Adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial (JASPAC 01)

Clinical Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is recommended for treating resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, its appropriate use in patients with resectable PDAC remains debatable.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify independent poor prognostic factors and evaluate the clinical significance of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable PDAC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients diagnosed with resectable PDAC at our institute between January 2003 and December 2022. We analyzed poor prognostic factors at the time of diagnosis in patients who underwent upfront surgery using the Cox proportional hazards model for overall survival (OS). The prognostic score was calculated by adding the individual prognostic factor scores.

RESULTS

Overall, 359 patients were included in this study, with 308 patients undergoing upfront surgery and the remaining 51 patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. The R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the neoadjuvant therapy group (70.6%) than in the upfront surgery group (64.0%). Multivariate analysis in the upfront surgery group revealed the following independent poor prognostic factors: tumor size ≥ 35 mm, serum albumin level ≤ .5 g/dL, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 3.5, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level ≥ 250 U/mL, and Duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 level ≥ 750 U/mL. Among patients with prognostic scores of 0-1 (n = 263), the intention-to-treat OS did not significantly differ between the neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery groups. Among those patients with a prognostic score of ≥ 2 (n = 96), the neoadjuvant therapy group had significantly longer intention-to-treat OS than the upfront surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic score-based stratification can help identify patients who could benefit from neoadjuvant therapy.

Recent advances in systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis using reconstructed RCT survival data

Background & Aims

Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) was the long-standing first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Following positive results from the TOPAZ-01 and KEYNOTE-966 trials, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy are now the standard of care. We aim to compare the efficacy of first-line therapies for advanced BTCs.

Methods

Our systematic review included studies from five databases focusing on English-language articles published between January 2010 and June 2024. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that featured GemCis in a treatment arm for treatment-naive adults with advanced BTCs. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. We conducted a one-stage meta-analysis using reconstructed survival data, Cox-based models, and restricted mean survival time (RMST).

Results

After screening 8,797 studies, 17 RCTs were selected, involving a total of 4,584 patients. Of these, 2,140 (46.7%) received GemCis. The majority (68.9%) were diagnosed with intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 80% had metastatic disease at the time of treatment. The pooled median OS in the GemCis group was 11.6 months (95% CI 11.3-12.2 months). GemCis plus pembrolizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p <0.001), GemCis plus durvalumab (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p = 0.015), GemCis plus S-1 (HR 0.97 95% CI 0.95-0.99; p <0.001), and GemCis plus nab-paclitaxel (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p <0.001) demonstrated superior OS compared with GemCis alone. These combinations also showed increases in RMST by +1.1, +2.5, +2.8, and +2.1 months, respectively. In terms of progression-free survival, GemCis with ICIs (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78-0.94; p <0.001), GemCis plus S-1 (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.003), and GemCis plus nab-paclitaxel (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p <0.001) also demonstrated superiority, with corresponding RMST increases of +0.7, +1.9, and +2.5 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Despite incremental advancements, a breakthrough in advanced BTC treatment remains elusive. Further improvements in treatment efficacy may require biomarker identification to optimize combinational therapies for better patient selection.

Impact and implications

This study analyzed recent RCTs, including KEYNOTE-966, TOPAZ-1, NIFE, and SWOG 1815, involving 4,584 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. A meta-analysis of 17 treatment arms, using reconstructed survival data, confirmed the modest survival benefit of GemCis plus ICIs, supporting its guideline adoption. The findings, however, highlight the need for biomarker identification and better patient selection.

Moving from the background towards the spotlight: A critical review of radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreas cancer

Radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) continues to be controversial. Advances in both systemic therapy and radiation therapy techniques have changed the landscape of LAPC management in recent years. Clinical outcomes of ablative radiation therapy have been encouraging and randomized clinical trials may clarify the role of radiation therapy for LAPC. We present a contemporary critical review of key aspects regarding optimal patient selection, radiation dose escalation techniques, novel radiosensitizers and radioprotectors, and treatment response assessment for LAPC.

Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor sintilimab plus S-1 and gemcitabine for liver metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. When it metastasizes to the liver, treatment options become particularly limited and challenging. Current treatment options for liver metastatic PDAC are limited, and chemotherapy alone often proves insufficient. Immunotherapy, particularly programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors like sintilimab, shows potential efficacy for various cancers but has limited reports on PDAC. This study compares the efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus S-1 and gemcitabine vs S-1 and gemcitabine alone in liver metastatic PDAC.

AIM

To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of combined PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab and S-1 and gemcitabine (combination group) vs S-1 and gemcitabine used alone (chemotherapy group) for treating liver metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Eligible patients were those with only liver metastatic PDAC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, adequate organ and marrow functions, and no prior anticancer therapy. Participants in the combination group received intravenous sintilimab 200 mg every 3 weeks, oral S-1 40 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle, and intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of the same cycle for up to eight cycles or until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Participants in the chemotherapy group received oral S-1 40 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle and intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of the same cycle for up to eight cycles. Between June 2020 and December 2021, 66 participants were enrolled, with 32 receiving the combination treatment and 34 receiving chemotherapy alone.

RESULTS

The group receiving the combined therapy exhibited a markedly prolonged median overall survival (18.8 months compared to 10.3 months, P < 0.05) and progression-free survival (9.6 months vs 5.4 months, P < 0.05). compared to the chemotherapy group. The incidence of severe adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of PD-1 inhibitor sintilimab with S-1 and gemcitabine demonstrated effectiveness and safety for treating liver metastatic PDAC, meriting further investigation.

RNA neoantigen vaccines prime long-lived CD8+ T cells in pancreatic cancer

A fundamental challenge for cancer vaccines is to generate long-lived functional T cells that are specific for tumour antigens. Here we find that mRNA-lipoplex vaccines against somatic mutation-derived neoantigens may solve this challenge in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a lethal cancer with few mutations. At an extended 3.2-year median follow-up from a phase 1 trial of surgery, atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitory antibody), autogene cevumeran1 (individualized neoantigen vaccine with backbone-optimized uridine mRNA-lipoplex nanoparticles) and modified (m) FOLFIRINOX (chemotherapy) in patients with PDAC, we find that responders with vaccine-induced T cells (n = 8) have prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS; median not reached) compared with non-responders without vaccine-induced T cells (n = 8; median RFS 13.4 months; P  =  0.007). In responders, autogene cevumeran induces CD8+ T cell clones with an average estimated lifespan of 7.7 years (range 1.5 to roughly 100 years), with approximately 20% of clones having latent multi-decade lifespans that may outlive hosts. Eighty-six percent of clones per patient persist at substantial frequencies approximately 3 years post-vaccination, including clones with high avidity to PDAC neoepitopes. Using PhenoTrack, a novel computational strategy to trace single T cell phenotypes, we uncover that vaccine-induced clones are undetectable in pre-vaccination tissues, and assume a cytotoxic, tissue-resident memory-like T cell state up to three years post-vaccination with preserved neoantigen-specific effector function. Two responders recurred and evidenced fewer vaccine-induced T cells. Furthermore, recurrent PDACs were pruned of vaccine-targeted cancer clones. Thus, in PDAC, autogene cevumeran induces de novo CD8+ T cells with multiyear longevity, substantial magnitude and durable effector functions that may delay PDAC recurrence. Adjuvant mRNA-lipoplex neoantigen vaccines may thus solve a pivotal obstacle for cancer vaccination.

Multidisciplinary Therapeutic Approaches to Pancreatic Cancer According to the Resectability Status

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal cancers, characterized by late diagnosis, rapid progression, and limited therapeutic options. Despite advancements, only 20% of patients are eligible for surgical resection at diagnosis, the sole curative treatment. Multidisciplinary evaluation is critical to optimize care, stratifying patients based on resectability into resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced, and metastatic stages. Preoperative imaging, such as computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), remains central for staging, for vascular assessment, and tissue acquisition. Endoscopic and systemic approaches are pivotal for addressing complications like biliary obstruction and improving outcomes. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been considered for years the gold standard for biliary drainage, although EUS-guided drainage is increasingly utilized due to its efficacy in both resectable and unresectable disease. Systemic therapies play a key role in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative settings, with ongoing trials exploring their impact on survival and resectability chance. This review highlights the evolving multidisciplinary approaches tailored to the disease stage, focusing on biliary drainage techniques, systemic therapies, and their integration into comprehensive care pathways for PDAC. The continuous refinement of these strategies offers incremental survival benefits and underscores the importance of personalized, multidisciplinary management.

