Critical Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Drug–Drug Interaction Potential of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib and Upadacitinib, the Three Approved Janus Kinase Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment

Safety and Effectiveness of Thiopurines and Small Molecules in Elderly Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

The management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) requires weighing an individual patient's therapeutic benefits and therapy-related complication risks. The immunomodulators that have been commonly used so far in IBD therapy are thiopurines, including 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine. As our understanding of the IBD pathomechanisms is widening, new therapeutic approaches are being introduced, including the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators' development. Non-selective JAK inhibitors are represented by tofacitinib, while selective JAK inhibitors comprise filgotinib and upadacitinib. As for the S1PR modulators, ozanimod and etrasimod are approved for UC therapy. The number of elderly patients with IBD is growing; therefore, this review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the oral immunomodulators among the subjects aged ≥60. Possible complications limit the use of thiopurines in senior patients. Likewise, the promising effectiveness of new drugs in IBD therapy in those with additional risk factors might be confined by the risk of serious adverse events. However, the data regarding this issue are limited.

A Systematic Overview of Contraindications and Special Warnings for Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Establishing a Framework to Create a "Safety Checklist"

BACKGROUND/AIM

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the contraindications, special warnings, and boxed warnings with the aim to establish a framework to create a prescription safety checklist for a class of drugs or disease indication. This study covers biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs).

METHODS

We identified contraindications, boxed warnings, and special warnings provided by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study included b/tsDMARDs approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) within the drug-classes anti-CD20, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-1 inhibitors (IL-1i), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA) 4, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i), interleukin 6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (PDE4i), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i).

RESULTS

All drug classes, except PDE4i, had contraindications and/or warnings related to infections, including tuberculosis. A warning about herpes zoster was listed for anti-CD20, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi, while a warning about hepatitis reactivation was listed for anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, CTLA4-Ig, IL-6Ri, and JAKi. Malignancy risk was mentioned for all drug classes except PDE4i, IL-17i, and IL-23i. Other warnings included demyelinating disease (TNFi, CTLA4-Ig, and IL-6Ri), heart failure (anti-CD20 and TNFi), major adverse cardiac events (JAKi and IL-12/23) and venous thromboembolism (JAKi), hyperlipidemia (IL-6Ri and JAKi), liver impairment (TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi), kidney impairment (IL-1i, JAKi, and PDE4i), inflammatory bowel disease (IL-17i), gastrointestinal perforation (IL-6Ri, JAKi), cytopenia (anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, JAKi), and depression (PDE4i). Contraindications and warnings appeared to increase with the passage of time since the drug's approval.

CONCLUSION

This review provides an overview to establish the framework to create an easily accessible and actionable prescription safety checklist from individual medical product prescription information provided by regulatory medical authorities.

Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors compared to biological DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and renal impairment: the ANSWER cohort study

Data on the safety of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in patients with renal impairment are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the safety of JAKis compared to biological (b) DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and renal impairment. We used a multi-centre observational registry of patients with RA in Japan (the ANSWER cohort). We assessed the drug retention rates of b/targeted synthetic DMARDs with different modes of action (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), immunoglobulins fused with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4-Ig), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ris), and JAKis) in patients with RA stratified by pre-treatment estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels. The time to discontinuation of bDMARDs or JAKis was analysed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model This study included 3775 patients, who were classified into three groups (the normal group (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2): 2893 patients; CKDa group (eGFR 45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2): 551; and CKDb group (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2): 331). In the CKDb group, the 12-month drug retention rate due to adverse events (AE) was the lowest in patients treated with JAKi (TNFi: 93.1%; IL-6Ri: 94.1%; CTLA-4-Ig: 92.3%; JAKi: 75.1%). In the normal and CKDa groups, drug retention rates due to AE were similar among patients treated with bDMARDs and JAKi. In contrast, drug retention rates due to inefficacy were similar between bDMARDs and JAKis in all groups. In the Cox-proportional model, in the CKDb group, TNFi, IL-6Ri, and CTLA-4-Ig showed lower incidence of drug discontinuation due to AE than JAKis (TNFi: hazard ratio = 0.23 (95% confidence interval 0.09-0.61), IL-6Ri: 0.34 (0.14-0.81), CTLA-4-Ig: 0.36 (0.15-0.89)). JAKis showed the lowest drug retention due to AE in patients with moderate-to-severe and severe renal impairment (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2). Physicians should pay more attention to renal function when using JAKis than when using bDMARDs.

