1
|
Garrido-Fernández S, Fernández DG, López GS, Mar Escribano Rodríguez MD, Delgado VM, Iglesias-Souto J, Castro Gómez CD, Bòria EV, Hernández-Peña J, Sánchez-López J. Satisfaction, Qol and adherence of patients allergic to dust mites and/or pollens undergoing sublingual immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2024:1-12. [PMID: 38888502 DOI: 10.1080/1750743x.2024.2347828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) changes history of allergic respiratory disease (ARD). However, adherence is a barrier for optimal outcomes. Patients & methods: In the QUALI study, 859 patients with house-dust mite (HDM) and/or pollen induced ARD uncontrolled with symptomatic treatment and undergoing SLIT for at least 6 months or including one pre-coseason (pollen) were collected. Results & conclusion: SLIT significantly improved allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) and asthma symptom control, leading to reduced medication, meaningful health-related quality of life gain, improved nasal, ocular and bronchial symptoms and everyday life activities. Patients were highly satisfied and most of them adhered to SLIT, being forgetfulness the main non-adherence motive. SLIT is a quick effective treatment against persistent moderate-to-severe symptoms in ARC and asthma but it should been improve forgetfulness, as non-adherence reason.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Garrido-Fernández
- Servicio de Alergología, Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN), Navarra, 31008, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IDISNA), Navarra, 31008, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Javier Iglesias-Souto
- Servicio de Alergología, Hospital Universitario Hospiten Sur, Tenerife, 38660, Spain
| | | | | | - Jenaro Hernández-Peña
- Servicio de Alergia, Hospital Central de la Defensa "Gómez Ulla", Madrid, 28028, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tempels-Pavlica Ž, Aarts MCJ, Welsing PMJ, van der Meer AN, van der Zwan LP, Uss E, Knulst AC. House dust mite sublingual allergen immunotherapy tablet is safe and well-tolerated in Dutch clinical practice. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2024; 5:1355324. [PMID: 38487467 PMCID: PMC10937523 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1355324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Half (49%) of clinically diagnosed allergic rhinitis (AR) patients are sensitized to house dust mite (HDM). If allergen avoidance and symptomatic medication fail, allergen immunotherapy may be indicated. Objective We investigated safety and tolerability of HDM-sublingual immunotherapy by HDM-SLIT tablets in Dutch daily clinical practice. Methods Daily intake of 12 SQ-HDM SLIT-tablet was investigated in a prospective, multicenter, observational study (EUPAS43753). It comprised 4 consultations in 1 year. Data on safety, tolerability, treatment satisfaction, symptomatic medication, compliance, and clinical effectiveness (Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test; CARAT) were collected. Descriptive and longitudinal regression data analysis were performed. Results Adult patients (n = 415), mean (SD) age 36.6 (12.2) years, 61.4% female and 36% asthmatic were included. The preponderance (65.1%) experienced adverse events (AEs). These, mostly mild (67%), AEs comprised: oral allergic reactions (58.6%), respiratory (12.4%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (9.4%). Sixty (14.5%) patients stopped due to AEs and 76 (18.3%) for non-AE reasons. CARAT scores improved clinically significant by 6 points and symptomatic medication use decreased from 96.1% to 77.4%. Most patients (74.5%) tolerated the treatment and were compliant (>86.5%). The majority of patients (62.4%) and investigators (69.4%) were satisfied with treatment. Conclusions HDM SLIT-tablet is a safe and well-tolerated AR treatment. AEs occur often but are mostly mild and decreasing during the first year. CARAT scores improved and symptomatic medication use decreased suggesting better control of AR with treatment. Compliance, tolerability, and treatment satisfaction are good. However, patient follow-up and compliance remain important points of attention when initiating treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark C. J. Aarts
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Paco M. J. Welsing
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Elena Uss
- Medical Department, ALK-Abelló BV, Almere, Netherlands
| | - André C. Knulst
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fox MG, Cass LM, Sykes KJ, Cummings EL, Fassas SN, Nallani R, Smith JB, Chiu AG, Villwock JA. Factors affecting adherence to intranasal treatment for allergic rhinitis: A qualitative study. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2022; 8:40-45. [PMID: 36846400 PMCID: PMC9948570 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the facilitators of and barriers to adherence to use of intranasal pharmacotherapy (daily intranasal corticosteroids and/or antihistamine, and nasal saline irrigation [NSI]), for allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods Patients were recruited from an academic tertiary care rhinology and allergy clinic. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after the initial visit and/or 4-6 weeks following treatment. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using a grounded theory, inductive approach to elucidate themes regarding patient adherence to AR treatment. Results A total of 32 patients (12 male, 20 female; age 22-78) participated (seven at initial visit, seven at follow-up visit, and 18 at both). Memory triggers, such as linking nasal routine to existing daily activities or medications, were identified by patients as the most helpful strategy for adherence at initial and follow-up visits. Logistical obstacles related to NSI (messy, takes time, etc.) was the most common concept discussed at follow-up. Patients modified the regimen based on side effects experienced or perceived efficacy. Conclusions Memory triggers help patients adhere to nasal routines. Logistical obstacles related to NSI can deter from use. Health care providers should address both concepts during patient counseling. Nudge-based interventions that incorporate these concepts may help improve adherence to AR treatment. Level of Evidence 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meha G. Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck SurgeryBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Lauren M. Cass
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryKaiser PermanentePortlandOregonUSA
| | - Kevin J. Sykes
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck SurgeryUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| | - Emily L. Cummings
- Department of Internal MedicineIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisIndianaUSA
| | - Scott N. Fassas
- Department of Internal MedicineGeorge Washington School of Medicine & Health SciencesWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Rohit Nallani
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck SurgeryUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| | - Josh B. Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck SurgerySt. Louis University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Alexander G. Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck SurgeryUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| | - Jennifer A. Villwock
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck SurgeryUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityKansasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Editorial: Pharmacotherapy and evidence based medicine. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 22:257-258. [DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Incorvaia C, Heffler E, Peveri S, Pucciarini F, Canonica GW, Ridolo E. Patient's Adherence and Compliance and Quality of Life During/After VIT. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 3:886054. [PMID: 35836739 PMCID: PMC9273771 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.886054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Adherence and compliance, respectively considered as a more positive, proactive behavior, resulting in a patient's lifestyle change to follow a daily regimen, and, as a more enforced response to an external command, are a critical aspect of any medical therapy, since it is estimated that less than half of the patients who are prescribed a therapy perform it, respecting the doses and duration. As far as aeroallergen immunotherapy is concerned, current data show that adherence is respected in about 50% of subcutaneous immunotherapy and in percentages even lower than 20% in sublingual immunotherapy treatments. This review analyzes the adherence to venom immunotherapy (VIT), in which, given its purpose of preventing potentially fatal anaphylactic reactions to insect stings, this aspect plays a critical role. In fact, protection from stings already takes place when the maintenance dose is reached, but VIT interruption before the recommended duration of 5 years exposes patients to new sting reactions. The data on adherence to VIT are far less abundant than that for aeroallergen immunotherapy. One of the first studies reported poor adherence in Austria, but the model used, consisting in the estimate of the percentage of patients with systemic reactions who accepted or rejected VIT, does not meet the criteria that define adherence to treatment. As for appropriate adherence studies, rates higher than 70% were reported in the United States and European countries. Studies from Italy found that good adherence were observed also in patients receiving, after 4 years of VIT, 3 months extended maintenance dose, as well as in patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic, <10% of whom stopped VIT. Instead, only 35% of the patients treated for allergy to imported fire ant remained adherent after 1 year of treatment. However, also concerning honeybees and vespids, although adherence is satisfactory, it is possible to further improve it by increasing information and support for patients. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is an efficient measure to estimate the effectiveness and safety of medical treatment. Tools designed to make patients aware of its improvement through VIT and, in particular, of the complete prevention of the risk of fatal reactions have an important role in reinforcing adherence. However, aspects not yet evaluated, such as the possible relationship between the efficacy of VIT and HRQL or its particular features in patients with mastocytosis, deserve specific studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristoforo Incorvaia
- Senior Consultant, Post-graduate School of Allergology and Immunology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma, and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Silvia Peveri
- Allergy Department Unit, Piacenza Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | - Francesco Pucciarini
- Senior Consultant, Post-graduate School of Allergology and Immunology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma, and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Erminia Ridolo
- Senior Consultant, Post-graduate School of Allergology and Immunology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
- *Correspondence: Erminia Ridolo
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen H, Gong GQ, Ding M, Dong X, Sun YL, Wan L, Gao YD. Dropouts From Sublingual Immunotherapy and the Transition to Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in House Dust Mite-Sensitized Allergic Rhinitis Patients. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 2:810133. [PMID: 35386972 PMCID: PMC8974757 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2021.810133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Both subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are effective in reducing symptoms and medication scores and inducing long-term efficacy in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). However, SLIT has been associated with poor patient adherence. This study investigates the factors impacting dropout rates from SLIT in house dust mite (HDM)-sensitized AR patients. Methods: A retrospective study was performed to analyze dropout rates and reasons in AR patients receiving Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f) SLIT with a follow-up period of 2 years. Results: A total of 719 HDM-sensitized AR patients received Der f-SLIT. Dropout rates increased with time and most occurred after 1 year of SLIT. By month 24, 654 (91%) patients had discontinued SLIT. The dropout rates by month 24 were 100, 90.1, and 91.1% in children <5 years old, children aged 5–18 years old, and adults ≥ 18 years old, respectively. Combination with allergic asthma and mono- or multi-sensitization to other aeroallergens did not affect the dropout rates. The most common self-reported reasons for dropouts were refusal of continuation, dissatisfaction with the efficacy, transition to SCIT, and adverse effects. Refusal of continuation increased with age, whereas transition to SCIT decreased with age. Ninety-seven cases transitioned from SLIT to SCIT, and the transition rates increased with time. Comorbid allergic asthma did not affect the transition rates. However, multi-sensitization was associated with a slightly higher rate of transition to SCIT. The most common reason for the transition was dissatisfaction with the efficacy (54.6%), which was only reported by patients older than 5 years. For children who began SLIT at younger than 5 years old, the most common reason (81.2%) for transition was age reaching 5 years. Conclusions: HDM-SLIT has a very high dropout rate, which is mainly due to refusal of continuation and dissatisfaction with the efficacy. Transitioning from SLIT to SCIT may help keep these patients on AIT and thus increase adherence and long-term efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology and Allergology, Central Hospital of Huangshi, Huangshi, China
| | - Guo-qing Gong
- Department of Otolaryngology and Allergology, Central Hospital of Huangshi, Huangshi, China
| | - Mei Ding
- Department of Allergology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immunology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiang Dong
- Department of Allergology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immunology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yuan-li Sun
- Department of Allergology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immunology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Lang Wan
- Department of Otolaryngology and Allergology, Central Hospital of Huangshi, Huangshi, China
| | - Ya-dong Gao
- Department of Allergology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immunology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- *Correspondence: Ya-dong Gao
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Compliance with subcutaneous immunotherapy and factors affecting compliance among patients with allergic rhinitis. Am J Otolaryngol 2021; 42:103125. [PMID: 34218068 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
8
|
A Retrospective Nationwide Non-Interventional Study of an Aqueous Sublingual Immunotherapy Formulation Administered with a 200-µL Dosing Pump. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2021; 8:241-251. [PMID: 33591547 PMCID: PMC8128946 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-021-00233-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Convenient dosing is a key component of treatment adherence and thus efficacy and safety. Aqueous sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) formulations can be administered with a dosing pump that delivers 200 µL of volume per actuation. Objective The objective of this study was to describe the use of Staloral® 300 Rapid in its new dosing pump presentation and to evaluate the safety and satisfaction from both the patient and doctor. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective non-interventional study in a population (aged 5 years or over) of individuals with allergic rhinitis or allergic asthma who were being treated with aqueous 300 index of reactivity SLIT formulations of various allergens (grass pollen, tree pollen, house dust mites). Based on a detailed, SLIT-specific, patient self-questionnaire (Quartis®) and the inspection of medical records, we assessed the characteristics of the SLIT, safety, patient satisfaction and willingness to continue SLIT. The physician’s satisfaction with the treatment was measured on a 0–100 visual analogue scale. Adverse events were coded with the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Results A total of 801 valid patients were included (52.4% male; mean ± standard deviation age: 25.9 ± 17.2 years; mean time since diagnosis: 4.56 ± 4.68 years; mean time using the previous dosing pump: 19.2 ± 13.0 months; time using the 200-µL dosing pump: 14.95 ± 3.80 months). Among the study population, 317 subjects comprised the paediatric subgroup (57%: male; mean age: 9.8 ± 2.5 years). Overall, 54 patients (6.7%) reported a total of 68 adverse events (including 51 gastrointestinal adverse events). The large majority of adverse events were mild, local and transient and did not require treatment. There were no severe adverse events. The level of patient satisfaction with the ease of SLIT administration was high (84.3% overall, and 82.6% in the paediatric subgroup). The mean ± standard deviation visual analogue scale score for physician satisfaction with the treatment was 70.6 ± 25.1 out of 100. Conclusions Administration of 300 index of reactivity SLIT with a 200-µL dosing pump is safe, well tolerated and associated with good levels of patient satisfaction.
