SJS/TEN 2017: Building Multidisciplinary Networks to Drive Science and Translation

Update on Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Diagnosis and Management

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are the most severe cutaneous adverse reactions that are typically drug-induced in adults. Both SJS and TEN have high morbidity and mortality rates. SJS/TEN imposes clinical challenges for physicians managing patients suffering from this condition, both because it is rare and because it is a rapidly progressing systemic disease with severe cutaneous, mucosal, and systemic manifestations. Although many cases of SJS/TEN have been reported in the literature, there is no consensus regarding diagnostic criteria or treatment. Significant progress has been made in understanding its genetic predisposition and pathogenesis. This review is intended to provide physicians with a comprehensive but practical SJS/TEN roadmap to guide diagnosis and management. We review data on pathogenesis, reported precipitating factors, presentation, diagnosis, and management SJS/TEN focusing on what is new over the last 5 years.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Updates in pathophysiology and management

ABSTRACT

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening conditions characterized by extensive detachment of the epidermis and mucous membranes. These severe disorders carry a high mortality rate, and their pathogenesis remains largely unclear. Furthermore, optimal therapeutic strategies for SJS/TEN remain a subject of ongoing debate. Early diagnosis of SJS/TEN is challenging, and reliable biomarkers for diagnosis or severity prediction have not been firmly established. Certain drugs, such as carbamazepine and allopurinol, have shown a strong association with specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) types. Recently, the potential benefits of HLA screening prior to administering these drugs to reduce the incidence of SJS/TEN have been explored. Epidermal cell death in SJS/TEN lesions is caused by extensive apoptosis, primarily through the Fas-Fas ligand (FasL) and perforin/granzyme pathways. Our findings suggest that necroptosis, a form of programmed necrosis, also contributes to epidermal cell death. Annexin A1, released from monocytes, interacts with the formyl peptide receptor 1 to induce necroptosis. Several biomarkers, such as CC chemokine ligand (CCL)-27, interleukin-15, galectin-7, receptor-interacting protein kinases 3 (RIP3), and lipocalin-2, have been identified for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in SJS/TEN. Supportive care is recommended for treating SJS/TEN, but the efficacy of various therapeutic options-including systemic corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclosporine, and tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists-remains controversial. Recent studies have investigated the potential benefits of tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the understanding and management of SJS/TEN.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Food and Drug Allergy

A patient-reported outcome is directly reported by the patient without interpretation of the patient's response by anyone else. It refers to the patient's health (symptoms and feelings), quality of life, or functional status associated with health care or treatment. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are defined as the tools or instruments that are used to measure patient-reported outcomes. Health-related quality of life has been the most studied psychosocial PROM in food allergy, using validated questionnaires. In drug allergy, PROMs are useful in capturing patients' experiences of potential allergic reactions, including subjective symptoms such as headache, dizziness, or fatigue. Patient-reported outcome measures can also help differentiate true allergies from side effects or other nonallergic reactions and inform decisions about drug challenges and de-labeling strategies. Ensuring the chosen tool is validated for the specific allergy context is crucial for accurate data collection. Integrating patient-reported experiences alongside traditional methods can lead to more accurate assessments and personalized care.

Atypical Stevens-Johnson syndrome characterized by mucosal ulcerations of the pharynx and larynx: A case report and literature review

By summarizing and analyzing the diagnostic and treatment process of a case with atypical Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) characterized by mucosal ulcerations of the pharynx and larynx, and reviewing related literature, we would like to remind that in the presence of unexplained mucosal lesions, atypical SJS should not be ignored.

Improving Clinical Practice Through Patient Registries in Allergy and Immunology

Patient registries are a mechanism for collecting data on allergic and immunologic diseases that provide important information on epidemiology and outcomes that can ultimately improve patient care. Key criteria for establishing effective registries include the use of a clearly defined purpose, identifying the target population and ensuring consistent data collection. Registries in allergic diseases include those for diseases such as inborn errors of immunity (IEI), food allergy, asthma and anaphylaxis, pharmacological interventions in vulnerable populations, and adverse effects of pharmacologic interventions including hypersensitivity reactions to drugs and vaccines. Important insights gained from patient registries in our field include contributions in phenotype and outcomes in IEI, the risk for adverse reactions in food-allergic patients in multiple settings, the benefits and risk of biologic medications for asthma during pregnancy, vaccine safety, and the categorization and genetic determination of risk for severe cutaneous adverse reactions to medications. Impediments to the development of clinically meaningful patient registries include the lack of funding resources for registry establishment and the quality, quantity, and consistency of available data. Despite these drawbacks, high-quality and successful registries are invaluable in informing clinical practice and improving outcomes in patients with allergic and immunological diseases.

Delayed Skin Testing for Systemic Medications: Helpful or Not?

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions collectively are delayed drug reactions such as morbilliform drug eruption and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). Morbilliform drug eruption may wane over time, be the result of drug viral interactions, and be amenable to slow reintroduction or rechallenge, whereas SCARs are HLA class I restricted, T-cell-mediated reactions that demonstrate durable immunity and warrant lifelong avoidance. SCARs such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption often occur in the setting of multiple drugs dosed together. Collectively, they lead to significant morbidity, mortality, and drug safety concerns that could severely limit future treatment options. Currently, no single or combination of diagnostic tests for SCARs such as ex vivo or in vitro testing, in vivo (skin) testing, or other adjunctive tests such as HLA typing have 100% negative predictive value. In this "Controversies in Allergy Review" article, we review the current literature on delayed skin testing (patch and delayed prick/intradermal test) and critically assess the evidence base of its utility across different drugs and clinical phenotypes of delayed hypersensitivity reactions.

The Australasian Registry for Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (AUS-SCAR) - Providing a roadmap for closing the diagnostic, patient, and healthcare gaps for a group of rare drug eruptions

Background

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) are a group of delayed presumed T-cell mediated hypersensitivities associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite their shared global healthcare burden and impact, the clinical phenotypes, genomic predisposition, drug causality, and treatment outcomes may vary. We describe the establishment and results from the first Australasian registry for SCAR (AUS-SCAR), that via a collaborative network advances strategies for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of SCAR.

Methods

Prospective multi-center registry of SCAR in Australian adult and adolescents, with planned regional expansion. The registry collects externally verified phenotypic data drug causality, therapeutics and long-term patient outcomes. In addition, biorepository specimens and DNA are collected at participating sites.

Results

we report on the first 100 patients enrolled in the AUS-SCAR database. DRESS (50%) is the most predominant phenotype followed by SJS/TEN (39%) and AGEP (10%), with median age of 52 years old (IQR 37.5, 66) with 1:1 male-to-female ratio. The median latency for all implicated drugs is highly variable but similar for DRESS (median 15 days IQR 5,25) and SJS/TEN (median 21 days, IQR 7,27), while lowest for AGEP (median 2.5 days, IQR 1,8). Antibiotics (54.5%) are more commonly listed as primary implicated drug compare with non-antibiotics agent (45.5%). Mortality rate at 90 days was highest in SJS/TEN at 23.1%, followed by DRESS (4%) and AGEP (0%).

Conclusion

In the first prospective national phenotypic and biorepository of SCAR in the southern hemisphere we demonstrate notable differences to other reported registries; including DRESS-predominant phenotype, varied antibiotic causality and low overall mortality rate. This study also highlights the lack of standardised preventative pharmacogenomic measures and in vitro/in vivo diagnostic strategies to ascertain drug causality.

