1
|
Sevilla JP, Tortorice D, Kantor D, Regan J, Meszaros KH, Beck EC, Begum N, Bloom DE. Lifecycle model-based evaluation of infant 4CMenB vaccination in the UK. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:1133-1146. [PMID: 38182698 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01654-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Invasive meningococcal disease, an uncommon but severe disease, imposes catastrophic health and economic burdens. Cost-utility analysis (CUA) assumes separability in lifetime health and economic variables and cannot capture the full value of preventing such burdens. We overcome these limitations with a retrospective societal perspective cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of meningococcal serogroup B vaccination (4CMenB) of one infant cohort in the United Kingdom using a health-augmented lifecycle model (HALM) incorporating health's interactions with consumption, earnings, non-market time and financial risk. METHODS We used a static Markov model of vaccination's health impact and an HALM to estimate the private willingness to pay (PWTP) for the intrinsic and instrumental value of health under perfect capital markets, financial risk protection in the absence of insurance against permanent disability, parental spillovers, and acute phase disability. We estimated social WTP (SWTP) incorporating social severity preferences. We estimated rates of return that inform health payer reimbursement decisions, finance ministry budgeting decisions, and legislature taxation decisions. An expert Advisory Board investigated the validity of applying the HALM to infant 4CMenB. RESULTS The PWTP for a 2 + 1 vaccination schedule is £395, comprising £166 of disability insurance value, £79 of positive parental spillover value, £28 in the value of averting acute phase disability, and £122 in residual intrinsic and instrumental value of health. SWTP is £969. CONCLUSIONS HALM-based CBA provides an empirically richer, more utility-theoretically grounded approach to vaccine evaluation than CUA, demonstrating good value for money for legislatures (based on private values) and for all decision-makers (based on social values).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Sevilla
- Data for Decisions (DfD) LLC, 681 Main Street, Suite 3-37, Waltham, MA, 02457, USA.
| | - Daniel Tortorice
- Data for Decisions (DfD) LLC, 681 Main Street, Suite 3-37, Waltham, MA, 02457, USA
| | - David Kantor
- Data for Decisions (DfD) LLC, 681 Main Street, Suite 3-37, Waltham, MA, 02457, USA
| | - John Regan
- Data for Decisions (DfD) LLC, 681 Main Street, Suite 3-37, Waltham, MA, 02457, USA
| | | | | | | | - David E Bloom
- Data for Decisions (DfD) LLC, 681 Main Street, Suite 3-37, Waltham, MA, 02457, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zeevat F, Simons JJM, Westra TA, Wilschut JC, van Sorge NM, Boersma C, Postma MJ. Cost of Illness Analysis of Invasive Meningococcal Disease Caused by Neisseria Meningitidis Serogroup B in the Netherlands-a Holistic Approach. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:481-499. [PMID: 38366286 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00903-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by Neisseria meningitidis is a rapidly progressing, rare disease that often presents as meningitis or sepsis. It mostly affects infants and adolescents, with high fatality rates or long-term sequelae. In the Netherlands, serogroup B (MenB) is most prevalent. We aimed to estimate the economic burden of MenB-related IMD between 2015 and 2019, including direct and indirect medical costs from short- and long-term sequelae, from a societal perspective. METHODS IMD incidence was based on laboratory-based case numbers from the Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands); there were 74 MenB cases on average per year in the study period 2015-2019. Case-fatality rate (3.8%) and percentage of patients discharged with sequelae (46%) were derived from literature. Direct costs included treatment costs of the acute phase, long-term sequelae, and public health response. Indirect costs were calculated using the human capital (HCA) and friction costs (FCA) approaches, in which productivity losses were estimated for patients and parents during the acute and sequelae phases. Costs were discounted by 4% yearly. RESULTS Estimated costs due to MenB IMD in an annual cohort were €3,094,199 with FCA and €9,480,764 with HCA. Direct costs amounted to €2,974,996, of which 75.2% were related to sequelae. Indirect costs related to sequelae were €52,532 with FCA and €5,220,398 with HCA. CONCLUSION Our analysis reflects the high economic burden of MenB-related IMD in the Netherlands. Sequelae costs represent a high proportion of the total costs. Societal costs were dependent on the applied approach (FCA or HCA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Zeevat
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Health-Ecore, Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M Simons
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- GSK, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
- Market Access Department, GSK, Van Ash van Wijckstraat 55H, 3811, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Jan C Wilschut
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis Boersma
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Health-Ecore, Zeist, The Netherlands
- Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schley K, Kowalik JC, Sullivan SM, Vyse A, Czudek C, Tichy E, Findlow J. Assessing the Role of Infant and Toddler MenACWY Immunisation in the UK: Does the Adolescent MenACWY Programme Provide Sufficient Protection? Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11050940. [PMID: 37243043 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11050940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
A combined Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)/meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) vaccine will soon be unavailable in the UK immunisation schedule due to discontinuation by the manufacturer. An interim statement by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advises stopping MenC immunisation at 12 months of age when this occurs. We undertook an analysis of the public health impact of various potential meningococcal vaccination strategies in the UK in the absence of the Hib/MenC vaccine. A static population-cohort model was developed evaluating the burden of IMD (using 2005-2015 epidemiological data) and related health outcomes (e.g., cases, cases with long-term sequelae, deaths), which allows for the comparison of any two meningococcal immunisation strategies. We compared potential strategies that included different combinations of infant and/or toddler MenACWY immunisations with the anticipated future situation in which a 12-month MenC vaccine is not used, but the MenACWY vaccine is routinely given in adolescents. The most effective strategy is combining MenACWY immunisation at 2, 4, and 12 months of age with the incumbent adolescent MenACWY immunisation programme, resulting in the prevention of an additional 269 IMD cases and 13 fatalities over the modelling period; of these cases, 87 would be associated with long-term sequelae. Among the different vaccination strategies, it was observed that those with multiple doses and earlier doses provided the greatest protection. Our study provides evidence suggesting that the removal of the MenC toddler immunisation from the UK schedule would potentially increase the risk of unnecessary IMD cases and have a detrimental public health impact if not replaced by an alternate infant and/or toddler programme. This analysis supports that infant and toddler MenACWY immunisation can provide maximal protection while complementing both infant/toddler MenB and adolescent MenACWY immunisation programmes in the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jack C Kowalik
- Pfizer Ltd., Walton Oaks, Dorking Rd., Tadworth KT20 7NS, UK
| | | | - Andrew Vyse
- Pfizer Ltd., Walton Oaks, Dorking Rd., Tadworth KT20 7NS, UK
| | - Carole Czudek
- Pfizer Ltd., Walton Oaks, Dorking Rd., Tadworth KT20 7NS, UK
| | - Eszter Tichy
- Evidera/PPD, Bocskai ut 134-144, Dorottya Udvar, Building E, Floor 2, H-1113 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jamie Findlow
- Pfizer Ltd., Walton Oaks, Dorking Rd., Tadworth KT20 7NS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weil-Olivier C, Taha MK, Bouée S, Emery C, Loncle-Provot V, Nachbaur G, Beck E, Pribil C. Care pathways in invasive meningococcal disease: a retrospective analysis of the French national public health insurance database. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2021764. [PMID: 35192785 PMCID: PMC8993105 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.2021764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) carries a high burden in terms of mortality, long-term complications, and cost, which can be significantly reduced by vaccination. The objectives of this case-control study were to document the care pathways of patients with IMD before, during, and after hospitalization and to assess in-hospital complications and long-term sequelae. Cases consisted of all people hospitalized for IMD in France between 2012 and 2017. Controls were matched by age, gender, and district of residence. Data were extracted from the French national public health insurance database on demographics, hospitalizations, mortality and potential sequelae of IMD. Overall, 3,532 cases and 10,590 controls were assessed and followed up for 2.8 years (median). During hospitalization, 1,577 cases (44.6%) stayed in an intensive care unit, 1,238 (35.1%) required mechanical ventilation, and 43 (1.2%) underwent amputation; 293 cases (8.3%) died in hospital and a further 163 (4.6%) died following discharge; 823 cases (25.4% of survivors) presented ≥1 sequela and 298 (9.2%) presented multiple sequelae. The most frequently documented sequelae were epilepsy (N = 205; 5.8%), anxiety (N = 196; 5.5%), and severe neurological disorders (N = 193; 5.5%). All individual sequelae were significantly more frequent (p < .0001) in cases than controls. Hearing/visual impairment and communication problems were conditions that presented the highest risk for cases compared to controls (risk ratios >20 in all cases). In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of providing optimal medical care for patients with IMD, of minimizing the delay before hospitalization, and of effective prevention through comprehensive vaccination programs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Shen J, Begum N, Ruiz-Garcia Y, Martinon-Torres F, Bekkat-Berkani R, Meszaros K. Range of invasive meningococcal disease sequelae and health economic application - a systematic and clinical review. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1078. [PMID: 35641955 PMCID: PMC9153861 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13342-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is uncommon, life-threatening, with many diverse sequelae. The aims were to: 1) comprehensively characterise the sequelae; 2) have a systematic application for sequelae impact in economic evaluation (EE). Methods Sequelae categorised as physical/neurological or psychological/behavioural were identified from a systematic review of IMD observational studies (OS) and EEs in high-income countries (published 2001–2020). A comprehensive map and EE-relevant list, respectively, included physical/neurological sequelae reported in ≥2OS and ≥ 2OS + 2EE (≥1OS and ≥ 1OS + 1EE for psychological/behavioural). Sequelae proportions were selected from the highest quality studies reporting most sequelae. Three medical experts independently evaluated the clinical impact of findings. Results Sixty-Six OS and 34 EE reported IMD sequelae. The comprehensive map included 44 sequelae (30 physical/neurological, 14 psychological/behavioural), of which 18 (14 physical/neurological and 4 psychological/behavioural) were EE-relevant. Experts validated the study and identified gaps due to limited evidence, underreporting of psychological/behavioural sequelae in survivors/their families, and occurrence of multiple sequelae in the acute phase and long-term. Conclusions The considerable burden of IMD sequelae on survivors and their families is potentially underestimated in EE, due to underreporting and poorly-defined subtle sequelae. When assessing IMD burden and potential interventions e.g., vaccination, sequelae range and duration, underreporting, and indirect burden on dependents should be considered. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13342-2. Invasive meningococcal disease survivors frequently suffer from variable sequelae. A broad sequelae map plus those relevant to economic evaluation (EE) were defined. Forty-four sequelae were selected: 30 physical/neurological and 14 psychological/behavioural. Eighteen EE-relevant sequelae included 14 physical/neurological and 4 psychological/behavioural Underreporting, family impact and multiple sequelae cases were critical gaps. A video summary linked to this article can be found on Figshare: 10.6084/m9.figshare.19753840.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Shen
- GSK, Avenue Fleming, 20 1300, Wavre, Belgium.,Present address: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Federico Martinon-Torres
- Genetics, Vaccines and Infections Research Group (GENVIP), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, University of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Department of Pediatrics, Translational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Graña MG, Cavada G, Vasquez M, Shen J, Maervoet J, Klint J, Gómez JA. Modeling the public health impact of different meningococcal vaccination strategies with 4CMenB and MenACWY versus the current toddler MenACWY National Immunization Program in Chile. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:5603-5613. [PMID: 34890520 PMCID: PMC8904027 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1996808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon yet unpredictable, severe, and life-threatening disease with the highest burden in young children. In Chile, most IMD is caused by meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) and W (MenW) infection. In response to a MenW outbreak in 2012, a toddler vaccination program was implemented using quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine against serogroups A, C, W and Y (MenACWY). The vaccine program, however, does not protect infants or other unvaccinated age groups and does not protect against MenB IMD. Since 2017, MenB IMD cases are becoming increasingly prevalent. Using a dynamic transmission model adapted for Chile, this analysis assessed the public health impact (reduction in IMD cases, long-term sequelae, deaths, and quality-adjusted life-years) of six alternative vaccination strategies using MenACWY and/or the four-component MenB (4CMenB) vaccine in infants, toddlers, and/or adolescents compared to the National Immunization Program (NIP) implemented in 2014. Strategies that added infant 4CMenB to MenACWY in toddlers or adolescents would prevent more IMD than the current NIP, observed within the first 5 years of the program. Replacing the NIP by an adolescent MenACWY strategy would prevent more IMD in the longer term, once herd immunity is established to protect unvaccinated infants or older age groups. The strategy that maximized reduction of IMD cases and associated sequelae in all age groups with immediate plus long-term benefits included infant 4CMenB and MenACWY in both toddlers and adolescents. This analysis can help policymakers determine the best strategy to control IMD in Chile and improve public health. A set of audio slides linked to this manuscript can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16837543.
