1
|
Ramagopalan SV, Gomes M, Durand-Zaleski I, Malcolm B, Diaz J, Mitchell G, Pearson-Stuttard J, Garrison LP. Val (EU) xit: do we need an international ISPOR value flower? J Comp Eff Res 2024; 13:e240083. [PMID: 39028108 PMCID: PMC11363197 DOI: 10.57264/cer-2024-0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sreeram V Ramagopalan
- Lane Clark & Peacock LLP, London, W1U 1DQ, UK
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Medicine Research, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH, UK
| | - Manuel Gomes
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | | | - Bill Malcolm
- Global Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UB8 1DH, UK
| | - Jose Diaz
- Global Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UB8 1DH, UK
| | | | | | - Louis P Garrison
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Campbell DJ, Pandey R, Bloudek LM, Carlson JJ, Wallick C, Veenstra DL, Kowal S. Development of stakeholder-informed recommendations for inclusion of family spillover effects in health technology assessment. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2024; 30:1013-1024. [PMID: 39213143 PMCID: PMC11365565 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.9.1013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impacts of disease and treatment on a patient's family members and informal caregivers are known as "family spillover effects." Although many formal value frameworks call for the consideration of these effects, they are often not included in health technology assessments (HTAs) and cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). A formal evaluation of stakeholder perspectives may help address the disconnect for inclusion of family spillover effects observed in practice. OBJECTIVE To develop stakeholder-driven recommendations for the measurement and use of family spillover effects in the United States and to identify research opportunities. METHODS We first conducted a targeted literature review of US-based CEAs and HTA reports from the past 10 years to assess the current use of family spillover effects. We then used a purposeful sampling technique to conduct 25 qualitative interviews with outcomes researchers, patient advocates, health economists, and health policy and payer experts to gather perspectives on when and how family spillover effects should be considered in HTA processes. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts to identify key themes and develop preliminary recommendations. Finally, we conducted an online workshop with 8 stakeholders to discuss, rate, and refine preliminary recommendations to develop final recommendations. RESULTS A key theme identified in the stakeholder interviews was the role that data availability, analyst preferences, and prior precedence play in limiting the inclusion of spillover effects in HTAs. Additional themes included support for the inclusion of both qualitative and quantitative spillover effects and the need to capture broad and diverse impacts across populations. We developed 15 recommendations from the consensus building workshop addressing measurement, CEA modeling, and HTA processes. Key recommendations included (1) a transparent process for deciding when family spillover effects should be included, (2) measurement of direct and indirect costs with priority based on the magnitude of impact, (3) the use of validated measures, (4) the use of proxy information and expert elicitation when quality data are unavailable, and (5) the use of a modified impact inventory table for transparency of included effects. Research opportunities included patient involvement in family spillover effect research and HTAs, mapping algorithms and non-preference-based caregiver measures to generate utilities, and consensus best practices for modeling. CONCLUSIONS The inconsistent inclusion of family spillover effects in HTAs and CEAs remains a persistent challenge. The stakeholder-driven recommendations and research opportunities identified in this study may help improve the transparency, measurement, and use of family spillover effects in assessing the clinical and economic value of novel medical technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Josh J. Carlson
- The CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - David L. Veenstra
- The CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mendoza-Jiménez MJ, van Exel J, Brouwer W. On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:1239-1260. [PMID: 38261132 PMCID: PMC11377364 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01658-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
An important issue in economic evaluations is determining whether all relevant impacts are considered, given the perspective chosen for the analysis. Acknowledging that patients are not isolated individuals has important implications in this context. Increasingly, the term "spillovers" is used to label consequences of health interventions on others. However, a clear definition of spillovers is lacking, and as a result, the scope of the concept remains unclear. In this study, we aim to clarify the concept of spillovers by proposing a definition applicable in health economic evaluations. To illustrate the implications of this definition, we highlight the diversity of potential spillovers through an expanded impact inventory and conduct a mapping review that outlines the evidence base for the different types of spillovers. In the context of economic evaluations of health interventions, we define spillovers as all impacts from an intervention on all parties or entities other than the users of the intervention under evaluation. This definition encompasses a broader range of potential costs and effects, beyond informal caregivers and family members. The expanded impact inventory enables a systematic approach to identifying broader impacts of health interventions. The mapping review shows that the relevance of different types of spillovers is context-specific. Some spillovers are regularly included in economic evaluations, although not always recognised as such, while others are not. A consistent use of the term "spillovers", improved measurement of these costs and effects, and increased transparency in reporting them are still necessary. To that end, we propose a research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María J Mendoza-Jiménez
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Guayaquil, Ecuador.
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lamsal R, Yeh EA, Pullenayegum E, Ungar WJ. A Systematic Review of Methods and Practice for Integrating Maternal, Fetal, and Child Health Outcomes, and Family Spillover Effects into Cost-Utility Analyses. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:843-863. [PMID: 38819718 PMCID: PMC11249496 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01397-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal-perinatal interventions delivered during pregnancy or childbirth have unique characteristics that impact the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the mother, fetus, and newborn child. However, maternal-perinatal cost-utility analyses (CUAs) often only consider either maternal or child health outcomes. Challenges include, but are not limited to, measuring fetal, newborn, and infant health outcomes, and assessing their impact on maternal HRQoL. It is also important to recognize the impact of maternal-perinatal health on family members' HRQoL (i.e., family spillover effects) and to incorporate these effects in maternal-perinatal CUAs. OBJECTIVE The aim was to systematically review the methods used to include health outcomes of pregnant women, fetuses, and children and to incorporate family spillover effects in maternal-perinatal CUAs. METHODS A literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, EconLit, Cochrane Collection, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA), and the Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation (PEDE) databases from inception to 2020 to identify maternal-perinatal CUAs that included health outcomes for pregnant women, fetuses, and/or children. The search was updated to December 2022 using PEDE. Data describing how the health outcomes of mothers, fetuses, and children were measured, incorporated, and reported along with the data on family spillover effects were extracted. RESULTS Out of 174 maternal-perinatal CUAs identified, 62 considered the health outcomes of pregnant women, and children. Among the 54 quality-adjusted life year (QALY)-based CUAs, 12 included fetal health outcomes, the impact of fetal loss on mothers' HRQoL, and the impact of neonatal demise on mothers' HRQoL. Four studies considered fetal health outcomes and the effects of fetal loss on mothers' HRQoL. One study included fetal health outcomes and the impact of neonatal demise on maternal HRQoL. Furthermore, six studies considered the impact of neonatal demise on maternal HRQoL, while four included fetal health outcomes. One study included the impact of fetal loss on maternal HRQoL. The remaining 26 only included the health outcomes of pregnant women and children. Among the eight disability-adjusted life year (DALY)-based CUAs, two measured fetal health outcomes. Out of 174 studies, only one study included family spillover effects. The most common measurement approach was to measure the health outcomes of pregnant women and children separately. Various approaches were used to assess fetal losses in terms of QALYs or DALYs and their impact on HRQoL of mothers. The most common integration approach was to sum the QALYs or DALYs for pregnant women and children. Most studies reported combined QALYs and incremental QALYs, or DALYs and incremental DALYs, at the family level for pregnant women and children. CONCLUSIONS Approximately one-third of maternal-perinatal CUAs included the health outcomes of pregnant women, fetuses, and/or children. Future CUAs of maternal-perinatal interventions, conducted from a societal perspective, should aim to incorporate health outcomes for mothers, fetuses, and children when appropriate. The various approaches used within these CUAs highlight the need for standardized measurement and integration methods, potentially leading to rigorous and standardized inclusion practices, providing higher-quality evidence to better inform decision-makers about the costs and benefits of maternal-perinatal interventions. Health Technology Assessment agencies may consider providing guidance for interventions affecting future lives in future updates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Lamsal
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Ann Yeh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eleanor Pullenayegum
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, 686 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kuharic M, Mulhern B, Sharp LK, Turpin RS, Pickard AS. Comparison of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S With Other Preference-Based Measures Among United States Informal Caregivers. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:967-977. [PMID: 38492925 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Several measures have been used or developed to capture the health and well-being of caregivers, including the EQ Health and Well-being (EQ-HWB) and its short form, EQ-HWB-S. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and construct validity of the EQ-HWB/EQ-HWB-S in a US caregiver population. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 504 caregivers. Eligible participants were 18+ years old, provided unpaid care to a relative/friend aged 18+ in the past 6 months, and spent on average of at least 1 hour per week caregiving. Survey included the following measures: EQ-HWB, Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers-Carer, CarerQol, and EQ-5D-5L. Psychometric properties were assessed using response distributions, floor/ceiling effects, Spearman's correlation for convergent validity, and effect sizes (ES) for known-group validity based on caregiving situations and intensity. RESULTS The average age of caregivers was 49.2 (SD = 15.4), with 57.5% being female. More than half (54.4%) reported high caregiving intensity, and 68.3% lived with the care recipient. The EQ-HWB-S index showed a strong positive correlation with the EQ-5D-5L (rs = 0.72), Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (rs = 0.54), and CarerQol (rs = 0.54) indices. Notably, the EQ-HWB-S index showed the largest ES among measures in differentiating caregiving scenarios with a large ES for caregiver's general health (d = 1.00) and small ES for caregiving intensity (d = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS Results support construct validity of EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S as measures for assessing health and well-being of adult informal caregivers in comparison with other validated instruments. Differing levels of known-group validity across anchors emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate measures for caregivers, depending on research question and/or intervention aims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Kuharic
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa K Sharp
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - A Simon Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Engel L, Chiotelis O, Papadopoulos N, Hiscock H, Howlin P, McGillivray J, Bellows ST, Rinehart N, Mihalopoulos C. Sleeping Sound Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Cost-Effectiveness of a Brief Behavioural Sleep Intervention in Primary School-Aged Autistic Children. J Autism Dev Disord 2024:10.1007/s10803-024-06422-2. [PMID: 38833029 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06422-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
Disordered sleep is common in autistic children. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a brief behavioural sleep intervention, the 'Sleeping Sound intervention', in primary school-aged autistic children in Australia. A cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken alongside a randomised controlled trial over a 6-month follow-up period from both a societal and healthcare sector perspective. Resources used by participants were collected from a resource-use questionnaire and administrative data; intervention costs were determined from study records. Mean costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared between the intervention and treatment as usual (TAU) groups. Uncertainty analysis using bootstrapping and sensitivity analyses were conducted. The sample included 245 children, with 123 participants randomised to the intervention group and 122 to TAU. The mean total costs were higher for the Sleeping Sound intervention with a mean difference of A$745 (95% CI 248; 1242; p = 0.003) from a healthcare sector perspective and A$1310 (95% CI 584; 2035, p < 0.001) from a societal perspective. However, the intervention also resulted in greater QALYs compared with TAU, with a mean difference of 0.038 (95% CI 0.004; 0.072; p = 0.028). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was A$24,419/QALY (95% CI 23,135; 25,703) from a healthcare sector perspective and A$41,922/QALY (95% CI 39,915; 43,928) from a societal perspective; with a probability of being cost-effective of 93.8% and 74.7%, respectively. Findings remained robust in the sensitivity analyses. The Sleeping Sound intervention offers a cost-effective approach in improving sleep in primary school-aged autistic children.Trial registration The trial was registered with the International Trial Registry (ISRCTN14077107).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Engel
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Oxana Chiotelis
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicole Papadopoulos