Trial registration

ANZCTR ACTRN12619000241134. Registered 19 February 2019.

Greater mechanistic understanding of the cutaneous pathogenesis of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis can shed light on novel therapeutic strategies: a comprehensive review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) characterized by widespread epithelial detachment and blistering, which affects the skin and mucocutaneous membranes. To date, therapeutic interventions for SJS/TEN have focused on systematic suppression of the inflammatory response using high-dose corticosteroids or intravenous immunoglobulin G (IgG), for example. No targeted therapies for SJS/TEN currently exist.

RECENT FINDINGS

Though our understanding of the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN has advanced from both an immunological and dermatological perspective, this knowledge is yet to translate into the development of new targeted therapies.

SUMMARY

Greater mechanistic insight into SJS/TEN would potentially unlock new opportunities for identifying or repurposing targeted therapies to limit or even prevent epidermal injury and blistering.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis caused by phenobarbital: a case report and literature review

Background

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) are rare, life-threatening immunologic reactions. Previous relevant literature has provided limited information regarding this disease's genetic susceptibility and management principles.

Objectives

This study aimed to describe a phenobarbital-induced TEN case report with HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-B*58:01 negative, CYP2C19*1/*2. In addition, we revised the existing literature on phenobarbital-induced SJS/TEN to explore its clinical characteristics.

Methods

We describe a woman undergoing treatment with Phenobarbital for status epilepticus who developed classic cutaneous findings of TEN. A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Medline, WanFang, and CNKI databases from 1995 to 2023. The search terms used were "Stevens-Johnson Syndrome," "Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis," and "Phenobarbital."

Results

We report a case of TEN resulting from phenobarbital; it tested negative for the HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-B*58:01 allele and CYP2C19*1/*2 intermediate metabolism. Supportive treatment with steroids and antihistamines resulted in complete resolution of the skin lesions and improvement in clinical symptoms after 14 days. Physicians and clinical pharmacists should be aware of these potential phenobarbital-related adverse events and closely monitor patients with first-time use of phenobarbital. Among 19 cases were identified in the literature, with 11 (57.9%) cases of SJS, 6 (31.6%) cases of TEN, and 2 (7.2%) cases of SJS-TEN/DRESS overlap. A total of 5 (26.3%) did not survive, of which 4 (21.1%) were under 12 years old and 1 (5.3%) was over 12 years old.

Conclusion

Phenobarbital-induced SJS/TEN may still occur in patients who test negative for HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-B*58:01, CYP2C19*1/*2. Most cutaneous adverse events occur early in the course of Phenobarbital therapy and should be closely monitored early in the course of treatment. In addition, Phenobarbital should be used with caution in patients with a history of asthma and allergy to antipyretics and analgesics.

The real-world safety of oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil in children: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

Background

Oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil are the two primary oral drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating influenza. Limited real-world evidence exists on their adverse events in children. The purpose of this study was to explore the adverse event (AE) profiles of oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil in children based on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods

FAERS reports were collected and analyzed from the first quarter of 2019 to the third quarter of 2023. Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were employed in data mining to quantify the signals of oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil-related AEs.

Results

A total of 464 reports of AEs to oseltamivir as the "primary suspect (PS)" and 429 reports of AEs to baloxavir marboxil as the "PS" were retrieved in pediatric patients. A total of 100 oseltamivir-induced AE signals were detected in 17 system organ classes (SOCs), and 11 baloxavir marboxil-induced AE signals were detected in 6 SOCs after complying with the four algorithms simultaneously. Categorized and summarized by the number of reports of involvement in each SOC, the top 3 for oseltamivir were psychiatric disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, general disorders and site-of-administration conditions, respectively. The top 3 for baloxavir marboxil were injury, poisoning and surgical complications, general disorders and site of administration conditions, and psychiatric disorders, respectively.

Conclusion

Our study identifies potential new AE signals for oseltamivir and provides a broader understanding of the safety of oseltamivir and baloxavir marboxil in children.

Drug hypersensitivity reactions: review of the state of the science for prediction and diagnosis

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are a type of adverse drug reaction that can occur with different classes of drugs and affect multiple organ systems and patient populations. DHRs can be classified as allergic or non-allergic based on the cellular mechanisms involved. Whereas nonallergic reactions rely mainly on the innate immune system, allergic reactions involve the generation of an adaptive immune response. Consequently, drug allergies are DHRs for which an immunological mechanism, with antibody and/or T cell, is demonstrated. Despite decades of research, methods to predict the potential for a new chemical entity to cause DHRs or to correctly attribute DHRs to a specific mechanism and a specific molecule are not well-established. This review will focus on allergic reactions induced by systemically administered low-molecular weight drugs with an emphasis on drug- and patient-specific factors that could influence the development of DHRs. Strategies for predicting and diagnosing DHRs, including potential tools based on the current state of the science, will also be discussed.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis complicated with respiratory failure in children: A case report

Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a severe skin and mucosal reaction that develops rapidly and has a high mortality rate. Its early identification and proper treatment are crucial to lowering the risk of death. Severe TEN can also lead to acute respiratory failure. This study probed the effect of early treatment on chronic airway damage in children with TEN complicated by respiratory failure. Three children diagnosed with TEN complicated by respiratory failure received interventions including high-dose glucocorticoids, gamma-globulin pulse therapy, and plasma exchange. One patient experienced recurrent lung infections, developed secondary chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and eventually succumbed to respiratory failure despite skin improvement. The other two patients showed improvement after receiving combination treatment with a tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor. However, they also had concurrent chronic airway disease during the follow-up period. The exact mechanism underlying TEN remains uncertain. Children with TEN complicated by respiratory failure continue to experience chronic airway damage even after standard treatment. In future, multi-center clinical studies are warranted to investigate the impact of TNF-α inhibitors in children with TEN. Assessing the effectiveness and safety of targeted medications for TEN will provide more evidence regarding the prognosis of this disease.

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor for successful treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis with severe infection: a case series

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare severe cutaneous adverse reaction that involves more than 30% of the body surface area. TEN can be accompanied by a series of systemic symptoms and has a high risk of death. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors such as adalimumab and etanercept have been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of TEN in some cases. However, clinical data on the use of TNF-α inhibitors to treat TEN with severe systemic infection are scarce. In the present study, three adult patients who developed TEN with serious active infection were successfully treated with etanercept. One of the three patients had active open pulmonary tuberculosis, and the other two had septicemia and/or fungal sepsis. All patients' skin lesions significantly improved after several days, and none of the patients developed emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases, adverse reactions, or a similar rash during follow-up. TNF-α inhibitors may be an effective treatment choice for TEN with severe systemic infection. However, further studies with large samples are still required for validation because clinical experience is limited.

Ocular Manifestations and Outcomes in Children With Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Comparison With Adult Patients

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical features and visual outcomes in children and adults with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative case series.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 280 eyes of 140 patients (35 children and 105 adults) with SJS/TEN treated between 2010 and 2020. The primary outcome measures were the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and severity of dry eye. The secondary outcome measure was the medical and surgical therapies used.

