1
|
Earl J, Dawson L, Rid A. The Social Value Misconception in Clinical Research. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024:1-17. [PMID: 39007856 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2371119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
Clinical researchers should help respect the autonomy and promote the well-being of prospective study participants by helping them make voluntary, informed decisions about enrollment. However, participants often exhibit poor understanding of important information about clinical research. Bioethicists have given special attention to "misconceptions" about clinical research that can compromise participants' decision-making, most notably the "therapeutic misconception." These misconceptions typically involve false beliefs about a study's purpose, or risks or potential benefits for participants. In this article, we describe a misconception involving false beliefs about a study's potential benefits for non-participants, or its expected social value. This social value misconception can compromise altruistically motivated participants' decision-making, potentially threatening their autonomy and well-being. We show how the social value misconception raises ethical concerns for inherently low-value research, hyped research, and even ordinary research, and advocate for empirical and normative work to help understand and counteract this misconception's potential negative impacts on participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Earl
- Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Largent EA, Joffe S, Dickert NW, Morain SR. The ethical value of consulting community members in non-emergency trials conducted with waivers of informed consent for research. Clin Trials 2024:17407745241259360. [PMID: 38916109 DOI: 10.1177/17407745241259360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
There is growing interest in using embedded research methods, particularly pragmatic clinical trials, to address well-known evidentiary shortcomings afflicting the health care system. Reviews of pragmatic clinical trials published between 2014 and 2019 found that 8.8% were conducted with waivers of informed consent; furthermore, the number of trials where consent is not obtained is increasing with time. From a regulatory perspective, waivers of informed consent are permissible when certain conditions are met, including that the study involves no more than minimal risk, that it could not practicably be carried out without a waiver, and that waiving consent does not violate participants' rights and welfare. Nevertheless, when research is conducted with a waiver of consent, several ethical challenges arise. We must consider how to: address empirical evidence showing that patients and members of the public generally prefer prospective consent, demonstrate respect for persons using tools other than consent, promote public trust and investigator integrity, and ensure an adequate level of participant protections. In this article, we use examples drawn from real pragmatic clinical trials to argue that prospective consultation with representatives of the target study population can address, or at least mitigate, many of the ethical challenges posed by waivers of informed consent. We also consider what consultation might involve to illustrate its feasibility and address potential objections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Largent
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Joffe
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Neal W Dickert
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stephanie R Morain
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Resnik DB, Pugh J. Green bioethics, patient autonomy and informed consent in healthcare. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2024; 50:489-493. [PMID: 37833040 PMCID: PMC11014890 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
Green bioethics is an area of research and scholarship that examines the impact of healthcare practices and policies on the environment and emphasises environmental values, such as ecological sustainability and stewardship. Some green bioethicists have argued that healthcare providers should inform patients about the environmental impacts of treatments and advocate for options that minimise adverse impacts. While disclosure of information pertaining to the environmental impacts of treatments could facilitate autonomous decision-making and strengthen the patient-provider relationship in situations where patients have clearly expressed environmental concerns, it may have the opposite effect in other situations if makes patients feel like they are being judged or manipulated. We argue, therefore, that there is not a generalisable duty to disclose environmental impact information to all patients during the consent process. Providers who practice green bioethics should focus on advocating for system-level changes in healthcare financing, organisation and delivery and use discretion when bringing up environmental concerns in their encounters with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Resnik
- Office of the Deputy Director, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan Pugh
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Racine E, Ji S, Badro V, Bogossian A, Bourque CJ, Bouthillier MÈ, Chenel V, Dallaire C, Doucet H, Favron-Godbout C, Fortin MC, Ganache I, Guernon AS, Montreuil M, Olivier C, Quintal A, Senghor AS, Stanton-Jean M, Martineau JT, Talbot A, Tremblay N. Living ethics: a stance and its implications in health ethics. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2024; 27:137-154. [PMID: 38478251 PMCID: PMC11076378 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-024-10197-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Moral or ethical questions are vital because they affect our daily lives: what is the best choice we can make, the best action to take in a given situation, and ultimately, the best way to live our lives? Health ethics has contributed to moving ethics toward a more experience-based and user-oriented theoretical and methodological stance but remains in our practice an incomplete lever for human development and flourishing. This context led us to envision and develop the stance of a "living ethics", described in this inaugural collective and programmatic paper as an effort to consolidate creative collaboration between a wide array of stakeholders. We engaged in a participatory discussion and collective writing process known as instrumentalist concept analysis. This process included initial local consultations, an exploratory literature review, the constitution of a working group of 21 co-authors, and 8 workshops supporting a collaborative thinking and writing process. First, a living ethics designates a stance attentive to human experience and the role played by morality in human existence. Second, a living ethics represents an ongoing effort to interrogate and scrutinize our moral experiences to facilitate adaptation of people and contexts. It promotes the active and inclusive engagement of both individuals and communities in envisioning and enacting scenarios which correspond to their flourishing as authentic ethical agents. Living ethics encourages meaningful participation of stakeholders because moral questions touch deeply upon who we are and who we want to be. We explain various aspects of a living ethics stance, including its theoretical, methodological, and practical implications as well as some barriers to its enactment based on the reflections resulting from the collaborative thinking and writing process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Racine
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), Université de Montréal, McGill University, 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, Montréal, QC, H2W 1R7, Canada.
| | - Sophie Ji
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, IRCM, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Aline Bogossian
- School of Social Work, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Clara Dallaire
- Center of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public, Université de Montréal, Research Centre of the Sainte-Justine University Hospital, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Anne-Sophie Guernon
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, IRCM, University of Oxford, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Marjorie Montreuil
- Ingram School of Nursing, Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, McGill University, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Ariane Quintal
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, IRCM, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Abdou Simon Senghor
- Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, IRCM, McGill University, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grenier A, O'Connor D, James K, Imahori D, Minchopoulos D, Velev N, Tamblyn-Watts L, Mann J. Consent and Inclusion of People Living with Dementia (PLWD) in Research: Establishing a Canadian Agenda for Inclusive Rights-Based Practices. Can J Aging 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38764147 DOI: 10.1017/s0714980824000217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with dementia (PLWD) may want to participate in research, but the guidelines and processes enacted across various contexts may prohibit this from happening. OBJECTIVE Understanding the experiences of people with lived experiences of dementia requires meaningful inclusion in research, as is consistent with rights-based perspectives. Currently, the inclusion of PLWD in Canadian research is complex, and guidelines and conceptual frameworks have not been fully developed. METHODS This research note outlines a three-year proof-of-concept grant on the inclusion and consent of PLWD in research. FINDINGS It presents a brief report on some of the contradictions and challenges that exist in legislation, research guidelines, and research practices and raises a series of questions as part of an agenda on rights and inclusion of PLWD in research. DISCUSSION It suggests conceptual, legal, and policy issues that need to be addressed and invites Canadian researchers to re-envision research practices and to advocate for law and policy reform that enables dementia research to align and respect the rights and personhood of PLWD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Grenier
- Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deborah O'Connor
- School of Social Work, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Krista James
- Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Daphne Imahori
- Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniella Minchopoulos
- Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole Velev
- Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Tamblyn-Watts
- Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- CanAge, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jim Mann
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada (Honorary doctorate)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Earl J, Shupp JW, Krohmal B. Ethical Justifications for Waiving Informed Consent for a Perianal Swab in Critical Burn Care Research. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024; 24:110-113. [PMID: 38529966 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2308133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Earl
- Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
| | | | - Ben Krohmal
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center
- Georgetown University
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Villiger D. Informed Consent Under Ignorance. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024:1-13. [PMID: 38181212 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2296429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, an old challenge to informed consent has been rediscovered: the challenge of ignorance. Several authors argue that due to the presence of irreducible ignorance in certain treatments, giving informed consent to these treatments is not possible. The present paper examines in what ways ignorance is believed to prevent informed consent and which treatments are affected by that. At this, it becomes clear that if the challenge of ignorance truly holds, it poses a major problem to informed consent. The paper argues, however, that from both an empirical and a theoretical point of view, it is not convincing that ignorance prevents informed consent. Still, it seems important that the presence of irreducible ignorance is openly discussed during the informed consent process.