Collapse
|
9
|
Traina G, Martelli A, Barberi S, Licari A, Marseglia GL, Tosca MA, Ciprandi G. Evaluation of safety and tolerability of a rush up-dosing allergen-specific immunotherapy with grass pollen, birch, hazel, and alder allergoid in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without asthma. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2021; 92:e2021037. [PMID: 33682836 PMCID: PMC7975937 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.9096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: Usually, the number of injections required to achieve the maintenance dose in subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is relatively small for some of the currently used allergens, but this may still be uncomfortable for patients, thus compromising adherence and compliance. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a dose acceleration of a conventional induction schedule using an allergoid extract of grass pollen, birch, hazel, and alder, needed to achieve the ideal maintenance dose. Methods: In this open-label study, 34 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without asthma, were treated with SCIT using an allergoid for grass pollen or birch or mix trees with an increase in accelerated induction dose comprising only 3 injections, one per week, compared to a conventional induction pattern in five injections (once a week). Safety determination was assessed by evaluating local and systemic adverse events. Tolerability was evaluated by patients and physicians who performed the treatment. Results: No treatment-related adverse events were observed in any of the patients undergoing rush SCIT. No local reactions, no systemic reactions of any degree (WAO Grade) have been observed. Tolerability has always been rated as very good by both patients and physician. Conclusions: The induction phase, needed to achieve the monthly maintenance dose for a pollen extract, can be greatly accelerated, ensuring a tolerability comparable to that of the conventional schedule. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Collapse
|
10
|
Xiang L, Liu F, Zhi L, Jiang W, Liu C, Xie H, Zhou X, Sun Y, Zheng Y, Zhu R, Tao Z, Xia W, Lai H, Wei Q, Cheng L, Tang Y, Xu R, Huang H, Zhou Q, Chang P. Safety of semi-depot house dust mite allergen extract in children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis and asthma. Immunotherapy 2020; 13:227-239. [PMID: 33317341 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2020-0232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Multicenter study to investigate the safety of mite extract product Novo-Helisen Depot, Strengths 1 to 3 (NHD3), as subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), in Chinese children and adolescents with allergic rhinitis (AR) and allergic asthma (AA). Patients & methods: We evaluated SCIT-related adverse events (AEs) during NHD3 14-week initial therapy in children (5-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) with perennial symptomatic AR and AA. Results: Among 3600 injections in 250 patients, 361/3600 (10.0%) injections caused SCIT-related AEs in 96/250 (38.4%) patients, 321/3600 injections (8.9%) caused local reactions in 89/250 (35.6%) and 40/3600 injections (1.1%) caused systemic reactions in 23/250 (9.2%). Conclusion: Initial SCIT treatment using NHD3 was safe and well tolerated in Chinese children and adolescents with AR and AA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Xiang
- Department of Allergy, Beijing Children's Hospital, Beijing 100045, China
| | - Fengxia Liu
- Department of Allergy, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang 261200, China
| | - Lili Zhi
- Department of Allergy, Central Hospital of Zibo, Zibo 255020, China
| | - Weihong Jiang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Changshan Liu
- Department of Pediatrics, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China
| | - Hua Xie
- Department of Respiratory, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110015, China
| | - Xiaoqin Zhou
- Department of Pediatrics, Hubei Provincial Maternal & Child Health Hospital, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Yuemei Sun
- Department of Allergy, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264000, China
| | - Yuejie Zheng
- Department of Respiratory, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen 518026, China
| | - Rongfei Zhu
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Zezhang Tao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
| | - Wanmin Xia
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
| | - He Lai
- Department of Allergy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China
| | - Qingyu Wei
- Department of Allergy, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110003, China
| | - Lei Cheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Clinical Allergy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.,International Centre for Allergy Research, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Department of Respiratory, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450018, China
| | - Rui Xu
- Department of Allergy of Otorhinolaryngology Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Huijie Huang
- Department of Allergy, Beijing Children's Hospital, Beijing 100045, China
| | - Queena Zhou
- Medical Affairs, Merck Serono Co., Ltd, Beijing 100016, China
| | - Peter Chang
- Global Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Medical Writing (GBEM), Merck Serono Co., Ltd, Beijing 100016, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ramió-Lluch L, Brazís P, Ferrer L, Puigdemont A. Allergen-specific immunotherapy in dogs with atopic dermatitis: is owner compliance the main success-limiting factor? Vet Rec 2020; 187:493. [PMID: 33082241 DOI: 10.1136/vr.106024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) to treat canine atopic dermatitis has been well established, it remains unclear why not all dogs show the same response to treatment. The goal of the study was to determine the relationship between duration of ASIT and two measurements of success: disease severity and concomitant medication sparing effect. METHODS Data were retrospectively compiled for 145 dogs with atopic dermatitis treated with ASIT. As a measure of treatment compliance, cases were stratified into dogs treated for less than 12 months or for at least 12 months. Treatment efficacy, defined as a reduction in disease severity score (scale 0-10), was compared between both groups, and correlations between treatment success and several related factors were examined. RESULTS ASIT treatment duration was strongly correlated with treatment efficacy. Animals treated for less than 12 months showed lower efficacy rates (22 per cent) than those treated for at least 12 months (65 per cent). Further, in animals treated for at least 12 months, concomitant medications were reduced more (87 per cent) than in animals treated for less than 12 months (39 per cent). CONCLUSION A lack of owner compliance emerged as the main factor explaining the reduced effectiveness of ASIT. To improve treatment adherence, veterinarians and owners need to be better informed about ASIT mechanisms of action before starting treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pilar Brazís
- Animal Health BU, Laboratorios Leti SL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis Ferrer
- Animal Medicine and Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Anna Puigdemont
- Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Steven GC. Shared decision making in allergic rhinitis: An approach to the patient. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020; 125:268-272. [PMID: 32615266 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review what is known about the importance of shared decision making (SDM) in allergic rhinitis. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE and PubMed database searches for SDM, patient preferences, patient motivation with mobile apps, over-the-counter medications, adherence, complementary and alternative therapies, nasal steroids, and immunotherapy. STUDY SELECTIONS No articles directly dealt with the effects of SDM on outcomes in allergic rhinitis. Thus, of the 77 articles produced by these searches, 41 were selected based on the information relevant to evaluating the need for SDM in these patients. RESULTS Poorly controlled allergic rhinitis continues to be associated with substantial morbidity. Complicating the effective control of the disease is the tendency of patients to self-manage using information from a variety of sources other than health care providers. Although direct evidence in allergic rhinitis is lacking, controlled trials have found the benefits of SDM in improving adherence and outcomes in at least 50 other disease states. Thus, this review explores the aspects of the disease that are complicated by poor adherence, establishing the case for the need for widespread use of SDM techniques. CONCLUSION Patients are confronted with a complex array of treatment options for allergic rhinitis, and a consistent SDM approach can better equip them to make the requisite care decisions needed to achieve optimal control. Furthermore, improving patient education through SDM provides a framework that enables long-term adherence for maximal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary C Steven
- Allergy, Asthma and Sinus Center, Greenfield, Wisconsin.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Adherence to Allergen Subcutaneous Immunotherapy is Increased by a Shortened Build-Up Phase: A Retrospective Study. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2020; 2020:7328469. [PMID: 32149130 PMCID: PMC7049433 DOI: 10.1155/2020/7328469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Introduction. The poor long-term adherence is known to affect the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy (AIT). In the case of injection AIT (SCIT), one of the main determinants is the inconvenience for patients to undergo prolonged build-up phases. Thus, simplifying the time schedule of the induction protocol could be effective in increasing the adherence to SCIT. Methods We backtracked the SCIT renewal orders, thanks to the cooperation of the manufacturing company, and we compared the long-term adherence of 152 patients, who were prescribed with an abbreviated build-up schedule (4 injections, allergoid) with that of 302 patients treated with the same product, but with the traditional build-up protocol (7 injections). Results According to the patient-named refills, those patients on the abbreviated build-up were significantly more compliant at the 2nd and 3rd year of treatment compared to the other group (p=0.0001). The drop-out rate after one year was also significantly lower between the two groups (p=0.0001). The drop-out rate after one year was also significantly lower between the two groups (p=0.0001). The drop-out rate after one year was also significantly lower between the two groups (. Conclusions Abbreviating the build-up phase by reducing the number of injections significantly improves patients' adherence to SCIT.
