Site-directed mutagenesis and continuous expression of human beta-adrenergic receptors. Identification of a conserved aspartate residue involved in agonist binding and receptor activation

pKa Calculations of GPCRs: Understanding Protonation States in Receptor Activation

The increase in the available G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structures has been pivotal in helping to understand their activation process. However, the role of protonation-conformation coupling in GPCR activation still needs to be clarified. We studied the protonation behavior of the highly conserved Asp2.50 residue in five different class A GPCRs (active and inactive conformations) using a linear response approximation (LRA) pKa calculation protocol. We observed consistent differences (1.3 pK units) for the macroscopic pKa values between the inactive and active states of the A2AR and B2AR receptors, indicating the protonation of Asp2.50 during GPCR activation. This process seems to be specific and not conserved, as no differences were observed in the pKa values of the remaining receptors (CB1R, NT1R, and GHSR).

17β-Estradiol Concentration and Direct β2-Adrenoceptor Inhibition Determine Estrogen-Mediated Reversal of Adrenergic Immunosuppression

Background:

Sympathetic innervation of lymphoid organs, and the presence of 17β-estradiol (estrogen or E2) and adrenergic receptors (ARs) on lymphocytes, suggests that sympathetic stimulation and hormonal activation may influence immune functions.

Purpose:

Modeling and simulating these pathways may help to understand the dynamics of neuroendocrine-immune modulation at the cellular and molecular levels.

Methods:

Dose- and receptor-dependent effects of E2 and AR subtype-specific agonists were established in vitro on lymphocytes from young male Sprague-Dawley rats and were modeled in silico using the MATLAB Simbiology toolbox. Kinetic principles were assigned to define receptor–ligand dynamics, and concentration/time plots were obtained using Ode15s solvers at different time intervals for key regulatory molecules. Comparisons were drawn between in silico and in vitro data for validating the constructed model with sensitivity analysis of key regulatory molecules to assess their individual impacts on the dynamics of the system. Finally, docking studies were conducted with key ligands E2 and norepinephrine (NE) to understand the mechanistic principles underlying their interactions.

Results:

Adrenergic activation triggered proapoptotic signals, while E2 enhanced survival signals, showing opposing effects as observed in vitro. Treatment of lymphocytes with E2 shows a 10-fold increase in survival signals in a dose-dependent manner. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) activation is crucial for the activation of survival signals through extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK) and cAMP responsive element binding (p-CREB) protein. Docking studies showed the direct inhibition of ERK by NE and β2-AR by E2 explaining how estrogen signaling overrides NE-mediated immunosuppression in vitro.

Conclusion:

The cross-talk between E2 and adrenergic signaling pathways determines lymphocyte functions in a receptor subtype and coactivation-dependent manner in health and disease.

Identification of ligand-specific G protein-coupled receptor states and prediction of downstream efficacy via data-driven modeling

Ligand binding stabilizes different G protein-coupled receptor states via a complex allosteric process that is not completely understood. Here, we have derived free energy landscapes describing activation of the β₂ adrenergic receptor bound to ligands with different efficacy profiles using enhanced sampling molecular dynamics simulations. These reveal shifts toward active-like states at the Gprotein-binding site for receptors bound to partial and full agonists, and that the ligands modulate the conformational ensemble of the receptor by tuning protein microswitches. We indeed find an excellent correlation between the conformation of the microswitches close to the ligand binding site and in the transmembrane region and experimentally reported cyclic adenosine monophosphate signaling responses. Dimensionality reduction further reveals the similarity between the unique conformational states induced by different ligands, and examining the output of classifiers highlights two distant hotspots governing agonism on transmembrane helices 5 and 7.

Analogues of Arylamide Phenylpiperazine Ligands To Investigate the Factors Influencing D3 Dopamine Receptor Bitropic Binding and Receptor Subtype Selectivity

We have previously reported on the ability of arylamide phenylpiperazines to bind selectively to the D3 versus the D2 dopamine receptor subtype. For these studies, we used LS-3-134 as the prototypic arylamide phenylpiperazine ligand because it binds with high affinity at D3 dopamine receptor (0.17 nM) and exhibits >150-fold D3 vs D2 receptor binding selectivity. Our goal was to investigate how the composition and size of the nonaromatic ring structure at the piperazine position of substituted phenylpiperazine analogues might influence binding affinity at the human D2 and D3 dopamine receptors. Two factors were identified as being important for determining the binding affinity of bitropic arylamide phenylpiperazines at the dopamine D3 receptor subtype. One factor was the strength of the salt bridge between the highly conserved residue Asp^3.32 with the protonated nitrogen of the nonaromatic ring at the piperazine position. The second factor was the configuration of the unbound ligand in an aqueous solution. These two factors were found to be related to the logarithm of the affinities using a simple correlation model, which could be useful when designing high affinity subtype selective bitropic ligands. While this model is based upon the interaction of arylamide phenylpiperazines with the D2 and D3 D2-like dopamine receptor subtypes, it provides insights into the complexity of the factors that define a bitropic mode of the binding at GPCRs.

Conserved Mechanism of Conformational Stability and Dynamics in G-Protein-Coupled Receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are transmembrane receptors involved in diverse biological functions. Despite the diversity in their amino acid sequences, class A GPCRs exhibit a conserved structural topology and possibly a common mechanism of receptor activation. To understand how this high sequence diversity translates to a conserved functional mechanism, we have compared the dynamic behavior of eight class A GPCRs comprised of six biogenic amine receptors, adenosine A_2A, and the peptide receptor protease-activated receptor 1. Starting from the crystal structures of the inactive state of these receptors bound to inverse agonists or antagonists, we have performed multiple all-atom MD simulations adding up to several microseconds of simulation. We elucidated the similarities and differences in the dynamic behavior and the conformational ensembles sampled by these eight class A GPCRs. Among the six biogenic amine receptors studied here, β₂-adrenergic receptor shows the highest level of fluctuation in the sixth and seventh transmembrane helices, possibly explaining its high basal activity. In contrast, the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors show the lowest fluctuations as well as tight packing and low hydration of the transmembrane domain. All eight GPCRs show several conserved allosteric communication pipelines from the residues in the agonist binding site with the G-protein interface. Positions of the residues along these pipelines that serve as major hubs of allosteric communication are conserved in their respective structures. These findings have important implications in understanding the dynamics and allosteric mechanism of communication in class A GPCRs and hence are useful for designing conformation-specific drugs.