A case of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma growing within the pancreatic duct mimicking an intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm

We herein report a case of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that developed within the pancreatic duct and was initially diagnosed as an intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN). A 76-year-old man presented with weight loss and main pancreatic duct dilation. The imaging studies revealed a 30-mm hypovascular tumor within the main duct of the pancreatic head. An endoscopic examination with a biopsy revealed high-grade atypical epithelial cells with immunostaining patterns suggestive of ITPN. Following robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy, postoperative pathology revealed conflicting features: nodular/cribriform infiltrations typical of ITPN and non-lobular replacement with scattered infiltrations characteristic of PDAC. A comprehensive genomic profiling test detected KRAS and TP53 mutations, leading to the final diagnosis of PDAC (fT3N1aM0, stage IIB). The patient received adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy and remained recurrence-free for 15 months post-surgery. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of differentiating intraductal pancreatic tumors and demonstrates the utility of integrating genetic testing with conventional diagnostic modalities for an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment selection.

Association of chemotherapy completion rates and overall survival with postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Despite the benefits of surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), over 30 % of patients fail to complete adjuvant oncological treatment. Whether postoperative complications affect chemotherapy completion rates and overall survival remains uncertain. We hypothesized that postoperative complications would be associated with chemotherapy delays, omission, and reduced overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC from 2008 to 2022 to assess whether serious surgical complications, defined as Clavien Dindo Grade 3b or higher, were associated with the omission or delay of adjuvant oncologic treatment as well as OS.

RESULTS

A total of 920 patients were available for analysis. Pancreatic and bile leakage were associated with risk of chemotherapy omission (OR 1.97 [CI 95 % 1.25-3.12], p = 0.004 and OR 1.96 [CI 95 % 1.04-3.67], p = 0.032, respectively). No delay of adjuvant chemotherapy >90 days nor change in OS was found.

CONCLUSION

Major surgical complications influence the likelihood of omitting adjuvant chemotherapy but not delaying it > 90 days. Patients with pancreatic or bile leakage were at greater risk of not completing planned chemotherapy but had the same OS.

Survival Analysis of 4 Different Age Groups of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Radical Resection From Retrospective Multi-Center Analysis (YPB-003)

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of radical resection and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival benefit in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), stratified by age, frailty, and other factors in actual clinical practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological and follow-up data of 414 patients with PDAC who underwent surgical resection at nine institutions under the Yamaguchi Pancreat/Biliary Disease Study Group, between January 1997 and December 2016. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between survival and prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

There were 30.5% of patients with PDAC who were aged < 65 years, 37.9% aged 65-74 years, 17.6% aged 75-79 years, and 14.0% aged ≥ 80 years. Notably, RFS declined with increasing age (median RFS: 12.9, 10.2, 9.4, and 7.4 months, respectively), although the differences were not significant (p = 0.223). OS significantly decreased with age (median OS: 21.6, 21.2, 17.0, and 13.9 months, respectively; p = 0.005). In patients aged < 75 years, independent prognostic factors identified by univariate and multivariate analyses included lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.598; p = 0.007), tumor size (HR, 1.489; p = 0.043), R status (HR, 1.536; p = 0.011), and serum albumin levels (HR, 1.526; p = 0.031). In patients aged ≥ 75 years, a high modified frailty index (HR, 2.446; p = 0.012) emerged as an independent prognostic factor, along with lymph node metastasis, CA19-9 level (HR, 1.897; p = 0.017), and R status (HR, 2.087; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The prognosis for older patients with PDAC was shorter than that of younger patients. Frailty may contribute to their poorer prognosis in older age.

Timing of TS1 adjuvant chemotherapy as a prognostic factor in recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgery

AIM

Prognosis of pancreatic cancer is improved by combining postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with surgery, while the importance of extended dissection surgery has decreased. To better understand prognostic factors of recurrence, we focused on the timing of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

One hundred patients who underwent pancreatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy and chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer were classified into early and late postoperative adjuvant therapy initiation groups. Prognosis was evaluated retrospectively using known prognostic factors.

RESULTS

On receiver operating characteristic analysis, optimum cut-off between the early (<52 days; n = 60) and late adjuvant initiation groups (≥52 days; n = 40) was 52 days. The two groups were well-matched, except the early initiation group had more surgeries with D2 lymph node dissection (75 % vs 48 %; p = 0.01); fewer postoperative complications (17 % vs 59 %; p = 0.04), including less postoperative pancreatic fistula (13 % vs 35 %; p = 0.03); and longer disease-free survival (0.7 years v 0.5 years; p = 0.02). On multivariate evaluation, early initiation and completion of adjuvant therapy were associated with increased overall survival, while early initiation was associated with prolonged disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer is improved by earlier rather than later initiation of postoperative adjuvant therapy.

A case of needle tract seeding of pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma after a single endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition

Needle tract seeding (NTS) is a rare complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA). Herein, we report the case of an 83 year-old man who presented with a solid mass in the pancreatic tail, measuring 35 mm in diameter, with cystic degeneration. EUS-TA was performed using a 22-gauge biopsy needle, with a single puncture via the stomach; however, no definitive pathological diagnosis was achieved. Due to the strong suspicion of malignancy, surgery was performed at the patient's request, and the postoperative pathological diagnosis was pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma. One year after surgery, computed tomography revealed a string of bead-like nodules within the gastric wall. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed three submucosal, tumor-like raised lesions aligned in a row on the upper posterior wall of the gastric body. EUS detected a solid mass with cystic degeneration. Histological findings from EUS-TA specimens were consistent with those from the pancreatic resection specimen, leading to a diagnosis of NTS. Although reports of NTS have been increasing in recent years, cases of NTS occurring after only a single puncture remain extremely rare. This case clearly demonstrates that NTS can occur even after a single puncture, highlighting the importance of obtaining thorough informed consent regarding this risk prior to performing EUS-TA.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Using Moderately Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) remains unclear. This study was designed to evaluate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy by using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (NAC-IMRT) for R-PDAC compared with upfront surgery (UpS).

METHODS

Among 198 patients with R-PDAC who were indicated for resection between 2013 and 2021, 130 were included in this study after excluding patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and did not meet the NAC-IMRT criteria (Eligible set). NAC-IMRT was planned for 58 patients, and UpS was planned for 72 patients. Additionally, in 105 patients who could undergo the planned treatment (As-treated set), the surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the Eligible set, median overall survival (OS) was 50.5 months with NAC-IMRT and 34.7 months with UpS and progression-free survival was 20.4 months with NAC-IMRT and 13.9 months with UpS. In the As-treated set, OS was longer in the NAC-IMRT group (66.7 months vs. 34.7 months, p = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, NAC-IMRT was identified as an independent factor for better OS (hazard ratio 0.617, 95% confidence interval 0.382-0.995, p = 0.047, in the Eligible set). The incidence of postoperative complications did not show a difference between the two groups, and NAC-IMRT suppressed local tumor invasion, including lymphatic, venous, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC-IMRT may offer superior survival outcomes and manageable toxicity in R-PDAC patients compared with upfront surgery. This study supports the efficacy and safety of NAC-IMRT and recommends its consideration in R-PDAC treatment protocols.

Is distal pancreatectomy the optimal surgical procedure for pancreatic neck cancer?

BACKGROUND

The optimal resection for pancreatic neck cancer is challenging in clinical practice because we could dissect by pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lymph node dissection and to help determine the optimal surgical treatment for pancreatic neck cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 462 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative-intent pancreatectomy between 2012 and 2022, 35 of whom had pancreatic neck cancer without preoperative radiologic gastroduodenal artery contact. We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics, lymph node metastasis stations, and the efficacy index of lymph node dissection, which was calculated by multiplying the frequency of lymph node metastasis to each station by the 5-year survival rate of patients with positive lymph nodes at each station.

RESULTS

The lymph node station with the greatest rate of metastasis was #11p (28.6%), followed by #8 (17.1%), #14 (14.3%), #13 (14.3%), #17 (9.5%), and #6 (4.8%). The efficacy indices of lymph node dissection were 14.3 for #11, 4.76 for #13, and 8.57 for #14. There were no significant differences in 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year overall survival between patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy and those undergoing distal pancreatectomy (23.7% vs 54.7%, P = .142; 29.9% vs 51.1%, P = .179, respectively). Univariate survival analysis showed that tumor size ≥2 cm was associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio, 3.842, P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

PD with #11p lymph node dissection is preferable to DP in terms of survival benefit for pancreatic neck cancer with lymph node metastasis.

