Transjugular liver biopsy--indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications--a systematic review

Liver fibrosis stage based on the four factors (FIB-4) score or Forns index in adults with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The presence and severity of liver fibrosis are important prognostic variables when evaluating people with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Although liver biopsy remains the reference standard, non-invasive serological markers, such as the four factors (FIB-4) score and the Forns index, can also be used to stage liver fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the FIB-4 score and Forns index in staging liver fibrosis in people with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) virus, using liver biopsy as the reference standard (primary objective). To compare the diagnostic accuracy of these tests for staging liver fibrosis in people with CHC and explore potential sources of heterogeneity (secondary objectives).

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard Cochrane search methods for diagnostic accuracy studies (search date: 13 April 2022).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included diagnostic cross-sectional or case-control studies that evaluated the performance of the FIB-4 score, the Forns index, or both, against liver biopsy, in the assessment of liver fibrosis in participants with CHC. We imposed no language restrictions. We excluded studies in which: participants had causes of liver disease besides CHC; participants had successfully been treated for CHC; or the interval between the index test and liver biopsy exceeded six months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data. We performed meta-analyses using the bivariate model and calculated summary estimates. We evaluated the performance of both tests for three target conditions: significant fibrosis or worse (METAVIR stage ≥ F2); severe fibrosis or worse (METAVIR stage ≥ F3); and cirrhosis (METAVIR stage F4). We restricted the meta-analysis to studies reporting cut-offs in a specified range (+/-0.15 for FIB-4; +/-0.3 for Forns index) around the original validated cut-offs (1.45 and 3.25 for FIB-4; 4.2 and 6.9 for Forns index). We calculated the percentage of people who would receive an indeterminate result (i.e. above the rule-out threshold but below the rule-in threshold) for each index test/cut-off/target condition combination.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 84 studies (with a total of 107,583 participants) from 28 countries, published between 2002 and 2021, in the qualitative synthesis. Of the 84 studies, 82 (98%) were cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy studies with cohort-based sampling, and the remaining two (2%) were case-control studies. All studies were conducted in referral centres. Our main meta-analysis included 62 studies (100,605 participants). Overall, two studies (2%) had low risk of bias, 23 studies (27%) had unclear risk of bias, and 59 studies (73%) had high risk of bias. We judged 13 studies (15%) to have applicability concerns regarding participant selection. FIB-4 score The FIB-4 score's low cut-off (1.45) is designed to rule out people with at least severe fibrosis (≥ F3). Thirty-nine study cohorts (86,907 participants) yielded a summary sensitivity of 81.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 75.6% to 85.6%), specificity of 62.3% (95% CI 57.4% to 66.9%), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.30 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.38). The FIB-4 score's high cut-off (3.25) is designed to rule in people with at least severe fibrosis (≥ F3). Twenty-four study cohorts (81,350 participants) yielded a summary sensitivity of 41.4% (95% CI 33.0% to 50.4%), specificity of 92.6% (95% CI 89.5% to 94.9%), and positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 5.6 (95% CI 4.4 to 7.1). Using the FIB-4 score to assess severe fibrosis and applying both cut-offs together, 30.9% of people would obtain an indeterminate result, requiring further investigations. We report the summary accuracy estimates for the FIB-4 score when used for assessing significant fibrosis (≥ F2) and cirrhosis (F4) in the main review text. Forns index The Forns index's low cut-off (4.2) is designed to rule out people with at least significant fibrosis (≥ F2). Seventeen study cohorts (4354 participants) yielded a summary sensitivity of 84.7% (95% CI 77.9% to 89.7%), specificity of 47.9% (95% CI 38.6% to 57.3%), and LR- of 0.32 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.41). The Forns index's high cut-off (6.9) is designed to rule in people with at least significant fibrosis (≥ F2). Twelve study cohorts (3245 participants) yielded a summary sensitivity of 34.1% (95% CI 26.4% to 42.8%), specificity of 97.3% (95% CI 92.9% to 99.0%), and LR+ of 12.5 (95% CI 5.7 to 27.2). Using the Forns index to assess significant fibrosis and applying both cut-offs together, 44.8% of people would obtain an indeterminate result, requiring further investigations. We report the summary accuracy estimates for the Forns index when used for assessing severe fibrosis (≥ F3) and cirrhosis (F4) in the main text. Comparing FIB-4 to Forns index There were insufficient studies to meta-analyse the performance of the Forns index for diagnosing severe fibrosis and cirrhosis. Therefore, comparisons of the two tests' performance were not possible for these target conditions. For diagnosing significant fibrosis and worse, there were no significant differences in their performance when using the high cut-off. The Forns index performed slightly better than FIB-4 when using the low/rule-out cut-off (relative sensitivity 1.12, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.25; P = 0.0573; relative specificity 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84; P = 0.002).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Both the FIB-4 score and the Forns index may be considered for the initial assessment of people with CHC. The FIB-4 score's low cut-off (1.45) can be used to rule out people with at least severe fibrosis (≥ F3) and cirrhosis (F4). The Forns index's high cut-off (6.9) can be used to diagnose people with at least significant fibrosis (≥ F2). We judged most of the included studies to be at unclear or high risk of bias. The overall quality of the body of evidence was low or very low, and more high-quality studies are needed. Our review only captured data from referral centres. Therefore, when generalising our results to a primary care population, the probability of false positives will likely be higher and false negatives will likely be lower. More research is needed in sub-Saharan Africa, since these tests may be of value in such resource-poor settings.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnostic value of focal liver lesions: A systematic analysis of 88 cases (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an important diagnostic tool for suspected parenchymal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract and adjacent organs. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EUS-FNA in focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHOD

Data from 88 patients diagnosed with FLLs by imaging who underwent EUS-FNA from 1 January 2017 to 31 August 2022 were reviewed in our retrospective study at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Ruijin Hospital of the School of Medicine of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The EUS-FNA biopsy results were compared with the final diagnosis to evaluate diagnostic value. The relevant factors were analysed to determine their influence on EUS-FNA biopsy results.

RESULTS

The 88 patients analysed in this study resulted in a final diagnosis of 86 malignant and two benign cases. The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA in FLLs was 93.18 % (82/88; 95 % Confidence Interval [CI], 87.9-98.5), with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 93.02 % (80/86; 95 %CI, 87.6-98.4), 100 % (2/2; 95 %CI, 100-100), 100 % (80/80; 95 %CI, 100-100), and 25 % (2/8; 95 %CI, -5-55.0), respectively. The parameters related to lesion and procedure were not significantly different between these two groups (p > 0.05). The number of puncture needles in the groups showed a statistically significant difference between multiple and single punctures (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data revealed that EUS-FNA is a safe and reliable diagnostic method for FLLs that shows high accuracy.

Transfemoral-Transcaval Liver Biopsy (TFTC) and Transjugular Liver Biopsy (TJLB) in Patients with Fontan-Associated Liver Disease (FALD)

PURPOSE

To describe our experience in performing transfemoral-transcaval liver biopsy (TFTC) and transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) in patients with Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD).

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective review of 23 TFTC and seven TJLB performed between August 2011 and May 2023 on patients who previously underwent the Fontan procedure (median age 23.1 years, ranging 11-43 years, 48% female). Patient demographics, laboratory values, pathology, radiology, and cardiology reports were reviewed. Liver explants were correlated with histopathological evaluation to determine sampling accuracy when available.