Pharmacological and signalling properties of a D2-like dopamine receptor (Dop3) in Tribolium castaneum

Dopamine is an important neurotransmitter in the central nervous system of vertebrates and invertebrates. Despite their evolutionary distance, striking parallels exist between deuterostomian and protostomian dopaminergic systems. In both, signalling is achieved via a complement of functionally distinct dopamine receptors. In this study, we investigated the sequence, pharmacology and tissue distribution of a D2-like dopamine receptor from the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (TricaDop3) and compared it with related G protein-coupled receptors in other invertebrate species. The TricaDop3 receptor-encoding cDNA shows considerable sequence similarity with members of the Dop3 receptor class. Real time qRT-PCR showed high expression in both the central brain and the optic lobes, consistent with the role of dopamine as neurotransmitter. Activation of TricaDop3 expressed in mammalian cells increased intracellular Ca(2+) signalling and decreased NKH-477 (a forskolin analogue)-stimulated cyclic AMP levels in a dose-dependent manner. We studied the pharmacological profile of the TricaDop3 receptor and demonstrated that the synthetic vertebrate dopamine receptor agonists, 2 - amino- 6,7 - dihydroxy - 1,2,3,4 - tetrahydronaphthalene hydrobromide (6,7-ADTN) and bromocriptine acted as agonists. Methysergide was the most potent of the antagonists tested and showed competitive inhibition in the presence of dopamine. This study offers important information on the Dop3 receptor from Tribolium castaneum that will facilitate functional analyses of dopamine receptors in insects and other invertebrates.

The 2.1 Å resolution structure of cyanopindolol-bound β1-adrenoceptor identifies an intramembrane Na+ ion that stabilises the ligand-free receptor

The β₁-adrenoceptor (β₁AR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that is activated by the endogenous agonists adrenaline and noradrenaline. We have determined the structure of an ultra-thermostable β₁AR mutant bound to the weak partial agonist cyanopindolol to 2.1 Å resolution. High-quality crystals (100 μm plates) were grown in lipidic cubic phase without the assistance of a T4 lysozyme or BRIL fusion in cytoplasmic loop 3, which is commonly employed for GPCR crystallisation. An intramembrane Na⁺ ion was identified co-ordinated to Asp87^2.50, Ser128^3.39 and 3 water molecules, which is part of a more extensive network of water molecules in a cavity formed between transmembrane helices 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Remarkably, this water network and Na⁺ ion is highly conserved between β₁AR and the adenosine A_2A receptor (rmsd of 0.3 Å), despite an overall rmsd of 2.4 Å for all Cα atoms and only 23% amino acid identity in the transmembrane regions. The affinity of agonist binding and nanobody Nb80 binding to β₁AR is unaffected by Na⁺ ions, but the stability of the receptor is decreased by 7.5°C in the absence of Na⁺. Mutation of amino acid side chains that are involved in the co-ordination of either Na⁺ or water molecules in the network decreases the stability of β₁AR by 5–10°C. The data suggest that the intramembrane Na⁺ and associated water network stabilise the ligand-free state of β₁AR, but still permits the receptor to form the activated state which involves the collapse of the Na⁺ binding pocket on agonist binding.

News from the protein mutability landscape

Some mutations of protein residues matter more than others, and these are often conserved evolutionarily. The explosion of deep sequencing and genotyping increasingly requires the distinction between effect and neutral variants. The simplest approach predicts all mutations of conserved residues to have an effect; however, this works poorly, at best. Many computational tools that are optimized to predict the impact of point mutations provide more detail. Here, we expand the perspective from the view of single variants to the level of sketching the entire mutability landscape. This landscape is defined by the impact of substituting every residue at each position in a protein by each of the 19 non-native amino acids. We review some of the powerful conclusions about protein function, stability and their robustness to mutation that can be drawn from such an analysis. Large-scale experimental and computational mutagenesis experiments are increasingly furthering our understanding of protein function and of the genotype-phenotype associations. We also discuss how these can be used to improve predictions of protein function and pathogenicity of missense variants.

Identifying ligand binding conformations of the β2-adrenergic receptor by using its agonists as computational probes

Recently available G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) structures and biophysical studies suggest that the difference between the effects of various agonists and antagonists cannot be explained by single structures alone, but rather that the conformational ensembles of the proteins need to be considered. Here we use an elastic network model-guided molecular dynamics simulation protocol to generate an ensemble of conformers of a prototypical GPCR, β(2)-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR). The resulting conformers are clustered into groups based on the conformations of the ligand binding site, and distinct conformers from each group are assessed for their binding to known agonists of β(2)AR. We show that the select ligands bind preferentially to different predicted conformers of β(2)AR, and identify a role of β(2)AR extracellular region as an allosteric binding site for larger drugs such as salmeterol. Thus, drugs and ligands can be used as "computational probes" to systematically identify protein conformers with likely biological significance.

Predicting novel binding modes of agonists to β adrenergic receptors using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations

Understanding the binding mode of agonists to adrenergic receptors is crucial to enabling improved rational design of new therapeutic agents. However, so far the high conformational flexibility of G protein-coupled receptors has been an obstacle to obtaining structural information on agonist binding at atomic resolution. In this study, we report microsecond classical molecular dynamics simulations of β(1) and β(2) adrenergic receptors bound to the full agonist isoprenaline and in their unliganded form. These simulations show a novel agonist binding mode that differs from the one found for antagonists in the crystal structures and from the docking poses reported by in silico docking studies performed on rigid receptors. Internal water molecules contribute to the stabilization of novel interactions between ligand and receptor, both at the interface of helices V and VI with the catechol group of isoprenaline as well as at the interface of helices III and VII with the ethanolamine moiety of the ligand. Despite the fact that the characteristic N-C-C-OH motif is identical in the co-crystallized ligands and in the full agonist isoprenaline, the interaction network between this group and the anchor site formed by Asp(3.32) and Asn(7.39) is substantially different between agonists and inverse agonists/antagonists due to two water molecules that enter the cavity and contribute to the stabilization of a novel network of interactions. These new binding poses, together with observed conformational changes in the extracellular loops, suggest possible determinants of receptor specificity.

Mutagenesis of important amino acid reveals unconventional homologous internalization of beta(1)-adrenergic receptor

AIMS

The study was designed to examine the internalization of Asp104Lys mutant of beta(1)-adrenergic receptor (beta(1)-AR) and compared to other mutant (Asp104Ala) and wild type receptors. Moreover, this study needs to perform the role of GRK2 (betaARK1) and beta-arrestin1 on this internalization of Asp104Lys mutant of beta(1)-AR.

MAIN METHODS

Binding affinity, functional potency of agonist and agonist-induced internalization were determined for wild type and both mutants of beta(1)-ARs stably expressed in HEK 293 cells as assessed by [(3)H] CGP12177 radioligand. We have performed GRK2 and beta-arrestin1 expression levels by western blot analysis and also performed internalization of this mutant receptor after over expression and deletion of beta-arrestin1 gene.

KEY FINDINGS

In the present study, the binding affinity of (-)-isoproterenol for both mutants were significantly decreased compared to wild type. Though the mutant Asp104Ala showed agonist-induced receptor activation, interestingly this mutant was not internalized. However, the mutant Asp104Lys, which showed uncoupling with G protein, was internalized 31.77+/-3.13% from cell surface. Asp104Lys mutant produced the same level of GRK2 expression in (-)-isoproterenol induced stimulation of wild type receptor and addition of (-)-isoproterenol further increased GRK2 expression in mutant receptors. In addition, overexpression of beta-arrestin1 in mutant Asp104Lys promoted (39.75+/-2.19%) and knockdown of beta-arrestin1 by siRNA decreased (3.55+/-1.75%) internalization compared to Asp104Lys mutant of beta(1)-ARs.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present studies suggest that Asp104Lys mutant beta(1)-ARs triggers unconventional homologous internalization induced by G protein independent signals, where GRK2 and beta-arrestin1 play an important role for beta(1)-AR internalization.

Mutation of important amino acid residue of Asp104Lys in human beta(1)-adrenergic receptor triggers functional and constitutive inactivation

Based on our previous molecular modeling and radioligand binding study, we have demonstrated that aspartic acid of 104 in transmembrane helix (TMH) II of beta(1)-adrenergic receptor (beta(1)-AR) is important for functional characteristics of these receptors. We have also showed that mutation of negatively charged aspartic acid to neutral charged alanine exhibited constitutive activity of beta(1)-AR. However, the mutation of negatively charged aspartic acid to positively charged lysine is still remained to be examined, which is very important to know for fully understanding the characteristics of beta(1)-AR. At the present study, we mutated aspartic acid to lysine (Asp104Lys) residue in human beta(1)-AR. This resultant mutant (Asp104Lys) markedly reduced the binding affinity of isoproterenol and (-)-epinephrine. On the other hand, antagonist binding with this mutant was similar to the wild type receptor. Isoproterenol at its saturation concentrations produced lower amount of intracellular cyclic adenosine-3',5' cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) in HEK-293 cells expressing Asp104Lys mutant receptor as compared to cells expressing wild type receptor. Moreover, cAMP accumulation of Asp104Lys mutant was unchanged in the presence or absence of isoproterenol. Therefore, it has been demonstrated that Asp104Lys mutation in the human beta(1)-AR differentially affects the binding of antagonist and exhibits a functional uncoupling of G-protein-coupled receptors. Thus, we may suggest that mutation of negatively charged aspartic acid to positively charged lysine as well as neutral charged alanine may help to understand the mechanism of the activation or inactivation of beta(1)-AR by its conformational changes and this finding would be helpful for clarifying the functional responses mediated by beta(1)-AR.

Structural basis for ligand binding and specificity in adrenergic receptors: implications for GPCR-targeted drug discovery

Crystal structures of engineered human beta 2-adrenergic receptors (ARs) in complex with an inverse agonist ligand, carazolol, provide three-dimensional snapshots of the disposition of seven transmembrane helices and the ligand-binding site of an important G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). As expected, beta 2-AR shares substantial structural similarities with rhodopsin, the dim-light photoreceptor of the rod cell. However, although carazolol and the 11- cis-retinylidene moiety of rhodopsin are situated in the same general binding pocket, the second extracellular (E2) loop structures are quite distinct. E2 in rhodopsin shows beta-sheet structure and forms part of the chromophore-binding site. In the beta 2-AR, E2 is alpha-helical and seems to be distinct from the receptor's active site, allowing a potential entry pathway for diffusible ligands. The structures, together with extensive structure-activity relationship (SAR) data from earlier studies, provide insight about possible structural determinants of ligand specificity and how the binding of agonist ligands might alter receptor conformation. We review key features of the new beta 2-AR structures in the context of recent complementary work on the conformational dynamics of GPCRs. We also report 600 ns molecular dynamics simulations that quantified beta 2-AR receptor mobility in a membrane bilayer environment and show how the binding of an agonist ligand, adrenaline (epinephrine), causes conformational changes to the ligand-binding pocket and neighboring helices.

Role of key transmembrane residues in agonist and antagonist actions at the two conformations of the human beta1-adrenoceptor

Studies with 4-[3-[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino]2-hydroxypropoxy]-1,3-dihydro-2H-benzimidazol-2-one hydrochloride (CGP 12177) at the human beta1-adrenoceptor have provided evidence for two binding modes or conformations that have markedly different pharmacological properties. Here, key transmembrane residues (Asp104, Asp138, Ser228, Ser229, Ser232, Phe341, Asn344 and Asn363) have been mutated to provide structural insights into the nature of these conformations. [(3)H]CGP 12177 binding and cAMP response element-mediated reporter gene studies confirmed that CGP 12177 was a neutral antagonist (log K(D) = -9.18) at the "catecholamine site" and an agonist at the "CGP 12177 site" (log EC(50) = -8.12). Agonist responses to isoprenaline and CGP 12177 had different sensitivities to beta1-antagonists (e.g., CGP 20712A; log K(D) = -8.65 and -7.26, respectively). Site-directed mutagenesis showed that Asn363 and Asp138 were key residues for binding of agonists and antagonists, and they were also essential for the agonist actions of CGP 12177. S228A and S229A in transmembrane-spanning region (TM) 5 reduced the binding of CGP 12177 and had an identical effect on its agonist and antagonist actions. Both N344A and F341A in TM6 abolished the ability of CGP 20712A to discriminate between responses elicited by isoprenaline and CGP 12177. The fact that both Asp138 and Asn363 are absolutely required for CGP 12117 binding in both agonist and antagonist modes leads to the conclusion that the secondary agonist binding site for CGP 12117 must overlap with the catecholamine binding site. Modeling studies provide a basis for these overlapping sites with either the tert-butylamino group or the hydroxyethyloxy and imidazolone portions of CGP 12177 capable of forming polar interactions with Asp138 and Asn363.

Biological properties and functional determinants of the urotensin II receptor

The urotensin II receptor (UT) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and binds the cyclic undecapeptide urotensin II (U-II) as well as the octapeptide urotensin II-related peptide (URP). The active UT mediates pleiotropic effects through various signal transduction pathways, including coupling to G proteins and activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Several highly conserved residues and motifs of class A GPCRs that are important for activity are found in UT. This review highlights some of the putative roles of these motifs in the binding, activation and desensitization of UT.

An ion-responsive motif in the second transmembrane segment of rhodopsin-like receptors

A L(M)xxxD(N, E) motif (x=a non-ionic amino acid residue, most frequently A, S, L or F; small capitals indicating a minor representation) is found in the second transmembrane (tm2) segment of most G-protein coupling metazoan receptors of the rhodopsin family (Rh-GPCRs). Changes in signal transduction, agonist binding and receptor cycling are known for numerous receptors bearing evolved or experimentally introduced mutations in this tm2 motif, especially of its aspartate residue. The [Na(+)] sensitivity of the receptor-agonist interaction relates to this aspartate in a number of Rh-GPCRs. Native non-conservative mutations in the tm2 motif only rarely coincide with significant changes in two other ubiquitous features of the rhodopsin family, the seventh transmembrane N(D)PxxY(F) motif and the D(E)RY(W,F) or analogous sequence at the border of the third transmembrane helix and the second intracellular loop. Native tm2 mutations with Rh-GPCRs frequently result in constitutive signaling, and with visual opsins also in shifts to short-wavelength sensitivity. Substitution of a strongly basic residue for the tm2 aspartate in Taste-2 receptors could be connected to a lack of sodium sensing by these receptors. These properties could be consistent with ionic interactions, and even of ion transfer, that involve the tm2 motif. A decrease in cation sensing by this motif is usually connected to an enhanced constitutive interaction of the mutated receptors with cognate G- proteins, and also relates to both the constitutive and the overall activity of the short-wavelength opsins.

Agonist binding, agonist affinity and agonist efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors

Measurements of affinity and efficacy are fundamental for work on agonists both in drug discovery and in basic studies on receptors. In this review I wish to consider methods for measuring affinity and efficacy at G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Agonist affinity may be estimated in terms of the dissociation constant for agonist binding to a receptor using ligand binding or functional assays. It has, however, been suggested that measurements of affinity are always contaminated by efficacy so that it is impossible to separate the two parameters. Here I show that for many GPCRs, if receptor/G protein coupling is suppressed, experimental measurements of agonist affinity using ligand binding (K(obs)) provide quite accurate measures of the agonist microscopic dissociation constant (KA). Also in pharmacological functional studies, good estimates of agonist dissociation constants are possible. Efficacy can be quantitated in several ways based on functional data (maximal effect of the agonist (E(max)), ratio of agonist dissociation constant to concentration of agonist giving half maximal effect in functional assay (K(obs)/EC50), a combined parameter E(max)K(obs)/EC50). Here I show that E(max)K(obs)/EC50 provides the best assessment of efficacy for a range of agonists across the full range of efficacy for full to partial agonists. Considerable evidence now suggests that ligand efficacy may be dependent on the pathway used to assess it. The efficacy of a ligand may, therefore, be multidimensional. It is still, however, necessary to have accurate measures of efficacy in different pathways.

GPCR engineering yields high-resolution structural insights into beta2-adrenergic receptor function

The beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) is a well-studied prototype for heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that respond to diffusible hormones and neurotransmitters. To overcome the structural flexibility of the beta2AR and to facilitate its crystallization, we engineered a beta2AR fusion protein in which T4 lysozyme (T4L) replaces most of the third intracellular loop of the GPCR ("beta2AR-T4L") and showed that this protein retains near-native pharmacologic properties. Analysis of adrenergic receptor ligand-binding mutants within the context of the reported high-resolution structure of beta2AR-T4L provides insights into inverse-agonist binding and the structural changes required to accommodate catecholamine agonists. Amino acids known to regulate receptor function are linked through packing interactions and a network of hydrogen bonds, suggesting a conformational pathway from the ligand-binding pocket to regions that interact with G proteins.

Real-time monitoring of receptor and G-protein interactions in living cells

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of proteins involved in signal transduction. Here we present a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assay that directly monitors in real time the early interactions between human GPCRs and their cognate G-protein subunits in living human cells. In addition to detecting basal precoupling of the receptors to Galpha-, Gbeta- and Ggamma-subunits, BRET measured very rapid ligand-induced increases in the interaction between receptor and Galphabetagamma-complexes (t(1/2) approximately 300 ms) followed by a slower (several minutes) decrease, reflecting receptor desensitization. The agonist-promoted increase in GPCR-Gbetagamma interaction was highly dependent on the identity of the Galpha-subunit present in the complex. Therefore, this G protein-activity biosensor provides a novel tool to directly probe the dynamics and selectivity of receptor-mediated, G-protein activation-deactivation cycles that could be advantageously used to identify ligands for orphan GPCRs.

Random mutagenesis of the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expressed in yeast: identification of second-site mutations that restore function to a coupling-deficient mutant M3 receptor

The M(3) muscarinic receptor is a prototypical member of the class A family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). To gain insight into the structural mechanisms governing agonist-mediated M(3) receptor activation, we recently developed a genetically modified yeast strain (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) which allows the efficient screening of large libraries of mutant M(3) receptors to identify mutant receptors with altered/novel functional properties. Class A GPCRs contain a highly conserved Asp residue located in transmembrane domain II (TM II; corresponding to Asp-113 in the rat M(3) muscarinic receptor) which is of fundamental importance for receptor activation. As observed previously with other GPCRs analyzed in mammalian expression systems, the D113N point mutation abolished agonist-induced receptor/G protein coupling in yeast. We then subjected the D113N mutant M(3) receptor to PCR-based random mutagenesis followed by a yeast genetic screen to recover point mutations that can restore G protein coupling to the D113N mutant receptor. A large scale screening effort led to the identification of three such second-site suppressor mutations, R165W, R165M, and Y250D. When expressed in the wild-type receptor background, these three point mutations did not lead to an increase in basal activity and reduced the efficiency of receptor/G protein coupling. Similar results were obtained when the various mutant receptors were expressed and analyzed in transfected mammalian cells (COS-7 cells). Interestingly, like Asp-113, Arg-165 and Tyr-250, which are located at the cytoplasmic ends of TM III and TM V, respectively, are also highly conserved among class A GPCRs. Our data suggest a conformational link between the highly conserved Asp-113, Arg-165, and Tyr-250 residues which is critical for receptor activation.

Synergistic contributions of the functional groups of epinephrine to its affinity and efficacy at the beta2 adrenergic receptor

The structural basis of ligand affinity can be approached by studying the interactions between a drug and receptor residues; the basis for efficacy is more complex and must involve activation-associated conformational changes. We have used wild-type (WT), a constitutively active mutant (CAM), and a "constitutively inactive" mutant beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) to investigate changes in the binding site that accompany binding and activation. The active state (R(*)) probably involves repositioning of at least some of the agonist-contact residues, thereby optimizing their interactions with agonist and resulting in a higher affinity for agonist. A comparison of the binding affinities of a series of phenethylamine derivatives for WT revealed a remarkable synergism between the various functional groups present in epinephrine. Binding affinity was essentially unchanged with addition of beta-OH, N-CH(3), or catechol OHs to phenethylamine. In contrast, when each of these same groups was added to the appropriate compound, already containing the other two groups, to make epinephrine, the increase in affinity was quite large (60- to 120-fold). An initial interaction between two or more contacts may stabilize an intermediate conformation of beta(2)AR, R', either by altering amino acid side chain rotamer conformations or by a more global conformational change involving the repositioning of transmembrane segments. The pattern of these effects was different in the CAM in that fewer interactions were required to observe the synergistic effect, consistent with the hypothesis that the CAM mutation enriches the proportion of receptors in R(*) or in R' from which R(*) is more readily assumed.

Regulation of agonist binding to rat ET(B) receptors by cations and GTPgammaS

Endothelins exert their physiological effects through interaction with cell surface receptors that are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. The endothelin receptor subtype B (ET(B) receptor) is abundantly expressed in rat cerebellum. Since agonist binding to G-protein-coupled receptors may be modulated by cations and guanine nucleotides, we investigated the effects of cations and guanosine 5'-O-(2-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) on 125I-endothelin-1 (125I-ET-1) binding to rat cerebellar membranes. Both Na+ and Mg2+-stimulated 125I-ET-1 binding causing an increase in receptor affinity for the agonist. While the effect of the divalent cation was evident at relatively low concentrations (5-10 mM), the stimulatory activity of the monovalent cation appeared at relatively high concentrations (50 mM). Additive activities of 25-50 mM NaCl and 1 mM MgCl2 suggested that monovalent and divalent cations increased receptor affinity for ET-1 by different mechanisms. In the presence of 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NaCl caused an additional modest reduction of the Kd value. Whereas 5 mM MgCl2 affected the displacement curves of both ET-3 and suc-[Glu9, Ala11,15]-endothelin-1 (8-21) (IRL 1620), the influence of 50 mM NaCl on these curves was less substantial. All together, these results suggest that modulation of receptor affinity by NaCl depends on the nature of the displacing agonist. In the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 or 50 mM NaCl, a partial regulation of 125I-ET-1 binding by GTPgammaS was detectable, while in the absence of cations no GTPgammaS-dependent inhibition was evident.

Modeling and mutational analysis of a putative sodium-binding pocket on the dopamine D2 receptor

A homology model of the dopamine D2 receptor was constructed based on the crystal structure of rhodopsin. A putative sodium-binding pocket identified in an earlier model (PDB ) was revised. It is now defined by Asn-419 backbone oxygen at the apex of a pyramid and Asp-80, Ser-121, Asn-419, and Ser-420 at each vertex of the planar base. Asn-423 stabilizes this pocket through hydrogen bonds to two of these residues. Highly conserved Asn-52 is positioned near the sodium pocket, where it hydrogen-bonds with Asp-80 and the backbone carbonyl of Ser-420. Mutation of three of these residues, Asn-52 in helix 1, Ser-121 in helix 3, and Ser-420 in helix 7, profoundly altered the properties of the receptor. Mutants in which Asn-52 was replaced with Ala or Leu or Ser-121 was replaced with Leu exhibited no detectable binding of radioligands, although receptor immunoreactivity in the membrane was similar to that in cells expressing the wild-type D2L receptor. A mutant in which Asn-52 was replaced with Gln, preserving hydrogen-bonding capability, was similar to D2L in affinity for ligands and ability to inhibit cAMP accumulation. Mutants in which either Ser-121 or Ser-420 was replaced with Ala or Asn had decreased affinity for agonists (Ser-121), but increased affinity for the antagonists haloperidol and clozapine. Interestingly, the affinity of these Ser-121 and Ser-420 mutants for substituted benzamide antagonists showed little or no dependence on sodium, consistent with our hypothesis that Ser-121 and Ser-420 contribute to the formation of a sodium-binding pocket.

The effect of pH on beta(2) adrenoceptor function. Evidence for protonation-dependent activation

The transition of rhodopsin from the inactive to the active state is associated with proton uptake at Glu(134) (1), and recent mutagenesis studies suggest that protonation of the homologous amino acid in the alpha(1B) adrenergic receptor (Asp(142)) may be involved in its mechanism of activation (2). To further explore the role of protonation in G protein-coupled receptor activation, we examined the effects of pH on the rate of ligand-induced conformational change and on receptor-mediated G protein activation for the beta(2) adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR). The rate of agonist-induced change in the fluorescence of NBD-labeled, purified beta(2)AR was 2-fold greater at pH 6.5 than at pH 8, even though agonist affinity was lower at pH 6.5. This biophysical analysis was corroborated by functional studies; basal (agonist-independent) activation of Galpha(s) by the beta(2)AR was greater at pH 6.5 compared with pH 8.0. Taken together, these results provide evidence that protonation increases basal activity by destabilizing the inactive state of the receptor. In addition, we found that the pH sensitivity of beta(2)AR activation is not abrogated by mutation of Asp(130), which is homologous to the highly conserved acidic amino acids that link protonation to activation of rhodopsin (Glu(134)) and the alpha(1B) adrenergic receptor (Asp(142)).

Uncovering molecular mechanisms involved in activation of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled, seven-transmembrane segment receptors (GPCRs or 7TM receptors), with more than 1000 different members, comprise the largest superfamily of proteins in the body. Since the cloning of the first receptors more than a decade ago, extensive experimental work has uncovered multiple aspects of their function and challenged many traditional paradigms. However, it is only recently that we are beginning to gain insight into some of the most fundamental questions in the molecular function of this class of receptors. How can, for example, so many chemically diverse hormones, neurotransmitters, and other signaling molecules activate receptors believed to share a similar overall tertiary structure? What is the nature of the physical changes linking agonist binding to receptor activation and subsequent transduction of the signal to the associated G protein on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane and to other putative signaling pathways? The goal of the present review is to specifically address these questions as well as to depict the current awareness about GPCR structure-function relationships in general.

A mutation in the second transmembrane region of the CB1 receptor selectively disrupts G protein signaling and prevents receptor internalization

We mutated a conserved aspartate in the second transmembrane domain of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor to asparagine (D164N), stably transfected it into AtT20 cells, and examined the coupling of this mutant receptor to several intracellular effectors that are targets of wild-type CB(1) receptor activation. We found that the D164N receptor binds the CB(1) agonist WIN 55,212-2 with an affinity matching that of the wild-type CB(1) receptor and inhibits Ca(2+) currents and cAMP production with an equivalent potency and efficacy. This mutation, however, blocks coupling of the receptor to the potentiation of inwardly rectifying potassium channel (KIR) currents and prevents internalization of the receptor after exposure to agonist. Although the mutant receptor did not internalize, we found it was still capable of activating p42/44 MAP kinase. In addition, we made a reciprocal mutation that exchanged the aspartate with an asparagine in the seventh transmembrane region (D164N/N394D). In other seven-membrane-spanning receptors, this reciprocal mutation is known to restore functions disrupted by the mutation of the single conserved aspartate. However, activation of D164N/N394D did not potentiate KIR current, nor did it internalize. We conclude that D164 is necessary for potentiation of KIR current and internalization of receptor but not necessary for agonist binding, inhibition of cAMP production, inhibition of Ca(2+) currents, or activation of p42/44 MAP kinase. Furthermore, CB(1) receptor internalization is not necessary for MAP kinase activation.

Chimeric receptor analysis of the ketanserin binding site in the human 5-Hydroxytryptamine1D receptor: importance of the second extracellular loop and fifth transmembrane domain in antagonist binding

The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1B/1D receptor subtypes are involved in the regulation of 5-HT release and have gained particular interest because of their apparent role in migraine. Although selective antagonists for both receptor subtypes recently have been developed, the receptor domains involved in the pharmacological specificity of these antagonists are defined poorly. This was investigated with a chimeric 5-HT1B/1D receptor analysis and using ketanserin as a selective antagonist of h5-HT1D (h5-HT1D) Ki = 24-27 nM) as opposed to h5-HT1B (Ki = 2193-2902 nM) receptors. A domain of the h5-HT1D receptor encompassing the second extracellular loop and the fifth transmembrane domain is necessary and sufficient to promote higher affinity binding (Ki = 65-115 nM) for ketanserin to the h5-HT1B receptor. The same domain of the h5-HT1B receptor, when exchanged in the h5-HT1D receptor, abolished high affinity binding of ketanserin (Ki = 364-1265 nM). A similar observation was made with the antagonist ritanserin and seems specific because besides the unmodified binding affinities for 5-HT and zolmitriptan, only minor modifications (2-4-fold) were observed for the agonists L 694247 and sumatriptan and the antagonists GR 127935 and SB 224289. Generating point mutations of divergent amino acids compared with the h5-HT1B receptor did not demonstrate a smaller peptide region related to a significant modification of ketanserin binding. The antagonists ketanserin and ritanserin are likely to bind the h5-HT1D receptor by its second extracellular loop, near the exofacial surface of the fifth transmembrane domain, or both.

Modulation of agonist binding to recombinant human alpha2-adrenoceptors by sodium ions

Agonist binding to alpha2-adrenoceptors is modulated by a number of factors such as Mg2+ and Na+ ions and by experimental manipulations which interfere with receptor-G-protein-coupling such as pertussis toxin pre-treatment or the presence of guanine nucleotides. Agonist binding assays may therefore offer an opportunity to make inferences, albeit indirect, about receptor states or conformations and about the molecular nature of the processes involved in receptor activation. We have investigated possible differences in the effects of Na+ ions on the binding of agonists to the three human alpha2-adrenoceptor subtypes, alpha2A, alpha2B and alpha2C, recombinantly expressed in S115 mouse mammary tumour cells. NaCl (40 mM) influenced the apparent affinity of a panel of alpha2-adrenoceptor ligands in a complex compound- and subtype-dependent manner. Sodium ions affected both high- and low-affinity conformations of the receptors, as defined by co-incubation with 10 microM 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate (Gpp(NH)p). The effects of NaCl and Gpp(NH)p on agonist binding were additive indicating different modes of action for the two allosteric modulators. Thus, quite marked differences between closely related receptor subtypes were noted in the molecular details of agonist-receptor interactions and in the integration of allosteric modulation by Na+ ions. Possible explanations for the experimental findings are discussed within the theoretical framework of multi-state models, and a proposal is presented for a potential physiological role of the modulatory effect of Na+ ions, where intracellular Na+ concentrations would direct the activating influence of receptors to different G-proteins.

The ligand binding site of NPY at the rat Y1 receptor investigated by site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling

The ligand binding site of neuropeptide Y (NPY) at the rat Y1 (rY1,) receptor was investigated by construction of mutant receptors and [3H]NPY binding studies. Expression levels of mutant receptors that did not bind [3H]NPY were examined by an immunological method. The single mutations Asp85Asn, Asp85Ala, Asp85Glu and Asp103Ala completely abolished [3H]NPY binding without impairing the membrane expression. The single mutation Asp286Ala completely abolished [3H]NPY binding. Similarly, the double mutation Leu34Arg/Asp199Ala totally abrogated the binding of [3H]NPY, whereas the single mutations Leu34Arg and Asp199Ala decreased the binding of [3H]NPY 2.7- and 5.2-fold, respectively. The mutants Leu34Glu, Pro35His as well as Asp193Ala only slightly affected [3H]NPY binding. A receptor with a deletion of the segment Asn2-Glu20 or with simultaneous mutations of the three putative N-terminal glycosylation sites, displayed no detectable [3H]NPY binding, due to abolished expression of the receptor at the cell surface. Taken together, these results suggest that amino acids in the N-terminal part as well as in the first and second extracellular loops are important for binding of NPY, and that Asp85 in transmembrane helix 2 is pivotal to a proper functioning of the receptor. Moreover, these studies suggest that the putative glycosylation sites in the N-terminal part are crucial for correct expression of the rY1 receptor at the cell surface.

The luteinizing hormone receptor

The luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) is a member of the subfamily of glycoprotein hormone receptors within the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)/seven-transmembrane domain receptors. Over the past eight years, major advances have been made in determining the structure and function of the LHR and its gene. The hormone-binding domain has been localized to exons 1-7 in the extracellular (EC) domain/region of the receptor, which contains several leucine-rich repeats. High-affinity binding of LH and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) causes secondary hormone or receptor contacts to be established with regions of the EC loop/transmembrane module that initiate signal transduction. Models of hormone-receptor interaction have been derived from the crystal structures of hCG and of the ribonuclease inhibitor, which also contains leucine-rich repeats. Such models provide a framework for the interpretation of mutational studies and for further experiments. The extracellular domain of the receptor has been overexpressed in vitro, which will facilitate crystallographic resolution of the structure of the receptor-binding site. The transmembrane domain/loop/cytoplasmic module transduces the signal for coupling to G proteins. Several constitutive, activating mutations that cause human disease have been found in helix VI and adjacent structures. These mutations have provided valuable information about mechanisms of signal transfer and G protein coupling. The structure of the LHR gene has been elucidated, and the regulation of its transcription is beginning to be understood. Valuable insights into receptor evolution have been derived from analysis of sequence homologies, the gene structure of glycoprotein hormone receptors and other members of the GPCR family, and the glycoprotein hormone receptor-like precursors identified in several invertebrate species.

Characterization of binding sites of a new neurotensin receptor antagonist, [3H]SR 142948A, in the rat brain

The present study describes the characterization of the binding properties and autoradiographic distribution of a new nonpeptide antagonist of neurotensin receptors, [3H]SR 142948A (2-[[5-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-(4-(N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N-methyl carbamoyl)-2-isopropylphenyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carbonyl]-amino]-ad amantane-2-carboxylic acid, hydrochloride), in the rat brain. The binding of [3H]SR 142948A in brain membrane homogenates was specific, time-dependent, reversible and saturable. [3H]SR 142948A bound to an apparently homogeneous population of sites, with a Kd of 3.5 nM and a Bmax value of 508 fmol/mg of protein, which was 80% higher than that observed in saturation experiments with [3H]neurotensin. [3H]SR 142948A binding was inhibited by SR 142948A, the related nonpeptide receptor antagonist, SR 48692 (2-[[1-(7-chloroquinolin-4-yl)-5-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-1H-pyrazole -3-carbonyl]amino]-adamantane-2-carboxylic acid) and neurotensin. Saturation and competition studies in the presence or absence of the histamine H1 receptor antagonist, levocabastine, revealed that [3H]SR 142948A bound with similar affinities to both the levocabastine-insensitive neurotensin NT1 receptors (20% of the total binding population) and the recently cloned levocabastine-sensitive neurotensin NT2 receptors (80% of the receptors) (Kd = 6.8 and 4.8 nM, respectively). The regional distribution of [3H]SR 142948A binding in the rat brain closely matched the distribution of [125I]neurotensin binding. In conclusion, these findings indicate that [3H]SR 142948A is a new potent antagonist radioligand which recognizes with high affinity both neurotensin NT1 and NT2 receptors and represents thus an excellent tool to study neurotensin receptors in the rat brain.

Dopamine receptors: from structure to function

The diverse physiological actions of dopamine are mediated by at least five distinct G protein-coupled receptor subtypes. Two D1-like receptor subtypes (D1 and D5) couple to the G protein Gs and activate adenylyl cyclase. The other receptor subtypes belong to the D2-like subfamily (D2, D3, and D4) and are prototypic of G protein-coupled receptors that inhibit adenylyl cyclase and activate K+ channels. The genes for the D1 and D5 receptors are intronless, but pseudogenes of the D5 exist. The D2 and D3 receptors vary in certain tissues and species as a result of alternative splicing, and the human D4 receptor gene exhibits extensive polymorphic variation. In the central nervous system, dopamine receptors are widely expressed because they are involved in the control of locomotion, cognition, emotion, and affect as well as neuroendocrine secretion. In the periphery, dopamine receptors are present more prominently in kidney, vasculature, and pituitary, where they affect mainly sodium homeostasis, vascular tone, and hormone secretion. Numerous genetic linkage analysis studies have failed so far to reveal unequivocal evidence for the involvement of one of these receptors in the etiology of various central nervous system disorders. However, targeted deletion of several of these dopamine receptor genes in mice should provide valuable information about their physiological functions.

Biochemical basis of partial nephrogenic diabetes insipidus phenotypes

Biochemical properties of mutant type 2 vasopressin receptors (V2Rs) causing a partial phenotype of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus were investigated in transiently transfected HEK 293 cells. Cell surface expression of the V2R was not altered by substituting Asp85 in the second transmembrane region by Asn as determined by saturation binding assays. Although the affinity of the mutant V2R for arginine vasopressin (AVP) was reduced only 6-fold, the response of adenylyl cyclase activity to AVP revealed a 50-fold right shift in EC50 and a decreased maximum response for the mutant V2R. These data indicated that replacement of Asp85 by Asn affected coupling of the receptor to Gs, a conclusion substantiated by a 20-fold decrease in the calculated coupling efficiency of this receptor. The Gly201Asp mutation in the second extracellular loop, also found associated with an NDI partial phenotype, decreased cell surface expression of the V2R with minor reduction in ligand-binding affinity and coupling efficiency to Gs. A pronounced difference was observed for this mutant V2R between the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity promoted by AVP and the V2 vasopressin receptor agonist deamino[Cys1,D-Arg8]-vasopressin, suggesting an involvement of Gly201 in the selectivity of the receptor for different ligands. These data demonstrated that while decreased ligand-binding affinity and decreased coupling to Gs are responsible for the attenuation of response to ligand in the Asp85Asn mutant V2R, cell surface expression of the V2R is the major factor reducing cellular responses to ligand for the Gly201Asp mutant V2R.

Substitution of a mutant alpha2a-adrenergic receptor via "hit and run" gene targeting reveals the role of this subtype in sedative, analgesic, and anesthetic-sparing responses in vivo

Norepinephrine contributes to antinociceptive, sedative, and sympatholytic responses in vivo, and alpha2 adrenergic receptor (alpha2AR) agonists are used clinically to mimic these effects. Lack of subtype-specific agonists has prevented elucidation of the role that each alpha2AR subtype (alpha2A, alpha2B, and alpha2C) plays in these central effects. Here we demonstrate that alpha2AR agonist-elicited sedative, anesthetic-sparing, and analgesic responses are lost in a mouse line expressing a subtly mutated alpha2AAR, D79N alpha2AAR, created by two-step homologous recombination. These functional changes are accompanied by failure of the D79N alpha2AAR to inhibit voltage-gated Ca2+ currents and spontaneous neuronal firing, a measure of K+ current activation. These results provide definitive evidence that the alpha2AAR subtype is the primary mediator of clinically important central actions of alpha2AR agonists and suggest that the D79N alpha2AAR mouse may serve as a model for exploring other possible alpha2AAR functions in vivo.

The human beta 2-adrenergic receptor expressed in Schizosaccharomyces pombe retains its pharmacological properties

We have developed a rapid and efficient expression system to study the human beta 2 adrenergic receptor (hu beta 2AR) in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. This was achieved by cloning the hu beta 2AR gene, modified by replacement of the 5' untranslated and a small part of the N-terminal coding sequence (first 14 amino acids) with the corresponding region of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae STE2 (alpha-factor receptor) gene. The gene was then placed under the control of a S. pombe constitutive promoter for alcohol dehydrogenase (adh). Hu beta 2AR expression was assessed by immunoblot analysis of the chimeric protein with an anti-STE2 serum raised against a dodecapeptide homologous to the N-terminal amino acids of STE2 and ligand binding was assayed using [125I]cyanopindolol. We demonstrate here that the chimeric receptor expressed in S. pombe exhibits the same characteristic ligand specificity and affinity as that of the authentic hu beta 2AR. This system constitutes a convenient alternative to existing methods for studying seven transmembrane domain receptors due to its simplicity and high reproducibility.

Signal transduction of the gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor: cross-talk of calcium, protein kinase C (PKC), and arachidonic acid

1. The decapeptide neurohormone gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) is the first key hormone of the reproductive system. Produced in the hypothalamus, GnRH is released in a pulsatile manner into the hypophysial portal system to reach the anterior pituitary and stimulates the release and synthesis of the gonadotropin hormones LH and FSH. GnRH, a Ca2+ mobilizing ligand, binds to its respective binding protein, which is a member of the seven transmembrane domain receptor family and activates a G-protein (Gq). 2. The alpha subunit of Gq triggers enhanced phosphoinositide turnover and the elevation of multiple second messengers required for gonadotropin release and biosynthesis. 3. The messenger molecules IP3, diacylglycerol, Ca2+, protein kinase C, arachidonic acid and leukotriene C4 cross-talk in a complex networks of signaling, culminating in gonadotropin release and gene expression.

Related contribution of specific helix 2 and 7 residues to conformational activation of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor

A conserved helix 2 Asp is required for the proper function of many G-protein-coupled receptors. To reveal the structural basis for the role of this residue, the additive effects of mutations at this locus and at a conserved helix 7 locus were investigated in the 5-HT2A receptor. All mutant receptors studied retained high affinity agonist and antagonist binding. Whereas an Asp-->Asn mutation in helix 2 eliminated coupling, interchanging the residues at the two positions by a second mutation of Asn-->Asp in helix 7 restored receptor function. These data suggest that these residues are adjacent in space and interact. The loss of function observed with Ala at either position is consistent with each side chain forming hydrogen bonds. Molecular dynamics simulations were performed on three-dimensional computational models of agonist-receptor complexes of both the wild-type receptor and the Asp-->Asn mutant receptor. Consonant with the lack of coupling observed for the mutant construct, introducing the mutation into the computational model produced a conformational change in a direction opposite to that seen from computational simulations of activation of the wild-type receptor model. These results implicate both loci in a common hydrogen-bonding network underlying receptor activation by agonist.

Functional domains of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor

1. The cloning of the mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor sets the stage for rapid progress in understanding the structure of the receptor, its interaction with ligand, and its mechanisms of activation. 2. The receptor is a 327 to 328-amino acid seven-transmembrane domain G protein-coupled receptor. 3. Recent site-direct mutagenesis studies have provided considerable insight into glycosylation of the receptor, the arrangement of the helices, and the ligand binding domains.

Characterization of a mutant type-1 angiotensin II receptor

We have used PCR to amplify the rat AT1 receptor from liver mRNA. The receptor DNA was subcloned into pcDNAI and a number of individual clones were transiently expressed in COS-7 cells. These individual receptors were characterized by binding of [125I] Sar1, Ile8-angiotensin II. It was found that one of the AT1 receptor clones did not bind the radiolabeled angiotensin II ligand. The mutant clone was analyzed by nucleotide sequencing. This analysis revealed that the clone has a single amino acid substitution in the third transmembrane domain of the receptor; a leucine at position 112 was changed to a proline. At this stage it is not known whether the mutant receptor is the result of a PCR artifact or an allelic difference.