse birth outcomes and adverse early life events in children fathered by men using SSRIs prior to conception.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All live-born singleton children born in Denmark from 1997 until 2019 and their parents were included. The exposed cohort comprised all children fathered by men using SSRIs 3 months prior to conception and the unexposed cohort comprised all other children. We estimated the odds ratios for adverse birth outcomes: small for gestational age (SGA), preterm birth, low Apgar score, and major congenital malformations. Furthermore, we estimated the hazard ratios for adverse early life events of infections and hospitalizations within 1 year from birth. We also examined adverse birth outcomes and the adverse early life events according to SSRI subgroups.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significantly increased odds ratio 1.15 (confidence interval, CI: 1.06-1.23) for preterm birth. No significant results were found for SGA, low Apgar score, and major congenital malformations. The adjusted hazard ratios for hospitalizations and infections were 1.06 (CI: 1.02-1.11) and 1.02 (CI: 0.97-1.07), respectively. There was a statistically significantly increased odds ratio for preterm birth with respect to the SSRI subgroups citalopram and escitalopram, and for hospitalizations with respect to citalopram.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Although the risks of certain adverse birth and adverse early life outcomes were statistically significantly increased, the ratios were small and may have limited clinical importance. Paternal use of SSRI was in general safe in the preconceptual period.

Risk of depression in persons with Alzheimer's disease: A national cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Depression is a risk factor and possible prodromal symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but little is known about subsequent risk of developing depression in persons with AD.

METHODS

National matched cohort study was conducted of all 129,410 persons diagnosed with AD and 390,088 with all-cause dementia during 1998-2017 in Sweden, and 3,900,880 age- and sex-matched controls without dementia, who had no prior depression. Cox regression was used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) for major depression through 2018.

RESULTS

Cumulative incidence of major depression was 13% in persons with AD and 3% in controls. Adjusting for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities, risk of major depression was greater than two-fold higher in women with AD (HR, 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.11-2.32) or men with AD (2.68; 2.52-2.85), compared with controls. Similar results were found for all-cause dementia.

DISCUSSION

Persons diagnosed with AD or related dementias need close follow-up for timely detection and treatment of depression.

Highlights

In a large cohort, women and men with AD had >2-fold subsequent risk of depression.Risks were highest in the first year (>3-fold) but remained elevated ≥3 years later.Risk of depression was highest in persons aged ≥85 years at AD diagnosis.Persons with AD need close follow-up for detection and treatment of depression.

Mortality in patients with incident rheumatoid arthritis and depression: a Danish cohort study of 11 071 patients and 55 355 comparators

OBJECTIVES

In patients with RA, the association between mortality and depression has been investigated only in patients with prevalent RA. In this study, we estimated the mortality risk associated with depression, defined as the first filling of a prescription for antidepressants, in patients with incident RA and background population comparators.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2018, we identified patients with incident RA in the nationwide Danish rheumatologic database, DANBIO. For each patient, we randomly selected five comparators. Participants were not treated with antidepressants or diagnosed with depression 3 years prior to the index date. From other registers we collected data on socioeconomic status, mortality and cause of death using unique personal identifiers. Using Cox models, we calculated hazard rate ratios (HRR) with 95% CI.

RESULTS

In depressed patients with RA vs patients without depression, adjusted HRR for all-cause mortality was 5.34 (95% CI 3.02, 9.45) during 0-2 years and 3.15 (95% CI 2.62, 3.79) during the total follow-up period, and highest in patients <55 years with HRR 8.13 (95% CI 3.89, 17.02). In comparators with depression vs comparators without depression, the association with mortality was similar to that in patients with RA. There were no unnatural causes of death among depressed patients with RA. The most frequent natural causes of death were cancer, cardiovascular disease, stroke and pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

In patients with RA, depression was a predictor of death but with a strength similar to that in matched comparators.

Improving patient experience for people prescribed medicines with a risk of dependence or withdrawal: co-designed solutions using experience based co-design

BACKGROUND

Significant concerns have been raised regarding how medications with a risk of dependence or withdrawal are managed and how care is experienced by patients. This study sought to co-design solutions to improve the experience of care for patients prescribed benzodiazepines, z-drugs, opioids for chronic non-cancer pain, gabapentinoids and antidepressants.

METHOD

Twenty patients and fifteen healthcare professionals from five different GP practices were recruited to take part. The study used Experience Based Co-Design. Patients and healthcare professionals completed semi-structured interviews and took part in feedback groups and co-design workshops to collaboratively identify priorities for improvement and to co-design solutions to improve the experience of care.

RESULTS

Poor patient experience was common among people prescribed medications with a risk of dependence or withdrawal. Patients and healthcare professionals identified three main priority areas to improve the experience of care: (i) ensuring patients are provided with detailed information in relation to their medication, (ii) ensuring continuity of care for patients, and (iii) providing alternative treatment options to medication. Solutions to improve care were co-designed by patients and healthcare staff and implemented within participating GP practices to improve the experience of care.

CONCLUSION

Good patient experience is a key element of quality care. This study highlights that the provision of in-depth medication related information, continuity of care and alternative treatment to medication are important to patients prescribed medicines with a risk of dependence or withdrawal. Improving these aspects of care should be a priority for future improvement and delivery plans.

Antidepressants and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Older Adults According to the Degree of Serotonin Reuptake Inhibition: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The effects of serotonin reuptake inhibition induced by antidepressants on ischemic stroke and its pathophysiology remain unclear despite the frequent use of antidepressants and high fatality of ischemic stroke. We estimated the risk of ischemic stroke associated with antidepressant use in older adults according to the degree of serotonin reuptake inhibition.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

The cohort consisted of older adult patients who were treated with antidepressants.

MEASUREMENTS

We estimated the risk of ischemic stroke associated with antidepressant use in older adults according to the degree of serotonin reuptake inhibition using Korea's National Health Insurance System-Senior Cohort. Exposure to antidepressants was categorized by type (strong, intermediate, or weak serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SRIs]) and by the mean prescribed dose per day and treatment duration. The risk for the strong and intermediate SRIs group was compared with that of the weak SRIs group using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Of 97,411 were weak SRIs users, and 107,152 and 18,783 were users of strong and intermediate SRIs. The risk of ischemic stroke was 1.192- and 1.057-fold higher in strong and intermediate SRI users, respectively than in weak SRI users. Hazard ratios were increased in higher dose and shorter duration user groups. The risk increased 1.753-fold in strong SRI users with anticonvulsants and 1.387-fold in intermediate SRI users with PPIs.

CONCLUSION

The use of strong and intermediate SRIs should be considered carefully in older adult patients, especially when high-dose antidepressants are prescribed even for a short duration.