Effect of P. corylifolia on the pharmacokinetic profile of tofacitinib and the underlying mechanism

This work aimed to explore the mechanisms underlying the interaction of the active furanocoumarins in P. corylifolia on tofacitinib both in vivo and in vitro. The concentration of tofacitinib and its metabolite M8 was determined using UPLC-MS/MS. The peak area ratio of M8 to tofacitinib was calculated to compare the inhibitory ability of furanocoumarin contained in the traditional Chinese medicine P. corylifolia in rat liver microsomes (RLMs), human liver microsomes (HLMs) and recombinant human CYP3A4 (rCYP3A4). We found that bergapten and isopsoralen exhibited more significant inhibitory activity in RLMs than other furanocoumarins. Bergapten and isopsoralen were selected to investigate tofacitinib drug interactions in vitro and in vivo. Thirty rats were randomly allocated into 5 groups (n = 6): control (0.5% CMC-Na), low-dose bergapten (20 mg/kg), high-dose bergapten (50 mg/kg), low-dose isopsoralen (20 mg/kg) and ketoconazole. 10 mg/kg of tofacitinib was orally intervented to each rat and the concentration level of tofacitinib in the rats were determined by UPLC-MS/MS. More imporrantly, the results showed that bergapten and isopsoralen significantly inhibited the metabolism of tofacitinib metabolism. The AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), MRT(0-t), MRT(0-∞) and Cmax of tofacitinib increased in varying degrees compared with the control group (all p < 0.05), but CLz/F decreased in varying degrees (p < 0.05) in the different dose bergapten group and isopsoralen group. Bergapten, isopsoralen and tofacitinib exhibit similar binding capacities with CYP3A4 by AutoDock 4.2 software, confirming that they compete for tofacitinib metabolism. P. corylifolia may considerably impact the metabolism of tofacitinib, which can provide essential information for the accurate therapeutic application of tofacitinib.

EIDD-1931 Treatment Tweaks CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 in Arthritic Rats to Expedite Drug Interaction: Implication in Oral Therapy of Molnupiravir

EIDD-1931 is the active form of molnupiravir, an orally effective drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) against COVID-19. Pharmacokinetic alteration can cause untoward drug interaction (drug-drug/disease-drug), but hardly any information is known about this recently approved drug. Therefore, we first investigated the impact of the arthritis state on the oral pharmacokinetics of EIDD-1931 using a widely accepted complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced rat model of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after ascertaining the disease occurrence by paw swelling measurement and X-ray examination. Comparative oral pharmacokinetic assessment of EIDD-1931 (normal state vs arthritis state) showed that overall plasma exposure was augmented (1.7-fold) with reduced clearance (0.54-fold), suggesting its likelihood of dose adjustment in arthritis conditions. In order to elucidate the effect of EIDD-1931 treatment at a therapeutic regime (normal state vs arthritis state) on USFDA-recommended panel of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4) for drug interaction using the same disease model, we monitored protein and mRNA expressions (rat homologs) in liver tissue by western blotting (WB) and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respectively. Results reveal that EIDD-1931 treatment could strongly influence CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 among experimental proteins/mRNAs. Although CYP2C8 regulation upon EIDD-1931 treatment resembles similar behavior under the arthritis state, results dictate a potentially reverse phenomenon for CYP3A4. Moreover, the lack of any CYP inhibitory effect by EIDD-1931 in human/rat liver microsomes (HLM/RLM) helps to ascertain EIDD-1931 treatment-mediated disease-drug interaction and the possibility of drug-drug interaction with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) upon coadministration. As elevated proinflammatory cytokine levels are prevalent in RA and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) and nuclear receptors control CYP expressions, further studies should focus on understanding the regulation of affected CYPs to subside unexpected drug interaction.

Targeted Systemic Therapies for Adults with Atopic Dermatitis: Selecting from Biologics and JAK Inhibitors

Therapeutic options for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy have rapidly expanded in recent years. These new targeted immunomodulatory agents-biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors-have each demonstrated high levels of efficacy and acceptable safety in mostly placebo-controlled clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, but there is no universally applicable algorithm to help choose between them for a given patient. Hence, patients and physicians should utilize shared decision making, discussing efficacy, safety, mode of delivery, monitoring, costs, speed of onset, and other factors to reach individualized treatment decisions. In this review, we try to aid shared decision making by summarizing the efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for adults with atopic dermatitis. Network meta-analyses suggest that higher doses of abrocitinib and upadacitinib are more effective than biologics. They also show that, among biologics, dupilumab is likely more effective than tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Biologics are generally considered safer than JAK inhibitors, although concerns about JAK inhibitors are mainly extrapolated from older generation JAK inhibitors used in higher-risk populations. We also outline evidence and considerations for choosing and using systemic immunomodulatory treatments for special populations including pregnant individuals, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, end stage kidney disease, and older adults.

Navigating the atopic dermatitis toolbox: Challenging scenarios and shared decision-making

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a complex pathogenesis and heterogeneous clinical presentation. Recently, multiple advanced therapies were approved for the treatment of moderate-severe AD, including the biologics dupilumab, tralokinumab, and lebrikizumab and oral Janus kinase inhibitors abrocitinib, upadacitinib, and baricitinib. These treatments have different efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles and monitoring requirements. The availability of multiple recently approved therapies poses a clinical challenge for health care providers and patients on how to select the best treatment for patients. This article aims to highlight clinical considerations and patient perspectives to guide shared decision-making for biologic and oral systemic therapy, particularly Janus kinase inhibitors, in AD. Important aspects to consider include treatment goals, medical history, symptom severity, physician assessments, safety profile of drugs, and the risk predispositions in patients.

Assessment of interactions and dosage recommendations of synthetic DMARDs-Evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations based on a systematic literature search

Conventional synthetic (cs) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) have potential interactions with a multitude of drugs. Furthermore, they sometimes have a lower therapeutic index, particularly in cases of limited organ functions. The aim of this work was to establish evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic use of DMARDs in the context of drug interactions and dosage recommendations. A systematic literature search was carried out on the issue of drug interactions and dosages in cases of patients with limited kidney function and higher age and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 2756 scientific publications were screened and 154 selected of which 68 were scrutinized in detail. Furthermore, the respective product information was also analyzed. A multitude of possible interactions of synthetic DMARDs with different drugs were detected, which were then assessed with respect to the clinical significance and consequences. A consensus process led to making recommendations with which the interactions were classified: A: dangerous combination, B: avoid combination (if possible, pausing DMARD treatment), C: possible combination requiring increased monitoring and potential adjustments in dosage and D: pharmacological interaction without relevance in DMARD standard doses. Apart from that dosage recommendations were established for each csDMARD and tsDMARD depending on kidney function and age. There are 3 primary recommendations and 11 core recommendations on interactions and dosages of csDMARDs and tsDMARDs meant as a practical help for therapeutic decision making and to improve safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Computational 3D Modeling-Based Identification of Inhibitors Targeting Cysteine Covalent Bond Catalysts for JAK3 and CYP3A4 Enzymes in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

This work aimed to find new inhibitors of the CYP3A4 and JAK3 enzymes, which are significant players in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. Advanced computer-aided drug design techniques, such as pharmacophore and 3D-QSAR modeling, were used. Two strong 3D-QSAR models were created, and their predictive power was validated by the strong correlation (R2 values > 80%) between the predicted and experimental activity. With an ROC value of 0.9, a pharmacophore model grounded in the DHRRR hypothesis likewise demonstrated strong predictive ability. Eight possible inhibitors were found, and six new inhibitors were designed in silico using these computational models. The pharmacokinetic and safety characteristics of these candidates were thoroughly assessed. The possible interactions between the inhibitors and the target enzymes were made clear via molecular docking. Furthermore, MM/GBSA computations and molecular dynamics simulations offered insightful information about the stability of the binding between inhibitors and CYP3A4 or JAK3. Through the integration of various computational approaches, this study successfully identified potential inhibitor candidates for additional investigation and efficiently screened compounds. The findings contribute to our knowledge of enzyme-inhibitor interactions and may help us create more effective treatments for autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis.

Development and validation of a multiplex HPLC-MS/MS assay for the monitoring of JAK inhibitors in patient plasma

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are oral small molecules used in the treatment of a broad spectrum of autoimmune and myeloproliferative diseases. JAKi exhibit significant intra- and inter-individual pharmacokinetic variabilities, due to fluctuations in compliance with oral treatments and their metabolism essentially driven by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Intrinsically, JAKi have dose-response relationship and narrow therapeutic index: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is expected to optimize and adapt their dosage regimen in order to resolve problems of efficacy and tolerance linked to dose and safety. A sensitive analytical method using multiplex high-performance liquid-chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification in plasma of the 6 major currently used JAKi, namely abrocitinib, baricitinib, fedratinib, ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib. Plasma samples are subjected to protein precipitation with MeOH, using stable isotopically labelled internal standards. The separation of JAKi in supernatants diluted 1:1 with ultrapure H2O was performed using a C18 column Xselect HSS T3 2.5 µm, 2.1x150 mm using a mobile phase composed of formic acid (FA) 0.2% and acetonitrile (+FA 0.1%) in gradient mode. The analytical run time for the multiplex assay was 7 min. JAKi drugs were monitored by electrospray ionization in the positive mode followed by triple-stage quadrupole MS/MS analysis. The method was validated according to SFSTP and ICH guidelines over the clinically relevant concentration ranges (0.5-200 ng/mL for abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib; 1-400 ng/mL for tofacitinib; 0.5-400 ng/mL for ruxolitinib, and 10-800 ng/mL for fedratinib). This multiplex HPLC-MS/MS assay achieved good performances in term of trueness (91.1-113.5%), repeatability (3.0-9.9%), and intermediate precision (4.5-11.3%). We developed and validated a highly sensitive method for the multiplex quantification of the JAKi abrocitinib, baricitinib, fedratinib, ruxolitinib, tofacitinib, and upadacitinib in human plasma. The method will be applied for prospective clinical pharmacokinetic studies to determine whether TDM programs for JAKi based on residual drug concentrations can be recommended using disease-specific therapeutic ranges.