What is the context?
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is a severe, sometimes fatal, unpredictable disease with highest rates in infants, young children, and adolescents. It is caused by different serogroups of Neisseria meningitidis bacteria. Most cases in Chile are due to meningococcal serogroups B (MenB) and W (MenW). Following a MenW IMD outbreak in 2012, vaccination was introduced, leading to the current National Immunization Program (NIP) in toddlers with quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY) (protecting against IMD caused by MenA, C, W, and Y).
What is new?
A disease model to predict the impact of vaccination strategies in the Chilean population compared six alternative strategies, using the multi-component MenB (4CMenB) vaccine for infants (protecting against MenB, with potential cross-protection against MenW and Y IMD) and/or the MenACWY vaccine for toddlers and/or adolescents.
What is the impact?
Results, compared to the NIP, show that: Strategy 1 (a program targeting only infants with 4CMenB) would reduce more MenB cases but fewer MenA, C, W and Y cases resulting in a lower reduction of total IMD cases in the long term; Strategy 3 (a program targeting only adolescents with MenACWY) would have a similar effect to the NIP in the short term but a far greater IMD reduction in the long term (as vaccinating this age group eventually reduces transmission to other age groups, reducing their risk of disease); all the other strategies targeted more than one age group, further reducing numbers of IMD cases compared with the NIP. The greatest benefits were seen with infant 4CMenB vaccination combined with toddler and adolescent MenACWY vaccination. Results can help policymakers determine the best IMD strategy to maximize the benefits of available meningococcal vaccines.
Collapse
|
7
|
Public Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Infant 4CMenB Vaccination in Germany to Prevent Serogroup B Invasive Meningococcal Disease. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 11:367-387. [PMID: 34877641 PMCID: PMC8847463 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00573-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon, severe, life-threatening disease primarily affecting infants, with potential lifelong sequelae. Neisseria meningitidis (Nm) serogroup B (MenB) causes most IMD cases in Germany, many of which can be prevented with four-component MenB (4CMenB) vaccination. The potential public health and economic impact of introducing routine 4CMenB infant vaccination in Germany was assessed. Methods A dynamic transmission-based cost-effectiveness model adapted for Germany assessed the impact of infant 4CMenB universal mass vaccination (UMV) versus no vaccination. The model included the latest real-world evidence on vaccine effectiveness, the comprehensive burden of disease on patients (sequelae) and their family (quality of life impact), comprehensive German IMD costs, and vaccination uptake assumptions. Results The largest public health impact was predicted in children: a rapid decline, 5 years after UMV implementation, of 39.9% (34.7%) for MenB (all IMD) cases aged 0–4 years and 42.4% (36.8%) in infants. Over lifetime (100-year time horizon), 4CMenB could prevent 3154 MenB (3303 all IMD) cases, 291 MenB (304 all IMD) deaths and 1370 MenB (1435 all IMD) long-term sequelae. 4CMenB saved 25,878 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), at a cost of €188,762 per QALY gained in the base case (societal perspective including lost productivity). Scenarios including potential Nm carriage protection (enabling herd protection) or societal preferences for the prevention of severe diseases led to more cost-effective results, while a scenario excluding IMD impact beyond the patient with increased discounting of vaccination health benefits produced less cost-effective results. Conclusions MenB IMD is a vaccine-preventable disease. This analysis for Germany can inform decision-makers on the potential impact of introducing infant 4CMenB UMV. The program is predicted to rapidly produce health benefits (reduction in child cases, deaths and sequelae) at a cost per QALY to society of around €190,000 (base case), decreasing to around €78,000 when considering societal preferences and IMD underreporting. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00573-w. Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon but severe infection, usually presenting as meningitis and/or sepsis, caused by the bacteria Neisseria meningitidis. Most cases occur in infants, young children and adolescents. Patients who survive the disease can develop lifelong sequelae, such as physical, neurological and psychological/behavioural problems that impact their quality of life and that of their family/caregivers. This disease can be prevented by vaccination. The use of the four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) in countries like Germany can prevent the most common form of this disease, IMD caused by serogroup B. This study assessed the public health and economic impact of infant vaccination in Germany with 4CMenB. For this, the authors used an economic model that measured the lifetime impact of the disease on patients but also on their families. The model predicted that after 5 years of vaccination, the number of cases and deaths in infants and young children aged 0–4 years would rapidly decrease by almost 40%. Over a long-term horizon of 100 years, this number was predicted to remain stable. Due to the reduced number of cases, vaccination would also result in fewer deaths and patients with sequelae, as well as cost savings for the healthcare system and society due to the reduced loss of productivity. In conclusion, in Germany, IMD caused by serogroup B is preventable through vaccination, and the 4CMenB vaccine in German infants is predicted to rapidly reduce the disease burden, save lives and prevent healthcare costs.
Collapse
|
8
|
Healthcare Resource Consumption and Cost of Invasive Meningococcal Disease in France: A Study of the National Health Insurance Database. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 10:1607-1623. [PMID: 34170505 PMCID: PMC8322339 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00468-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is an uncommon but serious infectious disease. Its economic burden is known to be high but is poorly characterised. The objective of this study was to determine costs, as captured in the healthcare claims database, incurred by all patients hospitalised for IMD in France over a 6-year period. Methods This case–control study was performed using the French national public health insurance database (SNDS). Cases comprised all individuals hospitalised with acute IMD in France between 2012 and 2017 inclusive. For each case, three controls were identified, matched for age, gender and region of residence. All healthcare resource consumption by cases and controls during the follow-up period was documented. Costs were analysed for the index hospitalisation in cases, 1 year following the index date and then for 5 years following the index date. Costs were assigned from national tariffs. The analysis was performed from a societal perspective. IMD sequelae were identified from hospital discharge summaries. Results A total of 3532 cases and 10,590 controls were evaluated. The mean per capita cost of the index IMD hospitalisation was €11,256, and increased with age and with the presence of sequelae. In the year following the index date, mean per capita direct medical costs were €6564 in cases and €2890 in controls. Annual costs were €4254 in cases without sequelae, €10,799 in cases with one sequela and €20,096 in cases with more than one sequela. In the fifth year of follow-up, mean per capita costs were €2646 in cases and €1478 in controls. The excess cost in cases was principally due to the management of sequelae. Amputation, skin scarring and mental retardation generated per capita costs in excess of €20,000 in the first year and in excess of €10,000 for subsequent years. Conclusion The economic burden of IMD in France is high and, over the long-term, is driven by sequelae management. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-021-00468-w.
Collapse
|
9
|
Beck E, Klint J, Neine M, Garcia S, Meszaros K. Cost-Effectiveness of 4CMenB Infant Vaccination in England: A Comprehensive Valuation Considering the Broad Impact of Serogroup B Invasive Meningococcal Disease. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:91-104. [PMID: 33431159 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of 4CMenB infant vaccination in England comprehensively considers the broad burden of serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease (MenB IMD), which has not been considered, or was only partially considered in previous CEAs. METHODS A review of previous MenB vaccination CEAs was conducted to identify aspects considered in the evaluation of costs and health outcomes of the disease burden of MenB IMD. To inform the model structure and comprehensive analysis, the aspects were grouped into 5 categories. A stepwise analysis was conducted to analyze the impact of each category, and the more comprehensive consideration of disease burden, on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS MenB IMD incidence decreased by 46.0% in infants and children 0-4 years old within 5 years after introduction of the program. Stepwise inclusion of the 5 disease burden categories to a conventional narrow CEA setting reduced the ICER from £360 595 to £18 645-that is, considering the impact of all 5 categories, 4CMenB infant vaccination is cost-effective at a threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS When considering comprehensively the MenB IMD burden, 4CMenB infant vaccination can be cost-effective, a finding contrary to previous CEAs. This analysis allows policy decision-makers globally to infer the impact of current disease burden considerations on the cost-effectiveness and the comprehensive assessment necessary for MenB IMD. Although this comprehensive CEA can help inform decision making today, it may be limited in capturing the full disease burden and complex interactions of health and economics of MenB IMD.