Predicting risk of suicidal behaviour after initiation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in children, adolescents and young adults: protocol for development and validation of clinical prediction models

INTRODUCTION

There is concern regarding suicidal behaviour risk during selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment among the young. A clinically useful model for predicting suicidal behaviour risk should have high predictive performance in terms of discrimination and calibration; transparency and ease of implementation are desirable.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Using Swedish national registers, we will identify individuals initiating an SSRI aged 8-24 years 2007-2020. We will develop: (A) a model based on a broad set of predictors, and (B) a model based on a restricted set of predictors. For the broad predictor model, we will consider an ensemble of four base models: XGBoost (XG), neural net (NN), elastic net logistic regression (EN) and support vector machine (SVM). The predictors with the greatest contribution to predictive performance in the base models will be determined. For the restricted predictor model, clinical input will be used to select predictors based on the top predictors in the broad model, and inputted in each of the XG, NN, EN and SVM models. If any show superiority in predictive performance as defined by the area under the receiver-operator curve, this model will be selected as the final model; otherwise, the EN model will be selected. The training and testing samples will consist of data from 2007 to 2017 and from 2018 to 2020, respectively. We will additionally assess the final model performance in individuals receiving a depression diagnosis within 90 days before SSRI initiation.The aims are to (A) develop a model predicting suicidal behaviour risk after SSRI initiation among children and youths, using machine learning methods, and (B) develop a model with a restricted set of predictors, favouring transparency and scalability.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The research is approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2020-06540). We will disseminate findings by publishing in peer-reviewed open-access journals, and presenting at international conferences.

Income gradient in psychotherapy use and psychotropic drug purchases: A longitudinal register study in Finnish employed population

OBJECTIVE

We examined the income gradient changes in the use of long-term rehabilitative psychotherapy and psychotropic drug purchases in men and women during a 9-year follow-up.

METHODS

We used register data from a random sample of the working-age population (18-64 years) with information on annual income, psychotherapy use and psychotropic drug purchases from 2011 to 2019 (N = 736 613, 49.7% women). Sex-stratified generalized estimating equations logistic regression models with predicted marginal probabilities were used to examine change in the treatment use rates over time for income quartiles.

RESULTS

Treatment rates increased during the follow-up, with men having lower rates than women. There were no significant differences in psychotherapy use rates between the income quartiles during the follow-up in men. A small income gradient in women (the wealthiest group with the highest use rate) remained stable throughout the follow-up. As for psychotropic drug purchases, the rates increased more among the poorest income quartile compared to the wealthiest quartile in both men and women. In the last year of the follow-up, the initial income gradient (wealthiest group having the highest psychotropic drug purchase rate) had become reversed, and the poorest group had the highest psychotropic drug purchase rate.

CONCLUSION

In psychotherapy use, no income gradient was found in men, while a stable income gradient was found in women. Psychotropic drug purchases have previously been more common in the wealthiest groups, but more recently among the poorest. The findings indicate that gender and income have distinct relationships with the treatment modality over time.

Utilization of psychotropic medicines in Romania during 1998–2018

Background: Mental disorders can have a significant impact on patients’ life, including economic, social and individual consequences, and psychotropic medication is essential to treat these conditions. Psychotropic drug utilization studies contribute to a clearer picture of the management of these conditions. Data published from Romania on this topic is limited. The present study aims to characterize the utilization patterns of anxiolytics, antidepressants (ADs), and antipsychotics (APs) in Romania during 1998–2018.

Methods: Drug utilization data were provided by Management Center for Documentation, Information and Marketing (CEGEDIM) Romania and quantitative data for each psychotropic medicine were converted to total defined daily doses (DDDs) and to DDD/1000inhabitants/day (DDD/TID). The total use of medicines in DDD/TID was computed in order to obtain the drug utilization 90% (DU90%) segment.

Results: An increasing trend in total utilization of psychotropic medicines in Romania started in 2004. Anxiolytics use was predominant until 2013 and the yearly anxiolytic use over the entire study period remained between 10 and 15 DDD/TID. Diazepam lost popularity over time in detriment of the utilization of other anxiolytic benzodiazepines, such as alprazolam and lorazepam. ADs utilization markedly increased during the study period (the average annual growth rate was 13.66% starting 1999). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) became present on the 2008 DU90% and was the dominant class of ADs, with sertraline being the most prescribed, followed by escitalopram and paroxetine. APs utilization showed an increasing trend from 2003 until 2018. Atypical APs became present on the 2008 DU90%, while typical APs were no longer included in the 2018 DU90%. Among atypical APs, olanzapine was the main agent prescribed, and starting 2010 was followed by quetiapine and risperidone. The uptake of APs long-acting formulations became more evident during the last analyzed years (2015–2018).

Conclusion: We observed an increasing utilization of APs and a more prominent increase in ADs utilization in Romania during 1998–2018. The anxiolytic prescribing remained nearly stable during this time. Further research can bring more information on the various factors influencing psychotropic utilization in Romania.

Antidepressant use in low- middle- and high-income countries: a World Mental Health Surveys report

BACKGROUND

The most common treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) is antidepressant medication (ADM). Results are reported on frequency of ADM use, reasons for use, and perceived effectiveness of use in general population surveys across 20 countries.

METHODS

Face-to-face interviews with community samples totaling n = 49 919 respondents in the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys asked about ADM use anytime in the prior 12 months in conjunction with validated fully structured diagnostic interviews. Treatment questions were administered independently of diagnoses and asked of all respondents.

RESULTS

3.1% of respondents reported ADM use within the past 12 months. In high-income countries (HICs), depression (49.2%) and anxiety (36.4%) were the most common reasons for use. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), depression (38.4%) and sleep problems (31.9%) were the most common reasons for use. Prevalence of use was 2-4 times as high in HICs as LMICs across all examined diagnoses. Newer ADMs were proportionally used more often in HICs than LMICs. Across all conditions, ADMs were reported as very effective by 58.8% of users and somewhat effective by an additional 28.3% of users, with both proportions higher in LMICs than HICs. Neither ADM class nor reason for use was a significant predictor of perceived effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

ADMs are in widespread use and for a variety of conditions including but going beyond depression and anxiety. In a general population sample from multiple LMICs and HICs, ADMs were widely perceived to be either very or somewhat effective by the people who use them.

Recognition and Management of Serotonin Toxidrome in the Emergency Department-Case Based Review

Serotonin syndrome (SS) is a clinical toxidrome with high variability in clinical practice. It develops due to increased serotonin levels in the central nervous system. With an underestimated frequency, SS can develop following an overdose, a therapeutic dose increase, or drug to drug interaction of at least one serotonergic agent. It can present with autonomic signs, neuromuscular changes and an altered mental status. However, history and clinical examination are key features to formulate the diagnosis. Treatment options consist of supportive measures, discontinuation of the offending agent and certain therapeutic agents previously reported to improve outcomes. Physicians have limited experience with SS, partially due to the lack of its identification in clinical practice. Therefore, we have integrated, in a narrative review, the case of a young male with SS following an atypical antipsychotic overdose superimposed on chronic treatment with agents previously known to produce SS.

Comparison of depression care provided in general practice in Norway and the Netherlands: registry-based cohort study (The Norwegian GP-DEP study)

BACKGROUND

Depression is highly prevalent in general practice, and organisation of primary health care probably affects the provision of depression care. General practitioners (GPs) in Norway and the Netherlands fulfil comparable roles. However, primary care teams with a mental health nurse (MHN) supplementing the GP have been established in the Netherlands, but not yet in Norway. In order to explore how the organisation of primary mental care affects care delivery, we aimed to examine the provision of GP depression care across the two countries.

METHODS

Registry-based cohort study comprising new depression episodes in patients aged ≥ 18 years, 2011-2015. The Norwegian sample was drawn from the entire population (national health registries); 297,409 episodes. A representative Dutch sample (Nivel Primary Care Database) was included; 27,362 episodes. Outcomes were follow-up consultation(s) with GP, with GP and/or MHN, and antidepressant prescriptions during 12 months from the start of the depression episode. Differences between countries were estimated using negative binomial and Cox regression models, adjusted for patient gender, age and comorbidity.