Collapse
|
14
|
Matricardi PM, Dramburg S, Alvarez‐Perea A, Antolín‐Amérigo D, Apfelbacher C, Atanaskovic‐Markovic M, Berger U, Blaiss MS, Blank S, Boni E, Bonini M, Bousquet J, Brockow K, Buters J, Cardona V, Caubet J, Cavkaytar Ö, Elliott T, Esteban‐Gorgojo I, Fonseca JA, Gardner J, Gevaert P, Ghiordanescu I, Hellings P, Hoffmann‐Sommergruber K, Fusun Kalpaklioglu A, Marmouz F, Meijide Calderón Á, Mösges R, Nakonechna A, Ollert M, Oteros J, Pajno G, Panaitescu C, Perez‐Formigo D, Pfaar O, Pitsios C, Rudenko M, Ryan D, Sánchez‐García S, Shih J, Tripodi S, Van der Poel L, Os‐Medendorp H, Varricchi G, Wittmann J, Worm M, Agache I. The role of mobile health technologies in allergy care: An EAACI position paper. Allergy 2020; 75:259-272. [PMID: 31230373 DOI: 10.1111/all.13953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Mobile health (mHealth) uses mobile communication devices such as smartphones and tablet computers to support and improve health-related services, data and information flow, patient self-management, surveillance, and disease management from the moment of first diagnosis to an optimized treatment. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology created a task force to assess the state of the art and future potential of mHealth in allergology. The task force endorsed the "Be He@lthy, Be Mobile" WHO initiative and debated the quality, usability, efficiency, advantages, limitations, and risks of mobile solutions for allergic diseases. The results are summarized in this position paper, analyzing also the regulatory background with regard to the "General Data Protection Regulation" and Medical Directives of the European Community. The task force assessed the design, user engagement, content, potential of inducing behavioral change, credibility/accountability, and privacy policies of mHealth products. The perspectives of healthcare professionals and allergic patients are discussed, underlining the need of thorough investigation for an effective design of mHealth technologies as auxiliary tools to improve quality of care. Within the context of precision medicine, these could facilitate the change in perspective from clinician- to patient-centered care. The current and future potential of mHealth is then examined for specific areas of allergology, including allergic rhinitis, aerobiology, allergen immunotherapy, asthma, dermatological diseases, food allergies, anaphylaxis, insect venom, and drug allergy. The impact of mobile technologies and associated big data sets are outlined. Facts and recommendations for future mHealth initiatives within EAACI are listed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Maria Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine Charité ‐ University Medicine Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine Charité ‐ University Medicine Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Alberto Alvarez‐Perea
- Allergy Service Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón Madrid Spain
- Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute Madrid Spain
| | | | - Christian Apfelbacher
- Medical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine University of Regensburg Regensburg Germany
| | | | - Uwe Berger
- Department of Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
| | - Michael S. Blaiss
- Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University Augusta Georgia USA
| | - Simon Blank
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), School of Medicine and Helmholtz Center Munich Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
| | - Elisa Boni
- Allergy Unit Santo Spirito Hospital Alessandria Italy
| | - Matteo Bonini
- National Heart and Lung Institute Royal Brompton Hospital & Imperial College London London UK
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli – IRCCS Rome Italy
- Universita’ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy
| | - Jean Bousquet
- University Hospital Montpellier France
- Contre les MAladies Chronique spour un VIeillissement Actif en France European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing Reference Site MACVIA‐France Montpellier France
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
| | - Jeroen Buters
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), School of Medicine and Helmholtz Center Munich Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
| | - Victoria Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine Hospital Vall d'Hebron Barcelona
- ARADyAL Research Network Barcelona Spain
| | - Jean‐Christoph Caubet
- Department of the Child and Adolescent, Pediatric Allergy Unit Geneva University Hospital Geneva Switzerland
| | - Özlem Cavkaytar
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital Istanbul Medeniyet University Istanbul Turkey
| | - Tania Elliott
- New York University Medical Center New York New York USA
| | | | - Joao A. Fonseca
- CINTESIS, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine University of Porto Porto Portugal
- MEDIDA, Lda Porto Portugal
- MEDCIDS, Dpt. of Community Medicine, Information, and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine University of Porto Portugal
| | - James Gardner
- Great North Children's Hospital Newcastle UK
- Newcastle University Newcastle UK
| | - Philippe Gevaert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Ghent University Ghent Belgium
| | | | - Peter Hellings
- Euforea Brussels Belgium
- Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | | | - A. Fusun Kalpaklioglu
- Department of Immunology and Allergic Diseases Kirikkale University School of Medicine Kırıkkale Turkey
| | | | | | - Ralph Mösges
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology University of Cologne Cologne Germany
- CRI ‐ Clinical Research International Ltd. Cologne Germany
| | - Alla Nakonechna
- Department of Allergy Broadgreen Hospital Liverpool UK
- Liverpool Hope University Liverpool UK
| | - Markus Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity Luxembourg Institute of Health Esch‐sur‐Alzette Luxembourg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis University of Southern Denmark Odense C Denmark
| | - José Oteros
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), School of Medicine and Helmholtz Center Munich Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
| | - Giovanni Pajno
- Allergy Unit‐ Department of Pediatrics University of Messina Messina Italy
| | - Catalina Panaitescu
- Family Medicine Solo Practice RespiRO – Romanian Primary Care Respiratory Group Bucharest Romania
| | - Daniel Perez‐Formigo
- Department of Ophthalmology Hospital Universitario de Torrejon Madrid Spain
- Faculty of Medicine University of Francisco de Vitoria (UFV) Pozuelo de Alarcon, Madrid Spain
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | | | | | - Dermot Ryan
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
- Optimum Patient Care Cambridge UK
| | - Silvia Sánchez‐García
- Allergy Unit Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús Madrid Spain
- Spanish Research Network on Allergy (ARADyAL: Red Nacional de Alergia ‐Asma, Reacciones Adversas y Alérgicas‐) of the Carlos III Health Institute Madrid Spain
| | - Jennifer Shih
- Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta Georgia USA
| | | | | | - Harmieke Os‐Medendorp
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology University Medical Center Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Gilda Varricchi
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences and Center for Basic and Clinical Immunology Research (CISI) University of Naples Federico II Naples Italy
| | - Jörn Wittmann
- Selbstregulierung Informationswirtschaft eV Berlin Germany
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Allergy‐Center‐Charité Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zielen S, Plückhahn K, Akboga Y, Rieker-Schwienbacher J, Thieme U, Rosewich M. Fast up-dosing with a birch allergoid is safe and well tolerated in allergic rhinitis patients with or without asthma. Immunotherapy 2020; 11:177-187. [PMID: 30730274 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2018-0143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Subcutaneous immunotherapy is effective in treating allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma, but is still inconvenient when heavy schedules are used. A faster dose escalation is desirable. MATERIALS & METHODS In this open-label, Phase II trial, 130 adults were randomized 1:1 to receive a birch pollen allergoid subcutaneous immunotherapy. Group I with four weekly injections and Group II with seven weekly injections. Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity were assessed. RESULTS Mild-to-moderate treatment-related adverse events were reported for 57.7% of the patients (Group I: 36, Group II: 39). Tolerability was assessed by physicians and rated as 'good' or 'very good' for 55 patients in Group I (87.3%) and for 63 patients in Group II (94.0%). Levels of IgG and IgG4 increased before and after treatment significantly (p < 0.0001) in both groups. CONCLUSION Standard versus fast dose escalation is comparable in terms of safety and tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Zielen
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division for Allergology, Pneumology & Cystic Fibrosis, University Hospital Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, 60590, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Uta Thieme
- HNO Practice Dr. Uta Thieme, Duisburg, 47051, Germany
| | - Martin Rosewich
- Department for Children & Adolescents, Division for Allergology, Pneumology & Cystic Fibrosis, University Hospital Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, 60590, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Alba P, Moreno V, Arias-Irigoyen J, Antón M, Parra A, Gómez-Fernández MC, Madariaga B, Martínez A, Begoña L. Safety evaluation of a multiallergen immunotherapy treatment in polyallergic patients. APOLO observational study. Immunotherapy 2020; 12:75-87. [PMID: 31902260 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2019-0187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Assessment of safety, tolerability and changes in global clinical impression with an multiallergen immunotherapy treatment without dilutional effect in polyallergic patients. Patients & methods: This observational prospective study included patients with allergic rhinitis-rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma between 5 and 60 years old receiving immunotherapy treatment with a mixture of two allergenic sources. All adverse events were recorded. Global clinical impression, tolerability subjective assessment and satisfaction were also assessed. Results: 130 patients were analyzed. Nine clinically relevant local adverse reactions were reported in six patients (4.6%). Six systemic reactions (grades 0-I) occurred in four patients (3.1%). Patients improved significantly in their global clinical impression. Good tolerability subjective assessment and satisfaction values were also observed. Conclusion: This multiallergen immunotherapy treatment without dilutional effect can be considered as a potential therapeutic alternative for polyallergic patients suffering from allergic rhinitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Alba
- Hospital de Manises. Allergy Department, Manises, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Mónica Antón
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario del Vinalopó. Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - Antonio Parra
- Department of Allergy, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | - Begoña Madariaga
- R&D Department, ROXALL Medicina España S.A., Zamudio, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Alberto Martínez
- R&D Department, ROXALL Medicina España S.A., Zamudio, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Leire Begoña
- R&D Department, ROXALL Medicina España S.A., Zamudio, Bizkaia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bousquet J, Ansotegui IJ, Anto JM, Arnavielhe S, Bachert C, Basagaña X, Bédard A, Bedbrook A, Bonini M, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Braido F, Cardona V, Czarlewski W, Cruz AA, Demoly P, De Vries G, Dramburg S, Mathieu-Dupas E, Erhola M, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, Haahtela T, Hellings PW, Illario M, Ivancevich JC, Jormanainen V, Klimek L, Kuna P, Kvedariene V, Laune D, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lourenço O, Onorato GL, Matricardi PM, Melén E, Mullol J, Papadopoulos NG, Pfaar O, Pham-Thi N, Sheikh A, Tan R, To T, Tomazic PV, Toppila-Salmi S, Tripodi S, Wallace D, Valiulis A, van Eerd M, Ventura MT, Yorgancioglu A, Zuberbier T. Mobile Technology in Allergic Rhinitis: Evolution in Management or Revolution in Health and Care? THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2019; 7:2511-2523. [PMID: 31445223 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.07.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Smart devices and Internet-based applications (apps) are largely used in allergic rhinitis and may help to address some unmet needs. However, these new tools need to first of all be tested for privacy rules, acceptability, usability, and cost-effectiveness. Second, they should be evaluated in the frame of the digital transformation of health, their impact on health care delivery, and health outcomes. This review (1) summarizes some existing mobile health apps for allergic rhinitis and reviews those in which testing has been published, (2) discusses apps that include risk factors of allergic rhinitis, (3) examines the impact of mobile health apps in phenotype discovery, (4) provides real-world evidence for care pathways, and finally (5) discusses mobile health tools enabling the digital transformation of health and care, empowering citizens, and building a healthier society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bousquet
- University Hospital, Montpellier, France; MACVIA-France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA-LR, Montpellier, France; VIMA, INSERM U 1168, VIMA: Ageing and chronic diseases Epidemiological and public health approaches, Villejuif, Université Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny le Bretonneux, France; Euforea, Brussels, Belgium; Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Ignacio J Ansotegui
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Hospital Quirónsalud Bizkaia, Erandio, Spain
| | - Josep M Anto
- ISGlobAL, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain; Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Claus Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, ENT Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Xavier Basagaña
- ISGlobAL, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Annabelle Bédard
- ISGlobAL, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Bedbrook
- MACVIA-France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA-LR, Montpellier, France
| | - Matteo Bonini
- UOC Pneumologia, Istituto di Medicina Interna, F Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton Hospital & Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia; Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Sydney Local Health District, Glebe, NSW, Australia
| | - Fulvio Braido
- Department of Internal Medicine (DiMI), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Vicky Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vall d'Hebron & ARADyAL Research Network, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alvaro A Cruz
- ProAR-Nucleo de Excelencia em Asma, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil; WHO GARD Planning Group, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Pascal Demoly
- Department of Pulmonology, Division of Allergy, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Equipe EPAR-IPLESP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Marina Erhola
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Euforea, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joao A Fonseca