Preoperative Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine for Pancreatic Cancer Causes Zinc Deficiency

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate how preoperative chemotherapy affected the serum zinc concentrations in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundreds thirty-one patients with PC who underwent pancreatectomy at our department from 2013 to 2019 were enrolled in this study and measured for the serum zinc concentrations before pancreatectomy. Patient characteristics, course of treatment, and laboratory data were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five patients underwent upfront pancreatectomy and 58 received preoperative gemcitabine + S1 (GEM + S1) and 29 received gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GEM + nab-PTX). Comparing the serum zinc concentrations before and after preoperative treatment, it was found to decrease after treatment with statistical difference (79.3 μg/dL vs 68.7 μg/dL, P < 0.001). The result was consistent with the investigation for both the patients who received GEM + S1 and those who received GEM + nab-PTX ( P = 0.019, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative chemotherapy consistently reduced the serum zinc concentrations in the PC patients, regardless of their regimen such as GEM + S1 and GEM + nab-PTX. Monitoring the serum zinc concentration and appropriate zinc supplementation may be essential for PC patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy and pancreatectomy.

Intratumoural expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase is an independent prognostic factor in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with adjuvant gemcitabine

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a poor prognosis, and biomarkers to guide treatment decisions in PDAC are generally lacking. Intratumoural expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a potential prognostic parameter in patients with PDAC undergoing surgical resection and postoperative chemotherapy. In the present study, DPD was analysed by immunohistochemistry of a tissue microarray platform including a real-world cohort of 495 patients with PDAC who had undergone resection with curative intent at any of three tertiary centres, including Northern, Western and Southeastern regions of Sweden, between 1993 and 2019. DPD level (high/low) was analysed and overall survival associations were assessed in treatment subgroups using a multivariate Cox regression model accounting for potential confounders. In patients who had not received adjuvant chemotherapy (n=182), the median overall survival time was 11.6 months (95% CI 9.6-13.5), compared with 28.8 months (25.0-32.6) among those who had (n=313; log-rank P<0.001). The most common type of chemotherapy was gemcitabine single agent (Gem, n=239) followed by gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GemCape, n=39). Tumour-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage and DPD expression were statistically significant prognostic parameters in the Gem group (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41, P=0.036), with high expression of DPD linked with worse survival. In addition, tumour grade and TNM stage were statistically significant prognostic factors in the group that did not receive any chemotherapy (P≤0.001). No statistically significant parameters were identified in the GemCape group. Taken together, intratumoural expression of DPD may be considered a prognostic marker for patients with PDAC treated with adjuvant gemcitabine following surgical resection, with low expression levels predicting better survival. Further studies in larger cohorts of patients receiving multi-drug or non-gemcitabine based regimens are warranted.

Clinical significance of resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with occult para-aortic lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the clinical significance of resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosed with occult para-aortic lymph node metastasis using intraoperative para-aortic lymph node sampling.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and May 2021, a total of 606 patients who underwent surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with intraoperative para-aortic lymph node sampling were retrospectively investigated and divided into the resected para-aortic lymph node-negative (n = 543), resected para-aortic lymph node-positive (n = 44), and unresected para-aortic lymph node-positive (n = 19) groups. Overall survival, clinicopathologic characteristics, and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall survival in the resected para-aortic lymph node-positive group was significantly worse than that in the resected para-aortic lymph node-negative group (3-year overall survival, 29.8% vs 48.4%, P < .001) and significantly better than that in the unresected para-aortic lymph node-positive group (3-year overall survival, 29.8% vs 0.0%, P = .008). In the resected para-aortic lymph node-positive group, adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio = 2.689, P = .033). The overall survival of patients in the resected para-aortic lymph node-positive group who received adjuvant chemotherapy was comparable to that of patients in the resected para-aortic lymph node-negative group who had 4 or more regional lymph node metastases and received adjuvant chemotherapy (3-year overall survival, 33.9% vs 34.1%, P = .343). A logistic regression analysis showed that neoadjuvant therapy, age <65 years, creatinine clearance >60 mL/min, pancreatic body or tail tumor, and serum albumin level >3.5 g/dL were significant predictive factors for induction of adjuvant chemotherapy in 587 resected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection may be acceptable for patients with para-aortic lymph node-positive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who are likely to tolerate adjuvant chemotherapy.

Dissecting Tumor Size Underestimation in Pancreatic Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Preoperative Treatments

BACKGROUND

Tumor size (TS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most important prognostic factors. However, discrepancies between TS on preoperative images (TSi) and pathological specimens (TSp) have been reported. This study aims to evaluate the factors associated with the differences between TSi and TSp.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with PDAC who underwent surgery at our institution between January 2010 and November 2023. TS discrepancy (TSD[%]) was defined as ([TSp - TSi]/TSp) × 100. Using logistic regression, we generated a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to define the cutoff for TSi underestimation predicting clinical tumor (T) stage migration. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of TSi underestimation.

RESULTS

Of the 231 patients, 99 (42%) patients received preoperative chemotherapy. The ROC curve determined a TSD underestimation cutoff of 25.9%. The number of TSp > TSi cases was 185 (80%), and TSi underestimation was present in 117 (51%) patients. T stage migration rates were 76%, 26%, and 50% in clinical stage (c) T1, cT2, cT3, respectively, among the patients with chemotherapy, and 93%, 33%, and 14%, respectively, in those without chemotherapy. Multivariate analyses revealed that independent predictors of TSi underestimation were posterior surface invasion in the patients with preoperative chemotherapy and anterior surface invasion in those without chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

TS was more commonly underestimated than overestimated, and cT1 rarely corresponded to pathological (p)T1. The factors contributing to TSi underestimation differed between patients with and without preoperative chemotherapy. Therefore, these two groups should be considered separately for accurate TSi evaluation.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Resection of Localized Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Following Preoperative FOLFIRINOX

Importance

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX (combination leucovorin calcium [folinic acid], fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin in full or modified dosing) chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) is unclear because current studies do not account for the number of cycles of preoperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.

Objective

To investigate the association of adjuvant chemotherapy following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX with OS, taking into account the number of cycles of preoperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with 2 to 11 cycles of preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX followed by resection across 48 centers in 20 countries from 2010 to 2018. Patients who died within 3 months after surgery were excluded (landmark). Data were analyzed from February 1 to December 31, 2023.

Exposures

Preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy followed by resection and eventually followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was OS, calculated from the 3-month landmark. Cox regression analysis, including interaction analyses, was performed to investigate the association of adjuvant chemotherapy with OS.

Results

Overall, 767 patients were included after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (median [IQR] age, 62 [55-67] years; 404 [52.7%] male). Adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.87), confirmed by adjusted OS curves. The interaction analysis to assess estimated treatment effect across subgroups was not statistically significant. The forest plot and interaction test suggest that the association of adjuvant chemotherapy was lower among patients receiving 8 or more cycles of preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX, those who had radiological response, and those with ypN0 disease. Compared to no adjuvant chemotherapy, both adjuvant (m)FOLFIRINOX (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.80) and other multiagent adjuvant regimens (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.92) were associated with prolonged OS, whereas single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy was not (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55-1.03).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, adjuvant (m)FOLFIRINOX and other multiagent chemotherapy regimens were associated with improved OS following resection of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma after preoperative (m)FOLFIRINOX, whereas single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy was not. The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS may be lower in subgroups such as patients with 8 or more preoperative cycles of (m)FOLFIRINOX, those having radiological response, and those with ypN0.

Pancreatectomies with vein resection: Two large institutions' experience of East and West

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and preferred reconstruction methods of pancreatectomy associated with vein resection (PAVR) for pancreatic cancer, especially for the extensive portal vein/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resections (more than 4 cm), are still subjects of debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of PAVR by analyzing data from two large institutions from different regions.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2018, we identified consecutive series of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent PAVR at Karolinska University Hospital (KUH), Sweden, and Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation of Cancer Research (JFCR), Japan. Both institutions adopted the artery-first approach to enhance surgical precision. This study compared the short- and long-term outcomes, vein resection types, and reconstruction methods between the two centers.

RESULTS

A total of 506 patients who underwent PAVR were identified, 211 patients were from KUH and 295 patients were from JFCR. A higher incidence of total pancreatectomy was identified at KUH (24.6 % vs 0.3 %). There were no significant differences in intraoperative estimated blood loss (KUH: 630 ml, JFCR: 600 ml), severe complications rate (8.5 %, 5.1 %), and mortality (2.4 %, 0.7 %). Primary end-to-end anastomosis was primarily performed even if the length of PV/SMV resection was 5 cm or more and achieved successfully with acceptable patency (No thrombus rate: overall cases, 98.0 %; 5 cm or more, 93.5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

We report favorable outcomes of PAVR for pancreatic cancer from two high-volume centers in the east and west. Primary end-to-end anastomosis was safe and feasible even if the length of PV/SMV resection was 5 cm or more.