RESULTS

Patients in the Netherlands compared to Norway were less likely to receive GP follow-up consultations, IRR (incidence rate ratio) = 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.74). Differences were greatest among patients aged 18-39 years (adj IRR = 0.64, 0.63-0.66) and 40-59 years (adj IRR = 0.71, 0.69-0.73). When comparing follow-up consultations in GP practices, including MHN consultations in the Netherlands, no cross-national differences were found (IRR = 1.00, 0.98-1.01). But in age-stratified analyses, Dutch patients 60 years and older were more likely to be followed up than their Norwegian counterparts (adj IRR = 1.21, 1.16-1.26). Patients in the Netherlands compared to Norway were more likely to receive antidepressant drugs, adj HR (hazard ratio) = 1.32 (1.30-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed differences indicate that the organisation of primary mental health care affects the provision of follow-up consultations in Norway and the Netherlands. Clinical studies are needed to explore the impact of team-based care and GP-based care on the quality of depression care and patient outcomes.

General antidepressants prescribing trends 2009-2018 in Slovenia: a cross-sectional retrospective database study

BACKGROUND

Antidepressants are one of the most frequently prescribed groups of medications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of antidepressants prescribed between 2009 and 2018 in Slovenia in different patient-age groups.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study performed a nationwide database analysis of all outpatient antidepressant prescriptions based on Slovenian health claims data. Prevalence was defined as number of recipients prescribed at least one antidepressant per 1000 inhabitants. Antidepressant consumption was presented as total dispensed defined daily doses per year.

RESULTS

In 2018, 147,300 patients were prescribed at least one antidepressant. The prevalence had increased by 16% in ten years and by 7.6% in age standardised data. The largest increase in prevalence was seen in the oldest patients (>80 years, 25% increase); of these, antidepressants are now prescribed to 1 in 4. Use of antidepressants had increased by 38%, suggesting longer treatment duration, increase in dose prescribed or both. SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) were the most prescribed antidepressants (70% share), with escitalopram and sertraline the most commonly prescribed antidepressants.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of antidepressant prescribing and antidepressant consumption is increasing, mainly due to the population ageing and the increasing prescribing in elderly patients.Key PointsThe prevalence of antidepressant prescribing as well as antidepressants' consumption is increasing, reflecting both population ageing and rising prescribing rates.The increase in prevalence and consumption is most dramatic in the oldest patients (over 80 years of age).SSRIs continue to be the most commonly prescribed antidepressants, whilst prescribing of SNRIs is increasing.Future research should focus on evaluating appropriate prescribing of antidepressants (treatment selection, dosage and duration), especially in the elderly.

The potential action of SSRIs in the treatment of skin diseases including atopic dermatitis and slow-healing wounds

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used to treat affective and anxiety disorders. Antidepressants have also been shown to have antimicrobial and immunomodulatory effects, which may affect the microbiota-intestinal-brain axis. Studies show that SSRIs have antimicrobial activity both in vivo and in vitro and influence bacteria by inhibiting biofilm, affecting efflux pumps, among others. A huge challenge today is the prevention and treatment of skin diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD) and slow-healing wounds. Skin diseases including AD and non-healing wounds are serious medical problem. People suffering from these conditions feel constant discomfort, which also affects their psychological state. Research on new treatments for AD and slow-healing wounds is essential because current medications are not fully effective and have many side effects. Exploring new drug groups for AD and slow-healing wounds will allow for the creation of an alternative treatment for these diseases. SSRIs represent a hope for the treatment of skin diseases due to their immunomodulatory and antimicrobial properties.

Antidepressant drug use and regional prescribing patterns in Germany: results from a large population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To consider antidepressant prescribing on a population level with a focus on regional prescribing patterns in Germany.

BASIC METHODS

Based on data from about 70 million individuals covered by all statutory health insurance funds in Germany in 2010, the prevalence of antidepressant use (overall, for drug classes and individual drugs) was calculated stratified by age and sex. Regional analyses were performed on a state and also on a district level.

MAIN RESULTS

The study population comprised 68 427 464 (female: 53.0%) persons, of which 5 052 293 (7.4%) were prescribed at least one antidepressant. The most frequently prescribed drug class was tricyclic antidepressants whereas on a substance level citalopram was most commonly used. Antidepressant prescribing was lowest in children and adolescents (0.2%) and most common in persons aged 70 years and older (13.4%). Women more often received antidepressants than men (9.7% vs. 4.8%). Prevalence of antidepressant use varied between 8.7% (Saarland) and 6.3% (Saxony-Anhalt) and was generally highest in the southwestern and lowest in the eastern states. Accordingly, districts with the highest prevalence were located in the southwestern states.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressant use in Germany varied considerably by age and sex and also on a state and district level.

Do clinicians follow heuristics in prescribing antidepressants?

BACKGROUND

While clinicians commonly learn heuristics to guide antidepressant treatment selection, surveys suggest real-world prescribing practices vary widely. We aimed to determine the extent to which antidepressant prescriptions were consistent with commonly-advocated heuristics for treatment selection.

METHODS

This retrospective longitudinal cohort study examined electronic health records from psychiatry and non-psychiatry practice networks affiliated with two large academic medical centers between March 2008 and December 2017. Patients included 45,955 individuals with a major depressive disorder or depressive disorder not otherwise specified diagnosis who were prescribed at least one of 11 common antidepressant medications. Specific clinical features that may impact prescribing choices were extracted from coded data, and analyzed for association with index prescription in logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic variables and provider type.

RESULTS

Multiple clinical features yielded 10% or greater change in odds of prescribing, including overweight and underweight status and sexual dysfunction. These heuristics were generally applied similarly across hospital systems and psychiatrist and non-psychiatrist providers.

LIMITATIONS

These analyses rely on coded clinical data, which is likely to substantially underestimate prevalence of particular clinical features. Additionally, numerous other features that may impact prescribing choices are not able to be modeled.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the hypothesis that clinicians apply heuristics on the basis of clinical features to guide antidepressant prescribing, although the magnitude of these effects is modest, suggesting other patient- or clinician-level factors have larger effects.

FUNDING

This work was funded by NSF GRFP (grant no. DGE1745303), Harvard SEAS, the Center for Research on Computation and Society at Harvard, the Harvard Data Science Initiative, and a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (grant no. 1R01MH106577).

The association of depression and anxiety with treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - a pooled analysis of five randomised controlled trials

Background:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory autoimmune condition associated with an increased risk of developing depression and anxiety. Depression and anxiety are associated with worse outcomes in RA, but the magnitude of the effect of each condition on RA outcomes is unclear. It is also unknown how pharmacological treatment of depression affects RA outcomes.

Objective:

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the association of comorbid depression and anxiety with remission in patients with RA. Secondary aims were to determine the association between comorbid depression and anxiety on patient-reported outcomes and the relationship between concomitant use of antidepressants and remission in patients with depression.

Design:

Data from patients with moderate to severe RA were pooled from five randomised controlled trials investigating tocilizumab and conventional synthetic disease-modifying agents.

Methods:

Remission was defined as a clinical disease activity index (CDAI) of ⩽2.8 and simple disease activity index (SDAI) of ⩽3.3. The association between the time to reach remission and depression and anxiety was analysed using Cox proportional hazard analysis.