Safety and Effectiveness of Tofacitinib in Treating Polyarticular Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Polyarticular course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pcJIA) is a form of arthritis that affects at least five joints at a time and presents before the age of 16. Its most common symptoms are pain, swelling, redness, and a limited range of motion, making it incredibly difficult for patients diagnosed to function in daily life. Historically, the leading treatment options have consisted of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as methotrexate. However, these drugs have serious toxic side effects associated with long-term use in addition to being ineffective in refractory cases. Recently, small molecule biologics have emerged as an alternate treatment to pcJIA. Tofacitinib is a small molecule JAK inhibitor that blocks the JAK/STAT cascade and decreases the transcription of genes responsible for immune function. We conducted a risk-benefit analysis to determine the viability of tofacitinib as a treatment for pcJIA. In our review, we found the side effect profile of tofacitinib to be relatively mild, with many of the serious adverse side effects occurring in those immunocompromised and those with impaired renal and hepatic metabolism. Overall, we have determined that tofacitinib has the potential to be effective in reducing flare-ups and lowering erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in immunocompetent patients with pcJIA. Additionally, our review has found that tofacitinib has the potential to be effective in patients who are refractory to traditional treatment. However, large-scale clinical trials are needed to determine if this effect holds true in younger pediatric populations, as limited data surrounds this demographic.

The prevalence and impact of polypharmacy in rheumatology

Polypharmacy is increasingly common in rheumatology due to the complex nature of managing chronic autoimmune diseases. To date there has been limited research into the impact of polypharmacy on rheumatology patients. In this article we reviewed the literature to characterize the prevalence of polypharmacy and its effect on patients. In addition, we have highlighted some key drug-drug interactions to consider involving DMARDs as well as complementary and alternative medicines. There is emerging evidence demonstrating that polypharmacy contributes to adverse outcomes and alters treatment response. This association is best described in RA and is less clear in other patient cohorts. It is also unclear whether polypharmacy is directly harmful or just a surrogate marker for other factors affecting outcomes. Rheumatologists should be aware of the risk of polypharmacy as well as specific drug-drug interactions that can occur in managing chronic autoimmune disease.

JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors in dermatology

The JAK-STAT signaling pathway mediates important cellular processes such as immune response, carcinogenesis, cell differentiation, division and death. Therefore, drugs that interfere with different JAK-STAT signaling patterns have potential indications for various medical conditions. The main dermatological targets of JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors are inflammatory or autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and alopecia areata; however, several dermatoses are under investigation to expand this list of indications. As JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors should gradually occupy a relevant space in dermatological prescriptions, this review presents the main available drugs, their immunological effects, and their pharmacological characteristics, related to clinical efficacy and safety, aiming to validate the best dermatological practice.

JAK Inhibition in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA): Better Understanding of a Promising Therapy for Refractory Cases

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous group of diseases with probably differential underlying physiopathology. Despite the revolutionary era of biologics, some patients remain difficult to treat because of disease severity, drug adverse events, drug allergy or association with severe comorbidities, i.e., uveitis, interstitial lung disease and macrophagic activation syndrome. Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are small molecules that target JAK/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STAT) pathways, which could then prevent the activity of several proinflammatory cytokines. They may provide a useful alternative in these cases of JIA or in patients actually affected by Mendelian disorders mimicking JIA, such as type I interferonopathies with joint involvement, and might be the bridge for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in these disabling conditions. As these treatments may have side effects that should not be ignored, ongoing and further controlled studies are still needed to provide data underlying long-term safety considerations in children and delineate subsets of JIA patients that will benefit from these promising treatments.

[Assessment of interactions and dosage recommendations of synthetic DMARDs-Evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations based on a systematic literature search]

Conventional synthetic (cs) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) have potential interactions with a multitude of drugs. Furthermore, they sometimes have a lower therapeutic index, particularly in cases of limited organ functions. The aim of this work was to establish evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic use of DMARDs in the context of drug interactions and dosage recommendations. A systematic literature search was carried out on the issue of drug interactions and dosages in cases of patients with limited kidney function and higher age and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 2756 scientific publications were screened and 154 selected of which 68 were scrutinized in detail. Furthermore, the respective specialist subject information was also analyzed. A multitude of possible interactions of synthetic DMARDs with different drugs were detected, which were then assessed with respect to the clinical significance and consequences. A consensus process led to making recommendations with which the interactions were classified: A: dangerous combination, B: avoid combination (if possible, pausing DMARD treatment), C: possible combination requiring increased monitoring and potential adjustments in dosage and D: pharmacological interaction without relevance in DMARD standard doses. Apart from that dosage recommendations were established for each csDMARD and tsDMARD depending on kidney function and age. There are 3 primary recommendations and 11 core recommendations on interactions and dosages of csDMARDs and tsDMARDs meant as a practical help for therapeutic decision making and to improve safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Mass balance study of [14C]SHR0302, a selective and potent JAK1 inhibitor in humans

SHR0302, a selective JAK1 inhibitor developed by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., was intended for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In this study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics, mass balance, and metabolism of SHR0302 in six healthy Chinese male subjects after a single 8 mg (80 µCi) oral dose of [¹⁴C]SHR0302.SHR0302 was absorbed rapidly (T_max = 0.505 h), and the average t_1/2 of the SHR0302-related components in plasma was approximately 9.18 h. After an oral dose was administered, the average cumulative excretion of the radioactive components was 100.56% ± 1.51%, including 60.95% ± 11.62% in urine and 39.61% ± 10.52% in faeces.A total of 16 metabolites were identified. In plasma, the parent drug SHR0302 accounted for 90.42% of the total plasma radioactivity. In urine, SHR161279 was the main metabolite, accounting for 33.61% of the dose, whereas the parent drug SHR0302 only accounted for 5.1% of the dose. In faeces, the parent drug SHR0302 accounted for 23.73% of the dose, and SHR161279 was the significant metabolite, accounting for 5.67% of the dose. In conclusion, SHR0302-related radioactivity was mainly excreted through urine (60.95%) and secondarily through faeces (39.61%).The metabolic reaction of SHR0302 in the human body is mainly through mono-oxidation and glucuronidation. The main metabolic location of SHR0302 in the human body is the pyrrolopyrimidine ring.