Analysis of physical activity levels and influencing factors in cancer survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Introduction

Physical activity is becoming more important in cancer patient care. However, there are limited studies investigating physical activity levels in cancer survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study aims to assess the present status of physical activity levels in cancer survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy and whether perioperative metrics and length of follow-up have an impact on physical activity levels in survivorship.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study. The study included cancer survivors who were treated at a tertiary general teaching hospital for pancreaticoduodenectomy from December 2019 to January 2022 following surgery. We quantified physical activity frequency, duration, and intensity using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained via an electronic medical record system. Postoperative complication data were obtained from our survival cohort. Variables univariately associated with the physical activity level at an alpha level of less than 0.1 were included in the logistic regression analysis of factors influencing physical activity in cancer survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Results

A total of 223 patients who met the eligibility criteria completed a telephone survey. The main form of physical exercise is walking, 69.5% of participants' physical activity belongs to the active category, but only 16.6% of participants met the aerobic guideline. Logistic regression showed that cancer survivors without pancreatic fistula were 2.453 times more likely to perform active physical activity in survival than those with pancreatic leakage (p = 0.041). For a one-unit increase in operation duration, there is approximately a 0.5% reduction in the level of active physical activity participation among cancer survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy (p = 0.015). For each unit increase in follow-up time, post-pancreaticoduodenectomy patients were 1.046 times more likely to participate in active physical activity (p = 0.030).

Conclusion

Although half of the cancer survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy experienced active physical activity, only a small percentage of individuals met the guideline-recommended level of aerobic exercise. More physical activity support should be provided to cancer survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Moreover, operation duration, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and follow-up time should be taken into consideration when giving exercise instructions to postoperative survivors of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Inhibitory effects of the combination of rapamycin with gemcitabine plus paclitaxel on the growth of pancreatic cancer tumors

We previously examined the antitumor effects of short interfering RNA nanoparticles targeting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer mouse model. We herein report the inhibitory effects of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin on tumor growth in a novel established mouse model of pancreatic cancer using human pancreatic cancer cell line-derived organoids. Gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel are clinically used to treat advanced pancreatic cancer. In vitro assays showed that rapamycin strongly inhibited cell invasion, while gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and gemcitabine plus paclitaxel primarily inhibited cell proliferation with minimal effects on invasion. In vivo mouse experiments demonstrated that rapamycin exhibited superior antitumor activity to S-1 (a metabolically activated prodrug of 5-fluorouracil) and another mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, while its efficacy was similar to that of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel (which was used instead of nab-paclitaxel due to concerns about allergic reactions in mice to human albumin) in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer using human pancreatic cancer cell line-derived organoids. Furthermore, the combination of rapamycin with gemcitabine plus paclitaxel exerted synergistic inhibitory effects on the growth of pancreatic cancer tumors. Although the inhibition of tumor growth was significantly stronger in everolimus-treated mice than in control mice, there were no additive anti-growth effects when combined with gemcitabine plus paclitaxel. The present results suggest that the combination of rapamycin with gemcitabine plus paclitaxel achieved the greatest reduction in tumor volumes in the mouse xenograft model and, thus, has significant clinical promise.

Phase II Trial of Adjuvant S-1 Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The PIECE Trial

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NAC-S) is the standard therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of the addition of adjuvant S-1 after R0 resection in ESCC patients who received NAC-S.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Key eligibility criteria included clinical stage IB-III (without T4 disease) ESCC, age 20-75 years, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received adjuvant therapy with four cycles of S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) administered orally for 4 weeks of 6-week cycles. The primary endpoint was 3 year relapse-free survival (RFS). If the lower confidence limit for 3 year RFS was >50%, we judged that the primary endpoint of this study was met.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were enrolled between January 2016 and January 2019. Two patients were excluded from analysis; five patients were determined to have R1 or R2 resection, and seven patients did not receive adjuvant S-1. The 3-year RFS and overall survival rates in the intention-to-treat population were 72.3% (90% confidence interval [CI] 59.9-81.5) and 85.0% (90% CI 73.9-91.6), indicating that the primary endpoint was met. Grade ≥3 adverse events with an incidence ≥10% included neutropenia (13.2%), anorexia (13.2%), and diarrhea (10.5%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant S-1 after NAC-S showed promising efficacy with a manageable safety profile for patients with resectable ESCC and warrants further evaluation in larger studies.

Changes in Skeletal Muscle Volume During Preoperative Chemotherapy Affect the Outcome of Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the effects of changes in clinicopathological factors during preoperative chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer, including skeletal muscle volume, on recurrence and prognosis after pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Data from 41 patients who underwent resection for pancreatic cancer after preoperative chemotherapy from 2012 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Skeletal muscle volume was substituted for the psoas muscle area (PMA) at the level of the third lumbar vertebra. We investigated the relationship of clinicopathological factors during preoperative chemotherapy with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The association between clinicopathological factors and a decrease in PMA was investigated.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analyses for DFS and OS, the factors associated with recurrence were as follows: decrease in PMA (P = 0.003) and the absence of adjuvant therapy (P = 0.03), and the factors associated with poor prognosis were as follows: decrease in PMA (P = 0.04) and the absence of adjuvant therapy (P = 0.008), and the resectability of borderline resectable and unresectable-locally advanced tumors (P = 0.033). All patients with partial response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1) had no decrease in PMA (P = 0.01). The proportion of patients with Evans classification ≥ II was significantly higher in the group without a decrease in PMA (P = 0.02). The proportion of patients with an average relative dose intensity of adjuvant therapy ≥0.6 was significantly higher in the group without a decrease in PMA (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Changes in preoperative skeletal muscle volume during preoperative chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer is a potential predictor of recurrence and prognosis after pancreatectomy.

Neoadjuvant Treatment with Changes in Chemotherapy Regimens According to Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Level for Resectable/Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The response of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may contribute to outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of changes in NAT regimens based on CA19-9 level.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included patients with resectable/borderline resectable (R/BR)-PDAC undergoing NAT from 2008 to 2022. A CA19-9 level lower than 150 IU/mL after NAT was the criterion for resection. If the level did not decrease, the chemotherapy regimen was changed to satisfy the criterion. The patient cohort was divided into group A (satisfied criterion without changing chemotherapy), group B (did not receive chemotherapy change, could not satisfy the criterion), group C (received chemotherapy change, satisfied the criterion), and group D (received chemotherapy change, could not satisfy the criterion).

RESULTS

The study cohort included 283 patients. After first-line chemotherapy, 112 (39.6%) patients did not satisfy the criterion (groups B [n = 64], C [n = 32], and D [n = 16]). Of the 283 patients, 48 (17%) received a chemotherapy change (groups C and D). The patients in groups C and D showed significantly better overall survival (OS, 35.9 months) than the group B patients (25.7 months) (P = 0.035). The OS of the group C patients (63.8 months) was similar to the OS of the group A patients (n = 171: 56.3 months; P = 0.430). Multivariate analysis of the patients in groups B, C, and D identified chemotherapy change as an independent prognostic factor for OS and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Changing the chemotherapy targeting the CA19-9 level can improve the outcome of R/BR-PDAC patients with poor biologic response to first-line NAT.

Impact of Preoperative Osteosarcopenia and Postoperative Administration of Pancrelipase on the Prognosis of Borderline Resectable and Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify postoperative recurrence and prognostic factors, including osteosarcopenia for borderline resectable (BR) and unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) pancreatic cancer and to examine the impact of postoperative pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT).

