1
|
Sackley CM, Rick C, Brady MC, Burton C, Jowett S, Patel S, Woolley R, Masterson-Algar P, Nicoll A, Smith CH, Abdali Z, Ives N, Beaton G, Dickson S, Ottridge R, Nankervis H, Clarke CE. The effect of two speech and language approaches on speech problems in people with Parkinson's disease: the PD COMM RCT. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-141. [PMID: 39364774 DOI: 10.3310/adwp8001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Speech impairments are common with Parkinson's disease (reported prevalence 68%), increasing conversational demands, reliance on family and social withdrawal. Objective(s) The PD COMM trial compared the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two speech and language therapy approaches: Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD and National Health Service speech and language therapy for the treatment of speech or voice problems in people with Parkinson's disease to no speech and language therapy (control) and against each other. Design PD COMM is a phase III, multicentre, three-arm, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomised in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio to control, National Health Service speech and language therapy or Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD via a central computer-generated programme, using a minimisation procedure with a random element, to ensure allocation concealment. Mixed-methods process and health economic evaluations were conducted. Setting United Kingdom outpatient and home settings. Participants People with idiopathic Parkinson's disease, with self-reported or carer-reported speech or voice problems. We excluded people with dementia, laryngeal pathology and those within 24 months of previous speech and language therapy. Interventions The Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD intervention included maximum effort drills and high-effort speech production tasks delivered over four 50-minute therapist-led personalised sessions per week, for 4 weeks with prescribed daily home practice. National Health Service speech and language therapy content and dosage reflected local non-Lee Silverman Voice Treatment speech and language therapy practices, usually 1 hour, once weekly, for 6 weeks. Trained, experienced speech and language therapists or assistants provided interventions. The control was no speech and language therapy until the trial was completed. Main outcome measures Primary outcome: Voice Handicap Index total score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes: Voice Handicap Index subscales, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39; Questionnaire on Acquired Speech Disorders; EuroQol-5D-5L; ICEpop Capabilities Measure for Older Adults; Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - Carers; resource utilisation; and adverse events. Assessments were completed pre-randomisation and at 3, 6 and 12 months post randomisation. Results Three hundred and eighty-eight participants were randomised to Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD (n = 130), National Health Service speech and language therapy (n = 129) and control (n = 129). The impact of voice problems at 3 months after randomisation was lower for Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD participants than control [-8.0 (99% confidence interval: -13.3, -2.6); p = 0.001]. There was no evidence of improvement for those with access to National Health Service speech and language therapy when compared to control [1.7 (99% confidence interval: -3.8, 7.1); p = 0.4]. Participants randomised to Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD reported a lower impact of their voice problems than participants randomised to National Health Service speech and language therapy [99% confidence interval: -9.6 (-14.9, -4.4); p < 0.0001]. There were no reports of serious adverse events. Staff were confident with the trial interventions; a range of patient and therapist enablers of implementing Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD were identified. The economic evaluation results suggested Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD was more expensive and more effective than control or National Health Service speech and language therapy but was not cost-effective with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £197,772 per quality-adjusted life-year gained and £77,017 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. Limitations The number of participants recruited to the trial did not meet the pre-specified power. Conclusions People that had access to Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD described a significantly greater reduction in the impact of their Parkinson's disease-related speech problems 3 months after randomisation compared to people that had no speech and language therapy. There was no evidence of a difference between National Health Service speech and language therapy and those that received no speech and language therapy. Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD resulted in a significantly lower impact of voice problems compared to National Health Service speech and language therapy 3 months after randomisation which was still present after 12 months; however, Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD was not found to be cost-effective. Future work Implementing Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD in the National Health Service and identifying alternatives to Lee Silverman Voice Treatment LOUD for those who cannot tolerate it. Investigation of less costly alternative options for Lee Silverman Voice Treatment delivery require investigation, with economic evaluation using a preference-based outcome measure that captures improvement in communication. Study registration This study is registered as ISRCTN12421382. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 10/135/02) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 58. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M Sackley
- Population Health Sciences, Addison House, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK
- School of Health Science, University of Nottingham, QMC, Nottingham, UK
| | - Caroline Rick
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marian C Brady
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christopher Burton
- School of Allied and Public Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Sue Jowett
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Smitaa Patel
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rebecca Woolley
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Avril Nicoll
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christina H Smith
- Division of Psychology and Language Science, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Zainab Abdali
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Natalie Ives
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gillian Beaton
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sylvia Dickson
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ryan Ottridge
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Helen Nankervis
- Population Health Sciences, Addison House, King's College London, Guy's Campus, London, UK
| | - Carl E Clarke
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Neurology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Darbà J, Ascanio M, Agüera A. Assessing a decade of leukaemia-related premature mortality costs: impact on productivity loss in Spain. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024:10.1007/s10198-024-01727-6. [PMID: 39340748 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01727-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 09/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer mortality is one of the dominant causes of productivity loss; and within all cancer sites, blood cancer is the fourth most common cause of death in Spain. Thus, its impacts in work productivity are a major concern and represent a high social impact. The aim of this study was to evaluate the productivity losses resulting from of premature deaths due to leukaemia in Spain. METHODS The productivity costs stemming from premature mortality due to leukaemia were estimated using the human capital method. Information pertaining to mortality rates, typical incomes, and joblessness figures was gathered throughout a decade-long period spanning from 2012 to 2021. RESULTS Leukaemia caused 40% of haematological malignancies losses. It represented a 3.39% of all cancer-related deaths. In addition, it was responsible for 7,851 years of potential productive life lost (YPLPLL) in 2021, and productivity losses of €4,206.52 million over the 10-year period. All these numbers are relevant for Spain as will help on a more efficient distribution of resource. CONCLUSIONS These productivity losses obtained, highlight the burden of leukaemia on the Spanish population, providing novel data on the number of deaths, trends and productivity losses for this type of cancer. This evaluation offers fresh insights that can aid policymakers in efficiently distributing resources, thereby lessening the economic burden it imposes on individuals of working age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep Darbà
- Department of Economics, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 696, Barcelona, 08034, Spain.
| | - Meritxell Ascanio
- BCN Health Economics & Outcomes Research S.L. Travessera de Gràcia, 62, Barcelona, 08006, Spain
| | - Ainoa Agüera
- BCN Health Economics & Outcomes Research S.L. Travessera de Gràcia, 62, Barcelona, 08006, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aranda-Reneo I, Oliva-Moreno J, Peña-Longobardo LM, Villar-Hernández ÁR, López-Bastida J. Economic burden and health-related quality of life in patients with epidermolysis bullosa in Spain. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2024; 19:352. [PMID: 39313783 PMCID: PMC11421099 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03328-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND . Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic skin disorder characterized by fragility of skin with appearance of acute and chronic wounds. The aim of this study was to determine the economic burden and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) in Spain from a societal perspective. METHODS . We conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective study including 62 patients with EB (62% dystrophic, 9.6% junctional, 3.2% Kindler syndrome, and 26% with simplex EB). Data were collected from questionnaires completed by patients or their caregivers. The costs were estimated, including not only direct healthcare costs but also direct non-healthcare costs and productivity losses. We compared severe EB (Dystrophic, Junctional EB and Kindler syndrome) to non-severe EB (simplex EB) using as reference year 2022. HRQoL was measured by generic (EQ-5D) and specific (QoLEB) questionnaires. RESULTS The average annual cost for an EB patient was €31,352. Direct healthcare costs represented 17.2% of the total cost, direct non-healthcare costs (mainly informal care costs) 71.3% and productivity losses 11.5% of the total cost. Participants in the severe EB group had a slightly higher average cost than participants in the non-severe EB group (€31,706 vs. €30,337). Direct healthcare costs and non-healthcare costs were higher in the severe EB group (€6,205 vs. €3,024 and €23,148 vs. €20,113) while productivity losses were higher in the non-severe EB group (€7,200 vs. €2,353). The mean utility index score, where the maximum value possible is one, was 0.45 for patients with severe EB (0.76 for their caregivers) and 0.62 for those with non-severe EB (0.77 for their caregivers). CONCLUSIONS . The social economic burden of EB, resulting from the high direct non-healthcare cost of informal care, and from the loss of productivity, accentuates the importance of not restricting cost analysis to direct healthcare costs. This substantiates that EB, particularly severe EB represents a significant hidden cost that should be revealed to society and should be considered in the support programmes for people who suffer from this disease, and in the economic evaluation of new treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Aranda-Reneo
- Economic Analysis and Finance Department, Faculty of Social Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Talavera de la Reina, 45600, Spain
| | - Juan Oliva-Moreno
- Economic Analysis and Finance Department, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, 45071, Spain
| | - Luz María Peña-Longobardo
- Economic Analysis and Finance Department, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, 45071, Spain.
| | | | - Julio López-Bastida
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Talavera de la Reina, 45600, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kwon J, Milne R, Rayner C, Rocha Lawrence R, Mullard J, Mir G, Delaney B, Sivan M, Petrou S. Impact of Long COVID on productivity and informal caregiving. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:1095-1115. [PMID: 38146040 PMCID: PMC11377524 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01653-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Around 2 million people in the UK suffer from Long COVID (LC). Of concern is the disease impact on productivity and informal care burden. This study aimed to quantify and value productivity losses and informal care receipt in a sample of LC patients in the UK. METHODS The target population comprised LC patients referred to LC specialist clinics. The questionnaires included a health economics questionnaire (HEQ) measuring productivity impacts, informal care receipt and service utilisation, EQ-5D-5L, C19-YRS LC condition-specific measure, and sociodemographic and COVID-19 history variables. Outcomes were changes from the incident infection resulting in LC to the month preceding the survey in paid work status/h, work income, work performance and informal care receipt. The human capital approach valued productivity losses; the proxy goods method valued caregiving hours. The values were extrapolated nationally using published prevalence data. Multilevel regressions, nested by region, estimated associations between the outcomes and patient characteristics. RESULTS 366 patients responded to HEQ (mean LC duration 449.9 days). 51.7% reduced paid work hours relative to the pre-infection period. Mean monthly work income declined by 24.5%. The average aggregate value of productivity loss since incident infection was £10,929 (95% bootstrap confidence interval £8,844-£13,014) and £5.7 billion (£3.8-£7.6 billion) extrapolated nationally. The corresponding values for informal caregiving were £8,726 (£6,247-£11,204) and £4.8 billion (£2.6-£7.0 billion). Multivariate analyses found significant associations between each outcome and health utility and C19-YRS subscale scores. CONCLUSION LC significantly impacts productivity losses and provision of informal care, exacerbated by high national prevalence of LC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Kwon
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
| | - Ruairidh Milne
- Public Health, Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, England
| | - Clare Rayner
- Locomotion Patient Advisory Group (Co-Lead), University of Leeds, Leeds, England
| | | | - Jordan Mullard
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
- Department of Sociology, University of Durham, Durham, England
| | - Ghazala Mir
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
| | - Brendan Delaney
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
| | - Manoj Sivan
- Academic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laflamme OD, Johnson N, Steele K, Chavez L, Cheng SY, Rabin HR, Cheema ZM, Mamic E, Gomez LC, Leong J, Quon BS, Sadatsafavi M, Stephenson AL, Wranik WD, Eckford PDW, Wallenburg J, Bowerman C, Stanojevic S. Socioeconomic burden of cystic fibrosis in Canada. BMJ Open Respir Res 2024; 11:e002309. [PMID: 39122474 PMCID: PMC11331897 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cost of illness studies are important tools to summarise the burden of disease for individuals, the healthcare system and society. The lack of standardised methods for reporting costs for cystic fibrosis (CF) makes it difficult to quantify the total socioeconomic burden. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively report the socioeconomic burden of CF in Canada. METHODS The total cost of CF in Canada was calculated by triangulating information from three sources (Canadian CF Registry, customised Burden of Disease survey and publicly available information). A prevalence-based, bottom-up, human capital approach was applied, and costs were categorised into four perspectives (ie, healthcare system, individual/caregiver, variable (ie, medicines) and society) and three domains (ie, direct, indirect and intangible). All costs were converted into 2021 Canadian dollars (CAD) and adjusted for inflation. The cost of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies was excluded. RESULTS The total socioeconomic burden of CF in Canada in 2021 across the four perspectives was $C414 million. Direct costs accounted for two-thirds of the total costs, with medications comprising half of all direct costs. Out-of-pocket costs to individuals and caregivers represented 18.7% of all direct costs. Indirect costs representing absenteeism accounted for one-third of the total cost. CONCLUSION This comprehensive cost of illness study for CF represents a community-oriented approach describing the socioeconomic burden of living with CF and serves as a benchmark for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier D Laflamme
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Noah Johnson
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Kim Steele
- Cystic Fibrosis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Luis Chavez
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Harvey R Rabin
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Zain M Cheema
- Cystic Fibrosis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eunice Mamic
- Cystic Fibrosis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lilian C Gomez
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Jeanette Leong
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bradley S Quon
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
- Respiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Anne L Stephenson
- Division of Respirology, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - W Dominika Wranik
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Department of Public and International Affairs, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | | | - Cole Bowerman
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sanja Stanojevic
- Department of Community Health, and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hansen JL, Wangen KR. Trajectories of opioid use among patients with low back pain: Association to work absence. Eur J Pain 2024. [PMID: 39092517 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a leading reason for opioid use and a closer examination of opioid use and productivity losses among these patients is needed. We identify opioid use trajectories using a group-based trajectory model (GBTM) and estimate productivity losses across the trajectories. METHODS Patients diagnosed with LBP in Swedish specialty care between 2011 and 2015, between the ages of 20 and 60, were included. Two GBTMs were estimated on monthly opioid use (converted to oral morphine equivalents) during the two 12-month periods preceding and following diagnosis. Productivity losses were estimated using the human-capital approach. RESULTS In total, 147,035 patients were included. The mean age at diagnosis was 43 years of age and 49% of the patients were male. A qualitative assessment of the identified groups in the GBTM models was made based on the patterns of opioid use. We chose three pre-diagnosis groups characterized as 'Pre-low' (N = 109,492), 'Pre-increase' (N = 27,336) and 'Pre-high' (N = 10,207). Similarly, four post-diagnosis groups were chosen and characterized as 'Post-low' (N = 73,287), 'Post-decrease' (N = 39,446), 'Post-moderate' (N = 20,001) and 'Post-high' (N = 13,595). Only 50% of the patients in the 'Pre-high' group were in the 'Post-high' group. The total productivity losses by the pre-diagnosis groups were more than 2.7 billion Euros over the total 6-year study period. CONCLUSION This study highlights how patients with LBP and high use of opioids are highly correlated before and after diagnosis. Patients with high use of opioids also exhibit high work absence and productivity losses. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This was the first study to estimate trajectories of opioids in the two time periods before and after a diagnosis of low back pain. For the first time, productivity losses were also estimated across the identified opioid use trajectories.
