1
|
Sides TL, Jensen AC, Argust MM, Amundson EC, Thomas GR, Keller R, Mahaffey M, Krebs EE. Experiences and lessons learned from a patient-engagement service established by a national research consortium in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration. Learn Health Syst 2024; 8:e10421. [PMID: 39036526 PMCID: PMC11257060 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Meaningful engagement of patients in the research process has increased over the past 20 years. Few accounts are available of engagement infrastructure and processes used by large research organizations. The Pain/Opioid Consortium of Research (Consortium) is a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) research network that provides infrastructure to accelerate health research and implementation of evidence-based health care. The Consortium's key activities include facilitating Veteran-engaged research and building community between Veterans and VA researchers. This report sought to describe experiences and lessons learned from the first 3 years of a national research engagement service, featuring a Veteran Engagement (VE) Panel, established by the Consortium. Methods We gathered authors' experiences to describe development and operation of the Consortium's VE Panel. Engagement staff collected program evaluation data about partners (Veterans and researchers), projects about which the VE Panel consulted, and meeting attendance during operation of the engagement service. Results We created a 12-member VE Panel; all of whom had lived experience with chronic pain, prescription opioid medication use, or opioid use disorder. Engagement staff and VE Panel members implemented an engagement service operational model designed to continuously learn and adapt. The panel consulted on 48 projects spanning the research process. Seventy-eight percent of panel members, on average, attended each monthly meeting. VE Panel members and participating researchers reported high satisfaction with the quality, ease, and outcomes of their engagement service experiences. Conclusions This work provides an illustrative example of how a national research consortium facilitated Veteran-engaged research and built community between Veterans and VA researchers by developing and operating an ongoing engagement consulting service, featuring a VE Panel. The service, designed as a learning community, relied on skilled engagement staff to cultivate high quality experiences and outcomes for all partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy L. Sides
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care SystemMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Agnes C. Jensen
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care SystemMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
- U.S. Military VeteranVeniceFloridaUSA
| | - Malloree M. Argust
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care SystemMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Erin C. Amundson
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care SystemMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | | | - Rebecca Keller
- U.S. Military VeteranRed WingMinnesotaUSA
- VA Pain/Opioid Consortium of Research Veteran Engagement PanelMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Mallory Mahaffey
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care SystemMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Erin E. Krebs
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care SystemMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
- School of Medicine, University of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramanadhan S, Alemán R, Bradley CD, Cruz JL, Safaeinili N, Simonds V, Aveling EL. Using Participatory Implementation Science to Advance Health Equity. Annu Rev Public Health 2024; 45:47-67. [PMID: 38109515 PMCID: PMC11251496 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060722-024251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Participatory approaches to implementation science (IS) offer an inclusive, collaborative, and iterative perspective on implementing and sustaining evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to advance health equity. This review provides guidance on the principles and practice of participatory IS, which enables academic researchers, community members, implementers, and other actors to collaboratively integrate practice-, community-, and research-based evidence into public health and health care services. With a foundational focus on supporting academics in coproducing knowledge and action, participatory IS seeks to improve health, reduce inequity, and create transformational change. The three main sections of this review provide (a) a rationale for participatory approaches to research in implementation science, (b) a framework for integrating participatory approaches in research utilizing IS theory and methods, and (c) critical considerations for optimizing the practice and impact of participatory IS. Ultimately, participatory approaches can move IS activities beyond efforts to make EBIs work within harmful systems toward transformative solutions that reshape these systems to center equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Rosa Alemán
- American Civil Liberties Union-Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cory D Bradley
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jennifer L Cruz
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Nadia Safaeinili
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Vanessa Simonds
- College of Education, Health and Human Development, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA
| | - Emma-Louise Aveling
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zittleman L, Westfall JM, Callen D, Herrick AM, Nkouaga C, Simpson M, Dickinson LM, Fernald D, Kaufman A, English AF, Dickinson WP, Nease DE. Does engagement matter? The impact of patient and community engagement on implementation of cardiovascular health materials in primary care settings. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:135. [PMID: 38664665 PMCID: PMC11044409 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02365-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Engaging patients and community members in healthcare implementation, research and evaluation has become more popular over the past two decades. Despite the growing interest in patient engagement, there is scant evidence of its impact and importance. Boot Camp Translation (BCT) is one evidence-based method of engaging communities in research. The purpose of this report is to describe the uptake by primary care practices of cardiovascular disease prevention materials produced through four different local community engagement efforts using BCT. METHODS EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW) was a randomized trial to increase cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in primary care practices. Because of its study design, Four BCTs were conducted, and the materials created were made available to participating practices in the "enhanced" study arm. As a result, ENSW offered one of the first opportunities to explore the impact of the BCT method by describing the uptake by primary care practices of health messages and materials created locally using the BCT process. Analysis compared uptake of locally translated BCT products vs. all other products among practices based on geography, type of practice, and local BCT. RESULTS Within the enhanced arm of the study that included BCT, 69 urban and 13 rural practices participated with 9 being federally qualified community health centers, 14 hospital owned and 59 clinician owned. Sixty-three practices had 5 or fewer clinicians. Two hundred and ten separate orders for materials were placed by 43 of the 82 practices. While practices ordered a wide variety of BCT products, they were more likely to order materials developed by their local BCT. CONCLUSIONS In this study, patients and community members generated common and unique messages and materials for cardiovascular disease prevention relevant to their regional and community culture. Primary care practices preferred the materials created in their region. The greater uptake of locally created materials over non-local materials supports the use of patient engagement methods such as BCT to increase the implementation and delivery of guideline-based care. Yes, patient and community engagement matters. TRIAL REGISTRATION AND IRB Trial registration was prospectively registered on July 31, 2015 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02515578, protocol identifier 15-0403). The project was approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board and the University of New Mexico Human Research Protections Office.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Zittleman
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - John M Westfall
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Danelle Callen
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Alisha M Herrick
- The Center for Health Innovation, New Mexico's Public Health Institute, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Carolina Nkouaga
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Matthew Simpson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - L Miriam Dickinson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Douglas Fernald
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Arthur Kaufman
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Aimee F English
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - W Perry Dickinson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Donald E Nease
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Orellana M, DSouza KN, Yap JQ, Sriganeshan A, Jones ME, Johnson C, Allyse M, Venable S, Stewart EA, Enders F, Balls-Berry JE. "In our community, we normalize pain": discussions around menstruation and uterine fibroids with Black women and Latinas. BMC Womens Health 2024; 24:233. [PMID: 38610011 PMCID: PMC11010402 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03008-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine fibroids are non-cancerous neoplasms that arise from the uterus affecting over 75% of women. However, there is a disparity with Black women having an increased prevalence of nearly 80%. Black women also experience increased symptom burden, including younger age at the time of diagnosis and increased number and volume of fibroids. Less is known about other ethnoracially diverse women such as Latinas and the potential cultural impacts on fibroid burden and treatment. METHODS Community engagement studios were conducted to facilitate discussions with stakeholders on their uterine fibroid and menstruation experience. We recruited Black women (n = 6) diagnosed with uterine fibroids and Latinas (n = 7) without uterine fibroids. We held two virtual community engagement studios split by uterine fibroid diagnosis. The studios were not audio recorded and notes were taken by four notetakers. The notes were thematically analyzed in Atlas.ti using content analysis. RESULTS Participants felt there was a lack of discussion around menstruation overall, whether in the home or school settings. This lack of menstruation education was pronounced when participants had their first menstruation experience, with many unaware of what to expect. This silence around menstruation led to a normalization of painful menstruation symptoms. When it came to different treatment options for uterine fibroids, some women wanted to explore alternative treatments but were dismissed by their healthcare providers. Many participants advocated for having discussions with their healthcare provider about life goals to discuss different treatment options for their uterine fibroids. CONCLUSION Despite uterine fibroid diagnosis, there is silence around menstruation. Menstruation is a normal biological occurrence and needs to be discussed to help prevent delayed diagnosis of uterine fibroids and possibly other gynecological disorders. Along with increased discussions around menstruation, further discussion is needed between healthcare providers and uterine fibroid patients to explore appropriate treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minerva Orellana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karen N DSouza
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jane Q Yap
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - M Elena Jones
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4488 Forest Park, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA
| | - Charis Johnson
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4488 Forest Park, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA
| | - Megan Allyse
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Program in Biomedical Ethics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth A Stewart
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine & Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Felicity Enders
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine & Science, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joyce E Balls-Berry
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4488 Forest Park, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sprague Martinez L, Araujo Brinkerhoff C, Howard RC, Feldman JA, Kobetz E, White JT, Tumiel Berhalter L, Bilheimer A, Hoffman M, Isasi CR, Killough C, Martinez J, Chesley J, Baig AA, Foy C, Islam N, Petruse A, Rosales C, Kipke MD, Baezconde-Garbanati L, Battaglia TA, Lobb R. Strategies to promote language inclusion at 17 CTSA hubs. J Clin Transl Sci 2024; 8:e67. [PMID: 38690228 PMCID: PMC11058578 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
The prioritization of English language in clinical research is a barrier to translational science. We explored promising practices to advance the inclusion of people who speak languages other than English in research conducted within and supported by NIH Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs. Key informant interviews were conducted with representatives (n = 24) from CTSA hubs (n = 17). Purposive sampling was used to identify CTSA hubs focused on language inclusion. Hubs electing to participate were interviewed via Zoom. Thematic analysis was performed to analyze interview transcripts. We report on strategies employed by hubs to advance linguistic inclusion and influence institutional change that were identified. Strategies ranged from translations, development of culturally relevant materials and consultations to policies and procedural changes and workforce initiatives. An existing framework was adapted to conceptualize hub strategies. Language justice is paramount to bringing more effective treatments to all people more quickly. Inclusion will require institutional transformation and CTSA hubs are well positioned to catalyze change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Sprague Martinez
- Boston University School of Social Work, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cristina Araujo Brinkerhoff
- Boston University School of Social Work, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Riana C. Howard
- Boston University School of Social Work, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James A. Feldman
- Boston University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston Medical Center Health System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erin Kobetz
- University of Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - J. Tommy White
- North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (NC TraCS) Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Laurene Tumiel Berhalter
- Dept of Family Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
- University at Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Alicia Bilheimer
- North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences (NC TraCS) Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Megan Hoffman
- University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Carmen R. Isasi
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- The Harold and Muriel Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), New York, NY, USA
| | - Cynthia Killough
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Julia Martinez
- Clinical and Translational Science Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | | - Arshiya A. Baig
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Center for Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Capri Foy
- Wake Forrest University School of Medicine Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Nadia Islam
- New York Langone University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antonia Petruse
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute Office of Clinical Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Carolina Rosales
- University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michele D. Kipke
- Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute (SC CTSI), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Tracy A. Battaglia
- Boston University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Boston Medical Center Health System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca Lobb
- Boston University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Odedina FT, Salinas M, Albertie M, Murrell D, Munoz K. Operational strategies for achieving comprehensive cancer center community outreach and engagement objectives: impact and logic models. Arch Public Health 2024; 82:35. [PMID: 38486330 PMCID: PMC10938690 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01252-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grants (CCSGs) encourages Cancer Centers to address health disparities and reduce the cancer burden in their Catchment Area (CA) through an organized Community Outreach and Engagement (COE) structure. This paper shares the development of two guide models that fosters the operations of the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center (MCCCC) COE Office and programs, the MCCCC COE Impact Model and the MCCCC COE Logic Model. METHODS Following a less than stellar CCSG rating for COE in 2018, the MCCCC developed a transition team to specifically address the critique and create a transformative plan for engaging communities to address cancer burden in the CA. A qualitative research approach was employed, focusing on organizing and displaying the relationship between MCCCC COE processes and outcomes through impact and logic models. An impact model was developed to illustrate the components of the CCSG and connect those components to short- and long-term COE outcomes. A logic model was developed to track and monitor activities for continuous process improvement for all COE activities. RESULTS The impact and logic model serve as a roadmap to monitor progress towards short- and long-term COE goals of the MCCCC. The COE operational strategies draw upon bidirectional partnership, evidence-based practices, and research facilitation to respond to the CCSG critique. CONCLUSION These strategies demonstrate successful practices in addressing cancer burden, promoting health equity and eliminating cancer disparities in the MCCCC CA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Folakemi T Odedina
- Community Outreach and Engagement Office and Programs, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 3224, USA.
| | - Manisha Salinas
- Community Outreach and Engagement Office and Programs, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 3224, USA
| | - Monica Albertie
- Community Outreach and Engagement Office and Programs, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 3224, USA
| | - Doug Murrell
- Community Outreach and Engagement Office and Programs, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Kristin Munoz
- Community Outreach and Engagement Office and Programs, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pham TV, Kincade M, Vranceanu AM. Culturally Adapting Mind-Body Interventions for Black Individuals with Chronic Pain: Arguments and Recommendations Towards a Task-Sharing Approach. Adv Mind Body Med 2024; 37:12-19. [PMID: 38466049 PMCID: PMC11168092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
Compared to non-Hispanic White individuals, non-Hispanic Black Individuals report worse chronic pain from a variety of medical issues. Among the options for non-pharmacological pain treatment, mind-body interventions (MBI) are a promising modality to help Black individuals manage their chronic pain effectively. MBIs such as mindfulness meditation improve chronic pain and chronic pain-related outcomes by shifting the individual's perception of pain away from stress-related cognitive appraisals, emotional reactions, and behaviors. MBIs may also address disparities in chronic pain outcomes between Black and White individuals because of their contextual overlap with (1) centering and contemplative prayer, (2) racial empowerment, and (3) social support. Despite this overlap, the demand for MBIs among Black individuals has generally been low due to lingering access and acceptability barriers. To reduce these barriers for Black individuals with chronic pain, we must adopt a community-engaged approach and culturally adapt MBIs for the specific historic, environmental, financial, and psychosocial needs of Black individuals. Example adaptations include increasing Black representation among MBI instructors, reducing geographical access barriers, accommodating the financial and personal realities of Black adults, and explicitly allowing relevant attitudes, practices, and terms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony V Pham
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Michael Kincade
- Center for Alzheimer's Research and Treatment, Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Scheffey K, Avelis J, Patel M, Oon AL, Evans C, Glanz K. Use of Community Engagement Studios to Adapt a Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study of Social Incentives and Physical Activity for the STEP Together Study. Health Promot Pract 2024; 25:285-292. [PMID: 35899691 PMCID: PMC10183149 DOI: 10.1177/15248399221113863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Physical activity is known to contribute to good health, but most adults in the United States do not meet recommended physical activity guidelines. Social incentive interventions that leverage insights from behavioral economics have increased physical activity in short-term trials, but there is limited evidence of their effectiveness in community settings or their long-term effectiveness. The STEP Together study is a Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation study to address these evidence and implementation gaps. This paper describes the process of adapting study procedures prior to the effectiveness trial using Community Engagement (CE) Studios, facilitated meetings during which community members provide feedback on research projects. Six CE Studios were held with community members from the priority population. They were conducted remotely because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fifteen liaisons representing 13 community organizations and 21 community members from different neighborhoods in Philadelphia participated. Three elements of the study design were modified based on feedback from the CE Studios: lowering the age requirement for an 'older adult', clarifying the definition of family members to include second-degree relatives, and adding a 6-month survey. These adaptations will improve the fit of the effectiveness trial to the local context and improve participant engagement and retention. CE Studios can be used to adapt intervention strategies and other aspects of study design during hybrid implementation-effectiveness trials. This approach was successfully used with remote online participation due to the COVID-19 pandemic and serves as a model for future community-engaged implementation research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jade Avelis
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mitesh Patel
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Ascension Health, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ai Leen Oon
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Karen Glanz
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kost RG, Cheng A, Andrews J, Chatterjee R, Dozier A, Ford D, Schlesinger N, Dykes C, Kelly-Pumarol I, Kennedy N, Lewis-Land C, Lindo S, Martinez L, Musty M, Roberts J, Vaughan R, Wagenknecht L, Carey S, Coffran C, Goodrich J, Panjala P, Cheema S, Qureshi A, Thomas E, O’Neill L, Bascompte-Moragas E, Harris P. Empowering the Participant Voice (EPV): Design and implementation of collaborative infrastructure to collect research participant experience feedback at scale. J Clin Transl Sci 2024; 8:e40. [PMID: 38476242 PMCID: PMC10928700 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Empowering the Participant Voice (EPV) is an NCATS-funded six-CTSA collaboration to develop, demonstrate, and disseminate a low-cost infrastructure for collecting timely feedback from research participants, fostering trust, and providing data for improving clinical translational research. EPV leverages the validated Research Participant Perception Survey (RPPS) and the popular REDCap electronic data-capture platform. This report describes the development of infrastructure designed to overcome identified institutional barriers to routinely collecting participant feedback using RPPS and demonstration use cases. Sites engaged local stakeholders iteratively, incorporating feedback about anticipated value and potential concerns into project design. The team defined common standards and operations, developed software, and produced a detailed planning and implementation Guide. By May 2023, 2,575 participants diverse in age, race, ethnicity, and sex had responded to approximately 13,850 survey invitations (18.6%); 29% of responses included free-text comments. EPV infrastructure enabled sites to routinely access local and multi-site research participant experience data on an interactive analytics dashboard. The EPV learning collaborative continues to test initiatives to improve survey reach and optimize infrastructure and process. Broad uptake of EPV will expand the evidence base, enable hypothesis generation, and drive research-on-research locally and nationally to enhance the clinical research enterprise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhonda G. Kost
- The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational
Science, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex Cheng
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt
University, Nashville, TN,
USA
| | - Joseph Andrews
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Clinical and Translational
Science Institute, Winston-Salem, NC,
USA
| | - Ranee Chatterjee
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of
Medicine, Duke Clinical Translational Science Institute,
Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ann Dozier
- Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry,
University of Rochester, Rochester,
NY, USA
| | - Daniel Ford
- Johns Hopkins University Institute for Clinical and Translational
Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Natalie Schlesinger
- The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational
Science, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carrie Dykes
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of
Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Issis Kelly-Pumarol
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Clinical and Translational
Science Institute, Winston-Salem, NC,
USA
| | - Nan Kennedy
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville,
TN, USA
| | - Cassie Lewis-Land
- Johns Hopkins University Institute for Clinical and Translational
Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sierra Lindo
- Duke Clinical Translational Science Institute,
Durham, NC, USA
| | - Liz Martinez
- Johns Hopkins University Institute for Clinical and Translational
Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Musty
- Duke Clinical Translational Science Institute,
Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Roger Vaughan
- The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational
Science, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynne Wagenknecht
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Clinical and Translational
Science Institute, Winston-Salem, NC,
USA
| | - Scott Carey
- Johns Hopkins University Institute for Clinical and Translational
Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cameron Coffran
- The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational
Science, New York, NY, USA
| | - James Goodrich
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Office of Clinical
Research, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Pavithra Panjala
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of
Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Sameer Cheema
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Office of Clinical
Research, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Adam Qureshi
- The Rockefeller University Center for Clinical and Translational
Science, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ellis Thomas
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt
University, Nashville, TN,
USA
| | - Lindsay O’Neill
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt
University, Nashville, TN,
USA
| | | | - Paul Harris
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt
University, Nashville, TN,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pang PS, Berger DA, Mahler SA, Li X, Pressler SJ, Lane KA, Bischof JJ, Char D, Diercks D, Jones AE, Hess EP, Levy P, Miller JB, Venkat A, Harrison NE, Collins SP. Short-Stay Units vs Routine Admission From the Emergency Department in Patients With Acute Heart Failure: The SSU-AHF Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2350511. [PMID: 38198141 PMCID: PMC10782263 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance More than 80% of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute heart failure (AHF) are hospitalized. With more than 1 million annual hospitalizations for AHF in the US, safe and effective alternatives are needed. Care for AHF in short-stay units (SSUs) may be safe and more efficient than hospitalization, especially for lower-risk patients, but randomized clinical trial data are lacking. Objective To compare the effectiveness of SSU care vs hospitalization in lower-risk patients with AHF. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter randomized clinical trial randomly assigned low-risk patients with AHF 1:1 to SSU or hospital admission from the ED. Patients received follow-up at 30 and 90 days post discharge. The study began December 6, 2017, and was completed on July 22, 2021. The data were analyzed between March 27, 2020, and November 11, 2023. Intervention Randomized post-ED disposition to less than 24 hours of SSU care vs hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures The study was designed to detect at least 1-day superiority for a primary outcome of days alive and out of hospital (DAOOH) at 30-day follow-up for 534 participants, with an allowance of 10% participant attrition. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, enrollment was truncated at 194 participants. Before unmasking, the primary outcome was changed from DAOOH to an outcome with adequate statistical power: quality of life as measured by the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). The KCCQ-12 scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Results Of the 193 patients enrolled (1 was found ineligible after randomization), the mean (SD) age was 64.8 (14.8) years, 79 (40.9%) were women, and 114 (59.1%) were men. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. The mean (SD) KCCQ-12 summary score between the SSU and hospitalization arms at 30 days was 51.3 (25.7) vs 45.8 (23.8) points, respectively (P = .19). Participants in the SSU arm had 1.6 more DAOOH at 30-day follow-up than those in the hospitalization arm (median [IQR], 26.9 [24.4-28.8] vs 25.4 [22.0-27.7] days; P = .02). Adverse events were uncommon and similar in both arms. Conclusions and Relevance The findings show that the SSU strategy was no different than hospitalization with regard to KCCQ-12 score, superior for more DAOOH, and safe for lower-risk patients with AHF. These findings of lower health care utilization with the SSU strategy need to be definitively tested in an adequately powered study. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03302910.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S. Pang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - David A. Berger
- Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Simon A. Mahler
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Xiaochun Li
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | | | - Kathleen A. Lane
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Jason J. Bischof
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Douglas Char
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Deborah Diercks
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Alan E. Jones
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson
| | - Erik P. Hess
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Phillip Levy
- Wayne State University School of Medicine and Integrative Biosciences Center, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Joseph B. Miller
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Arvind Venkat
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicholas E. Harrison
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Sean P. Collins
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ilias MR, Zhang X, Stinson N, Carrington K, Huff E, Freeman N, Wilson-Frederick S, Ampey B, Rajapakse N, Johnson LE, Mensah GA. Establishing a Community Engagement Consultative Resource: A CEAL Initiative. Am J Public Health 2024; 114:S22-S24. [PMID: 37733995 PMCID: PMC10785170 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2023.307385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maliha R Ilias
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| | - Xinzhi Zhang
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| | - Nathaniel Stinson
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| | - Kelli Carrington
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| | - Erynn Huff
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| | - Naomi Freeman
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| | - Shondelle Wilson-Frederick
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| | - Bryan Ampey
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| | - Nishadi Rajapakse
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| | - Lenora E Johnson
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| | - George A Mensah
- Maliha R. Ilias and Xinzhi Zhang are with the Health Inequities and Global Health Branch, Center for Translation Research and Implementation Sciences (CTRIS), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD. Nathaniel Stinson and Kelli Carrington are with the Division of Community Health and Population Science, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIH. Erynn Huff is with the Other Transaction Authority Office, Office of Management, NHLBI. Naomi Freeman is with the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH. Bryan Ampey is with the Immediate Office of the Director, NHLBI. Nishadi Rajapakse is with the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. Shondelle Wilson-Frederick and Lenora E. Johnson are with the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education, and Communication, NHLBI. George A. Mensah is with CTRIS
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alvarado J, Strong LL, Buzcu-Guven B, Thompson LB, Cantu E, Carrier CC, Chukwu CD, Harris CL, Melendez LK, Roberson CL, Ross AM, Russell SC, Sanchez P, Tahanan A, Zdenek BC, Reininger BM, McNeill LH. Community scientist program provides bi-directional communication and co-learning between researchers and community members. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 8:e18. [PMID: 38384927 PMCID: PMC10879996 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Community involvement in research is key to translating science into practice, and new approaches to engaging community members in research design and implementation are needed. The Community Scientist Program, established at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston in 2018 and expanded to two other Texas institutions in 2021, provides researchers with rapid feedback from community members on study feasibility and design, cultural appropriateness, participant recruitment, and research implementation. This paper aims to describe the Community Scientist Program and assess Community Scientists' and researchers' satisfaction with the program. We present the analysis of the data collected from 116 Community Scientists and 64 researchers who attended 100 feedback sessions, across three regions of Texas including Northeast Texas, Houston, and Rio Grande Valley between June 2018 and December 2022. Community Scientists stated that the feedback sessions increased their knowledge and changed their perception of research. All researchers (100%) were satisfied with the feedback and reported that it influenced their current and future research methods. Our evaluation demonstrates that the key features of the Community Scientist Program such as follow-up evaluations, effective bi-directional communication, and fair compensation transform how research is conducted and contribute to reducing health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Alvarado
- School of Health Professions, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA
| | - Larkin L. Strong
- Department of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Birnur Buzcu-Guven
- Department of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Leonetta B. Thompson
- Department of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Erica Cantu
- UTHealth Houston School of Public Health Regional Campus at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, USA
| | - Chelsea C. Carrier
- Department of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chiamaka D. Chukwu
- Department of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cassandra L. Harris
- Department of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luz K. Melendez
- UTHealth Houston School of Public Health Regional Campus at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, USA
| | - Crystal L. Roberson
- Department of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Angela M. Ross
- UTHealth Houston McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sophia C. Russell
- Department of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pablo Sanchez
- UTHealth Houston School of Public Health Regional Campus at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, USA
| | | | - Blair C. Zdenek
- UTHealth Houston School of Public Health Regional Campus at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, USA
| | - Belinda M. Reininger
- UTHealth Houston School of Public Health Regional Campus at Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, USA
| | - Lorna H. McNeill
- Department of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chin MH, Afsar-Manesh N, Bierman AS, Chang C, Colón-Rodríguez CJ, Dullabh P, Duran DG, Fair M, Hernandez-Boussard T, Hightower M, Jain A, Jordan WB, Konya S, Moore RH, Moore TT, Rodriguez R, Shaheen G, Snyder LP, Srinivasan M, Umscheid CA, Ohno-Machado L. Guiding Principles to Address the Impact of Algorithm Bias on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health and Health Care. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2345050. [PMID: 38100101 PMCID: PMC11181958 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Health care algorithms are used for diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, risk stratification, and allocation of resources. Bias in the development and use of algorithms can lead to worse outcomes for racial and ethnic minoritized groups and other historically marginalized populations such as individuals with lower income. Objective To provide a conceptual framework and guiding principles for mitigating and preventing bias in health care algorithms to promote health and health care equity. Evidence Review The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institute for Minority Health and Health Disparities convened a diverse panel of experts to review evidence, hear from stakeholders, and receive community feedback. Findings The panel developed a conceptual framework to apply guiding principles across an algorithm's life cycle, centering health and health care equity for patients and communities as the goal, within the wider context of structural racism and discrimination. Multiple stakeholders can mitigate and prevent bias at each phase of the algorithm life cycle, including problem formulation (phase 1); data selection, assessment, and management (phase 2); algorithm development, training, and validation (phase 3); deployment and integration of algorithms in intended settings (phase 4); and algorithm monitoring, maintenance, updating, or deimplementation (phase 5). Five principles should guide these efforts: (1) promote health and health care equity during all phases of the health care algorithm life cycle; (2) ensure health care algorithms and their use are transparent and explainable; (3) authentically engage patients and communities during all phases of the health care algorithm life cycle and earn trustworthiness; (4) explicitly identify health care algorithmic fairness issues and trade-offs; and (5) establish accountability for equity and fairness in outcomes from health care algorithms. Conclusions and Relevance Multiple stakeholders must partner to create systems, processes, regulations, incentives, standards, and policies to mitigate and prevent algorithmic bias. Reforms should implement guiding principles that support promotion of health and health care equity in all phases of the algorithm life cycle as well as transparency and explainability, authentic community engagement and ethical partnerships, explicit identification of fairness issues and trade-offs, and accountability for equity and fairness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Christine Chang
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Malika Fair
- Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC
| | | | | | - Anjali Jain
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland
| | | | - Stephen Konya
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Washington, DC
| | - Roslyn Holliday Moore
- US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wilkins CH, Miller ST, Richmond AN, Carrasquillo O. Community-Engaged Research - Essential to Addressing Health Inequities. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1928-1931. [PMID: 37982404 PMCID: PMC11088953 DOI: 10.1056/nejmp2307774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Consuelo H. Wilkins
- Office of Health Equity and Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | - Olveen Carrasquillo
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lum HD, Fischer S, Ytell K, Scherer L, O’Leary ST, Elk R, Hurley S, Washington KT, DeCamp M. Elevating Home Health Aide Input in Co-Creation of COVID-19 Vaccine Messaging. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2023:10499091231218455. [PMID: 37991051 PMCID: PMC11109014 DOI: 10.1177/10499091231218455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Home health aides (HHAs) care for patients highly vulnerable to COVID-19 and are disproportionately women from minority communities that have been adversely impacted by COVID-19. Yet, direct care workers are less likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19 compared to others. As the pandemic evolves, interest in vaccination may decrease suggesting the need for relevant vaccine messaging to HHAs. Objectives: (1) to describe HHAs and administrators' perspectives related to COVID-19 vaccination messaging, and (2) to co-design a Communication Toolkit to create COVID-19 vaccine messages. Methods: HHAs and administrators from 4 geographically diverse Palliative Care Research Cooperative (PCRC) hospice agencies were recruited for a multi-method process involving qualitative interviews (17 HHAs and 5 administrators), community engagement (CE) studios, and development of a Communication Toolkit. Interviews were guided by the PEN-3 conceptual framework to explore barriers and facilitators to vaccination. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Despite power differences, HHAs and administrators share a commitment to protecting patients affected by serious illness. HHAs desire vaccine messaging that includes personal narratives, good news about the vaccine, and facts about benefits and risks of the vaccine. Preferred message formats include the agency intranet, daily briefings, or "little seeds" (ie, short, high-impact information). Through the studios, HHAs provided input on a Toolkit prototype with messages tailored to the context of home care. Conclusions: Grounded in the commitment of HHAs and administrators to protecting vulnerable patients, we co-created an adaptable Communication Toolkit to address COVID-19 vaccination misinformation and mistrust among direct care workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hillary D. Lum
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stacy Fischer
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kate Ytell
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laura Scherer
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sean T. O’Leary
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Divisions of Infectious Diseases/Epidemiology and General Academic Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ronit Elk
- Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Karla T. Washington
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew DeCamp
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hamer MK, Sobczak C, Whittington L, Bowyer RL, Koren R, Begay JA, Lum HD, Ginde AA, Wynia MK, Kwan BM. Real-world data to evaluate effects of a multi-level dissemination strategy on access, outcomes, and equity of monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e258. [PMID: 38229899 PMCID: PMC10789982 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Multi-level dissemination strategies are needed to increase equitable access to effective treatment for high-risk outpatients with COVID-19, particularly among patients from disproportionately affected communities. Yet assessing population-level impact of such strategies can be challenging. Methods In collaboration with key contributors in Colorado, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate a multi-level dissemination strategy for neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment. Real-world data included county-level, de-identified output from a statewide mAb referral registry linked with publicly available epidemiological data. Outcomes included weekly number of mAb referrals, unique referring clinicians, and COVID-19 hospitalization rates. We assessed weekly changes in outcomes after dissemination strategies launched in July 2021. Results Overall, mAb referrals increased from a weekly average of 3.0 to 15.5, with an increase of 1.3 to 42.1 additional referrals per county in each post-period week (p < .05). Number of referring clinicians increased from a weekly average of 2.2 to 9.7, with an additional 1.5 to 22.2 unique referring clinicians observed per county per week beginning 5 weeks post-launch (p < .001). Larger effects were observed in communities specifically prioritized by the dissemination strategies. There were no observed differences in COVID-19 hospitalization rates between counties with and without mAb treatment sites. Conclusion Real-world data can be used to estimate population impact of multi-level dissemination strategies. The launch of these strategies corresponded with increases in mAb referrals, but no apparent population-level effects on hospitalization outcomes. Strengths of this analytic approach include pragmatism and efficiency, whereas limitations include inability to control for other contemporaneous trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mika K. Hamer
- Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado
Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO,
USA
| | - Chelsea Sobczak
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado
Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO,
USA
| | | | | | - Ramona Koren
- Patient Partner/Community Affiliate, University of Colorado
Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO,
USA
| | - Joel A. Begay
- Johns Hopkins Center for Indigenous Health, Department of International
Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,
Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hillary D. Lum
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine,
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora,
CO, USA
| | - Adit A. Ginde
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado
School of Medicine, Aurora, CO,
USA
- Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute,
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,
Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew K. Wynia
- Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado
Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO,
USA
- Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute,
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,
Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado
School of Medicine, Aurora, CO,
USA
| | - Bethany M. Kwan
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado
Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO,
USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado
School of Medicine, Aurora, CO,
USA
- Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute,
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus,
Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cheng AC, Dunkel L, Byrne LM, Tischbein M, Burts D, Hamilton J, Phillips K, Embry B, Tan J, Olson E, Harris PA. ResearchMatch on FHIR: Development and evaluation of a recruitment registry and electronic health record system interface for volunteer profile completion. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e222. [PMID: 38028340 PMCID: PMC10643912 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Obtaining complete and accurate information in recruitment registries is essential for matching potential participants to research studies for which they qualify. Since electronic health record (EHR) systems are required to make patient data available to external systems, an interface between EHRs and recruitment registries may improve accuracy and completeness of volunteers' profiles. We tested this hypothesis on ResearchMatch (RM), a disease- and institution-neutral recruitment registry with 1357 studies across 255 institutions. Methods We developed an interface where volunteers signing up for RM can authorize transfer of demographic data, medical conditions, and medications from the EHR into a registration form. We obtained feedback from a panel of community members to determine acceptability of the planned integration. We then developed the EHR interface and performed an evaluation study of 100 patients to determine whether RM profiles generated with EHR-assisted adjudication included more conditions and medications than those without the EHR connection. Results Community member feedback revealed that members of the public were willing to authenticate into the EHR from RM with proper messaging about choice and privacy. The evaluation study showed that out of 100 participants, 75 included more conditions and 69 included more medications in RM profiles completed with the EHR connection than those without. Participants also completed the EHR-connected profiles in 16 fewer seconds than non-EHR-connected profiles. Conclusions The EHR to RM integration could lead to more complete profiles, less participant burden, and better study matches for many of the over 148,000 volunteers who participate in ResearchMatch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex C. Cheng
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Leah Dunkel
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Delicia Burts
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jahi Hamilton
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kaysi Phillips
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Bryce Embry
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jason Tan
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Erik Olson
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paul A. Harris
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fuentes-Alabí S, Carpenter K, Shea M, Vásquez L, Benitez Majano S, Maza M, Luciani S, Albanti I. Storytelling workshop to encourage stakeholder engagement with the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2023; 47:e148. [PMID: 37818485 PMCID: PMC10561658 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2023.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Storytelling can enhance stakeholder engagement and support the implementation of the World Health Organization and Pan American Health Organization's (PAHO) Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer, which aims to improve care globally for children with cancer. The Initiative aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, addressing health, education, inequalities and international collaboration. This report describes the design and implementation of a workshop that used storytelling through film to encourage stakeholders in national cancer control plans to engage with the Initiative in its focal countries in Central America, the Dominican Republic and Haiti. A six-step process was used to develop the virtual workshop hosted by PAHO: (i) define the audience; (ii) define the goals of storytelling; (iii) build an appropriate storyline, including choosing a platform and content, and addressing group dynamics and the length of the film; (iv) guide the workshop's design and implementation with current theoretical frameworks, including the Socioecological Model of Health and the Theory of Change; (v) design interactive group exercises; and (vi) disseminate workshop results. The skills-building component of the day-long workshop included 80 representatives from eight countries in the Region of the Americas, with participants representing pediatric oncology, hospital administration, ministries of health, nonprofit foundations, the scientific community and public health organizations. Outputs from the workshop included (i) a summary report, (ii) an empathy word cloud with live reactions from participants, (iii) qualitative responses (i.e. quotes from participants), (iv) stakeholders' analyses and (v) a prioritization matrix for country-level strategic activities that could be undertaken to strengthen health systems when caring for children with cancer. The workshop used storytelling through film to try to reduce health inequalities and have a regional impact. Combining art, public health and medicine, the workshop created positive change by sharing real-life experiences. Commitment was fostered among stakeholders through their engagement with the workshop, which aimed to increase their awareness of the need and advocacy to improve health systems and enhance access to health care for this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soad Fuentes-Alabí
- Pan American Health OrganizationWashington, D.C.United States of AmericaPan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Kendall Carpenter
- Boston Children’s HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States of AmericaBoston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
| | - Meghan Shea
- Persistent ProductionsRockportUnited States of AmericaPersistent Productions, Rockport, United States of America
| | - Liliana Vásquez
- Pan American Health OrganizationWashington, D.C.United States of AmericaPan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Sara Benitez Majano
- Pan American Health OrganizationWashington, D.C.United States of AmericaPan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Mauricio Maza
- Pan American Health OrganizationWashington, D.C.United States of AmericaPan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Silvana Luciani
- Pan American Health OrganizationWashington, D.C.United States of AmericaPan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Irini Albanti
- Harvard Humanitarian InitiativeHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUnited States of AmericaHarvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bridges MS, Curran M, Neal C, Piasta S, Fleming K, Hogan T. Adapting Curricula for Children With Language Comprehension Deficits. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2023; 54:1066-1079. [PMID: 37459612 PMCID: PMC10734896 DOI: 10.1044/2023_lshss-22-00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We will describe how a multisite research team adapted a language-focused curriculum to be used in a scale-up project. Specifically, we identified underlying principles to modify a Tier 1 whole-classroom language comprehension-focused curriculum to be used as a Tier 2 small-group curriculum with children identified as at risk for low language comprehension, including children with developmental language disorder (DLD). METHOD We discuss how researchers used the following five guiding principles to adapt a curriculum for children at risk for low language comprehension, including children with DLD: (a) increased and ongoing professional development, (b) simplification of language input, (c) increased scaffolding, (d) attention to distributed practice, and (e) materials to support diversity and inclusion. RESULTS We used these guiding principles to modify a popular language-based curriculum used in schools across the country. CONCLUSION This clinical focus article showcases how guiding principles and frameworks for adaptation, within implementation science, can serve as a guidepost for speech-language pathologists and other educators who are adapting or scaling up a curriculum or intervention that was not designed for their target population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Corinne Neal
- The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Brockhoven F, Raphael M, Currier J, Jäderholm C, Mody P, Shannon J, Starling B, Turner-Uaandja H, Pashayan N, Arteaga I. REPRESENT recommendations: improving inclusion and trust in cancer early detection research. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1195-1208. [PMID: 37689805 PMCID: PMC10575902 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02414-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Detecting cancer early is essential to improving cancer outcomes. Minoritized groups remain underrepresented in early detection cancer research, which means that findings and interventions are not generalisable across the population, thus exacerbating disparities in cancer outcomes. In light of these challenges, this paper sets out twelve recommendations to build relations of trust and include minoritized groups in ED cancer research. The Recommendations were formulated by a range of stakeholders at the 2022 REPRESENT consensus-building workshop and are based on empirical data, including a systematic literature review and two ethnographic case studies in the US and the UK. The recommendations focus on: Long-term relationships that build trust; Sharing available resources; Inclusive and accessible communication; Harnessing community expertise; Unique risks and benefits; Compensation and support; Representative samples; Demographic data; Post-research support; Sharing results; Research training; Diversifying research teams. For each recommendation, the paper outlines the rationale, specifications for how different stakeholders may implement it, and advice for best practices. Instead of isolated recruitment, public involvement and engagement activities, the recommendations here aim to advance mutually beneficial and trusting relationships between researchers and research participants embedded in ED cancer research institutions.
Collapse
Grants
- EICEDAAP\100011 Cancer Research UK
- Cancer Research UK (CRUK)
- The International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection, an alliance between Cancer Research UK [EICEDAAP\100011], Canary Center at Stanford University, the University of Cambridge, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, University College London and the University of Manchester.
- This work was supported by the International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection, an alliance between Cancer Research UK [EICEDAAP\100011], Canary Center at Stanford University, the University of Cambridge, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, University College London and the University of Manchester.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maya Raphael
- Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jessica Currier
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Christina Jäderholm
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Perveez Mody
- Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Bella Starling
- Vocal, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ignacia Arteaga
- Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ming DY, Wong W, Jones KA, Antonelli RC, Gujral N, Gonzales S, Rogers U, Ratliff W, Shah N, King HA. Feasibility of Implementation of a Mobile Digital Personal Health Record to Coordinate Care for Children and Youth With Special Health Care Needs in Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e46847. [PMID: 37728977 PMCID: PMC10551780 DOI: 10.2196/46847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health record (EHR)-integrated digital personal health records (PHRs) via Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) are promising digital health tools to support care coordination (CC) for children and youth with special health care needs but remain widely unadopted; as their adoption grows, mixed methods and implementation research could guide real-world implementation and evaluation. OBJECTIVE This study (1) evaluates the feasibility of an FHIR-enabled digital PHR app for CC for children and youth with special health care needs, (2) characterizes determinants of implementation, and (3) explores associations between adoption and patient- or family-reported outcomes. METHODS This nonrandomized, single-arm, prospective feasibility trial will test an FHIR-enabled digital PHR app's use among families of children and youth with special health care needs in primary care settings. Key app features are FHIR-enabled access to structured data from the child's medical record, families' abilities to longitudinally track patient- or family-centered care goals, and sharing progress toward care goals with the child's primary care provider via a clinician dashboard. We shall enroll 40 parents or caregivers of children and youth with special health care needs to use the app for 6 months. Inclusion criteria for children and youth with special health care needs are age 0-16 years; primary care at a participating site; complex needs benefiting from CC; high hospitalization risk in the next 6 months; English speaking; having requisite technology at home (internet access, Apple iOS mobile device); and an active web-based EHR patient portal account to which a parent or caregiver has full proxy access. Digital prescriptions will be used to disseminate study recruitment materials directly to eligible participants via their existing EHR patient portal accounts. We will apply an intervention mixed methods design to link quantitative and qualitative (semistructured interviews and family engagement panels with parents of children and youth with special health care needs) data and characterize implementation determinants. Two CC frameworks (Pediatric Care Coordination Framework; Patient-Centered Medical Home) and 2 evaluation frameworks (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Technology Acceptance Model) provide theoretical foundations for this study. RESULTS Participant recruitment began in fall 2022, before which we identified >300 potentially eligible patients in EHR data. A family engagement panel in fall 2021 generated formative feedback from family partners. Integrated analysis of pretrial quantitative and qualitative data informed family-centered enhancements to study procedures. CONCLUSIONS Our findings will inform how to integrate an FHIR-enabled digital PHR app for children and youth with special health care needs into clinical care. Mixed methods and implementation research will help strengthen implementation in diverse clinical settings. The study is positioned to advance knowledge of how to use digital health innovations for improving care and outcomes for children and youth with special health care needs and their families. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05513235; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05513235. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/46847.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Y Ming
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Willis Wong
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Kelley A Jones
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Richard C Antonelli
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Nitin Gujral
- Innovation and Digital Health Accelerator, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sarah Gonzales
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Ursula Rogers
- AI Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - William Ratliff
- Duke Institute for Health Innovation, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Nirmish Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Heather A King
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veteran Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kimminau KS, Jernigan C, Krebill H, Douglas S, Peltzer J, Hamilton-Reeves J, Chen RC, Jensen R. Roadmap to engagement: Bringing patient partners into cancer research and beyond. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e178. [PMID: 37654779 PMCID: PMC10465315 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The University of Kansas Cancer Center (KU Cancer Center) initiated an engagement program to leverage the lived experience of individuals and families with cancer. KU Cancer Center faculty, staff, and patient partners built an infrastructure to achieve a patient-designed, patient-led, and research-informed engagement program called Patient and Investigator Voices Organizing Together (PIVOT). This special communication offers an engagement roadmap that can be replicated, scaled, and adopted at other cancer centers and academic health systems. PIVOT demonstrates that collaboration among academic leaders, investigators, and people with a lived experience yields a patient-centered, vibrant environment that enriches the research enterprise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim S. Kimminau
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Cheryl Jernigan
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Sara Douglas
- Patient Advocacy and Engagement Talaris Therapeutics, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Jill Peltzer
- University of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Jill Hamilton-Reeves
- KU Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Ronald C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Roy Jensen
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stephenson-Hunter C, Yusuf Y, Larson R, Campanella J, Gutnick DN. What matters to us: Bridging research and accurate information through dialogue (BRAID) to build community trust and cultivate vaccine confidence. Prev Med Rep 2023; 34:102253. [PMID: 37252070 PMCID: PMC10199752 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 infections and mortality, vaccine uptake in Black and Latinx populations remained disproportionately low, including in the Bronx, New York. In response, we used the Bridging Research, Accurate Information, and Dialogue (BRAID) model to elicit community members' COViD-19 vaccine-related perspectives and informational needs and inform strategies to improve vaccine acceptance. We conducted a longitudinal qualitative study over 13 months (May 2021-June 2022), with 25 community experts from the Bronx including community health workers, and representatives from community-based organizations. Each expert participated in 1-5 of the 12 conversation circles conducted via Zoom. Clinicians and scientists, attended circles to provide additional information in content areas identified by the experts. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the conversations. Five overarching themes, related to trust, emerged: (1) disparate and unjust treatment from institutions; (2) the impact of rapidly changing COVID messages in the lay press (a different story every day); (3) influencers of vaccine intention; (4) strategies to build community trust; and (5) what matters to community experts [us]. Our findings highlighted the influence of factors, such as health communication, on trust (or lack thereof) and vaccine intention. They also reinforce that creating safe spaces for dialogue and listening and responding to community concerns in real time are effective trust-building strategies. The BRAID model fostered open discussion about the factors that influence vaccine uptake and empowered participants to share accurate information with their community. Our experience suggests that the model can be adapted to address many public health issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara Stephenson-Hunter
- Harold and Muriel Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
| | - Yousra Yusuf
- Section for Health Equity, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States
| | - Rita Larson
- Section for Health Equity, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States
| | - James Campanella
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
| | - Damara N. Gutnick
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pham TV, Doorley J, Kenney M, Joo JH, Shallcross AJ, Kincade M, Jackson J, Vranceanu AM. Addressing chronic pain disparities between Black and White people: a narrative review of socio-ecological determinants. Pain Manag 2023; 13:473-496. [PMID: 37650756 PMCID: PMC10621777 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
A 2019 review article modified the socio-ecological model to contextualize pain disparities among different ethnoracial groups; however, the broad scope of this 2019 review necessitates deeper socio-ecological inspection of pain within each ethnoracial group. In this narrative review, we expanded upon this 2019 article by adopting inclusion criteria that would capture a more nuanced spectrum of socio-ecological findings on chronic pain within the Black community. Our search yielded a large, rich body of literature composed of 174 articles that shed further socio-ecological light on how chronic pain within the Black community is influenced by implicit bias among providers, psychological and physical comorbidities, experiences of societal and institutional racism and biomedical distrust, and the interplay among these factors. Moving forward, research and public-policy development must carefully take into account these socio-ecological factors before scaling up pre-existing solutions with questionable benefit for the chronic pain needs of Black individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony V Pham
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - James Doorley
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Martha Kenney
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jin Hui Joo
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Amanda J Shallcross
- Wellness & Preventative Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Michael Kincade
- Center for Alzheimer's Research & Treatment, Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Centre, Boston, MA 02129, USA
| | - Jonathan Jackson
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Thomas J, Eckstrom E, Lam K, Sullivan S, Bentley-Edwards K, Gierisch JM, Bowling CB. Recommendations for using the 5Ts Framework to support research inclusion across the lifespan. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:2664-2669. [PMID: 37036034 PMCID: PMC10495931 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Thomas
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Elizabeth Eckstrom
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
- Oregon Clinical & Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - K.K. Lam
- Duke Clinical & Translational Science Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Sydney Sullivan
- Duke Clinical & Translational Science Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Keisha Bentley-Edwards
- Samuel DuBois Cook Center On Social Equity, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Jennifer M. Gierisch
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC
| | - C. Barrett Bowling
- Durham Veterans Affairs Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), Durham, NC
- Divison of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Evans CD, Nanda JP, Ouyang P, Bone L, Byiringiro S, Lacanienta C, Clark R, Weston C, Han HR, Terkowitz M, Bates-Hopkins B, Galiatsatos P, Xu AJ, Stevens S, Himmelfarb CR. Integrating community voices in the research continuum: Perspectives on a consultation service. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e177. [PMID: 37654776 PMCID: PMC10465313 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The Community Research Advisory Council (C-RAC) of the Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research was established in 2009 to provide community-engaged research consultation services. In 2016-2017, C-RAC members and researchers were surveyed on their consultation experiences. Survey results and a 2019 stakeholder meeting proceeding helped redesign the consultation services. Transitioning to virtual consultations during COVID-19, the redesigning involved increasing visibility, providing consultation materials in advance, expanding member training, and effective communications. An increase in consultations from 28 (2009-2017) to 114 (2020-2022) was observed. Implementing stakeholder-researcher inputs is critical to holistic and sustained community-engaged research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Crystal D. Evans
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joy P. Nanda
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pamela Ouyang
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lee Bone
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Samuel Byiringiro
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cyd Lacanienta
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Roger Clark
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christine Weston
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hae-Ra Han
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mia Terkowitz
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Barbara Bates-Hopkins
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Panagis Galiatsatos
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ashley Jingzhi Xu
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sarah Stevens
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cheryl R. Himmelfarb
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Community Research Advisory Council, The Johns Hopkins ICTR, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nanda JP, Clark RS, Harrison JA, Ouyang P, Lacanienta C, Himmelfarb C. Community-academic partnerships to embrace and ensure diversity, equity, and inclusion in translational science: Evidence of successful community engagement. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e188. [PMID: 37745925 PMCID: PMC10514689 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Community-Research Advisory Councils (C-RAC) provide a unique mechanism for building sustainable community-academic partnership, fostering bidirectional understanding of complex research issues, disseminating timely research findings, and thereby improving public trust in science. Created in 2009, the Johns Hopkins C-RAC has a mission to achieve diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) of stakeholders across the entire research continuum. It has nurtured over a decade of partnership among community and academic stakeholders toward addressing health disparity, health equity, structural racism, and discrimination. Evidence of successful strategies to ensure DEI in partnership and lessons learned are illustrated in this special communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy P. Nanda
- Community Research Advisory Council, Johns Hopkins Institute of Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Roger S. Clark
- Community Research Advisory Council, Johns Hopkins Institute of Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Ayana Harrison
- Community Research Advisory Council, Johns Hopkins Institute of Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pamela Ouyang
- Community Research Advisory Council, Johns Hopkins Institute of Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cyd Lacanienta
- Community Research Advisory Council, Johns Hopkins Institute of Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cheryl Himmelfarb
- Community Research Advisory Council, Johns Hopkins Institute of Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lemon SC, Joseph HA, Williams S, Brown C, Aytur S, Catalano K, Chacker S, Goins KV, Rudolph L, Whitehead S, Zimmerman S, Schramm PJ. Reimagining the Role of Health Departments and Their Partners in Addressing Climate Change: Revising the Building Resilience against Climate Effects (BRACE) Framework. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6447. [PMID: 37568988 PMCID: PMC10419192 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20156447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
Public health departments have important roles to play in addressing the local health impacts of climate change, yet are often not well prepared to do so. The Climate and Health Program (CHP) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) created the Building Resilience Against Climate Effects (BRACE) framework in 2012 as a five-step planning framework to support public health departments and their partners to respond to the health impacts of climate change. CHP has initiated a process to revise the framework to address learnings from a decade of experience with BRACE and advances in the science and practice of addressing climate and health. The aim of this manuscript is to describe the methodology for revising the BRACE framework and the expected outputs of this process. Development of the revised framework and associated guidance and tools will be guided by a multi-sector expert panel, and finalization will be informed by usability testing. Planned revisions to BRACE will (1) be consistent with the vision of Public Health 3.0 and position health departments as "chief health strategists" in their communities, who are responsible for facilitating the establishment and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations with community organizations, other partners, and other government agencies to address local climate impacts and prevent further harm to historically underserved communities; (2) place health equity as a central, guiding tenet; (3) incorporate greenhouse gas mitigation strategies, in addition to its previous focus on climate adaptation; and (4) feature a new set of tools to support BRACE implementation among a diverse set of users. The revised BRACE framework and the associated tools will support public health departments and their partners as they strive to prevent and reduce the negative health impacts of climate change for everyone, while focusing on improving health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephenie C. Lemon
- Prevention Research Center, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA;
| | - Heather A. Joseph
- Climate and Health Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; (H.A.J.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (P.J.S.)
| | - Samantha Williams
- Climate and Health Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; (H.A.J.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (P.J.S.)
| | - Claudia Brown
- Climate and Health Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; (H.A.J.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (P.J.S.)
| | - Semra Aytur
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Health and Human Services, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA;
| | - Katherine Catalano
- Center for Climate, Health and Equity, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC 20001, USA;
| | | | - Karin V. Goins
- Prevention Research Center, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA;
| | - Linda Rudolph
- Center for Climate Change and Health, Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA 94607, USA;
| | - Sandra Whitehead
- College of Professional Studies, Sustainable Urban Planning Program, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA;
| | | | - Paul J. Schramm
- Climate and Health Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; (H.A.J.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (P.J.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hanley DF, Bernard GR, Wilkins CH, Selker HP, Dwyer JP, Dean JM, Benjamin DK, Dunsmore SE, Waddy SP, Wiley KL, Palm ME, Mould WA, Ford DF, Burr JS, Huvane J, Lane K, Poole L, Edwards TL, Kennedy N, Boone LR, Bell J, Serdoz E, Byrne LM, Harris PA. Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e170. [PMID: 37654775 PMCID: PMC10465321 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
New technologies and disruptions related to Coronavirus disease-2019 have led to expansion of decentralized approaches to clinical trials. Remote tools and methods hold promise for increasing trial efficiency and reducing burdens and barriers by facilitating participation outside of traditional clinical settings and taking studies directly to participants. The Trial Innovation Network, established in 2016 by the National Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Science to address critical roadblocks in clinical research and accelerate the translational research process, has consulted on over 400 research study proposals to date. Its recommendations for decentralized approaches have included eConsent, participant-informed study design, remote intervention, study task reminders, social media recruitment, and return of results for participants. Some clinical trial elements have worked well when decentralized, while others, including remote recruitment and patient monitoring, need further refinement and assessment to determine their value. Partially decentralized, or "hybrid" trials, offer a first step to optimizing remote methods. Decentralized processes demonstrate potential to improve urban-rural diversity, but their impact on inclusion of racially and ethnically marginalized populations requires further study. To optimize inclusive participation in decentralized clinical trials, efforts must be made to build trust among marginalized communities, and to ensure access to remote technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel F. Hanley
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gordon R. Bernard
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Consuelo H. Wilkins
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Harry P. Selker
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jamie P. Dwyer
- University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Utah Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Daniel Kelly Benjamin
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah E. Dunsmore
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Salina P. Waddy
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kenneth L. Wiley
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Marisha E. Palm
- Department of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - W. Andrew Mould
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins BIOS Clinical Trials Coordinating Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel F. Ford
- Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeri S. Burr
- University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Karen Lane
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lori Poole
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Terri L. Edwards
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Nan Kennedy
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Leslie R. Boone
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jasmine Bell
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Emily Serdoz
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Loretta M. Byrne
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paul A. Harris
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kious BM, Pabst Peggy Battin M. A Focus Group Study of the Views of Persons with a History of Psychiatric Illness about Psychiatric Medical Aid in Dying. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2023; 15:1-10. [PMID: 37339278 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2224591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical aid in dying (MAID) is legal in a number of countries, including some states in the U.S. While MAID is only permitted for terminal illnesses in the U.S., some other countries allow it for persons with psychiatric illness. Psychiatric MAID, however, raises unique ethical concerns, especially related to its effects on mental illness stigma and on how persons with psychiatric illnesses would come to feel about treatment and suicide. To explore those concerns, we conducted several focus groups with persons with lived experience of mental illness. METHODS We conducted three video-conference-based focus groups involving adults residing in the U.S. who reported a prior diagnosis of any psychiatric illness. Only participants who reported thinking that MAID for terminal illness was morally acceptable were included. Focus group participants were asked to respond to a series of four questions. Groups were facilitated by a coordinator who was independent of the research team. RESULTS A total of 22 persons participated in the focus groups. The majority of participants had depression and anxiety disorders; no participants had psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Many participants strongly favored permitting psychiatric MAID, generally on the basis of respect for autonomy, its effects on stigma, and the severe suffering caused by mental illness. Others expressed concerns, typically related to difficulties in ensuring decision-making capacity and to the risk that MAID would be used in lieu of suicide. CONCLUSIONS Persons with a history of psychiatric illness, as a group, have a diverse array of views about the permissibility of psychiatric MAID, reflecting nuanced consideration of how it relates to the public perception of mental illness, stigma, autonomy, and suicide risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brent M Kious
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Center for Health Ethics, Arts, and Humanities, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Margaret Pabst Peggy Battin
- Department of Philosophy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Center for Health Ethics, Arts, and Humanities, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cassinelli EH, McKinley MC, Kent L, Eastwood KA, Schoenaker DAJM, Trew D, Stoikidou T, McGowan L. Preconception health and care policies, strategies and guidelines in the UK and Ireland: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067822. [PMID: 37147097 PMCID: PMC10163469 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preconception care can significantly improve maternal and infant outcomes, and thus optimise intergenerational health. The aims of this scoping review are to (1) provide an up-to-date summary of preconception health and care strategies, policies, guidelines, frameworks and recommendations across the UK and Ireland and (2) explore preconception health and care services and interventions in Northern Ireland as a case study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This scoping review of grey literature will be conducted as per the Scoping Review Methods Manual by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Arksey-O'Malley framework for scoping studies, and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were conducted on Google Advanced Search, OpenAire, NICE, ProQuest and relevant public health websites in May 2022. Only results published, reviewed or updated between January 2011 and the time of the searches (May 2022) were considered for inclusion. In addition, searches on interventions and services provided in Northern Ireland will be supplemented by consultations and audits with key stakeholders to validate findings, identify other potentially eligible resources and ensure breadth of coverage. Data will be extracted into Excel and coded using NVivo, and ≥10% of the data will be double-coded. A narrative approach with content analysis highlighting key themes and concepts will be used to report findings.Throughout the research cycle, members of the wider public will be involved and engaged with to provide feedback. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required as analyses will be conducted on data available in the public domain. Findings will be shared with relevant stakeholders with the aim to inform future research, practice and decision-making, and disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and infographics. Dissemination plans will be informed by the 'Healthy Reproductive Years' patient and public involvement and engagement advisory panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma H Cassinelli
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Michelle C McKinley
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Lisa Kent
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Kelly-Ann Eastwood
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Danielle A J M Schoenaker
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - David Trew
- Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Laura McGowan
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Leader AE, Melillo RJ, Greene Q, Blanding-Godbolt J, Shimada A, Eischen CM, Aplin AE. Engaging community members in cancer research: an assessment of an NCI-designated cancer center. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:307-319. [PMID: 36598655 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-022-01666-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the importance of engaging community members in research, multiple barriers exist. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to understand the opportunities and challenges of engaging community members in basic, clinical, translational, and population science research. METHODS We designed a survey and an interview guide based on the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Surveys were distributed electronically to all cancer center investigators and interviews were conducted virtually with a select group of basic, clinical, and population science investigators. Survey data (n = 77) were analyzed across all respondents using frequency counts and mean scores; bivariate analyses examined differences in responses by research program affiliation, gender, race, and faculty rank. Interviews (n = 16) were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a reflective thematic approach. RESULTS There was strong agreement among investigators that "Community engagement in research will help the SKCC address cancer disparities in the catchment area" (M 4.2, SD 0.9) and less agreement with items such as "I know how to find and connect with community members who I can engage in my research" (M 2.5, SD 1.3). Investigators mentioned challenges in communicating complex science to a lay audience but were open to training and workshops to acquire skills needed to integrate community members into their research. CONCLUSION Cancer centers should develop and promote training and collaborative opportunities for investigators and community members. Overcoming challenges will lead to more patient- and community-centered cancer research in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E Leader
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Thomas Jefferson University, 833 Chestnut Street, 11th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| | - Rebecca J Melillo
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Ayako Shimada
- Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christine M Eischen
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew E Aplin
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Varela EG, Zeldman J, Bolivar I, Mobley AR. A Qualitative Study to Compare Barriers to Improving Food Security among Households with Young Children in the U.S. as Perceived by Different Types of Stakeholders before and during COVID-19. Nutrients 2023; 15:nu15061438. [PMID: 36986168 PMCID: PMC10055020 DOI: 10.3390/nu15061438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
This qualitative study aimed to determine the perceived barriers of different community stakeholders’ to providing resources for improving food security in households with young children in the U.S. Community stakeholders working with low-income families with children 0–3 years of age in Florida were recruited to represent healthcare (n = 7), community/policy development (n = 6), emergency food assistance (n = 6), early childhood education (n = 7), and nutrition education (n = 6) sectors. In 2020, one-on-one interviews were conducted with each stakeholder in via Zoom, using an interview script based on the PRECEDE–PROCEED model and questions to capture the impacts of COVID-19. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a deductive thematic approach. A cross-tab qualitative analysis was used to compare data across categories of stakeholders. Healthcare professionals and nutrition educators indicated stigma, community/policy development stakeholders indicated a lack of time, emergency food assistance personnel indicated a limited access to food, and early childhood professionals indicated a lack of transportation as the main barriers to food security prior to COVID-19. COVID-19 impacts included the fear of virus exposure, new restrictions, lack of volunteers, and a lack of interest in virtual programming as barriers to food security. As perceived barriers may vary with respect to providing resources to improve food security in families with young children and the COVID-19 impacts persist, coordinated policy, systems, and environmental changes are needed.
Collapse
|
34
|
Jasper EA, Holley SE, Jones SH, Liu M, Israel T, Van Driest SL, Velez Edwards DR. Tutorial: Using Community Engagement Studios to Enhance Pharmacogenetic Study Design for Maximizing Enrollment of Diverse Children and Pregnant People. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 113:607-614. [PMID: 36366911 PMCID: PMC9957793 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Most pharmacogenetic research is conducted in adult, non-pregnant populations of European ancestry. Study of more diverse and special populations is necessary to validate findings and improve health equity. However, there are significant barriers to recruitment of diverse populations for genetic studies, such as mistrust of researchers due to a history of unethical research and ongoing social inequities. Engaging communities and understanding community members' perspectives may help to overcome these barriers and improve research quality. Here, we highlight one method for engaging communities, the Community Engagement Studio (CES), a consultative session that allows researchers to obtain guidance and feedback based on community members' lived experiences. We also provide an example of its use in pharmacogenetic studies. In designing a survey study of knowledge and attitudes around pharmacogenetic testing among children with chronic conditions and pregnant individuals, we sought input from diverse community stakeholders through CESs at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. We participated in two CESs with community stakeholders representing study target populations. Our goals were to learn specific concerns about pharmacogenetic testing and preferred recruitment strategies for these communities. Concerns were expressed about how genetic information would be used beyond the immediate study. Participants emphasized the importance of clarity and transparency in communication to overcome participation hesitancy and mistrust of the study team. Recruitment strategy recommendations ranged from informal notices posted in healthcare settings to provider referrals. The CES enabled us to modify our recruitment methods and research materials to better communicate with populations currently under-represented in pharmacogenetics research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Jasper
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sabrina E Holley
- Center for Pediatric Precision Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sarah H Jones
- Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Michelle Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Tiffany Israel
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sara L Van Driest
- Center for Pediatric Precision Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Digna R Velez Edwards
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bucknor MD, Narayan AK, Spalluto LB. A Framework for Developing Health Equity Initiatives in Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:385-392. [PMID: 36922114 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In recent years, radiology departments have increasingly recognized the extent of health care disparities related to imaging and image-guided interventions. The goal of this article is to provide a framework for developing a health equity initiative in radiology and to articulate key defining factors. METHODS This article leverages the experience of three academic radiology departments and explores key principles that emerged when observing the experiences of these departments that have begun to engage in health equity-focused work. RESULTS A four-component framework is described for a health equity initiative in radiology consisting of (1) environmental scan and blueprint, (2) design and implementation, (3) initiative evaluation, and (4) community engagement. Key facilitators include a comprehensive environmental scan, early stakeholder engagement and consensus building, implementation science design thinking, and multitiered community engagement. CONCLUSIONS All radiology organizations should strive to develop, pilot, and evaluate novel initiatives that promote equitable access to high-quality imaging services. Establishing systems for high-quality data collection is critical to success. An implementation science approach provides a robust framework for developing and testing novel health equity initiatives in radiology. Community engagement is critical at all stages of the health equity initiative time line.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Bucknor
- Associate Chair for Wellbeing and Professional Climate, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging and Executive Sponsor, Differences Matter, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| | - Anand K Narayan
- Vice Chair of Health Equity, Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. https://twitter.com/%20AnandKNarayan
| | - Lucy B Spalluto
- Chair of Health Equity, Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Health Care System Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. https://twitter.com/%20LBSrad
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kaminstein DS, Brown KM. Conceptualizing the Carrying Function of Community Advisory Boards. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE 2023. [DOI: 10.1177/00218863231155490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Community Advisory Boards (CABs) often, “carry” important ideas and concepts for the larger organization of which they are a part. The word “carry” in this context, means that a person or group expresses verbal and nonverbal messages that inform others of what the institution acknowledges, and also what it cannot bear to feel or talk about. These expressions may include attitudes and expectations, values, risks, or disowned features and qualities. A group can contain, “carry,” and express formal, informal, and unconscious issues for a department or system. In this article, we situate our theoretical underpinning of this carrying function by relying on a number of literatures: identified patient, splitting and projection, parallel process, and container and contained. Specifying and examining the dynamics of what CABs carry for an institution can prevent common pitfalls for these groups, such as mistrust, feelings of disrespect, lack of productivity, and thwarted expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana S. Kaminstein
- VA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kimberly M. Brown
- VA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Using a multicultural and multilingual awareness-raising strategy to enhance enrollment of racially underrepresented minoritized communities - the PassITON trial. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e9. [PMID: 36755543 PMCID: PMC9879880 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Racially and ethnically minoritized populations have been historically excluded and underrepresented in research. This paper will describe best practices in multicultural and multilingual awareness-raising strategies used by the Recruitment Innovation Center to increase minoritized enrollment into clinical trials. The Passive Immunity Trial for Our Nation will be used as a primary example to highlight real-world application of these methods to raise awareness, engage community partners, and recruit diverse study participants.
Collapse
|
38
|
Doucette L, Kiely BT, Gierisch JM, Marion E, Nadler L, Heflin MT, Upchurch G. Participatory research to improve medication reconciliation for older adults in the community. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:620-631. [PMID: 36420635 PMCID: PMC9957786 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medication reconciliation, a technique that assists in aligning a care team's understanding of an individual's true medication regimen, is vital to optimize medication use and prevent medication errors. Historically, most medication reconciliation research has focused on institutional settings and transitional care, with comparatively little attention given to medication reconciliation in community settings. To optimize medication reconciliation for community-dwelling older adults, healthcare professionals and older adults must be engaged in co-designing processes that create sustainable approaches. METHODS Academic researchers, older adults, and community- and health system-based healthcare professionals engaged in a participatory process to better understand medication reconciliation barriers and co-design solutions. The initiative consisted of two participatory research approaches: (1) Sparks Innovation Studios, which synthesized professional expertise and opinions, and (2) a Community Consultation Studio with older adults. Input from both groups informed a list of possible solutions and these were ranked based on evaluative criteria of feasibility, person-centeredness, equity, and sustainability. RESULTS Sparks Innovation Studios identified a lack of ownership, fragmented healthcare systems, and time constraints as the leading barriers to medication reconciliation. The Community Consultation Studio revealed that older adults often feel dismissed in medical encounters and perceive poor communication with and among providers. The Community Consultation Studio and Sparks Innovation Studios resulted in four highly-ranked solutions to improve medication reconciliation: (1) support for older adults to improve health literacy and ownership; (2) ensuring medication indications are included on prescription labels; (3) trainings and incentives for front-line staff in clinic settings to become champions for medication reconciliation; and (4) electronic health record improvements that simplify active medication lists. CONCLUSION Engaging community representatives with academic partners in the research process enhanced understanding of community priorities and provided a practical roadmap for innovations that have the potential to improve the well-being of community-dwelling older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna Doucette
- Department of Maternal, Child and Family Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Jennifer M. Gierisch
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care Center, Durham, NC
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Eve Marion
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Durham, NC
| | | | - Mitchell T Heflin
- Duke Health Center for Interprofessional Education and Care (IPEC), Duke University Schools of Nursing and Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Gina Upchurch
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Senior PharmAssist, Durham, NC
- Department of Public Health Leadership, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cunningham-Erves J, Joosten Y, Kusnoor SV, Mayers SA, Ichimura J, Dunkel L, Israel TL, Ray D, Stroud M, Harris PA, Wilkins CH. A community-informed recruitment plan template to increase recruitment of racial and ethnic groups historically excluded and underrepresented in clinical research. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 125:107064. [PMID: 36572240 PMCID: PMC9926351 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Engaging communities in research planning and implementation can enhance recruitment and retention (R&R) of racial and ethnic groups historically excluded and underrepresented in clinical research; however, most studies do not use community-informed approaches. This paper describes the formative research process used to design a Community-Informed Recruitment Plan Template for racial and ethnic groups historically excluded and underrepresented in clinical research. METHODS Using an existing R&R template as a starting point, we iteratively developed and refined the community-informed template through a 3-phase process to achieve cultural-appropriateness. Phase 1 included a literature review, 34 community engagement (CE) studios to review recommendations, community advisory board (CAB) review, and survey data from minority recruitment experts. Phase 2 involved integration of content into existing R&R template. Phase 3 was a final review and revision using input of the CAB and researchers' panel. Survey data collected in Phase 1 were analyzed using descriptives (i.e., frequencies and percentages). Open-ended survey responses were analyzed using inductive, qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS The final 8-section template can help develop effective grant or proposal language where study R&R plans are requested. They include: 1) Recruitment Strategy; 2) A Stakeholder Communication Plan; 3) Evidence of Recruitment Feasibility; 4) Recruitment and Retention Team; 5) Recruitment and Retention Methods; 6) Recruitment and Retention Timeline; 7) Evaluation; and 8) Budget. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating multiple perspectives into this formative research process enhances the cultural appropriateness of this community-informed R&R template to help research teams achieve R&R goals for individuals historically excluded and underrepresented in clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yvonne Joosten
- Vanderbilt Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sheila V Kusnoor
- Center for Knowledge Management, Strategy and Innovation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stephanie A Mayers
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jabari Ichimura
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Leah Dunkel
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Tiffany L Israel
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Devan Ray
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mary Stroud
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paul A Harris
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Consuelo H Wilkins
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Office of Health Equity, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ukoli F, Leavell J, Mayo A, Moore J, Nchami N, Britt A. Encouraging and Reinforcing Safe Breastfeeding Practices during the COVID-19 Pandemic. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:1756. [PMID: 36767117 PMCID: PMC9914864 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
AIM Promote safe breastfeeding during the pandemic. METHODS All participants were encouraged to request safe breastfeeding education from their prenatal provider. Pregnant mothers received appropriate breastfeeding and COVID-19 safe breastfeeding education in line with the CDC's COVID-19 breastfeeding guidelines. Data were obtained from 39 mothers attending Nashville General Hospital pediatric well-baby clinics (Group I: from December 2019 to June 2020) and 97 pregnant women attending prenatal clinics (Group II: from July 2020 to August 2021). RESULTS The participants' ages ranged from 15 to 45 years, with a mean of 27.5 ± 6.2. The women in both groups were similar in age, education, employment, and breastfeeding experience. They were equally unlikely to use face masks at home even while receiving guests or holding their babies. Although 121 (89.0%) women claimed face mask use while shopping, the rate for never doing so was 7 (18.0%) vs. 8 (8.3%) (p < 0.006) for Groups I and II, respectively. Safe practices included limited outing (66 (48.5%)), sanitized hands (62 (45.6%)), restricted visitors (44 (32.4%)), and limited baby outing (27 (19.9%)), and 8 (8.3%) in Group II received COVID-19 vaccinations. About half described fair and accurate COVID-19 safe breastfeeding knowledge, but 22 (30.1%) of them claimed they received no information. Breastfeeding contraindication awareness for Groups I and II were as follows: cocaine = 53.8% vs. 37.1%, p < 0.06; HIV = 35.9% vs. 12.4%, p < 0.002; breast cancer = 17.9% vs. 16.5%; and COVID-19 with symptoms = 28.2% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.001. The information source was similar, with family, friends, and media accounting for 77 (56.6%) of women while doctors, nurses, and the CLC was the source for 21 (15.4%) women. Exclusive breastfeeding one month postpartum for Groups I and II was 41.9% and 12.8% (p < 0.006), respectively. CONCLUSION The mothers were not more knowledgeable regarding breastfeeding safely one year into the COVID-19 pandemic. Conflicting lay information can create healthy behavior ambivalence, which can be prevented by health professionals confidently advising mothers to wear face masks when breastfeeding, restricting visitors and outings, and accepting COVID-19 vaccination. This pandemic remains an open opportunity to promote and encourage breastfeeding to every mother as the default newborn feeding method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flora Ukoli
- Department of Surgery, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Jacinta Leavell
- Department of Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Amasyah Mayo
- Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Jayla Moore
- Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Nia Nchami
- Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| | - Allysceaeioun Britt
- Division of Public Health Practice, School of Graduate Studies and Research, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN 37208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wallace AS, Wang CY, Flake N, Bristol AA, Altizer R. Feasibility and usefulness of the going home toolkit, an mhealth app, during hospital discharge: patient and clinician perspectives. Inform Health Soc Care 2023; 48:1-12. [PMID: 35234556 DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2022.2043330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Feasibility and Usefulness of the Going Home Toolkit, an mHealth App, during Hospital Discharge: Patient and Clinician Perspectives. Objective Communication gaps during discharge planning contribute to post-discharge outcomes. mHealth Apps may allow health systems to provide resources to fill patients' needs. The study's purpose was to elicit feedback regarding The Going Home Toolkit (GHT), an App that aims to facilitate patient communication about discharge needs. Participants Twenty patients hospitalized within the past year, and seven case managers involved in discharge processes from an academic health sciences center. Methods Using tablets installed with the GHT prototype, remote engagement studio interviews were used to observe GHT use and perceptions about usefulness and feasibility. Results Patients successfully used the GHT to identify resources that they may not have known otherwise. Clinicians reported the GHT would support patient engagement during discharge. However, patients liked being able to search for resources, while clinicians focused on offering a list of information. This can be described as a pull vs. push approach to accessing resources. Participants recognized the GHT's unique focus on cognitive processes related to self-management vs. knowledge transfer. Conclusions The GHT represents a valuable tool for facilitating anticipatory planning and procurement of resources post-discharge. Future work should focus on refining the user interface and user experience of the app and creating seamless links to community resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea S Wallace
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Ching-Yu Wang
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Naomi Flake
- Community Collaboration and Engagement Team, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Alycia A Bristol
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Roger Altizer
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Currier J, Arteaga I, Turner-Uaandja H, Starling B, Pashayan N, Jäderholm C, Ponce Campuzano C, Shannon J. Represent: A community engagement roadmap to improve participant representation in cancer early detection research: An Oregon case study. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1110543. [PMID: 36935656 PMCID: PMC10020373 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1110543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction While authentic and sustained community involvement in the research process is critically important to making new technologies and interventions effective and socially acceptable, there is uneven participation across sociodemographic, racial, and ethnic communities in many research areas, including cancer early detection research. Currently, 18% of cancer in the United States impacts Hispanics and Latinos, this population accounts for < 10% of research participants. Understanding barriers and facilitators to cancer early detection research is imperative to the ultimate success of this research. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: understand Hispanic and Latino community perspectives in participation in cancer early detection research; and identify sustainable and mutually beneficial approaches to community engagement and involvement. Methods The Oregon Case Study, led by Oregon Health & Science University's Community Outreach, Research and Engagement (CORE) in partnership with colleagues at Vocal, a partnership between Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester and Cambridge University, adopted a participatory research approach to better understand participation in cancer early detection research from the perspectives of Oregon's Hispanic and Latino community members. We implemented two evidence-based community engagement models, the Community Engagement Studio and the Community Readiness Assessment Model. Using a facilitated format prescribed by each community engagement model, community members helped us to answer two research questions: (1) What methods help us increase participation of underrepresented communities in cancer early detection research?; and (2) How can we build trust between researchers and underrepresented communities within cancer early detection research? Quantitative (i.e., descriptive statistic) and qualitative (i.e., thematic analysis) analytic methods were used to measure and assess community knowledge, leadership, beliefs, and resources regarding participation in cancer early detection research. Results A total of 36 Hispanic and Latino community members participated in the two community engagement models. We identified three emergent themes pertaining to participation in cancer early detection research that include: low-level awareness of cancer early detection research and opportunities for research participation, structural barriers to research participation, and uncertainty of the benefits of research participation. Conclusion Our approach, using two evidence-based community engagement models, yielded valuable insights about perceptions of research participation for Hispanic and Latino community members. These findings, synthesized into three key themes, led to actionable recommendations to increase research participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Currier
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - Hannah Turner-Uaandja
- Vocal, Research & Innovation, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, in Partnership With University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Bella Starling
- Vocal, Research & Innovation, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, in Partnership With University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina Jäderholm
- Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR, United States
| | | | - Jackilen Shannon
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pellerano MB, Hill D, Jimenez ME, Gordon M, Macenat M, Ferrante JM, Rivera-Núñez Z, Devance D, Lima D, Sullivan B, Crabtree BF, Georgopoulos P, Barrett ES, Reed DJ, Pernell CT, Dawkins MR, Lynn B, Dixon F, Castañeda M, Garcia H, Blaser MJ, Panettieri RA, Hudson SV. Connect: Cultivating Academic-Community Partnerships to Address Our Communities' Complex Needs During Public Health Crises. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2023; 17:447-464. [PMID: 37934443 PMCID: PMC11041973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black and Latino communities have been disproportionately impacted by coronavirus disease 2019 and we sought to understand perceptions and attitudes in four heavily impacted New Jersey counties to develop and evaluate engagement strategies to enhance access to testing. OBJECTIVE To establish a successful academic/community partnership team during a public health emergency by building upon longstanding relationships and using principles from community engaged research. METHODS We present a case study illustrating multiple levels of engagement, showing how we successfully aligned expectations, developed a commitment of cooperation, and implemented a research study, with community-based and health care organizations at the center of community engagement and recruitment. LESSONS LEARNED This paper describes successful approaches to relationship building including information sharing and feedback to foster reciprocity, diverse dissemination strategies to enhance engagement, and intergenerational interaction to ensure sustainability. CONCLUSIONS This model demonstrates how academic/community partnerships can work together during public health emergencies to develop sustainable relationships.
Collapse
|
44
|
Eder M(M. Aligning clinical research ethics with community-engaged and participatory research in the United States. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1122479. [PMID: 37213625 PMCID: PMC10192870 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1122479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The professional role in ethical review of research in which boards review proposed research involving human beings continues to evolve. The scholarly literature on institutional review boards in academic centers of the United States, at which a majority of the community engaged and participatory research emanates and is reviewed, suggests the need to implement changes in board education, the infrastructure supporting review, and the accountability of review. The recommendations for change advanced in this perspective involve enhancing reviewer knowledge of local community contexts and developing an infrastructure that supports engagement in and dialogue among individuals involved in community-academic research to inform ethical review and the assessment of review outcomes. Additionally, recommendations regarding putting an institutional infrastructure in place are advanced in order to sustain community engaged and participatory research. The infrastructure can also support the collection and review of outcome data as the foundation of accountability. The recommendations outlined intend to improve clinical research ethics reviews of community-engaged and participatory research.
Collapse
|
45
|
Cope EL, McTigue KM, Forrest CB, Carton TW, Fair AM, Goytia C, Harrington JM, Lowe S, Merritt JG, Shenkman EA, Stephens WJ, Templeton A, Williams NA, Zemon N, Millender S, Angove RSM. Stakeholder engagement infrastructure to support multicenter research networks: Advances from the clinical research networks participating in PCORnet. Learn Health Syst 2023; 7:e10313. [PMID: 36654809 PMCID: PMC9835038 DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The evidence based on the inclusion of patients and other stakeholders as partners in the clinical research process has grown substantially. However, little has been reported on how stakeholders are engaged in the governance of large-scale clinical research networks and the infrastructure used by research networks to support engagement in network-affiliated activities. Objectives The objective was to document engagement activities and practices emerging from Clinical Research Networks (CRNs) participating in PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, specifically regarding governance and engagement infrastructure. Methods We conducted an environmental scan of PCORnet CRN engagement structures, assets, and services, focusing on network oversight structures for policy development and strategic decision-making. The scan included assets and services for supporting patient/stakeholder engagement. Data were collected by searching web-based literature and tool repositories, review of CRN Engagement Plans, analysis of previously collected key informant interviews, and CRN-based iterative review of structured worksheets. Results We identified 87 discrete engagement structures, assets, and services across nine CRNs. All CRNs engage patients/stakeholders in their governance, maintain workgroups and/or staff dedicated to overseeing engagement strategies, and offer one or more services to non-CRN researchers to enhance conducting engaged clinical research. Conclusions This work provides an important resource for the research community to explore engagement across peers, reflect on progress, consider opportunities to leverage existing infrastructure, and identify new collaborators. It also serves to highlight PCORnet as a resource for non-CRN researchers seeking to efficiently conduct engaged clinical research and a venue for advancing the science of engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christopher B. Forrest
- Applied Clinical Research Center, Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | | | - Alecia M. Fair
- Meharry‐Vanderbilt Alliance, Department of MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Crispin Goytia
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiInstitute for Health Equity ResearchNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Susan Lowe
- ADVANCE Clinical Research Network, OCHIN, Inc.PortlandOregonUSA
| | | | - Elizabeth A. Shenkman
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical InformaticsCollege of Medicine, University of FloridaGainesvilleFloridaUSA
| | | | | | | | - Nadine Zemon
- OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of FloridaGainesvilleFloridaUSA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nwakoby C, Pierce LJ, Crawford R, Conserve D, Perkins J, Hurt S, Ahonkhai AA. Establishing an Academic-Community Partnership to Explore the Potential of Barbers and Barbershops in the Southern United States to Address Racial Disparities in HIV Care Outcomes for Black Men Living With HIV. Am J Mens Health 2023; 17:15579883231152114. [PMID: 36757054 PMCID: PMC9943967 DOI: 10.1177/15579883231152114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Black men comprise most new HIV infections in the Southern United States and have worse HIV outcomes than their non-Black counterparts. We developed an academic-community partnership in Nashville, Tennessee, to explore opportunities to improve HIV outcomes for Black men. We recruited barbers to an HIV training and focus group discussion about prevention and potential barber/barbershop-based strategies to address HIV-related needs for Black men. We assessed HIV knowledge and stigma with validated scales and conducted thematic analysis on discussion transcripts. HIV-related stigma was low (1.8 of 15 points [SD = 1.69]) among 13 participants of unknown HIV status (12 men and one woman). HIV knowledge increased among eight (67%) participants after receiving a brief HIV didactic. Participants described general health care barriers (e.g., the social norm that Black men do not go to the doctor until they are "damn near dead"), fears about unwanted HIV disclosure when seeking HIV testing or care, and community fears about negative stereotypes associated with HIV. Participants expressed enthusiasm about receiving more HIV-related training and utilizing communication skills and client/community relationships to serve as health educators and navigators. Barbers highlighted opportunities to disseminate HIV information in barbershops and combine HIV interventions with other health issues, such as COVID-19, and suggested that these interventions may help reduce HIV-related stigma. Our findings suggest that barbers and barbershops are an underutilized resource for disseminating HIV-related health information and engaging Black men in HIV and other important prevention and care activities such as COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leslie J. Pierce
- Vanderbilt Institute of Global Health,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Donaldson Conserve
- Department of Prevention and Community
Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University,
Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Aima A. Ahonkhai
- Vanderbilt Institute of Global Health,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fair A, Watson KS, Cohn EG, Carpenter SM, Richardson-Heron D, Wilkins CH. Innovation in Large-Scale Research Programs: Elevating Research Participants to Governance Roles Through the All of Us Research Program Engagement Core. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2022; 97:1794-1798. [PMID: 36449919 PMCID: PMC9698090 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM Despite the successes of community-engaged research in advancing research relevance and health equity for diverse communities, the impact of this research has been limited to local and regional programs. Engaging diverse community voices in large-scale, national research programs represents a paradigm shift in biomedical research. Still, disconnects remain between research decision makers and the communities they serve, impeding richer, bidirectional engagement. APPROACH An engagement core team was established within National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program (AoURP) in 2018 to synthesize community-engaged research practices and establish infrastructure that operationalizes diverse research participant engagement. The authors integrated research participants as "participant partners" within the AoURP governance, an approach that is embedded into the engagement core's 3 aims: (1) integrate a diverse pool of participants into the program, (2) identify and meaningfully engage a cadre of diverse participants into program governance, and (3) assess the impact of such engagement on research. Participant partners are compensated as consultants at approximately $50/hour. OUTCOMES As of August 2022, more than 515,000 individuals consented to participate in the AoURP, with more than 49% representing racial/ethnic minorities. The authors invited participants to self-nominate if interested in engaging in research working groups, decision making, and governance. Also, consortium partners nominated individuals on AoURP community advisory and/or participant advisory boards to serve as participant ambassadors. Ten individuals were selected as participant partners for the 2022-2025 term. Eight serve on the steering committee; of those, 4 serve on the executive committee; 2 more serve on the advisory panel. An additional 23 serve as participant ambassadors. NEXT STEPS The authors continue to increase the number of research participants serving as engaged partners in the program. Engagement approaches will be systematically evaluated with the goal of adoption by other large-scale research programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alecia Fair
- A. Fair is research assistant professor, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0144-1425
| | - Karriem S. Watson
- K.S. Watson was associate executive director at University of Illinois Mile Square Health Center, Chicago, Illinois, at the time of writing and is now chief engagement officer, All of Us Research Program, Bethesda, Maryland; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5575-7102
| | - Elizabeth G. Cohn
- E.G. Cohn is the Rudin Professor of Community Health, Hunter-Bellevue School of Nursing, New York, New York; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0923-7827
| | - Selena M. Carpenter
- S.M. Carpenter is senior program manager, Office of Health Equity, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8837-7990
| | | | - Consuelo H. Wilkins
- C.H. Wilkins is professor of medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, and senior vice president and senior associate dean for health equity and inclusive excellence, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8043-513X
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rubyan M, Trinidad MG, Ryan KA, Spiroff M, Goold S, Burns J, Calhoun K, Rowe Z, Büyüktür AG, Piechowski P, Platt J. A conceptual framework for clinical and translational virtual community engagement research. J Clin Transl Sci 2022; 6:e136. [PMID: 36590362 PMCID: PMC9794960 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated a trend for clinical and translational community-engaged research in adapting to an increasingly virtual landscape. This requires a framework for engagement distinct from in-person research and program activities. We reflect on four case studies of community engagement activities that inform a conceptual framework to better integrate the virtual format into community-engaged research reflecting key tenets of health equity and antiracist praxis. Methods Four projects were selected by community-engaged research stakeholders for an in-depth review based on how much the virtual transition impacted activities such as planning, recruitment, and data collection for each project. Transitions to virtual engagement were assessed across ten areas in which community engagement has been demonstrated to make a positive impact. Results Our analysis suggests a conceptual evaluation framework in which the ten community engagement areas cluster into four interrelated domains: (1) development, design, and delivery; (2) partnership and trust building; (3) implementation and change; and (4) ethics and equity. Conclusions The domains in this conceptual framework describe critical elements of community engaged research and programs consistent with recommendations for health equity informed meaningful community engagement from the National Academy of Medicine. The conceptual framework and case studies can be used for evaluation and to develop guidelines for clinical and translational researchers utilizing the virtual format in community-engaged research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Rubyan
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - M. Grace Trinidad
- National Hemophilia Program Coordinating Center, American Thrombosis & Hemostasis Network, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Kerry A. Ryan
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Meghan Spiroff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Susan Goold
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jade Burns
- Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Karen Calhoun
- Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Ayşe G. Büyüktür
- Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Patricia Piechowski
- Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jodyn Platt
- Institute for Healthcare Policy & Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mendonca EA, Richesson RL, Hochheiser H, Cooper DM, Bruck MN, Berner ES. Informatics education for translational research teams: An unrealized opportunity to strengthen the national research infrastructure. J Clin Transl Sci 2022; 6:e130. [PMID: 36590353 PMCID: PMC9794970 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify the informatics educational needs of clinical and translational research professionals whose primary focus is not informatics. Introduction Informatics and data science skills are essential for the full spectrum of translational research, and an increased understanding of informatics issues on the part of translational researchers can alleviate the demand for informaticians and enable more productive collaborations when informaticians are involved. Identifying the level of interest in different topics among various types of of translational researchers will help set priorities for development and dissemination of informatics education. Methods We surveyed clinical and translational science researchers in Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) programs about their educational needs and preferences. Results Researchers from 23 out of the 62 CTSA hubs responded to the survey. 67% of respondents across roles and topics expressed interest in learning about informatics topics. There was high interest in all 30 topics included in the survey, with some variation in interest depending on the role of the respondents. Discussion Our data support the need to advance training in clinical and biomedical informatics. As the complexity and use of information technology and data science in research studies grows, informaticians will continue to be a limited resource for research collaboration, education, and training. An increased understanding of informatics issues across translational research teams can alleviate this burden and allow for more productive collaborations. To inform a roadmap for informatics education for research professionals, we suggest strategies to use the results of this needs assessment to develop future informatics education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eneida A. Mendonca
- Indiana University/Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | - Meg N. Bruck
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Eta S. Berner
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Shrestha A, Tamrakar D, Shrestha B, Karmacharya BM, Shrestha A, Pyakurel P, Spiegelman D. Stakeholder engagement in a hypertension and diabetes prevention research program: Description and lessons learned. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0276478. [PMID: 36264860 PMCID: PMC9584412 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stakeholder engagement is important from the management point of view to capture knowledge, increase ownership, reduce conflict, encourage partnership, as well as to develop an ethical perspective that facilitates inclusive decision making and promotes equity. However, there is dearth of literature in the process of stakeholder engagement. The purpose of this paper is to describe the process of increasing stakeholder engagement and highlight the lessons learnt on stakeholder engagement while designing, implementing, and monitoring a study on diabetes and hypertension prevention in workplace settings in Nepal. Methodology We identified the stakeholders based on the 7P framework: Patients and public (clients), providers, payers, policy makers, product makers, principal investigators, and purchasers. The identified stakeholders were engaged in prioritization of the research questions, planning data collection, designing, implementing, and monitoring the intervention. Stakeholders were engaged through focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, participatory workshops, individual consultation, information sessions and representation in study team and implementation committees. Results The views of the stakeholders were synthesized in each step of the research process, from designing to interpreting the results. Stakeholder engagement helped to shape the methods and plan, and process for participant’s recruitment and data collection. In addition, it enhanced adherence to intervention, mutual learning, and smooth intervention adoption. The major challenges were the time-consuming nature of the process, language barriers, and the differences in health and food beliefs between researchers and stakeholders. Conclusion It was possible to engage and benefit from stakeholder’s engagement on the design, implementation and monitoring of a workplace-based hypertension and diabetes management research program in Nepal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Shrestha
- Department of Public Health, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal
- Center of Methods for Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Institute for Implementation Science and Health, Kathmandu, Nepal
- * E-mail:
| | - Dipesh Tamrakar
- Department of Public Health, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal
| | - Bhawana Shrestha
- Department of Public Health, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal
| | - Biraj Man Karmacharya
- Department of Public Health, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal
| | - Abha Shrestha
- Department of Public Health, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal
| | - Prajjwal Pyakurel
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal
| | - Donna Spiegelman
- Center of Methods for Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|