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 32 resected patients with BR and UR-LA pancreatic cancer. We investigated independent factors in the disease-free survival and overall survival. The relation of osteosarcopenia with the clinicopathological factors was investigated. Additionally, the association of the administration of a standard dose of pancrelipase, the amount of lipase required for patients with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, for ≥6 months postoperatively with improvement of sarcopenia, osteopenia, and osteosarcopenia and completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy was investigated.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses identified osteosarcopenia (P = 0.049) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.01) as independent recurrence predictors, and osteosarcopenia (P = 0.002), maximum tumor diameter ≥40 mm (P = 0.006), and no adjuvant therapy (P = 0.01) as independent prognostic predictors. In the osteosarcopenia group, serum CA19-9 levels were higher (P = 0.03). The administration of a standard dose of pancrelipase for ≥6 months postoperatively was none in the osteosarcopenia group (0% vs 42.9%, P = 0.01), while significantly improved postoperative sarcopenia (33% vs 0%, P = 0.004), increased number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 6 vs n = 3, P = 0.03), and the completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy in excluding cases interrupted because of recurrence (86% vs 25%, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Osteosarcopenia was an independent recurrent and prognostic factor in patients after pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Appropriate postoperative PERT may contribute to a better prognosis by improving sarcopenia and increasing the completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Optimal treatment strategy for patients with pancreatic cancer having positive peritoneal cytology: A nationwide multicenter retrospective cohort study supervised by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer (PaCa) having positive peritoneal cytology (PPC).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with PPC treated at 78 high-volume centers between January 2012 and December 2020. Prognoses after resection (S-group) and initiation of nonsurgical treatment (N-group) were compared. Prognostic factors for survival in both groups were analyzed. Detailed characteristics of conversion surgery (CS) in the N-group were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 568 enrolled patients were classified into an S-group (n = 445) or an N-group (n = 123). Median survival times (MSTs) were 19.0 months and 19.3 months, respectively, with no significant difference in prognosis (p = .845). The intervenable prognostic factors for survival were adjuvant treatment in the S-group (p < .001) and CS in the N-group (p < .001). Following CS, the MST was prolonged to 45.6 months, and peritoneal or liver recurrence decreased considerably. CS can be expected if PPC is diagnosed before neoadjuvant treatment and when combination treatment is initiated.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection may not be beneficial for improving survival when PPC is evident. Chemotherapy aiming for CS may be the optimal treatment for such patients.

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and S-1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Effects on nutritional status and pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes

BACKGROUND

With the advent of improved chemotherapy options, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has gained acceptance as a multidisciplinary treatment approach for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to clarify whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 influences preoperative nutritional status and postoperative outcomes, particularly in patients undergoing highly invasive pancreatic resection.

METHODS

Patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy as upfront surgery or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 between January 2015 and December 2022 were assessed. In addition to perioperative surgical outcomes, preoperative nutritional status was evaluated using serum albumin, controlling nutritional status, and prognostic nutritional index.

RESULTS

A total of 158 patients who underwent upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy and 119 who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 before pancreaticoduodenectomy were evaluated. Preoperative nutritional assessments (serum albumin, controlling nutritional status score, and prognostic nutritional index) showed no significant differences between groups, either at the initial consultation or immediately before surgery. No significant differences were observed in postoperative outcomes, including blood loss, operation time, and morbidity. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 group had a significantly greater rate of negative tumor margins (R0 resection rate 86% vs 74%, P = .018), and improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.67, P < .001) compared with the upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 does not adversely impact preoperative nutritional status and enhances the effectiveness of pancreaticoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, leading to improved pathologically curative resection rates and overall survival.

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Long-Term Outcomes of Adjuvant Therapy in the ESPAC4 Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

The ESPAC4 trial showed that adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GemCap) produced longer overall survival (OS) than gemcitabine monotherapy. Subsequently, the PRODIGE24-CCTG PA.6 trial showed even longer survival for modified fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) than gemcitabine but had more restrictive eligibility criteria. Our aim was to analyze the ESPAC4 survival on long-term follow-up.

METHODS

The OS of 732 ESPAC4 patients comparing 367 randomly assigned to gemcitabine and 365 to GemCap was previously reported after a median follow-up time of 43.2 months (95% CI, 39.7 to 45.5) and 458 deaths. Analysis was now carried out after a median follow-up of 104 months (101-108) and 566 deaths.

RESULTS

The median OS was 29.5 months (27.5-32.1) for all patients, 28.4 months (25.2-32.0) in the gemcitabine group and 31.6 months (26.5-38.0) in the GemCap group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [0.71 to 0.98]; P = .031). R0 patients given gemcitabine had a median survival of 32.2 months (27.9-41.6) compared with 49.9 months (39.0-82.3) for those given GemCap (HR, 0.63 [0.47 to 0.84]; P = .002). Lymph node-negative patients had significantly higher 5 year OS rates on GemCap (59% [49%-71%]) than gemcitabine (53% [42%-66%]; HR, 0.63 [0.41 to 0.98]; P = .04) but not those with positive lymph nodes (P = .225). The OS advantage for GemCap was retained in the PRODIGE24 subgroup of 193 (26.4%) ESPAC4 patients not eligible for PRODIGE24 with a median survival of 20.7 (16.2-27.3) months in patients allocated to gemcitabine compared with 25.9 (22.3-30.2) months for ineligible patients allocated to GemCap (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.98]; χ2log-rank-1df = 4.31; P = .038).

CONCLUSION

GemCap is a standard option for patients not eligible for mFOLFIRINOX. Exploratory evidence suggests that GemCap may be particularly efficacious in R0 patients and also in lymph node-negative patients.

Outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy for octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of elderly patients are being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, with increasing need to consider pancreatic surgery. This study aims to provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed via a search of Medline, PubMed and Cochrane databases. Studies comparing outcomes of patients >80 years to younger patients undergoing PD were included.

RESULTS

26 studies were included. This included 22481 patients, with 20134 (89.6%) aged <80 years old, and 2347 (10.4%) octogenarians. Octogenarians were associated with higher rates of mortality (OR 2.37 (95%CI 1.91-2.94, p < 0.00001)), all-cause morbidity (OR 1.60 (95%CI 1.30-1.96), p<0.00001) and re-operation (OR 1.41 (95%CI 1.13-1.75), p = 0.002). Octogenarians had a two-fold risk of cardiac complications and respiratory complications (OR 2.13 (95%CI 1.67-2.73), p < 0.00001), (OR 2.38 (95%CI 1.72-3.27), p < 0.0001). There was no difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage or delayed gastric emptying. Younger patients were more likely to return to adjuvant therapy (OR 0.20 (95%CI 0.12-0.34), p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Octogenerians are associated with higher mortality rate, postoperative complications, and reduced likelihood to undergo adjuvant therapy. Careful preoperative assessment and selection of elderly patients for consideration of pancreatic surgery is essential.

Combination of S-1 and the oral ATR inhibitor ceralasertib is effective against pancreatic cancer cells

PURPOSE

In our previous study, we found that the Chk1 inhibitor prexasertib enhances the antitumour effect of the oral anticancer drug S-1 against pancreatic cancer cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of combining S-1 and ceralasertib, an oral inhibitor of ATR, which is located upstream of Chk1. Ceralasertib is currently being investigated in multiple clinical trials for various cancers.

METHODS

The cell-proliferation inhibitory effect was measured by MTT assay, using the pancreatic cancer cell lines BxPC-3, SUIT-2, PANC-1, and MIA PaCa-2, while apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry using PI/Annexin staining. The mechanism underlying the combined effect was analysed using western blotting, and the antitumor effect was analysed using a mouse xenograft model.

RESULTS

MTT assay revealed that the combination of S-1 and ceralasertib had a synergistic effect, leading to the suppression of cell proliferation. Measurement with PI/Annexin staining revealed that the combination of S-1 and ceralasertib induced apoptosis more efficiently than either drug alone. Western blotting results showed that ceralasertib inhibited S-1-induced activation of ATR and Chk1. The average estimated tumour volume after 3 weeks of administration was 601 mm3 in the S-1 group, 580 mm3 in the ceralasertib group, and 298 mm3 in the combination group.

CONCLUSION

The combination of S-1 and ceralasertib demonstrated a high antiproliferative effect in inhibiting tumour growth in vitro.

Preoperative nutritional status is a useful predictor of the feasibility of postoperative treatment in octogenarian-plus pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

The suitability of radical surgery for very elderly pancreatic cancer (PC) patients remains controversial due to concerns about postoperative functional reserve. Inflammatory-nutritional status may help identify elderly patients at risk of compromised postoperative treatment tolerance.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 121 patients over eighty who were diagnosed with PC in 2010-2019, 40 of whom underwent radical surgery. Surgical outcomes were compared with those of 205 younger patients (under 80 years-old) who underwent radical surgery. K-means cluster analysis was conducted with four inflammatory-nutritional indices (NLR, PLR, PNI, and mGPS) to define, and the indices using ordinal logistic analysis were evaluated in each cluster to create a formula named 'nutritional index (NTI)', which was then used to redefine the clusters. The predictive ability of the NTI was validated in other octogenarians who underwent pancreatectomy for PC between 2020 and 2023.

RESULTS

Patients older than eighty exhibited comparable overall survival to younger patients (median survival time, 30.7/37.1 months, p = 0.20). However, octogenarian-plus patients had lower rates of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) initiation (45/80 %) and treatment upon recurrence (52/84 %), resulting in shorter survival after recurrence (7.4/11.1 months, p = 0.06). Inflammatory-nutritional status was significantly associated with overall survival, with poor nutritional status being linked to lower rates of AC initiation and/or treatment upon recurrence. NTI effectively predicted AC feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical surgery for octogenarian-plus PC patients meeting the current criteria was safe, but lower rates of postoperative treatment initiation may lead to poorer outcomes after recurrence. Inflammatory-nutritional status assessment could enhance surgical eligibility in octogenarian-plus PC patients.