Results:

Individual patient data were available from 5502 subjects, of whom 511 had depression, 236 had anxiety and 387 were using antidepressants. Depression was significantly associated with reduced remission [adjusted HR (95% CI): 0.62 (0.48–0.80), p < 0.001 and adjusted HR (95% CI): 0.59 (0.44–0.79), p < 0.001] using CDAI and SDAI, respectively. Depression was associated with a lower likelihood of achieving more subjective outcomes (⩽1 physician global assessment, ⩽1 patient global assessment) and ⩽1 28-swollen joint count, but not ⩽1 28-tender joint count or C-reactive protein measurement. Treatment with antidepressants did not improve outcomes for patients with depression. Anxiety was not significantly associated with RA remission.

Conclusion:

Comorbid depression, but not anxiety, was associated with less frequent remission. Concomitant antidepressant use was not associated with improvements in RA outcomes in patients with depression.

Effect of single doses of citalopram and reboxetine on urethral pressure: A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled three-period crossover study in healthy women

AIMS

Urethral closure function is essential for urinary continence in women and decreased urethral pressure is associated with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). For decades, the effects of serotonergic drugs on central neural control of urethral closure have been investigated and discussed. Epidemiological studies suggest that the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as citalopram, is associated with SUI. However, the literature findings are conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate citalopram's effect on opening urethral pressure (OUP) in healthy women.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover study in 24 healthy women. On three study days, which were separated by 8 days of washout, the subjects received single doses of either 40 mg citalopram (and placebo_reboxetine ), 8 mg reboxetine (and placebo_citalopram ), or two placebos. Study drugs were administered at a 1-h interval due to a difference in estimated time to peak plasma concentration (t_max ). We measured OUP with urethral pressure reflectometry under both resting and squeezing conditions of the pelvic floor at estimated t_max for both study drugs (one timepoint).

RESULTS

Compared to placebo, citalopram increased OUP by 6.6 cmH₂ 0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-13.1, p = 0.048) in resting condition. In squeezing condition, OUP increased by 7.1 cmH₂ 0 (95% CI: 1.3-12.9, p = 0.01). Reboxetine increased OUP by 30.0 cmH₂ 0 in resting condition compared to placebo (95% CI: 23.5-36.5, p < 0.001), and 27.0 cmH₂ 0 (95% CI: 21.2-32.8, p < 0.001) in squeezing condition.

CONCLUSION

Citalopram increased OUP slightly compared to placebo suggesting that SSRI treatment does not induce or aggravate SUI.

Global prevalence of antidepressant drug utilization in the community: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Antidepressant drugs are the most frequently prescribed medication for mental disorders. They are also used off-label and for non-psychiatric indications. Prescriptions of antidepressants have increased in the last decades, but no systematic review exists on the extent of their use in the community.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of antidepressant use in the community. We will search for studies published from 1 January 2010 in the Embase and MEDLINE databases using a combination of controlled vocabulary and keywords adjusted for each database without any language restriction. The main inclusion criterion is the presence of prevalence data of antidepressant utilization. Thus, we will include all studies with a descriptive observational design reporting the prevalence of antidepressant use in the community. Study selection (by title/abstract and full-text screening) and data extraction for included studies will be independently conducted by pairs of reviewers. We will then synthesize the data on the prevalence of antidepressant use in individuals living in the community. If possible, we will perform a meta-analysis to generate prevalence-pooled estimates. If the data allows it, we will conduct subgroup analyses by antidepressant class, age, sex, country and other sociodemographic categories. We will evaluate the risk of bias for each included study through a quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool: Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. DistillerSR software will be used for the management of this review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this review as it will not directly involve human or animal subjects. The findings of our systematic review will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, the Qualaxia Network (https://qualaxia.org), presentations at international conferences on mental health and pharmacoepidemiology, as well as general public events.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021247423.

Initiation of antidepressant medication in people with type 2 diabetes living in the UK - a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Depression is a common comorbidity in people with type 2 diabetes and it is associated with poorer outcomes. There is limited data on the treatments used for depression in this population. The aim of this study was to explore the rates of initiation of antidepressant prescriptions in people with type 2 diabetes in the UK and identify those most at risk of needing such treatment.

Research Design and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using data from IQVIA Medical Research Data (IMRD)‐UK data. Data from general practices in IMRD‐UK between January 2008 and December 2017 were used for this study.

Results

The overall rates of antidepressant prescribing were stable over the study period. The rate of initiation of antidepressant medication in people with type 2 diabetes was 22.93 per 1000 person years at risk (PYAR) with a 95%CI 22.48 to 23.39 compared to 16.89 per 1000 PYAR (95%CI 16.77 to 17.01) in an age and gender matched cohort. The risk of being prescribed antidepressant medication with age had a U‐shaped distribution with the lowest risk in the 65–69 age group. The peak age for antidepressant initiation in men and women was 40–44, with a rate in men of 32.78 per 1000 PYAR (95% CI 29.57 to 36.34) and a rate in women of 46.80 per 1000 PYAR (95% CI 41.90 to 52.26). People with type 2 diabetes with in the least deprived quintile had an initiation rate of 19.66 per 1000 PYAR (95%CI 18.67 to 20.70) compared to 27.19 per 1000 PYAR (95%CI 25.50 to 28.93) in the most deprived quintile, with a 32% increase in the risk of starting antidepressant medication (95%CI 1.22 to 1.43).

Conclusions

People with type 2 diabetes were 30% more likely to be started on antidepressant medication than people without type 2 diabetes. Women with type 2 diabetes were 35% more likely than men to be prescribed antidepressants and the risks increased with deprivation and in younger or older adults, with the lowest rates in the 65–69 year age band. The rates of antidepressant prescribing were broadly stable over the 10‐year period in this study. The antidepressant medications prescribed changed slightly over time with sertraline becoming more widely used and fewer prescriptions of citalopram.

A Focus on Abuse/Misuse and Withdrawal Issues with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): Analysis of Both the European EMA and the US FAERS Pharmacovigilance Databases

Despite increasing reports, antidepressant (AD) misuse and dependence remain underestimated issues, possibly due to limited epidemiological and pharmacovigilance evidence. Thus, here we aimed to determine available pharmacovigilance misuse/abuse/dependence/withdrawal signals relating to the Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline. Both EudraVigilance (EV) and Food and Drug Administration-FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) datasets were analysed to identify AD misuse/abuse/dependence/withdrawal issues. A descriptive analysis was performed; moreover, pharmacovigilance measures, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) were calculated. Both datasets showed increasing trends of yearly reporting and similar signals regarding abuse and dependence. From the EV, a total of 5335 individual ADR reports were analysed, of which 30% corresponded to paroxetine (n = 1592), 27% citalopram (n = 1419), 22% sertraline (n = 1149), 14% fluoxetine (n = 771), and 8% escitalopram (n = 404). From FAERS, a total of 144,395 individual ADR reports were analysed, of which 27% were related to paroxetine, 27% sertraline, 18% citalopram, 16% fluoxetine, and 13% escitalopram. Comparing SSRIs, the EV misuse/abuse-related ADRs were mostly recorded for citalopram, fluoxetine, and sertraline; conversely, dependence was mostly associated with paroxetine, and withdrawal to escitalopram. Similarly, in the FAERS dataset, dependence/withdrawal-related signals were more frequently reported for paroxetine. Although SSRIs are considered non-addictive pharmacological agents, a range of proper withdrawal symptoms can occur well after discontinuation, especially with paroxetine. Prescribers should be aware of the potential for dependence and withdrawal associated with SSRIs.