Collapse
|
10
|
Meningococcal Deduced Vaccine Antigen Reactivity (MenDeVAR) Index: a Rapid and Accessible Tool That Exploits Genomic Data in Public Health and Clinical Microbiology Applications. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 59:JCM.02161-20. [PMID: 33055180 PMCID: PMC7771438 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02161-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
As microbial genomics makes increasingly important contributions to clinical and public health microbiology, the interpretation of whole-genome sequence data by nonspecialists becomes essential. In the absence of capsule-based vaccines, two protein-based vaccines have been used for the prevention of invasive serogroup B meningococcal disease (IMD) since their licensure in 2013 and 2014. These vaccines have different components and different levels of coverage of meningococcal variants. Hence, decisions regarding which vaccine to use in managing serogroup B IMD outbreaks require information about the index case isolate, including (i) the presence of particular vaccine antigen variants, (ii) the expression of vaccine antigens, and (iii) the likely susceptibility of its antigen variants to antibody-dependent bactericidal killing. As microbial genomics makes increasingly important contributions to clinical and public health microbiology, the interpretation of whole-genome sequence data by nonspecialists becomes essential. In the absence of capsule-based vaccines, two protein-based vaccines have been used for the prevention of invasive serogroup B meningococcal disease (IMD) since their licensure in 2013 and 2014. These vaccines have different components and different levels of coverage of meningococcal variants. Hence, decisions regarding which vaccine to use in managing serogroup B IMD outbreaks require information about the index case isolate, including (i) the presence of particular vaccine antigen variants, (ii) the expression of vaccine antigens, and (iii) the likely susceptibility of its antigen variants to antibody-dependent bactericidal killing. To obtain this information requires a multitude of laboratory assays, impractical in real-time clinical settings, where the information is most urgently needed. To facilitate assessment for public health and clinical purposes, we synthesized genomic and experimental data from published sources to develop and implement the Meningococcal Deduced Vaccine Antigen Reactivity (MenDeVAR) Index, which is publicly available on PubMLST (https://pubmlst.org). Using whole-genome sequences or individual gene sequences obtained from IMD isolates or clinical specimens, the MenDeVAR Index provides rapid evidence-based information on the presence and possible immunological cross-reactivity of different meningococcal vaccine antigen variants. The MenDeVAR Index enables practitioners who are not genomics specialists to assess the likely reactivity of vaccines for individual cases, outbreak management, or the assessment of public health vaccine programs. The MenDeVAR Index has been developed in consultation with, but independently of, both the 4CMenB (Bexsero; GSK) and rLP2086 (Trumenba; Pfizer, Inc.) vaccine manufacturers.
Collapse
|
11
|
Why the Anti-Meningococcal B Vaccination during Adolescence Should Be Implemented in Italy: An Overview of Available Evidence. Microorganisms 2020; 8:microorganisms8111681. [PMID: 33138142 PMCID: PMC7692044 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8111681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Although meningococcal disease has a low incidence in Italy, it is a public health concern owing to its high lethality rate and high frequency of transitory and/or permanent sequelae among survivors. The highest incidence rates are recorded in infants, children and adolescents, and most of the cases are due to Neisseria meningitidis B. In Italy, anti-meningococcal B (anti-MenB) vaccination is free for infants but, despite the considerable disease burden in adolescents, no national recommendation to vaccinate in this age-group is currently available. The aim of this study was to assess the main available scientific evidence to support the Italian health authorities in implementing a program of free anti-MenB vaccination for adolescents. We conducted an overview of the scientific literature on epidemiology, disease burden, immunogenicity and safety of available vaccines, and economic evaluations of vaccination strategies. Each case of invasive meningococcal disease generates a considerable health burden (lethality rate: 9%; up to 60% of patients experience at least one sequela) in terms of impaired quality of life for survivors and high direct and indirect costs (the mean overall cost of acute phase for a single case amounts to about EUR 13,952; the costs for post-acute and the long-term phases may vary widely depending of the type of sequela, reaching an annual cost of about EUR 100,000 in cases of severe neurological damage). Furthermore, vaccination against meningococcus B in adolescence proved cost-effective. The study highlights the need to actively offer the anti-MenB vaccination during adolescence at a national level. This would make it possible to avoid premature deaths and reduce the high costs borne by the National Health Service and by society of supporting survivors who suffer temporary and/or permanent sequelae.
Collapse
|
12
|
Parikh SR, Campbell H, Bettinger JA, Harrison LH, Marshall HS, Martinon-Torres F, Safadi MA, Shao Z, Zhu B, von Gottberg A, Borrow R, Ramsay ME, Ladhani SN. The everchanging epidemiology of meningococcal disease worldwide and the potential for prevention through vaccination. J Infect 2020; 81:483-498. [PMID: 32504737 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Neisseria meningitidis is a major cause of bacterial meningitis and septicaemia worldwide and is associated with high case fatality rates and serious life-long complications among survivors. Twelve serogroups are recognised, of which six (A, B, C, W, X and Y) are responsible for nearly all cases of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). The incidence of IMD and responsible serogroups vary widely both geographically and over time. For the first time, effective vaccines against all these serogroups are available or nearing licensure. Over the past two decades, IMD incidence has been declining across most parts of the world through a combination of successful meningococcal immunisation programmes and secular trends. The introduction of meningococcal C conjugate vaccines in the early 2000s was associated with rapid declines in meningococcal C disease, whilst implementation of a meningococcal A conjugate vaccine across the African meningitis belt led to near-elimination of meningococcal A disease. Consequently, other serogroups have become more important causes of IMD. In particular, the emergence of a hypervirulent meningococcal group W clone has led many countries to shift from monovalent meningococcal C to quadrivalent ACWY conjugate vaccines in their national immunisation programmes. Additionally, the recent licensure of two protein-based, broad-spectrum meningococcal B vaccines finally provides protection against the most common group responsible for childhood IMD across Europe and Australia. This review describes global IMD epidemiology across each continent and trends over time, the serogroups responsible for IMD, the impact of meningococcal immunisation programmes and future needs to eliminate this devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydel R Parikh
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, UK
| | - Helen Campbell
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, UK
| | - Julie A Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lee H Harrison
- Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Research Unit, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Helen S Marshall
- Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide and Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Federico Martinon-Torres
- Genetics, Vaccines and Pediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group (GENVIP), Hospital Clínico Universitario and Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC), Galicia, Spain
| | - Marco Aurelio Safadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Zhujun Shao
- State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Bingqing Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Anne von Gottberg
- Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Ray Borrow
- Meningococcal Reference Unit, Public Health England, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mary E Ramsay
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, UK
| | - Shamez N Ladhani
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, UK; Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group (PIDRG), St. George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bettinger JA, Liberator P, Halperin SA, Vaudry W, Sadarangani M, Hao L, Lambert N, Jansen KU, Anderson AS, Tsang R. Estimated susceptibility of Canadian meningococcal B isolates to a meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (MenB-FHbp). Vaccine 2020; 38:2026-2033. [PMID: 31983586 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB) remains a health risk in Canada and globally. Two MenB vaccines are now approved for use. An understanding of the genotype of Canadian strains and the potential strain coverage conferred by the MenB-FHbp vaccine is needed to inform immunization policies. METHODS Serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis strains responsible for meningococcal disease in Canada from 2006 to 2012 were collected as part of the Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program Active surveillance network. Genotypic analysis was done on MenB isolates from 2006 to 2012 with determination of fHbp surface expression for a subset of isolates: those occurring from 2010 to 2012. RESULTS Two clonal complexes (cc269 and cc41/44) were observed in 68.8% of the 276 isolates. A total of 50 different fHbp peptides were identified among isolates from 2006 to 2012. Surface expression of fHbp was detected on 95% of MenB isolates from 2010 to 2012 and 91% of isolates expressed fHbp at levels that are predicted to be susceptible to the bactericidal immune response elicited by the MenB-FHbp vaccine. Some regional differences were observed, particularly in isolates from British Columbia and Quebec. CONCLUSION The majority of MenB isolates responsible for meningococcal disease in Canada expressed fHbp at levels predicted to be sufficient for complement mediated bactericidal activity in the presence of MenB-FHbp induced serum antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z4H4, Canada.
| | - Paul Liberator
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA
| | - Scott A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, IWK Health Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax B3K6R8, Canada
| | - Wendy Vaudry
- Stollery Children's Hospital and University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G1C9, Canada
| | - Manish Sadarangani
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z4H4, Canada
| | - Li Hao
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA
| | - Nathaniel Lambert
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA; Juno Therapeutics, A Celgene Company, Seattle, WA 98102, USA
| | - Kathrin U Jansen
- Vaccine Research and Development, Pfizer, Inc., Pearl River, NY 10965, USA
| | | | - Raymond Tsang
- National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg R3E3R2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Breton MC, Huang L, Snedecor SJ, Cornelio N, Fanton-Aita F. Cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for vaccination of adolescents against serogroup B IMD with the MenB-FHbp vaccine in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health 2020; 111:182-192. [PMID: 31907760 PMCID: PMC7109210 DOI: 10.17269/s41997-019-00275-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Serogroup B meningococci (MnB) are now the largest cause of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in Canada. We assessed the clinical and economic impact of 3 adolescent MenB-FHbp immunization strategies. METHODS A population-based dynamic transmission model was developed to simulate the transmission of MnB among the entire Canadian population over a 30-year time horizon. Age group-based IMD incidence, bacterial carriage and transmission, disease outcomes, costs, and impact on quality of life were obtained from Canadian surveillance data and published literature. The vaccine was assumed to provide 85% protection against IMD and 26.6% against carriage acquisition. The model estimated the impact of routine vaccination with MenB-FHbp in 3 strategies: (1) age 14, along with existing school-based programs, with 75% uptake; (2) age 17 with 75% uptake, assuming school vaccination; and (3) age 17 with 30% uptake, assuming vaccination outside of school. Costs were calculated from the Canadian societal perspective. RESULTS With no vaccination, an estimated 3974 MnB cases would be expected over 30 years. Vaccination with strategies 1-3 were estimated to avert 688, 1033, and 575 cases, respectively. These outcomes were associated with incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year of $976,000, $685,000, and $490,000. CONCLUSIONS Our model indicated that if the vaccine reduces risk of carriage acquisition, vaccination of older adolescents, even at lower uptake, could have a significant public health impact. Due to low disease incidence, MnB vaccination is unlikely to meet widely accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds, but evaluations of new programs should consider the overall benefits of the vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Claude Breton
- Pfizer Canada ULC, 17300 Trans-Canada Highway, Kirkland, Montréal, QC, H9J 2M5, Canada.