RESULTS

All biopsies achieved technical success (accurate targeting and safe tissue sample extraction) and histopathological success (yielding sufficient tissue for accurate diagnosis). Liver biopsies were performed during simultaneous cardiac catheterization in 28 of 30 (93%) procedures. There was no statistically significant change in hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count post-procedure, and fluoroscopy times. There was one major complication within the TJLB group and one minor complication within the TFTC group.

CONCLUSION

Transvenous liver biopsies, whether via transfemoral or transjugular route, may be safely performed in FALD patients while yielding samples with technical and histopathological success. The transfemoral approach, which is our preferred method; its compatibility with simultaneous cardiac catheterization and its potentially increased safety profile stemming from the avoidance of transversing the Fontan shunt-makes it a particular advantageous option in the management of FALD.

Miliary tuberculosis diagnosed by diffuse hepatic uptake on PET/CT and transjugular liver biopsy

The patient was an 81-year-old man. In his 20s, he had been treated with pharmacotherapy for pulmonary tuberculosis for 1 year. He presented to the Department of Respiratory Medicine with a chief complaint of dyspnea. The possibility of respiratory disease appeared to be low, but hepatic impairment was detected. The patient was thus referred to our department. Though the cause of hepatic impairment was unknown, the soluble interleukin-2 receptor level was elevated, suggesting malignant lymphoma. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) revealed diffuse, homogenous, intense FDG uptake in the entire liver, and transjugular liver biopsy confirmed the diagnosis. Histopathological examination revealed an epithelioid granuloma, and auramine staining was positive for bacilli suggestive of tuberculosis. CT revealed diffuse micronodular shadows in the lung, yielding a diagnosis of miliary tuberculosis. Therefore, the patient was prescribed antituberculosis medication by the Department of Respiratory Medicine. His subsequent clinical course was good. The miliary (hepatic) tuberculosis was typical based on the diffuse, homogenous, intense FDG uptake throughout the liver observed on PET-CT.

Endohepatology in clinical practice: EUS-guided portal pressure measurement combined with EUS-guided liver biopsy and variceal screening and treatment in outpatients

Background and Objectives

EUS-guided portal pressure gradient (PPG) is a novel technique that permits a true, direct measure of portal vein pressure and hepatic vein pressure. This article details our experience and lessons learned from 20 consecutive outpatient EUS-PPG procedures performed at a single center, along with simultaneous EUS-guided liver biopsy, variceal screening, and variceal banding.

Methods

Data on the first 20 patients who underwent EUS-PPG at a single center were retrospectively viewed and analyzed. The effects of various liver diseases or other patient-related factors on the clinical and technical success of EUS-PPG measurements, as well as EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB), were evaluated. During the procedure, if esophageal varices were encountered, they were assessed, and if felt to be clinically indicated, endoscopic variceal ligation was performed.

Results

The 20 patients included 10 male and 10 female patients. All procedures were technically successful. In all patients, the portal vein and hepatic veins could be easily identified. One adverse event of bleeding occurred during the EUS-PPG measuring procedure. All 20 EUS-LBs were technically successful and yielded adequate samples for histological evaluations, with an average of 25 complete portal tracts per sample. Among patients with esophageal varices, 40% of patients underwent banding. The mean EUS-PPG among 5 patients with esophageal varices was 11.6 mm Hg, compared with 3.2 mm Hg among 15 patients without esophageal varices.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that EUS-PPG is a novel, safe, reproducible, and effective technique. Also, the fact that EUS-PPG, EUS-LB, variceal screening, and variceal banding could be performed in 1 session and on an outpatient basis speaks to the growing relevance and impact of the nascent field of endohepatology.

Hepatomegaly and jaundice as the presenting symptoms of systemic light-chain amyloidosis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by the pathologic production and extracellular tissue deposition of fibrillar proteins derived from immunoglobulin AL fragments secreted by a clone of plasma cells, which leads to progressive dysfunction of the affected organs. The two most commonly affected organs are the heart and kidneys, and liver is rarely the dominant affected organ with only 3.9% of cases, making them prone to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.

CASE SUMMARY

A 65-year-old woman was admitted with a 3-mo history of progressive jaundice and marked hepatomegaly. Initially, based on enhanced computed tomography scan and angiography, Budd-Chiari syndrome was considered and balloon dilatation of significant hepatic vein stenoses was performed. However, additional diagnostic procedures, including liver biopsy and bone marrow-examination, revealed immunoglobulin kapa AL amyloidosis with extensive liver involvement and hepatic vascular compression. The disease course was progressive and fatal, and the patient eventually died 5 mo after initial presentation of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

AL amyloidosis with isolated liver involvement is very rare, and can be easily misdiagnosed as a vascular disease.

Liver failure after treatment with inotuzumab and polychemotherapy including PEG-asparaginase in a patient with relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia

We present the case of a 58-year-old female patient who presented with an extramedullary B-ALL relapse after prior allogenic HSCT and blinatumomab therapy. The patient died from complications of a drug-induced acute liver failure after a salvage therapy combining inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO)-based induction followed by consolidation with high dose MTX and pegaspargase based on the GMALL protocol for older ALL patients. After a diagnosis of the extramedullary relapse in the form of a retro vesical chloroma, the patient received an individualized multi-agent chemotherapy based on induction chemotherapy for older patients in combination with InO. After four administrations of InO, in combination with vincristine, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide, CT-imaging showed a reduction in volume of the chloroma and response to therapy. Consolidation with high-dose methotrexate and pegaspargase was administered. The patient developed toxic liver damage manifested by hyperbilirubinemia and progressive hepatic encephalopathy. The diagnostic criteria for VOD were met, and therapy with defibrotide was initiated. Liver biopsy revealed no histological signs of VOD but instead steatohepatitis indicative of drug-induced toxicity. The patient ultimately died of hemorrhagic shock through postinterventional hemorrhage after liver biopsy. In conclusion, although InO shows promising results in the therapy of r/r ALL with and without additional chemotherapy, the combination with MTX and pegaspargase in an intensively pretreated patient with relapse after HCST may impart an increased risk for liver-related toxicity. Special caution is required when assessing fitness for further liver toxic regimens. A key takeaway is also the reminder that InO can cause liver damage not only in the form of VOD but also through direct hepatocellular toxicity.

Role of Interventional Radiology (IR) in vascular emergencies among cirrhotic patients

Gastrointestinal hemorrhage remains one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality among patients with liver cirrhosis. Mostly, these patients bleed from the gastroesophageal varices. However, nonvariceal bleeding is also more likely to occur in these patients. Because of frequent co-existing coagulopathy, cirrhotics are more prone to bleed from a minor vascular injury while performing percutaneous interventions. Ultrasound-guided bedside vascular access is an essential procedure in liver critical care units. Transjugular portosystemic shunts (TIPS) with/without variceal embolization is a life-saving measure in patients with refractory variceal bleeding. Whenever feasible, balloon-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) is an alternative to TIPS in managing gastric variceal bleeding, but without a risk of hepatic encephalopathy. In cases of failed or unfeasible endotherapy, transarterial embolization using various embolic agents remains the cornerstone therapy in patients with nonvariceal bleeding such as ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma, gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding, and procedure-related hemorrhagic complications. Among various embolic agents, N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) enables better vascular occlusion in cirrhotics, even in coagulopathy, making it a more suitable embolic agent in an expert hand. This article briefly entails the different interventional radiological procedures in vascular emergencies among patients with liver cirrhosis.