- Krongold Clinic, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia
- School of Educational Psychology & Counselling, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Harriet Hiscock
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Patricia Howlin
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jane McGillivray
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Susannah T Bellows
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicole Rinehart
- Krongold Clinic, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bailey C, Dalziel K, Jones R, Hiscock H, Devlin NJ, Peasgood T. The Validity of the EuroQol Health and Wellbeing Short Version (EQ-HWB-S) Instrument in Parents of Children With and Without Health Conditions. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:163-179. [PMID: 38238605 PMCID: PMC11168993 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01351-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EuroQol Health and Wellbeing Short Version (EQ-HWB-S) instrument has been developed to measure the health and wellbeing of care-recipients and their caregivers for use in economic evaluation.The EQ-HWB-S has nine items, and pilot UK preference weights have now been developed. OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate the validity of the instrument in parents of children with and without health conditions. METHODS EQ-HWB-S data were sourced from an Australian paediatric multi-instrument comparison study. We analysed the baseline characteristics and response distribution of the EQ-HWB-S items. Assessment of known-group validity was conducted for EQ-HWB-S items, level sum-scores and preference-weighted scores, including partial effects. Known-group analyses included three child health variables and where caregivers reported coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had impacted their wellbeing. We included analyses across gender, controlled for child and parent demographic variables, and compared scores across child health conditions. RESULTS Item responses were distributed as expected, with higher skew for mobility and activities. Parents experienced high levels of exhaustion. We detected significant differences between groups for level sum-scores and preference-weighted scores, as hypothesised; all tests were significant (p < 0.001), with moderate effect sizes (effect sizes were slightly higher for female than male parents). The regression analysis identified significantly different EQ-HWB-S scores for child health samples compared with the general population after controlling for demographic variables. Differences were observed between child health conditions. CONCLUSION The EQ-HWB-S is a useful instrument to measure parent quality of life for economic evaluation in this population. Data were limited to one time point; further research should investigate the instrument's sensitivity to change and test-retest reliability in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cate Bailey
- Melbourne Health Economics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
| | - Kim Dalziel
- Melbourne Health Economics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Renee Jones
- Melbourne Health Economics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Harriet Hiscock
- Health Services and Economics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Health Services Research Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nancy J Devlin
- Melbourne Health Economics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne Health Economics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bailey C, Dalziel K, Constable L, Devlin NJ, Hiscock H, Skouteris H, Peasgood T. The performance of the EQ-HWB-S as a measure of quality-of-life of caregivers in families that have experienced adverse events. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024:10.1007/s10198-024-01688-w. [PMID: 38578477 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01688-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The recently developed EQ Health and Wellbeing Instrument (EQ-HWB) is a broad, generic measure of quality-of-life designed to be suitable for caregivers. The aim of this study was to investigate performance and validity of the 9-item version (EQ-HWB-S) for caregivers where families had experienced adverse-life-events. METHODS Using survey data from caregivers of children aged 0-8 years attending a community-health centre in 2021-2022, the general performance, feasibility, convergent and known-group validity, responsiveness-to-change, and test-retest reliability of the EQ-HWB-S was assessed. Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with survey respondents to assess acceptability and content validity. RESULTS The sample included 234 caregivers at baseline (81% female, mean age 36-years, 38% Australian-born) and 190 at 6-months follow-up. Most EQ-HWB-S item responses were evenly spread, except for 'Mobility'. The instrument showed good convergent validity with psychological distress (Kessler 6 (K6)) and personal-wellbeing (PWI-A) scales. EQ-HWB-S level sum-scores and preference-weighted scores were significantly different in all known-group analyses, in expected directions, and the instrument was responsive to change. For test-retest reliability, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were excellent and individual item Kappa scores were moderate. The instrument was well received by interviewees who found the questions clear and relevant. The items were appropriate for parents experiencing adversity and carers of children with additional needs. CONCLUSION The EQ-HWB-S appeared valid, responsive to change, feasible, and well accepted by caregivers. By demonstrating the validity of the EQ-HWB-S in this hard-to-reach population of caregivers in families experiencing adverse events, this study adds to existing international evidence supporting its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cate Bailey
- Melbourne Health Economics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
| | - Kim Dalziel
- Melbourne Health Economics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
- Health Services and Economics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Leanne Constable
- Health Services and Economics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nancy J Devlin
- Melbourne Health Economics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Harriet Hiscock
- Health Services and Economics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Health Services Research Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Skouteris
- Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne Health Economics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shah R, Salek MS, Finlay AY, Kay R, Nixon SJ, Otwombe K, Ali FM, Ingram JR. Mapping of Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16) scores to EQ-5D: algorithm to calculate utility values. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:1107-1119. [PMID: 38402530 PMCID: PMC10973087 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03590-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although decision scientists and health economists encourage inclusion of family member/informal carer utility in health economic evaluation, there is a lack of suitable utility measures comparable to patient utility measures such those based on the EQ-5D. This study aims to predict EQ-5D-3L utility values from Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16) scores, to allow the use of FROM-16 data in health economic evaluation when EQ-5D data is not available. METHODS Data from 4228 family members/partners of patients recruited to an online cross-sectional study through 58 UK-based patient support groups, three research support platforms and Welsh social services departments were randomly divided five times into two groups, to derive and test a mapping model. Split-half cross-validation was employed, resulting in a total of ten multinomial logistic regression models. The Monte Carlo simulation procedure was used to generate predicted EQ-5D-3L responses, and utility scores were calculated and compared against observed values. Mean error and mean absolute error were calculated for all ten validation models. The final model algorithm was derived using the entire sample. RESULTS The model was highly predictive, and its repeated fitting using multinomial logistic regression demonstrated a stable model. The mean differences between predicted and observed health utility estimates ranged from 0.005 to 0.029 across the ten modelling exercises, with an average overall difference of 0.015 (a 2.2% overestimate, not of clinical importance). CONCLUSIONS The algorithm developed will enable researchers and decision scientists to calculate EQ-5D health utility estimates from FROM-16 scores, thus allowing the inclusion of the family impact of disease in health economic evaluation of medical interventions when EQ-5D data is not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Shah
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
| | - M S Salek
- School of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - A Y Finlay
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - R Kay
- RK Statistics, Bakewell, UK
| | - S J Nixon
- Multiple Sclerosis Society, Cardiff, UK
| | - K Otwombe
- Statistics and Data Management Centre, Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - F M Ali
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - J R Ingram
- Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Henry E, Al-Janabi H, Brouwer W, Cullinan J, Engel L, Griffin S, Hulme C, Kingkaew P, Lloyd A, Payakachat N, Pennington B, Peña-Longobardo LM, Prosser LA, Shah K, Ungar WJ, Wilkinson T, Wittenberg E. Recommendations for Emerging Good Practice and Future Research in Relation to Family and Caregiver Health Spillovers in Health Economic Evaluations: A Report of the SHEER Task Force. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:343-362. [PMID: 38041698 PMCID: PMC10861630 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01321-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Omission of family and caregiver health spillovers from the economic evaluation of healthcare interventions remains common practice. When reported, a high degree of methodological inconsistency in incorporating spillovers has been observed. AIM To promote emerging good practice, this paper from the Spillovers in Health Economic Evaluation and Research (SHEER) task force aims to provide guidance on the incorporation of family and caregiver health spillovers in cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. SHEER also seeks to inform the basis for a spillover research agenda and future practice. METHODS A modified nominal group technique was used to reach consensus on a set of recommendations, representative of the views of participating subject-matter experts. Through the structured discussions of the group, as well as on the basis of evidence identified during a review process, recommendations were proposed and voted upon, with voting being held over two rounds. RESULTS This report describes 11 consensus recommendations for emerging good practice. SHEER advocates for the incorporation of health spillovers into analyses conducted from a healthcare/health payer perspective, and more generally inclusive perspectives such as a societal perspective. Where possible, spillovers related to displaced/foregone activities should be considered, as should the distributional consequences of inclusion. Time horizons ought to be sufficient to capture all relevant impacts. Currently, the collection of primary spillover data is preferred and clear justification should be provided when using secondary data. Transparency and consistency when reporting on the incorporation of health spillovers are crucial. In addition, given that the evidence base relating to health spillovers remains limited and requires much development, 12 avenues for future research are proposed. CONCLUSIONS Consideration of health spillovers in economic evaluations has been called for by researchers and policymakers alike. Accordingly, it is hoped that the consensus recommendations of SHEER will motivate more widespread incorporation of health spillovers into analyses. The developing nature of spillover research necessitates that this guidance be viewed as an initial roadmap, rather than a strict checklist. Moreover, there is a need for balance between consistency in approach, where valuable in a decision making context, and variation in application, to reflect differing decision maker perspectives and to support innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Henry
- J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - John Cullinan
- J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Lidia Engel
- Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan Griffin
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Claire Hulme
- Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Pritaporn Kingkaew
- Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | | | - Nalin Payakachat
- Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Becky Pennington
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Koonal Shah
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas Wilkinson
- Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Eve Wittenberg
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Elliott J, Francetic I, Meacock R, Sutton M. Do Informal Care Recipients Internalise Carer Burden? Examining the Impact of Informal Care Receipt on Health Behaviours. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:209-225. [PMID: 38198104 PMCID: PMC10864417 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00843-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Providing informal care has a negative effect on the caregiver's health and well-being, but little is known about how individuals respond to receiving informal care. Care recipients may improve their health behaviours to minimise the onerousness of caregiving and the stress faced by their carer from seeing a loved one in ill-health. OBJECTIVE We aimed to examine whether informal care recipients internalise the potential for carer spillovers through changes in health behaviours. METHODS We used data from 3250 older adults with care needs who took part in the UK Household Longitudinal Study between 2017 and 2019. We examined the response to informal care receipt in terms of the probability of engaging in four health behaviours: healthy diet, physical activity, smoking and alcohol consumption. We estimated average treatment effects using regression adjustment with inverse probability treatment weights, comparing individuals that received informal care to those receiving either formal or no care. RESULTS We found that informal care receipt increased the probability of refraining from negative health behaviours (smoking and alcohol consumption) but reduced the probability of engaging in positive health behaviours (eating fruits and/or vegetables and physical activity). CONCLUSIONS The asymmetric effects detected suggest that the underlying mechanisms are different, and care recipients may be engaging in risk and effort compensation between negative and positive health behaviours. Failure to account for the behavioural responses from informal care recipients may lead to under-estimation or over-estimation of the extent of caregiving burden and the effectiveness of interventions impacting informal carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Elliott
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Services, The University of Manchester, Williamson building, 176 Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9QQ, UK.