- CINTESIS, Center for Research in Health Technology and Information Systems, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal; Medida, Lda, Porto, Portugal
| | - Tari Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Peter W Hellings
- Euforea, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maddalena Illario
- Division for Health Innovation, Campania Region and Federico II University Hospital Naples (R&D and DISMET), Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Piotr Kuna
- Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Violeta Kvedariene
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Chest Diseases and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Désirée Larenas-Linnemann
- Center of Excellence in Asthma and Allergy, Médica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital, México City, Mexico
| | - Olga Lourenço
- Faculty of Health Sciences and CICS-UBI, Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | | | - Paolo M Matricardi
- AG Molecular Allergology and Immunomodulation, Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Erik Melén
- E. Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden; Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Joaquim Mullol
- Rhinology Unit & Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Clinical & Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nikos G Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, Athens General Children's Hospital "P&A Kyriakou", University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Phillipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nhân Pham-Thi
- Allergy Department, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- The Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Tan
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia; Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Sydney Local Health District, Glebe, NSW, Australia
| | - Teresa To
- Sidkkids Hospital and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Sanna Toppila-Salmi
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Dana Wallace
- Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Fla
| | - Arunas Valiulis
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Clinic of Children's Diseases, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Public Health, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania; European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP/UEMS-SP), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Maria Teresa Ventura
- University of Bari Medical School, Unit of Geriatric Immunoallergology, Bari, Italy
| | - Arzu Yorgancioglu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Uniersität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy-Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Berlin, Germany; Member of GA(2)LEN, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee JH, Lee SH, Ban GY, Ye YM, Nahm DH, Park HS, Shin YS. Factors Associated with Adherence to Allergen Specific Subcutaneous Immunotherapy. Yonsei Med J 2019; 60:570-577. [PMID: 31124341 PMCID: PMC6536387 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.6.570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is known to be the only therapeutic modality to alter the natural course of allergic diseases. However, at least 3 years of treatment is recommended for achieving long-term disease modifying effect. This study aimed to investigate factors associated with immunotherapy non-adherence in real practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis, asthma, or atopic dermatitis, and received AIT to common allergens such as house dust mite and/or pollens from January 2007 to August 2014. In this study, non-adherence was defined as not completing 3 years of AIT. RESULTS Among 1162 patients enrolled, 228 (19.6%) failed to complete 3 years of AIT. In multivariate analysis, age less than 20 years [odds ratio (OR) 3.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70-5.69] and 20 to 40 years (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.17-3.43), cluster build-up (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.05-3.02) and ultra-rush build-up schedules (OR 5.46, 95% CI 2.40-12.43), and absence of visit to other departments in the same hospital (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.05-3.32) were independently associated with immunotherapy non-adherence. Disease duration of 5-10 years was negatively associated with non-adherence compared to shorter disease duration of less than 5 years (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.94). Although male sex and commercial product of AIT, Tyrosine S®, compared to Novo-Helisen® were non-adherent factors in univariate analysis, no statistical significances were identified in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Various factors are associated with immunotherapy adherence affecting the utility of immunotherapy. Clinicians should be aware of factors associated with adherence to maximize the utility of allergen-specific subcutaneous immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Ho Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - So Hee Lee
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Ga Young Ban
- Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Min Ye
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Dong Ho Nahm
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hae Sim Park
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Yoo Seob Shin
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Scadding GK, Kariyawasam HH, Scadding G, Mirakian R, Buckley RJ, Dixon T, Durham SR, Farooque S, Jones N, Leech S, Nasser SM, Powell R, Roberts G, Rotiroti G, Simpson A, Smith H, Clark AT. BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis (Revised Edition 2017; First edition 2007). Clin Exp Allergy 2019; 47:856-889. [PMID: 30239057 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Revised: 05/01/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This is an updated guideline for the diagnosis and management of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis, first published in 2007. It was produced by the Standards of Care Committee of the British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, using accredited methods. Allergic rhinitis is common and affects 10-15% of children and 26% of adults in the UK, it affects quality of life, school and work attendance, and is a risk factor for development of asthma. Allergic rhinitis is diagnosed by history and examination, supported by specific allergy tests. Topical nasal corticosteroids are the treatment of choice for moderate to severe disease. Combination therapy with intranasal corticosteroid plus intranasal antihistamine is more effective than either alone and provides second line treatment for those with rhinitis poorly controlled on monotherapy. Immunotherapy is highly effective when the specific allergen is the responsible driver for the symptoms. Treatment of rhinitis is associated with benefits for asthma. Non-allergic rhinitis also is a risk factor for the development of asthma and may be eosinophilic and steroid-responsive or neurogenic and non- inflammatory. Non-allergic rhinitis may be a presenting complaint for systemic disorders such as granulomatous or eosinophilic polyangiitis, and sarcoidoisis. Infective rhinitis can be caused by viruses, and less commonly by bacteria, fungi and protozoa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G K Scadding
- The Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK
| | - H H Kariyawasam
- The Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK.,UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Scadding
- Department of Upper Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College NHLI, London, UK
| | - R Mirakian
- The Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK
| | - R J Buckley
- Vision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - T Dixon
- Royal Liverpool and Broad green University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - S R Durham
- Department of Upper Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College NHLI, London, UK
| | - S Farooque
- Chest and Allergy Department, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - N Jones
- The Park Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - S Leech
- Department of Child Health, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - S M Nasser
- Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - R Powell
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Nottingham University, Nottingham UK
| | - G Roberts
- Department of Child Health, University of Southampton Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - G Rotiroti
- The Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Simpson
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, UK
| | - H Smith
- Division of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - A T Clark
- Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Menditto E, Costa E, Midão L, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Novellino E, Bialek S, Briedis V, Mair A, Rajabian-Soderlund R, Arnavielhe S, Bedbrook A, Czarlewski W, Annesi-Maesano I, Anto JM, Devillier P, De Vries G, Keil T, Sheikh A, Orlando V, Larenas-Linnemann D, Cecchi L, De Feo G, Illario M, Stellato C, Fonseca J, Malva J, Morais-Almeida M, Pereira AM, Todo-Bom AM, Kvedariene V, Valiulis A, Bergmann KC, Klimek L, Mösges R, Pfaar O, Zuberbier T, Cardona V, Mullol J, Papadopoulos NG, Prokopakis EP, Bewick M, Ryan D, Roller-Wirnsberger RE, Tomazic PV, Cruz AA, Kuna P, Samolinski B, Fokkens WJ, Reitsma S, Bosse I, Fontaine JF, Laune D, Haahtela T, Toppila-Salmi S, Bachert C, Hellings PW, Melén E, Wickman M, Bindslev-Jensen C, Eller E, O'Hehir RE, Cingi C, Gemicioğlu B, Kalayci O, Ivancevich JC, Bousquet J. Adherence to treatment in allergic rhinitis using mobile technology. The MASK Study. Clin Exp Allergy 2019; 49:442-460. [PMID: 30597673 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile technology may help to better understand the adherence to treatment. MASK-rhinitis (Mobile Airways Sentinel NetworK for allergic rhinitis) is a patient-centred ICT system. A mobile phone app (the Allergy Diary) central to MASK is available in 22 countries. OBJECTIVES To assess the adherence to treatment in allergic rhinitis patients using the Allergy Diary App. METHODS An observational cross-sectional study was carried out on all users who filled in the Allergy Diary from 1 January 2016 to 1 August 2017. Secondary adherence was assessed by using the modified Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) and the Proportion of days covered (PDC) approach. RESULTS A total of 12 143 users were registered. A total of 6 949 users reported at least one VAS data recording. Among them, 1 887 users reported ≥7 VAS data. About 1 195 subjects were included in the analysis of adherence. One hundred and thirty-six (11.28%) users were adherent (MPR ≥70% and PDC ≤1.25), 51 (4.23%) were partly adherent (MPR ≥70% and PDC = 1.50) and 176 (14.60%) were switchers. On the other hand, 832 (69.05%) users were non-adherent to medications (MPR <70%). Of those, the largest group was non-adherent to medications and the time interval was increased in 442 (36.68%) users. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Adherence to treatment is low. The relative efficacy of continuous vs on-demand treatment for allergic rhinitis symptoms is still a matter of debate. This study shows an approach for measuring retrospective adherence based on a mobile app. This also represents a novel approach for analysing medication-taking behaviour in a real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Menditto
- CIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Elisio Costa
- UCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Faculty of Pharmacy, and Competence Center on Active and Healthy Ageing of University of Porto (Porto4Ageing), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luis Midão
- UCIBIO, REQUIMTE, Faculty of Pharmacy, and Competence Center on Active and Healthy Ageing of University of Porto (Porto4Ageing), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney Woolcock Emphysema Centre and Sydney Local Health District, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Slawomir Bialek
- Department of Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy with the Division of Laboratory Medicine, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Alpana Mair
- DG for Health and Social Care, Scottish Government, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Anna Bedbrook
- MACVIA-France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA-LR, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Isabella Annesi-Maesano
- Epidemiology of Allergic and Respiratory Diseases, Department Institute Pierre Louis of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM and Sorbonne Université, Medical School Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Josep M Anto
- ISGlobAL, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philippe Devillier
- Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Respiratoire UPRES EA220, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.,Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, Université Paris Saclay, Paris Saclay, France
| | | | - Thomas Keil
- Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- The Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Valentina Orlando
- CIRFF, Center of Pharmacoeconomics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Désirée Larenas-Linnemann
- Center of Excellence in Asthma and Allergy, Médica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital, México City, Mexico
| | - Lorenzo Cecchi
- SOS Allergology and Clinical Immunology, USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | - Giulia De Feo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - M Illario
- Division for Health Innovation, Campania Region and Federico II University Hospital Naples (R&D and DISMET), Naples, Italy
| | - Cristiana Stellato
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Joao Fonseca
- CINTESIS, Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,MEDIDA, Lda, Porto, Portugal
| | - Joao Malva
- Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Ageing@Coimbra EIP-AHA Reference Site, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Ana Maria Pereira
- Allergy Unit, CUF-Porto Hospital and Institute, Porto, Portugal.,Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems CINTESIS, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Maria Todo-Bom
- Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - Arunas Valiulis
- Department of Public Health, Clinic of Children's Diseases, and Institute of Health Sciences, Vilnius University Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.,European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP/UEMS-SP), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Karl Christian Bergmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ralph Mösges
- Medical Faculty, Institute of Medical Statistics, and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,CRI-Clinical Research International-Ltd, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Phillipps-Universität Marburg, Germany
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vicky Cardona
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, & ARADyAL Spanish Research Network, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquim Mullol
- Rhinology Unit & Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.,Clinical & Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nikos G Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection, Immunity& Respiratory Medicine, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, Athens General Children's Hospital "P&A Kyriakou", University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Emmanuel P Prokopakis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece
| | | | - Dermot Ryan
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Alvaro A Cruz
