1
|
Parada-Rojas CH, Stahr M, Childs KL, Quesada-Ocampo LM. Effector Repertoire of the Sweetpotato Black Rot Fungal Pathogen Ceratocystis fimbriata. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2024; 37:315-326. [PMID: 38353601 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-09-23-0146-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
In 2015, sweetpotato producers in the United States experienced one of the worst outbreaks of black rot recorded in history, with up to 60% losses reported in the field and packing houses and at shipping ports. Host resistance remains the ideal management tool to decrease crop losses. Lack of knowledge of Ceratocystis fimbriata biology represents a critical barrier for the deployment of resistance to black rot in sweetpotato. In this study, we scanned the recent near chromosomal-level assembly for putative secreted effectors in the sweetpotato C. fimbriata isolate AS236 using a custom fungal effector annotation pipeline. We identified a set of 188 putative effectors on the basis of secretion signal and in silico prediction in EffectorP. We conducted a deep RNA time-course sequencing experiment to determine whether C. fimbriata modulates effectors in planta and to define a candidate list of effectors expressed during infection. We examined the expression profile of two C. fimbriata isolates, a pre-epidemic (1990s) isolate and a post-epidemic (2015) isolate. Our in planta expression profiling revealed clusters of co-expressed secreted effector candidates. Based on fold-change differences of putative effectors in both isolates and over the course of infection, we suggested prioritization of 31 effectors for functional characterization. Among this set, we identified several effectors that provide evidence for a marked biotrophic phase in C. fimbriata during infection of sweetpotato storage roots. Our study revealed a catalog of effector proteins that provide insight into C. fimbriata infection mechanisms and represent a core catalog to implement effector-assisted breeding in sweetpotato. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo H Parada-Rojas
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology and NC Plant Sciences Initiative, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, U.S.A
| | - Madison Stahr
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology and NC Plant Sciences Initiative, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, U.S.A
| | - Kevin L Childs
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, U.S.A
| | - Lina M Quesada-Ocampo
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology and NC Plant Sciences Initiative, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang Z, Wang C, Li H, Zhou Y, Duan Z, Bao Y, Hu Q, Powell CA, Chen B, Zhang J, Zhang M, Yao W. Small secreted effector protein from Fusarium sacchari suppresses host immune response by inhibiting ScPi21-induced cell death. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2024; 25:e13414. [PMID: 38279852 PMCID: PMC10782473 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.13414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
Fusarium sacchari is one of the primary pathogens causing pokkah boeng disease, which impairs the yield and quality of sugarcane around the world. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of the F. sacchari effectors that regulate plant immunity is of great importance for the development of novel strategies for the persistent control of pokkah boeng disease. In a previous study, Fs00367 was identified to inhibit BAX-induced cell death. In this study, Fs00367nsp (without signal peptide) was found to suppress BAX-induced cell death, reactive oxygen species bursts and callose accumulation. The amino acid region 113-142 of Fs00367nsp is the functional region. Gene mutagenesis indicated that Fs00367 is important for the full virulence of F. sacchari. A yeast two-hybrid assay revealed an interaction between Fs00367nsp and sugarcane ScPi21 in yeast that was further confirmed using bimolecular fluorescence complementation, pull-down assay and co-immunoprecipitation. ScPi21 can induce plant immunity, but this effect could be blunted by Fs00367nsp. These results suggest that Fs00367 is a core pathogenicity factor that suppresses plant immunity through inhibiting ScPi21-induced cell death. The findings of this study provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of effectors in regulating plant immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Huang
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
| | - Caixia Wang
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
| | - Huixue Li
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
| | - Yuming Zhou
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
| | - Zhenzhen Duan
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
| | - Yixue Bao
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
| | - Qin Hu
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
| | | | - Baoshan Chen
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
| | - Jisen Zhang
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
| | - Muqing Zhang
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
- IRREC‐IFASUniversity of FloridaFort PierceFloridaUSA
| | - Wei Yao
- State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agri‐Biological Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane BiologyGuangxi UniversityNanningChina
- IRREC‐IFASUniversity of FloridaFort PierceFloridaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rai P, Prasad L, Rai PK. Fungal effectors versus defense-related genes of B. juncea and the status of resistant transgenics against fungal pathogens. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2023; 14:1139009. [PMID: 37360735 PMCID: PMC10285668 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1139009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Oilseed brassica has become instrumental in securing global food and nutritional security. B. juncea, colloquially known as Indian mustard, is cultivated across tropics and subtropics including Indian subcontinent. The production of Indian mustard is severely hampered by fungal pathogens which necessitates human interventions. Chemicals are often resorted to as they are quick and effective, but due to their economic and ecological unsustainability, there is a need to explore their alternatives. The B. juncea-fungal pathosystem is quite diverse as it covers broad-host range necrotrophs (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum), narrow-host range necrotrophs (Alternaria brassicae and A. brassicicola) and biotrophic oomycetes (Albugo candida and Hyaloperonospora brassica). Plants ward off fungal pathogens through two-step resistance mechanism; PTI which involves recognition of elicitors and ETI where the resistance gene (R gene) interacts with the fungal effectors. The hormonal signalling is also found to play a vital role in defense as the JA/ET pathway is initiated at the time of necrotroph infection and SA pathway is induced when the biotrophs attack plants. The review discuss the prevalence of fungal pathogens of Indian mustard and the studies conducted on effectoromics. It covers both pathogenicity conferring genes and host-specific toxins (HSTs) that can be used for a variety of purposes such as identifying cognate R genes, understanding pathogenicity and virulence mechanisms, and establishing the phylogeny of fungal pathogens. It further encompasses the studies on identifying resistant sources and characterisation of R genes/quantitative trait loci and defense-related genes identified in Brassicaceae and unrelated species which, upon introgression or overexpression, confer resistance. Finally, the studies conducted on developing resistant transgenics in Brassicaceae have been covered in which chitinase and glucanase genes are mostly used. The knowledge gained from this review can further be used for imparting resistance against major fungal pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prajjwal Rai
- Division of Plant Pathology, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Laxman Prasad
- Division of Plant Pathology, Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - Pramod Kumar Rai
- Division of Plant Pathology, Directorate of Rapeseed-Mustard Research, Bharatpur, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Resistance strategies for defense against Albugo candida causing white rust disease. Microbiol Res 2023; 270:127317. [PMID: 36805163 DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2023.127317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Albugo candida, the causal organism of white rust, is an oomycete obligate pathogen infecting crops of Brassicaceae family occurred on aerial part, including vegetable and oilseed crops at all growth stages. The disease expression is characterized by local infection appearing on the abaxial region developing white or creamy yellow blister (sori) on leaves and systemic infections cause hypertrophy and hyperplasia leading to stag-head of reproductive organ. To overcome this problem, several disease management strategies like fungicide treatments were used in the field and disease-resistant varieties have also been developed using conventional and molecular breeding. Due to high variability among A. candida isolates, there is no single approach available to understand the diverse spectrum of disease symptoms. In absence of resistance sources against pathogen, repetitive cultivation of genetically-similar varieties locally tends to attract oomycete pathogen causing heavy yield losses. In the present review, a deep insight into the underlying role of the non-host resistance (NHR) defence mechanism available in plants, and the strategies to exploit available gene pools from plant species that are non-host to A. candida could serve as novel sources of resistance. This work summaries the current knowledge pertaining to the resistance sources available in non-host germ plasm, the understanding of defence mechanisms and the advance strategies covers molecular, biochemical and nature-based solutions in protecting Brassica crops from white rust disease.
Collapse
|
5
|
Oh S, Kim S, Park HJ, Kim MS, Seo MK, Wu CH, Lee HA, Kim HS, Kamoun S, Choi D. Nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat network underlies nonhost resistance of pepper against the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL 2023. [PMID: 36912620 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.14039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Nonhost resistance (NHR) is a robust plant immune response against non-adapted pathogens. A number of nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins that recognize non-adapted pathogens have been identified, although the underlying molecular mechanisms driving robustness of NHR are still unknown. Here, we screened 57 effectors of the potato late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans in nonhost pepper (Capsicum annuum) to identify avirulence effector candidates. Selected effectors were tested against 436 genome-wide cloned pepper NLRs, and we identified multiple functional NLRs that recognize P. infestans effectors and confer disease resistance in the Nicotiana benthamiana as a surrogate system. The identified NLRs were homologous to known NLRs derived from wild potatoes that recognize P. infestans effectors such as Avr2, Avrblb1, Avrblb2, and Avrvnt1. The identified CaRpi-blb2 is a homologue of Rpi-blb2, recognizes Avrblb2 family effectors, exhibits feature of lineage-specifically evolved gene in microsynteny and phylogenetic analyses, and requires pepper-specific NRC (NLR required for cell death)-type helper NLR for proper function. Moreover, CaRpi-blb2-mediated hypersensitive response and blight resistance were more tolerant to suppression by the PITG_15 278 than those mediated by Rpi-blb2. Combined results indicate that pepper has stacked multiple NLRs recognizing effectors of non-adapted P. infestans, and these NLRs could be more tolerant to pathogen-mediated immune suppression than NLRs derived from the host plants. Our study suggests that NLRs derived from nonhost plants have potential as untapped resources to develop crops with durable resistance against fast-evolving pathogens by stacking the network of nonhost NLRs into susceptible host plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soohyun Oh
- Plant Immunity Research Center, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sejun Kim
- Plant Immunity Research Center, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyo-Jeong Park
- Plant Immunity Research Center, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Myung-Shin Kim
- Plant Immunity Research Center, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Min-Ki Seo
- Plant Immunity Research Center, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chih-Hang Wu
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Hyun-Ah Lee
- Department of Horticulture, Division of Smart Horticulture, Yonam University, Cheonan, South Korea
| | - Hyun-Soon Kim
- Korean Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Sophien Kamoun
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
| | - Doil Choi
- Plant Immunity Research Center, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Receptor-mediated nonhost resistance in plants. Essays Biochem 2022; 66:435-445. [PMID: 35388900 PMCID: PMC9528085 DOI: 10.1042/ebc20210080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Nonhost resistance (NHR) is a plant immune response that prevents many microorganisms in the plant's environment from pathogenicity against the plant. Since successful pathogens have adapted to overcome the immune systems of their host, the durable nature of NHR has potential in the management of plant disease. At present, there is genetic and molecular evidence that the underlying molecular mechanisms of NHR are similar to the plant immune responses that occur in host plants following infection by adapted pathogens. We consider that the molecular basis of NHR is multilayered, conferred by physicochemical barriers and defense responses that are induced following molecular recognition events. Moreover, the relative contribution of each component may depend on evolutionary distances between host and nonhost plants of given pathogen species. This mini-review has focused on the current knowledge of plant NHR, especially the recognition of non-adapted pathogens by nonhost plants at the cellular level. Recent gains in understanding the roles of plasma membrane-localized pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) and the cytoplasmic nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs) associated with these processes, as well as the genes involved, are summarized. Finally, we provide a theoretical perspective on the durability of receptor-mediated NHR and its practical potential as an innovative strategy for crop protection against pathogens.
Collapse
|
7
|
Nellist CF, Armitage AD, Bates HJ, Sobczyk MK, Luberti M, Lewis LA, Harrison RJ. Comparative Analysis of Host-Associated Variation in Phytophthora cactorum. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:679936. [PMID: 34276614 PMCID: PMC8285097 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.679936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora cactorum is often described as a generalist pathogen, with isolates causing disease in a range of plant species. It is the causative agent of two diseases in the cultivated strawberry, crown rot (CR; causing whole plant collapse) and leather rot (LR; affecting the fruit). In the cultivated apple, P. cactorum causes girdling bark rots on the scion (collar rot) and rootstock (crown rot), as well as necrosis of the fine root system (root rot) and fruit rots. We investigated evidence for host specialisation within P. cactorum through comparative genomic analysis of 18 isolates. Whole genome phylogenetic analysis provided genomic support for discrete lineages within P. cactorum, with well-supported non-recombining clades for strawberry CR and apple infecting isolates specialised to strawberry crowns and apple tissue. Isolates of strawberry CR are genetically similar globally, while there is more diversity in apple-infecting isolates. We sought to identify the genetic basis of host specialisation, demonstrating gain and loss of effector complements within the P. cactorum phylogeny, representing putative determinants of host boundaries. Transcriptomic analysis highlighted that those effectors found to be specific to a single host or expanded in the strawberry lineage are amongst those most highly expressed during infection of strawberry and give a wider insight into the key effectors active during strawberry infection. Many effectors that had homologues in other Phytophthoras that have been characterised as avirulence genes were present but not expressed in our tested isolate. Our results highlight several RxLR-containing effectors that warrant further investigation to determine whether they are indeed virulence factors and host-specificity determinants for strawberry and apple. Furthermore, additional work is required to determine whether these effectors are suitable targets to focus attention on for future resistance breeding efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew D. Armitage
- NIAB EMR, East Malling, United Kingdom
- National Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham, United Kingdom
| | - Helen J. Bates
- NIAB EMR, East Malling, United Kingdom
- NIAB, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Panstruga R, Moscou MJ. What is the Molecular Basis of Nonhost Resistance? MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2020; 33:1253-1264. [PMID: 32808862 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-06-20-0161-cr] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
This article is part of the Top 10 Unanswered Questions in MPMI invited review series.Nonhost resistance is typically considered the ability of a plant species to repel all attempts of a pathogen species to colonize it and reproduce on it. Based on this common definition, nonhost resistance is presumed to be very durable and, thus, of great interest for its potential use in agriculture. Despite considerable research efforts, the molecular basis of this type of plant immunity remains nebulous. We here stress the fact that "nonhost resistance" is a phenomenological rather than a mechanistic concept that comprises more facets than typically considered. We further argue that nonhost resistance essentially relies on the very same genes and pathways as other types of plant immunity, of which some may act as bottlenecks for particular pathogens on a given plant species or under certain conditions. Thus, in our view, the frequently used term "nonhost genes" is misleading and should be avoided. Depending on the plant-pathogen combination, nonhost resistance may involve the recognition of pathogen effectors by host immune sensor proteins, which might give rise to host shifts or host range expansions due to evolutionary-conditioned gains and losses in respective armories. Thus, the extent of nonhost resistance also defines pathogen host ranges. In some instances, immune-related genes can be transferred across plant species to boost defense, resulting in augmented disease resistance. We discuss future routes for deepening our understanding of nonhost resistance and argue that the confusing term "nonhost resistance" should be used more cautiously in the light of a holistic view of plant immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph Panstruga
- RWTH Aachen University, Institute for Biology I, Unit of Plant Molecular Cell Biology, Worringer Weg 1, 52056 Aachen, Germany
| | - Matthew J Moscou
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UK, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lin X, Armstrong M, Baker K, Wouters D, Visser RGF, Wolters PJ, Hein I, Vleeshouwers VGAA. RLP/K enrichment sequencing; a novel method to identify receptor-like protein (RLP) and receptor-like kinase (RLK) genes. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2020; 227:1264-1276. [PMID: 32285454 PMCID: PMC7383770 DOI: 10.1111/nph.16608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The identification of immune receptors in crop plants is time-consuming but important for disease control. Previously, resistance gene enrichment sequencing (RenSeq) was developed to accelerate mapping of nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat containing (NLR) genes. However, resistances mediated by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) remain less utilized. Here, our pipeline shows accelerated mapping of PRRs. Effectoromics leads to precise identification of plants with target PRRs, and subsequent RLP/K enrichment sequencing (RLP/KSeq) leads to detection of informative single nucleotide polymorphisms that are linked to the trait. Using Phytophthora infestans as a model, we identified Solanum microdontum plants that recognize the apoplastic effectors INF1 or SCR74. RLP/KSeq in a segregating Solanum population confirmed the localization of the INF1 receptor on chromosome 12, and led to the rapid mapping of the response to SCR74 to chromosome 9. By using markers obtained from RLP/KSeq in conjunction with additional markers, we fine-mapped the SCR74 receptor to a 43-kbp G-LecRK locus. Our findings show that RLP/KSeq enables rapid mapping of PRRs and is especially beneficial for crop plants with large and complex genomes. This work will enable the elucidation and characterization of the nonNLR plant immune receptors and ultimately facilitate informed resistance breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Lin
- Plant BreedingWageningen University and ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708PBWageningenthe Netherlands
| | - Miles Armstrong
- Cell and Molecular SciencesThe James Hutton InstituteDundeeDD2 5DAUK
| | - Katie Baker
- Cell and Molecular SciencesThe James Hutton InstituteDundeeDD2 5DAUK
| | - Doret Wouters
- Plant BreedingWageningen University and ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708PBWageningenthe Netherlands
| | - Richard G. F. Visser
- Plant BreedingWageningen University and ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708PBWageningenthe Netherlands
| | - Pieter J. Wolters
- Plant BreedingWageningen University and ResearchDroevendaalsesteeg 16708PBWageningenthe Netherlands
| | - Ingo Hein
- Cell and Molecular SciencesThe James Hutton InstituteDundeeDD2 5DAUK
- Division of Plant SciencesSchool of Life SciencesUniversity of Dundee at the James Hutton InstituteDundeeDD2 5DAUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zheng H, Zhang Y, Li J, He L, Wang F, Bi Y, Gao J. Comparative transcriptome analysis between a resistant and a susceptible Chinese cabbage in response to Hyaloperonospora brassicae. PLANT SIGNALING & BEHAVIOR 2020; 15:1777373. [PMID: 32538253 PMCID: PMC8570763 DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1777373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/02/2020] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Downy mildew caused by Hyaloperonosporabrassicae (H. brassicae) leads to up to 90% of the crop yield loss in Chinese cabbage in China. A transcriptome analysis was carried out between a resistant line (13-13, R) and a susceptible line (15-14, S) of Chinese cabbage in response to H. brassicae. The NOISeq method was used to find differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between these two groups and GO and KEGG were carried out to find R genes related to downy mildew response of Chinese cabbage. qRT-PCR was carried out to verify the reliability of RNA-seq expression data. A total of 3,055 DEGs were screened out from 41,020 genes and clustered into 6 groups with distinct expression patterns. A total of 87 candidate DEGs were identified by functional annotation based on GO and KEGG analysis. These candidate genes are involved in plant-pathogen interaction pathway, among which 54 and 33 DEGs were categorized into plant-pathogen interaction proteins and transcription factors, respectively. Proteins encoded by these genes have been reported to play an important role in the pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) processes of disease responses in some model plants, such as Arabidopsis, rice, tobacco, and tomato. However, little is known about the mechanisms of these genes in resistance to downy mildew in Chinese cabbage. Our findings are useful for further characterization of these candidate genes and helpful in breeding resistant strains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Zheng
- College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
| | - Yihui Zhang
- College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Branch of National Vegetable Improvement Center, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Science, Jinan, China
| | - Jingjuan Li
- College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Branch of National Vegetable Improvement Center, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Science, Jinan, China
| | - Lilong He
- Shandong Branch of National Vegetable Improvement Center, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Science, Jinan, China
| | - Fengde Wang
- College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Branch of National Vegetable Improvement Center, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Science, Jinan, China
| | - Yuping Bi
- College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Branch of National Vegetable Improvement Center, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Science, Jinan, China
| | - Jianwei Gao
- College of Life Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
- Shandong Branch of National Vegetable Improvement Center, Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Science, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Superinfection by PHYVV Alters the Recovery Process in PepGMV-Infected Pepper Plants. Viruses 2020; 12:v12030286. [PMID: 32151060 PMCID: PMC7150747 DOI: 10.3390/v12030286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Geminiviruses are important plant pathogens that affect crops around the world. In some geminivirus-host interactions, infected plants show recovery, a phenomenon characterized by symptom disappearance in newly emerging leaves. In pepper-Pepper golden mosaic virus (PepGMV) interaction, the host recovery process involves a silencing mechanism that includes both post-transcriptional (PTGS) and transcriptional (TGS) gene silencing pathways. Under field conditions, PepGMV is frequently found in mixed infections with Pepper huasteco yellow vein virus (PHYVV), another bipartite begomovirus. Mixed infected plants generally show a synergetic phenomenon and do not present recovery. Little is known about the molecular mechanism of this interaction. In the present study, we explored the effect of superinfection by PHYVV on a PepGMV-infected pepper plant showing recovery. Superinfection with PHYVV led to (a) the appearance of severe symptoms, (b) an increase of the levels of PepGMV DNA accumulation, (c) a decrease of the relative methylation levels of PepGMV DNA, and (d) an increase of chromatin activation marks present in viral minichromosomes. Finally, using heterologous expression and silencing suppression reporter systems, we found that PHYVV REn presents TGS silencing suppressor activity, whereas similar experiments suggest that Rep might be involved in suppressing PTGS.
Collapse
|
12
|
Prasad P, Savadi S, Bhardwaj SC, Gangwar OP, Kumar S. Rust pathogen effectors: perspectives in resistance breeding. PLANTA 2019; 250:1-22. [PMID: 30980247 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-019-03167-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Identification and functional characterization of plant pathogen effectors promise to ameliorate future research and develop effective and sustainable strategies for controlling or containing crop diseases. Wheat is the second most important food crop of the world after rice. Rust pathogens, one of the major biotic stresses in wheat production, are capable of threatening the world food security. Understanding the molecular basis of plant-pathogen interactions is essential for devising novel strategies for resistance breeding and disease management. Now, it has been established that effectors, the proteins secreted by pathogens, play a key role in plant-pathogen interactions. Therefore, effector biology has emerged as one of the most important research fields in plant biology. Recent advances in genomics and bioinformatics have allowed identification of a large repertoire of candidate effectors, while the evolving high-throughput tools have continued to assist in their functional characterization. The repertoires of effectors have become an important resource for better understanding of effector biology of pathosystems and resistance breeding of crop plants. In recent years, a significant progress has been made in the field of rust effector biology. This review describes the recent advances in effector biology of obligate fungal pathogens, identification and functional analysis of wheat rust pathogens effectors and the potential applications of effectors in molecular plant biology and rust resistance breeding in wheat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pramod Prasad
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Regional Station, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, 171002, India
| | - Siddanna Savadi
- ICAR-Directorate of Cashew Research, Puttur, Karnataka, 574202, India
| | - S C Bhardwaj
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Regional Station, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, 171002, India.
| | - O P Gangwar
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Regional Station, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, 171002, India
| | - Subodh Kumar
- ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Regional Station, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, 171002, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Toljamo A, Blande D, Munawar M, Kärenlampi SO, Kokko H. Expression of the GAF Sensor, Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes, Elicitins, and RXLRs Differs Markedly Between Two Phytophthora cactorum Isolates. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2019; 109:726-735. [PMID: 30412010 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-04-18-0136-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The phytopathogen Phytophthora cactorum infects economically important herbaceous and woody plant species. P. cactorum isolates differ in host specificity; for example, strawberry crown rot is often caused by a specialized pathotype. Here we compared the transcriptomes of two P. cactorum isolates that differ in their virulence to garden strawberry (Pc407: high virulence; Pc440: low virulence). De novo transcriptome assembly and clustering of contigs resulted in 19,372 gene clusters. Two days after inoculation of Fragaria vesca roots, 3,995 genes were differently expressed between the P. cactorum isolates. One of the genes that were highly expressed only in Pc407 encodes a GAF sensor protein potentially involved in membrane trafficking processes. Two days after inoculation, elicitins were highly expressed in Pc407 and lipid catabolism appeared to be more active than in Pc440. Of the carbohydrate-active enzymes, those that degrade pectin were often more highly expressed in Pc440, whereas members of glycosyl hydrolase family 1, potentially involved in the metabolism of glycosylated secondary metabolites, were more highly expressed in Pc407 at the time point studied. Differences were also observed among the RXLR effectors: Pc407 appears to rely on a smaller set of key RXLR effectors, whereas Pc440 expresses a greater number of RXLRs. This study is the first step toward improving understanding of the molecular basis of differences in the virulence of P. cactorum isolates. Identification of the key effectors is important, as it enables effector-assisted breeding strategies toward crown rot-resistant strawberry cultivars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Toljamo
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Daniel Blande
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mustafa Munawar
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sirpa O Kärenlampi
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Harri Kokko
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Noman A, Aqeel M, Lou Y. PRRs and NB-LRRs: From Signal Perception to Activation of Plant Innate Immunity. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20081882. [PMID: 30995767 PMCID: PMC6514886 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20081882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
To ward off pathogens and pests, plants use a sophisticated immune system. They use pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), as well as nucleotide-binding and leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) domains, for detecting nonindigenous molecular signatures from pathogens. Plant PRRs induce local and systemic immunity. Plasma-membrane-localized PRRs are the main components of multiprotein complexes having additional transmembrane and cytosolic kinases. Topical research involving proteins and their interactive partners, along with transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation, has extended our understanding of R-gene-mediated plant immunity. The unique LRR domain conformation helps in the best utilization of a surface area and essentially mediates protein–protein interactions. Genome-wide analyses of inter- and intraspecies PRRs and NB-LRRs offer innovative information about their working and evolution. We reviewed plant immune responses with relevance to PRRs and NB-LRRs. This article focuses on the significant functional diversity, pathogen-recognition mechanisms, and subcellular compartmentalization of plant PRRs and NB-LRRs. We highlight the potential biotechnological application of PRRs and NB-LRRs to enhance broad-spectrum disease resistance in crops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Noman
- Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
- Department of Botany, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
| | - Muhammad Aqeel
- State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
| | - Yonggen Lou
- Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Della Coletta R, Hirsch CN, Rouse MN, Lorenz A, Garvin DF. Genomic Dissection of Nonhost Resistance to Wheat Stem Rust in Brachypodium distachyon. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2019; 32:392-400. [PMID: 30261155 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-08-18-0220-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The emergence of new races of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, the causal pathogen of wheat stem rust, has spurred interest in developing durable resistance to this disease in wheat. Nonhost resistance holds promise to help control this and other diseases because it is durable against nonadapted pathogens. However, the genetic and molecular basis of nonhost resistance to wheat stem rust is poorly understood. In this study, the model grass Brachypodium distachyon, a nonhost of P. graminis f. sp. tritici, was used to genetically dissect nonhost resistance to wheat stem rust. A recombinant inbred line (RIL) population segregating for response to wheat stem rust was evaluated for resistance. Evaluation of genome-wide cumulative single nucleotide polymorphism allele frequency differences between contrasting pools of resistant and susceptible RILs followed by molecular marker analysis identified six quantitative trait loci (QTL) that cumulatively explained 72.5% of the variation in stem rust resistance. Two of the QTLs explained 31.7% of the variation, and their interaction explained another 4.6%. Thus, nonhost resistance to wheat stem rust in B. distachyon is genetically complex, with both major and minor QTLs acting additively and, in some cases, interacting. These findings will guide future research to identify genes essential to nonhost resistance to wheat stem rust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Della Coletta
- 1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A
- 2 CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
| | - Candice N Hirsch
- 1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A
| | - Matthew N Rouse
- 3 USDA-ARS Cereal Disease Laboratory, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A
- 4 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota; and
| | - Aaron Lorenz
- 1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A
| | - David F Garvin
- 1 Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A
- 5 USDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pelgrom AJE, Eikelhof J, Elberse J, Meisrimler C, Raedts R, Klein J, Van den Ackerveken G. Recognition of lettuce downy mildew effector BLR38 in Lactuca serriola LS102 requires two unlinked loci. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2019; 20:240-253. [PMID: 30251420 PMCID: PMC6637914 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Plant-pathogenic oomycetes secrete effector proteins to suppress host immune responses. Resistance proteins may recognize effectors and activate immunity, which is often associated with a hypersensitive response (HR). Transient expression of effectors in plant germplasm and screening for HR has proven to be a powerful tool in the identification of new resistance genes. In this study, 14 effectors from the lettuce downy mildew Bremia lactucae race Bl:24 were screened for HR induction in over 150 lettuce accessions. Three effectors-BLN06, BLR38 and BLR40-were recognized in specific lettuce lines. The recognition of effector BLR38 in Lactuca serriola LS102 did not co-segregate with resistance against race Bl:24, but was linked to resistance against multiple other B. lactucae races. Two unlinked loci are both required for effector recognition and are located near known major resistance clusters. Gene dosage affects the intensity of the BLR38-triggered HR, but is of minor importance for disease resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra J. E. Pelgrom
- Plant–Microbe Interactions, Department of BiologyUtrecht UniversityPadualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Jelle Eikelhof
- Plant–Microbe Interactions, Department of BiologyUtrecht UniversityPadualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Joyce Elberse
- Plant–Microbe Interactions, Department of BiologyUtrecht UniversityPadualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Claudia‐Nicole Meisrimler
- Plant–Microbe Interactions, Department of BiologyUtrecht UniversityPadualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Rob Raedts
- BASF Vegetable SeedsPO Box 4005, 6080 AA, Haelenthe Netherlands
| | - Joël Klein
- Plant–Microbe Interactions, Department of BiologyUtrecht UniversityPadualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Guido Van den Ackerveken
- Plant–Microbe Interactions, Department of BiologyUtrecht UniversityPadualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrechtthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kale SD. PenSeq: coverage you can count on. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2019; 221:1177-1179. [PMID: 30644579 DOI: 10.1111/nph.15608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shiv D Kale
- Biocomplexity Institute of Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24060, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thilliez GJA, Armstrong MR, Lim T, Baker K, Jouet A, Ward B, van Oosterhout C, Jones JDG, Huitema E, Birch PRJ, Hein I. Pathogen enrichment sequencing (PenSeq) enables population genomic studies in oomycetes. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2019; 221:1634-1648. [PMID: 30288743 PMCID: PMC6492278 DOI: 10.1111/nph.15441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
The oomycete pathogens Phytophthora infestans and P. capsici cause significant crop losses world-wide, threatening food security. In each case, pathogenicity factors, called RXLR effectors, contribute to virulence. Some RXLRs are perceived by resistance proteins to trigger host immunity, but our understanding of the demographic processes and adaptive evolution of pathogen virulence remains poor. Here, we describe PenSeq, a highly efficient enrichment sequencing approach for genes encoding pathogenicity determinants which, as shown for the infamous potato blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans, make up < 1% of the entire genome. PenSeq facilitates the characterization of allelic diversity in pathogen effectors, enabling evolutionary and population genomic analyses of Phytophthora species. Furthermore, PenSeq enables the massively parallel identification of presence/absence variations and sequence polymorphisms in key pathogen genes, which is a prerequisite for the efficient deployment of host resistance genes. PenSeq represents a cost-effective alternative to whole-genome sequencing and addresses crucial limitations of current plant pathogen population studies, which are often based on selectively neutral markers and consequently have limited utility in the analysis of adaptive evolution. The approach can be adapted to diverse microbes and pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetan J. A. Thilliez
- Cell and Molecular SciencesThe James Hutton InstituteErrol Road, InvergowrieDundeeDD2 5DAUK
- Division of Plant Sciences at the James Hutton InstituteSchool of Life SciencesUniversity of DundeeDundeeDD2 5DAUK
| | - Miles R. Armstrong
- Cell and Molecular SciencesThe James Hutton InstituteErrol Road, InvergowrieDundeeDD2 5DAUK
| | - Tze‐Yin Lim
- Information and Computational SciencesThe James Hutton InstituteDundeeDD2 5DAUK
| | - Katie Baker
- Information and Computational SciencesThe James Hutton InstituteDundeeDD2 5DAUK
| | - Agathe Jouet
- The Sainsbury LaboratoryNorwich Research ParkNorwichNR4 7GJUK
| | - Ben Ward
- The Earlham InstituteNorwich Research ParkNorwichNR4 7UHUK
| | | | | | - Edgar Huitema
- Division of Plant Sciences at the James Hutton InstituteSchool of Life SciencesUniversity of DundeeDundeeDD2 5DAUK
| | - Paul R. J. Birch
- Cell and Molecular SciencesThe James Hutton InstituteErrol Road, InvergowrieDundeeDD2 5DAUK
- Division of Plant Sciences at the James Hutton InstituteSchool of Life SciencesUniversity of DundeeDundeeDD2 5DAUK
| | - Ingo Hein
- Cell and Molecular SciencesThe James Hutton InstituteErrol Road, InvergowrieDundeeDD2 5DAUK
- Division of Plant Sciences at the James Hutton InstituteSchool of Life SciencesUniversity of DundeeDundeeDD2 5DAUK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Transgressive segregation reveals mechanisms of Arabidopsis immunity to Brassica-infecting races of white rust ( Albugo candida). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116:2767-2773. [PMID: 30692254 PMCID: PMC6377460 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1812911116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Most plants resist most plant pathogens. Barley resists wheat-infecting powdery mildew races (and vice versa), and both barley and wheat resist potato late blight. Such “nonhost” resistance could result because the pathogen fails to suppress defense or triggers innate immunity due to failure to evade detection. Albugo candida causes white rust on most Brassicaceae, and we investigated Arabidopsis NHR to Brassica-infecting races. Transgressive segregation for resistance in Arabidopsis recombinant inbred lines revealed genes encoding nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) immune receptors. Some of these NLR-encoding genes confer resistance to white rust in Brassica sp. This genetic method thus provides a route to reveal resistance genes for crops, widening the pool from which such genes might be obtained. Arabidopsis thaliana accessions are universally resistant at the adult leaf stage to white rust (Albugo candida) races that infect the crop species Brassica juncea and Brassica oleracea. We used transgressive segregation in recombinant inbred lines to test if this apparent species-wide (nonhost) resistance in A. thaliana is due to natural pyramiding of multiple Resistance (R) genes. We screened 593 inbred lines from an Arabidopsis multiparent advanced generation intercross (MAGIC) mapping population, derived from 19 resistant parental accessions, and identified two transgressive segregants that are susceptible to the pathogen. These were crossed to each MAGIC parent, and analysis of resulting F2 progeny followed by positional cloning showed that resistance to an isolate of A. candida race 2 (Ac2V) can be explained in each accession by at least one of four genes encoding nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) immune receptors. An additional gene was identified that confers resistance to an isolate of A. candida race 9 (AcBoT) that infects B. oleracea. Thus, effector-triggered immunity conferred by distinct NLR-encoding genes in multiple A. thaliana accessions provides species-wide resistance to these crop pathogens.
Collapse
|
20
|
Omidvar V, Dugyala S, Li F, Rottschaefer SM, Miller ME, Ayliffe M, Moscou MJ, Kianian SF, Figueroa M. Detection of Race-Specific Resistance Against Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae in Brachypodium Species. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2018; 108:1443-1454. [PMID: 29923800 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-03-18-0084-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Oat crown rust caused by Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae is the most destructive foliar disease of cultivated oat. Characterization of genetic factors controlling resistance responses to Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae in nonhost species could provide new resources for developing disease protection strategies in oat. We examined symptom development and fungal colonization levels of a collection of Brachypodium distachyon and B. hybridum accessions infected with three North American P. coronata f. sp. avenae isolates. Our results demonstrated that colonization phenotypes are dependent on both host and pathogen genotypes, indicating a role for race-specific responses in these interactions. These responses were independent of the accumulation of reactive oxygen species. Expression analysis of several defense-related genes suggested that salicylic acid and ethylene-mediated signaling but not jasmonic acid are components of resistance reaction to P. coronata f. sp. avenae. Our findings provide the basis to conduct a genetic inheritance study to examine whether effector-triggered immunity contributes to nonhost resistance to P. coronata f. sp. avenae in Brachypodium spp.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahid Omidvar
- First, second, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, and ninth authors: Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul; sixth author: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, ACT, Australia; seventh author: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, U.K.; eighth author: Cereal Disease Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN, USA; and ninth author: Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
| | - Sheshanka Dugyala
- First, second, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, and ninth authors: Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul; sixth author: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, ACT, Australia; seventh author: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, U.K.; eighth author: Cereal Disease Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN, USA; and ninth author: Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
| | - Feng Li
- First, second, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, and ninth authors: Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul; sixth author: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, ACT, Australia; seventh author: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, U.K.; eighth author: Cereal Disease Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN, USA; and ninth author: Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
| | - Susan M Rottschaefer
- First, second, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, and ninth authors: Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul; sixth author: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, ACT, Australia; seventh author: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, U.K.; eighth author: Cereal Disease Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN, USA; and ninth author: Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
| | - Marisa E Miller
- First, second, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, and ninth authors: Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul; sixth author: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, ACT, Australia; seventh author: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, U.K.; eighth author: Cereal Disease Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN, USA; and ninth author: Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
| | - Mick Ayliffe
- First, second, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, and ninth authors: Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul; sixth author: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, ACT, Australia; seventh author: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, U.K.; eighth author: Cereal Disease Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN, USA; and ninth author: Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
| | - Matthew J Moscou
- First, second, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, and ninth authors: Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul; sixth author: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, ACT, Australia; seventh author: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, U.K.; eighth author: Cereal Disease Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN, USA; and ninth author: Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
| | - Shahryar F Kianian
- First, second, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, and ninth authors: Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul; sixth author: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, ACT, Australia; seventh author: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, U.K.; eighth author: Cereal Disease Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN, USA; and ninth author: Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
| | - Melania Figueroa
- First, second, third, fourth, fifth, eighth, and ninth authors: Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul; sixth author: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, ACT, Australia; seventh author: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, U.K.; eighth author: Cereal Disease Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, St. Paul, MN, USA; and ninth author: Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gilbert B, Bettgenhaeuser J, Upadhyaya N, Soliveres M, Singh D, Park RF, Moscou MJ, Ayliffe M. Components of Brachypodium distachyon resistance to nonadapted wheat stripe rust pathogens are simply inherited. PLoS Genet 2018; 14:e1007636. [PMID: 30265668 PMCID: PMC6161853 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Phytopathogens have a limited range of host plant species that they can successfully parasitise ie. that they are adapted for. Infection of plants by nonadapted pathogens often results in an active resistance response that is relatively poorly characterised because phenotypic variation in this response often does not exist within a plant species, or is too subtle for genetic dissection. In addition, complex polygenic inheritance often underlies these resistance phenotypes and mutagenesis often does not impact upon this resistance, presumably due to genetic or mechanistic redundancy. Here it is demonstrated that phenotypic differences in the resistance response of Brachypodium distachyon to the nonadapted wheat stripe rust pathogen Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst) are genetically tractable and simply inherited. Two dominant loci were identified on B. distachyon chromosome 4 that each reduce attempted Pst colonisation compared with sib and parent lines without these loci. One locus (Yrr1) is effective against diverse Australian Pst isolates and present in two B. distachyon mapping families as a conserved region that was reduced to 5 candidate genes by fine mapping. A second locus, Yrr2, shows Pst race-specificity and encodes a disease resistance gene family typically associated with host plant resistance. These data indicate that some components of resistance to nonadapted pathogens are genetically tractable in some instances and may mechanistically overlap with host plant resistance to avirulent adapted pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Gilbert
- CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Clunies Ross Drive, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Jan Bettgenhaeuser
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Narayana Upadhyaya
- CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Clunies Ross Drive, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Melanie Soliveres
- CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Clunies Ross Drive, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Davinder Singh
- University of Sydney, Plant Breeding Institute, Cobbitty, NSW, Australia
| | - Robert F. Park
- University of Sydney, Plant Breeding Institute, Cobbitty, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew J. Moscou
- The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom
- University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Ayliffe
- CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Clunies Ross Drive, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Global gene expression profiling for fruit organs and pathogen infections in the pepper, Capsicum annuum L. Sci Data 2018; 5:180103. [PMID: 29870035 PMCID: PMC5987667 DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Hot pepper (Capsicum annuum) is one of the most consumed vegetable crops in the world and useful to human as it has many nutritional and medicinal values. Genomic resources of pepper are publically available since the pepper genomes have been completed and massive data such as transcriptomes have been deposited. Nevertheless, global transcriptome profiling is needed to identify molecular mechanisms related to agronomic traits in pepper, but limited analyses are published. Here, we report the comprehensive analysis of pepper transcriptomes during fruit ripening and pathogen infection. For the ripening, transcriptome data were obtained from placenta and pericarp at seven developmental stages. To reveal global transcriptomic landscapes during infection, leaves at six time points post-infection by one of three pathogens (Phytophthora infestans, Pepper mottle virus, and Tobacco mosaic virus P0 strain) were profiled. The massive parallel transcriptome profiling in this study will serve as a valuable resource for detection of molecular networks of fruit development and disease resistance in Capsicum annuum.
Collapse
|
23
|
Dalio RJD, Maximo HJ, Oliveira TS, Dias RO, Breton MC, Felizatti H, Machado M. Phytophthora parasitica Effector PpRxLR2 Suppresses Nicotiana benthamiana Immunity. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2018; 31:481-493. [PMID: 29165046 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-07-17-0158-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora species secrete several classes of effector proteins during interaction with their hosts. These proteins can have multiple functions including modulation of host physiology and immunity. The RxLR effectors have the ability to enter plant cells using the plant machinery. Some of these effectors have been characterized as immunity suppressors; however, very little is known about their functions in the interaction between Phytophthora parasitica and its hosts. Using a bioinformatics pipeline, we have identified 172 candidate RxLR effectors (CREs) in the isolate IAC 01_95 of P. parasitica. Of these 172 CREs, 93 were found to be also present in eight other genomes of P. parasitica, isolated from different hosts and continents. After transcriptomics and gene expression analysis, we have found five CREs to be up-regulated in in-vitro and in-planta samples. Subsequently, we selected three CREs for functional characterization in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana. We show that PpRxLR2 is able to completely suppress INF-1-induced cell death, whereas PpRxLR3 and PpRxLR5 moderately suppressed N. benthamiana immunity in a less-extensive manner. Moreover, we confirmed the effector-triggered susceptibility activity of these proteins after transient transformation and infection of N. benthamiana plants. All three CREs enhanced virulence of P. parasitica during the interaction with N. benthamiana. These effectors, in particular PpRxLR2, can be targeted for the development of biotechnology-based control strategies of P. parasitica diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J D Dalio
- 1 Biotechnology Laboratory, Centro de Citricultura Sylvio Moreira/Instituto Agronômico, Cordeirópolis, SP, Brazil
| | - H J Maximo
- 1 Biotechnology Laboratory, Centro de Citricultura Sylvio Moreira/Instituto Agronômico, Cordeirópolis, SP, Brazil
| | - T S Oliveira
- 1 Biotechnology Laboratory, Centro de Citricultura Sylvio Moreira/Instituto Agronômico, Cordeirópolis, SP, Brazil
| | - R O Dias
- 2 Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; and
| | - M C Breton
- 1 Biotechnology Laboratory, Centro de Citricultura Sylvio Moreira/Instituto Agronômico, Cordeirópolis, SP, Brazil
| | - H Felizatti
- 3 Instituto de Matemática, Física e Computação Científica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - M Machado
- 1 Biotechnology Laboratory, Centro de Citricultura Sylvio Moreira/Instituto Agronômico, Cordeirópolis, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Qi M, Grayczyk JP, Seitz JM, Lee Y, Link TI, Choi D, Pedley KF, Voegele RT, Baum TJ, Whitham SA. Suppression or Activation of Immune Responses by Predicted Secreted Proteins of the Soybean Rust Pathogen Phakopsora pachyrhizi. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2018; 31:163-174. [PMID: 29144203 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-07-17-0173-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Rust fungi, such as the soybean rust pathogen Phakopsora pachyrhizi, are major threats to crop production. They form specialized haustoria that are hyphal structures intimately associated with host-plant cell membranes. These haustoria have roles in acquiring nutrients and secreting effector proteins that manipulate host immune systems. Functional characterization of effector proteins of rust fungi is important for understanding mechanisms that underlie their virulence and pathogenicity. Hundreds of candidate effector proteins have been predicted for rust pathogens, but it is not clear how to prioritize these effector candidates for further characterization. There is a need for high-throughput approaches for screening effector candidates to obtain experimental evidence for effector-like functions, such as the manipulation of host immune systems. We have focused on identifying effector candidates with immune-related functions in the soybean rust fungus P. pachyrhizi. To facilitate the screening of many P. pachyrhizi effector candidates (named PpECs), we used heterologous expression systems, including the bacterial type III secretion system, Agrobacterium infiltration, a plant virus, and a yeast strain, to establish an experimental pipeline for identifying PpECs with immune-related functions and establishing their subcellular localizations. Several PpECs were identified that could suppress or activate immune responses in nonhost Nicotiana benthamiana, N. tabacum, Arabidopsis, tomato, or pepper plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingsheng Qi
- 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, U.S.A
| | - James P Grayczyk
- 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, U.S.A
| | - Janina M Seitz
- 2 Institut für Phytomedizin, Universität Hohenheim, Otto-Sander-Straße 5, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Youngsill Lee
- 3 Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-921, Korea; and
| | - Tobias I Link
- 2 Institut für Phytomedizin, Universität Hohenheim, Otto-Sander-Straße 5, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Doil Choi
- 3 Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-921, Korea; and
| | - Kerry F Pedley
- 4 Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Ft. Detrick, MD 21702, U.S.A
| | - Ralf T Voegele
- 2 Institut für Phytomedizin, Universität Hohenheim, Otto-Sander-Straße 5, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Thomas J Baum
- 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, U.S.A
| | - Steven A Whitham
- 1 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Giesbers AKJ, Pelgrom AJE, Visser RGF, Niks RE, Van den Ackerveken G, Jeuken MJW. Effector-mediated discovery of a novel resistance gene against Bremia lactucae in a nonhost lettuce species. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2017; 216:915-926. [PMID: 28833168 PMCID: PMC5656935 DOI: 10.1111/nph.14741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Candidate effectors from lettuce downy mildew (Bremia lactucae) enable high-throughput germplasm screening for the presence of resistance (R) genes. The nonhost species Lactuca saligna comprises a source of B. lactucae R genes that has hardly been exploited in lettuce breeding. Its cross-compatibility with the host species L. sativa enables the study of inheritance of nonhost resistance (NHR). We performed transient expression of candidate RXLR effector genes from B. lactucae in a diverse Lactuca germplasm set. Responses to two candidate effectors (BLR31 and BLN08) were genetically mapped and tested for co-segregation with disease resistance. BLN08 induced a hypersensitive response (HR) in 55% of the L. saligna accessions, but responsiveness did not co-segregate with resistance to Bl:24. BLR31 triggered an HR in 5% of the L. saligna accessions, and revealed a novel R gene providing complete B. lactucae race Bl:24 resistance. Resistant hybrid plants that were BLR31 nonresponsive indicated other unlinked R genes and/or nonhost QTLs. We have identified a candidate avirulence effector of B. lactucae (BLR31) and its cognate R gene in L. saligna. Concurrently, our results suggest that R genes are not required for NHR of L. saligna.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne K. J. Giesbers
- Laboratory of Plant BreedingWageningen University & Research6700AJ Wageningenthe Netherlands
| | - Alexandra J. E. Pelgrom
- Plant–Microbe InteractionsDepartment of BiologyUtrecht University3584CH Utrechtthe Netherlands
| | - Richard G. F. Visser
- Laboratory of Plant BreedingWageningen University & Research6700AJ Wageningenthe Netherlands
| | - Rients E. Niks
- Laboratory of Plant BreedingWageningen University & Research6700AJ Wageningenthe Netherlands
| | | | - Marieke J. W. Jeuken
- Laboratory of Plant BreedingWageningen University & Research6700AJ Wageningenthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee HA, Kim S, Kim S, Choi D. Expansion of sesquiterpene biosynthetic gene clusters in pepper confers nonhost resistance to the Irish potato famine pathogen. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2017. [PMID: 28631815 DOI: 10.1111/nph.14637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Chemical barriers contribute to nonhost resistance, which is defined as the resistance of an entire plant species to nonadapted pathogen species. However, the molecular basis of metabolic defense in nonhost resistance remains elusive. Here, we report genetic evidence for the essential role of phytoalexin capsidiol in nonhost resistance of pepper (Capsicum spp.) to potato late blight Phytophthora infestans using transcriptome and genome analyses. Two different genes for capsidiol biosynthesis, 5-epi-aristolochene synthase (EAS) and 5-epi-aristolochene-1,3-dihydroxylase (EAH), belong to multigene families. However, only a subset of EAS/EAH gene family members were highly induced upon P. infestans infection, which was associated with parallel accumulation of capsidiol in P. infestans-infected pepper. Silencing of EAS homologs in pepper resulted in a significant decrease in capsidiol accumulation and allowed the growth of nonadapted P. infestans that is highly sensitive to capsidiol. Phylogenetic and genomic analyses of EAS/EAH multigene families revealed that the emergence of pathogen-inducible EAS/EAH genes in Capsicum-specific genomic regions rendered pepper a nonhost of P. infestans. This study provides insights into evolutionary aspects of nonhost resistance based on the combination of a species-specific phytoalexin and sensitivity of nonadapted pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun-Ah Lee
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
- Division of Eco-Friendly Horticulture, Yonam College, Cheonan, 31005, Korea
| | - Sejun Kim
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
| | - Seungill Kim
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
| | - Doil Choi
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhang M, Coaker G. Harnessing Effector-Triggered Immunity for Durable Disease Resistance. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2017; 107:912-919. [PMID: 28430023 PMCID: PMC5810938 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-03-17-0086-rvw] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Genetic control of plant diseases has traditionally included the deployment of single immune receptors with nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) domain architecture. These NLRs recognize corresponding pathogen effector proteins inside plant cells, resulting in effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Although ETI triggers robust resistance, deployment of single NLRs can be rapidly overcome by pathogen populations within a single or a few growing seasons. In order to generate more durable disease resistance against devastating plant pathogens, a multitiered strategy that incorporates stacked NLRs combined with other sources of disease resistance is necessary. New genetic and genomic technologies have enabled advancements in identifying conserved pathogen effectors, isolating NLR repertoires from diverse plants, and editing plant genomes to enhance resistance. Significant advancements have also been made in understanding plant immune perception at the receptor level, which has promise for engineering new sources of resistance. Here, we discuss how to utilize recent scientific advancements in a multilayered strategy for developing more durable disease resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meixiang Zhang
- First and second authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis 95616; and first author: Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Gitta Coaker
- First and second authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis 95616; and first author: Department of Plant Pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Dagvadorj B, Ozketen AC, Andac A, Duggan C, Bozkurt TO, Akkaya MS. A Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici secreted protein activates plant immunity at the cell surface. Sci Rep 2017; 7:1141. [PMID: 28442716 PMCID: PMC5430700 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01100-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Pathogens secrete effector proteins to suppress host immunity, mediate nutrient uptake and subsequently enable parasitism. However, on non-adapted hosts, effectors can be detected as non-self by host immune receptors and activate non-host immunity. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms of effector triggered non-host resistance remain unknown. Here, we report that a small cysteine-rich protein PstSCR1 from the wheat rust pathogen Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst) activates immunity in the non-host solanaceous model plant Nicotiana benthamiana. PstSCR1 homologs were found to be conserved in Pst, and in its closest relatives, Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici and Puccinia triticina. When PstSCR1 was expressed in N. benthamiana with its signal peptide, it provoked the plant immune system, whereas no stimulation was observed when it was expressed without its signal peptide. PstSCR1 expression in N. benthamiana significantly reduced infection capacity of the oomycete pathogens. Moreover, apoplast-targeted PstSCR1 triggered plant cell death in a dose dependent manner. However, in Brassinosteroid insensitive 1-Associated Kinase 1 (SERK3/BAK1) silenced N. benthamiana, cell death was remarkably decreased. Finally, purified PstSCR1 protein activated defence related gene expression in N. benthamiana. Our results show that a Pst-secreted protein, PstSCR1 can activate surface mediated immunity in non-adapted hosts and contribute to non-host resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bayantes Dagvadorj
- Middle East Technical University, Biotechnology Program, Department of Chemistry, Dumlupinar Blvd., Cankaya, Ankara, TR-06800, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Caglar Ozketen
- Middle East Technical University, Biotechnology Program, Department of Chemistry, Dumlupinar Blvd., Cankaya, Ankara, TR-06800, Turkey
| | - Ayse Andac
- Middle East Technical University, Biotechnology Program, Department of Chemistry, Dumlupinar Blvd., Cankaya, Ankara, TR-06800, Turkey
| | - Cian Duggan
- Imperial College London, Department of Life Sciences, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | | | - Mahinur S Akkaya
- Middle East Technical University, Biotechnology Program, Department of Chemistry, Dumlupinar Blvd., Cankaya, Ankara, TR-06800, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Buiate EAS, Xavier KV, Moore N, Torres MF, Farman ML, Schardl CL, Vaillancourt LJ. A comparative genomic analysis of putative pathogenicity genes in the host-specific sibling species Colletotrichum graminicola and Colletotrichum sublineola. BMC Genomics 2017; 18:67. [PMID: 28073340 PMCID: PMC5225507 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-3457-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colletotrichum graminicola and C. sublineola cause anthracnose leaf and stalk diseases of maize and sorghum, respectively. In spite of their close evolutionary relationship, the two species are completely host-specific. Host specificity is often attributed to pathogen virulence factors, including specialized secondary metabolites (SSM), and small-secreted protein (SSP) effectors. Genes relevant to these categories were manually annotated in two co-occurring, contemporaneous strains of C. graminicola and C. sublineola. A comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis was performed to address the evolutionary relationships among these and other divergent gene families in the two strains. Results Inoculation of maize with C. sublineola, or of sorghum with C. graminicola, resulted in rapid plant cell death at, or just after, the point of penetration. The two fungal genomes were very similar. More than 50% of the assemblies could be directly aligned, and more than 80% of the gene models were syntenous. More than 90% of the predicted proteins had orthologs in both species. Genes lacking orthologs in the other species (non-conserved genes) included many predicted to encode SSM-associated proteins and SSPs. Other common groups of non-conserved proteins included transporters, transcription factors, and CAZymes. Only 32 SSP genes appeared to be specific to C. graminicola, and 21 to C. sublineola. None of the SSM-associated genes were lineage-specific. Two different strains of C. graminicola, and three strains of C. sublineola, differed in no more than 1% percent of gene sequences from one another. Conclusions Efficient non-host recognition of C. sublineola by maize, and of C. graminicola by sorghum, was observed in epidermal cells as a rapid deployment of visible resistance responses and plant cell death. Numerous non-conserved SSP and SSM-associated predicted proteins that could play a role in this non-host recognition were identified. Additional categories of genes that were also highly divergent suggested an important role for co-evolutionary adaptation to specific host environmental factors, in addition to aspects of initial recognition, in host specificity. This work provides a foundation for future functional studies aimed at clarifying the roles of these proteins, and the possibility of manipulating them to improve management of these two economically important diseases. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3457-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E A S Buiate
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, 201F Plant Science Building, 1405 Veterans Drive, Lexington, KY, 40546-0312, USA.,Present Address: Monsanto Company Brazil, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - K V Xavier
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, 201F Plant Science Building, 1405 Veterans Drive, Lexington, KY, 40546-0312, USA
| | - N Moore
- Department of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, Davis Marksbury Building, 328 Rose Street, Lexington, KY, 40504-0633, USA
| | - M F Torres
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, 201F Plant Science Building, 1405 Veterans Drive, Lexington, KY, 40546-0312, USA.,Present Address: Functional Genomics Laboratory, Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | - M L Farman
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, 201F Plant Science Building, 1405 Veterans Drive, Lexington, KY, 40546-0312, USA
| | - C L Schardl
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, 201F Plant Science Building, 1405 Veterans Drive, Lexington, KY, 40546-0312, USA
| | - L J Vaillancourt
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, 201F Plant Science Building, 1405 Veterans Drive, Lexington, KY, 40546-0312, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Belhaj K, Cano LM, Prince DC, Kemen A, Yoshida K, Dagdas YF, Etherington GJ, Schoonbeek H, van Esse HP, Jones JD, Kamoun S, Schornack S. Arabidopsis late blight: infection of a nonhost plant by Albugo laibachii enables full colonization by Phytophthora infestans. Cell Microbiol 2017; 19:e12628. [PMID: 27302335 PMCID: PMC5215655 DOI: 10.1111/cmi.12628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2015] [Revised: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
The oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans causes potato late blight, and as a potato and tomato specialist pathogen, is seemingly poorly adapted to infect plants outside the Solanaceae. Here, we report the unexpected finding that P. infestans can infect Arabidopsis thaliana when another oomycete pathogen, Albugo laibachii, has colonized the host plant. The behaviour and speed of P. infestans infection in Arabidopsis pre-infected with A. laibachii resemble P. infestans infection of susceptible potato plants. Transcriptional profiling of P. infestans genes during infection revealed a significant overlap in the sets of secreted-protein genes that are induced in P. infestans upon colonization of potato and susceptible Arabidopsis, suggesting major similarities in P. infestans gene expression dynamics on the two plant species. Furthermore, we found haustoria of A. laibachii and P. infestans within the same Arabidopsis cells. This Arabidopsis-A. laibachii-P. infestans tripartite interaction opens up various possibilities to dissect the molecular mechanisms of P. infestans infection and the processes occurring in co-infected Arabidopsis cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaoula Belhaj
- The Sainsbury LaboratoryNorwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
| | - Liliana M. Cano
- The Sainsbury LaboratoryNorwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
- University of FloridaDepartment of Plant Pathology, Indian River Research and Education CenterFort PierceUSA
| | - David C. Prince
- The Sainsbury LaboratoryNorwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUnited Kingdom
| | - Ariane Kemen
- The Sainsbury LaboratoryNorwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
- Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchCologneGermany
| | - Kentaro Yoshida
- The Sainsbury LaboratoryNorwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
- Organization of Advanced Science and TechnologyKobe UniversityKobeHyogoJapan
| | - Yasin F. Dagdas
- The Sainsbury LaboratoryNorwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
| | - Graham J. Etherington
- The Sainsbury LaboratoryNorwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
- The Genome Analysis CentreNorwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
| | - Henk‐jan Schoonbeek
- John Innes CentreDepartment of Crop Genetics, Norwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
| | | | | | - Sophien Kamoun
- The Sainsbury LaboratoryNorwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
| | - Sebastian Schornack
- The Sainsbury LaboratoryNorwich Research ParkNorwichUnited Kingdom
- Sainsbury LaboratoryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lee HA, Lee HY, Seo E, Lee J, Kim SB, Oh S, Choi E, Choi E, Lee SE, Choi D. Current Understandings of Plant Nonhost Resistance. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2017; 30:5-15. [PMID: 27925500 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-10-16-0213-cr] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Nonhost resistance, a resistance of plant species against all nonadapted pathogens, is considered the most durable and efficient immune system of plants but yet remains elusive. The underlying mechanism of nonhost resistance has been investigated at multiple levels of plant defense for several decades. In this review, we have comprehensively surveyed the latest literature on nonhost resistance in terms of preinvasion, metabolic defense, pattern-triggered immunity, effector-triggered immunity, defense signaling, and possible application in crop protection. Overall, we summarize the current understanding of nonhost resistance mechanisms. Pre- and postinvasion is not much deviated from the knowledge on host resistance, except for a few specific cases. Further insights on the roles of the pattern recognition receptor gene family, multiple interactions between effectors from nonadapted pathogen and plant factors, and plant secondary metabolites in host range determination could expand our knowledge on nonhost resistance and provide efficient tools for future crop protection using combinational biotechnology approaches. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun-Ah Lee
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye-Young Lee
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunyoung Seo
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Republic of Korea
| | - Joohyun Lee
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Republic of Korea
| | - Saet-Byul Kim
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Republic of Korea
| | - Soohyun Oh
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunbi Choi
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunhye Choi
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Republic of Korea
| | - So Eui Lee
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Republic of Korea
| | - Doil Choi
- Department of Plant Science, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-921, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gómez-Cortecero A, Saville RJ, Scheper RWA, Bowen JK, Agripino De Medeiros H, Kingsnorth J, Xu X, Harrison RJ. Variation in Host and Pathogen in the Neonectria/Malus Interaction; toward an Understanding of the Genetic Basis of Resistance to European Canker. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2016; 7:1365. [PMID: 27695463 PMCID: PMC5023678 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Apple canker caused by the phytopathogenic fungus Neonectria ditissima is an economically important disease, which has spread in recent years to almost all pome-producing regions of the world. N. ditissima is able to cross-infect a wide range of apple varieties and causes branch and trunk lesions, known as cankers. Most modern apple varieties are susceptible and in extreme cases suffer from high mortality (up to 50%) in the early phase of orchard establishment. There is no known race structure of the pathogen and the global level of genetic diversity of the pathogen population is unknown. Resistance breeding is underway in many global breeding programmes, but nevertheless, a total resistance to canker has not yet been demonstrated. Here we present preliminary data from a survey of the phylogenetic relationships between global isolates of N. ditissima which reveals only slight evidence for population structure. In addition we report the results of four rapid screening tests to assess the response to N. ditissima in different apple scion and rootstock varieties, which reveals abundant variation in resistance responses in both cultivar and rootstock material. Further seedling tests show that the segregation patterns of resistance and susceptibility vary widely between crosses. We discuss inconsistencies in test performance with field observations and discuss future research opportunities in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Gómez-Cortecero
- NIAB-EMRKent, UK
- School of Agriculture Policy and Development, University of ReadingReading, UK
| | - Robert J. Saville
- NIAB-EMRKent, UK
- School of Agriculture Policy and Development, University of ReadingReading, UK
| | - Reiny W. A. Scheper
- The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research LimitedHavelock North, New Zealand
| | - Joanna K. Bowen
- The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research LimitedAuckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Xiangming Xu
- NIAB-EMRKent, UK
- School of Agriculture Policy and Development, University of ReadingReading, UK
| | - Richard J. Harrison
- NIAB-EMRKent, UK
- School of Agriculture Policy and Development, University of ReadingReading, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Poloni A, Schirawski J. Host specificity in Sporisorium reilianum is determined by distinct mechanisms in maize and sorghum. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2016; 17:741-54. [PMID: 26419898 PMCID: PMC6638427 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Smut fungi are biotrophic plant pathogens that exhibit a very narrow host range. The smut fungus Sporisorium reilianum exists in two host-adapted formae speciales: S. reilianum f. sp. reilianum (SRS), which causes head smut of sorghum, and S. reilianum f. sp. zeae (SRZ), which induces disease on maize. It is unknown why the two formae speciales cannot form spores on their respective non-favoured hosts. By fungal DNA quantification and fluorescence microscopy of stained plant samples, we followed the colonization behaviour of both SRS and SRZ on sorghum and maize. Both formae speciales were able to penetrate and multiply in the leaves of both hosts. In sorghum, the hyphae of SRS reached the apical meristems, whereas the hyphae of SRZ did not. SRZ strongly induced several defence responses in sorghum, such as the generation of H2 O2 , callose and phytoalexins, whereas the hyphae of SRS did not. In maize, both SRS and SRZ were able to spread through the plant to the apical meristem. Transcriptome analysis of colonized maize leaves revealed more genes induced by SRZ than by SRS, with many of them being involved in defence responses. Amongst the maize genes specifically induced by SRS were 11 pentatricopeptide repeat proteins. Together with the microscopic analysis, these data indicate that SRZ succumbs to plant defence after sorghum penetration, whereas SRS proliferates in a relatively undisturbed manner, but non-efficiently, on maize. This shows that host specificity is determined by distinct mechanisms in sorghum and maize.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana Poloni
- Albrecht-von-Haller Institute for Plant Sciences, Department for Molecular Biology of Plant-Microbe Interaction, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Julia-Lermontowa-Weg 3, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
- Institute of Applied Microbiology, Department of Microbial Genetics, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jan Schirawski
- Albrecht-von-Haller Institute for Plant Sciences, Department for Molecular Biology of Plant-Microbe Interaction, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Julia-Lermontowa-Weg 3, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
- Institute of Applied Microbiology, Department of Microbial Genetics, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Boevink PC, Wang X, McLellan H, He Q, Naqvi S, Armstrong MR, Zhang W, Hein I, Gilroy EM, Tian Z, Birch PRJ. A Phytophthora infestans RXLR effector targets plant PP1c isoforms that promote late blight disease. Nat Commun 2016; 7:10311. [PMID: 26822079 PMCID: PMC4740116 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2015] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Plant pathogens deliver effectors to alter host processes. Knowledge of how effectors target and manipulate host proteins is critical to understand crop disease. Here, we show that in planta expression of the RXLR effector Pi04314 enhances leaf colonization by Phytophthora infestans via activity in the host nucleus and attenuates induction of jasmonic and salicylic acid-responsive genes. Pi04314 interacts with three host protein phosphatase 1 catalytic (PP1c) isoforms, causing their re-localization from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm. Re-localization of PP1c-1 also occurs during infection and is dependent on an R/KVxF motif in the effector. Silencing the PP1c isoforms or overexpression of a phosphatase-dead PP1c-1 mutant attenuates infection, demonstrating that host PP1c activity is required for disease. Moreover, expression of PP1c-1mut abolishes enhanced leaf colonization mediated by in planta Pi04314 expression. We argue that PP1c isoforms are susceptibility factors forming holoenzymes with Pi04314 to promote late blight disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra C. Boevink
- Department of Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
| | - Xiaodan Wang
- Department of Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
- Division of Plant Sciences, College of Life Science, University of Dundee (at JHI), Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
- Virus-free Seedling Research Institute of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 368 Xuefu Road, Harbin 150086, China
| | - Hazel McLellan
- Division of Plant Sciences, College of Life Science, University of Dundee (at JHI), Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
| | - Qin He
- Division of Plant Sciences, College of Life Science, University of Dundee (at JHI), Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
- Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (at HAU), Ministry of Education, National Center for Vegetable Improvement (Central China), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
| | - Shaista Naqvi
- Department of Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
| | - Miles R. Armstrong
- Department of Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
- Division of Plant Sciences, College of Life Science, University of Dundee (at JHI), Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
| | - Wei Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (at HAU), Ministry of Education, National Center for Vegetable Improvement (Central China), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
| | - Ingo Hein
- Department of Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
| | - Eleanor M. Gilroy
- Department of Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
| | - Zhendong Tian
- Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (at HAU), Ministry of Education, National Center for Vegetable Improvement (Central China), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
| | - Paul R. J. Birch
- Department of Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
- Division of Plant Sciences, College of Life Science, University of Dundee (at JHI), Errol Road, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zuluaga AP, Vega-Arreguín JC, Fei Z, Ponnala L, Lee SJ, Matas AJ, Patev S, Fry WE, Rose JKC. Transcriptional dynamics of Phytophthora infestans during sequential stages of hemibiotrophic infection of tomato. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2016; 17:29-41. [PMID: 25845484 PMCID: PMC6638332 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Hemibiotrophic plant pathogens, such as the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, employ a biphasic infection strategy, initially behaving as biotrophs, where minimal symptoms are exhibited by the plant, and subsequently as necrotrophs, feeding on dead plant tissue. The regulation of this transition and the breadth of molecular mechanisms that modulate plant defences are not well understood, although effector proteins secreted by the pathogen are thought to play a key role. We examined the transcriptional dynamics of P. infestans in a compatible interaction with its host tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) at three infection stages: biotrophy; the transition from biotrophy to necrotrophy; and necrotrophy. The expression data suggest a tight temporal regulation of many pathways associated with the suppression of plant defence mechanisms and pathogenicity, including the induction of putative cytoplasmic and apoplastic effectors. Twelve of these were experimentally evaluated to determine their ability to suppress necrosis caused by the P. infestans necrosis-inducing protein PiNPP1.1 in Nicotiana benthamiana. Four effectors suppressed necrosis, suggesting that they might prolong the biotrophic phase. This study suggests that a complex regulation of effector expression modulates the outcome of the interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea P Zuluaga
- Section of Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Julio C Vega-Arreguín
- Section of Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
- Laboratory of Agrigenomics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), ENES-León, 37684, Guanajuato, Mexico
| | - Zhangjun Fei
- Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
- Robert W. Holly Center for Agriculture and Health, USDA-ARS, Tower Road, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Lalit Ponnala
- Institute for Biotechnology and Life Science Technologies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Sang Jik Lee
- Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
- Biotechnology Institute, Nongwoo Bio Co., Ltd, Gyeonggi, South Korea
| | - Antonio J Matas
- Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
- Departamento de Biología Vegetal, Campus de Teatinos, Universidad de Málaga, 29071, Málaga, Spain
| | - Sean Patev
- Section of Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - William E Fry
- Section of Plant Pathology and Plant Microbe Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Jocelyn K C Rose
- Section of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rajaraman J, Douchkov D, Hensel G, Stefanato FL, Gordon A, Ereful N, Caldararu OF, Petrescu AJ, Kumlehn J, Boyd LA, Schweizer P. An LRR/Malectin Receptor-Like Kinase Mediates Resistance to Non-adapted and Adapted Powdery Mildew Fungi in Barley and Wheat. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2016; 7:1836. [PMID: 28018377 PMCID: PMC5156707 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) belonging to the multigene family of receptor-like kinases (RLKs) are the sensing devices of plants for microbe- or pathogen-associated molecular patterns released from microbial organisms. Here we describe Rnr8 (for Required for non-host resistance 8) encoding HvLEMK1, a LRR-malectin domain-containing transmembrane RLK that mediates non-host resistance of barley to the non-adapted wheat powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f.sp. tritici. Transgenic barley lines with silenced HvLEMK1 allow entry and colony growth of the non-adapted pathogen, although sporulation was reduced and final colony size did not reach that of the adapted barley powdery mildew fungus B. graminis f.sp. hordei. Transient expression of the barley or wheat LEMK1 genes enhanced resistance in wheat to the adapted wheat powdery mildew fungus while expression of the same genes did not protect barley from attack by the barley powdery mildew fungus. The results suggest that HvLEMK1 is a factor mediating non-host resistance in barley and quantitative host resistance in wheat to the wheat powdery mildew fungus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeyaraman Rajaraman
- Pathogen-Stress Genomics, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)Stadt Seeland, Germany
| | - Dimitar Douchkov
- Pathogen-Stress Genomics, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)Stadt Seeland, Germany
| | - Götz Hensel
- Plant Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)Stadt Seeland, Germany
| | | | - Anna Gordon
- National Institute of Agricultural BotanyCambridge, UK
| | - Nelzo Ereful
- National Institute of Agricultural BotanyCambridge, UK
| | - Octav F. Caldararu
- Department of Bioinformatics and Structural Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry of the Romanian AcademyBucharest, Romania
| | - Andrei-Jose Petrescu
- Department of Bioinformatics and Structural Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry of the Romanian AcademyBucharest, Romania
| | - Jochen Kumlehn
- Plant Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)Stadt Seeland, Germany
| | | | - Patrick Schweizer
- Pathogen-Stress Genomics, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)Stadt Seeland, Germany
- *Correspondence: Patrick Schweizer,
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dong Y, Su Y, Yu P, Yang M, Zhu S, Mei X, He X, Pan M, Zhu Y, Li C. Proteomic Analysis of the Relationship between Metabolism and Nonhost Resistance in Soybean Exposed to Bipolaris maydis. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0141264. [PMID: 26513657 PMCID: PMC4626022 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2015] [Accepted: 10/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Nonhost resistance (NHR) pertains to the most common form of plant resistance against pathogenic microorganisms of other species. Bipolaris maydis is a non-adapted pathogen affecting soybeans, particularly of maize/soybean intercropping systems. However, no experimental evidence has described the immune response of soybeans against B. maydis. To elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying NHR in soybeans, proteomics analysis based on two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-DE) was performed to identify proteins involved in the soybean response to B. maydis. The spread of B. maydis spores across soybean leaves induced NHR throughout the plant, which mobilized almost all organelles and various metabolic processes in response to B. maydis. Some enzymes, including ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO), mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP), oxygen evolving enhancer (OEE), and nucleoside diphosphate kinase (NDKs), were found to be related to NHR in soybeans. These enzymes have been identified in previous studies, and STRING analysis showed that most of the protein functions related to major metabolic processes were induced as a response to B. maydis, which suggested an array of complex interactions between soybeans and B. maydis. These findings suggest a systematic NHR against non-adapted pathogens in soybeans. This response was characterized by an overlap between metabolic processes and response to stimulus. Several metabolic processes provide the soybean with innate immunity to the non-adapted pathogen, B. maydis. This research investigation on NHR in soybeans may foster a better understanding of plant innate immunity, as well as the interactions between plant and non-adapted pathogens in intercropping systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yumei Dong
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Biodiversity and Pest Management of Education Ministry of China, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China
| | - Yuan Su
- The Life Science and Technology Department of Kunming University, Kunming, 650214, China
| | - Ping Yu
- Institute of Biotechnology and Germplasm Resources, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650223, China
| | - Min Yang
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Biodiversity and Pest Management of Education Ministry of China, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China
| | - Shusheng Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Biodiversity and Pest Management of Education Ministry of China, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China
| | - Xinyue Mei
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Biodiversity and Pest Management of Education Ministry of China, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China
| | - Xiahong He
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Biodiversity and Pest Management of Education Ministry of China, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China
| | - Manhua Pan
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Biodiversity and Pest Management of Education Ministry of China, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China
| | - Youyong Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Biodiversity and Pest Management of Education Ministry of China, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China
| | - Chengyun Li
- Key Laboratory of Agro-Biodiversity and Pest Management of Education Ministry of China, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Anderson RG, Deb D, Fedkenheuer K, McDowell JM. Recent Progress in RXLR Effector Research. MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS : MPMI 2015; 28:1063-72. [PMID: 26125490 DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-01-15-0022-cr] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Some of the most devastating oomycete pathogens deploy effector proteins, with the signature amino acid motif RXLR, that enter plant cells to promote virulence. Research on the function and evolution of RXLR effectors has been very active over the decade that has transpired since their discovery. Comparative genomics indicate that RXLR genes play a major role in virulence for Phytophthora and downy mildew species. Importantly, gene-for-gene resistance against these oomycete lineages is based on recognition of RXLR proteins. Comparative genomics have revealed several mechanisms through which this resistance can be broken, most notably involving epigenetic control of RXLR gene expression. Structural studies have revealed a core fold that is present in the majority of RXLR proteins, providing a foundation for detailed mechanistic understanding of virulence and avirulence functions. Finally, functional studies have demonstrated that suppression of host immunity is a major function for RXLR proteins. Host protein targets are being identified in a variety of plant cell compartments. Some targets comprise hubs that are also manipulated by bacteria and fungi, thereby revealing key points of vulnerability in the plant immune network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan G Anderson
- Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A
| | - Devdutta Deb
- Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A
| | - Kevin Fedkenheuer
- Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A
| | - John M McDowell
- Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Figueroa M, Castell-Miller CV, Li F, Hulbert SH, Bradeen JM. Pushing the boundaries of resistance: insights from Brachypodium-rust interactions. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2015; 6:558. [PMID: 26284085 PMCID: PMC4519692 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2015] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
The implications of global population growth urge transformation of current food and bioenergy production systems to sustainability. Members of the family Poaceae are of particular importance both in food security and for their applications as biofuel substrates. For centuries, rust fungi have threatened the production of valuable crops such as wheat, barley, oat, and other small grains; similarly, biofuel crops can also be susceptible to these pathogens. Emerging rust pathogenic races with increased virulence and recurrent rust epidemics around the world point out the vulnerability of monocultures. Basic research in plant immunity, especially in model plants, can make contributions to understanding plant resistance mechanisms and improve disease management strategies. The development of the grass Brachypodium distachyon as a genetically tractable model for monocots, especially temperate cereals and grasses, offers the possibility to overcome the experimental challenges presented by the genetic and genomic complexities of economically valuable crop plants. The numerous resources and tools available in Brachypodium have opened new doors to investigate the underlying molecular and genetic bases of plant-microbe interactions in grasses and evidence demonstrating the applicability and advantages of working with B. distachyon is increasing. Importantly, several interactions between B. distachyon and devastating plant pathogens, such rust fungi, have been examined in the context of non-host resistance. Here, we discuss the use of B. distachyon in these various pathosystems. Exploiting B. distachyon to understand the mechanisms underpinning disease resistance to non-adapted rust fungi may provide effective and durable approaches to fend off these pathogens. The close phylogenetic relationship among Brachypodium spp. and grasses with industrial and agronomic value support harnessing this model plant to improve cropping systems and encourage its use in translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melania Figueroa
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
- Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Claudia V. Castell-Miller
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
- Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Feng Li
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
- Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Scot H. Hulbert
- Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - James M. Bradeen
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
- Stakman-Borlaug Center for Sustainable Plant Health, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Fry WE, Birch PRJ, Judelson HS, Grünwald NJ, Danies G, Everts KL, Gevens AJ, Gugino BK, Johnson DA, Johnson SB, McGrath MT, Myers KL, Ristaino JB, Roberts PD, Secor G, Smart CD. Five Reasons to Consider Phytophthora infestans a Reemerging Pathogen. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2015; 105:966-81. [PMID: 25760519 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-01-15-0005-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora infestans has been a named pathogen for well over 150 years and yet it continues to "emerge", with thousands of articles published each year on it and the late blight disease that it causes. This review explores five attributes of this oomycete pathogen that maintain this constant attention. First, the historical tragedy associated with this disease (Irish potato famine) causes many people to be fascinated with the pathogen. Current technology now enables investigators to answer some questions of historical significance. Second, the devastation caused by the pathogen continues to appear in surprising new locations or with surprising new intensity. Third, populations of P. infestans worldwide are in flux, with changes that have major implications to disease management. Fourth, the genomics revolution has enabled investigators to make tremendous progress in terms of understanding the molecular biology (especially the pathogenicity) of P. infestans. Fifth, there remain many compelling unanswered questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W E Fry
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - P R J Birch
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - H S Judelson
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - N J Grünwald
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - G Danies
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - K L Everts
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - A J Gevens
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - B K Gugino
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - D A Johnson
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - S B Johnson
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - M T McGrath
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - K L Myers
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - J B Ristaino
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - P D Roberts
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - G Secor
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - C D Smart
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cheng Y, Yao J, Zhang H, Huang L, Kang Z. Cytological and molecular analysis of nonhost resistance in rice to wheat powdery mildew and leaf rust pathogens. PROTOPLASMA 2015; 252:1167-1179. [PMID: 25547964 DOI: 10.1007/s00709-014-0750-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Cereal powdery mildews caused by Blumeria graminis and cereal rusts caused by Puccinia spp. are constant disease threats that limit the production of almost all important cereal crops. Rice is an intensively grown agricultural cereal that is atypical because of its immunity to all powdery mildew and rust fungi. We analyzed the nonhost interactions between rice and the wheat powdery mildew fungus B. graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt) and the wheat leaf rust fungus Puccinia triticina (Ptr) to identify the basis of nonhost resistance (NHR) in rice against cereal powdery mildew and rust fungi at cytological and molecular levels. No visible symptoms were observed on rice leaves inoculated with Bgt or Ptr. Microscopic observations showed that both pathogens exhibited aberrant differentiation and significantly reduced penetration frequencies on rice compared to wheat. The development of Bgt and Ptr was also completely arrested at early infection stages in cases of successful penetration into rice leaves. Attempted infection of rice by Bgt and Ptr induced similar defense responses, including callose deposition, accumulation of reactive oxygen species, and hypersensitive response in rice epidermal and mesophyll cells, respectively. Furthermore, a set of defense-related genes were upregulated in rice against Bgt and Ptr infection. Rice is an excellent monocot model for genetic and molecular studies. Therefore, our results demonstrate that rice is a useful model to study the mechanisms of NHR to cereal powdery mildew and rust fungi, which provides useful information for the development of novel and durable strategies to control these important pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulin Cheng
- State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas and College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lee HA, Yeom SI. Plant NB-LRR proteins: tightly regulated sensors in a complex manner. Brief Funct Genomics 2015; 14:233-42. [DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elv012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
43
|
Cook DE, Mesarich CH, Thomma BPHJ. Understanding plant immunity as a surveillance system to detect invasion. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2015; 53:541-63. [PMID: 26047564 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 313] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Various conceptual models to describe the plant immune system have been presented. The most recent paradigm to gain wide acceptance in the field is often referred to as the zigzag model, which reconciles the previously formulated gene-for-gene hypothesis with the recognition of general elicitors in a single model. This review focuses on the limitations of the current paradigm of molecular plant-microbe interactions and how it too narrowly defines the plant immune system. As such, we discuss an alternative view of plant innate immunity as a system that evolves to detect invasion. This view accommodates the range from mutualistic to parasitic symbioses that plants form with diverse organisms, as well as the spectrum of ligands that the plant immune system perceives. Finally, how this view can contribute to the current practice of resistance breeding is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E Cook
- Laboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands; ,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hadwiger LA. Anatomy of a nonhost disease resistance response of pea to Fusarium solani: PR gene elicitation via DNase, chitosan and chromatin alterations. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2015; 6:373. [PMID: 26124762 PMCID: PMC4464173 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Of the multiplicity of plant pathogens in nature, only a few are virulent on a given plant species. Conversely, plants develop a rapid "nonhost" resistance response to the majority of the pathogens. The anatomy of the nonhost resistance of pea endocarp tissue against a pathogen of bean, Fusarium solani f.sp. phaseoli (Fsph) and the susceptibility of pea to F. solani f sp. pisi (Fspi) has been described cytologically, biochemically and molecular-biologically. Cytological changes have been followed by electron microscope and stain differentiation under white and UV light. The induction of changes in transcription, protein synthesis, expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes, and increases in metabolic pathways culminating in low molecular weight, antifungal compounds are described biochemically. Molecular changes initiated by fungal signals to host organelles, primarily to chromatin within host nuclei, are identified according to source of the signal and the mechanisms utilized in activating defense genes. The functions of some PR genes are defined. A hypothesis based on this data is developed to explain both why fungal growth is suppressed in nonhost resistance and why growth can continue in a susceptible reaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee A. Hadwiger
- *Correspondence: Lee A. Hadwiger, Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, 100 Dairy Road, Pullman, WA 99163-6430, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stam R, Mantelin S, McLellan H, Thilliez G. The role of effectors in nonhost resistance to filamentous plant pathogens. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2014; 5:582. [PMID: 25426123 PMCID: PMC4224059 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2014] [Accepted: 10/08/2014] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
In nature, most plants are resistant to a wide range of phytopathogens. However, mechanisms contributing to this so-called nonhost resistance (NHR) are poorly understood. Besides constitutive defenses, plants have developed two layers of inducible defense systems. Plant innate immunity relies on recognition of conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). In compatible interactions, pathogenicity effector molecules secreted by the invader can suppress host defense responses and facilitate the infection process. Additionally, plants have evolved pathogen-specific resistance mechanisms based on recognition of these effectors, which causes secondary defense responses. The current effector-driven hypothesis is that NHR in plants that are distantly related to the host plant is triggered by PAMP recognition that cannot be efficiently suppressed by the pathogen, whereas in more closely related species, nonhost recognition of effectors would play a crucial role. In this review we give an overview of current knowledge of the role of effector molecules in host and NHR and place these findings in the context of the model. We focus on examples from filamentous pathogens (fungi and oomycetes), discuss their implications for the field of plant-pathogen interactions and relevance in plant breeding strategies for development of durable resistance in crops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remco Stam
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee – The James Hutton InstituteDundee, UK
- *Correspondence: Remco Stam, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee – The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, Scotland, UK e-mail:
| | - Sophie Mantelin
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton InstituteDundee, UK
| | - Hazel McLellan
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee – The James Hutton InstituteDundee, UK
| | - Gaëtan Thilliez
- Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee – The James Hutton InstituteDundee, UK
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, The James Hutton InstituteDundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|