| | - Igor Francetic
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Services, The University of Manchester, Williamson building, 176 Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9QQ, UK
| | - Rachel Meacock
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Services, The University of Manchester, Williamson building, 176 Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9QQ, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Services, The University of Manchester, Williamson building, 176 Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9QQ, UK
- Melbourne Institute, Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Miao P, Terris-Prestholt F, Fairley CK, Tucker JD, Wiseman V, Mayaud P, Zhang Y, Rowley J, Gottlieb S, Korenromp EL, Watts CG, Ong JJ. Ignored and undervalued in public health: a systematic review of health state utility values associated with syphilis infection. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:17. [PMID: 38350925 PMCID: PMC10863090 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02234-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection causing significant global morbidity and mortality. To inform policymaking and economic evaluation studies for syphilis, we summarised utility and disability weights for health states associated with syphilis. METHODS We conducted a systematic review, searching six databases for economic evaluations and primary valuation studies related to syphilis from January 2000 to February 2022. We extracted health state utility values or disability weights, including identification of how these were derived. The study was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42021230035). FINDINGS Of 3401 studies screened, 22 economic evaluations, two primary studies providing condition-specific measures, and 13 burden of disease studies were included. Fifteen economic evaluations reported outcomes as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and seven reported quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Fourteen of 15 economic evaluations that used DALYS based their values on the original Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study from 1990 (published in 1996). For the seven QALY-related economic evaluations, the methodology varied between studies, with some studies using assumptions and others creating utility weights or converting them from disability weights. INTERPRETATION We found a limited evidence base for the valuation of health states for syphilis, a lack of transparency for the development of existing health state utility values, and inconsistencies in the application of these values to estimate DALYs and QALYs. Further research is required to expand the evidence base so that policymakers can access accurate and well-informed economic evaluations to allocate resources to address syphilis and implement syphilis programs that are cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Miao
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, 580 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria, 3053, Australia
| | - Fern Terris-Prestholt
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christopher K Fairley
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joseph D Tucker
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Virginia Wiseman
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Philippe Mayaud
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ying Zhang
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Rowley
- Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexual Transmitted Infections Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sami Gottlieb
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Caroline G Watts
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jason J Ong
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lamsal R, Yeh EA, Pullenayegum E, Ungar WJ. A Systematic Review of Methods Used by Pediatric Cost-Utility Analyses to Include Family Spillover Effects. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:199-217. [PMID: 37945777 PMCID: PMC10810985 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01331-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A child's health condition affects family members' health and well-being. However, pediatric cost-utility analysis (CUA) commonly ignores these family spillover effects leading to an incomplete understanding of the cost and benefits of a child's health intervention. Methodological challenges exist in assessing, valuing, and incorporating family spillover effects. OBJECTIVE This study systematically reviews and compare methods used to include family spillover effects in pediatric CUAs. METHODS A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, EconLit, Cochrane collection, CINAHL, INAHTA, and the Pediatric Economic Database Evaluation (PEDE) database from inception to 2020 to identify pediatric CUAs that included family spillover effects. The search was updated to 2021 using PEDE. The data describing in which family members spillover effects were measured, and how family spillover effects were measured, incorporated, and reported, were extracted. Common approaches were grouped conceptually. Further, this review identified theories or theoretical frameworks used to justify approaches for integrating family spillover effects into CUA. RESULTS Of 878 pediatric CUAs identified, 35 included family spillover effects. Most pediatric CUAs considered family spillover effects on one family member. Pediatric CUAs reported eight different approaches to measure the family spillover effects. The most common method was measuring the quality-adjusted life years (QALY) loss of the caregiver(s) or parent(s) due to a child's illness or disability using an isolated approach whereby family spillover effects were quantified in individual family members separately from other health effects. Studies used four approaches to integrate family spillover effects into CUA. The most common method was to sum children's and parents/caregivers' QALYs. Only two studies used a theoretical framework for incorporation of family spillover effects. CONCLUSIONS Few pediatric CUAs included family spillover effects and the observed variation indicated no consensus among researchers on how family spillover effects should be measured and incorporated. This heterogeneity is mirrored by a lack of practical guidelines by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies or a theoretical foundation for including family spillover effects in pediatric CUA. The results from this review may encourage researchers to develop a theoretical framework and HTA agencies to develop guidelines for including family spillover effects. Such guidance may lead to more rigorous and standardized methods for including family spillover effects and better-quality evidence to inform decision-makers on the cost-effectiveness of pediatric health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Lamsal
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Ann Yeh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Neurosciences and Mental Health, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eleanor Pullenayegum
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Goh ZZS, Ho MHR, Ng KYY, Chia JMX, Ishak NDB, Shwe TT, Chua ZY, Ngeow JYY, Griva K. Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model to explore the psychological impact of COVID-19 on anxiety in dyads of patients with cancer and caregivers. Int J Behav Med 2024; 31:19-30. [PMID: 36788172 PMCID: PMC9928140 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-023-10154-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delineating the compound psychological effect of the pandemic on cancer care, and the interdependency across cancer patient-caregiver dyads have yet to be explored. This study examines the levels of psychological impact of COVID-19 on patient-caregiver dyads anxiety, and the interdependent associations between their COVID-19 and cancer concerns, and risk perceptions. METHOD There were 352 patients and caregivers (patient-caregiver dyads, N = 176) included in this study (43.2% spousal dyads). Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and questionnaires regarding risk perception, perceived confidence in healthcare system, COVID-19, and cancer-related concerns were administered. Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) analyses were used to determine the interdependent effects. Indirect effects were tested using mediation pathway analyses. RESULTS Patients reported significantly higher levels of risk perceptions and anxiety than their caregivers (p < 0.01). Anxiety rates (GAD-7 ≥ 10) were also significantly higher (26.7% vs 18.2%, p < 0.01). Dyads' anxiety, "general COVID-19 concerns," "cancer-related concerns," and risk perceptions were correlated (ps < 0.01). APIM showed only actor effects of general COVID-19 concerns, cancer-related COVID-19 concerns, and risk perceptions on anxiety (βs = 0.19-0.53, ps < 0.01). No partner effects were observed. Similar results were found in the composite APIM. Indirect effects of the patient/caregiver's variables on their partner's anxiety were observed in the mediation analyses. CONCLUSION Concerns about COVID-19 and cancer care could be indirectly associated in patient-caregiver dyads and need to be proactively addressed. As pandemic evolves into endemicity, engagement with patients and caregivers should strive to be sensitive to their differential needs and messages should be tailored to the informational needs of each.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zack Zhong Sheng Goh
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308232 Singapore
| | - Moon-ho R. Ho
- School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kennedy Yao Yi Ng
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jace Ming Xuan Chia
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308232 Singapore
| | - Nur Diana Binte Ishak
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Than Than Shwe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zi Yang Chua
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joanne Yuen Yie Ngeow
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308232 Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Konstadina Griva
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, 11 Mandalay Road, Singapore, 308232 Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zwack CC, Haghani M, de Bekker-Grob EW. Research trends in contemporary health economics: a scientometric analysis on collective content of specialty journals. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2024; 14:6. [PMID: 38270771 PMCID: PMC10809694 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-023-00471-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health economics is a thriving sub-discipline of economics. Applied health economics research is considered essential in the health care sector and is used extensively by public policy makers. For scholars, it is important to understand the history and status of health economics-when it emerged, the rate of research output, trending topics, and its temporal evolution-to ensure clarity and direction when formulating research questions. METHODS Nearly 13,000 articles were analysed, which were found in the collective publications of the ten most specialised health economic journals. We explored this literature using patterns of term co-occurrence and document co-citation. RESULTS The research output in this field is growing exponentially. Five main research divisions were identified: (i) macroeconomic evaluation, (ii) microeconomic evaluation, (iii) measurement and valuation of outcomes, (iv) monitoring mechanisms (evaluation), and (v) guidance and appraisal. Document co-citation analysis revealed eighteen major research streams and identified variation in the magnitude of activities in each of the streams. A recent emergence of research activities in health economics was seen in the Medicaid Expansion stream. Established research streams that continue to show high levels of activity include Child Health, Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Cost-effectiveness. Conversely, Patient Preference, Health Care Expenditure and Economic Evaluation are now past their peak of activity in specialised health economic journals. Analysis also identified several streams that emerged in the past but are no longer active. CONCLUSIONS Health economics is a growing field, yet there is minimal evidence of creation of new research trends. Over the past 10 years, the average rate of annual increase in internationally collaborated publications is almost double that of domestic collaborations (8.4% vs 4.9%), but most of the top scholarly collaborations remain between six countries only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara C Zwack
- Department of Nursing and Allied Health, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Milad Haghani
- School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Esther W de Bekker-Grob
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Simoens S, Tubeuf S, Dauby N, Ethgen O, Marbaix S, Willaert M, Luyten J. The broader benefits of vaccines: methodologies for inclusion in economic evaluation. Expert Rev Vaccines 2024; 23:779-788. [PMID: 39136368 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2024.2387599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the societal value of vaccines is increasingly recognized, there is a need to examine methodological approaches that could be used to integrate these various benefits in the economic evaluation of a vaccine. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A literature review and two expert panel meetings explored methodologies to value herd immunity, health spillover effects (beyond herd immunity), impact on antimicrobial resistance, productivity, and equity implications of vaccines. RESULTS The consideration of broader benefits of vaccines in economic evaluation is complicated and necessitates technical expertise. Whereas methodologies to account for herd immunity and work productivity are relatively well established, approaches to investigate equity implications are developing and less frequently applied. Modeling the potential impact on antimicrobial resistance not only depends on the multi-faceted causal relationship between vaccination and resistance but also on data availability. CONCLUSIONS Different methods are available to value the broad impact of vaccines, and it is important that analysts are aware of their strengths and limitations and justify their choice of method. In the future, we expect that an increasing number of economic evaluations will consider the broader benefits of vaccines as part of their base-case analysis or in sensitivity analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sandy Tubeuf
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain (UClouvain), Brussels, Belgium
- Institute of Economic and Social Research (IRES), Université Catholique de Louvain (UClouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Dauby
- Department of Infectious Diseases, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Ethgen
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- SERFAN Innovation, Namur, Belgium
| | - Sophie Marbaix
- Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons-UMONS, Mons, Belgium
| | | | - Jeroen Luyten
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pennington B, Al-Janabi H. Modelling Informal Carers' Health-Related Quality of Life: Challenges for Economic Evaluation. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:9-16. [PMID: 37948034 PMCID: PMC10761460 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00834-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
There has been increasing interest in including carers' health-related qualify of life (HRQoL) in decision models, but currently there is no best practice guidance as to how to do so. Models thus far have typically assumed that carers' HRQoL can be predicted from patient health states, as we illustrate with three examples of disease-modifying treatments. However, this approach limits the mechanisms that influence carers' HRQoL solely to patient health and may not accurately reflect carers' outcomes. In this article, we identify and discuss challenges associated with modelling intervention effects on carers' HRQoL: attaching carer utilities to patient disease states, the size of the caring network, aggregation of carer and patient HRQoL, patient death, and modelling longer-term carer HRQoL. We review and critique potential alternatives to modelling carers' HRQoL in decision models: trial-based analyses, qualitative consideration, cost-consequence analysis, and multicriteria decision analysis, noting that each of these also has its own challenges. We provide a framework of issues to consider when modelling carers' HRQoL and suggest how these can be addressed in current practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becky Pennington
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Faraji H, Soleymani F, Yaseri M, Sahraian MA, Abdollahiasl A, Meftah A, Nikfar S. Choosing the Best Instrument for Measuring Health Spillover Effect in Caregivers of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Value Health Reg Issues 2024; 39:49-56. [PMID: 37979543 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To measure the health spillover effect in caregivers of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), we aimed to select the best instrument from 2 common health-related quality of life (QoL) instruments, the 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) and the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3), by assessing them. METHODS Using consecutive sampling, 452 primary caregivers of patients with MS were asked to fill out a Care-related QoL instrument (CarerQol-7D), EQ-5D-3L, HUI-3, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale between October 2019 and May 2020. Convergent and clinical validity were assessed to measure spillover effect in caregivers of patients with MS. RESULTS A strong correlation of health-utility scores between EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 (r = 0.914, P < .01) was observed. The 95% limit of agreement (LoA) for CarerQol-7D and HUI-3 (-10.6 to 8.2) was narrower than the LoA for CarerQol-7D and EQ-5D-3L (-15.1 to 17.1). Both EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 proved clinical validity for the QoL of caregivers. The CarerQoL-7D score was significantly lower in female (P < .001), single (P < .014), lower-educated (P < .001), parent's relatives (P < .001), and unemployed (P < .001) caregivers. CONCLUSIONS We found that both, EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3, were appropriate for measuring caregivers' QoL, although HUI-3 was a better choice because of its narrower LoA. Our findings suggest researchers should use HUI-3 to measure the quality-adjusted life-year of caregivers to aggregate with the QoL of patients in the denominator of an economic evaluation equation, such as the cost-effective ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoda Faraji
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran
| | - Fatemeh Soleymani
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran
| | - Mehdi Yaseri
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran
| | - Mohammad Ali Sahraian
- Neurology Department, MS Research Centre, Neuroscience institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran
| | - Akbar Abdollahiasl
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran
| | - Azin Meftah
- Faculty of Health Sciences Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Finland, Kuopio
| | - Shekoufeh Nikfar
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Galbraith AA, Faugno E, Cripps LA, Przywara KM, Wright DR, Gilkey MB. "You Have to Rob Peter to Pay Paul So Your Kid Can Breathe": Using Qualitative Methods to Characterize Trade-Offs and Economic Impact of Asthma Care Costs. Med Care 2023; 61:S95-S103. [PMID: 37963027 PMCID: PMC10635333 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Economic analyses often focus narrowly on individual patients' health care use, while overlooking the growing economic burden of out-of-pocket costs for health care on other family medical and household needs. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore intrafamilial trade-offs families make when paying for asthma care. RESEARCH DESIGN In 2018, we conducted telephone interviews with 59 commercially insured adults who had asthma and/or had a child with asthma. We analyzed data qualitatively via thematic content analysis. PARTICIPANTS Our purposive sample included participants with high-deductible and no/low-deductible health plans. We recruited participants through a national asthma advocacy organization and a large nonprofit regional health plan. MEASURES Our semistructured interview guide explored domains related to asthma adherence and cost burden, cost management strategies, and trade-offs. RESULTS Participants reported that they tried to prioritize paying for asthma care, even at the expense of their family's overall financial well-being. When facing conflicting demands, participants described making trade-offs between asthma care and other health and nonmedical needs based on several criteria: (1) short-term needs versus longer term financial health; (2) needs of children over adults; (3) acuity of the condition; (4) effectiveness of treatment; and (5) availability of lower cost alternatives. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that cost-sharing for asthma care often has negative financial consequences for families that traditional, individually focused economic analyses are unlikely to capture. This work highlights the need for patient-centered research to evaluate the impact of health care costs at the family level, holistically measuring short-term and long-term family financial outcomes that extend beyond health care use alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison A. Galbraith
- Boston Medical Center and Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine
- Harvard Medical School & Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Elena Faugno
- Harvard Medical School & Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Lauren A. Cripps
- Harvard Medical School & Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Davene R. Wright
- Harvard Medical School & Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Melissa B. Gilkey
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bucholc J, McCaffrey N, Ugalde A, Muldowney A, Rand S, Hoefman R, Mihalopoulos C, Engel L. How well do the adult social care outcomes toolkit for carers, carer experience scale and care-related quality of life capture aspects of quality of life important to informal carers in Australia? Qual Life Res 2023; 32:3109-3121. [PMID: 37356076 PMCID: PMC10522516 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03459-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Identify aspects of quality of life (QoL) important to Australian informal carers and explore how well the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers, Care-related Quality of Life instrument and Carer Experience Scale capture these aspects in the Australian context. METHODS Online questionnaires were completed by Australian informal carers. Socio-demographics, open-ended questions: positive/negative aspects of caring and QoL aspects missing from the instruments, and ranking of the instrument domains was used to explore the content of the instruments. Instruments were scored using preference-weighted value sets (reported in another paper). Content analysis was used to analyse the open-ended responses. Chi-squared test looked at differences in domain importance. Descriptive analyses summarised all other information. RESULTS Eight themes were identified: Behaviour-mood of the care recipient, Caring responsibilities, Finances, Health, Own life, Perception of carers, Relationship with care recipient and Support. Many aspects of carer QoL mentioned as missing in the instruments appeared covered by the domains, of which all were reported as important. The highest ranked domain was relationship with the care recipient. The influence of the care recipient specific support, behaviour/mood and health on carer QoL appear absent in all instruments. CONCLUSION The content of the three instruments appears relevant in an Australian setting. The influence of care recipient's health and well-being on carer QoL should be considered, along with spillover effects. A content and/or face validity analysis is required to confirm differences in item interpretation in Australian informal carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Bucholc
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
| | - Nikki McCaffrey
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Ugalde
- Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Renske Hoefman
- The Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP), The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lidia Engel
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
McLoughlin C, Goranitis I, Al-Janabi H. The Feasibility and Validity of Preference-Based Quality of Life Measures With Informal Carers: A Think-Aloud Study. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:1655-1664. [PMID: 37516197 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A range of preference-based quality of life (QoL) measures have been proposed for use with informal carers. Qualitative evaluation of validity and feasibility of the measures is an important step in understanding whether measures will work as intended. At present, little is known about the performance of different types of preference-based QoL measures with informal carers. The objective of this study was to qualitatively assess the feasibility, content validity (including face validity), and acceptability of 5 QoL measures (the Carer Experience Scale, CarerQoL-7D, ASCOT-C, ICECAP-A, and EQ-5D-5L) with informal carers. METHODS A total of 24 "think-aloud" interviews were conducted with a cross-section of carers of adults in the United Kingdom. This think-aloud process was followed by semistructured discussion to probe issues of validity and feasibility in more detail. The interview data were transcribed, coded to identify the frequency of errors in completing the QoL measures and thematically analyzed to study the validity, feasibility, and acceptability of the measures. RESULTS Few errors (3%-7% per item) were identified in completing each of the measures with little distinct pattern. Most participants found the measures to be concise, clear, and relevant. Challenges included relevance, context, time period, missing items, multiple questions, and response options. Informal carers generally expressed a preference for using a care-related QoL measure. CONCLUSIONS Existing preference-based QoL measures have encouraging validity and feasibility within a mixed sample of informal carers, with minor challenges raised. These challenges ought to be considered, alongside the decision context, when administering QoL measures in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Presciutti AM, Woodworth E, Rochon E, Neale M, Motta M, Piazza J, Vranceanu AM, Hwang DYG. A Mindfulness-Based Resiliency Program for Caregivers of Patients With Severe Acute Brain Injury Transitioning Out of Critical Care: Protocol for an Open Pilot Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e50860. [PMID: 37878376 PMCID: PMC10632918 DOI: 10.2196/50860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caregivers of patients with severe acute brain injuries (SABI) that lead to coma and require intensive care unit (ICU) treatment often experience chronic emotional distress. To address this need, we developed the Coma Family (COMA-F) program, a mindfulness-based resiliency intervention for these caregivers. OBJECTIVE We will conduct an open pilot trial of COMA-F (National Institutes of Health Stage IA). Here we describe our study protocol and proposed intervention content. METHODS We will enroll 15 caregivers of patients with SABIs during their loved one's hospital course from 3 enrollment centers. A clinical psychologist will deliver the COMA-F intervention (6 sessions) over Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, Inc) or in person. We will iterate COMA-F after each caregiver completes the intervention and an exit interview. English-speaking adults who have emotional distress confirmed by the clinical team and are the primary caregivers of a patient with SABI are eligible. The adult patient must have been admitted to the neuro-ICU for SABI and (1) have had a Glasgow Coma Scale score below 9 while not intubated or an inability to follow meaningful commands while intubated at any point during their hospitalization for >24 hours due to SABI; (2) will be undergoing either tracheostomy or percutaneous endoscopic or surgical gastrostomy tube placement or have already received one or both; and (3) have a prognosis of survival >3 months. We will identify eligible caregivers through screening patients' medical records and through direct referrals from clinicians in the neuro-ICU. During the intervention we will teach caregivers mind-body and resilience skills, including deep breathing, mindfulness, meditation, dialectical thinking, acceptance, cognitive restructuring, effective communication, behavioral activation, and meaning-making. Caregivers will complete self-report assessments (measures of emotional distress and resilience) before and after the intervention. Primary outcomes are feasibility (recruitment, quantitative measures, adherence, and therapist fidelity) and acceptability (treatment satisfaction, credibility, and expectancy). We will conduct brief qualitative exit interviews to gather feedback on refining the program and study procedures. We will examine frequencies and proportions to determine feasibility and acceptability and will analyze qualitative exit interview data using thematic analysis. We will also conduct 2-tailed t tests to explore signals of improvement in emotional distress and treatment targets. We will then conduct an explanatory-sequential mixed methods analysis to integrate quantitative and qualitative data to refine the COMA-F manual and study procedures. RESULTS This study has been approved by the institutional review board at 1 of the 3 enrollment centers (2023P000536), with approvals at the other 2 centers pending. We anticipate that the study will be completed by late 2024. CONCLUSIONS We will use our findings to refine the COMA-F intervention and prepare for a feasibility randomized controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05761925; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05761925. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/50860.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Mattia Presciutti
- Department of Psychiatry, Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Emily Woodworth
- Department of Psychiatry, Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Elizabeth Rochon
- Department of Psychiatry, Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Molly Neale
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Melissa Motta
- Program in Trauma, Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Joseph Piazza
- Program in Trauma, Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Department of Psychiatry, Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - David Yi-Gin Hwang
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ungar WJ, Hayeems RZ, Marshall CR, Gillespie MK, Szuto A, Chisholm C, James Stavropoulos D, Huang L, Jarinova O, Wu V, Tsiplova K, Lau L, Lee W, Venkataramanan V, Sawyer S, Mendoza-Londono R, Somerville MJ, Boycott KM. Protocol for a Prospective, Observational Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Returning Secondary Findings of Genome Sequencing for Unexplained Suspected Genetic Conditions. Clin Ther 2023; 45:702-709. [PMID: 37453830 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although costly, genome-wide sequencing (GWS) detects an extensive range of variants, enhancing our ability to diagnose and assess risk for an increasing number of diseases. In addition to detecting variants related to the indication for testing, GWS can detect secondary variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other genes for which early intervention may improve health. As the list of secondary findings grows, there is increased demand for surveillance and management by multiple specialists, adding pressure to constrained health care budgets. Secondary finding testing is actively debated because some consider it opportunistic screening for future health risks that may not manifest. Given the economic implications of secondary finding testing and follow-up and its unproven clinical utility, the objective is to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of secondary finding ascertainment per case detected and per unit of improved clinical utility in families of children with unexplained suspected genetic conditions undergoing clinical GWS. METHODS Those undergoing trio genome or exome sequencing are eligible for the study. Positive secondary finding index cases will be matched to negative controls (1:2) based on age group, primary result(s) type, and clinical indication. During the 2-year study, 71 cases and 142 matched controls are expected. Health service use will be collected in patients and 1 adult family member every 6 months. The per-child and per-dyad total cost will be determined by multiplying use of each resource by a corresponding unit price and summing all cost items. Costs will be estimated from the public and societal payer perspectives. The mean cost per child and per dyad for secondary finding-positive and secondary finding-negative groups will be compared statistically. If important demographic differences are observed between groups, ordinary least-squares regression, log transformation, or other nonparametric technique will be used to compare adjusted mean costs. The ratio of the difference in mean cost to the secondary finding yield will be used to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness. In secondary analyses, effectiveness will be estimated using the number of clinical management changes due to secondary findings or the Clinician-Reported Genetic Testing Utility Index (C-GUIDE) score, a validated measure of clinical utility. Sensitivity analysis will be undertaken to assess the robustness of the findings to variation in key parameters. IMPLICATIONS This study generates key evidence to inform clinical practice and funding allocation related to secondary finding testing. The inclusion of family members and a new measure of clinical utility represent important advancements in economic evaluation in genomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy J Ungar
- Program in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Robin Z Hayeems
- Program in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian R Marshall
- Genome Diagnostics, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meredith K Gillespie
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Szuto
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caitlin Chisholm
- Department of Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - D James Stavropoulos
- Genome Diagnostics, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lijia Huang
- Department of Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Olga Jarinova
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vercancy Wu
- Program in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kate Tsiplova
- Program in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lynnette Lau
