Atorvastatin increases low-density lipoprotein size and enhances high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration in male, but not in female patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

Sex differences in treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a highly prevalent monogenic disorder characterized by elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Sex disparities in diagnosis, lipid-lowering therapy, and achieved lipid levels have emerged worldwide, resulting in barriers to care in FH. A systematic review was performed to investigate sex-related disparities in treatment, response, and lipid target achievement in FH (PROSPERO, CRD42022353297).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane library, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and grey literature databases were searched from inception to 26 April 2023. Records were eligible if they described sex differences in the treatment of adults with FH.

RESULTS

Of 4432 publications reviewed, 133 met our eligibility criteria. In 16 interventional clinical trials (eight randomized and eight non-randomized; 1840 participants, 49.4% females), there were no differences between males and females in response to fixed doses of lipid-lowering therapy, suggesting that sex was not a determinant of response. Meta-analysis of 25 real-world observational studies (129 441 participants, 53.4% females) found that females were less likely to be on lipid-lowering therapy compared with males (odds ratio .74, 95% confidence interval .66-.85). Importantly, females were less likely to reach an LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L (odds ratio .85, 95% confidence interval .74-.97). Similarly, treated LDL-C levels were higher in females. Despite this, male sex was associated with a two-fold greater relative risk of major adverse cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Females with FH were less likely to be treated intensively and to reach guideline-recommended LDL-C targets. This sex bias represents a surmountable barrier to clinical care.

Comparative efficacy and safety among high-intensity statins. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: To summarize the evidence in terms of efficacy and safety of head-to-head studies of high-intensity statins regardless of the underlying population. Materials & methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the effect sizes in randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that compared high-intensity statins. Results: Based on 44 articles, similar effectiveness was observed across the statins in reducing LDL levels from baseline. All statins were observed to have similar adverse drug reactions (ADRs), although higher dosages were associated with more ADRs. Based on a pooled quantitative analysis of atorvastatin 80 mg versus rosuvastatin 40 mg, rosuvastatin was statistically more effective in reducing LDL. Conclusion: This review further confirms that high-intensity statins reduce LDL by ≥50%, favoring rosuvastatin over atorvastatin. Additional data are needed to confirm the clinical significance on cardiovascular outcomes using real-world studies.

HDL Cholesterol as a Residual Risk Factor for Vascular Events and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether low HDL cholesterol (HDL-c) levels are a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and whether it remains a residual risk factor when attaining low LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) treatment goals or when LDL-c is treated with intensive lipid-lowering therapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of 1,829 patients with type 2 diabetes included in the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) cohort. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the risk of HDL-c on cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Analyses were performed in strata of LDL-c levels (<2.0, 2.0-2.5, and >2.5 mmol/L) and lipid-lowering therapy intensity and were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol, LDL-c, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, glucose, and HbA1c.

RESULTS

A total of 335 new cardiovascular events and 385 deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 7.0 years (interquartile range 3.9-10.4). No relation was found between plasma HDL-c and cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-1.01) or all-cause mortality (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.03). Subgroup analysis supported effect modification by plasma LDL-c levels. In patients with LDL-c levels <2.0 mmol/L, higher HDL-c was related to higher risk for all-cause mortality (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07-1.21). Higher HDL-c was also related to higher risk for cardiovascular events in patients with LDL-c levels <2.0 mmol/L (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.21) in contrast to patients with LDL-c levels between 2.0 and 2.5 mmol/L (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.95) and >2.5 mmol/L (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.91-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes with LDL-c levels <2.0 mmol/L, higher HDL-c at baseline is unexpectedly related to a higher risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in contrast to high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes with LDL-c levels between 2.0 and 2.5 mmol/L.

Lipid-lowering efficacy of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND

This represents the first update of this review, which was published in 2012. Atorvastatin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs and the most widely prescribed statin in the world. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of atorvastatin on blood lipids.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To quantify the effects of various doses of atorvastatin on serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides in individuals with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease. The primary focus of this review was determination of the mean per cent change from baseline of LDL-cholesterol. Secondary objectives • To quantify the variability of effects of various doses of atorvastatin.• To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2013), MEDLINE (1966 to December Week 2 2013), EMBASE (1980 to December Week 2 2013), Web of Science (1899 to December Week 2 2013) and BIOSIS Previews (1969 to December Week 2 2013). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of atorvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included and extracted data. We collected information on withdrawals due to adverse effects from placebo-controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we found an additional 42 trials and added them to the original 254 studies. The update consists of 296 trials that evaluated dose-related efficacy of atorvastatin in 38,817 participants. Included are 242 before-and-after trials and 54 placebo-controlled RCTs. Log dose-response data from both trial designs revealed linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides. The Summary of findings table 1 documents the effect of atorvastatin on LDL-cholesterol over the dose range of 10 to 80 mg/d, which is the range for which this systematic review acquired the greatest quantity of data. Over this range, blood LDL-cholesterol is decreased by 37.1% to 51.7% (Summary of findings table 1). The slope of dose-related effects on cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol was similar for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, but rosuvastatin is about three-fold more potent. Subgroup analyses suggested that the atorvastatin effect was greater in females than in males and was greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Risk of bias for the outcome of withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) was high, but the mostly unclear risk of bias was judged unlikely to affect lipid measurements. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were not statistically significantly different between atorvastatin and placebo groups in these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.40).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This update resulted in no change to the main conclusions of the review but significantly increases the strength of the evidence. Studies show that atorvastatin decreases blood total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol in a linear dose-related manner over the commonly prescribed dose range. New findings include that atorvastatin is more than three-fold less potent than rosuvastatin, and that the cholesterol-lowering effects of atorvastatin are greater in females than in males and greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. This review update does not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because included trials were of short duration and adverse effects were not reported in 37% of placebo-controlled trials.

Effects of fluvastatin on plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein subfractions, oxidized low-density lipoprotein, and soluble adhesion molecules: a twenty-four-week, open-label, dose-increasing study

BACKGROUND

Statins not only lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels, but also have several antiarteriosclerotic effects (eg, decreasing arterial inflammation and arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation, as well as antioxidant effects). The relationship between the dose of statin and its effects on plasma LDL levels and other arteriosclerosis-related effects remains to be clarified.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effect of a statin, fluvastatin, on plasma levels of lipoprotein subfractions, oxidized LDL (Ox-LDL), Ox-LDL immunoglobulin G (IgG), soluble adhesion molecules, reverse cholesterol transport (ie, transport of esterified high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C] to triglyceride [TG]-rich lipoproteins by cholesteryl ester transfer protein [CETP] and reduction of plasma HDL-C levels), and on the intima-medial thickness (IMT) of the common carotid arteries.

METHODS

Patients with nonfamilial type 2 hyperlipoproteinemia were eligible for this open-label, dose-increasing study. Fluvastatin 20 mg/d was administered for the first 12 weeks, and the daily dose was increased to 40 mg for the subsequent 12 weeks. Patients were examined at baseline and after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment. Plasma lipoprotein subfractions were determined using sequential ultracentrifugation at 100,000g. The plasma levels of Ox-LDL, Ox-LDL-IgG, CETP, and soluble adhesion molecules were measured using sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The maximum IMT of the common carotid arteries was measured using sonography.

RESULTS

The plasma levels of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein (apo) B were reduced by 25% and 17%, respectively (P<0.001 for both), after 12 weeks of treatment with fluvastatin 20 mg/d; no further significant reductions in LDL were observed after increasing the daily dose to 40 mg. Fluvastatin 20 mg/d for 12 weeks decreased plasma levels of intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-I-C, LDL-II-C, and LDL-III-C by 25% (P<0.01), 30% (P<0.001), 23% (P<0.01), and 20% (P = 0.02), respectively. No further significant reductions in these levels were observed after increasing the daily dose to 40 mg. The plasma levels of Ox-LDL decreased in a similar fashion to the plasma levels of LDL-C (P<0.001). However, plasma levels of Ox-LDL-IgG and soluble P-selectin did not decrease after 12 weeks of fluvastatin 20 mg/d, but did decrease significantly (both 22%) after the next 12 weeks of treatment with fluvastatin 40 mg/d (P<0.05). Plasma levels of intercellular adhesion molecule 1and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and CETP mass were not altered by fluvastatin treatment. Significant changes in maximum IMT of the common carotid arteries were not seen throughout 24 weeks of fluvastatin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient population, fluvastatin 20 mg/d was sufficient to significantly reduce plasma levels of LDL, the 3 LDL subfractions, and Ox-LDL, but was not sufficient to reduce plasma levels of Ox-LDL-IgG and soluble P-selectin. It is important to check not only plasma lipoprotein levels but also other factors relating to arteriosclerosis during treatment with statins for the prevention and treatment of arteriosclerosis.

Lipid lowering efficacy of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND

Atorvastatin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs and the most widely prescribed statin in the world. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of atorvastatin on blood lipids.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the dose-related effects of atorvastatin on blood lipids and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2011, MEDLINE (1966 to November 2011), EMBASE (1980 to November 2011), ISI Web of Science (1899 to November 2011) and BIOSIS Previews (1969 to November 2011). No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of atorvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of 3 to 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. WDAE information was collected from the placebo-controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-four trials evaluated the dose-related efficacy of atorvastatin in 33,505 participants. Log dose-response data revealed linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides. Combining all the trials using the generic inverse variance fixed-effect model for doses of 10 to 80 mg/day resulted in decreases of 36% to 53% for LDL-cholesterol. There was no significant dose-related effects of atorvastatin on blood high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. WDAE were not statistically different between atorvastatin and placebo for these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.45).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride lowering effect of atorvastatin was dependent on dose. Log dose-response data was linear over the commonly prescribed dose range. Manufacturer-recommended atorvastatin doses of 10 to 80 mg/day resulted in 36% to 53% decreases of LDL-cholesterol. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 37% of the placebo-controlled trials.

Differential effects of fluvastatin alone or in combination with ezetimibe on lipoprotein subfractions in patients at high risk of coronary events

BACKGROUND

Ezetimibe, a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor, significantly lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) when administered in addition to statin treatment. The effect of ezetimibe on the incidence and progression of vascular disease is elusive. The objective of the study was to examine the effects of fluvastatin plus ezetimibe on lipoprotein subfractions in patients with type 2 diabetes and/or coronary heart disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety patients with LDL-C between 100 and 160 mg dL(-1) were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, single-blind, single-centre study. A total of 84 patients were treated with either fluvastatin 80 mg (n = 28) alone or in combination with ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 56) for 12 weeks to determine the effects on lipids, apolipoproteins and LDL subfractions by equilibrium density gradient ultracentrifugation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00814723.

RESULTS

Total cholesterol, LDL-C and apolipoprotein B were significantly more reduced in the combined therapy group. High density lipoproteins increased in the fluvastatin-only group and decreased in the combined therapy group. There was a significant difference between the two groups in buoyant and intermediate, but not in dense LDL particles.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of ezetimibe to fluvastatin resulted in a further reduction of buoyant and intermediate, but not of dense LDL compared with fluvastatin alone.

Activation of hepatic lipase expression by oleic acid: possible involvement of USF1

Polyunsaturated fatty acids affect gene expression mainly through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs), but how monounsaturated fatty acids affect gene expression is poorly understood. In HepG2 cells, oleate supplementation has been shown to increase secretion of hepatic lipase (HL). We hypothesized that oleate affects HL gene expression at the transcriptional level. To test this, we studied the effect of oleate on HL promoter activity using HepG2 cells and the proximal HL promoter region (700 bp). Oleate increased HL expression and promoter activity 1.3-2.1 fold and reduced SREBP activity by 50%. Downregulation of SREBP activity by incubation with cholesterol+25-hydroxycholesterol had no effect on HL promoter activity. Overexpression of SREBP2, but not SREBP1, reduced HL promoter activity, which was effected mainly through the USF1 binding site at -307/-312. Oleate increased the nuclear abundance of USF1 protein 2.7 ± 0.6 fold, while USF1 levels were reduced by SREBP2 overexpression. We conclude that oleate increases HL gene expression via USF1. USF1 may be an additional fatty acid sensor in liver cells.

Effects of statin on small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and remnant-like particle cholesterol in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

AIM

The effects of statin on small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sd-LDL-C) and remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) levels in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have not been examined. This study aimed to clarify the effects of statin on sd-LDL-C and RLP-C levels in heterozygous FH.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with heterozygous FH were randomly assigned to 2 mg/day pitavastatin or 10 mg/day atorvastatin. At baseline and 12 weeks after treatment with statin, we measured sd-LDL-C and RLP-C levels.

RESULTS

Sd-LDL-C levels significantly decreased from 43 +/- 24 to 16 +/- 10 mg/dL (-63%, p=0.001) in the pitavastatin group, and from 44 +/- 17 to 19 +/- 10 mg/dL (-55%, p<0.001) in the atorvastatin group. RLP-C levels decreased from 8.4 +/- 2.8 to 6.6 +/- 2.7 mg/dL (-16%, p=0.156) in the pitava-statin group, and from 9.8 +/- 4.7 to 5.9 +/- 5.4 mg/dL (-45%, p=0.044) in the atorvastatin group. There were no significant differences in percent changes of sd-LDL-C (p=0.370) and RLP-C levels (p=0.097) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Sd-LDL-C measured by the heparin-magnesium precipitation method and RLP-C levels in heterozygous FH were decreased by 12 weeks of statin therapy. Statin might have additional anti-atherogenic effects by reducing not only LDL-C but also sd-LDL-C and RLP-C.

Atherogenic lipoprotein particle size and concentrations and the effect of pravastatin in children with familial hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVE

To determine lipoprotein particle concentrations and size in children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and investigate the effect of pravastatin therapy on these measures.

STUDY DESIGN

Lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes were examined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in 144 children with FH and 45 unaffected siblings. The effect of pravastatin therapy (20 to 40 mg) on lipoprotein particle concentration and size were compared with placebo after 1 year of treatment, using analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Compared with the unaffected siblings, the children with FH had significantly higher concentrations of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles (115.6 nmol/L vs 51.2 nmol/L; P < .001) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles (1726.8 nmol/L vs 955.3 nmol/L; P < .001), and lower concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles (23.2 micromol/L vs 26.9 micromol/L; P < .001). Compared with placebo, pravastatin therapy decreased the concentration of VLDL particles by 35.9 nmol/L (P < .001), of total LDL particles by 342.7 nmol/L (P < .001), of large LDL particles by 189.5 nmol/L (P < .001), and of small LDL particles by 156.2 nmol/L (P = .152), but increased the concentration of total HDL particles by 2.2 micromol/L (P < .001), of large HDL particles by 1.0 micromol/L (P = .006), and of medium HDL particles by 1.1 micromol/L (P = .003). VLDL particle size increased by 1.0 nm (P = .032).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with their healthy siblings, children with FH have an atherogenic lipoprotein profile based on their lipoprotein distribution and lipoprotein particle diameter. Pravastatin therapy can improve, but not fully restore, these lipoprotein abnormalities toward normal levels in these children.

Differential effect of fenofibrate and atorvastatin on in vivo kinetics of apolipoproteins B-100 and B-48 in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus with marked hypertriglyceridemia

The specific impact of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors and fibrates on the in vivo metabolism of apolipoprotein (apo) B has not been systematically investigated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with high plasma triglyceride (TG) levels. Therefore, the objective of this 2-group parallel study was to examine the differential effects of a 6-week treatment with atorvastatin or fenofibrate on in vivo kinetics of apo B-48 and B-100 in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus with marked hypertriglyceridemia. Apolipoprotein B kinetics were assessed at baseline and at the end of the intervention using a primed constant infusion of [5,5,5-D(3)]-l-leucine for 12 hours in the fed state. Fenofibrate significantly decreased plasma TG levels with no significant change in plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and apo B levels. On the other hand, atorvastatin significantly reduced plasma levels of TG, LDL-C, and apo B. After treatment with fenofibrate, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) apo B-100 pool size (PS) was decreased because of an increase in the fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of VLDL apo B-100. No significant change was observed in the kinetics of LDL apo B-100. Moreover, fenofibrate significantly decreased TG-rich lipoprotein (TRL) apo B-48 PS because of a significant increase in TRL apo B-48 FCR. After treatment with atorvastatin, VLDL and IDL apo B-100 PSs were significantly decreased because of significant elevations in the FCR of these subfractions. Low-density lipoprotein apo B-100 PS was significantly lowered because of a tendency toward decreased LDL apo B-100 production rate (PR). Finally, atorvastatin reduced TRL apo B-48 PS because of a significant decrease in the PR of this subfraction. These results indicate that fenofibrate increases TRL apo B-48 as well as VLDL apo B-100 clearance in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus with marked hypertriglyceridemia, whereas atorvastatin increases both VLDL and IDL apo B-100 clearance and decreases TRL apo B-48 and LDL apo B-100 PR.

Polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis of lipoprotein subclasses

High-density (HDL), low-density (LDL), and very-low-density (VLDL) lipoproteins are heterogeneous cholesterol-containing particles that differ in their metabolism, environmental interactions, and association with disease. Several protocols use polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (GGE) to separate these major lipoproteins into known subclasses. This article provides a brief history of the discovery of lipoprotein heterogeneity and an overview of relevant lipoprotein metabolism, highlighting the importance of the subclasses in the context of their metabolic origins, fates, and clinical implications. Various techniques using polyacrylamide GGE to assess HDL and LDL heterogeneity are described, and how the genetic and environmental determinations of HDL and LDL affect lipoprotein size heterogeneity and the implications for cardiovascular disease are outlined.

Clinical importance and therapeutic modulation of small dense low-density lipoprotein particles

The National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III accepted the predominance of small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) as an emerging cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor. Most studies suggest that measuring low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size, sdLDL cholesterol content and LDL particle number provides additional assessment of CVD risk. Therapeutic modulation of small LDL size, number and distribution may decrease CVD risk; however, no definitive causal relationship is established, probably due to the close association between sdLDL and triglycerides and other risk factors (e.g., high-density lipoprotein, insulin resistance and diabetes). This review addresses the formation and measurement of sdLDL, as well as the relationship between sdLDL particles and CVD. The effect of hypolipidaemic (statins, fibrates and ezetimibe) and hypoglycaemic (glitazones) agents on LDL size and distribution is also discussed.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of atorvastatin in dyslipidemic subjects with advanced (non-nephrotic) and endstage chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

Patients with dyslipidemia and advanced renal failure are at markedly increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of atorvastatin in non-nephrotic, dyslipidemic patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) or endstage renal failure (ESRF) receiving dialysis.

METHODS

Following a 6-week baseline period, adult patients meeting Australian Heart Foundation treatment guidelines received atorvastatin for 16 weeks: 19 with CRF (predialysis), 17 on hemodialysis (HD), and 13 on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Dose (10-40 mg daily) was titrated to achieve lipid-lowering targets. Efficacy was determined by monitoring lipids (principally triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol); safety and tolerance by monitoring clinical and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin was effective in reducing LDL cholesterol from baseline at each of weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 in all study groups, with reductions of more than 40% at week 16. Sixty-two percent of PD, 73% of HD, and 100% of CRF patients were at or below target (<2.6 mmol/l) for LDL cholesterol at week 16. Significant reductions in triglycerides (approximately 27%) were seen in the CRF and combined HD/CAPD groups at all time points. Depending on the group, 65%-83% of patients were at or below target (<2.0 mmol/l) for triglycerides at week 16. The majority of patients received the 10-mg dose. Atorvastatin also reduced total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels in all groups and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol in the CRF group. Significant increases in LDL particle size were found in the HD and combined HD/CAPD groups. Minor, particularly gastrointestinal, symptoms were common. Three patients reported musculoskeletal symptoms, but creatine kinase was raised in only one.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin is an effective lipid-lowering agent for dyslipidemic subjects with advanced and endstage renal failure, and was reasonably well tolerated.

The Clinical Relevance of Low-Density-Lipoproteins Size Modulation by Statins

The predominance of small, dense low density lipoproteins (LDL) has been accepted as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III; in fact, LDL size seems to be an important predictor of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary heart disease. Several studies have also shown that the therapeutical modulation of LDL size is of great benefit in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Hypolipidemic treatment is able to alter LDL subclass distribution and statins are currently the most widely used lipid-lowering agents. Statins are potent inhibitors of hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in hepatic cholesterol synthesis and are the main drugs of choice for the treatment of elevated plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations. Statins potentially lower all LDL subclasses (e.g., large, medium and small particles); thus, their net effect on LDL subclasses or size is often only moderate. However, a strong variation has been noticed among the different agents: analyses of all published studies suggest a very limited role of pravastatin and simvastatin in modifying LDL size and their subclasses, while fluvastatin and atorvastatin seem to be much more effective agents. Finally, rosuvastatin, the latest statin molecule introduced in the market, seems to be promising in altering LDL subclasses towards less atherogenic particles.

Low-density lipoprotein size and cardiovascular risk assessment

A predominance of small, dense low-density lipoproteins (LDL) has been accepted as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. LDL size seems to be an important predictor of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary heart disease and evidences suggests that both quality (particularly small, dense LDL) and quantity may increase cardiovascular risk. However, other authors have suggested that LDL size measurement does not add information beyond that obtained by measuring LDL concentration, triglyceride levels and HDL concentrations. Therefore, it remains debatable whether to measure LDL particle size in cardiovascular risk assessment and, if so, in which categories of patient. Therapeutic modulation of LDL particle size or number appears beneficial in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events, but no clear causal relationship has been shown, because of confounding factors, including lipid and non-lipid variables. Studies are needed to investigate the clinical significance of LDL size measurements in patients with coronary and non-coronary forms of atherosclerosis; in particular, to test whether LDL size is associated with even higher vascular risk, and whether LDL size modification may contribute to secondary prevention in such patients.

Beneficial effects of atorvastatin on sd LDL and LDL phenotype B in statin-naive patients and patients previously treated with simvastatin or pravastatin

BACKGROUND

The presence of increased levels of small dense (sd) LDL (phenotype B) is associated with a substantial increase of cardiovascular disease risk. Since lowering of plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) by statins involves an up-regulation of the LDL receptor, we questioned whether LDL lowering by atorvastatin affects different LDL subfractions equally.

METHODS

Fifty-four hypercholesterolemic patients, requiring treatment for prevention of coronary heart disease received atorvastatin (10, 20 or 40 mg/day), either as initial therapy (n=33), or as replacement therapy (n=21) for pravastatin or simvastatin (both at 40 mg/day). In addition to plasma lipid measurements, cholesterol LDL subfractions were separated and analysed before and after 3 months of treatment.

RESULTS

In addition to the expected LDL-C decrease (-34%; p<0.0001), a major reduction in sd LDL occurred after atorvastatin therapy (-38.2%; p<0.0001). Interestingly, sd LDL decreased as much in patients previously treated with other statins (-36%; p<0.002). A close correlation (r=0.89, p<0.001) was found between reduction of sd LDL and that of LDL-C, in patients with phenotype B. Although high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) was not affected by atorvastatin treatment, plasma triglycerides decreased by 27.4% (p<0.0001). Only a weak correlation (r=0.35, p<0.01) was found between the reduction of plasma triglycerides and the decrease of sd LDL after atorvastatin treatment.

CONCLUSION

These results show that the reduction of LDL-C by atorvastatin largely reflects a lowering of sd LDL. Our data also suggest that triglyceride lowering plays only a partial role in sd LDL reduction.

Effect of statins on LDL particle size in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia: a comparison between atorvastatin and pravastatin

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Elevation of plasma cholesterol and/or triglycerides, and the prevalence of small dense low density lipoproteins (LDL) particles remarkably increase the risk in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). There are, at present, inconsistent data on the effects of different treatments on size and density of LDL particles in FCHL patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study was designed to evaluate the effect of 3 months' treatment with atorvastatin (10mg/day) or pravastatin (20mg/day) on the lipid/lipoprotein profile and LDL size in a total of 86 FCHL patients. Both statins significantly lowered plasma total and LDL cholesterol, with a significantly higher hypocholesterolemic effect observed with atorvastatin (-26.8+/-11.1% and -35.9+/-11.1%, respectively) compared to pravastatin (-17.6+/-11.1% and -24.5+/-10.2%). The percent decrease in plasma triglycerides was highly variable, but more pronounced with atorvastatin (-19.8+/-29.2%) than with pravastatin (-5.3+/-48.6%). Opposite changes in LDL size were seen with the 2 treatments, with increased mean LDL particle diameter with atorvastatin, and decreased diameter with pravastatin, and significant between treatment difference in terms of percent modification vs baseline (+0.5+/-1.6% with atorvastatin vs -0.3+/-1.8% with pravastatin).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results support the evidence indicative of a greater hypocholesterolemic effect of atorvastatin compared to pravastatin, and in addition show a raising effect of atorvastatin on the size of LDL particles in FCHL patients.

Sterol-regulatory-element binding protein inhibits upstream stimulatory factor-stimulated hepatic lipase gene expression

Hepatic lipase (HL) not only plays an important role in plasma lipoprotein transport, but may also affect intracellular lipid metabolism. We hypothesize that HL expression is regulated as an integral part of intracellular lipid homeostasis. Addition of oleate (1 mM) to HepG2 cells increased HL secretion to 134+/-14% of control (p<0.02), and increased the transcriptional activity of a 698-bp HL promoter-reporter construct two-fold. Atorvastatin (10 microM) abolished the oleate stimulation. The transcriptional activity of a sterol-regulatory-element binding protein (SREBP)-sensitive HMG-CoA synthase promoter construct was reduced 50% by oleate, and increased 2-3-fold by atorvastatin. Co-transfection with an SREBP-2 expression vector reduced HL promoter activity and increased HMG-CoA synthase promoter activity. Upstream stimulatory factors (USF) are also implicated in maintenance of lipid homeostasis. Co-transfection with a USF-1 expression vector stimulated HL promoter activity 4-6-fold. The USF-stimulated HL promoter activity was not further enhanced by oleate, but almost completely prevented by atorvastatin or co-transfection with the SREBP-2 vector. Opposite regulation by USF-1 and SREBP-2 was also observed with a 318-bp HL promoter construct that lacks potential SRE-like and E-box binding motifs. We conclude that the opposite regulation of HL expression by fatty acids and statins is mediated via SREBP, possibly through interaction with USF.

The effect of high dose atorvastatin therapy on lipids and lipoprotein subfractions in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes

Few data are available on the effects of high dose statin therapy on lipoprotein subfractions in type 2 diabetes. In a double blind randomised placebo-controlled trial we have studied the effects of 80 mg atorvastatin over 8 weeks on LDL, VLDL and HDL subfractions in 40 overweight type 2 diabetes patients. VLDL and LDL subfractions were prepared by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Triglycerides, cholesterol, total protein and phospholipids were measured and mass of subfractions calculated. HDL subfractions were prepared by precipitation. Atorvastatin 80 mg produced significant falls in LDL subfractions (LDL(1) 66.2 mg/dl:36.6 mg/dl, LDL(2) 118:56.6 mg/dl, LDL(3) 36.9:19.9 mg/dl all P < 0.01 relative to placebo) and VLDL subfractions (VLDL(1) 55:22.1 mg/dl, VLDL(2) 40.1:19.1 mg/dl, VLDL(3) 52.6:30 mg/dl all P < 0.01 relative to placebo). There was no change in the proportion of LDL present as LDL(3). There was a reduction in the proportion of VLDL as VLDL(1) and a reciprocal increase in the proportion as VLDL(3). Changes in VLDL subfractions were associated with changes in lipid composition, particularly a reduction in cholesterol ester and a reduction in the cholesterol ester/triglyceride ratio. Effects on HDL subfractions were largely neutral. High dose atorvastatin produces favourable effects on lipoprotein subfractions in type 2 diabetes which may enhance antiatherogenic potential.

Effect of atorvastatin on high density lipoprotein cholesterol and its relationship with coronary events: a subgroup analysis of the GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between changes in high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C) levels after statin treatment and the risk for coronary heart disease (CHD)-related events in the secondary CHD prevention GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary heart disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study. These findings suggested that dose titration with atorvastatin (10-80 mg/day, mean 24 mg/day)achieves the National Cholesterol Educational Program treatment goals and significantly reduces morbidity and mortality, in comparison to usual care.

METHODS

Analysis of variance was used to assess the effect of atorvastatin on HDL-C over time (up to 48 months) in 1600 CHD patients. The time-dependent multivariate Cox predictive model,involving backward stepwise logistic regression,was used to evaluate the relation between coronary events and HDL-C changes.

RESULTS

The mean increase in HDL-C levels during the study was 7%. All doses of atorvastatin significantly increased HDL-C levels. Increases were greater in men (7.8 vs 6.1%; p = 0.02), in combined hyperlipidaemia (7.9 vs 6.4% for hypercholesterolaemia; p = 0.04), and in the lower baseline HDL-C quartile (9.2 vs 5.3%, 1st vs 4th quartile; p = 0.001). After adjustment for 24 predictors of coronary events, multivariate analysis revealed a Hazards Ratio of 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.94; p = 0.002) for every 4 mg/dL(0.1 mmol/L) increase in HDL-C.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant beneficial effect on HDL-C levels across the dose range of atorvastatin. Clinical outcomes in the structured care arm of GREACE were determined in part by the extent of atorvastatin-induced HDL-C increase. This effect was independent from benefit induced by low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)reduction, suggesting that the CHD risk reduction associated with a rise in a low HDL-C at baseline remains significant under aggressive (-46%) LDL-C lowering conditions. However, the relationship between HDL-C and vascular risk may be weaker when LDL-C levels are aggressively lowered.

Effects of Atorvastatin and Simvastatin on Low-Density Lipoprotein Subtraction Profile, Low-Density Lipoprotein Oxidizability, and Antibodies to Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein in Relation to Carotid Intima Media Thickness in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Background

Little is known about the effects of statins on the quality of circulating low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in relation to atherosclerosis progression.

Methods

In a double-blind, randomized trial of 325 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), we assessed the effects of high-dose atorvastatin (80 mg) and conventional-dose simvastatin (40 mg) on LDL subtraction profile ( n = 289), LDL oxidizability ( n = 121), and circulating autoantibodies to oxidized LDL ( n = 220). Progression of atherosclerosis was measured by carotid intima media thickness (IMT) ( n = 325).

Results

At baseline, the patients showed an intermediate LDL subtraction profile composed of three LDL subtractions (LDL1, LDL2, LDL3), with LDL2 as the predominant subtraction. A strong negative correlation was found between plasma triglycerides and the LDL subtraction profile ( r = - .64, p = .000). Both plasma levels of triglycerides and small dense LDL3 correlated weakly with baseline IMT ( r = .11, p = .04 and r = .15, p = .01, respectively; n = 289). No association was found between baseline IMT and oxidation parameters or circulating antibodies to oxidized LDL. Atorvastatin reduced triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, and all LDL subtractions to a greater extent than did simvastatin and led to regression of carotid IMT. However, LDL subtraction pattern and plasma levels of autoantibodies to oxidized LDL remained unchanged in both treatment groups, and LDL oxidizability increased minimally to a similar extent in both groups. Significant treatment differences were found for the rate of in vitro oxidation of LDL and the amount of dienes formed during in vitro oxidation of LDL, which both decreased more following atorvastatin than after simvastatin.

Conclusion

Change of IMT after statin treatment was associated with baseline IMT ( r = .41), LDL cholesterol ( r = -.20), and the amount of dienes formed during in vitro oxidation of LDL ( r = .28) but not with plasma levels of antibodies to oxidized LDL, in vitro LDL oxidizability, and LDL subtraction profile.

Time-dependent lipid response on fluvastatin therapy of patients with hypercholesterolemia sensitive to apoE phenotype

Sixty-seven male patients with hypercholesterolemia, divided into three groups according to apolipoprotein E phenotype (33 with apoE3/ 3 phenotype, E3 group; 23 with 2/2 or 2/3, E2+ group; 11 with 4/4 or 4/3, E4+ group), received daily 20-40 mg of fluvastatin for 12 weeks. The levels of triglyceride (TG), cholesterol (Chol), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were measured after 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks on fluvastatin and after 4 weeks washout period. Lipid percentage changes (delta) were not associated with apoE phenotype for any treatment time. Cholesterol decreased by 14% after 12 weeks and HDL-C increased by 14-16% after 12 weeks for three phenotype groups. deltaTG, deltaChol, deltaLDL-C were associated positively, while negatively for deltaHDL-C, with the corresponding basal lipid values for the three groups. The positive deltaTG values occurred at a low basal TG0 level and became negative at TG0 > 1.6-1.9 mM. For E3 and E4+ groups, only a single parameter contributed significantly into a variation of lipid percentage changes. For the E2+ group, TG0 and Chol0 contributed in a reciprocal manner into deltaTG12/0, both positively into deltaChol8/0; Chol0 and HDL-C0 both negatively contributed into deltaHDL-C12/0. HDL-C0 contributed reciprocally into LDL-C variability for E2+ and E4+ groups. Three effects seem to contribute differently into lipid response among patients with different apoE phenotype: the inhibition of hepatic and lipoprotein lipase activities, the competition between TG-rich and low-density lipoproteins for LDL-receptor and the accumulation of intermediate-density lipoproteins in patients bearing E2 isoform.

Treatment of small dense LDL

The increased frequency of small, dense LDL is associated with the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Possible mechanisms include the increased susceptibility of small, dense LDL to oxidation and its high affinity for LDL-receptor-independent cell surface binding sites. Although more than 30% of adult men in the USA have been reported to have small,dense LDL, only 5.4% of young Japanese men are affected. However, more than 76% of Japanese diabetics with coronary heart disease have small, dense LDL. Furthermore, almost half of all obese women (BMI > 35 kg/m(2)) have small, dense LDL. Our previous observation revealed that type 2 diabetics had smaller LDL even if they were apparently normolipidemic. In the normotriglycelidemic group there was also a close relationship between LDL size and plasma triglyceride. Diabetics with microalbuminuria had smaller LDL than those with normoalbuminuria, indicating the early nephrotoxicity of small, dense LDL. We also found that young men with high-normal blood pressure have smaller LDL than those with optimal blood pressure. Furthermore, LDL size was decreased not only in preeclamptic women but also in normal pregnant women. Finally, weight reduction by obese women through strict diet control, the treatment of diabetics by acarbose or troglitazone, and the treatment of hyperlipidemia by new statins as well as fibrates were all successful in increasing LDL size associated with decreased plasma triglyceride.

Effect of atorvastatin on lipid parameters, LDL subtype distribution, hemorrheological parameters and adhesion molecule concentrations in patients with hypertriglyceridemia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hypertriglyceridemia is a risk factor for atherosclerosis that is typically associated with high concentrations of adhesion molecules, impaired hemorrheology and an unfavourable low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subtype distribution. We hypothesised that some of these risk markers might be beneficially influenced by lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin in hypertriglyceridemic patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nineteen patents with primary hypertriglyceridemia were given 10 mg of atorvastatin per day for four weeks. Their cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, LDL subtype profile, hemorrheological parameters and E-selectin, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 concentrations were measured before and at the end of atorvastatin therapy. The levels of total and LDL cholesterol respectively decreased by 25% and 24% (both p < 0.001). Furthermore, cholesterol was reduced by 8-29% in all seven LDL subfractions (density range: 1.020-1.066 g/mL) (p < 0.05). The reduction in triglyceride concentrations was of marginal significance (9%, p = 0.1), but its degree positively correlated with the reduction of small-dense LDL (r = 0.5, p < 0.025). Plasma viscosity and blood viscosity at low shear rates were respectively reduced by 2% and 16% (both p < 0.05). The effect of the treatment on the concentrations of HDL-C, fibrinogen and adhesion molecules was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Atorvastatin (10 mg/day) not only reduced the plasma concentrations of atherogenic lipoproteins but also improved the LDL-subtype profile and reduced plasma and blood viscosity in patients with hypertriglyceridemia; however, it failed to significantly lower triglyceride concentrations.

Hepatic lipase: a marker for cardiovascular disease risk and response to therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hepatic lipase plays a key role in the metabolism of pro-atherogenic and anti-atherogenic lipoproteins affecting their plasma level as well as their physico-chemical properties. However, controversial evidence exists concerning whether hepatic lipase is pro or anti-atherogenic. The goal of this review is to summarize recent evidence that connects the enzyme to cardiovascular disease. The potential impact of genetic determinants of hepatic lipase activity in modulating both the development of coronary and carotid atherosclerosis will be discussed based on hepatic lipase proposed roles in lipoprotein metabolism.

RECENT FINDINGS

Twenty to 30% of individual variation of hepatic lipase activity is accounted for by the presence of a common polymorphism in the promoter region (-514 C to T) of the hepatic lipase gene (LIPC). This polymorphism, via its impact on hepatic lipase synthesis and activity, appears to contribute to (1) individual susceptibility to cardiovascular disease: the presence of the T allele (low hepatic lipase activity) may carry a marginally increased risk of atherosclerosis; (2) carotid plaque composition and individual susceptibility to cerebrovascular events: the presence of the C allele (high hepatic lipase activity) is associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness and abundance of macrophages in the carotid plaque (unstable plaque); and (3) response of cardiovascular disease patients to lipid-lowering therapy: patients with the CC genotype have the greatest clinical benefit from intensive lipid-lowering therapy.

SUMMARY

Convincing evidence shows that hepatic lipase plays a key role in remnant lipoprotein catabolism as well as in remodeling of LDL and HDL particles. The anti or pro-atherogenic role of hepatic lipase is likely to be modulated by the concurrent presence of other lipid abnormalities (i.e. increased LDL cholesterol levels) as well as by the genetic regulation of other enzymes involved in lipoprotein metabolism. Characterization of patients by their LIPC genotype will contribute to a better definition of individual risk of coronary and cerebrovascular events, specifically in patients with qualitative (small, atherogenic LDL and low HDL2 cholesterol) rather than quantitative lipid abnormalities for whom the routine lipid profile may underestimate the risk of coronary and cerebrovascular disease.

Effects of atorvastatin on electrophoretic characteristics of LDL particles among subjects with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

The effects of the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor atorvastatin on electrophoretic characteristics of LDL particles were evaluated in 46 patients (28 males and 18 females) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) aged 20-61 carrying either a negative or a defective LDL receptor gene mutation. Following a 6 week drug-free baseline period, FH heterozygotes were treated with atorvastatin (median dose: 20 mg/day, range 10-80 mg/day)) for 6 months to maintain their plasma LDL-cholesterol concentrations between 4.0 and 5.0 mmol/l. Atorvastatin treatment significantly reduced plasma total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels and increased plasma HDL-cholesterol. Furthermore, atorvastatin treatment significantly increased LDL peak particle diameter (LDL-PPD) by 0.5% (from 255.0+/-6.2 to 256.4+/-5.5 A, P=0.004) and reduced the absolute concentration of cholesterol among small (<255 A) and large (>260 A) LDL particles by 35% (P<0.001). Changes in LDL-PPD and plasma triglyceride levels were inversely correlated (R=-0.34; P=0.02). Stepwise multiple linear regression analyses showed that 41.6% of the variation in the LDL-PPD response to atorvastatin was attributable to the initial LDL-PPD (14.4%, P=0.003), the apo E polymorphism (12.4%, P=0.02), the nature of the LDL receptor gene mutation (9.6%, P=0.01) and change in triglyceride levels (5.2%, P=0.04). Moreover, the reduction in the cholesterol content of LDL <255 A was directly correlated with the daily dosage of atorvastatin (P=0.05). Results of the present study showed that atorvastatin alters significantly LDL heterogeneity in patients at high risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) such as FH heterozygotes. These results also suggest that genetic and metabolic factors may be important determinants of atorvastatin-induced changes of LDL particle size and distribution among FH heterozygotes.

Atorvastatin dose-dependently decreases hepatic lipase activity in type 2 diabetes: effect of sex and the LIPC promoter variant

OBJECTIVE

Hepatic lipase (HL) is involved in the metabolism of several lipoproteins and may contribute to the atherogenic lipid profile in type 2 diabetes. Little is known about the effect of cholesterol synthesis inhibitors on HL activity in relation to sex and the hepatic lipase gene, the LIPC promoter variant in type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we studied the effect of atorvastatin 10 mg (A10) and 80 mg (A80) on HL activity in 198 patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients (aged 45-75 years, without manifest coronary artery disease, total cholesterol 4.0-8.0 mmol/l, and fasting triglycerides [TG] 1.5-6.0 mmol/l) were included in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial for 30 weeks (Diabetes Atorvastatin Lipid Intervention study).

RESULTS

HL activity at baseline was significantly higher in our population compared with an age-matched control group without type 2 diabetes (406 +/- 150 vs. 357 +/- 118 units/l). HL activity in men versus women (443 +/- 158 vs. 358 +/- 127 units/l), in carriers of the LIPC C/C allele versus carriers of the T/T allele (444 +/- 142 vs. 227 +/- 96 units/l), and in Caucasians versus blacks (415 +/- 150 vs. 260 +/- 127 units/l) all differed significantly (P < 0.001). Atorvastatin dose-dependently decreased HL (A10, -11%; A80, -22%; both P < 0.001). Neither sex nor the LIPC C-->T variation influenced the effect of atorvastatin on HL activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex, LIPC promoter variant, and ethnicity significantly contribute to the baseline variance in HL activity. Atorvastatin treatment in diabetic dyslipidemia results in a significant dose-dependent decrease in HL activity, regardless of sex or the LIPC promoter variant.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor decreases small dense low-density lipoprotein and remnant-like particle cholesterol in patients with type-2 diabetes

Patients with type 2 diabetes are known to have abnormalities in their remnant metabolism and low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfraction pattern, with a preponderance of small dense LDL. The effects of pitavastatin, a newly synthesized 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, on lipoprotein profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes were determined. Thirty-three patients were treated with pitavastatin with a daily dose of 2 mg for 8 weeks. After treatment, triglyceride, total and LDL cholesterol were significantly reduced by 28.7 +/- 36.7%, 25.2 +/- 14.3% and 36.1 +/- 14.3%, respectively. Remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C), an independent risk factor for CAD which is known to be elevated in diabetic patients, was also significantly reduced (-30.9 +/- 30.5%) by the treatment and this decrease correlated well with the decrease in triglyceride level. The proportion of small dense LDL, which is known for its atherogenisity, decreased from 29.9 +/- 26.2% to 19.7 +/- 22.7% and the mean LDL particle size significantly increased from 26.36 +/- 1.13 nm to 27.10 +/- 1.36 nm. Pitavastatin, which is known to improve triglyceride levels and cholesterol levels, also improves RLP-C level and LDL subfraction profiles, and this in turn may reduce the cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Hepatic lipase: a pro- or anti-atherogenic protein?

Hepatic lipase (HL) plays a role in the metabolism of pro- and anti-atherogenic lipoproteins affecting their plasma level and composition. However, there is controversy regarding whether HL accelerates or retards atherosclerosis. Its effects on different lipoprotein classes show that, potentially, HL may promote as well as decrease atherogenesis. Studies in animals with genetically modulated HL expression show that it depends on the model used whether HL acts pro- or anti-atherogenic. In humans, HL activity seems to correlate inversely with atherosclerosis in (familial) hypercholesterolemia, and positively in hypertriglyceridemia. In normolipidemia, HL activity is weakly associated with coronary artery disease (CAD). Genetically low or absent HL activity is usually associated with increased CAD risk, especially if plasma lipid transport is impaired due to other factors. Since HL promotes the uptake of lipoproteins and lipoprotein-associated lipids, HL may affect intracellular lipid content. We hypothesize that the prime role of HL is to maintain, in concert with other factors (e.g., lipoprotein receptors), intracellular lipid homeostasis. This, and the uncertainties about its impact on human atherosclerosis, makes it difficult to predict whether HL is a suitable target for intervention to lower CAD risk. First, the physiological meaning of changes in HL activity under different conditions should be clarified.

Atorvastatin: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and use in dyslipidaemia

Atorvastatin is a synthetic hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor. In dosages of 10 to 80 mg/day, atorvastatin reduces levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, triglyceride and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol and increases high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol in patients with a wide variety of dyslipidaemias. In large long-term trials in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia. atorvastatin produced greater reductions in total cholesterol. LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels than other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. In patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), atorvastatin was more efficacious than lovastatin, pravastatin. fluvastatin and simvastatin in achieving target LDL-cholesterol levels and, in high doses, produced very low LDL-cholesterol levels. Aggressive reduction of serum LDL-cholesterol to 1.9 mmol/L with atorvastatin 80 mg/day for 16 weeks in patients with acute coronary syndromes significantly reduced the incidence of the combined primary end-point events and the secondary end-point of recurrent ischaemic events requiring rehospitalisation in the large. well-designed MIRACL trial. In the AVERT trial, aggressive lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/ day for 18 months was at least as effective as coronary angioplasty and usual care in reducing the incidence of ischaemic events in low-risk patients with stable CHD. Long-term studies are currently investigating the effects of atorvastatin on serious cardiac events and mortality in patients with CHD. Pharmacoeconomic studies have shown lipid-lowering with atorvastatin to be cost effective in patients with CHD, men with at least one risk factor for CHD and women with multiple risk factors for CHD. In available studies atorvastatin was more cost effective than most other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in achieving target LDL-cholesterol levels. Atorvastatin is well tolerated and adverse events are usually mild and transient. The tolerability profile of atorvastatin is similar to that of other available HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and to placebo. Elevations of liver transaminases and creatine phosphokinase are infrequent. There have been rare case reports of rhabdomyolysis occurring with concomitant use of atorvastatin and other drugs.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin is an appropriate first-line lipid-lowering therapy in numerous groups of patients at low to high risk of CHD. Additionally it has a definite role in treating patients requiring greater decreases in LDL-cholesterol levels. Long-term studies are under way to determine whether achieving very low LDL-cholesterol levels with atorvastatin is likely to show additional benefits on morbidity and mortality in patients with CHD.

The evolving role of high-density lipoprotein in reducing cardiovascular risk

In many patients with coronary artery disease, a low level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), rather than substantially elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is often the predominant lipid abnormality. Although the National Cholesterol Education Program treatment guidelines include HDL-C concentration as a major risk factor for primary prevention, the guidelines' emphasis on LDL-C as the primary target of therapy may cause uncertainty as to whether risk reduction strategies should focus on lowering LDL-C or raising HDL-C in high-risk patients with low HDL-C. Recent clinical trial evidence and epidemiologic data suggest that HDL-C should play a more important role in risk assessment, and that the definition of low HDL-C may need adjustment from the current National Cholesterol Education Program definition of <35 mg/dL to perhaps <40 mg/dL in men and <45 mg/dL in women. Patients with low HDL-C should receive aggressive risk factor modification, and more emphasis on increasing HDL-C may be warranted in addition to lowering LDL-C. (c) 2001 by CHF, Inc.

Atherogenic lipoproteins and diabetes mellitus

The most common lipoprotein abnormality in type 2 diabetics is hypertriglyceridemia, which is known to be an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetics. It is known that remnant lipoproteins, small, dense LDL, and isolated hypo-alphalipoproteinemia exist in diabetics even if they are apparently normolipidemic. Our previous observation revealed that type 2 diabetics had smaller LDL even if they were without hyperlipidemia. We also found that diabetics with microalbuminuria had smaller LDL than those with normoalbuminuria, indicating early nephrotoxicity of small, dense LDL. More than half of the Japanese type 2 diabetics associated with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) showed isolated hypo-alpha lipoproteinemia, indicating the clinical importance of suppressed HDL fraction without prominent hyperlipidemia in the diabetics. Finally, strict diet control and treatment of diabetics with dyslipidemias by acarbose, troglitazone, fibrates and/or statins were all successful in increasing LDL size.

Low hepatic lipase activity is a novel risk factor for coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

The crucial function of hepatic lipase (HL) in lipid metabolism has been well established, but the relationship between HL activity and coronary artery disease (CAD) is disputed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured HL activity in the postheparin plasma of 200 consecutive men undergoing elective coronary angiography and determined the degree of CAD with the extent score, which has been shown to be better correlated with known risk factors than other measures of CAD extent. We found a significant inverse correlation between HL activity and the extent of CAD (r=-0.19, P<0.01). This association was mainly due to patients with HDL levels >0.96 mmol/L (n=94, r=-0.30, P<0.005). HL activity was lower in 173 patients with CAD than in 40 controls with normal angiograms (286+/-106 versus 338+/-108 nmol. mL(-1). min(-1), P<0.01). To correct for potential confounding factors, we performed multivariate analyses that confirmed the independent association of HL activity with CAD extent. In addition, the presence of the T allele at position -514 in the HL promoter, which leads to a reduced HL promoter activity, was associated with lower HL activity (r=0.30, P<0.001) and higher CAD extent (42.2+/-20.8 versus 35.3+/-23.6 [extent score], P<0.05). In patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, calcified lesions in ECG-gated spiral computed tomography were higher in patients with low HL activity (6.3+/-6.8 versus 1.5+/-3.1, P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that low HL activity is associated with CAD. Therefore, HL might be useful for CAD risk estimation and might be a target for pharmacological intervention.

Effect of atorvastatin treatment on lipoprotein lipase mass in the pre-heparin plasma in Japanese hyperlipidemic subjects

BACKGROUND

Atorvastatin is a recently introduced statin that lowers LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides more than some of the older statins.

METHODS

Twenty-one Japanese hyperlipidemic subjects were treated with atorvastatin (10 mg/day) for 6 weeks. Plasma lipid concentrations and pre-heparin plasma LPL mass before and after oral administration were evaluated using an open crossover trial format. LPL mass in the pre-heparin plasma was measured by a sandwich enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin decreased plasma triglyceride (TG) concentration (-21%, p<0.05), as well as plasma total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations. LPL mass in the pre-heparin plasma did not change significantly by this treatment during this period. Both apolipoprotein (apo) B and E decreased considerably (-33%, p<0.001 for apo B; -29% p<0.001 for apo E), while apo A-I concentration did not change. Other clinical parameters such as body mass index, blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose concentration of these subjects did not change during this treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Atorvastatin is effective in reducing plasma TG, which did not appear to be associated with an increased LPL mass.

Paraoxonase genotype modifies the effect of pravastatin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Paraoxonase (PON) is an enzyme carried by high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Two gene polymorphisms leading to amino acid substitutions of methionine for leucine at position 55 (M/L55) and arginine for glutamine at position 192 (R/Q192) modulate the activity of the enzyme and possibly also lipid and apolipoprotein concentrations. Our purpose was to examine the effect of the PON genotype on HDL-C and apolipoprotein AI (apo AI) responses to pravastatin treatment. Fifty-one mildly hypercholesterolemic male subjects (mean age 35 +/- 4 years) were enrolled by this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Lipid concentrations were measured at baseline and after 6 months of pravastatin (n = 25) or placebo (n = 26) therapy. Low active (MM, ML or QQ) and high active (LL or RQ, RR) PON genotype groups were related to lipid and apolipoprotein concentration changes. Pravastatin increased the apo AI concentration 12% (P = 0.017, RANOVA) and tended to increase the HDL-C concentration (P = 0.095, RANOVA) in R allele carriers but not in QQ homozygotes. Significant predictors of the change in apo AI concentration during pravastatin treatment were R/Q192 genotype (P = 0.002), apo AI concentration at baseline (P = 0.002) and M/L55 genotype (P = 0.042). Correspondingly, R/Q192 (P = 0.009) and M/L55 (P = 0.050) genotypes were the statistically significant determinants of HDL-C concentration change. The PON genotype thus modifies the effect of pravastatin on serum HDL-C and apo AI concentrations. This could partly explain the contradictory results obtained from previous studies on the effects of statins on the serum HDL-C concentration.

The effect of aggressive versus standard lipid lowering by atorvastatin on diabetic dyslipidemia: the DALI study: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic dyslipidemia

OBJECTIVE

In patients with type 2 diabetes, intensive glucose regulation, although effective for microangiopathy, has not been shown to have unambiguous preventive effects on the occurrence of cardiovascular disease. Patients with diabetes show a characteristic dyslipidemia (high triglyceride level, low HDL cholesterol level). Aggressive reduction of triglycerides might be an effective method to reduce the cardiovascular risk in these patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to assess the effect of 30 weeks of administration of atorvastatin 10 and 80 mg on plasma triglyceride levels in 217 patients with type 2 diabetes and fasting triglyceride levels between 1.5 and 6.0 mmol/l.

RESULTS

Administration of atorvastatin 10 and 80 mg resulted in significant reductions (25 and 35%, respectively) of plasma triglyceride levels (both P < 0.001). The difference between 10 and 80 mg was not statistically significant (P > 0.5). Atorvastatin 10 mg provided significant reductions from baseline in total cholesterol (-30%, P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (-40%, P < 0.001), and apolipoprotein B (-31%, P < 0.001), and significantly increased HDL cholesterol from baseline by 6% (P < 0.005). Atorvastatin 80 mg had a similar effect on HDL cholesterol (+5.2%, P < 0.005) but significantly decreased total cholesterol (-40%, P < 0.001), LDL cholesterol (-52%, P < 0.001), and apolipoprotein B (-40%, P < 0.001) more than atorvastatin 10 mg (P < 0.005). The side effects of atorvastatin 10 and 80 mg were similar and did not differ from the patients receiving placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of 10- and 80-mg doses of atorvastatin provides similar, significant reductions from baseline in triglyceride levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. A higher dose of atorvastatin improves cholesterol-related parameters. Both doses were well tolerated in this patient population.

Atorvastatin

Atorvastatin (Lipitor, Pfizer) is a safe and effective 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (statin). It is the most potent currently available statin in terms of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol levels. It was the first statin shown to lower triglycerides in patients with isolated hypertriglyceridaemia. It has a good safety profile. In common with other statins, it has non-lipid-lowering effects including improving endothelial function, antiproliferative actions on smooth muscle and reducing platelet aggregation. It also has anti-inflammatory effects and may reduce plasma glucose levels. Clinical trial evidence with this statin is currently limited. It did slightly reduce events in the AVERT trial comparing patients receiving coronary angioplasty with those receiving high-dose atorvastatin therapy and in the MIRACL study reduced ischemia in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Other end point trials are in progress.

Fluvastatin lowers atherogenic dense low-density lipoproteins in postmenopausal women with the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype

BACKGROUND

Although HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (HMGRIs) are effective lipid-lowering agents, it remains controversial whether these agents also lower dense LDL (dLDL), a predominance of which is considered to contribute to the atherogenicity of the metabolic syndrome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we determined the effect of the HMGRI fluvastatin on lipids, apolipoproteins, and LDL subfractions (by equilibrium density gradient ultracentrifugation). A total of 52 postmenopausal women with combined hyperlipidemia and increased dLDL were treated with either fluvastatin 40 mg/d (n=35) or placebo (n=17). After 12 weeks' treatment, significant reductions (P<0.001) in total cholesterol (-19%), IDL cholesterol (-35%), LDL cholesterol (-23%), apolipoprotein B (-21%), and apolipoprotein B in dLDL (-42%) were apparent among fluvastatin recipients. No significant changes in triglycerides or HDL cholesterol were observed. The effect of fluvastatin on dLDL was correlated with baseline values. There was no consistent relationship, however, between the effect of fluvastatin on triglycerides and the decrease in dLDL.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluvastatin lowers total and LDL cholesterol and the concentration of dLDL. This profile may contribute to an antiatherogenic effect for fluvastatin that is greater than expected on the basis of changes in lipids and apolipoproteins.

Evaluation of coronary risk factors in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Age at onset of clinically manifested coronary artery disease (CAD) varies widely among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). A number of factors in addition to high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) have been suggested as predictors of risk among patients with FH, but a comprehensive examination of their utility is lacking. We therefore measured plasma lipids, carotid intima-medial thickness, and a variety of coronary risk factors in 262 patients with FH > or = 30 years old (68 of whom had premature CAD). Age (p < 0.0001) and gender were the most important determinants of premature CAD risk, with men having 5.64 times the risk of women (p < 0.0001). In addition, cigarette smoking (odds ratio [OR] 2.71, p = 0.026), smaller LDL as determined by the LDL cholesterol/LDL apolipoprotein B ratio (OR 2.60, p = 0.014), and white blood cell count (p = 0.014) were also statistically significant risk factors. Lipoprotein(a) and the presence of xanthoma were associated with risk only in very early coronary cases. After correction for age, carotid intima-media thickness was not associated with CAD risk. Insulin, fibrinogen, homocysteine, plasma C-reactive protein, and the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism were unrelated to risk in this cohort. These results provide little justification for extensive investigation of risk factors among patients with FH, at least for the risk factors examined here. Rather, the inherent high LDL cholesterol of these patients should be the focus of preventive efforts. The novel finding of increased risk with smaller LDL may prove useful but needs further confirmation.

Therapeutic modulation of low-density lipoprotein size

Small, dense LDL particles have been linked to atherosclerosis, often in a cluster of risk factors and affecting approximately 20% of adults. Over the past year, studies confirmed that small dense LDL is an autosomal dominant trait, influenced mainly by hypertriglyceridaemia and obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus and some incompletely investigated genetic loci. Compositional and functional differences have been observed in small LDL. Evidence is emerging that lifestyle as well as pharmacological intervention can modulate LDL size, but there is no proof yet that this is of clinical benefit.