1
|
Salcher-Konrad M, Nguyen M, Savovic J, Higgins JPT, Naci H. Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies of Pharmacological Interventions: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2436230. [PMID: 39331390 PMCID: PMC11437387 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.36230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are widely regarded as the methodological benchmark for assessing clinical efficacy and safety of health interventions. There is growing interest in using nonrandomized studies to assess efficacy and safety of new drugs. Objective To determine how treatment effects for the same drug compare when evaluated in nonrandomized vs randomized studies. Data Sources Meta-analyses published between 2009 and 2018 were identified in MEDLINE via PubMed and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Data analysis was conducted from October 2019 to July 2024. Study Selection Meta-analyses of pharmacological interventions were eligible for inclusion if both randomized and nonrandomized studies contributed to a single meta-analytic estimate. Data Extraction and Synthesis For this meta-analysis using a meta-epidemiological framework, separate summary effect size estimates were calculated for nonrandomized and randomized studies within each meta-analysis using a random-effects model and then these estimates were compared. The reporting of this study followed the Guidelines for Reporting Meta-Epidemiological Methodology Research and relevant portions of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome was discrepancies in treatment effects obtained from nonrandomized and randomized studies, as measured by the proportion of meta-analyses where the 2 study types disagreed about the direction or magnitude of effect, disagreed beyond chance about the effect size estimate, and the summary ratio of odds ratios (ROR) obtained from nonrandomized vs randomized studies combined across all meta-analyses. Results A total of 346 meta-analyses with 2746 studies were included. Statistical conclusions about drug benefits and harms were different for 130 of 346 meta-analyses (37.6%) when focusing solely on either nonrandomized or randomized studies. Disagreements were beyond chance for 54 meta-analyses (15.6%). Across all meta-analyses, there was no strong evidence of consistent differences in treatment effects obtained from nonrandomized vs randomized studies (summary ROR, 0.95; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.89-1.02). Compared with experimental nonrandomized studies, randomized studies produced on average a 19% smaller treatment effect (ROR, 0.81; 95% CrI, 0.68-0.97). There was increased heterogeneity in effect size estimates obtained from nonrandomized compared with randomized studies. Conclusions and Relevance In this meta-analysis of treatment effects of pharmacological interventions obtained from randomized and nonrandomized studies, there was no overall difference in effect size estimates between study types on average, but nonrandomized studies both overestimated and underestimated treatment effects observed in randomized studies and introduced additional uncertainty. These findings suggest that relying on nonrandomized studies as substitutes for RCTs may introduce additional uncertainty about the therapeutic effects of new drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Salcher-Konrad
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG)/Austrian National Public Health Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mary Nguyen
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jelena Savovic
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Julian P T Higgins
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Huseyin Naci
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoogteijling TJ, Abu Hilal M, Zimmitti G, Aghayan DL, Wu AGR, Cipriani F, Gruttadauria S, Scatton O, Long TCD, Herman P, Marino MV, Mazzaferro V, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Choi SH, Lee JH, Gastaca M, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Yong CC, Yin M, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Morise Z, Di Benedetto F, Brustia R, Dalla Valle R, Boggi U, Geller D, Belli A, Memeo R, Mejia A, Park JO, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Robles-Campos R, Wang X, Sutcliffe RP, Pratschke J, Tang CN, Chong CCN, D'Hondt M, Monden K, Lopez-Ben S, Kingham TP, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Cherqui D, Liang X, Soubrane O, Wakabayashi G, Troisi RI, Han HS, Cheung TT, Sugioka A, Dokmak S, Chen KH, Liu R, Fuks D, Zhang W, Aldrighetti L, Edwin B, Goh BKP. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on short-term outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score matched and coarsened exact matched study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108309. [PMID: 38626588 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the last three decades, minimally invasive liver resection has been replacing conventional open approach in liver surgery. More recently, developments in neoadjuvant chemotherapy have led to increased multidisciplinary management of colorectal liver metastases with both medical and surgical treatment modalities. However, the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive liver resections remains poorly understood. METHODS A multicenter, international, database of 4998 minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases was used to compare surgical outcomes in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone. To correct for baseline imbalance, propensity score matching, coarsened exact matching and inverse probability treatment weighting were performed. RESULTS 2546 patients met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching there were 759 patients in both groups and 383 patients in both groups after coarsened exact matching. Baseline characteristics were equal after both matching strategies. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with statistically significant worse surgical outcomes of minimally invasive minor hepatectomy. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no statistically significant impact on short-term surgical outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tijs J Hoogteijling
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andrew G R Wu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy, Palermo, Italy; Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | - Paulo Herman
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy; Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mikel Gastaca
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, United Hospital of Ancona, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chee Chien Yong
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, China
| | - Mengqiu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center - IRCCS-G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatc-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Alejandro Mejia
- The Liver Institute, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - James O Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chung-Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C N Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery. Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Ho Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Kuo Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Wanguang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center and Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Strand BH, Håberg AK, Eyjólfsdóttir HS, Kok A, Skirbekk V, Huxhold O, Løset GK, Lennartsson C, Schirmer H, Herlofson K, Veenstra M. Spousal bereavement and its effects on later life physical and cognitive capability: the Tromsø study. GeroScience 2024:10.1007/s11357-024-01150-y. [PMID: 38594472 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01150-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Spousal bereavement is associated with health declines and increased mortality risk, but its specific impact on physical and cognitive capabilities is less studied. A historical cohort study design was applied including married Tromsø study participants (N=5739) aged 50-70 years with baseline self-reported overall health and health-related factors and measured capability (grip strength, finger tapping, digit symbol coding, and short-term recall) at follow-up. Participants had data from Tromsø4 (1994-1995) and Tromsø5 (2001), or Tromsø6 (2007-2008) and Tromsø7 (2015-2016). Propensity score matching, adjusted for baseline confounders (and baseline capability in a subset), was used to investigate whether spousal bereavement was associated with poorer subsequent capability. Spousal bereavement occurred for 6.2% on average 3.7 years (SD 2.0) before the capability assessment. There were no significant bereavement effects on subsequent grip strength, immediate recall, or finger-tapping speed. Without adjustment for baseline digit symbol coding test performance, there was a negative significant effect on the digit symbol coding test (ATT -1.33; 95% confidence interval -2.57, -0.10), but when baseline digit symbol coding test performance was taken into account in a smaller subsample, using the same set of matching confounders, there was no longer any association (in the subsample ATT changed from -1.29 (95% CI -3.38, 0.80) to -0.04 (95% CI -1.83, 1.75). The results in our study suggest that spousal bereavement does not have long-term effects on the intrinsic capacity components physical or cognition capability to a notable degree.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bjørn Heine Strand
- Department for Physical Health and Aging, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
- Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Asta K Håberg
- Department for Physical Health and Aging, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Harpa Sif Eyjólfsdóttir
- Aging Research Center (ARC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Almar Kok
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Aging & Later Life Programme, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vegard Skirbekk
- Department for Physical Health and Aging, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Gøril Kvamme Løset
- NOVA - Norwegian Social Research, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Carin Lennartsson
- Aging Research Center (ARC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Schirmer
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Cardiology, Akershus, University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Katharina Herlofson
- NOVA - Norwegian Social Research, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liau MYQ, Toh EQ, Muhamed S, Selvakumar SV, Shelat VG. Can propensity score matching replace randomized controlled trials? World J Methodol 2024; 14:90590. [PMID: 38577204 PMCID: PMC10989411 DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i1.90590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have long been recognized as the gold standard for establishing causal relationships in clinical research. Despite that, various limitations of RCTs prevent its widespread implementation, ranging from the ethicality of withholding potentially-lifesaving treatment from a group to relatively poor external validity due to stringent inclusion criteria, amongst others. However, with the introduction of propensity score matching (PSM) as a retrospective statistical tool, new frontiers in establishing causation in clinical research were opened up. PSM predicts treatment effects using observational data from existing sources such as registries or electronic health records, to create a matched sample of participants who received or did not receive the intervention based on their propensity scores, which takes into account characteristics such as age, gender and comorbidities. Given its retrospective nature and its use of observational data from existing sources, PSM circumvents the aforementioned ethical issues faced by RCTs. Majority of RCTs exclude elderly, pregnant women and young children; thus, evidence of therapy efficacy is rarely proven by robust clinical research for this population. On the other hand, by matching study patient characteristics to that of the population of interest, including the elderly, pregnant women and young children, PSM allows for generalization of results to the wider population and hence greatly increases the external validity. Instead of replacing RCTs with PSM, the synergistic integration of PSM into RCTs stands to provide better research outcomes with both methods complementing each other. For example, in an RCT investigating the impact of mannitol on outcomes among participants of the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial, the baseline characteristics of comorbidities and current medications between treatment and control arms were significantly different despite the randomization protocol. Therefore, PSM was incorporated in its analysis to create samples from the treatment and control arms that were matched in terms of these baseline characteristics, thus providing a fairer comparison for the impact of mannitol. This literature review reports the applications, advantages, and considerations of using PSM with RCTs, illustrating its utility in refining randomization, improving external validity, and accounting for non-compliance to protocol. Future research should consider integrating the use of PSM in RCTs to better generalize outcomes to target populations for clinical practice and thereby benefit a wider range of patients, while maintaining the robustness of randomization offered by RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Yi Quan Liau
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore
| | - En Qi Toh
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore
| | - Shamir Muhamed
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore
| | - Surya Varma Selvakumar
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore
| | - Vishalkumar Girishchandra Shelat
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
- Surgical Science Training Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Toews I, Anglemyer A, Nyirenda JL, Alsaid D, Balduzzi S, Grummich K, Schwingshackl L, Bero L. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 1:MR000034. [PMID: 38174786 PMCID: PMC10765475 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.mr000034.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Researchers and decision-makers often use evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy or effectiveness of a treatment or intervention. Studies with observational designs are often used to measure the effectiveness of an intervention in 'real world' scenarios. Numerous study designs and their modifications (including both randomised and observational designs) are used for comparative effectiveness research in an attempt to give an unbiased estimate of whether one treatment is more effective or safer than another for a particular population. An up-to-date systematic analysis is needed to identify differences in effect estimates from RCTs and observational studies. This updated review summarises the results of methodological reviews that compared the effect estimates of observational studies with RCTs from evidence syntheses that addressed the same health research question. OBJECTIVES To assess and compare synthesised effect estimates by study type, contrasting RCTs with observational studies. To explore factors that might explain differences in synthesised effect estimates from RCTs versus observational studies (e.g. heterogeneity, type of observational study design, type of intervention, and use of propensity score adjustment). To identify gaps in the existing research comparing effect estimates across different study types. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science databases, and Epistemonikos to May 2022. We checked references, conducted citation searches, and contacted review authors to identify additional reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA We included systematic methodological reviews that compared quantitative effect estimates measuring the efficacy or effectiveness of interventions tested in RCTs versus in observational studies. The included reviews compared RCTs to observational studies (including retrospective and prospective cohort, case-control and cross-sectional designs). Reviews were not eligible if they compared RCTs with studies that had used some form of concurrent allocation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Using results from observational studies as the reference group, we examined the relative summary effect estimates (risk ratios (RRs), odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), mean differences (MDs), and standardised mean differences (SMDs)) to evaluate whether there was a relatively larger or smaller effect in the ratio of odds ratios (ROR) or ratio of risk ratios (RRR), ratio of hazard ratios (RHR), and difference in (standardised) mean differences (D(S)MD). If an included review did not provide an estimate comparing results from RCTs with observational studies, we generated one by pooling the estimates for observational studies and RCTs, respectively. Across all reviews, we synthesised these ratios to produce a pooled ratio of ratios comparing effect estimates from RCTs with those from observational studies. In overviews of reviews, we estimated the ROR or RRR for each overview using observational studies as the reference category. We appraised the risk of bias in the included reviews (using nine criteria in total). To receive an overall low risk of bias rating, an included review needed: explicit criteria for study selection, a complete sample of studies, and to have controlled for study methodological differences and study heterogeneity. We assessed reviews/overviews not meeting these four criteria as having an overall high risk of bias. We assessed the certainty of the evidence, consisting of multiple evidence syntheses, with the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 39 systematic reviews and eight overviews of reviews, for a total of 47. Thirty-four of these contributed data to our primary analysis. Based on the available data, we found that the reviews/overviews included 2869 RCTs involving 3,882,115 participants, and 3924 observational studies with 19,499,970 participants. We rated 11 reviews/overviews as having an overall low risk of bias, and 36 as having an unclear or high risk of bias. Our main concerns with the included reviews/overviews were that some did not assess the quality of their included studies, and some failed to account appropriately for differences between study designs - for example, they conducted aggregate analyses of all observational studies rather than separate analyses of cohort and case-control studies. When pooling RORs and RRRs, the ratio of ratios indicated no difference or a very small difference between the effect estimates from RCTs versus from observational studies (ratio of ratios 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.15). We rated the certainty of the evidence as low. Twenty-three of 34 reviews reported effect estimates of RCTs and observational studies that were on average in agreement. In a number of subgroup analyses, small differences in the effect estimates were detected: - pharmaceutical interventions only (ratio of ratios 1.12, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.21); - RCTs and observational studies with substantial or high heterogeneity; that is, I2 ≥ 50% (ratio of ratios 1.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.18); - no use (ratio of ratios 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11) or unclear use (ratio of ratios 1.13, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.25) of propensity score adjustment in observational studies; and - observational studies without further specification of the study design (ratio of ratios 1.06, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.18). We detected no clear difference in other subgroup analyses. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found no difference or a very small difference between effect estimates from RCTs and observational studies. These findings are largely consistent with findings from recently published research. Factors other than study design need to be considered when exploring reasons for a lack of agreement between results of RCTs and observational studies, such as differences in the population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes investigated in the respective studies. Our results underscore that it is important for review authors to consider not only study design, but the level of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of RCTs or observational studies. A better understanding is needed of how these factors might yield estimates reflective of true effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Toews