Collapse
|
7
|
Setiawan E, Cassidy-Seyoum SA, Thriemer K, Carvalho N, Devine A. A Systematic Review of Methods for Estimating Productivity Losses due to Illness or Caregiving in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:865-877. [PMID: 38874846 PMCID: PMC11249595 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01402-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Productivity losses are often included in costing studies and economic evaluations to provide a comprehensive understanding of the economic burden of disease. Global guidance on estimating productivity losses is sparse, especially for low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) where informal and unpaid work remains dominant. This study aims to describe current practices for valuing productivity losses in LMICs. METHODS We performed a systematic review of studies published before April 2022 using three databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection. We included any costing or economic evaluation study conducted in a LMIC that provided methodological details on how the monetary value for productivity losses was estimated. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the quality of the studies. RESULTS A total of 281 articles were included. While most studies did not specify the overall approach used to measure and value productivity losses (58%), the human capital approach was the most frequently used approach to measure productivity losses when this was clearly stated (39%). The most common methods to estimate a monetary value for productivity losses were market wages (51%), self-reported wages (28%) and macroeconomic measures (15%). CONCLUSION Reporting standards for productivity losses in LMIC settings have room for improvement. While market wages were the most frequently used method to estimate the monetary value of productivity losses, this relies on context-specific data availability. Until a consensus is reached on if, when and how to include productivity losses in costing and economic evaluation studies, future studies could include a sensitivity analysis to explore the impact of different methods for estimating the monetary value of productivity losses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ery Setiawan
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
| | - Sarah A Cassidy-Seyoum
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
| | - Kamala Thriemer
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia
| | - Natalie Carvalho
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Angela Devine
- Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oliva-Moreno J, Vilaplana-Prieto C. Social costs associated with fibromyalgia in Spain. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2024; 14:51. [PMID: 38997577 PMCID: PMC11245780 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00527-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fibromyalgia is a chronic rheumatic disease of unknown aetiology, highly disabling and mainly affecting women. The aim of our work is to estimate, on a national scale, the economic impact of this disease on the employment of patients and non-professional (informal) care dimension. METHODS Survey on Disabilities, Autonomy and Dependency carried out in Spain in 2020/21 was used to obtain information on disabled individuals with AD and their informal caregivers. Six estimation scenarios were defined as base case, depending on whether the maximum daily informal caregiving time was censored or not, and on the approach chosen for the valuation of informal caregiving time (contingent valuation and replacement time). Another six conservative scenarios were developed using the minimum wage for the estimation of labour losses. RESULTS Our estimates range from 2,443.6 (willingness to pay, censored informal care time) to 7,164.8 million euros (replacement cost, uncensored informal care time) (base year 2021). Multivariate analyses identified that the degree of dependency of the person suffering from fibromyalgia is the main explanatory variable for both the probability of being employed and the time spent in informal care. Conservative scenarios estimates range from 1,807 to 6,528 million euros. CONCLUSIONS The high economic impact revealed should help to position a health problem that is relatively unknown in society and for which there are significant research and care gaps to be filled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Oliva-Moreno
- Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, Departamento de Análisis Económico y Finanzas, 45071, Toledo, Spain.
- CIBER de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tanaka A, Yuasa A, Kamei K, Nagano M, Murofushi T, Bjerke A, Nakamura K, Ikeda S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of abrocitinib compared with standard of care in adult moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in Japan. J Dermatol 2024; 51:759-771. [PMID: 38650307 DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.17234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a significant clinical, economic, and human burden. The JAK1 Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy and Safety (JADE) program's Phase 3 trials demonstrated that as a treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in adults with previous exposure to immunotherapy, abrocitinib showed superior efficacy and safety compared with standard of care (SoC), consisting of topical corticosteroids. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of abrocitinib with SoC versus SoC alone for this patient population in Japan from a societal perspective. A hybrid decision tree and Markov model were used to capture the initial treatment and long-term maintenance phases. Clinical inputs at 16 weeks were obtained through a Bayesian network meta-analysis of four pivotal trials from the JADE program. Clinical inputs at 52 weeks were derived from the JADE EXTEND trial. Response-specific utility inputs were obtained from published literature. Resource use, costs, and productivity inputs were gathered from Japanese claims analysis, literature, public documents, and expert opinion. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 2.0% per year and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to validate the base case results and explore a payer perspective. Over a lifetime horizon and with the base-case societal perspective, abrocitinib produced a mean gain of 0.75 QALYs, incremental costs of JPY (¥) 2 270 386 (USD [$] 17 265.6), and a resulting ICER of ¥3 034 514 ($23 076.5) per QALY compared with SoC. From a payer perspective, the incremental costs increased to ¥4 476 777 ($34 044.4), with an ICER of ¥5 983 495 ($45 502.6) per QALY. The results were most sensitive to treatment-specific, response-based utility weights, drug costs, and productivity-related inputs. From a Japanese societal perspective, abrocitinib demonstrated superior QALYs and with a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥5 000 000 ($38 023.4) per QALY, can be considered cost-effective compared with SoC as a treatment for moderate-to-severe AD in adult patients with previous immunosuppressant exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akio Tanaka
- Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Akira Yuasa
- Japan Access & Value, Pfizer Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Annika Bjerke
- Modeling and Analytics, Lumanity, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Shunya Ikeda
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Augustin M, Beier D, Branner J, Häckl D, Hampel R, Kramps T, Kurzen H, Lintener H, Melzer N, Müller M, Staubach P, Schwichtenberg U, Termeer C, Zink A, Nathan P, Maurer M. The socio-economic burden of H1-antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria in Germany. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024. [PMID: 38733261 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM Data from the AWARE study (A Worldwide Antihistamine-Refractory chronic urticaria patient Evaluation) illustrate a substantial disease burden in German patients with H1-antihistamine (-H1-AH)-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Detrimental effects on patients' quality of life, poor disease control and impairment in the ability to work and perform other daily activities are reported. Based on these findings, this study aims to quantify the epidemiological and socio-economic burden of H1-AH-refractory CSU in Germany. METHODS To determine the epidemiological burden of H1-AH-refractory CSU, the age- and gender-specific prevalence of CSU and the proportion of H1-AH-refractory patients in Germany anonymized data from the InGef research database have been used. In a second step, the socio-economic burden in terms of lost numbers of hours in paid and unpaid work was calculated by extrapolating the age- and gender-specific work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) observed in AWARE to the H1-AH-refractory CSU population in Germany. Finally, productivity losses in paid and unpaid work were monetized using the human capital and the friction cost approach respectively. Moreover, socio-economic burden was calculated depending on symptom control of the patients (measured by urticaria control test [UCT]). RESULTS In Germany, over 203,000 patients (20 years or older) had H1-AH-refractory CSU in 2018. The avoided lost paid and unpaid work hours attributable to H1-AH-refractory CSU summed up to over 100 million. Overall, the socio-economic burden of H1-AH-refractory CSU in monetary terms was evaluated at € 2.2 billion and the majority of this was due to unpaid work loss. Patients with poor disease control, as indicated by UCT score < 12, were more likely to suffer from high impairment than patients with controlled disease, resulting in a higher socio-economic burden. CONCLUSION The results of our analyses picture the substantial socio-economic burden of H1-AH-refractory CSU and therefore the tremendous impact it has on daily lives of individuals and society overall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dominik Beier
- InGef-Institut für angewandte Gesundheitsforschung Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Dennis Häckl
- WIG2 Wissenschaftliches Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Gesundheitssystemforschung Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Petra Staubach
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Christian Termeer
- Practice, Stuttgart, Germany
- Department of Dermatology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Zink
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie am Biederstein, Fakultät für Medizin, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
- Division of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Marcus Maurer
- Institute of Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martinez MF, Weatherwax C, Piercy K, Whitley MA, Bartsch SM, Heneghan J, Fox M, Bowers MT, Chin KL, Velmurugan K, Dibbs A, Smith AL, Pfeiffer KA, Farrey T, Tsintsifas A, Scannell SA, Lee BY. Benefits of Meeting the Healthy People 2030 Youth Sports Participation Target. Am J Prev Med 2024; 66:760-769. [PMID: 38416089 PMCID: PMC11034834 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Healthy People 2030, a U.S. government health initiative, has indicated that increasing youth sports participation to 63.3% is a priority in the U.S. This study quantified the health and economic value of achieving this target. METHODS An agent-based model developed in 2023 represents each person aged 6-17 years in the U.S. On each simulated day, agents can participate in sports that affect their metabolic and mental health in the model. Each agent can develop different physical and mental health outcomes, associated with direct and indirect costs. RESULTS Increasing the proportion of youth participating in sports from the most recent participation levels (50.7%) to the Healthy People 2030 target (63.3%) could reduce overweight/obesity prevalence by 3.37% (95% CI=3.35%, 3.39%), resulting in 1.71 million fewer cases of overweight/obesity (95% CI=1.64, 1.77 million). This could avert 352,000 (95% CI=336,200, 367,500) cases of weight-related diseases and gain 1.86 million (95% CI=1.86, 1.87 million) quality-adjusted life years, saving $22.55 billion (95% CI=$22.46, $22.63 billion) in direct medical costs and $25.43 billion (95% CI= $25.25, $25.61 billion) in productivity losses. This would also reduce depression/anxiety symptoms, saving $3.61 billion (95% CI=$3.58, $3.63 billion) in direct medical costs and $28.38 billion (95% CI=$28.20, $28.56 billion) in productivity losses. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that achieving the Healthy People 2030 objective could save third-party payers, businesses, and society billions of dollars for each cohort of persons aged 6-17 years, savings that would continue to repeat with each new cohort. This suggests that even if a substantial amount is invested toward this objective, such investments could pay for themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie F Martinez
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York
| | - Colleen Weatherwax
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York
| | - Katrina Piercy
- Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Rockville, Maryland
| | - Meredith A Whitley
- Ruth S. Ammon College of Education and Health Sciences, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York; Stellenbosch University, Maties Sport, Centre for Sport Leadership, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Sarah M Bartsch
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York
| | - Jessie Heneghan
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York
| | - Martin Fox
- Project Play, Sports & Society Program, The Aspen Institute, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Matthew T Bowers
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, College of Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Kevin L Chin
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York
| | - Kavya Velmurugan
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York
| | - Alexis Dibbs
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York
| | - Alan L Smith
- Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
| | - Karin A Pfeiffer
- Department of Kinesiology, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - Tom Farrey
- Project Play, Sports & Society Program, The Aspen Institute, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Alexandra Tsintsifas
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York
| | - Sheryl A Scannell
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York
| | - Bruce Y Lee
- Public Health Informatics, Computational, and Operations Research (PHICOR), City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Center for Advanced Technology and Communication in Health (CATCH), CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York; Artificial Intelligence, Modeling, and Informatics, for Nutrition Guidance and Systems (AIMINGS) Center, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York City, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lirola-Palmero S, Salva-Coll G, Yáñez-Juan AM, Sánchez-Iriso E. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the ball-and-socket trapeziometacarpal prosthesis compared to trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials 2024; 25:220. [PMID: 38532422 PMCID: PMC10967180 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08057-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of pain and weakness during thumb pinch leading to disability. There is no consensus about the best surgical treatment in unresponsive cases. The treatment is associated with costs and the recovery may take up to 1 year after surgery depending on the procedure. No randomized controlled trials have been conducted comparing ball and socket TMC prosthesis to trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction. METHODS A randomized, blinded, parallel-group superiority clinical trial comparing trapeziectomy with abductor pollicis longus (APL) arthroplasty and prosthetic replacement with Maïa® prosthesis. Patients, 18 years old and older, with a clinical diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral TMC OA who fulfill the trial's eligibility criteria will be invited to participate. The diagnosis will be made by experienced hand surgeons based on symptoms, clinical history, physical examination, and complementary imaging tests. A total of 106 patients who provide informed consent will be randomly assigned to treatment with APL arthroplasty and prosthetic replacement with Maïa® prosthesis. The participants will complete different questionnaires including EuroQuol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), the Quick DASH, and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at baseline, at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after surgical treatment. The participants will undergo physical examination, range of motion assessment, and strength measure every appointment. The trial's primary outcome variable is the change in the visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to 12 months. A long-term follow-up analysis will be performed every year for 5 years to assess chronic changes and prosthesis survival rate. The costs will be calculated from the provider's and society perspective using direct and indirect medical costs. DISCUSSION This is the first randomized study that investigates the effectiveness and cost-utility of trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction arthroplasty and Maïa prosthesis. We expect the findings from this trial to lead to new insights into the surgical approach to TMC OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04562753. Registered on June 15, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serafín Lirola-Palmero
- Departmen of Hand Surgery and Microsurgery, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Ctra. Valldemosa 79, Palma de Mallorca, 07120, Spain.
