Evolution of body weight parameters up to 3 years after solid organ transplantation: The prospective Swiss Transplant Cohort Study

Effect of Pre-Transplant Recipient Underweight on the Postoperative Outcome and Graft Survival in Primary Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of recipient underweight on the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing primary kidney transplantation (KT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred thirty-three patients receiving primary KT in our department between 1993 and 2017 were included in the study. Patients were divided according to their body mass index (BMI) into underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2; N = 29) and normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2; N = 304) groups. Clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and graft and patient survival were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The postoperative rate of surgical complications and renal function were comparable between the groups. One year and 3 years after KT, 70% and 92.9%, respectively, of the pre-transplant underweight patients reached a normal BMI (≥18.5 kg/m2). The mean death-censored graft survival was significantly lower in pre-transplant underweight patients than in pre-transplant normal-weight patients (11.5 ± 1.6 years vs 16.3 ± 0.6 years, respectively; P = .045). Especially KT recipients with a moderate or severe pre-transplant underweight (BMI <17 kg/m2; N = 8) showed an increased rate of graft loss (5- and 10-year graft survival: 21.4% each). No statistical difference could be observed between the 2 groups regarding causes of graft loss. In multivariate analysis, recipient underweight (P = .024) remained an independent prognostic factor for graft survival.

CONCLUSION

Being underweight did not affect the early postoperative outcome after primary KT. However, underweight, and especially moderate and severe thinness, is associated with reduced long-term kidney graft survival, and therefore this group of patients should be monitored with special attention.

Nutritional Intake after Liver Transplant: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cardiovascular disease and its concurrent risk factors are prevalent after liver transplant (LT). Most of these risk factors are modifiable by diet. We aimed to synthesise the literature reporting the nutritional intake of liver transplant recipients (LTR) and the potential determinants of intake. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses of studies published up until July 2021 reporting the nutritional intake of LTR. The pooled daily mean intakes were recorded as 1998 (95% CI 1889, 2108) kcal, 17 (17, 18)% energy from protein, 49 (48, 51)% energy from carbohydrates, 34 (33, 35)% energy from total fat, 10 (7, 13)% energy from saturated fat, and 20 (18, 21) g of fibre. The average fruit and vegetable intake ranged from 105 to 418 g/day. The length of time post-LT and the age and sex of the cohorts, as well as the continent and year of publication of each study, were sources of heterogeneity. Nine studies investigated the potential determinants of intake, time post-LT, gender and immunosuppression medication, with inconclusive results. Energy and protein requirements were not met in the first month post-transplant. After this point, energy intake was significantly higher and remained stable over time, with a high fat intake and low intake of fibre, fruits and vegetables. This suggests that LTR consume a high-energy, low-quality diet in the long term and do not adhere to the dietary guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention.

Progress of new-onset diabetes after liver and kidney transplantation

Organ transplantation is currently the most effective treatment for end-stage organ failure. Post transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a severe complication after organ transplantation that seriously affects the short-term and long-term survival of recipients. However, PTDM is often overlooked or poorly managed in its early stage. This article provides an overview of the incidence, and pathogenesis of and risk factors for PTDM, aiming to gain a deeper understanding of PTDM and improve the quality of life of recipients.

Variable Selection for Assessing Risk Factors for Weight and Body fat Gain During the First Year After Kidney Transplantation

Background: Body fat and overall weight gain are common after kidney transplantation and are associated with poor clinical outcomes. Therefore, identification of at-risk patients is relevant for preventive interventions. Clinical Question: What variables influence weight and fat gain in patients in the first year after kidney transplantation? Literature Search Prospective and retrospective cohort studies published in or after 2001 naming fat and/or overall weight gain during the first year after kidney transplantation as outcome variable(s) were systematically searched in Medline/Pubmed in November 2018 and March 2022. Clinical Appraisal: We identified 16 studies examining a wide variety of potential factors influencing weight and fat gain over the first posttransplant years. These included genetic, socio-demographic, behavioral, biomedical, psychological and environmental factors. For a number of variables, study results were contradictory: some studies indicated preventive impacts on weight or fat gain; others concluded that the same factors increased it. Cases were discussed with 2 clinical experts. We eventually agreed on 13 potentially relevant risk factors for post-transplant weight/fat gain: age, gender, genes, income, ethnicity, education, eating habits, physical activity, smoking cessation, baseline BMI, baseline fat, depression and perceived overall wellbeing. Integration into Practice Before integration into clinical practice, a critical evaluation of all potential risk factors' suitability for assessment will be necessary. In addition to feasibility, operational definitions and measurement methods must also be considered. Evaluation: To reduce the list of risk factors to the most relevant, a first testing within a prospectively collected data set is planned.