Collapse
|
8
|
Haeusermann T, Chiong W. Ethical considerations in rapid and novel treatments in psychiatry. Neuropsychopharmacology 2024; 49:291-293. [PMID: 37391590 PMCID: PMC10700644 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-023-01635-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
New treatment modalities for mental illness are deeply needed, and emerging therapeutic agents such as psychedelics, ketamine, and neuromodulatory technologies have been welcomed by many researchers and patients. These treatment approaches have also been observed to raise novel ethical questions, and to pose new and different versions of familiar ethical questions in clinical treatment and research. We present an overview and introduction to these issues organized around three specific domains of ethical concern: informed consent, the role of expectancy in clinical response, and distributive justice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Haeusermann
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Winston Chiong
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ittenbach RF, Gaynor JW, Dorich JM, Burnham NB, Huang G, Harvey MT, Corsmo JJ. uConsent: Addressing the gap in measuring understanding of informed consent in clinical research. Clin Transl Sci 2023; 16:2530-2542. [PMID: 37828723 PMCID: PMC10719467 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to establish the technical merit, feasibility, and generalizability of a new measure of understanding of informed consent for use with clinical research participants. A total of 109 teens/young adults at a large, pediatric medical center completed the consenting process of a hypothetical biobanking study. Data were analyzed using a combination of classical and modern theory analytic methods to produce a final set of 19 items referred to as the uConsent scale. A requirement of the scale was that each item mapped directly onto one or more of the Basic Elements of Informed Consent from the 2018 Final Rule. Descriptive statistics were computed for each item as well as the scale as a whole. Partial credit (Rasch) logistic modeling was then used to generate difficulty/endorsability estimates for each item. The final, 19-item uConsent scale was derived using inferential methods to yield a set of items that ranged across difficulty levels (-3.02 to 3.10 logits) with a range of point-measure correlations (0.12 to 0.50), within-range item- and model-fit statistics, varying item types mapped to both Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning and required regulatory components of the 2018 Final Rule. Median coverage rate for the uConsent scale was 95% for the 25 randomly selected studies from ClinicalTrials.gov. The uConsent scale may be used as an effective measure of informed consent when measuring and documenting participant understanding in clinical research studies today.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard F. Ittenbach
- Division of Biostatistics and EpidemiologyCincinnati Children's Hospital, University of Cincinnati College of MedicineCincinnatiOhioUSA
| | - J. William Gaynor
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Jenny M. Dorich
- Division of Patient Services, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of Cincinnati College of MedicineOhioCincinnatiUSA
- Department of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition SciencesUniversity of Cincinnati College of Allied Health SciencesOhioCincinnatiUSA
| | - Nancy B. Burnham
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Guixia Huang
- Division of Biostatistics and EpidemiologyCincinnati Children's Hospital, University of Cincinnati College of MedicineCincinnatiOhioUSA
| | - Madisen T. Harvey
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Jeremy J. Corsmo
- Research Administration, Kennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sulaieva ON, Artamonova O, Dudin O, Semikov R, Urakov D, Zakharash Y, Kacharian A, Strilka V, Mykhalchuk I, Haidamak O, Serdyukova O, Kobyliak N. Ethical navigation of biobanking establishment in Ukraine: learning from the experience of developing countries. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023:jme-2023-109129. [PMID: 37945338 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Building a biobank network in developing countries is essential to foster genomic research and precision medicine for patients' benefit. However, there are serious barriers to establishing biobanks in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Ukraine. Here, we outline key barriers and essential milestones for the successful expansion of biobanks, genomic research and personalised medicine in Ukraine, drawing from the experience of other LMICs. A lack of legal and ethical governance in conjunction with limited awareness about biobanking and community distrust are the principal threats to establishing biobanks. The experiences of LMICs suggest that Ukraine urgently needs national guidelines covering ethical and legal aspects of biospecimen-related research. National guidelines must be consistent with international ethical recommendations for safeguarding participants' rights, welfare and privacy. Additionally, efforts to educate and engage physicians and patient communities are essential for achieving biobanking goals and benefits for precision medicine and future patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oksana N Sulaieva
- Department of Pathology, Medical Laboratory CSD, Kyiv, Ukraine
- Doctorate in Bioethics, Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Ukrainian Association of Research Biobanks, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Oleksandr Dudin
- Department of Pathology, Medical Laboratory CSD, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Rostyslav Semikov
- Ukrainian Association of Research Biobanks, Kyiv, Ukraine
- Audubon Bioscience, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Dmytro Urakov
- Ukrainian Association of Research Biobanks, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | | | | | | | - Ivan Mykhalchuk
- Ukrainian Association of Research Biobanks, Kyiv, Ukraine
- Audubon Bioscience, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Olena Serdyukova
- Ukrainian Association of Research Biobanks, Kyiv, Ukraine
- Audubon Bioscience, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Nazarii Kobyliak
- Department of Pathology, Medical Laboratory CSD, Kyiv, Ukraine
- Department of Endocrinology, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kraft SA, Duenas DM, Shah SK. Patient priorities for fulfilling the principle of respect in research: findings from a modified Delphi study. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:73. [PMID: 37735658 PMCID: PMC10512546 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00954-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard interpretations of the ethical principle of respect for persons have not incorporated the views and values of patients, especially patients from groups underrepresented in research. This limits the ability of research ethics scholarship, guidance, and oversight to support inclusive, patient-centered research. This study aimed to identify the practical approaches that patients in community-based settings value most for conveying respect in genomics research. METHODS We conducted a 3-round, web-based survey using the modified Delphi technique to identify areas of agreement among English-speaking patients at primary care clinics in Washington State and Idaho who had a personal or family history of cancer. In Round 1, respondents rated the importance of 17 items, identified in prior qualitative work, for feeling respected. In Round 2, respondents re-rated each item after reviewing overall group ratings. In Round 3, respondents ranked a subset of the 8 most highly rated items. We calculated each item's mean and median rankings in Round 3 to identify which approaches were most important for feeling respected in research. RESULTS Forty-one patients consented to the survey, 21 (51%) completed Round 1, and 18 (86% of Round 1) completed each of Rounds 2 and 3. Two sets of rankings were excluded from analysis as speed of response suggested they had not completed the Round 3 ranking task. Respondents prioritized provision of study information to support decision-making (mean ranking 2.6 out of 8; median ranking 1.5) and interactions with research staff characterized by kindness, patience, and a lack of judgment (mean ranking 2.8; median ranking 2) as the most important approaches for conveying respect. CONCLUSIONS Informed consent and interpersonal interactions are key ways that research participants experience respect. These can be supported by other approaches to respecting participants, especially when consent and/or direct interactions are infeasible. Future work should continue to engage with patients in community-based settings to identify best practices for research without consent and examine unique perspectives across clinical and demographic groups in different types of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 Ninth Ave., M/S JMB-6, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| | - Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 Ninth Ave., M/S JMB-6, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Seema K Shah
- Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jacobs E. Transformative experience and informed consent to psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1108333. [PMID: 37303902 PMCID: PMC10254809 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1108333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Just as psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy (PAP) represents a clinical innovation that may need to be accommodated with corresponding theoretical and methodological innovations, there is growing awareness that the tools, normative frameworks, and standard practices of our clinical ethics may also need to be adapted, renewed, or replaced to accommodate its unusual features. Drawing on L. A. Paul's work on "Transformative Experience," I argue that the acute and long-term effects that are repeatedly reported following the administration of psychedelic drugs, including in clinical contexts, are epistemically inaccessible at the point of deciding to take them. By virtue of both the so-called "mystical" experiences that frequently arise during PAP, and the long-term shifts to outlooks, values, and priorities that can follow treatment, the processes of decision-making that are normatively expected of patients run aground. If this framing is correct, then prospective patients cannot meet the requirement of understanding that is one of the principal analytic components of informed consent. The role of understanding in supporting two functions of informed consent-avoiding unauthorized trespass against patients and supporting values-aligned decision-making-is explored, and I argue that, while the normative standard for the first function may be met by extant suggestions for enhancing the consenting process for PAP, the latter function remains unattainable. In light of this, the consequences for the ethical preparation of prospective patients are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Jacobs
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Verbeke K, Krawczyk T, Baeyens D, Piasecki J, Borry P. Informed Consent and Debriefing When Deceiving Participants: A Systematic Review of Research Ethics Guidelines. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2023:15562646231173477. [PMID: 37186795 DOI: 10.1177/15562646231173477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Informed consent and debriefing of research participants in studies that use deception are ethical safeguards for which existing scholarly work on their implementation remains variable and insufficiently clear. A systematic review of research ethics guidelines was conducted to sketch a picture of whether, why and how informed consent and debriefing are recommended when using deception. Documents roughly agreed on several general principles, but varied significantly in the specifics of why and whether these safeguards are necessary, in which conditions and how they should be implemented. Various aspects that appear in the literature could not be found in the guidelines. In our review, guidance was integrated and showed a variation of implementation strategies that could help in contextualizing these safeguards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamiel Verbeke
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tomasz Krawczyk
- Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Dieter Baeyens
- Chair of Social and Societal Ethics Committee, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Research Unit Parenting and Special Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Piasecki
- Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hutchinson N, Gelinas L, Zarin D, Bierer BE. Disclosure of Possible Trial Termination to Participants of Interventional Clinical Trials. JAMA 2023; 329:1116-1117. [PMID: 37014347 PMCID: PMC10074217 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.0875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluates a cross-section of interventional clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with publicly available informed consent forms along with the proportion of trials that disclosed the possibility of trial termination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Hutchinson
- Multi-regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Deborah Zarin
- Multi-regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Barbara E. Bierer
- Multi-regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Avinger AM, Sibold HC, Campbell G, Abernethy E, Bourgeois J, McClary T, Blee S, Dixon M, Harvey RD, Pentz RD. Improving oncology first-in-human and Window of opportunity informed consent forms through participant feedback. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:12. [PMID: 36803249 PMCID: PMC9938963 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00890-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although patient advocates have developed templates for standard consent forms, evaluating patient preferences for first in human (FIH) and window of opportunity (Window) trial consent forms is critical due to their unique risks. FIH trials are the initial use of a novel compound in study participants. In contrast, Window trials give an investigational agent over a fixed duration to treatment naïve patients in the time between diagnosis and standard of care (SOC) surgery. Our goal was to determine the patient-preferred presentation of important information in consent forms for these trials. METHODS The study consisted of two phases: (1) analyses of oncology FIH and Window consents; (2) interviews of trial participants. FIH consent forms were analyzed for the location(s) of information stating that the study drug has not been tested in humans (FIH information); Window consents were analyzed for the location(s) of information stating the trial may delay SOC surgery (delay information). Participants were asked about their preferred placement of the information in their own trial's consent form. The location of information in the consent forms was compared to the participants' suggestions for placement. RESULTS 34 [17 FIH; 17 Window] of 42(81%) cancer patients approached participated. 25 consents [20 FIH; 5 Window] were analyzed. 19/20 FIH consent forms included FIH information, and 4/5 Window consent forms included delay information. 19/20(95%) FIH consent forms contained FIH information in the risks section 12/17(71%) patients preferred the same. Fourteen (82%) patients wanted FIH information in the purpose, but only 5(25%) consents mentioned it there. 9/17(53%) Window patients preferred delay information to be located early in the consent, before the "Risks" section. 3/5(60%) consents did this. CONCLUSIONS Designing consents that reflect patient preferences more accurately is essential for ethical informed consent; however, a one-size fits all approach will not accurately capture patient preferences. We found that preferences differed for FIH and Window trial consents, though for both, patients preferred key risk information early in the consent. Next steps include determining if FIH and Window consent templates improve understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Avinger
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, 475 Vine St, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA
| | - Hannah Claire Sibold
- Duke University School of Medicine, 40 Duke Medicine Cir., Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Gavin Campbell
- Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, 1518 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Eli Abernethy
- Duke University School of Medicine, 40 Duke Medicine Cir., Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - John Bourgeois
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 E Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Tekiah McClary
- South University Orlando Campus, 5900 Lake Ellenor Dr., Orlando, FL, 32809, USA
| | - Shannon Blee
- Creighton University Medical School, 2621 Burt Street, Omaha, NE, 68178, USA
| | - Margie Dixon
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 E Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.,Emory University School of Medicine, 201 Dowman Dr., Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - R Donald Harvey
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 E Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.,Emory University School of Medicine, 201 Dowman Dr., Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Rebecca D Pentz
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, 1365 E Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. .,Emory University School of Medicine, 201 Dowman Dr., Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. .,Winship Cancer Institute, 2004 Ridgewood Dr., Office 301, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mozersky J, Solomon ED, Baldwin K, Wroblewski M, Parsons M, Goodman M, DuBois JM. Barriers to Using Legally Authorized Representatives in Clinical Research with Older Adults. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 2023; 7:135-149. [PMID: 36891257 PMCID: PMC9986706 DOI: 10.3233/adr-220103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Older adults are at increased risk of cognitive impairments including Alzheimer's disease dementia. Legally authorized representatives (LARs) can provide informed consent when a participant is no longer able to, but little is known about barriers to incorporating them in research. Objective Explore reasons for not asking and documenting participant decisions to appoint LARs among researchers conducting clinical intervention trials studying older adults or individuals with cognitive impairments. Methods Mixed method design consisting of a survey (N = 1,284) and qualitative interviews (N = 40) regarding barriers to incorporating LARs. Participants were principal investigators and clinical research coordinators. Results 37% (N = 469) had not asked and documented participant decisions about appointing LARs in the prior year. They had significantly lower confidence in resources available to incorporate LARs and lower positive attitudes compared to their counterparts who had done so. The majority (83%) had no trials studying individuals with cognitive impairments and reported LARs were not applicable. A minority (17%) had at least one trial studying individuals with cognitive impairments and reported being unaware of LARs. Qualitative findings indicate discomfort broaching a sensitive topic especially with individuals who are not yet impaired. Conclusion Resources and education to increase awareness and knowledge of LARs are needed. Researchers studying older adults should, at minimum, have the knowledge and resources to incorporate LARs when necessary. Stigma and discomfort discussing LARs will need to be overcome, as early proactive discussions before a participant loses decisional capacity could enhance participant autonomy and facilitate recruitment and retention of older adults to research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Mozersky
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Erin D. Solomon
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kari Baldwin
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew Wroblewski
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Meredith Parsons
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Melody Goodman
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - James M. DuBois
- Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nix HP, Largent EA, Taljaard M, Mitchell SL, Weijer C. Ethical analysis of vulnerabilities in cluster randomized trials involving people living with dementia in long-term care homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:588-598. [PMID: 36435175 PMCID: PMC9957897 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Cluster randomized trials (CRT) of non-pharmacological interventions are an important means of improving the quality of care and quality of life of people living with dementia (PLWD) in long-term care (LTC) homes. PLWD in LTC homes are, however, vulnerable in manifold ways. Therefore, researchers require guidance to ensure that the rights and welfare of PLWD are protected in the course of this valuable research. In this article, we introduce a framework for identifying vulnerabilities in randomized trials and apply it to three CRTs involving PLWD in LTC homes. CRTs may render PLWD in LTC homes vulnerable to three autonomy wrongs: inadequately informed consent, inadequately voluntary consent, and invasions of privacy; two welfare wrongs: risks of therapeutic procedure exceed potential benefits, and excessive risk of non-therapeutic procedures; and one justice wrong: unjust impact of research activities on care. We then discuss appropriate, feasible additional protections that can be implemented to mitigate vulnerability while preserving the scientific validity of the CRT. Corresponding additional protections that can be feasibly implemented include capacity assessments, substitute decision-makers, assent, insulation from LTC home employees during the consent process, patient advocates, utilizing LTC home employees for data collection, stakeholder engagement, additional supervision during study procedures, using caregivers to complete questionnaires by proxy, and gatekeeper permission. Reassuringly, many of these additional protections promote, rather than imperil, the scientific validity of these trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayden P Nix
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
- Oxford Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Emily A Largent
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Susan L Mitchell
- Hebrew SeniorLife Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charles Weijer
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada
- Department of Philosophy, Western University, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sankary LR, Zelinsky ME, Ford PJ, Blackstone EC, Fox RJ. Overcoming barriers to informed consent in neurological research: Perspectives from a national survey. RESEARCH ETHICS 2023; 19:42-61. [PMID: 37901309 PMCID: PMC10609656 DOI: 10.1177/17470161221131497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
The ethical recruitment of participants with neurological disorders in clinical research requires obtaining initial and ongoing informed consent. The purpose of this study is to characterize barriers faced by research personnel in obtaining informed consent from research participants with neurological disorders and to identify strategies applied by researchers to overcome those barriers. This study was designed as a web-based survey of US researchers with an optional follow-up interview. A subset of participants who completed the survey were selected using a stratified purposeful sampling strategy and invited to participate in an in-depth qualitative interview by phone or video conference. Data were analyzed using a mixed methods approach, including content analysis of survey responses and thematic analysis of interview responses. Over 1 year, 113 survey responses were received from US research personnel directly involved in obtaining informed consent from participants in neurological research. Frequently identified barriers to informed consent included: cognitive and communication impairments (e.g. aphasia), unrealistic expectations of research participants, mistrust of medical research, time constraints, literacy barriers, lack of available social support, and practical or resource-related constraints. Strategies to enhance informed consent included: involving close others to support participant understanding of study-related information, collaborating with more experienced research personnel to facilitate training in obtaining informed consent, encouraging participants to review consent forms in advance of consent discussions, and using printed materials and visual references. Beyond conveying study-related information, researchers included in this study endorsed ethical responsibilities to support deliberation necessary to informed consent in the context of misconceptions about research, unrealistic expectations, limited understanding, mistrust, and/or pressure from close others. Findings highlight the importance of training researchers involved in obtaining informed consent in neurological research to address disease-specific challenges and to support the decision-making processes of potential research participants and their close others.
Collapse
|
19
|
Grote T. Randomised controlled trials in medical AI: ethical considerations. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2022; 48:899-906. [PMID: 33990429 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a surge of high-profile publications on applications of artificial intelligence (AI) systems for medical diagnosis and prognosis. While AI provides various opportunities for medical practice, there is an emerging consensus that the existing studies show considerable deficits and are unable to establish the clinical benefit of AI systems. Hence, the view that the clinical benefit of AI systems needs to be studied in clinical trials-particularly randomised controlled trials (RCTs)-is gaining ground. However, an issue that has been overlooked so far in the debate is that, compared with drug RCTs, AI RCTs require methodological adjustments, which entail ethical challenges. This paper sets out to develop a systematic account of the ethics of AI RCTs by focusing on the moral principles of clinical equipoise, informed consent and fairness. This way, the objective is to animate further debate on the (research) ethics of medical AI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Grote
- Ethics and Philosophy Lab, Cluster of Excellence "Machine Learning: New Perspectives for Science", University of Tübingen, Tübingen D-72076, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Largent EA, Clapp J, Blumenthal-Barby JS, Grady C, McGuire AL, Karlawish J, Grill JD, Stites SD, Peterson A. Deciding with Others: Interdependent Decision-Making. Hastings Cent Rep 2022; 52:23-32. [PMID: 36537275 PMCID: PMC9773484 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Over the course of human life, health care decision-making is often interdependent. In this article, we use "interdependence" to refer to patients' engagement of nonclinicians-for example, family members or trusted friends-to reach health care decisions. Interdependence, we suggest, is common for patients in all stages of life, from early childhood to late adulthood. This view contrasts with the common bioethical assumption that medical decisions are either wholly independent or dependent and that independence or dependence is tightly coupled with a person's decision-making capacity. In this article, we array various approaches to decision-making along a continuum of interdependence. An appreciation of this continuum can empower patients and elucidate ethical challenges that arise when people transition between different kinds of interdependence across the life span.
Collapse
|
21
|
White S, Turbitt E, Phillips JL, Jacobs C. Approaching discussions about genetics with palliative patients and their families: a qualitative exploration with genetic health professionals. Eur J Hum Genet 2022:10.1038/s41431-022-01179-7. [PMID: 36064787 PMCID: PMC9441822 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01179-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic information can provide clinical benefits to families of palliative patients. However, integration of genetics into mainstream medicine has not focused on palliative populations. We explored the views and experiences of genetic health professionals in addressing genetics with palliative patients, and their families. We conducted an interpretive descriptive qualitative study with genetic counsellors and clinical geneticists using interviews and focus groups. Findings were generated using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were identified: (1) Focusing on the benefit to the family, (2) The discomfort of addressing genetics near end-of-life and (3) "It's always on the back-burner": Challenges to getting genetics on the palliative care agenda. Participants discussed the familial benefit of genetics in palliative care alongside the challenges when patients are near end-of-life. They perceived genetics as low priority for palliative care due to misunderstandings related to the value of genetic information. Acknowledging the challenges in the palliative care context, genetic health professionals want improved service leadership and awareness of the familial benefits of palliative genetic testing. Strong leadership to support genetic health professionals in addressing these barriers is needed for the benefits of genetic information to be realised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie White
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Erin Turbitt
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane L Phillips
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Die zeitliche Dimension des Broad Consent. Ethik Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s00481-022-00715-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungDie informierte Einwilligung von Teilnehmer:innen gilt in vielen Fällen als Voraussetzung auch für die rein datenbasierte medizinische Forschung. In diesem Kontext wird ein Modell der breiten Einwilligung (Broad Consent) diskutiert. In Deutschland hat die Medizininformatik-Initiative einen konkreten Vorschlag für deutsche Kliniken ausgearbeitet, der eine Gültigkeit der Einwilligung für einen Zeitraum von 30 Jahren vorsieht. Der vorliegende Artikel diskutiert vor diesem Hintergrund die Frage, wie der Anspruch der Informiertheit in dieser zeitlichen Perspektive einzuordnen ist. Die Praxis der Einwilligung wird dabei so verstanden, dass sie auf die Verwirklichung von Wohlergehen, persönlicher Souveränität und Vertrauen ausgerichtet ist. Eine anzunehmende Informationsasymmetrie zwischen Forschungsteilnehmenden, Forschenden, und datenspeichernden Institutionen wird dabei als spezifisches Kontextmerkmal herausgestellt. Um dieser Informationsasymmetrie in angemessener Weise zu begegnen, so die These, ist eine kontinuierliche Weitergabe von verständlich aufbereiteten Informationen an Forschungsteilnehmende notwendig, um die Wahrnehmung persönlicher Souveränität zu ermöglichen.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kandi V, Vundecode A, Godalwar TR, Dasari S, Vadakedath S, Godishala V. The Current Perspectives in Clinical Research: Computer-Assisted Drug Designing, Ethics, and Good Clinical Practice. BORNEO JOURNAL OF PHARMACY 2022. [DOI: 10.33084/bjop.v5i2.3013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In the era of emerging microbial and non-communicable diseases and re-emerging microbial infections, the medical fraternity and the public are plagued by under-preparedness. It is evident by the severity of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic that novel microbial diseases are a challenge and are challenging to control. This is mainly attributed to the lack of complete knowledge of the novel microbe’s biology and pathogenesis and the unavailability of therapeutic drugs and vaccines to treat and control the disease. Clinical research is the only answer utilizing which can handle most of these circumstances. In this review, we highlight the importance of computer-assisted drug designing (CADD) and the aspects of molecular docking, molecular superimposition, 3D-pharmacophore technology, ethics, and good clinical practice (GCP) for the development of therapeutic drugs, devices, and vaccines.