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andrew Anglemyer
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - John Lz Nyirenda
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dima Alsaid
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sara Balduzzi
- Biometrics Department, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Kathrin Grummich
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Schwingshackl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Bero
- Charles Perkins Centre and School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghotbi J, Aghayan D, Fretland Å, Edwin B, Syn NL, Cipriani F, Alzoubi M, Lim C, Scatton O, Long TCD, Herman P, Coelho FF, Marino MV, Mazzaferro V, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Choi SH, Lee JH, Prieto M, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Yong CC, Yin M, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Morise Z, Di Benedetto F, Brustia R, Dalla Valle R, Boggi U, Geller D, Belli A, Memeo R, Mejia A, Park JO, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Robles-Campos R, Wang X, Sutcliffe RP, Pratschke J, Tang CN, Chong CCN, D'Hondt M, Monden K, Lopez-Ben S, Kingham TP, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Levi Sandri GB, Pascual F, Cherqui D, Liang X, Mazzotta A, Wakabayashi G, Giglio M, Troisi RI, Han HS, Cheung TT, Sugioka A, Chen KH, Liu R, Soubrane O, Fuks D, Aldrighetti L, Abu Hilal M, Goh BKP. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the difficulty and outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic major liver resections for colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score and coarsened exact-matched controlled study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1209-1216. [PMID: 36774216 PMCID: PMC10809954 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimal invasive liver resections are a safe alternative to open surgery. Different scoring systems considering different risks factors have been developed to predict the risks associated with these procedures, especially challenging major liver resections (MLR). However, the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) on the difficulty of minimally invasive MLRs remains poorly investigated. METHODS Patients who underwent laparoscopic and robotic MLRs for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) performed across 57 centers between January 2005 to December 2021 were included in this analysis. Patients who did or did not receive NAT were matched based on 1:1 coarsened exact and 1:2 propensity-score matching. Pre- and post-matching comparisons were performed. RESULTS In total, the data of 5189 patients were reviewed. Of these, 1411 procedures were performed for CRLM, and 1061 cases met the inclusion criteria. After excluding 27 cases with missing data on NAT, 1034 patients (NAT: n = 641; non-NAT: n = 393) were included. Before matching, baseline characteristics were vastly different. Before matching, the morbidity rate was significantly higher in the NAT-group (33.2% vs. 27.2%, p-value = 0.043). No significant differences were seen in perioperative outcomes after the coarsened exact matching. After the propensity-score matching, statistically significant higher blood loss (mean, 300 (SD 128-596) vs. 250 (SD 100-400) ml, p-value = 0.047) but shorter hospital stay (mean, 6 [4-8] vs. 6 [5-9] days, p-value = 0.043) were found in the NAT-group. CONCLUSION The current study demonstrated that NAT had minimal impact on the difficulty and outcomes of minimally-invasive MLR for CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Ghotbi
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Davit Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Åsmund Fretland
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Nicholas L Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and Ministry of Health Holdings, Singapore
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Paulo Herman
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy; Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Sung-Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mikel Prieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, United Hospital of Ancona, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chee-Chien Yong
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Mengqiu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center - IRCCS-G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatc-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Alejandro Mejia
- The Liver Institute, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - James O Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gi-Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chung-Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C N Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery. Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Franco Pascual
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Alessandro Mazzotta
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Mariano Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom and Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zlotta AR, Ballas LK, Niemierko A, Lajkosz K, Kuk C, Miranda G, Drumm M, Mari A, Thio E, Fleshner NE, Kulkarni GS, Jewett MAS, Bristow RG, Catton C, Berlin A, Sridhar SS, Schuckman A, Feldman AS, Wszolek M, Dahl DM, Lee RJ, Saylor PJ, Michaelson MD, Miyamoto DT, Zietman A, Shipley W, Chung P, Daneshmand S, Efstathiou JA. Radical cystectomy versus trimodality therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a multi-institutional propensity score matched and weighted analysis. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:669-681. [PMID: 37187202 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00170-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous randomised controlled trials comparing bladder preservation with radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer closed due to insufficient accrual. Given that no further trials are foreseen, we aimed to use propensity scores to compare trimodality therapy (maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumour followed by concurrent chemoradiation) with radical cystectomy. METHODS This retrospective analysis included 722 patients with clinical stage T2-T4N0M0 muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (440 underwent radical cystectomy, 282 received trimodality therapy) who would have been eligible for both approaches, treated at three university centres in the USA and Canada between Jan 1, 2005, and Dec 31, 2017. All patients had solitary tumours less than 7 cm, no or unilateral hydronephrosis, and no extensive or multifocal carcinoma in situ. The 440 cases of radical cystectomy represent 29% of all radical cystectomies performed during the study period at the contributing institutions. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival. Differences in survival outcomes by treatment were analysed using propensity scores incorporated in propensity score matching (PSM) using logistic regression and 3:1 matching with replacement and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW). FINDINGS In the PSM analysis, the 3:1 matched cohort comprised 1119 patients (837 radical cystectomy, 282 trimodality therapy). After matching, age (71·4 years [IQR 66·0-77·1] for radical cystectomy vs 71·6 years [64·0-78·9] for trimodality therapy), sex (213 [25%] vs 68 [24%] female; 624 [75%] vs 214 [76%] male), cT2 stage (755 [90%] vs 255 [90%]), presence of hydronephrosis (97 [12%] vs 27 [10%]), and receipt of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (492 [59%] vs 159 [56%]) were similar between groups. Median follow-up was 4·38 years (IQR 1·6-6·7) versus 4·88 years (2·8-7·7), respectively. 5-year metastasis-free survival was 74% (95% CI 70-78) for radical cystectomy and 75% (70-80) for trimodality therapy with IPTW and 74% (70-77) and 74% (68-79) with PSM. There was no difference in metastasis-free survival either with IPTW (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0·89 [95% CI 0·67-1·20]; p=0·40) or PSM (SHR 0·93 [0·71-1·24]; p=0·64). 5-year cancer-specific survival for radical cystectomy versus trimodality therapy was 81% (95% CI 77-85) versus 84% (79-89) with IPTW and 83% (80-86) versus 85% (80-89) with PSM. 5-year disease-free survival was 73% (95% CI 69-77) versus 74% (69-79) with IPTW and 76% (72-80) versus 76% (71-81) with PSM. There were no differences in cancer-specific survival (IPTW: SHR 0·72 [95% CI 0·50-1·04]; p=0·071; PSM: SHR 0·73 [0·52-1·02]; p=0·057) and disease-free survival (IPTW: SHR 0·87 [0·65-1·16]; p=0·35; PSM: SHR 0·88 [0·67-1·16]; p=0·37) between radical cystectomy and trimodality therapy. Overall survival favoured trimodality therapy (IPTW: 66% [95% CI 61-71] vs 73% [68-78]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·53-0·92]; p=0·010; PSM: 72% [69-75] vs 77% [72-81]; HR 0·75 [0·58-0·97]; p=0·0078). Outcomes for radical cystectomy and trimodality therapy were not statistically different among centres for cancer-specific survival and metastasis-free survival (p=0·22-0·90). Salvage cystectomy was done in 38 (13%) trimodality therapy patients. Pathological stage in the 440 radical cystectomy patients was pT2 in 124 (28%), pT3-4 in 194 (44%), and 114 (26%) node positive. The median number of nodes removed was 39, the soft tissue positive margin rate was 1% (n=5), and the perioperative mortality rate was 2·5% (n=11). INTERPRETATION This multi-institutional study provides the best evidence to date showing similar oncological outcomes between radical cystectomy and trimodality therapy for select patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These results support that trimodality therapy, in the setting of multidisciplinary shared decision making, should be offered to all suitable candidates with muscle-invasive bladder cancer and not only to patients with significant comorbidities for whom surgery is not an option. FUNDING Sinai Health Foundation, Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre R Zlotta
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Leslie K Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katherine Lajkosz
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cynthia Kuk
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gus Miranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael Drumm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Ethan Thio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Neil E Fleshner
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert G Bristow
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Charles Catton
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anne Schuckman
- Aresty Department of Urology, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Adam S Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Wszolek
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Douglas M Dahl
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard J Lee
- MGH Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Philip J Saylor
- MGH Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Dror Michaelson
- MGH Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David T Miyamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anthony Zietman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William Shipley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Aresty Department of Urology, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guo G, Sun M, Li Y, Yang W, Wang X, Yu Z, Li C, Hui Y, Fan X, Jiang K, Sun C. Serum Ferritin Has Limited Prognostic Value on Mortality Risk in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Lab Med 2023; 54:47-55. [PMID: 35960775 DOI: 10.1093/labmed/lmac064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The prognostic value of serum ferritin remains elusive in the literature. We aimed to examine the association between serum ferritin and mortality risk in cirrhosis. METHODS A total of 257 cirrhotic patients were recruited. The cut-off of serum ferritin was determined by X-tile. The Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier method were used. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to diminish the impacts of selection bias and possible confounders. RESULTS The difference regarding mortality was mostly significant for serum ferritin >158 ng/mL. Before PSM, serum ferritin >158 ng/mL was an independent predictor of mortality. However, the clinical relevance of high ferritin level for prognostication was blunted after PSM (survival rate: 86.8% vs 96.3%, P = .078). Cox regression indicated that model for end-stage liver disease remains only independent risk factor of 180-day mortality after PSM. CONCLUSION Serum ferritin may not serve as an independent prognostic indicator of mortality risk in decompensated cirrhotic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaoyue Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Mingyu Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yifan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Wanting Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaoyu Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zihan Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Chaoqun Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Department of Internal Medicine, Tianjin Hexi Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yangyang Hui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaofei Fan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Kui Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Chao Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Tianjin Institute of Digestive Disease, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Willems E, D'Hondt M, Kingham TP, Fuks D, Choi GH, Syn NL, Sucandy I, Marino MV, Prieto M, Chong CC, Lee JH, Efanov M, Chiow AKH, Choi SH, Sutcliffe RP, Troisi RI, Pratschke J, Cheung TT, Wang X, Tang CN, Liu R, Han HS, Goh BKP. Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Right Anterior and Right Posterior Sectionectomy vs Right Hepatectomy: An International Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched and Coarsened-Exact-Matched Analysis of 1,100 Patients. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 235:859-868. [PMID: 36102506 PMCID: PMC9720542 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of minimally invasive right anterior and right posterior sectionectomy (MI-RAS/MI-RPS) for right-sided liver lesions remains debatable. Although technically more demanding, these procedures might result in faster recovery and lower postoperative morbidity compared with minimally invasive right hemihepatectomy. STUDY DESIGN This is an international multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,114 patients undergoing minimally invasive right hemihepatectomy, MI-RAS, and MI-RPS at 21 centers between 2006 and 2019. Minimally invasive surgery included pure laparoscopic, robotic, hand-assisted, or a hybrid approach. A propensity-matched and coarsened-exact-matched analysis was performed. RESULTS A total of 1,100 cases met study criteria, of whom 759 underwent laparoscopic, 283 robotic, 11 hand-assisted, and 47 laparoscopic-assisted (hybrid) surgery. There were 632 right hemihepatectomies, 373 right posterior sectionectomies, and 95 right anterior sectionectomies. There were no differences in baseline characteristics after matching. In the MI-RAS/MI-RPS group, median blood loss was higher (400 vs 300 mL, p = 0.001) as well as intraoperative blood transfusion rate (19.6% vs 10.7%, p = 0.004). However, the overall morbidity rate was lower including major morbidity (7.1% vs 14.3%, p = 0.007) and reoperation rate (1.4% vs 4.6%, p = 0.029). The rate of close/involved margins was higher in the MI-RAS/MI-RPS group (23.4% vs 8.9%, p < 0.001). These findings were consistent after both propensity and coarsened-exact matching. CONCLUSIONS Although technically more demanding, MI-RAS/MI-RPS is a valuable alternative for minimally invasive right hemihepatectomy in right-sided liver lesions with lower postoperative morbidity, possibly due to the preservation of parenchyma. However, the rate of close/involved margins is higher in these procedures. These findings might guide surgeons in preoperative counselling and in selecting the appropriate procedure for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Willems
- From the Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium (Willems, D'Hondt)
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- From the Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium (Willems, D'Hondt)
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (Kingham)
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France (Fuks)
| | - Gi-Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Choi)
| | - Nicholas L Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore (Syn)
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (Syn)
| | - Marco V Marino
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL (Sucandy)
| | - Mikel Prieto
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy (Marino)
| | - Charing C Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Chong)
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Lee)
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia (Efanov)
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore (Chiow)
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea (Choi)
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom (Sutcliffe)
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy (Troisi)
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin (Pratschke)
- Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany (Pratschke)
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Cheung)
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (Wang)
| | - Chung-Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China (Tang)
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China (Liu)
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Han)
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore (Goh)
- Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore (Goh)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
D’Silva M, Han HS, Liu R, Kingham TP, Choi GH, Syn NLX, Prieto M, Choi SH, Sucandy I, Chiow AKH, Marino MV, Efanov M, Lee JH, Sutcliffe RP, Chong CCN, Tang CN, Cheung TT, Pratschke J, Wang X, Park JO, Chan CY, Scatton O, Rotellar F, Troisi RI, D’Hondt M, Fuks D, Goh BKP, Gastaca M, Schotte H, De Meyere C, Lai EC, Krenzien F, Schmelzle M, Kadam P, Giglio M, Montalti R, Liu Q, Lee KF, Lee LS, Jang JY, Lim C, Labadie KP. Limited liver resections in the posterosuperior segments: international multicentre propensity score-matched and coarsened exact-matched analysis comparing the laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1140-1149. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Limited liver resections (LLRs) for tumours located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver are technically demanding procedures. This study compared outcomes of robotic (R) and laparoscopic (L) LLR for tumours located in the posterosuperior liver segments (IV, VII, and VIII).
Methods
This was an international multicentre retrospective analysis of patients who underwent R-LLR or L-LLR at 24 centres between 2010 and 2019. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were analysed; 1 : 3 propensity score matching (PSM) and 1 : 1 coarsened exact matching (CEM) were performed.
Results
Of 1566 patients undergoing R-LLR and L-LLR, 983 met the study inclusion criteria. Before matching, 159 R-LLRs and 824 L-LLRs were included. After 1 : 3 PSM of 127 R-LLRs and 381 L-LLRs, comparison of perioperative outcomes showed that median blood loss (100 (i.q.r. 40–200) versus 200 (100–500) ml; P = 0.003), blood loss of at least 500 ml (9 (7.4 per cent) versus 94 (27.6 per cent); P < 0.001), intraoperative blood transfusion rate (4 (3.1 per cent) versus 38 (10.0 per cent); P = 0.025), rate of conversion to open surgery (1 (0.8 per cent) versus 30 (7.9 per cent); P = 0.022), median duration of Pringle manoeuvre when applied (30 (20–46) versus 40 (25–58) min; P = 0.012), and median duration of operation (175 (130–255) versus 224 (155–300); P < 0.001) were lower in the R-LLR group compared with the L-LLR group. After 1 : 1 CEM of 104 R-LLRs with 104 L-LLRs, R-LLR was similarly associated with significantly reduced blood loss and a lower rate of conversion to open surgery.
Conclusion
Based on a matched analysis of well selected patients, both robotic and laparoscopic access could be undertaken safely with good outcomes for tumours in the posterosuperior liver segments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizelle D’Silva
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul , Korea
| | - Ho Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul , Korea
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery , First Medical Centre of Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing , China
| | - Thomas Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York , USA
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine , Seoul , Korea
| | - Nicholas Li Xun Syn
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore , Singapore
| | - Mikel Prieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country , Bilbao , Spain
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Centre, CHA University School of Medicine , Seongnam , Korea
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute , Tampa, Florida , USA
| | - Adrian Kah Heng Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital , Singapore
| | - Marco Vito Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy and Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital , Palermo , Italy
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Centre , Moscow , Russia
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine , Seoul , Korea
| | - Robert Peter Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham , UK
| | - Charing Ching Ning Chong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong , New Territories Hong Kong , China
| | - Chung Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital , Hong Kong , China
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong , China
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health , Berlin , Germany
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University , Shanghai , China
| | - James Oh Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle , Washington , USA
| | - Chung Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-National University Singapore Medical School , Singapore
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary–Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Pitie-Salpetriere, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université , Paris , France
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra and Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA) , Pamplona , Spain
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples , Naples , Italy
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital , Kortrijk , Belgium
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes , Paris , France
| | - Brian Kim Poh Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-National University Singapore Medical School , Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bröckelmann N, Balduzzi S, Harms L, Beyerbach J, Petropoulou M, Kubiak C, Wolkewitz M, Meerpohl JJ, Schwingshackl L. Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in medical research: a meta-epidemiological study. BMC Med 2022; 20:174. [PMID: 35538478 PMCID: PMC9092682 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02369-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies are the most common study design types used to assess the treatment effects of medical interventions. To evaluate the agreement of effect estimates between bodies of evidence (BoE) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies and to identify factors associated with disagreement. METHODS Systematic reviews were published in the 13 medical journals with the highest impact factor identified through a MEDLINE search. BoE-pairs from RCTs and cohort studies with the same medical research question were included. We rated the similarity of PI/ECO (Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparison, Outcome) between BoE from RCTs and cohort studies. The agreement of effect estimates across BoE was analyzed by pooling ratio of ratios (RoR) for binary outcomes and difference of mean differences for continuous outcomes. We performed subgroup analyses to explore factors associated with disagreements. RESULTS One hundred twenty-nine BoE pairs from 64 systematic reviews were included. PI/ECO-similarity degree was moderate: two BoE pairs were rated as "more or less identical"; 90 were rated as "similar but not identical" and 37 as only "broadly similar". For binary outcomes, the pooled RoR was 1.04 (95% CI 0.97-1.11) with considerable statistical heterogeneity. For continuous outcomes, differences were small. In subgroup analyses, degree of PI/ECO-similarity, type of intervention, and type of outcome, the pooled RoR indicated that on average, differences between both BoE were small. Subgroup analysis by degree of PI/ECO-similarity revealed high statistical heterogeneity and wide prediction intervals across PI/ECO-dissimilar BoE pairs. CONCLUSIONS On average, the pooled effect estimates between RCTs and cohort studies did not differ. Statistical heterogeneity and wide prediction intervals were mainly driven by PI/ECO-dissimilarities (i.e., clinical heterogeneity) and cohort studies. The potential influence of risk of bias and certainty of the evidence on differences of effect estimates between RCTs and cohort studies needs to be explored in upcoming meta-epidemiological studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Bröckelmann
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 86, 79110, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sara Balduzzi
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Louisa Harms
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 86, 79110, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jessica Beyerbach
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 86, 79110, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria Petropoulou
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Charlotte Kubiak
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 86, 79110, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Wolkewitz
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 86, 79110, Freiburg, Germany
- Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Schwingshackl
- Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Straße 86, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee KS, Zhang JJY, Nga VDW, Ng CH, Tai BC, Higgins JPT, Syn NL. Tenets for the Proper Conduct and Use of Meta-Analyses: A Practical Guide for Neurosurgeons. World Neurosurg 2022; 161:291-302.e1. [PMID: 35505547 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Neurosurgeons today are inundated with rapidly amassing neurosurgical research publications. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have consequently surged in popularity because, when executed properly, they constitute a high level of evidence and may save busy neurosurgeons many hours of combing and reviewing the literature for relevant articles. Meta-analysis refers to the quantitative (and discretionary) component of systematic reviews. It involves applying statistical techniques to combine effect sizes from multiple studies, which might offer more actionable insights than a systematic review without meta-analysis. Well-executed meta-analyses may prove instructive for clinical practice, but poorly conducted ones sow confusion and have the potential to cause harm. Unfortunately, recent audits have found the conduct and reporting of meta-analyses in neurosurgery (but also other surgical disciplines) to be relatively lackluster in methodologic rigor and compliance to established guidelines. Some of these deficiencies can be easily remedied through better awareness and adherence to prescribed standards-which will be reviewed in this article-but others stem from inherent problems with the source data (e.g., poor reporting of original research) as well as unique constraints faced by surgery as a field (e.g., lack of equipoise for randomized trials, or existence of learning curves for novel surgical procedures, which can lead to temporal heterogeneity), which may require unconventional tools (e.g., cumulative meta-analysis) to address. Therefore, it is also our goal to take stock of the unique issues encountered by surgeons who do meta-analysis and to highlight various techniques-some of which less well-known-to address such challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keng Siang Lee
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - John J Y Zhang
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vincent Diong Weng Nga
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bee Choo Tai
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Biostatistics and Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Julian P T Higgins
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas L Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Biostatistics and Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in oldest-old patients: a propensity score matched analysis of a nationwide registry. Updates Surg 2022; 74:979-989. [DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01254-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
|
14
|
Whitten T, Cale J, Nathan S, Bista S, Ferry M, Williams M, Rawstorne P, Hayen A. Hospitalisation following therapeutic community drug and alcohol treatment for young people with and without a history of criminal conviction. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 231:109280. [PMID: 35030508 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study examines the association between treatment in a therapeutic community for adolescents with drug and alcohol problems on hospitalisation outcomes up to 15 years later for all clients, and separately for those with and without a history of criminal conviction. METHOD A quasi-experimental design was used to examine the linked administrative health and criminal justice records for all adolescents admitted to the Program for Adolescent Life Management (PALM) from January 2001 to December 2016 (n = 3059) in Sydney, Australia. ICD-10AM codes were used to designate hospitalisation outcomes as either physical injury, mental health problems, substance use disorders, or organic illness. The treatment and comparison groups were matched on factors associated with program retention, resulting in a final sample of 1266 clients. We examined the rate of hospitalisation up to 15 years posttreatment for all clients and stratified by prior conviction status using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS The treatment group had significantly lower rates of hospitalisation for a physical injury (HR = 0.77 [95% CI = 0.61-0.98]), mental health problem (HR = 0.62 [95% CI = 0.47-0.81]), substance use disorder (HR = 0.59 [95% CI = 0.47-0.75]), and organic illness (HR = 0.71 [95% CI = 0.55-0.92]). There was a significant interaction between treatment and prior criminal conviction status on rate of hospitalisation for physical injury, suggesting that the effect of treatment on physical injury was significantly greater for clients with a prior criminal conviction. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents who engage in a therapeutic community treatment program may have a long-lasting reduction in the risk of subsequent hospitalisation. This also appears to apply to those with a history of criminal conviction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyson Whitten
- School of Social Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Jesse Cale
- School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sally Nathan
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarita Bista
- School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Ferry
- Ted Noffs Foundation, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan Williams
- School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patrick Rawstorne
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Hayen
- School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Freedman SB, Kuppermann N, Funk AL, Kim K, Xie J, Tancredi D, Dalziel SR, Neuman MI, Mintegi S, Plint AC, Gómez-Vargas J, Finkelstein Y, Ambroggio L, Klassen TP, Salvadori M, Malley R, Payne DC, Florin TA. Corticosteroids and Other Treatments Administered to Children Tested for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Emergency Departments. Acad Pediatr 2022; 22:1200-1211. [PMID: 35462066 PMCID: PMC9023083 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to determine if corticosteroid administration is associated with a SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test-positive result and to describe therapies administered to SARS-CoV-2 infected children. METHODS We collected cross-sectional data from participants recruited in 41 pediatric emergency departments (ED) in 10 countries between March 2020 and June 2021. Participants were <18 years old, had signs or symptoms of, or risk factors for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, and had nucleic acid testing performed. To determine if SARS-CoV-2 test status was independently associated with corticosteroid administration, we used a multivariable conditional logistic regression model matched by study site to compare treatments administered based on SARS-CoV-2 test and disposition status. This analysis was repeated for the subgroup of study participants who were hospitalized. RESULTS 30.3% (3,121/10,315) of participants were SARS-CoV-2-positive. Although remdesivir was more commonly administered to SARS-CoV-2-positive children, use was infrequent (25/3120 [0.8%] vs 1/7188 [0.01%]; P = .001). Corticosteroid use was less common among SARS-CoV-2-positive children (219/3120 [7.0%] vs 759/7190 [10.6%]; P < .001). Among hospitalized children, there were no differences in provision of inotropes, respiratory support, chest drainage or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between groups. Corticosteroid administration was associated with age, history of asthma, wheezing, study month, hospitalization and intensive care unit admission; it was not associated with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result overall (aOR: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.74, 1.12) or among the subgroup of those hospitalized (aOR: 1.04; 95%CI: 0.75, 1.44). CONCLUSIONS Few disease-specific treatments are provided to SARS-CoV-2-positive children; clinical trials evaluating therapies in children are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B. Freedman
- Divisions of Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Gastroenterology, Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine (SB Freedman), University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada,Address correspondence to Stephen Freedman MDCM, MSc, Alberta Children's Hospital Foundation Professor in Child Health and Wellness, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Nathan Kuppermann
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics (N Kuppermann), University of California (UC), Davis School of Medicine, and UC Davis Health, Sacramento, Calif
| | - Anna L. Funk
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine (AL Funk, K Kim, and J Xie), University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Kelly Kim
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine (AL Funk, K Kim, and J Xie), University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Jianling Xie
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine (AL Funk, K Kim, and J Xie), University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Daniel Tancredi
- Department of Pediatrics (D Tancredi), UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, Calif
| | - Stuart R. Dalziel
- Departments of Surgery and Paediatrics, Child and Youth Health, The University of Auckland and Children's Emergency Department (SR Dalziel), Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Mark I. Neuman