Inclusion of currently diagnosed or treated individuals in studies of depression screening tool accuracy: a meta-research review of studies published in 2018-2021

OBJECTIVES

Screening is done to improve health outcomes by identifying and effectively treating individuals with unrecognized conditions. Depression screening has been proposed to identify previously unrecognized depression cases. Including individuals already diagnosed or treated for depression in screening test accuracy studies could exaggerate accuracy and the yield of new cases from screening. The present study investigated (1) the proportion of depression screening tool accuracy primary studies published in 2018-2021 that excluded individuals with a confirmed depression diagnosis or who were already undergoing treatment; and (2) whether this has improved since the last review of studies published in 2013-2015, which found that five of 89 (5.6%) primary studies appropriately excluded such individuals.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched from January 1, 2018 through May 21, 2021 for primary studies on depression screening tool accuracy.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 106 (17.0%; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 11.0% to 25.3%) primary studies excluded currently diagnosed or treated individuals. This was 11.4% (95% CI, 2.8% to 20.0%) greater than in similar studies published in 2013-2015.

CONCLUSION

There has been an improvement since 2015, but the proportion of studies that exclude individuals already known to have depression remains low. This may bias research findings intended to inform clinical practice.

Indications related to antidepressant prescribing in the Nivel-PCD database and the SIDIAP database

BACKGROUND

Antidepressant drug consumption has increased, mainly in the elderly. This trend could be explained by the use for indications other than depression. We aimed to describe the indications related to antidepressant drug new users in two primary care settings.

METHODS

A longitudinal study of new antidepressant users aged ≥65 was conducted, with data from the Nivel-PCD (The Netherlands) and SIDIAP (Catalonia) databases (2010-2015). As a proxy for indication, diagnoses registered around the 3 months of antidepressant prescribing were collected. Indications were classified in seven categories and an additional one of non-selected indications. The percentage and incidence calculated over the total population registered was described.

RESULTS

A total of 16,537 and 199,168 new antidepressant users were identified in the Nivel-PCD and SIDIAP databases, respectively (women aged 65-69 were the most prevalent). Depression was the most frequent indication (24.0% and 31.3%), followed by anxiety (12.5% and 19.5%) and sleep disorders (10.2% and 26.4%). Tricyclic antidepressants were the most commonly prescribed in Nivel-PCD (48.7%), mainly associated with neuropathic pain, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants in SIDIAP (63.1%), associated with depression. The non-selected indications category showed an upward trend in the Nivel-PCD database while in the SIDIAP database it decreased.

LIMITATIONS

It is not mandatory for physicians to register a diagnosis with each prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression was the most common prescribing indication in The Netherlands and Spain, followed by anxiety and sleep disorders. The most commonly prescribed antidepressant differed between the countries and is likely explained by differences in local guidelines.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and suicidal behaviour: a population-based cohort study

There is concern that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment may increase the risk of suicide attempts or deaths, particularly among children and adolescents. However, debate remains regarding the nature of the relationship. Using nationwide Swedish registers, we identified all individuals aged 6-59 years with an incident SSRI dispensation (N = 538,577) from 2006 to 2013. To account for selection into treatment, we used a within-individual design to compare the risk of suicide attempts or deaths (suicidal behaviour) in time periods before and after SSRI-treatment initiation. Within-individual incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of suicidal behaviour were estimated. The 30 days before SSRI-treatment initiation was associated with the highest risk of suicidal behaviour compared with the 30 days 1 year before SSRI initiation (IRR = 7.35, 95% CI 6.60-8.18). Compared with the 30 days before SSRI initiation, treatment periods after initiation had a reduced risk-the IRR in the 30 days after initiation was 0.62 (95% CI 0.58-0.65). The risk then declined over treatment time. These patterns were similar across age strata, and when stratifying on history of suicide attempts. Initiation with escitalopram was associated with the greatest risk reduction, though CIs for the IRRs of the different SSRI types were overlapping. The results do not suggest that SSRI-treatment increases the risk for suicidal behaviour in either youths or adults; rather, it may reduce the risk. Further research with different study designs and in different populations is warranted.

The effect of smoking on the plasma concentration of tricyclic antidepressants: a systematic review

Smoking is highly prevalent in the psychiatric population, and hospital admittance usually results in partial or complete smoking cessation. Tobacco use is known to affect the metabolism of certain psychoactive drugs, but whether smoking influences the plasma concentration of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) remains unclear. This article investigates the possible effect of smoking on the plasma concentration of TCAs. A systematic review of the literature available on PubMed and EMBASE as of October 2020 was carried out using PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting plasma concentrations of any TCA in both a smoking and a non-smoking group were included and compared. Ten eligible studies were identified and included. In the eight studies investigating the effect of smoking on amitriptyline and/or nortriptyline, five studies found no significant effect. Two studies investigating the effect of smoking on imipramine found a significant effect, and one study investigating the effect of smoking on doxepin found no significant effect. The majority of studies included in this review were influenced by small study populations and other methodical issues. The effect of smoking on the plasma concentration of TCAs is still not entirely clear. There is a possibility that smoking affects the distribution of TCA metabolites, but this is probably not of clinical importance.

Antidepressant use and expenditure in the treatment of patients with depression: Evidence from China urban medical claims data

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have analyzed the use of antidepressants among population suffering from depression in China. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and the cost of commonly prescribed antidepressants among patients with depression.

METHODS

This study used data that comprised 5% random sample of claims data from China's Urban Basic Medical Insurance between 2013 and 2016. We estimated the prevalence, calculated the proportions of those on antidepressant treatment as well as those on specific drugs.

RESULTS

Among 26 826 patients with depression, 62.31% were prescribed with antidepressants in urban China, and the estimated average annual total cost of antidepressants per patient was RMB887.7(USD140.9). The prevalence of antidepressant prescription was higher among patients aged 15-24 years, having URBMI insurance, with recurrent depression and having severe or moderate depression. Approximately 9.3% of patients used more than one type of antidepressants and 19% of patients have only one prescription of antidepressant in a year.

CONCLUSION

Our analyses showed that antidepressant prescribing was prevalent among patients with depression, particularly in adolescents and youth groups, and are subject to variation with clinical features and different insurance scheme. Further investigation of antidepressant use patterns, such as duration, combination and switching, as well as treatment trajectories will facilitate our understanding of the pharmacotherapy practices of depressive disorders.

Association of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment with acute substance misuse outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely prescribed medications for patients with anxiety/depression. These patients often have problems with substance use, but it remains unclear whether the risk of substance misuse is influenced by SSRI treatment. We aimed to determine whether SSRI treatment is associated with a decreased risk of acute substance misuse-related outcomes.

DESIGN

Cohort study following individuals through Swedish nation-wide registers between July 2005 and December 2013 and comparing the risk of substance misuse outcomes during periods on- versus off-treatment within the same individual.

SETTING

Swedish general population.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with a newly dispensed prescription of SSRIs between July 2006 and December 2013 and an ICD-10 diagnosis of anxiety/depressive disorder before the first treatment initiation. The cohort included 146 114 individuals (60.7% women).

MEASUREMENTS

Substance misuse outcomes included ICD-10 diagnoses of acute intoxications (F10.0-F19.0), accidental poisonings by alcohol or drugs (X41-X42, X45-X46) and substance-related criminal offenses.