First Testing of Literature-Based Models for Predicting Increase in Body Weight and Adipose Tissue Mass After Kidney Transplantation

Introduction: Weight gain is a risk factor for poor clinical outcomes following kidney transplantation. Research Question: This study's aim was a first testing of 2 models to identify patients early after kidney transplantation who are at risk for weight gain and increase in adipose tissue mass in the first year after kidney transplantation. Design: The literature-based models were evaluated on longitudinal data of 88, respectively 79 kidney transplant recipients via ordinary and Firth regression, using gains ≥ 5% in weight and adipose tissue mass respectively as primary and secondary endpoints. Results: The models included physical activity, smoking cessation at time of kidney transplantation, self-reported health status, depressive symptomatology, gender, age, education, baseline body mass index and baseline trunk fat as predictors. Area under the curve was 0.797 (95%-CI 0.702 to 0.893) for the weight model and 0.767 (95%-CI 0.656 to 0.878) for the adipose tissue mass model-showing good, respectively fair discriminative ability. For weight gain ≥ 5%, main risk factors were smoking cessation at time of transplantation (OR 16.425, 95%-CI 1.737-155.288) and better self-reported baseline health state (OR 1.068 for each 1-unit increase, 95%-CI 1.012-1.128). For the adipose tissue mass gain ≥ 5%, main risk factor was overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25) at baseline (odds ratio 7.659, 95%-CI 1.789-32.789). Conclusions: The models have potential to assess patients' risk for weight or adipose tissue mass gain during the year after transplantation, but further testing is needed before implementation in clinical practice.

Long-term changes in body weight and serum cholesterol in heart transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Long-term changes in weight and blood lipids beyond 12 months after heart transplantation are largely unknown. We quantified changes in weight, body mass index (BMI), blood cholesterol, and triglycerides in heart transplant recipients (HTRs) during the 36 months after transplantation, and we assessed the influence of statin therapy on these outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of adult HTRs, transplanted 1990-2017, in Queensland, Australia. From each patient's medical charts, we extracted weight, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and statin therapy at four time-points: time of transplant (baseline), and 12-, 24-, 36-month post-transplant. Changes in weight and blood lipids were assessed according to baseline BMI.

RESULTS

Among 316 HTRs, 236 (median age 52 years, 83% males) with available information were included. During the 36 months post-transplant, all patients gained weight (83.5-90.5 kg; p < .001), especially those with baseline BMI < 25.0 km/m2 (67.9-76.2 kg; p < .001). Mean blood cholesterol (4.60-4.90 mmol/L; p = .004) and mean blood triglycerides (1.79-2.18 mmol/L; p = .006) also increased significantly in all patients, particularly in those with baseline BMI ≥ 25.0 km/m2 but the differences were not significant (total cholesterol 4.42-5.13 mmol/L; triglycerides 1.76-2.47 mmol/L). Total cholesterol was highest in patients not taking statins, and levels differed significantly (p = .010) according to statin dosing changes during the 36 months post-transplant.

CONCLUSION

Patients demonstrate significant rises in weight and blood lipids in the 36 months after heart transplantation.

The role of bariatric surgery in liver transplantation: timing and type

Introduction

The rise in obesity worldwide has shifted the indications for liver transplantation (LT), with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) being the second most common indication for transplantation. There remains an underestimation of cirrhosis being attributed to NASH. Bariatric surgery (BS) is a reliable solution to overcome obesity and its associated comorbidities. The role of BS in LT has been investigated by different studies; however, the type of BS and timing of LT need further investigation.

Methods

A systemic review examining the role of BS in LT patients was performed. After selection of the studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Primary outcomes included patient and graft survival.

Results

From a total of 2374 articles, five met the prefined criteria. One hundred sixty-two patients had both BS + LT and 1426 underwent LT alone. The percentage of female patients in the BS + LT and LT cohorts was 75% and 35% respectively. The average age in BS + LT and LT cohorts was 43.05 vs. 56.22 years respectively. Patients undergoing BS had comparable outcomes in terms of overall patient survival, graft survival and post-operative morbidity compared to LT alone. When comparing BMI change in patients with prior versus simultaneous BS + LT, no significant difference was found.

Conclusion

BS and LT patients achieve comparable outcomes to general LT populations. Further studies examining simultaneous BS + LT are needed to answer questions concerning patient selection and timing of surgery.

New-onset Obesity After Lung Transplantation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant (LTx) recipients who gain weight after transplantation may experience an upward shift in body mass index (BMI) that places them in the obese category. The incidence, risk factors, and impact on metabolic health and mortality of new-onset obesity have not been documented in the LTx setting.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 564 LTx recipients. Individuals were stratified according to their BMI trajectories from pretransplant evaluation up to 10 y posttransplant. New-onset obesity was defined as a pretransplant BMI <30 kg/m2 and posttransplant BMI >30 kg/m2. The incidence, risk factors, and posttransplant diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and mortality of recipients with new-onset obesity were compared with those of nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m2, pre/post-LTx), consistently obese (BMI >30 kg/m2, pre/post-LTx), and obese recipients with weight loss (BMI >30 kg/m2 pre-LTx, BMI <30 kg/m2 post-LTx).