Comparison of the Safety of Transjugular and Percutaneous Liver Biopsies

PURPOSE

To compare adverse events (AEs) between the transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) and percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1,300 patients who underwent liver biopsy between July 1, 2014 and January 31, 2018, were examined, and bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine predictors of the biopsy method used and AEs. To reduce bias in the comparison of the AE rates between patients who had TJLB or PLB, propensity score matching was used to control for baseline disease severity.

RESULTS

PLB and TJLB were performed in 601 and 699 patients, respectively. The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 3 (±2), and antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy at the time of biopsy was used in <10% of patients. Patients with suspected cirrhosis or portal hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 9.9), an international normalized ratio of >1.5 (OR, 5.9), or a platelet count of <100 × 103/mL (OR, 3.9) were more likely to undergo TJLB. After propensity matching, which identified a population of patients with a mean international normalized ratio of <1.5 and platelet count of >150 × 103/mL, the only difference in the AE rate was for pain, which was present in 8% and 10% of patients after TJLB and PLB, respectively (P < .001). Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 2 patients who underwent TJLB and 1 patient who underwent PLB. There was 1 case of death occurring after TJLB.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe/life-threatening AEs occurring after liver biopsy were uncommon, and the 2 liver biopsy approaches appeared to have similar safety profiles for low-risk patients. After matching for underlying disease severity, pain was the AE that was more likely to occur in patients who underwent PLB.

Distinct ways to perform a liver biopsy: The core technique setups and updated understanding of these modalities

There is dramatically increased incidence of several liver diseases worldwide; thus, an unmet need to diagnose and stage these pathological entities heralds the wide application of liver biopsy (LB) techniques. The ways of LB are versatile, including percutaneous LB, transjugular LB, and more recently an approach of minimal invasiveness, that is, EUS-guided LB (EUS-LB). In this review article, we come to the conclusion that EUS-LB may serve as a feasible, reliable, and safe alternative to percutaneous LB and transjugular LB in terms of improved diagnostic yield, excellent sampling performance, and controlled adverse events among patients with focal, infiltrative, and parenchymal liver diseases. Furthermore, extensive efforts have been made to optimize and refine several technical pillars within EUS-LB modality such as the selection of needle size/type, priming manner of biopsy needle, and choice of pass/actuation technique, all of which aim at obtaining better specimen quantity and quality. Another advantageous aspect and unique property pertinent to EUS-guided modality indicate that multiple screening, surveillance, and intervention procedures can be combined into one single endoscopic session. Accordingly, some pilot studies have clarified the clinical usefulness by integrating EUS-LB with simultaneous measurement of portal pressure gradient or examination of liver stiffness. However, more studies, in particular, randomized controlled trials or real-world evidence, are practically warranted to elucidate the validity and safety of EUS-LB as a regular/routine part of managing liver diseases.

Technical Success, Sample Adequacy, and Complications of Pediatric Transjugular Liver Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) procedurally samples liver tissue through the internal jugular vein. It is indicated in the presence of coagulopathies and/or ascites.

AIMS

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of TJLB in children.

METHODS

A literature search of several databases was conducted from inception to August 2022. Eligible studies reported pediatric patients (< 18 years old) who underwent TJLB. The pooled proportion was analyzed using a random-effects model. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022354421).

RESULTS

From 921 initial studies screened, eight met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 361 pediatric patients who underwent 374 TJLBs. All eight studies reported pooled rates of technical success at 99.1% (95% CI 0.982, 1.001; I2 = 0%) and histological adequacy of sampling at 97.5% (95% CI 0.954, 0.995; I2 = 27.66%). A total of 49 complications were reported across six studies, the most common being bleeding from the entry site (38.78%), fevers for less than 24 h (12.24%), red blood cells transfusion requirement (10.2%), supraventricular tachycardia (8.16%), and pain requiring analgesia (8.16%).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric TJLB demonstrates high rates of technical success and adequate liver core biopsy samples, with a low rate of complications. These results suggest that TJLB is an effective method for diagnostic yield and postprocedural outcomes, especially in patients with preexisting coagulopathies and ascites where percutaneous liver biopsy is contraindicated. Additional studies evaluating larger groups of pediatric patients may provide further support for the use of TJLB in this population.

Changing Trends in Liver Biopsy Practices: A Single-Center Analysis

Introduction To assess the trends for liver biopsy (LB) indications, technique, and histopathologic diagnosis, we retrospectively evaluated liver biopsies in two one-year periods, separated by a decade. Methods A pathology database query was performed for all parenchymal LB in patients over 18 years (11/2017 to 10/2018) and compared to those performed over a one-year period, a decade ago. We identified 427 parenchymal liver biopsies in the recent group and 166 in the decade-old group. Results Elevated liver enzymes are the most common indication for LB. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common diagnosis compared to 10 years ago, when it was viral hepatitis. Routes of LB were significantly different between the two groups, endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) (80.3% vs 0; p<0.0001), computed tomography-guided (0 vs 42.8%, p<0.0001), percutaneous by gastroenterologists (0% vs 29.5%, p<0.0001), and transjugular-LB (15.1% vs 17.6%, p<0.0001). The adequacy of the tissue for pathological diagnosis was similar, and there was no difference in adverse events. Conclusion At our institution, practice patterns have changed significantly for liver biopsy. There has been an increase in liver biopsy volume, and EUS guidance has become the most common approach for liver biopsy.

Quality standards for the management of alcohol-related liver disease: consensus recommendations from the British Association for the Study of the Liver and British Society of Gastroenterology ARLD special interest group

OBJECTIVE

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is the most common cause of liver-related ill health and liver-related deaths in the UK, and deaths from ALD have doubled in the last decade. The management of ALD requires treatment of both liver disease and alcohol use; this necessitates effective and constructive multidisciplinary working. To support this, we have developed quality standard recommendations for the management of ALD, based on evidence and consensus expert opinion, with the aim of improving patient care.

DESIGN

A multidisciplinary group of experts from the British Association for the Study of the Liver and British Society of Gastroenterology ALD Special Interest Group developed the quality standards, with input from the British Liver Trust and patient representatives.

RESULTS

The standards cover three broad themes: the recognition and diagnosis of people with ALD in primary care and the liver outpatient clinic; the management of acutely decompensated ALD including acute alcohol-related hepatitis and the posthospital care of people with advanced liver disease due to ALD. Draft quality standards were initially developed by smaller working groups and then an anonymous modified Delphi voting process was conducted by the entire group to assess the level of agreement with each statement. Statements were included when agreement was 85% or greater. Twenty-four quality standards were produced from this process which support best practice. From the final list of statements, a smaller number of auditable key performance indicators were selected to allow services to benchmark their practice and an audit tool provided.

CONCLUSION

It is hoped that services will review their practice against these recommendations and key performance indicators and institute service development where needed to improve the care of patients with ALD.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in diagnosing hepatic focal lesions

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has become an established method in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in gastroenterology; however, it has recently gained a growing role in hepatology.

AIM

To evaluate the role of EUS features, strain elastography (SE), and EUS-tissue acquisition in diagnosing hepatic focal lesions (HFLs) that could affect further management.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 215 patients with pancreatic, biliary, or gastrointestinal malignancies referred for EUS examination. HFLs were identified in 43 patients (20%), and EUS-guided tissue acquisition was performed from these lesions.

RESULTS

EUS features were highly sensitive (100%) but much less specific (57%) in diagnosing HFLs; the overall accuracy was 94%. Real-time elastography was also very sensitive (97%) but less specific (67%) in diagnosing HFLs; however, the overall accuracy was 92%. EUS tissue acquisition was extremely sensitive (100%) and specific (100%), with a 100% overall diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic utility of EUS-guided tissue acquisition was extremely accurate in diagnosing HFLs. EUS characteristics and real-time SE accurately predicted the histological diagnosis of both benign and malignant HFLs.