Clinical significance and therapeutic implication of CD200 in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

CD200, a negative regulator of T cells as well as a marker for cancer stem cells, represents a significant prognostic factor and potential therapeutic target in certain cancers. However, its clinical significance remains unknown in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

CD200 was assessed in 220 resected PDAC patients who underwent surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT). We examined the clinicopathological outcomes associated with CD200 and further assessed its clinical implications regarding immunological and cancer stem cell properties.

RESULTS

NACRT was associated with higher CD200 expression (66.4 % vs. 32.2 %, P < 0.001) compared to upfront surgery. CD200 was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor in NACRT (hazard ratio 1.90, 95 % confidence interval 1.12-3.23, P = 0.016), but not in upfront surgery patients. Post-recurrence survival was significantly worse in CD200+ patients compared to CD200- patients in the NACRT group, but there was no significant difference observed in the upfront surgery group. CD200 expression was correlated with significantly lower levels of CD4+, CD8+, and CD45RO+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Furthermore, the correlation of CD200 with pancreatic cancer stem cell markers CD44/CD24/ESA was stronger in irradiated human pancreatic cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data underscore novel roles for CD200 in immune evasion as well as therapy resistance in pancreatic cancer. CD200 may represent a novel poor prognostic predictive factor and potential therapeutic target for PDAC with NACRT.

Characteristics and prognosis of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma not expressing CA19-9: Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Around 5-10 % of pancreatic cancer patients are non-expressors of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), which has an unknown impact on the aggressiveness and prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and the prognosis of PDAC patients who do not express CA 19-9.

METHODS

Patients with PDAC diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Clinical characteristics were compared according to CA 19-9 levels stratified in four different groups: non-expressors (≤1.0 U/mL), normal range (1.1-37.0 U/mL), mildly elevated (37.1-97.9 U/mL), and CA 19-9 ≥98.0 U/mL. The characteristics were analyzed in the whole cohort and overall survival (OS) was evaluated in a subgroup of upfront resected patients who had cT1-3 tumors without distant metastases.

RESULTS

In total, 88,749 patients were included, of which 4.5 % were CA 19-9 non-expressors. The non-expressors had a higher risk of having distant metastasis at diagnosis, compared to patients with normal-range or mildly elevated CA 19-9 levels. In resected patients (n = 4008), CA 19-9 non-expressors had shorted median OS compared to patients with normal-range CA 19-9 levels (29.3 vs 34.4 months, p = 0.024). This OS association remained in a multivariable Cox regression model (adjusted HR 1.22, 95 % CI 1.04-1.44).

CONCLUSIONS

CA 19-9 non-expression is associated with distant metastatic disease at diagnosis and with death in resected non-metastatic patients compared to normal-range CA 19-9 levels. This clinically relevant subgroup requires alternative biomarkers, and may need consideration of more extensive preoperative staging and intensive perioperative systemic therapy.

Targeted Dynamic Phospho-Proteogenomic Analysis of Gastric Cancer Cells Suggests Host Immunity Provides Survival Benefit

Despite of massive emergence of molecular targeting drugs, the mainstay of advanced gastric cancer (GC) therapy is DNA-damaging drugs. Using a reverse-phase protein array-based proteogenomic analysis of a panel of 8 GC cell lines, we identified genetic alterations and signaling pathways, potentially associated with resistance to DNA-damaging drugs, including 5-fluorouracil (5FU), cisplatin, and etoposide. Resistance to cisplatin and etoposide, but not 5FU, was negatively associated with global copy number loss, vimentin expression, and caspase activity, which are considered hallmarks of previously established EMT subtype. The segregation of 19,392 protein expression time courses by sensitive and resistant cell lines for the drugs tested revealed that 5FU-resistant cell lines had lower changes in global protein dynamics, suggesting their robust protein level regulation, than their sensitive counterparts, whereas the cell lines that are resistant to other drugs showed increased protein dynamics in response to each drug. Despite faint global protein dynamics, 5FU-resistant cell lines showed increased signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 phosphorylation and PD-L1 expression in response to 5FU. In publicly available cohort data, expression of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and NFκB target genes induced by proinflammatory cytokines was associated with prolonged survival in GC. In our validation cohort, total lymphocyte count, rather than PD-L1 positivity, predicted a better relapse-free survival rate in GC patients with 5FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy than those with surgery alone. Moreover, total lymphocyte count+ patients who had no survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy were discriminated by expression of IκBα, a potent negative regulator of NFκB. Collectively, our results suggest that 5FU resistance observed in cell lines may be overcome by host immunity or by combination therapy with immune checkpoint blockade.

Prognostic nutritional index is an independent risk factor for continuing S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection

PURPOSE

Reports on the association of perioperative nutritional and inflammatory status with the clinical course of adjuvant chemotherapy did not include neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to clarify the mechanism by which perioperative nutritional and inflammatory status affect the clinical course of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We enrolled 123 patients with pancreatic cancer retrospectively who underwent surgical resection with neoadjuvant and S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy between January 2013 and December 2022. The duration of continuing S-1 treatment and the continuation rates at 3 and 6 months after initiating adjuvant chemotherapy were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to evaluate statistical differences between the high and low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) groups. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for continuing S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value for preoperative PNI was 45. Preoperative PNI was an independent risk factor for continuing S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who underwent perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection (hazard ratio = 2.435, 95% confidence interval = 1.229 - 4.824, p = 0.011). Low PNI was associated with lower S-1completion (p = 0.02) and higher S-1 withdrawal (p = 0.031). Additionally, the preoperative PNI status affected ≥ grade 2 adverse events caused by adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PNI affected adjuvant chemotherapy continuation and related adverse events in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and curative resection. Additional perioperative anti-inflammatory management and nutritional support may be required to improve the clinical course of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and patient survival.

Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy preserving blood supply for pancreatic cancer with a history of proximal gastrectomy and sigmoidectomy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Blood supply to the remnant stomach should be preserved during pancreatectomy in patients with a history of gastrectomy. Moreover, ischemic complications should be considered when performing pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with celiac axis and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenosis. However, whether these surgical procedures can be safely performed remains unclear.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 75-year-old man had a history of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (PG) with double-flap technique for gastric cancer and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for sigmoid cancer treated 4 years ago. Follow-up computed tomography (CT) revealed an irregular nodular tumor measuring 13 mm in the pancreatic head. The patient was diagnosed with resectable pancreatic head cancer without lymph node metastasis (cT1cN0M0, cStageIA) according to the Union for International Cancer Control, 8th edition. As a standard pancreatic cancer treatment, two courses of preoperative chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S-1 were administered. CT after preoperative chemotherapy identified no significant changes in tumor size but revealed SMA stenosis due to atherosclerosis. Blood flow to the left-sided colon was supplied from the middle colic artery via the SMA because of the past sigmoidectomy with inferior mesenteric artery detachment. Therefore, SMA stent placement was performed 1 day preoperatively. Subsequently, pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) was performed, preserving the remnant stomach with the right gastroepiploic (RGE) artery and vein. After resection, indocyanine green fluorescence imaging confirmed a good blood supply to the remnant stomach. The operation time was 467 min, and the blood lost was 442 mL. Histopathologically, the tumor was diagnosed as moderate adenocarcinoma and pT1cN0M0, Stage IA. The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 23. S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy was administered on postoperative day 63. The patient has been alive without recurrence for 7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We performed PPPD preserving blood supply for pancreatic head cancer in a patient with benign SMA stenosis and a history of PG and sigmoidectomy. Blood supply was preserved through preoperative SMA stent placement and a surgical procedure preserving the RGE vessels. Furthermore, S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was successfully initiated. These multimodal therapies contributed to a favorable clinical outcome.

Variability of quality-of-life measurements and reporting in randomised controlled trials of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to evaluate the methodology used in pancreatic cancer (PC) randomised controlled trials (RCTs) measuring quality of life (QOL) and focuses on the type, frequency, survey compliance and duration of these assessments.

DESIGN

Systematic review of PC RCTs measuring QOL.

DATA SOURCES

A search of PubMed.gov and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted for PC RCTs measuring QOL from inception to 21 March 2023. Only phase III RCTs were included. Studies were excluded if QOL was not measured, the study was phase I/II, in the second-line setting or unavailable in English. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers in a standardised fashion.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes included the type of QOL instrument used, the timing and frequency of assessments, methods of analysis and survey completion rates (SCRs) over time. Secondary outcomes included patient demographics, significant QOL improvements and the frequency of trials measuring QOL.