RESULTS

We found that 14% of recipients developed obesity after transplantation. Overweight individuals (odds ratio [OR]: 9.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] [4.86-16.69]; P < 0.001) and candidates with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 6.93; 95% CI [2.30-20.85]; P = 0.001) and other diagnoses (OR: 4.28; 95% CI [1.22-14.98]; P = 0.023) were at greater risk. Multivariable regression analysis showed that new-onset obesity was associated with a greater risk of metabolic syndrome (hazard ratio: 1.70; 95% CI [1.17-2.46]; P = 0.005), but not of posttransplant diabetes mellitus, than nonobesity. Recipients with new-onset obesity had a survival comparable to that of consistently obese individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater understanding of the multifaceted nature of post-LTx obesity may lead to interventions that are better tailored to the characteristics of these individuals.

Clinical and Economic Impact of Bariatric Surgery Post Liver Transplantation: a Nationwide, Population-Based Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Prevalence of obesity in liver transplant recipients is increasing with the overall epidemic augmentation of severe obesity, the effects of immunosuppressive drugs, and lifestyle changes which are responsible for de novo obesity development or aggravation of pre-existing obesity. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences in overall mortality, re-hospitalization rate, and hospitalization-related costs between patients undergoing bariatric surgery after liver transplantation and patients undergoing bariatric surgery alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with history of liver transplantation who underwent bariatric surgery were analyzed from the French National Hospital Discharge Database. Overall mortality, re-hospitalization rate, length of stay for bariatric procedure, and the costs of bariatric surgery hospitalization and eventual re-hospitalizations were compared to a group of 360,846 patients who underwent bariatric surgery alone from 2010 to 2019. Furthermore, a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Patients with a history of liver transplantation showed an increased risk of overall mortality (HR: 7.66, p = 0.0047) and increased costs of hospitalization for bariatric surgery (8250 ± 4822€ vs 5583 ± 3398€, p = 0.0005). No differences in length of stay, re-hospitalization rate, and costs were found after multivariate analysis. After propensity score matching analysis, a significant increased cost of hospitalization (8250 ± 4822€ vs 6086 ± 1813€, p = 0.0195) still resulted for the liver transplantation group.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery represents the best treatment for obesity and its related associated medical problems. Our study highlights an increased risk of overall all-cause mortality and increased costs of hospitalization in this population compared to patients undergoing bariatric surgery alone.

The Main Thing is to be Alive-Exploring Patients' Experiences With Weight Gain After Liver Transplantation: A Qualitative Study

Weight gain after liver transplantation (LTx) contributes to new-onset obesity. We explored patients’ experiences with gaining weight after LTx. Individual interviews were guided by open-ended questions. We analyzed transcripts with the reflexive thematic analysis approach by Braun and Clarke. The 12 participants gained 11.5 kg weight (median) over a median of 23 months after LTx. The constitutive theme “The main thing is to be alive” was a recurrent insight, captured in three facets: “The arduous path back to living” was the emotional expression of the ups and downs during a life-threatening illness to finally being grateful for the new life. “A pleasurable new phase of life” was the legitimation, reflecting the appreciation of gaining weight and returning to a healthy appearance. “I am allowed to look like this now” was the consoling facet after a time of burden due to the increased weight and frustration of being unsuccessful in losing weight. Finally, the awareness of being a LTx survivor outplayed the burden of the excess weight. Early interventions are crucial because the comforting insight “I am allowed to look like this now” may hinder further engagement in weight loss activities. Our recommendations on education and self-management support may guide clinical practice.

Cohort profile: The Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS): A nationwide longitudinal cohort study of all solid organ recipients in Switzerland

PURPOSE

The Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS) is a prospective multicentre cohort study which started to actively enrol study participants in May 2008. It takes advantage of combining data from all transplant programmes in one unique system to perform comprehensive nationwide reporting and to promote translational and clinical post-transplant outcome research in the framework of Swiss transplantation medicine.

PARTICIPANTS

Over 5500 solid organ transplant recipients have been enrolled in all six Swiss transplant centres by end of 2019, around three-quarter of them for kidney and liver transplants. Ninety-three per cent of all transplanted recipients have consented to study participation, almost all of them (99%) contributed to bio-sampling. The STCS genomic data set includes around 3000 patients.

FINDINGS TO DATE

Detailed clinical and laboratory data in high granularity as well as patient-reported outcomes from transplant recipients and activities in Switzerland are available in the last decade. Interdisciplinary contributions in diverse fields of transplantation medicine such as infectious diseases, genomics, oncology, immunology and psychosocial science have resulted in approximately 70 scientific papers getting published in peer-review journals so far.

FUTURE PLANS

The STCS will deepen its efforts in personalised medicine and digital epidemiology, and will also focus on allocation research and the use of causal inference methods to make complex matters in transplant medicine more understandable and transparent.

Weight Gain After Heart Transplantation in Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gain in weight is common after heart transplantation but the magnitude of usual weight gain and whether this varies by country is unknown. We systematically reviewed all relevant studies to quantify weight change among heart transplant recipients (HTRs) in the years after transplantation and assess variation with geographic location. We searched PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Excerpta Medica Database databases to September 2020. Eligible studies reported adult HTRs' mean/median weight and/or body mass index (BMI) up to time of transplantation (baseline) and posttransplantation in any language. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of weight/BMI from baseline to posttransplantation were estimated using a random-effects model. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed weight gain of 7.1 kg (95% CI, 4.4-9.8 kg) in HTRs 12 months posttransplant, with corresponding BMI increase of 1.69 kg/m2 (95% CI, 0.83-2.55 kg/m2). Greatest weight gain at 12 months posttransplant occurred in US HTRs (WMD weight 10.42 kg, BMI 3.25 kg/m2) and least, in European HTRs (WMD weight 3.10 kg, BMI 0.78 kg/m2). In conclusion, HTRs gain substantial weight in the years after transplantation, but varying widely by geographic location.

Weight gain following pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetes is associated with a worse glycemic profile: A retrospective cohort study

AIMS

Evaluate the weight trajectories after pancreas transplantation (PT) and their relationships with pancreas graft outcomes in type 1 diabetes (T1D).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. T1D individuals who underwent PT were recruited (T1D-PT; n = 194) and divided into three groups according to transplantation date: 1999-2004 (n = 57), 2005-2009 (n = 79), 2010-2015 (n = 58). For weight comparisons, a random sample of T1D without renal impairment was also recruited during 2015 (n = 61; T1D-control).

RESULTS

The median follow-up for the T1D-PT group was 11.1 years. Despite significant weight loss at 6 months (65.7 ± 12.4 vs. 64.1 ± 11.4 Kg; p < 0.001), a stepped increase was seen thereafter (60 months: 68.0 ± 14.0 Kg; p < 0.001). Participants from the 2010-2015 period showed higher weight gain (p < 0.001), outweighing that observed in the T1D-control (60 months: +4.69 ± 8.49 vs. -0.97 ± 4.59 Kg; p = 0.003). Weight gain between 6 and 36 months was directly associated with fasting glucose and HbA1c at 36 months, and with HbA1c at 60 months (p < 0.05). However, in Cox-regression models adjusted for age, sex, and several recipient and PT-related variables, the third tertile of weight gain between 6 and 36 months showed a non-significant increase in the graft failure/dysfunction (HR 2.33 [0.75-7.27]).

CONCLUSIONS

Weight gain post-PT was associated with glucose-related biochemical markers of graft dysfunction, which needs confirmation in further studies.

Atherogenic Dyslipidemia After Liver Transplantation: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly atherosclerosis-associated CVD, is a major cause of long-term mortality after liver transplantation (LT). The liver is central in lipid homeostasis, and changes associated with insulin resistance, weight gain, adipose tissue inflammation, and development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after LT promote atherogenesis. These factors synergistically alter lipid homeostasis, thereby leading to the production of proatherogenic lipoproteins, which contribute to the heighted risk of CVD-associated events observed in LT recipients. Although the exact mechanism promoting this shift of a proatherogenic lipoprotein profile is currently not known, the choice of immunosuppression and preexisting metabolic risk factors (ie, NAFLD) are likely contributors. This shift in proatherogenic lipoprotein subparticles presents clinical challenges as the traditional lipid profile employed in clinical practice may not fully capture this atherogenic risk. This review focuses on lipoprotein metabolism and atherogenesis in LT recipients.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Prior Solid Organ Transplantation: an MBSAQIP Analysis

Introduction

Obesity is a risk factor for poor patient outcomes after organ transplantation (TXP). While metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is safe and effective in treating severe obesity, the role of MBS in transplant patients continues to evolve.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients in the 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality and Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) database. Propensity and case-control matching, and multivariable logistic regression were performed for 30-day post-operative outcomes.

Results

A total of 336 transplant patients were compared with 157,413 patients without transplant. Propensity and case-control matching reveal no significant differences in mortality (p > 0.2). However, case-control matching revealed longer operative time (104 min versus 76 min, p < 0.001), increased length of stay (2 days versus 1 day, p < 0.05), perioperative transfusions (2% versus 0.22%, p = 0.009), and leak rates (2.2% versus 0.55%, p = 0.02) in the transplant cohort. On multivariable regression analysis, prior transplantation was associated with higher rates of overall (OR 1.6, p = 0.007) and bariatric-related morbidity (OR 1.78, p = 0.004), leak (OR 3.47, p = 0.0027), and surgical site infection (OR 3.32, p = 0.004). Prior transplantation did not predict overall (p = 0.55) nor bariatric-related mortality (p = 0.99).

Conclusion

MBS in prior solid organ transplantation patients is overall safe, but is associated with increased operative time and length of stay, as well as higher rates of some post-operative morbidity.

Risk factors associated with weight gain after kidney transplantation: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation is the best modality of renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, it is associated with weight gain and metabolic abnormalities, which adversely impact transplant outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors of one-year weight gain after renal transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 374 patients that underwent kidney transplantation between January 2006 and July 2013. Clinical and laboratory variables were collected from electronic records, and the outcome of interest was weight gain during the first year after renal transplantation. The data were reported as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) or number of subjects (%). The association between variables were assessed via chi-square test and ANOVA. For analysis of risk factors related to the outcomes of interest, multivariable logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

There were 181 (48.4%) female patients, 334 (89.3%) with white ethnicity and the mean age was 44.4 ± 12.8 years. The mean BMI pre-transplant was 24.7 ± 4.1 kg/m2, and 35 (9.9%) patients were classified as obese; 119 (33.6%) as overweight; 187 (52.8%) as normal weight; and 13 (3.7%) as malnourished. After one year of follow-up, the mean BMI was 26.2 ± 5.0 kg/m2, and 61 (17.3%) patients were classified as obese; 133 (37.8%) as overweight; 148 (42.0%) as normal weight; and 10 (2.8%) as malnourished. Weight gain was observed in 72.7% patients, and the average increase was 7.12 ± 5.9 kg. The female gender, lower pre-transplant body weight, lower number of hospitalizations, and a kidney received from a living donor were associated with weight gain by more than 5% in the first year post-transplant.

CONCLUSION

Female gender and lower pre-transplant body weight were independently associated with weight gain by more than 5% in the first year after kidney transplantation; lower rates of hospitalization and donation from living donors were also risk factors for this outcome.

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Previous Organ Transplant: Scoping Review and Analysis of the MBSAQIP

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a major risk factor for transplant. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) offers transplant patient benefits including improved comorbidities, graft function, and longevity. We completed a scoping review and analyzed the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) to determine the risk-benefit profile of LBS after transplant. We also compared laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) following transplant.

METHODS

Univariate analysis determined between group differences with subgroup analysis comparing LSG versus LRYGB in transplant patients. Multivariable analysis assessed whether prior transplant was independently associated with major complications or mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 469 (0.1%) patients had previous transplant and had more comorbidities and more often underwent LSG. Operative time (93.9 min vs 83 min, p < 0.001) and length of stay were longer. Major complications were threefold higher in patients with a transplant history (9.6% vs 3.2%; p < 0.001. Previous transplant was the second greatest independent predictor for major complication (OR 2.14 [1.54-2.98], p = < 0.001) but was not predictive of death (OR 1.06 [0.14-8.13] p = 0.956). Amongst transplant patients, LRYGB demonstrated higher rates of leak (n = 1), VTE, AKI, unplanned intubation, and readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

The 30-day complication rate from LBS is three times higher amongst patients with a transplant. LSG is likely the best surgical approach. Despite risks, post-transplant patients incur important benefits from LBS. Surgeons must be aware of this risk-benefit profile when determining LBS candidacy.

Feasibility and acceptability of a televideo physical activity and nutrition program for recent kidney transplant recipients

Background

Post-transplant weight gain affects 50-90% of kidney transplant recipients adversely affecting survival, quality of life, and risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Diet modification and physical activity may help prevent post-transplant weight gain. Methods for effective implementation of these lifestyle modifications are needed. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered nutrition and physical activity intervention among kidney transplant recipients. Secondary aims were to estimate the effectiveness of the intervention in producing changes in physical activity, qualify of life, fruit and vegetable intake, and consumption of whole grains and water from baseline to 6 months.

Methods

A randomized controlled study for stable kidney transplant recipients between 6 and 12 months post-transplantation was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to a technology-based, lifestyle modification program (intervention) or to enhanced usual care (control).

Results

The first 10 kidney transplant recipients screened were eligible and randomized into the intervention and control groups with no significant between-group differences at baseline. Health coaching attendance (78%) and adherence to reporting healthy behaviors (86%) were high. All participants returned for final assessments. The weight in controls remained stable, while the intervention arm showed weight gain at 3 and 6 months. Improvements were found for physical activity, quality of life, and fruit and vegetable intake in both groups. All participants would recommend the program to other transplant recipients.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that a remotely delivered televideo nutrition and physical activity intervention is feasible and valued by patients. These findings will aid in the development of a larger, more prescriptive, randomized trial to address weight gain prevention.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03697317. Retrospectively registered on October 5, 2018.

Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and implications on cardiovascular outcomes in liver transplantation

Along with the obesity epidemic there has been a major increase in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) prevalence, paralleling a steady increase in cirrhosis of the liver and hepatocellular cancer (HCC) related to NAFLD. Currently, NAFLD (related HCC and cirrhosis) is the second most common cause for liver transplantation (LT) and it is projected to take the top spot in the next 3-5 years. Patients with NAFLD cirrhosis and HCC have a unique set of comorbidities which potentially increases their risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. However, a review of the published data in NAFLD patients who undergo LT, does not paint a clear picture. While CVD is the most common cause of non-graft related mortality over the long-term, the short and intermediate-term survival post LT in NAFLD cirrhosis appears to be on par with other etiologies when age and comorbidities are factored. The cardiovascular complications are increased in the immediate post-transplant period but there is a shift from ischemic complications to arrhythmias and heart failure (HF). NAFLD recurs in 80-100% patients and occurs de novo in about 50% after LT, potentially impacting their long-term morbidity and mortality. This review summarizes the available data on CVD in NAFLD patients before and after LT, explains what is currently known about the epidemiology and pathogenesis of CVD in NAFLD and posits strategies to improve wait-list and post-transplant survival.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus and preexisting liver disease - a bidirectional relationship affecting treatment and management

Liver cirrhosis and diabetes mellitus (DM) are both common conditions with significant socioeconomic burden and impact on morbidity and mortality. A bidirectional relationship exists between DM and liver cirrhosis regarding both etiology and disease-related complications. Type 2 DM (T2DM) is a well-recognized risk factor for chronic liver disease and vice-versa, DM may develop as a complication of cirrhosis, irrespective of its etiology. Liver transplantation (LT) represents an important treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease due to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which represents a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome and a common complication of T2DM. The metabolic risk factors including immunosuppressive drugs, can contribute to persistent or de novo development of DM and NAFLD after LT. T2DM, obesity, cardiovascular morbidities and renal impairment, frequently associated with metabolic syndrome and NAFLD, may have negative impact on short and long-term outcomes following LT. The treatment of DM in the context of chronic liver disease and post-transplant is challenging, but new emerging therapies such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) targeting multiple mechanisms in the shared pathophysiology of disorders such as oxidative stress and chronic inflammation are a promising tool in future patient management.

Changes in Body Mass Index and Outcomes After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe changes in body mass index after kidney transplant and to assess how these changes influence long-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from kidney transplant recipients seen at our center between January 2007 and July 2016. Changes in body mass index over the posttransplant period were modeled using a generalized estimating equation, with changes calculated for each patient from pretransplant to 6 months posttransplant. Calculations were then categorized into 3 body mass index groups: stable (change of ± 1.5 kg/m² or less), reduced (reduction of > 1.5 kg/m²), and increased (increase of > 1.5 kg/m²). Outcomes among groups were compared.

RESULTS

Among 1344 total patients, the geometric mean pretransplant body mass index was 27.3 kg/m². This declined significantly (P < .001) to a geometric mean of 25.6 kg/m² at 1 month posttransplant, before increasing and stabilizing to pretransplant levels by 36 months (geometric mean body mass index of 27.2 kg/m² ; P = .522). Of 822 patients with body mass index measurements at 6 months, 303 had reduced, 388 had stable, and 131 had increased levels relative to pretransplant levels. On multivariate analyses, 12-month creatinine levels were significantly higher in the reduced cohort, with adjusted levels of 160.6 versus 135.0 μmol/L for the stable cohort. However, no significant associations were detected between 6-month body mass index changes and patient survival, graft survival, incidences of posttransplant diabetes and cancer, and a range of other clinical and histologic outcomes (all P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrated that body mass index was significantly reduced in the first month after kidney transplant before increasing to pretransplant levels during years 3 to 5. Furthermore, patients who retained decreased levels at 6 months had impaired graft function in long-term follow-up. These observations conflict with the existing literature and warrant further investigations.

Comparison of a Behavioral Versus an Educational Weight Management Intervention After Renal Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

In the first year following renal transplantation, preventing weight gain to minimize overweight or obesity is particularly important. The aim of this study is to test the effect of an 8-month behavioral intervention BMI and physical activity.

Methods.

This randomized controlled study included 123 adult kidney or kidney-pancreas recipients. Patients were randomized to usual (1 educational session, then weight self-monitoring) and intervention care (usual care plus 7–8 counseling sessions). Alongside weight, body composition, and physical activity, satisfaction and perceptions regarding care were measured at weeks 2–6 (baseline), then at months 8 and 12.

Results.

Both groups reported comparably high satisfaction. The intervention group (IG) reported more chronic care-related activities. In patients with BMIs ≥ 18.5, mean weight gain (from baseline) was unexpectedly low in both groups: at month 8, +0.04 kg/m² in IG patients and +0.14 kg/m² in the control group (P = 0.590), and respectively, +0.03 kg/m² and +0.19 kg/m² at month 12 (P = 0.454). Both groups were physically active, walking averages of 10 807 (IG) and 11 093 (control group) steps per day at month 8 (P = 0.823), and respectively 9773 and 11 217 at month 12 (P = 0.195).

Conclusions.

The behavioral intervention had high patient acceptance and supported patients in maintaining their weight, but had no superior effect on a single educational session. Further research is needed to assess patient weight gain risk profiles to stratify the intervention.