RESULTS

Among 64 eyes of children recruited in the study, acute ocular involvement was found in 58 eyes (90.6%). The chronic score in pediatric patients was significantly higher than that in adult patients (P = .004). The use of antibiotics/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Mycoplasma infection were the more common etiologies in children. In all, 75% of eyes in children maintained a visual acuity of 20/40 or better at a mean follow-up time of 4.3 years. The severity of dryness was comparable between the child and adult groups. The proportion of eyes undergoing amniotic membrane and oral mucosa transplantation was significantly higher in children than in adults in the chronic stage, reflecting that children exhibit much more severe complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although pediatric SJS/TEN patients have more severe ocular complications than adults, most children maintain long-term good vision. Early intervention and aggressive treatment help to preserve vision.

Updates in SJS/TEN: collaboration, innovation, and community

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a predominantly drug-induced disease, with a mortality rate of 15-20%, that engages the expertise of multiple disciplines: dermatology, allergy, immunology, clinical pharmacology, burn surgery, ophthalmology, urogynecology, and psychiatry. SJS/TEN has an incidence of 1-5/million persons per year in the United States, with even higher rates globally. One of the challenges of SJS/TEN has been developing the research infrastructure and coordination to answer questions capable of transforming clinical care and leading to improved patient outcomes. SJS/TEN 2021, the third research meeting of its kind, was held as a virtual meeting on August 28-29, 2021. The meeting brought together 428 international scientists, in addition to a community of 140 SJS/TEN survivors and family members. The goal of the meeting was to brainstorm strategies to support the continued growth of an international SJS/TEN research network, bridging science and the community. The community workshop section of the meeting focused on eight primary themes: mental health, eye care, SJS/TEN in children, non-drug induced SJS/TEN, long-term health complications, new advances in mechanisms and basic science, managing long-term scarring, considerations for skin of color, and COVID-19 vaccines. The meeting featured several important updates and identified areas of unmet research and clinical need that will be highlighted in this white paper.

Why drug exposure is frequently associated with T-cell mediated cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions

Cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions represent the most common manifestation of drug allergy seen in the clinic, with 25% of all adverse drug reactions appearing in the skin. The severity of cutaneous eruptions can vastly differ depending on the cellular mechanisms involved from a minor, self-resolving maculopapular rash to major, life-threatening pathologies such as the T-cell mediated bullous eruptions, i.e., Stevens Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. It remains a significant question as to why these reactions are so frequently associated with the skin and what factors polarise these reactions towards more serious disease states. The barrier function which the skin performs means it is constantly subject to a barrage of danger signals, creating an environment that favors elicitation. Therefore, a critical question is what drives the expansion of cutaneous lymphocyte antigen positive, skin homing, T-cell sub-populations in draining lymph nodes. One answer could be the heterologous immunity hypothesis whereby tissue resident memory T-cells that express T-cell receptors (TCRs) for pathogen derived antigens cross-react with drug antigen. A significant amount of research has been conducted on skin immunity in the context of contact allergy and the role of tissue specific antigen presenting cells in presenting drug antigen to T-cells, but it is unclear how this relates to epitopes derived from circulation. Studies have shown that the skin is a metabolically active organ, capable of generating reactive drug metabolites. However, we know that drug antigens are displayed systemically so what factors permit tolerance in one part of the body, but reactivity in the skin. Most adverse drug reactions are mild, and skin eruptions tend to be visible to the patient, whereas minor organ injury such as transient transaminase elevation is often not apparent. Systemic hypersensitivity reactions tend to have early cutaneous manifestations, the progression of which is halted by early diagnosis and treatment. It is apparent that the preference for cutaneous involvement of drug hypersensitivity reactions is multi-faceted, therefore this review aims to abridge the findings from literature on the current state of the field and provide insight into the cellular and metabolic mechanisms which may contribute to severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

Guideline for allergological diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: S2k Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in cooperation with the German Dermatological Society (DDG), the Association of German Allergologists (ÄDA), the German Society for Pediatric Allergology (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the German Society for Pneumology (DGP), the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, the Austrian Society of Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Austrian Society of Dermatology and Venereology (ÖGDV), the German Academy of Allergology and Environmental Medicine (DAAU), and the German Documentation Center for Severe Skin Reactions (dZh)

Not available.

Tools for Etiologic Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Allergic Conditions

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are a serious concern in clinical practice because they can be severe and result in lifelong sequelae. An accurate diagnosis and identification of the culprit drug is essential to prevent future reactions as well as for the identification of safe treatment alternatives. Nonetheless, the diagnosis can be challenging. In vivo and in vitro tests can be helpful, although none are conclusive; therefore, the tests are not usually performed in isolation but as part of a diagnostic algorithm. In addition, some in vitro tests are only available in research laboratories, and standardization has not been fully accomplished. Collaborating research is needed to improve drug hypersensitivity reaction diagnosis. In this review, we update the current available in vivo and in vitro tools with their pros and cons and propose an algorithm to integrate them into clinical practice.

New insights into the diagnosis and management of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent studies have been clarifying the pathogenesis and early diagnostic markers of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Additionally, the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors is attracting attention. This review provides) recent evidence for the diagnosis and management of SJS/TEN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Risk factors for the development of SJS/TEN have been identified, particularly the association between HLA and the onset of SJS/TEN with specific drugs, which has been intensively studied. Research on the pathogenesis of keratinocyte cell death in SJS/TEN has also progressed, revealing the involvement of necroptosis, an inflammatory cell death, in addition to apoptosis. Diagnostic biomarkers associated with these studies have also been identified.

SUMMARY

The pathogenesis of SJS/TEN remains unclear and effective therapeutic agents have not yet been established. As the involvement of innate immunity, such as monocytes and neutrophils, in addition to T cells, has become clear, a more complex pathogenesis is predicted. Further elucidation of the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN is expected to lead to the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic agents.

Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome Caused by Apalutamide: A Case Presentation

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe drug reaction that is triggered several weeks after the start of a new medication. This syndrome presents with a variety of clinical symptoms, specifically a manifestation involving a fever followed by a severe rash. A variety of medications are known to trigger DRESS, with the most common being anticonvulsants and allopurinol. Here, we discuss the case of a medication, apalutamide, that caused DRESS in our patient. Early recognition and abrupt discontinuation of the medication is required for the management of this syndrome and to minimize morbidity and mortality.

Updates on the immunopathology and genomics of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) cause significant morbidity and mortality and impede new drug development. HLA class I associations with SJS/TEN and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome have aided preventive efforts and provided insights into immunopathogenesis. In SJS/TEN, HLA class I-restricted oligoclonal CD8+ T-cell responses occur at the tissue level. However, specific HLA risk allele(s) and antigens driving this response have not been identified for most drugs. HLA risk alleles also have incomplete positive and negative predictive values, making truly comprehensive screening currently challenging. Although, there have been key paradigm shifts in knowledge regarding drug hypersensitivity, there are still many open and unanswered questions about SCAR immunopathogenesis, as well as genetic and environmental risk. In addition to understanding the cellular and molecular basis of SCAR at the single-cell level, identification of the MHC-restricted drug-reactive self- or viral peptides driving the hypersensitivity reaction will also be critical to advancing premarketing strategies to predict risk at an individual and drug level. This will also enable identification of biologic markers for earlier diagnosis and accurate prognosis, as well as drug causality and targeted therapeutics.