Transjugular liver biopsy: enlarge the indications for liver biopsy with reliable diagnostic quality

BACKGROUND

Complications and diagnostic efficiency for liver biopsy are main concerns for clinicians. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) compared with percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) when patients had equal level of liver function and number of passes, using propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

The clinical and pathological data of patients who received TJLB or PLB between January 2012 and October 2022 were collected. Matching factors included age, gender, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, liver function, creatinine, number of passes, hemodialysis, history of anti-coagulation and anti-platelet, and comorbidities. Coagulation indexes were not considered as matching factors due to different indications of the two techniques.

RESULTS

2711 PLBs and 30 TJLBs were evaluated. By PSM, 75 patients (50 PLBs, 25 TJLBs) were matched. The complication rates for TJLB and PLB were 4.0% (1/25) and 10.0% (5/50) (P > 0.05). Two PLBs had hepatic hemorrhage, one of which required only close monitoring (Grade 1) and the other needed hemostasis and rehydration therapy (Grade 2). The other 3 cases presented with mild abdominal pain (Grade 1). And only one TJLB presented with mild pain. The median number of complete portal tracts were 6.0 and 10.0 for TJLBs and PLBs (P < 0.05). Moreover, the median length of sample for TJLBs and PLBs were 10.0 and 16.5 mm (P < 0.05). The diagnostic efficiency of hepatopathy of unknown etiology of TJLB versus PLB groups before and after matching were 96.4% vs. 94.1% and 95.7% vs. 93.2%, respectively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TJLB is an effective invasive diagnostic procedure that expands indications for liver biopsy with reliable diagnostic quality.

EUS-guided versus percutaneous liver biopsy: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis of outcomes

EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has gained momentum in recent years, especially with availability of newer needle designs. Given the emerging comparative data on EUS-LB with second-generation needles and percutaneous LB (PC-LB), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of the two techniques. We searched multiple databases from inception through November 2021 to identify studies comparing outcomes of EUS-LB and PC-LB. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, and the results were expressed in terms of pooled proportions and odds ratio (OR) along with relevant 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Five studies with 748 patients were included in the final analysis. EUS-LB was performed in 276 patients and PC-LB in 472 patients. Across all studies, PC-LB had an overall higher diagnostic accuracy than EUS-LB, 98.6% confidence interval (CI: 94.7-99.7) versus 88.3% (49.6-98.3), OR: 1.65, P = 0.04. On assessing data from randomized controlled trials, there was no difference between the two. While pooled diagnostic adequacy and overall adverse events were not significantly different between PC-LB and EUS-LB, the former was superior in terms of the mean number of complete portal tracts (CPT) and total specimen length. PC-LB and EUS-LB produce similar results. PC-LB allows obtaining longer samples and more CPT. Further studies are needed to see if these trends hold up as more providers begin to perform EUS-LB.

EUS-guided left lobe liver biopsy: Safer modality with similar diagnostic yield as right lobe: a pilot study

Background and study aims  Percutaneous liver biopsy is traditionally done on the right lobe of the liver. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) can be performed on either the left or right lobe or as a combined bi-lobar biopsy. Earlier studies did not compare the benefit of bi-lobar biopsies to single-lobe biopsy for reaching a tissue diagnosis. The current study compared the degree of agreement of pathological diagnosis between the left lobe of the liver compared to right-lobe and with bi-lobar biopsy. Patients and methods  Fifty patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. EUS-LB with a 22G core needle was performed separately on both the liver lobes. Three pathologists, who were blinded to the site of biopsy independently reviewed the liver biopsies. Sample adequacy, safety, and concordance of pathological diagnosis between left- and right-lobe biopsy of the liver were analyzed. Results  The pathological diagnosis was made in 96 % of patients. Specimen lengths from the left lobe and the right lobe were 2.31 ± 0.57 cm and 2.28 ± 0.69 cm, respectively ( P  = 0.476). The respective number of portal tracts were 11.84 ± 6.71 versus 9.58 ± 7.14; P  = 0.106. Diagnosis between the two lobes showed substantial (κ = 0.830) concordance. Left-lobe (κ value 0.878) and right-lobe (κ = 0.903) biopsies showed no difference when compared with bi-lobar biopsies. Adverse events were observed in two patients, both of whom had biopsies of the right lobe. Conclusions  EUS-guided left-lobe liver biopsy is safer than right-lobe biopsy with similar diagnostic yield.

Diagnostic outcome and safety of plugged liver biopsy in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous liver biopsy is the gold standard test for the assessment of liver disease. In patients with coagulopathy, ascites, post-transplantation, and hypervascular tumors, biopsy is associated with increased risk of adverse events (AEs). Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) is recommended in these conditions but is expensive and unavailable at many centers. Plugged liver biopsy (PLB) provides an alternate diagnostic modality in these high-risk cases.

PURPOSE

To analyze the pooled diagnostic outcome and safety of PLB in high-risk cases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature search of various databases from January 1990 to July 2022 was conducted for studies evaluating the outcome of PLB in high-risk cases. The primary outcomes were pooled sample adequacy and AEs. Pooled event rates across studies were expressed with summative statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies (2329 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of sample adequacy was 98.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]=98.2-99.6). Severe AEs, major bleeding, and minor AEs were seen in 0.7% (95% CI=0.1-1.3), 0.4% (95% CI=0.1-0.8), and 11.5% (95% CI=2.4-20.6) of the patients. There was only one reported mortality, giving a pooled incidence of 0.0002% (95% CI=0.0-0.0038). Compared to TJLB (5 studies, n = 336), there was no difference in either sample adequacy (odds ratio [OR]=2.34, 95% CI=0.83-6.58) or risk of serious AEs (OR=0.47, 95% CI=0.173-1.31).

CONCLUSION

PLB can be safely performed on patients with coagulopathy and/or ascites with high sample adequacy rates and low incidence of AEs and mortality.

Emerging Biomarkers in Alcohol-associated Hepatitis

Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is a clinical syndrome of jaundice, abdominal pain, and anorexia due to prolonged heavy alcohol intake. AH is associated with changes in gene expression, cytokines, immune response, and the gut microbiome. There are limited biomarkers to diagnose and prognosticate in AH, but several non-invasive biomarkers are emerging. In this review, clinical risk-stratifying algorithms, promising AH biomarkers like cytokeratin-18 fragments, genetic polymorphisms, and microRNAs will be reviewed.

Learning curve of microwave ablation for liver cancers

PURPOSE

To evaluate MWA efficacy and safety by cumulative MWA volume and interventional experience.

METHOD

3113 primary liver cancers treated by 7 operators between 2006 and 2018 were studied. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate within-operators effects of increasing cumulative MWA volume per year on major complication, technical efficacy (TE) and local tumor progression (LTP) rates were adjusted for treatment-level characteristics. Changes were also evaluated by subgroups of tumor size and location.

RESULTS

Lower severe complication rate was detected only in higher MWA volume (HR: 0.31, P = 0.02)). TE rates increased with the increase of MWA volume ((100-150 procedures (HR: 0.33, P = 0.00); 150-200 procedures (HR: 0.08, P = 0.00)) per year. Similar results were found in subgroup analysis of interventional experience (5 to < 10 years (HR: 0.10, P = 0.00). MWA volume per year larger than 150 cases could reduce the major complication rate for tumors smaller than 5 cm (HR: 0.21, P = 0.03) and tumors in higher risk location (HR: 0.18, P = 0.03). The increase of MWA volume per year could significantly increase the TE rate in all tumor size, expect for tumors in high-risk location (100-150 procedures (HR:1.12, P = 0.84), 150-200 procedures (HR: 0.14, P = 0.08)).