| | | | | | | | - Fiorella Fanton-Aita
- Pfizer Canada ULC, 17300 Trans-Canada Highway, Kirkland, Montréal, QC, H9J 2M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Boccalini S, Bechini A, Sartor G, Paolini D, Innocenti M, Bonanni P, Panatto D, Lai PL, Zangrillo F, Marchini F, Lecini E, Iovine M, Amicizia D, Landa P. [Health Technology Assessment of meningococcal B vaccine (Trumenba ®) in adolescent in Italy]. JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE AND HYGIENE 2019; 60:E1-E94. [PMID: 32047867 PMCID: PMC7007189 DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.3s2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Boccalini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - A Bechini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - G Sartor
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - D Paolini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - M Innocenti
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - P Bonanni
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Firenze
| | - D Panatto
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - P L Lai
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - F Zangrillo
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - F Marchini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - E Lecini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - M Iovine
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - D Amicizia
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università degli Studi di Genova
| | - P Landa
- Dipartimento di Economia, Università degli Studi di Genova
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, thus remaining a concern for healthcare providers and the public. Evidence of the longitudinal burden of IMD and associated costs are scarce. Here we have evaluated the healthcare utilization and cost associated with hospitalized IMD cases in Ontario, Canada. METHODS Observational cohort study utilizing the Ontario provincial claims databases, comprising: (1) individuals hospitalized with IMD between January 1995 and June 2012 and (2) age-, gender- and area-matched non-IMD controls (1:20 ratio). IMD cases were identified through diagnostic codes from hospitalization data and medical services claims. Costs are presented in Canadian dollars. RESULTS Nine-hundred twelve IMD cases and 18,221 non-IMD controls were included. Over 5 years of follow-up, 27% of IMD cases (excluding initial hospitalization and 30-day acute phase) versus 15% of non-IMD controls (P < 0.001) were hospitalized. Compared with controls, IMD cases were more likely to receive alternative level of care (6.7% vs. 1.1%; P < 0.001) or visit the intensive care unit (49.2% vs. 2.4%; P < 0.001), and were associated with significantly higher mean hospitalization cost per case ($40,075 vs. $2827; P < 0.001). The hospitalization cost per case remained significantly higher when excluding the initial hospitalization and acute phase ($9867 vs. $3312; P < 0.001). The mean total cost per IMD case, including medications, hospitalization and medical services, was $45,768-$52,631 ($13,520-$23,789 excluding initial hospitalization and acute phase), for an overall cost (all cases during total follow-up) of $41,740,142-$47,999,289. CONCLUSIONS In addition to its clinical burden, IMD is associated with significant economic burden to the public health system.
Collapse
|
17
|
A Longitudinal Epidemiology Study of Meningococcal Carriage in Students 13 to 25 Years Old in Quebec. mSphere 2018; 3:3/6/e00427-18. [PMID: 30518675 PMCID: PMC6282008 DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00427-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis is associated with serious complications and a high fatality rate. Asymptomatic individuals can harbor the bacterium in the throat, a state known as “carriage,” which can lead to person-to-person spread of the pathogen. This study examined N. meningitidis carriage from 2010 to 2013 among 2 groups in the Quebec City region: ninth-grade students (aged 13 to 15 years), who were also followed in their last year of high school (eleventh grade/college entry; 16 to 18 years), and university students (18 to 25 years); both groups have been shown in some other geographic regions to have high rates of carriage. This study demonstrated that N. meningitidis carriage rates were higher among university students in dormitories than ninth-grade and eleventh-grade/college entry students. Understanding carriage rates in these age groups leads to better strategies to control N. meningitidis by targeting vaccination to those responsible for transmission within the population. Neisseria meningitidis carriage data are necessary to inform serogroup B (NmB) immunization program implementation. This longitudinal study compared detection methods to measure N. meningitidis throat carriage prevalence in Quebec from November 2010 to December 2013 using cultured swab isolates and direct swab PCR from students in ninth grade (aged 13 to 15 years; n = 534) and eleventh grade/college entry (16 to 18 years; n = 363) and in university students in dormitories (18 to 25 years; n = 360) at 3 time points per group. Meningococcal and NmB carriage rates were lower in ninth- and eleventh-grade/college entry students than university students, regardless of methodology. Genotyping cultured isolates by PCR detected NmB and non-NmB in 2.1% and 7.3% of ninth-grade students, in 1.7% and 7.2% of eleventh-grade/college entry students, and in 7.5% and 21.9% of university students, respectively. NmB acquisition rates were 1.9, 0.7, and 3.3 per 1,000 person-months across respective age groups. Most NmB isolates (94.7%, 76.9%, and 86.8%, respectively) expressed subfamily A factor H binding-protein (fHBP) variants. The most common non-NmB serogroups were NmY (1.7%/1.1%) from ninth grade and eleventh grade/college entry and NmW (2.8%) from university students. Genomic analyses detected disease-associated sequence types in carriage isolates, and carriage could persist for months. This is the largest longitudinal carriage study in Canada and the first to report fHBP variants in NmB carriage isolates in healthy Canadians. These data contribute to identification of the optimal window for NmB vaccination in precollege adolescents and provide a baseline for investigating NmB vaccination effects on carriage in this population. IMPORTANCE Disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis is associated with serious complications and a high fatality rate. Asymptomatic individuals can harbor the bacterium in the throat, a state known as “carriage,” which can lead to person-to-person spread of the pathogen. This study examined N. meningitidis carriage from 2010 to 2013 among 2 groups in the Quebec City region: ninth-grade students (aged 13 to 15 years), who were also followed in their last year of high school (eleventh grade/college entry; 16 to 18 years), and university students (18 to 25 years); both groups have been shown in some other geographic regions to have high rates of carriage. This study demonstrated that N. meningitidis carriage rates were higher among university students in dormitories than ninth-grade and eleventh-grade/college entry students. Understanding carriage rates in these age groups leads to better strategies to control N. meningitidis by targeting vaccination to those responsible for transmission within the population.