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics (MI Neuman), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Santiago Mintegi
- Pediatric Emergency Department (S Mintegi), Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Cruces, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Amy C. Plint
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine (AC Plint), University of Ottawa and Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jessica Gómez-Vargas
- Emergency Department (J Gómez-Vargas), Hospital Nacional de Niños Dr. Carlos Sáenz Herrera, CCSS, San José, Costa Rica
| | - Yaron Finkelstein
- Divisions of Emergency Medicine, and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Pediatrics (Y Finkelstein), Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lilliam Ambroggio
- Sections of Emergency Medicine and Hospital Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics (L Ambroggio), University of Colorado, Denver, Colo
| | - Terry P. Klassen
- Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba and Department of Pediatrics and Child Health (TP Klassen), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Marina Salvadori
- Public Health Agency of Canada, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics McGill University (M Salvadori), Montreal, Canada
| | - Richard Malley
- Division of Infectious Diseases (R Malley), Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Daniel C. Payne
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (DC Payne), Atlanta, United States
| | - Todd A. Florin
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Department of Pediatrics (TA Florin), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill,Address correspondence to Todd Florin MD, MSCE, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 225 E. Chicago Ave, Chicago, Il 60611
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Di Martino M, Primavesi F, Syn N, Dorcaratto D, de la Hoz Rodríguez Á, Dupré A, Piardi T, Rhaiem R, Blanco Fernández G, Prada Villaverde A, Rodríguez Sanjuán JC, Fernández Santiago R, Fernández-Moreno MC, Ferret G, López Ben S, Suárez Muñoz MÁ, Perez-Alonso AJ, Koh YX, Jones R, Martín-Pérez E. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable colorectal liver metastases: an international multicentre propensity score matched analysis on long-term outcomes according to established prognostic risk scores. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1873-1885. [PMID: 34103246 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still uncertainty regarding the role of perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), especially in those with a low-risk of recurrence. METHODS Multicentre retrospective analysis of patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection between 2010-2015. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received perioperative CTx or not and were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Then, they were stratified according to prognostic risk scores, including: Clinical Risk Score (CRS), Tumour Burden Score (TBS) and Genetic And Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score. RESULTS The study included 967 patients with a median follow-up of 68 months. After PSM analysis, patients with perioperative CTx presented prolonged overall survival (OS) in comparison with the surgery alone group (82.8 vs 52.5 months, p = 0.017). On multivariable analysis perioperative CTx was an independent predictor of increased OS (HR 0.705, 95%CI 0.705-0.516, p = 0.029). The benefits of perioperative CTx on survival were confirmed in patients with CRS and TBS scores ≤2 (p = 0.022 and p = 0.020, respectively) and in patients with a GAME score ≤1 (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION Perioperative CTx demonstrated an increase in OS in patients with CRLM. Patients with a low-risk of recurrence seem to benefit from systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Di Martino
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Dimitri Dorcaratto
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ángela de la Hoz Rodríguez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurélien Dupré
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France; Department of Surgery, HPB Unit, Simone Veil Hospital, Troyes, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Department of HBP and Digestive Oncological Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Gerardo Blanco Fernández
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Badajoz, INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura), University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Arancha Prada Villaverde
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Badajoz, INUBE (Instituto Universitario de Investigación Biosanitaria de Extremadura), University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
| | | | | | - María-Carmen Fernández-Moreno
- Department of Surgery, Liver, Biliary, and Pancreatic Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clínico University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Georgina Ferret
- Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | | | | - Alejandro J Perez-Alonso
- Unidad de Cirugia HBP y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Robert Jones
- Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Martín-Pérez
- HPB Unit, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hwang IY, Park J, Park SS, Yang J, Kang MS. Injury Characteristics and Predisposing Effects of Various Outdoor Traumatic Situations in Children and Adolescents. Clin Orthop Surg 2021; 13:423-435. [PMID: 34484636 PMCID: PMC8380528 DOI: 10.4055/cios20242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgroud Many studies have reported injury characteristics of individual traumatic situations. However, a comparative analysis of specific risks is meaningful to better understand injury characteristics and help establish injury-prevention measures. This study was conducted to investigate and compare injury characteristics in children and adolescents by various outdoor traumatic situations. Methods Outdoor traumatic situations were determined and classified into physical activity-related injury (n = 3,983) and pedestrian (n = 784) and passenger (n = 1,757) injuries in traffic accidents. Home injury (n = 16,121) was used as the control group. Then, the characteristics of each outdoor trauma were compared with 1:1 matched indoor trauma (among home injuries); each outdoor traumatic situation's predisposing risk for the injured body part, injury type, and injury severity were analyzed; and changes by age of frequency ranking among physical activity-related injuries were investigated. Results Outdoor trauma showed higher risks for limb injuries (injured body part), fracture and muscle/tendon injuries (injury type), and severe injuries (severity) than indoor trauma. Various outdoor traumatic situations presented different predisposing effects on injury characteristics. Among physical activity-related injuries, bicycle injury was commonest across all ages, and playing activities were common causes for injury for individuals of age < 9 years, whereas sports activities overwhelmed the common causes thereafter. Conclusions The findings would help to better understand the specific injury risk of various outdoor traumatic situations and may potentially facilitate the establishment of more effective injury-prevention measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Il-Yeong Hwang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Jinhee Park
- College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo-Sung Park
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinseok Yang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Michael Seungcheol Kang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Takaori A, Ikeura T, Hori Y, Ito T, Nakamaru K, Masuda M, Mitsuyama T, Miyoshi H, Shimatani M, Takaoka M, Okazaki K, Naganuma M. Rectally Administered Low-Dose Diclofenac Has No Effect on Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Propensity Score Analysis. Pancreas 2021; 50:1024-1029. [PMID: 34629455 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated the preventive effect of low-dose diclofenac (25-50 mg) on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) by propensity score matching analysis. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of 515 patients who underwent ERCP for the first time with or without the rectal administration of low-dose diclofenac before the procedure. For the purpose of minimization of the intrinsic selection bias, we compared the incidence rate of PEP between the diclofenac and control group after propensity score matching. RESULTS Post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 15 patients (2.9%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of PEP between the diclofenac (2.4%) and control group (3.3%) (P = 0.608). One hundred ninety matched pairs were generated by propensity score matching and analyzed; however, the incidence rate of PEP was the same in both groups (2.1%, P = 1.000). In the subgroup analysis using data of patients with high-risk factors for developing PEP, the incidence rate of PEP was comparable between the diclofenac (3.8%) and control groups (4.0%) (P = 0.917). CONCLUSIONS In our propensity score analysis, rectal administration of low-dose diclofenac was not shown to be useful in preventing PEP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayaka Takaori
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Tsukasa Ikeura
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Yuichi Hori
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Takashi Ito
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Koh Nakamaru
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Masataka Masuda
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | | | - Hideaki Miyoshi
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Masaaki Shimatani
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | - Makoto Takaoka
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| | | | - Makoto Naganuma
- From the Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Flikweert ER, Wendt KW, Diercks RL, Izaks GJ, Stewart R, Stevens M, Reininga IHF. A comprehensive multidisciplinary care pathway for hip fractures better outcome than usual care? Injury 2021; 52:1819-1825. [PMID: 33947587 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hip fracture surgery is among the most performed surgical procedures in elderly patients. Mortality rates are high, however, and patients often fail to live independently following a hip fracture. To improve outcome, multidisciplinary care pathways have been initiated, but longer-term results are lacking. Aim of this study was to compare functional outcome and living situation six months after hip fracture treatment with and without a care pathway. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multicentre prospective controlled trial was conducted with three hospitals: in one hospital patients were treated with a care pathway, in the other hospitals patients received usual care. All patients aged ≥ 60 years with a hip fracture were asked to participate. Besides basic characteristics, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) and performance scores of activities of daily living (Katz Index and Lawton IADL) were assessed. Differences in scores were analysed using linear regression. Propensity score adjustment was used to correct for differences between the care pathway and the usual care group. Missing data were imputed. RESULTS No differences in rate of return to prefracture ADL level were found between patients in the care pathway group and the usual care group. The percentage of participants in the same situation as before the fracture was the same in both treatment groups (81%). There were no significant differences in quality of life, activities of daily living or mortality (15% vs 10%, p = 0.17), but hospital stay in the care pathway group was significantly shorter (median 7 vs 10 days). DISCUSSION Treatment of elderly patients with a hip fracture is commonly organised in care pathways. Although short-term advantages are reported, positive effects on longer-term functional results could not be proven in our study. This study confirmed a shorter hospital stay in the care pathway group, which potentially may lead to a reduction in costs. CONCLUSIONS Functional outcome and living situation six months after a hip fracture is the same for patients treated with or without a care pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvira R Flikweert
- Department of Surgery-Traumatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 300019700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Klaus W Wendt
- Department of Surgery-Traumatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 300019700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald L Diercks
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 300019700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerbrand J Izaks
- University Center for Geriatric Medicine University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 300019700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roy Stewart
- Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 300019700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Stevens
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 300019700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Inge H F Reininga
- Department of Surgery-Traumatology University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 300019700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Goh BKP, Syn N, Koh YX, Teo JY, Cheow PC, Jeyaraj PR, Chow PKH, Ooi LLPJ, Chung AYF, Chan CY. Comparison between short and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open primary liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: A 1:1 matched analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:560-571. [PMID: 34061361 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) versus open liver resection (OLR) for nonrecurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Review of 204 MILR and 755 OLR without previous LR performed between 2005 and 2018. 1:1 coarsened exact matching (CEM) and 1:1 propensity-score matching (PSM) were performed. RESULTS Overall, 190 MILR were well-matched with 190 OLR by PSM and 86 MILR with 86 OLR by CEM according to patient baseline characteristics. After PSM and CEM, MILR was associated with a significantly longer operation time [230 min (interquartile range [IQR], 145-330) vs. 160 min (IQR, 125-210), p < .001] [215 min (IQR, 135-295) vs. 153.5 min (120-180), p < .001], shorter postoperative stay [4 days (IQR, 3-6) vs. 6 days (IQR, 5-8), p = .001)] [4 days (IQR, 3-5) vs. 6 days (IQR, 5-7), p = .004] and lower postoperative morbidity [40 (21%) vs. 67 (35.5%), p = .003] [16 (18.6%) vs. 27 (31.4%), p = .036] compared to OLR. MILR was also associated with a significantly longer median time to recurrence (70 vs. 40.3 months, p = .014) compared to OLR after PSM but not CEM. There was no significant difference in terms of overall survival and recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION MILR is associated with superior short-term postoperative outcomes and with at least equivalent long-term oncological outcomes compared to OLR for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Peng-Chung Cheow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Prema R Jeyaraj
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Pierce K H Chow
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - London L P J Ooi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y F Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Liver Transplant Center, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Amoah J, Stuart EA, Cosgrove SE, Harris AD, Han JH, Lautenbach E, Tamma PD. Comparing Propensity Score Methods Versus Traditional Regression Analysis for the Evaluation of Observational Data: A Case Study Evaluating the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 71:e497-e505. [PMID: 32069360 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Propensity score methods are increasingly being used in the infectious diseases literature to estimate causal effects from observational data. However, there remains a general gap in understanding among clinicians on how to critically review observational studies that have incorporated these analytic techniques. METHODS Using a cohort of 4967 unique patients with Enterobacterales bloodstream infections, we sought to answer the question "Does transitioning patients with gram-negative bloodstream infections from intravenous to oral therapy impact 30-day mortality?" We conducted separate analyses using traditional multivariable logistic regression, propensity score matching, propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting, and propensity score stratification using this clinical question as a case study to guide the reader through (1) the pros and cons of each approach, (2) the general steps of each approach, and (3) the interpretation of the results of each approach. RESULTS 2161 patients met eligibility criteria with 876 (41%) transitioned to oral therapy while 1285 (59%) remained on intravenous therapy. After repeating the analysis using the 4 aforementioned methods, we found that the odds ratios were broadly similar, ranging from 0.84-0.95. However, there were some relevant differences between the interpretations of the findings of each approach. CONCLUSIONS Propensity score analysis is overall a more favorable approach than traditional regression analysis when estimating causal effects using observational data. However, as with all analytic methods using observational data, residual confounding will remain; only variables that are measured can be accounted for. Moreover, propensity score analysis does not compensate for poor study design or questionable data accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Amoah