FINDINGS

The absolute rate of substance misuse increased sharply before the onset of SSRI treatment and decreased after treatment initiation. Stratified Cox regression models showed an elevated risk [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.62-1.78] of substance misuse outcomes during a 1-month period preceding treatment initiation, compared with the reference period of more than 1 month before treatment start. The on-treatment estimates (1-30 days, HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.23-1.37; 31-120 days, HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.24-1.35; and > 120 days, HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.18-1.30 after treatment initiation] were consistently lower than the 1-month pre-treatment estimate, but still elevated compared with the reference period.

CONCLUSIONS

For people with anxiety/depression, the risk of substance misuse appears to be particularly elevated immediately before initiating selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment, which may reflect the emergence or worsening of substance use problems concurrently with anxiety/depression. SSRI treatment appears to be associated with a lower risk of substance misuse compared with the 1-month period preceding treatment initiation, but causality remains uncertain.

Use of central nervous system drugs in combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment: A Bayesian screening study for risk of suicidal behavior

BACKGROUND

Using other central nervous system (CNS) medications in combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment is common. Despite this, there is limited evidence on the impact on suicidal behavior of combining specific medications. We aim to provide evidence on signals for suicidal behavior risk when initiating CNS drugs during and outside of SSRI treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a linkage of Swedish national registers, we identified a national cohort of SSRI users aged 6-59 years residing in Sweden 2006-2013. We used a two-stage Bayesian Poisson model to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of suicidal behavior in periods up to 90 days before and after a CNS drug initiation during SSRI treatment, while accounting for multiple testing. For comparison, and to assess whether there were interactions between SSRIs and other CNS drugs, we also estimated the IRR of initiating the CNS drug without SSRI treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 53 common CNS drugs initiated during SSRI treatment, dispensed to 262,721 individuals. We found 20 CNS drugs with statistically significant IRRs. Of these, two showed a greater risk of suicidal behavior after versus before initiating the CNS drug (alprazolam, IRR = 1.39; flunitrazepam, IRR = 1.83). We found several novel signals of drugs that were statistically significantly associated with a reduction in the suicidal behavior risk. We did not find evidence of harmful interactions between SSRIs and the selected CNS drugs.

CONCLUSION

Several of the detected signals for reduced risk correspond to drugs where there is previous evidence of benefit for antidepressant augmentation (e.g., olanzapine, quetiapine, lithium, buspirone, and mirtazapine). Novel signals of reduced suicidal behavior risk, including for lamotrigine, valproic acid, risperidone, and melatonin, warrant further investigation.

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Treatment Strategies, Evaluating the Meaningfulness of HAM-D Rating Scale in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

INTRODUCTION

Due to the complexity of symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD), the majority of depression scales fall short of accurately assessing a patient's progress. When selecting the most appropriate antidepressant treatment in MDD, a multidimensional scale such as the Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAM-D) may provide clinicians with more information especially when coupled with unidimensional analysis of some key factors such as depressed mood, altered sleep, psychic and somatic anxiety and suicidal ideation etc.

METHODS

HAM-D measurements were carried out in patients with MDD when treated with two different therapeutic interventions. The prespecified primary efficacy variables for the study were changes in score from baseline to the end of the 12 weeks on HAM-D scale (i.e., ≤ 8 or ≥50% response). The study involved three assessment points (baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks).

RESULTS

Evaluation of both the absolute HAM-D scores and four factors derived from the HAM-D (depressed mood, sleep, psychic and somatic anxiety and suicidal ideation) revealed that the latter showed a greater promise in gauging the anti-depressant responses.

CONCLUSION

The study confirms the assumption that while both drugs may improve several items on the HAM-D scale, the overall protocol may fall short of addressing the symptoms diversity in MDD and thus the analysis of factor (s) in question might be more relevant and meaningful.

Major depressive disorder: Validated treatments and future challenges

Depression is a prevalent psychiatric disorder that often leads to poor quality of life and impaired functioning. Treatment during the acute phase of a major depressive episode aims to help the patient reach a remission state and eventually return to their baseline level of functioning. Pharmacotherapy, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors antidepressants, remains the most frequent option for treating depression during the acute phase, while other promising pharmacological options are still competing for the attention of practitioners. Depression-focused psychotherapy is the second most common option for helping patients overcome the acute phase, maintain remission, and prevent relapses. Electroconvulsive therapy is the most effective somatic therapy for depression in some specific situations; meanwhile, other methods have limits, and their specific indications are still being studied. Combining medications, psychotherapy, and somatic therapies remains the most effective way to manage resistant forms of depression.

Effects of inescapable stress on responses to social incentive stimuli and modulation by escitalopram

RATIONALE

Stress is a well-known risk factor for anhedonia, and its impacts on social reward functions may be mitigated by its controllability. Moreover, there are questions about the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on improving social hedonic functioning deficits characteristic of major depression.

OBJECTIVES

The current study in male Sprague-Dawley rats investigated the effects of uncontrollable stress on responses to social incentive stimuli and possible modulation by the SSRI escitalopram (ESC).

METHODS

The effects of inescapable foot-shocks on preferential responses to a conspecific, and to a compartment that was previously paired with the presence of a conspecific, were assessed in a Y-apparatus in rats that received 0, 5, or 10 mg/kg ESC.

RESULTS

Although inescapable foot-shock exposure did not significantly alter the investigation of the conspecific, it did impair the response to the social-paired compartment and, importantly, this impairment was reversed by ESC.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that psychophysical stress can negatively impact reactivity to learned social rewards and that SSRI administration can have positive therapeutic effects.

Antidepressant use and stroke or mortality risk in the elderly

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Current evidence on antidepressant-related stroke or mortality risk is inconsistent. Because the elderly have the highest exposure to antidepressants, the aim was to quantify their association with stroke and mortality risks in this vulnerable population.

METHODS

Persons over 65 years old and registered in the Information System for Research in Primary Care of Catalonia during 2010-2015 comprised the study population. Antidepressant exposure was categorized into current-users, recent-users, past-users and antidepressant non-users (controls). The effect of antidepressant exposure on stroke or death, whichever came first, was analyzed by Cox regression adjusted for established risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1,068,117 participants included, 20% had antidepressant reimbursements during follow-up, 17% had a stroke and 3% died. The risk of experiencing stroke or death was higher in antidepressant current-users (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.06), recent-users (HR 3.34; 95% CI 3.27-3.41) and past-users (HR 2.06; 95% CI 2.02-2.10) compared to antidepressant non-users. Antidepressant current-use was associated with increased stroke (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.50-1.61) but decreased mortality risk (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.91-0.94). During antidepressant recent-use and past-use, both stroke and mortality risks were significantly increased compared to no antidepressant use.

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressant use may be associated with increased stroke risk in the elderly. When using antidepressants in this population, the potential risks should be considered.

Tricyclic antidepressants for major depressive disorder: a comprehensive evaluation of current practice in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Traditionally tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) have an important place in treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Today, often other antidepressant medications are considered as first step in the pharmacological treatment of MDD, mainly because they are associated with less adverse effects, whereby the position of TCAs appears unclear. In this study we aimed to examine the current practice of TCAs in treatment of unipolar MDD.

METHODS

A mixed methods approach was applied. First, a selection of leading international and national guidelines was reviewed. Second, actual TCA prescription was examined by analyzing health records of 75 MDD patients treated with the TCAs nortriptyline, clomipramine or imipramine in different centers in the Netherlands. Third, promotors and barriers influencing the choice for TCAs and dosing strategies were explored using semi-structured interviews with 24 Dutch psychiatrists.