CONCLUSIONS

Early and intensive performance of MWA procedures would reduce major complication rates regardless of tumor size and tumor location, but could not improve TE rate in high-risk locations.

Indications and methods for measuring portal hypertension in cirrhosis

Background and objectives: Over the last decade our understanding of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension has increased. Novel diagnostic technologies have facilitated and improved the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. With this review we aim to provide an overview of contemporary diagnostic principles of portal hypertension and indications for measuring portal pressure in cirrhosis.Methods: By review of current literature, we assessed new and old principles of measuring portal hypertension and the diagnostic values of the methods.Results: Invasive measurement of the portal pressure is still the gold standard to quantitate portal hypertension and to assess response to vasoactive treatment. The size of the portal pressure is important to assess since it contains information on the course of the disease and risk of developing hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, and mortality. Reliable non-invasive Elastography techniques are emerging that adequately assess portal pressure, but the available methods are not yet sufficiently accurate.Conclusion: Although elastography techniques provide valuable information and are good monitoring tools, liver vein catheterization remains valuable in diagnosing and monitoring portal hypertension, especially in combination with a trans-jugular liver biopsy.

LiverMultiScan as an alternative to liver biopsy to monitor autoimmune hepatitis in the National Health Service in England: an economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare chronic progressive liver disease, managed with corticosteroids and immunosuppressants and monitored using a combination of liver biochemistry and histology. Liver biopsy (gold standard) is invasive, costly and has risk of complications. Non-invasive imaging using multiparametric magnetic resonance (mpMR) can detect the presence and extent of hepatic fibroinflammation in a risk-free manner.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct early economic modelling to assess the affordability of using mpMR as an alternative to liver biopsy.

METHODS

Medical test costs associated with following 100 patients over a 5-year time horizon were assessed from a National Health Service payor perspective using tariff costs and average biopsy-related adverse events costs. Sensitivity analyses modelling the cost consequences of increasing the frequency of mpMR monitoring within the fixed cost of liver biopsy were performed.

RESULTS

Per 100 moderate/severe AIH patients receiving an annual mpMR scan (in place of biopsy), early economic modelling showed minimum cost savings of £232 333. Per 100 mild/moderate AIH patients receiving three mpMR scans over 5 years estimated minimum cost savings were £139 400. One-way sensitivity analyses showed increasing the frequency of mpMR scans from 5 to 10 over 5 years in moderate/severe AIH patients results in a cost saving of £121 926.20. In patients with mild/moderate AIH, an increase from 3 to 6 mpMR scans over 5 years could save £73 155.72. In a minimalistic approach, the use of 5 mpMR scans was still cost saving (£5770.48) if they were to replace two biopsies over the 5-year period for all patients with moderate/severe or mild/moderate AIH.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of mpMR scans in AIH patient pathways leads to significant cost savings when liver biopsy frequency is either reduced or eliminated, in addition to improved patient experience and clinician acceptability as well as providing detailed phenotyping to improve patient outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03979053.

Current Medical Treatment for Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease

Alcohol-associated liver disease is one of the main causes of chronic liver disease. It comprises a clinical-histologic spectrum of presentations, from steatosis, steatohepatitis, to different degrees of fibrosis, including cirrhosis and severe necroinflammatory disease, called alcohol-associated hepatitis. In this focused update, we aim to present specific therapeutic interventions and strategies for the management of alcohol-associated liver disease. Current evidence for management in all spectra of manifestations is derived from general chronic liver disease recommendations, but with a higher emphasis on abstinence and nutritional support. Abstinence should comprise the treatment of alcohol use disorder as well as withdrawal syndrome. Nutritional assessment should also consider the presence of sarcopenia and its clinical manifestation, frailty. The degree of compensation of the disease should be evaluated, and complications, actively sought. The most severe acute form of this disease is alcohol-associated hepatitis, which has high mortality and morbidity. Current treatment is based on corticosteroids that act by reducing immune activation and blocking cytotoxicity and inflammation pathways. Other aspects of treatment include preventing and treating hepatorenal syndrome as well as preventing infections although there is no clear evidence as to the benefit of probiotics and antibiotics in prophylaxis. Novel therapies for alcohol-associated hepatitis include metadoxine, interleukin-22 analogs, and interleukin-1-beta antagonists. Finally, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, microbiota transplantation, and gut-liver axis modulation have shown promising results. We also discuss palliative care in advanced alcohol-associated liver disease.

Ultrasound Pressure Estimation for Diagnosing Portal Hypertension in Patients Undergoing Dialysis for Chronic Kidney Disease

OBJECTIVES

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is considered the standard in quantifying portal hypertension, but can be unreliable in dialysis patients. A noninvasive ultrasound technique, subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE), may be a valuable surrogate of these pressure estimates. This study compared SHAPE and HVPG with pathology findings for fibrosis in dialysis patients.

METHODS

This was a subgroup study from an IRB-approved trial that included 20 patients on dialysis undergoing SHAPE examinations of portal and hepatic veins using a modified Logiq 9 scanner (GE, Waukesha, WI), during infusion of Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway). SHAPE was compared to HVPG and pathology findings using the Ludwig-Batts scoring system for fibrosis. Logistic regression, ROC analysis, and t-tests were used to compare HVPG and SHAPE with pathological findings of fibrosis.

RESULTS

Of 20 cases, 5 had HVPG values corresponding to subclinical and clinical portal hypertension (≥6 and ≥10 mmHg, respectively) while 15 had normal HVPG values (≤5 mmHg). SHAPE and HVPG correlated moderately (r = 0.45; P = .047). SHAPE showed a trend toward correlating with fibrosis (r = 0.42; P = .068), while HVPG did not (r = 0.18; P = .45). SHAPE could differentiate between mild (stage 0-1) and moderate to severe (stage 2-4) fibrosis (-10.4 ± 4.9 dB versus -5.4 ± 3.2 dB; P = .035), HVPG could not (3.0 ± 0.6 mmHg versus 4.8 ± 0.7 mmHg; P = .30). ROC curves showed a diagnostic accuracy for SHAPE of 80%, while HVPG reached 76%.

CONCLUSION

Liver fibrosis staging in dialysis patients evaluated for portal hypertension appears to be more accurately predicted by SHAPE than by HVPG; albeit in a small sample size.

Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy

Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a minimally-invasive alternative to the traditional (percutaneous or transjugular) liver biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. Po-tentially, EUS-LB combines the advantages of percutaneous and transjugular liver biopsy in addressing focused sampling in addition to measuring portal pressure. Additionally, EUS-LB facilitates access to both the lobes of the liver which is not considered with the traditional percutaneous liver biopsy. Multiple studies have compared EUS-LB with conventional liver biopsy and reported comparable diagnostic yield, increased acquisition of complete portal tracts, and longer specimen length as compared to the traditional approaches. EUS-LB is associated with lesser post-procedural pain and shorter recovery time, while providing lower risk of complications when compared to traditional liver biopsy. Innovations in needle types, needle sizes and suction techniques have aimed at further optimizing the EUS-LB technique. This review article updates current literature with focus on the variations in the technique and equipment used for EUS-LB, and compares EUS-LB with traditional methods of liver biopsy.

Systematic screening for advanced liver fibrosis in patients with coronary artery disease: The CORONASH study

Although coronary artery disease (CAD) and advanced liver fibrosis (AdLF) are commonly associated in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the prevalence of AdLF and the diagnostic performance of non-invasive fibrosis tests (NITs) in CAD patients remains unknown. We aimed to prospectively screen for AdLF in patients with documented CAD using NITs and Fibroscan. High and intermediate zones of NITs were combined to define AdLF. AdLF was suspected whenever APRI ≥ 0.5, Forns index ≥ 4.2, NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) ≥ -1.455/0.12 for age </≥ 65 yrs), Fib4 (≥ 1.30/2.0 for age </≥ 65 yrs) and eLIFT≥ 8. A presumed AdLF assessed by Fibroscan ≥ 8 kPa was the primary outcome measure. Results were given on the basis of intent-to-diagnose liver stiffness ≥ 8 kPa. Among 189 patients (age 60±7years), 10 (5.3%) had a Fibroscan ≥ 8 kPa, of whom 5 underwent liver biopsy (F3/F4: n = 3; no fibrosis: n = 2). AdLF was suspected in 31% of cases using eLIFT (specificity, Sp 70%), 85% with Forns (Sp 16%), 38% with NFS (Sp 63%), 25% with Fib4 (Sp 74%), and 10% with APRI (Sp 91%). In 149 patients “at-risk” of NAFLD (i.e., elevated ALT or diabetes or hypertriglyceridemia or BMI ≥25 kg/m²), AdLF ranged between 10% (APRI) to 84% (Forns). In this subgroup, the most efficient NITs to predict Fibroscan ≥ 8 kPa were eLIFT (Se 60%, Sp 70%) and NFS (Se 70%, Sp 60%). Finally, in CAD patients with risk factors for NAFLD, NFS or the more user-friendly eLIFT are the most attractive first-line biochemical NITs to discriminate good candidates for Fibroscan.

The Value of Liver and Spleen Stiffness for Evaluation of Portal Hypertension in Compensated Cirrhosis

Patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease who develop clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) are at high risk for hepatic decompensation and mortality if left untreated. Liver biopsy and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements are the current gold standard procedures for determining fibrosis severity and diagnosing CSPH, respectively; however, both are invasive, limiting their use in clinical practice and larger trials of novel agents. As such, there is an unmet clinical need for reliable, validated, noninvasive measures to detect CSPH and to further assess portal hypertension (PH) severity. Alterations in the biomechanical properties of the liver or spleen in patients with cirrhosis can be quantified by tissue elastography, which examines the elastic behavior of tissue after a force has been applied. A variety of methods are available, including magnetic resonance elastography, shear-wave elastography, and the most thoroughly investigated measure, vibration-controlled transient elastography. Liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) measurements offer valuable alternatives to detect and monitor CSPH. Both LS and SS correlate well with HVPG, with thresholds of LS >20-25 kPa and SS >40-45 kPa indicating a high likelihood of CSPH. Because SS is a direct and dynamic surrogate of portal pressure, it has the potential to monitor PH severity and assess PH improvement as a surrogate marker for clinical outcomes. Importantly, SS seems to be superior to LS for monitoring treatment response in clinical trials focusing on reducing PH.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on prevention and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis

The prevention and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis poses several difficult clinical questions. These Clinical Practice Guidelines have been developed to provide practical guidance on debated topics, including current views on haemostasis in liver disease, controversy regarding the need to correct thrombocytopenia and abnormalities in the coagulation system in patients undergoing invasive procedures, and the need for thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised patients with haemostatic abnormalities. Multiple recommendations in this document are based on interventions that the panel feels are not useful, even though widely applied in clinical practice.

Histologic Analysis of Transjugular Liver Biopsy Specimens for Early Prediction of Prognosis in Acute Liver Failure

Background and Aims

The prognosis of acute liver failure (ALF) treated with conservative therapy is extremely poor. Histologic diagnosis at the time ALF occurs provides important clues for determining the prognosis, including indications for liver transplant. Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB), which helps clarify the pathology of ALF, may be an effective clinical parameter that contributes to prognosis prediction, including indications for liver transplant.

Methods

In this prospective study, 79 patients who underwent TJLB with ALF were enrolled between May 2002 and March 2021. The relationships between prognosis and the extent of tissue necrosis on TJLB specimens, serum parameters related to the cause, and clinical parameters were investigated.

Results

Model for end-stage liver disease-sodium, hepatic encephalopathy predicting, total bilirubin, hepatocyte growth factor, ammonia, coma rate, and histologic diagnosis were identified as prognostic factors on univariate analysis. Histologically, 13 of 16 patients with massive hepatic necrosis died or had a liver transplant. On multivariate analysis, the only prognostic factor was massive hepatic necrosis. There were no treatment-related complications, and TJLB was technically successful in all patients.

Conclusion

In diagnosing the cause of ALF and understanding its pathology, TJLB contributes to predicting the prognosis of ALF based on histologic findings together with liver function tests and imaging findings, and it is an important diagnostic technique for determining diagnostic and treatment eligibility, including indications for liver transplant. When determining the best timing for patient selection and liver transplant, the finding of massive hepatic necrosis on TJLB specimens at the time ALF occurred was the most important prognostic factor.

Indian College of Radiology and Imaging Evidence-Based Guidelines for Interventions in Portal Hypertension and Its Complications

Portal hypertension is a complication of chronic liver disease. Various radiological interventions are being done to aid in the diagnosis of portal hypertension; further, an interventional radiologist can offer various treatments for the complications of portal hypertension. Diagnosis of portal hypertension in its early stage may require hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement. Measurement of gradient also guides in diagnosing the type of portal hypertension, measuring response to treatment and prognostication. This article attempts to provide evidence-based guidelines on the management of portal hypertension and treatment of its complications.

Prevention of bleeding after percutaneous biopsy with a small intestinal submucosa hemostatic plug

Percutaneous biopsies (PBs) are the gold standard diagnostic procedures indicated for renal and hepatic disorders. Nevertheless, they can cause hemorrhages and are contraindicated for coagulopathic patients. In this study we designed, fabricated, and evaluated a small intestinal submucosa (SIS) plug to reduce, and potentially cease, bleeding to decrease death risk after percutaneous hepatic and renal biopsies in healthy and coagulopathic in vivo models. First, the plug's blocking capacity was determined with an increase in its diameter of 24 ± 11% after immersion in human blood, and the capacity to induce clotting on its surface. The plug's in vivo performance was evaluated in a healthy porcine model, which showed minimal inflammatory reaction without side effects confirmed by histological results after 30 days. The plug's response in the coagulopathic model was assessed using heparinized swine for 2 days, which revealed localized microhemorrhages and mild inflammatory response without any lesions to the surrounding tissue. No major adverse events nor macroscopic hemorrhages were detected in the animal models. Furthermore, we assessed the plug's efficacy to reduce and stop bleeding using a transplant-discarded human liver model (n = 14). In this case, the mass of blood lost was 43.8 ± 21.8% lower in plugged transplant-discarded human liver biopsies compared to control biopsies without a plug. The bleeding was stopped within three minutes in 92% of plugged cases, but only in 8% of non-plugged cases. We demonstrated the feasibility of making a hemostatic SIS plug, which does not induce major inflammatory reaction and can effectively reduce and stop bleeding after PBs in non-coagulopathic and coagulopathic in vivo models, and in a transplant-discarded human liver model. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Percutaneous biopsy (PB) is a gold standard diagnostic procedure, but it can provoke life-threatening complications and is contraindicated for patients with coagulopathic disorders. This study demonstrates that small intestinal submucosa (SIS) can be manufactured into a biocompatible thrombogenic plug, insertable through a commercial Tru-Cut needle sheath. This device takes advantage of the collagen-rich composition of SIS to stop and reduce bleeding more effectively than the traditional PB, indicating that it could be routinely employed in a traditional biopsy to increase safety, or as a cost and time-reducing alternative to transjugular biopsy for coagulopathic patients.