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Stuart
- The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Mental Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sara E Cosgrove
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Anthony D Harris
- The University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Ebbing Lautenbach
- The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pranita D Tamma
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vilchez G, Kumar K, Singh S, Patel N, Kao M, Lagos M, Duncan J. Risk of preterm birth and neonatal outcomes after cerclage placement in triplet pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 35:5409-5415. [PMID: 33847210 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1881476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of triplet pregnancies in the United States has increased significantly. Perinatal morbidity and mortality are higher in these pregnancies mainly due to higher preterm birth rates. Interventions to decrease the risk of preterm delivery in this population are needed. Evidence regarding cerclage placement in triplets is limited. We performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study to study the risk of preterm birth and neonatal outcomes after cerclage placement in triplet pregnancies. METHODS All U.S. triplet deliveries from 2006 to 2013 with risk factors for cervical insufficiency were selected, excluding cases with indicated preterm delivery. Cases were categorized according to cerclage placement status. The risk of preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes were calculated using propensity score analysis, generalized linear, and logistic regression models. RESULTS From ∼33 million deliveries, 43,000 were triplets, and 7308 fulfilled eligibility criteria. There was no difference in the gestational age at delivery between the cerclage and noncerclage groups, aOR (95% CI) = 1.0(0.9-1.0). The difference between the risk of preterm delivery at <34 weeks and <32 weeks was not statistically significant. The risk of the composite outcome of neonatal complications was higher in the cerclage compared to the noncerclage group, aOR (95% CI) = 1.5 (1.1-2.2). CONCLUSIONS Cerclage placement in triplet pregnancies does not appear to decrease preterm birth rates and seems to increase the risk of neonatal complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Vilchez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, MO, USA
| | - Komal Kumar
- Department of Medical Technology Research Institute, Universidad Nacional Federico Villareal, Lima, Peru
| | - Som Singh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, MO, USA
| | - Neil Patel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, MO, USA
| | - Monica Kao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, MO, USA
| | - Moraima Lagos
- Department of Medical Technology Research Institute, Universidad Nacional Federico Villareal, Lima, Peru
| | - Jose Duncan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tapa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kimachi M, Onishi A, Tajika A, Kimachi K, Furukawa TA. Systematic differences in effect estimates between observational studies and randomized control trials in meta-analyses in nephrology. Sci Rep 2021; 11:6088. [PMID: 33731727 PMCID: PMC7971062 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85519-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The limited availability of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in nephrology undermines causal inferences in meta-analyses. Systematic reviews of observational studies have grown more common under such circumstances. We conducted systematic reviews of all comparative observational studies in nephrology from 2006 to 2016 to assess the trends in the past decade. We then focused on the meta-analyses combining observational studies and RCTs to evaluate the systematic differences in effect estimates between study designs using two statistical methods: by estimating the ratio of odds ratios (ROR) of the pooled OR obtained from observational studies versus those from RCTs and by examining the discrepancies in their statistical significance. The number of systematic reviews of observational studies in nephrology had grown by 11.7-fold in the past decade. Among 56 records combining observational studies and RCTs, ROR suggested that the estimates between study designs agreed well (ROR 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.23). However, almost half of the reviews led to discrepant interpretations in terms of statistical significance. In conclusion, the findings based on ROR might encourage researchers to justify the inclusion of observational studies in meta-analyses. However, caution is needed, as the interpretations based on statistical significance were less concordant than those based on ROR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miho Kimachi
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
| | - Akira Onishi
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyōgo, Japan
| | - Aran Tajika
- Department of Psychiatry, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kimihiko Kimachi
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
| | - Toshi A Furukawa
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hoshino N, Sakamoto T, Hida K, Takahashi Y, Okada H, Obama K, Nakayama T. Difference in surgical outcomes of rectal cancer by study design: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, case-matched studies, and cohort studies. BJS Open 2021; 5:6173855. [PMID: 33724337 PMCID: PMC7962725 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background RCTs are considered the standard in surgical research, whereas case-matched studies and propensity score matching studies are conducted as an alternative option. Both study designs have been used to investigate the potential superiority of robotic surgery over laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. However, no conclusion has been reached regarding whether there are differences in findings according to study design. This study aimed to examine similarities and differences in findings relating to robotic surgery for rectal cancer by study design. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL to identify RCTs, case-matched studies, and cohort studies that compared robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Primary outcomes were incidence of postoperative overall complications, incidence of anastomotic leakage, and postoperative mortality. Meta-analyses were performed for each study design using a random-effects model. Results Fifty-nine articles were identified and reviewed. No differences were observed in incidence of anastomotic leakage, mortality, rate of positive circumferential resection margins, conversion rate, and duration of operation by study design. With respect to the incidence of postoperative overall complications and duration of hospital stay, the superiority of robotic surgery was most evident in cohort studies (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.92, P < 0.001; mean difference (MD) –1.11 (95 per cent c.i. –1.86 to –0.36) days, P = 0.004; respectively), and least evident in RCTs (RR 1.12, 0.91 to 1.38, P = 0.27; MD –0.28 (–1.44 to 0.88) days, P = 0.64; respectively). Conclusion Results of case-matched studies were often similar to those of RCTs in terms of outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. However, case-matched studies occasionally overestimated the effects of interventions compared with RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Hoshino
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - T Sakamoto
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - K Hida
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Y Takahashi
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - H Okada
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - K Obama
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - T Nakayama
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hoshino N, Fukui Y, Hida K, Obama K. Similarities and differences between study designs in short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, case-matched, and cohort studies. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:183-193. [PMID: 33860138 PMCID: PMC8034685 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are the gold standard in surgical research, and case-matched studies, such as studies with propensity score matching, are expected to serve as an alternative to RCT. Both study designs have been used to investigate the potential superiority of laparoscopic surgery to open surgery for rectal cancer, but it remains unclear whether there are any differences in the findings obtained using these study designs. We aimed to examine similarities and differences between findings from different study designs regarding laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analyses. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. RCT, case-matched studies, and cohort studies comparing laparoscopic low anterior resection and open low anterior resection for rectal cancer were included. In total, 8 short-term outcomes and 3 long-term outcomes were assessed. Meta-analysis was conducted stratified by study design using a random-effects model. RESULTS Thirty-five studies were included in this review. Findings did not differ between RCT and case-matched studies for most outcomes. However, the estimated treatment effect was largest in cohort studies, intermediate in case-matched studies, and smallest in RCT for overall postoperative complications and 3-year local recurrence. CONCLUSION Findings from case-matched studies were similar to those from RCT in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. However, findings from case-matched studies were sometimes intermediate between those of RCT and unadjusted cohort studies, and case-matched studies and cohort studies have a potential to overestimate the treatment effect compared with RCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuaki Hoshino
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Yudai Fukui
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Koya Hida
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Kazutaka Obama
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Liveris A, Parsikia A, Melvin J, Chao E, Reddy SH, Teperman S, Stone ME. Is There an Age Cutoff for Intracranial Pressure Monitoring?: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. Am Surg 2021; 88:1163-1171. [PMID: 33522254 DOI: 10.1177/0003134821991985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite mostly favorable past evidence for use of intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM), more recent data question not only the indications but also the utility of ICPM. The Fourth Edition Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines offer limited indications for ICPM. Evidence supports ICPM for reducing mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and cites decreased survival in elderly patients. METHODS All patients ≥ 18 years of age with isolated TBI, head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3, and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8 between 2008 and 2014 were included from the National Trauma Data Bank. Exclusion criteria were head AIS = 6 and death within 24 hours. Patients with and without ICPM were compared using TBI-specific variables. Patients were then matched via propensity-score matching (PSM), and the odds ratio (OR) of death with ICPM was determined using logistic regression modeling for 8 different age strata. RESULTS A total of 23,652 patients with a mean age of 56 years, median head AIS of 4, median GCS of 3, and overall mortality of 29.2% were analyzed. After PSM, ICPM was associated with death beginning at the age stratum of 56-65 years. Intracranial pressure monitoring was associated with survival beginning at the age-group 36-45 years. DISCUSSION Based on a large propensity-matched sample of TBI patients, ICPM was not associated with improved survival for TBI patients above 55 years of age. Until level 1 evidence is available, this age threshold should be considered for further prospective study in determining indications for ICPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Liveris
- Department of Surgery, 24502Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Afshin Parsikia
- Department of Surgery, 24502Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Edward Chao
- Department of Surgery, 24502Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.,Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Srinivas H Reddy
- Department of Surgery, 24502Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.,Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Sheldon Teperman
- Department of Surgery, 24502Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.,Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Melvin E Stone
- Department of Surgery, 24502Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.,Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Raoult D. Rational for meta-analysis and randomized treatment: the COVID-19 example. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 27:6-8. [PMID: 33098998 PMCID: PMC7577218 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Didier Raoult
- MEPHI, IRD, Aix Marseille Univ, AP-HM, Marseille, France; IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Safieddine M, Chapelle C, Ollier E, Ferdynus C, Bertoletti L, Mismetti P, Cucherat M, Laporte S. Compared to randomized studies, observational studies may overestimate the effectiveness of DOACs: a metaepidemiological approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 130:49-58. [PMID: 33080342 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are criticized for including patients who are overselected. Health authorities consequently encourage "real-world" postmarketing cohort studies. Our objective was to determine the differences between RCTs and observational studies as regards their populations and efficacy/safety results. METHODS A systematic review was conducted to identify RCTs and observational studies including patients with venous thromboembolism receiving direct oral anticoagulants or conventional treatment. Ratios of hazard ratio (RHR) comparing epidemiological studies (prospective and retrospective cohort studies and studies using living databases) with RCTs were computed. RESULTS Six RCTs (27,121 patients) and twenty observational studies (248,971 patients) were identified and analyzed. Prospective cohort studies seemed to recruit patients who were no less selected than those of RCTs whereas other types of observational studies may reflect the population treated in real life. Among observational studies, prospective cohort studies yielded the most favorable estimates of treatment effect compared with RCTs. These studies were associated with a nonsignificant 33% increase in efficacy estimate (RHR 0.67, [95% CI, 0.39-1.18]) but no effect on safety estimate. Studies using living databases were associated with nonsignificant trends toward a greater effect on efficacy (RHR 0.82, [0.66-1.01]) and a smaller effect on safety (RHR 1.33, [0.96-1.84]). DISCUSSION Overall, in this clinical setting, an exaggeration of the treatment efficacy estimate was seen with observational studies compared with RCTs. CONCLUSIONS As the presence of residual confounding cannot be excluded, these results should be interpreted cautiously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maissa Safieddine
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, Innovation, Pharmacologie, CHU Saint-Etienne, Hôpital Nord, F-42055 Saint-Etienne, France; Unité de Soutien Méthodologique, INSERM, CIC1410, CHU de la Réunion, Saint-Denis, France
| | - Celine Chapelle
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, Innovation, Pharmacologie, CHU Saint-Etienne, Hôpital Nord, F-42055 Saint-Etienne, France; SAINBIOSE U1059, Université Jean Monnet, University of Lyon, INSERM, F-CRIN INNOVTE Network, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Edouard Ollier
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, Innovation, Pharmacologie, CHU Saint-Etienne, Hôpital Nord, F-42055 Saint-Etienne, France; SAINBIOSE U1059, Université Jean Monnet, University of Lyon, INSERM, F-CRIN INNOVTE Network, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Cyril Ferdynus
- Unité de Soutien Méthodologique, INSERM, CIC1410, CHU de la Réunion, Saint-Denis, France