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang B, Santoreneos R, Afzali H, Giles L, Marshall H. Costs of Invasive Meningococcal Disease: A Global Systematic Review. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2018; 36:1201-1222. [PMID: 29948965 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0679-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive meningococcal disease remains a public health concern because of its rapid onset and significant risk of death and long-term disability. New meningococcal serogroup B and combination serogroup ACWY vaccines are being considered for publicly funded immunization programs in many countries. Contemporary costing data associated with invasive meningococcal disease are required to inform cost-effectiveness analyses. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to estimate costs and resource utilization associated with acute infection and the long-term care of invasive meningococcal disease. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, health economic databases, and electronically available conference abstracts were searched. Studies reporting any costs associated with acute infection and long-term sequelae of invasive meningococcal disease in English were included. All costs were converted into purchasing power parity-adjusted estimates [international dollars (I$)] using the Campbell and Cochrane Economics Methods Group and the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre cost converter. RESULTS Fourteen studies met our eligibility criteria and were included. The mean costs of acute admission ranged from I$1629 to I$50,796, with an incremental cost of I$16,378. The mean length of hospital stay was reported to be 6-18 days in multiple studies. The average costs reported for readmissions ranged from I$7905 to I$15,908. Key variables such as the presence of sequelae were associated with higher hospitalization costs and longer inpatient stay. No studies estimated direct non-healthcare costs and productivity loss. Ten studies reported only unadjusted mean values without using appropriate statistical methods for adjustment. CONCLUSIONS Invasive meningococcal disease can result in substantial costs to healthcare systems. However, costing data on long-term follow-up and indirect costs used to populate health economic models are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Wang
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | | | - Hossein Afzali
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Lynne Giles
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Helen Marshall
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Systematic Review of Invasive Meningococcal Disease: Sequelae and Quality of Life Impact on Patients and Their Caregivers. Infect Dis Ther 2018; 7:421-438. [PMID: 30267220 PMCID: PMC6249177 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-018-0213-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD, septicaemia and/or meningitis) has a severe acute and long-term burden: 5–10% of patients die within 48 h, and long-term sequelae have been reported in 10–20% of survivors. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is increasingly but inconsistently assessed. Methods A systematic literature review on Neisseria meningitidis IMD sequelae and HRQoL in survivors of all ages and their caregivers, including family, was conducted for high-income countries from 2001 to 2016 (in Medline and Embase, following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines). Results A total of 31 studies, mostly of childhood IMD cases, were included. A broad range of physical, neurological and psychological IMD sequelae were identified. The literature has evolved, with more types of sequelae reported in more recent studies; however, meningococcal disease-specific and sequelae-specific HRQoL data are lacking, and existing studies used a wide variety of instruments. Physical sequelae included: amputations (up to 8% of children, 3% adolescents/adults) and skin scars (up to 55% of children, 18% adolescents, 2% adults). Neurologic sequelae included: hearing loss (up to 19% of infants, 13% children, 12% adolescents, 8% adults). Psychological sequelae included: anxiety, learning difficulties, emotional and behavioural difficulties. IMD negatively affects HRQoL in patients and also in their family and close caregiver network, both in the short- and long-term. Even IMD survivors without sequelae experienced an adverse impact on HRQoL after many years, affecting self-esteem, physical, mental and psychosocial health, and HRQoL was worse in those with cognitive and behavioural sequelae. Conclusion A high proportion of IMD survivors are affected by a broad range of sequelae and reduced HRQoL that persists years after infection. Childhood IMD survivors had more sequelae and more severe sequelae compared with adult survivors. HRQoL was affected in patients and also in their families, caregivers and surrounding network over the long term. More research is needed to resolve data gaps and to standardise HRQoL assessment. Funding GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (Rixensart, Belgium). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-018-0213-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
20
|
Robinson JL. Mise à jour sur la vaccination contre la méningococcie invasive chez les enfants et les adolescents canadiens. Paediatr Child Health 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxx163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
21
|
Robinson JL. Update on invasive meningococcal vaccination for Canadian children and youth. Paediatr Child Health 2018; 23:e1-e4. [PMID: 29479282 PMCID: PMC5814812 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxx162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is serious, often resulting in fulminant sepsis or meningitis. IMD in Canada is primarily attributable to serogroups B and C. There are routine programs for serogroup C vaccine at 12 months of age, with some jurisdictions routinely providing additional earlier doses. Adolescents routinely receive a booster dose of serogroup C vaccine or of a quadrivalent (serogroups A, C, W and Y) vaccine. Serogroup B vaccines are not recommended for routine use pending further data on the efficacy and duration of protection from the available vaccine. However, children at increased risk for IMD should start immunization for serogroups B and C as soon as possible, assuming that they are at least 2 months of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan L Robinson
- Canadian Paediatric Society, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee, Ottawa, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sadarangani M, Sell T, Iro MA, Snape MD, Voysey M, Finn A, Heath PT, Bona G, Esposito S, Diez-Domingo J, Prymula R, Odueyungbo A, Toneatto D, Pollard AJ. Persistence of immunity after vaccination with a capsular group B meningococcal vaccine in 3 different toddler schedules. CMAJ 2017; 189:E1276-E1285. [PMID: 29038320 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.161288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One schedule for the capsular group B meningococcal vaccine 4CMenB is 2 doses that are administered 2 months apart for children aged 12-23 months, with a booster dose 12-24 months later. Our objective was to provide data on persistence of human serum bactericidal antibody (hSBA) titres in children up to 4 years of age after initial doses at 12-24 months, and immunogenicity of a booster dose at 48 months of age compared with vaccine-naive children. METHODS Children previously immunized, as part of a randomized controlled trial, with 2 doses of 4CMenB vaccine at 12-24 months of age received a booster at 4 years of age. Vaccine-naive age-matched toddlers received 2 doses of 4CMenB. Human serum bactericidal antibody titres against reference strains H44/76, 5/99, NZ98/254 and M10713 were evaluated before and after innoculation with 4CMenB vaccine in 4-year-old children. RESULTS Of 332 children in the study, 123 had previously received 4CMenB and 209 were vaccine-naive controls. Before the booster, the proportions of participants (previously vaccinated groups compared with controls) with hSBA titres of 1:5 or more were as follows: 9%-11% v. 1% (H44/76), 84%-100% v. 4% (5/99), 0%-18% v. 0% (NZ98/254) and 59%-60% v. 60% (M10713). After 1 dose of 4CMenB in previously immunized children, the proportions of participants achieving hSBA titres of 1:5 or more were 100% (H44/76 and 5/99), 70%-100% (NZ98/254) and 90%-100% (M10713). INTERPRETATION We found that waning of hSBA titres by 4 years of age occurred after 2 doses of 4CMenB vaccine administered at 12-24 months, and doses at 12-24 months have a priming effect on the immune system. A booster may be necessary to maintain hSBA titres of 1:5 or more among those children with increased disease risk. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT01717638.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Sadarangani
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Tim Sell
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Mildred A Iro
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Matthew D Snape
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Merryn Voysey
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Adam Finn
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Paul T Heath
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Gianni Bona
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Susanna Esposito
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Javier Diez-Domingo
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Roman Prymula
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Adefowope Odueyungbo
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Daniela Toneatto
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | - Andrew J Pollard
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics (Sadarangani, Sell, Iro, Snape, Voysey, Pollard), University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Vaccine Evaluation Center (Sadarangani), BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Voysey), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Bristol Children's Vaccine Centre (Finn), School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; St. George's Vaccine Institute (Heath), University of London, London, UK; Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità (Bona), Clinica Pediatrica, Novara, Italy; Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit (Esposito), Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Vaccine Research Area (Diez-Domingo), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain; Charles University Prague, School of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences (Prymula), Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc. (Odueyungbo), Cambridge, Mass.; Hoffmann-La Roche Limited (Odueyungbo), Mississauga, Ont.; GSK (Toneatto), Siena, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Predicted vs observed effectiveness of outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccines against meningococcal serogroup B disease: Systematic review. J Infect 2017; 75:81-94. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
24
|
MacDougall DM, Langley JM, Li L, Ye L, MacKinnon-Cameron D, Top KA, McNeil SA, Halperin BA, Swain A, Bettinger JA, Dubé E, De Serres G, Halperin SA. Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of university students, faculty, and staff during a meningococcal serogroup B outbreak vaccination program. Vaccine 2017; 35:2520-2530. [PMID: 28347501 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Revised: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES During an outbreak of invasive meningococcal B disease on a university campus, we explored the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of members of the university community in relation to the disease, the vaccine, and the vaccination program. DESIGN All students, faculty and staff were invited by email to participate in a 71-item online survey, which was administered after completion of the mass clinics for the first and second doses of a meningococcal B vaccination program. RESULTS A total of 404 individuals responded to the survey; 75.7% were students. Knowledge about meningococcal disease and vaccine was generally high; more than 70% correct responses were received on each knowledge question except for one question about the different meningococcal serogroups. Gender (female) and higher knowledge scores were significantly associated with either being immunized or intending to be immunized (p<0.05). Positive attitudes about immunization, concern about meningococccal infection, a sense of community responsibility, and trust in public health advice also correlated with being vaccinated or intending to be vaccinated (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS A successful mass vaccination program in a Nova Scotia university was associated with high levels of knowledge, positive attitudes toward vaccination, and positive attitudes toward public health recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M MacDougall
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada; School of Nursing, St. Francis Xavier University, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| | - J M Langley
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - L Li
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - L Ye
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - D MacKinnon-Cameron
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - K A Top
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - S A McNeil
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - B A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada; School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - A Swain
- Acadia University, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - J A Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | - E Dubé
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - G De Serres
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - S A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Neisseria meningitidis still leads to deaths and severe disability in children, adolescents and adults. Six different capsular groups of N. meningitidis cause invasive meningococcal disease in the form of meningitis and septicaemia in humans. Although conjugate meningococcal vaccines have been developed to provide protection against four of the capsular groups causing most diseases in humans, vaccines against capsular group B, which causes 85% of cases in Australia and the United Kingdom, have only recently been developed. A capsular group B meningococcal vaccine - 4CMenB (Bexsero) - has recently been licensed in the European Union, Canada and Australia. In Australia, a submission for inclusion of 4CMenB in the funded national immunization programme has recently been rejected. The vaccine will now be introduced into the national immunization programme in the United Kingdom following negotiation of a cost-effective price. With the current low incidence of invasive meningococcal disease in many regions, cost-effectiveness of a new capsular group B meningococcal vaccine is borderline in both the United Kingdom and Australia. Cost-effectiveness of an infant programme is determined largely by the direct protection of those vaccinated and is driven by the higher rate of disease in this age group. However, for an adolescent programme to be cost-effective, it must provide both long-term protection against both disease and carriage. The potential of vaccination to reduce the rate of severe invasive disease is a real possibility. A dual approach using both an infant and adolescent immunization programme to provide direct protection to those age groups at highest risk of meningococcal disease and to optimize the potential herd immunity effects is likely to be the most effective means of reducing invasive meningococcal disease. This commentary aims to describe the known disease burden and consequences of meningococcal disease, and the development and potential effectiveness of new capsular group B meningococcal vaccines.
Collapse
|
26
|
Deciphering the Burden of Meningococcal Disease: Conventional and Under-recognized Elements. J Adolesc Health 2016; 59:S12-20. [PMID: 27449145 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Revised: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Invasive meningococcal disease remains a substantial global public health burden despite being vaccine-preventable worldwide. More than one million cases are reported annually, with average fatality rates ranging from 10% to 40% depending on clinical presentation and geographic location. Survivors may suffer debilitating sequelae that reduce the quality of life for the patient and family members responsible for their care. Major financial burdens are associated with acute treatment and follow-up care, and outbreak management often places extensive financial strains on public health resources. Although the clinical and financial aspects of meningococcal disease burden are straightforward to quantify, other burdens such as lifelong cognitive deficits, psychological stress, adaptive measures for reintegration into society, familial impact, and legal costs are systematically overlooked. These and other facets of disease burden are therefore not systematically considered in cost-effectiveness analyses that public health authorities take into consideration when making decisions regarding vaccination programs. Changing the approach for measuring meningococcal disease burden is necessary to accurately understand the societal consequences of this devastating illness. In this article, the conventional and under-recognized burdens of meningococcal disease are presented and discussed.
Collapse
|
27
|
Vygen S, Hellenbrand W, Stefanoff P, Hanquet G, Heuberger S, Stuart J. European public health policies for managing contacts of invasive meningococcal disease cases better harmonised in 2013 than in 2007. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 21:23-31. [PMID: 26875517 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2016.21.5.30125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2014] [Accepted: 05/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In 2007, a European survey identified variation in country policies on public health management of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). In 2009-10, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) published evidence-based guidance on IMD. We therefore surveyed again European countries to describe policies for managing IMD cases and contacts in 2013. We asked national IMD public health experts from 32 European countries to complete a questionnaire focusing on post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for IMD contacts and meningococcal vaccination. Proportions in 2007 and 2013 were compared using the chi-squared test. All 32 countries responded, with responses from two regions for Belgium and Italy; half stated having used ECDC guidance to update national recommendations. PEP was recommended to close contacts in 33 of 34 countries/regions, mainly ciprofloxacin for adults (29/32 countries) and rifampicin for children (29/32 countries). ECDC guidance for managing IMD contacts in airplanes was strictly followed by five countries/regions. Twenty-three countries/regions participated in both surveys. Compared with 2007, in 2013, more countries/regions recommended i) ceftriaxone for children (15/23 vs 6/20; p = 0.03), ii) PEP for all children in the same preschool group (8/23 vs 17/23; p = 0.02). More countries/regions recommended evidence-based measures for IMD public health management in 2013 than 2007. However, some discrepancies remain and they call for further harmonisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Vygen
- French Institute of Public Health Surveillance, Department of Coordination of Alerts and Regions, Regional office in Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Langley JM, MacDougall DM, Halperin BA, Swain A, Halperin SA, Top KA, McNeil SA, MacKinnon-Cameron D, Marty K, De Serres G, Dubé E, Bettinger JA. Rapid surveillance for health events following a mass meningococcal B vaccine program in a university setting: A Canadian Immunization Research Network study. Vaccine 2016; 34:4046-9. [PMID: 27302338 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2016] [Revised: 05/17/2016] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
An outbreak of Neisseria meningitidis serotype B infection occurred at a small residential university; public health announced an organizational vaccination program with the 4-component Meningococcal B (4CMenB) vaccine (Bexsero(TM), Novartis/GlaxoSmithKline Inc.) several days later. Since there were limited published data on reactogenicity of 4CMenB in persons over 17years of age, this study sought to conduct rapid surveillance of health events in vaccinees and controls using an online survey. Vaccine uptake was 84.7% for dose 1 (2967/3500) and 70% (2456/3500) for dose 2; the survey response rates were 33.0% (987/2967) and 18.7% (459/2456) in dose 1 and dose 1 recipients respectively, and 12% in unvaccinated individuals (63/533). Most students were 20-29years of age (vaccinees, 64.0%; controls, 74.0). A new health problem or worsening of an existing health problem was reported by 30.0% and 30.3% of vaccine recipients after doses 1 and 2 respectively; and by 15.9% of controls. These health problems interfered with the ability to perform normal activities in most vaccinees reporting these events (74.7% post dose 1; 62.6% post dose 2), and in 60% of controls. The health problems led to a health care provider visit (including emergency room) in 12.8% and 14.4% of vaccinees post doses 1 and 2, respectively and in 40% of controls. The most common reactions in vaccinees were injection site reactions (20.6% post dose 1, 16.1% post dose 20 and non-specific systemic complaints (22.6% post dose 1, 17.6% post dose 2). No hospitalizations were reported. An online surveillance program during an emergency meningococcal B vaccine program was successfully implemented, and detected higher rates of health events in vaccinees compared to controls, and high rates of both vaccinees and controls seeking medical attention. The types of adverse events reported by young adult vaccinees were consistent with those previously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Langley
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and the Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), Canada.
| | | | - B A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and the Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), Canada
| | - A Swain
- Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada
| | - S A Halperin
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and the Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), Canada
| | - K A Top
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and the Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), Canada
| | - S A McNeil
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and the Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), Canada
| | - D MacKinnon-Cameron
- Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and the Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia (NS), Canada
| | - K Marty
- Vaccine Evaluation Centre, B.C. Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - G De Serres
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - E Dubé
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - J A Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Centre, B.C. Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Christensen H, Irving T, Koch J, Trotter CL, Ultsch B, Weidemann F, Wichmann O, Hellenbrand W. Epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness of universal vaccination with Bexsero® to reduce meningococcal group B disease in Germany. Vaccine 2016; 34:3412-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Revised: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 04/01/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
30
|
Hellenbrand W, Koch J, Harder T, Bogdan C, Heininger U, Tenenbaum T, Terhardt M, Vogel U, Wichmann O, von Kries R. Background Paper for the update of meningococcal vaccination recommendations in Germany: use of the serogroup B vaccine in persons at increased risk for meningococcal disease. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2016; 58:1314-43. [PMID: 26487381 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-015-2253-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In December 2013 Bexsero® became available in Germany for vaccination against serogroup B meningococci (MenB). In August 2015 the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) endorsed a recommendation for use of this vaccine in persons at increased risk of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). This background paper summarizes the evidence underlying the recommendation. Bexsero® is based on surface protein antigens expressed by about 80% of circulating serogroup B meningococci in Germany. The paper reviews available data on immunogenicity and safety of Bexsero® in healthy children and adolescents; data in persons with underlying illness and on the effectiveness in preventing clinical outcomes are thus far unavailable.STIKO recommends MenB vaccination for the following persons based on an individual risk assessment: (1) Persons with congenital or acquired immune deficiency or suppression. Among these, persons with terminal complement defects and properdin deficiency, including those under eculizumab therapy, are at highest risk with reported invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) incidences up 10,000-fold higher than in the general population. Persons with asplenia were estimated to have a ~ 20-30-fold increased risk of IMD, while the risk in individuals with other immune defects such as HIV infection or hypogammaglobulinaemia was estimated at no more than 5-10-fold higher than the background risk. (2) Laboratory staff with a risk of exposure to N. meningitidis aerosols, for whom an up to 271-fold increased risk for IMD has been reported. (3) Unvaccinated household (-like) contacts of a MenB IMD index case, who have a roughly 100-200-fold increased IMD risk in the year after the contact despite chemoprophylaxis. Because the risk is highest in the first 3 months and full protective immunity requires more than one dose (particularly in infants and toddlers), MenB vaccine should be administered as soon as possible following identification of the serogroup of the index case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Judith Koch
- Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Harder
- Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Bogdan
- Mikrobiologisches Institut - Klinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Tobias Tenenbaum
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Pulmonology, University Children's Hospital, Mannheim-Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Vogel
- Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ole Wichmann
- Immunization Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rüdiger von Kries
- Institute for Social Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ginsberg GM, Block C, Stein-Zamir C. Cost-utility analysis of a nationwide vaccination programme against serogroup B meningococcal disease in Israel. Int J Public Health 2016; 61:683-692. [PMID: 27105884 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-016-0821-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2015] [Revised: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Using cost-utility analysis, to evaluate whether or not to adopt a Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B vaccination programme for Israeli children. METHODS Epidemiological, demographic, health service utilisation and economic data were integrated into a spreadsheet model to calculate the cost per averted disability-adjusted life year (DALY) of the intervention. RESULTS Assuming 78 % vaccine efficacy with no herd immunity, vaccination will prevent 223 cases and 22 deaths over a 100-year period. Based on vaccine price of $60 per dose, total intervention costs ($315,400,000) are partially offset by a $22,700,000 reduction in treatment and sequelae costs as a result of decreased morbidity. The intervention was not cost-effective since the net cost ($292,700,000) per averted DALY gained (1249 mostly due to decreased mortality) was $234,394. Additional two dose catch-up programmes vaccinating children in cohorts aged 1-2 to 1-13 were also not cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS The vaccination will become cost-effective if vaccine costs fall below $19.44 per dose. However, in identified high risk areas, the vaccine would be cost-effective and could be recommended for use both with and without catch-up campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary M Ginsberg
- Department of Technology Assessment, Public Health Service, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Colin Block
- Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Centre, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Chen Stein-Zamir
- Jerusalem District Health Office, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University and Hadassah, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive meningococcal disease remains a rare infectious disease not only with high mortality but also with important morbidity. Until recently no universal vaccine existed against serogroup B, which explains most of the cases in settings like Europe. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical course and sequelae of meningococcal disease in Spain. METHODS Retrospective review of all children younger than 15 years admitted to any of the 36 hospitals in the MENDICOS Spanish network (www.mendicos.org) with confirmed or probable invasive meningococcal disease in children between January 2008 and December 2013. RESULTS A total of 458 cases were identified across the country, most of them occurring in previously healthy children (91.5%; n = 419/458). Median (interquartile range) age was 1.7 (0.7 and 4.6) years, with 53.1% of the cases occurring in children younger than 2 years; 82.1% (n = 368) were laboratory confirmed cases; 95.2% (n = 256) of those serogrouped were serogroup B. The diagnosis was meningitis in 24.9% (n = 114) of the cases, sepsis in 37.1% (n = 170) and both in 38.0% (n = 174). Mean hospital length of stay was 11.6 (10.9) days; 79.2% (n = 354) of the patients required pediatric intensive care unit admission, with a mean pediatric intensive care unit stay of 3.9 (4.9) days; 3.5% (n = 16) died; 12.9% (n = 59) of the survivors were discharged with some kind of physical sequelae, mainly neurological (n = 23). CONCLUSIONS Serogroup B invasive meningococcal infection explains substantial morbidity and mortality in Spain, occurring mainly in infants. The recent availability of a vaccine against serogroup B may change this scenario. Given that the vast majority of the cases occur in otherwise healthy children, inclusion of the meningococcal B vaccine in the national immunization program should be carefully considered.
Collapse
|
33
|
Eton V, Tsang RSW, Ulanova M. Paediatric meningococcaemia in northwestern Ontario, Canada: a case for publicly funded meningococcal B vaccination. JMM Case Rep 2016; 3:e005017. [PMID: 28348748 PMCID: PMC5343130 DOI: 10.1099/jmmcr.0.005017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2015] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B is an important infectious agent in developed countries, including Canada. Infants are particularly susceptible to infection with serogroup B because of immature immune systems, pathogen virulence factors and changing serogroup dynamics in the post-vaccination era. Currently, the Ontario provincial government does not include serogroup B in its routine publicly funded meningococcal vaccination program. CASE PRESENTATION A formerly well 14-month-old male presented to a tertiary hospital emergency department with fever, minor respiratory problems, diffuse purpuric rash, distended abdomen, tachycardia, and history of one episode of vomiting and melena each. Meningococcaemia was immediately suspected, and he was treated with ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and vancomycin before transfer to a different acute care facility within 12 h. N. meningitidis serogroup B, sensitive to ceftriaxone and penicillin, was identified in his blood. The patient developed gangrene of the lower legs and underwent bilateral below-knee amputation 8 days post-admission. CONCLUSION This instance of meningococcaemia with extensive sequelae is an example of the various serious outcomes of meningococcal infection. It provides persuasive reason for routine publicly funded vaccination against N. meningitidis serogroup B in Ontario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vic Eton
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine , Thunder Bay, Ontario , Canada
| | - Raymond S W Tsang
- Vaccine Preventable Bacterial Diseases, National Microbiology Laboratory , Winnipeg, Manitoba , Canada
| | - Marina Ulanova
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada; Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Neisseria meningitidis is a gram-negative diplococcus, for which humans are the only reservoir. While colonization is common, invasive meningococcal disease in the form of meningitis or bacteremia can be devastating and potentially fatal. Certain populations are at higher risk for disease including infants, adolescents, those with asplenia or complement deficiencies, and potentially those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Use of conjugate meningococcal vaccines has impacted disease epidemiology in both high- and low-income countries. Outbreaks of serogroup B disease at university campuses have drawn further attention to the recent development of a novel serogroup B vaccine now approved in many countries. This review covers key aspects of the pathogenesis and management of meningococcal disease, as well as the very recent developments in disease epidemiology, outbreaks, and the evolution of meningococcal immunizations.
Collapse
|
35
|
Mameli C, Faccini M, Mazzali C, Picca M, Colella G, Duca PG, Zuccotti GV. Acceptability of meningococcal serogroup B vaccine among parents and health care workers in Italy: a survey. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2015; 10:3004-10. [PMID: 25483638 DOI: 10.4161/21645515.2014.971602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
A new meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4 CMenB) has recently been licensed. This study assessed the acceptability of 4 CMenB vaccine among parents and healthcare workers (HCWs). From May to July 2013 in Milan, Italy, self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 2050 parents of infants presenting at immunization clinics for the mandatory hexavalent vaccination and submitted to 350 HCWs involved in immunization practices. 1842 parents (89.1%) responded to the survey; 64.4% of parents wanted their child to receive the 4 CMenB vaccine and 5.1% would not vaccinate their children. Multivariate analysis showed that recognition of the severity of meningitis [a life threatening vs a mild or unthreatening disease (Odds ratio (OR): 2.3; confidence interval (CI): 1.4-3.6], awareness of vaccination as a beneficial preventive measure (very beneficial vs not beneficial OR = 6.4; CI 3.0-13.7) and knowledge of the Meningococcal C vaccine (OR = 1.4; CI 1.1-1.8) were strongly associated to willingness to receive 4 CMenB vaccine. On the contrary, level of education was associated with refusal of immunization (university vs education level lower than middle school OR = 0.68; CI 0.47-0.97). Among the parents who were willing to immunize their children, 66.9% would agree with three injections to be administered during the same visit. A total of 291 HCWs (83.1%) agreed to participate in the survey; 73% considered 4 CMenB vaccine a priority in infants' immunization schedule; 26.8% of HCWs suggested the concomitant administration with routine infant immunization. Parental and HCWs acceptability of 4 CMenB vaccine was high. Increasing knowledge about meningitis and vaccine prevention might further increase the acceptability of this vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Mameli
- a Department of Pediatrics; L Sacco Hospital ; University of Milan ; Milan , Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Perrett KP, McVernon J, Richmond PC, Marshall H, Nissen M, August A, Percell S, Toneatto D, Nolan T. Immune responses to a recombinant, four-component, meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB) in adolescents: a phase III, randomized, multicentre, lot-to-lot consistency study. Vaccine 2015; 33:5217-24. [PMID: 26232542 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2014] [Revised: 06/26/2015] [Accepted: 06/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For decades, a broadly effective vaccine against serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis (MenB) has remained elusive. Recently, a four-component recombinant vaccine (4CMenB) has been developed and is now approved in Europe, Canada, Australia and some Latin American countries. This phase III, randomized study evaluated the lot consistency, early immune responses and the safety profile of 4CMenB in 11 to 17-year-old adolescents in Australia and Canada (NCT01423084). METHODS In total, 344 adolescents received two doses of one of 2 lots of 4CMenB, 1-month apart. Immunogenicity was assessed before, 2-weeks and 1-month following the second vaccination. Serum bactericidal activity using human complement (hSBA) was measured against three reference strains 44/76-SL, 5/99 and NZ98/254, selected to express one of the vaccine antigens; Neisseria adhesin A (NadA), factor H binding protein (fHbp) and porin A (PorA) containing outer membrane vesicle (OMV), respectively. Responses to the Neisseria heparin binding antigen (NHBA) were assessed with enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Local and systemic reactions were recorded for 7 days following each vaccination; unsolicited adverse events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS Immunological equivalence of the two lots of 4CMenB was established at 1-month. At baseline, ≤7% of participants had hSBA titers ≥5 to all three reference strains. Two weeks following the second dose of 4CMenB, all participants had hSBA titers ≥5 against fHbp and NadA compared with 84-96% against the PorA reference strains. At 1-month, corresponding proportions were 99%, 100% and 70-79%, respectively. Both lots were generally well tolerated and had similar adverse event profiles. CONCLUSIONS Two doses of 4CMenB had an acceptable safety profile and induced a robust immune response in adolescents. Peak antibody responses were observed at 14 days following vaccination. While a substantial non-uniform antigen-dependent early decline in antibody titers was seen thereafter, a significant percentage of participants continued to maintain protective hSBA titers at 1-month.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten P Perrett
- Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group (VIRGo), Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jodie McVernon
- Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group (VIRGo), Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter C Richmond
- School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Australia
| | - Helen Marshall
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit (VIRTU), Women's and Children's Hospital, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health and Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Michael Nissen
- Queensland Paediatric Infectious Diseases Laboratory (Qpid), Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Allison August
- Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Sandra Percell
- Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Terry Nolan
- Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group (VIRGo), Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yamashiro H, Cutcliffe N, Dobson S, Fisman D, Gold R. The role of pediatricians as key stakeholders in influencing immunization policy decisions for the introduction of meningitis B vaccine in Canada: The Ontario perspective. THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES & MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY = JOURNAL CANADIEN DES MALADIES INFECTIEUSES ET DE LA MICROBIOLOGIE MEDICALE 2015; 26:183-90. [PMID: 26361485 PMCID: PMC4556178 DOI: 10.1155/2015/963940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
As key stakeholders in immunization policy decisions, the Pediatricians of Ontario held an accredited conference on January 18, 2014, to discuss prevention of invasive meningococcal disease. Five key recommendations were put forth regarding immunization strategies to protect children from meningococcal serogroup B disease. The recently approved four-component meningococcal B (4CMenB) vaccine should be recommended and funded as part of Ontario's routine immunization schedule and should also be mandated for school attendance. Public funding for 4CMenB immunization is justified based on current MenB epidemiology, vaccine coverage, cost effectiveness and acceptability, as well as legal, political and ethical considerations related to 4CMenB immunization, particularly because routine recommendations and funding are currently in place for vaccination against meningococcal serogroups that cause significantly less disease in Canada than MenB. Broadly, the goals are to assist individual practitioners in advocating the benefits of 4CMenB vaccination to parents, and to counterbalance recommendations from the National Advisory Committee on Immunization and the Canadian Paediatric Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirotaka Yamashiro
- Pediatrics Section, Ontario Medical Association (PSOMA) and Pediatricians Alliance of Ontario (PAO); ‘Pediatricians of Ontario’
| | - Nora Cutcliffe
- Pediatrics Section, Ontario Medical Association (PSOMA) and Pediatricians Alliance of Ontario (PAO); ‘Pediatricians of Ontario’
| | - Simon Dobson
- Pediatrics Section, Ontario Medical Association (PSOMA) and Pediatricians Alliance of Ontario (PAO); ‘Pediatricians of Ontario’
| | - David Fisman
- Pediatrics Section, Ontario Medical Association (PSOMA) and Pediatricians Alliance of Ontario (PAO); ‘Pediatricians of Ontario’
| | - Ronald Gold
- Pediatrics Section, Ontario Medical Association (PSOMA) and Pediatricians Alliance of Ontario (PAO); ‘Pediatricians of Ontario’
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Stoof SP, Rodenburg GD, Knol MJ, Rümke LW, Bovenkerk S, Berbers GAM, Spanjaard L, van der Ende A, Sanders EAM. Disease Burden of Invasive Meningococcal Disease in the Netherlands Between June 1999 and June 2011: A Subjective Role for Serogroup and Clonal Complex. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61:1281-92. [PMID: 26123933 DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2015] [Accepted: 06/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several countries consider the implementation of a meningococcal serogroup B vaccine for young children and/or serogroup C or ACWY conjugate vaccine for adolescents. Representative information on clinical course of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is useful to evaluate cost-effectiveness of vaccination. Information on the relation between infecting meningococcal clonal complex (CC), disease course and outcome of IMD is scarce. METHODS A retrospective study using Dutch surveillance data on IMD from June 1999 to June 2011. Clinical information was retrieved from hospital records. The effect of age, comorbidity, clinical manifestation, serogroup, and CC on disease course and outcome was assessed in multivariable analyses. Meningococcal CCs were assessed by multilocus sequence typing. RESULTS Clinical information was retrieved for 879 IMD cases: 48% of patients presented with meningitis, 17% with septic shock, and 22% with septic shock plus meningitis. Development of septic shock was not related to CC or serogroup. Median (interquartile range) duration of hospital admission was 10 (8-13) days. Intensive care unit admittance (38%) was higher for patients aged ≥10 years and patients with septic shock (P-values ≤.001). Case-fatality rate (8%) and development of sequelae (29%) was dependent on age and clinical manifestation (P-values ≤.001) and not affected by comorbidity, CC, or serogroup. CONCLUSIONS IMD still coincides with a considerable disease burden and mortality. Disease course and outcome depend mainly on age and clinical manifestation and less on meningococcal CC or serogroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne P Stoof
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht
| | - Gerwin D Rodenburg
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht
| | - Mirjam J Knol
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven
| | - Lidewij W Rümke
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht
| | | | - Guy A M Berbers
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven
| | - Lodewijk Spanjaard
- Department of Medical Microbiology Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis, Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Arie van der Ende
- Department of Medical Microbiology Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis, Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth A M Sanders
- Centre for Infectious Disease Control (CIb), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven Department of Pediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Whelan J, Bambini S, Biolchi A, Brunelli B, Robert–Du Ry van Beest Holle M. Outbreaks of meningococcal B infection and the 4CMenB vaccine: historical and future perspectives. Expert Rev Vaccines 2015; 14:713-36. [DOI: 10.1586/14760584.2015.1004317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
40
|
Sáfadi MA, Bettinger JA, Maturana GM, Enwere G, Borrow R. Evolving meningococcal immunization strategies. Expert Rev Vaccines 2014; 14:505-17. [DOI: 10.1586/14760584.2015.979799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
41
|
Takla A, Wichmann O, Koch J, Terhardt M, Hellenbrand W. Survey of pediatricians in Germany reveals important challenges for possible implementation of meningococcal B vaccination. Vaccine 2014; 32:6349-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2014] [Revised: 09/12/2014] [Accepted: 09/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
42
|
Wang B, Haji Ali Afzali H, Marshall H. The inpatient costs and hospital service use associated with invasive meningococcal disease in South Australian children. Vaccine 2014; 32:4791-8. [PMID: 24998605 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2013] [Revised: 03/26/2014] [Accepted: 05/27/2014] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) remains a serious public health concern due to a sustained high case fatality rate and morbidity in survivors. This study aimed to estimate the hospital service costs associated with IMD and variables associated with the highest costs in Australian children admitted to a tertiary paediatric hospital. METHODS Clinical details were obtained from medical records and associated inpatient costs were collected and inflated to 2011 Australian dollars using the medical and hospital services component of the Australian Consumer Price Index. Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses were undertaken. Multivariate regression models were used to adjust for potential covariates and determine independent predictors of high costs and increased length of hospital stay. RESULTS Of 109 children hospitalised with IMD between May 2000 and April 2011, the majority were caused by serogroup B (70.6%). Presence of sequelae, serogroup B infection, male gender, infants less than one year of age, and previous medical diagnosis were associated with higher inpatient costs and length of stay (LOS) in hospital (p<0.001) during the acute admissions. Children diagnosed with septicaemia had a longer predicted LOS (p=0.033) during the acute admissions compared to those diagnosed with meningitis alone or meningitis with septicaemia. Serogroup B cases incurred a significantly higher risk of IMD related readmissions (IRR: 21.1, p=0.008) for patients with sequelae. Serogroup B infection, male gender, diagnosis of septicaemia, infants less than one year of age, and no previous medical diagnosis were more likely to have higher inpatient costs and LOS during the IMD related readmissions for patients with sequelae (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Although IMD is uncommon, the disease severity and associated long-term sequelae result in high health care costs, which should be considered in meningococcal B vaccine funding considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Wang
- Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit (VIRTU), Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia 5006, Australia.
| | - Hossein Haji Ali Afzali
- Discipline of Public Health, School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, Level 7, 178 North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
| | - Helen Marshall
- Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit (VIRTU), Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia 5006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Implications of differential age distribution of disease-associated meningococcal lineages for vaccine development. CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY : CVI 2014; 21:847-53. [PMID: 24695776 PMCID: PMC4054250 DOI: 10.1128/cvi.00133-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
New vaccines targeting meningococci expressing serogroup B polysaccharide have been developed, with some being licensed in Europe. Coverage depends on the distribution of disease-associated genotypes, which may vary by age. It is well established that a small number of hyperinvasive lineages account for most disease, and these lineages are associated with particular antigens, including vaccine candidates. A collection of 4,048 representative meningococcal disease isolates from 18 European countries, collected over a 3-year period, were characterized by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Age data were available for 3,147 isolates. The proportions of hyperinvasive lineages, identified as particular clonal complexes (ccs) by MLST, differed among age groups. Subjects <1 year of age experienced lower risk of sequence type 11 (ST-11) cc, ST-32 cc, and ST-269 cc disease and higher risk of disease due to unassigned STs, 1- to 4-year-olds experienced lower risk of ST-11 cc and ST-32 cc disease, 5- to 14-year-olds were less likely to experience ST-11 cc and ST-269 cc disease, and ≥25-year-olds were more likely to experience disease due to less common ccs and unassigned STs. Younger and older subjects were vulnerable to a more diverse set of genotypes, indicating the more clonal nature of genotypes affecting adolescents and young adults. Knowledge of temporal and spatial diversity and the dynamics of meningococcal populations is essential for disease control by vaccines, as coverage is lineage specific. The nonrandom age distribution of hyperinvasive lineages has consequences for the design and implementation of vaccines, as different variants, or perhaps targets, may be required for different age groups.
Collapse
|
44
|
Le Saux N. Guidelines for the management of suspected and confirmed bacterial meningitis in Canadian children older than one month of age. Paediatr Child Health 2014; 19:141-52. [PMID: 24665226 DOI: 10.1093/pch/19.3.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of bacterial meningitis in infants and children has decreased since the routine use of conjugated vaccines targeting Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis. However, this infection continues to be associated with considerable mortality and morbidity if not treated effectively with empirical antimicrobial therapy. Diagnosis still rests on clinical signs and symptoms, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis. This position statement outlines the rationale for current recommended empirical therapy using a third-generation cephalosporin and vancomycin for suspected bacterial meningitis. It also provides new recommendations for the use of adjuvant corticosteroids in this setting. Once antibiotic susceptibilities of the pathogen are known, antimicrobials should be reviewed and modified accordingly. Recommendations for treatment duration as well as audiology testing are included. The present statement replaces a previous Canadian Paediatric Society position statement on bacterial meningitis published in 2007 and revised in 2008.
Collapse
|
45
|
Robinson JL. Immunization for meningococcal serogroup B: What does the practitioner need to know? Paediatr Child Health 2014; 19:91-8. [PMID: 24596484 DOI: 10.1093/pch/19.2.91] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Most invasive meningococcal disease in Canada is now caused by serogroup B organisms. A vaccine directed against this serogroup (4CMenB) is newly licensed in Canada. A decision will need to be made by all provinces and territories regarding whether a routine infant immunization program is warranted. This decision will need to take into account factors such as uncertain estimates for the effectiveness of the vaccine, the high incidence of fever from the vaccine and the burden of introducing more injections into the current immunization schedule, and consider them against the potentially preventable mortality and morbidity that result from a rare but very serious disease.
Collapse
|
46
|
Le Saux N. Lignes directrices pour la prise en charge de la méningite bactérienne présumée ou confirmée chez les enfants canadiens de plus d'un mois. Paediatr Child Health 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/pch/19.3.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
47
|
Robinson JL. La vaccination contre le méningocoque du sérogroupe B : ce que le praticien doit savoir. Paediatr Child Health 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/pch/19.2.95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
48
|
Diversity of Canadian meningococcal serogroup B isolates and estimated coverage by an investigational meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB). Vaccine 2013; 32:124-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2012] [Revised: 02/26/2013] [Accepted: 03/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
49
|
Bettinger JA, Deeks SL, Halperin SA, Tsang R, Scheifele DW. Controlling serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease: the Canadian perspective. Expert Rev Vaccines 2013; 12:505-17. [PMID: 23659299 DOI: 10.1586/erv.13.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
With publically funded meningococcal immunization programs established in infants, children and adolescents, Canada is at the forefront of invasive meningococcal disease prevention. The advent of two new serogroup B vaccines that may protect against multiple disease-causing strains offers the potential to reduce endemic disease to very low levels in Canada. Canada likely will be one of the first countries with approval to use recombinant serogroup B vaccine. However, inclusion of these new vaccines into public immunization programs will be decided at the provincial/territorial level, rather than nationally, and may result initially in different immunization schedules throughout the country as we have seen with conjugate meningococcal vaccines. Such heterogeneous use and adoption of new vaccines complicates disease control, but may assist in evaluation of effectiveness. Minimally, it requires regionally specific information. In this article, the authors provide an overview of the Canadian epidemiology, serogroup B vaccine characteristics, potential strain coverage, immunization strategies and remaining postmarketing research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Bettinger
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children's Hospital and the University of British Columbia, A5-950 West 28th Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Frosi G, Biolchi A, Lo Sapio M, Rigat F, Gilchrist S, Lucidarme J, Findlow J, Borrow R, Pizza M, Giuliani MM, Medini D. Bactericidal antibody against a representative epidemiological meningococcal serogroup B panel confirms that MATS underestimates 4CMenB vaccine strain coverage. Vaccine 2013; 31:4968-74. [PMID: 23954380 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2013] [Revised: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 08/02/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 4CMenB (Bexsero), a vaccine developed against invasive meningococcal disease caused by capsular group B strains (MenB), was recently licensed for use by the European Medicines Agency. Assessment of 4CMenB strain coverage in specific epidemiologic settings is of primary importance to predict vaccination impact on the burden of disease. The Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (MATS) was developed to predict 4CMenB strain coverage, using serum bactericidal antibody assay with human complement (hSBA) data from a diverse panel of strains not representative of any specific epidemiology. OBJECTIVE To experimentally validate the accuracy of MATS-based predictions against strains representative of a specific epidemiologic setting. METHODS AND RESULTS We used a stratified sampling method to identify a representative sample from all MenB disease isolates collected from England and Wales in 2007-2008, tested the strains in the hSBA assay with pooled sera from infant and adolescent vaccinees, and compared these results with MATS. MATS predictions and hSBA results were significantly associated (P=0.022). MATS predicted coverage of 70% (95% CI, 55-85%) was largely confirmed by 88% killing in the hSBA (95% CI, 72-95%). MATS had 78% accuracy and 96% positive predictive value against hSBA. CONCLUSION MATS is a conservative predictor of strain coverage by the 4CMenB vaccine in infants and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Frosi
- Research Center, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Via Fiorentina 1, 53100 Siena, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|