- Genome Diagnostics, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Whiwon Lee
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Viji Venkataramanan
- Program in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Sawyer
- Department of Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Roberto Mendoza-Londono
- Division of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin J Somerville
- Genome Diagnostics, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kym M Boycott
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Genetics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zappas MP, Devereaux A, Pesch MH. The Psychosocial Impact of Congenital Cytomegalovirus on Caregivers and Families: Lived Experiences and Review of the Literature. Int J Neonatal Screen 2023; 9:30. [PMID: 37367211 PMCID: PMC10299480 DOI: 10.3390/ijns9020030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Caring for a child with congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) can be costly for families, not only in terms of out-of-pocket expenses, but also in terms of caregiver time, relationships, career trajectories, and mental health. These additional burdens are sometimes referred to as "spillover effects". As parents of children with cCMV, we, the authors of this article, discuss the impact that cCMV has had on our families. While multiple studies have reported on the epidemiology, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and management of cCMV, there has been minimal research regarding the possible impact on the family unit. In this narrative review, we discuss the various areas of the lives of families and caregivers that may be impacted by raising a child with cCMV. Whether children are minimally or severely affected by the sequelae of cCMV, they and their families merit the progression of awareness of the virus and governmental policies to help end cCMV. As the existing cCMV-specific literature is limited, we correlate studies of other childhood disabilities and find the mutuality experienced by families affected by cCMV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle P. Zappas
- Department of Nursing, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA
| | | | - Megan H. Pesch
- National CMV Foundation, Tampa, FL 33606, USA
- Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Teo H. The impact of a partner's nursing home admission on individuals' mental well-being. Soc Sci Med 2023; 327:115941. [PMID: 37182294 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
This study analyzes the effect of a partner's nursing home admission on individuals' mental well-being. To do so, we use longitudinal data on couples from the Health and Retirement Study and a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design to isolate the causal effect of the transition. We hypothesize that: (i) a partner's nursing home admission has a negative impact on individuals' mental well-being and (ii) the size of the negative effect is decreasing in the amount of caregiving provided by respondents pre-admission. We find that a partner's nursing home admission raises respondents' depressive symptomology scores by 0.839, corresponding to a 50 percent increase from the average pre-admission baseline. Amongst respondents providing care to their partners pre-admission, a nursing home transition raises depression scores by 0.670, corresponding to a 36.8 increase from baseline. Non-caregiving respondents experience a corresponding 1.05 increase in depression scores, representing a 67.2 percent rise from baseline. Amongst pre-admission caregivers, we find that the negative well-being impact of a partner's admission decreases in the duration and intensity of caregiving pre-admission. We also find that partners of care recipients with more severe physical and cognitive impairment pre-admission experience less deterioration in mental well-being compared to their counterparts. Overall, our findings indicate that a partner's transition into residential care can provide respite from caregiving-related stressors. However, on average, the negative well-being effects of the transition tend to outweigh this positive respite effect. The policy implications are twofold: first, there is a need for continued support to families of care recipients during the latter's transition into institutional care. Second, nursing homes and other institutions have a role in providing respite care, especially for high-intensity caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hansel Teo
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pichon-Riviere A, Bardach A, Rodríguez Cairoli F, Casarini A, Espinola N, Perelli L, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Llorente B, Pinto M, Saenz De Miera Juárez B, Villacres T, Peña Torres E, Amador N, Loza C, Castillo-Riquelme M, Roberti J, Augustovski F, Alcaraz A, Palacios A. Health, economic and social burden of tobacco in Latin America and the expected gains of fully implementing taxes, plain packaging, advertising bans and smoke-free environments control measures: a modelling study. Tob Control 2023:tc-2022-057618. [PMID: 37142423 DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the tobacco-attributable burden on disease, medical costs, productivity losses and informal caregiving; and to estimate the health and economic gains that can be achieved if the main tobacco control measures (raising taxes on tobacco, plain packaging, advertising bans and smoke-free environments) are fully implemented in eight countries that encompass 80% of the Latin American population. DESIGN Markov probabilistic microsimulation economic model of the natural history, costs and quality of life associated with the main tobacco-related diseases. Model inputs and data on labour productivity, informal caregivers' burden and interventions' effectiveness were obtained through literature review, surveys, civil registrations, vital statistics and hospital databases. Epidemiological and economic data from January to October 2020 were used to populate the model. FINDINGS In these eight countries, smoking is responsible each year for 351 000 deaths, 2.25 million disease events, 12.2 million healthy years of life lost, US$22.8 billion in direct medical costs, US$16.2 billion in lost productivity and US$10.8 billion in caregiver costs. These economic losses represent 1.4% of countries' aggregated gross domestic products. The full implementation and enforcement of the four strategies: taxes, plain packaging, advertising bans and smoke-free environments would avert 271 000, 78 000, 71 000 and 39 000 deaths, respectively, in the next 10 years, and result in US$63.8, US$12.3, US$11.4 and US$5.7 billions in economic gains, respectively, on top of the benefits being achieved today by the current level of implementation of these measures. CONCLUSIONS Smoking represents a substantial burden in Latin America. The full implementation of tobacco control measures could successfully avert deaths and disability, reduce healthcare spending and caregiver and productivity losses, likely resulting in large net economic benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés Pichon-Riviere
- Department of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, IECS-Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- CIESP, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ariel Bardach
- Department of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, IECS-Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- CIESP, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Federico Rodríguez Cairoli
- Department of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, IECS-Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Agustín Casarini
- Department of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, IECS-Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Natalia Espinola
- Department of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, IECS-Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Lucas Perelli
- Department of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, IECS-Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu
- Departamento de Investigación sobre Tabaco, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | | | - Marcia Pinto
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Tatiana Villacres
- Health Economics, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador
| | | | | | - César Loza
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | | | | | - Federico Augustovski
- Department of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, IECS-Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Andrea Alcaraz
- Department of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, IECS-Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alfredo Palacios
- Department of Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics, IECS-Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tervonen T, Veldwijk J, Payne K, Ng X, Levitan B, Lackey LG, Marsh K, Thokala P, Pignatti F, Donnelly A, Ho M. Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment in Medical Product Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:449-460. [PMID: 37005055 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Benefit-risk assessment is commonly conducted by drug and medical device developers and regulators, to evaluate and communicate issues around benefit-risk balance of medical products. Quantitative benefit-risk assessment (qBRA) is a set of techniques that incorporate explicit outcome weighting within a formal analysis to evaluate the benefit-risk balance. This report describes emerging good practices for the 5 main steps of developing qBRAs based on the multicriteria decision analysis process. First, research question formulation needs to identify the needs of decision makers and requirements for preference data and specify the role of external experts. Second, the formal analysis model should be developed by selecting benefit and safety endpoints while eliminating double counting and considering attribute value dependence. Third, preference elicitation method needs to be chosen, attributes framed appropriately within the elicitation instrument, and quality of the data should be evaluated. Fourth, analysis may need to normalize the preference weights, base-case and sensitivity analyses should be conducted, and the effect of preference heterogeneity analyzed. Finally, results should be communicated efficiently to decision makers and other stakeholders. In addition to detailed recommendations, we provide a checklist for reporting qBRAs developed through a Delphi process conducted with 34 experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jorien Veldwijk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management & Erasmus Choice Modelling Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, UK
| | - Xinyi Ng
- Office of Biostatistics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Leila G Lackey
- Decision Support and Analysis Staff, Office of Program and Strategic Analysis, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Praveen Thokala
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | | | - Anne Donnelly
- Patient Council of the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Al-Najjar N, Bray L, Carter B, Castle AP, Collingwood A, Cook G, Crudgington H, Currier J, Dietz KC, Hardy WAS, Hiscock H, Hughes D, Morris C, Roberts D, Rouncefield-Swales A, Saron H, Spowart C, Stibbs-Eaton L, Tudur Smith C, Watson V, Whittle L, Wiggs L, Wood E, Gringras P, Pal DK. Changing Agendas on Sleep, Treatment and Learning in Epilepsy (CASTLE) Sleep-E: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing an online behavioural sleep intervention with standard care in children with Rolandic epilepsy. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e065769. [PMID: 36898757 PMCID: PMC10008377 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sleep and epilepsy have an established bidirectional relationship yet only one randomised controlled clinical trial has assessed the effectiveness of behavioural sleep interventions for children with epilepsy. The intervention was successful, but was delivered via face-to-face educational sessions with parents, which are costly and non-scalable to population level. The Changing Agendas on Sleep, Treatment and Learning in Epilepsy (CASTLE) Sleep-E trial addresses this problem by comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness in children with Rolandic epilepsy between standard care (SC) and SC augmented with a novel, tailored parent-led CASTLE Online Sleep Intervention (COSI) that incorporates evidence-based behavioural components. METHODS AND ANALYSES CASTLE Sleep-E is a UK-based, multicentre, open-label, active concurrent control, randomised, parallel-group, pragmatic superiority trial. A total of 110 children with Rolandic epilepsy will be recruited in outpatient clinics and allocated 1:1 to SC or SC augmented with COSI (SC+COSI). Primary clinical outcome is parent-reported sleep problem score (Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire). Primary health economic outcome is the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective, Child Health Utility 9D Instrument). Parents and children (≥7 years) can opt into qualitative interviews and activities to share their experiences and perceptions of trial participation and managing sleep with Rolandic epilepsy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The CASTLE Sleep-E protocol was approved by the Health Research Authority East Midlands (HRA)-Nottingham 1 Research Ethics Committee (reference: 21/EM/0205). Trial results will be disseminated to scientific audiences, families, professional groups, managers, commissioners and policymakers. Pseudo-anonymised individual patient data will be made available after dissemination on reasonable request. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN13202325.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Al-Najjar
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lucy Bray
- Department of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - Bernie Carter
- Department of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - Advisory Panel Castle
- Department of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - Amber Collingwood
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Georgia Cook
- Centre for Psychological Research, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Holly Crudgington
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Janet Currier
- Department of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - Kristina Charlotte Dietz
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Will A S Hardy
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Harriet Hiscock
- Centre for Community Child Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dyfrig Hughes
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Christopher Morris
- University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Deborah Roberts
- Department of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - Alison Rouncefield-Swales
- Department of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - Holly Saron
- Department of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
| | - Catherine Spowart
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lucy Stibbs-Eaton
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Catrin Tudur Smith
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Victoria Watson
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Liam Whittle
- Department of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Luci Wiggs
- Centre for Psychological Research, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Eifiona Wood
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Paul Gringras
- Department of Sleep Medicine, Evelina London Children's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Deb K Pal
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Universal Repeat Screening for Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:535-543. [PMID: 36800852 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the cost effectiveness of universal repeat screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the third trimester of pregnancy. METHODS A decision-analytic model was constructed to compare two strategies: screening for HIV infection in the first trimester alone compared with the addition of repeat screening in the third trimester. Probabilities, costs, and utilities were derived from the literature and varied in sensitivity analyses. The assumed incidence of HIV infection in pregnancy was 0.0145% or 14.5 per 100,000. Outcomes included costs (in 2022 U.S. dollars), maternal and neonatal quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and cases of neonatal HIV infection. Our theoretical cohort contained 3.8 million pregnant individuals, the approximate number of births per year in the United States. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. We performed univariable and multivariable sensitivity analyses to determine inputs that most influenced the model. RESULTS Universal third-trimester screening prevented 133 cases of neonatal HIV infection in this theoretical cohort. Universal third-trimester screening led to an increased cost of $17.54 million and 2,732 increased QALYs, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $6,418.56 per QALY, less than the willingness-to-pay threshold. In a univariate sensitivity analysis, third-trimester screening remained cost effective with variation of HIV incidence in pregnancy to as low as 0.0052%. CONCLUSION In a theoretical U.S.-based cohort of pregnant individuals, universal repeat screening for HIV infection in the third trimester was found to be cost effective and to reduce vertical transmission of HIV. These results merit consideration of a broader HIV-screening program in the third trimester.