RESULTS

Out of 269 studies screened, 54 RCTs were identified, and 24 measured QOL (involving 11 229 patients). Instruments used included the EORTC QLQ-C30 (n=15), FACT-HEP (n=3), Spitzer-QOL-Index (n=2), EQ-5D (n=2), LASA (n=1) and FACT-PA (n=1). Most trials assessed QOL until disease progression or death (10/24), with 4-week intervals being the most common (7/24). SCRs were reported in 15/24 trials, with disease stage influencing SCRs over time. In trials with metastatic, locally advanced/metastatic, and resectable disease, the median times to reach a 50% response rate-defined as the point where the number of surveys completed was half of the enrolled participants-were 12.41 weeks (n=2), 14.14 weeks (n=10), and 54.2 weeks (n=3), respectively." Only 2/24 trials reported significant QOL improvements between treatment arms. Patient age was reported in all trials, while race/ethnicity was only reported in 4/24 trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability exists in the timing, methods and reporting of QOL assessments in PC trials. There is a need for further research to assess the implications of missing data and consider the temporality of QOL assessment in patients with advanced cancers and poor prognosis.

Clinical impact of the prognostic nutritional index and skeletal muscle index for the incompletion of adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard therapeutic option for resected pancreatic cancer. However, the risk factors for incompletion of adjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 72 patients who underwent radical pancreatectomy and received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. The patients were assigned to two groups according to their completion or incompletion of adjuvant chemotherapy. We compared the perioperative skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) and nutritional status using prognostic nutritional index (PNI) between the two groups.

RESULTS

The completion and incompletion groups included 46 (64 %) and 26 (36 %) patients, respectively. Overall survival was shorter in the incompletion group than in the completion group (median survival time, 20.2 months vs. 42.0 months; log-rank, p = 0.018). Decreasing rate of PNI (12.7 % vs. 0.2 %, p = 0.010) and decreasing rate of SMI (26.9 % vs. 12.5 %, p = 0.001) were significantly larger in the incompletion group than in the completion group. Multivariate analysis showed that decreasing rate of PNI (p = 0.016), decreasing rate of SMI (p = 0.013), and old age (p = 0.049) were independent risk factors for incompletion of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. Regarding the time-series variations, PNI improved from 1 to 3 months after pancreatectomy in the completion group (p = 0.006). Furthermore, the decreasing slope of SMI was stronger in the incompletion group.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative decrease of PNI and SMI is associated with the incompletion of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

The impact of preoperative renal insufficiency on the outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the impact of renal function impairment on long-term survival outcomes and adjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

In this study, 264 patients who underwent PD for pancreatic head cancer between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were subsequently categorized into three groups according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate: normal group (> 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 73), moderate group (45-90 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 176), and severe group (< 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, n = 15). The primary outcomes evaluated were postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS). Additionally, the completion of adjuvant therapy and risk factors for adjuvant therapy discontinuation were analyzed.

RESULTS

The total proportion of patients with complications was significantly higher in the severe group (p = 0.008). The proportion of patients with severe complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa) did not significantly differ between the chronic kidney disease (CKD) groups (p = 0.730). The proportion of patients in whom adjuvant therapy was completed was notably lower in the severe group (p = 0.011). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that CKD groups and hemoglobin levels ≤ 11.5 g/dL were independent predictors of adjuvant therapy completion failure (p = 0.016 and p = 0.016). There was no significant difference in the OS and RFS rates between the CKD groups (p = 0.499, p = 0.688).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pancreatic cancer and CKD, performing PD safely may be feasible; however, adjuvant therapy completion is challenging.

Prognosis prediction of PDAC via detection of O-glycan altered extracellular vesicles in perioperative sera

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a fatal malignancy due to the difficulty in diagnosis and poor prognosis because of the high recurrence rate, necessitating reliable biomarkers to improve the diagnosis and prognosis. However, the existing markers have limitations. We previously identified extracellular vesicles (EVs) recognized by O-glycan-binding lectins (Amaranthus caudatus agglutinin [ACA]) as a novel diagnostic biomarker for PDAC using an EV-counting system (ExoCounter). This retrospective study analyzed changes in ACA-positive EVs in perioperative PDAC serum and its association with prognosis using ExoCounter. Absolute EV levels in the pre- and postoperative sera of 44 patients who underwent curative pancreatectomy for PDAC were quantified using ExoCounter. The carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels declined in most samples postoperatively, and presented no correlation with poor prognosis. In contrast, ACA-positive EVs increased in serum at 7 days postoperatively in 27 of 44 patients (61.4%). We therefore divided participants with ACA-positive EVs before and after surgery into elevation and decline groups. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with higher ACA-positive EVs were significantly shorter than those with lower ACA-positive EVs (26.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.018; 11.9 vs. 38.6 months, P = 0.013). Multivariable analysis revealed that ACA-positive EV elevation in postoperative serum was an independent prognostic factor for poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.891, P = 0.023) and RFS (HR = 2.650, P = 0.024). The detection of ACA-positive EVs in perioperative serum may be used to predict the prognosis of PDAC in the early postoperative period.

Clinical impact of intraoperative pancreatic transection margin analysis and additional resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of additional resection based on intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) of the pancreatic transection margin in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognosis based on the results of the first FSA of the pancreatic transection margin (1st FSA) and the clinical significance of additional resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for PDAC from 2000 to 2020 at a single center were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the 1stFSA. Survival and prognostic factors were analyzed according to the 1stFSA.

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients were included in this study. The 1stFSA was negative in 272 patients (1stFSA-R0) and positive in 39 patients [carcinoma in situ (1stFSA-CIS), 21 patients; invasive carcinoma (1stFSA-IC), 18 patients]. Additional resections were performed on 37 patients [1stFSA-CIS, 20 patients; 1stFSA-IC, 17 patients], and R0 resection was achieved in 34 patients intraoperatively. Comparing median survival time to 1stFSA-R0 (36.4 months), 1stFSA-CIS was comparable (27.8 months, p = 0.276), although 1stFSA-IC was significantly worse (18.8 months, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, 1stFSA-IC was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 2.68, 95 % confidence interval 1.16-6.17, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

1stFSA-CIS and 1stFSA-R0 had similar OS, implying that additional resection may be acceptable for 1stFSA-CIS. 1stFSA-IC was still an independent prognostic factor based on additional resection, and the prognostic significance of additional resection is uncertain for 1stFSA-IC.

Survival outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I pancreatic cancer stratified by pathologic risk

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with stage I pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, stratified according to pathologic risk factors.

METHODS

A total of 259 patients with stage I pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent radical resection were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were categorized into groups with and without pathologic risk based on the presence of perineural and/or lymphovascular invasion. Subset Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the recurrence-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly prolong recurrence-free survival (P = .213) but increased overall survival (P = .019) in patients with stage I pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved recurrence-free survival (P = .037) and overall survival (P = .007) in patients with pathologic risk (n = 160). However, patients without pathologic risk (n = 99) showed no enhancement of recurrence-free survival (P = .870) and overall survival (P = .413) after adjuvant chemotherapy. Subset multivariate analyses indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor in patients with pathologic risk but not in those without pathologic risk.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma may provide survival benefits specifically to patients with pathologic risk.

Outcomes of Surgical Resection of Primary Lung Cancer After Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to elucidate the therapeutic significance of lung resection for primary lung cancer after pancreatic cancer surgery in contemporary cases.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who had lung nodules and performed pulmonary resection after pancreatic cancer surgery at seven hospitals affiliated with the Thoracic Surgery Study Group of Osaka University between January 2009 and December 2021. Patients in which surgery was performed for biopsy purposes, those with a history of other cancers with potential for lung metastasis, patients who did not give their consent for enrollment, and patients determined to be ineligible by the attending physician were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

A demographic analysis revealed that 17 patients were eligible for inclusion. Pathological diagnoses were established by institutional pathologists and occasionally aided by immunostaining and genetic testing. A survival analysis revealed a 3-year survival rate of 61.9% and a 5-year survival rate of 54.2% after lung resection. Subgroup analyses highlighted the impact of the interval between pancreatic cancer surgery and lung nodule detection, tumor diameter, and procedure on survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the therapeutic implications of lung resection for primary lung cancer following surgery for pancreatic cancer. Despite the challenges in preoperative diagnosis and treatment decisions, surgical intervention demonstrates promise, especially in select cases. Further research is needed to determine the best therapeutic strategies for this group.

Endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones with benign choledochojejunal anastomotic stenosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic interventions for bile duct stones (BDSs) with benign choledochojejunal anastomotic stenosis (bCJS) are challenging. Therefore, we investigated endoscopic interventions for BDSs with bCJS.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with BDSs with bCJS were retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics, technical success, adverse events (AEs), and recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

In 17 patients, the median diameters of the bile duct and BDSs were both 8 mm. The median number of BDSs was 3. The technical success rate was 94% (16/17). Ten patients underwent balloon dilation at the choledochojejunal anastomotic site (CAS), the median diameter of balloon dilation was 10.5 mm, and waist disappearance was achieved in 2. Six patients had fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) with a diameter of 10 mm placed at the CAS. BDSs were removed after balloon dilation or FCSEMS removal, and 6 of 16 patients were treated with a combination of lithotripsy and 5 with peroral direct cholangioscopy (PDCS). Regarding AEs, perforation at the CAS by balloon dilation occurred in 1 patient. The median follow-up was 3701 days. Nine of 16 patients (56%) had recurrence. The patients treated with a combination of PDCS at BDS removal (P = .022) and waist disappearance at the CAS by balloon dilation (P = .035) had significantly fewer recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic interventions for BDSs with bCJS are useful and relatively safe; however, long-term follow-up showed frequent recurrences. Recurrence was common in patients not treated with the combination of PDCS at BDS removal and those without waist disappearance at the CAS by balloon dilation.

Current status and prospect of gut and oral microbiome in pancreatic cancer: Clinical and translational perspectives

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal malignancy, and its diagnosis and treatment continue to pose significant challenges. Despite advancements in surgical and comprehensive treatment methods, the five-year survival rate remains below 12 %. With the rapid development of microbiome science, the gut and oral microbiota, which are readily accessible and can be sampled non-invasively, have emerged as a novel area of interest in pancreatic cancer research. Dysbiosis in these microbial communities can induce persistent inflammatory responses and affect the host's immune system, promoting cancer development and impacting the efficacy of treatments like chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This review provides an up-to-date overview of the roles of both gut and oral microbiota in the onset, progression, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic cancer. It analyzes the potential of utilizing these microbiomes as biomarkers and therapeutic targets from a clinical application perspective. Furthermore, it discusses future research directions aimed at harnessing these insights to advance the diagnosis and treatment strategies for pancreatic cancer. By focusing on the microbiome's role in clinical and translational medicine, this review offers insights into improving pancreatic cancer diagnosis and treatment outcomes.

Relationships between postoperative recurrences and standardized uptake value on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative pancreatic resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine postoperative recurrence after curative pancreatic resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with resectable (R-) and borderline resectable (BR-) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), focusing on its relationship with the standardized uptake value (SUV) on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET).

METHOD

The postoperative initial recurrence patterns were examined in patients with R- and BR-PDAC who underwent NACRT followed by curative pancreatic resection. Data collected from three prospective clinical trials were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 29 months, 91 (60 %) of 151 patients experienced postoperative recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for all patients was 18 months. The sites of first recurrence were lung-only in 24 (26 %) patients, liver-only in 23 (25 %), local-only in 11 (12 %), peritoneum-only in 10 (11 %), other single site in 5 (5 %), and multiple sites in 19 (21 %) patients. Multivariate analysis identified the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET at diagnoses ≥5.40 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.61; p = 0.045) and node-positive pathology (HR, 2.01; 95 % CI, 1.32-3.08; p = 0.001) as significant predictors of RFS. Furthermore, the SUVmax at initial diagnosis and after NACRT correlated with liver metastasis.

CONCLUSION

R- and BR-PDACs with high SUV on FDG-PET at diagnosis are risk factors for postoperative recurrence. Among patients who undergo surgery after NACRT, those with a high SUVmax at diagnosis or post-NACRT require careful attention for postoperative liver recurrence.

Clinical Implications of the Degree of Pancreatic Invasion in Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Ampulla of Vater carcinoma (AVC) stage T3 was subdivided according to the degree of pancreatic invasion into T3a (≤ 0.5 cm) and T3b (> 0.5 cm) by the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging system. However, the differences in clinicopathological features and survival outcomes between the two categories have not been well discussed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 133 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for AVC at our institution between 2002 and 2020. Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with AVC were analyzed, with a focus on the depth of pancreatic invasion. In addition, the survival outcomes of patients with T3 AVC were compared with those of patients with resectable pancreatic head carcinoma (R-PhC) who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy during the same period.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) in patients with T3b AVC (n = 12) was significantly worse than that in patients with T3a AVC (n = 39) [median survival time (MST) 9.2 vs. 74.5 months, p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis identified T3b tumor (hazard ratio 5.64, p = 0.009) as an independent prognostic factor. The OS of patients with T3a AVC was significantly better than that of patients with R-PhC who received adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 276, MST 35.0 months, p = 0.007). In contrast, the OS of patients with T3b AVC tended to be worse than that of patients with R-PhC managed without adjuvant chemotherapy, although this difference was not statistically significant (n = 163; MST, 17.5; p = 0.140).

CONCLUSIONS

AVC with > 0.5 cm invasion into the pancreas was associated with poor survival and represented advanced tumor progression to systemic disease.

Predictive factors of actual 5-y recurrence-free survival after upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer: Exploration of patients who did not require neoadjuvant treatment

Aim

The present study investigated the prognostic factors associated with actual 5-y recurrence-free survival (RFS) after upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (R-PC) in patients who were deemed not to require neoadjuvant treatment.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2016, 316 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for radiologically R-PC were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the predictors of actual 5-y RFS. Predictors were identified using logistic regression analysis of preoperative evaluable factors. The cutoff values for continuous variables were determined based on a minimum p-value approach (model 1) or the value that maximized the rate of 5-y RFS survivors (model 2).

Results

Fifty-one patients (16.1%) achieved a 5-y RFS. A tumor size ≤23 mm, the absence of serosal invasion on computed tomography (CT), and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio <1.0, were significantly associated with the 5-y RFS in model 1. A Prognostic Nutritional Index ≥58 and the absence of serosal invasion and extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion on CT were significantly associated with 5-y RFS in model 2. Only six (11.8%, model 1) and four (7.8%, model 2) patients had all three prognostic factors, and their 5-y RFS rates were 83.3% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions

A modest number of patients who underwent upfront surgery achieved 5-y RFS, but only ~10% of them could be identified preoperatively. Based on these results, almost all R-PC patients are forced to undergo neoadjuvant treatment in daily practice.

Evaluation of a new scoring system for assessing nerve invasion in resected pancreatic cancer: A single-center retrospective analysis

Nerve invasion (NI) is a characteristic feature of pancreatic cancer. Traditional dichotomous statements on the presence of NI are unreasonable because almost all cases exhibit NI when sufficient pathological sections are examined. The critical implications of NI in pancreatic cancer highlight the need for a more effective criterion. This study included 511 patients, who were categorized into a training group and a testing group at a ratio of 7:3. According to the traditional definition, NI was observed in 91.2 % of patients using five pathological slides in our study. The prevalence of NI increased as more pathological slides were used. The criterion of 'two points of intraneural (endoneural) invasion in the case of four pathological slides' has the highest receiver operating characteristic (ROC) score. Based on this new criterion, NI was proved to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) and was also correlated with tumor recurrence (P = 0.004). Interestingly, gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimen is an independent favorable factor for patients with high NI. In the high NI group, patients who received a gemcitabine-based regimen exhibited a better prognosis than those who did not receive the gemcitabine-based regimen for OS (P = 0.000) and DFS (P = 0.001). In conclusion, this study establishes assessment criteria to evaluate the severity of NI in order to predict patient outcomes.

Clinical usefulness of C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index as a prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing surgical resection of pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index, which simultaneously evaluates the nutritional, immunological, and inflammatory statuses, is a new prognostic biomarker in patients with various cancers; however, no study has reported the clinical significance of the CALLY index in patients with pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether the preoperative CALLY index is a prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing surgical resection of pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 461 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgical resection between January 2013 and December 2022. The overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value for the preoperative CALLY index was 1.9. In the low CALLY group, patients were older (p = 0.012), more patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (p = 0.002), the median tumor size was larger (p < 0.001), more patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph nodes (p = 0.015) and worse pathological stage (p = 0.015), and fewer patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003). A low CALLY index was associated with decreased OS (22.1 vs. 37.9 months) and RFS (12.4 vs. 16.4 months). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the preoperative CALLY index was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p < 0.001) and RFS (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

The preoperative CALLY index is a prognostic biomarker for both OS and RFS in patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer.