Effects of Semaglutide on Stroke Subtypes in Type 2 Diabetes: Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6

Diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with ischaemic heart disease and acute coronary syndromes - a review of evidence and recommendations

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) represents a major healthcare condition of the 21st century. It is characterised by persistently elevated blood glucose occurring as a result of peripheral insulin resistance and reduced insulin production which may lead to multiple long-term health conditions such as retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy. The estimated number of individuals suffering from diabetes mellitus (DM) is expected to rise to 591 million by the year 2035 with 4.4 million in the United Kingdom (UK) alone, 90% of which is attributed to T2DM. Moreover, a significant proportion of individuals may have undetected diabetes mellitus, especially among those presenting with symptoms of ischaemic heart disease (IHD). This is particularly important in those individuals presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who are at the highest risk of complications and sudden cardiac death. Identifying abnormal levels of common biochemical markers of diabetes, such as capillary blood glucose or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in these patients is important for early diagnosis, which will then allow for timely intervention to improve outcomes. However, a significant proportion of individuals who meet the criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes remain undiagnosed, representing missed opportunities for early intervention. This may result in a prolonged period of untreated hyperglycaemia, which can result resulting in significant further microvascular and macrovascular complications. There is an increased risk of IHD, heart failure, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), and peripheral artery disease (PVD). These account accounting for 50% of deaths in patients with T2DM. Cardiovascular diseases in the context of diabetes particular represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality with a two to three times higher risk of cardiovascular disease in individuals with T2DM than in those without the condition normo-glycaemia. In the United Kingdom UK alone, around 120 amputations, 770 CVA, 590 heart attacks, and more than 2300 presentations with heart failure per week are attributed to diabetes DM. with One 1 in six 6 hospital beds and around 10% of the healthcare budget may be being spent on managing diabetes DM or its complications. Therefore, it represents a significant burden on our healthcare system.

Semaglutide: Double-edged Sword with Risks and Benefits

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus therapy has evolved over the years to now include a new class of therapeutics, semaglutide. This article reviews the mechanism of action and formulation of semaglutide therapy, potential benefits, contraindications, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Oral and subcutaneous semaglutide therapies have shown effectiveness in improving glycemic control, weight loss, and reducing cardiovascular risks associated with diabetes mellitus. Semaglutide has also shown potential in being used as a therapeutic strategy in Alzheimer's disease due to its anti-neuroinflammatory effects and being used to treat polycystic ovary syndrome. However, semaglutide therapy is also associated with concerning adverse effects like acute pancreatitis, anesthetic risks like pulmonary aspiration or residual gastric content, acute kidney injury, acute gallbladder injury, nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and diabetic retinopathy. Contraindications of semaglutide include history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, and pregnancy. Drug interactions to consider with semaglutide therapy include those also used in diabetes treatment, like metformin, as well as anti-psychotics, due to anti-psychotics associated weight gain. The findings of this article emphasize the need for a cross-disciplinary approach to understand the molecular mechanisms and clinical implications of semaglutide on patients with complex medical histories and treatment regimens. The potential anesthetic risks of semaglutide therapy warrant careful consideratiion with ethical concerns. Further studies can assess if there is a need to modify pre-operative guidelines to account for patient using semaglutide and how delayed gastric emptying and constitpation will affect surgical outcomes and complications. While semaglutide therapy for diabetes mellitus has been established, there is a need for extensive research on repurposing semaglutide in neurodegenerative disease treatment.

evoke and evoke+: design of two large-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability of semaglutide in early-stage symptomatic Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Disease-modifying therapies targeting the diverse pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including neuroinflammation, represent potentially important and novel approaches. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide is approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity and has an established safety profile. Semaglutide may have a disease-modifying, neuroprotective effect in AD through multimodal mechanisms including neuroinflammatory, vascular, and other AD-related processes. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in early-stage symptomatic AD.

METHODS

evoke and evoke+ are randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials investigating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily oral semaglutide versus placebo in early-stage symptomatic AD. Eligible participants were men or women aged 55-85 years with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to AD with confirmed amyloid abnormalities (assessed by positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] analysis). After a maximum 12-week screening phase, an anticipated 1840 patients in each trial are randomized (1:1) to semaglutide or placebo for 156 weeks (104-week main treatment phase and 52-week extension). Randomized participants follow an 8-week dose escalation regimen (3 mg [weeks 0-4], 7 mg [weeks 4-8], and 14 mg [weeks 8-156]). The primary endpoint is the semaglutide-placebo difference on change from baseline to week 104 in the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes score. Analyses of plasma biomarkers, collected from all participants, and a CSF sub-study (planned n = 210) will explore semaglutide effects on AD biomarkers and neuroinflammation.

RESULTS

Enrollment was undertaken between May 18, 2021, and September 8, 2023. Completion of the trials' main phase is expected in September 2025, and the 52-week extension (in which participants and investigators remain blinded to treatment assignment) will continue to October 2026.

CONCLUSION

evoke and evoke+ are the first large-scale trials to investigate the disease-modifying potential of semaglutide in participants with early-stage symptomatic AD, including exploration of effects on AD biomarkers and neuroinflammation. The trials will provide data on the potential disease-modifying effects of semaglutide and will be important in evaluating its utility in the treatment of early-stage symptomatic AD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04777396 and NCT04777409. Date: 02/03/2021.