- ProAR - Nucleo de Excelencia em Asma, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.,WHO GARD Planning Group, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Piotr Kuna
- Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Boleslaw Samolinski
- Department of Prevention of Envinronmental Hazards and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sietze Reitsma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Tari Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sanna Toppila-Salmi
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Claus Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, ENT Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter W Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Univ Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Academic Medical Center, Univ of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Euforea, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Erik Melén
- Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Wickman
- Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden
| | - Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense, Denmark
| | - Esben Eller
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense, Denmark
| | - Robyn E O'Hehir
- Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Immunology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cemal Cingi
- ENT Department, Medical Faculty, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Bilun Gemicioğlu
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Omer Kalayci
- Pediatric Allergy and Asthma Unit, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Jean Bousquet
- MACVIA-France, Fondation partenariale FMC VIA-LR, Montpellier, France.,Euforea, Brussels, Belgium.,INSERM U 1168, VIMA: Ageing and Chronic Diseases Epidemiological and Public Health Approaches, Villejuif, France.,Université Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, UMR-S 1168, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mösges R, Breitrück NY, Allekotte S, Shah-Hosseini K, Dao VA, Zieglmayer P, Birkholz K, Hess M, Bastl M, Bastl K, Berger U, Kramer MF, Guethoff S. Shortened up-dosing with sublingual immunotherapy drops containing tree allergens is well tolerated and elicits dose-dependent clinical effects during the first pollen season. World Allergy Organ J 2019; 12:100012. [PMID: 30937138 PMCID: PMC6439405 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study compared a rapid home-based up-dosing schedule for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) drops containing tree pollen allergens with two previously established schedules. Furthermore, the clinical effect of the SLIT was investigated with respect to patients’ first pollen season under treatment. Methods In this open-label, prospective, patient-preference, non-interventional study, local and systemic reactions were compared between three up-dosing groups using a SLIT formulation containing birch, alder, and hazel pollen extracts (ORALVAC® Compact Bäume). Clinical improvement after patients’ first season under treatment was analysed using symptom scores, ARIA classification, symptom control, and the use of symptomatic medication and was compared with data from the previous, pre-treatment pollen season. As the real-life study design allowed no placebo group, the late-treated patients (co-seasonal) served as a control, and crowd-sourced symptom data from persons with hay fever were used from a free web-based online diary. Results In 33 study centres in Germany and Austria, 164 patients were included. The treatment was well tolerated, without difference between the groups during the up-dosing phase. At the end of the assessment, 96.1% rated the tolerability of the treatment as good or very good. Local reactions were mostly mild in severity and no serious adverse events occurred. Symptom scores decreased from the 2016 pollen season to the 2017 pollen season. As for the ARIA classification, 79.0% of patients had persistent, moderate-to-severe rhinitis before treatment, but only 18.6% had the same classification after treatment. In all, 62.4% of patients achieved symptom control, and 34.3% of patients required no symptomatic medication after treatment. The rhinoconjunctivitis score was 34.4% lower for pre-seasonal treatment initiation than for the control group. Crowd-sourced symptom load indices showed that the 2016 season caused slightly more symptoms; however, it is assumed that this difference of 0.3–0.5 (score range 0–10) was of less clinical relevance. Conclusion The treatment administered using the rapid home-based up-dosing schedule was safe and well tolerated. Symptom relief and reduction in medication use were observed during the first pollen season with SLIT. Trial registration number NCT03097432 (clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Key Words
- AE, adverse event
- ARIA, Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma
- Adherence
- Asthma
- Conjunctivitis
- IgE, immunoglobulin E
- Immunotherapy
- N, number
- PHD, Patient's Hay Fever Diary
- Pollen allergy
- Pre-seasonal
- RCAT, Rhinitis Control Assessment Test
- Rhinitis
- SD, standard deviation
- SLI, symptom load index
- SLIT
- SLIT, sublingual immunotherapy
- SmPC, Summary of Product Characteristics
- Sublingual immunotherapy
- TU, therapeutic units
- V, visit
- sIgE, specific immunoglobulin E
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph Mösges
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computational Biology (IMSB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- CRI - Clinical Research International Ltd., Cologne, Germany
| | - Nils Y Breitrück
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computational Biology (IMSB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Silke Allekotte
- CRI - Clinical Research International Ltd., Cologne, Germany
| | - Kija Shah-Hosseini
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computational Biology (IMSB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Van-Anh Dao
- CRI - Clinical Research International Ltd., Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Mark Hess
- CRI - Clinical Research International Ltd., Cologne, Germany
| | - Maximilian Bastl
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Research Group Aerobiology and Pollen Information, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katharina Bastl
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Research Group Aerobiology and Pollen Information, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Uwe Berger
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Research Group Aerobiology and Pollen Information, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias F Kramer
- Bencard Allergie GmbH, Munich, Germany
- Allergy Therapeutics, Worthing, United Kingdom
| | - Sonja Guethoff
- Bencard Allergie GmbH, Munich, Germany
- Allergy Therapeutics, Worthing, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Baiardini I, Novakova S, Mihaicuta S, Oguzulgen IK, Canonica GW. Adherence to treatment in allergic respiratory diseases. Expert Rev Respir Med 2018; 13:53-62. [PMID: 30518277 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2019.1554438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) are chronic conditions in which management needs adherence to prescribed drugs. Despite the benefits of regular maintenance of asthma and AR therapy, low adherence is a frequent issue in clinical practice. Areas covered: The aim of this review is to provide a targeted analysis of the more recent literature on adherence in asthma and AR, focused on the following areas: adherence extent, barriers and consequences, effects of educational interventions and use of new technologies to improve the level of adherence. Expert commentary: Despite the extent, reasons and effects of this problem being well known, non-adherence in asthma and allergic AR remains worryingly high. Poor adherence leads to unsatisfactory health outcomes, with a negative impact on patients and society. Recent literature suggests that successful programs to improve adherence should include a combination of strategies. The new technologies represent a promising tool to improve adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Baiardini
- a Department of Biomedical Sciences , Humanitas University , Milano , Italy
| | - Silviya Novakova
- b Allergy Unit of Internal Consulting Department , University Hospital "St. George" , Plovdiv , Bulgaria
| | - Stefan Mihaicuta
- c Pulmonology Department, CardioPrevent Foundation , University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Dr Victor Babes" , Timisoara , Romania
| | | | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- a Department of Biomedical Sciences , Humanitas University , Milano , Italy.,e Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy Clinic , Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Blaiss MS, Steven GC, Bender B, Bukstein DA, Meltzer EO, Winders T. Shared decision making for the allergist. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018; 122:463-470. [PMID: 30201469 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Revised: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making (SDM) is becoming more commonly appreciated and used in medical practice as a way to empower patients who are facing treatment preference-sensitive conditions, such as allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, food allergy, and persistent asthma. The purpose of this review is to educate the allergy health care provider about how SDM works and provide practical advice and allergist-specific SDM resources. DATA SOURCES PubMed and online patient decision aid resources. STUDY SELECTIONS Studies and reviews relevant to SDM and patient decision aids relevant to the allergy health care provider were selected for discussion. RESULTS There are ethical, practical, economic, and psychological imperatives for the implementation of quality SDM, particularly for chronic diseases. Many benefits and barriers of SDM have been identified and models have been developed to encourage implementation of quality SDM. For the allergy health care provider, SDM for asthma has been shown to improve adherence, outcomes, and patient satisfaction with care. Patient decision aids are useful tools for SDM and have recently been developed for allergen immunotherapy, severe asthma, and atopic dermatitis. CONCLUSION Effective SDM has been shown to improve adherence and lead to better outcomes. SDM should be universally implemented as a key component of patient-centered health care. Allergy health care providers should work with their patients to reach treatment decisions that align with their values and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Blaiss
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia.
| | - Gary C Steven
- Allergy, Asthma & Sinus Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Bruce Bender
- National Jewish Health, Denver, and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Eli O Meltzer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California-San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yang Y, Wang Y, Yang L, Wang J, Huang N, Wang X, Hu L, Jiang Q, Liu G, Zhu R. Risk factors and strategies in nonadherence with subcutaneous immunotherapy: a real-life study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018; 8:1267-1273. [PMID: 30048045 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Revised: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is still the only causal treatment for allergic diseases. However, conventional subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) administration schedules are time-consuming and patient nonadherence is a major barrier to achieving a satisfactory therapeutic effect. Our study aimed to analyze the causes leading to discontinuation of SCIT and to determine risk factors associated with nonadherence in respiratory allergies. METHODS This was a prospective study. Patients with respiratory allergies who had received standardized dust mite SCIT were enrolled from January 2012 to January 2014. And a follow-up study on these subjects was conducted via telephone interviews on an interval of 3 months and online communication through social network applications. Reasons for discontinuation were documented when patients claimed to stop treatment. RESULTS A total of 311 patients were enrolled in the study. The adherence rate at year 3 was 64.6%. Fifty-nine patients (19.0%) dropped out in year 1, 31 (10.0%) in year 2, and 20 (6.4%) in year 3. Reasons for nonadherence included inconvenience (32.7%), ineffectiveness (25.5%), improvement of symptoms (22.7%), and adverse reactions (14.5%). Children had higher adherence than adults (70.7% vs 55.0%) (p < 0.05). The dropout reasons were different among the children and adults groups (p < 0.005). The follow-up work was carefully and thoroughly done. All the 311 (100%) patients accepted the telephone interview, and 296 (95.2%) patients submitted questions and got rapid replies from doctors online. CONCLUSION Adherence to SCIT was less than satisfactory in the real-life study. A close communication between doctors and patients is helpful in enhancing adherence with AIT in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongshi Yang
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China
| | - Yin Wang
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China
| | - Lin Yang
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China
| | - Jingru Wang
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China
| | - Nan Huang
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaolong Wang
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China
| | - Lintao Hu
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China
| | - Qing Jiang
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China
| | - Guanghui Liu
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China
| | - Rongfei Zhu
- Department of Allergy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Harrill WC, Melon DE, Seshul MJ, Katz MS, Zanation AM. Contemporary analysis of practicing otolaryngologists. Laryngoscope 2018; 128:2490-2499. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.27196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Willard C. Harrill
- Carolina Ear, Nose & Throat/Head and Neck Surgery Center, PA; Hickory North Carolina
- Department of Otolaryngology Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center; Winston-Salem North Carolina
| | - David E. Melon
- Department of Otolaryngology Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center; Winston-Salem North Carolina
| | - Merritt J. Seshul
- Department of Otolaryngology Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center; Winston-Salem North Carolina
| | - Marc S. Katz
- Carolina Ear, Nose & Throat/Head and Neck Surgery Center, PA; Hickory North Carolina
| | - Adam M. Zanation
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery and Neurosurgery; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Chapel Hill North Carolina U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Allergies are steadily gaining in importance in the Western world. For over one hundred years, immunology has been the only causal treatment. Specific immunotherapy (SIT) aims at the cure of allergy or at least freedom from allergy symptoms. In association with this, adherence poses a complex problem. Both treatment applications commonly used in Germany-sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy-show poor persistence on the part of the patients. In most cases, SIT is not carried out to the end of the recommended duration and instead is discontinued prematurely. Corresponding figures from 3‑year studies in the literature range from 41- 93% for uncompleted SLIT and from 40-77% for uncompleted SCIT. Patient adherence is subject to influencing factors of various dimensions that are interdependent in complex relationships. The physician-patient relationship is just as decisive a factor for treatment success as the patient's understanding of allergy, treatment, and the importance of adherence.
Collapse
|
27
|
Tater KC, Cole WE, Pion PD. Allergen-specific immunotherapy prescription patterns in veterinary practice: a US population-based cohort study. Vet Dermatol 2017; 28:362-e82. [PMID: 28164402 DOI: 10.1111/vde.12426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor adherence to continuing allergen-specific immunotherapy treatment (ASIT) may be an issue in veterinary medicine. No studies describe how allergen tests are used in general veterinary practice, including the percentage of patients that receive ASIT after allergen testing. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES Assess veterinary ASIT patterns in United States general practices. ANIMALS Dogs (n = 2,557) and 121 cats allergen-tested at 177 hospitals (173 general practice and four specialty practices) in 44 states. METHODS Invoiced service descriptions of allergen tests and ASIT orders were retrieved from an aggregated database of veterinary practices. RESULTS In general practice, 42% (992 of 2,360) of patients did not begin ASIT after allergen testing. ASIT was not refilled for 29% (398 of 1,368) of patients after the initial order. ASIT was initiated and refilled more often in dogs (56.6%, 71.4%, respectively) than cats (38%, 67.4%). Specialty practice patients had the highest ASIT initiation (94.4%) and refill (92.7%) percentages in comparison to general practices (P < 0.001). Size, age, geographical region and type of practice were associated with whether dogs were started on ASIT. Geographical region was also associated with refilling a prescription for ASIT, which was considered to be evidence of adherence to continuing treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE Almost one third of clients failed to continue ASIT beyond the initial order, which is a much shorter duration of therapy than the 12 months recommended for determining ASIT efficacy. A large number of general practice patients did not begin ASIT after allergen testing, likely due to differences in how clinicians in general and dermatology practices use allergen tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Chu Tater
- Veterinary Information Network, 777 West Covell Boulevard, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - William Elliott Cole
- Veterinary Information Network, 777 West Covell Boulevard, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| | - Paul David Pion
- Veterinary Information Network, 777 West Covell Boulevard, Davis, CA, 95616, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lemberg ML, Berk T, Shah-Hosseini K, Kasche EM, Mösges R. Sublingual versus subcutaneous immunotherapy: patient adherence at a large German allergy center. Patient Prefer Adherence 2017; 11:63-70. [PMID: 28115832 PMCID: PMC5221545 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s122948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many placebo-controlled studies have demonstrated that allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an effective therapy for treating allergies. Both commonly used routes, subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), require high patient adherence to be successful. In the literature, numbers describing adherence vary widely; this investigation compares these two routes of therapy directly. METHODS All data were retrieved from the patient data management system of a center for dermatology, specific allergology, and environmental medicine in Germany. All 330 patients (aged 13-89 years) included in this study had commenced AIT between 2003 and 2011, thus allowing a full 3-year AIT cycle to be considered for each investigated patient. RESULTS In this specific center, SCIT was prescribed to 62.7% and SLIT to 37.3% of all included patients. The total dropout rate of the whole patient cohort was 34.8%. Overall, SLIT patients showed a higher dropout rate (39.0%) than did SCIT patients (32.4%); however, the difference between these groups was not significant. Also, no significant difference between the overall dropout rates for men and for women was observed. A Kaplan-Meier curve of the patient collective showed a remarkably high dropout rate for the first year of therapy. CONCLUSION The analysis presented in this single-center study shows that most patients who discontinue AIT do so during the first year of therapy. Patients seem likely to finish the 3-year therapy cycle if they manage to adhere to treatment throughout the first year. Strategies for preventing nonadherence in AIT, therefore, need to be developed and standardized in future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Luise Lemberg
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Till Berk
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kija Shah-Hosseini
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena-Manja Kasche
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Dermatology, Specific Allergology and Environmental Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ralph Mösges
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Correspondence: Ralph Mösges, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Lindenburger Allee 42, Cologne 50931, Germany, Tel +49 221 478 82929, Fax +49 221 478 82940, Email
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Caminati M, Senna G, Stefanizzi G, Bellamoli R, Longhi S, Chieco-Bianchi F, Guarnieri G, Tognella S, Olivieri M, Micheletto C, Festi G, Bertocco E, Mazza M, Rossi A, Vianello A. Drop-out rate among patients treated with omalizumab for severe asthma: Literature review and real-life experience. BMC Pulm Med 2016; 16:128. [PMID: 27562427 PMCID: PMC5000547 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-016-0290-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with asthma, particularly severe asthma, poor adherence to inhaled drugs negatively affects the achievement of disease control. A better adherence rate is expected in the case of injected drugs, such as omalizumab, as they are administered only in a hospital setting. However, adherence to omalizumab has never been systematically investigated. The aim of this study was to review the omalizumab drop-out rate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-life studies. A comparative analysis was performed between published data and the Italian North East Omalizumab Network (NEONet) database. Results In RCTs the drop-out rate ranged from 7.1 to 19.4 %. Although the reasons for withdrawal were only occasionally reported, patient decision and adverse events were the most frequently reported causes. In real-life studies the drop-out rate ranged from 0 to 45.5 %. In most cases lack of efficacy was responsible for treatment discontinuation. According to NEONet data, 32 % of treated patients dropped out, with an increasing number of drop outs observed over time. Patient decision and lack of efficacy accounted for most treatment withdrawals. Conclusions Treatment adherence is particularly crucial in patients with severe asthma considering the clinical impact of the disease and the cost of non-adherence. The risk of treatment discontinuation has to be carefully considered both in the experimental and real-life settings. Increased knowledge regarding the main reasons for patient withdrawal is important to improve adherence in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Caminati
- Asthma Center and Allergy Unit, Verona General and University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
| | - G Senna
- Asthma Center and Allergy Unit, Verona General and University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - G Stefanizzi
- Asthma Center and Allergy Unit, Verona General and University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - R Bellamoli
- Asthma Center and Allergy Unit, Verona General and University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - S Longhi
- Asthma Center and Allergy Unit, Verona General and University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - F Chieco-Bianchi
- Respiratory Pathophysiology Division, University-City Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - G Guarnieri
- Department of Cardiologic, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - S Tognella
- Respiratory Unit, Orlandi General Hospital, Bussolengo, Verona, Italy
| | - M Olivieri
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Verona General and University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - C Micheletto
- Respiratory Unit, Mater Salutis Hospital, Legnago, Verona, Italy
| | - G Festi
- Pulmonary Unit, Verona University and General Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - E Bertocco
- Respiratory pathology Unit, Arzignano General Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - M Mazza
- Pulmonary Unit, Pordenone General Hospital, Pordenone, Italy
| | - A Rossi
- Pulmonary Unit, Verona University and General Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - A Vianello
- Respiratory Pathophysiology Division, University-City Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Demoly P, Passalacqua G, Pfaar O, Sastre J, Wahn U. Patient engagement and patient support programs in allergy immunotherapy: a call to action for improving long-term adherence. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2016; 12:34. [PMID: 27478445 PMCID: PMC4966171 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-016-0140-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Allergy immunotherapy (AIT) is acknowledged to produce beneficial mid- and long-term clinical and immunologic effects and increased quality of life in patients with allergic respiratory diseases (such as allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma). However, poor adherence to AIT (due to intentional and/or non-intentional factors) is still a barrier to achieving these benefits. There is an urgent need for patient support programs (PSPs) that encompass communication, educational and motivational components. In the field of AIT, a PSP should be capable of (1) improving adherence, (2) boosting patient engagement, (3) explaining how AIT differs from pharmacological allergy treatments; (4) increasing health literacy about chronic, progressive, immunoglobulin-E-mediated immune diseases, (5) helping the patient to understand and manage local or systemic adverse events, and (6) providing and/or predicting local data on aeroallergen levels. We reviewed the literature in this field and have identified a number of practical issues to be addressed when implementing a PSP for AIT: the measurement of adherence, the choice of technologies, reminders, communication channels and content, the use of "push" messaging and social networks, interactivity, and the involvement of caregivers and patient leaders. A key issue is "hi-tech" (i.e. approaches based mainly on information technology) vs. "hi-touch" (based mainly on interaction with humans, i.e. family members, patient mentors and healthcare professionals). We conclude that multistakeholder PSPs (combining patient-, provider and society-based actions) must now be developed and tested with a view to increasing adherence, efficacy and safety in the field of AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Demoly
- Department of Pulmonology, Division of Allergy, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Paris 06, UMR-S 1136, IPLESP, Equipe EPAR, Paris, France
| | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS San Martino-IST, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Allergy Department, Fundación Jimenez Díaz, Madrid, Spain ; CIBERES, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ulrich Wahn
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Immunology, Charité Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Malet A, Azpeitia A, Gutiérrez D, Moreno F, San Miguel Moncín MDM, Cumplido JA, Lluch M, Baró E, Roger A. Comprehensive Study of Patients' Compliance with Sublingual Immunotherapy in House Dust Mite Perennial Allergic Rhinitis. Adv Ther 2016; 33:1199-214. [PMID: 27312976 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0347-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allergen immunotherapy is a long-term treatment that has been associated with patient adherence issues. The aim of the study was to increase the knowledge on compliance of patients allergic to house dust mites, receiving sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). METHODS A retrospective observational study was performed in 53 Spanish allergy units. We enrolled patients undergoing the SLIT treatment for house dust mites including a scheduled control visit 12 months after initiating the therapy. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of compliance using three methods. In the first step, an allergist evaluated the patients according to the results of an interview and the existing medical records. The subjects taking more than 80% of the overall prescription were defined as compliant. The remaining noncompliant patients were divided into groups taking less than 25%, 25-50%, and 50-80% of the prescribed SLIT. In the second stage, we conducted the Morisky-Green test. Finally, the noncompliant patients were asked to fill a self-report assessment form. Data were stratified into age groups. The potential factors affecting compliance were also investigated. RESULTS Overall, 380 subjects participated in the study. The compliance rate was 79.7%, and the treatment discontinuation rate was 22.5%, while 66.8% of patients were adherent (both compliant and continuing with the treatment). The results showed that children were the most compliant and adolescents the least compliant (86.6% and 60.9%, respectively). The main reason for noncompliance was "forgetting some doses" in 31.0% of the children, 48.0% of the adolescents, and 53.2% of the adults. Compliance was associated with the following factors: age, number of annual control visits, and reduction in symptomatic medication. CONCLUSION Our results showed that two out of three patients with house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis adhered to the SLIT treatment. Multidisciplinary and integral solutions are needed to improve the compliance, with special attention paid to adolescents. FUNDING Stallergenes Greer Spain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angel Azpeitia
- Medical Department, Stallergenes Iberica, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Diego Gutiérrez
- Servicio Neumologia-Alergia, Puerta del Mar Hospital, Cádiz, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Eva Baró
- Health Outcomes Research Department, 3D Health, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Albert Roger
- Allergy Unit, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital, Badalona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Adherence is a major issue in any medical treatment. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is particularly affected by a poor adherence because a flawed application prevents the immunological effects that underlie the clinical outcome of the treatment. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) was introduced in the 1990s, and the early studies suggested that adherence and compliance to such a route of administration was better than the traditional subcutaneous route. However, the recent data from manufacturers revealed that only 13% of patients treated with SLIT reach the recommended 3-year duration. Therefore, improved adherence to SLIT is an unmet need that may be achieved by various approaches. The utility of patient education and accurate monitoring during the treatment was demonstrated by specific studies, while the success of technology-based tools, including online platforms, social media, e-mail, and a short message service by phone, is currently considered to improve the adherence. This goal is of pivotal importance to fulfill the object of SLIT that is to modify the natural history of allergy, ensuring a long-lasting clinical benefit, and a consequent pharmaco-economic advantage, when patients complete at least a 3-year course of treatment.
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite that specific immunotherapy can boast being more than a century old, there is still skepticism about its real effectiveness, and therefore it is still used too little in clinical practice. The purpose of this review was to analyze the most recent articles in the literature to highlight scientific evidence for the proper use of allergen immunotherapy (AIT). RECENT FINDINGS In the near future, the concept of medicine for trials will have to be revised and in certain cases abandoned in favor of a personalized medicine, able to use a drug more targeted for the individual patient and not for the disease. SUMMARY For AIT, it will become increasingly important to use products designed properly, standardized and with a well documented effectiveness in clinical studies. We must overcome the disputes of subcutaneous immunotherapy versus sublingual immunotherapy, arrive at the concept of personalized medicine regarding AIT, framing in different phenotypes of asthma patients to use the optimal preparation for each particular patient.
Collapse
|
34
|
Chaker AM, Al-Kadah B, Luther U, Neumann U, Wagenmann M. An accelerated dose escalation with a grass pollen allergoid is safe and well-tolerated: a randomized open label phase II trial. Clin Transl Allergy 2016; 6:4. [PMID: 26839682 PMCID: PMC4736162 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-016-0093-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
The number of injections in the dose escalation of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is small for some currently used hypoallergenic allergoids, but can still be inconvenient to patients and can impair compliance. The aim of this trial was to compare safety and tolerability of an accelerated to the conventional dose escalation scheme of a grass pollen allergoid.
Methods In an open label phase II trial, 122 patients were 1:1 randomized for SCIT using a grass pollen allergoid with an accelerated dose escalation comprising only 4 weekly injections (Group I) or a conventional dose escalation including 7 weekly injections (Group II). Safety determination included the occurrence of local and systemic adverse events. Tolerability was assessed by patients and physicians. Results Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 22 (36.1 %) patients in Group I and 15 (24.6 %) in Group II. Local reactions were reported by 18 patients in Group I and 11 in Group II. Five Grade 1 systemic reactions (WAO classification) were observed in Group I and 2 in Group II. Grade 2 reactions occurred 3 times in Group I and 2 times in Group II. Tolerability was rated as “good” or “very good” by 53 (86.9 %) patients in Group I and 59 (100 %) in Group II by investigators. Forty-eight patients in Group I (80.0 %) and 54 in Group II (91.5 %) rated tolerability as “good” or “very good”. Conclusions The dose escalation of a grass pollen allergoid can be accelerated with safety and tolerability profiles comparable to the conventional dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Chaker
- Department of Otolaryngology and ZAUM, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität and Helmholtz Center Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - B Al-Kadah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Kirrberger Straße, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - U Luther
- Joint Practice of Dermatologists, Allergology - Phlebology, Kaiser-Joseph-Str. 145, 79098 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - U Neumann
- ENT Medicine, Bahnhofstr. 18, 39326 Wolmirstedt, Germany
| | - M Wagenmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Demoly P, Passalacqua G, Pfaar O, Sastre J, Wahn U. Management of the polyallergic patient with allergy immunotherapy: a practice-based approach. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2016; 12:2. [PMID: 26759555 PMCID: PMC4709898 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-015-0109-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2015] [Accepted: 12/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The great majority (60–80 %) of patients consulting specialist physicians for allergic respiratory disease are polysensitized and thus may be potentially clinically polyallergic. However, management approaches to allergen immunotherapy (AIT) in polysensitized and polyallergic patients are not standardized. Methods An international group of clinicians with in-depth expertise in AIT product development, clinical trials and clinical practice met to generate up-to-date, unambiguous, pragmatic guidance on AIT in polysensitized and polyallergic patients. The guidance was developed after reviewing (1) the current stance of regulatory bodies and learned societies, (2) the literature data on single- and multi-AIT and (3) the members’ confirmed clinical experience with polysensitized patients. Results AIT is safe and effective in polysensitized
and polyallergic patients, and should always be based on the identification of one or more clinically relevant allergens (based on the type and severity of symptoms, the duration of induced symptoms, the impact on quality of life and how difficult an allergen is to avoid). Single-AIT is recommended in polyallergic patients in whom one of the relevant allergens is nevertheless clearly responsible for the most intense and/or bothersome symptoms. Parallel 2-allergen immunotherapy or mixed 2-allergen immunotherapy is indicated in polyallergic patients in whom two causal relevant allergens have a marked clinical and QoL impact. In parallel 2-allergen immunotherapy (whether subcutaneous or sublingual), high-quality, standardized, single-allergen formulations must be administered with an interval of 30 min. Mixing of allergen extracts may be considered, as long as (1) the mixture is technically feasible, (2) the mixture is allowed from a regulatory standpoint, (3) the allergen doses are reduced in proportion to the number of components but are still at concentrations with demonstrated efficacy. Conclusions Physicians can prescribe AIT (preferably with high-quality, standardized, single-allergen formulations) with confidence in polysensitized and polyallergic patients by focusing on clinical/QoL relevance and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Demoly
- Division of Allergy, Department of Pulmonology, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France ; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Paris 06, UMR-S 1136, IPLESP, Equipe EPAR, Paris, France
| | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS San Martino-IST, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Universitatsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Wahn
- Department of Paediatric Pulmonology and Immunology, Charité Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Leader BA, Rotella M, Stillman L, DelGaudio JM, Patel ZM, Wise SK. Immunotherapy compliance: comparison of subcutaneous versus sublingual immunotherapy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2015; 6:460-4. [PMID: 26718480 DOI: 10.1002/alr.21699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2015] [Revised: 11/18/2015] [Accepted: 11/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient compliance is critical for successful allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Previous studies suggest that AIT compliance is worse outside of controlled clinical trials, with reported subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) noncompliance at 11% to 50% and 3% to 25%, respectively. METHODS A retrospective review of 384 AIT patients at a single, tertiary care otolaryngic allergy practice evaluated SCIT and SLIT compliance, based on treatment stage. SCIT compliance was defined as the number of 2-week breaks per year or in compliance with their defined schedule: excellent = 2 or fewer; good = 3 to 4; fair = 5 to 6; and poor = 7 or more. Compliance with SLIT was defined as the number of days vials were refilled within the defined expiration date: excellent = 10 days or fewer; good = 11 to 15 days, fair = 16 to 20 days; and poor = 25 or more days. Fisher exact and chi square tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Seventy-four SCIT and 200 SLIT patients had data appropriate for analysis. Compliance rates were excellent (62%) or good (22%) in 62 SCIT patients and excellent (31%) or good (35%) in 131 SLIT patients. Comparing excellent compliance rates, SCIT patients had a higher rate of excellent compliance at all stages of treatment compared to SLIT patients (p < 0.05). For SCIT patients there was no significant difference in excellent compliance rates between escalation, first year of maintenance, and greater than 1 year of maintenance (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION The results of this study showed higher rates of patient adherence to treatment protocols among SCIT patients. There was no decrease in SCIT compliance rates across treatment stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany A Leader
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Melissa Rotella
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Leisa Stillman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Shah-Hosseini K, Mioc K, Hadler M, Karagiannis E, Mösges R. Optimum treatment strategies for polyallergic patients - analysis of a large observational trial. Curr Med Res Opin 2015; 31:2249-59. [PMID: 26366617 DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1094653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To document the effectiveness and safety of sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) with a five-grass pollen tablet (Oralair ) and compare different treatment options in a broad, non-selected population of patients in a real-world clinical setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a 2 year, open, prospective, multicenter, single-arm, non-interventional study. Patients with a history of clinically relevant allergic symptoms caused by grass pollen, confirmed by skin prick testing, received treatment with the five-grass pollen tablet. Concomitant treatment with symptomatic medication and/or additional SLIT or subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) was permitted. Twelve-month data are presented here. Effectiveness was assessed comparing a combined rhinoconjunctivitis (RC) score derived from the severity of rhinitis and conjunctivitis symptoms under treatment with retrospective data of the previous year. RESULTS A total of 1408 patients participated in the study, of whom 434 were children/adolescents and 962 polyallergic. Compared with the grass pollen season preceding five-grass pollen tablet treatment, a statistically significant reduction of 49.9% was achieved in RC score for the total population (p < 0.001), and an improvement in overall health was perceived by 90.9% of patients. The overall population of polyallergic patients derived similar benefits from treatment with the five-grass pollen tablet as monoallergic patients. The percentage reduction in RC score was larger in polyallergic patients taking no additional therapy (60.2%) than in those taking concomitant symptomatic medication (38.1%) or allergen immunotherapy (AIT) (50.8%). Within the last of these groups, RC score improved by 47.6% among patients receiving additional SCIT, versus 54.8% with additional SLIT. Adverse drug reactions, reported in 15.3% of study participants, were mostly local in nature and mild or moderate in intensity. CONCLUSIONS After 1 year of treatment, polyallergic patients responded similarly to the five-grass pollen tablet as monoallergic patients. For polyallergic patients in whom additional treatment was needed, a second SLIT may be more beneficial than a SCIT or symptomatic co-medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kija Shah-Hosseini
- a a Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMSIE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne , Cologne , Germany
| | - Katharina Mioc
- a a Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMSIE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne , Cologne , Germany
| | | | | | - Ralph Mösges
- a a Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMSIE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne , Cologne , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pizzulli A, Perna S, Florack J, Pizzulli A, Giordani P, Tripodi S, Pelosi S, Matricardi PM. The impact of telemonitoring on adherence to nasal corticosteroid treatment in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Clin Exp Allergy 2015; 44:1246-54. [PMID: 25109375 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2014] [Revised: 06/05/2014] [Accepted: 07/01/2014] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to controller therapy in allergic diseases is low. Telemonitoring has been proposed to improve adherence to treatment in chronic diseases. However, this strategy has never been tested in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. OBJECTIVE To test whether Internet-based telemonitoring during the grass-pollen season of children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis may enhance adherence to treatment. METHODS Children and adolescents, 5-18 years old, with moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to grass pollen requiring daily administration of nasal corticosteroid (NCS) (mometasone) were recruited (April 2013) in a paediatric allergy practice. Participants were randomized to Internet-based monitoring (AllergyMonitor(™) , AM) or to usual care (no diary at all, controls) and followed from 13 May (T0) to 15 June 2013 (T2). An intermediate visit (T1) was performed between 31 May and 2 June. Optimal adherence to therapy was expressed as the use of at least 0.190 g/day of mometasone, corresponding to 1 puff/nostril/day, and it was measured by canister weights during (T1) and at the end (T2) of the study period. Main secondary outcomes included the reported disease severity (validated self-questionnaire) and quality of life (AdoIRQLQ questionnaire), disease knowledge (multiple-choice questionnaire), nasal flow and resistance at baseline and at T2. RESULTS The use of mometasone, expressed as both optimal adherence rate (48.4% vs. 12.5%; P = 0.002) and average daily use (0.20 ± 0.12 g/day vs. 0.15 ± 0.07 g/day; P = 0.037), was higher in the AM group (n = 31) than among controls (n = 32). Disease knowledge improved among the patients using AM (83.3% vs. 68.3%; P < 0.001) but not among controls (68.2% vs. 67.7% right answers; P > 0.05). No differences were observed in the reported severity of disease, nasal flow and resistance and quality of life both at baseline and at follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS Internet-based telemonitoring improves adherence to NCS treatment and disease knowledge among children and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Pizzulli
- Department of Paediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany; Practice for Pediatric Allergy and Pneumology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Blankestijn MA, Boyle RJ, Gore R, Hawrylowicz C, Jarvis D, Knulst AC, Wardlaw AJ. Developments in the field of allergy in 2013 through the eyes of Clinical and Experimental Allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2015; 44:1436-57. [PMID: 25346287 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
2013 was another exciting year for allergy in general and Clinical and Experimental Allergy in particular. In the field of asthma and rhinitis, there continued to be a focus on heterogeneity and phenotypes with increasing use of biostatistical techniques to determine clusters of similar populations. Obesity- and aspirin-associated disease are intriguing associations with asthma which were explored in a number of papers. We published a number of excellent papers on mechanisms of airway inflammation and how this relates to physiology, pathology, genetics and biomarkers in both human and experimental model systems. In terms of mechanisms, there is less on individual cell types in allergic disease at the moment, but the immunology of allergic disease continued to fascinate our authors. Another area that was popular both in the mechanisms and in the epidemiology sections was early life events and how these lead to allergic disease, with an increasing focus on the role of the microbiome and how this influences immune tolerance. In the clinical allergy section, oral immunotherapy for food allergy is clearly a major topic of interest at the moment as was in vitro testing to distinguish between sensitization and allergic disease. There was less on inhalant allergy this year, but a good representation from the drug allergy community including some interesting work on non-IgE-mediated mechanisms. In the allergen section, important new allergens continue to be discovered, but the major focus as in the last couple of years was on working out how component-resolved approaches can improve diagnosis and management of food and venom allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Blankestijn
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Larenas Linnemann DES, Blaiss MS. Selection of patients for sublingual versus subcutaneous immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2015; 6:871-84. [PMID: 25290418 DOI: 10.2217/imt.14.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy is the sole treatment for IgE-mediated allergic diseases directed at the underlying mechanism. The two widely accepted administration routes are sublingual (SLIT) and subcutaneous (SCIT). We reviewed how patients should best be selected for immunotherapy and how the optimal administration route can be defined. Before deciding SCIT or SLIT, appropriate selection of patients for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is mandatory. To be eligible for AIT, subjects must have a clear medical history of allergic disease, with exacerbation of symptoms on exposure to one or more allergens and a corresponding positive skin or in vitro test. Then the route of administration should be based on: published evidence of clinical and immunologic efficacy (which varies per allergic disease and per allergen); mono- or multi-allergen immunotherapy, for SLIT multi-allergen immunotherapy was not effective; safety: adverse events with SLIT are more frequent, but less severe; and, costs and patient preferences, closely related to adherence issues. All these are discussed in the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Désirée E S Larenas Linnemann
- Hospital Médica Sur, Torre 2, cons.602, Puente de Piedra 150, Colonia Toriello Guerra, Delegación Tlalpan, 14050 México D.F., México
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Makatsori M, Senna G, Pitsios C, Lleonart R, Klimek L, Nunes C, Rukhadze M, Rogala B, Gawlik R, Panzner P, Pfaar O, Calderon M. Prospective adherence to specific immunotherapy in Europe (PASTE) survey protocol. Clin Transl Allergy 2015; 5:17. [PMID: 25918637 PMCID: PMC4410463 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-015-0060-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2015] [Accepted: 03/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to allergen immunotherapy is important for its effectiveness. There is currently limited data available on allergen immunotherapy adherence outside of clinical trials i.e. in real-life clinical practice. As part of a European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Immunotherapy Interest group initiative, we endeavoured to design a survey in order to prospectively evaluate adherence to subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy across different European countries. METHOD/DESIGN The inclusion criteria for this prospective, multi-country survey were set as: adults, starting clinically indicated allergen immunotherapy for respiratory allergic disorders or Hymenoptera venom allergy. An online survey was designed in order to enrol participants and assess adherence to immunotherapy. Eight countries (Czech Republic, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain) were selected to reflect different parts of Europe and differences in allergens and routes of immunotherapy administration. Each country has an allocated National co-ordinator that has identified local Allergy departments willing to enrol participants in this survey. Each participant will be followed up for a total of three years. In order to assess adherence, a 4-monthly follow-up form detailing any missed doses and reasons will be completed online. In case of a participant discontinuing treatment, reasons for this will be recorded. DISCUSSION The use of online survey software has enabled us to make this survey a reality and reach clinicians in different countries. Forty-five centres have enrolled a total of over 1,350 participants. It is hoped that this prospective real life survey will enable us to gain a better understanding of reasons that affect adherence to subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy and assist in developing ways to improve this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Makatsori
- />Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK
- />Imperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
| | - Gianenrico Senna
- />Allergy Department, Azienda Universitaria-Ospedaliera Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Ramon Lleonart
- />Allergy Department, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ludger Klimek
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Carlos Nunes
- />Centro de Imunoalergologia do Algarve, Portimao, Portugal
| | | | - Barbara Rogala
- />Medical University of Silesia, Allergology & Clinical Immunology, Katowice, Poland
| | - Radoslaw Gawlik
- />Medical University of Silesia, Allergology & Clinical Immunology, Katowice, Poland
| | - Petr Panzner
- />Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University Prague, Immunology and Allergology, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
- />Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Moises Calderon
- />Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, London, UK
- />Imperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Allergic Sensitization and Rhinitis in Children: What Is New? CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-015-0044-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
43
|
Senna G, Caminati M, Lockey RF. Allergen Immunotherapy Adherence in the Real World: How Bad Is It and How Can It Be Improved? CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-014-0037-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
44
|
Pajno GB, Nadeau KC, Passalacqua G, Caminiti L, Hobson B, Jay DC, Arasi S, Chiera F, Salzano G. The evolution of allergen and non-specific immunotherapy: past achievements, current applications and future outlook. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2014; 11:141-54. [PMID: 25454510 DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2015.977260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Recent epidemiological studies estimated that more than 30% of European suffer from allergic rhinitis or conjunctivitis, while up to 20% suffer from asthma and 15% from allergic skin conditions, while for many other regions the prevalence is increasing. Allergen immunotherapy represents the only available treatment that can modify the allergic disease process, and thus is worth considering as a treatment in affected individuals. A beneficial effect of allergen immunotherapy has been shown in both adults and children affected by allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic asthma and hymenoptera venom allergy. The present study represents an overview on allergen immunotherapy, focusing on the principal aspects of the use of immunotherapy in the past, its recent clinical applications and future outlook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni B Pajno
- Department of Pediatrics- Allergy Unit, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria-Gazzi, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Su N, Lin J, Liu G, Yin K, Zhou X, Shen H, Chen P, Chen R, Liu C, Wu C, Zhao J, Lin Y. Asthma with allergic rhinitis management in China: a nationwide survey of respiratory specialists at tertiary hospitals. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014; 5:221-32. [PMID: 25400200 DOI: 10.1002/alr.21449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2014] [Revised: 09/26/2014] [Accepted: 10/07/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many asthmatic patients have coexisting allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to investigate the compliance of physicians with respiratory medicine specialty (PRMs) to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines during the management of their asthma-AR patients. METHODS This cross-sectional questionnaire study surveyed the diagnostic methods and treatment patterns for asthma-AR comorbidity by PRMs from 98 hospitals across China. RESULTS PRMs reported an estimated prevalence of asthma-AR comorbidity of >30% at their clinics. PRMs with greater work experience and a higher professional title estimated treating a significantly higher proportion of patients with AR within the previous month (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively); they also estimated a higher incidence of patients with AR in the autumn (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). A higher percentage of PRMs with ≥11 years work experience prescribed nasal steroids for AR as compared to those with 1 to 10 years experience (56.9% vs 44.7%, p = 0.002). A greater proportion of chief physicians used leukotriene modifiers and a lower proportion used antihistamine H1 -receptor blockers for AR as compared to residents (resident vs assistant chief: 27.5% vs 11.6%, p = 0.002; and resident vs chief PRMs: 27.5% vs 9.5%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION PRMs in China demonstrated an up-to-date comprehension of asthma management (>90%); however, knowledge gaps existed in their concepts of AR and asthma-AR comorbidity. Thus, further education is warranted for PRMs regarding the importance of AR in asthma patients, definitive diagnosis (allergy tests), classifications of AR, and treatment guidelines for the asthma-AR comorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Su
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sublingual immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: efficacy, safety, adherence and guidelines. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 7:241-9. [PMID: 25436040 PMCID: PMC4240478 DOI: 10.3342/ceo.2014.7.4.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2013] [Revised: 05/20/2013] [Accepted: 07/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a globally increasing health problem affecting the quality of life. Specific immunotherapy is an available causal treatment changing the basic allergic mechanisms of the disease. Over one hundred years, subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) was developed and proved its efficacy but many adverse effects were recorded including anaphylaxis. In 1986, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) was introduced as an alternative solution to solve this problem. Our study aims to discuss SLIT from the points of efficacy, safety, adherence and guidelines developed. A literature search was conducted in Medline/PubMed and the Cochrane Library in January 2013 using the keywords "allergic rhinitis, sublingual immunotherapy, efficacy, safety, compliance, adherence, guidelines." All types of publications were included. We augmented our study by searching the reference lists of identified reviews. SLIT has been established in many guidelines as an evidence-based effective treatment in AR with safer profile than SCIT. The meta-analyses confirmed its efficacy and showed a significant reduction in both symptoms and medication scores. The most common recorded adverse effects were minor local effects in the mouth, gastrointestinal reactions with few cases of anaphylaxis and no fatality. Adherence is more favorable for SLIT mainly because it is safe, noninvasive and easily taken at home. We support the call to conduct large multi-centric studies to gain more statistical power and overcome the problem of heterogeneity observed in the meta-analyses.
Collapse
|
47
|
Passalacqua G. Recommendations for appropriate sublingual immunotherapy clinical trials. World Allergy Organ J 2014; 7:21. [PMID: 25309678 PMCID: PMC4192398 DOI: 10.1186/1939-4551-7-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2014] [Accepted: 07/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Sublingual immunotherapy is currently considered a viable alternative to the subcutaneous route. The body of evidence of its efficacy is based on the results of 77 clinical trials and 7 meta-analyses, that have been published so far. Nonetheless, the experimental evidence is partially weak due to the large heterogeneity of studies, namely: doses, regimens, patient selection, duration of treatment, outcomes and reporting. In addition, it is virtually impossible to compare the potency of extracts produced by different manufacturers. Also, there is large variability in reporting and in the classification of adverse events, either systemic or local, so that only a rough estimate can be provided. Considering all these aspects, efforts are needed to harmonize the methodology, outcome measures and reporting of SLIT clinical trials, to achieve the ability of comparing the results of various studies. International societies and the World Allergy Organization have recently provided general recommendations on how to design and conduct trials which can provide more interpretable and homogeneous data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS S.Martino Hospital – IST – University of Genoa, L.go R Benzi 10, Padiglione Maragliano, 16132 Genoa Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tripodi S, Comberiati P, Di Rienzo Businco A. A web-based tool for improving adherence to sublingual immunotherapy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2014; 25:611-2. [PMID: 24965104 DOI: 10.1111/pai.12260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Tripodi
- Pediatric Department and Pediatric Allergy Unit, "Sandro Pertini" Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Safety and tolerability of sublingual immunotherapy in clinical trials and real life. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2014; 13:656-62. [PMID: 24126613 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is effective in allergic rhinitis and asthma. Apart from its efficacy, safety is crucial as this treatment is usually self-administered at home. Tolerability also plays a pivotal role, as mild local reactions, although not life-threatening, may represent a risk for treatment withdrawal and can therefore negatively affect clinical outcomes. The present study addresses this issue by reviewing double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials and real-life studies. RECENT FINDINGS The number of life-threatening SLIT-related reactions is negligible. SLIT-related adverse events are not always consistently reported nor uniformly classified in published studies. However, systemic reactions are rare and side effects mostly consist of mild, self-limiting local reactions. No treatment-related risk factors for adverse events have been clearly defined, as far as type of allergen, dose or schedule. SUMMARY SLIT provides an optimal safety profile both in children and in adults. Apart from life-threatening reactions, the lack of standardization of adverse events reporting may account for the wide variability of the prevalence of side effects in clinical trials and in real-life setting. It can lead to a possible underestimation of adverse events, concerning, in particular, local reactions. Since poor tolerability may affect adherence and cause treatment discontinuation, adopting shared strategies in order to recognize, grade and manage adverse events is mandatory.
Collapse
|
50
|
Gammeri E, Dell’Albani I, Incorvaia C, di Cara G, Barberi S, Ciprandi G, Frati F. FeNO measurement as a new tool for increasing patient's adherence to SLIT. REVUE FRANÇAISE D'ALLERGOLOGIE 2014; 54:296-299. [DOI: 10.1016/j.reval.2014.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
|