Towards a view of functioning dimeric metabotropic receptors

Signaling Specificity and Kinetics of the Human Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are obligate dimer G protein coupled receptors that can all function as homodimers. Here, each mGluR homodimer was examined for its G protein coupling profile using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay that detects the interaction between a split YFP-tagged Gβ 1γ2 and a Nanoluciferase tagged free Gβγ sensor, MAS-GRK3-ct- nanoluciferase with 14 specific Gα proteins heterologously expressed, representing each family. Canonically, the group II and III mGluRs (2 and 3 and 4, 6, 7, and 8, respectively) are thought to couple to Gi/o exclusively. In addition, the group I mGluRs (1 and 5) are known to couple to the Gq/11 family and generally thought to also couple to the pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi/o family some reports have suggested Gs coupling is possible as cAMP elevations have been noted. In this study, coupling was observed with all eight mGluRs through the Gi/o proteins and only mGluR1 and mGluR5 through Gq/11, and, perhaps surprisingly, not G14 None activated any Gs protein. Interestingly, coupling was seen with the group I and II but not the group III mGluRs to G16 Slow but significant coupling to Gz was also seen with the group II receptors. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR)-G protein coupling has not been thoroughly examined, and some controversy remains about whether some mGluRs can activate Gαs family members. Here we examine the ability of each mGluR to activate representative members of every Gα protein family. While all mGluRs can activate Gαi/o proteins, only the group I mGluRs couple to Gαq/11, and no members of the family can activate Gαs family members, including the group I receptors alone or with positive allosteric modulators.

Signaling specificity and kinetics of the human metabotropic glutamate receptors

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are obligate dimer G protein coupled receptors that can all function as homodimers. Here, each mGluR homodimer was examined for its G protein coupling profile using a BRET based assay that detects the interaction between a split YFP-tagged Gβ1γ2 and a Nanoluc tagged free Gβγ sensor, MAS-GRK3-ct-NLuc with 14 specific Ga proteins heterologously expressed, representing each family. Canonically, the group II and III mGluRs (2&3, and 4, 6, 7&8, respectively) are thought to couple to Gi/o exclusively. In addition, the group I mGluRs (1&5) are known to couple to the Gq/11 family, and generally thought to also couple to the PTX-sensitive Gi/o family; some reports have suggested Gs coupling is possible as cAMP elevations have been noted. In this study, coupling was observed with all 8 mGluRs through the Gi/o proteins, and only mGluR1&5 through Gq/11, and perhaps surprisingly, not G14. None activated any Gs protein. Interestingly, coupling was seen with the group I and II, but not the group III mGluRs to G16. Slow but significant coupling to Gz was also seen with the group II receptors.

Dysfunction of inhibitory interneurons contributes to synaptic plasticity via GABABR-pNR2B signaling in a chronic migraine rat model

Background

According to our previous study, the loss of inhibitory interneuron function contributes to central sensitization in chronic migraine (CM). Synaptic plasticity is a vital basis for the occurrence of central sensitization. However, whether the decline in interneuron-mediated inhibition promotes central sensitization by regulating synaptic plasticity in CM remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to explore the role of interneuron-mediated inhibition in the development of synaptic plasticity in CM.

Methods

A CM model was established in rats by repeated dural infusion of inflammatory soup (IS) for 7 days, and the function of inhibitory interneurons was then evaluated. After intraventricular injection of baclofen [a gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor (GABABR) agonist] or H89 [a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor), behavioral tests were performed. The changes in synaptic plasticity were investigated by determining the levels of the synapse-associated proteins postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95), synaptophysin (Syp) and synaptophysin-1(Syt-1)]; evaluating the synaptic ultrastructure by transmission electron microscopy (TEM); and determining the density of synaptic spines via Golgi-Cox staining. Central sensitization was evaluated by measuring calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), c-Fos and substance P (SP) levels. Finally, the PKA/Fyn kinase (Fyn)/tyrosine-phosphorylated NR2B (pNR2B) pathway and downstream calcium-calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII)/c-AMP-responsive element binding protein (pCREB) signaling were assessed.

Results

We observed dysfunction of inhibitory interneurons, and found that activation of GABABR ameliorated CM-induced hyperalgesia, repressed the CM-evoked elevation of synapse-associated protein levels and enhancement of synaptic transmission, alleviated the CM-triggered increases in the levels of central sensitization-related proteins, and inhibited CaMKII/pCREB signaling via the PKA/Fyn/pNR2B pathway. The inhibition of PKA suppressed the CM-induced activation of Fyn/pNR2B signaling.

