Approach to the patient with acute severe autoimmune hepatitis

Acute Liver Failure Etiology Determines Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of the UNOS Database

Background: Acute liver failure (ALF) involves rapid liver injury, often leading to multi-organ failure. Liver transplantation (LT) has improved survival rates, with U.S. rates reaching 92%. This study analyzes UNOS data (2002-2020) to evaluate long-term survival and identify risk factors affecting waitlist and post-LT outcomes in ALF patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on adult ALF patients waitlisted for LT (Status 1/1A). ALF etiologies, including viral infections, drug-induced liver injury (DILI), acetaminophen (APAP) overdose, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), Wilson disease (WD), and unknown causes, were assessed with patient and donor characteristics. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses identified predictors of patient and graft survival. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the model's robustness. Results: We identified 2759 ALF patients. APAP (HR 1.7; p < 0.001) and unknown etiology (HR 1.3; p = 0.037) were linked to higher waitlist removal risk, while WD (HR 0.36; p < 0.001) increased LT probability. Among 2014 LT recipients, WD showed improved survival (HR 0.53; p = 0.002). Black/African American race (HR 1.47; p < 0.001), diabetes (HR 1.81; p < 0.001), and encephalopathy (HR 1.27; p < 0.001) predicted higher mortality. AIH had the lowest 1- and 10-year survival (83% and 62%), while APAP had the lowest 5-year survival (76%). WD had the highest graft survival at 1, 5, and 10 years (93%, 88%, and 80%). Conclusions: ALF etiology significantly affects survival outcomes. AIH and APAP are associated with worse survival, while WD shows favorable outcomes. Tailored post-LT management is essential to improve survival in ALF patients.

Acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis -from acute hepatitis to ALF and ACLF

Acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) occurs in 22-43% of all AIH cases, and is not a rare condition. Rather than constituting a single disease entity, it represents a clinical spectrum characterized by considerable variability in severity and the presence of preexisting chronic AIH. This spectrum ranges from acute AIH and acute severe AIH to AIH presenting as acute liver failure (ALF) or as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), contingent upon factors such as coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, and underlying liver disease. Diagnosing acute presentation of AIH can be particularly challenging due to the frequent absence of classical serologic signatures such as autoantibodies and elevated IgG levels. Histopathological examination remains essential for diagnosis, typically necessitating percutaneous or transjugular liver biopsy. Corticosteroids (CS) are recommended for the management of acute AIH and acute severe AIH with coagulopathy. However, the therapeutic response to CS should be meticulously monitored. If a poor response is anticipated, liver transplantation (LT) should be promptly considered. For AIH presenting as ALF with encephalopathy or ACLF with advanced underlying liver disease, LT is generally advised. Nonetheless, there is potential for a trial of CS therapy in cases of ALF with low MELD scores or ACLF without encephalopathy. This review provides an overview of the latest findings concerning the definition, diagnosis, and management of acute presentation of AIH.

Diagnosis and management of pediatric acute liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Indian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ISPGHAN)

Timely diagnosis and management of pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) is of paramount importance to improve survival. The Indian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition invited national and international experts to identify and review important management and research questions. These covered the definition, age appropriate stepwise workup for the etiology, non-invasive diagnosis and management of cerebral edema, prognostic scores, criteria for listing for liver transplantation (LT) and bridging therapies in PALF. Statements and recommendations based on evidences assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system were developed, deliberated and critically reappraised by circulation. The final consensus recommendations along with relevant published background information are presented here. We expect that these recommendations would be followed by the pediatric and adult medical fraternity to improve the outcomes of PALF patients.

Outcomes of patients with acute severe autoimmune hepatitis: Predictors of non-response to corticosteroids and need for liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute severe autoimmune hepatitis (AS-AIH) is an evolving concept and the outcomes and optimal treatment have been less studied. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients with AS-AIH and predictors of non-response to corticosteroid therapy and need for liver transplantation.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort, we included patients with AS-AIH admitted to our liver center. We defined AS-AIH based on the international autoimmune hepatitis group score as acute presentation of AIH with an international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 1.5 and without liver cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy. All patients received high dose corticosteroid therapy. Treatment response was defined as liver transplant free survival at 4 months after presentation. Factors associated with response to corticosteroids and survival of patients were studied.

RESULTS

In total, 61 patients with AS-AIH were included. Forty-seven patients responded to corticosteroid therapy. In the multivariate regression model, baseline INR (odds ratio [OR]: 0.184; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.048-0.699; p = 0.013) and delayed versus early initiation of corticosteroid (after vs. before 5 days of presentation) (OR: 0.189; 95% CI: 0.039-0.919; p = 0.039) were independent predictors of clinical non-response to corticosteroid therapy. In the multivariable Cox regression model, baseline INR level (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.542; 95% CI: 1.188-5.440; p = 0.016) and delayed initiation of corticosteroids (HR: 3.578; 95% CI: 1.084-11.812; p = 0.036) were independent predictors of liver transplant free survival at 6 months after diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Delayed initiation of corticosteroid therapy might be predictive of clinical non-response to medical therapy and need for liver transplantation in patients with AS-AIH.

Outcomes and management in paediatric autoimmune hepatitis presenting as acute liver failure: Individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in children presenting in acute liver failure (ALF) can be fatal and often requires liver transplantation (LTx). This individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD) aims to examine management and outcomes of this population, given the lack of large cohort studies on paediatric AIH first presenting as ALF (AIH-ALF).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of IPD statement using PubMed and Excerpta Medica dataBASE, and included English studies published between 2000 and 2020. The study included patients under 21 years of age, diagnosed with type 1 or 2 AIH and presenting with ALF. Data extracted included clinical and biochemical characteristics, interventions, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty eligible patients from 61 studies were identified, with an additional five patients from our institution. The majority were female (66.8%), with a median age of 10. Overall, 59.7% achieved native liver survival (NLS), 35% underwent LTx, and 5% died before LTx. The use of corticosteroids with non-steroid immunomodulators increased the likelihood of NLS by 2.5-fold compared to corticosteroids alone. AIH-1 was associated with 3.3-fold odds for NLS, compared to AIH-2. However, on multivariate analysis, only AIH-1 was identified as an independent predictor for NLS (OR 3.8 [95% CI 1.03-14.2], p = .04).

CONCLUSION

While corticosteroids and non-steroid immunomodulators treatment may offer enhanced probability of achieving NLS, treatment regimens for AIH-ALF may need to consider patient-specific factors, especially AIH type. This highlights the potential for NLS in AIH-ALF and suggest a need to identify biomarkers which predict the need for combination immunosuppression to avoid LTx.

Comparison of the recommendation of international autoimmune hepatitis pathology group 2022 and the simplified criteria for autoimmune hepatitis 2008: A preliminary study

Background and Aim

The histological diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is challenging. A new consensus recommendation was provided by the International AIH Pathology Group to address the problems in the histological diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to compare the 2008 'simplified' criteria for AIH with the 'consensus recommendation' of 2022 in terms of diagnostic sensitivity.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on pathological specimens of patients diagnosed with Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) between 2010 and 2022. Out of 188 patients enlisted, 88 were selected based on exclusion criteria. The specimens were examined by two experienced hepatopathologists and a resident pathologist. All specimens were analyzed using both the "simplified" criteria and the new consensus recommendations.

Results

Out of a total of 78 patients, the 2022 consensus recommendations raised the diagnostic category of 16 patients (20.5%) to a higher level. Six patients who were previously diagnosed as "atypical" were now considered "possible AIH", while 10 patients with a "compatible" diagnosis were elevated to "likely AIH" category. No patients were found to fall into a lower diagnostic category according to the new recommendations. A significant difference in diagnostic sensitivity was observed between the 2008 criteria and the 2022 consensus report (p<0.001).

Conclusion

The 2022 consensus recommendation may be more sensitive in the diagnosis of AIH in comparison to the 2008 'simplified' histological criteria. More studies are needed both for the validation of the sensitivity of the new consensus recommendation and for the determination of the specificity.

Prevalence of Acute on Chronic Liver Failure in Autoimmune Hepatitis, Treatment Response and Mortality Burden Assessment: A Region-Predominant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a global health problem. Little scientific evidence exists on its prevalence in autoimmune hepatitis. Treatment response and mortality outcomes have also been reported differently. The study was conducted to estimate the overall prevalence of ACLF among patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and determine the associated treatment response and mortality. We scrutinized wide literature in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane, and assessed published articles completely, studies performed and reported from around the globe, until December 07, 2023, according to the PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42023412176). Studies (retrospective and prospective cohort study type) that stated the ACLF development among established AIH cases were considered. Features of the study, duration of follow-up, and numeric patient information were retrieved from the studies included. The research paper quality was checked for risk of bias. Random effect meta-analysis with metaregression and subsection scrutinies were performed with R. The main outcome was the collective prevalence of ACLF in the AIH patients, whereas treatment response and mortality in AIH-associated ACLF were secondary outcomes. Six studies were involved with confirmed diagnoses in 985 AIH patients for the data synthesis. The pooled prevalence of ACLF in the explored patients was 12% (95% CI: 8-17) ( P =0.01). Heterogeneity was found to be high in the present meta-analysis ( I2 =72%; P < 0.01). For the secondary endpoint analysis, the pooled prevalence of complete remission at 1-year follow-up was 71% (0.52; 0.85), and mortality from the ACLF-AIH patient population was 32% (95% CI: 18-50). Sensitivity analysis showed no influence on the overall estimations of the pooled prevalence of ACLF by omitting studies one by one. One in 10 AIH patients likely present with ACLF. The response to treatment is seen in two-thirds of patients, and mortality is high.

Elevated serum HE4 levels as a novel biomarker of disease severity and hepatic fibrosis in autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) has been identified as a biomarker for renal fibrosis. This study aimed to evaluate the role of HE4 in the diagnosis and determination of disease severity and hepatic fibrosis in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

METHODS

Serum HE4 levels were determined via electrochemiluminescence immunoassays in 60 healthy controls and 109 AIH patients (43 without liver cirrhosis and 66 with liver cirrhosis). Liver biopsy was performed on 56 of 109 enrolled patients. We conducted a 5-year follow-up survey of 53 enrolled patients. All continuous variables were reported as median (25th-75th percentile).

RESULTS

Serum HE4 levels were significantly elevated in autoimmune hepatitis with liver cirrhosis (AIH-LC) patients compared with AIH patients and healthy controls [98.60 (74.15-139.08) vs 73.50 (59.88-82.00) vs 48.75 (43.38-52.93) pmol/L, p = 0.004]. The serum HE4 levels showed a positive correlation with the METAVIR scoring system in patients with liver biopsy (r = 0.711, p < 0.001). Serum HE4 levels were significantly elevated in Child-Pugh class C patients compared with Child-Pugh class B patients and Child-Pugh class A patients [106.50 (83.46-151.25) vs 110.00 (73.83-166.75) vs 77.03 (72.35-83.33) pmol/L, p = 0.006]. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of serum HE4 for evaluating liver cirrhosis were 69.7 % and 79.07 %, respectively, with a cutoff value of 82.34 pmol/L in enrolled patients. The logistic regression analysis showed that high levels of HE4 (≥82.34 pmol/L) were associated with AIH-LC (OR = 8.751, 95 % CI = 1.412-54.225, p = 0.020). The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that high levels of serum HE4 (≥82.34 pmol/L) were associated with poor outcome (log-rank p = 0.037, HR = 0.372, 95 % CI = 0.146-0.946).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum HE4 levels were found to be elevated in AIH-LC patients and exhibited a strong correlation with the severity of hepatic fibrosis, thus supporting their potential clinical value as a novel biomarker of disease severity and hepatic fibrosis in AIH.

Long-term outcomes of patients with autoimmune hepatitis induced cirrhosis after immunosuppressive treatment

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune hepatitis is an immune-mediated liver disease that results in hepatic inflammation and subsequent fibrosis. We aimed to assess the natural history of autoimmune hepatitis in patients who had cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis.

METHODS

We examined consecutive patients with autoimmune hepatitis (based on the revised International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group criteria) and cirrhosis who had long-term follow-up between 2012 and 2018. Complete clinical data, including longitudinal data, was obtained for each patient to determine clinical and biochemical outcomes. Decompensating events were defined as complications of portal hypertension.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients presenting with autoimmune hepatitis induced cirrhosis (age 50, 17-81; 71% women) were followed for an average of 8 years post-diagnosis. Fourteen (41%) patients had a decompensating event at diagnosis. All patients were begun on treatment; index decompensating events resolved in all patients. Twenty-six (76%) patients had normalization of transaminases; in this group, 4 (15%) patients developed one or more new decompensating events and 1 patient (4%) died. Of the 8 (24%) patients who did not have transaminase normalization, 6 (75%) developed one or more new decompensating events and 5 (62%) died or underwent liver transplant. There was a significant association between achieving normalization of transaminases and protection from developing a decompensating event ( P  = 0.003) and liver transplant or death ( P  = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis with cirrhosis at presentation achieved normalization of transaminases with treatment and rarely developed further decompensating events. We speculate that some of these patients had stabilization or reversal of portal hypertension.

A Prospective Multimodal Education Intervention for Providers Does Not Increase Hepatic Encephalopathy Treatment Rates

BACKGROUND

Over 50% of hospitalizations from hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are preventable, but patients often do not receive medical treatment.

AIMS

To use a multimodal education intervention (MMEI) to increase HE treatment rates and to evaluate (1) trends in HE treatment, (2) predictors of receiving treatment, and (3) the impact of treatment on hospitalization outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective single-center cohort study of patients hospitalized with HE from April 1, 2020-September 30, 2022. The first 15 months were a control ("pre-MMEI"), the subsequent 15 months (MMEI) included three phases: (1) prior authorization resources, (2) electronic order set, and (3) in-person provider education. Treatment included receiving any drug (lactulose or rifaximin), or combination therapy. Treatment rates pre- vs. post-MMEI were compared using logistic regression.

RESULTS

471 patients were included. There were lower odds of receiving any drug post-MMEI (p = 0.03). There was no difference in receiving combination therapy pre- or post-MMEI (p = 0.32). Predictors of receiving any drug included alcohol-related or cryptogenic cirrhosis (p's < 0.001), and the presence of ascites (p = 0.005) and/or portal hypertension (p = 0.003). The only significant predictor of not receiving any drug treatment was having autoimmune cirrhosis (p < 0.001). Patients seen by internal medicine (p = 0.01) or who were intoxicated (p = 0.02) were less likely to receive rifaximin. Any treatment was associated with higher 30-day liver disease-specific readmission (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This MMEI did not increase HE treatment rates, suggesting that alternative strategies are needed to identify and address barriers to treatment.

Development and validation of a noninvasive prediction model for significant hepatic liver fibrosis in Chinese patients with autoimmune hepatitis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a prevalent noninfectious liver disease. However, there is currently a lack of noninvasive tests appropriate for evaluating liver fibrosis in AIH patients. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model for noninvasive assessment of significant liver fibrosis (S ≥ 2) in patients to provide a reliable method for evaluating liver fibrosis in individuals with AIH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical data of 374 AIH patients were analyzed. A prediction model was established through logistic regression in the training set, and bootstrap method was used to validate the models internally. In addition, the clinical data of 109 AIH patients were collected for external verification of the model.The model was expressed as a nomogram, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the accuracy of the prediction model.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis revealed that age, platelet count (PLT), and the A/G ratio were identified as independent risk factors for liver fibrosis in AIH patients (P < 0.05). The diagnostic model that was composed of age, PLT and A/G was superior to APRI and FIB-4 in both the internal validation (0.872, 95%CI: 0.819-0.924) and external validation (0.829, 95%CI: 0.753-0.904).

CONCLUSIONS

Our predictive model can predict significant liver fibrosis in AIH patients more accurately, simply, and noninvasively.

Hepatic Sirt6 activation abrogates acute liver failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a deadly illness due to insufficient detoxification in liver induced by drugs, toxins, and other etiologies, and the effective treatment for ALF is very limited. Among the drug-induced ALF, acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is the most common cause. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying APAP hepatoxicity remain incompletely understood. Sirtuin 6 (Sirt6) is a stress responsive protein deacetylase and plays an important role in regulation of DNA repair, genomic stability, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Here, we report that genetic and pharmacological activation of Sirt6 protects against ALF in mice. We first observed that Sirt6 expression was significantly reduced in the liver tissues of human patients with ALF and mice treated with an overdose of APAP. Then we developed an inducible Sirt6 transgenic mice for Cre-mediated overexpression of the human Sirt6 gene in systemic (Sirt6-Tg) and hepatic-specific (Sirt6-HepTg) manners. Both Sirt6-Tg mice and Sirt6-HepTg mice exhibited the significant protection against APAP hepatoxicity. In contrast, hepatic-specific Sirt6 knockout mice exaggerated APAP-induced liver damages. Mechanistically, Sirt6 attenuated APAP-induced hepatocyte necrosis and apoptosis through downregulation of oxidative stress, inflammation, the stress-activated kinase JNK activation, and apoptotic caspase activation. Moreover, Sirt6 negatively modulated the level and activity of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) in APAP-treated mouse liver tissues. Importantly, the specific Sirt6 activator MDL-800 exhibited better therapeutic potential for APAP hepatoxicity than the current drug acetylcysteine. Furthermore, in the model of bile duct ligation induced ALF, hepatic Sirt6-KO exacerbated, but Sirt6-HepTg mitigated liver damage. Collectively, our results demonstrate that Sirt6 protects against ALF and suggest that targeting Sirt6 activation could be a new therapeutic strategy to alleviate ALF.

[Treatment of autoimmune hepatitis-First-line, second-line and third-line treatment]

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare autoimmune inflammation of the liver mostly with a chronic course, which can also be acutely manifested up to acute liver failure. It affects women 3-4 times more frequently than men and can be diagnosed in all age groups. In one third of the patients a liver cirrhosis is present at the time of diagnosis. It is characterized by a hepatic inflammation pattern, a polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia of immunoglobulin G and the detection of autoantibodies. A liver biopsy is necessary to make the diagnosis. The AIH is histologically characterized in particular by a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate in the portal fields. In cases with a relevant disease activity, AIH is typically treated by immunosuppression. The immunosuppressive treatment is associated with a prevention of disease progression to liver cirrhosis and a better survival. The success of treatment is measured by achieving biochemical remission, i.e., normalization of the transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels as a good noninvasive predictor of a histological remission. Another treatment target is an improvement of the symptoms of the patient. The first-line treatment consists of a glucocorticoid, mostly prednisolone or in cases without advanced fibrosis budesonide, and azothioprine. For reduction of steroid-specific treatment side effects the maintenance treatment should be carried out steroid-free whenever possible. In cases of insufficient response to azothioprine or side effects a treatment attempt using antimetabolites, such as 6‑mercaptopurine or mycophenolate mofetil is primarily carried out as second-line treatment. For patients who do not achieve biochemical remission through first-line or second-line treatment, a variety of medications are available for third-line treatment, e.g., rituximab, calcineurin inhibitors or antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) antibodies. Third-line treatment should be carried out in expert centers and registered in the European Reference Network for Rare Liver Diseases in order to improve the currently sparse database for these forms of treatment in the future.

Implications of Gender on the Outcome in Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is uncommon and predominantly affects females. Data on AIH from India are scanty. We retrospectively analyzed the spectrum and outcome of adults with AIH and compared it between male and female patients.

METHODS

AIH was diagnosed using a simplified AIH score. For suspected seronegative AIH, the revised score was used. Standard therapies for AIH and portal hypertension were administered and response was assessed at six months. Relapse rates and five-year mortality were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 157 patients with AIH, 85 (male: female 25: 60) were included in the study. The median age at diagnosis was 46 (interquartile range (IQR) 32-55.5) years in males vs 45 (IQR 34.2-54) years in females (p=0.91). A similar proportion of male and female patients presented with cirrhosis, acute severe AIH, or AIH-related acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF); Extra-hepatic autoimmune diseases were less common in male patients (16% vs 35.5% p=0.02). Other laboratory and histological features were comparable in both groups. During the median follow-up period of 51 months (IQR 45-67 months). The biochemical and clinical response at six months were seen in 64% of male patients and 63.3% of female patients (p= 0.57). Of patients, 75% relapsed in the male AIH group (12 of 16 patients) after initial remission compared to 42% in the female group (p=0.02). Five-year mortality was 14.1%, and no patient developed hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Male and female patients with AIH have similar clinical, biochemical, and histological profiles. More male patients relapsed after an initial response to therapy.

Prognostic models and autoimmune liver diseases

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs) are complex diseases with unknown causes and immune-mediated pathophysiology. In primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) disease modifying drugs are available which improve patient quality and quantity of life. In primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) no medical therapy is available and the only accepted treatment is liver transplantation (LT). PBC, PSC and AIH possess features that describe the archetype of patients within each disorder. On the other hand, the classical disorders are not homogeneous, and patients within each diagnosis may present with a range of clinical, biochemical, serological, and histological findings. Singularly, they are considered rare diseases, but together, they account for approximately 20% of LTs in Europe and USA. Management of these patients is complex, as AILDs are relatively uncommon in clinical practice with challenges in developing expertise, disease presentation can be sneaky, clinical phenotypes and disease course are heterogeneous. Prognostic models are key tools for clinicians to assess patients' risk and to provide personalized care to patients. Aim of this review is to discuss challenges of the management of AILDs and how the available prognostic models can help. We will discuss the prognostic models developed in AILDs, with a special focus on the prognostic models that can support the clinical management of patients with AILDs: in PBC models based on ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) response and markers of liver fibrosis; in PSC several markers including biochemistry, disease stage and radiological semiquantitative markers; and finally in AIH, markers of disease stage and disease activity.

The Dual Therapeutic Potential of Ottelione A on Carbon Tetrachloride-induced Hepatic Toxicity in Mice

BACKGROUND

Some herbal natural products play an important role in protecting organisms from the toxic effect of some xenobiotics. The present study was designed to evaluate the potential therapeutic effects of Ottelione A (OTTE) against carbon tetrachloride(CCl4)-induced toxicity in mice.

METHODS

Adult male Swiss albino mice were divided into six groups: group I was used as a normal control received olive oil; group II received DMSO; group III received OTTE; group IV received CCl4 in olive oil, (injected i.p) 3 times/week for 6 weeks; group V received the same CCl4 regimen as group IV followed by OTTE injected for 15 days, and group VI first received OTTE injected for 15 days followed by the same CCl4 regimen as group IV. Some biochemical and histological parameters were investigated.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the administration of CCl4 caused hepatotoxicity, as monitored by the significant increase in biochemical parameters concerning the olive oil group. Treatment with OTTE appeare d to be effective against hepatotoxic and liver changes induced by CCl4, as evidenced by the improvement of the same parameters.

CONCLUSION

Ottelione A (OTTE) has good antioxidant and therapeutic properties, which can help in preventing CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity in both pre-treatment and post-treatment modes.

Pediatric Autoimmune or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Metronidazole Effectiveness on Biochemical Data, Bile Acid Profile, and Gut Microbiota: A Pilot Study

Objectives

Autoimmune hepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) can both be present, resulting in autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis (ASC). PSC physiopathology could be based on the cross-talk between gut microbiota and bile acids (BAs); antibiotics are an innovative therapy. This pilot study assesses metronidazole (MTZ)'s effectiveness in ASC or PSC patients according to the stage of the disease, and its effects on biochemical parameters, BA profiles, and gut microbiota.

Methods

ASC or PSC patients from Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc's pediatric hepato-gastroenterology division were enrolled retrospectively and prospectively; both datasets were merged. MTZ was administered over at least 14 days on top of standard treatment (ursodeoxycholic acid, azathioprine, and steroids). Fecal and blood samples were collected before (T0) and at MTZ day 14 (T14). Sustained biochemical remission was defined by the reduction of transaminases (AST and ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and CRP until 12 months post-MTZ.

Results

A total of 18 patients (mean age, 13.2 ± 4.5 years) were enrolled (13 ASC and 5 PSC), and divided in remission or relapse patients. CRP, AST, ALT, and GGT levels decreased post-MTZ in both groups (excepting GGT in relapse patients), with decreases between T0 and T14 being significant for AST and ALT. Relapse patients were older (P = 0.0351) and in late-disease stage, with mainly large-duct PSC (P = 0.0466). In remission patients, the mean plasma relative abundance of hydrophilic BA increased by +6.3% (P = 0.0391) after MTZ. Neither at baseline nor T14, there were significant differences in gut microbiota recorded.

Conclusion

These data are likely indicative of long-term benefits following MTZ therapy at early-stage ASC or PSC, with increased hydrophilic BA abundance. Multicenter prospective studies are needed.

Identifying the early predictors of non-response to steroids in patients with flare of autoimmune hepatitis causing acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Early identification of non-response to steroids is critical in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) causing acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). We assessed if this non-response can be accurately identified within first few days of treatment.

METHODS

Patients with AIH-ACLF without baseline infection/hepatic encephalopathy were identified from APASL ACLF research consortium (AARC) database. Diagnosis of AIH-ACLF was based mainly on histology. Those treated with steroids were assessed for non-response (defined as death or liver transplant at 90 days for present study). Laboratory parameters, AARC, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores were assessed at baseline and day 3 to identify early non-response. Utility of dynamic SURFASA score [- 6.80 + 1.92*(D0-INR) + 1.94*(∆%3-INR) + 1.64*(∆%3-bilirubin)] was also evaluated. The performance of early predictors was compared with changes in MELD score at 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty-five out of one hundred and sixty-five patients (age-38.2 ± 15.0 years, 67.2% females) with AIH-ACLF [median MELD 24 (IQR: 22-27); median AARC score 7 (6-9)] given oral prednisolone 40 (20-40) mg per day were analyzed. The 90 day transplant-free survival in this cohort was 45.7% with worse outcomes in those with incident infections (56% vs 28.0%, p = 0.03). The AUROC of pre-therapy AARC score [0.842 (95% CI 0.754-0.93)], MELD [0.837 (95% CI 0.733-0.94)] score and SURFASA score [0.795 (95% CI 0.678-0.911)] were as accurate as ∆MELD at 2 weeks [0.770 (95% CI 0.687-0.845), p = 0.526] and better than ∆MELD at 3 days [0.541 (95% CI 0.395, 0.687), p < 0.001] to predict non-response. Combination of AARC score > 6, MELD score > 24 with SURFASA score ≥ - 1.2, could identify non-responders at day 3 (concomitant- 75% vs either - 42%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Baseline AARC score, MELD score, and the dynamic SURFASA score on day 3 can accurately identify early non-response to steroids in AIH-ACLF.

[Autoimmune hepatitis : From autoantibodies to cirrhosis]

Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated liver disease of unknown origin. Its clinical presentation is heterogeneous and ranges from asymptomatic courses over several years to acute forms with acute liver failure. Accordingly, the diagnosis is only made at the stage of cirrhosis in about one third of affected individuals. Early diagnosis and a consistent, adequate, individualized, immunosuppressive therapy are crucial for the prognosis, which is excellent when treated properly. AIH is rare in the general population and can be easily overlooked due to its variable clinical picture and sometimes difficult diagnosis. AIH should be considered as a differential diagnosis in any unclear acute or chronic hepatopathy. The therapy initially consists of remission induction and subsequently maintenance therapy with (often lifelong) immunosuppressants.

Budesonide as first-line treatment in patients with autoimmune hepatitis seems inferior to standard predniso(lo)ne administration

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In patients with non-severe acute or chronic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) without cirrhosis, clinical practice guidelines recommend indistinct use of prednisone or budesonide. However, budesonide is infrequently used in clinical practice. We aimed to describe its use and compare its efficacy and safety with prednisone as first-line options.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This was a retrospective, multicenter study of 105 naive AIH patients treated with budesonide as the first-line drug. The control group included 276 patients treated with prednisone. Efficacy was assessed using logistic regression and validated using inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. The median time to biochemical response (BR) was 3.1 months in patients treated with budesonide and 4.9 months in those with prednisone. The BR rate was significantly higher in patients treated with prednisone (87% vs. 49% of patients with budesonide, p < 0.001). The probability of achieving BR, assessed using the inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score, was significantly lower in the budesonide group (OR = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.11-0.38) at any time during follow-up, and at 6 (OR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.29-0.89) and 12 months after starting treatment (0.41; 95% CI: 0.23-0.73). In patients with transaminases <2 × upper limit of normal, BR was similar in both treatment groups. Prednisone treatment was significantly associated with a higher risk of adverse events (24.2% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-life setting, the use of budesonide as first-line treatment is low, and it is generally prescribed to patients with perceived less disease activity. Budesonide was inferior to prednisone as a first-line drug but was associated with fewer side effects.

Open challenges in the management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare autoimmune disease of the liver with many open questions as regards its etiopathogenesis, natural history and clinical management. The classical picture of AIH is chronic hepatitis with fluctuating elevation of serum transaminases and Immunoglobulin G levels, the presence of circulating autoantibodies and typical histological features. However, atypical presentations do occur and are not well captured by current diagnostic scores, with important consequences in terms of missed diagnoses and delayed treatments. AIH is treated with corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs but up to 40% of patients do not achieve full biochemical response and are at risk of progressing to cirrhosis and liver failure. Moreover, standard therapies are associated by significant side-effects which may impair the quality of life of patients living with AIH. However, advances in the understanding of the underlying immunology of AIH is raising the prospect of novel therapies and optimization of existing therapeutic approaches to reduce side-effect burdens and potentially restore immunological tolerance. In this review we outlined the clinical characteristics, etiopathogenesis and management of AIH and current challenges in the diagnosis and management of AIH and provided evidence underlying the evolution of diagnostic and clinical management protocols.

Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is an inflammatory disease of the liver of unknown cause that may progress to liver cirrhosis and end stage liver failure if diagnosis is overlooked and treatment delayed. The clinical presentation is often that of acute hepatitis, sometimes very severe; less frequently, it can be insidious or completely asymptomatic. The disease can affect people of any age and is more common in women; its incidence and prevalence seem to be on the rise worldwide. An abnormal immune response targeting liver autoantigens and inducing persistent and self-perpetuating liver inflammation is the pathogenic mechanism of the disease. A specific set of autoantibodies, increased IgG concentrations, and histological demonstration of interface hepatitis and periportal necrosis are the diagnostic hallmarks of autoimmune hepatitis. Prompt response to treatment with corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory drugs is almost universal and supports the diagnosis. The aims of treatment are to induce and maintain long term remission of liver inflammation. Treatment can often even reverse liver fibrosis, thus preventing progression to advanced cirrhosis and its complications. Most patients need lifelong maintenance therapy, and repeated follow-up in experienced hands improves the quality of care and quality of life for affected patients.

The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value of NCAPG as a Proposed Biomarker Candidate in Acute Liver Failure

BACKGROUND

Acute Liver Failure (ALF) is a difficult problem to solve in clinical practice. The presence of non-SMC condensin I complex subunit G (NCAPG) has previously been linked to vascular invasion of digestive system tumors, foreshadowing poor prognosis. Its role in ALF biology, however, remains unknown. This article explores the role of NCAPG as a potential biomarker candidate for the accurate diagnosis and targeted treatment of ALF.

METHODS

The study included transcription data (GSE14668, GSE38941, GSE62029, GSE96851, and GSE120652) of ALF, normal tissues, and clinical samples, where NCAPG was selected as the differential gene by the "DESeq2" R package to analyze the immune cell functions and signal pathways. Furthermore, RT-qPCR and Western blot analyses were used to confirm the RNA and protein levels of NCAPG in ALF cell models, respectively.

RESULTS

Bioinformatics analysis revealed that NACPG was up-regulated in ALF tissues, and the functional signaling pathway was primarily associated with immune infiltration. Based on the results of clinical samples, we suggest that NCAPG was overexpressed in ALF tissues. We also found that the expression of NCAPG increased with the degree of liver injury in vitro. Enrichment analysis suggested that NCAPG influenced ALF as a PI3K/AKT pathway activator.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that NCAPG is a preliminary tool for the diagnosis of ALF. It can affect ALF via the PI3K/AKT pathway and is a potential therapeutic target to improve prognosis.

Artificial intelligence for precision medicine in autoimmune liver disease

Autoimmune liver diseases (AiLDs) are rare autoimmune conditions of the liver and the biliary tree with unknown etiology and limited treatment options. AiLDs are inherently characterized by a high degree of complexity, which poses great challenges in understanding their etiopathogenesis, developing novel biomarkers and risk-stratification tools, and, eventually, generating new drugs. Artificial intelligence (AI) is considered one of the best candidates to support researchers and clinicians in making sense of biological complexity. In this review, we offer a primer on AI and machine learning for clinicians, and discuss recent available literature on its applications in medicine and more specifically how it can help to tackle major unmet needs in AiLDs.

Early Dynamics of MELD Scores Predict Corticosteroid Responsiveness to Severe Acute-Onset Autoimmune Hepatitis

Timely diagnosis and management of severe acute-onset autoimmune hepatitis (SA-AIH), a potential cause of acute liver failure (ALF), are challenging. An initial trial of corticosteroids (CS) followed by an assessment of clinical responses over 1-2 weeks is advocated by the latest international practice guidelines^1,2 and expert reviews.^3,4 Consideration of a second-line drug while evaluating for liver transplantation (LT) is also recommended.² Established predictors of "CS responsiveness" to guide decision-making are nonexistent. Herein, we determined the diagnostic abilities of early dynamics to define CS responsiveness in SA-AIH using the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores.

Management of Acute Liver Failure: Update 2022

Abbreviated pathogenesis and clinical course of the acute liver failure syndrome. The pathogenesis and clinical course of the syndrome of acute liver failure (ALF) differs depending upon the etiology of the primary liver injury. In turn, the severity of the liver injury and resulting synthetic failure is often the primary determinant of whether a patient is referred for emergency liver transplantation. Injuries by viral etiologies trigger the innate immune system via pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), while toxin-induced (and presumably ischemia-induced) injuries do so via damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The course of the clinical syndrome further depends upon the relative intensity and composition of cytokine release, resulting in an early proinflammatory phenotype (SIRS) and later compensatory anti-inflammatory response phenotype (CARS). The outcomes of overwhelming immune activation are the systemic (extrahepatic) features of ALF (cardiovascular collapse, cerebral edema, acute kidney injury, respiratory failure, sepsis) which ultimately determine the likelihood of death.Acute liver failure (ALF) continues to carry a high risk of mortality or the need for transplantation despite recent improvements in overall outcomes over the past two decades. Optimal management begins with identifying that liver failure is indeed present and its etiology, since outcomes and the need for transplantation vary widely across the different etiologies. Most causes of ALF can be divided into hyperacute (ischemia and acetaminophen) and subacute types (other etiologies), based on time of evolution of signs and symptoms of liver failure; the former evolve in 3 to 4 days and the latter typically in 2 to 4 weeks. Both involve intense release of cytokines and hepatocellular contents into the circulation with multiorgan effects/consequences.Management involves optimizing fluid balance and cardiovascular support, including the use of continuous renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, and pulmonary ventilation. Early evaluation for liver transplantation is advised particularly for acetaminophen toxicity, which evolves so rapidly that delay is likely to lead to death.Vasopressor support, high-grade hepatic encephalopathy, and unfavorable (subacute) etiologies heighten the need for urgent listing for liver transplantation. Prognostic scores such as Kings Criteria, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, and the Acute Liver Failure Group prognostic index take these features into account and provide reasonable but imperfect predictive accuracy. Future treatments may include liver support devices and/or agents that improve hepatocyte regeneration.

Alanine Aminotransferase and Bilirubin Dynamic Evolution Pattern as a Novel Model for the Prediction of Acute Liver Failure in Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Aims: To develop, optimize, and validate a novel model using alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TB) dynamic evolution patterns in predicting acute liver failure (ALF) in drug-induced liver injury (DILI) patients.

Methods: The demographics, clinical data, liver biopsy, and outcomes of DILI patients were collected from two hospitals. According to the dynamic evolution of ALT and TB after DILI onset, the enrolled patients were divided into ALT-mono-peak, TB-mono-peak, double-overlap-peak, and double-separate-peak (DSP) patterns and compared. Logistic regression was used to develop this predictive model in both discovery and validation cohorts.

Results: The proportion of ALF was significantly higher in patients with the DSP pattern than in the ALT-mono-peak pattern and DOP pattern (10.0 vs. 0.0% vs. 1.8%,p &lt; 0.05). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the DSP pattern model was 0.720 (95% CI: 0.682–0.756) in the discovery cohort and 0.828 (95% CI: 0.788–0.864) in the validation cohort in predicting ALF, being further improved by combining with international normalized ratio (INR) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (AUROC in the discovery cohort: 0.899; validation cohort: 0.958). Histopathologically, patients with the DSP pattern exhibited a predominantly cholestatic hepatitis pattern (75.0%, p &lt; 0.05) with a higher degree of necrosis (29.2%, p = 0.084).

Conclusion: DILI patients with the DSP pattern are more likely to progress to ALF. The predictive potency of the model for ALF can be improved by incorporating INR and ALP. This novel model allows for better identification of high-risk DILI patients, enabling timely measures to be instituted for better outcome.

Early predictors of corticosteroid response in acute severe autoimmune hepatitis: a nationwide multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To assess whether corticosteroids improve prognosis in patients with AS-AIH, and to identify factors at therapy initiation and during therapy predictive of the response to corticosteroids.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients with AS-AIH admitted to 13 tertiary centres from January 2002 to January 2019. The composite primary outcome was death or liver transplantation within 90 days of admission. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of 242 consecutive patients enrolled (mean age [SD] 49.7 [16.8] years), 203 received corticosteroids. Overall 90-day transplant-free survival was 61.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55.4-67.7). Corticosteroids reduced the risk of a poor outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.25; 95% CI 0.2-0.4), but this treatment failed in 30.5%. An internally validated nomogram composed of older age, MELD, encephalopathy and ascites at the initiation of corticosteroids accurately predicted the response (C-index 0.82; [95% CI 0.8-0.9]). In responders, MELD significantly improved from days 3 to 14 but remained unchanged in non-responders. MELD on day 7 with a cut-off of 25 (sensitivity 62.5%[95% CI: 47.0-75.8]; specificity 95.2% [95% CI: 89.9-97.8]) was the best univariate predictor of the response. Prolonging corticosteroids did not increase the overall infection risk (adjusted HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.3-2.1).

CONCLUSION

Older patients with high MELD, encephalopathy or ascites at steroid therapy initiation and during treatment are unlikely to show a favourable response and so prolonged therapy in these patients, especially if they are transplantation candidates, should be avoided.

Growth differentiation factor 15 as a novel diagnostic and therapeutic marker for autoimmune hepatitis

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) has been reported to be associated with fibrosis and cancer in liver disease. Diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is often difficult because of the lack of specific markers. We investigated whether GDF15 is useful for diagnosing AIH and determined its therapeutic effects. We enrolled 171 Japanese patients as follows: AIH (n = 45), hepatitis B (HB) (n = 17), hepatitis C (HC) (n = 15), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) (n = 20), and 74 healthy controls. Serum GDF15 levels were measured, and immunohistological analyses of GDF15 were performed using liver tissue of AIH patients. (1) GDF15 levels (pg/ml) were higher in AIH (1994.3 ± 1258.0) and HC (1568.0 ± 822.3) than in HB (953.2 ± 871.4), PBC (643.9 ± 247.0), and controls (475.3 ± 145.3) (p < 0.0001), as well as in cirrhosis patients (n = 31) than in non-cirrhosis patients (n = 66) (1926.6 ± 1026.0 vs. 1249.1 ± 1124.1, p < 0.0001). In non-cirrhosis patients, GDF15 levels were higher in AIH (1914.0 ± 1327.2) than in HC (955.7 ± 502.7), HB (519.3 ± 197.5), and PBC (643.9 ± 247.0) (p < 0.0001). (2) GDF15 was positively correlated with M2BPGi (r = 0.7728), total bilirubin (r = 0.6231), and PT-INR (r = 0.6332). (3) GDF15 levels could be used to distinguish AIH from other liver diseases in non-cirrhosis patients, with an area under the curve of 0.9373 (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 79.3%, cut-off value 931.3). (4) GDF15 in AIH decreased after treatment. (5) Immunohistological analyses in AIH liver tissues revealed that GDF15 was strongly expressed in inflammatory cells, hepatic cytoplasm, and sinusoidal endothelial cells, but decreased after treatment. GDF15 is a novel diagnostic marker for AIH and is also expected to be a therapeutic marker for AIH.Clinical Trials Registration: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Kurume University (Approval No.: 19049).

Consensus recommendations for histological criteria of autoimmune hepatitis from the International AIH Pathology Group: Results of a workshop on AIH histology hosted by the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases and the European Society of Pathology: Results of a workshop on AIH histology hosted by the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases and the European Society of Pathology

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Diagnostic histological criteria for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have not been clearly established. Previously published criteria focused mainly on chronic AIH, in which inflammatory changes mainly occur in portal/periportal regions and may not be applicable to acute presentation of AIH, in which inflammatory changes are typically predominantly lobular in location. International consensus criteria for the diagnosis and assessment of disease severity in both acute and chronic AIH are thus urgently needed.

METHODS

Seventeen expert liver pathologists convened at an international workshop and subsequently used a modified Delphi panel approach to establish consensus criteria for the histopathological diagnosis of AIH.

RESULTS

The consensus view is that liver biopsy should remain standard for diagnosing AIH. AIH is considered likely, if there is a predominantly portal lymphoplasmacytic hepatitis with more than mild interface activity and/or more than mild lobular hepatitis in the absence of histological features suggestive of another liver disease. AIH is also considered likely if there is predominantly lobular hepatitis with or without centrilobular necroinflammation and at least one of the following features: portal lymphoplasmacytic hepatitis, interface hepatitis or portal-based fibrosis, in the absence of histological features suggestive of another liver disease. Emperipolesis and hepatocellular rosettes are not regarded as being specific for AIH.

CONCLUSIONS

The criteria proposed in this consensus statement provide a uniform approach to the histological diagnosis of AIH, which is relevant for patients with an acute as well as a chronic presentation and to more accurately reflect the current understanding of liver pathology in AIH.

B cells in autoimmune hepatitis: bystanders or central players?

B cells are central for the adaptive immune system to mount successful immune responses not only as antibody producers but also as regulators of cellular immunity. These multifaceted features are also reflected in autoimmunity where autoreactive B cells can fuel disease by production of cytotoxic autoantibodies, presentation of autoantigens to autoreactive T cells, and secretion of cytokines and chemokines that either promote detrimental immune activation or impair regulatory T and B cells. The role of B cells and autoantibodies in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have been controversially discussed, with typical autoantibodies and hypergammaglobulinemia indicating a key role, while strong HLA class II association suggests T cells as key players. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on B cells in AIH and how different B cell subpopulations may drive AIH progression beyond autoantibodies. We also discuss recent findings of B cell-directed therapies in AIH.

Autoimmmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a T-cell mediated, inflammatory liver disease affecting all ages and characterized by female preponderance, elevated serum transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels, positive circulating autoantibodies, and presence of interface hepatitis at liver histology. AIH type 1, affecting both adults and children, is defined by positive anti-nuclear and/or anti-smooth muscle antibodies, while type 2 AIH, affecting mostly children, is defined by positive anti-liver-kidney microsomal type 1 and/or anti-liver cytosol type 1 antibody. While the autoantigens of type 2 AIH are well defined, being the cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) and the formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase (FTCD), in type 1 AIH they remain to be identified. AIH-1 predisposition is conferred by possession of the MHC class II HLA DRB1*03 at all ages, while DRB1*04 predisposes to late onset disease; AIH-2 is associated with possession of DRB1*07 and DRB1*03. The majority of patients responds well to standard immunosuppressive treatment, based on steroid and azathioprine; second- and third-line drugs should be considered in case of intolerance or insufficient response. This review offers a comprehensive overview of pathophysiological and clinical aspects of AIH.

Autoimmune Hepatitis-Primary Biliary Cholangitis Overlap Syndrome Triggered by COVID-19

COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, has caused the ongoing global pandemic. Initially considered a respiratory disease, it can manifest with a wide range of complications (gastrointestinal, neurological, thromboembolic and cardiovascular) leading to multiple organ dysfunction. A range of immune complications have also been described. We report the case of a 57-year-old man with a medical history of hypertension, prediabetes and beta thalassemia minor, who was diagnosed with COVID-19 and subsequently developed fatigue and arthralgias, and whose blood work showed hyperferritinemia, elevated liver enzymes (AST/ALT/GGT), hypergammaglobulinemia, anti-smooth muscle antibody, anti-mitochondrial antibody, and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies. The patient was diagnosed with autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis overlap syndrome triggered by COVID-19. To our knowledge, this is the first such case reported.

LEARNING POINTS

COVID-19 can precipitate a wide range of immune complications; we report a case of autoimmune hepatitis-primary biliary cholangitis overlap syndrome triggered by COVID-19.Clinicians should be aware of this unusual manifestation of COVID-19 so that prompt and appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic interventions can be initiated if the syndrome is suspected or confirmed.Our case further suggests the necessity for continued and regular follow-up of patients who have recovered from COVID-19 in order to uncover the long-term effects of the novel virus.