RESULTS

Clinical practice guidelines were sometimes indirective and inconsistent with each other. Health records revealed that most patients (71%) attained therapeutic plasma concentrations within two months of TCA use. Patients who achieved therapeutic plasma concentrations reached them on average after 19.6 days (SD 10.9). Both health records and interviews indicated that therapeutic nortriptyline concentrations were attained faster compared to other TCAs. Various factors were identified influencing the choice for TCAs and dosing by psychiatrists.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline recommendations and clinical practice regarding TCA prescription for MDD vary. To increase consistency in clinical practice we recommend development of an up-to-date guideline integrating selection and dosing of TCAs, including the roles of therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetics. Such a guideline is currently lacking and would contribute to optimal TCA treatment, whereby efficacy and tolerability may be increased.

No difference in antidepressant prescription in rheumatoid arthritis and controls. Results from a population-based, matched inception cohort

Objective: Depression occurs at least two times more often in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients than in controls, but little is known about the treatment of depression in RA. The primary objective of this study was to compare the 1 year period prevalence of antidepressant prescription in patients with RA versus controls.Method: We included a retrospective inception cohort of 509 patients with incident RA and 2545 frequency-matched population controls ascertained from 1995 to 2002. The cohort was followed until 31 December 2017 and linked with nationwide Danish registers. From the Danish National Prescription Register, we obtained information on redeemed prescriptions of antidepressants (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code N06A).Results: We did not demonstrate significant differences in the 1 year period prevalence ratios and the incidence rate ratios for either antidepressant prescription or the frequency of hospital admissions with depressive episode. The most frequent indication for antidepressant prescription in patients with RA was depression. Cox regression analyses showed no association between RA and antidepressant prescription.Conclusion: We found no significant differences in the occurrence of antidepressant prescription in patients with RA versus matched controls. The main indication for antidepressant prescription in RA was depression.

Use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of subsequent bone loss in a nationwide population-based cohort study

This study examined whether the use of SRIs is associated with an increased risk of bone loss using a nested case-control design with a nationwide population-based cohort in Korea. Using the Korean National Health Screening Cohort, subjects newly diagnosed with osteoporosis or osteopenia (n = 55,799) were matched with controls (n = 278,995) at a ratio of 1:5. We stratified the participants by their time-dependent use of SRIs and sex and controlled for various confounders, including lifestyle habits, laboratory data, and comorbidities. Conditional logistic regression showed that both recent and former users of SRIs had an increased risk of subsequent bone loss compared with non-users: men [recent users: odds ratio (OR) 1.35, 95% confidential interval (CI) 1.20, 1.53; former-users: OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01, 1.20]; women (recent users: OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28-1.48; former-users: OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02, 1.21). The use of SRIs was associated with an increased risk of bone loss in both men and women. In particular, the association was stronger in recent users. These findings provide population-level evidence for the risk of bone loss associated with SRI exposure and highlight the importance of monitoring the bone health of SRI users.

Gender Differences in the Prevalence of Mental Health, Psychological Distress and Psychotropic Medication Consumption in Spain: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

To assess gender differences in the prevalence of self-reported mental disorders, psychological distress and psychotropic drug consumption, and to identify sociodemographic and health-related variables associated with these conditions in the male and female population (aged ≥ 18 years).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried on 22,141 subjects aged 18 and over, using data from the Spanish National Health Interview Survey 2017.

RESULTS

We found an overall prevalence of mental disorders, psychological distress and psychotropic drug consumption of 13.8%, 18.3% and 13.9%, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, women showed significantly increased probabilities of 1.74-fold for mental disorders, 1.26-fold for psychological distress and 1.26-fold for psychotropic drug consumption compared to men. Variables such as gender, age, nationality, marital status, educational level, self-rated health, the presence of different chronic disorders, alcohol consumption and smoking habit were independently associated with mental disorders, psychological distress and psychotropic drug consumption. Several variables showed a differential effect on mental health status and psychotropic drug consumption according to gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Women suffer from mental disorders, experience psychological distress and consume psychotropic drugs significantly more than men in Spain. Possible explanations for these results may be related to differences in emotional processing, willingness to report diseases and even intrinsic biological traits. Screening for mental health status and psychotropic drug consumption should be considered, particularly in Spanish women, younger adults and individuals who are not married, are obese, have poor self-rated health, suffer from chronic diseases or have a smoking habit.

Antidepressants and Antipsychotic Agents as Repurposable Oncological Drug Candidates

Drug repurposing, also known as drug repositioning/reprofiling, is a relatively new strategy for the identification of alternative uses of well-known therapeutics that are outside the scope of their original medical indications. Such an approach might entail a number of advantages compared to standard de novo drug development, including less time needed to introduce the drug to the market, and lower costs. The group of compounds that could be considered as promising candidates for repurposing in oncology include the central nervous system drugs, especially selected antidepressant and antipsychotic agents. In this article, we provide an overview of some antidepressants (citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline) and antipsychotics (chlorpromazine, pimozide, thioridazine, trifluoperazine) that have the potential to be repurposed as novel chemotherapeutics in cancer treatment, as they have been found to exhibit preventive and/or therapeutic action in cancer patients. Nevertheless, although drug repurposing seems to be an attractive strategy to search for oncological drugs, we would like to clearly indicate that it should not replace the search for new lead structures, but only complement de novo drug development.

Association of Type of Antidepressant Initiation with Bleeding Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulants

Background

Inconsistent evidence suggests that use of certain antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), in patients using oral anticoagulants (OACs) might be associated with an elevated risk of bleeding.

Objective

This study aims to investigate the risk of bleeding associated with initiation of different types of antidepressants among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients on OAC therapy.

Patients and methods

A total of 30,336 AF patients (mean age 72.2 years; 54% female) on OAC therapy that started antidepressant treatment were identified from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Databases for the period 2007–2015. Exposure was defined as filling a prescription for antidepressant, and categorized as SSRI, serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), or other antidepressants. The primary outcome was incident hospitalized bleeding. Associations of antidepressant type with bleeding were assessed calculating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with adjusted Cox models in pairwise propensity score-matched cohorts.

Results

During a mean follow-up of 21 months, we identified 1612 bleeding episodes. In pairwise comparisons, SSRI use was associated with an increased risk of bleeding when compared to most other antidepressants (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.96–1.54 vs SNRI; HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90–1.35 vs SRI; HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82–1.30 vs TCA). SNRI use was associated with the lowest bleeding risk. Results did not differ by OAC type, age, and sex.

Conclusions

Among AF patients on OAC initiating antidepressants, risk of bleeding varied across antidepressant type. This information can inform treatment choices among patients receiving OAC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-021-00258-3.

Treatment patterns in patients with treatment-resistant depression in Danish patients with major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE

To describe treatment patterns in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) stratified by depression severity and year of diagnosis. Patterns of treatment were also compared to country-specific guidelines.

METHODS

All adults registered first time with a hospital contact due to MDD from 1996 through 2015 were identified and followed for all dispensed prescriptions of antidepressants, antipsychotics, lithium, initiation of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and psychotherapy in Danish registers 12 months before and after their hospital MDD diagnosis. TRD was characterized by two shifts in treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 197,615 patients of whom 15% developed TRD. In total, 88% of patients started treatment with antidepressants or ECT. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were the most frequently used treatment during the study period and more than half (50.7%) of patients changed treatment at least once. Among patients with TRD, serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were the most frequently used treatment (55.9%), and 37.0% initiated a new treatment the following year. SSRIs and SNRIs were part of most combinations of treatment, regardless of depression severity, year of diagnosis, or presence of TRD.

