Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in a global cohort of 57,885 statin-treated patients

Adverse events associated with inclisiran: a real-world disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials have reported some safety profiles in inclisiran, but adverse events in real-world remain insufficient. We aim to evaluate the safety of inclisiran in real-world by collecting the data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.

METHODS

Disproportionality analysis was performed by utilizing both Frequency method and Bayesian method to mine adverse event signals of inclisiran. A positive signal was deemed significant when adverse event met the criteria of the aforementioned methods simultaneously.

RESULTS

We gathered a total of 2309 adverse event reports. Among these cases, adverse events were more common in females and ≥ 65 years age group. After data analysis, 51 positive signals from 11 system organ classes were identified, involving "Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders," "General disorders and administration site conditions," "Gastrointestinal disorders," etc. At the preferred term level, the top three frequently reported adverse events were arthralgia, injection site pain and myalgia. We also found some uncommon but significantly strong adverse event signals (bladder discomfort and sinus pain) which should be taken prudently.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we analyzed the real-world adverse events of inclisiran more comprehensively and reported some new adverse events, hoping that can offer more safety information for clinical medication.

Monoclonal Anti-PCSK9 Antibodies: Real-World Data

Background: Real-world data on the use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in clinical practice show that about 80% of (very) high-cardiovascular (CV)-risk patients disregard the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines' recommendations on dyslipidemias. The availability of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9mAb) should reduce this gap. Our aim was to provide data on PCSK9mAb use in clinical practice, investigating the achievement of the ESC Guidelines' recommendations in the real world. Methods: Between April 2018 and December 2022, patients who started on PCSK9mAb therapy (140 mg of evolocumab or 75 mg or 150 mg of alirocumab, subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks) were included in a prospective registry. Our cohort consisted of 256 patients: 95 (37.1%) were women (mean age: 65.43 ± 11.12 yrs), 53 (20.7%) were at high CV risk, and 203 (79.3%) were at very high CV risk. Results: After one year of PCSK9mAb treatment, nearly 60% of patients demonstrated full adherence to the ESC Guidelines' recommendations, defined as achieving at least a 50% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels along with reaching LDL-C target levels (≤55 and ≤70 mg/dL for very high and high risk, respectively). Concomitant high-dose statin therapy emerged as the primary predictor of LDL-C target attainment. Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), statin intolerance, and female gender were associated with a significant lower probability of achieving LDL-C target levels. Conclusions: Our analysis confirms that PCSK9mAb treatment is safe and effective, enabling 60% of our cohort to fully achieve the LDL-C guideline recommendations. The use of high-intensity statins emerged as a significant predictor of efficacy. Conversely, familial hypercholesterolemia and female gender were identified as predictors of therapeutic failure. Hence, it is crucial to address disparities in cardiovascular disease prevention between genders and to enhance strategies for managing elevated LDL-C in HeFH patients.

Treatment of dyslipidemia in acute coronary syndrome

Despite numerous improvements in the management of acute coronary syndrome(ACS), it is a major cause of mortality in India. Lipids play a critical role in pathogenesis of ACS and reduction of lipid parameters plays a pivotal role in secondary prevention. High total cholesterol and high low-density lipoprotein(LDL) are the major lipid abnormalities globally as well as in Indians. Among all the lipid parameters, LDL is the primary target of lipid-lowering therapies across the globe. High-dose statins, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, and bempedoic acid are recommended therapies for LDL reduction in ACS patients. Statins have pleiotropic effects on the modulation of thrombogenesis, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardial protection. Multiple randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown that the use of high-dose statin has significant benefits in ACS. LDL reduction goal is < 55 mg/dl or at least 50 % reduction from the baseline regardless of age or gender. Non-fasting LDL should be measured soon after the ACS as it varies minimally with food intake. The first line of therapy after ACS is to advise lifestyle modifications, combination therapy including high-dose statin with ezetimibe, and evaluation after 4-6 weeks of the index event. If the goal is not achieved then PCSK 9 inhibitors or Bempedoic acid should be used in combination with statins and ezetimibe to reduce recurrent ischaemic events. Despite the proven effect of these lipid-lowering therapies, undertreatment is still a big hurdle across the globe. Prohibitive costs, adverse effects, medication non-adherence, variation in health practice in different countries, and clinical inertia to prescribe this medication by physicians are the main reasons for the undertreatment.

Achievement of target LDL-cholesterol level in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The JET-LDL registry

BACKGROUND

In patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), current guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level < 1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL).

METHODS

The JET-LDL is a multicenter, observational, prospective registry created to investigate levels of LDL-C in consecutive patients with ACS undergoing PCI at 35 Italian hospitals, and to report their lipid lowering therapies (LLT). Follow-up was planned at 1 and 3 months. LDL-C reduction >50% from baseline or level < 55 mg/dL at 1-month was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 1095 patients were included: median age was 67 (58-75); 33.7% were already on LLT. Baseline LDL-C levels was 105 (76.5-137) mg/dL. At hospital discharge all patients were on LLT: 98.1% received statins (as mono or combination therapy), ezetimibe and PCSK9i were used in 60.1% and 8.5% of cases, respectively. Primary endpoint was achieved in 62% (95% CI 58-65) of cases. At 1-month LDL-C levels dropped to 53 (38-70) mg/dL (p < 0.001 vs baseline) and it was <55 mg/dL in 53% (95% CI 49-57) of patients; however, PCSK9i were added to 7 further cases. At 3-months 58% (95% CI 55-62) of patients achieved the target level, but PCSK9i was added to only 11 new patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world registry of ACS patients undergoing PCI, recommend LDL-C levels were obtained in 62% of patients, but PCSK9i prescription was limited to 10% of cases. As LLT pattern appeared mainly improved at hospital discharge, an early and strong treatment should be considered.

Characterization and LDL-C management in a cohort of high and very high cardiovascular risk patients: The PORTRAIT-DYS study

AIM

This study aims to characterize sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control in a population with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study that uses electronic health records of patients from one hospital and across 14 primary care health centers in the North of Portugal, spanning from 2000 to 2020 (index date). Patients presented at least (i) 1 year of clinical data before inclusion, (ii) one primary care appointment 3 years before the index date, and (iii) sufficient data for CV risk classification. Patients were divided into three cohorts: high CV risk; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk equivalents without established ASCVD; evidence of ASCVD. CV risk and LDL-C control were defined by the 2019 and 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) dyslipidemia guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 51 609 patients were included, with 23 457 patients classified as high CV risk, 19 864 with ASCVD equivalents, and 8288 with evidence of ASCVD. LDL-C control with 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines was 32%, 10%, and 18% for each group, respectively. Considering the ESC/EAS 2019 guidelines control level was even lower: 7%, 3%, and 7% for the same cohorts, respectively. Patients without any LLT prescribed ranged from 37% in the high CV risk group to 15% in patients with evidence of ASCVD.

CONCLUSION

We found that LDL-C control was very low in patients at higher risk of CV events. An alarming gap between guidelines on dyslipidemia management and clinical implementation persists, even in those at very high risk or with established ASCVD.

Utilizing Pharmacogenomic Data for a Safer Use of Statins among the Emirati Population

BACKGROUND

Statins are the most prescribed lipid-lowering drugs worldwide. The associated adverse events, especially muscle symptoms, have been frequently reported despite their perceived safety. Three pharmacogenes, the solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 (SLCO1B1), ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2), and cytochrome P450 2C9 (CYP2C9) are suggested as safety biomarkers for statins. The Clinical Pharmacogenomic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) issued clinical guidelines for statin use based on these three genes.

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to examine variants in these pharmacogenes to predict the safety of statin use among the Emirati population.

METHODS

Analyzing 242 whole exome sequencing data at the three genes enabled the determination of the frequencies of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), annotating the haplotypes and the predicted functions of their proteins.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 29.8% and 5.4% had SLCO1B1 decreased and poor function, respectively. The high frequency warns of the possibility of significant side effects of some statins and the importance of pharmacogenomic testing. We found a low frequency (6%) of the ABCG2:rs2231142 variant, which indicates the low probability of Emirati patients being recommended against higher rosuvastatin doses compared with other populations with higher frequencies of this variant. In contrast, we found high frequencies of the functionally impaired CYP2C9 alleles, which makes fluvastatin a less favorable choice.

CONCLUSION

Among the sparse studies available, the present one demonstrates all SLCO1B1 and CYP2C9 function-impairing alleles among Emiratis. We highlighted how population-specific pharmacogenomic data can predict safer choices of statins, especially in understudied populations.

LDL-cholesterol target levels achievement in high-risk patients: An (un)expected gender bias

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease prevention. Collection of epidemiological data is crucial for monitoring healthcare appropriateness. This analysis aimed to evaluate the proportion of high-risk patients who achieved guidelines recommended LDL-C goal, and explore the predictors of therapeutic failure, with a focus on the role of gender.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Health administrative and laboratory data from seven Local Health Districts in Tuscany were collected for residents aged ≥45 years with a history of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (MACCE) and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from January 1, 2019, to January 1, 2021. The study aimed to assess the number of patients with optimal levels of LDL-C (<55 mg/dl for patients with MACCE and <70 mg/dl for patients with T2DM without MACCE). A cohort of 174 200 individuals (55% males) was analyzed and it was found that 11.6% of them achieved the target LDL-C levels. Female gender was identified as an independent predictor of LDL-C target underattainment in patients with MACCE with or without T2DM, after adjusting for age, cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, and district area (adjusted-IRR 0.58 ± 0.01; p < 0.001). This result was consistent in subjects without lipid-lowering therapies (adjusted-IRR 0.56 ± 0.01; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In an unselected cohort of high-risk individuals, females have a significantly lower probability of reaching LDL-C recommended targets. These results emphasize the need for action to implement education for clinicians and patients and to establish clinical care pathways for high-risk patients, with a special focus on women.

Sex differences in LDL-C control in a primary care population: The PORTRAIT-DYS study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases show clear differences in clinical manifestation and treatment outcomes between men and women. To reduce sex disparities in achieving lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) goals, a sex-focused assessment is essential and more studies are needed to bring new evidence to clinicians. This study aims to assess the role of sex in attaining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, after correction for age, CV risk category, LLT intensity, and presence of mental health disorder and social deprivation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of patients aged 40-85, followed in 1 hospital and 14 primary care centers in Portugal, using electronic health records from 1/1/2012 to 31/12/2020, was performed. The analysis considered an episode-based design, where exposure consists of any time when LLT was started or intensity changed. The likelihood of reaching the LDL-C goal according to contemporary ESC/EAS guidelines was modeled using multivariate Cox regression. LDL-C goal achievement at 180 days was defined as the outcome. The analysis was repeated at 30-day follow-up intervals up to 360 days, and also stratified by CV risk category.

RESULTS

We identified 40,032 exposure episodes (LLT initiation or intensity change) in 30,323 distinct patients. Male sex, older age, lower CV risk and increasing LLT intensity were associated with improved LDL-C control. Women were 22% less likely to reach the LDL-C goal than men (HR = 0.78, 95% CI:0.73, 0.82) independently of covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Women have a lower likelihood of attaining LDL-C goals than men after adjustment for LLT intensity, age, CV risk category, presence of mental health disorder and social deprivation. This finding underscores the need for further investigation and tailoring of LLT management strategies in women.

Treatment gaps in the implementation of LDL cholesterol control among high- and very high-risk patients in Europe between 2020 and 2021: the multinational observational SANTORINI study

Background

European data pre-2019 suggest statin monotherapy is the most common approach to lipid management for preventing cardiovascular (CV) events, resulting in only one-fifth of high- and very high-risk patients achieving the 2019 ESC/EAS recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Whether the treatment landscape has evolved, or gaps persist remains of interest.

Methods

Baseline data are presented from SANTORINI, an observational, prospective study that documents the use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in patients ≥18 years at high or very high CV risk between 2020 and 2021 across primary and secondary care settings in 14 European countries.

Findings

Of 9602 enrolled patients, 9044 with complete data were included (mean age: 65.3 ± 10.9 years; 72.6% male). Physicians reported using 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines as a basis for CV risk classification in 52.0% (4706/9044) of patients (overall: high risk 29.2%; very high risk 70.8%). However, centrally re-assessed CV risk based on 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines suggested 6.5% (308/4706) and 91.0% (4284/4706) were high- and very high-risk patients, respectively. Overall, 21.8% of patients had no documented LLTs, 54.2% were receiving monotherapy and 24.0% combination LLT. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) LDL-C was 2.1 (1.6, 3.0) mmol/L (82 [60, 117] mg/dL), with 20.1% of patients achieving risk-based LDL-C goals as per the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines.

Interpretation

At the time of study enrolment, 80% of high- and very high-risk patients failed to achieve 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines LDL-C goals. Contributory factors may include CV risk underestimation and underutilization of combination therapies. Further efforts are needed to achieve current guideline-recommended LDL-C goals.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04271280.

Funding

This study is funded by Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany.

Trends in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement and changes in lipid-lowering therapy after incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Danish cohort study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate trends in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement (LDL-C<1.8 mmol/L, equivalent to 70 mg/dL), initiation of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and changes in LLT intensity in individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) at very high risk of recurrent cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

A cohort study design was used including individuals with incident ASCVD and LDL-C≥1.8 mmol/L in 2010-2015. Data were obtained from national, population-based registers (patient, prescription, income, and laboratory).

RESULTS

We included 11,997 individuals. Acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke and stable angina pectoris accounted for 79.6% of the qualifying ASCVD events. At inclusion, 37.2% were in LLT. Mean LDL-C before or during ASCVD hospitalization was 3.1 mmol/L (120 mg/dL). LDL-C goal achievement increased within the first two years after inclusion from 40.5% to 50.6%. LLT initiation within the first 90 days increased from 48.6% to 56.0%. Initiation of intensive LLT increased from 9.6% to 32.8%. The largest change in LLT intensity was seen in the period 180 days before to 90 days after discharge with 2.2% in 2010 to 12.1% in 2015.

CONCLUSION

LDL-C goal achievement within the first 2 years after inclusion increased from 40.5% in 2010 to 50.6% in 2015. LLT initiation within the first year after inclusion increased, especially for intensive LLT, although only one third initiated intensive LLT in 2015. Despite trends show improvements in LDL-C goal achievement, 49.4% of individuals at very high risk of a CV event did not achieve the LDL-C goal within 2 years after ASCVD hospitalization.

Prognostic Role of Polyvascular Involvement in Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease

Background: Statin therapy is recommended for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, PAD patients with polyvascular (PV) extent remain threatened by an increased residual cardiovascular (CV) risk. Purpose: To investigate the association of prescribed statin therapy and mortality in PAD patients with or without PV extent. Methods: A single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study originating from a consecutive registry with 1380 symptomatic PAD patients over a mean observational time of 60 ± 32 months. The association of atherosclerotic extent and statin use (PAD, plus one additional region (CAD or CeVD, [+1 V]), +2 vascular regions (+CAD and CeVD [+2 V]) with the risk of all-cause mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounding factors. Results: The mean age of the study's participants was 72.0 ± 11.7 years, with 36% being female. PAD patients with PV extent [+1 V] and [+2 V] were older and suffered from diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia more often; they, too, had more severely impaired kidney function (all p < 0.0001) compared to patients with PAD only. PAD patients with PV [+1 V] and [+2 V] received better statin medication and reached the recommended LDL-C target compared to PAD-only patients (p < 0.001). Despite better statin treatment, the rate of all-cause mortality was higher in PV patients than in PAD-only patients (PAD only: 13%; [+1 V]: 22%; [+2 V]: 35%; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: PV patients receive better statin therapy than PAD-only patients but nevertheless still have higher mortality rates. Future studies are needed to explore whether more aggressive LDL-lowering treatment for PAD patients may be translated into better prognosis.

Cost-Effectiveness of Evolocumab in Adult Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease from Chinese Healthcare Perspective

INTRODUCTION

To assess the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab with statins versus placebo combined with statins in the treatment of adult patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels > 70 mg/dl after the maximum tolerable dose of statin therapy in China.

METHODS

A Markov model, based on data from the FOURIER trial, claims databases, and published literature, was used to compare the health outcomes of the two therapies from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system. The time horizon in the model was a lifetime, the cycle length was a year, and the discount rate was 5%. The output indicators of the model included direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted on critical parameters such as cost, utility, and incidence of cardiovascular events to evaluate the effect of uncertainty in parameters and the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

In Chinese adult patients with ASCVD and LDL-C levels > 70 mg/dl, evolocumab was associated with incremental QALYs of 1.25 and incremental costs of 18,714 CNY versus placebo, both with a statin therapy, resulting in an ICER of 14,969 CNY/QALY gained, which was less than the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold (80,976 CNY/QALY, a capita GDP of China, 2021). The result of one-way sensitivity analysis indicated that when the effect of evolocumab on myocardial infarction (MI) rate after the first year varied, ICER changed the most. The results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of evolocumab added to statins being cost-effective at a threshold of 80,976 CNY/QALY was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Compared with placebo and statin therapy combination, evolocumab added to statin therapy for adult patients with ASCVD and LDL-C > 70 mg/dl in China is cost-effective.