Collapse
|
24
|
Silva P, Dahlke DV, Smith ML, Charles W, Gomez J, Ory MG, Ramos KS. An Idealized Clinicogenomic Registry to Engage Underrepresented Populations Using Innovative Technology. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12050713. [PMID: 35629136 PMCID: PMC9144063 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12050713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Current best practices in tumor registries provide a glimpse into a limited time frame over the natural history of disease, usually a narrow window around diagnosis and biopsy. This creates challenges meeting public health and healthcare reimbursement policies that increasingly require robust documentation of long-term clinical trajectories, quality of life, and health economics outcomes. These challenges are amplified for underrepresented minority (URM) and other disadvantaged populations, who tend to view the institution of clinical research with skepticism. Participation gaps leave such populations underrepresented in clinical research and, importantly, in policy decisions about treatment choices and reimbursement, thus further augmenting health, social, and economic disparities. Cloud computing, mobile computing, digital ledgers, tokenization, and artificial intelligence technologies are powerful tools that promise to enhance longitudinal patient engagement across the natural history of disease. These tools also promise to enhance engagement by giving participants agency over their data and addressing a major impediment to research participation. This will only occur if these tools are available for use with all patients. Distributed ledger technologies (specifically blockchain) converge these tools and offer a significant element of trust that can be used to engage URM populations more substantively in clinical research. This is a crucial step toward linking composite cohorts for training and optimization of the artificial intelligence tools for enhancing public health in the future. The parameters of an idealized clinical genomic registry are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Silva
- Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, 8441 Riverside Pkwy, Bryan, TX 77807, USA; (J.G.); (K.S.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-979-436-9055
| | - Deborah Vollmer Dahlke
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 212 Adriance Lab Rd., College Station, TX 77843, USA; (D.V.D.); (M.L.S.); (M.G.O.)
| | - Matthew Lee Smith
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 212 Adriance Lab Rd., College Station, TX 77843, USA; (D.V.D.); (M.L.S.); (M.G.O.)
| | - Wendy Charles
- BurstIQ, 9635 Maroon Circle, #310, Englewood, CO 80112, USA;
| | - Jorge Gomez
- Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, 8441 Riverside Pkwy, Bryan, TX 77807, USA; (J.G.); (K.S.R.)
| | - Marcia G. Ory
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, 212 Adriance Lab Rd., College Station, TX 77843, USA; (D.V.D.); (M.L.S.); (M.G.O.)
| | - Kenneth S. Ramos
- Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, 8441 Riverside Pkwy, Bryan, TX 77807, USA; (J.G.); (K.S.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kaye DK. Navigating ethical challenges of conducting randomized clinical trials on COVID-19. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2022; 17:2. [PMID: 35086524 PMCID: PMC8794733 DOI: 10.1186/s13010-022-00115-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The contemporary frameworks for clinical research require informed consent for research participation that includes disclosure of material information, comprehension of disclosed information and voluntary consent to research participation. There is thus an urgent need to test, and an ethical imperative, to test, modify or refine medications or healthcare plans that could reduce patient morbidity, lower healthcare costs or strengthen healthcare systems. METHODS Conceptual review. DISCUSSION Although some allocation principles seem better than others, no single moral principle allocates interventions justly, necessitating combining the moral principles into multiprinciple allocation systems. The urgency notwithstanding, navigating ethical challenges related to conducting corona virus disease (COVID-19) clinical trials is mandatory, in order to safeguard the safety and welfare of research participants, ensure autonomy of participants, reduce possibilities for exploitation and ensure opportunities for research participation. The ethical challenges to can be categorized as challenges in allocation of resources for research; challenges of clinical equipoise in relation to the research questions; challenges of understanding disclosed information in potential participants; and challenges in obtaining informed consent. CONCLUSION To navigate these challenges, stakeholders need a delicate balance of moral principles during allocation of resources for research. Investigators need to apply information processing theories to aid decision-making about research participation or employ acceptable modifications to improve the informed consent process. Research and ethics committees should strengthen research review and oversight to ensure rigor, responsiveness and transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Kabonge Kaye
- College of Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Deering Hall, 1809 Ashland Avenue, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Piasecki J, Walkiewicz-Żarek E, Figas-Skrzypulec J, Kordecka A, Dranseika V. Ethical issues in biomedical research using electronic health records: a systematic review. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2021; 24:633-658. [PMID: 34146228 PMCID: PMC8214390 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-021-10031-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Digitization of a health record changes its accessibility. An electronic health record (EHR) can be accessed by multiple authorized users. Health information from EHRs contributes to learning healthcare systems' development. The objective of this systematic review is to answer a question: What are ethical issues concerning research using EHRs in the literature? We searched Medline Ovid, Embase and Scopus for publications concerning ethical issues of research use of EHRs. We employed the constant comparative method to retrieve common ethical themes. We descriptively summarized empirical studies. The study reveals the breadth, depth, and complexity of ethical problems associated with research use of EHRs. The central ethical question that emerges from the review is how to manage access to EHRs. Managing accessibility consists of interconnected and overlapping issues: streamlining research access to EHRs, minimizing risk, engaging and educating patients, as well as ensuring trustworthy governance of EHR data. Most of the ethical problems concerning EHR-based research arise from rapid cultural change. The framing of concepts of privacy, as well as individual and public dimensions of beneficence, are changing. We are currently living in the middle of this transition period. Human emotions and mental habits, as well as laws, are lagging behind technological developments. In the medical tradition, individual patient's health has always been in the center. Transformation of healthcare care, its digitalization, seems to have some impacts on our perspective of health care ethics, research ethics and public health ethics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Piasecki
- Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, Michalowskiego 12, 31-126, Krakow, Poland.
| | | | | | - Anna Kordecka
- HTA Registry Sp. z o.o. Sp. K, Herzoga 15, 30-252, Krakow, Poland
| | - Vilius Dranseika
- Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, Michalowskiego 12, 31-126, Krakow, Poland
- Institute of Philosophy, Vilnius University, 9/1 Universiteto, 01513, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tse T, White S, Gelinas L, Morrell W, Bierer B, Zarin DA. Characterization of Informed Consent Forms Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2135146. [PMID: 34792593 PMCID: PMC8603088 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
This cross-sectional study examines available forms and posting trends of registered trials as well as the frequency of form posting by funder type for trials initiated since the revised Common Rule was implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Tse
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sarah White
- Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Walker Morrell
- Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Barbara Bierer
- Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah A. Zarin
- Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Noda A, Kato K, Tamura C, Biesecker LG, Imaizumi M, Inoue Y, Henderson GE, Wilfond B, Muto K, Naito M, Kayukawa J. Ethical, legal and social implications of human genome studies in radiation research: a workshop report for studies on atomic bomb survivors at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:656-661. [PMID: 34059901 PMCID: PMC8273803 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF) is the primary organization in Japan dedicated to studying the health consequences of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings in World War II. In December 2020, RERF held a virtual international workshop on the ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) of genome studies. In this workshop, the ELSI considerations of future human genome studies on radiation research including atomic bomb survivors and their families were discussed. Since genome sequencing (GS) is now practical and affordable, RERF now plans GS of parents/child trios to examine genetic effects of atomic bomb radiation. As such studies may engender some novel risks and benefits, ethics review and engagement with families (including consent) need to be considered. These include protection of individual privacy, use of samples from deceased prior participants, return of results to the participants, public sharing of genome data and advance science and social welfare. Specifically with regard to social welfare, the results of such studies may have implications for public and government decision-making regarding social benefits of victims and other important questions. Based on these broad-ranging discussions we have developed the following concepts to guide this work: "trust," "compromise" and "relationship building," inclusive of the concerned stakeholders, scientific aims and Japanese society at large. We conclude that in order to realize, establish and maintain these concepts, it is essential to put procedures into place to ensure the successful, consensus-based implementation of the RERF studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asao Noda
- Corresponding author. Department of Molecular Biosciences, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, 5-2 Hijiyama-Park, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima 732-0815, Japan. Tel: 011-81-82-261-3131; Fax: 81-82-263-7279;
| | - Kazuto Kato
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Chieko Tamura
- Division of Medical Information and Genetic Counseling, FMC Tokyo Clinic, Tokyo 102-0072, Japan
| | - Leslie G Biesecker
- Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Misa Imaizumi
- Department of Clinical Studies, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Nagasaki 850-0013, Japan
| | - Yusuke Inoue
- Department of Public Policy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | - Gail E Henderson
- Department of Social Medicine, and Center for Genomics and Society, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7240, USA
| | - Benjamin Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Translational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Kaori Muto
- Department of Public Policy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
| | - Mariko Naito
- Department of Oral Epidemiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Junji Kayukawa
- Department of Social System Design, Eikei University of Hiroshima, Hiroshima 730-0016, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Turbitt E, Newson AJ, Biesecker BB, Wilfond BS. Enrolling Children in Clinical Trials for Genetic Neurodevelopmental Conditions: Ethics, Parental Decisions, and Children's Identities. Ethics Hum Res 2021; 43:27-36. [PMID: 34196500 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Knowledge of genetic mechanisms contributing to neurodevelopmental conditions is advancing. This is informing development of new drugs to treat or ameliorate these conditions, through targeting underlying genetic pathways. Drugs are tested in clinical trials, necessitating parents to engage with decisions about whether to enroll their child. In this article, we consider important ethical issues to anticipate as clinical research opportunities in genetic neurodevelopmental conditions arise. For example, genetic pathways targeted by the drugs may interact with valued character and personality traits. It is essential that recruitment and consent processes are optimized for families who will grapple with whether these novel drug treatments interact with their child's personality and authentic identity. We call for focused social science research and further normative analysis so that parents are better supported to make informed choices. Additionally, clinical research regulators should have a sound understanding of the contextual experiences regarding how this population of parents engages with decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Turbitt
- Lecturer in the Graduate School of Health at the University of Technology Sydney
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Professor of bioethics at Sydney Health Ethics in the Faculty of Medicine and Health at the University of Sydney
| | | | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Professor of pediatrics at the University of Washington and Seattle Children's Research Institute
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Largent EA, Hey SP, Harkins K, Hoffman AK, Joffe S, Lima JC, London AJ, Karlawish J. Ethical and Regulatory Issues for Embedded Pragmatic Trials Involving People Living with Dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 68 Suppl 2:S37-S42. [PMID: 32589273 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) present an opportunity to improve care for people living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners, but they also generate a complex constellation of ethical and regulatory challenges. These challenges begin with participant identification. Interventions may be delivered in ways that make it difficult to identify who is a human subject and therefore who needs ethical and regulatory protections. The need for informed consent, a core human subjects protection, must be considered but can be in tension with the goals of pragmatic research design. Thus it is essential to consider whether a waiver or alteration of informed consent is justifiable. If informed consent is needed, the question arises of how it should be obtained because researchers must acknowledge the vulnerability of PLWD due in part to diminished capacity and also to increased dependence on others. Further, researchers should recognize that many sites where ePCTs are conducted will be unfamiliar with human subjects research regulations and ethics. In this report, the Regulation and Ethics Core of the National Institute on Aging Imbedded Pragmatic Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (AD/ADRD) Clinical Trials (IMPACT) Collaboratory discusses key ethical and regulatory challenges for ePCTs in PLWD. A central thesis is that researchers should strive to anticipate and address these challenges early in the design of their ePCTs as a means of both ensuring compliance and advancing science. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:S37-S42, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Largent
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Kristin Harkins
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Allison K Hoffman
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Steven Joffe
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Julie C Lima
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice , Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Alex John London
- Center for Ethics and Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jason Karlawish
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Resnik DB. Informed Consent, Understanding, and Trust. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:61-63. [PMID: 33945427 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1906987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David B Resnik
- National Institute of Environmental Health Science, National Institutes of Health
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Millum J, Bromwich D. Informed Consent: What Must Be Disclosed and What Must Be Understood? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:46-58. [PMID: 33460362 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1863511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Over the last few decades, multiple studies have examined the understanding of participants in clinical research. They show variable and often poor understanding of key elements of disclosure, such as expected risks and the experimental nature of treatments. Did the participants in these studies give valid consent? According to the standard view of informed consent they did not. The standard view holds that the recipient of consent has a duty to disclose certain information to the profferer of consent because valid consent requires that information to be understood. The contents of the understanding and disclosure requirements are therefore conceptually linked. In this paper, we argue that the standard view is mistaken. The disclosure and understanding requirements have distinct grounds tied to two different ways in which a token of consent can be rendered invalid. Analysis of these grounds allows us to derive the contents of the two requirements. It also implies that it is sometimes permissible to enroll willing participants who have not understood everything that they ought to be told about their clinical trials.
Collapse
|
33
|
Morain SR, Largent EA. Public Attitudes toward Consent When Research Is Integrated into Care-Any "Ought" from All the "Is"? Hastings Cent Rep 2021; 51:22-32. [PMID: 33840104 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Research that is integrated into ongoing clinical activities holds the potential to accelerate the generation of knowledge to improve the health of individuals and populations. Yet integrating research into clinical care presents difficult ethical and regulatory challenges, including how or whether to obtain informed consent. Multiple empirical studies have explored patients' and the public's attitudes toward approaches to consent for pragmatic research. Questions remain, however, about how to use the resulting empirical data in resolving normative and policy debates and what kind of data warrants the most consideration. We recommend prioritizing data about what people consider acceptable with respect to consent for pragmatic research and data about people's informed, rather than initial, preferences on this subject. In addition, we advise caution regarding the weight given to majority viewpoints and identify circumstances when empirical data can be overridden. We argue that empirical data bolster normative arguments that alterations of consent should be the default in pragmatic research; waivers are appropriate only when the pragmatic research would otherwise be impracticable and has sufficiently high social value.
Collapse
|
34
|
Rothwell E, Brassil D, Barton-Baxter M, Brownley KA, Dickert NW, Ford DE, Kraft SA, McCormick JB, Wilfond BS. Informed consent: Old and new challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5:e105. [PMID: 34192059 PMCID: PMC8193198 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2021.401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we address how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted informed consent for clinical research through examining experiences within Clinical and Translation Science Award (CTSA) institutions. We begin with a brief overview of informed consent and the challenges that existed prior to COVID-19. Then, we discuss how informed consent processes were modified or changed to address the pandemic, consider what lessons were learned, and present research and policy steps to prepare for future research and public health crises. The experiences and challenges for CTSA institutions offer an important perspective for examining what we have learned about informed consent and determining the next steps for improving the consent process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Rothwell
- Department of Ob/Gyn, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Marietta Barton-Baxter
- University of Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Kimberly A. Brownley
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, NC Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Neal W. Dickert
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliancet, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Daniel E. Ford
- Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephanie A. Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute and Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer B. McCormick
- Department of Humanities, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, and Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine; Institute of Translational Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kraft SA. Respecting Donor-Recipient Relationships in Research Decision-Making Commentary on: When Living Donor and Kidney Transplant Recipient Are Both Research Subjects. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:112-114. [PMID: 33825630 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1891326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute
- University of Washington School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kraft SA, Porter KM, Duenas DM, Guerra C, Joseph G, Lee SSJ, Shipman KJ, Allen J, Eubanks D, Kauffman TL, Lindberg NM, Anderson K, Zepp JM, Gilmore MJ, Mittendorf KF, Shuster E, Muessig KR, Arnold B, Goddard KAB, Wilfond BS. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2021; 12:1-11. [PMID: 32981477 PMCID: PMC7785634 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical genomic implementation studies pose challenges for informed consent. Consent forms often include complex language and concepts, which can be a barrier to diverse enrollment, and these studies often blur traditional research-clinical boundaries. There is a move toward self-directed, web-based research enrollment, but more evidence is needed about how these enrollment approaches work in practice. In this study, we developed and evaluated a literacy-focused, web-based consent approach to support enrollment of diverse participants in an ongoing clinical genomic implementation study. Methods: As part of the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study, we developed a web-based consent approach that featured plain language, multimedia, and separate descriptions of clinical care and research activities. CHARM offered clinical exome sequencing to individuals at high risk of hereditary cancer. We interviewed CHARM participants about their reactions to the consent approach. We audio recorded, transcribed, and coded interviews using a deductively and inductively derived codebook. We reviewed coded excerpts as a team to identify overarching themes. Results: We conducted 32 interviews, including 12 (38%) in Spanish. Most (69%) enrolled without assistance from study staff, usually on a mobile phone. Those who completed enrollment in one day spent an average of 12 minutes on the consent portion. Interviewees found the information simple to read but comprehensive, were neutral to positive about the multimedia support, and identified increased access to testing in the study as the key difference from clinical care. Conclusions: This study showed that interviewees found our literacy-focused, web-based consent approach acceptable; did not distinguish the consent materials from other online study processes; and valued getting access to testing in the study. Overall, conducting empirical bioethics research in an ongoing clinical trial was useful to demonstrate the acceptability of our novel consent approach but posed practical challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kathryn M Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Devan M Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudia Guerra
- Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Anthropology, History and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kelly J Shipman
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jake Allen
- IT (Information Technology) Department, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Donna Eubanks
- IT (Information Technology) Department, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Nangel M Lindberg
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shuster
- Research Data and Analysis Center, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Briana Arnold
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rothstein MA. Informed Consent for Secondary Research under the New NIH Data Sharing Policy. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2021; 49:489-494. [PMID: 34665099 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2021.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The new NIH data sharing policy, effective January 2023, requires researchers to submit a data management and data sharing plan in their grant application. Expanded data sharing, encouraged by NIH to facilitate secondary research, will require informed consent documents to explain data sharing plans, limitations, and procedures.
Collapse
|
38
|
Silbergleit R, Dickert NW. Context and principles must drive alternatives to consent in emergency research. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19:968-969. [PMID: 33098756 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30367-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Silbergleit
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| | - Neal W Dickert
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kompanje EJO, van Dijck JTJM, Chalos V, van den Berg SA, Janssen PM, Nederkoorn PJ, van der Jagt M, Citerio G, Stocchetti N, Dippel DWJ, Peul WC. Informed consent procedures for emergency interventional research in patients with traumatic brain injury and ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19:1033-1042. [PMID: 33098755 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30276-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Health-care professionals and researchers have a legal and ethical responsibility to inform patients before carrying out diagnostic tests or treatment interventions as part of a clinical study. Interventional research in emergency situations can involve patients with some degree of acute cognitive impairment, as is regularly the case in traumatic brain injury and ischaemic stroke. These patients or their proxies are often unable to provide informed consent within narrow therapeutic time windows. International regulations and national laws are criticised for being inconclusive or restrictive in providing solutions. Currently accepted consent alternatives are deferred consent, exception from consent, or waiver of consent. However, these alternatives appear under-utilised despite being ethically permissible, socially acceptable, and regulatorily compliant. We anticipate that, when the requirements for medical urgency are properly balanced with legal and ethical conduct, the increased use of these alternatives has the potential to improve the efficiency and quality of future emergency interventional studies in patients with an inability to provide informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erwin J O Kompanje
- Department of Intensive Care Adult, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jeroen T J M van Dijck
- University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Haaglanden Medical Center & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden and The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Vicky Chalos
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Science, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie A van den Berg
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
| | - Paula M Janssen
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mathieu van der Jagt
- Department of Intensive Care Adult, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giuseppe Citerio
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Nino Stocchetti
- Department of Physiopathology and Transplantation, Milan University, Milan, Italy; Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Diederik W J Dippel
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilco C Peul
- University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Haaglanden Medical Center & Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden and The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Vears DF, Borry P, Savulescu J, Koplin JJ. Old Challenges or New Issues? Genetic Health Professionals' Experiences Obtaining Informed Consent in Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2020; 12:12-23. [PMID: 33017265 PMCID: PMC8120994 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1823906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background While integrating genomic sequencing into clinical care carries clear medical benefits, it also raises difficult ethical questions. Compared to traditional sequencing technologies, genomic sequencing and analysis is more likely to identify unsolicited findings (UF) and variants that cannot be classified as benign or disease-causing (variants of uncertain significance; VUS). UF and VUS pose new challenges for genetic health professionals (GHPs) who are obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing from patients. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 31 GHPs across Europe, Australia and Canada to identify some of these challenges. Results Our results show that GHPs find it difficult to prepare patients to receive results because a vast amount of information is required to fully inform patients about VUS and UF. GHPs also struggle to engage patients – many of whom may be focused on ending their ‘diagnostic odyssey’ – in the informed consent process in a meaningful way. Thus, some questioned how ‘informed’ patients actually are when they agree to undergo clinical genomic sequencing. Conclusions These findings suggest a tension remains between sufficient information provision at the risk of overwhelming the patient and imparting less information at the risk of uninformed decision-making. We suggest that a shift away from ‘fully informed consent’ toward an approach aimed at realizing, as far as possible, the underlying goals that informed consent is meant to promote.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya F Vears
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.,Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julian J Koplin
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.,Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Desine S, Hollister BM, Abdallah KE, Persaud A, Hull SC, Bonham VL. The Meaning of Informed Consent: Genome Editing Clinical Trials for Sickle Cell Disease. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2020; 11:195-207. [PMID: 33044907 PMCID: PMC7710006 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1818876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A first therapeutic target of somatic genome editing (SGE) is sickle cell disease (SCD), the most commonly inherited blood disorders, affecting more than 100,000 individuals in the United States. Advancement of SGE is contingent on patient participation in first in human clinical trials. However, seriously ill patients may be vulnerable to overestimating the benefits of early phase studies while underestimating the risks. Therefore, ensuring potential clinical trial participants are fully informed prior to participating in a SGE clinical trial is critical. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study of adults with SCD as well as parents and physicians of individuals with SCD. Participants were asked to complete a genetic literacy survey, watch an educational video about genome editing, complete a two-part survey, and take part in focus group discussions. Focus groups addressed topics on clinical trials, ethics of gene editing, and what is not understood regarding gene editing. All focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using conventional content analysis techniques to identify major themes. Results: Our study examined the views of SCD stakeholders regarding what they want and need to know about genome editing to make an informed decision to participate in a SGE clinical trial. Prominent themes included stakeholders' desire to understand treatment side effects, mechanism of action of SGE, trial qualification criteria, and the impact of SGE on quality of life. In addition, some physicians expressed concerns about the extent to which their patients would understand concepts related to SGE; however, individuals with SCD demonstrated higher levels of genetic literacy than estimated by physicians. Conclusions: Designing ethically robust genome editing clinical trials for the SCD population will require, at a minimum, addressing the expressed information needs of the community through culturally sensitive engagement, so that they can make informed decisions to consider participation in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Desine
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Brittany M. Hollister
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Khadijah E. Abdallah
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Anitra Persaud
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Sara Chandros Hull
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
- Bioethics Core, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Vence L. Bonham
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Asch DA, Joffe S, Bierer BE, Greene SM, Lieu TA, Platt JE, Whicher D, Ahmed M, Platt R. Rethinking ethical oversight in the era of the learning health system. HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION 2020; 8:100462. [PMID: 32992106 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Opportunities to advance science increasingly arise through investigations embedded within routine clinical practice in the form of learning health systems. Such activities challenge conventional approaches to research regulation that have not caught up with those opportunities, often imposing burdens generalized from riskier research. We analyze the rules and conventions in the US, demonstrating how even those rules are compatible with a much more flexible approach to participant risk, institutional oversight, participant consent, and disclosure for low-risk learning activities in all jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Asch
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Cpl Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Steven Joffe
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Barbara E Bierer
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Tracy A Lieu
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Jodyn E Platt
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Richard Platt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
After expressing our gratitude to the commentators for their valuable analyses and assessments of Principles of Biomedical Ethics, we respond to several particular critiques raised by the commentators under the following rubrics: the compatibility of different sets of principles and rules; challenges to the principle of respect for autonomy; connecting principles to cases and resolving their conflicts; the value of and compatibility of virtues and principles; common morality theory; and moral status. We point to areas where we see common agreement with our commentators and respond to their critical evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom L Beauchamp
- Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Broekstra R, Maeckelberghe ELM, Aris-Meijer JL, Stolk RP, Otten S. Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:62. [PMID: 32711531 PMCID: PMC7382031 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00504-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Large-scale, centralized data repositories are playing a critical and unprecedented role in fostering innovative health research, leading to new opportunities as well as dilemmas for the medical sciences. Uncovering the reasons as to why citizens do or do not contribute to such repositories, for example, to population-based biobanks, is therefore crucial. We investigated and compared the views of existing participants and non-participants on contributing to large-scale, centralized health research data repositories with those of ex-participants regarding the decision to end their participation. This comparison could yield new insights into motives of participation and non-participation, in particular the behavioural change of withdrawal. Methods We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with ex-participants, participants, and non-participants of a three-generation, population-based biobank in the Netherlands. The interviews focused on the respondents’ decision-making processes relating to their participation in a large-scale, centralized repository for health research data. Results The decision of participants and non-participants to contribute to the biobank was motivated by a desire to help others. Whereas participants perceived only benefits relating to their participation and were unconcerned about potential risks, non-participants and ex-participants raised concerns about the threat of large-scale, centralized public data repositories and public institutes, such as social exclusion or commercialization. Our analysis of ex-participants’ perceptions suggests that intrapersonal characteristics, such as levels of trust in society, participation conceived as a social norm, and basic societal values account for differences between participants and non-participants. Conclusions Our findings indicate the fluidity of motives centring on helping others in decisions to participate in large-scale, centralized health research data repositories. Efforts to improve participation should focus on enhancing the trustworthiness of such data repositories and developing layered strategies for communication with participants and with the public. Accordingly, personalized approaches for recruiting participants and transmitting information along with appropriate regulatory frameworks are required, which have important implications for current data management and informed consent procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Broekstra
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, FA 40, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - E L M Maeckelberghe
- University Medical Center Groningen, Institute for Medical Education, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J L Aris-Meijer
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, FA 40, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R P Stolk
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, FA 40, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S Otten
- Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kuhn E, Müller S, Heidbrink L, Buyx A. [Informed Employees - Informed Consent as Ethical Guidance for Behavioural Prevention in the Corporate Context]. DAS GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2020; 83:946-950. [PMID: 32693419 DOI: 10.1055/a-1205-0779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHOD People have a right to physical and mental integrity in all spheres of life. They also have the right to autonomous actions and informed decisions regarding their health. To ensure this, informed consent has been the ethico-legal gold standard in medicine for some years now. The registration for measures of behavioural prevention, in contrast, is mainly conducted through forms focussing on data protection, with little attention to full informed consent of future participants. In this article, we discuss the ethical challenges that arise when employees consent to health-promoting measures. We then examine whether the instrument of informed consent can be translated to the context of behavioural prevention. RESULTS Informed consent can be transferred to the corporate context in an altered version. Of particular importance is not only the handling of health-related data, but also the appropriate disclosure of all essential information as well as voluntary participation. CONCLUSIONS The adjusted version of informed consent in behavioural prevention ought to be developed further, resulting in a matrix of criteria that define conditions under which the informed consent can be applied to single measures of behavioural prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Kuhn
- Fakultät für Medizin, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Technische Universität München, München
| | - Sebastian Müller
- Lehrstuhl für Praktische Philosophie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel
| | - Ludger Heidbrink
- Lehrstuhl für Praktische Philosophie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel
| | - Alena Buyx
- Fakultät für Medizin, Institut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, Technische Universität München, München
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
McGuire AL, Aulisio MP, Davis FD, Erwin C, Harter TD, Jagsi R, Klitzman R, Macauley R, Racine E, Wolf SM, Wynia M, Wolpe PR. Ethical Challenges Arising in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Overview from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD) Task Force. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2020; 20:15-27. [PMID: 32511078 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1764138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has raised a host of ethical challenges, but key among these has been the possibility that health care systems might need to ration scarce critical care resources. Rationing policies for pandemics differ by institution, health system, and applicable law. Most seem to agree that a patient's ability to benefit from treatment and to survive are first-order considerations. However, there is debate about what clinical measures should be used to make that determination and about other factors that might be ethically appropriate to consider. In this paper, we discuss resource allocation and several related ethical challenges to the healthcare system and society, including how to define benefit, how to handle informed consent, the special needs of pediatric patients, how to engage communities in these difficult decisions, and how to mitigate concerns of discrimination and the effects of structural inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - F Daniel Davis
- Center for Translational Bioethics and Health Care Policy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Racine
- Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Université de Montréal, McGill University
- McGill University
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kraft SA, Porter KM, Duenas DM, Sullivan E, Rowland M, Saelens BE, Wilfond BS, Shah SK. Assessing Parent Decisions About Child Participation in a Behavioral Health Intervention Study and Utility of Informed Consent Forms. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e209296. [PMID: 32735337 PMCID: PMC7395235 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Obtaining informed consent is an important ethical obligation for clinical research participation that is imperfectly implemented. Research on improving consent processes often focuses on consent forms, but little is known about consent forms' influence on decision-making compared with other types of engagement. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether parents decide whether to enroll their children in research before or after they receive the consent form. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS An online survey of 88 parents who enrolled or declined to enroll their child in a weight management intervention study between January 2, 2018, and June 24, 2019, was conducted; surveys were completed between February 2, 2018, and July 9, 2019. A 31-item survey asked about impressions of the study throughout the enrollment process, timing of enrollment decisions, and decision-making factors. Responses were summarized descriptively and subgroups were compared using the Fisher exact test or χ2 test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Self-reported timing of enrollment decision. RESULTS A total of 106 parents were approached and gave permission for their contact information to be shared with the study team; 22 additional parents declined to allow their information to be shared, and 24 lost contact with the partner study before they could be asked for permission. A total of 88 parents (67 enrollees, 21 decliners) completed the survey (83% participation rate); 79 of 88 reporting gender (instead of sex, as biological sex was not relevant to survey) information were women (91%), 66 participants (75%) were non-Hispanic White, and 63 participants (72%) had annual household incomes greater than or equal to $70 000. No significant differences in respondent characteristics between enrollees and decliners were identified. Fifty-nine parents (67%) responded that they decided whether to enroll in the weight management study before receiving the consent form. Only 17 of 69 parents (25%) who remembered receiving the consent form responded that it taught them new information. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that interventions to improve informed consent forms may have limited influence on decision-making because many research decisions occur before review of the consent form. It appears that regulatory review and interventions to improve decision-making should focus more on early engagement (eg, recruitment materials). Future studies should test timing of decisions in other types of research with different populations and clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A. Kraft
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle
| | - Kathryn M. Porter
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Devan M. Duenas
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Erin Sullivan
- Seattle Children’s Core for Biomedical Statistics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Maya Rowland
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Brian E. Saelens
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle
- Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Benjamin S. Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle
| | - Seema K. Shah
- Mary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Research, Outreach, and Advocacy Center; Stanley Manne Children’s Research Institute; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Khan MI, Holek M, Bdair F, Mbuagbaw L, Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Lancaster GA, Thabane L. Assessing the transparency of informed consent in feasibility and pilot studies: a single-centre quality assurance study protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036226. [PMID: 32571863 PMCID: PMC7311004 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pilot/feasibility studies assess the feasibility of conducting a larger study. Although researchers ought to communicate the feasibility objectives to their participants, many research ethics guidelines do not comment on how informed consent applies to pilot studies. It is unclear whether researchers and research ethics boards clearly communicate the purpose of pilot studies to participants consenting.The primary objective of this study is to assess whether pilot/feasibility studies submitted for ethics approval to a research ethics board transparently communicate the purpose of the study to participants through their informed consent practice. A highly transparent consent practice entails the consent documents communicate: (1) the term 'pilot' or 'feasibility' in the title; (2) the definition of a pilot/feasibility study; (3) the primary objectives of the study are to assess feasibility; (4) the specific feasibility objectives; and (5) the criteria for the study to successfully lead to the main study. The secondary objectives are to assess whether there is a difference between submitted and revised versions of the consent documents (revisions are made to obtain research ethics approval), to determine factors associated with transparent consent practices and to assess the consistency with which pilot and feasibility studies assess feasibility outcomes as their primary objectives. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a retrospective review of informed consent information for pilot/feasibility studies submitted to the Hamilton integrated Research Ethics Board, Canada. We will look at submitted and revised consent documents for pilot/feasibility studies submitted over a 14-year period. We will use descriptive statistics to summarise data, reporting results as percentages with 95% CIs, and conduct logistic regression to determine characteristics associated with transparent consent practices. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol was approved by the Hamilton integrated Research Ethics Board, and the results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed I Khan
- Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Holek
- Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Faris Bdair
- Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra M Eldridge
- Barts and The London Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Claire L Chan
- Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Michael J Campbell
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Christine M Bond
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sally Hopewell
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Gillian A Lancaster
- School of Primary, Community and Social Care; Keele Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Newcastle under Lyme, UK
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Weinfurt KP. A Model to Be Emulated. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2020; 20:18-20. [PMID: 32364489 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
|
50
|
Dickert NW, Bernard AM, Brabson JM, Hunter RJ, McLemore R, Mitchell AR, Palmer S, Reed B, Riedford M, Simpson RT, Speight CD, Steadman T, D Pentz R. Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2020; 20:7-17. [PMID: 32364468 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Clinical trials for acute conditions such as myocardial infarction and stroke pose challenges related to informed consent due to time limitations, stress, and severe illness. Consent processes should be sensitive to the context in which trials are conducted and to needs of patients and surrogate decision-makers. This manuscript describes a collaborative effort between ethicists, researchers, patients, and surrogates to develop patient-driven, patient-centered approaches to consent for clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction and stroke.Our group identified important ways in which existing consent processes and forms for clinical trials fail to meet patients' and surrogates' needs in the acute context. We collaborated to create model forms and consent processes that are substantially shorter and, hopefully, better-matched to patients' and surrogates' needs and expectations from the perspective of content, structure, and tone. These changes, however, challenge some common conventions regarding consent.
Collapse
|