| | - Laurent Bertoletti
- SAINBIOSE U1059, Université Jean Monnet, University of Lyon, INSERM, F-CRIN INNOVTE Network, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France; Service de Médecine Vasculaire et Thérapeutique, CHU Saint-Etienne, Hôpital Nord, F-40255 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Patrick Mismetti
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, Innovation, Pharmacologie, CHU Saint-Etienne, Hôpital Nord, F-42055 Saint-Etienne, France; SAINBIOSE U1059, Université Jean Monnet, University of Lyon, INSERM, F-CRIN INNOVTE Network, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France; Service de Médecine Vasculaire et Thérapeutique, CHU Saint-Etienne, Hôpital Nord, F-40255 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Michel Cucherat
- Service de Pharmacologie, HCL, UMR CNRS 5558 Evaluation et Modélisation des Effets Thérapeutiques, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Silvy Laporte
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, Innovation, Pharmacologie, CHU Saint-Etienne, Hôpital Nord, F-42055 Saint-Etienne, France; SAINBIOSE U1059, Université Jean Monnet, University of Lyon, INSERM, F-CRIN INNOVTE Network, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Syn NL, Kabir T, Koh YX, Tan HL, Wang LZ, Chin BZ, Wee I, Teo JY, Tai BC, Goh BKP. Survival Advantage of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection For Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data From Randomized Trials and Propensity-score Matched Studies. Ann Surg 2020; 272:253-265. [PMID: 32675538 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform an individual participant data meta-analysis using randomized trials and propensity-score matched (PSM) studies which compared laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). BACKGROUND Randomized trials and PSM studies constitute the highest level of evidence in addressing the long-term oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic versus open resection for CLM. However, individual studies are limited by the reporting of overall survival in ways not amenable to traditional methods of meta-analysis, and violation of the proportional hazards assumption. METHODS Survival information of individual patients was reconstructed from the published Kaplan-Meier curves with the aid of a computer vision program. Frequentist and Bayesian survival models (taking into account random-effects and nonproportional hazards) were fitted to compare overall survival of patients who underwent laparoscopic versus open surgery. To handle long plateaus in the tails of survival curves, we also exploited "cure models" to estimate the fraction of patients effectively "cured" of disease. RESULTS Individual patient data from 2 randomized trials and 13 PSM studies involving 3148 participants were reconstructed. Laparoscopic resection was associated with a lower hazard rate of death (stratified hazard ratio = 0.853, 95% confidence interval: 0.754-0.965, P = 0.0114), and there was evidence of time-varying effects (P = 0.0324) in which the magnitude of hazard ratios increased over time. The fractions of long-term cancer survivors were estimated to be 47.4% and 18.0% in the laparoscopy and open surgery groups, respectively. At 10-year follow-up, the restricted mean survival time was 8.6 months (or 12.1%) longer in the laparoscopy arm (P < 0.0001). In a subgroup analysis, elderly patients (≥65 years old) treated with laparoscopy experienced longer 3-year average life expectancy (+6.2%, P = 0.018), and those who live past the 5-year milestone (46.1%) seem to be cured of disease. CONCLUSIONS This patient-level meta-analysis of high-quality studies demonstrated an unexpected survival benefit in favor of laparoscopic over open resection for CLM in the long-term. From a conservative viewpoint, these results can be interpreted to indicate that laparoscopy is at least not inferior to the standard open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Biostatistics & Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tousif Kabir
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ye Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hwee Leong Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Louis Z Wang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Ian Wee
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jin Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bee Choo Tai
- Biostatistics & Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Biostatistics Core, Investigational Medicine Unit, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Syn NL, Lee PC, Kovalik JP, Tham KW, Ong HS, Chan WH, Tan CS, Lim CH. Associations of Bariatric Interventions With Micronutrient and Endocrine Disturbances. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e205123. [PMID: 32515795 PMCID: PMC7284307 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Few studies have described the longitudinal trajectories of serum levels of micronutrients whose deficiencies are associated with serious sequelae following bariatric procedures, such as anemia, osteoporotic fractures, and neuropathies. Furthermore, previous studies comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) procedures may have been limited by selection and confounding biases. OBJECTIVE To appraise the spectrum and temporal course of micronutrient deficiencies associated with bone metabolism and erythropoiesis after LSG vs OAGB or LRYGB procedures, using the propensity score as a balancing score. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This prospective, longitudinal comparative effectiveness study was conducted at a high-volume bariatric unit in Singapore from September 1, 2008, to November 30, 2017, with a cutoff date for analysis of September 2018. Patients who underwent adjustable gastric banding, biliopancreatic diversion procedures, and intragastric balloon procedures were excluded. All other patients who underwent bariatric procedures were included. Data were analyzed from September 23 to 30, 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Serial assessment of 13 biochemical parameters at 12 time points for up to 5 years after bariatric procedure. Inverse probability-of-treatment weights were used to obtain estimates of the mean associations of variables assessed with the bariatric surgical interventions. Longitudinal trajectories were analyzed using mixed-effects generalized linear models to apportion the temporal variation of serum micronutrients into fixed-effects and random-effects components. RESULTS A total of 688 patients were included in this study, of whom 499 underwent LSG (mean [SD] age, 41.5 [11.3] years; 318 [63.7%] women) and 189 underwent OAGB or LRYGB (mean [SD] age, 48.6 [9.4] years; 112 [59.3%] women). There were no differences during follow-up among patients who underwent LSG vs those who underwent OAGB or LRYGB in intact parathyroid hormone levels (mean difference, 7.05 [95% CI, -28.67 to 42.77] pg/mL; P = .70), serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (mean difference, -0.72 [95% CI, -1.56 to 0.12] ng/mL; P = .09), or phosphate levels (mean difference, 0.006 [95% CI, -0.052 to 0.064] mg/dL; P = .83). Hemoglobin levels were a mean 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.85) g/dL higher among patients who underwent LSG compared with those who underwent OAGB or LRYGB (P < .001), despite no differences in iron concentration levels (mean difference, 1.50 [95% CI, -1.39 to 4.39] µg/dL; P = .31), total iron-binding capacity (mean difference, 4.36 [95% CI, -5.25 to 13.98] µg/dL; P = .37), or ferritin levels (mean difference, 3.0 [95% CI, -13.0 to 18.9] ng/mL; P = .71). Compared with patients who underwent LSG procedures, patients who underwent OAGB or LRYGB had higher folate levels (mean difference, 2.376 [95% CI, 1.716 to 3.036] ng/mL; P < .001) but lower serum magnesium levels (mean difference, -0.25 [95% CI, -0.35 to -0.16] mg/dL; P < .001) and zinc levels (mean difference, -7.58 [95% CI, -9.92 to -5.24] µg/dL; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that LSG vs OAGB or LRYGB procedures have differential associations with various micronutrient and metabolic parameters. These differences should be recognized in guidelines for postbariatric nutritional surveillance and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L. Syn
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Phong Ching Lee
- Department of Endocrinology, Division of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jean-Paul Kovalik
- Department of Endocrinology, Division of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Kwang Wei Tham
- Department of Endocrinology, Division of Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Hock Soo Ong
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Weng Hoong Chan
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Chuen Seng Tan
- Biostatistics and Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Chin Hong Lim
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kobayashi S, Beppu T, Honda G, Yamamoto M, Takahashi K, Endo I, Hasegawa K, Kotake K, Itabashi M, Hashiguchi Y, Kotera Y, Sakamoto K, Yamaguchi T, Morita S, Tabuchi K, Miyazaki M, Sugihara K. Survival Benefit of and Indications for Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases-a Japanese Nationwide Survey. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1244-1260. [PMID: 31197683 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04250-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The survival benefit of and indications for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain unclear. METHODS Patients who were diagnosed with liver-limited CRLM between 2005 and 2007 and subsequently underwent R0 resection without preoperative chemotherapy were identified in a Japanese nationwide survey. This overall cohort was divided into synchronous and metachronous CRLM cohorts. In each of the three cohorts, the patients that were given AC were matched with those treated with surgery alone via 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after the initial hepatectomy were compared. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 79.4 months and the overall, synchronous, and metachronous cohorts included 1145, 498, and 647 patients, respectively. After the PS matching, the patients' demographics were well balanced. AC was effective in terms of both RFS and OS in the overall cohort (RFS hazard ratio [HR] 0.784, p = 0.045; OS HR 0.716, p = 0.028) and synchronous cohort (RFS HR 0.677, p = 0.027; OS HR 0.642, p = 0.036), whereas AC was not effective in the metachronous cohort (RFS HR 0.875, p = 0.378; OS HR 0.881, p = 0.496). However, in the metachronous cohort, AC was effective in terms of OS in the subgroup that exhibited disease-free intervals of ≤ 1 year after primary tumor resection (RFS HR 0.667, p = 0.068; OS HR 0.572, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemotherapy has a survival benefit for patients with resected CRLM. Synchronous CRLM is a favorable indication for AC, whereas in metachronous CRLM, the use of AC should be individualized according to each patient's risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Kobayashi
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Toru Beppu
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Yamaga City Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Goro Honda
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masakazu Yamamoto
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichi Takahashi
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan. .,Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 1138677, Japan.
| | - Itaru Endo
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Kotake
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Sano City Hospital, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Michio Itabashi
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yojiro Hashiguchi
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Kotera
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsunori Sakamoto
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Ehime University Hospital, Ehime, Japan
| | - Tatsuro Yamaguchi
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 1138677, Japan
| | - Satoshi Morita
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ken Tabuchi
- The Joint Committee for Nationwide Survey on Colorectal Liver Metastasis, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Pediatrics, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaru Miyazaki
- Mita Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tamura T, Ogura T, Takenaka M, Tanioka K, Itonaga M, Yamao K, Kamata K, Hirono S, Okada KI, Imanishi M, Higuchi K, Yamaue H, Kitano M. Endoscopic sphincterotomy to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with biliary neoplasms: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E513-E522. [PMID: 32258373 PMCID: PMC7089788 DOI: 10.1055/a-1107-2629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Treatment of biliary neoplasms often involves multiple endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related procedures. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) may prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). This retrospective, multicenter cohort study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ES for prevention of PEP in patients with biliary neoplasm. Methods Patients with biliary duct neoplasm who underwent ERCP between January 2006 and December 2016 were enrolled. The frequency of PEP was compared between the ES and non-ES groups using propensity score analysis. The effectiveness of ES in subgroups of patients who underwent biliary duct stent placement, intraductal ultrasound (IDUS), and transpapillary biliary duct biopsy was analyzed by logistic regression. Results Of the 362 patients enrolled, 84 (23.2 %) developed PEP. Propensity score matching for PEP risk factors in 172 ERCP procedures showed that the frequency of PEP in the ES group was lower than that in the non-ES group (19.7 % vs. 33.7 %). Non-ES was also an independent risk factor for PEP in patients who underwent intraductal ultrasound and transpapillary biliary duct biopsy (RR = 4.54 and 5.26), but was not an independent risk factor for PEP in patients with biliary duct stents. In addition, there was no evidence that the frequency of PEP was statistically different between patients with plastic stents and metal stents in the ES and non-ES groups ( P = 0.14 and 0.10). Conclusions ES is an effective technique to prevent PEP in patients with biliary neoplasms. In particular, ES is a safe technique to prevent PEP when performing IDUS and transpapillary biliary duct biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Tamura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ogura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kensuke Tanioka
- Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Kentaro Yamao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ken Kamata
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Seiko Hirono
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Ken-ichi Okada
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Miyuki Imanishi
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Higuchi
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kitano
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Meta-analyses frequently pooled different study types together: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 118:18-28. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
34
|
Poleksic A, Xie L. Database of adverse events associated with drugs and drug combinations. Sci Rep 2019; 9:20025. [PMID: 31882773 PMCID: PMC6934730 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56525-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the aging world population and increasing trend in clinical practice to treat patients with multiple drugs, adverse events (AEs) are becoming a major challenge in drug discovery and public health. In particular, identifying AEs caused by drug combinations remains a challenging task. Clinical trials typically focus on individual drugs rather than drug combinations and animal models are unreliable. An added difficulty is the combinatorial explosion in the number of possible combinations that can be made using the increasingly large set of FDA approved chemicals. We present a statistical and computational technique for identifying AEs caused by two-drug combinations. Taking advantage of the large and increasing data deposited in FDA’s postmarketing reports, we demonstrate that the task of predicting AEs for 2-drug combinations is amenable to the Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT). Our pAERS database constructed with LRT contains almost 77 thousand associations between pairs of drugs and corresponding AEs caused solely by drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The DDIs stored in pAERS complement the existing data sets. Due to our stringent statistical test, we expect many of the associations in pAERS to be unrecorded or poorly documented in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandar Poleksic
- Department of Computer Science, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, 50614, USA.