Liver Biopsy in Patients With Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Patients with alcohol-associated liver disease may develop severe forms of presentation of acute-on-chronic liver failure, with a high risk for short-term mortality. Alcoholic hepatitis should be suspected among patients with alcohol-associated liver disease who present with acute-on-chronic liver failure. In this review, we discuss the need and feasibility of liver biopsy in the diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis and predicting its prognosis among decompensated patients with alcohol-associated liver disease and acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Clinical Usefulness of Transjugular Liver Biopsy in Patients With Hematological Diseases With Liver Dysfunction

Introduction

Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) is indicated for patients in whom percutaneous liver biopsy is contraindicated, such as those with hematological diseases complicated by liver dysfunction. However, the clinical utility of TJLB in this group of patients has not been thoroughly investigated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of TJLB in patients with hematological diseases complicated by liver dysfunction.

Methods

We analyzed the data of patients who developed liver disorders during treatment for hematological diseases at our hospital and required tissue diagnosis via TJLB. The clinical features of patients were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (mean age, 60.07 years; 12 men, 15 women) requiring tissue diagnoses via TJLB after developing liver disorders while undergoing treatment for hematological diseases were enrolled. One patient with autoimmune hemolytic anemia was diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury; two patients with amyloidosis had nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; one patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia had a drug-induced liver injury; one patient with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia had liver infiltration caused by an underlying disease; three patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura had autoimmune hepatitis; four patients with malignant lymphoma had liver infiltration by the underlying disease, and one patient with multiple myeloma had liver disorder caused by disseminated intravascular coagulation. Moreover, one patient had hepatitis B reactivation, another had hepatitis E, and six patients had a drug-induced liver injury. The treatment regimen was altered in cases of liver infiltration caused by the underlying disease, and the drug was changed for patients with drug-induced liver injury.

Conclusion

The etiology of liver disorders in patients with hematological diseases varies widely. Therefore, histological diagnosis using TJLB is useful to determine an appropriate therapeutic strategy for underlying hematological diseases.

Transjugular Liver Biopsy

Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) was first performed in 1970 and has since become a standard procedure in interventional radiology practices. TJLB can be used when a percutaneous liver biopsy is contraindicated, such as patients with ascites, coagulopathy, congenital clotting disorders or for patients undergoing concurrent evaluation for portal hypertension. While TJLB specimens tend to be smaller with less complete portal triads numerous studies have shown the samples to be adequate for diagnosis and staging. This article will review what the interventional radiologist needs to know about TJLB including indications/work-up, technical details, tips and tricks, and complications.

Transjugular liver biopsy and hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement in patients with and without liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement are diagnostic procedures for patients with acute and chronic liver diseases. Technical execution of TJLB and HVPG may be challenging in patients with advanced liver disease.

OBJECTIVE

We studied consecutive TJLB and HVPG procedures and investigated technical success, complications, quality of biopsies, indications and treatment changes in patients with and without liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

In the study period from 2010 to 2018, 575 consecutive TJLB and HVPG procedures were analyzed. Demographic characteristics, procedure-related and follow-up data were extracted from medical records.

RESULTS

In total, 259 (45%) patients were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis whereas 316 (55%) patients had no evidence of advanced chronic liver disease. Technical success of TJLB was significantly higher in patients without liver cirrhosis (287; 92%) compared to patients with liver cirrhosis [184; 76.7% (P = 0.001)]. Technical success of HVPG measurement was not different between both groups (P = 0.553). Liver biopsy specimens were significantly shorter in patients with liver cirrhosis (P = 0.001). Medical therapy was adjusted in 163 (28.4%) patients. In patients with liver cirrhosis, results of TJLB led less frequently to therapy initiation or adjustment compared to patients without liver cirrhosis (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, liver cirrhosis (Exp(B) 1.866; P = 0.012), alanine aminotransferase (Exp(B) 0.248; P < 0.001) and INR (Exp(B) 0.583; P = 0.027) were independently associated with treatment change.

CONCLUSION

Technical success and therapeutic decisions of TJLB are directly linked to presence or absence of liver cirrhosis.

Outcomes of transjugular liver biopsies for liver transplant recipients with bicaval and piggyback hepatic vein anastomoses

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant hepatic venous anastomoses are usually created using "bicaval" or "piggyback" techniques, which may result in unfavorable angulation between the inferior vena cava and hepatic veins, and makes hepatic vein catheterization and tissue sampling during transjugular liver biopsy (TLB) technically challenging.

PURPOSE

To compare the technical successes and complications of TLBs for recipients of liver transplants with bicaval and piggyback hepatic vein anastomoses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Information on type of hepatic vein surgical anastomosis was available for 190 adult patients in whom 306 consecutive TLBs were performed during 2009-2017: 158 with bicaval and 148 with piggyback anastomoses. The primary outcome of procedural success was defined as obtaining a tissue sample sufficient to make a pathologic diagnosis.

RESULTS

A technical success rate of 97% with adequate liver tissue for diagnosis was similar between the anastomotic groups (P = 0.50). TLB was unsuccessful in 3% of patients with piggyback anastomoses due to unfavorable hepatic venous anatomy whereas biopsy was successful in all patients with bicaval anastomoses (P = 0.02). Fluoroscopy times were not significantly different (12.1 vs. 13.9 min, P = 0.08). Rates of major complication were similar between the two groups (3% vs. 3%, P > 0.99).

CONCLUSION

TLB is safe and effective for liver transplant patients regardless of the type of hepatic vein anastomosis. While failure to catheterize or advance the stiffened biopsy cannula into the hepatic vein is more likely to occur in patients with piggyback anastomoses, this is a rare occurrence.

Liver biopsy in the real world-reporting, expert concordance and correlation with a pragmatic clinical diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis stage ≥2 comprise a target population for pharmacotherapy. Liver biopsy, the reference standard for identifying this population, requires complete and accurate assessment of steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Aims To investigate the completeness of real-world NASH-related pathology reports, assess concordance between site pathologists and central expert interpretation of the histologic elements of NASH, and determine concordance between biopsy-diagnosed NASH and a pragmatic clinical definition of NASH.

METHODS

Liver pathology reports from 222 patients across 38 TARGET-NASH sites were analysed for documentation of the histologic features of NASH. Biopsy slides were over-read by a blinded central expert pathologist. Concordance of histologic scores and interpretation was assessed. Histologic concordance with a clinical definition of NASH was determined. TARGET-NASH clinically defined NASH: elevated ALT, hepatic steatosis on biopsy or imaging and ≥1 of the following: BMI ≥30 kg/m² , type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia.