Conclusion

These data reveal that the dysfunction of inhibitory interneurons contributes to central sensitization by regulating synaptic plasticity through the GABABR/PKA/Fyn/pNR2B pathway in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) of CM rats. Blockade of GABABR-pNR2B signaling might have a positive influence on the effects of CM therapy by modulating synaptic plasticity in central sensitization.

GPCR interactions involving metabotropic glutamate receptors and their relevance to the pathophysiology and treatment of CNS disorders

Cellular responses to metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor activation are shaped by mechanisms of receptor-receptor interaction. mGlu receptor subtypes form homodimers, intra- or inter-group heterodimers, and heteromeric complexes with other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In addition, mGlu receptors may functionally interact with other receptors through the βγ subunits released from G proteins in response to receptor activation or other mechanisms. Here, we discuss the interactions between (i) mGlu₁ and GABA_B receptors in cerebellar Purkinje cells; (ii) mGlu₂ and 5-HT_2Aserotonergic receptors in the prefrontal cortex; (iii) mGlu₅ and A_2A receptors or mGlu₅ and D₁ dopamine receptors in medium spiny projection neurons of the indirect and direct pathways of the basal ganglia motor circuit; (iv) mGlu₅ and A_2A receptors in relation to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease; and (v) mGlu₇ and A₁ adenosine or α- or β₁ adrenergic receptors. In addition, we describe in detail a novel form of non-heterodimeric interaction between mGlu₃ and mGlu₅ receptors, which appears to be critically involved in mechanisms of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Finally, we highlight the potential implication of these interactions in the pathophysiology and treatment of cerebellar disorders, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, l-DOPA-induced dyskinesias, stress-related disorders, and cognitive dysfunctions.

Cholesterol Localization around the Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 2

The metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) 2 plays a key role in the central nervous system. mGluR2 has been shown to be regulated by its surrounding lipid environment, especially by cholesterol, by an unknown mechanism. Here, using a combination of biochemical approaches, photo-cross-linking experiments, and molecular dynamics simulations we show the interaction of cholesterol with at least two, but potentially five more, preferential sites on the mGluR2 transmembrane domain. Our simulations demonstrate that surface matching, rather than electrostatic interactions with specific amino acids, is the main factor defining cholesterol localization. Moreover, the cholesterol localization observed here is similar to the sterol-binding pattern previously described in silico for other members of the mGluR family. Biochemical assays suggest little influence of cholesterol on trafficking or dimerization of mGluR2. Nevertheless, simulations revealed a significant reduction of residue-residue contacts together with an alteration in the internal mechanical stress at the cytoplasmic side of the helical bundle when cholesterol was present in the membrane. These alterations may be related to destabilization of the basal state of mGluR2. Due to the high sequence conservation of the transmembrane domains of mGluRs, the molecular interaction of cholesterol and mGluR2 described here is also likely to be relevant for other members of the mGLuR family.

Allostery in oligomeric receptor models

We show how equilibrium binding curves of receptor homodimers can be expressed as rational polynomial functions of the equilibrium binding curves of the constituent monomers, without approximation and without assuming independence of receptor monomers. Using a distinguished spanning tree construction for reduced graph powers, the method properly accounts for thermodynamic constraints and allosteric interactions between receptor monomers (i.e. conformational coupling). The method is completely general; it begins with an arbitrary undirected graph representing the topology of a monomer state-transition diagram and ends with an algebraic expression for the equilibrium binding curve of a receptor oligomer composed of two or more identical and indistinguishable monomers. Several specific examples are analysed, including guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptor dimers and tetramers composed of multiple 'ternary complex' monomers.

Application of surface plasmon resonance imaging to monitoring G protein-coupled receptor signaling and its modulation in a heterologous expression system

Background

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous surface proteins mediating various biological responses and thus, important targets for therapeutic drugs. GPCRs individually produce their own signaling as well as modulate the signaling of other GPCRs. Real-time observation of GPCR signaling and modulation in living cells is key to molecular study of biological responses and pharmaceutical development. However, fluorescence imaging, the technique widely used for this purpose, requires a fluorescent dye which may inhibit biological responses or a fluorescent-tagged target protein created through time-consuming genetic manipulation. In this study, we applied two-dimensional surface plasmon resonance (SPR) imaging to monitoring the translocation of protein kinase C (PKC), a major GPCR-coupled signaling molecule in the widely used HEK293 cell lines and examined whether the signaling of, and, modulation between heterologously expressed GPCRs can be measured without fluorescent labeling.

Results

We cultured HEK293 cells on the gold-plated slide glass and evoked SPR at the interface between the cell’s plasma membrane and the gold surface with incident light. The translocation of activated native PKC to the plasma membrane is expected to alter the incident angle-SPR extent relation, and this could be detected as a change in the intensity of light reflection from the specimen illuminated at a fixed incident angle. Direct activation of PKC with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate increased the reflection intensity. This increase indeed reported PKC translocation because it was reduced by a pre-treatment with bisindolylmaleimide-1, a PKC inhibitor. We further applied this technique to a stable HEK293 cell line heterologously expressing the GPCRs type-1 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1) and adenosine A1 receptor (A1R). (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine, a mGluR1 agonist, increased the reflection intensity, and the PKC inhibitor reduced this increase. A pre-treatment with (R)-N⁶-phenylisopropyladenosine, an A1R-selective agonist suppressed mGluR1-mediated reflection increase. These results suggest that our technique can detect PKC translocation initiated by ligand binding to mGluR1 and its modulation by A1R.

Conclusions

SPR imaging turned out to be utilizable for monitoring GPCR-mediated PKC translocation and its modulation by a different GPCR in a heterologous expression system. This technique provides a powerful yet easy-to-use tool for molecular study of biological responses and pharmaceutical development.

The anti-spasticity drug baclofen alleviates collagen-induced arthritis and regulates dendritic cells

Baclofen is used clinically as a drug that treats spasticity, which is a syndrome characterized by excessive contraction of the muscles and hyperflexia in the central nervous system (CNS), by activating GABA(B) receptors (GABA(B)Rs). Baclofen was recently reported to desensitize chemokine receptors and to suppress inflammation through the activation of GABA(B)Rs. GABA(B)Rs are expressed in various immune cells, but the functions of these receptors in autoimmune diseases remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the effects of baclofen in murine collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). Oral administration of baclofen alleviated the clinical development of CIA, with a reduced number of IL-17-producing T helper 17 (T(H)17) cells. In addition, baclofen treatment suppressed dendritic cell (DC)-primed T(H)17 cell differentiation by reducing the production of IL-6 by DCs in vitro. Furthermore, the pharmacological and genetic blockade of GABA(B)Rs in DCs weakened the effects of baclofen, indicating that GABA(B)Rs are the molecular targets of baclofen on DCs. Thus, our findings revealed a potential role for baclofen in the treatment of CIA, as well as a previously unknown signaling pathway that regulates DC function.

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: G protein-coupled receptors

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 2000 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.12444/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the seven major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being G protein-coupled receptors, ligand-gated ion channels, ion channels, catalytic receptors, nuclear hormone receptors, transporters and enzymes. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. A new landscape format has easy to use tables comparing related targets. It is a condensed version of material contemporary to late 2013, which is presented in greater detail and constantly updated on the website www.guidetopharmacology.org, superseding data presented in previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in conjunction with NC-IUPHAR and provides the official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate. It consolidates information previously curated and displayed separately in IUPHAR-DB and the Guide to Receptors and Channels, providing a permanent, citable, point-in-time record that will survive database updates.

Muscarinic receptor trafficking

Knowledge of the mechanisms responsible for the trafficking of neurotransmitter receptors away from the cell surface is of obvious importance in understanding what regulates their expression and function. This chapter will focus on the mechanisms responsible for the internalization and degradation of muscarinic receptors. There are both receptor subtype-specific and cell-type specific differences in muscarinic receptor trafficking. Studies on muscarinic receptor trafficking both in cells in culture and in vivo will be described, and the potential physiological consequences of this trafficking will be discussed.

The GABAβ receptor as a target for antidepressant drug action

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that a modification in GABA(B) receptor expression and function may contribute to the symptoms of major depression and the response to antidepressants. This includes laboratory animal experiments demonstrating that antidepressants modify brain GABA(B) receptor expression and function and that GABA(B) receptor antagonists display antidepressant potential in animal models of this condition. Clinical and post-mortem studies reveal changes in GABAergic transmission associated with depression as well as depression-related changes in GABA(B) subunit expression that are localized to the cortical depression network. Detailed in this review are the preclinical and clinical data implicating a role for the GABA(B) receptor system in mediating symptoms of this disorder and its possible involvement in the response to antidepressants. Particular emphasis is placed on clinical and post-mortem studies, including previously unpublished work demonstrating regionally-selective modifications in GABA(B) receptor subunit expression in brain samples obtained from depressed subjects. Together with the earlier preclinical studies, these new data point to a role for the GABA(B) system in major depression and support the antidepressant potential of GABA(B) receptor antagonists.