| | - Guillem Salva-Coll
- Departmen of Hand Surgery and Microsurgery, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Ctra. Valldemosa 79, Palma de Mallorca, 07120, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lathe J, Silverwood RJ, Hughes AD, Patalay P. Examining how well economic evaluations capture the value of mental health. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11:221-230. [PMID: 38281493 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00436-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Health economics evidence informs health-care decision making, but the field has historically paid insufficient attention to mental health. Economic evaluations in health should define an appropriate scope for benefits and costs and how to value them. This Health Policy provides an overview of these processes and considers to what extent they capture the value of mental health. We suggest that although current practices are both transparent and justifiable, they have distinct limitations from the perspective of mental health. Most social value judgements, such as the exclusion of interindividual outcomes and intersectoral costs, diminish the value of improving mental health, and this reduction in value might be disproportionate compared with other types of health. Economic analyses might have disadvantaged interventions that improve mental health compared with physical health, but research is required to test the size of such differential effects and any subsequent effect on decision-making systems such as health technology assessment systems. Collaboration between health economics and the mental health sciences is crucial for achieving mental-physical health parity in evaluative frameworks and, ultimately, improving population mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Lathe
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Richard J Silverwood
- Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alun D Hughes
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Praveetha Patalay
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, Department of Population Science and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang F, Hwang JS, Huang WY, Chang YT, Wang JD. Estimation of lifetime productivity loss from patients with chronic diseases: methods and empirical evidence of end-stage kidney disease from Taiwan. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2024; 14:10. [PMID: 38319466 PMCID: PMC10848535 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00480-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Studies that examine the broad allocation of resources, regardless of who bears the costs, should ideally estimate costs from a societal perspective. We have successfully integrated survival rates, employment ratios, and earnings to address the significant challenge of evaluating societal value through productivity assessments of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in Taiwan. METHODS Using a theoretical framework, we interconnected two nationwide databases: the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) and the Taiwan Mortality Registry from 2000 to 2017. Due to the statutory retirement age of 65, we collected data on all patients (83,358) aged 25-64 years diagnosed with ESKD and undergoing maintenance dialysis. We estimated the lifetime survival function through a rolling extrapolation algorithm, which was then combined with the monthly employment ratio and wages to calculate the lifetime employment duration and productivity up to the legal retirement age of ESKD patients. These were compared with sex-, age-, and calendar year-matched referents to determine the loss of employment duration and productivity of ESKD patients. RESULTS ESKD patients experienced a loss of approximately 25-56% in lifetime employment duration and a larger loss of about 32-66% in lifetime productivity after adjustments for different age, sex, and calendar year. The annual productivity loss per male (female) ESKD patient relative to that of the age-and calendar year-matched referent ranges from 75.5% to 82.1% (82.3% to 90.3%). During the periods when they are able to work (over the on-the-job duration) male ESKD patients lose between 34 and 56% of their income, and female ESKD patients lose between 39 and 68% of their income, compared to the age-and calendar year-matched referents. The loss of lifetime productivity is a combination of reduced lifetime employment duration, functional disability, absenteeism, and presenteeism at the workplace. The loss related to presenteeism is implied by the reduced wages. CONCLUSIONS In addition to the loss of employment duration, we have empirically demonstrated the lifetime loss of productivity in patients with ESKD, also indicating the "presenteeism" resulted from inability to perform their job with full capacity over long-term periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuhmei Wang
- Department of Economics in College of Social Science and Department of Public Health in College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | | | - Wen-Yen Huang
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Tzu Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Jung-Der Wang
- Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 701, Taiwan.
- Departments of Public Health and Occupational and Environmental Medicine, College of Medicine and Hospital, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Crosland P, Angeles MR, Noyes J, Willman A, Palermo M, Klarenaar P, Howse E, Ananthapavan J. The economic costs of alcohol-related harms at the local level in New South Wales. Drug Alcohol Rev 2024; 43:440-453. [PMID: 38173218 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Alcohol is a harmful, toxic and addictive substance that causes many diseases and injuries. Alcohol use also incurs a financial cost to the health care system and wider economy. This project aimed to undertake a cost impact analysis of alcohol-related harms at the local level in New South Wales (NSW). The alcohol-related harms costing model is an interactive tool designed for use by local health districts, stakeholders such as Liquor and Gaming NSW, NSW Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority and community stakeholders. METHODS Costs included in the analysis were alcohol-related hospitalisations, deaths, crimes, emergency department attendances, outpatient presentations and their impacts on productivity. Two local government areas (LGA) were used as case studies to demonstrate local impacts. RESULTS In 2019-2020, the total cost of alcohol-related harms for NSW was estimated at $9 billion, at a rate of $120.3 million per 100,000 population. The total costs were comprised of alcohol-attributable premature mortality ($8.3 billion), non-fatal health care costs ($275 million) and crime costs ($457 million). A comparative analysis of two case study LGAs estimated that alcohol-related harms cost $195 million for the Northern Beaches LGA and $351 million for the Central Coast LGA. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS This research has developed a 'proof-of-concept' model to estimate the cost of alcohol-related harms at the local level in Australia, empowering health agencies and local community stakeholders to use economic evidence in their submissions in response to new liquor licence applications and other policies that impact their local community. This economic evidence can be used to improve the quality of decisions on alcohol regulation and policies. There are a number of future research opportunities that would enhance the economic evidence available to liquor licensing decision-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Crosland
- Systems Modelling, Simulation & Data Science, Youth Mental Health and Technology, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mary Rose Angeles
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Jonathon Noyes
- Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Arlita Willman
- Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Paul Klarenaar
- Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eloise Howse
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jaithri Ananthapavan
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Simoens S, Tubeuf S, Dauby N, Ethgen O, Marbaix S, Willaert M, Luyten J. The broader benefits of vaccines: methodologies for inclusion in economic evaluation. Expert Rev Vaccines 2024; 23:779-788. [PMID: 39136368 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2024.2387599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the societal value of vaccines is increasingly recognized, there is a need to examine methodological approaches that could be used to integrate these various benefits in the economic evaluation of a vaccine. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A literature review and two expert panel meetings explored methodologies to value herd immunity, health spillover effects (beyond herd immunity), impact on antimicrobial resistance, productivity, and equity implications of vaccines. RESULTS The consideration of broader benefits of vaccines in economic evaluation is complicated and necessitates technical expertise. Whereas methodologies to account for herd immunity and work productivity are relatively well established, approaches to investigate equity implications are developing and less frequently applied. Modeling the potential impact on antimicrobial resistance not only depends on the multi-faceted causal relationship between vaccination and resistance but also on data availability. CONCLUSIONS Different methods are available to value the broad impact of vaccines, and it is important that analysts are aware of their strengths and limitations and justify their choice of method. In the future, we expect that an increasing number of economic evaluations will consider the broader benefits of vaccines as part of their base-case analysis or in sensitivity analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sandy Tubeuf
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain (UClouvain), Brussels, Belgium
- Institute of Economic and Social Research (IRES), Université Catholique de Louvain (UClouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Dauby
- Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Ethgen
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- SERFAN Innovation, Namur, Belgium
| | - Sophie Marbaix
- Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons-UMONS, Mons, Belgium
| | | | - Jeroen Luyten
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Milovic M, Tamas T, Crnobrnja V, Paut Kusturica M. Economic burden of breast cancer in northern Serbia. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1265301. [PMID: 38162600 PMCID: PMC10757838 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1265301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Breast cancer is the most common cancer in terms of incidence and mortality among all cancers in women in Vojvodina, the northern region of Serbia. In addition to the effectiveness and safety of therapy, it is important to put emphasis on the cost of treatment, as well as on the optimal allocation of limited resources. Objectives This study aimed to assess the overall economic burden of breast cancer in Vojvodina, as well as the ratio of direct and indirect costs in 2019. Materials and methods Costs were estimated using Cost of Illness (COI) evaluation, from a social perspective, based on the prevalence of the disease. The total costs included both direct and indirect expenditures. Direct costs associated with breast cancer comprised expenses linked to screening, hospital treatment, outpatient care, and prescribed medications. Indirect costs were estimated using a human capital approach, encompassing expenditures tied to lost productivity arising from sick leave, early retirement, and premature death. Results The total cost of breast cancer in Vojvodina during 2019 was estimated to be 15 million euros. Among the total cost, direct costs accounted for 5 million euros, representing 34% of the overall expenses. Hospital treatment costs accounted for 76% of the direct costs, while screening costs represented 1%. Indirect costs amounted to 10 million euros, constituting 66% of the total cost. The primary driver was attributed to production losses caused by premature retirement, which accounted for 50% of the indirect costs. Conclusion Breast cancer is a huge financial burden on both the health system and society in Vojvodina, accounting for 0.12% GDP. The dominance of indirect costs in total costs, can provide significant guidance to decision-makers in the healthcare system in terms of better allocation of limited resources to breast cancer prevention and early detection strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Milovic
- University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Tatjana Tamas
- University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Veljko Crnobrnja
- University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
- Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Phillips T, Liu N, Bloudek B, Migliaccio-Walle K, Reynolds J, Burke JM. Estimated impact of ECHELON-1 overall survival on productivity costs in stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2023; 29:1312-1320. [PMID: 37921077 PMCID: PMC10701259 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.23101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A 2010 study on the impact of cancer mortality on productivity costs found Hodgkin lymphoma to have the second largest productivity cost lost per death in the United States. The ECHELON-1 trial demonstrated that frontline brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) improves overall survival (OS) vs doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) in stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), reducing the risk of death to 41% (hazard ratio = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.40-0.88; P = 0.009). OBJECTIVES To assess the estimated impact of frontline treatment choice on mortality and productivity using an oncology simulation model informed by ECHELON-1 data. METHODS Individual productivity was estimated using the human capital approach and reported via present value lifetime earnings (PVLE) estimates. Deaths avoided and lifeyears saved without and with A+AVD were calculated using a model informed by realworld treatment use, treatment-specific OS, and expert clinicians' opinions. A+AVD use in the base case was 27% (range: 0%-80%). Stage III/IV cHL prevalence over a 10-year period was estimated; downstream lifetime productivity costs were projected without and with A+AVD. RESULTS In 2031, 3,645 patients were estimated to be newly diagnosed with stage III/IV cHL. Over 10 years with 27% A+AVD vs no A+AVD use, estimates predicted 14% fewer deaths (2,290 vs 2,650) and 14% less total PVLE losses ($1.438 vs $1.664 billion). Results from scenario analyses (40%-80% vs no A+AVD use) showed 20% to 32% decreases in PVLE losses ($1.331-$1.137 billion vs $1.664 billion), saving up to $527 million over 10 years. CONCLUSIONS Productivity cost losses due to mortality in stage III/IV cHL are high. Increasing A+AVD use for patients with stage III/IV cHL would reduce productivity cost losses as deaths are avoided, based on ECHELON-1 OS results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tycel Phillips
- Department of Hematology, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - John M. Burke
- US Oncology Hematology Research Program, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brouwer W, Verbooy K, Hoefman R, van Exel J. Production Losses due to Absenteeism and Presenteeism: The Influence of Compensation Mechanisms and Multiplier Effects. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:1103-1115. [PMID: 36856941 PMCID: PMC9976676 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01253-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Productivity costs can form a large and influential component of total costs in an economic evaluation taking a societal perspective. In calculating productivity costs, estimating productivity losses is a central element. Compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects may influence these losses but remain understudied. Compensation mechanisms could reduce productivity losses while multiplier effects may increase them. METHODS Data on productivity losses were collected in 2015 using an online survey among a sample of persons aged 15-65 years in The Netherlands who worked at least 12 h per week and reported to have experienced absenteeism and/or presenteeism during the past 4 weeks. A total of 877 respondents completed the survey that contained questions on productivity losses, compensation mechanisms, and multiplier effects. RESULTS We found that 45.5% of the respondents reported absenteeism (average 6.5 days) during the past 4 weeks, losing on average 48.7 working hours, while presenteeism was experienced by 75.9% of respondents, with an average loss of 10.7 working hours. Compensation mechanisms were reported by 76.9% of respondents, compensating almost 80% of their lost production, while multiplier effects were reported by 23.6% of respondents, reducing the productivity of 4.2 colleagues by 27.8% on average, implying a multiplier of 2.1 in that subgroup. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights that compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects are common and may substantially affect production losses. Investigating these mechanisms and effects further, as well as their interactions, remains important. Translating these findings into productivity cost calculations in economic evaluations is not straightforward and requires attention, especially since compensation mechanisms may not be costless and, for multiplier effects, the value of hours of colleagues may not be similar to that of the person experiencing health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Kaya Verbooy
- Hotel Management School Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renske Hoefman
- The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Krol M, Hosseinnia N, Brouwer W, van Roijen LH. Multiplier Effects and Compensation Mechanisms for Inclusion in Health Economic Evaluation: A Systematic Review. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:1031-1050. [PMID: 37592122 PMCID: PMC10450000 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01304-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects may affect productivity losses due to illness, disability, or premature death of individuals. Hence, they are important in estimating productivity losses and productivity costs in the context of economic evaluations of health interventions. This paper presents a systematic literature review of papers focusing on compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects, as well as whether and how they are included in health economic evaluations. METHODS The systematic literature search was performed covering EconLit and PubMed. A data-extraction form was developed focusing on compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects. RESULTS A total of 26 studies were included. Of these, 15 were empirical studies, three studies were methodological studies, two studies combined methodological research with empirical research, four were critical reviews, one study was a critical review combined with methodological research, and one study was a cost-benefit analysis. No uniform definition of compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects was identified. The terminology used to describe compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects varied as well. While the included studies suggest that both multipliers as well as compensation mechanisms substantially impact productivity cost estimates, the available evidence is scarce. Moreover, the generalizability as well as validity of assumptions underlying the calculations are unclear. Available measurement methods for compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects differ in approaches and are hardly validated. CONCLUSION While our review suggests that compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects may have a significant impact on productivity losses and costs, much remains unclear about their features, valid measurement, and correct valuation. This hampers their current inclusion in economic evaluation, and therefore, more research into both phenomena remains warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke Krol
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- IQVIA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nikkie Hosseinnia
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Leona Hakkaart van Roijen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
- Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hanly P, Ortega Ortega M, Pearce A, de Camargo Cancela M, Soerjomataram I, Sharp L. Estimating Global Friction Periods for Economic Evaluation: A Case Study of Selected OECD Member Countries. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:1093-1101. [PMID: 37036642 PMCID: PMC10088804 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01261-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The friction cost approach (FCA) offers an alternative to the dominant human capital approach to value productivity losses. Application of the FCA in practice is limited largely due to data availability. Recent attempts have tried to standardise the estimation of friction periods across Europe, but to date, this has not been attempted elsewhere. Our aim was to estimate friction periods for 17 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries between 2010 and 2021 based on routinely published data. METHODS We derived friction period estimates for Australia, Austria, Canada, Czechia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. Vacancy stock and flow data was sourced from the OECD's short-term labour situation database from 2010 to 2021, and included the impact of Covid-19 on the labour market. The estimated friction periods were applied to cost cancer-related premature mortality for the United States as an illustrative case. RESULTS The average friction period in the five non-European countries (Australia, Canada, Korea, Japan and the United States) was 61.0 days (SD 9.4) (range between 44.8 days in Korea and 82.2 days in Canada) and the average friction period in the 12 European countries was 60.6 days (SD 14.8) (range between 34.1 days in Switzerland and 137.3 days in Czechia). In both cases, the outbreak of Covid-19 increased the length of the friction period. Our illustrative case revealed that productivity costs in the US were over a third lower using the study-specific friction period (56 days) compared with the conventionally assumed 90-day friction period applied in the literature as a default measure. CONCLUSIONS Our results expand the potential application of the FCA outside of Europe and will support greater utilisation of the FCA and wider inclusion of productivity costs in societal-based economic evaluations based on the use of widely available and updated key labour market variables in our selected countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Hanly
- School of Business, National College of Ireland, Mayor Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | - Marta Ortega Ortega
- Department of Applied and Public Economics, and Political Economy, Faculty of Economics and Business, Complutense University of Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223 Madrid, Spain
| | - Alison Pearce
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Marianna de Camargo Cancela
- Division of Cancer Surveillance and Data Analysis, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health, Rua Marquês de Pombal 125, Rio de Janeiro, 22230-24 Brazil
| | - Isabelle Soerjomataram
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
| | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Michaud TL, Wilson KE, Katula JA, You W, Estabrooks PA. Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of a digital diabetes prevention program: results from the PREDICTS trial. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:501-510. [PMID: 36809348 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibad008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Although technology-assisted diabetes prevention programs (DPPs) have been shown to improve glycemic control and weight loss, information are limited regarding relevant costs and their cost-effectiveness. To describe a retrospective within-trial cost and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to compare a digital-based DPP (d-DPP) with small group education (SGE), over a 1-year study period. The costs were summarized into direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs (i.e., times that participants spent engaging with the interventions), and indirect costs (i.e., lost work productivity costs). The CEA was measured by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity analysis was performed using nonparametric bootstrap analysis. Over 1 year, the direct medical costs, direct nonmedical costs, and indirect costs per participant were $4,556, $1,595, and $6,942 in the d-DPP group versus $4,177, $1,350, and $9,204 in the SGE group. The CEA results showed cost savings from d-DPP relative to SGE based on a societal perspective. Using a private payer perspective for d-DPP, ICERs were $4,739 and $114 to obtain an additional unit reduction in HbA1c (%) and weight (kg), and were $19,955 for an additional unit gain of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to SGE, respectively. From a societal perspective, bootstrapping results indicated that d-DPP has a 39% and a 69% probability, at a willingness-to-pay of $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY, respectively, of being cost-effective. The d-DPP was cost-effective and offers the prospect of high scalability and sustainability due to its program features and delivery modes, which can be easily translated to other settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzeyu L Michaud
- Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
- Center for Reducing Health Disparities, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Kathryn E Wilson
- Department of Kinesiology and Health, College of Education & Human Development, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Center for the Study of Stress, Trauma, and Resilience, College of Education and Human Development, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Katula
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Wen You
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Paul A Estabrooks
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Manipis K, Mulhern B, Haywood P, Viney R, Goodall S. Estimating the willingness-to-pay to avoid the consequences of foodborne illnesses: a discrete choice experiment. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:831-852. [PMID: 36074311 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01512-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Lost productivity is one of the largest costs associated with foodborne illness (FBI); however, the methods used to estimate lost productivity are often criticised for overestimating the actual burden of illness. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was undertaken to elicit preferences to avoid six possible FBIs and estimate whether ability to work, availability of paid sick leave and health-related quality of life affect willingness-to-pay (WTP) to avoid FBI. Respondents (N = 1918) each completed 20 DCE tasks covering two different FBIs [gastrointestinal illness, flu-like illness, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), reactive arthritis (ReA), or haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS)]. Attributes included: ability to work, availability of sick leave, treatment costs and illness duration. Choices were modelled using mixed logit regression and WTP was estimated. The WTP to avoid a severe illness was higher than a mild illness. For chronic conditions, the marginal WTP to avoid a chronic illness for one year, ranged from $531 for mild ReA ($1412 for severe ReA) to $1025 for mild HUS ($2195 for severe HUS). There was a substantial increase in the marginal WTP to avoid all the chronic conditions when the ability to work was reduced and paid sick leave was not available, ranging from $6289 for mild IBS to $11,352 for severe ReA. Including factors that reflect productivity and compensation to workers influenced the WTP to avoid a range of FBIs for both acute and chronic conditions. These results have implications for estimating the burden and cost of FBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Manipis
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Philip Haywood
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Stephen Goodall
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kohler S, Dalal S, Hettema A, Matse S, Bärnighausen T, Paul N. Out-of-pocket Expenses and Time Spent on Clinic Visits Among HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Users and Other Clinic Attendees in Eswatini. AIDS Behav 2023; 27:1222-1233. [PMID: 36219271 PMCID: PMC9551250 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-022-03859-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
User costs constitute a barrier to the uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but their magnitude appears rarely assessed. In this prospective observational study, we assessed self-reported out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) and time spent on clinic visits during a PrEP demonstration project in Eswatini. At six public primary care clinics, 240 PrEP users and other clinic attendees were interviewed after a clinic visit. Among the 79.2% of clinic attendees reporting any medical OOPE (e.g., expenses for consultations or drugs) and/or non-medical OOPE (e.g., expenses for transport, food, or phone use), the median total OOPE was $1.36 (IQR 0.91-1.96). Non-medical OOPE occurred mostly due to transport expenses. The median travel time for a clinic visit was 1.0 h (IQR 0.67-2.0). The median time spent in the clinic was 2.0 h (IQR 1.15-3.0). The median opportunity cost of a clinic visit was $7.54 (IQR 5.42-11) when valuing time spent on a clinic visit with Eswatini's per-capita gross domestic product. Our findings can guide measures to reduce the user costs of PrEP in Eswatini and other contexts in which oral PrEP is provided through health care facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Kohler
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Shona Dalal
- Department of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Sindy Matse
- Eswatini Ministry of Health, Mbabane, Eswatini
| | - Till Bärnighausen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicolas Paul
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lotfi F, Khodabandeh F, Jafari A, Rezaee M, Rahimi H, Shiravani Z, Keshavarz K. Economic burden of cervical cancer and premalignant lesions associated with human papilloma virus: a societal perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:439-447. [PMID: 36876411 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2186400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women, the cause of which is mostly human papilloma virus (HPV). The aim of this study was to determine the economic burden of cervical cancer and premalignant lesions associated with HPV infection from a societal perspective. METHODS The study is a partial economic evaluation (cost of illness), which was conducted cross-sectionally in the referral university clinic in Fars province in 2021. The prevalence-based and bottom-up approaches used to calculate the costs, the indirect costs were calculated by human capital approach. RESULTS The mean cost of premalignant lesions associated with HPV infection was USD 2,853 per patient, which 68.57% was direct medical costs. In addition, the mean cost of cervical cancer was USD 39,327 per patient, the largest share of which (57.9%) was related to indirect costs. The mean annual cost of cervical cancer patients in the country was estimated at USD 40,884,609 as well. CONCLUSION Cervical cancer and premalignant lesions associated with HPV infection imposed a significant economic burden on the health system and patients. The results of the present study can help health policymakers with efficient and equitable prioritization and allocation of resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhad Lotfi
- National Center for Health Insurance Research, Tehran, Iran.,Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Khodabandeh
- Student Research Committee, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Abdosaleh Jafari
- Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mehdi Rezaee
- Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.,Student Research Committee, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Hamed Rahimi
- School of Medicine, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran
| | - Zahra Shiravani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Khosro Keshavarz
- Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.,Emergency Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Akksilp K, Isaranuwatchai W, Teerawattananon Y, Chen C. The association between health costs and physical inactivity; analysis from the Physical Activity at Work study in Thailand. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1037699. [PMID: 36960361 PMCID: PMC10027789 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1037699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Physical inactivity increases the risks of several common yet serious non-communicable diseases, costing a tremendous amount of health expenditure globally. This study aimed to estimate the association between health costs and physical inactivity in Thailand. Methods Data from the Physical Activity at Work cluster randomized controlled trial participants with valid objective physical activity data were extracted. Health costs were collected using the Health and Welfare Survey and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire and were categorized into past-month outpatient illness, past-year inpatient illness, and past-week presenteeism and absenteeism. Time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was used to determine the activity level according to the current guideline (i.e., ≥150 minutes moderate-intensity or ≥75 minutes vigorous-intensity equivalent physical activity per week). The primary analysis evaluated the association between direct cost (treatment and travel costs) and societal cost (direct cost plus absenteeism due to the illness) of past-month outpatient illness and physical inactivity using a two-part model. Results In total, 277 participants with a mean age of 38.7 were included. Average direct and societal cost due to past-month outpatient illness were 146 THB (3.99 USD) (SD = 647 THB) and 457 THB (12.5 USD) (SD = 1390 THB), respectively. Compared to active participants, direct and societal cost of past-month outpatient illness were 153 THB (4.18 USD) (95%CI: -54.7 to 360 THB) and 426 THB (11.7 USD) (95%CI: 23.3 to 829 THB) higher in physically inactive individuals, respectively, adjusted for covariates. The additional societal cost of past-month outpatient illness was 145% higher in physically inactive participants compared to active participants. On the other hand, there was no significant association in direct and societal cost of past-year inpatient illness nor past-week indirect costs between physically active and non-active participants. Discussion Results were similar to recent findings in different countries. However, the findings should be generalized with caution due to the small sample size and potential bias from reverse causation. Future research is crucial for clarifying the health costs of physical inactivity in Thailand and other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katika Akksilp
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Yot Teerawattananon
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Cynthia Chen
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Decker B, Tuzil J, Lukas M, Cerna K, Bortlik M, Velackova B, Pilnackova B, Dolezal T. Patient-reported symptoms are a more reliable predictor of the societal burden compared to established physician-reported activity indices in inflammatory bowel disease: a cross-sectional study. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:99-108. [PMID: 36537197 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2161047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The societal burden of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is not well documented, and further studies are needed to quantify the costs of the disease state. Thus, the aim was to estimate the societal burden and identify its predictors. METHODS A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study complemented by objective data from patient medical records was performed for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). RESULTS We analyzed data from 161 patients (CD: 102, UC: 59). The overall work impairment reached 15.4%, 11.2% vs. 28.8% without/with self-reported symptoms (p = 0.006). Daily activity impairment was 19.3%, 14.1% vs. 35.6% (p < 0.001). The disability pension rate was 28%, 23% vs. 44% (p = 0.012). The total productivity loss due to absenteeism, presenteeism, and disability amounted to 7,673 €/patient/year, 6,018 vs. 12,354 €/patient/year (p = 0.000). Out-of-pocket costs amounted to 562 €/patient/year, 472 vs. 844 €/patient/year (p = 0.001). Self-reported symptoms were the strongest predictor of costs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION We found a high societal burden for IBD and a significant association between patient-reported disease symptoms and work disability, daily activity impairment, disability pensions, and out-of-pocket costs. Physician-reported disease activity is not a reliable predictor of costs except for out-of-pocket expenses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbora Decker
- Institute of Health Economics and Technology Assessment, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Tuzil
- Institute of Health Economics and Technology Assessment, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Medical Informatics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Lukas
- IBD clinical and research center ISCARE a.s, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Karin Cerna
- IBD clinical and research center ISCARE a.s, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Bortlik
- Gastroenterology Department, Ceske Budejovice Hospital, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.,Department of Internal Medicine, Military University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Institute of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Barbora Velackova
- Institute of Health Economics and Technology Assessment, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Barbora Pilnackova
- Institute of Health Economics and Technology Assessment, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Dolezal
- Institute of Health Economics and Technology Assessment, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yuasa A, Yonemoto N, Kamei K, Murofushi T, LoPresti M, Taneja A, Horgan J, Ikeda S. Systematic Literature Review of the Use of Productivity Losses/Gains in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Immune-Mediated Disorders. Adv Ther 2022; 39:5327-5350. [PMID: 36205907 PMCID: PMC9540264 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02321-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In light of the lack of an agreed international standard for how to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs), including cost-utility analyses (CUAs) from a societal perspective, there is uncertainty regarding to what extent the inclusion of productivity losses/gains in economic evaluations can affect cost-effectiveness results and subsequently decisions on whether to recommend new health technologies. To investigate this, we conducted a systematic review of CEAs and CUAs of drug-based therapies for a set of chronic immune-mediated disorders to understand how cost elements and calculation methods related to productivity losses/gains are used, examine the impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of including productivity costs, and explore factors that affect the inclusion of productivity loss. METHODS Databases (MEDLINE® In-process, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library) were searched from January 2010 to October 2020 by two independent reviewers for all CEAs and CUAs in adults with any of the following conditions: ankylosing spondylitis, chronic idiopathic urticaria, Crohn's disease, fibromyalgia, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and ulcerative colitis. Relevant study data were extracted and evidence was synthesized for both qualitative and quantitative analysis. Productivity cost elements including absenteeism, presenteeism, unemployment/early retirement, premature mortality and informal care were extracted, along with the method used to determine them. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the inclusion of productivity loss. RESULTS Our searches identified 5016 records, culminating in 198 unique studies from 234 publications following screening. Most of the studies investigated rheumatoid arthritis (37.0%) or psoriasis (32.0%). The majority were CUAs, with some including both a CEA and a CUA (73.0%). Most studies used a payer perspective only (28.5%) or a societal perspective only (21.0%). Of the 49 studies incorporating productivity losses/gains, 42 reported the type of cost element used; all of these used patient absenteeism, either alone or in addition with other elements. Only 16 studies reported the method used to value productivity changes, of which eight used a human capital approach, four used a friction cost approach and four used both approaches. Twenty-eight of the 49 studies (57.1%) reported inclusion of productivity losses/gains as contributing to more favourable cost-effectiveness outcomes and ICERs, while 12 (24.5%) reported no substantial impact. On the basis of a multivariate analysis, rheumatoid arthritis as the target disease had a statistically significant association with the inclusion of productivity loss compared with psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSIONS The results of our review suggest that incorporating productivity cost elements may positively affect cost-effectiveness outcomes in evaluations of therapeutics for immune-mediated disorders. Our work highlights the continued need for clarity when reporting how CEAs and CUAs in this disease area are conducted, in order to better inform healthcare decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shunya Ikeda
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, 4-3, Kozunomori, Narita, 286-8686, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kwon J, Squires H, Franklin M, Young T. Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2022; 20:33. [PMID: 35842721 PMCID: PMC9287934 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-022-00367-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls impose significant health and economic burdens on community-dwelling older persons. Decision modelling can inform commissioning of alternative falls prevention strategies. Several methodological challenges arise when modelling public health interventions including community-based falls prevention. This study aims to conduct a systematic review (SR) to: systematically identify community-based falls prevention economic models; synthesise and critically appraise how the models handled key methodological challenges associated with public health modelling; and suggest areas for further methodological research. METHODS The SR followed the 2021 PRISMA reporting guideline and covered the period 2003-2020 and 12 academic databases and grey literature. The extracted methodological features of included models were synthesised by their relevance to the following challenges: (1) capturing non-health outcomes and societal intervention costs; (2) considering heterogeneity and dynamic complexity; (3) considering theories of human behaviour and implementation; and (4) considering equity issues. The critical appraisal assessed the prevalence of each feature across models, then appraised the methods used to incorporate the feature. The methodological strengths and limitations stated by the modellers were used as indicators of desirable modelling practice and scope for improvement, respectively. The methods were also compared against those suggested in the broader empirical and methodological literature. Areas of further methodological research were suggested based on appraisal results. RESULTS 46 models were identified. Comprehensive incorporation of non-health outcomes and societal intervention costs was infrequent. The assessments of heterogeneity and dynamic complexity were limited; subgroup delineation was confined primarily to demographics and binary disease/physical status. Few models incorporated heterogeneity in intervention implementation level, efficacy and cost. Few dynamic variables other than age and falls history were incorporated to characterise the trajectories of falls risk and general health/frailty. Intervention sustainability was frequently based on assumptions; few models estimated the economic/health returns from improved implementation. Seven models incorporated ethnicity- and severity-based subgroups but did not estimate the equity-efficiency trade-offs. Sixteen methodological research suggestions were made. CONCLUSION Existing community-based falls prevention models contain methodological limitations spanning four challenge areas relevant for public health modelling. There is scope for further methodological research to inform the development of falls prevention and other public health models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Kwon
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court (ScHARR), 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA England UK
| | - Hazel Squires
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court (ScHARR), 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA England UK
| | - Matthew Franklin
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court (ScHARR), 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA England UK
| | - Tracey Young
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court (ScHARR), 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA England UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Holko P, Kawalec P, Sajak-Szczerba M, Avedano L, Mossakowska M. Indirect Costs of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Across 12 European Countries. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022; 29:752-762. [PMID: 35792501 PMCID: PMC10152296 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National studies report a high variability of indirect costs of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this study, selected aspects of the societal burden of IBDs were compared between 12 European countries. METHODS A questionnaire-based study among adult patients with IBD was performed. Data on patient characteristics, productivity loss, and informal care were collected. The costs of productivity loss were assessed from the social perspective. The cost of absenteeism and presenteeism was valuated using the gross domestic product per worker. Informal care was measured by time inputs of relatives and friends to assist patients. Productivity loss among informal caregivers outside their paid work was valuated with the average wage. The results were adjusted for confounders and multiplicity. RESULTS Responses from 3687 patients (67% employed) were analyzed. Regular activity (outside paid work) impairment did not differ between countries, but a significant difference in informal care and productivity loss was observed. There were no differences in indirect costs between the types of IBD across the countries. The mean annual cost of absenteeism, presenteeism, and informal care varied from €1253 (Bulgaria) to €7915 (Spain), from €2149 (Bulgaria) to €14 524 (Belgium), and from €1729 (Poland) to €12 063 (Italy), respectively. Compared with patients with active disease, those with IBD in remission showed a lower indirect cost by 54% (presenteeism, P < .001) or 75% (absenteeism, informal care, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The study showed a high relevance of the indirect cost of IBD in the context of economic evaluation, as well as a between-country variability of work-related impairment or informal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Przemysław Holko
- Department of Nutrition and Drug Research, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Paweł Kawalec
- Department of Nutrition and Drug Research, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Magdalena Sajak-Szczerba
- European Federation of Crohn's and Ulcerative Colitis Associations, Brussels, Belgium.,Polish Association Supporting People with Inflammatory Bowel Disease "J-elita," Warsaw, Poland
| | - Luisa Avedano
- European Federation of Crohn's and Ulcerative Colitis Associations, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Małgorzata Mossakowska
- Polish Association Supporting People with Inflammatory Bowel Disease "J-elita," Warsaw, Poland.,International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mattingly TJ, Diaz Fernandez V, Seo D, Melgar Castillo AI. A review of caregiver costs included in cost-of-illness studies. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2022; 22:1051-1060. [PMID: 35607780 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2080056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Economic evaluations typically focus solely on patient-specific costs with economic spillovers to informal caregivers less frequently evaluated. This may systematically underestimate the burden resulting from disease. AREAS COVERED Cost-of-illness (COI) analyses that identified costs borne to caregiver(s) were identified using PubMed and Embase. We extracted study characteristics, clinical condition, costs, and cost methods. To compare caregiver costs reported across studies, estimated a single 'annual caregiver cost' amount in 2021 USD. EXPERT OPINION A total of 51 studies met our search criteria for inclusion with estimates ranging from $30 - $86,543. The majority (63%, 32/51) of studies estimated caregiver time costs with fewer studies reporting productivity or other types of costs. Caregiver costs were frequently reported descriptively (69%, 35/51), with fewer studies reporting more rigorous methods of estimating costs. Only 27% (14/51) of studies included used an incremental analysis approach for caregiver costs. In a subgroup analysis of dementia-focused studies (n = 16), we found the average annual cost of caregiving time for patients with dementia was $30,562, ranging from $4,914 to $86,543. We identified a wide range in annual caregiver cost estimates, even when limiting by condition and cost type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Joseph Mattingly
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,The PATIENTS Program, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Valeria Diaz Fernandez
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dominique Seo
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Andrea I Melgar Castillo
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,The PATIENTS Program, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ha IH, Kim ES, Lee SH, Lee YJ, Song HJ, Kim Y, Kim KW, Cho JH, Lee JH, Shin BC, Lee J, Shin JS. Cost-Utility Analysis of Chuna Manual Therapy and Usual Care for Chronic Neck Pain: A Multicenter Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:896422. [PMID: 35646995 PMCID: PMC9131099 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.896422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of manual therapy and usual care for patients with chronic neck pain. A cost-utility analysis alongside a pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted in five South Korean hospitals. Data were procured from surveys and nationally representative data. Participants were 108 patients aged between 19 and 60 years, with chronic neck pain persisting for at least 3 months and a pain intensity score of ≥5 on the numerical rating scale in the last 3 days. The study was conducted for 1 year, including 5 weeks of intervention and additional observational periods. Participants were divided into a manual therapy (Chuna) group and a usual care group, and quality-adjusted life-years, costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated. The quality-adjusted life-years of the manual therapy group were 0.024 higher than that of the usual care group. From the societal perspective, manual therapy incurred a lower cost—at $2,131—and was, therefore, the more cost-effective intervention. From a healthcare system perspective, the cost of manual therapy was higher, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio amount of $11,217. Manual therapy is more cost-effective for non-specific chronic neck pain management from both a healthcare system and societal perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In-Hyuk Ha
- Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun-San Kim
- Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sook-Hyun Lee
- Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoon Jae Lee
- Jaseng Spine and Joint Research Institute, Jaseng Medical Foundation, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Jin Song
- College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Younhee Kim
- College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, South Korea
| | - Koh-Woon Kim
- Department of Korean Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae-Heung Cho
- Department of Korean Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jun-Hwan Lee
- Clinical Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea.,Korean Medicine Life Science, Campus of Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Byung-Cheul Shin
- School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, South Korea.,Spine & Joint Center, Pusan National University Korean Medicine Hospital, Ysangsan, South Korea
| | - Jinho Lee
- Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
MacLeod KE, Ye Z, Donald B, Wang G. A Literature Review of Productivity Loss Associated with Hypertension in the United States. Popul Health Manag 2022; 25:297-308. [PMID: 35119298 PMCID: PMC9536345 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2021.0201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A literature review of peer-reviewed articles published 2000-2019 was conducted to determine the types and extent of hypertension-associated productivity loss among adults in the United States. All monetary outcomes were standardized to 2019 $ by using the Employment Cost Index. Twenty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Nearly half of the articles (12 articles) presented monetary outcomes of productivity loss. Absenteeism (14 articles) and presenteeism (8 articles) were most frequently assessed. Annual absenteeism was estimated to cost more than $11 billion, nationally controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. The annual additional costs per person were estimated at $63 for short-term disability, $72-$330 for absenteeism, and $53-$156 for presenteeism, controlling for participant characteristics; and may be as high as $2362 for absenteeism and presenteeism when considered in combination. The annual additional time loss per person was estimated as 1.3 days for absenteeism, controlling for common hypertension comorbidities, including stroke and diabetes; and 15.6 days for work and home productivity loss combined, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. The loss from absenteeism alone might be more than 20% of the total medical expenditure of hypertension. Although the differences in estimation methods and study populations make it challenging to synthesize the costs across the studies, this review provides detailed information on the various types of productivity loss. In addition, the ways in which methods could be standardized for future research are discussed. Accounting for the costs from productivity loss can help public health officials, health insurers, employers, and researchers better understand the economic burden of hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara E. MacLeod
- Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, Georgia, USA
- ASRT, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Zhiqiu Ye
- Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, Georgia, USA
| | - Bruce Donald
- Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, Georgia, USA
- ASRT, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Guijing Wang
- Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Productivity Losses Due to Diabetes in Urban Rural China. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19105873. [PMID: 35627410 PMCID: PMC9140384 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19105873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Productivity losses due to diabetes are increasing in China, but research about the impact of diabetes on productivity in urban and rural areas requires further in-depth study. This article provides the first estimate of the cost of productivity losses attributed to diabetes in individuals 20-69 years old in urban and rural areas of China. METHODS The human capital approach is employed to measure the productivity losses attributed to absenteeism, presenteeism, labor force dropout, and premature deaths due to diabetes of the 20-69-year-old population of males and females in urban and rural areas of China. Based on the life table modelling, we calculate the years of potential life lost and working years of life lost of people with diabetes. RESULTS In 2017, we estimated that there were 100.46 million people with diabetes, with the total cost of productivity losses being USD 613.60 billion, comprising USD 326.40 billion from labor force dropout, USD 186.34 billion from premature death, USD 97.71 billion from absenteeism, and USD 27.04 billion from presenteeism. Productivity loss was greater in urban (USD 490.79 billion) than rural areas (USD 122.81 billion), with urban presenteeism (USD 2.54 billion) greater than rural presenteeism (USD 608.55 million); urban absenteeism (USD 79.10 billion) greater than rural absenteeism (USD 18.61 billion); urban labor force dropout (USD 261.24 billion) greater than rural labor force dropout (USD 65.15 billion); and urban premature death (USD 147.90 billion) greater than rural premature death (USD 38.44 billion). CONCLUSIONS Diabetes has a large and significant negative impact on productivity in urban and rural China. Productivity loss is significantly higher in urban versus rural regions. Further investment is required in the prevention, diagnosis, and control of diabetes in under-resourced health services in rural locations as well as in urban areas, where most diabetes cases reside. Specifically, targeted and effective diabetes prevention and management actions are urgently required.
Collapse
|
35
|
Ho-Henriksson CM, Svensson M, Thorstensson CA, Nordeman L. Physiotherapist or physician as primary assessor for patients with suspected knee osteoarthritis in primary care - a cost-effectiveness analysis of a pragmatic trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:260. [PMID: 35300671 PMCID: PMC8932301 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05201-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over the next decade, the number of osteoarthritis consultations in health care is expected to increase. Physiotherapists may be considered equally qualified as primary assessors as physicians for patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, economic evaluations of this model of care have not yet been described. To determine whether physiotherapists as primary assessors for patients with suspected knee osteoarthritis in primary care are a cost-effective alternative compared with traditional physician-led care, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized controlled pragmatic trial. Methods Patients were randomized to be assessed and treated by either a physiotherapist or physician first in primary care. A cost-effectiveness analysis compared costs and effects in quality adjusted life years (QALY) for the different care models. Analyses were applied with intention to treat, using complete case dataset, and missing data approaches included last observation carried forward and multiple imputation. Non-parametric bootstrapping was conducted to assess sampling uncertainty, presented with a cost-effectiveness plane and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Results 69 patients were randomized to a physiotherapist (n = 35) or physician first (n = 34). There were significantly higher costs for physician visits and radiography in the physician group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01). Both groups improved their health-related quality of life 1 year after assessment compared with baseline. There were no statistically significant differences in QALYs or total costs between groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for physiotherapist versus physician was savings of 24,266 €/lost QALY (societal perspective) and 15,533 €/lost QALY (health care perspective). There is a 72–80% probability that physiotherapist first for patients with suspected knee osteoarthritis is less costly and differs less than ±0.1 in QALY compared to traditional physician-led care. Conclusion These findings suggest that physiotherapist-led care model might reduce health care costs and lead to marginally less QALYs, but confidence intervals were wide and overlapped no difference at all. Health consequences depending on the profession of the first assessor for knee osteoarthritis seem to be comparable for physiotherapists and physicians. Direct access to physiotherapist in primary care seems to lead to fewer physician consultations and radiography. However, larger clinical trials and qualitative studies to evaluate patients’ perception of this model of care are needed. Clinical trial registration The study was retrospectively registered in clinicaltrial.gov, ID: NCT03822533. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05201-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan-Mei Ho-Henriksson
- Region Västra Götaland, Primary Care Rehabilitation, Närhälsan Lidköping Rehabmottagning, Lidköping, Sweden. .,Department of Health and rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Mikael Svensson
- University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Carina A Thorstensson
- Department of Health and rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Research and Development Department at Region Halland, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Lena Nordeman
- Department of Health and rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Region Västra Götaland, Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Research, Education, Development and Innovation Centre Södra Älvsborg, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Del Llano Señarís JE, Correia NN, Logusso LG, Errea Rodríguez M, Bringas Roldán C. [The indirect costs of tension type headache. A systematic literature review]. Aten Primaria 2022; 54:102238. [PMID: 35077913 PMCID: PMC8790615 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this work was to systematically review the published literature in relation to the estimated indirect costs associated with TTH. DESIGN This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items Statement for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyzes (PRISMA). DATA SOURCES The review was performed in two main databases, PubMed and EconLit, and was completed with the gray literature search. STUDY SELECTION The basic criterion for the inclusion of studies was that they present at least one measure of indirect costs specific to TTH. DATA EXTRACTION 12 studies were finally selected for information extraction. Of all the selected articles, the characteristics of the study design, the types of costs included, as well as the measurement instrument, and the main results were synthesized. RESULTS The search yielded a total of 568 studies. Heterogeneity was found in the designs and samples/populations of the included studies. Only two studies estimated direct and indirect costs for TTH. Among the most notable results, we find an estimated moderate impact of disability due to TTH (between 0.037 and 0.15 per person, 0.06-0.09% for the population). Productivity and efficiency losses were observed and were very heterogeneous. The willingness to pay for effective treatment would range from $1.32 to $9.20 per month. Quality of life is low, between 28.2 and 28.4 points out of 100, and health-related quality of life seems to improve significantly with treatment. CONCLUSIONS Despite the high heterogeneity of the results, we can conclude that tension headache is characterized by a moderate impact on disability, on productivity and efficiency at work or school, and on the quality of life of those who suffer it.
Collapse
|
37
|
Wijker BJ, de Groot S, van Dongen JM, van Nassau F, Adriaansen JJE, Achterberg-Warmer WJ, Anema JR, Riedstra AT, van Tulder MW, Janssen TWJ. Electrical stimulation to prevent recurring pressure ulcers in individuals with a spinal cord injury compared to usual care: the Spinal Cord Injury PREssure VOLTage (SCI PREVOLT) study protocol. Trials 2022; 23:156. [PMID: 35172888 PMCID: PMC8848924 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06088-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressure ulcers (PUs) on the buttocks are among the most common secondary complications in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). PUs can result from sitting for extended periods, disuse atrophy, increased sitting pressure and reduced circulation. Compared with usual care, activation of paralysed muscles using electrical stimulation (ES) has been shown to markedly increase paralysed muscle mass, improve circulation of skin and muscle and improve sitting pressure distribution. ES might therefore be a useful method to reduce PU incidence. METHODS A multicentre randomized controlled trial (SCI PREVOLT) will be conducted with an economic and process evaluation alongside. One hundred participants with a SCI in the chronic phase and a minimal incidence of 1 PU in the last 5 years will be recruited from rehabilitation centres across the Netherlands. Participants will be stratified by centre and age and randomized to the intervention or control group. The intervention group will use ES at least 1 h/day during at least 4 times a week for 1 year next to usual care. The control group will only receive usual care. The primary outcome is the incidence of PUs, measured by a blinded person assessing the presence or absence of a PU on the buttocks on a photo made by the participant or his/her caregiver. The incidence of a PU will be evaluated every 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes include interface pressure distribution, blood flow in the profunda femoris artery, muscle thickness of the hamstrings and gluteal muscles and questionnaires about different dimensions of life, e.g. participation and quality of life. Secondary outcomes will be measured at baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomization. DISCUSSION This study will assess if electrical stimulation is a (cost-)effective method to prevent PUs and reduce the risk factors of getting PUs. If ES is effective and cost-effective compared with usual care, ES could be implemented in daily treatment of individuals with a SCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trials Register NTR NL9469 . Registered on 26 May 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boas J. Wijker
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja de Groot
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M. van Dongen
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke van Nassau
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Johan R. Anema
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries T. Riedstra
- Paraplegia Organization | Dwarslaesie Organisatie Nederland (DON), Nijkerk, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits W. van Tulder
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas W. J. Janssen
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ortega-Ortega M, Hanly P, Pearce A, Soerjomataram I, Sharp L. Paid and unpaid productivity losses due to premature mortality from cancer in Europe in 2018. Int J Cancer 2022; 150:580-593. [PMID: 34569617 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
When someone dies prematurely from cancer this represents a loss of productivity for society. This loss can be valued and provides a measure of the cancer burden. We estimated paid and unpaid productivity lost due to cancer-related premature mortality in 31 European countries in 2018. Lost productivity was estimated for all cancers combined and 23 cancer sites, overall, by region and country. Deaths aged 15 to 64 were abstracted from GLOBOCAN 2018. Unpaid time lost (housework, caring, volunteering) was derived from Eurostat. Paid and unpaid productivity losses were valued using the human capital approach. In total, 347,149 premature cancer deaths occurred (60% male). The total value of cancer-related lost productivity was €104.6 billion. Of this, €52.9 billion (50.6%) was due to lost paid work, and €51.7 billion (49.4%) to unpaid work. Females accounted for 36.7% of paid work costs but half (51.1%) of the unpaid work costs. Costs were highest in Western Europe (€52.0 billion). The most costly cancer was lung (€21.7 billion), followed by breast (€10.6 billion). The average loss per premature death was highest for Hodgkin's lymphoma (€506 345), melanoma (€450 694), brain cancer (€428 449) and leukaemia (€378 750). Cancer-related lost productivity costs are significant. Almost half are due to unpaid work losses, indicating the importance of considering both paid and unpaid labour in assessing the cancer economic burden. The high cost per premature death of some less common cancers illustrates the potential benefits that could accrue from investment in prevention and control of these cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Ortega-Ortega
- Department of Applied and Public Economics, and Political Economy, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paul Hanly
- School of Business, National College of Ireland, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | - Alison Pearce
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Brouwer W, Huls S, Sajjad A, Kanters T, Roijen LHV, van Exel J. In Absence of Absenteeism: Some Thoughts on Productivity Costs in Economic Evaluations in a Post-corona Era. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:7-11. [PMID: 34913141 PMCID: PMC8674022 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01117-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Samare Huls
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ayesha Sajjad
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Kanters
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lizano-Díez I, Naharro J, Zsolt I. Indirect costs associated with skin infectious disease in children: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1325. [PMID: 34895206 PMCID: PMC8665520 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07189-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data in the literature on the indirect costs associated with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in the pediatric population. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the indirect costs associated with SSTIs in children. METHODS The search was conducted in PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science up to January 2020. Thirteen search strategies were designed combining MeSH terms and free terms. SSTIs were defined as bacterial or viral infections, dermatomycoses, and parasitic infestations. Only primary studies were included. All analyzed costs were converted to 2020 Euros. RESULTS Thirteen of the identified publications presented indirect costs of SSTIs in children and were conducted in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Hungary, New Zealand, Poland, Spain, Taiwan, and the USA. Nine studies described indirect costs associated with infection of Varicella-zoster virus: lost workdays by outpatient caregivers ranged from 0.27 to 7.8, and up to 6.14 if caring for inpatients; total productivity losses ranged from €1.16 to €257.46 per patient. Three studies reported indirect costs associated with acute bacterial SSTIs (community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in children: total productivity losses ranged from €1,814.39 to €8,224.06 per patient, based on impetigo, cellulitis, and folliculitis. One study of parasitic infestations (Pediculus humanus capitis) reported total indirect costs per patient of €68.57 (formal care) plus €21.41 due to time lost by parents in purchasing treatment. CONCLUSIONS The economic burden of SSTIs is highly relevant but underestimated due to the lack of studies reporting indirect costs. Further cost studies will allow a better understanding of the magnitude of the financial burden of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Lizano-Díez
- Ferrer Internacional, S.A., Av Diagonal 549, 5th floor, 08029, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Jesús Naharro
- Ferrer Internacional, S.A., Av Diagonal 549, 5th floor, 08029, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ilonka Zsolt
- Ferrer Internacional, S.A., Av Diagonal 549, 5th floor, 08029, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Banker KK, Liew D, Ademi Z, Owen AJ, Afroz A, Magliano DJ, Zomer E. The Impact of Diabetes on Productivity in India. Diabetes Care 2021; 44:2714-2722. [PMID: 34675058 DOI: 10.2337/dc21-0922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Diabetes increases the risk of premature mortality and considerably impacts on work productivity. We sought to examine the impact of diabetes in India, in terms of excess premature mortality, years of life lost (YLL), productivity-adjusted life years (PALYs) lost, and its associated economic impact. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A life table model was constructed to examine the productivity of the Indian working-age population currently aged 20-59 years with diabetes, followed until death or retirement age (60 years). The same cohort was resimulated, hypothetically assuming that they did not have diabetes. The total difference between the two cohorts, in terms of excess deaths, YLL and PALYs lost reflected the impact of diabetes. Data regarding the prevalence of diabetes, mortality, labor force dropouts, and productivity loss attributable to diabetes were derived from published sources. RESULTS In 2017, an estimated 54.4 million (7.6%) people of working-age in India had diabetes. With simulated follow-up until death or retirement age, diabetes was predicted to cause 8.5 million excess deaths (62.7% of all deaths), 42.7 million YLL (7.4% of total estimated years of life lived), and 89.0 million PALYs lost (23.3% of total estimated PALYs), equating to an estimated Indian rupee 176.6 trillion (U.S. dollars 2.6 trillion; purchasing power parity 9.8 trillion) in lost gross domestic product. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates the impact of diabetes on productivity loss and highlights the importance of health strategies aimed at the prevention of diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khyati K Banker
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zanfina Ademi
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alice J Owen
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Afsana Afroz
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dianna J Magliano
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ella Zomer
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Turner HC, Archer RA, Downey LE, Isaranuwatchai W, Chalkidou K, Jit M, Teerawattananon Y. An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations. Front Public Health 2021; 9:722927. [PMID: 34513790 PMCID: PMC8424074 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.722927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Economic evidence is increasingly being used for informing health policies. However, the underlining principles of health economic analyses are not always fully understood by non-health economists, and inappropriate types of analyses, as well as inconsistent methodologies, may be being used for informing health policy decisions. In addition, there is a lack of open access information and methodological guidance targeted to public health professionals, particularly those based in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive and accessible introduction to economic evaluations for public health professionals with a focus on LMIC settings. We cover the main principles underlining the most common types of full economic evaluations used in healthcare decision making in the context of priority setting (namely cost-effectiveness/cost-utility analyses, cost-benefit analyses), and outline their key features, strengths and weaknesses. It is envisioned that this will help those conducting such analyses, as well as stakeholders that need to interpret their output, gain a greater understanding of these methods and help them select/distinguish between the different approaches. In particular, we highlight the need for greater awareness of the methods used to place a monetary value on the health benefits of interventions, and the potential for such estimates to be misinterpreted. Specifically, the economic benefits reported are typically an approximation, summarising the health benefits experienced by a population monetarily in terms of individual preferences or potential productivity gains, rather than actual realisable or fiscal monetary benefits to payers or society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo C Turner
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel A Archer
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Laura E Downey
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kalipso Chalkidou
- School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Jit
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.,Modelling and Economics Unit, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yot Teerawattananon
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Cost-effectiveness of physical activity intervention in children - results based on the Physical Activity and Nutrition in Children (PANIC) study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2021; 18:116. [PMID: 34488794 PMCID: PMC8419957 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01181-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We assessed the cost-effectiveness of a 2-year physical activity (PA) intervention combining family-based PA counselling and after-school exercise clubs in primary-school children compared to no intervention from an extended service payer’s perspective. Methods The participants included 506 children (245 girls, 261 boys) allocated to an intervention group (306 children, 60 %) and a control group (200 children, 40 %). The children and their parents in the intervention group had six PA counselling visits, and the children also had the opportunity to participate in after-school exercise clubs. The control group received verbal and written advice on health-improving PA at baseline. A change in total PA over two years was used as the outcome measure. Intervention costs included those related to the family-based PA counselling, the after-school exercise clubs, and the parents’ taking time off to travel to and participate in the counselling. The cost-effectiveness analyses were performed using the intention-to-treat principle. The costs per increased PA hour (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ICER) were based on net monetary benefit (NMB) regression adjusted for baseline PA and background variables. The results are presented with NMB and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Results Over two years, total PA increased on average by 108 h in the intervention group (95 % confidence interval [CI] from 95 to 121, p < 0.001) and decreased by 65.5 h (95 % CI from 81.7 to 48.3, p < 0.001) in the control group, the difference being 173.7 h. the incremental effectiveness was 87 (173/2) hours. For two years, the intervention costs were €619 without parents’ time use costs and €860 with these costs. The costs per increased PA hour were €6.21 without and €8.62 with these costs. The willingness to pay required for 95 % probability of cost-effectiveness was €14 and €19 with these costs. The sensitivity analyses revealed that the ICER without assuming this linear change in PA were €3.10 and €4.31. Conclusions The PA intervention would be cost-effective compared to no intervention among children if the service payer’s willingness-to-pay for a 1-hour increase in PA is €8.62 with parents’ time costs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01803776. Registered 4 March 2013 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=01803776&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01181-0.
Collapse
|
44
|
Holdford D, Vendetti N, Sop DM, Johnson S, Smith WR. Indirect Economic Burden of Sickle Cell Disease. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:1095-1101. [PMID: 34372974 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to quantify the indirect costs of sickle cell disease in the United States. METHODS Adult patients from a sickle cell disease clinic at an urban academic healthcare system completed an adapted Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire related to the impact of their disorder on absenteeism, presenteeism, ability to contribute through unpaid work outside of employment, and other aspects of life. Additional data were collected from patient records about each participant's genotype, total hemoglobin level, and pain level. RESULTS Of the 192 individuals, 187 who completed the survey reported experiencing vaso-occlusive crisis pain events during the last year that negatively affected their productivity at work and in daily roles. Three-fourths of respondents reported impairment in their ability to complete everyday tasks, such as caring for children, running errands, doing housework, shopping for groceries, and volunteer (unpaid) work. Only 30% of respondents reported being employed or self-employed. Of those employed, estimated costs of absenteeism and presenteeism attributable to pain events averaged $15 103 per person annually. Estimated total annual losses in unpaid work productivity averaged $3 145 862 for the study respondents and another $2 870 652 for their caregivers. CONCLUSIONS Sickle cell disease affected the work productivity, nonwork productivity, and the daily lives of adults seen with the disorder in an academic medical center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel M Sop
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Wally R Smith
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Return to work is potentially an important factor in assessing the success of treatment. However, little is known about the return to work after treatment for Dupuytren's contracture. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to assess return to work after limited fasciectomy and percutaneous needle fasciotomy. METHODS Patients who underwent either a limited fasciectomy or percutaneous needle fasciotomy were invited to complete a return-to-work questionnaire at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Median time to return to work was assessed using inverted Kaplan-Meier curves, and hazard ratios were calculated with Cox regression models. Finally, a cost analysis was carried out using the human capital method to determine indirect costs associated with loss of productivity. RESULTS The authors included 2698 patients in the study, of which 53 percent were employed at intake and included in the follow-up. After 1 year of follow-up, 90 percent of the patients had returned to work. Median time to return to work was 2 weeks after limited fasciectomy and within days after percutaneous needle fasciotomy. Furthermore, physically strenuous work, female sex, and higher age were associated with a longer time to return to work. Lost productivity per patient was estimated at €2614.43. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients returned to work after treatment for Dupuytren's disease. Return to work is much faster after percutaneous needle fasciotomy compared to limited fasciectomy. These findings can be used for more evidence-based preoperative counseling with patients with Dupuytren's disease.
Collapse
|
46
|
Middleton J, Black K, Ghosh S, Eisenstat DD, Patel S. Indirect costs associated with out-of-country referral for proton therapy: a survey of adult and pediatric patients in Alberta, Canada. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:683. [PMID: 34246276 PMCID: PMC8272904 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06701-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients in Alberta, Canada are referred to the United States (US) for proton treatment. The Alberta Ministry of Health pays for the proton treatment and the cost of flights to and from the United States. This study aimed to determine the out-of-pocket expenses incurred by patients or patients’ families. Methods An electronic survey was sent to 59 patients treated with proton therapy between January 2008 and September 2019. Survey questions asked about expenses related to travel to the US and those incurred while staying in the US, reimbursement of expenses, and whether any time away from work was paid or unpaid leave. Results Seventeen respondents (response rate, 29%) reported expenses of flights for family members (mean, CAD 1886; range CAD 0–5627), passports/visas and other travel costs (mean, CAD 124; range CAD 0–546), accommodation during travel to the US (mean, CAD 50; range CAD 0–563), food during travel to the US (mean, CAD 89; range CAD 0–338), accommodation in the US (rented home/apartment mean, CAD 7394; range CAD 3075-13,305; hotel mean, CAD 4730; range CAD 3564-5895; other accommodation mean CAD 2660; range CAD 0–13,842), transportation in the US (car mean, CAD 2760; range CAD 0–7649; bus/subway mean, CAD 413; range CAD 246–580), and food in the US (mean, CAD 2443; range 0–6921). Expenses were partially reimbursed or covered by not-for-profit organizations or government agencies for some patients (35%). Patients missed a mean of 59 days of work; accompanying family members missed an average of 34 days. For 29% this time away from work was paid, but unpaid for 71% of respondents. Conclusions Multiple factors contributed to the expenses incurred including age of the patient, number of accompanying individuals, available accommodation, mode of transportation within the US, and whether the patient qualified for financial support. Added to this burden is the potential loss of wages for time away from work. The study showed a large variation in indirect costs for each family and supports actively seeking more opportunities for financial support for families with children with cancer. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06701-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karina Black
- Northern Alberta Children's Cancer Program, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - David D Eisenstat
- Northern Alberta Children's Cancer Program, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology & Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1Z2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Stegwee SI, Ben ÂJ, El Alili M, van der Voet LF, de Groot CJM, Bosmans JE, Huirne JAF. Cost-effectiveness of single-layer versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044340. [PMID: 34215598 PMCID: PMC8256741 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of double-layer compared with single-layer uterine closure after a first caesarean section (CS) from a societal and healthcare perspective. DESIGN Economic evaluation alongside a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING 32 hospitals in the Netherlands, 2016-2018. PARTICIPANTS 2292 women ≥18 years undergoing a first CS were randomly assigned (1:1). Exclusion criteria were: inability for counselling, previous uterine surgery, known menstrual disorder, placenta increta or percreta, pregnant with three or more fetuses. 1144 women were assigned to single-layer and 1148 to double-layer closure. We included 1620 women with a menstrual cycle in the main analysis. INTERVENTIONS Single-layer unlocked uterine closure and double-layer unlocked uterine closure with the second layer imbricating the first. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Spotting days, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and societal costs at 9 months of follow-up. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. RESULTS No significant differences were found between single-layer versus double-layer closure in mean spotting days (1.44 and 1.39 days; mean difference (md) -0.056, 95% CI -0.374 to 0.263), QALYs (0.663 and 0.658; md -0.005, 95% CI -0.015 to 0.005), total healthcare costs (€744 and €727; md €-17, 95% CI -273 to 143), and total societal costs (€5689 and €5927; md €238, 95% CI -624 to 1108). The probability of the intervention being cost-effective at willingness-to-pay of €0, €10 000 and €20 000/QALY gained was 0.30, 0.27 and 0.25, respectively, (societal perspective), and 0.55, 0.41 and 0.32, respectively, (healthcare perspective). CONCLUSION Double-layer uterine closure is not cost-effective compared with single-layer uterine closure from both perspectives. If this is confirmed by our long-term reproductive follow-up, we suggest to adjust uterine closure technique guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR5480/NL5380.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne I Stegwee
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ângela J Ben
- Health Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohamed El Alili
- Health Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Christianne J M de Groot
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Judith E Bosmans
- Health Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Judith A F Huirne
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Afroz A, Hird TR, Zomer E, Owen A, Chen L, Ademi Z, Liew D, Magliano DJ, Billah B. The impact of diabetes on the productivity and economy of Bangladesh. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 5:bmjgh-2020-002420. [PMID: 32532757 PMCID: PMC7295429 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To estimate the impact of type 2 diabetes in terms of mortality, years of life lost (YLL) and productivity-adjusted life years (PALY) lost in Bangladesh. METHODS A life table model was constructed to estimate the productivity of the Bangladeshi population of current working age (20-59 years) with diabetes. Follow-up to 60 years (retirement age) was simulated. The life table analysis was then repeated assuming that the cohort did not have diabetes, with subsequent improvement in productivity. Differences in the results of the two analyses reflected the impact of diabetes on health and productivity. Demographic and the prevalence of diabetes data were sourced from the International Diabetes Foundation estimates for 2017 and mortality data were based on the 2017 Global Burden of Disease study. Relative risk and productivity indices were based on an Indian and Bangladeshi study, respectively. The cost of each PALY was assumed to be equivalent to gross domestic product (GDP) per equivalent full-time worker (US$8763). Future costs and years of life, and PALYs lived were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. RESULTS Assuming a follow-up of this population (aged 20-59 years) until age 60 years or death, an estimated 813 807 excess deaths, loss of 4.0 million life years (5.5%) and 9.2 million PALYs (20.4%) were attributable to having diabetes. This was equivalent to 0.7 YLL, and 1.6 PALYs lost per person. The loss in PALYs equated to a total of US$97.4 billion lost (US$16 987 per person) in GDP. The results of the scenario analysis showed that the estimation was robust. CONCLUSION In Bangladesh, the impact of diabetes on productivity loss and the broader economy looms large, and poses a substantial risk to the country's future prosperity. This highlights the critical importance of health strategies aimed at the control of diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afsana Afroz
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas R Hird
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Diabetes and Population Health, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ella Zomer
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alice Owen
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lei Chen
- Diabetes and Population Health, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zanfina Ademi
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dianna J Magliano
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Diabetes and Population Health, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Baki Billah
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rissanen I, Ala-Mursula L, Nerg I, Korhonen M. Adjusted productivity costs of stroke by human capital and friction cost methods: a Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2021; 22:531-545. [PMID: 33625624 PMCID: PMC8166714 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01271-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Productivity costs result from loss of paid and unpaid work and replacements due to morbidity and mortality. They are usually assessed in health economic evaluations with human capital method (HCM) or friction cost method (FCM). The methodology for estimating lost productivity is an area of considerable debate. OBJECTIVE To compare traditional and adjusted HCM and FCM productivity cost estimates among young stroke patients. METHODS The Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 was followed until the age of 50 to identify all 339 stroke patients whose productivity costs were estimated with traditional, occupation-specific and adjusted HCM and FCM models by using detailed, national register-based data on care, disability, mortality, education, taxation and labour market. RESULTS Compared to traditional HCM, taking into account occupational class, national unemployment rate, disability-free life expectancy and decline in work ability, the productivity cost estimate decreased by a third, from €255,960 to €166,050. When traditional FCM was adjusted for occupational class and national unemployment rate, the estimate more than doubled from €3,040 to €7,020. HCM was more sensitive to adjustments for discount rate and wage growth rate than FCM. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the importance of adjustments of HCM and FCM. Routine register-based data can be used for accurate productivity cost estimates of health shocks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Rissanen
- Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Huispost nr. STR 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Leena Ala-Mursula
- Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Iiro Nerg
- Oulu Business School, Department of Economics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Marko Korhonen
- Oulu Business School, Department of Economics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rankala R, Mattila K, Voutilainen M, Mustonen A. Inflammatory bowel disease-related economic costs due to presenteeism and absenteeism. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:687-692. [PMID: 33826877 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1908416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), consisting of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, can be a lifelong burden generating high costs to an economic system. Data regarding the cost of workplace presenteeism and absenteeism in workers with IBD are limited. Our objective was to assess these costs in employed adults. METHODS A structured questionnaire, hospital records and national registers were combined to assess the economic costs involved with workplace presenteeism and absenteeism in employed patients. Our final sample comprised 320 IBD patients. The costs were calculated as productivity-loss costs by using a Human Capital Approach. RESULTS Due to IBD, the mean annual economic costs of workplace presenteeism were €643.90/patient, and mean annual absenteeism costs were €740.90/patient. Women had higher costs (€955/patient/year) from absenteeism compared to men (€531/patient/year) especially when working blue-collar jobs. These findings were also evident in presenteeism. CD and UC patients had similar total costs due to presenteeism and absenteeism. The use of biologics did not have a major impact on these costs. CONCLUSION IBD patients had moderate economic costs from workplace presenteeism and absenteeism. Interestingly, women, working blue-collar jobs, had higher costs than men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmus Rankala
- Department of Internal Medicine, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Kalle Mattila
- Department of Public Health, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Markku Voutilainen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Anssi Mustonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|