Review of culprit drugs associated with patients admitted to the burn unit with the diagnosis of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Syndrome

PURPOSE

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Syndrome (TENS) are severe and potentially lethal adverse drug reactions characterized by acute inflammation of the skin, mucous membranes, and ocular surface that typically occurs within weeks of a culprit drug ingestion. The purpose of this study is to report a retrospective trend analysis of SJS spectrum diagnoses and associated culprit drugs in patients admitted to the Loyola University Medical Center (LUMC) Burn Unit, the major referral center in the Chicagoland region for patients with SJS disease spectrum.

METHODS

The electronic medical records (EMR) of 163 patients with a diagnosis of SJS/TENS admitted to the LUMC Burn Unit from 2000 to 2019 were reviewed. Clinical data in addition to the well-established algorithm of drug causality for epidermal necrolysis (ALDEN) allowed us to identify the single most probable culprit drug in 131 cases.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2019, the most common spectrum classification was TENS (48.1%), followed by SJS (33.6%) and SJS-TEN Overlap Syndrome (18.3%). Anticonvulsants were found to be the most probable culprit class in 30% of cases followed by Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in 19% of cases. Beta-lactams were the most probable culprit class in 11% of cases while NSAIDs and allopurinol were each the most probable culprit class/drug in 8.4% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the largest single center series of SJS/TENS cases in the United States. Further study into culprit drug distribution by region as well as continuous monitoring of trends is crucial in order to advise prescribing practices.

Effectiveness and Safety of Early Short-Course, Moderate- to High-Dose Glucocorticoids for the Treatment of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Retrospective Study

Objective

To summarise the clinical characteristics of patients with Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis syndrome (SJS/TEN) and analyse the efficacy and safety of systemic glucocorticoid therapy.

Methods

This study was a retrospective study of 56 patients with SJS/TEN who had been systematically treated with glucocorticoids in the dermatology ward of Peking University Third Hospital from 2010 to 2020. The clinical characteristics, treatment regimen, effects on underlying diseases, incidence and outcome of hormone-related adverse reactions and skin lesion prognosis were summarised and analysed for each patient.

Results

① The allergenic drugs were found to be antibiotics (31.51%), antipyretic and analgesics (21.92%), traditional Chinese medicines and health products (15.07%) and neuropsychiatric drugs (13.70%). ② Based on the 56 patients’ scores of toxic epidermal necrosis at admission, the actual mortality rate was 1.8% (1/56), which was significantly lower than the average expected mortality rate of 15.0% (P = 0.032; standardised mortality ratio = 0.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.00–0.53). ③ A total of 33 patients (58.9%) had underlying diseases, of which 10 patients (30.3%) had underlying diseases that fluctuated during treatment but stabilised after symptomatic treatment. ④ During treatment, 73.2% (41/56) of patients had complications that may have been related to systemic glucocorticoids; 97.6% (40/41) had mild symptoms, and 92.7% (38/41) had improved/recovered complications at the time of discharge.

Conclusion

① Antibiotics are still the most common sensitising drugs, and traditional Chinese medicine and health products are also common sensitising drugs. ② Early systemic application of medium- to high-dose glucocorticoids is effective in the treatment of SJS/TEN, and it is beneficial in reducing mortality. ③ The short-term application of medium- to high-dose hormone therapy for SJS/TEN has little effect on underlying diseases. The related complications are mostly mild, and the treatment is safe.

Study protocol: Australasian Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (AUS-SCAR)

INTRODUCTION

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) are a group of T cell-mediated hypersensitivities associated with significant morbidity, mortality and hospital costs. Clinical phenotypes include Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). In this Australasian, multicentre, prospective registry, we plan to examine the clinical presentation, drug causality, genomic predictors, potential diagnostic approaches, treatments and long-term outcomes of SCAR in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Adult and adolescent patients with SCAR including SJS, TEN, DRESS, AGEP and another T cell-mediated hypersensitivity, generalised bullous fixed drug eruption, will be prospectively recruited. A waiver of consent has been granted for some sites to retrospectively include cases which result in early mortality. DNA will be collected for all prospective cases. Blood, blister fluid and skin biopsy sampling is optional and subject to patient consent and site capacity. To develop culprit drug identification and prevention, genomic testing will be performed to confirm human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type and ex vivo testing will be performed via interferon-γ release enzyme linked immunospot assay using collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The long-term outcomes of SCAR will be investigated with a 12-month quality of life survey and examination of prescribing and mortality data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was reviewed and approved by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/50791/Austin-19). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000241134).

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions among people living with human immunodeficiency virus in a tertiary care hospital in Johor, Malaysia

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) among people living with HIV (PLWH) are common. Data on drug eruptions among PLWH in Malaysia are limited. Thus, our study aimed to determine the clinical patterns of cADRs among PLWH and the risk factors associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among PLWH who developed cADRs presenting to our dermatology clinic from June 2020 to December 2020. The Naranjo scale was used for drug causality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 78 PLWH were recruited with a male-to-female ratio of 12:1. The maculopapular eruption was the commonest type of cADRs (75.6%), followed by drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) (15.4%). SCAR is defined as a potentially life-threatening, immunologically mediated, drug-induced disease, accounting for 17.9% of the cases. Most of the patients were on antiretroviral therapy (ART) (85.9%), with efavirenz + tenofovir/emtricitabine being the most common combination (80.6%). Efavirenz (51.3%) was the main culprit drug implicated, followed by trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (23.1%) and nevirapine (11.5%). CD4 T-cell count <100 cells/μL (p = 0.006) was the independent risk factor for SCAR. Most cases had probable causal relationships with the culprit drugs (84.6%) and were not preventable (93.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The commonest cADR seen in PLWH was maculopapular eruption, while efavirenz, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and nevirapine were the three main implicated drugs. Most of the cases had probable drug causality and were not preventable. PLWH with CD4 count <100 cells/μL were particularly at risk of developing SCAR. Overall, this study showed that immune suppression and polypharmacy as a consequence of opportunistic infection prophylaxis are important factors contributing to the increased risk of ADRs among PLWH.

Clinical features and outcomes in children with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening cutaneous conditions. However, studies of pediatric SJS/TEN are limited. To investigate the causes, clinical course, outcomes and complications of SJS and TEN in children. This retrospective study included 47 pediatric patients (aged < 18 years) with SJS, SJS/TEN, or TEN treated at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, between January 2009 and December 2019. ALDEN scores and serological tests were used to assess causes and SCORTEN scores were applied to evaluate disease severity. Forty-seven patients, including 30 with SJS, 6 with SJS/TEN, and 11 with TEN were included. Median age was 8 years (range 1-17 years); 51.1% were male. Thirty-three cases (70.2%) were caused by drugs and infectious pathogens were suspected in 14 cases (29.8%). Oxcarbazepine (5/47, 10.6%) and amoxicillin (5/47, 10.6%) were the most often-implicated drugs, and Mycoplasma infection (9/47, 19.1%) was the predominant infectious cause. Only one TENS patient died (mortality rate 1/47, 2.1%) due to septic shock with ARDS, acute renal failure and cardiopulmonary shock. Median hospital stay was 15.5 (3-42) days. Pulmonary involvement (2/39, 5.1%), including pneumonia and ARDS, was noted in acute stage. Long-term sequelae were ocular involvement (6/39, 15.4%), nail dystrophy (4/39, 10.3%) and post-inflammatory hypo-/hyperpigmentation (3/39, 7.7%). In the present study, pediatric patients with SJS, SJS/TEN, or TEN have good outcomes with few long-term complications and low mortality. Mycoplasma is the most common infectious cause in pediatric SJS/TEN. Ocular discomfort, nail dystrophy and skin dyschromia are common long-term sequelae requiring regular follow-up.

Epidermal necrolysis in the context of immuno-oncologic medication as well as kinase inhibitors and biologics

BACKGROUND

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are severe, primarily drug-induced reactions of skin and mucosa. Since they differ in the extent of skin detachment but not in etiology, they are grouped together as epidermal necrolysis (EN). Due to nationwide registration, representative data are available at the German Center for the Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions (dZh). Here, an increasing number of case notifications in the context with new immuno-oncologic drugs, kinase inhibitors and biologics have been observed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 4,150 cases notifications between January 2003 and February 2019, 102 cases with exposure to these drug groups underwent systematic analysis, validation and causality assessment.

RESULTS

Two cases of EN to vemurafenib were confirmed and one case to afatinib and pembrolizumab, respectively. In 14 EN cases other drugs - predominantly allopurinol or cotrimoxazole - were the causative agent. Fourteen cases were EN-like reactions: six bullous lichenoid drug eruptions (DE) to pembrolizumab (2), obinutuzumab, nivolumab, rituximab, infliximab/nivolumab, and eight multiforme-like DE to rituximab (2), adalimumab, ramucirumab, bevacizumab, vemurafenib, sorafenib (2). Lichenoid DE were differentiated from EN through histopathology and by the protracted course of EN, multiforme-like DE by variable skin manifestations with only sparse epidermolysis or mucosal involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

A correct diagnosis is highly relevant in terms of prognosis and use of these drugs in malignoma treatment. Re-exposure is contraindicated in EN, but possible in other DE after rigorous risk-benefit evaluation.

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Following Vancomycin and Linezolid: A Real-World Analysis of Post-Marketing Surveillance Data

Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) has been reported as a serious adverse effect in patients treated with vancomycin or linezolid, and there is currently a lack of real-world studies comparing specific differences in adverse effects of SJS.

Methods: According to the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), from January 2004 to July 2021, the data of suspected SJS after the use of vancomycin and linezolid were analyzed by imbalance and Bayesian analysis. The onset time, fatality rate and hospitalization rate of vancomycin-associated SJS and linezolid-associated SJS were also investigated.

Results: 276 cases of vancomycin-related SJS reports and 63 cases of linezolid-related SJS reports were identified. These two drugs are more common in middle-aged patients (45–64 years) than other age groups, and less common in underage children (<18). Among them, linezolid-related SJS is more common in middle-aged and elderly patients (45–74 years old) than other groups. Except for unspecified data, in vancomycin-associated SJS cases, there are more men than women (49.28% vs 43.84%), while in linezolid-associated SJS cases, the proportion of men and women is almost equal (44.44%). From the point of view of the areas where adverse reactions were reported, about 1/2 of the reports on Vancomycin-related SJS came from North America, and 1/3 of the reports came from Europe. The median onset time of Linezolid-related SJS was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2–7.75), which was significantly earlier than that of Vancomycin-related SJS (12 days, IQR 4–20) (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in mortality and hospitalization rates after vancomycin and linezolid caused SJS.

Conclusion: The analysis of faers data provides a comprehensive overview of the adverse reactions of SJS caused by the use of vancomycin and linezolid, and can warn clinical workers to timely intervene and continuously monitor the patients at risk of SJS when using such drugs.

Advances in the Pathomechanisms of Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity

Delayed drug hypersensitivity continues to contribute to major clinical problems worldwide. The clinical presentations of delayed drug hypersensitivity are diverse, ranging from mild skin rashes to life-threatening systemic reactions. The pathomechanism of delayed drug hypersensitivity involves human leukocyte antigens (HLA) presentation of drugs/metabolites to T cell receptors (TCR), resulting in T-cell activation. The pathogenesis of delayed drug hypersensitivity also has reactivation of the virus, and activation of many immune mediators. In this review, we discuss the immune pathogenesis, molecular interactions of HLA/drugs/TCR, and downstream signaling of cytotoxic proteins/cytokines/chemokines, as well as disease prevention and management for delayed drug hypersensitivity.

Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome (DIHS)/Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS): Clinical Features and Pathogenesis

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DIHS/DRESS) is one example of a severe delayed T-cell-mediated adverse drug reaction. DIHS/DRESS presents with fever, widespread rash and facial edema, organ involvement, and hematological abnormalities, including eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytosis. DIHS/DRESS is associated with relapse 2 to 4 weeks after acute symptoms, often coinciding with reactivation of prevalent chronic persistent human herpesviruses such as human herpesvirus 6, EBV, and cytomegalovirus. The mortality of DIHS/DRESS is up to 10% and often related to unrecognized myocarditis and cytomegalovirus complications, with longer-term consequences that contribute to morbidity including autoimmune diseases such as thyroiditis. It is essential that all potential drug causes, including all new drugs introduced within the 8 weeks preceding onset of DIHS/DRESS symptoms, are identified. All potential drug culprits, as well as drugs that are closely related structurally to the culprit drug, should be avoided in the future. Systemic corticosteroids have remained the mainstay for the treatment of DIHS/DRESS with internal organ involvement. Steroid-sparing agents, such as cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and monthly intravenous immune globulin, have been successfully used for treatment, and careful follow-up for cytomegalovirus reactivation is recommended. Strong associations between HLA class I alleles and DIHS/DRESS predisposition include HLA-B∗13:01 and dapsone, HLA-B∗58:01 and allopurinol, and HLA-B∗32:01 and vancomycin. These have opened a pathway for prevention, risk stratification, and earlier diagnosis. Single-cell sequencing and other studies of immunopathogenesis promise to identify targeted treatment approaches.

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in the Era of Systems Medicine

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are severe mucocutaneous bullous disorders characterized by widespread skin and mucosal necrosis and detachment, which are most commonly triggered by medications. Despite their rarity, these severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions will result in high mortality and morbidity as well as long-term sequela. The immunopathologic mechanisms is mainly cell-mediated cytotoxic reaction against keratinocytes leading to massive skin necrolysis. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that immune synapse composed of cytotoxic T cells with drug-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I restriction and T cell receptors (TCR) repertoire is the key pathogenic for SJS/TEN. Various cytotoxic proteins and cytokines such as soluble granulysin, perforin, granzyme B, interleukin-15, Fas ligand, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α have been as mediators involved in the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN. Early recognition and immediate withdrawal of causative agents, and critical multidisciplinary supportive care are key management of SJS/TEN. To date, there is yet to be a sufficient consensus or recommendation for the immunomodulants of the treatment in SJS/TEN. Systemic corticosteroids remain one of the most common treatment options for SJS/TEN, though the efficacy remain uncertain. Currently, there is increasing evidence showing that cyclosporine and TNF-α inhibitors decrease the mortality of SJS/TEN. Further multicenter double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are required to confirm the efficacy and safety.

Combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

The exact efficacy of cyclosporine in the treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) still needs evidence from more clinical data. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and side-effects of combined use of cyclosporine in the treatment TEN with glucocorticoids (GC)/i.v. immunoglobulin G (IVIG). A total of 46 patients with SJS/TEN were enrolled and classified into two groups based on the therapeutic drugs used. Clinical characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and disease progressions were collected and compared between the two groups. In our cohort, seven patients eventually died and the overall fatality rate was 15.2%, but there was no difference between the two groups (p = 0.557). On discharge, the median SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) fell from 2.0 at admission to 1.0 and the median body surface area detached fell from 32.0% at admission to 9.5%. Patients in the cyclosporine group had a higher rate of re-epithelialized area than patients in the non-cyclosporine group (p < 0.05). Cyclosporine significantly reduced the length of stay (19.0 vs. 13.0 days, p = 0.019) and the rate of systemic infection (71.4% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.017) compared with the non-cyclosporine group. SCORTEN was the only significant risk factor for death and the risk ratio was 1.96 (1.17-3.31, p = 0.011). Conclusively, the combined use of cyclosporine could reduce the occurrence of systemic infection and accelerate the re-epithelialization.

Systemic interventions for treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome

BACKGROUND

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome are rare, severe cutaneous adverse reactions usually triggered by medications. In addition to tertiary-level supportive care, various systemic therapies have been used including glucocorticoids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), cyclosporin, N-acetylcysteine, thalidomide, infliximab, etanercept, and plasmapheresis. There is an unmet need to understand the efficacy of these interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of systemic therapies (medicines delivered orally, intramuscularly, or intravenously) for the treatment of SJS, TEN, and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to March 2021: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We also searched five clinical trial registers, the reference lists of all included studies and of key review articles, and a number of drug manufacturer websites. We searched for errata or retractions of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational comparative studies of participants of any age with a clinical diagnosis of SJS, TEN, or SJS/TEN overlap syndrome. We included all systemic therapies studied to date and permitted comparisons between each therapy, as well as between therapy and placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as specified by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were SJS/TEN-specific mortality and adverse effects leading to discontinuation of SJS/TEN therapy. Secondary outcomes included time to complete re-epithelialisation, intensive care unit length of stay, total hospital length of stay, illness sequelae, and other adverse effects attributed to systemic therapy. We rated the certainty of the evidence for each outcome using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine studies with a total of 308 participants (131 males and 155 females) from seven countries. We included two studies in the quantitative meta-analysis. We included three RCTs and six prospective, controlled observational studies. Sample sizes ranged from 10 to 91. Most studies did not report study duration or time to follow-up. Two studies reported a mean SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis (SCORTEN) of 3 and 1.9. Seven studies did not report SCORTEN, although four of these studies reported average or ranges of body surface area (BSA) (means ranging from 44% to 51%). Two studies were set in burns units, two in dermatology wards, one in an intensive care unit, one in a paediatric ward, and three in unspecified inpatient units. Seven studies reported a mean age, which ranged from 29 to 56 years. Two studies included paediatric participants (23 children). We assessed the results from one of three RCTs as low risk of bias in all domains, one as high, and one as some concerns. We judged the results from all six prospective observational comparative studies to be at a high risk of bias. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence because of serious risk of bias concerns and for imprecision due to small numbers of participants. The interventions assessed included systemic corticosteroids, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors, cyclosporin, thalidomide, N-acetylcysteine, IVIG, and supportive care. No data were available for the main comparisons of interest as specified in the review protocol: etanercept versus cyclosporin, etanercept versus IVIG, IVIG versus supportive care, IVIG versus cyclosporin, and cyclosporin versus corticosteroids. Corticosteroids versus no corticosteroids It is uncertain if there is any difference between corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 4 mg/kg/day for two more days after fever had subsided and no new lesions had developed) and no corticosteroids on disease-specific mortality (risk ratio (RR) 2.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 9.03; 2 studies; 56 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Time to complete re-epithelialisation, length of hospital stay, and adverse effects leading to discontinuation of therapy were not reported. IVIG versus no IVIG It is uncertain if there is any difference between IVIG (0.2 to 0.5 g/kg cumulative dose over three days) and no IVIG in risk of disease-specific mortality (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.91); time to complete re-epithelialisation (mean difference (MD) -2.93 days, 95% CI -4.4 to -1.46); or length of hospital stay (MD -2.00 days, 95% CI -5.81 to 1.81). All results in this comparison were based on one study with 36 participants, and very low-certainty evidence. Adverse effects leading to discontinuation of therapy were not reported. Etanercept (TNF-alpha inhibitor) versus corticosteroids Etanercept (25 mg (50 mg if weight > 65 kg) twice weekly "until skin lesions healed") may reduce disease-specific mortality compared to corticosteroids (intravenous prednisolone 1 to 1.5 mg/kg/day "until skin lesions healed") (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.63; 1 study; 91 participants; low-certainty evidence); however, the CIs were consistent with possible benefit and possible harm. Serious adverse events, such as sepsis and respiratory failure, were reported in 5 of 48 participants with etanercept and 9 of 43 participants with corticosteroids, but it was not clear if they led to discontinuation of therapy. Time to complete re-epithelialisation and length of hospital stay were not reported. Cyclosporin versus IVIG  It is uncertain if there is any difference between cyclosporin (3 mg/kg/day or intravenous 1 mg/kg/day until complete re-epithelialisation, then tapered off (10 mg/day reduction every 48 hours)) and IVIG (continuous infusion 0.75 g/kg/day for 4 days (total dose 3 g/kg) in participants with normal renal function) in risk of disease-specific mortality (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.98, 1 study; 22 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Time to complete re-epithelialisation, length of hospital stay, and adverse effects leading to discontinuation of therapy were not reported. No studies measured intensive care unit length of stay.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When compared to corticosteroids, etanercept may result in mortality reduction. For the following comparisons, the certainty of the evidence for disease-specific mortality is very low: corticosteroids versus no corticosteroids,  IVIG versus no IVIG and cyclosporin versus IVIG. There is a need for more multicentric studies, focused on the most important clinical comparisons, to provide reliable answers about the best treatments for SJS/TEN.

Colistin-associated Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis reactions: a retrospective case-non-case pharmacovigilance study

BACKGROUND

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening skin reactions. Colistin is a last resort antibiotic with a historically poor safety profile. The association between colistin and SJS/TEN has not been previously quantified.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We identified colistin and SJS/TEN adverse event reports from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and calculated effect estimates using OpenEpi.

RESULTS

From January 2013 through March 2021, 964 adverse events were reported for colistin. Colistin was listed as a secondary suspect drug in 13 SJS/TEN adverse event reports (1.3%), with a reporting odds ratio of 29.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1-51.1), and proportional reporting ratio of 29.2 (95% CI 17.0-50.2). The limitations that accompany any FAERS study include the voluntary nature of reporting, unclear causal relationship between drug and adverse reaction, underreporting, and wide confidence intervals for rare adverse events like SJS/TEN.

CONCLUSIONS

Colistin was not the primary suspect drug in any SJS/TEN adverse event reports. We did identify a statistically significant safety signal for SJS/TEN with colistin as a secondary suspect drug. SJS/TEN is not currently included in the colistin product label. This association should be further explored in other pharmacoepidemiologic drug safety studies.

Clinical and Epidemiological Features of Patients with Drug-Induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in Iran: Different Points of Children from Adults

Background

Different epidemiologic aspects of drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) in children are scarce.

Aim

To compare the clinical and epidemiological features of patients with drug-induced SJS and TEN in children and adults.

Method

This retrospective study was conducted at two academic referral centers (Isfahan, Iran) over 5 years. SJS and TEN were clinically diagnosed and confirmed by skin biopsy as needed.

Results

One hundred one patients (31 children and 70 adults) with a female to male ratio of 1.1 : 1 was identified in the present study. SJS was more commonly diagnosed in both pediatric and adult patients. The most frequent reason for drug administration identified was the infection (45.2%) and seizure (45.2%) in children and infection (34.3%) and psychiatry disorder (27.1%) in adults (P = 0.001). The most common culprit drugs in the pediatric were phenobarbital (9/31), cotrimoxazole (4/31), and amoxicillin (4/31); however, in the adult group, the most common drugs were carbamazepine (11/70) and lamotrigine (9/70). Fever was significantly more common in adults (44.3%) compared to pediatric patients (22.6%) (P = 0.03). Multiple logistic regression models showed that pediatric patients had significantly lower odds of hospitalization (OR [odds ratio]: 0.14; 95% CI 0.02, 0.67). In addition, patients with SCORTEN 1 had significantly higher odds of hospitalization (OR: 6.3; 95% CI: 1.68, 23.79) compared to patients with SCORTEN 0.

Conclusions

The present study showed several differences between the pediatric and adult patients with SJS and TEN, including the reason for drug administration, culprit drugs, length of hospital stay, presence of fever, and final diagnosis of disease.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Combined With Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Study in China

Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but life-threatening severe adverse drug reactions. The use of corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in SJS/TEN remains controversial. Methods: In this single-center, observational, propensity-matched, retrospective study, we collected a total of 224 patients with SJS/TEN who were hospitalized in our department from 2008 to 2019; according to treatment with IVIg combined with corticosteroids or with corticosteroids alone, patients were divided into combination therapeutic group (163 patients) and monotherapeutic group (61 patients). Patients from the two groups were matched by their propensity score in blocks of 2:1. Comparisons of the clinical characteristics and prognoses between propensity-matched SJS/TEN patients treated with IVIg combined with corticosteroids and corticosteroids alone were made. Results: After our propensity matching, a total of 145 patients were yielded, including 93 patients treated with IVIg and 52 patients not treated with IVIg. All of the 23 variables reflected good matching between patients treated with/without IVIg, and no significant difference was observed. Although there was no significant difference between the totally predicted and actual mortality in both of our groups, the actual mortality was lower than it was predicted in patients treated with IVIg [p > 0.250, the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was 0.38, 95% CI 0.00-0.91] and patients treated without IVIg (p = 1.000, the SMR was 0.75, 95% CI 0.00-1.76). IVIg tended toward reducing the time to arrest of progression by 1.56 days (p = 0.000) and the length of hospital stay by 3.37 days (p = 0.000). The mortality rate was 45% lower for patients treated with IVIg combined with corticosteroids than those only treated with corticosteroid therapy, although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.555). The incidence of skin infections was significantly lower in the combined therapy group (p < 0.025), and the total infection rate of patients treated with combination therapy tended to decrease by 67% compared to patients treated with corticosteroids alone (p = 0.047). Conclusion: The actual mortality rate of patients treated with corticosteroids alone or IVIg combined with corticosteroids tended to be lower than those predicted by TEN-specific severity-of-illness score (SCORTEN), although there was no significance. Compared with those treated by corticosteroids alone, combination therapy was prone to bring a better prognosis for SJS/TEN patients.

A contemporary snippet on clinical presentation and management of toxic epidermal necrolysis

Introduction

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is one of the most severe cutaneous adverse reactions with a mortality rate of 30%. Due to a lack of consensus regarding the treatment and management of TEN, therapy is individualized on a case-to-case basis.

Purpose

The scientific literature about Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and TEN is summarized and assessed to aid and assist in determining the optimal course of treatment.

Methods

PubMed and Google Scholar, among others, were searched with the keywords: “Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis”, “corticosteroids”, “cyclosporine”, “etanercept”, “intravenous immunoglobulin”, “Stevens-Johnson syndrome” and filtered by year. The research articles generated by the search, and their references, were reviewed.

Results

TEN is a severe dermatological condition that is mainly caused by medicines. World-wide guidelines differ in care plans. As there is no consensus on the management of TEN, this article aims to summarize the efficacy and feasibility of the management aspect of TEN from previous studies. Supportive care is highly accepted, along with early discontinuation of all medicines (hydration & electrolytes). Corticosteroids and cyclosporine have been used in therapy. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is currently being administered; however, their efficacy by themselves and in combination remains uncertain.

Conclusion

Current evidence predominantly from retrospective studies suggests no individual treatment has sufficient efficacy and a multi-faceted regimen stands to be favored. Therapeutic regimens from corticosteroids to IVIG are under constant evaluation. The life-threatening nature of TEN warrants further confirmation with more extensive, robust randomized, controlled trials.

Lay Summary

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a serious skin reaction with a 30% chance of mortality. Commonly TEN is caused by medicines and results in a burn like appearance and sensation in patients. Usually administered medicine is cleared effectively by the human body but when the clearance of few metabolites from medicine is disrupted due to few genes, it leads to an ominous response by the body. This response involves several intermediate chemicals that primarily attack skin cells. Treatment guidelines differ globally. Supportive care is highly accepted, along with early discontinuation of all medicine. Currently, a multi-faceted treatment regimen is favored. Treatments like corticosteroids to immunoglobulins are under constant evaluation. Identification of the perfect combination of treatment needs confirmation from robust randomized controlled trials.

Successful Treatment of Carbamazepine-Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis With Clinical Gastrointestinal Involvement: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a rare and life-threatening disease of the skin and mucosal surfaces. Although gastrointestinal manifestations in adults are potential prognostic factors for disease severity, there are limited data on such cases and their standard management in the pediatric population.

CASE PRESENTATION

We herein report the case of an 8-year-old girl with a 1-year history of epilepsy, who presented with bilateral conjunctivitis and progressively widespread bullous, and pruritic eruption based on erythematous skin after administration of carbamazepine. A diagnosis of carbamazepine-induced TEN was made, and the drug was immediately discontinued. The result of genetic screening showed that the patient was positive for the HLA-B^*15:02 allele. Then, her condition got worse by developing gastrointestinal involvement, including hematemesis and severe watery bloody diarrhea. A combination of the intravenous immunoglobulin and the appropriate dose of systemic steroids have contributed to a favorable outcome in this case. Multidisciplinary care of mucocutaneous involvement, supplemental nutrition, and fluid replacement was also critically warranted. This report aims to contribute to the current literature on TEN-related gastrointestinal manifestations in pediatrics and highlights the need for further investigations in determining the optimal treatment in such cases.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we reported the successful treatment of TEN-related gastrointestinal manifestations in a pediatric patient, which should be critically considered in patients with SJS/TEN. Since it may significantly contribute to the poor prognosis of the illness, further investigations in determining standard management in such cases are necessary.

Deep Neural Network for Early Image Diagnosis of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

BACKGROUND

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a life-threatening cutaneous adverse drug reaction (cADR). Distinguishing SJS/TEN from nonsevere cADRs is difficult, especially in the early stages of the disease.

OBJECTIVE

To overcome this limitation, we developed a computer-aided diagnosis system for the early diagnosis of SJS/TEN, powered by a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN).

METHODS

We trained a DCNN using a dataset of 26,661 individual lesion images obtained from 123 patients with a diagnosis of SJS/TEN or nonsevere cADRs. The DCNN's accuracy of classification was compared with that of 10 board-certified dermatologists and 24 trainee dermatologists.

RESULTS

The DCNN achieved 84.6% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.6-88.6), whereas the sensitivities of the board-certified dermatologists and trainee dermatologists were 31.3 % (95% CI, 20.9-41.8; P < .0001) and 27.8% (95% CI, 22.6-32.5; P < .0001), respectively. The negative predictive value was 94.6% (95% CI, 93.2-96.0) for the DCNN, 68.1% (95% CI, 66.1-70.0; P < .0001) for the board-certified dermatologists, and 67.4% (95% CI, 66.1-68.7; P < .0001) for the trainee dermatologists. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the DCNN for a SJS/TEN diagnosis was 0.873, which was significantly higher than that for all board-certified dermatologists and trainee dermatologists.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a DCNN to classify SJS/TEN and nonsevere cADRs based on individual lesion images of erythema. The DCNN performed significantly better than did dermatologists in classifying SJS/TEN from skin images.

Multi-state model for predicting ocular progression in acute Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

This study aimed to clarify the etiologic factors predicting acute ocular progression in SJS/TEN, and identify patients who require immediate and intensive ophthalmological treatment. We previously conducted two Japanese Surveys of SJS/TEN (i.e., cases arising between 2005-2007 and between 2008-2010), and obtained the medical records, including detailed dermatological and ophthalmological findings, of 230 patients. Acute ocular severity was evaluated as none, mild, severe, and very severe. A multi-state model assuming the Markov process based on the Cox proportional hazards model was used to elucidate the specific factors affecting the acute ocular progression. Our findings revealed that of the total 230 patients, 23 (24%) of 97 cases that were mild at initial presentation worsened to severe/very severe. Acute ocular progression developed within 3 weeks from disease onset. Exposure to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and younger patient age were found to be statistically significant for the progression of ocular severity from mild to severe/very severe [hazard ratio (HR) 3.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.48 to 9.91] and none to severe/very severe [HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97 to 0.99], respectively. The acute ocular severity score at worst-condition was found to be significantly correlated with ocular sequelae. Thus, our detailed findings on acute ocular progression revealed that in 24% of SJS/TEN cases with ocular involvement, ocular severity progresses even after initiating intensive treatment, and that in younger-age patients with a history of exposure to NSAIDs, very strict attention must be given to their ophthalmological appearances.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare and severe skin and mucosal reactions that are associated with high mortality. Despite the severity, an evidence-based treatment protocol for SJS/TEN is still lacking.

METHOD

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the PubMed database was searched using the following terms: [Stevens-Johnson syndrome] OR [toxic epidermal necrolysis] AND [therapy] OR [treatment] over a 20-year period (1999-2019) in the German and English language. All clinical studies reporting on the treatment of SJS/TEN were included, and epidemiological and diagnostic aspects of treatment were analysed. A meta-analysis was conducted on all comparative clinical studies that met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 88 studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 2647 patients. Treatment was either supportive or used systemic corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, cyclosporine, thalidomide or cyclophosphamide therapy. The meta-analysis included 16 (18%) studies, reporting outcomes in 976 (37%) patients. Systemic glucocorticoids showed a survival benefit for SJS/TEN patients in all analyses compared with other forms of treatment. Cyclosporine treatment also showed promising results, despite being used in a small cohort of patients. No beneficial effects on mortality could be demonstrated for intravenous immunoglobulins.

CONCLUSION

Glucocorticoids and cyclosporine may be tentatively recommended as the most promising immunomodulatory therapies for SJS/TEN, but these results should be investigated in future prospective controlled trials.

Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Beta-Lactam Antibiotics

Beta-lactam antibiotics are the most commonly reported drug allergy in adults and children. More than 95% of those with reported allergy labels to beta lactams are not confirmed when subjected to allergy testing. Beta lactam antibiotics are associated with a wide spectrum of immediate and delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. The latency period to symptoms and clinical presentation aids in the causality assessment. Risk stratification based on diagnosis and timing then allows for appropriate management and evaluation. Skin prick testing, intradermal testing and oral challenge are well established for evaluation of immediate reactions. Delayed intradermal testing, patch testing and oral challenge can also be considered for evaluation of mild to moderate delayed reactions. Cross-reactivity between beta-lactams appears to be driven most commonly by a shared R1 side-chain. Standardized algorithms, protocols and pathways are needed for widespread implementation of a pragmatic and effective approach to patients reporting beta lactam allergy.

Corticosteroid Pulse Therapy for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Patients With Acute Ocular Involvement

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term effects of corticosteroid pulse therapy (CPT) for the treatment of acute-stage Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) patients with severe ocular involvement.

DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative case series.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 116 SJS/TEN patients who developed the disease between 2002 and 2018. Patients with severe ocular disorders (ie, ocular surface epithelial defect, pseudomembranous formation, or both) at the acute stage and who were followed for >1 year post SJS/TEN onset were enrolled. In those patients, the treatments administered for acute-stage SJS/TEN and associated ocular sequelae were examined, including the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the patient's worse eye and the incidence of the ocular complications at the final follow-up examination.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients were enrolled. Of those, 36 received CPT within 4 days post disease onset (group A) and 49 patients did not receive CPT within 4 days post disease onset (group B). The percentage of eyes with a BCVA in the worse eye of ≥ 1.0 were 52.8% in group A and 14.3% in group B. Severe ocular sequelae (ie, a worsening of BCVA and corneal and conjunctival complications) were significantly less in group A than in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

In SJS/TEN patients with acute ocular involvement, CPT initiated within 4 days from disease onset may help reduce severe ocular sequelae.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards pharmacogenomics among hospital pharmacists in Thailand

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is the use of human genomic information to avoid toxicity and optimize efficacy of drug therapy in an individual. Hospital pharmacists are the key persons to facilitate the incorporation of PGx into clinical practice. PGx is relatively new to Thai hospital pharmacists. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice of Thai hospital pharmacists towards PGx implementation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey among 600 hospital pharmacists in 21 hospitals across Thailand. The questionnaire consisted of 35 questions using comment boxes, Likert scales, and multiple choice answers.

RESULTS

The response rate was 20.5% (n = 123). Nearly half of the hospital pharmacists (46.3%) had low PGx knowledge score (<5 points), particularly for applied PGx knowledge in clinical situations. Concerns regarding PGx reimbursement, privacy issues, and discrimination were mentioned in this survey. However, most hospital pharmacists had positive attitude towards PGx service. Only 7% of hospital pharmacists had recommended or interpreted PGx tests in the past year. National PGx guidelines and government policies were considered the important factors for PGx implementation. Moreover, the most preferred learning format for PGx education was professional academic conferences.

CONCLUSION

Hospital pharmacists in Thailand had positive attitude towards PGx, despite limited experience and practice of PGx. PGx education to support an application of PGx knowledge in clinical situations is required. National PGx guidelines and government policies may need to be developed to address the concerns for reimbursement, privacy, and discrimination to ensure successful PGx implementation.