RESULTS

Documentation of steatosis, lobular inflammation, portal inflammation and ballooning were missing from 21%, 35%, 46% and 40% of reports, respectively. There was slight-to-fair concordance (weighted kappa 0.01-0.35) between site and central pathologists for inflammatory features, and moderate concordance (weighted kappa 0.56-0.57) for fibrosis staging. Clinical definition of NASH was 75%-91% concordant (94%-95% sensitive) with biopsy-diagnosed NASH.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial variability in reporting and grading NASH and fibrosis staging in clinical practice. This heterogeneity may adversely impact patient assessment and translation of practice guidelines into reality. The TARGET-NASH pragmatic clinical definition may serve as a valuable tool to accurately identify NASH patients in clinical practice.

Hepatic Vein Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Subharmonic Imaging Signal as a Screening Test for Portal Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Portal hypertension is the underlying cause of most complications associated with cirrhosis, with the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) used for diagnosis and disease progression. Subharmonic imaging (SHI) is a contrast-specific imaging technique receiving at half the transmit frequency resulting in better tissue suppression.

AIMS

To determine whether the presence of optimized SHI signals inside the hepatic vein can be used as a screening test for portal hypertension.

METHODS

This prospective trial had 131 patients undergoing SHI examination of portal and hepatic veins using a modified Logiq 9 scanner (GE, Waukesha, WI). Images acquired after infusion of the ultrasound contrast agent Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) were assessed for the presence of optimized SHI signals in the hepatic vein and compared to the HVPG values obtained as standard of care.

RESULTS

Of 131 cases, 64 had increased HVPG values corresponding to subclinical (n = 31) and clinical (n = 33) portal hypertension (> 5 and > 10 mmHg, respectively), and 67 had normal HVPG values (< 5 mmHg). Two readers performed independent, binary qualitative assessments of the acquired digital clips. Reader one (experienced radiologist) achieved for the subclinical subgroup sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 88%, and ROC area of 0.93 and for the clinical subgroup sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 61%, with an ROC area of 0.74. Reader two (less experienced radiologist) achieved for the subclinical subgroup sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 76%, and ROC area of 0.76 and for the clinical subgroup sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 63%, with an ROC area of 0.70. Readers agreement was of 83% with kappa value of 0.66.

CONCLUSION

The presence of optimized SHI signals inside the hepatic vein can be a qualitative screening test for portal hypertension, which could reduce the need for invasive diagnostic procedures.

Liver Biopsy in Pregnancy: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature

The etiology of most cases of liver diseases in pregnancy can be diagnosed with a thorough history, physical examination, laboratory values, serology, and noninvasive imaging. However, atypical clinical and laboratory presentations of liver diseases/chemistries require a liver biopsy to render an accurate diagnosis in cases where the biopsy results affect the timing of delivery or impact choice of medical therapy. According to the American College of Gastroenterology, liver biopsy can be effectively and safely conducted in pregnant women. Conventional routes of performing a liver biopsy include the percutaneous, transjugular route, and surgical methods. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy is a recent technique that has not yet gained widespread adoption but can potentially serve as an alternative route for obtaining the liver sample. Adverse events associated with liver biopsy include abdominal pain and hemorrhage. Maternal and fetal outcomes are limited to increased risk of preterm birth and small for gestational age neonate. However, very few studies have formally evaluated the safety of liver biopsy in pregnant women. In this review, we present two successful cases of liver biopsy performed during pregnancy and summarize the most recent evidence regarding the safety and outcomes of the procedure in pregnancy to assist clinicians in their decision to perform a liver biopsy during pregnancy or postpone it until after delivery.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the field of hepatology: Recent advances and future trends

The role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality for the management of various gastrointestinal diseases has been expanding. The imaging or intervention for various liver diseases has primarily been the domain of radiologists. With the advances in EUS, the domain of endosonologists is rapidly expanding in the field of hepatology. The ability to combine endoscopy and sonography in one hybrid device is a unique property of EUS, together with the ability to bring its probe/transducer near the liver, the area of interest. Its excellent spatial resolution and ability to provide real-time images coupled with several enhancement techniques, such as contrast-enhanced (CE) EUS, have facilitated the growth of EUS. The concept of “Endo-hepatology” encompasses the wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are now gradually becoming feasible for managing various liver diseases. Diagnostic advancements can enable a wide array of techniques from elastography and liver biopsy for liver parenchymal diseases, to CE-EUS for focal liver lesions to portal pressure measurements for managing various liver conditions. Similarly, therapeutic advancements range from EUS-guided eradication of varices, drainage of bilomas and abscesses to various EUS-guided modalities of liver tumor management. We provide a comprehensive review of all the different diagnostic and therapeutic EUS modalities available for the management of various liver diseases. A synopsis of all the technical details involving each procedure and the available data has been tabulated, and the future trends in this area have been highlighted.

A Noninvasive Ultrasound Based Technique to Identify Treatment Responders in Patients with Portal Hypertension

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) is based on the inverse relationship between the subharmonic amplitude of ultrasound contrast microbubbles and ambient pressure. The aim of this study was to verify if SHAPE can accurately monitor disease progression in patients identified with portal hypertension.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A modified Logiq 9 scanner with a 4C curvi-linear probe (GE, Waukesha, WI) was used to acquire SHAPE data (transmitting and receiving at 2.5 and 1.25 MHz, respectively) using Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway; FDA IND 124,465). Twenty-one (median age 59 years; 12 Males) of the 178 patients enrolled in this institutional review board approved study (14F.113) were identified as having clinically significant portal hypertension based on their hepatic venous pressure gradient results ≥ 10 mmHg. Repeat SHAPE examinations were done every 6.2 months. Liver function tests and clinical indicators were used to establish treatment response.

RESULTS

Of the 21 portal hypertensive subjects, 11 had successful follow up scans with an average follow up time of 6.2 months. There was a significantly larger SHAPE signal reduction in the group who were classified as treatment responders (n = 10; -4.01±3.61 dB) compared to the single nonresponder (2.33 dB; p < 0.001). Results for responders matched the corresponding clinical outcomes of improved model for end stage liver disease (MELD) scores, improvement in underlying cause of portal hypertension, improved liver function tests and reduced ascites.

CONCLUSION

SHAPE can potentially monitor disease progression in portal hypertensive patients and hence, may help clinicians in patient management. A larger study would further validate this claim.

Safety, Feasibility, Yield, Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications of Transjugular Liver Biopsy in Children and Adolescents

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to evaluate the indications, feasibility, complications and clinical implications of transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) in children.

METHODS

Data of all TJLB performed in children <18 years old was retrieved from the computerized hospital information system. TJLB was done using a 19 G quick-core needle biopsy system with 20 mm throw length. Hepatic venous pressure gradient was additionally measured in children with portal hypertension. A single pathologist reviewed all the biopsies again and provided structured information.

RESULTS

A total of 102 children, including 5 with acute liver failure underwent TJLB with technical success in 101 (99%). A mean of 2.3 ± 0.9 passes (range: 1-5) was taken for the biopsy. The most common indications for TJLB in our cohort were elevated international normalized ratio >1.5 (66, 64.7%), ascites (46, 45.1%) and thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 60,000/mm3) (42, 41.2%). Mean size of the tissue received was 14.5 ± 5.6 mm with an average of 10.2 ± 4.7 portal tracts. Only one child developed major (category D) complication (hemobilia) and 12 (11.8%) developed minor complications post-procedure. Etiological diagnosis could be made in a total of 64 (63.9%) children undergoing TJLB, the most common diagnosis being autoimmune hepatitis (n = 31), non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis (n = 16) and drug-induced liver injury (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

TJLB is well tolerated, feasible and helps make a diagnosis in close to 64% children allowing timely medical and/or surgical intervention. It is especially useful for diagnosis of autoimmune liver diseases, drug-induced liver injury and non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis.