1
|
Ramchandani R, Lucyshyn R, Linton S, Ellis AK. Breaking the mold: nontraditional approaches to allergen immunotherapy for environmental allergens. Immunotherapy 2024:1-17. [PMID: 39382452 DOI: 10.1080/1750743x.2024.2408216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 09/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy is a disease-modifying treatment for allergic diseases. The predominant traditional immunotherapy is through subcutaneous administration of allergens to gradually desensitize allergic individuals. While effective, traditional allergen immunotherapy approaches are often lengthy, time consuming for patients and can result in local or systemic adverse reactions. Nontraditional immunotherapies are emerging as promising alternatives, offering potentially more convenient, safe and efficacious treatment options. This review sought to comprehensively examine the safety, efficacy and performance of various nontraditional immunotherapies for environmental allergens. Nontraditional immunotherapy approaches covered in this review include sublingual, local nasal, intralymphatic rush and ultra-rush immunotherapy, allergoid, microbial and anti-IgE immunotherapies. Nontraditional immunotherapies show significant promise in addressing the limitations of traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy. Methods like intralymphatic and rush immunotherapy offer shorter treatment regimens, enhancing patient adherence and convenience. The co-administration of probiotics or monoclonal antibodies, like omalizumab, with AIT appears to improve treatment efficacy and safety. Despite these advancements, further large-scale, long-term studies are needed to establish standardized protocols, dosing and validate long-term effects of these nontraditional immunotherapies. Standardizing outcome measurements across studies is crucial for accurate comparisons of nontraditional immunotherapies prior to widespread clinical adoption of these innovative techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashi Ramchandani
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Lucyshyn
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Center - KGH Site, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Sophia Linton
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Anne K Ellis
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston Health Sciences Center - KGH Site, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lill D, Bertlich M, Oppel E. [Allergen-specific immunotherapy : A brief overview in association with allergic conjunctivitis]. DIE OPHTHALMOLOGIE 2024; 121:187-195. [PMID: 38324025 DOI: 10.1007/s00347-024-01987-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causal and disease-modifying treatment for immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated type I allergies. Regular exposure to the causative allergen results in an immunomodulatory effect by which the predominant T‑helper (Th) 2 lymphocyte response is shifted to a Th1 lymphocyte response and more allergen-specific blocking immunoglobulins are produced. The approval of substances for AIT is regulated by the Therapy Allergens Ordinance (TAV). There are subcutaneous and/or sublingual AITs for the following indications: allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic asthma and insect venom allergy. In this article the indications for allergic conjunctivitis are discussed in particular. Clinical symptoms and a relevant type 1 sensitization are the prerequisites for the indications for AIT. The assessment of the indications and carrying out an AIT should only be carried out by physicians who have been trained in allergology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Lill
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, München, Deutschland.
| | - Mattis Bertlich
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, München, Deutschland
| | - Eva Oppel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80337, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Layhadi JA, Moya R, Tan TJ, Lenormand MM, Sharif H, Parkin RV, Vila-Nadal G, Fedina O, Zhu R, Laisuan W, Durham SR, Carnés J, Shamji MH. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies precise tolerogenic cellular and molecular pathways induced by depigmented-polymerized grass pollen allergen extract. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023; 151:1357-1370.e9. [PMID: 36649758 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunologic mechanism of action of allergoids remains poorly understood. Previous models of allergenicity and immunogenicity have yielded suboptimal knowledge of these immunotherapeutic vaccine products. Novel single-cell RNA sequencing technology offers a bridge to this gap in knowledge. OBJECTIVE We sought to identify the underpinning tolerogenic molecular and cellular mechanisms of depigmented-polymerized Phleum pratense (Phl p) extract. METHODS The molecular mechanisms underlying native Phl p, depigmented Phl p (DPG-Phl p), and depigmented-polymerized (DPG-POL-Phl p) allergoid were investigated by single-cell RNA sequencing. Allergen-specific TH2A, T follicular helper (Tfh), and IL-10+ regulatory B cells were quantified by flow cytometry in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 16 grass pollen-allergic and 8 nonatopic control subjects. The ability of Phl p, DPG-Phl p, and DPG-POL-Phl p to elicit FcεRI- and FcεRII-mediated IgE responses was measured by basophil activation test and IgE-facilitated allergen binding assay. RESULTS Analysis revealed that DPG-POL-Phl p downregulated genes associated with TH2 signaling, induced functional regulatory T cells exhibiting immunosuppressive roles through CD52 and Siglec-10, modulated genes encoding immunoproteasome that dysregulate the processing and presentation of antigens to T cells and promoted a shift from IgE toward an IgA1 and IgG responses. In grass pollen-allergic subjects, DPG-POL-Phl p exhibited reduced capacity to elicit proliferation of TH2A, IL-4+ Tfh and IL-21+ Tfh cells while being the most prominent at inducing IL-10+CD19+CD5hi and IL-10+CD19+CD5hiCD38intCD24int regulatory B-cell subsets compared to Phl p (all P < .05). Furthermore, DPG-POL-Phl p demonstrated a hypoallergenic profile through basophil activation and histamine release compared to Phl p (31.54-fold, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Single-cell RNA sequencing provides an in-depth resolution of the mechanisms underlying the tolerogenic profile of DPG-POL-Phl p.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice A Layhadi
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Raquel Moya
- R&D Allergy & Immunology Unit, LETI Pharma SL, Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tiak Ju Tan
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Madison M Lenormand
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hanisah Sharif
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei
| | - Rebecca V Parkin
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma Vila-Nadal
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oleksandra Fedina
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rongfei Zhu
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wannada Laisuan
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen R Durham
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jerónimo Carnés
- R&D Allergy & Immunology Unit, LETI Pharma SL, Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang P, Bian S, Wang X, Chen Z, Yang L, Xiao F, Guan K. A real-world retrospective study of safety, efficacy, compliance and cost of combination treatment with rush immunotherapy plus one dose of pretreatment anti-IgE in Chinese children with respiratory allergies. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1024319. [PMID: 36268011 PMCID: PMC9577550 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1024319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe efficacy of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) in treating pediatric allergy has been clearly demonstrated, however, many patients hesitate to initiate AIT due to weekly hospital visits during the 3-4 months up-dosing phase. Meanwhile, rush immunotherapy (RIT) shortens the duration of the up-dosing phase to 7 days. However, considering that patients receiving RIT are exposed to the allergens during a much shorter period of time and thus may be at a greater risk of systemic reactions, RIT is currently underused, especially in children. This study investigated the utility of combination treatment with RIT plus 1 dose of pretreatment anti-IgE in children with respiratory allergies.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed records of children with allergic rhinitis (AR) and/or allergic asthma (AA) sensitized to dust mite allergens receiving RIT+1 dose of pretreatment anti-IgE (the RIT group) or conventional immunotherapy (the CIT group) at our hospital from January 2020 to March 2021. Data such as visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, comprehensive symptom and medication score (CSMS), allergy blood test results, adverse reactions, compliance and cost were collected and analyzed.Results40 patients in the RIT group and 81 patients in the CIT group were included in this study. Both treatments were well tolerated and patients in the 2 treatment groups had comparable local and systemic reactions. Compared to CIT, RIT + anti-IgE combination led to significantly faster symptomatic improvement as demonstrated by significantly decreased VAS and CSMS starting as early as 1 month after AIT initiation (P<0.05). Nobody dropped out in the RIT group during the 1 year follow-up, while 11 out of 81 patients in the CIT group dropped out (loss rate 13.5%). Thus, the RIT group had a significantly higher compliance rate than the CIT group (P<0.05). Finally, the 2 treatment regimens had comparable cost per patient per injection (P> 0.05).ConclusionsRIT + 1 dose of pretreatment anti-IgE combination has practical advantages over CIT, including comparable safety, better compliance, and probably a faster onset of clinical efficacy at no additional cost, so it can be an useful regimen for the treatment of Chinese children with respiratory allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pingping Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Allergy, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sainan Bian
- Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xibin Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuanggui Chen
- Department of Pediatrics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Allergy, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lifen Yang
- Department of Pediatrics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Lifen Yang, ; Feng Xiao, ; Kai Guan,
| | - Feng Xiao
- Department of Stomatology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Lifen Yang, ; Feng Xiao, ; Kai Guan,
| | - Kai Guan
- Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Lifen Yang, ; Feng Xiao, ; Kai Guan,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Role of Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in ENT Diseases: A Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12060946. [PMID: 35743730 PMCID: PMC9224998 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12060946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that both subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual specific immunotherapy (SLIT) are effective in treating allergic rhinitis (AR). Further studies have evaluated the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) on different ear, nose, and throat (ENT) manifestations, in which allergy might have an etiopathogenetic role, such as local allergic rhinitis (LAR), rhinosinusitis (RS), otitis media (OM), and adenotonsillar (AT) disease. Nevertheless, the management of allergy in ENT diseases is still debated. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review assessing the efficacy of AIT in ENT diseases aside from AR. Literature data confirmed that AIT might be an effective therapeutic option in LAR, although its effect is restricted to studies with short-term follow-up. Furthermore, previous research demonstrated that AIT may improve symptoms and surgical outcomes of chronic rhinosinusitis when used as an adjunctive treatment. Few studies supported the hypothesis that AIT may exert positive therapeutic effects on recurrent upper airway infections as adenotonsillar disease. Finally, some clinical observations suggested that AIT may add some benefits in the management of otitis media with effusion (OME). The results of this systematic review allow us to conclude that the efficacy of AIT in ENT disorders has been only slightly investigated and additional studies are needed.
Collapse
|
6
|
Specjalski K, Maciejewska A, Romantowski J, Pawłowski R, Jassem E, Niedoszytko M. miRNA profiles change during grass pollen immunotherapy irrespective of clinical outcome. Immunotherapy 2022; 14:433-444. [DOI: 10.2217/imt-2021-0217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is widely used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aimed to determine the expression of 48 miRNAs in patients with AR undergoing grass pollen SCIT and investigate relations with clinical outcomes. Methodology: Expression of selected miRNAs was determined using RT-PCR in the full blood of 16 patients with AR and seven healthy controls. Results: miR-136, miR-208 and miR-190 were upregulated in the AR group. After 6 months of SCIT, significant downregulation of some proinflammatory miRNAs and upregulation of several miRNAs regulating Th1/Th2 balance were found. No differences were found between good and poor responders. Conclusion: miRNAs may play a regulatory role in SCIT, leading to tolerance induction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krzysztof Specjalski
- Department of Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, ul. Smoluchowskiego 17, Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Maciejewska
- Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, ul. Debowa 23, Gdansk, 80-208, Poland
| | - Jan Romantowski
- Department of Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, ul. Smoluchowskiego 17, Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
| | - Ryszard Pawłowski
- Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, ul. Debowa 23, Gdansk, 80-208, Poland
| | - Ewa Jassem
- Department of Pneumonology, Medical University of Gdansk, ul. Smoluchowskiego 17, Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
| | - Marek Niedoszytko
- Department of Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, ul. Smoluchowskiego 17, Gdansk, 80-952, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Allergen Immunotherapy in Pediatric Respiratory Allergy. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-021-00280-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Atopic diseases such as asthma and allergic rhinitis are highly prevalent in children. Common triggers include tree and grass pollens, house dust mites, molds, and animal dander. These diseases are most often treated symptomatically; however, many patients show partial or poor response and require long-term medication use. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) stands as the only treatment modality that can alter the underlying disease process and potentially offer a cure. In this review article, we discuss the merits of AIT with particular emphasis on its efficacy and safety in pediatric patients. We also discuss the challenges for AIT implementation and present an overview of current research that aims at improving its applicability for the treatment of allergic diseases.
Recent Findings
Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are both safe and efficacious treatment options in children with allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. Additionally, AIT has efficacy in preventing the development of asthma in children. Although there are clear advantages with AIT, there are challenges to overcome to optimize treatment. Solutions include improved diagnostics with pre-treatment biomarkers and molecular multiplex assays, biomarkers for prediction of response (e.g., basophil activation markers), improved allergen immunogenicity with the use of recombinant AIT, adjuvants, and allergoids, and lastly improved safety with the concurrent use of omalizumab.
Summary
AIT has shown safety and efficacy in major clinical trials for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma in children. AIT provides a curative treatment option for atopic disorders and should be considered in children with allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. There are many continued advances being made in the field of allergy to further improve the safety and efficacy profile and shorten the duration of AIT treatment.
Collapse
|
8
|
Jiang Z, Xiao H, Liu S, Meng J. Changes in Immunologic Indicators During Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis and Determinants of Variability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2021; 35:910-922. [PMID: 33631946 DOI: 10.1177/1945892421999649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, there are no generally recognized biomarkers for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and even the changes in immunological indicators during AIT are inconsistent in different publications. OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to quantify the immunological changes that occur during AIT and identify the determinants of heterogeneity. METHODS Randomized controlled trials of AIT published in the past 10 years were searched in Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL. Data on immunological indicators were extracted, and the characteristics of the included studies were collected. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted for each indicator. The study was registered on the PROSPERO website (CRD42020176127). RESULTS We reviewed 1898 studies. Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, and 31 studies were included in the quantitative analyses. Subset analyses by time demonstrated that serum allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) of AIT patients increased in the first 12 months, then decreased and became slightly lower than that of control patients. Allergen-specific IgG4 (sIgG4) was elevated in the AIT group during and after treatment. IgE-blocking factor (IgE-BF) was increased and IgE-facilitated allergen binding (IgE-FAB) was reduced in AIT patients. Both of them of the 2 factors were associated with clinical efficacy in the multivariate regression analysis. sIgE/sIgG4 decreased in AIT patients, while there was no change in total IgE. CONCLUSION The levels of serum sIgE and sIgG4 during AIT showed a time-dependent pattern. IgE-BF and IgE-FAB should be further investigated as biomarkers for predicting and monitoring AIT efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zihan Jiang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao Xiao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Shixi Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Meng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Traina G, Martelli A, Barberi S, Licari A, Marseglia GL, Tosca MA, Ciprandi G. Evaluation of safety and tolerability of a rush up-dosing allergen-specific immunotherapy with grass pollen, birch, hazel, and alder allergoid in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without asthma. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2021; 92:e2021037. [PMID: 33682836 PMCID: PMC7975937 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.9096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: Usually, the number of injections required to achieve the maintenance dose in subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is relatively small for some of the currently used allergens, but this may still be uncomfortable for patients, thus compromising adherence and compliance. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a dose acceleration of a conventional induction schedule using an allergoid extract of grass pollen, birch, hazel, and alder, needed to achieve the ideal maintenance dose. Methods: In this open-label study, 34 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without asthma, were treated with SCIT using an allergoid for grass pollen or birch or mix trees with an increase in accelerated induction dose comprising only 3 injections, one per week, compared to a conventional induction pattern in five injections (once a week). Safety determination was assessed by evaluating local and systemic adverse events. Tolerability was evaluated by patients and physicians who performed the treatment. Results: No treatment-related adverse events were observed in any of the patients undergoing rush SCIT. No local reactions, no systemic reactions of any degree (WAO Grade) have been observed. Tolerability has always been rated as very good by both patients and physician. Conclusions: The induction phase, needed to achieve the monthly maintenance dose for a pollen extract, can be greatly accelerated, ensuring a tolerability comparable to that of the conventional schedule. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Collapse
|
10
|
Trivedi A, Katelaris C. Presentation, diagnosis, and the role of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy in the management of ocular allergy. Clin Exp Optom 2020; 104:334-349. [PMID: 32944983 DOI: 10.1111/cxo.13129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergic eye disease or ocular allergy is a debilitating condition with a significant impact on quality of life and productivity. As atopy continues to be on the rise, primary care providers are likely to encounter increasing numbers of patients with allergic eye disease. This review outlines the classification and pathophysiology of allergic eye disease and its clinical presentation. This paper does not detail traditional first-line therapies of allergic eye disease but describes the interdisciplinary management between the eye-care provider and allergist. It is recommended that patients with ongoing signs and symptoms of ocular allergy despite first-line therapies be referred for allergen immunotherapy, as it is highly effective for treatment of allergic eye disease. Through induction of immune tolerance, allergen immunotherapy is a disease-modifying therapy that can result in long-term improvement of ocular allergy. A thorough literature review was conducted on the efficacy and safety of allergen immunotherapy, including subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy, and its role in allergic eye disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amruta Trivedi
- Immunology Department, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Constance Katelaris
- Immunology Department, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pechsrichuang P, Jacquet A. Molecular approaches to allergen-specific immunotherapy: Are we so far from clinical implementation? Clin Exp Allergy 2020; 50:543-557. [PMID: 32078207 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Conventional allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), based on administrations of allergen extracts, represents up to now the unique protocol for the desensitization of allergic patients. Whereas the effectiveness of AIT was evidenced for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma, such strategy remains experimental for food allergies up to now. However, important issues are commonly associated with AIT as the quality of natural allergen extracts, the long duration and adverse side-effects which negatively affect successful desensitization together with the patient compliance. The rapid progression of molecular allergology made possible the quest of safer, shorter and more effective immunotherapeutic approaches. The aim of this review was to provide an update on these different innovative recombinant derivatives including their efficacy but also their limitations. Despite promising preclinical and early clinical studies, the absence of convincing data in large phase III trials precludes so far the translation of these immunotherapeutic candidates into the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phornsiri Pechsrichuang
- Faculty of Medicine, Center of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Alain Jacquet
- Faculty of Medicine, Center of Excellence in Vaccine Research and Development, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Caffarelli C, Cangemi J, Mastrorilli C, Giannetti A, Ricci G. Allergen-specific Immunotherapy for Inhalant Allergens in Children. Curr Pediatr Rev 2020; 16:129-139. [PMID: 31642784 DOI: 10.2174/1573396315666191021104003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) for aeroallergens consists of the administration of standardized allergen extracts to patients with respiratory IgE-mediated diseases to the same allergen in order to achieve immune tolerance to the allergen and prevent the onset of symptoms. AIT is usually delivered by sublingual (SLIT), subcutaneous (SCIT) route. AIT with one or multiple allergens currently represents the only causal treatment able to change the natural history of allergic airway diseases. Significant progresses have been made in terms of AIT efficacy and safety. In this paper, mechanisms of action, indication and side effects of allergen immunotherapy are reviewed. SLIT and SCIT have been found to be effective in the treatment of asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis due to inhalant allergens. The route of AIT administration should be selected on availability, cost (dependent from the local health system), tolerability (better for SLIT), patient's preference (injections are less accepted in young children), and adherence (higher for SCIT beyond pediatric age). However, it should be taken into account that metanalyses on AIT do not consider that effectiveness and safety depend upon the product chosen for treatment. Each product should be separately assessed to avoid generalization on administration routes or age group that may affect the decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Caffarelli
- Clinica Pediatrica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Jessica Cangemi
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carla Mastrorilli
- Clinica Pediatrica, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Arianna Giannetti
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Ricci
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mösges R, Valero Santiago A, Allekotte S, Jahed N, Astvatsatourov A, Sager A, Sánchez-López J. Subcutaneous immunotherapy with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transl Allergy 2019; 9:29. [PMID: 31171962 PMCID: PMC6549305 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-019-0268-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (DBPCTs) have confirmed the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) with depigmented-polymerized allergen extracts (DPAEs). This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of AIT using different allergens in different severity stages of rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma in the pollen studies and asthma and rhinitis in the house dust mite studies in comparison to placebo. METHODS We used MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and LILACS databases to review DBPCTs published until July 2016. The combined symptom and medication score (cSMS) served as primary endpoint. The total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (RCSS) and total score in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) were secondary efficacy endpoints. Solicited local and systemic adverse events were secondary safety endpoints. We assumed a random effects model with standardized mean differences (SMDs) or mean differences as summary statistics. In a subgroup analysis, we classified the studies following the GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) and ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma) guidelines for rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma severity. RESULTS Six DBPCTs in pollen and 2 trials in house dust mites (HDM) were selected. Patients (N = 915) with intermittent or mild persistent asthma were included in 3 (37.5%) and 5 (62.5%) trials, respectively. Two (25%) HDM studies included patients with moderate persistent asthma, 4 trials patients with moderate-to-severe rhinoconjunctivitis. Treatment periods ranged from 12 to 24 months. AIT with DPAEs yielded significantly lower cSMS (SMD: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.9-2.8) and RQLQ (SMD: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.5) values than did placebo. An exploratory analysis of cSMS and RCSS suggested that the efficacy of AIT treatment with DPAEs was higher in trials including patients with more severe rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. A publication bias was not detected. Heterogeneity between individual studies was explained by differences in severity. Patients receiving DPAEs did not experience a significantly higher risk of local (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 0.86-2.79) or systemic reactions (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 0.98-3.84). CONCLUSIONS Compared to placebo, AIT with DPAEs is effective in patients with pollen- or HDM-induced rhinoconjunctivitis with or without allergic asthma and improves health-related quality of life. It does not differ significantly in safety and tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph Mösges
- CRI – Clinical Research International Ltd, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Antonio Valero Santiago
- Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Allergy, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigaciones Biomedicas en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Nilufar Jahed
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anatoli Astvatsatourov
- Clinical Trials Centre Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Angelika Sager
- Laboratorios LETI, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 184, 08038 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaime Sánchez-López
- Laboratorios LETI, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes 184, 08038 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Klimek L, Brehler R, Hamelmann E, Kopp M, Ring J, Treudler R, Jakob T, Worm M, Pfaar O. Entwicklung der subkutanen Allergen-Immuntherapie (Teil 1): von den Anfängen zu immunologisch orientierten Therapiekonzepten. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-019-1819-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
15
|
Evolution of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (part 1): from first developments to mechanism-driven therapy concepts. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40629-019-0092-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
16
|
Rowane M, Shilian R, Jhaveri DK, Tcheurekdjian HH, Sher TH, Hostoffer R. Familial Success in Allergen Desensitization. ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY (PROVIDENCE, R.I.) 2019; 10:2152656719890315. [PMID: 31819808 PMCID: PMC6883665 DOI: 10.1177/2152656719890315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a widely prevalent immunoglobulin E-mediated inflammatory nasal condition resulting from reexposure to an allergen in a sensitized individual. The genetic associations behind AR and other allergic conditions have been studied. However, familial success with AR therapies, specifically allergen desensitization through subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), has never been reported in the literature. Pharmocogenetics has been gradually applied to link heritable genetic variants with drug responses, such as intergenic region variants APOBEC3B and APOBEC3C and β2-adrenergic receptor and glycoprotein ADAM33 polymorphisms as predictive biomarkers for biologic treatment response in asthma. We provide the first reported survey of familial success with SCIT. METHODS We administered a month-long, institutional review board-approved (20190493) questionnaire to 200 adult patients receiving SCIT in a suburban allergy/immunology practice. The anonymous survey inquired about demographics, target allergens for their SCIT, current symptom improvement on SCIT, and family history of allergies and SCIT management. RESULTS Twenty-six percent (52 of 200, 26%) SCIT patients reported familial success with the same allergy treatment modality. AR diagnosis and symptom improvement from SCIT was similar among previous/same (18 of 52, 38%; 26 of 52, 54%) and subsequent (10 of 52, 21%; 19 of 52, 40%) generations of family members. A combination of seasonal and perennial allergies was most prevalent (81%) among this population. CONCLUSION In a subpopulation of SCIT patients, there appears to be a familial success rate with this allergen desensitization treatment. This is the first reported pharmocogenetic evidence of assessing hereditary influence on effective AR therapy. Understanding pharmacogenetic associations involved with SCIT may improve allergists' recommendations for this treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marija Rowane
- Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University,
Athens, Ohio
| | - Ryan Shilian
- Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care, University
Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Devi K. Jhaveri
- Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care, University
Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
- Allergy Immunology Associates, Inc., Mayfield Heights,
Ohio
| | | | | | - Robert Hostoffer
- Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care, University
Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
- Allergy Immunology Associates, Inc., Mayfield Heights,
Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mösges R, Bachert C, Panzner P, Calderon MA, Haazen L, Pirotton S, Wathelet N, Durham SR, Bonny MA, Legon T, von Frenckell R, Pfaar O, Shamji MH. Short course of grass allergen peptides immunotherapy over 3 weeks reduces seasonal symptoms in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with/without asthma: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Allergy 2018. [PMID: 29512827 PMCID: PMC6175232 DOI: 10.1111/all.13433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Immunotherapy with peptide hydrolysates from Lolium perenne (LPP) is an alternative treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis with or without asthma. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a cumulative dose of 170 μg LPP administered subcutaneously over 3 weeks. Methods In a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, 554 adults with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis were randomized (1:2 ratio) to receive 8 subcutaneous injections of placebo or 170 μg LPP administered in increasing doses in 4 visits over 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the combined symptom and medication score (CSMS) measured over the peak pollen season. Reactivity to conjunctival provocation test (CPT) and quality of life (QOL) was assessed as secondary endpoints. Results The mean reduction in CSMS in the LPP vs placebo group was −15.5% (P = .041) during the peak period and −17.9% (P = .029) over the entire pollen season. LPP‐treated group had a reduced reactivity to CPT (P < .001) and, during the pollen season, a lower rhinoconjunctivitis QOL global score (P = .005) compared with placebo group. Mostly mild and WAO grade 1 early systemic reaction (ESR) were observed ≤30 minutes in 10.5% of LPP‐treated patients, whereas 3 patients with a medical history of asthma (<1%) experienced a serious ESR that resolved with rescue medication. Conclusion Lolium perenne pollen peptides administered over 3 weeks before the grass pollen season significantly reduced seasonal symptoms and was generally safe and well‐tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Mösges
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology; Cologne Germany
| | - C. Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory; Ghent University Hospital; Ghent Belgium
| | - P. Panzner
- Department of Immunology and Allergology; Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen; Charles University in Prague; Pilsen Czech Republic
| | - M. A. Calderon
- Immune Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation; Repair and Development, NHLI; Imperial College; London MRC Asthma UK Centre, UK
| | | | | | | | - S. R. Durham
- Immune Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation; Repair and Development, NHLI; Imperial College; London MRC Asthma UK Centre, UK
| | | | | | | | - O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Universitätsmedizin Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim; Heidelberg University; Mannheim Germany
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - M. H. Shamji
- Immune Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation; Repair and Development, NHLI; Imperial College; London MRC Asthma UK Centre, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gunawardana NC, Durham SR. New approaches to allergen immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018; 121:293-305. [PMID: 30025907 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE New insights into mechanisms should enable strategic improvement of allergen immunotherapy, aiming to make it safer, faster, more effective, and able to induce long-term tolerance. We review novel approaches with potential to translate into clinical use. DATA SOURCES Database searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTIONS Search terms were based on current and novel approaches in immunotherapy. Literature was selected primarily from recent randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses. RESULTS Alum, microcrystalline tyrosine, and calcium phosphate are adjuvants in current use. Toll-like receptor-4 agonists combined with allergen have potential to shorten duration of treatment. Other novel adjuvants, nanoparticles, and virus-like particles in combination with allergen have shown early promise. Omalizumab lessens systemic side effects but does not improve efficacy. Intralymphatic immunotherapy for aeroallergens, epicutaneous immunotherapy for food allergens, and use of modified allergens (allergoids), recombinant allergens (and hypoallergenic variants), and T- and B-cell peptide approaches have shown evidence of efficacy and permitted shortened courses but have only rarely been compared with conventional extracts. CONCLUSION Novel routes of immunotherapy, use of modified allergens, and combination of allergens with immunostimulatory adjuvants or immune modifiers have been developed to augment downregulation of T-helper cell type 2 immunity and/or induce "protective" blocking antibodies. Although these strategies have permitted shortened courses, confirmatory phase 3 trials are required to confirm efficacy and safety and head-to-head trials are required for comparative efficacy. Currently, subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapies using in-house standardized crude extracts remain the only approaches proved to induce long-term tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha C Gunawardana
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wise SK, Lin SY, Toskala E, Orlandi RR, Akdis CA, Alt JA, Azar A, Baroody FM, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Chacko T, Cingi C, Ciprandi G, Corey J, Cox LS, Creticos PS, Custovic A, Damask C, DeConde A, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, Eloy JA, Flanagan CE, Fokkens WJ, Franzese C, Gosepath J, Halderman A, Hamilton RG, Hoffman HJ, Hohlfeld JM, Houser SM, Hwang PH, Incorvaia C, Jarvis D, Khalid AN, Kilpeläinen M, Kingdom TT, Krouse H, Larenas-Linnemann D, Laury AM, Lee SE, Levy JM, Luong AU, Marple BF, McCoul ED, McMains KC, Melén E, Mims JW, Moscato G, Mullol J, Nelson HS, Patadia M, Pawankar R, Pfaar O, Platt MP, Reisacher W, Rondón C, Rudmik L, Ryan M, Sastre J, Schlosser RJ, Settipane RA, Sharma HP, Sheikh A, Smith TL, Tantilipikorn P, Tversky JR, Veling MC, Wang DY, Westman M, Wickman M, Zacharek M. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018; 8:108-352. [PMID: 29438602 PMCID: PMC7286723 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Revised: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). METHODS Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. CONCLUSION This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Allergy/Asthma, Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research, Switzerland
| | | | - Antoine Azar
- Allergy/Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Cemal Cingi
- Otolaryngology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adam DeConde
- Otolaryngology, University of California San Diego, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jan Gosepath
- Otorhinolaryngology, Helios Kliniken Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jens M. Hohlfeld
- Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Airway Research Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, German Center for Lung Research, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amber U. Luong
- Otolaryngology, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, USA
| | | | | | | | - Erik Melén
- Pediatric Allergy, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | | | | | - Joaquim Mullol
- Otolaryngology, Universitat de Barcelona, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Oliver Pfaar
- Rhinology/Allergy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | | | - Carmen Rondón
- Allergy, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Spain
| | - Luke Rudmik
- Otolaryngology, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Matthew Ryan
- Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern, USA
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Allergology, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jiminez Diaz, Spain
| | | | | | - Hemant P. Sharma
- Allergy/Immunology, Children's National Health System, George Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - De Yun Wang
- Otolaryngology, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gomes Dos Reis Pimentel RA, Oliveira G, Ferreira Chaves Loureiro E Lemos CS. Accelerated subcutaneous immunotherapy in pediatric population - Systematic review. Pulmonology 2017; 24:S2173-5115(17)30152-5. [PMID: 29183774 DOI: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accelerated subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) schedules represent an alternative to conventional SCIT, providing immunotherapy benefits in a shorter period of time. The objectives of this systematic review were to assess clinical and immunological efficacy as well as safety of accelerated SCIT build-up schedules for the treatment of respiratory allergy in pediatric patients. METHODS Studies were located by searching PubMed, using "immunotherapy" and "desensitization" as keywords. The selection of studies, published from January 1st, 2006, to December 31th, 2015, was performed in two stages: screening of titles and abstracts, and assessment of the full papers identified as relevant, considering the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted in a standardized way and synthesized qualitatively to assess efficacy and safety of accelerated schedules in respiratory allergy. RESULTS Eleven trials were included: two evaluated rush SCIT and nine assessed cluster SCIT. This review demonstrated that rush and cluster schedules are clinically and immunological efficacious, with faster effect than conventional schedules. No relevant difference with respect to clinical outcomes was noticed between subgroups (pediatric, adult and mixed populations). Regarding safety, most local adverse reactions were mild and there were neither life-threatening systemic reactions nor fatal events. No relevant differences in the incidence and severity of either local or systemic reactions between the accelerated schedule group and control group were registered. CONCLUSIONS Accelerated SCIT build-up schedules are effective in the treatment of respiratory allergy in pediatric patients, representing a safe alternative to the conventional schedules with the advantage of achieving clinical effectiveness sooner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - G Oliveira
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Coimbra (FMUC) Pediatric Hospital of the Hospital and University Center of Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dhami S, Nurmatov U, Arasi S, Khan T, Asaria M, Zaman H, Agarwal A, Netuveli G, Roberts G, Pfaar O, Muraro A, Ansotegui IJ, Calderon M, Cingi C, Durham S, Wijk RG, Halken S, Hamelmann E, Hellings P, Jacobsen L, Knol E, Larenas‐Linnemann D, Lin S, Maggina P, Mösges R, Oude Elberink H, Pajno G, Panwankar R, Pastorello E, Penagos M, Pitsios C, Rotiroti G, Timmermans F, Tsilochristou O, Varga E, Schmidt‐Weber C, Wilkinson J, Williams A, Worm M, Zhang L, Sheikh A. Allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 2017; 72:1597-1631. [PMID: 28493631 DOI: 10.1111/all.13201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 201] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is in the process of developing Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis. To inform the development of clinical recommendations, we undertook a systematic review to assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety of AIT in the management of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS We searched nine international biomedical databases for published, in-progress, and unpublished evidence. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers against predefined eligibility criteria and critically appraised using established instruments. Our primary outcomes of interest were symptom, medication, and combined symptom and medication scores. Secondary outcomes of interest included cost-effectiveness and safety. Data were descriptively summarized and then quantitatively synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS We identified 5960 studies of which 160 studies satisfied our eligibility criteria. There was a substantial body of evidence demonstrating significant reductions in standardized mean differences (SMD) of symptom (SMD -0.53, 95% CI -0.63, -0.42), medication (SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.49, -0.26), and combined symptom and medication (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.69, -0.30) scores while on treatment that were robust to prespecified sensitivity analyses. There was in comparison a more modest body of evidence on effectiveness post-discontinuation of AIT, suggesting a benefit in relation to symptom scores. CONCLUSIONS AIT is effective in improving symptom, medication, and combined symptom and medication scores in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis while on treatment, and there is some evidence suggesting that these benefits are maintained in relation to symptom scores after discontinuation of therapy.
Collapse
|
22
|
Bao Y, Chen J, Cheng L, Guo Y, Hong S, Kong W, Lai H, Li H, Li H, Li J, Li T, Lin X, Liu S, Liu Z, Lou H, Meng J, Qiu Q, Shen K, Tang W, Tao Z, Wang C, Wang X, Wei Q, Xiang L, Xie H, Xu Y, Zhang G, Zhang Y, Zheng Y, Zhi Y, Chen D, Hong H, Li Q, Liu L, Meng Y, Wang N, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Zhang L. Chinese Guideline on allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9:4607-4650. [PMID: 29268533 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The present document is based on a consensus reached by a panel of experts from Chinese Society of Allergy (CSA) and Chinese Allergic Rhinitis Collaborative Research Group (C2AR2G). Allergen immunotherapy (AIT), has increasingly been used as a treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR) globally, as it has been shown to provide a long-term effect in improving nasal and ocular symptoms, reducing medication need, and improving quality of life. AIT is currently the only curative intervention that can potentially modify the immune system in individuals suffering from AR and prevent the development of new sensitization and the progression of disease from AR to asthma. Although the use of AIT is becoming more acceptable in China, to date no AR immunotherapy guideline from China is available for use by the international community. This document has thus been produced and covers the main aspects of AIT undertaken in China; including selection of patients for AIT, the allergen extracts available on the Chinese market, schedules and doses of allergen employed in different routes of AIT, assessment of effect and safety, patients' administration and follow-up, and management of adverse reactions. The Chinese guideline for AR immunotherapy will thus serve as a reference point by doctors, healthcare professionals and organizations involved in the AIT of AR in China. Moreover, this guideline will serve as a source of information for the international community on AIT treatment strategies employed in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixiao Bao
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Pubin Children Hospital, Shanghai Children Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Jianjun Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Lei Cheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.,International Centre for Allergy Research, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Yinshi Guo
- Department of Allergy & Immunology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Suling Hong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
| | - Weijia Kong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - He Lai
- Department of Allergy, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China
| | - Houyong Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China
| | - Huabin Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China
| | - Jing Li
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
| | - Tianying Li
- Department of otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Xiaoping Lin
- The PLA Center of respiratory and allergic disease diagnosing and management, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Shixi Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Hongfei Lou
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Juan Meng
- Department of Otolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Qianhui Qiu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
| | - Kunling Shen
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing 100045, China
| | - Wei Tang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Zezhang Tao
- Department of Otolaryngology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
| | - Chengshuo Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Xiangdong Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Qingyu Wei
- Department of Allergy, NO.202 Hospital of PLA, Shenyang 110003, China
| | - Li Xiang
- Department of Allergy, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing 100045, China
| | - Hua Xie
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, the General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang 110016, China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
| | - Gehua Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Yiwu Zheng
- Scientific Affairs, ALK, Guangzhou 510300, China
| | - Yuxiang Zhi
- Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100720, China
| | - Dehua Chen
- Department of otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Haiyu Hong
- Department of otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Quansheng Li
- Department of Allergy, NO.202 Hospital of PLA, Shenyang 110003, China
| | - Lin Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Yifan Meng
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China
| | - Nan Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Yihui Wang
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Pubin Children Hospital, Shanghai Children Medical Center Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
| | - Yue Zhou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing 100005, China.,Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mösges R, Shah-Hosseini K, Hucke HP, Joisten MJ. Dexpanthenol: An Overview of its Contribution to Symptom Relief in Acute Rhinitis Treated with Decongestant Nasal Sprays. Adv Ther 2017; 34:1850-1858. [PMID: 28695477 PMCID: PMC5565656 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-017-0581-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Nasal blockage is the most bothersome symptom of acute rhinitis. Nasal decongestant sprays containing alpha-sympathomimetics, such as oxymetazoline and xylometazoline, have a rapid onset of action. However, this effect decreases with repeated application and, furthermore, the ciliary function of the nasal mucosa is practically paralyzed. Dexpanthenol promotes cell proliferation and protects the epithelium. Combining these two agents has demonstrated beneficial synergetic effects on the symptoms of acute rhinitis. In a post hoc analysis of a large-scale double-blind, active-controlled study including 152 patients, we could demonstrate that the benefit of added dexpanthenol appears as early as on the third day of the combined application of xylometazoline and dexpanthenol in terms of complete or near-to-complete freedom from symptoms. After 5 days, 47% of the patients were cured under the combined treatment compared with only 1% under xylometazoline monotherapy. These data show that the addition of dexpanthenol to an alpha-sympathomimetic nasal spray not only improves its tolerability but also further increases its effectiveness and leads to expedited cure. FUNDING Klosterfrau Healthcare Group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph Mösges
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kija Shah-Hosseini
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Marie-Josefine Joisten
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Allergen Immunotherapy Clinical Trial Outcomes and Design: Working Toward Harmonization of Methods and Principles. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2017; 17:18. [PMID: 28293909 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-017-0687-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Progress has been made in the harmonization of efficacy and safety outcome measures for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) trials, but unresolved issues still remain. Furthermore, there are discrepancies in recommendations from professional medical societies and regulatory agencies regarding requirements for AIT trials. In this article, we reviewed published recommendations and current data from recent clinical trials, as well as the criteria applied by regulatory authorities for approval of AIT products, to provide updated considerations for conducting phase 3 AIT trials. Topics discussed include analysis of outcomes and trial designs for pediatric and asthma indications, as well as trial designs for perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. In addition, the need for harmonization of safety reporting is emphasized. Considerations presented in this article may further effort to find common ground among professional medical societies and government agencies in developing future recommendations for AIT trial design.
Collapse
|
25
|
Klimek L, Pfaar O, Bousquet J, Senti G, Kündig T. Allergen immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis: current use and future trends. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2017; 13:897-906. [DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2017.1333423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ludger Klimek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Allergy Center, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Allergy Center, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jean Bousquet
- MACVIA-France, Contre les MAladies Chroniques pour un VIeillissement Actif en France European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing Reference Site, Montpellier, France
- INSERM U 1168, VIMA: Ageing and chronic diseases Epidemiological and public health approaches, Villejuif, Université Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
| | - Gabriela Senti
- Center for Clinical Trials, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Kündig
- Dept. of Dermatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pfaar O, Bastl K, Berger U, Buters J, Calderon MA, Clot B, Darsow U, Demoly P, Durham SR, Galán C, Gehrig R, Gerth van Wijk R, Jacobsen L, Klimek L, Sofiev M, Thibaudon M, Bergmann KC. Defining pollen exposure times for clinical trials of allergen immunotherapy for pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis - an EAACI position paper. Allergy 2017; 72:713-722. [PMID: 27874202 DOI: 10.1111/all.13092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical efficacy of pollen allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has been broadly documented in randomized controlled trials. The underlying clinical endpoints are analysed in seasonal time periods predefined based on the background pollen concentration. However, any validated or generally accepted definition from academia or regulatory authorities for this relevant pollen exposure intensity or period of time (season) is currently not available. Therefore, this Task Force initiative of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) aimed to propose definitions based on expert consensus. METHODS A Task Force of the Immunotherapy and Aerobiology and Pollution Interest Groups of the EAACI reviewed the literature on pollen exposure in the context of defining relevant time intervals for evaluation of efficacy in AIT trials. Underlying principles in measuring pollen exposure and associated methodological problems and limitations were considered to achieve a consensus. RESULTS The Task Force achieved a comprehensive position in defining pollen exposure times for different pollen types. Definitions are presented for 'pollen season', 'high pollen season' (or 'peak pollen period') and 'high pollen days'. CONCLUSION This EAACI position paper provides definitions of pollen exposures for different pollen types for use in AIT trials. Their validity as standards remains to be tested in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Medical Faculty Mannheim; Universitätsmedizin Mannheim; Heidelberg University; Mannheim Germany
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - K. Bastl
- Aerobiology and Pollen Information Research Unit; Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - U. Berger
- Aerobiology and Pollen Information Research Unit; Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - J. Buters
- ZAUM; Center of Allergy & Environment; Helmholtz Center Munich/Technische Universität München; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL); Munich Germany
- Kühne Foundation; Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-CARE); Munich Germany
| | - M. A. Calderon
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; Imperial College London; London UK
- National Heart & Lung Institute; Royal Brompton Hospital; London UK
| | - B. Clot
- Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss; Payerne Switzerland
| | - U. Darsow
- ZAUM; Center of Allergy & Environment; Helmholtz Center Munich/Technische Universität München; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL); Munich Germany
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein; Technical University of Munich (TUM); Munich Germany
| | - P. Demoly
- Département de Pneumologie et Addictologie; Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve; University Hospital of Montpellier; Montpellier France
- UPMC Paris 06; UMR-S 1136; IPLESP; Equipe EPAR; Sorbonne Universités; Paris France
| | - S. R. Durham
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; Imperial College London; London UK
| | - C. Galán
- Department of Botany; Ecology and Plant Physiology; University of Córdoba; Córdoba Spain
| | - R. Gehrig
- Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss; Zurich Switzerland
| | - R. Gerth van Wijk
- Section of Allergology; Department of Internal Medicine; Erasmus MC; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - L. Jacobsen
- ALC; Allergy Learning and Consulting; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - L. Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - M. Sofiev
- Finnish Meteorological Institute; Helsinki Finland
| | - M. Thibaudon
- RNSA (Réseau National de Surveillance Aérobiologique); Brussieu France
| | - K. C. Bergmann
- Foundation German Pollen Information Service; Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Witting Christensen SK, Krohn IK, Thuraiaiyah J, Skjold T, Schmid JM, Hoffmann HJH. Increasing time interval and decreasing allergen dose interval improves ex vivo desensitization of human blood basophils. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2016; 92:340-347. [PMID: 27071698 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2015] [Revised: 02/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Desensitization is a method for inducing temporary tolerance to allergen. The mechanism underlying desensitization is yet to be established. METHODS Basophil granulocytes in whole blood from grass pollen allergic subjects were desensitized ex vivo by sequential addition of increasing allergen concentrations. At each step basophil activation (CD193 + CD63+ ) was monitored with and without (background activation) allergen challenge at optimal concentration. The sequential desensitization protocol was compared to two single-dose desensitization protocols with threshold and subthreshold allergen concentrations. Incubation intervals and allergen concentrations were varied in order to optimise the protocol. RESULTS Sequential desensitization effectively reduced basophil response. The single-dose subthreshold protocol and single-dose threshold protocol did not reduce basophil activation with optimal allergen challenge from a mean 57.1 (95% CI: 32.7 - 81.5) to 50.4% (95% CI: 16.3 - 84.4; n = 5; P = 0.43) and 45.0% (95% CI: 23.1 - 66.9; P = 0.14) respectively, while the sequential desensitization protocol reduced activation to a mean 37.2% (95% CI: 16.3 - 58.1; P = 0.018). Reducing incubation time from 10 to 5 minutes increased mean background activation from 22.4 (95% CI: 11.7 - 33.1) to 30.0% (95% CI: 19.7 - 40.3; n = 5; P = 0.026). Increasing time intervals from 10 to 20 minutes reduced background activation from 30.9 (95% CI: 22.8 - 39.0) to 21.9% (95% CI: 16.0 - 27.7; n = 5; P = 0.020). Increasing allergen concentration intervals from 2-fold to 5- and 10-fold did not have significant effect on basophil activation. CONCLUSIONS Sequential desensitization ex vivo effectively attenuates the basophil response to allergen. Increasing the time spent at each step improves desensitization. This protocol could be valuable for investigation the mechanism of desensitization. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Inge Kortekaas Krohn
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jani Thuraiaiyah
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tina Skjold
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Johannes Martin Schmid
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Hans Jürgen H Hoffmann
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chaker AM, Al-Kadah B, Luther U, Neumann U, Wagenmann M. An accelerated dose escalation with a grass pollen allergoid is safe and well-tolerated: a randomized open label phase II trial. Clin Transl Allergy 2016; 6:4. [PMID: 26839682 PMCID: PMC4736162 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-016-0093-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
The number of injections in the dose escalation of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is small for some currently used hypoallergenic allergoids, but can still be inconvenient to patients and can impair compliance. The aim of this trial was to compare safety and tolerability of an accelerated to the conventional dose escalation scheme of a grass pollen allergoid.
Methods In an open label phase II trial, 122 patients were 1:1 randomized for SCIT using a grass pollen allergoid with an accelerated dose escalation comprising only 4 weekly injections (Group I) or a conventional dose escalation including 7 weekly injections (Group II). Safety determination included the occurrence of local and systemic adverse events. Tolerability was assessed by patients and physicians. Results Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 22 (36.1 %) patients in Group I and 15 (24.6 %) in Group II. Local reactions were reported by 18 patients in Group I and 11 in Group II. Five Grade 1 systemic reactions (WAO classification) were observed in Group I and 2 in Group II. Grade 2 reactions occurred 3 times in Group I and 2 times in Group II. Tolerability was rated as “good” or “very good” by 53 (86.9 %) patients in Group I and 59 (100 %) in Group II by investigators. Forty-eight patients in Group I (80.0 %) and 54 in Group II (91.5 %) rated tolerability as “good” or “very good”. Conclusions The dose escalation of a grass pollen allergoid can be accelerated with safety and tolerability profiles comparable to the conventional dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Chaker
- Department of Otolaryngology and ZAUM, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität and Helmholtz Center Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - B Al-Kadah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Centre, Kirrberger Straße, 66421 Homburg, Saar, Germany
| | - U Luther
- Joint Practice of Dermatologists, Allergology - Phlebology, Kaiser-Joseph-Str. 145, 79098 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - U Neumann
- ENT Medicine, Bahnhofstr. 18, 39326 Wolmirstedt, Germany
| | - M Wagenmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Morais-Almeida M, Arêde C, Sampaio G, Borrego LM. Ultrarush schedule of subcutaneous immunotherapy with modified allergen extracts is safe in paediatric age. Asia Pac Allergy 2016; 6:35-42. [PMID: 26844218 PMCID: PMC4731479 DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2016.6.1.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2015] [Accepted: 01/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy up dosing with allergenic extracts has been shown to be associated with frequent adverse reactions. In recent studies it has been demonstrated that using modified extracts, namely allergoids, it is a safe and effective procedure particularly on accelerated schedules. However data assessing its safety in paediatric age is scarce. Objective To evaluate the safety profile in paediatric population of using modified allergen extracts, in an ultrarush schedule, to reach the maintenance dose in the first day. Methods We included children undergoing treatment with subcutaneous immunotherapy during a five-year period, using modified aeroallergen extracts, depigmented, polymerized with glutaraldehyde and adsorbed on aluminium hydroxide using an ultrarush induction phase. The type of adverse reactions during the ultrarush protocol was recorded. Results We studied 100 paediatric patients (57 males) with a mean age of 11.6 years (5 to 18 years; standard deviation, 3.3), all with moderate to severe persistent rhinitis, with or without allergic conjunctivitis, asthma and atopic eczema, sensitized to mites and/or pollens. All reached the maintenance dose of 0.5 mL in the first day, except 1 child. During the ultrarush protocol the total number of injections was 199. There were 21 local adverse reactions in 11 patients, 11 immediate and 10 delayed; from those, had clinical relevance 1 immediate and 4 delayed. Systemic reactions were recorded in 2 cases, both immediate and mild. Conclusion The ultrarush protocol, without premedication, was a safe alternative to be used in paediatric age during the induction phase of subcutaneous immunotherapy using allergoid depigmented extracts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mário Morais-Almeida
- Allergy Center, CUF Descobertas Hospital, 1998-018 Lisbon, Portugal.; CINTESIS, Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Cristina Arêde
- Allergy Center, CUF Descobertas Hospital, 1998-018 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Graça Sampaio
- Allergy Center, CUF Descobertas Hospital, 1998-018 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Luis Miguel Borrego
- Allergy Center, CUF Descobertas Hospital, 1998-018 Lisbon, Portugal.; CEDOC, Chronic Diseases Research Center, Immunology Department, NOVA Medical School, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sola J, da Silva Ferreira JA, Dionicio Elera J, Plácido JL, Pereira C, Fonseca J, Panizo C, Inácio LF, Cancelleire N, Zubeldia Ortuño JM, Landeta A, Madariaga B, Martínez A. Timothy grass pollen therapeutic vaccine: optimal dose for subcutaneous immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2016; 8:251-63. [PMID: 26760111 DOI: 10.2217/imt.15.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To establish the optimal dose of Phleum pratense subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with/without asthma. MATERIALS & METHODS One hundred and fifty-one patients were randomized to receive SCIT 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 or 4.0 skin-prick test units (SPT) or placebo. The primary end point was the variation in the concentration of Phleum pratense extract needed to produce a positive nasal provocation test from baseline (V0) to final visit (FV). RESULTS After 17 weeks, a dose-dependent trend was apparent in the concentration of P. pratense extract needed to produce a positive nasal provocation response. Systemic adverse reactions occurred with 3.2% of administered doses. Grade III (n = 2) and IV (n = 2) events were observed only at the two highest doses. CONCLUSION P. pratense depot SCIT showed signs of clinical and immunological efficacy by dose-dependently decreasing the allergen sensitization rate. Risk-benefit favored doses below 1.0 SPT units for confirmatory trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Sola
- Allergy Service, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - José Luís Plácido
- Imuno-Allergology Service, Centro Hospitalar de S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Celso Pereira
- Imuno-Allergology Service, Hospital da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
| | - João Fonseca
- Imuno-Allergology Service, CUF Porto Instituto e Hospital, Universidade do Porto, Portugal
| | - Carmen Panizo
- Allergy Service, Hospital Nuestra Señora del Prado, Talavera de la Reina, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pfaar O, Sager A, Robinson DS. Safety and effect on reported symptoms of depigmented polymerized allergen immunotherapy: a retrospective study of 2927 paediatric patients. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2015; 26:280-286. [PMID: 25640879 PMCID: PMC4576817 DOI: 10.1111/pai.12347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is effective treatment for allergic diseases, and subcutaneous use of depigmented polymerized extracts may allow rapid up-dosing and safe therapy. To date, there is little information on their safety and clinical effects for children and adolescents with allergic disease. METHODS We performed a retrospective survey of patient notes of 2927 children and adolescents across 136 centres who had received subcutaneous AIT (SCIT) with depigmented polymerized extracts to pollen or mite allergens for at least 1 yr to collect documentation on safety and clinical symptoms. RESULTS 16.3% percent of patients had local reactions, of these 148 were larger than 12 cm in diameter. Systemic reactions were documented in 1.6% of children and in 0.8% of adolescents. There were no documented cases of anaphylactic shock. There were significant reductions in the frequency of patients with recorded nasal symptoms over time of treatment. Moreover, the prescribing rate of rescue medication was reduced over the course of SCIT. CONCLUSION These 'real-life' data from a large retrospective analysis including 2927 children and adolescents with pollen- and/or mite-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with/or without allergic asthma indicate that AIT with depigmented polymerized extracts is well tolerated, and they are compatible with clinical response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Douglas S Robinson
- Leukocyte Biology Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Allergy, Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, University College London Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Network Meta-analysis Shows Commercialized Subcutaneous and Sublingual Grass Products Have Comparable Efficacy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2015; 3:256-266.e3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2014] [Revised: 09/12/2014] [Accepted: 09/16/2014] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
33
|
Conjunctival provocation tests: a predictive factor for patients' seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2015; 3:381-6. [PMID: 25609338 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2014] [Revised: 10/15/2014] [Accepted: 10/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No parameters currently exist that can reliably predict the impact of preseasonal immunotherapy on the symptoms occurring during the season. OBJECTIVE The purpose of our studies was to prove a correlation between preseasonal conjunctival allergen challenge and coseasonal primary clinical endpoints using the total combined score, ie, a combination of symptoms and medication score, as the primary outcome parameter. METHODS Twelve weeks before both the birch and the grass pollen seasons, 2 separate prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled studies were conducted followed by posttrial observations for each study during the active season. In the studies, patients who reacted to conjunctival allergen challenge were treated with sublingual immunotherapy tablets that contain either birch and/or alder or grass pollen allergoids. RESULTS In all, 158 patients were included in the grass and 160 in the tree pollen study; of these, 100 and 109 patients, respectively, took part in the posttrial observations. When comparing patients with and without a positive reaction in the final conjunctival allergen challenge, the results revealed a significant difference in the total combined score (grass: P < .001; birch: P = .025). The same applied to the rescue medication score (P = .005; P = .025). A significant difference regarding the rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score was shown in the grass pollen study (P = .002), and the difference of well days was significant in the tree pollen study (P = .049). CONCLUSION When comparing patients based on their reaction to allergen challenge after immunotherapy, each study leads to similarly significant results. Therefore, conjunctival allergen challenge can be used effectively as a parameter to predict allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms during the season in patients treated with preseasonal sublingual immunotherapy tablets. Whether this can be transferred to untreated patients needs to be determined.
Collapse
|
34
|
Verheggen BG, Westerhout KY, Schreder CH, Augustin M. Health economic comparison of SLIT allergen and SCIT allergoid immunotherapy in patients with seasonal grass-allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in Germany. Clin Transl Allergy 2015; 5:1. [PMID: 25691953 PMCID: PMC4330981 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-015-0045-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2014] [Accepted: 01/02/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergoids are chemically modified allergen extracts administered to reduce allergenicity and to maintain immunogenicity. Oralair® (the 5-grass tablet) is a sublingual native grass allergen tablet for pre- and co-seasonal treatment. Based on a literature review, meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis the relative effects and costs of the 5-grass tablet versus a mix of subcutaneous allergoid compounds for grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were assessed. METHODS A Markov model with a time horizon of nine years was used to assess the costs and effects of three-year immunotherapy treatment. Relative efficacy expressed as standardized mean differences was estimated using an indirect comparison on symptom scores extracted from available clinical trials. The Rhinitis Symptom Utility Index (RSUI) was applied as a proxy to estimate utility values for symptom scores. Drug acquisition and other medical costs were derived from published sources as well as estimates for resource use, immunotherapy persistence, and occurrence of asthma. The analysis was executed from the German payer's perspective, which includes payments of the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) and additional payments by insurants. Comprehensive deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and different scenarios were performed to test the uncertainty concerning the incremental model outcomes. RESULTS The applied model predicted a cost-utility ratio of the 5-grass tablet versus a market mix of injectable allergoid products of € 12,593 per QALY in the base case analysis. Predicted incremental costs and QALYs were € 458 (95% confidence interval, CI: € 220; € 739) and 0.036 (95% CI: 0.002; 0.078), respectively. Compared to the allergoid mix the probability of the 5-grass tablet being the most cost-effective treatment option was predicted to be 76% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of € 20,000. The results were most sensitive to changes in efficacy estimates, duration of the pollen season, and immunotherapy persistence rates. CONCLUSIONS This analysis suggests the sublingual native 5-grass tablet to be cost-effective relative to a mix of subcutaneous allergoid compounds. The robustness of these statements has been confirmed in extensive sensitivity and scenario analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram G Verheggen
- Pharmerit International, Marten Meesweg, 107 3068AV Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Matthias Augustin
- University Medical Center and Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Di Bona D, Plaia A, Di Lorenzo G. Knowledge of the literature is crucial for meta-analyses. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2015; 135:293-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2014] [Revised: 07/16/2014] [Accepted: 08/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
36
|
Leitlinie zur (allergen-)spezifischen Immuntherapie bei IgE-vermittelten allergischen Erkrankungen. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-014-0707-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
37
|
Klimek L, Uhlig J, Mösges R, Rettig K, Pfaar O. A high polymerized grass pollen extract is efficacious and safe in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study using a novel up-dosing cluster-protocol. Allergy 2014; 69:1629-38. [PMID: 25130503 PMCID: PMC4238814 DOI: 10.1111/all.12513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cluster immunotherapy represents an interesting alternative to conventional up-dosing schedules because it allows achieving the maintenance dose within a shorter time interval. In this study, the efficacy and safety of cluster immunotherapy with a high polymerized allergen extract of a grass/rye pollen mixture have been evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. METHODS In total, 121 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass pollen were randomized 1 : 1 to verum or placebo group. A short cluster up-dosing schedule of only 1 week was applied to achieve the maintenance dose which was administered monthly during the study period of 1 year. Total combined symptom and medication score (TCS) was defined as primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters were individual symptom and medication scores, 'well days,' global improvement as well as immunological effects and nasal allergen challenge. The safety profile was evaluated based on the European academy of allergy and clinical immunology grading system. RESULTS Significant reduction in the verum compared to the placebo group (intention-to-treat, population, verum: n = 55; placebo: n = 47) was found regarding TCS (P = 0.005), rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom score (RTSS, P = 0.006), and total rescue medication score (TRMS, P = 0.002). Additionally, secondary outcomes such as 'well days,' nasal challenge results, and increase of specific IgG4 were in favor of the active treatment. All systemic adverse reactions (0.8% of all injections in the verum group) were of mild intensity. No severe reactions related to the study medication were observed. CONCLUSION Cluster immunotherapy with high polymerized grass pollen extracts resulted in significant clinical efficacy and has been shown to be a safe treatment for grass pollen-allergic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pfaar O, Demoly P, Gerth van Wijk R, Bonini S, Bousquet J, Canonica GW, Durham SR, Jacobsen L, Malling HJ, Mösges R, Papadopoulos NG, Rak S, Rodriguez del Rio P, Valovirta E, Wahn U, Calderon MA. Recommendations for the standardization of clinical outcomes used in allergen immunotherapy trials for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: an EAACI Position Paper. Allergy 2014; 69:854-67. [PMID: 24761804 DOI: 10.1111/all.12383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 311] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2014] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has been thoroughly documented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It is the only immune-modifying and causal treatment available for patients suffering from IgE-mediated diseases such as allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, allergic asthma and insect sting allergy. However, there is a high degree of clinical and methodological heterogeneity among the endpoints in clinical studies on AIT, for both subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy (SCIT and SLIT). At present, there are no commonly accepted standards for defining the optimal outcome parameters to be used for both primary and secondary endpoints. METHODS As elaborated by a Task Force (TF) of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Immunotherapy Interest Group, this Position Paper evaluates the currently used outcome parameters in different RCTs and also aims to provide recommendations for the optimal endpoints in future AIT trials for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. RESULTS Based on a thorough literature review, the TF members have outlined recommendations for nine domains of clinical outcome measures. As the primary outcome, the TF recommends a homogeneous combined symptom and medication score (CSMS) as a simple and standardized method that balances both symptoms and the need for antiallergic medication in an equally weighted manner. All outcomes, grouped into nine domains, are reviewed. CONCLUSION A standardized and globally harmonized method for analysing the clinical efficacy of AIT products in RCTs is required. The EAACI TF highlights the CSMS as the primary endpoint for future RCTs in AIT for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Pfaar
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; University Hospital Mannheim; Mannheim Germany
| | - P. Demoly
- Département de Pneumologie et Addictologie; Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve; University Hospital of Montpellier; Montpellier France
- Sorbonne Universités; UPMC Paris 06, UMR-S 1136, IPLESP; Equipe EPAR; Paris France
| | - R. Gerth van Wijk
- Section of Allergology; Department of Internal Medicine; Erasmus MC; Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - S. Bonini
- Second University of Naples and Institute of Translational Pharmacology; Italian National Research Council (IFT-CNR); Rome Italy
| | - J. Bousquet
- Département de Pneumologie et Addictologie; Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve; University Hospital of Montpellier; Montpellier France
- 1018, Respiratory and Environmental Epidemiology Team; INSERM; CESP Centre for research in Epidemiology and Population Health; Villejuif France
| | - G. W. Canonica
- Respiratory Diseases & Allergy Clinic; University of Genova; IRCCS AOU San Martino; Genova Italy
| | - S. R. Durham
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; National Heart and Lung Institute; Imperial College; London UK
| | - L. Jacobsen
- ALC, Allergy Learning and Consulting; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - H. J. Malling
- Allergy Clinic; University Hospital Gentofte; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - R. Mösges
- Institute of Medical Statistics; Informatics and Epidemiology (IMSIE); University of Cologne; Cologne Germany
| | - N. G. Papadopoulos
- Allergy Department; 2nd Pediatric Clinic; University of Athens; Athens Greece
- Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health; Institute of Human Development; University of Manchester; Manchester UK
| | - S. Rak
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology; Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Goteborg Sweden
| | | | - E. Valovirta
- Department of Clinical Allergology and Pulmonary Diseases; University of Turku; Finland
- Suomen Terveystalo Allergy Clinic; Turku Finland
| | - U. Wahn
- Department for Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology; Charité Medical University; Berlin Germany
| | - M. A. Calderon
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; National Heart and Lung Institute; Imperial College; London UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dranitsaris G, Ellis AK. Sublingual or subcutaneous immunotherapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis: an indirect analysis of efficacy, safety and cost. J Eval Clin Pract 2014; 20:225-38. [PMID: 24444390 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The standard of preventive care for poorly controlled seasonal allergic rhinitis (AR) is subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with allergen extracts, administered in a physician's office. As an alternative to SCIT, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is now an option for patients with seasonal AR. Oralair, a SLIT tablet containing freeze-dried allergen extracts of five grasses [cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata), meadow grass (Poa pratensis), rye grass (Lolium perenne), sweet vernal grass (Anthoxanthum odoratum) and timothy grass (Phleum pratense)], and Grazax, a SLIT tablet containing a standardized extract of grass pollen allergen from timothy grass (P pratenase), are two such agents currently available in many countries. However, head-to-head comparative data are not available. In this study, an indirect comparison on efficacy, safety and cost was undertaken between Oralair, Grazax and SCIT. METHODS A systematic review was conducted for double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trials evaluating Oralair, Grazax or SCIT in patients with grass-induced seasonal AR. Using placebo as the common control, an indirect statistical comparison between treatments was performed using meta regression analysis with active drug as the primary independent variable. An economic analysis, which included both direct and indirect costs for the Canadian setting, was also undertaken. RESULTS Overall, 20 placebo-controlled trials met the study inclusion criteria. The indirect analysis suggested improved efficacy with Oralair over SCIT [standardized mean difference (SMD) in AR symptom control = -0.21; P = 0.007] and Grazax (SMD = -0.18; P = 0.018). In addition, there were no significant differences in the risk of discontinuation due to adverse events between therapies. Oralair was associated with cost savings against year-round SCIT ($2471), seasonal SCIT ($948) and Grazax ($1168) during the first year of therapy. CONCLUSIONS Oralair has at least non-inferior efficacy and comparable safety against SCIT and Grazax at a lower annual cost.
Collapse
|
40
|
Urry ZL, Richards DF, Black C, Morales M, Carnés J, Hawrylowicz CM, Robinson DS. Depigmented-polymerised allergoids favour regulatory over effector T cells: enhancement by 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. BMC Immunol 2014; 15:21. [PMID: 24884430 PMCID: PMC4051145 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2172-15-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2013] [Accepted: 05/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Allergen immunotherapy (SIT) is the only treatment for allergic disease capable of modifying disease long term. To reduce the risk of anaphylaxis from SIT, allergen-extracts have been modified by polymerisation with glutaraldehyde to reduce IgE binding. It is suggested that these allergoid extracts also have reduced T cell activity, which could compromise clinical efficacy. Effective SIT is thought to act through regulatory T cells (Tregs) rather than activation of effector T cells. There is no published data on the activity of modified extracts on Tregs. Results We compared the capacity of modified (depigmented-polymerised) versus unmodified (native) allergen extracts of grass pollen and house dust mite to stimulate proliferation/cytokine production and to modulate Treg/effector T cell frequency in cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), from volunteers sensitised to both allergens in vitro. Depigmented-polymerised allergen extracts stimulated less proliferation of PBMC, and reduced effector cell numbers after 7 days in culture than did native extracts. However, the frequency of Foxp3+ Tregs in cultures were similar to those seen with native extract so that ratios of regulatory to effector T cells were significantly increased in cultures stimulated with depigmented-polymerised extracts. Addition of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 further favoured Treg, and reduced effector cytokine production, but not interleukin-10. Conclusions Depigmented-polymerised allergen extracts appear to favour Treg expansion over activation of effector T cells and this may relate to their demonstrated efficacy and safety in SIT. 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 further reduces effector T cell activation by allergen extracts and may be a useful adjuvant for SIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Catherine M Hawrylowicz
- Department of Allergy and Asthma, MRC and Asthma UK Centre for Mechanisms of Allergic Asthma, Guy's Campus, King's College London, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Safety and efficacy of tree pollen specific immunotherapy on the ultrarush administration schedule method using purethal trees. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2014; 2014:707634. [PMID: 24783221 PMCID: PMC3982251 DOI: 10.1155/2014/707634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2013] [Revised: 02/18/2014] [Accepted: 02/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Background. Specific immunotherapy (SIT) with an ultrarush administration schedule with Purethal for tree pollen allergens has been evaluated to assess its efficacy and safety. Methods. The study group consisted of 22 patients with symptoms of allergic rhinitis and confirmed allergy to tree pollens. Patients were randomized and given an administration schedule of either ultrarush therapy or conventional preseasonal SIT. Treatment was performed during three consecutive years. Results. After three years of treatment, a similar reduction in nasal symptoms was observed; according to the visual analog scale, there was a decrease from 3.991 ± 0.804 points to 1.634 ± 0.540 in the ultrarush group and from 3.845 ± 0.265 to 1.501 ± 0.418 in the group desensitized using the conventional method (P > 0.05). There was also a comparable reduction in the use of relief drugs during pollen season and an increase in the serum concentration of IgG4 to tree pollens. No significant differences in the safety profile were observed. Conclusion. An administration schedule of ultrarush SIT with Purethal Trees is a safe treatment in preliminary observations. This therapy is comparable with conventional administration of SIT in the field of efficacy and safety.
Collapse
|
42
|
Pfaar O, Bachert C, Bufe A, Buhl R, Ebner C, Eng P, Friedrichs F, Fuchs T, Hamelmann E, Hartwig-Bade D, Hering T, Huttegger I, Jung K, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Merk H, Rabe U, Saloga J, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schuster A, Schwerk N, Sitter H, Umpfenbach U, Wedi B, Wöhrl S, Worm M, Kleine-Tebbe J, Kaul S, Schwalfenberg A. Guideline on allergen-specific immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2k Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto- Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Pneumology (GPP), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the German Association of ENT Surgeons (BV-HNO), the Professional Federation of Paediatricians and Youth Doctors (BVKJ), the Federal Association of Pulmonologists (BDP) and the German Dermatologists Association (BVDD). ALLERGO JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL 2014; 23:282-319. [PMID: 26120539 PMCID: PMC4479478 DOI: 10.1007/s40629-014-0032-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 247] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The present guideline (S2k) on allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) was established by the German, Austrian and Swiss professional associations for allergy in consensus with the scientific specialist societies and professional associations in the fields of otolaryngology, dermatology and venereology, pediatric and adolescent medicine, pneumology as well as a German patient organization (German Allergy and Asthma Association; Deutscher Allergie- und Asthmabund, DAAB) according to the criteria of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF). AIT is a therapy with disease-modifying effects. By administering allergen extracts, specific blocking antibodies, toler-ance-inducing cells and mediators are activated. These prevent further exacerbation of the allergen-triggered immune response, block the specific immune response and attenuate the inflammatory response in tissue. Products for SCIT or SLIT cannot be compared at present due to their heterogeneous composition, nor can allergen concentrations given by different manufacturers be compared meaningfully due to the varying methods used to measure their active ingredients. Non-modified allergens are used for SCIT in the form of aqueous or physically adsorbed (depot) extracts, as well as chemically modified allergens (allergoids) as depot extracts. Allergen extracts for SLIT are used in the form of aqueous solutions or tablets. The clinical efficacy of AIT is measured using various scores as primary and secondary study endpoints. The EMA stipulates combined symptom and medication scores as primary endpoint. A harmonization of clinical endpoints, e. g., by using the combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS) recommended by the EAACI, is desirable in the future in order to permit the comparison of results from different studies. The current CONSORT recommendations from the ARIA/GA2LEN group specify standards for the evaluation, presentation and publication of study results. According to the Therapy allergen ordinance (TAV), preparations containing common allergen sources (pollen from grasses, birch, alder, hazel, house dust mites, as well as bee and wasp venom) need a marketing authorization in Germany. During the marketing authorization process, these preparations are examined regarding quality, safety and efficacy. In the opinion of the authors, authorized allergen preparations with documented efficacy and safety, or preparations tradeable under the TAV for which efficacy and safety have already been documented in clinical trials meeting WAO or EMA standards, should be preferentially used. Individual formulations (NPP) enable the prescription of rare allergen sources (e.g., pollen from ash, mugwort or ambrosia, mold Alternaria, animal allergens) for specific immunotherapy. Mixing these allergens with TAV allergens is not permitted. Allergic rhinitis and its associated co-morbidities (e. g., bronchial asthma) generate substantial direct and indirect costs. Treatment options, in particular AIT, are therefore evaluated using cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses. From a long-term perspective, AIT is considered to be significantly more cost effective in allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma than pharmacotherapy, but is heavily dependent on patient compliance. Meta-analyses provide unequivocal evidence of the efficacy of SCIT and SLIT for certain allergen sources and age groups. Data from controlled studies differ in terms of scope, quality and dosing regimens and require product-specific evaluation. Therefore, evaluating individual preparations according to clearly defined criteria is recommended. A broad transfer of the efficacy of certain preparations to all preparations administered in the same way is not endorsed. The website of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (www.dgaki.de/leitlinien/s2k-leitlinie-sit; DGAKI: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allergologie und klinische Immunologie) provides tables with specific information on available products for AIT in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. The tables contain the number of clinical studies per product in adults and children, the year of market authorization, underlying scoring systems, number of randomized and analyzed subjects and the method of evaluation (ITT, FAS, PP), separately given for grass pollen, birch pollen and house dust mite allergens, and the status of approval for the conduct of clinical studies with these products. Strong evidence of the efficacy of SCIT in pollen allergy-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in adulthood is well-documented in numerous trials and, in childhood and adolescence, in a few trials. Efficacy in house dust mite allergy is documented by a number of controlled trials in adults and few controlled trials in children. Only a few controlled trials, independent of age, are available for mold allergy (in particular Alternaria). With regard to animal dander allergies (primarily to cat allergens), only small studies, some with methodological deficiencies are available. Only a moderate and inconsistent therapeutic effect in atopic dermatitis has been observed in the quite heterogeneous studies conducted to date. SCIT has been well investigated for individual preparations in controlled bronchial asthma as defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2007 and intermittent and mild persistent asthma (GINA 2005) and it is recommended as a treatment option, in addition to allergen avoidance and pharmacotherapy, provided there is a clear causal link between respiratory symptoms and the relevant allergen. The efficacy of SLIT in grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is extensively documented in adults and children, whilst its efficacy in tree pollen allergy has only been shown in adults. New controlled trials (some with high patient numbers) on house dust mite allergy provide evidence of efficacy of SLIT in adults. Compared with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, there are only few studies on the efficacy of SLIT in allergic asthma. In this context, newer studies show an efficacy for SLIT on asthma symptoms in the subgroup of grass pollen allergic children, adolescents and adults with asthma and efficacy in primary house dust mite allergy-induced asthma in adolescents aged from 14 years and in adults. Aspects of secondary prevention, in particular the reduction of new sensitizations and reduced asthma risk, are important rationales for choosing to initiate treatment early in childhood and adolescence. In this context, those products for which the appropriate effects have been demonstrated should be considered. SCIT or SLIT with pollen or mite allergens can be performed in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis using allergen extracts that have been proven to be effective in at least one double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) study. At present, clinical trials are underway for the indication in asthma due to house dust mite allergy, some of the results of which have already been published, whilst others are still awaited (see the DGAKI table "Approved/potentially completed studies" via www.dgaki.de/Leitlinien/s2k-Leitlinie-sit (according to www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu)). When establishing the indication for AIT, factors that favour clinical efficacy should be taken into consideration. Differences between SCIT and SLIT are to be considered primarily in terms of contraindications. In individual cases, AIT may be justifiably indicated despite the presence of contraindications. SCIT injections and the initiation of SLIT are performed by a physician experienced in this type of treatment and who is able to administer emergency treatment in the case of an allergic reaction. Patients must be fully informed about the procedure and risks of possible adverse events, and the details of this process must be documented (see "Treatment information sheet"; available as a handout via www.dgaki.de/Leitlinien/s2k-Leitlinie-sit). Treatment should be performed according to the manufacturer's product information leaflet. In cases where AIT is to be performed or continued by a different physician to the one who established the indication, close cooperation is required in order to ensure that treatment is implemented consistently and at low risk. In general, it is recommended that SCIT and SLIT should only be performed using preparations for which adequate proof of efficacy is available from clinical trials. Treatment adherence among AIT patients is lower than assumed by physicians, irrespective of the form of administration. Clearly, adherence is of vital importance for treatment success. Improving AIT adherence is one of the most important future goals, in order to ensure efficacy of the therapy. Severe, potentially life-threatening systemic reactions during SCIT are possible, but - providing all safety measures are adhered to - these events are very rare. Most adverse events are mild to moderate and can be treated well. Dose-dependent adverse local reactions occur frequently in the mouth and throat in SLIT. Systemic reactions have been described in SLIT, but are seen far less often than with SCIT. In terms of anaphylaxis and other severe systemic reactions, SLIT has a better safety profile than SCIT. The risk and effects of adverse systemic reactions in the setting of AIT can be effectively reduced by training of personnel, adhering to safety standards and prompt use of emergency measures, including early administration of i. m. epinephrine. Details on the acute management of anaphylactic reactions can be found in the current S2 guideline on anaphylaxis issued by the AWMF (S2-AWMF-LL Registry Number 061-025). AIT is undergoing some innovative developments in many areas (e. g., allergen characterization, new administration routes, adjuvants, faster and safer dose escalation protocols), some of which are already being investigated in clinical trials. Cite this as Pfaar O, Bachert C, Bufe A, Buhl R, Ebner C, Eng P, Friedrichs F, Fuchs T, Hamelmann E, Hartwig-Bade D, Hering T, Huttegger I, Jung K, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Merk H, Rabe U, Saloga J, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schuster A, Schwerk N, Sitter H, Umpfenbach U, Wedi B, Wöhrl S, Worm M, Kleine-Tebbe J. Guideline on allergen-specific immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases - S2k Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Pneumology (GPP), the German Respiratory Society (DGP), the German Association of ENT Surgeons (BV-HNO), the Professional Federation of Paediatricians and Youth Doctors (BVKJ), the Federal Association of Pulmonologists (BDP) and the German Dermatologists Association (BVDD). Allergo J Int 2014;23:282-319.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
- />Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, An den Quellen 10, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Claus Bachert
- />Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Bufe
- />Department of Experimental Pneumology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Roland Buhl
- />Pulmonary Department, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christof Ebner
- />Outpatient Clinic for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Eng
- />Department of Children and Adolescent Medicine, Aarau and Children‘s Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Frank Friedrichs
- />Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine Practice, Laurensberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Fuchs
- />Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Eckard Hamelmann
- />Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pediatric Center Bethel, Evangelical Hospital, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hering
- />Pulmonary Outpatient Practice, Tegel, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isidor Huttegger
- />Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg Regional Hospitals, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Ludger Klimek
- />Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Matthias Volkmar Kopp
- />Clinic of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Lübeck University, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Lung Center (DZL), Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hans Merk
- />Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Uta Rabe
- />Department of Allergology, Johanniter-Krankenhaus im Fläming Treuenbrietzen GmbH, Treuenbrietzen Germany, Treuenbrietzen, Germany
| | - Joachim Saloga
- />Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Antje Schuster
- />Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Schwerk
- />University Children’s hospital, Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hanover Medical University, Hannover, Germany
| | - Helmut Sitter
- />Institute for Theoretical Surgery, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Bettina Wedi
- />Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, Hannover Medical University, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Margitta Worm
- />Allergy-Centre-Charité, Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Susanne Kaul
- />Division of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Klimek L, Pfaar O. A comparison of immunotherapy delivery methods for allergen immunotherapy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2013; 9:465-74; quiz 475. [PMID: 23634740 DOI: 10.1586/eci.13.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergic diseases are among the most common diseases in humans. Besides allergen avoidance, allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only causative treatment option. During recent years, many innovations of this therapy have emerged. METHODS Selective literature research in Medline and PubMed, under the inclusion of national and international guidelines and Cochrane meta analyses. RESULTS In several meta-analyses, the clinical efficacy of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) has been largely demonstrated. Recently, major research activities in mucosal immunotherapies focused on the sublingual application route. There are well-documented clinical data on the efficacy and safety of this form of immunotherapy. New application routes as well as new immune-modifying agents such as virus-like particles or CpG-motifs have also been investigated. CONCLUSION SIT is accepted to be the only causative treatment option for allergies. New application routes and new immune-modifying agents will allow for different delivery methods in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludger Klimek
- Allergy Center, An den Quellen 10, D-65183 Wiesbaden, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Depigmented allergoids reveal new epitopes with capacity to induce IgG blocking antibodies. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2013; 2013:284615. [PMID: 24222901 PMCID: PMC3816019 DOI: 10.1155/2013/284615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2013] [Revised: 08/01/2013] [Accepted: 08/12/2013] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Background. The synthesis of allergen-specific blocking IgGs that interact with IgE after allergen immunotherapy (SIT) has been related to clinical efficacy. The objectives were to investigate the epitope specificity of IgG-antibodies induced by depigmented-polymerized (Dpg-Pol) allergoids and unmodified allergen extracts, and examine IgE-blocking activity of induced IgG-antibodies. Methods. Rabbits were immunized with native and Dpg-Pol extracts of birch pollen, and serum samples were obtained. Recognition of linear IgG-epitopes of Bet v 1 and Bet v 2 and the capacity of these IgG-antibodies to block binding of human-IgE was determined. Results. Serum from rabbits immunized with native extracts recognised 11 linear epitopes from Bet v 1, while that from Dpg-Pol-immunized animals recognised 8. For Bet v 2, 8 epitopes were recognized by IgG from native immunized animals, and 9 from Dpg-Pol immunized one. Dpg-Pol and native immunized serum did not always recognise the same epitopes, but specific-IgG from both could block human-IgE binding sites for native extract. Conclusions. Depigmented-polymerized birch extract stimulates the synthesis of specific IgG-antibodies which recognize common but also novel epitopes compared with native extracts. IgG-antibodies induced by Dpg-Pol effectively inhibit human-IgE binding to allergens which may be part of the mechanism of action of SIT.
Collapse
|
45
|
Pfaar O, Biedermann T, Klimek L, Sager A, Robinson DS. Depigmented-polymerized mixed grass/birch pollen extract immunotherapy is effective in polysensitized patients. Allergy 2013; 68:1306-13. [PMID: 23991896 DOI: 10.1111/all.12219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis have symptoms due to sensitization with more than one pollen allergen, and mixed pollen extracts are widely used for allergen immunotherapy in practice, there are few published trials. METHODS We performed a 2-year multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of subcutaneous immunotherapy with mixed depigmented-polymerized birch and grass pollen extract in 285 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptomatic during both birch and grass pollen seasons. Primary outcome was combined symptom and medication score (SMS) assessed by daily visual analogue scales (VAS). Analysis included a placebo-based analysis examining the effect of treatment only on days when placebo patients were symptomatic. RESULTS There was a significant reduction in median SMS for actively treated patients (median 5.70 (interquartile range 2.62-10.02) compared with 7.07 (3.47-10.71) for placebo, P = 0.0385). Rhinitis quality-of-life scores were significantly better for active compared with placebo, and other secondary endpoints were not significantly different. Placebo-based analysis showed a 33.7% reduced SMS at year 2 for active treatment compared with placebo on days when placebo patients were symptomatic. Both birch pollen- and grass pollen-specific IgG4 increased with active treatment. CONCLUSIONS This study shows efficacy of mixed pollen extracts for immunotherapy for patients symptomatic to both birch and grass pollen allergens. The relatively modest effect may reflect 50% dose reduction for each allergen in the mixture. It supports VAS for symptom assessment and placebo-based analysis as useful for the analysis of immunotherapy trials. The safety of modified extracts may allow study of mixed extracts without dose reduction to improve efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Center for Rhinology and Allergology; University Hospital Mannheim; Wiesbaden; Germany
| | - T. Biedermann
- Clinic for Dermatology; University Hospital Tübingen; Tübingen; Germany
| | - L. Klimek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Center for Rhinology and Allergology; University Hospital Mannheim; Wiesbaden; Germany
| | | | - D. S. Robinson
- Leukocyte Biology Section; National Heart and Lung Institute; Imperial College London; London; UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Rush and cluster immunotherapy schedules are accelerated immunotherapy build-up schedules. A cluster immunotherapy schedule involves the patient receiving several allergen injections (generally 2-4) sequentially in a single day of treatment on nonconsecutive days. The maintenance dose is generally reached in 4-8 weeks. In rush immunotherapy protocols, higher doses are administered at 15- to 60-min intervals over a 1- to 3-day period until the maintenance dose is achieved. This review will serve as an update for accelerated immunotherapy schedules. The review will include recent investigations demonstrating the safety of cluster schedules in atopic dermatitis, pediatric patients, and inhalant allergen mixtures and an accelerated protocol utilizing an infusion pump for allergen delivery. There has also been further elucidation on the immunological changes which occur during accelerated immunotherapy. Finally, new studies analyzing systemic reaction risk factors are discussed.
Collapse
|
47
|
Reply. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 132:508-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2013] [Revised: 04/26/2013] [Accepted: 04/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
48
|
Meechan P, Tungtrongchitr A, Chaisri U, Maklon K, Indrawattana N, Chaicumpa W, Sookrung N. Intranasal, liposome-adjuvanted cockroach allergy vaccines made of refined major allergen and whole-body extract of Periplaneta americana. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2013; 161:351-62. [PMID: 23689057 DOI: 10.1159/000348314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2012] [Accepted: 01/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cockroach (CR) allergens frequently cause severe asthma in CR-sensitized subjects. Allergen-specific immunotherapy causes a shift of allergic Th2 responses towards Th1 and/or regulatory T cell (Treg) responses which reduce airway inflammation and prevent disease progression. Data are relatively limited on immunotherapy via CR allergy vaccine. METHODS The therapeutic efficacy of an intranasal liposome-adjuvant vaccine made of a refined Periplaneta americana arginine kinase (AK) was compared to the liposome-entrapped P. americana crude extract (CRE) vaccine. Adult BALB/c mice were rendered allergic to CRE. Three allergic mouse groups were immunized intranasally on alternate days with 8 doses of liposome-entrapped CRE (L-CRE), liposome-entrapped AK and placebo, respectively. One week later, all mice received a nebulized CRE provocation. Evaluation of vaccine efficacy was performed 1 day after provocation. RESULTS Liposome-entrapped native AK attenuated airway inflammation after the CRE provocation and caused a shift of allergic Th2 to Th1 and Treg responses. The L-CRE also induced a shift from the Th2 to the Th1 response but did not induce a Treg response and could not attenuate the airway inflammation upon allergen reexposure. CONCLUSIONS Intranasal liposome-adjuvant CR allergy vaccine containing native AK (Per a 9) is better than L-CRE in attenuating allergic airway inflammation. The findings of this study not only document a more comprehensive and beneficial immune response induced by the refined allergen vaccine but also raise the point that the shift from the Th2 to the Th1 response alone might not correlate with improved airway histopathology, clinical outcome and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panissara Meechan
- Graduate Program in Immunology, Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Immunologic effect and tolerability of intra-seasonal subcutaneous immunotherapy with an 8-day up-dosing schedule to 10,000 standardized quality-units: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Ther 2013; 34:2072-81. [PMID: 23063373 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2012] [Revised: 08/21/2012] [Accepted: 09/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International guidelines recommend that allergen-specific immunotherapy for pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis is initiated preseasonally. However, because subjects often present to physicians with allergy symptoms during the pollen season, "within-season" initiation of specific immunotherapy is of special interest. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the immunomodulatory effects and tolerability of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with Standardized Quality (SQ) 6-grass mix and rye allergen extract, using an 8-day intra-seasonal up-dosing schedule to 10,000 SQ-units (SQ-U). METHODS In a 9-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults (mean age, 34.6 years; 99.3% whites) with grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis (mean disease duration, 15.1 years) were randomized 3:1 to receive SCIT or placebo. Treatment was initiated during the 2008 pollen season, with an 8-day up-dosing from 100 to 10,000 SQ-U (6 daily injections) followed by 2 maintenance injections of 10,000 SQ-U at intervals of 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. The primary end point examined immunologic effects, assessing the difference in IgE-blocking factor (serum components competing with IgE for allergen binding) between SCIT and placebo at week 9. Secondary/explorative end points included the difference in IgE-blocking factor, specific IgG(4), and specific IgE at various times. Tolerability (adverse events, local and systemic allergic reactions) of the up-dosing schedule was also evaluated. RESULTS Of the 148 treated subjects 144 (SCIT n = 109; placebo n = 35) were analyzed for the primary parameter. Immunologic response (significantly higher increase in IgE-blocking factor and IgG(4) levels) occurred with SCIT versus placebo at week 9 (IgE-blocking factor, P = 0.0017; IgG(4,)P = 0.0215). Significant differences were observed as early as week 3. AEs were reported in 60.7% of SCIT- and 30.6% of placebo-treated subjects, with no treatment-related serious AEs. Local allergic reactions occurred in 46.4% of SCIT and 8.3% of placebo subjects (χ(2) test, P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed between groups in the incidence of systemic reactions (7.1% SCIT vs 5.6% placebo; χ(2) test, P = 0.7413). CONCLUSIONS This trial provides the first description of short (8-day) intra-seasonal up-dosing with SCIT, which induced immunologic effects after only 3 weeks, and was generally well tolerated, although it induced a marked increase in the rate of local reactions compared with placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00807547; ALK trial ID SHX0562.
Collapse
|
50
|
Brehler R, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Christian Virchow J. Specific immunotherapy-indications and mode of action. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2013; 110:148-58. [PMID: 23533561 PMCID: PMC3601291 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2012] [Accepted: 01/17/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is estimated that up to 24% of the population in Germany suffers from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and 5% from allergic asthma. Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is closely related to other atopic diseases. METHODS This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search of the Medline database, guidelines from Germany and abroad, and Cochrane meta-analyses. RESULTS Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only diseases-modifying treatment option for allergies. Meta-analysis reveals standardized mean differences in allergic rhinitis symptom scores of -0.73 for subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and -0.49 for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT); the corresponding mean differences in medication scores are -0.57 and -0.32, respectively. The treatment should be carried out for at least three years. It is indicated when the symptoms are severe and allergen avoidance is not a realistic option. The efficacy of treatment depends on the allergen dose; thus, every allergen preparation should be evaluated individually, independent of route of administration. SCIT can cause systemic adverse effects, including anaphylaxis. SLIT is safer but often causes allergic symptoms of the oral mucosa at the beginning of treatment. CONCLUSION Even though the efficacy of SIT is well documented, it is still underused. SIT should be offered as standard treatment to patients suffering from allergic rhinitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Matthias Volkmar Kopp
- Pediatric Pneumology & Allergology, Department of Pediatric Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Centrum Lübeck
| | | |
Collapse
|