Trends, Determinants, and Impact on Survival of Post-Lung Transplant Weight Changes: A Single-center Longitudinal Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Weight gain is commonly seen in lung transplant (LTx) recipients. Although previous studies have focused on weight changes at fixed time periods and relatively early after transplant, trends over time and long-term weight evolution have not been described in this population. The study objectives were to document weight changes up to 15 years post-LTx and assess the predictors of post-LTx weight changes and their associations with mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of LTx recipients between January 1, 2000, and November 30, 2016 (n = 502). Absolute weight changes from transplant were calculated at fixed time periods (6 mo, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 y), and continuous trends over time were generated. Predictors of weight changes and their association with mortality were assessed using linear and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

LTx recipients experienced a gradual increase in weight, resulting from the combination of multiple weight trajectories. Interstitial lung disease diagnosis negatively predicted post-LTx weight changes at all time points, whereas transplant body mass index categories were significant predictors at earlier time points. Patients with a weight gain of >10% at 5 years had a better survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.66), whereas a 10% weight loss at earlier time points was associated with worse survival (1 y: HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.22-3.41 and 2 y: HR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.22-4.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-LTx weight changes display various trajectories, are predicted to some extent by individual and LTx-related factors, and have a negative or positive impact on survival depending on the time post-LTx. These results may lead to a better individualization of weight management after transplant.

Early or Late Transplantation in Congenital Nephrotic Syndrome: Which is Effective for Optimal Growth?

Congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS) is a genetic disease that is present in the antenatal period or during the first 3 months of life. In this study, we aimed to compare growth parameters of patients with CNS who received kidney transplants and either (1) had a normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at the time of transplant or (2) chronic kidney disease (CKD) at the time of transplant. Patients with a diagnosis of CNS who had a minimum follow-up period of 6 months were evaluated retrospectively. Children at stages 4 or 5 CKD or patients receiving dialysis during the pretransplant period were defined as group 1; patients with normal GFR at the time of transplantation were classified as group 2. Short stature and low weight were defined as less than -2 standard deviation scores (SDS) for height and weight according to their age. A total of 17 patients were included in the study. Thirteen of 17 patients had NPHS1 gene mutations. Group 1 and group 2 consisted of 8 and 9 patients, respectively. Mean height SDS and mean weight SDS in group 2 were higher than group 1 in the pretransplant period (-4.34 ± 1.74 vs -2.84 ± 1.56; P = .011 and -3.54 ± 0.93 vs -1.83 ± 1.13; P = .008). In the post-transplant period, the significant difference in height SDS continued in favor of group 2 (-3.16 ± 1.11 vs -1.16 ± 0.87; P = .002). The short stature rate was 83% in group 1 and 72% in group 2 in the pretransplant period (P = .62), and 83% in group 1 and 27% in group 2 in the post-transplant period (P = .02). Early renal transplantation seems to be effective for optimal height gain in children with CNS.

Weight Gain After Simultaneous Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Excessive weight (EW) gain is common after solid organ transplantation, but there is little information concerning obesity after pancreas transplantation. The study goal was to characterize EW gain after kidney-pancreas (KP) transplantation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center review of 100 KP recipients transplanted between September 2007 and June 2015.

RESULTS

The median percent weight gain for all recipients at 1 year posttransplant was 10% (interquartile range, 2.7%-19.3%) of baseline weight. EW gain, defined as greater than or equal to a 19% 1-year increase in weight, included all recipients (n = 26) above the upper limit of interquartile range for weight gain at 1 year. In multivariate analysis, recipient age <40 years, the use of tacrolimus/mammalian target of rapamycin immunosuppression, and an acute rejection event were independent risk factors for EW gain. At a mean follow-up of 43±23 months, there was no difference in patient or graft survival between the EW and non-EW cohorts. Although mean hemoglobin A1c levels between groups were equivalent, the EW versus non-EW cohort displayed a significant increase in mean insulin levels and a trend towards higher C-peptide levels. Criteria for posttransplant metabolic syndrome was met in 34.6% of EW versus 17.6% of non-EW cohorts (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

At intermediate-term follow-up, EW gain after KP transplantation was not associated with an increased risk of death or graft loss, although there was a trend toward a greater risk of posttransplant metabolic syndrome. There may be a metabolic consequence of successful pancreas transplantation that results in EW gain in a proportion of recipients, leading to an increased risk of long-term cardiovascular complications.

Body Image in Liver Transplantation Recipients

Body image (BI) concerns have been reported to play a significant role in the psychological adaptation after organ transplantation. There is a paucity of data about BI beliefs in liver transplant recipients. We report the results of a cross-sectional study of 177 liver transplant recipients for whom we assessed BI, anxiety, depression, and quality of life (QOL) using validated instruments. Our results indicate that higher BI concerns correlated with higher levels of anxiety and depression. BI concerns were more elevated in females, younger patients, and patients with a lower income. Patients with chronic liver disease had more BI concerns than patients who received liver transplantation for acute liver failure. Specific BI concerns also correlated independently with QOL scores. We conclude that BI concerns are significant in liver transplant recipients and should be evaluated by clinicians involved in the mental health care of this population.