A new approach to analyze cell surface protein complexes reveals specific heterodimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form heteromeric complexes. Herein, we describe a new approach to test the heteromerization of 2 receptors, or 2 receptor subunits, and to study the stoichiometry of the resulting complexes. As a proof-of-concept study, we investigated whether metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), in addition to being well-known homodimers, can form heteromers. To that aim, we combine the benefits of time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (trFRET) with the specific, cell-surface labeling of SNAP- and CLIP-tagged rat mGluR subunits, expressed in a mammalian cell line. First, we show that mGlu2 and mGlu4 subunits (but not mGlu2 and mGlu1) can heteromerize. Moreover, our trFRET data are consistent with mGluR subunits forming strict homodimeric receptors on single expression, and a combination of strict heterodimeric and strict homodimeric receptors on coexpression. Second, a comprehensive analysis reveals that from the 21 possible pairs of 2 mGluR subunits out of 7 subtypes (mGlu1 to 8, but not 6), only 11 are able to form heterodimers. These findings were further validated by biochemical and functional complementation studies. In addition to describing a new method to analyze cell-surface receptor complexes, our data reveal a new level of complexity within the mGluR family.

Oligomeric forms of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)

Oligomerization is a general characteristic of cell membrane receptors that is shared by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) together with their G protein partners. Recent studies of these complexes, both in vivo and in purified reconstituted forms, unequivocally support this contention for GPCRs, perhaps with only rare exceptions. As evidence has evolved from experimental cell lines to more relevant in vivo studies and from indirect biophysical approaches to well defined isolated complexes of dimeric receptors alone and complexed with G proteins, there is an expectation that the structural basis of oligomerization and the functional consequences for membrane signaling will be elucidated. Oligomerization of cell membrane receptors is fully supported by both thermodynamic calculations and the selectivity and duration of signaling required to reach targets located in various cellular compartments.

Venus fly trap domain of mGluR1 functions as a dominant negative against group I mGluR signaling

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) form covalently linked homodimers and contain large, N-terminal extracellular ligand binding, "venus fly trap" (VFT) domains. These domains, when expressed separately, are secreted as disulfide linked dimers and can dimerize with full-length receptors. mGluR splice variants have been described that contain only this domain, but the consequences of their interaction on receptor signaling have not been explored. Here it is shown that an mGluR1 mutant containing only the VFT is retained on the cell surface when a full-length receptor is co-expressed. Further, when expressed in rat superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons and modulation of native calcium currents is used as an assay for receptor activity, the VFT acts as a dominant negative with respect to mGluR1 signaling. Although full-length mGluR1 and mGluR5 are not known to heterodimerize, the mGluR5 VFT partially occludes mGluR1 signaling and the mGluR1 VFT potently occludes mGluR5 signaling in SCG neurons. In addition, an mGluR1 point mutant, mGluR1 C140G, which cannot covalently dimerize, functions like the wild-type receptor when expressed alone. The C140G mutant is inhibited by the mGluR1 VFT construct but does not retain the mGluR1 VFT on the cell surface, suggesting that the loss of C140 renders the interaction reversible. Finally, a peptide designed to disrupt mGluR1 dimerization reduced signaling through the C140G mutant receptor, but only when applied intracellularly for several hours, indicating that loss of signaling requires disruption of dimerization prior to plasma membrane insertion.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1 in taste tissue

l-Glutamate confers cognitive discrimination for umami taste (delicious or savory) and dietary information to the brain through the activation of G protein-coupled receptors in specialized taste receptor cells of the tongue. The taste heterologous receptor T1R1 plus T1R3 is not sufficient to detect umami taste in mice. The lack of T1R3 diminished but did not abolish nerve and behavioral responses in null mice that still contained umami-sensitive taste receptor cells. The remnant umami responses in T1R3 knockout mice indicate that there are also T1R3 independent receptors. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1), which is widely expressed throughout the central nervous system and regulates synaptic signaling, is another l-glutamate receptor candidate. It is found within taste buds, although the amount of l-glutamate in the perisynaptic region is in the order of micromol/L, whereas free dietary l-glutamate is in the mmol/L range. We reexamined the expression of one mGluR1 variant with a lower affinity for l-glutamate that is found in fungiform and circumvallate papillae. This taste mGluR1 receptor responds in vitro to the concentration of l-glutamate usually found in foodstuffs.

The group II metabotropic glutamate receptor 3 (mGluR3, mGlu3, GRM3): expression, function and involvement in schizophrenia

Group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) comprise mGluR2 (mGlu2; encoded by GRM2) and mGluR3 (mGlu3; encoded by GRM3) and modulate glutamate neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity. Here we review the expression and function of mGluR3 and its involvement in schizophrenia. mGluR3 is expressed by glia and neurons in many brain regions and has a predominantly presynaptic distribution, consistent with its role as an inhibitory autoreceptor and heteroceptor. mGluR3 splice variants exist in human brain but are of unknown function. Differentiation of mGluR3 from mGluR2 has been problematic because of the lack of selective ligands and antibodies; the available data suggest particular roles for mGluR3 in long-term depression, in glial function and in neuroprotection. Some but not all studies find genetic association of GRM3 polymorphisms with psychosis, with the risk alleles also being associated with schizophrenia-related endophenotypes such as impaired cognition, cortical activation and glutamate markers. The dimeric form of mGluR3 may be reduced in the brain in schizophrenia. Finally, preclinical findings have made mGluR3 a putative therapeutic target, and now direct evidence for antipsychotic efficacy of a group II mGluR agonist has emerged from a randomised clinical trial in schizophrenia. Together these data implicate mGluR3 in aetiological, pathophysiological and pharmacotherapeutic aspects of the disorder.

Localization of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the outer plexiform layer of the goldfish retina

We studied the localization of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in the goldfish outer plexiform layer by light-and electron-microscopical immunohistochemistry. The mGluR1alpha antibody labeled putative ON-type bipolar cell dendrites and horizontal cell processes in both rod spherules and cone triads. Immunolabeling for mGluR2/3 was absent in the rod synaptic complex but was found at horizontal cell dendrites directly opposing the cone synaptic ribbon. The mGluR5 antibody labeled Müller cell processes wrapping rod terminals and horizontal cell somata. The mGluR7 antibody labeled mainly horizontal cell dendrites invaginating rods and cones and some putative bipolar cell dendrites in the cone synaptic complex. The finding of abundant expression of various mGluRs in bipolar and horizontal cell dendrites suggests multiple sites of glutamatergic modulation in the outer retina.

Altered dimerization of metabotropic glutamate receptor 3 in schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGlus) may be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Group II mGlus (mGlu2 and mGlu3) have attracted considerable interest since the development of potent specific agonists that exhibit atypical antipsychotic-like activity and reports of a genetic association between the mGlu3 gene and schizophrenia.

METHODS

In this postmortem study, mGlu3 protein levels in Brodmann area 10 of prefrontal cortex from schizophrenic (n = 20) and control (n = 35) subjects were analyzed by western immunoblotting using a novel specific mGlu3 antibody and an antibody for the vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGluT1).

RESULTS

We report a significant decrease in the dimeric/oligomeric forms of mGlu3 in schizophrenic patients compared with control subjects, whereas total mGlu3 and VGluT1 levels were not altered significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first experimental evidence that mGlu3 receptor levels are altered in schizophrenia and supports the hypothesis that neurotransmission involving this particular excitatory amino acid receptor is impaired in schizophrenia.

Activation of a dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor by intersubunit rearrangement

Although many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form dimers, a possible role of this phenomenon in their activation remains elusive. A recent and exciting proposal is that a dynamic intersubunit interplay may contribute to GPCR activation. Here, we examined this possibility using dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). We first developed a system to perfectly control their subunit composition and show that mGluR dimers do not form larger oligomers. We then examined an mGluR dimer containing one subunit in which the extracellular agonist-binding domain was uncoupled from the G protein-activating transmembrane domain. Despite this uncoupling in one protomer, agonist stimulation resulted in symmetric activation of either transmembrane domain in the dimer with the same efficiency. This, plus other data, can only be explained by an intersubunit rearrangement as the activation mechanism. Although well established for other types of receptors such as tyrosine kinase and guanylate cyclase receptors, this is the first clear demonstration that such a mechanism may also apply to GPCRs.

Coarse-grained free energy functions for studying protein conformational changes: a double-well network model

In this work, a double-well network model (DWNM) is presented for generating a coarse-grained free energy function that can be used to study the transition between reference conformational states of a protein molecule. Compared to earlier work that uses a single, multidimensional double-well potential to connect two conformational states, the DWNM uses a set of interconnected double-well potentials for this purpose. The DWNM free energy function has multiple intermediate states and saddle points, and is hence a "rough" free energy landscape. In this implementation of the DWNM, the free energy function is reduced to an elastic-network model representation near the two reference states. The effects of free energy function roughness on the reaction pathways of protein conformational change is demonstrated by applying the DWNM to the conformational changes of two protein systems: the coil-to-helix transition of the DB-loop in G-actin and the open-to-closed transition of adenylate kinase. In both systems, the rough free energy function of the DWNM leads to the identification of distinct minimum free energy paths connecting two conformational states. These results indicate that while the elastic-network model captures the low-frequency vibrational motions of a protein, the roughness in the free energy function introduced by the DWNM can be used to characterize the transition mechanism between protein conformations.

The neurobiologist's guide to structural biology: a primer on why macromolecular structure matters and how to evaluate structural data

Structural biology now plays a prominent role in addressing questions central to understanding how excitable cells function. Although interest in the insights gained from the definition and dissection of macromolecular anatomy is high, many neurobiologists remain unfamiliar with the methods employed. This primer aims to help neurobiologists understand approaches for probing macromolecular structure and where the limits and challenges remain. Using examples of macromolecules with neurobiological importance, the review covers X-ray crystallography, electron microscopy (EM), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and biophysical methods with which these approaches are often paired: isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), equilibrium analytical ultracentifugation, and molecular dynamics (MD).

G protein-independent neuromodulatory action of adenosine on metabotropic glutamate signalling in mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells

Adenosine receptors (ARs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediating the neuromodulatory actions of adenosine that influence emotional, cognitive, motor, and other functions in the central nervous system (CNS). Previous studies show complex formation between ARs and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in heterologous systems and close colocalization of ARs and mGluRs in several central neurons. Here we explored the possibility of intimate functional interplay between G(i/o) protein-coupled A(1)-subtype AR (A1R) and type-1 mGluR (mGluR1) naturally occurring in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Using a perforated-patch voltage-clamp technique, we found that both synthetic and endogenous agonists for A1R induced continuous depression of a mGluR1-coupled inward current. A1R agonists also depressed mGluR1-coupled intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization monitored by fluorometry. A1R indeed mediated this depression because genetic depletion of A1R abolished it. Surprisingly, A1R agonist-induced depression persisted after blockade of G(i/o) protein. The depression appeared to involve neither the cAMP-protein kinase A cascade downstream of the alpha subunits of G(i/o) and G(s) proteins, nor cytoplasmic Ca(2+) that is suggested to be regulated by the beta-gamma subunit complex of G(i/o) protein. Moreover, A1R did not appear to affect G(q) protein which mediates the mGluR1-coupled responses. These findings suggest that A1R modulates mGluR1 signalling without the aid of the major G proteins. In this respect, the A1R-mediated depression of mGluR1 signalling shown here is clearly distinguished from the A1R-mediated neuronal responses described so far. These findings demonstrate a novel neuromodulatory action of adenosine in central neurons.

GABA(B2) receptor subunit mRNA decreases in the thalamus of monoarthritic animals

Many studies have implicated GABA(B) receptors in pain transmission mechanisms, especially in the spinal cord. In the thalamus, mRNA expression of the GABA(B(1b)) isoform was shown to be regulated in relay nuclei in response to chronic noxious input arising from experimental monoarthritis. GABA(B(1a)) and GABA(B2) mRNA expression was here determined by in situ hybridisation in the brain of control, 2, 4, 7 and 14 days monoarthritic rats, to evaluate whether this expression was regulated by chronic noxious input in thalamic nuclei. mRNA labelling was analysed quantitatively in the ventrobasal complex, posterior, central medial/central lateral and reticular thalamic nuclei; the thalamic visual relay and dentate gyrus were examined for control. No mRNA expression was detected for GABA(B(1a)) in control and monoarthritic animals. Similarly, GABA(B2) mRNA was not found in the reticular nucleus. However, GABA(B2) mRNA expression was observed in the ventrobasal complex, posterior and central medial/central lateral nuclei of control animals. A significant decrease of 42% at 2 days and 27% at 4 days of monoarthritis was observed in the ventrobasal complex contralaterally, when compared with controls, returning to basal levels at 7 days of monoarthritis. In the ipsilateral posterior nucleus, there was a significant decrease of 38% at 2 days of monoarthritis. No significant changes were observed in central medial/central lateral nuclei. The data suggest that GABA(B2) mRNA expression in the ventrobasal complex and posterior nucleus is regulated by noxious input and that GABA(B) receptors might play a role in the plasticity of these relay nuclei during chronic inflammatory pain.

GABA(B) receptor-mediated modulation of glutamate signaling in cerebellar Purkinje cells

Since Purkinje cells are the sole output neurons of the cerebellar cortex, the postsynaptic integration of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs in this cell type is a pivotal step for cerebellar motor information processing. In Purkinje cells, Gi/o protein-coupled B-type gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor (GABABR) is expressed at the annuli of the dendritic spines that are innervated by the glutamatergic terminals of parallel fibers. The subcellular localization of GABABR suggests the possibility of postsynaptic interplay between GABABR and glutamate signaling. It has recently been demonstrated that GABABR indeed modulates alpha amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxalone propionate-type ionotropic glutamate receptor (AMPAR)-mediated and type-1 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1)-mediated signaling. Interestingly, GABABR exerts modulatory actions not only via the classical Gi/o protein-dependent signaling cascade but also via a Gi/o protein-independent interaction between GABABR and mGluR1. In this review, we compare the physiological nature, underlying mechanisms, and possible functional significance of these modulatory actions of GABABR.

GABAB receptors and synaptic modulation

GABA(B) receptors modulate transmitter release and postsynaptic membrane potential at various types of central synapses. They function as heterodimers of two related seven-transmembrane domain receptor subunits. Trafficking, activation and signalling of GABA(B) receptors are regulated both by allosteric interactions between the subunits and by the binding of additional proteins. Recent studies have shed light on the roles of GABA(B) receptors in plasticity processes at excitatory synapses. This review summarizes our knowledge of the localization, structure and function of GABA(B) receptors in the central nervous system and their use as drug targets for neurological and psychiatric disorders.

The Role of GABA in the Mediation and Perception of Pain

A great deal of effort has been expended in attempting to define the role of GABA in mediating the transmission and perception of pain. Pursuit of this question has been stimulated by the fact that GABAergic neurons are widely distributed throughout the central nervous system, including regions of the spinal cord dorsal horn known to be important for transmitting pain impulses to the brain. In addition, GABA neurons and receptors are found in supraspinal sites known to coordinate the perception and response to painful stimuli and this neurotransmitter system has been shown to regulate control of sensory information processing in the spinal cord. The discovery that GABA receptor agonists display antinociceptive properties in a variety of animal models of pain has provided an impetus for developing such agents for this purpose. It has been shown that GABA receptor agonists, as well as inhibitors of GABA uptake or metabolism, are clinically effective in treating this symptom. However, even with an enhanced understanding of the relationship between GABAergic transmission and pain, it has proven difficult to exploit these findings in designing novel analgesics that can be employed for the routine management of pain. Work in this area has revealed a host of reasons why GABAergic drugs have, to date, been of limited utility in the management of pain. Chief among these are the side effects associated with such agents, in particular sedation. These limitations are likely due to the simultaneous activation of GABA receptors throughout the neuraxis, most of which are not involved in the transmission or perception of pain. This makes it difficult to fully exploit the antinociceptive properties of GABAergic drugs before untoward effects intervene. The discovery of molecularly and pharmacologically distinct GABAA receptors may open the way to developing subtype selective agents that target those receptors most intimately involved in the transmission and perception of pain. The more limited repertoire of GABAB receptor subunits makes it more difficult to develop subtype selective agents for this site. Nonetheless, a GABAB agonist, CGP 35024, has been identified that induces antinociceptive responses at doses well below those that cause sedation (Patel et al., 2001). It has also been reported that, unlike baclofen, tolerance to antinociceptive responses is not observed with CGP 44532, a more potent GABAB receptor agonist (Enna et al., 1998). While the reasons for these differences in responses to members of the same class remain unknown, these findings suggest it may be possible to design a GABAB agonist with a superior clinical profile than existing agents. Besides the challenges associated with identifying subtype selective GABAA and GABAB receptor agonists, the development of GABA analgesics has been hindered by the fact that the responsiveness of these receptor systems appear to vary with the type and duration of pain being treated and the mode of drug administration. Further studies are necessary to more precisely define the types of pain most amenable to treatment with GABAergic drugs. Inasmuch as the antinociceptive responses to these agents in laboratory animals are mediated, at least in part, through activation or inhibition of other neurotransmitter and neuromodulator systems, it is conceivable that GABA agonists will be most efficacious as analgesics when administered in combination with other agents. The results of anatomical, biochemical, molecular, and pharmacological studies support the notion that generalized activation of GABA receptor systems dampens the response to painful stimuli. The data leave little doubt that, under certain circumstances, stimulation of neuroanatomically discreet GABA receptor sites could be of benefit in the management of pain. Continued research in this area is warranted given the limited choices, and clinical difficulties, associated with conventional analgesics.

Comparative analysis of the subcellular and subsynaptic localization of mGluR1a and mGluR5 metabotropic glutamate receptors in the shell and core of the nucleus accumbens in rat and monkey

Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) play critical roles in synaptic plasticity and drug addiction. To characterize potential sites whereby these receptors mediate their effects in the ventral striatum, we studied the subcellular and subsynaptic localization of mGluR1a and mGluR5 in the shell and core of the nucleus accumbens in rat and monkey. In both species, group I mGluRs are mainly postsynaptic in dendrites and spines, with rare presynaptic labeling in unmyelinated axons. Minor, yet significant, differences in proportions of specific immunoreactive elements were found between the accumbens shell and the accumbens core in monkey. At the subsynaptic level, significant differences were found in the proportion of plasma membrane-bound mGluR5 labeling between species. In dendrites, spines, and unmyelinated axons, a significantly larger proportion of mGluR5 labeling was bound to the plasma membrane in rats (50-70%) than in monkeys (30-50%). Conversely, mGluR1a displayed the same pattern of immunogold labeling in the two species. Electron microscopic colocalization studies revealed 30% colocalization of mGluR1a and mGluR5 in dendrites and as much as 50-65% in spines in both compartments of the rat accumbens. Both group I mGluRs were significantly expressed in D1-immunoreactive dendritic processes (60-75% colocalization) and spines (30-50%) of striatal projection neurons as well as dendrites of cholinergic (30-70%) and parvalbumin-containing (70-85%) interneurons. These findings highlight the widespread expression of group I mGluRs in projection neurons and interneurons of the shell and core of the nucleus accumbens, providing a solid foundation for regulatory and therapeutic functions of group I mGluRs in reward-related behaviors and drug addiction.

GABA(B) receptor function and subunit expression in the rat spinal cord as indicators of stress and the antinociceptive response to antidepressants

Experiments were undertaken to examine whether once daily i.p. administration of either of two antidepressants used for the treatment of neuropathic pain, amitriptyline (10 mg/kg) and fluoxetine (5 mg/kg), to rats for 7 days modifies GABA(B) receptor function and subunit expression in the lumbar spinal cord. The results indicate that, as previously reported for desipramine, both amitriptyline and fluoxetine increase the pain threshold to a thermal stimulus, the expression of GABA(B(1)) subunits, and baclofen-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding, a measure of GABA(B) receptor function. The effects of antidepressant administration on GABA(B(1b)) and GABA(B(2)) subunit expression in spinal cord are more variable than for GABA(B(1a)). It was also discovered that repeated daily exposure to a thermal stimulus or immobilization stress increases GABA(B(1a)) expression in the lumbar spinal cord, with no commensurate change in thermal pain threshold or GABA(B) receptor sensitivity. These results support a relationship between GABA(B) receptors and the action of antidepressants. The findings demonstrate that drug-induced increases in GABA(B) receptor function can occur independently of any change in GABA(B) receptor subunit expression and are consistent with the notion that GABA(B) receptor subunits have multiple functions, only one of which is dimerization to form GABA(B) receptors. The data also suggest that GABA(B) subunit gene expression may serve as a preclinical marker of antidepressant efficacy and of drug- or stress-induced modifications in central nervous system activity.

Role of arginine in immunonutrition

Arginine plays an important role in many physiologic and biologic processes beyond its role as a protein-incorporated amino acid. Dietary supplementation of arginine can enhance wound healing, regulate endocrine activity and potentiate immune activity. Under normal unstressed conditions the arginine requirement of adult humans is fulfilled by endogenous sources, however this is compromised during times of stress, especially in critical illness. These finding have led to use of arginine supplementation as part of an immune-enhancing dietary regimen to help combat the immune suppression seen in such patients. Though the results from studies examining the use of this type of immunonutrition in critically ill patients are far from definitive, they are promising that this mode of therapy may be of some advantage. A better understanding of the in vivo biology of arginine and its metabolism is necessary to truly define a benefit from arginine supplementation.