CONCLUSION

15% of patients met the criteria for TRD. Irrespective of patient characteristics and year of diagnosis, SSRIs and SNRIs are the most used treatments for depression, even after patients met the criteria for TRD. We confirm that guidelines for first treatment were followed for most patients diagnosed with MDD in Denmark, but for patients with TRD, choice of treatment was arbitrary.

Antidepressant and anticonvulsant prescription rates in patients with osteoarthritis: a population-based cohort study

Objectives

There are signs that antidepressants and anticonvulsants are being prescribed more often for OA patients, despite limited evidence. Our objectives were to examine prescription rates and time trends for antidepressants and anticonvulsants in OA patients, to assess the percentage of long-term prescriptions, and to determine patient characteristics associated with antidepressant or anticonvulsant prescription.

Methods

A population-based cohort study was conducted using the Integrated Primary Care Information database. First, episodic and prevalent prescription rates for antidepressants (amitriptyline, nortriptyline and duloxetine) and anticonvulsants (gabapentinoids) in OA patients were calculated for the period 2008–17. Logistic regression was used to assess which patient characteristics were associated with prescriptions.

Results

In total, 164 292 OA patients were included. The prescription rates of amitriptyline, gabapentin and pregabalin increased over time. The increase in prescription rates for pregabalin was most pronounced. Episodic prescription rate increased from 7.1 to 13.9 per 1000 person-years between 2008 and 2017. Amitriptyline was prescribed most (15.1 episodic prescriptions per 1000 person-years in 2017). Prescription rates of nortriptyline and duloxetine remained stable at 3.0 and 2.0 episodic prescriptions per 1000 person-years, respectively. For ≤3% of patients with incident OA, medication was prescribed long-term (≥3 months). In general, all medication was prescribed more frequently for older patients (except duloxetine), women, patients with OA in ≥2 joints, patients with spinal OA and patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Conclusion

Prescription rates of amitriptyline, gabapentin and pregabalin increased over time. Since there is little evidence to support prescription in OA, caution is necessary when prescribing.

Antidepressant prescriptions and adherence in primary care in India: Insights from a cluster randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization recommends that treatment of depression in low and middle-income countries with a scarcity of psychiatrists could be done in primary care and should include prescription of antidepressant medications for moderate and severe depression. Little is known, however, about the actual practices of antidepressant prescription by primary care physicians in low and middle-income countries, nor about adherence by people receiving such prescriptions. In a large study of primary care clinics in Goa, India, we examined the relationship of actual to recommended prescribing practices for depression, among all patients who screened positive for common mental disorder. We also examined other patient and clinic characteristics associated with antidepressant prescription, and self-reported adherence over a one-month period.

METHODS

Patients attending 24 primary care clinics were screened for common mental disorders. Those who screened positive were eligible to enroll in a trial to assess the effectiveness of a collaborative stepped care (CSC) intervention for mental disorders. Physicians in the 12 intervention and 12 control clinics (usual care) were free to prescribe antidepressants and follow-up interviews were conducted at 2, 6 and 12 months. Screening results were shared with the physician, but they were blinded to the diagnosis generated later using a standardized diagnostic interview administered by a health counsellor. We categorized these later diagnoses as "moderate/severe depression", "mild depression or non-depression diagnosis", and "no diagnosis". We used a two-level hierarchical logistic regression model to examine diagnostic and other factors associated with antidepressant prescription and one-month adherence.

RESULTS

Overall, about 47% of screened positive patients (n = 1320) received an antidepressant prescription: 60% of those with moderate/severe depression, 48% of those with mild depression or non-depression diagnosis, and 31% with no diagnosis. Women (OR 1.29; 95%CI 1.04-1.60) and older adults (OR 1.80; 95%CI 1.32-2.47) were more likely to receive an antidepressant prescription. While the overall rate of antidepressant prescription was similar in clinics with and without CSC, patients without any diagnosis were more likely to receive a prescription (OR 2.20 95% CI 1.03-4.70) in the usual care clinics. About 47% of patients adhered to antidepressant treatment for one month or more and adherence was significantly better among older adults (OR 3.92; 95% CI 1.70-8.93) and those who received antidepressant as part of the CSC treatment model (OR 6.10 95% CI 3.67-10.14) compared with those attending the usual care clinic.

CONCLUSION

Antidepressants were widely prescribed following screening in primary care, but prescription patterns were in poor accord with WHO recommendations. The data suggest under-prescription for people with moderate/severe depression; over-prescription for people with mild depression or non-depression diagnoses; and over-prescription for people with no disorders. For all diagnoses adherence was low, especially in usual care clinics. To address these concerns, there is an urgent need to study and develop strategies in primary care practices to limit unnecessary antidepressant prescriptions, target prescription for those patients who clearly benefit, and to improve adherence to antidepressant treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00446407.

Use of Antidepressants among Patients Diagnosed with Depression: A Scoping Review

Introduction

Depression is a major global health problem with a relatively high lifetime prevalence and significant disability. Antidepressants are the most effective medications used for the treatment of depression. Hence, this study is aimed at summarizing the studies on antidepressant use among patients diagnosed with depression.

Method

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for literature (2000-2019) using keywords such as depression, drug utilization, antidepressants, prescription, serotonin reuptake inhibitor, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, tricyclic antidepressants, and atypical antidepressants.

Results

Antidepressant users were mostly females, married people, housewives, lower-income people, employees, and highly educated people, as they were found to be more prone to develop depression than their counterparts. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as sertraline, were most commonly prescribed among depressive patients.

Conclusion

Our study suggested that out of five major antidepressant drugs available for the treatment of depression, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are preferred over others because of their better side effects and tolerability profile.

Time trends in pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder: Results from the AMSP Pharmacovigilance Program from 2001-2017

BACKGROUND

Currently available data on the prescription practice among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) reflect the outpatient setting. This is the first study to provide information on time trends of psychotropic drug utilization in psychiatric inpatients.

METHOD

Data stems from German-speaking psychiatric hospitals collected by the program "Drug Safety in Psychiatry" (Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie, AMSP) between 2001 and 2017. 44,418 psychiatric inpatients with MDD were included. Time trends in drug utilization were analyzed by comparing the first (2001-2003) and last time point (2015-2017) using risk ratios (RR).

RESULTS

Antidepressant drugs (ADD) were the most used psychotropic drug class with utilization decreasing slightly from 2001-2003 (89.7%) to 2015-2017 (85.5%). Use of tricyclic ADDs showed the greatest decline (RR 0.35), while use of selective serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (RR 1.72) and "other ADDs" increased the most. Use of antipsychotic drugs (APD), especially second-generation antipsychotic drugs (RR 1.46), increased. Use of tranquilizing (RR 0.71) and hypnotic drugs (RR 0.43) both decreased. Most patients were treated with more than one psychotropic drug, most often ADD + APD, which was utilized more often in 2015-2017 (51.1%) than in 2001-2003 (45.1%; RR 1.13). Combination of two ADDs increased from 2001-2003 (24.5%) to 2015-2017 (33.0%; RR 1.35).

LIMITATIONS

The cross-sectional design does not allow conclusions to be drawn about causal relationship of findings. Further, only certain clinical and sociodemographic data was available.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of MDD has shown significant changes from 2001 to 2017.