Collapse
|
30
|
Rodríguez-Sánchez B, Daugbjerg S, Peña-Longobardo LM, Oliva-Moreno J, Aranda-Reneo I, Cicchetti A, López-Bastida J. Does the inclusion of societal costs change the economic evaluations recommendations? A systematic review for multiple sclerosis disease. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:247-277. [PMID: 35596098 PMCID: PMC9985586 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01471-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis imposes a heavy burden on the person who suffers from it and on the relatives, due to the caregiving load involved. The objective was to analyse whether the inclusion of social costs in economic evaluations of multiple sclerosis-related interventions changed results and/or conclusions. METHODS A systematic review was launched using Medline and the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry of Tufts University (2000-2019). Included studies should: (1) be an original study published in a scientific journal, (2) be an economic evaluation of any multiple sclerosis-related intervention, (3) include productivity losses and/or informal care costs (social costs), (4) be written in English, (5) use quality-adjusted life years as outcome, and (6) separate the results according to the perspective applied. RESULTS Twenty-nine articles were selected, resulting in 67 economic evaluation estimations. Social costs were included in 47% of the studies. Productivity losses were assessed in 90% of the estimations (the human capital approach was the most frequently used method), whereas informal care costs were included in nearly two-thirds of the estimations (applying the opportunity and the replacement-cost methods equally). The inclusion of social costs modified the figures for incremental costs in 15 estimations, leading to a change in the conclusions in 10 estimations, 6 of them changing from not recommended from the healthcare perspective to implemented from the societal perspective. The inclusion of social costs also altered the results from cost-effective to dominant in five additional estimations. CONCLUSIONS The inclusion of social costs affected the results/conclusions in multiple sclerosis-related interventions, helping to identify the most appropriate interventions for reducing its economic burden from a broader perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Rodríguez-Sánchez
- Department of Applied Economics, Public Economics and Political Economy, University Complutense of Madrid, Pl. Menéndez Pelayo 4, 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Daugbjerg
- Graduate School of Health Economics and Management (Alta Scuola Di Economia E Management Dei Sistemi Sanitari), Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - L M Peña-Longobardo
- Economic Analysis and Finance Department, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071, Toledo, Spain
| | - J Oliva-Moreno
- Economic Analysis and Finance Department, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071, Toledo, Spain
| | - I Aranda-Reneo
- Economic Analysis and Finance Department, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Real Fábrica de Seda s/n, 45600, Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain.
| | - A Cicchetti
- Graduate School of Health Economics and Management (Alta Scuola Di Economia E Management Dei Sistemi Sanitari), Universitá Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - J López-Bastida
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Castilla-La Mancha, 45600, Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Making visible the cost of informal caregivers' time in Latin America: a case study for major cardiovascular, cancer and respiratory diseases in eight countries. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:28. [PMID: 36604686 PMCID: PMC9815678 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14835-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informal care is a key element of health care and well-being for society, yet it is scarcely visible and rarely studied in health economic evaluations. This study aims to estimate the time use and cost associated with informal care for cardiovascular diseases, pneumonia and ten different cancers in eight Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico and Peru). METHODS We carried out an exhaustive literature review on informal caregivers' time use, focusing on the selected diseases. We developed a survey for professional caregivers and conducted expert interviews to validate this data in the local context. We used an indirect estimate through the interpolation of the available data, for those cases in which we do not found reliable information. We used the proxy good method to estimate the monetary value of the use of time of informal care. National household surveys databases were processed to obtain the average wage per hour of a proxy of informal caregiver. Estimates were expressed in 2020 US dollars. RESULTS The study estimated approximately 1,900 million hours of informal care annually and $ 4,300 million per year in average informal care time cost for these fifteen diseases and eight countries analyzed. Cardiovascular diseases accounted for an informal care burden that ranged from 374 to 555 h per year, while cancers varied from 512 to 1,825 h per year. The informal care time cost share on GDP varied from 0.26% (Mexico) to 1.38% (Brazil), with an average of 0.82% in the studied American countries. Informal care time cost represents between 16 and 44% of the total economic cost (direct medical and informal care cost) associated with health conditions. CONCLUSIONS The study shows that there is a significant informal care economic burden -frequently overlooked- in different chronic and acute diseases in Latin American countries; and highlights the relevance of including the economic value of informal care in economic evaluations of healthcare.
Collapse
|
32
|
Leech AA, Lin PJ, D'Cruz B, Parsons SK, Lavelle TA. Family Spillover Effects: Are Economic Evaluations Misrepresenting the Value of Healthcare Interventions to Society? APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:5-10. [PMID: 35997896 PMCID: PMC9839569 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00755-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The societal impacts of health interventions are seldom incorporated into health economic evaluations, including the impact that illness can have on informal or unpaid caregivers and other family members (i.e., "family spillover effects"). Previous research has demonstrated that by excluding family spillover effects, the value of health interventions may be underestimated on average. In this commentary, we discuss how the inclusion of spillover effects influences how we value interventions and, given the extent to which caregiver/family effects are largely not captured or known, propose ways in which these data could be more systematically collected or estimated and used by researchers. These recommendations include prioritizing data collection alongside clinical trials and patient registries, engaging expert opinion panels, and developing mapping algorithms for estimating caregiver/family utility values from non-preference-based caregiver health-related quality-of-life measures and/or from patient preference-based measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley A Leech
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 1275-F, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brittany D'Cruz
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan K Parsons
- Center for Health Solutions, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tara A Lavelle
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Carias C, Hu T, Chen YT. Burden of rotavirus gastroenteritis on caregivers: Findings from a systematic literature review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2047545. [PMID: 35377826 PMCID: PMC9196848 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2047545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) poses a substantial clinical, economic, and humanistic burden globally. While predominantly affecting children, the burden of RVGE extends to caregivers and families but is often overlooked. In this systematic literature review, we aim to identify and summarize methods and estimates of RVGE associated caregiver burden. Of the 190 publications identified, 10 were included. Four studies used the EuroQoL-5 Dimension instrument and its associated Visual Analog Scale and reported a decrease in caregiver health related quality of life when a child contracted RVGE, with the greatest reduction observed in caregivers of hospitalized children. Other studies utilized surveys to assess impacts on caregivers’ quality of life. Caregivers of RVGE patients experienced multiple impacts beyond financial costs related to productivity and absenteeism, with disruptions to daily routines and anxiety/stress frequently reported. This review highlights the importance of including RVGE caregiver burden when evaluating interventions, such as vaccination, to decrease RVGE burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Carias
- Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Tianyan Hu
- Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Ya-Ting Chen
- Center for Observational and Real-world Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Thornburg B, Bray JW, Wittenberg E. Health Utility of Drinkers' Family Members: A Secondary Analysis of a US Population Data Set. MDM Policy Pract 2022; 7:23814683221128507. [PMID: 36187422 PMCID: PMC9520150 DOI: 10.1177/23814683221128507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Problematic alcohol use is known to harm individuals surrounding the drinker. This study described the health utility of people who reported having a family member(s) whom they perceived as a "problem drinker."Methods. We conducted a secondary analysis of the US National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions Wave 3 (NESARC-III, 2012-13) data to estimate the independent associations of a family member's problem drinking on the respondent's health utility, also known as health-related quality of life, assessed via the SF-6D. Participants included 29,159 noninstitutionalized adults, of whom 21,808 reported perceiving a family member or members as having a drinking problem at any point in that person's life. Respondent drinking was assessed via self-report and diagnostic interview. We used population-weighted multivariate regression to estimate disutility. Results. After adjusting for the respondent's own alcohol consumption, alcohol use disorder (AUD), family structure, and sociodemographic characteristics, the mean decrement in SF-6D score associated with perceiving a family member as a problem drinker ranged from 0.033 (P < 0.001) for a spouse/partner to 0.023 (P < 0.001) for a grandparent, sibling, aunt, or uncle. The mean decrement in SF-6D score from having AUD oneself was 0.039 (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Perceived problem drinking within one's family is associated with statistically significant losses in health utility, the magnitude of which is dependent on relationship type. The adverse consequences associated with problem drinking in the family may rival having AUD oneself. Implications. Family-oriented approaches to AUD interventions may confer outsize benefits, especially if focused on the spouse or partner. Economic evaluation of alcohol misuse could be made more accurate through the inclusion of family spillover effects. Highlights Spillover effects from problem drinking in the family vary by relationship type.One's perception of their spouse or child as having a drinking problem is associated with a utility decrement of equal magnitude to having alcohol use disorder oneself.Medical decision makers should consider the outsize effects of family spillovers in treatment decisions in the context of alcohol consumption, particularly among spouses and children of problem drinkers.Economic evaluation should consider how to incorporate family spillover effects from problem drinking in alcohol-related models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Thornburg
- Benjamin Thornburg, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205-2103, USA; ()
| | - Jeremy W. Bray
- Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA
| | - Eve Wittenberg
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Scope A, Bhadhuri A, Pennington B. Systematic Review of Cost-Utility Analyses That Have Included Carer and Family Member Health-Related Quality of Life. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1644-1653. [PMID: 35339379 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health interventions for patients can also affect the health of their informal carers and family members. These changes in carer or family member health could be reflected in cost-utility analyses (CUAs) through the inclusion of their quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We conducted a systematic review to identify and describe all CUAs that have included family member health-related QALYs. METHODS A total of 4 bibliographic databases were searched from inception to July 2021. A 2-stage sifting process for inclusion of studies was undertaken. We performed data extraction using a standardized data extraction form and performed a narrative synthesis of the evidence. RESULTS A total of 40 CUAs published between 1999 and 2021 were identified. CUAs were conducted in 15 different countries. CUAs examined 13 different conditions including 15 CUAs on vaccination, 5 on Alzheimer's disease, 2 on Parkinson's disease, 3 on dementia, and 2 on terminal illness. The EQ-5D was the most commonly used measure of family member health. Generally, including carer QALYs resulted in lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. CONCLUSIONS When considering the total number of economic evaluations published, few have included family member QALYs and the methods for doing so are often inconsistent and data sources often limited. Estimation of family member QALYs in patient CUAs was regularly uncertain and often substantial in magnitude. The findings highlight the variation among methods and call for greater consistency in methods for incorporating family member QALYs in patient CUAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Scope
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Arjun Bhadhuri
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Becky Pennington
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pennington B, Eaton J, Hatswell AJ, Taylor H. Carers' Health-Related Quality of Life in Global Health Technology Assessment: Guidance, Case Studies and Recommendations. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:837-850. [PMID: 35821351 PMCID: PMC9363311 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01164-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Including health outcomes for carers as well as patients in economic evaluations can change the results and conclusions of the analysis. Whilst in many disease areas there can be clear justification for including carers' health-related quality of life (HRQL) in health technology assessments (HTAs), we believe that, in general, the perspective of carers is under-represented in HTA. We were interested in the extent, and methods by which, HTA bodies include carers' HRQL in economic evaluation. We reviewed guidance from 13 HTA bodies across the world regarding carers' HRQL. We examined five interventions, as case studies, assessed by different HTA bodies, and extracted information on whether carers' HRQL was included by the manufacturers or assessors in their dossiers of evidence, the data and methods used, and the impact on the results. We developed recommendations to guide analysts on including carers' HRQL in economic evaluations. When reviewing the methods guides: two bodies recommend including carers' HRQL in the base case, two referred to outcomes for all individuals, two preferred to exclude carers, three said it depended on other conditions, and it was unclear for four. Across the five case studies: five source studies for carers' HRQL and two different modelling approaches were used. Including carers' HRQL increased incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in 19/23 analyses (decreased it in two); there was substantial variation in the magnitude of change. We recommend: (1) the inclusion of carers is clearly justified, (2) the use of HRQL data from the population under comparison where possible, (3) the use of data from another disease area or country is clearly justified (and transferability/applicability issues are discussed), (4) the use of external data to derive comparisons for cross-sectional data is justified, (5) assumptions and implications of the modelling approach are explicit, and (6) disaggregated results for patients and carers are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becky Pennington
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | | | - Anthony J Hatswell
- Delta Hat, Nottingham, UK
- Department of Statistical Science, UCL, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bremmers LGM, Fabbricotti IN, Gräler ES, Uyl-de Groot CA, Hakkaart-van Roijen L. Assessing the impact of caregiving on informal caregivers of adults with a mental disorder in OECD countries: A systematic literature review of concepts and their respective questionnaires. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270278. [PMID: 35802584 PMCID: PMC9269485 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted a systematic literature review to identify and review the concepts and questionnaires used to assess the impact of caregiving on caregivers for adults with a mental disorder. With our study, we aimed to provide an overview and categorize the conceptualization and operationalization of the impact of caregiving, with special attention for the complexity and multi-conceptualization of concepts. Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Trials, Cinahl Plus, Econlit and Google Scholar were systematically searched for articles from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2019. Eligible articles were peer-reviewed studies that assessed the impact of caregiving for informal caregivers of adults with a reported mental disorder by means of a questionnaire. The complete study protocol can be found on PROSPERO (CRD42020157300). A total of 144 questionnaires were identified that assessed the impact of caregiving. Based on similarities in meaning, concepts were classified into 15 concept clusters. The most frequently assessed concept clusters were mental health, caregiving burden, other caregiving consequences, family impact, and overall health-related outcomes. The use of concept clusters differed per diagnosis group, with diagnoses, such as schizophrenia, using a wide range of caregiving impact concepts and other diagnoses, such as personality disorders, only using a limited range of concepts. This is the first study that identified and reviewed the concepts and questionnaires that are used to assess the impact of caregiving. Caregiving is researched from a broad array of perspectives, with the identification of a variety of concepts and dimensions and use of non-specific questionnaires. Despite increasing interest in this field of research, a high degree of variability remains abundant with limited consensus. This can partially be accredited to differences in the naming of concepts. Ultimately, this review can serve as a reference to researchers who wish to assess the impact of caregiving and require further insight into concepts and their respective questionnaires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonarda G. M. Bremmers
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle N. Fabbricotti
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eleonora S. Gräler
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carin A. Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenetic diseases versus unassisted conception with prenatal diagnosis for Huntington disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril 2022; 118:56-64. [PMID: 35618525 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate if in vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease is cost effective for heterozygous individuals with Huntington disease vs. unassisted conception with prenatal diagnosis. DESIGN Cost-effectiveness analysis in a theoretical cohort of 3,851 couples, where one individual is heterozygous for Huntington disease. SETTING N/A. PATIENTS/ANIMALS None. INTERVENTION In vitro fertilization preimplantation genetic testing for couples attempting conception. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Outcomes included cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for both parents in addition to secondary outcomes of procedure-related loss, spontaneous abortion, termination of pregnancy, and early/normal/late-onset Huntington disease. A willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. RESULTS In vitro fertilization preimplantation genetic testing is lower in cost and higher in effectiveness compared to unassisted conception with prenatal diagnosis among couples with one heterozygous Huntington disease individual, making it the dominant strategy. In vitro fertilization preimplantation genetic testing was associated with 77 more QALYs and a cost savings of $46,394,268. All measured outcomes were lower in the IVF preimplantation genetic testing strategy, including 39 fewer procedure-related losses, 39 fewer spontaneous abortions, and 462 fewer terminations of pregnancy. Most notably, in our theoretical cohort of couples, IVF preimplantation genetic testing resulted in 1,079 fewer Huntington disease-affected offspring. Our results were robust over a wide range of assumptions. CONCLUSION In vitro fertilization preimplantation genetic testing is a cost-effective conception strategy compared to unassisted conception with prenatal diagnosis when one individual is heterozygous for Huntington disease. Not only can morbidity and mortality incurred by Huntington disease be mitigated for the offspring with the use of IVF preimplantation genetic testing, but this study demonstrates the cost-effectiveness of using IVF preimplantation genetic testing for those with Huntington disease.
Collapse
|
39
|
Ignatova V, Kostadinov K, Vassileva E, Muradyan N, Stefanov G, Iskrov G, Stefanov R. Socio-Economic Burden of Myasthenia Gravis: A Cost-of-Illness Study in Bulgaria. Front Public Health 2022; 10:822909. [PMID: 35309194 PMCID: PMC8927679 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.822909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundMyasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disorder, which is characterized by fatigable muscle weakness with frequent ocular signs and/or generalized muscle fatigue, and occasionally associated with thymoma. MG patients and their families face a significant socio-economic burden. This population is often experiencing unemployment, unwilling job transfers and decreased income.ObjectiveThis study aimed to estimate the annual costs from a societal perspective in a triple dimension of direct health care costs, direct non-health care costs (formal and informal care) and labor productivity losses in MG patients from Bulgaria, as well as to identify the main clinical and demographical cost drivers.MethodsA bottom-up, cross-sectional, cost-of-illness analysis of 54 adult MG patients was carried out in 2020. To collect data on demographic characteristics, health resource utilization, informal care and productivity losses, questionnaires were administered to and completed by patients.Results and ConclusionMedian annual costs of MG in Bulgaria were 4,047 EUR per patient. Direct costs slightly outweighed indirect costs, with drugs cost item having the biggest monetary impact. Despite the zero-inflated median, hospitalizations also influenced the direct costs by an estimated amount of 1,512 EUR in the 3rd quartile. Social services and professional caregiver costs were found to be almost missing, with the vast majority of patients reporting reliance on informal caregivers. Severe generalized disease, disease crises, and recurrent infections were confirmed as statistically significant cost driving factors. There were no severe generalized MG patients in the bottom quartile of the total costs distribution. It should be noted that in both cases of crises or infections, the overall increase in the total costs was mainly due to higher indirect costs observed. Reliance on family members as informal caregivers is routine among Bulgarian MG patients. This phenomenon is likely due to the lack of access to appropriate social services. Moreover, it is directly related with higher disease burden and significant inequalities. There is a need for further research on MG in Bulgaria in order to design targeted health policies that meet the needs and expectations of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kostadin Kostadinov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Evguenia Vassileva
- Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital “Tsaritsa Yoanna–ISUL”, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Naira Muradyan
- Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital “Tsaritsa Yoanna–ISUL”, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Georgi Iskrov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Institute for Rare Diseases, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- *Correspondence: Georgi Iskrov
| | - Rumen Stefanov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Institute for Rare Diseases, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Halley MC, Young JL, Fernandez L, Kohler JN, Bernstein JA, Wheeler MT, Tabor HK. Perceived utility and disutility of genomic sequencing for pediatric patients: Perspectives from parents with diverse sociodemographic characteristics. Am J Med Genet A 2022; 188:1088-1101. [PMID: 34981646 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Given the limited therapeutic options for most rare diseases diagnosed through genomic sequencing (GS) and the proportion of patients who remain undiagnosed even after GS, it is important to characterize a broader range of benefits and potential harms of GS from the perspectives of families with diverse sociodemographic characteristics. We recruited parents of children enrolled in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network. Parents completed an in-depth interview, and we conducted a comparative content analysis of the data. Parents (n = 30) were demographically diverse, with 43.3% identifying as Hispanic, 33.3% primarily Spanish-speaking, and widely variable household income and education. Parents reported minimal changes in their child's health status following GS but did report a range of other forms of perceived utility, including improvements in their child's healthcare management and access, in their own psychological well-being, and in disease-specific social connections and research opportunities. Parents who received a diagnosis more frequently perceived utility across all domains; however, disutility also was reported by both those with and without a diagnosis. Impacts depended on multiple mediating factors, including parents' underlying expectations and beliefs, family sociodemographic characteristics, individual disease characteristics, and prior healthcare access. Our study suggests that the perceived utility of GS varies widely among parents and may depend on multiple individual, sociodemographic, and contextual factors that are relevant for pre- and post-GS counseling, for value assessment of GS, and for policymaking related to access to new genomic technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan C Halley
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jennifer L Young
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Liliana Fernandez
- Stanford Center for Undiagnosed Diseases, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jennefer N Kohler
- Stanford Center for Undiagnosed Diseases, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Jonathan A Bernstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Matthew T Wheeler
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Holly K Tabor
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Medicine (and by courtesy, Department of Epidemiology), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life-A Systematic Review of Evidence from Longitudinal Observational Studies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182212022. [PMID: 34831779 PMCID: PMC8621394 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182212022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This review aimed to systematically review observational studies investigating the longitudinal association between anxiety, depression and quality of life (QoL). A systematic search of five electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, NHS EED and EconLit) as well as forward/backward reference searches were conducted to identify observational studies on the longitudinal association between anxiety, depression and QoL. Studies were synthesized narratively. Additionally, a random-effects meta-analysis was performed using studies applying the mental and physical summary scores (MCS, PCS) of the Short Form Health Survey. The review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO and a study protocol was published. n = 47 studies on heterogeneous research questions were included, with sample sizes ranging from n = 28 to 43,093. Narrative synthesis indicated that QoL was reduced before disorder onset, dropped further during the disorder and improved with remission. Before onset and after remission, QoL was lower in comparison to healthy comparisons. n = 8 studies were included in random-effects meta-analyses. The pooled estimates of QoL at follow-up (FU) were of small to large effect sizes and showed that QoL at FU differed by disorder status at baseline as well as by disorder course over time. Disorder course groups differed in their MCS scores at baseline. Effect sizes were generally larger for MCS relative to PCS. The results highlight the relevance of preventive measures and treatment. Future research should consider individual QoL domains, individual anxiety/depressive disorders as well as the course of both over time to allow more differentiated statements in a meta-analysis.
Collapse
|
42
|
Ochieng W. Advanced cancer palliative care economics in sub-Saharan Africa: an important start. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH 2021; 9:e1638-e1639. [PMID: 34756182 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00486-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Ochieng
- Office of the Director, Center for Global Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Al-Janabi H, Wittenberg E, Donaldson C, Brouwer W. The relative value of carer and patient quality of life: A person trade-off (PTO) study. Soc Sci Med 2021; 292:114556. [PMID: 34823129 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Carer quality of life is increasingly considered alongside patient quality of life in economic evaluation. Important questions remain about how to value carer and patient quality of life effects alongside one another. In this study, we estimated the relative social value of two conceptualisations of carer quality of life (health-related and care-related) compared to patient quality of life. Relative valuations were estimated using a person trade-off (PTO) study with 990 representative members of the UK public. Participants chose between hypothetical services that improved the quality of life of carers and patients, iterating to a point of indifference. Overall 84% of participants completing the task were willing to trade patient and carer quality of life effects. Relative to a reference point of 1 for patient health-related quality of life, we estimated a social value of 0.74 for carer health-related quality of life effects and 0.69 for carer care-related quality of life effects. In conclusion, public preferences appear to support the inclusion of carer quality of life effects within economic evaluation. The results provide a means to value different carer quality of life outcomes in economic evaluation, where such values are needed and deemed appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, UK.
| | - Eve Wittenberg
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, United States
| | - Cam Donaldson
- Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jaffe DH, Balkaran BL, Yue L, Mulhern-Haughey S, Anjo J. The burden of caring for adults with depression and suicidal ideation in five large European countries: analysis from the 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21:550. [PMID: 34753436 PMCID: PMC8576941 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03511-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suicidal ideation (SI) affects approximately 30-40% of those with major depressive disorder (MDD). To date, studies have examined the substantial humanistic and economic burden to caregivers of persons with MDD, however little is known of the impact of caring for persons with MDD when SI is present. This study examined the additional burden imposed on caregivers for persons with unipolar depression and SI in five major European countries. METHODS A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was conducted in five European countries using 2020 Europe National Health Wellness Survey (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom) to compare differences in health and economic outcomes between caregivers of adults with unipolar depression and SI (CAUD-SI) and caregivers of adults with unipolar depression without SI (CAUD-nSI). The outcomes assessed included health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Medical Outcomes Study Short Form [SF-12v2]), health status (Short-Form 6 Dimension [SF-6D], EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level [EQ-5D-5L]), Work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) and healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models adjusted for covariates were used to compare the two groups on outcomes of interest. RESULTS Of 62,319 respondents, 0.89% (n = 554) were CAUD-SI and 1.34% (n = 837) were CAUD-nSI. In adjusted models, CAUD-SI reported greater humanistic burden than CAUD-nSI, with lower HRQoL (PCS: 42.7 vs. 45.0, p < 0.001 and MCS: 37.5 vs. 38.9, p = 0.007) and health status (SF-6D: 0.57 vs 0.60, p < 0.001 and EQ-5D-5L: 0.58 vs 0.66, p < 001). CAUD-SI respondents reported significantly higher economic burden than CAUD-nSI respondents for WPAI (percent activity impairment: 64.9% vs. 52.5%, p = 0.026) and HRU (provider visits: 10.0 vs. 7.9, p < 0.001, emergency room visits: 1.49 vs. 0.73, p < 0.001 and hospitalizations: 1.03 vs. 0.52, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In five European countries, caregivers of adults with depression and SI experience additional humanistic and economic burden than caregivers of adults with depression and no SI. Distinguishing caregiver groupings and their unique burden provide important insights for providing targeted support and interventions for both the patient and caregiver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - L. Yue
- Cerner Enviza, New York, NY USA
| | | | - J. Anjo
- Janssen-Cilag Farmaceutica, Porto Salvo, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Dhanji N, Brouwer W, Donaldson C, Wittenberg E, Al-Janabi H. Estimating an exchange-rate between care-related and health-related quality of life outcomes for economic evaluation: An application of the wellbeing valuation method. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2021; 30:2847-2857. [PMID: 34455657 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Quality of life outcomes for family carers and patients may be measured in different ways within the same economic evaluation. We used the wellbeing valuation method to calculate "exchange rates" between care-related outcomes (the Carer Experience Scale and CarerQoL-7D) and health-related (the EQ-5D-5L) outcomes. Data on quality of life outcomes were collected through a postal quality of life survey in the UK. A random effects model was used to estimate carers' wellbeing as a function of their EQ-5D-5L, Carer Experience Scale (or CarerQoL-7D) and a set of control variables. When life satisfaction was used as the measure of wellbeing, a one-point gain in the Carer Experience Scale (0-100 scale) was equivalent (in wellbeing terms) to a 0.014 gain in EQ-5D-5L value; and a one point gain in the CarerQoL-7D (0-100 scale) was equivalent to a 0.033 gain in EQ-5D-5L. The exchange rate values were reduced when capability was used as the measure of wellbeing. The exchange rates estimated in this study offer a means to place carer and patient outcomes, measured via different quality of life instruments, on a common scale, although there are important issues to consider in operationalising the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishit Dhanji
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Cam Donaldson
- Yunus Centre for Social Business, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Eve Wittenberg
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Urwin S, Lau YS, Grande G, Sutton M. The Challenges of Measuring Informal Care Time: A Review of the Literature. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:1209-1223. [PMID: 34324174 PMCID: PMC8516777 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01053-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Economic evaluations increasingly include the value of informal care, for example, in terms of caregiver health effects or time costs. If an economic evaluation uses caregiving time costs, appropriate measurement of caregiving time is an important first step prior to its valuation. There is no comprehensive overview of the measurement challenges for caregiving time. In this literature review, we searched Medline, Embase, Econlit and Scopus to identify measurement issues and associated studies which reported informal care time that addressed them. The search identified 27 studies that addressed nine measurement issues. There is limited evidence on how to address these issues, although some have received relatively more attention, including incremental time (considered in 16 studies), time measurement method comparisons (six studies) and the inclusion of intangible tasks (four studies). Non-response (considered in only one study) and carer and recipient identification (two studies) were the most wide-reaching measurement concerns, as these determine who is identified as carers. There was no evidence on the consequences of these measurement challenges in terms of impacts on cost-effectiveness ratios and on the total cost of health conditions, which would be a crucial next step. Future research on these issues should consider a range of different settings, as informal care is highly heterogeneous. The measurement of informal care is key for its inclusion in economic evaluations but there is little consensus on how to appropriately measure this type of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Urwin
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Yiu-Shing Lau
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Gunn Grande
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lee D, Kim Y, Devine B. Spillover Effects of Mental Health Disorders on Family Members' Health-Related Quality of Life: Evidence from a US Sample. Med Decis Making 2021; 42:80-93. [PMID: 34378438 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211027146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to characterize the spillover effects of selected mental health disorders (episodic mood disorder (EMD), anxiety, substance use disorder (SUD), schizophrenia, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and dementia) on family members' health-related quality of life and to compare the magnitude of spillover effects across these types. METHODS Using the 2000-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, households having individuals with mental health disorders were identified. The SF-12 and EQ-5D surveys were used to acquire utility and health status scores for household members. The outcomes in households including an individual with a mental health disorder were compared to those of the control group (absence of individuals with mental health disorders in the household). We also compared a total of 15 pairs of diseases based on the SF-6D scores. A beta generalized estimating equation model was employed. RESULTS Average scores of utility and health status among individuals living with a member with a mental health disorder in the household were statistically lower than those of the control group and; for the SF-6D, met the minimally important difference for SUD, schizophrenia, and dementia. Differences in the SF-6D scores were statistically significant for 5 pairs of the mental health disorders: EMD-anxiety, EMD-ADHD, dementia-anxiety, dementia-ADHD, and schizophrenia-ADHD. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence of family spillover effects in mental illness using both utility and health status measures from a US representative sample. Integrating this evidence into clinical and policy decision making as well as economic evaluations would allow for a more comprehensive valuation of the societal benefits of mental and behavioral health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donghoon Lee
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yeonil Kim
- Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Beth Devine
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Al-Janabi H, Efstathiou N, McLoughlin C, Calvert M, Oyebode J. The scope of carer effects and their inclusion in decision-making: a UK-based Delphi study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:752. [PMID: 34325700 PMCID: PMC8320027 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06742-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Health and social care may affect unpaid (family) carers’ health and wellbeing in addition to patients’ lives. It is recommended that such impacts (carer effects) are considered in decision-making. However, the scope of carer effects and range of decisions where carer effects should be considered is uncertain. This study aimed to identify: (i) how different categories of healthcare and social care were perceived to impact on unpaid carers; and (ii) whether there was consensus about when carer effects should be formally considered in decision-making contexts. Methods A two round, online Delphi study was conducted with 65 UK-based participants (unpaid carers, care professionals, and researchers) with expertise in dementia, mental health, and stroke. Participants considered two broad forms of ‘interventions’ (patient treatment and replacement care) and two broad forms of ‘organisational change’ (staffing and changes in timing/location of care). Participants assessed the likely impacts of these on unpaid carers and whether impacts should be considered in decision-making. Results Participants predicted interventions and organisational changes would impact on multiple domains of unpaid carers’ lives, with ‘emotional health’ the most likely outcome to be affected. Patient treatment and replacement care services (‘interventions’) were associated with positive impacts across all domains. Conversely, timing/location changes and staffing changes (‘organisational changes’) were perceived to have mixed and negative impacts. There was widespread support (80–81 %) for considering carer effects in research studies, funding decisions, and patient decision-making. Conclusions This study highlights a perception that carer effects are widespread and important to consider in economic evaluation and decision-making. It highlights the particular need to measure and value effects on carers’ emotional health and the need to use a societal perspective to avoid cost shifting to unpaid carers when introducing interventions and making organisational changes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06742-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Nikolaos Efstathiou
- School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Carol McLoughlin
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.,NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, NIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre and NIHR Applied Research Centre, West Midlands, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.,Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University Hospitals, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jan Oyebode
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, Richmond Rd, BD7 1DP, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Henry E, Cullinan J. Mental health spillovers from serious family illness: Doubly robust estimation using EQ-5D-5L population normative data. Soc Sci Med 2021; 279:113996. [PMID: 33993007 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
People are interconnected and ill-health is rarely experienced in isolation. However, while there has been extensive research on health spillovers related to informal caregiving, there is comparatively little evidence on how ill-health may impact upon non-caregiving family members. This paper analyses EQ-5D-5L normative data from a nationally representative sample of adult residents of Ireland to estimate the independent relationship between serious family illness and five distinct dimensions of health. The empirical strategy combines inverse probability weighting and multivariate ordered probit regression in a doubly robust estimation. We find that experience of serious family illness is associated with large mental health decrements that are independent of caring responsibilities, while similar results are not evident for the four other health dimensions. Furthermore, stratified sub-sample analyses indicate considerable heterogeneity by sex and by income. In particular, we find evidence consistent with larger mental health spillovers for females than for males, as well as for low- and medium-income households relative to high-income households. The latter suggests that such spillovers may be substantially worse for those with fewer resources. Overall, the findings have a range of potential implications, including for the provision of mental health supports and services, for equity of health outcomes, as well as for health economic evaluation. For example, we calculate that our estimates of health spillovers are consistent with a 1.3% reduction in health utility for non-caregiving family members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Henry
- Discipline of Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.
| | - John Cullinan
- Discipline of Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Basu A, Gandhay VJ. Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Losses Averted With Every COVID-19 Infection Prevented in the United States. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:632-640. [PMID: 33933231 PMCID: PMC7938736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the overall quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained by averting 1 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection over the duration of the pandemic. METHODS A cohort-based probabilistic simulation model, informed by the latest epidemiological estimates on COVID-19 in the United States provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and literature review. Heterogeneity of parameter values across age group was accounted for. The main outcome studied was QALYs for the infected patient, patient's family members, and the contagion effect of the infected patient over the duration of the pandemic. RESULTS Averting a COVID-19 infection in a representative US resident will generate an additional 0.061 (0.016-0.129) QALYs (for the patient: 0.055, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.014-0.115; for the patient's family members: 0.006, 95% CI 0.002-0.015). Accounting for the contagion effect of this infection, and assuming that an effective vaccine will be available in 3 months, the total QALYs gains from averting 1 single infection is 1.51 (95% CI 0.28-4.37) accrued to patients and their family members affected by the index infection and its sequelae. These results were robust to most parameter values and were most influenced by effective reproduction number, probability of death outside the hospital, the time-varying hazard rates of hospitalization, and death in critical care. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that the health benefits of averting 1 COVID-19 infection in the United States are substantial. Efforts to curb infections must weigh the costs against these benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirban Basu
- The CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Varun J Gandhay
- Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|