Influence of LDL-Cholesterol Lowering on Coronary Plaque Progression of Non-Target Lesions in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings from a Retrospective Study

The progression of NTLs after PCI accounts for a significant portion of future adverse cardiac events. The reduction in LDL-C reduces cardiovascular events. This has, however, not yet been shown in a real-world setting. We aimed to investigate the association between LDL-C changes with progression in NTLs. A total of 847 patients with successful PCI were enrolled. Patients with follow-up LDL-C ≥ 1.4 mmol/L or percent reduction <50% compared to baseline were Non-optimal group (n = 793); patients with follow-up LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L and percent reduction ≥50% compared to baseline were Optimal group (n = 54). Compared to Non-optimal group, Optimal group presented a lower rate of NTL plaque progression (11.11% vs. 23.96%; p = 0.007) and a lower follow-up TC (2.77 ± 0.59 vs. 3.66 ± 0.97; p < 0.001) and LDL-C (1.09 ± 0.26 vs. 2.03 ± 0.71; p < 0.001). The univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that follow-up LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L and a percent reduction ≥50% from baseline was a protective factor for NTL plaque progression (OR: 0.397; 95%CI: 0.167-0.941; p = 0.036). The multivariate logistic regression model revealed that follow-up LDL-C < 1.4 mmol/L and percent reduction ≥50% was indeed an independent factor associated with a lower rate of plaque progression of NTLs (OR: 0.398; 95% CI: 0.167-0.945; p = 0.037). Therefore, achieving guideline-recommended LDL-C level was associated with a significantly reduced risk of NTL plaque progression.

Impact of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) on mid-term clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: A secondary analysis of the DACAB trial

Purpose

The objective was to evaluate the influence of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of a 5-year follow-up of the DACAB trial (NCT02201771), in which 500 patients who underwent primary isolated CABG were randomized to three-antiplatelet therapy for 1 year after surgery. Of them, 459 patients were recruited in this secondary analysis. Baseline LDL-C and Lp(a) levels were collected, and repeated measurement of LDL-C levels during the follow-up were recorded. Cut-off values for LDL-C were set at 1.8 and 2.6 mmol/L; thus, the patients were stratified into LDL-C <1.8, 1.8-<2.6, and ≥2.6 mmol/L subgroups. Cut-off value for Lp(a) was 30 mg/dL; thus, the patients were divided into Lp(a) <30 and ≥30 mg/dL subgroups. The primary outcome was 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-4), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization. Median follow-up time was 5.2 (interquartile range, 4.2-6.1) years.

Results

During the follow-up, 129 (28.1%) patients achieved the attainment of LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L, 186 (40.5%) achieved LDL-C 1.8-<2.6 mmol/L, and 144 (31.4%) remained LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L. Compared with the postoperative LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L group, the risk of MACE-4 was significantly higher in the LDL-C 1.8-<2.6 mmol/L group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.92, 95% CI, 1.12-3.29; P = 0.019] and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L group (aHR = 3.90, 95% CI, 2.29-6.64; P < 0.001). Baseline Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL was identified in 131 (28.5%) patients and was associated with an increased risk of MACE-4 (aHR = 1.52, 95% CI, 1.06-2.18; P = 0.022).

Conclusions

For CABG patients, exposure to increased levels of postoperative LDL-C or baseline Lp(a) was associated with worse mid-term clinical outcomes. Our findings suggested the necessity of achieving LDL-C target and potential benefit of adding Lp(a) targeted lipid-lowering therapy in CABG population.

False versus True Statin Intolerance in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Background: Statin intolerance (SI) is often documented in patients’ charts but rarely confirmed by objective methods. Objective: We aimed to identify the rate of true SI in a large population with peripheral artery disease (PAD) as well as the subsequent use of such drugs and the impact on cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: Patients with PAD and reported SI were retrospectively classified in those with “probable/possible” (pp) and “unlikely” (u) SI, after the application of the “Statin Myalgia Clinical Index Score” (SAMS-CI). Both groups were compared after 62 months (date of observation period?). Results: Among the 4,505 included patients, 139 (3%) had been reported as having SI. Of those, 33 (24%) had ppSI, and 106 (76%) had uSI. During the observation period, statin use decreased in patients with both ppSI (from 97% to 21%; p < 0.0001) and uSI (from 87% to 53%; p < 0.0001). At the end of the observation period, patients with ppSI more often received PCSK9 inhibitors (55% vs. 7%; p < 0.0001), had a stronger decrease in LDL-C from baseline to follow-up (1.82 ± 1.69 mmol/L vs. 0.85 ± 1.41 mmol/L; p < 0.01), and a lower rate of mortality (3% vs. 21%; p = 0.04) than those with uSI. Conclusions: SI is low in PAD patients (3.1%), with only one quarter fulfilling the criteria of ppSI. The overdiagnosis of SI is related to an underuse of statins and an increased mortality in a short time period.

Statin adherence in patients with high cardiovascular risk: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

Statin adherence is an essential problem although lifetime medication is recommended especially in patients with high cardiovascular risk. The importance of perceived risk as a predictor of adherence among cardiology patients has not been fully explored. This study aimed to test the importance of perceived risk as a predictor of statin adherence amongst hypercholesterolemic patients to identify predictors associated with poor adherence.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at cardiology outpatient clinics of the University hospital in Ankara, Turkey. A total of 327 consecutive patients with high CV risk were recruited. Self-reported Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale was used to assess statin adherence.

RESULTS

Of the patients studied, 34.5% had concerns about side effects. Also, the mean age was 63.85 ± 11.29 years, 66.1% were men, 32.4% applied non-drug alternative therapies, 53.2% had a Mediterranean-style diet and 20.8% checked their lipid values irregularly. Participants reported 50.2% high, 30% moderate, and 19.9% low statin medication adherence. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglyceride (TG) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) control rates were 44.6%, 74.3%, 61.5% and 41.6%. On multiple logistic regression, concern about side effects was associated with a statistically significant quadruple elevation of odds of non-adherence. Also, being male, former smokers, not having complementary interventions, having regular visits, being educated for more than 5 years, having low depressive symptom scores, living in a rural, being never or former smokers, employee were significant predictors of high medication adherence scores.

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of the patients reported high medication adherence. Proper strategies to improve adherence would include patient education efforts focused on patients with concerns about side effects and those who are female, less educated, current smokers, interested in complementary interventions, have irregular follow-up visits, and have depressive symptoms. Brief medication adherence scales may facilitate the assessment of patients' adherence.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in patients with clinical evidence of familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated Lp(a)

BACKGROUND

Although potent lipid-lowering therapies are available, patients commonly fall short of recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and LDL-C goal attainment, as well as the prevalence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Moreover, we characterized patients failing to meet recommended LDL-C goals.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis in a cohort of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Clinical FH was determined by the Dutch Clinical Lipid Network Score, and Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL (≈ 107 nmol/L) was considered elevated.

RESULTS

A total of 838 participants were included. Overall, the prevalence of CAD was 72%, and 62% received lipid-lowering treatment. The prevalence of clinical FH (probable and definite FH) was 4%, and 19% had elevated Lp(a) levels. With 35%, LDL-C goal attainment was generally poor. Among the participants with clinical FH, none reached their LDL-C target. Among patients with elevated Lp(a), LDL-C target achievement was only 28%. The prevalence and severity of CAD were higher in participants with clinical FH (86% prevalence) and elevated Lp(a) (80% prevalence).

CONCLUSION

Most participants failed to meet their individual LDL-C goals according to the ESC 2016 and 2019 guidelines. In particular, high-risk patients with clinical FH or elevated Lp(a) rarely met their target for LDL-C. The identification of these patients and more intense treatment approaches are crucial for the improvement of CAD primary and secondary prevention.

Achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets in Chinese patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease after receiving statins and ezetimibe

Background

The importance of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk is strongly emphasized. If the LDL-C goals are not achieved with statin therapy, combination with ezetimibe is recommended. Studies revealed a substantial gap between obtained LDL-C levels and LDL-C target in ASCVD patients. However, little is known about the achievement of LDL-lowering treatment targets in ASCVD patients receiving ezetimibe in addition to statins.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective cohort study based on EHR data from the regional health information system of Yinzhou, an eastern coastal area of China. ASCVD Patients stratified as very high risk, taking both statin and ezetimibe for lipid control, and had at least one lipid test after ezetimibe initiation were included between January 2013 and July 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the LDL-C values and target value (1.8 mmol/L according to the Chinese guideline, 1.4 mmol/L according to the European guideline) achievements. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the influencing factors of target achievement rate.

Results

A total of 1,727 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 15.0 months. Taking 1.8 mmol/L as the target value, the achievement rates of LDL-C over the first 3 follow up years were 50.6, 31.3, and 30.3%, respectively. Taking 1.4 mmol/L as the target value, the achievement rates were 25.6, 15.5, and 16.5%, respectively. Multivariable analysis suggested that male patients (OR = 1.78, 95%CI: 1.27-2.49), combined use of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin with ezetimibe (vs other statins, OR = 4.64, 95% CI: 1.83-11.76), better medication adherence (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04) and smoking cessation (vs smoking, OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.27-4.02) were associated with a higher achievement rate, while baseline LDL-C level (OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.41-0.56) and treatment course of statin before ezetimibe (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.98) were negatively associated with achievement rate.

Conclusion

Long-term follow-up data based on a Chinese regional database shows that in very high-risk ASCVD patients taking ezetimibe in addition to statins, achievement rate of LDL-lowering treatment targets is still low and far from satisfactory in real-world setting. More efforts are needed to achieve optimal LDL-C levels.

Platelet Redox Imbalance in Hypercholesterolemia: A Big Problem for a Small Cell

The imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) synthesis and their scavenging by anti-oxidant defences is the common soil of many disorders, including hypercholesterolemia. Platelets, the smallest blood cells, are deeply involved in the pathophysiology of occlusive arterial thrombi associated with myocardial infarction and stroke. A great deal of evidence shows that both increased intraplatelet ROS synthesis and impaired ROS neutralization are implicated in the thrombotic process. Hypercholesterolemia is recognized as cause of atherosclerosis, cerebro- and cardiovascular disease, and, closely related to this, is the widespread acceptance that it strongly contributes to platelet hyperreactivity via direct oxidized LDL (oxLDL)-platelet membrane interaction via scavenger receptors such as CD36 and signaling pathways including Src family kinases (SFK), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase. In turn, activated platelets contribute to oxLDL generation, which ends up propagating platelet activation and thrombus formation through a mechanism mediated by oxidative stress. When evaluating the effect of lipid-lowering therapies on thrombogenesis, a large body of evidence shows that the effects of statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors are not limited to the reduction of LDL-C but also to the down-regulation of platelet reactivity mainly by mechanisms sensitive to intracellular redox balance. In this review, we will focus on the role of oxidative stress-related mechanisms as a cause of platelet hyperreactivity and the pathophysiological link of the pleiotropism of lipid-lowering agents to the beneficial effects on platelet function.

[Inclisiran - a new era in lipid-lowering therapy]

Inclisiran is a novel hypolipidemic drug that inhibits synthesis of the PCSK9 protein through the process called RNA interference. Inclisiran is a double-stranded, modified RNA bound to the N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) carbohydrate molecule, a ligand of the acialoglycoprotein receptor, that is expressed by hepatocytes. After entering hepatocytes, inclisiran cleaves matrix RNA and, thereby, reduces the PCSK9 protein synthesis. This, in turn, enhances the uptake of circulating low-density lipoproteins (LDL) by specific receptors on hepatocytes, thereby lowering LDL levels in circulation. Efficacy and safety of inclisiran for lowering LDL cholesterol (C) in blood and its effect on the risk of clinical complications of atherosclerosis have been studied in the ORION program that includes multiple clinical trials. According to results of this program, inclisiran effectively reduces both LDL-C levels and the incidence of cardiovascular complications in the absence of clinically significant adverse reactions. An important advantage of inclisiran compared with other lipid-lowering drugs is the administration schedule (twice a year), which allows a considerable improvement of patients' compliance with the treatment and also of the effectiveness of the hypolipidemic treatment.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Inclisiran: A Small Interfering Ribonucleic Acid Molecule Targeting PCSK9—A Narrative Review

As dyslipidemias remain one of the main risk factors for developing cardiovascular disease, the question of maintaining optimal lipid levels with pharmacotherapy remains a subject of interest worldwide. In contrast to conventional pharmacotherapy, human monoclonal antibodies directed against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PSCK9) and small interfering RNA- (siRNA-) based drug targeting PCSK9 represent a new strategy for managing lipid disorders and reducing cardiovascular risk. Inclisiran is a long-acting, synthetic siRNA that targets hepatic production of PCSK9 and consequently causes a reduction in LDL-C concentrations by approximately 50% compared to placebo. The structural modification of inclisiran has led to better stability and prolonged biological activity of the drug. The main advantage over conventional pharmacotherapy and anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies is its favorable administration regimen (0–90–180 days), which should lead to much better compliance. Clinical trials conducted so far have confirmed the tolerability and efficacy of inclisiran in long-term PCSK9 and LDL-C level reductions. Moreover, a short-term follow-up on the safety of inclisiran showed a relatively good safety profile of the drug. However, it is still of great importance for ongoing and forthcoming clinical trials to be continued on a larger group of patients in order to assess long-term tolerability, efficacy, and safety of inclisiran.

Personalizing cholesterol treatment recommendations for primary cardiovascular disease prevention

Statin therapy is the cornerstone of preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), primarily by reducing low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Optimal statin therapy decisions rely on shared decision making and may be uncertain for a given patient. In areas of clinical uncertainty, personalized approaches based on real-world data may help inform treatment decisions. We sought to develop a personalized statin recommendation approach for primary ASCVD prevention based on historical real-world outcomes in similar patients. Our retrospective cohort included adults from a large Northern California electronic health record (EHR) aged 40–79 years with no prior cardiovascular disease or statin use. The cohort was split into training and test sets. Weighted-K-nearest-neighbor (wKNN) regression models were used to identify historical EHR patients similar to a candidate patient. We modeled four statin decisions for each patient: none, low-intensity, moderate-intensity, and high-intensity. For each candidate patient, the algorithm recommended the statin decision that was associated with the greatest percentage reduction in LDL-C after 1 year in similar patients. The overall cohort consisted of 50,576 patients (age 54.6 ± 9.8 years) with 55% female, 48% non-Hispanic White, 32% Asian, and 7.4% Hispanic patients. Among 8383 test-set patients, 52%, 44%, and 4% were recommended high-, moderate-, and low-intensity statins, respectively, for a maximum predicted average 1-yr LDL-C reduction of 16.9%, 20.4%, and 14.9%, in each group, respectively. Overall, using aggregate EHR data, a personalized statin recommendation approach identified the statin intensity associated with the greatest LDL-C reduction in historical patients similar to a candidate patient. Recommendations included low- or moderate-intensity statins for maximum LDL-C lowering in nearly half the test set, which is discordant with their expected guideline-based efficacy. A data-driven personalized statin recommendation approach may inform shared decision making in areas of uncertainty, and highlight unexpected efficacy-effectiveness gaps.

A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of New-Formulation Zenon (Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination) in Primary Hypercholesterolemia Inadequately Controlled by Statins

OBJECTIVE

In primary hypercholesterolemia many people treated with statins do not reach their plasma LDL-C goals and are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of a new fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe (R/E) in this population.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-arm study of FDC R/E in people with primary hypercholesterolemia at very high risk (VHR) or high risk (HR) of CVD, inadequately controlled with 20 mg or 10 mg stable daily dose of rosuvastatin or equipotent dose of another statin. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of FDC R/E versus rosuvastatin monotherapy uptitrated to 40 mg (R40) or 20 mg (R20) in reduction of LDL-C after 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Randomized VHR participants (n = 244) were treated with R40, R40/E10, or R20/E10; randomized HR participants (n = 208) received R10/E10 or R20. In VHR participants, superiority of R40/E10 and R20/E10 versus R40 was demonstrated on LDL-C percent change from baseline to Week 6 with least squares mean differences (LSMD) of -19.66% (95% CI: -29.48% to -9.84%; P < .001) and -12.28% (95% CI: -22.12% to -2.44%; P = .015), respectively. In HR participants, superiority of R10/E10 over R20 was not demonstrated (LSMD -5.20%; 95% CI: -15.18% to 4.78%; P = .306), despite clinically relevant LDL-C reduction with R10/E10. No unexpected safety findings were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study suggest that R/E FDCs improve LDL-C reduction and goal achievement in people with primary hypercholesterolemia inadequately controlled with statins and at VHR/HR of CVD.

Control of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease in Real-Life Practice: The DAUSSET Study in French Cardiologists

Introduction: Patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) are at very high risk for cardiovascular events. Methods: The DAUSSET study is a national, multicenter, non-interventional study that included very high-risk CAD patients followed by French cardiologists. It aimed to describe real-life clinical practices for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol control in the secondary prevention of CAD. Results: A total of 912 patients (mean age, 65.4 years; men, 76.1%; myocardial infarction, 69.4%; first episode, 80.1%) were analyzed. The LDL cholesterol goal was 70 mg/dL in most cases (84.9%). The LDL cholesterol goal <70 mg/dL was achieved in 41.7% of patients. Of the 894 (98.0%) patients who received lipid-lowering therapy, 81.2% had been treated more intensively after the cardiac event, 27.0% had been treated less intensively and 13.1% had been maintained. Participating cardiologists were very satisfied or satisfied with treatment response in 72.6% of patients. Moderate satisfaction or dissatisfaction with lipid-lowering therapy was related to not achieving objectives (100%), treatment inefficacy (53.7%), treatment intolerance (23.4%) and poor adherence (12.3%). Conclusion: These real-world results show that lipid control in very high-risk patients remains insufficient. More than half of the patients did not achieve the LDL cholesterol goal. Prevention of cardiovascular events in these very high-risk patients could be further improved by better education and more intensive lipid-lowering therapy.

Defining the Cholesterol Lowering Mechanism of Bergamot (Citrus bergamia) Extract in HepG2 and Caco-2 Cells

Bergamot, a Mediterranean citrus fruit native to southern Italy, has been reported to have cholesterol-lowering properties; however, the mechanism of action is not well understood. Due to structural similarities with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitors, it has been proposed that the phenolic compounds in bergamot may also inhibit HMGCR. Statins are widely used for their cholesterol-lowering properties; however, they are not universally well tolerated, suggesting there is a need to identify novel cholesterol-lowering strategies. In the present study, we investigated bergamot fruit extract (BFE) and its principal components (neoeriocitrin, naringin, neohesperidin, melitidin, and brutieridin) for their ability to regulate cholesterol levels in HepG2 and Caco-2 cells. BFE at increasing concentrations decreased the levels of total and free cholesterol in HepG2 cells. BFE and its constituents did not directly inhibit HMGCR activity. However, BFE and neohesperidin decreased HMGCR levels in HepG2 cells, suggesting that neohesperidin and BFE may downregulate HMGCR expression. An increase in AMP-kinase phosphorylation was observed in BFE and neohesperidin-treated cells. In Caco-2 cells, brutieridin exhibited a significant reduction in cholesterol uptake and decreased the level of Niemann-Pick C1 Like 1, an important cholesterol transporter. Taken together, our data suggest that the cholesterol-lowering activity of bergamot is distinct from statins. We hypothesize that BFE and its principal constituents lower cholesterol by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis and absorption.

Treatment with PCSK9 Inhibitors in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia Lowers Plasma Levels of Platelet-Activating Factor and Its Precursors: A Combined Metabolomic and Lipidomic Approach

INTRODUCTION

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by extremely high levels of circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and is caused by mutations of genes involved in LDL-C metabolism, including LDL receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB), or proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (PCSK9). Accordingly, PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are effective in LDL-C reduction. However, no data are available on the pleiotropic effect of PCSK9i. To this end, we performed an untargeted metabolomics approach to gather a global view on changes in metabolic pathways in patients receiving treatment with PCSK9i.

METHODS

Twenty-five FH patients starting treatment with PCSK-9i were evaluated by an untargeted metabolomics approach at baseline (before PCSK9i treatment) and after 12 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

All the 25 FH subjects enrolled were on maximal tolerated lipid-lowering therapy prior to study entry. After a 12 week treatment with PCSK9i, we observed an expected significant reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels (from 201.0 ± 69.5 mg/dL to 103.0 ± 58.0 mg/dL, p < 0.001). The LDL-C target was achieved in 36% of patients. After peak validation and correction, after 12 weeks of PCSK9i treatment as compared to baseline, we observed increments in creatine (p-value = 0.041), indole (p-value = 0.045), and indoleacrylic acid (p-value= 0.045) concentrations. Conversely, significant decreases in choline (p-value = 0.045) and phosphatidylcholine (p-value < 0.01) together with a reduction in platelet activating factor (p-value = 0.041) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking advantage of untargeted metabolomics, we first provided evidence of concomitant reductions in inflammation and platelet activation metabolites in FH patients receiving a 12 week treatment with PCSK9i.

Evaluation of contemporary treatment of high- and very high-risk patients for the prevention of cardiovascular events in Europe - Methodology and rationale for the multinational observational SANTORINI study

Background and aims

Clinical practice before 2019 suggests a substantial proportion of high and very high CV risk patients taking lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) would not achieve the new LDL-C goals recommended in the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines (<70 and < 55 mg/dL, respectively). To what extent practice has changed since the last ESC/EAS guideline update is uncertain, and quantification of remaining implementation gaps may inform health policy.

Methods

The SANTORINI study is a multinational, multicentre, prospective, observational, non-interventional study documenting patient data at baseline (enrolment) and at 12-month follow-up. The study recruited 9606 patients ≥18 years of age with high and very high CV risk (as assigned by the investigators) requiring LLT, with no formal patient or comparator groups. The primary objective is to document, in the real-world setting, the effectiveness of current treatment modalities in managing plasma levels of LDL-C in high- and very high-risk patients requiring LLT. Key secondary effectiveness objectives include documenting the relationship between LLT and levels of other plasma lipids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and overall predicted CV risk over one year. Health economics and patient-relevant parameters will also be assessed.

Conclusions

The SANTORINI study, which commenced after the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines were published, is ideally placed to provide important contemporary insights into the evolving management of LLT in Europe and highlight factors contributing to the low levels of LDL-C goal achievement among high and very high CV risk patients. It is hoped the findings will help enhance patient management and reduce the burden of ASCVD in Europe.

Prevalence of plasma lipid disorders with an emphasis on LDL cholesterol in selected countries in the Asia-Pacific region

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity within the Asia-Pacific region, with the prevalence of CVD risk factors such as plasma lipid disorders increasing in many Asian countries. As members of the Cardiovascular RISk Prevention (CRISP) in Asia network, the authors have focused on plasma lipid disorders in the six countries within which they have clinical experience: Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, and Australia. Based on country-specific national surveys, the prevalence of abnormal levels of total cholesterol, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C and HDL-C, respectively), and triglycerides (TG) are reported. An important caveat is that countries have used different thresholds to define plasma lipid disorders, making direct comparisons difficult. The prevalence of abnormal lipid levels was as follows: high total cholesterol (30.2-47.7%, thresholds: 190-213 mg/dL); high LDL-C (33.2-47.5%; thresholds: 130-135 mg/dL); low/abnormal HDL-C (22.9-72.0%; thresholds: 39-50 mg/dL); and high/abnormal TG (13.9-38.7%; thresholds: 150-177 mg/dL). Similarities and differences between country-specific guidelines for the management of plasma lipid disorders are highlighted. Based on the authors' clinical experience, some of the possible reasons for suboptimal management of plasma lipid disorders in each country are described. Issues common to several countries include physician reluctance to prescribe high-dose and/or high-intensity statins and poor understanding of disease, treatments, and side effects among patients. Treatment costs and geographical constraints have also hampered disease management in Indonesia and the Philippines. Understanding the factors governing the prevalence of plasma lipid disorders helps enhance strategies to reduce the burden of CVD in the Asia-Pacific region.

LDL Cholesterol Reduction Variability with Different Types and Doses of Statins in Monotherapy or Combined with Ezetimibe. Results from the Spanish Arteriosclerosis Society Dyslipidaemia Registry

PURPOSE

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol reduction by statin therapy is dose-dependent, varies among different statins, and has wide inter-individual variability. The present study aimed to compare mean LDL cholesterol reduction and its variability achieved with different doses of the three statins most frequently used in monotherapy or combined with ezetimibe in a real clinical setting.

METHODS

Of 5620 cases with primary hypercholesterolemia on the Spanish Arteriosclerosis Society Registry, 1004 with non-familial hypercholesterolemia and complete information on drug therapy and lipid profile were included.

RESULTS

The lowest mean percentage LDL cholesterol reduction was observed with simvastatin 10 mg (32.5 ± 18.5%), while the highest mean percentage LDL reduction was obtained with rosuvastatin 40 mg (58.7 ± 18.8%). As to combined treatment, the lowest and highest mean percentage LDL cholesterol reductions were obtained with simvastatin 10 mg combined with ezetimibe (50.6 ± 24.6%) and rosuvastatin 40 mg combined with ezetimibe (71.6 ± 11.1%), respectively. Factors associated with a suboptimal response were male sex, lower age, body mass index, and baseline LDL cholesterol levels. Combined treatment was associated with less variability in LDL cholesterol reduction (OR 0.603, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a real clinical setting, rosuvastatin was superior to the other statins in lowering LDL cholesterol, both as monotherapy or combined with ezetimibe. Factors associated with a suboptimal response in LDL cholesterol decline were male sex, age, body mass index, and baseline LDL cholesterol levels. Combined treatment was associated with less variability in LDL cholesterol improvement.

Improved lipid target level attainment in patients with peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) fall under the category of a very high cardiovascular risk. Although, consequent lipid lowering therapy (LLT) is advised, only sparse data on attained target level in PAD exists.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to analyse contemporary guideline recommendations for LLT in symptomatic PAD patients.

METHODS

monocentric, prospective, observational study involving 200 symptomatic PAD patients. Guideline target level attainment and LLT were analysed between 2017 and 2019.

RESULTS

Overall 78.5% of the patients were on statin therapy, mainly of high intensity with atorvastatin in 50% and rosuvastatin in 33% of the cases. Average statin dosage adjusted for simvastatin was 55 mg/d. Low density lipoproteincholesterol (LDL-C) was <1.8 mmol/L in 53% and <1.4 mmol/L in 34% of the cases. Mean LDL-C levels were at 1.85 ± 0.88 mmol/L. We observed no difference in the treatment and the target level attainment of patients with a stable PAD (intermittent claudication) or chronic critical PAD. However, patients with ≥1 vascular region affected (i.e. coronary and/or cerebrovascular) were treated more intensively and had lower LDL-C levels than patients with PAD alone.

CONCLUSION

It appears that there is more awareness and improvement of previously documented undertreatment of LDL-C levels in symptomatic PAD patients. Although statin treatment is initiated in the majority of patients, our findings call for a continuously intensified LLT in symptomatic PAD patients.

An innovative lipid-lowering approach to enhance attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals

Aims

To improve attainment of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c) targets, an expert group proposed an algorithm for lipid-lowering therapy during hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome and during follow-up. We aimed to assess adherence to this algorithm, and evaluate its impact on LDL-c levels and on attainment of therapeutic LDL-c targets in a population of post-acute coronary syndrome patients.

Methods and results

Prospective, observational study including patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome between February 2017 and September 2018. Patients admitted without statins or ezetimibe were considered ‘naïve’. Baseline LDL-c was admission LDL-c in naïve patients, and for those taking lipid-lowering therapy at admission, baseline LDL-c was back-calculated. In line with the most recent guidelines, the target was a &gt;50% reduction in naïve LDL-c and &lt;55 mg/dL. In total, 270 patients were analysed, mean age 67 ± 12 years, 78% men, 26% diabetic. At admission, 175 (65%) were naïve, 95 (35%) had previous lipid-lowering therapy, of which 13 (5%) statin+ezetimibe. Average LDL-c at admission was 120 ± 47 mg/dL (136 ± 44 mg/dL in naïve, 91 ± 39 mg/dL in pretreated patients). Discharge prescription was in compliance with the algorithm in 204 (76%) patients. Average LDL-c at two months was 57 ± 28 mg/dL; it was &lt;55 mg/dL in 135 (50%), and 178 (66%) achieved a &gt;50% reduction. Overall, 125/270 (46%) achieved the LDL-c goal. The reduction in LDL-c observed at two months persisted at five months.

Conclusion

Prescription of high-intensity statins, associated with ezetimibe where applicable, achieves LDL-c levels &lt;55 mg/dL in 50% of patients at two months, and attains therapeutic goals defined by the European Society of Cardiology in 46% of cases.

Utilization of statins and LDL-cholesterol target attainment in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes - a nationwide cross-sectional study (TEMD dyslipidemia study)

BACKGROUND

Attaining acceptable levels of LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) significantly improves cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The LDL-C target attainment and the characteristics of patients attaining these targets were investigated in this study. Furthermore, the reasons for not choosing statins and the physicians' attitudes on the treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia were also examined.

METHODS

A nationwide, cross-sectional survey was conducted in tertiary centers for diabetes management. Adult patients with T2DM, who were under follow-up for at least a year in outpatient clinics, were consecutively enrolled for the study. LDL-C goals were defined as below 70 mg/dL for patients with macrovascular complications or diabetic nephropathy, and below 100 mg/dL for other patients. Data about lipid-lowering medications were self-reported.

RESULTS

A total of 4504 patients (female: 58.6%) were enrolled for the study. The mean HbA1c and diabetes duration was 7.73 ± 1.74% and 10.9 ± 7.5 years, respectively. The need for statin treatment was 94.9% (n = 4262); however, only 42.4% (n = 1807) of these patients were under treatment, and only 24.8% (n = 448) of these patients achieved LDL-C targets. The main reason for statin discontinuation was negative media coverage (87.5%), while only a minority of patients (12.5%) mentioned side effects. Physicians initiated lipid-lowering therapy in only 20.3% of patients with high LDL-C levels. It was observed that the female gender was a significant independent predictor of not attaining LDL-C goals (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 50 % of patients with T2DM who need statins were under treatment, and only a quarter of them attained their LDL-C targets. There exists a significant gap between the guideline recommendations and the real-world evidence in the treatment of dyslipidemia in T2DM.

Meta-Analysis of Inclisiran for the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia

Statin therapy is the gold standard for hypercholesterolemia. However, a significant number of patients cannot achieve their target low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels despite a maximal dose of statin therapy, and some cannot tolerate statins at all. Approval of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors has been revolutionary for those patients. However, the need for frequent injections limits patient compliance with their use. Recently, a twice-yearly injection of inclisiran, a small interfering RNA, has been shown to inhibit hepatic synthesis of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. However, patient randomized clinical trial has been underpowered for clinical end points, necessitating a meta-analysis of those trials. The weighted mean difference was used to describe continuous variables, and pooled risk ratios, calculated using a random effects model, were used to describe discrete variables. Data from 3 randomized clinical trials comprising 3,660 patients showed that inclisiran decreased LDL cholesterol levels by 51% (95% Confidence Interval, 48 to 53%; p < 0.001) compared with placebo. It was associated with a 24% lower major adverse cardiovascular events rate (risk ratios = 0.76; 95% Confidence Interval, 0.61 to 0.92). It also significantly decreased total cholesterol by 37%, apolipoprotein B by 41%, and non high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 45% (all p < 0.001). No differences were found in adverse events, abnormalities in liver function tests, or creatine kinase levels between the treatment strategies. However, a mild injection site reaction occurred more frequently in the inclisiran group. In conclusions, in patients with hypercholesterolemia, inclisiran decreased LDL level by 51% without significant adverse effects. Additionally, it was associated with a lower major adverse cardiovascular event rate.

Lipid-lowering treatment and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target achievement in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus characteristically display an atherogenic lipid profile with high triglyceride concentrations, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations not always elevated. It is unclear if patients with diabetes who present with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) receive different or more-potent lipid-lowering therapy (LLT).

AIMS

To investigate lipid abnormalities in patients with and without type 2 diabetes hospitalised for an ACS, and use of LLT before admission and 4 months after the event.

METHODS

Patients were included in the observational DYSIS II study if they were hospitalised for an ACS and had a full lipid profile.

RESULTS

Of 3803 patients, diabetes was documented in 1344 (54.7%). Compared to patients without diabetes, those with diabetes had a lower mean LDL-C (101.2 vs. 112.0mg/dL; 2.6 vs. 2.9mmol/L; P<0.0001), with a greater proportion attaining concentrations<70mg/dL (1.8mmol/L) (23.9% vs. 16.0%; P<0.0001) and<55mg/dL (1.4mmol/L) (11.3% vs. 7.3%; P<0.0001), a higher mean triglyceride concentration (139.0 vs. 121.0mg/dL; 1.6 vs. 1.4mmol/L; P<0.0001) and a lower HDL-C concentration. LLT was more commonly given to patients with diabetes (77.5% vs. 58.8%; P<0.0001); there were no differences in types of therapy prescribed. Four months after hospitalisation, most patients from both groups were being treated with LLT (predominantly statin monotherapy).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the different lipid profiles, the type of LLT prescribed did not vary depending on the presence or absence of type 2 diabetes. There was no difference in LLT in patients with and without diabetes at 4-month follow-up, except for fibrates, which were used in 2% of patients with and 1% of patients without diabetes. Statin monotherapy of intermediate potency was the predominant treatment in both groups.

Prevalence and Predictors of Out-of-Target LDL Cholesterol 1 to 3 Years After Myocardial Infarction. A Subanalysis From the EYESHOT Post-MI Registry

BACKGROUND

There is an incomplete understanding of the prevalence and predictors of attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal after myocardial infarction (MI).

AIM

To evaluate the prevalence of achievement of LDL-C goal of 70 mg/dL, to identify the baseline features associated with suboptimal lipid control, and to assess the use of LDL-C-lowering drug therapies (LLT) beyond the first year after MI.

METHODS

The EYESHOT Post-MI was a prospective, cross-sectional, Italian registry, which enrolled patients presenting to cardiologist 1 to 3 years after MI. In this retrospective post-hoc analysis, patients were categorized in 2 groups according to the achievement or not of the LDL-C goal of 70 mg/dL. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the baseline features associate with LDL-C≥70 mg/dL.

RESULTS

The study population included 903 patients (mean age 65.5 ± 11.5 years). Among them, LDL-C was ≥70 mg/dL in 474 (52.5%). Male sex (P = 0.031), hypertension (P = 0.024), prior percutaneous coronary intervention (P = 0.016) and high education level (P = 0.008) were higher in the LDL-C <70 group. At multivariable analysis, low education level was an independent predictor of LDL-C≥70 mg/dL (OR:1.582; 95%CI, 1.156-2.165; P = 0.004). Conversely, hypertension increased the probability to achieve the LDL-C goal (OR:0.650; 95%CI, 0.443-0.954; P = 0.028). Among off-target patients, LLT was not modified in the majority of cases (67.3%), intensified in 85 (18.6%), and actually reduced in 63 patients (13.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients presenting to cardiologists 1 to 3 years from the last MI event, LDL-C is not under control in a large proportion of patients, particularly in those with a low education level or without hypertension. LLT is underused in this very-high-risk setting.

PCSK9 Inhibitors: From Nature’s Lessons to Clinical Utility

Background:

Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are a novel class of non-statin lipid lowering therapy that reduce LDL-cholesterol by 50 - 60%. PCSK9 inhibitors decrease LDL-cholesterol by preventing intracellular degradation of LDL receptors; subsequently, a greater number of LDL-receptors are available on the cell surface to extract circulating LDL.

Objective:

To describe the origins of PCSK9 inhibitors and their current use in clinical practice.

Methods:

We performed a narrative review of the PCSK9 inhibitor class of drugs.

Results:

Current data indicate that PCSK9 inhibitors effectively reduce LDL-cholesterol and are well tolerated and safe. PCSK9 inhibitors have also been shown to reduce cardiovascular event rates in patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and in patients with a recent (up to one year) acute coronary syndrome. Given the costs, chronicity of the treatment and the potential budget impact, PCSK9 inhibitors are often limited to patients with the highest absolute risk for major adverse cardiovascular events despite optimal treatment with high-intensity statin and ezetimibe.

Conclusion:

PCSK9 inhibitors have a favorable safety, efficacy and tolerability profile. Postmarketing safety surveillance and real-world studies are needed to further support the long-term safety profile of this class of medicine.

Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bempedoic acid is a first-in-class lipid-lowering drug recommended by guidelines for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Our objective was to estimate its average effect on plasma lipids in humans and its safety profile.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II and III randomized controlled trials on bempedoic acid (PROSPERO: CRD42019129687). PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were searched, with no language restriction, from inception to 5 August 2019. We included 10 RCTs (n = 3,788) comprising 26 arms (active arm [n = 2,460]; control arm [n = 1,328]). Effect sizes for changes in lipids and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) serum concentration were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For safety analyses, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Bempedoic acid significantly reduced total cholesterol (MD -14.94%; 95% CI -17.31%, -12.57%; p < 0.001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -18.17%; 95% CI -21.14%, -15.19%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -22.94%; 95% CI -26.63%, -19.25%; p < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein particle number (MD -20.67%; 95% CI -23.84%, -17.48%; p < 0.001), apolipoprotein B (MD -15.18%; 95% CI -17.41%, -12.95%; p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -5.83%; 95% CI -6.14%, -5.52%; p < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein particle number (MD -3.21%; 95% CI -6.40%, -0.02%; p = 0.049), and hsCRP (MD -27.03%; 95% CI -31.42%, -22.64%; p < 0.001). Bempedoic acid did not significantly modify triglyceride level (MD -1.51%; 95% CI -3.75%, 0.74%; p = 0.189), very-low-density lipoprotein particle number (MD 3.79%; 95% CI -9.81%, 17.39%; p = 0.585), and apolipoprotein A-1 (MD -1.83%; 95% CI -5.23%, 1.56%; p = 0.290). Treatment with bempedoic acid was positively associated with an increased risk of discontinuation of treatment (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.06, 1.76; p = 0.015), elevated serum uric acid (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.03, 12.27; p = 0.045), elevated liver enzymes (OR 4.28; 95% CI 1.34, 13.71; p = 0.014), and elevated creatine kinase (OR 3.79; 95% CI 1.06, 13.51; p = 0.04), though it was strongly associated with a decreased risk of new onset or worsening diabetes (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.39, 0.90; p = 0.01). The main limitation of this meta-analysis is related to the relatively small number of individuals involved in the studies, which were often short or middle term in length.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that bempedoic acid has favorable effects on lipid profile and hsCRP levels and an acceptable safety profile. Further well-designed studies are needed to explore its longer-term safety.

Achievement of LDL-C Targets Defined by ESC/EAS (2011) Guidelines in Risk-Stratified Korean Patients with Dyslipidemia Receiving Lipid-Modifying Treatments

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the proportion of risk-stratified Korean patients with dyslipidemia achieving their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets as defined by the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) (2011) guidelines while receiving lipid-modifying treatments (LMTs).

METHODS

In this multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study, we evaluated data from Korean patients aged ≥19 years who were receiving LMTs for ≥3 months and had an LDL-C value within the previous 12 months on the same LMT. Data were collected for demographics, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, medical history, and healthcare consumption. Patients were risk-stratified according to the ESC Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) chart and LDL-C target achievement rate was assessed.

RESULTS

Guideline-based risk-stratification of the 1,034 patients showed the majority (72.2%) to be in the very high-risk category. Investigators' assessment of risk was underestimated in 71.6% compared to ESC/EAS guidelines. Overall LDL-C target achievement rate was 44.3%; target achievement was the highest (66.0%) in moderate-risk patients and the lowest (39.0%) in very high-risk patients. Overall 97.1% patients were receiving statin therapy, mostly as a single-agent (89.2%). High-intensity statins and the highest permissible dose of high-intensity statins had been prescribed to only 9.1% and 7.3% patients in the very high-risk group, respectively. Physician satisfaction with patients' LDL-C levels was the primary reason for non-intensification of statin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Achievement of target LDL-C level is suboptimal in Korean patients with dyslipidemia, especially in those at very high-risk of CV events. Current practices in LMTs need to be improved based on precise CV risk evaluation posed by dyslipidemia.

Hyperlipidemias in elderly patients: results from the Berlin Aging Study II (BASEII), a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipidemias are common and the last decades have seen substantially growing evidence of their causative role in the development of atherosclerosis and subsequent cardiovascular diseases. Since hyperlipidemias usually do not cause direct clinical symptoms, they often remain undiagnosed until a serious cardiovascular event occurs. Especially for LDL-hypercholesteremia, there are well-established treatment options available to prevent the occurrence of atherosclerosis. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the proper treatment of elderly patients. The goal of this study was to assess the prevalence of hyperlipidemia in a group of young and a group of elderly community-dwelling participants and to determine to what extent treatment of hyperlipidemia should be initiated or required.

METHODS

Crossectional data from a total of 2151 subjects (1657 in the elderly group, mean age 69, and 494 in the young group (control group), mean age 29) of the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II) were available. Medical history was assessed and recorded by trained physicians and prevalence of lipid disorders was determined with laboratory tests, including a lipid-profile.

RESULTS

A large proportion of subjects (39%) were unaware of an existing lipid disorder. The prevalence of hyperlipidemia was more frequent in the elderly group (76%) compared to the young group (41%). Hypercholesterolemia was the most common diagnosed disorder (64%), followed by hyperlipoproteinemia(a) (18%), hypertriglyceridemia (7%) and combined hyperlipoproteinaemia (5%). Only a minority of this cohort was treated with lipid-lowering medication (17%) and of those treatment targets according to ESC guidelines were reached only in 16.5 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperlipidemias appear underdiagnosed and undertreated. As the prevalence of these disorders increases with age and with regard to their role as a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease it seems to be advisable to aim for more consistent and sustainable screening and treatment of these common disorders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

BASE-II registered with the clinical trial registry Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS00009277).

Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in a Bulgarian Population of Patients with Dyslipidaemia and Diabetes: An Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with diabetes and familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) are at very high risk of cardiovascular events, but rates of FH detection are very low in most countries, including Bulgaria. Given the lack of relevant data in the literature, we conducted a retrospective observational study to (1) identify individuals with previously undiagnosed FH among patients being treated at Bulgarian diabetes centres, and (2) gain insight into current management and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals in such patients.

METHODS

From a database of diabetes centres across Bulgaria we retrieved medical records from patients aged ≥ 18 years with type 1/2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM/T2DM) who were being treated with insulin/insulin analogues, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and/or sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Patients with FH (Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score ≥ 3) were identified, and their data analyzed (lipid-modifying therapy (LMT), diabetes treatment, cardiovascular events and glycaemic and lipid parameters).

RESULTS

A total of 450 diabetic patients with FH (92.0% with T2DM; 52.4% receiving insulin/insulin analogues) were included in the analysis. LMT consisted of statin monotherapy (86% of patients; 18% receiving high-intensity statin monotherapy), statin-based combination therapy (13%) or fenofibrate (< 1%). Median LDL-C was 4.4 mmol/L. Although 30% of patients had a glycated haemoglobin level of ≤ 7%, only one patient (< 1%) achieved the LDL-C target recommended in 2016 European guidelines for very high-risk patients (< 1.8 mmol/L). Previous cardiovascular events were documented in 40% of patients.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically explore lipid target achievement in diabetic patients with FH. In this preselected Bulgarian population, < 1% of patients achieved the 2016 European guideline-defined LDL-C target. These data highlight the importance of identifying FH in diabetic patients as early as possible so that they can receive appropriate treatment.

Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Goal Achievement in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients in Fuzhou, China

PURPOSE

This study aims to analyze the treatment patterns and goal attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) in the real-world setting in Fuzhou, China.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥20 years with a valid LDL-C measurement (index date) in 2016 were selected from National Healthcare Big Data in Fuzhou, China. Patients were stratified into mutually exclusive cardiovascular risk categories: ASCVD (including recent acute coronary syndrome [ACS], chronic coronary heart disease [CHD], stroke, and peripheral arterial disease [PAD]), and DM alone (without ASCVD). Lipid-modifying medication and LDL-C attainment at the index date were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 21 989 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 17 320 (78.8%) with ASCVD and 4669 (21.2%) with DM alone; 47.7% of patients received current statin therapy in the overall cohort (53.5% in ASCVD, 26.5% for DM); 20.5% ASCVD population achieved LDL-C target with the highest in patients with recent ACS (33.8%), followed by chronic CHD (21.2%), PAD (20.9%), and ischemic stroke (17.3%); 49.0% of patients with DM achieved LDL-C target. Higher LDL-C attainment was observed in high-intensity statin and a combination of statin and nonstatin groups. Atorvastatin was the most commonly used statin with the highest LDL-C attainment, followed by rosuvastatin.

CONCLUSION

Compared with previous studies in China, our study found a relatively low statin use and LDL-C target attainment, but higher than similar studies in Europe. Guidelines should be well complied and more prescription of high-intensity statin or statin and nonstatin combination should be advocated.

Adherence to statin therapy favours survival of patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease

AIMS 

We hypothesized that adherence to statin therapy determines survival in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS 

Single-centre longitudinal observational study with 691 symptomatic PAD patients. Mortality was evaluated over a mean follow-up of 50 ± 26 months. We related statin adherence and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target attainment to all-cause mortality. Initially, 73% of our PAD patients were on statins. At follow-up, we observed an increase to 81% (P < 0.0001). Statin dosage, normalized to simvastatin 40 mg, increased from 50 to 58 mg/day (P < 0.0001), and was paralleled by a mean decrease of LDL-C from 97 to 82 mg/dL (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients receiving a high-intensity statin increased over time from 38% to 62% (P < 0.0001). Patients never receiving statins had a significant higher mortality rate (31%) than patients continuously on statins (13%) or having newly received a statin (8%; P < 0.0001). Moreover, patients on intensified statin medication had a low mortality of 9%. Those who terminated statin medication or reduced statin dosage had a higher mortality (34% and 20%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that adherence to or an increase of the statin dosage (both P = 0.001), as well as a newly prescribed statin therapy (P = 0.004) independently predicted reduced mortality.

CONCLUSION 

Our data suggest that adherence to statin therapy is associated with reduced mortality in symptomatic PAD patients. A strategy of intensive and sustained statin therapy is recommended.

Effect of Bempedoic Acid vs Placebo Added to Maximally Tolerated Statins on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: The CLEAR Wisdom Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Additional treatment options are needed for patients who do not achieve sufficient reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level with available lipid-lowering therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of bempedoic acid vs placebo in patients at high cardiovascular risk receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 91 clinical sites in North America and Europe from November 2016 to September 2018, with a final date of follow-up of September 22, 2018. A total of 779 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, or both met randomization criteria, which included LDL-C level 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) or greater while receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to treatment with bempedoic acid (180 mg) (n = 522) or placebo (n = 257) once daily for 52 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was percent change from baseline in LDL-C level at week 12. Secondary measures included changes in levels of lipids, lipoproteins, and biomarkers.

RESULTS

Among 779 randomized patients (mean age, 64.3 years; 283 women [36.3%]), 740 (95.0%) completed the trial. At baseline, mean LDL-C level was 120.4 (SD, 37.9) mg/dL. Bempedoic acid lowered LDL-C levels significantly more than placebo at week 12 (-15.1% vs 2.4%, respectively; difference, -17.4% [95% CI, -21.0% to -13.9%]; P < .001). Significant reductions with bempedoic acid vs placebo were observed at week 12 for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-10.8% vs 2.3%; difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -16.3% to -9.8%]; P < .001), total cholesterol (-9.9% vs 1.3%; difference, -11.2% [95% CI, -13.6% to -8.8%]; P < .001), apolipoprotein B (-9.3% vs 3.7%; difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -16.1% to -9.9%]; P < .001), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (median, -18.7% vs -9.4%; difference, -8.7% [asymptotic confidence limits, -17.2% to -0.4%]; P = .04). Common adverse events included nasopharyngitis (5.2% vs 5.1% with bempedoic acid and placebo, respectively), urinary tract infection (5.0% vs 1.9%), and hyperuricemia (4.2% vs 1.9%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease receiving maximally tolerated statins, the addition of bempedoic acid compared with placebo resulted in a significant lowering of LDL-C level over 12 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the durability and clinical effect as well as long-term safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02991118.

Inclisiran-New hope in the management of lipid disorders?

Drugs reducing plasma concentrations of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins have been demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in both primary and secondary prevention. Despite the demonstrated efficacy of statins and ezetimibe on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) concentration and long-term CVD risk, a large number of patients do not achieve their therapeutic goals. The introduction of monoclonal antibodies against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) protein was a milestone in the treatment of lipid disorders, as their administration leads to unprecedentedly low LDL cholesterol concentrations. Inclisiran represents an entirely new mechanism of PSCK9 protein inhibition in hepatocytes, targeting the messenger RNA for PCSK9. Its administration is necessary only every 3 to 6 months, which is an essential advantage over statin and monoclonal antibody therapy. The infrequent administration regimen can increase the number of patients who maintain their therapeutic goals, especially in patients struggling to comply with daily or biweekly pharmacotherapy. Preclinical studies and Phase I and Phase II clinical trials of inclisiran have demonstrated its tolerability and efficacy in promoting long-term reduction of both PCSK9 protein and LDL cholesterol. The efficacy and safety of inclisiran will continue to be assessed in ongoing and forthcoming trials on larger patient groups. If the results of these trials reflect previously published data, they will add further evidence that inclisiran might be a revolutionary new tool in the pharmacologic management of plasma lipids. This review summarizes the currently available literature data on inclisiran with respect to its mechanism of action, effectiveness, and safety as a lipid-lowering drug for CVD prevention.

Prior adherence to recommended lipid control targets in patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Optimal lipid control is difficult to attain. We assessed preadmission achievement of the European Society of Cardiology targets for low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) control in patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS

Fasting LDL-C levels were measured in 3164 patients admitted between 2010 and 2017. We assessed the frequency of adequate LDL-C control, with targets defined according to individual cardiovascular risk, and the predictors of inadequate control.

RESULTS

The median LDL-C value was 104 (80-130) mg/dL. Most patients had high or very high cardiovascular risk and only 34.2% had LDL-C levels below the recommended target for their estimated risk. Achievement of LDL-C goals increased moderately throughout the study period. Adequate LDL-C control was inversely associated with patient risk. Dyslipidemia, active smoking, diabetes mellitus, and body mass index ≥ 25 were independent predictors of inadequate lipid control, while ongoing statin therapy was associated with adequate control.

CONCLUSIONS

Only slightly more than one third of patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome meet recommended LDL-C targets on admission. There is broad scope for improvement in primary and secondary prevention, especially among patients who are overweight or have other cardiovascular risk factors.