| | - Lei Xie
- Department of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, New York, 10065, USA. .,Ph.D. Program in Computer Science, Biochemistry and Biology, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, New York, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ewald H, Ioannidis JPA, Ladanie A, Mc Cord K, Bucher HC, Hemkens LG. Nonrandomized studies using causal-modeling may give different answers than RCTs: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 118:29-41. [PMID: 31704350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate how estimated treatment effects agree between nonrandomized studies using causal modeling with marginal structural models (MSM-studies) and randomized trials (RCTs). STUDY DESIGN Meta-epidemiological study. SETTING MSM-studies providing effect estimates on any healthcare outcome of any treatment were eligible. We systematically sought RCTs on the same clinical question and compared the direction of treatment effects, effect sizes, and confidence intervals. RESULTS The main analysis included 19 MSM-studies (1,039,570 patients) and 141 RCTs (120,669 patients). MSM-studies indicated effect estimates in the opposite direction from RCTs for eight clinical questions (42%), and their 95% CI (confidence interval) did not include the RCT estimate in nine clinical questions (47%). The effect estimates deviated 1.58-fold between the study designs (median absolute deviation OR [odds ratio] 1.58; IQR [interquartile range] 1.37 to 2.16). Overall, we found no systematic disagreement regarding benefit or harm but confidence intervals were wide (summary ratio of odds ratios [sROR] 1.04; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.23). The subset of MSM-studies focusing on healthcare decision-making tended to overestimate experimental treatment benefits (sROR 1.44; 95% CI 0.99 to 2.09). CONCLUSION Nonrandomized studies using causal modeling with MSM may give different answers than RCTs. Caution is still required when nonrandomized "real world" evidence is used for healthcare decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Ewald
- Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland; University Medical Library, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - John P A Ioannidis
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Aviv Ladanie
- Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kimberly Mc Cord
- Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, 4051 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Heiner C Bucher
- Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lars G Hemkens
- Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tamura T, Kitano M, Kawai M, Tanioka K, Itonaga M, Kawaji Y, Nuta J, Hatamaru K, Yamashita Y, Kitahata Y, Miyazawa M, Hirono S, Okada KI, Yamaue H. Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage for noncapsulated postoperative pancreatic collection. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2019; 12:1756284819884418. [PMID: 31695750 PMCID: PMC6820174 DOI: 10.1177/1756284819884418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic collection (POPC) is a frequent complication after pancreatectomy. Although percutaneous drainage (PD) has been the treatment of choice for POPC with encapsulation, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) was recently reported effective for this condition. The main aim of this retrospective study was to compare EUS-TD and PD in terms of effectiveness and safety as the first procedure in patients with noncapsulated POPC. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent pancreatectomy and developed noncapsulated POPC requiring EUS-TD or PD between April 2003 and May 2018 were enrolled. Noncapsulated POPC was defined as pancreatic collection appearing within 28 days postoperatively and lacking a thick encapsulating inflammatory wall on contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The effectiveness of drainage was compared between the two groups before and after propensity-score matching of patient characteristics. Outcomes of interest included re-intervention rate, number of re-interventions, immediate complication, remote complication, and time to clinical resolution after the procedure. RESULTS A sum of 81 patients were included: 14 underwent EUS-TD, and 67 underwent PD. There were significant differences between groups in POPC size and type of surgery. Propensity-score matching selected 13 patients who underwent EUS-TD and 28 who underwent PD. Re-intervention rate (p = 0.045), and number of re-interventions (p = 0.026) were significantly lower in the matched EUS-TD group than in the matched PD group. There were no significant between-group differences in immediate complication and remote complication. The time to clinical resolution after the procedure was significantly shorter in the matched EUS-TD than in the matched PD group (14 versus 26 days; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION EUS-TD is more effective than PD for drainage of noncapsulated POPC. EUS-TD should be considered as the first treatment of choice for noncapsulated POPC visible on EUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Tamura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | | | - Manabu Kawai
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Kensuke Tanioka
- Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masahiro Itonaga
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yuki Kawaji
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Junya Nuta
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Keiichi Hatamaru
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yasunobu Yamashita
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yuji Kitahata
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Motoki Miyazawa
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Seiko Hirono
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Ken-ichi Okada
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mege D, Sabbagh C, Manceau G, Bridoux V, Lakkis Z, Momar D, Sielezneff I, Karoui M. What is the Best Option Between Primary Diverting Stoma or Endoscopic Stent as a Bridge to Surgery with a Curative Intent for Obstructed Left Colon Cancer? Results from a Propensity Score Analysis of the French Surgical Association Multicenter Cohort of 518 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:756-764. [PMID: 30623342 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-07139-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic stent (ES) as a bridge to surgery in obstructed left colon cancer (OLCC) is controversial. Our goal was to compare the operative and oncological results of primary diverting colostomy (PDC) and ES for the curative treatment of OLCC. METHODS Between 2000 and 2015, patients who underwent PDC or ES in a curative intent for OLCC at member centers of the French Surgical Association were included. Patients with unresectable tumors and/or synchronous metastases were excluded. Comparisons between the two groups were performed after ponderation with propensity score for: demographic and tumor characteristics, operative, and oncological results. RESULTS A total of 518 patients were included: PDC (n = 327); ES (n = 191). The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. ES failed in 23% of the patients (11% perforation). Cumulative tumor resection rates were 80% and 86% after PDC and ES, respectively (p = 0.049). The rates of primary anastomosis were 57% in the PDC group and 40% in the ES group (p < 0.0001). The permanent stoma rates were similar between the two groups (29% vs. 28%, p = 0.0586). Cumulative overall, surgical, and medical complications were significantly higher in PDC group. The resected tumors were significantly smaller and less frequently perforated and metastatic in the PDC group. The median overall survival was significantly higher after PDC (123.6 vs. 58.5 months, p = 0.046), whereas the median disease-free survival was similar between the two groups (54.1 vs. 53.6 months, p = 0.646). CONCLUSIONS Although endoscopic stenting is associated with better surgical outcomes than diverting stoma, it may negatively impact histological features and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Mege
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Charles Sabbagh
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - Gilles Manceau
- Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Valérie Bridoux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Zaher Lakkis
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Diouf Momar
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - Igor Sielezneff
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Mehdi Karoui
- Sorbonne University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Li J, Knoll S, Bocharova I, Tang W, Signorovitch J. Comparative efficacy of first-line ceritinib and crizotinib in advanced or metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer: an adjusted indirect comparison with external controls. Curr Med Res Opin 2019; 35:105-111. [PMID: 30362839 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1541443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective: In the absence of head-to-head trials, this study indirectly compared progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between ceritinib and crizotinib among patients with previously untreated advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Methods: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison method was implemented to adjust for cross-trial differences in patient characteristics between ASCEND-4 and PROFILE 1014 trials. Patient-level data from ASCEND-4 and published summary data from PROFILE 1014 were used. Patients in ASCEND-4 were reweighted to match average baseline characteristics (i.e. age, sex, race, tumor histology, ECOG score, smoking status, extent of disease, and presence of brain metastases) reported for PROFILE 1014 patients using propensity score weighting. PFS and OS were then compared between balanced populations.Results: ASCEND-4 included more current smokers (8.0% vs 4.4%) and fewer patients under the age of 65 years (78.5% vs 84.0%) compared to PROFILE 1014. After matching, these and all other patient characteristics were balanced between the two trial populations. Compared to crizotinib, ceritinib was associated with a significantly longer PFS (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] (HR [CI]) = 0.64 [0.47-0.87]; median PFS: 25.2 vs 10.8 months, log-rank p-value = 0.003). OS did not differ significantly, with a HR of 0.82 [0.54-1.27] for ceritinib compared to crizotinib.Conclusions: In the adjusted indirect comparison with external controls, the second generation ALK inhibitor, ceritinib, was associated with a significantly prolonged PFS compared to crizotinib as first-line treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stefanie Knoll
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dobson A, Murray K, Manolov N, DaVanzo JE. Economic value of orthotic and prosthetic services among medicare beneficiaries: a claims-based retrospective cohort study, 2011-2014. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2018; 15:55. [PMID: 30255806 PMCID: PMC6157184 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0406-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are few studies of the economic value of orthotic and prosthetic services. A prior cohort study of orthotic and prosthetic Medicare beneficiaries based on Medicare Parts A and B claims from 2007 to 2010 concluded that patients who received timely orthotic or prosthetic care had comparable or lower total health care costs than a comparison group of untreated patients. This follow-up study reports on a parallel analysis based on Medicare claims from 2011 to 2014 and includes Part D in addition to Parts A and B services and expenditures. Its purpose is to validate earlier findings on the extent to which Medicare patients who received select orthotic and prosthetic services had less health care utilization, lower Medicare payments, and potentially fewer negative outcomes compared to matched patients not receiving these services. Methods This is a retrospective cohort analysis of 78,707 matched pairs of Medicare beneficiaries with clinical need for orthotic and prosthetic services (N = 157,414) using 2011–2014 Medicare claims data. It uses propensity score matching techniques to control for observable selection bias. Economically, a cost-consequence evaluation over a four-year time horizon was performed. Results Patients who received lower extremity orthotics had 18-month episode costs that were $1939 lower than comparable patients who did not receive orthotic treatment ($22,734 vs $24,673). Patients who received spinal orthotic treatment had 18-month episode costs that were $2094 lower than comparable non-treated patients ($23,560 vs $25,655). Study group beneficiaries receiving both types of orthotics had significantly lower Part D spending than those not receiving treatment (p < 0.05). Patients who received lower extremity prostheses had comparable 15-month episode payments to matched beneficiaries not receiving prostheses ($68,877 vs $68,893) despite the relatively high cost of the prosthesis. Conclusions These results were consistent with those found in the prior study and suggest that orthotic and prosthetic services provide value to the Medicare program and to the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allen Dobson
- Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC, 450 Maple Avenue East, Suite 303, Vienna, VA, 22180, USA
| | - Kennan Murray
- Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC, 450 Maple Avenue East, Suite 303, Vienna, VA, 22180, USA.
| | - Nikolay Manolov
- Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC, 450 Maple Avenue East, Suite 303, Vienna, VA, 22180, USA
| | - Joan E DaVanzo
- Dobson DaVanzo & Associates, LLC, 450 Maple Avenue East, Suite 303, Vienna, VA, 22180, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Meltzer JA, Stone ME, Reddy SH, Silver EJ. Association of Whole-Body Computed Tomography With Mortality Risk in Children With Blunt Trauma. JAMA Pediatr 2018; 172:542-549. [PMID: 29630685 PMCID: PMC6137533 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although several studies have demonstrated an improvement in mortality for injured adults who receive whole-body computed tomography (WBCT), it is unclear whether children experience the same benefit. OBJECTIVE To determine whether emergent WBCT is associated with lower mortality among children with blunt trauma compared with a selective CT approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014, using data from the National Trauma Data Bank on children aged 6 months to 14 years with blunt trauma who received an emergent CT scan in the first 2 hours after emergency department arrival. Data analysis was conducted from February 2 to December 29, 2017. EXPOSURES Patients were classified as having WBCT if they received CT head, CT chest, and CT abdomen/pelvis scans in the first 2 hours and as having a selective CT if they did not receive all 3 scans. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality in the 7 days after ED arrival. To adjust for potential confounding, propensity score weighting was used. Subgroup analyses were performed for those with the highest mortality risk (ie, occupants and pedestrians involved in motor vehicle crashes, children with a Glasgow Coma Scale score lower than 9, children with hypotension, and those admitted to the intensive care unit). RESULTS Of the 42 912 children included in the study (median age [interquartile range], 9 [5-12] years; 27 861 [64.9%] boys), 8757 (20.4%) received a WBCT. Overall, 405 (0.9%) children died within 7 days. After adjusting for the propensity score, children who received WBCT had no significant difference in mortality compared with those who received selective CT (absolute risk difference, -0.2%; 95% CI, -0.6% to 0.1%). All subgroup analyses similarly showed no significant association between WBCT and mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among children with blunt trauma, WBCT, compared with a selective CT approach, was not associated with lower mortality. These findings do not support the routine use of WBCT for children with blunt trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A. Meltzer
- Department of Pediatrics, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York,Division of Emergency Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Melvin E. Stone
- Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Srinivas H. Reddy
- Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Ellen J. Silver
- Department of Pediatrics, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kang SI, Oh HK, Yoo JS, Ahn S, Kim MH, Kim MJ, Son IT, Kim DW, Kang SB, Park YS, Yoon CJ, Shin R, Heo SC, Lee IT, Youk EG, Kim MJ, Chang TY, Park SC, Sohn DK, Oh JH, Park JW, Ryoo SB, Jeong SY, Park KJ. Oncologic outcomes of preoperative stent insertion first versus immediate surgery for obstructing left-sided colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:216-224. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
42
|
Osokogu OU, Khan J, Nakato S, Weibel D, de Ridder M, Sturkenboom MCJM, Verhamme K. Choice of time period to identify confounders for propensity score matching, affected the estimate: a retrospective cohort study of drug effectiveness in asthmatic children. J Clin Epidemiol 2018; 101:107-115.e3. [PMID: 29378305 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To control for confounding by indication in comparative (drug) effectiveness studies, propensity score (PS) methods may be used. Since childhood diseases or outcomes often present as acute events, we compared the effect of using different look-back periods in electronic health-care data, to construct PSs. This was applied in our research on the effect of a combination of inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta-2 agonists (ICS + LABA), either as fixed combination or used as loose combination (2 separate inhaler devices) in the prevention of severe asthma exacerbations. METHODS We created a cohort of children (5-17 years) diagnosed with asthma from the Dutch Integrated Primary Care information database. Within this cohort, we identified new users of ICS + LABA, either as fixed combination or loose combination (2 separate inhaler devices). The outcome of interest was severe asthma exacerbations. PSs for type of treatment were created using comorbidity and drug use history in different time windows: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, and full history prior to the start of treatment. PSs were used for matching subjects in both exposure groups. Time to first asthma exacerbation was analyzed with Cox proportional hazard regression. The results were compared with published clinical trials. RESULTS Of 39,682 asthmatic children, 3,500 (8.8%) were new users of either ICS + LABA fixed (3,324 [95.0%]) or loose (176 [5.0%]). The crude hazard ratio (HR) for a severe asthma exacerbation, comparing ICS + LABA fixed to loose was 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.66). PS-matched HRs (1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 1 year, and full history) were 0.48 (95% CI: 0.22-1.04); 0.60 (95% CI: 0.26-1.38), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.31-1.57), 0.56 (CI: 0.25-1.24), and 0.58 (CI: 0.24-1.36), respectively. CONCLUSIONS PS matching can be used to control for confounding in pediatric comparative (drug) effectiveness studies, the impact of different look-back periods to implement the PS is important. Controlling for confounders occurring in the 3 months preceding drug exposure may yield results comparable to clinical trial results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osemeke U Osokogu
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Javeed Khan
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Statistics, Universiteit Hasselt, BE 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Swabra Nakato
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Weibel
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria de Ridder
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam C J M Sturkenboom
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katia Verhamme
- Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Takagi H, Ando T, Mitta S. Meta-Analysis Comparing ≥10-Year Mortality of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Am J Cardiol 2017; 120:1933-1938. [PMID: 28942940 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is suggested to be associated with an increase in long-term (≥5-year) all-cause mortality. To determine whether off-pump CABG is associated with an increase in very long-term (≥10-year) all-cause mortality, we performed a meta-analysis of propensity-score matched observational comparative studies of off-pump versus on-pump CABG. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through May 2017. A hazard ratio of follow-up (including early) all-cause mortality for off-pump versus on-pump CABG was extracted from each individual study. Study-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic hazard ratios in the random-effects model. Of 164 potentially relevant studies, our search identified 16 propensity-score matched observational comparative studies of off-pump versus on-pump CABG with ≥10-year follow-up enrolling a total of 82,316 patients. A pooled analysis of all the 16 studies demonstrated that off-pump CABG was significantly associated with an increase in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.12, p for effect = 0.0008; p for heterogeneity = 0.30, I2 = 12%). In a sensitivity analysis, exclusion of any single hazard ratio from the analysis (leave-one-out meta-analysis) did not substantively alter the overall result. There was no evidence of a significant publication bias. In conclusion, off-pump CABG is associated with an increase in very long-term (≥10 years) all-cause mortality compared with on-pump CABG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisato Takagi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
| | - Tomo Ando
- Department of Cardiology, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Shohei Mitta
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
What is the best setting for receiving dialysis vascular access repair and maintenance services? J Vasc Access 2017; 18:473-481. [PMID: 28885654 DOI: 10.5301/jva.5000790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advances in dialysis vascular access (DVA) management have changed where beneficiaries receive this care. The effectiveness, safety, quality, and economy of different care settings have been questioned. This study compares patient outcomes of receiving DVA services in the freestanding office-based center (FOC) to those of the hospital outpatient department (HOPD). It also examines whether outcomes differ for a centrally managed system of FOCs (CMFOC) compared to all other FOCs (AOFOC). METHODS Retrospective cohort study of clinically and demographically similar patients within Medicare claims available through United States Renal Data System (USRDS) (2010-2013) who received at least 80% of DVA services in an FOC (n = 80,831) or HOPD (n = 133,965). Separately, FOC population is divided into CMFOC (n = 20,802) and AOFOC (n = 80,267). Propensity matching was used to control for clinical, demographic, and functional characteristics across populations. RESULTS FOC patients experienced significantly better outcomes, including lower annual mortality (14.6% vs. 17.2%, p<0.001) and DVA-related infections (0.16 vs. 0.20, p<0.001), fewer hospitalizations (1.65 vs. 1.91, p<0.001), and lower total per-member-per-month (PMPM) payments ($5042 vs. $5361, p<0.001) than HOPD patients. CMFOC patients had lower annual mortality (12.5% vs. 13.8%, p<0.001), PMPM payments (DVA services) ($1486 vs. $1533, p<0.001) and hospitalizations ($1752 vs. $1816, p<0.001) than AOFOC patients. CONCLUSIONS Where nephrologists send patients for DVA services can impact patient clinical and economic outcomes. This research confirmed that patients who received DVA care in the FOC had better outcomes than those treated in the HOPD. The organizational culture and clinical oversight of the CMFOC may result in more favorable outcomes than receiving care in AOFOC.
Collapse
|
45
|
Outcomes of Hemiepiphyseal Stapling for Genu Valgum Deformities in Patients With Multiple Hereditary Exostoses: A Comparative Study of Patients With Deformities of Idiopathic Cause. J Pediatr Orthop 2017; 37:265-271. [PMID: 26296227 DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000000628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) frequently present with a genu valgum deformity. Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis, such as hemiepiphyseal stapling, is a relatively safe surgical method to correct angular deformities in skeletally immature patients, but its outcomes for genu valgum deformity in MHE patients have not been extensively reported. We investigated the outcomes of hemiepiphyseal stapling in MHE patients (MHE group) and compared those with the outcomes in patients with idiopathic deformities (idiopathic group) after adjusting for potential bias. METHODS Data from 70 limbs with genu valgum deformity (15 MHE and 55 idiopathic), which had undergone hemiepiphyseal stapling, were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes were focused on the achievement of satisfactory correction and the velocity of correction. The independent effects of each characteristic on each outcome were investigated using multivariate analyses. The outcomes between the groups were also compared after 1:2 matching using propensity score analysis. RESULTS The mean valgus angle of the MHE group was 7.4±4.1 degrees at stapling and was corrected to 1.3±3.0 degrees at staple removal. The rate of satisfactory corrections was not different between the MHE and idiopathic groups (67% and 70%, respectively, P=0.820). However, the correction velocity was significantly lower in the MHE group than in the idiopathic group on both multivariate analysis (P=0.001) and matching comparison (4.4 vs. 7.9 degrees/y, P<0.001). The duration of correction was longer in the MHE group than in the idiopathic group by approximately half a year (1.5±0.6 vs. 0.9±0.3 y, respectively, P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS In MHE patients with genu valgum deformity, satisfactory correction can be achieved by hemiepiphyseal stapling and is comparable with that seen in idiopathic patients. However, the MHE group showed lower correction velocity and required a longer time by about one half year for correction compared with the idiopathic group. Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis should be considered at an earlier age for patients with MHE compared with those with idiopathic deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III-prognostic study.
Collapse
|
46
|
Reim D, Choi YS, Yoon HM, Park B, Eom BW, Kook MC, Ryu KW, Choi IJ, Joo J, Kim YW. Alpha-fetoprotein is a significant prognostic factor for gastric cancer: Results from a propensity score matching analysis after curative resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43:1542-1549. [PMID: 28511775 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2016] [Revised: 04/19/2017] [Accepted: 04/21/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognosis of alpha-fetoprotein positive gastric cancer (AFPP-GC) remains elusive so far due to disparities in cohort size and baseline characteristics in previous studies. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis as well as multivariable model was performed for unbiased evaluation of the outcome in AFPGC. METHODS Among 3034 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastric cancer surgery (R0, M0) at the National Cancer Center, Korea between 2002 and 2007, we identified 97 patients being positive for AFP either by elevation of serum-AFP levels >10 μg/L or by immunohistochemical staining. Due to marked disparities in baseline characteristics and cohort size, propensity-score-matching was performed which matched 87 AFPP-GC patients to the same number of AFP-negative gastric cancer (AFPN-GC) patients. Baseline characteristics were compared using χ2-test. Survival curves were compared using the Kaplan-Meier-method and multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of AFP-positivity while adjusting the effects of confounding variables. RESULTS AFPP-GC and AFPN-GC patients revealed marked disparities in patient cohorts. After PSM, groups were balanced for age, sex, tumor size, BMI, tumor location, grade of differentiation, presence of lymphatic vessel infiltration (LVI), Lauren histologic type and stage distribution. In multivariable regression analysis of the PSM-groups, only AFP-positivity and pathologic stage were predictive for overall survival (HR 2.98, CI 95% {1.7-5.1}, p < 0.0001). Five-year-survival rates were significantly worse for AFPP-GC patients (57.9% vs. 76.1%, p = 0.014). Recurrence was significantly more frequent in AFPP-GC patients (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION AFP can be considered as an independent negative predictor of overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Reim
- Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea; Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Department of Surgery, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Y-S Choi
- Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea
| | - H M Yoon
- Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea
| | - B Park
- Biometric Research Branch, Clinical Research Coordination Center, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea
| | - B W Eom
- Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea
| | - M-C Kook
- Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea
| | - K W Ryu
- Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea
| | - I J Choi
- Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea
| | - J Joo
- Biometric Research Branch, Clinical Research Coordination Center, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea.
| | - Y-W Kim
- Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Ilsan-ro 323, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, 410-769, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dai MH, Shi N, Xing C, Liao Q, Zhang TP, Chen G, Wu WM, Guo JC, Liu ZW, Zhao YP. Splenic preservation in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 2016; 104:452-462. [PMID: 28004852 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Revised: 07/10/2016] [Accepted: 10/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) is designed principally for the removal of benign and low-grade malignant lesions in the left pancreas. The aims of this study were to compare LSPDP with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (LDPS), compare two splenic preservation techniques (splenic vessel preservation and Warshaw technique) and investigate factors that influence splenic preservation.
Methods
Information from patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy between December 2004 and January 2016 at a single institution was reviewed. Data were extracted from a prospectively developed database. Intention-to-treat and propensity score matching analyses were employed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to investigate factors affecting splenic preservation.
Results
There were 206 patients in total (126 planned LSPDP and 80 planned LDPS procedures), of whom 108 underwent LSPDP and 98 LDPS. In intention-to-treat analysis, the duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the LSPDP group than in the LDPS group (mean 191·0 versus 220·5 min respectively; P < 0·001). Tumour size was an independent risk factor for splenic vessel resection in planned splenic vessel preservation operations, and a cut-off value of 3 cm provided optimal diagnostic accuracy. After a median follow-up of 35·9 months, there were no clinically significant splenic infarctions and no patient developed gastrointestinal bleeding after LSPDP.
Conclusion
Planned LSPDP had a high splenic preservation rate and was associated with significantly shorter operating time than LDPS. Splenic vessel preservation could be predicted using a tumour cut-off size of 3 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M-H Dai
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - N Shi
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - C Xing
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Q Liao
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - T-P Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - G Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - W-M Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - J-C Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Z-W Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Y-P Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tan DSW, Araújo A, Zhang J, Signorovitch J, Zhou ZY, Cai X, Liu G. Comparative Efficacy of Ceritinib and Crizotinib as Initial ALK –Targeted Therapies in Previously Treated Advanced NSCLC: An Adjusted Comparison with External Controls. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11:1550-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2016] [Revised: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 05/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
49
|
Reim D, Strobl AN, Buchner C, Schirren R, Mueller W, Luppa P, Ankerst DP, Friess H, Novotny A. Perioperative transfusion of leukocyte depleted blood products in gastric cancer patients negatively influences oncologic outcome: A retrospective propensity score weighted analysis on 610 curatively resected gastric cancer patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4322. [PMID: 27442682 PMCID: PMC5265799 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000004322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The influence of perioperative transfusion (PT) on outcome following surgery for gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial, with randomized trials lacking and observational series confounded by patient risk factors. This analysis determines the association between reception of leukocyte-depleted blood products and post-operative survival for GC.Data from 610 patients who underwent curative surgery for GC in a German tertiary care clinic from 2001 to 2013 were included. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression were applied to determine the association of PT and clinical and patient risk factors for overall and relapse-free survival. Propensity score analysis was performed to adjust for observational biases in reception of PT.Higher Union International Contre le Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC)-stages (P <0.001), postoperative complications and severity according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification (P <0.001), PT (P = 0.02), higher age (P <0.001), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P <0.001) were related to increased mortality rates. Higher UICC-stages (P <0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P <0.001), and type of surgery (P = 0.02) were independently associated with increased relapse rates. Patients were more likely to receive PT with higher age (P = 0.05), surgical extension to adjacent organs/structures (P = 0.002), tumor location (P = 0.003), and female gender (P = 0.03). In the adjusted propensity score weighted analysis, PT remained associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio (HR): 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.69, P = 0.04).Because of the association of PT with negative influence on patient survival following resection for GC, risks from application of blood products should be weighed against the potential benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Reim
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar
| | | | | | | | - Werner Mueller
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Peter Luppa
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | | | | | - Alexander Novotny
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar
- Correspondence: Alexander Novotny, Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universitat München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 München, Germany (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kim YW, Joo J, Yoon HM, Eom BW, Ryu KW, Choi IJ, Kook MC, Schuhmacher C, Siewert JR, Reim D. Different survival outcomes after curative R0-resection for Eastern Asian and European gastric cancer: Results from a propensity score matched analysis comparing a Korean and a German specialized center. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4261. [PMID: 27428238 PMCID: PMC4956832 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000004261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Several retrospective analyses on patients who underwent gastric cancer (GC) surgery revealed different survival outcomes between Eastern (Korean, Japanese) and Western (USA, Europe) countries due to potential ethnical and biological differences. This study investigates treatment outcomes between specialized institution for GC in Korea and Germany.The prospectively documented databases of the Gastric Cancer Center of the National Cancer Center, Korea (NCCK) and the Department of Surgery of the Technische Universitaet Muenchen (TUM), Germany were screened for patients who underwent primary surgical resection for GC between 2002 and 2008. Baseline characteristics were compared using χ testing, and 2 cohorts were matched using a propensity score matching (PSM) method. Patients' survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used for comparison.Three thousand seven hundred ninety-five patients were included in the final analysis, 3542 from Korea and 253 from Germany. Baseline characteristics revealed statistically significant differences for age, tumor location, pT stage, grading, lymphatic vessel infiltration (LVI), comorbidities, number of dissected lymph nodes (LN), postoperative complications, lymph-node ratio stage, and application of adjuvant chemotherapy. After PSM, 171 patients in TUM were matched to NCCK patients, and baseline characteristics for both cohorts were well balanced. Patients in Korea had significantly longer survival than those in Germany both before and after PSM. When the analysis was performed for each UICC stage separately, same trend was found over all UICC stages before PSM. However, significant difference in survival was observed only for UICC I after PSM.This analysis demonstrates different survival outcomes after surgical treatment of GC on different continents in specialized centers after balancing of baseline characteristics by PSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Woo Kim
- Center for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute & Hospital
| | - Jungnam Joo
- Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang-si Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hong Man Yoon
- Center for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute & Hospital
| | - Bang Wool Eom
- Center for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute & Hospital
| | - Keun Won Ryu
- Center for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute & Hospital
| | - Il Ju Choi
- Center for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute & Hospital
| | | | - Christoph Schuhmacher
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Department of Surgery, Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg Ruediger Siewert
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Department of Surgery, Munich, Germany
- University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Reim
- Center for Gastric Cancer, Research Institute & Hospital
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Department of Surgery, Munich, Germany
- Correspondence: Daniel Reim, Chirurgische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|