Janus kinases inhibitors for coronavirus disease-2019: A pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

JAK (Janus kinases) inhibitors have been proposed as a promising treatment option for the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, the benefits of JAK inhibitors and the optimum thereof for COVID-19 have not been adequately defined.

Methods

Databases were searched from their inception dates to 17 June 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Extracted data were analyzed by pairwise and network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the coefficient of mortality.

Results

Twenty-eight studies of 8,206 patients were included and assessed qualitatively (modified Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale scores). A pairwise meta-analysis revealed that JAK inhibitors effectively reduced the mortality (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.46-0.63; P < 0.00001; I ² = 32%) without increasing the risk of adverse events (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.88-1.18; P = 0.79; I ² = 12%). In a network meta-analysis, clinical efficacy benefits were seen among different types of JAK inhibitors (baricitinib, ruxolitinib, and tofacitinib) without the observation of a declined incidence of adverse events. The assessment of rank probabilities indicated that ruxolitinib presented the greatest likelihood of benefits regarding mortality and adverse events.

Conclusion

JAK inhibitors appear to be a promising treatment for COVID-19 concerning reducing mortality, and they do not increase the risk of adverse events vs. standard of care. A network meta-analysis suggests that mortality benefits are associated with specific JAK inhibitors, and among these, ruxolitinib presents the greatest likelihood of having benefits for mortality and adverse events.

Systematic review registration

[www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42022343338].

Will the Use of Pharmacogenetics Improve Treatment Efficiency in COVID-19?

The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a global health crisis and the greatest challenge for scientists and doctors. The virus causes severe acute respiratory syndrome with an outcome that is fatal in more vulnerable populations. Due to the need to find an efficient treatment in a short time, there were several drugs that were repurposed or repositioned for COVID-19. There are many types of available COVID-19 therapies, including antiviral agents (remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, oseltamivir), antibiotics (azithromycin), antiparasitics (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin), and corticosteroids (dexamethasone). A combination of antivirals with various mechanisms of action may be more efficient. However, the use of some of these medicines can be related to the occurrence of adverse effects. Some promising drug candidates have been found to be ineffective in clinical trials. The knowledge of pharmacogenetic issues, which translate into variability in drug conversion from prodrug into drug, metabolism as well as transport, could help to predict treatment efficiency and the occurrence of adverse effects in patients. However, many drugs used for the treatment of COVID-19 have not undergone pharmacogenetic studies, perhaps as a result of the lack of time.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic combined JAK2 occupancy modelling to simulate PK and PD of baricitinib with kidney transporter inhibitors and in patients with hepatic/renal impairment

PURPOSE

Our aim is to build a physiologically based pharmacokinetic and JAK2 occupancy model (PBPK-JO) to simultaneously predict pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) changes of baricitinib (BAR) in healthy humans when co-administrated with kidney transporters OAT3 and MATE2-K inhibitors, and in patients with hepatic and renal impairment.

METHODS

Probenecid and vandetanib were selected as OAT3 and MATE2-K competitive inhibitors, respectively. The PBPK-JO model was built using physicochemical and biochemical properties of BAR, and then verified by observed clinical PK. Finally, the model was applied to determine optimal dosing regimens in various clinical situations.

RESULTS

Here, we have successfully simulated PK and JAK2 occupancy profiles in humans by PBPK-JO model. Moreover, this modelling reproduced every observed PK data, and every mean relative deviation (MRD) was below 2. The simulation suggested that PK of BAR had a significant change (2.22-fold increase), however PD only had a slight increase of 1.14-fold. Additionally, the simulation also suggested that vandetanib was almost unlikely to affect the PK and PD of BAR. In simulations of hepatic and renal impairment patients, the predictions suggested that significant changes in the PK and PD of BAR occurred. However, there was a lower fold increase in JAK2 occupancy than in PK in patients relative to healthy individuals.

CONCLUSION

Administration dose adjustment of BAR when co-administrated with OAT3 inhibitors or in patients with hepatic or renal impairment should combine PK and PD changes of BAR, instead of only considering PK alteration.

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with conventional, targeted and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the setting of liver injury and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Increased incidence of liver diseases emphasizes greater caution in prescribing antirheumatic drugs due to their hepatotoxicity. A transient elevation of transaminases to autoimmune hepatitis and acute liver failure has been described. For every 10 cases of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation in a clinical trial, it is estimated that one case of more severe liver injury will develop once the investigated drug is widely available. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARDs) are less likely to cause liver damage. However, various manifestations, from a transient elevation of transaminases to autoimmune hepatitis and acute liver failure, have been described. Research on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has provided insight into a pre-existing liver disease that may be worsen by medication. Diabetes and obesity could be an additional burden in drug-induced liver injury (DILI). In the intertwining of the inflammatory and metabolic pathways, the most important cytokines are IL-6 and TNF alpha, which are also the cornerstone of biological treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. This narrative review evaluates the complexity and prevention of DILI in RA and treatment options involving biological therapy and tsDMARDs.

Pharmacogenetics and Precision Medicine Approaches for the Improvement of COVID-19 Therapies

Many drugs are being administered to tackle coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic situations without establishing clinical effectiveness or tailoring safety. A repurposing strategy might be more effective and successful if pharmacogenetic interventions are being considered in future clinical studies/trials. Although it is very unlikely that there are almost no pharmacogenetic data for COVID-19 drugs, however, from inferring the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic(PD) properties and some pharmacogenetic evidence in other diseases/clinical conditions, it is highly likely that pharmacogenetic associations are also feasible in at least some COVID-19 drugs. We strongly mandate to undertake a pharmacogenetic assessment for at least these drug-gene pairs (atazanavir-UGT1A1, ABCB1, SLCO1B1, APOA5; efavirenz-CYP2B6; nevirapine-HLA, CYP2B6, ABCB1; lopinavir-SLCO1B3, ABCC2; ribavirin-SLC28A2; tocilizumab-FCGR3A; ivermectin-ABCB1; oseltamivir-CES1, ABCB1; clopidogrel-CYP2C19, ABCB1, warfarin-CYP2C9, VKORC1; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-CYP2C9) in COVID-19 patients for advancing precision medicine. Molecular docking and computational studies are promising to achieve new therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The current situation in the discovery of anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents at four important targets from in silico studies has been described and summarized in this review. Although natural occurring compounds from different herbs against SARS-CoV-2 infection are favorable, however, accurate experimental investigation of these compounds is warranted to provide insightful information. Moreover, clinical considerations of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and drug-herb interactions (DHIs) of the existing repurposed drugs along with pharmacogenetic (e.g., efavirenz and CYP2B6) and herbogenetic (e.g., andrographolide and CYP2C9) interventions, collectively called multifactorial drug-gene interactions (DGIs), may further accelerate the development of precision COVID-19 therapies in the real-world clinical settings.

Simultaneous measurement of upadacitinib and methotrexate by UPLC-MS/MS and its pharmacokinetic application in rats

Upadacitinib, as a selective and reversible Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has been widely used in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, ulcerative colitis and other inflammatory bowel diseases and other immune-mediated diseases. The combination of methotrexate and upadacitinib is a common clinical treatment strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in recent years. In this study, we established an ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) assay for quantitative measurement of upadacitinib and methotrexate, by which we successfully determined pharmacokinetic parameters of them in rat plasma. In order to pretreat the samples, we used acetonitrile as the precipitant, and for the internal standard (IS), we chose tofacitinib. The Acquity BEHC18 (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) column, with acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution composed mobile phases, was used to separate upadacitinib, methotrexate and tofacitinib. A Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer was used as the detecting instrument in the positive ion mode. For upadacitinib, excellent linearity was shown of this assay in the calibration range with 0.1-200 ng/mL, and as for methotrexate, the range was 0.05-100 ng/mL. As the results indicated, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was respectively 0.1 and 0.05 ng/mL for upadacitinib and methotrexate, the intra- and inter-day precision were ≤ 13.3%, and the accuracy of all the analytes ranged from -4.1% to 12.7%. The recovery of each analyte was > 80.2% in this experiment, and matrix effects we observed were unobvious. The establishment of this method and its successful application in rat plasma can provide a theoretical and technical support for the deeper study of pharmacodynamics and the clinical medication strategies.

Emerging Place of JAK Inhibitors in the Treatment of Inborn Errors of Immunity

Among inborn errors of immunity (IEIs), some conditions are characterized by inflammation and autoimmunity at the front line and are particularly challenging to treat. Monogenic diseases associated with gain-of-function mutations in genes critical for cytokine signaling through the JAK-STAT pathway belong to this group. These conditions represent good candidates for treatment with JAK inhibitors. Type I interferonopathies, a group of recently identified monogenic auto-inflammatory diseases characterized by excessive secretion of type I IFN, are also good candidates with growing experiences reported in the literature. However, many questions remain regarding the choice of the drug, the dose (in particular in children), the efficacy on the various manifestations, the monitoring of the treatment, and the management of potent side effects in particular in patients with infectious susceptibility. This review will summarize the current experiences reported and will highlight the unmet needs.

Clinical translation of immunomodulatory therapeutics

Immunomodulatory therapeutics represent a unique class of drug products that have tremendous potential to rebalance malfunctioning immune systems and are quickly becoming one of the fastest-growing areas in the pharmaceutical industry. For these drugs to become mainstream medicines, they must provide greater therapeutic benefit than the currently used treatments without causing severe toxicities. Immunomodulators, cell-based therapies, antibodies, and viral therapies have all achieved varying amounts of success in the treatment of cancers and/or autoimmune diseases. However, many challenges related to precision dosing, off-target effects, and manufacturing hurdles will need to be addressed before we see widespread adoption of these therapies in the clinic. This review provides a perspective on the progress of immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive therapies to date and discusses the opportunities and challenges for clinical translation of the next generation of immunomodulatory therapeutics.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Coronavirus Disease (COVID)-19: Rationale, Clinical Evidence and Safety Issues

We are witnessing a paradigm shift in drug development and clinical practice to fight the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and a number of clinical trials have been or are being testing various pharmacological approaches to counteract viral load and its complications such as cytokine storm. However, data on the effectiveness of antiviral and immune therapies are still inconclusive and inconsistent. As compared to other candidate drugs to treat COVID-19, Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including baricitinib and ruxolitinib, possess key pharmacological features for a potentially successful repurposing: convenient oral administration, favorable pharmacokinetic profile, multifunctional pharmacodynamics by exerting dual anti-inflammatory and anti-viral effects. Baricitinib, originally approved for rheumatoid arthritis, received Emergency Use Authorization in November 2020 by the Food and Drug Administration in combination with remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients ≥ 2 years old who require supplemental oxygen, invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. By July 2021, the European Medicines Agency is also expected to issue the opinion on whether or not to extend its use in hospitalised patients from 10 years of age who require supplemental oxygen. Ruxolitinib, approved for myelofibrosis, was prescribed in patients with COVID-19 within an open-label Emergency Expanded Access Plan. This review will address key milestones in the discovery and use of JAK inhibitors in COVID-19, from artificial intelligence to current clinical evidence, including real world experience, and critically appraise emerging safety issues, namely infections, thrombosis, and liver injury. An outlook to ongoing studies (ClinicalTrials.gov) and unpublished pharmacovigilance data is also offered.

Recent Developments in the Use of Kinase Inhibitors for Management of Viral Infections

Kinases are a group of therapeutic targets involved in the progression of numerous diseases, including cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, and viral infections. The majority of approved antiviral agents are inhibitors of virus-specific targets that are encoded by individual viruses. These inhibitors are narrow-spectrum agents that can cause resistance development. Viruses are dependent on host cellular proteins, including kinases, for progression of their life-cycle. Thus, targeting kinases is an important therapeutic approach to discovering broad-spectrum antiviral agents. As there are a large number of FDA approved kinase inhibitors for various indications, their repurposing for viral infections is an attractive and time-sparing strategy. Many kinase inhibitors, including baricitinib, ruxolitinib, imatinib, tofacitinib, pacritinib, zanubrutinib, and ibrutinib, are under clinical investigation for COVID-19. Herein, we discuss FDA approved kinase inhibitors, along with a repertoire of clinical/preclinical stage kinase inhibitors that possess antiviral activity or are useful in the management of viral infections.

Working and safety profiles of JAK/STAT signaling inhibitors. Are these small molecules also smart?

The Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) pathway is an important intracellular route through which many different extracellular soluble molecules, by reaching membrane receptors, can signal the nucleus. The spectrum of soluble molecules that use the JAK/STAT pathway through their corresponding receptors is quite large (almost 50 different molecules), and includes some cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of many immune-mediated diseases. Such diseases, when left untreated, present an evident hyperactivation of JAK/STAT signaling. Therefore, given the pathogenetic role of JAK/STAT, drugs known as JAK inhibitors (JAKi), that target one or more JAKs, have been developed to counteract JAK/STAT signal hyperactivation. As some hematological malignancies present an intrinsic JAK/STAT hyperactivation due to a JAK mutation, some JAKi have also been successfully used in this context. Regulatory agencies for drug administration in different countries have already approved a few JAKi in the setting of either immune-mediated diseases or hematological malignancies. Aim of this review is to describe the physiology of intracellular JAK/STAT pathway signaling and the pathological conditions associated to its dysregulation. Then, the rationale for targeting JAK in rheumatic autoimmune diseases is discussed, along with clinical data from registration studies showing the efficacy of these drugs. Finally, the excellent safety profile of JAKi is discussed in the context of the apparent poor specificity of JAK/STAT pathway signal.

Minor immunosuppressive spiroorthoester group-containing pregnane glycosides from the root barks of Periploca sepium

LC-MS guided chemical investigation of the periploside-rich extract of the root barks of Periploca sepium afforded six new minor pregnane glycosides, named periplosides A1-A6 (1-6). Their structures were characterized on the basis of extensive spectroscopic analysis. Compounds 1-6 were evaluated for their inhibitory activities against the proliferation of T and B lymphocytes in vitro, among them, compound 5 exhibited significant inhibitory activities and the most favorite selective index (SI) values against the proliferation of T lymphocyte (IC₅₀ = 0.30 μM, SI = 176) and B lymphocyte (IC₅₀ = 0.55 μM, SI = 97).

Interactions of janus kinase inhibitors with drug transporters and consequences for pharmacokinetics and toxicity

Introduction: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) constitute an emerging and promising pharmacological class of anti-inflammatory or anti-cancer drugs, used notably for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and some myeloproliferative neoplasms.Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the interactions between marketed JAKinibs and major uptake and efflux drug transporters. Consequences regarding pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions and toxicity are summarized.Expert opinion: JAKinibs interact in vitro with transporters in various ways, as inhibitors or as substrates of transporters or as regulators of transporter expression. This may theoretically result in drug-drug interactions (DDIs), with JAKinibs acting as perpetrators or as victims, or in toxicity, via impairment of thiamine transport. Clinical significance in terms of DDIs for JAKinib-transporter interactions remains however poorly documented. In this context, the in vivo unbound concentration of JAKinibs is likely a key parameter to consider for evaluating the clinical relevance of JAKinibs-mediated transporter inhibition. Additionally, the interplay with drug metabolism as well as possible interactions with transporters of emerging importance and time-dependent inhibition have to be taken into account. The role drug transporters may play in controlling cellular JAKinib concentrations and efficacy in target cells is also an issue of interest.

Old Problem, New Concerns: Hypercortisolemia in the Time of COVID-19

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced a change in the way we provide medical treatment. Endocrinology in the era of COVID-19 had to transform and reduce its vast potential to the absolute necessities. Medical professionals needed to update their clinical practice to provide their patients as much support and as little harm as possible in these increasingly difficult times. International expert statements were published to offer guidance regarding proper care. It was suggested to simplify the diagnostic scheme of hypercortisolemia and to modify the approach to treatment. Hypercortisolemic patients with COVID-19 and iatrogenic hypercortisolemia due to glucocorticoid use are important clinical scenarios - we aimed to provide a cohesive summary of issues to consider.

Multidisciplinary Guidance Regarding the Use of Immunomodulatory Therapies for Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Immune-mediated lung injury and systemic hyperinflammation are characteristic of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults. Although the majority of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections in pediatric populations result in minimal or mild COVID-19 in the acute phase of infection, a small subset of children develop severe and even critical disease in this phase with concomitant inflammation that may benefit from immunomodulation. Therefore, guidance is needed regarding immunomodulatory therapies in the setting of acute pediatric COVID-19. This document does not provide guidance regarding the recently emergent multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of pediatric subspecialty physicians and pharmacists with expertise in infectious diseases, rheumatology, hematology/oncology, and critical care medicine was convened. Guidance statements were developed based on best available evidence and expert opinion.

RESULTS

The panel devised a framework for considering the use of immunomodulatory therapy based on an assessment of clinical disease severity and degree of multiorgan involvement combined with evidence of hyperinflammation. Additionally, the known rationale for consideration of each immunomodulatory approach and the associated risks and benefits was summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunomodulatory therapy is not recommended for the majority of pediatric patients, who typically develop mild or moderate COVID-19. For children with severe or critical illness, the use of immunomodulatory agents may be beneficial. The risks and benefits of such therapies are variable and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with input from appropriate specialty services. When available, the panel strongly favors immunomodulatory agent use within the context of clinical trials. The framework presented herein offers an approach to decision-making regarding immunomodulatory therapy for severe or critical pediatric COVID-19 and is informed by currently available data, while awaiting results of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials.

JAK out of the Box; The Rationale behind Janus Kinase Inhibitors in the COVID-19 setting, and their potential in obese and diabetic populations

The adaptive use of Janus kinase (JAK)-inhibitors has been suggested by rheumatology experts in the management of COVID-19. We recount the rationale behind their use in this setting, and the current evidence for and against their use in this review. JAK-inhibitors role in COVID-19 infection appears to be multifaceted, including preventing viral endocytosis and dampening the effect of excessive chemokines. This drug class may be able to achieve these effects at already preapproved dosages. Concerns arise regarding reactivation of latent viral infections and the feasibility of their use in those with severe disease. Most interestingly, JAK-Inhibitors may also have an additional advantage for diabetic and obese populations, where the dysregulation of JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway may be responsible for their increased risk of poor outcomes. Targeting this pathway may provide a therapeutic advantage for these patient groups.

Tofacitinib, the First Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor Approved for Adult Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by chronic gastrointestinal inflammation. In most patients, the disease cycles through periods of remission and exacerbations. The complex etiology involves multiple factors including environmental, genetic, and immune causal elements. Janus Kinase (JAK) family is an essential component of a cytokine-signaling cascade partially responsible for the pathogenesis of UC. Treating UC presents difficulties despite various therapeutic options. Medications that block the JAK-signaling pathway can interfere with the inflammatory pathway of UC and possibly reduce symptoms and frequency of exacerbations. Tofacitinib is an oral pan-JAK inhibitor, primarily of JAK1 and JAK3, that was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the chronic treatment of UC in 2018. The following review describes the newly approved Janus kinase inhibitor, tofacitinib, including its pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy and safety data, and potential place in therapy.