The impact of plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentration and weight gain after kidney transplantation

Obesity and its related complications continue to be significant challenges for kidney transplant recipients. In previous studies, researchers have reported that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is closely associated with metabolic imbalance and obesity, but the role of BDNF in weight gain after kidney transplant has not been elucidated. The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the relationship between plasma BDNF levels and weight change. We examined associations between plasma BDNF levels measured at transplantation and 12 months later and measures of weight change during these 12 months in a sample of 55 kidney recipients (mean age of 48 years, 60% male, 56% African American). Of the 55 recipients, 49 had BDNF levels measured at baseline, 33 had BDNF levels measured at 12 months, and 27 had BDNF levels measured at both time points. We found that plasma BDNF levels at baseline (n = 49), but not at 12 months (n = 33), were significantly and positively correlated with the body mass index change (p = 0.037) and percentage weight change (p = 0.036). In addition, average plasma BDNF value at 12 months (307 ± 254 pg/ml) was significantly lower than at baseline (452 ± 345 pg/ml) in the 27 recipients with BDNF levels measured at both time points. Findings from this pilot work suggest that BDNF might serve as a regulator of weight change for kidney transplant related obesity.

Obesity in patients with end-stage heart failure

Obesity poses an increasing problem in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). The most commonly used indicator of obesity is body mass index. The value of this parameter is widely taken into consideration when selecting the best way of treatment for patients with advanced HF. The aim of this paper is to outline the recent knowledge about obesity in the abovementioned group of patients.

New-onset obesity after liver transplantation-outcomes and risk factors: the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study

Weight gain after liver transplantation (LTx) facilitates development of new-onset obesity; however, its risk factors and outcomes are poorly understood. We identified the impact of new-onset obesity on cardiovascular events (CVEs) and patient survival, and risk factors for new-onset obesity. Multiple Cox regression models examined risk factors for CVEs, patient survival, and new-onset obesity in 253 adults (mean age 52.2 ± 11.6 years, male gender 63.6%, mean follow up 5.7 ± 2.1 years). Cumulative incidence of post-LTx CVE was 28.1%; that of new-onset obesity was 21.3%. Regardless of CVE at LTx, post-LTx CVEs were predicted by new-onset obesity [Hazard Ratio (HR), 2.95; P = 0.002] and higher age at LTx (HR, 1.05; P < 0.001). In patients without known pre-LTx CVEs (n = 214), risk factors for post-LTx CVEs were new-onset obesity (HR, 2.59; P = 0.014) and higher age (HR, 1.04; P = 0.001). Survival was not associated with new-onset obesity (P = 0.696). Alcoholic liver disease predicted new-onset obesity (HR, 3.37; P = 0.025), female gender was protective (HR, 0.39; P = 0.034). In 114 patients with available genetic data, alcoholic liver disease (HR, 12.82; P = 0.014) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HR, 10.02; P = 0.048) predicted new-onset obesity, and genetics remained borderline significant (HR, 1.07; P = 0.071). Early introduction of post-LTx weight management programs may suggest a potential pathway to reduce CVE risk.

Influence of the recipient body mass index on the outcomes after kidney transplantation

PURPOSE

The relationship between the body mass index (BMI) of kidney transplant recipients and outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT) is not fully understood and remains controversial. We studied the influence of BMI on clinically relevant outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-centre study, all patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our institution between January 2007 and December 2012 were included. Demographic data and BMI were correlated with the clinical course of the disease, rejection rates, delayed graft function rates, and graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

During the study period, 384 single KTs (130 women and 254 men) were performed. Seventeen percent of the transplants were transplanted within the Eurotransplant Senior Programme (ESP). Most of the transplants were performed using organs that were obtained from donors after brain death (DBD), and living donor kidney transplants were performed in 22.4% of all transplants. The median BMI of the recipients was 25.9 kg/m². Additionally, 13.5% of the recipients had a BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m² and 3.9% had a BMI >35 kg/m². A BMI >30 kg/m² was significantly associated with primary non-function of the kidney (p = 0.047), delayed graft function (p = 0.008), and a higher rate of loss of graft function (p = 0.015). The glomerular filtration rate 12 months after KT was significantly lower in recipients with a BMI >30 kg/m². Multivariate analysis revealed that recipient BMI, among other factors, was an independent risk factor for delayed graft function and graft survival. Patients with a BMI >30 kg/m² had an almost four times higher risk for surgical site infection than did recipients with a lower BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased BMI at kidney transplantation is a predictor of adverse outcomes, including delayed graft function. These findings demonstrate the importance of the careful selection of patients and pre-transplant weight reduction, although the role of weight reduction for improving graft function is not clear.