Cardiovascular and kidney benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs according to baseline blood pressure in type 2 diabetes: a systematic meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials

Using a systematic meta-analysis, we investigated if patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and with varying baseline blood pressure (BP) differ in the cardiorenal benefits received from sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to April 2024. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled. The differential treatment effect by baseline BP category within each trial was estimated as the ratio of the HR (RHR) and pooled. Results: Seventeen publications based on 9 unique CVOTs (4 SGLT-2is and 5 GLP-1RAs) were eligible. In participants with normal baseline BP, comparing SGLT-2is with placebo, the HRs (95% CIs) were 0.88 (0.79-0.97) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), 0.73 (0.59-0.91) for heart failure (HF) hospitalization, 0.78 (0.65-0.94) for composite CVD death/HF hospitalization, and 0.55 (0.41-0.73) for composite renal outcome. The corresponding estimates for participants with higher baseline BP were 0.88 (0.81-0.96), 0.67 (0.57-0.79), 0.73 (0.65-0.82), and 0.61 (0.48-0.77), respectively. In participants with normal baseline BP, GLP-RAs had no strong effect on MACE, stroke and nephropathy, but reduced stroke and nephropathy risk in those with higher baseline BP. Estimated RHRs showed no statistical evidence that baseline BP modified the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT-2is and GLP-1RAs. Conclusions: In patients with T2D, the cardiorenal benefits of treatment with SGLT2-Is and GLP1-RAs were similar in patients with normal baseline BP compared to those with a higher baseline BP.

Potential mechanisms of ischemic stroke induced by heat exposure

Recent decades of epidemiological and clinical research have suggested that heat exposure could be a potential risk factor for ischemic stroke. Despite climate factors having a minor impact on individuals compared with established risk factors such as smoking, their widespread and persistent effects significantly affect public health. The mechanisms by which heat exposure triggers ischemic stroke are currently unclear. However, several potential mechanisms, such as the impact of temperature variability on stroke risk factors, inflammation, oxidative stress, and coagulation system changes, have been proposed. This article details the potential mechanisms by which heat exposure may induce ischemic stroke, aiming to guide the prevention and treatment of high-risk groups in hot climates and support public health policy development.

Association between Semaglutide and Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Multinational Population-Based Real-World Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether semaglutide increases the risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) in the general population.

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study utilized a de-identified global electronic medical records database. The enrollment period was extended from January 2017 to August 2023, with observations concluding in August 2024.

PARTICIPANTS

This study included individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or obesity. They were further categorized into T2DM-only, obesity-only, and T2DM with obesity groups to assess the differences among these subgroups. The effects of semaglutide were compared with those of glucose-lowering or weight loss medications other than glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists.

METHODS

Patient data were obtained from 160 healthcare organizations across 21 countries. Outcomes were evaluated at one, two, and three years of follow-up. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance age, sex, body mass index, hemoglobin A1C, medications, and underlying comorbidities. Cox regression models were used to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The occurrence of NAION.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 37,245 participants with T2DM-only, 33,537 participants with obesity-only, and 64,989 participants with both T2DM and obesity. The results indicated that the administration of semaglutide was not associated with the development of NAION in the T2DM-only group (1 year follow-up: HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 0.60-8.97; 2 years: HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 0.86-6.17; 3 years: HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.71-3.25), the obesity-only group (1 year follow-up: HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.03-2.28; 2 years: HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.09-2.21; 3 years: HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.09-2.21), and the T2DM with obesity group (1 year follow-up: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.42-1.57; 2 years: HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.74-1.94; 3 years: HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.78-1.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that semaglutide may not be associated with an increased risk of NAION in the general population. Therefore, avoidance of semaglutide based solely on concerns regarding the risk of NAION may not be warranted, as its potential benefits for blood glucose control and cardiovascular health likely outweigh its potential risks.

Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Cardio-Oncology: Pathophysiology of Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Cancer Patients

Cancer patients, especially long cancer survivors, are exposed to several cardio-metabolic diseases, including diabetes, heart failure, and atherosclerosis, which increase their risk of cardiovascular mortality. Therapy with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists demonstrated several beneficial cardiovascular effects, including atherosclerosis and heart failure prevention. Cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) suggest that GLP-1 RA could exert cardiorenal benefits and systemic anti-inflammatory effects in patients with type-2 diabetes through the activation of cAMP and PI3K/AkT pathways and the inhibition of NLRP-3 and MyD88. In this narrative review, we highlight the biochemical properties of GLP-1 RA through a deep analysis of the clinical and preclinical evidence of the primary prevention of cardiomyopathies. The overall picture of this review encourages the study of GLP-1 RA in cancer patients with type-2 diabetes, as a potential primary prevention strategy against heart failure and atherosclerosis.

Vascular cognitive impairment and dementia: Mechanisms, treatment, and future directions

Worldwide, around 50 million people live with dementia, and this number is projected to triple by 2050. It has been estimated that 20% of all dementia cases have a predominant cerebrovascular pathology, while perhaps another 20% of vascular diseases contribute to a mixed dementia picture. Therefore, the vascular contribution to dementia affects 20 million people currently and will increase markedly in the next few decades, particularly in lower- and middle-income countries.In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and review management. VCI refers to the spectrum of cerebrovascular pathologies that contribute to any degree of cognitive impairment, ranging from subjective cognitive decline, to mild cognitive impairment, to dementia. While acute cognitive decline occurring soon after a stroke is the most recognized form of VCI, chronic cerebrovascular disease, in particular cerebral small-vessel disease, can cause insidious cognitive decline in the absence of stroke. Moreover, cerebrovascular disease not only commonly co-occurs with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and increases the probability that AD pathology will result in clinical dementia, but may also contribute etiologically to the development of AD pathologies.Despite its enormous health and economic impact, VCI has been a neglected research area, with few adequately powered trials of therapies, resulting in few proven treatments. Current management of VCI emphasizes prevention and treatment of stroke and vascular risk factors, with most evidence for intensive hypertension control. Reperfusion therapies in acute stroke may attenuate the risk of VCI. Associated behavioral symptoms such as apathy and poststroke emotionalism are common. We also highlight novel treatment strategies that will hopefully lead to new disease course-modifying therapies. Finally, we highlight the importance of including cognitive endpoints in large cardiovascular prevention trials and the need for an increased research focus and funding for this important area.

GLP-1 physiology in obesity and development of incretin-based drugs for chronic weight management

The introduction of the highly potent incretin receptor agonists semaglutide and tirzepatide has marked a new era in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. With normalisation of glycated haemoglobin levels and weight losses around 15-25%, therapeutic goals that were previously unrealistic are now within reach, and clinical trials have documented that these effects are associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular events and premature mortality. Here, I review this remarkable development from the earliest observations of glucose lowering and modest weight losses with native glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and short acting compounds, to the recent development of highly active formulations and new molecules. I will classify these agents as GLP-1-based therapies in the understanding that these compounds or combinations may have actions on other receptors as well. The physiology of GLP-1 is discussed as well as its mechanisms of actions in obesity, in particular, the role of sensory afferents and GLP-1 receptors in the brain. I provide details regarding the development of GLP-1 receptor agonists for anti-obesity therapy and discuss the possible mechanism behind their beneficial effects on adverse cardiovascular events. Finally, I highlight new pharmacological developments, including oral agents, and discuss important questions regarding maintenance therapy.

Geriatric Pharmacotherapy Case Series: Medications for Diabetes-A Focus on Secondary Stroke Prevention

This report addresses evidence for efficacy of diabetes medications with a focus on stroke risk reduction. The cardiovascular benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists have been well-established; however, clinical trials to date have examined composite cardiovascular endpoints that include, but do not specifically focus on, stroke. The purpose of this case review is to examine the evidence for the various diabetes medications in reducing the risk for stroke. This literature review was inspired by a patient seen in a geriatric day hospital program with diabetes and a history of multiple strokes. Our goal was to select a diabetes management regimen that would provide both glycemic control and stroke risk reduction. As diabetes and cerebrovascular disease commonly coexist and are important contributors to morbidity and mortality in older individuals, appropriate management must incorporate both current evidence as well as consideration for patient-specific factors that may influence the treatment plan. This patient case illustrates the importance of both.

The role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) in the management of the hypertensive patient with metabolic syndrome: a position paper from the Korean society of hypertension

Obesity is the one of the most important components of metabolic syndrome. Because obesity related hypertension accounts for two thirds of essential hypertension, managing obesity and metabolic syndrome is a crucial task in the management of hypertension. However, the current non-pharmacological therapies have limitations for achieving or maintaining ideal body weight. Recently, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) have demonstrated excellent weight control effects, accompanied by corresponding reductions in blood pressure. GLP1-RAs have shown cardiovascular and renal protective effects in cardiovascular outcome trials both in primary and secondary prevention. In this document, the Korean Society of Hypertension intends to remark the current clinical results of GLP1-RAs and recommend the government and health-policy makers to define obesity as a disease and to establish forward-looking policies for GLP1-RA treatment for obesity treatment, including active reimbursement policies.

Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and stroke associated with treatment with GLP-1 or the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Mounting evidence suggests that glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor-agonists (GLP-1 RAs) attenuate cardiovascular-risk in type-2 diabetes (T2DM). Tirzepatide is the first-in-class, dual glucose-dependent-insulinotropic-polypeptide GIP/GLP-1 RA approved for T2DM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to estimate: (i) the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); and (ii) incidence of stroke, fatal, and nonfatal stroke in T2DM-patients treated with GLP-1 or GIP/GLP-1 RAs (vs placebo).

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs (9 and 4 on GLP-1 RAs and tirzepatide, respectively) comprising 65,878 T2DM patients were included. Compared to placebo, GLP-1RAs or GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduced MACE (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81-0.94; p < 0.01; I2 = 37%), all-cause mortality (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.82-0.96; p < 0.01; I2 = 21%) and cardiovascular-mortality (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80-0.96; p < 0.01; I2 = 14%), without differences between GLP-1 versus GIP/GLP-1 RAs. Additionally, GLP-1 RAs reduced the odds of stroke (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76-0.93; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and nonfatal stroke (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76-0.94; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), whereas no association between fatal stroke and GLP-1RAs was uncovered (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.61-1.05; p = 0.105; I2 = 0%). In secondary analyses, GLP-1 RAs prevented ischemic stroke (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61-0.91; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and MACE-recurrence, but not hemorrhagic stroke (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.51-1.66; p = 0.792; I2 = 0%). There was no association between GLP-1RAs or GIP/GLP-1 RAs and fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

GLP-1 and GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduce cardiovascular-risk and mortality in T2DM. While there is solid evidence that GLP-1 RAs significantly attenuate the risk of ischemic stroke in T2DM, dedicated RCTs are needed to evaluate the efficacy of novel GIP/GLP-1 RAs for primary and secondary stroke prevention.

Effect of health lifestyle on the risk of stroke: A prospective cohort study from Chongqing, China

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively investigate the associations of healthy lifestyle factors on the risk of stroke and stroke subtypes, as studies exploring this relationship are limited in China.

METHODS

The 22,661 participants in the prospective cohort study in Chongqing, China, aged 30-79 years and stroke-free at baseline completed follow-up from 2018 to 2022. We included seven healthy lifestyle factors, including non-smoking, non-excessive drinking, sufficient physical activity, healthy diet, sleep duration of 7-9 h/d, and standard range of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio. The healthy lifestyle score was calculated based on the number of healthy lifestyle factors.

RESULTS

Compared with participants who had scores ≤2, participants with scores ≥6 had an HRs (95 % CIs) of 0.56 (0.34, 0.92) for total stroke and 0.53 (0.30, 0.93) for ischemic stroke. For every 1-point increase in healthy lifestyle scores, the HRs (95 % CIs) for total stroke and ischemic stroke was 0.86 (0.78, 0.95) and 0.86 (0.77, 0.96), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining multiple healthy lifestyle factors can significantly reduce the risk of stroke. As the number of healthy lifestyle factors increased, the stroke risk gradually decreased. Our findings emphasize the significance of comprehensive lifestyle interventions.

Impaired glucose metabolism and the risk of vascular events and mortality after ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM), prediabetes, and insulin resistance are highly prevalent in patients with ischemic stroke (IS). DM is associated with higher risk for poor outcomes after IS.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the risk of recurrent vascular events and mortality associated with impaired glucose metabolism compared to normoglycemia in patients with IS and transient ischemic attack (TIA).

METHODS

Systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library on 21st March 2024 and via citation searching. Studies that comprised IS or TIA patients and exposures of impaired glucose metabolism were eligible. Study Quality Assessment Tool was used for risk of bias assessment. Covariate adjusted outcomes were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Recurrent stroke, cardiac events, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and composite of vascular outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 10,974 identified studies 159 were eligible. 67% had low risk of bias. DM was associated with an increased risk for composite events (pooled HR (pHR) including 445,808 patients: 1.58, 95% CI 1.34-1.85, I2 = 88%), recurrent stroke (pHR including 1.161.527 patients: 1.42 (1.29-1.56, I2 = 92%), cardiac events (pHR including 443,863 patients: 1.55, 1.50-1.61, I2 = 0%), and all-cause mortality (pHR including 1.031.472 patients: 1.56, 1.34-1.82, I2 = 99%). Prediabetes was associated with an increased risk for composite events (pHR including 8,262 patients: 1.50, 1.15-1.96, I2 = 0%) and recurrent stroke (pHR including 10,429 patients: 1.50, 1.18-1.91, I2 = 0), however, not with mortality (pHR including 9,378 patients, 1.82, 0.73-4.57, I2 = 78%). Insulin resistance was associated with recurrent stroke (pHR including 21,363 patients: 1.56, 1.19-2.05, I2 = 55%), but not with mortality (pHR including 21,363 patients: 1.31, 0.66-2.59, I2 = 85%).

DISCUSSION

DM is associated with a 56% increased relative risk of death after IS and TIA. Risk estimates regarding recurrent events are similarly high between prediabetes and DM, indicating high cardiovascular risk burden already in precursor stages of DM. There was a high heterogeneity across most outcomes.

Bridging the gap between GLP1-receptor agonists and cardiovascular outcomes: evidence for the role of tirzepatide

Tirzepatide is a new drug targeting glucagon-like peptide 1(GLP1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptors. This drug has demonstrated great potential in improving the clinical outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes. It can lead to weight loss, better glycemic control, and reduced cardiometabolic risk factors. GLP1 receptor agonists have been proven effective antidiabetic medications with possible cardiovascular benefits. Even though they have been proven to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, their effectiveness in treating heart failure is unknown. Unlike traditional GLP1 receptor agonists, tirzepatide is more selective for the GIP receptor, resulting in a more balanced activation of these receptors. This review article discusses the possible mechanisms tirzepatide may use to improve cardiovascular health. That includes the anti-inflammatory effect, the ability to reduce cell death and promote autophagy, and also its indirect effects through blood pressure, obesity, and glucose/lipid metabolism. Additionally, tirzepatide may benefit atherosclerosis and lower the risk of major adverse cardiac events. Currently, clinical trials are underway to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tirzepatide in patients with heart failure. Overall, tirzepatide's dual agonism of GLP1 and GIP receptors appears to provide encouraging cardiovascular benefits beyond glycemic control, offering a potential new therapeutic option for treating cardiovascular diseases and heart failure.

Diabetes and Stroke—A Focused Review

Globally, diabetes mellitus (DM) and stroke are two common chronic illnesses that have a substantial impact on rates of morbidity and mortality. There is significant evidence linking diabetes to an increased risk of stroke in terms of incidence, severity, and mortality. This extensive review looks at shared risk factors, underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, epidemiological trends, and evidence-based therapy approaches to give a thorough analysis of the causal relationship between diabetes mellitus and stroke. Studies using epidemiological data regularly show that people with diabetes have a higher incidence of stroke than people without the disease. Furthermore, diabetes is linked to a less favorable outcome following a stroke, as well as an elevated chance of stroke recurrence. Determining the pathophysiological pathways that connect diabetes and stroke is essential to understanding their relationship. Key pathophysiological processes associated with these disorders include endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia. Due to microvascular complications, these mechanisms raise the risk of hemorrhagic stroke and predispose diabetics to an increased risk of ischemic stroke by creating a prothrombotic and atherosclerotic milieu. Diabetes and stroke are linked due to shared risk factors like smoking, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and poor glycemic control. Lifestyle changes, blood pressure control, lipid-lowering therapy, antiplatelet medicines, and a nutritious diet are essential for stroke risk reduction. Reducing the risk of stroke in people with diabetes requires the implementation of management techniques that focus on both diabetes control and stroke prevention. Optimizing results and lowering the frequency of stroke-related complications in diabetics requires multidisciplinary care. The intricate interactions between diabetes mellitus and stroke are highlighted in this review’s conclusion, which also highlights the value of patient education, risk factor treatment, the effect of antidiabetic therapy on stroke, and integrated care in lowering the incidence of stroke in people with diabetes.

Immunomodulation and inflammation: Role of GLP-1R and GIPR expressing cells within the gut

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are peptide hormones produced by enteroendocrine cells in the small intestine. Despite being produced in the gut, the leveraging of their role in potentiating glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, also known as the incretin effect, has distracted from discernment of direct intestinal signaling circuits. Both preclinical and clinical evidence have highlighted a role for the incretins in inflammation. In this review, we highlight the discoveries of GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R)+ natural (TCRαβ and TCRγδ) and induced (TCRαβ+CD4+ cells and TCRαβ+CD8αβ+) intraepithelial lymphocytes. Both endogenous signaling and pharmacological activation of GLP-1R impact local and systemic inflammation, the gut microbiota, whole-body metabolism, as well as the control of GLP-1 bioavailability. While GIPR signaling has been documented to impact hematopoiesis, the impact of these bone marrow-derived cells in gut immunology is not well understood. We uncover gaps in the literature of the evaluation of the impact of sex in these GLP-1R and GIP receptor (GIPR) signaling circuits and provide speculations of the maintenance roles these hormones play within the gut in the fasting-refeeding cycles. GLP-1R agonists and GLP-1R/GIPR agonists are widely used as treatments for diabetes and weight loss, respectively; however, their impact on gut homeostasis has not been fully explored. Advancing our understanding of the roles of GLP-1R and GIPR signaling within the gut at homeostasis as well as metabolic and inflammatory diseases may provide targets to improve disease management.

Diabetes and Stroke: Impact of Novel Therapies for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a significant risk factor for stroke. Nevertheless, the evidence supporting stringent glycemic control to reduce macrovascular complications, particularly stroke, is not as clear as for microvascular complications. Presently, risk reduction strategies are based on controlling multiple risk factors, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, glycemia, smoking, and weight. Since 2008, new pharmacological therapies for treating T2DM have been required to undergo trials to ensure their cardiovascular safety. Remarkably, several novel therapies have exhibited protective effects against the combined endpoint of major cardiovascular events. Evidence from these trials, with stroke as a secondary endpoint, along with real-world data, suggests potential benefits in stroke prevention, particularly with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Conversely, the data on sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors remains more controversial. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors appear neutral in stroke prevention. More recent pharmacological therapies still lack significant data on this particular outcome. This article provides a comprehensive review of the evidence on the most recent T2DM therapies for stroke prevention and their impact on clinical practice.

Therapeutic strategies targeting mechanisms of macrophages in diabetic heart disease

Diabetic heart disease (DHD) is a serious complication in patients with diabetes. Despite numerous studies on the pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic targets of DHD, effective means of prevention and treatment are still lacking. The pathogenic mechanisms of DHD include cardiac inflammation, insulin resistance, myocardial fibrosis, and oxidative stress. Macrophages, the primary cells of the human innate immune system, contribute significantly to these pathological processes, playing an important role in human disease and health. Therefore, drugs targeting macrophages hold great promise for the treatment of DHD. In this review, we examine how macrophages contribute to the development of DHD and which drugs could potentially be used to target macrophages in the treatment of DHD.

GLP-1 receptor agonists and myocardial metabolism in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Many medical conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, obesity, sleep apnea, and heart failure (HF), increase the risk for AF. Cardiomyocytes have unique metabolic characteristics to maintain adenosine triphosphate production. Significant changes occur in myocardial metabolism in AF. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been used to control blood glucose fluctuations and weight in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. GLP-1RAs have also been shown to reduce oxidative stress, inflammation, autonomic nervous system modulation, and mitochondrial function. This article reviews the changes in metabolic characteristics in cardiomyocytes in AF. Although the clinical trial outcomes are unsatisfactory, the findings demonstrate that GLP-1 RAs can improve myocardial metabolism in the presence of various risk factors, lowering the incidence of AF.

Risk of Stroke in Real-World US Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Semaglutide or a Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitor

INTRODUCTION

People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher risk of stroke and worse outcomes than those without T2D. Pooled data from randomized controlled trials indicate that the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist semaglutide is associated with stroke risk reduction in people with T2D at high cardiovascular risk. We compared real-world stroke risk in people with T2D or T2D plus atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) initiating either semaglutide or a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4i).

METHODS

Adults (≥ 18 years old) in a US claims database with a claim indicating initiation of either semaglutide or a DPP4i (index date) during the index period (1 January 2018-30 September 2020), a diagnosis code for T2D on or before the index date and at least 12 months' continuous enrolment in the database pre-index were included and propensity score matched 1:1 on baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary outcome was time to first stroke event during follow-up. Healthcare resource utilization was also compared between groups.

RESULTS

The analysis included 17,920 matched pairs with T2D and 4234 matched pairs with T2D and ASCVD. The groups were well matched on baseline characteristics. People initiating semaglutide had a lower risk of stroke over short-term follow-up than those initiating a DPP4i (T2D: hazard ratio 0.63 [95% confidence interval 0.41-0.95], p = 0.029; T2D plus ASCVD: 0.45 [0.24-0.86], p = 0.015). Semaglutide was also associated with a lower rate of inpatient, outpatient and emergency room visits compared with a DPP4i.

CONCLUSION

This proof-of-concept analysis indicates that semaglutide has the potential to reduce the risk of stroke in people with T2D when prescribed in clinical practice.

Beyond antithrombotics: recent advances in pharmacological risk factor management for secondary stroke prevention

Patients with ischaemic stroke represent a diverse group with several cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, which classify them as patients at very high risk of stroke recurrence, cardiovascular adverse events or death. In addition to antithrombotic therapy, which is important for secondary stroke prevention in most patients with stroke, cardiovascular risk factor assessment and treatment also contribute significantly to the reduction of mortality and morbidity. Dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus and hypertension represent common and important modifiable cardiovascular risk factors among patients with stroke, while early recognition and treatment may have a significant impact on patients' future risk of major cardiovascular events. In recent years, there have been numerous advancements in pharmacological agents aimed at secondary cardiovascular prevention. These innovations, combined with enhanced awareness and interventions targeting adherence and persistence to treatment, as well as lifestyle modifications, have the potential to substantially alleviate the burden of cardiovascular disease, particularly in patients who have experienced ischaemic strokes. This review summarises the evidence on the contemporary advances on pharmacological treatment and future perspectives of secondary stroke prevention beyond antithrombotic treatment.

Injectable Weight Loss Medications in Plastic Surgery: What We Know, Perioperative Considerations, and Recommendations for the Future

Obesity is a major epidemic plaguing American society. Injectable subcutaneous medications initially designed for use in type 2 diabetes management, such as semaglutide and other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, are rapidly gaining popularity for their effects on weight. These drugs (Ozempic, Wegovy, Saxenda, and Mounjaro) are ubiquitous on social media and are promoted by celebrities across all demographics. "Ozempic face" and "Ozempic butt" are now mainstream concepts highlighting the morphologic changes that occur with these medications. There is a paucity of literature available on the impact of these medications for plastic surgeons and their patients. As use becomes widespread, it is important for plastic surgeons to understand their indications, contraindications, appropriate perioperative management, and impact on plastic surgery procedures.

Drug Therapies for Diabetes

The treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) necessitates a multifaceted approach that combines behavioral and pharmacological interventions to mitigate complications and sustain a high quality of life. Treatment encompasses the management of glucose levels, weight, cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, and associated complications through medication and lifestyle adjustments. Metformin, a standard in diabetes management, continues to serve as the primary, first-line oral treatment across all age groups due to its efficacy, versatility in combination therapy, and cost-effectiveness. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) offer notable benefits for HbA1c and weight reduction, with significant cardiovascular benefits. Sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT-2i) lower glucose levels independently of insulin while conferring notable benefits for cardiovascular, renal, and heart-failure outcomes. Combined therapies emphasizing early and sustained glycemic control are promising options for diabetes management. As insulin therapy remains pivotal, metformin and non-insulin agents such as GLP-1 RA and SGLT-2i offer compelling options. Notably, exciting novel treatments like the dual GLP-1/ glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) agonist show promise for substantially reducing glycated hemoglobin and body weight. This comprehensive review highlights the evolving landscape of pharmacotherapy in diabetes, the drugs currently available for treating diabetes, their effectiveness and efficacy, the impact on target organs, and side effects. This work also provides insights that can support the customization of treatment strategies.

Obesity, thrombosis, venous disease, lymphatic disease, and lipedema: An obesity medicine association (OMA) clinical practice statement (CPS) 2023

Background

This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) is intended to provide clinicians with an overview on obesity, thrombosis, venous disease, lymphatic disease, and lipedema.

Methods

The scientific support for this CPS is based upon published citations, clinical perspectives of OMA authors, and peer review by the Obesity Medicine Association leadership.

Results

Topics in this CPS include obesity, thrombosis, venous disease, lymphatic disease, and lipedema. Obesity increases the risk of thrombosis and cardiovascular disease via fat mass and adiposopathic mechanisms. Treatment of thrombosis or thrombotic risk includes healthful nutrition, physical activity, and the requisite knowledge of how body weight affects anti-thrombotic medications. In addition to obesity-related thrombotic considerations of acute coronary syndrome and ischemic non-hemorrhagic stroke, this Clinical Practice Statement briefly reviews the diagnosis and management of clinically relevant presentations of deep vein thromboses, pulmonary embolism, chronic venous stasis, varicose veins, superficial thrombophlebitis, lipodermatosclerosis, corona phlebectatica, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, iliofemoral venous obstruction, pelvic venous disorder, post-thrombotic syndrome, as well as lymphedema and lipedema - which should be included in the differential diagnosis of other edematous or enlargement disorders of the lower extremities.

Conclusions

This Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) on obesity, thrombosis, and venous/lymphatic disease is one of a series of OMA CPSs designed to assist clinicians in the care of patients with the disease of obesity.

Management of Poststroke Hyperglycemia: Results of the TEXAIS Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke reduces the efficacy of stroke thrombolysis and thrombectomy, with worse clinical outcomes. Insulin-based therapies are difficult to implement and may cause hypoglycemia. We investigated whether exenatide, a GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) receptor agonist, would improve stroke outcomes, and control poststroke hyperglycemia with minimal hypoglycemia.

METHODS

The TEXAIS trial (Treatment With Exenatide in Acute Ischemic Stroke) was an international, multicenter, phase 2 prospective randomized clinical trial (PROBE [Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-Point] design) enrolling adult patients with acute ischemic stroke ≤9 hours of stroke onset to receive exenatide (5 µg BID subcutaneous injection) or standard care for 5 days, or until hospital discharge (whichever sooner). The primary outcome (intention to treat) was the proportion of patients with ≥8-point improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (or National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores 0-1) at 7 days poststroke. Safety outcomes included death, episodes of hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and adverse event.

RESULTS

From April 2016 to June 2021, 350 patients were randomized (exenatide, n=177, standard care, n=173). Median age, 71 years (interquartile range, 62-79), median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 4 (interquartile range, 2-8). Planned recruitment (n=528) was stopped early due to COVID-19 disruptions and funding constraints. The primary outcome was achieved in 97 of 171 (56.7%) in the standard care group versus 104 of 170 (61.2%) in the exenatide group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.79-1.88]; P=0.38). No differences in secondary outcomes were observed. The per-patient mean daily frequency of hyperglycemia was significantly less in the exenatide group across all quartiles. No episodes of hypoglycemia were recorded over the treatment period. Adverse events of mild nausea and vomiting occurred in 6 (3.5%) exenatide patients versus 0 (0%) standard care with no withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with exenatide did not reduce neurological impairment at 7 days in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Exenatide did significantly reduce the frequency of hyperglycemic events, without hypoglycemia, and was safe to use. Larger acute stroke trials using GLP-1 agonists such as exenatide should be considered.

REGISTRATION

URL: www.australianclinicaltrials.gov.au; Unique identifier: ACTRN12617000409370. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03287076.

The expanding incretin universe: from basic biology to clinical translation

Incretin hormones, principally glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1), potentiate meal-stimulated insulin secretion through direct (GIP + GLP-1) and indirect (GLP-1) actions on islet β-cells. GIP and GLP-1 also regulate glucagon secretion, through direct and indirect pathways. The incretin hormone receptors (GIPR and GLP-1R) are widely distributed beyond the pancreas, principally in the brain, cardiovascular and immune systems, gut and kidney, consistent with a broad array of extrapancreatic incretin actions. Notably, the glucoregulatory and anorectic activities of GIP and GLP-1 have supported development of incretin-based therapies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Here we review evolving concepts of incretin action, focusing predominantly on GLP-1, from discovery, to clinical proof of concept, to therapeutic outcomes. We identify established vs uncertain mechanisms of action, highlighting biology conserved across species, while illuminating areas of active investigation and uncertainty that require additional clarification.

An Imbalance of Pathophysiologic Factors in Late Postprandial Hypoglycemia Post Bariatric Surgery: A Narrative Review

With a rise in obesity and more patients opting for bariatric surgery, it becomes crucial to understand associated complications like postprandial hypoglycemia (PPH). After bariatric surgery, significant changes are seen in insulin sensitivity, beta cell function, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) levels, the gut microbiome, and bile acid metabolism. And in a small subset of patients, exaggerated imbalances in these functional and metabolic processes lead to insulin-glucose mismatch and hypoglycemia. The main treatment for PPH involves dietary modifications. For those that do not respond, medications or surgical interventions are considered to reverse some of the imbalances. We present a few case reports of patients that safely tolerated GLP-1 agonists. However, larger randomized control trials are needed to further characterize PPH and understand its treatment.

The Synergistic Relationship Between Atrial Fibrillation and Diabetes Mellitus: Implications for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are widespread chronic conditions that profoundly impact public health. While the intricate mechanisms linking these two diseases remain incompletely understood, this review sets out to comprehensively analyze the current evidence about their pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. We reveal that T2DM can influence the electrical and structural properties of the atria through multiple pathways, including oxidative stress, inflammation, fibrosis, connexin remodeling, glycemic variability, and autonomic dysfunction. Moreover, it significantly influences AF's clinical course, elevating the risk of heart failure, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Our review also explores treatment options for individuals with T2DM and AF, encompassing antidiabetic and antiarrhythmic drugs and non-pharmacological interventions, such as cardioversion catheter ablation and direct current cardioversion. This review depicts an insight into the clinical interplay between T2DM and AF. It deepens our comprehension of the fundamental mechanisms, potential therapeutic interventions, and their implications for patient care. This comprehensive resource benefits researchers seeking to deepen their knowledge in this domain. Ultimately, our findings pave the way for more effective strategies in managing AF within the context of T2DM.

Do SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists modulate differently the risk of stroke ? Discordance between randomised controlled trials and observational studies

Stroke represents a major burden in patients with type 2 diabetes, yet this cerebrovascular complication has been less carefully investigated than the risk of cardiovascular mortality, heart failure and renal disease. Some data suggested that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) exert a better protection against stroke than sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is). However, this conclusion was derived from indirect comparisons in absence of any head-to-head randomised controlled trial (RCT). The present comprehensive review compares the effects of SGLT2is versus GLP-1RAs on nonfatal and fatal/nonfatal strokes in network meta-analyses of RCTs (mostly cardiovascular outcome trials) versus placebo, on the one hand, and in real-life observational cohort studies, on the other hand. Whereas network meta-analyses of placebo-controlled RCTs confirm a slight but significant (in 11 out of 13 meta-analyses) higher incidence of stroke in patients treated with SGLT2is compared with those treated with GLP-1RAs, a large majority of retrospective observational cohort studies (19 out of 21) failed to find any significant difference in the risk of stroke between the two pharmacological classes. Available, yet limited, findings suggest that SGLT2is may be more efficacious against haemorrhagic than ischaemic strokes, in patients at risk for atrial fibrillation and in patients with chronic kidney disease.

The heterogeneity of metabolic syndrome presentation and challenges this causes in its pharmacological management: a narrative review focusing on principal risk modifiers

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic syndrome (MetS), i.e. the cluster of cardiometabolic risk factors comprising visceral obesity, impaired glucose metabolism, arterial hypertension and atherogenic dyslipidemia, is prevalent globally and exacts a heavy toll on health care expenditures.

AREAS COVERED

The pathophenotypes of individual traits of the MetS in adults are discussed first, with strong emphasis on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and sex differences. Next, I discuss recent studies on phenotypic and outcome heterogeneity of the MetS, highlighting the role of NAFLD, sex, reproductive status, and depressive disorders. In the second half of the article, the therapeutic implications of the variable MetS types and features are analyzed, focusing on the most recent developments, and guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

I have identified physiological, pathological, social and medical sources of phenotypical heterogeneity in the MetS and its constitutive traits. Improved understanding of these variables may be utilized in the setting of future precision medicine approaches in the field of metabolic disorders and target organ damage.

Newer Glucose-Lowering Therapies in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes is prevalent in older adults and older adults with diabetes are more likely to have multiple comorbidities. It is, therefore, important to personalize diabetes management in this group. Newer glucose-lowering drugs, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists can be safely used in older patients and are preferred choices in many cases due to their safety, efficacy, and low risk of hypoglycemia.

Risks of stroke, its subtypes and atrial fibrillation associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists versus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a real-world population-based cohort study in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on head-to-head comparative risk of stroke between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA). We compared risk of stroke with its subtypes and incident atrial fibrillation (AF) between them.

METHODS

A population-based, retrospective cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes between 2008 and 2020 were identified from the electronic health records of Hong Kong Hospital Authority. Patients who received SGLT2i or GLP-1RA were matched pairwise by propensity score. Risks of stroke and AF were evaluated by hazard ratios (HRs) from the Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 5840 patients (2920 SGLT2i users; 2920 GLP-1RA users) were included (mean age 55.5 years, 56.1% men, mean HbA1c 8.9% and duration of diabetes 13.7 years). Upon median follow-up of 17 months, there were 111 (1.9%) events of stroke (SGLT2i: 62, 2.1%; GLP-1RA: 49 1.7%). SGLT2i users had comparable risk of all stroke as GLP-1RA users (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.99-2.17, p = 0.058). SGLT2i users had higher risk of ischemic stroke (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.01-2.33, p = 0.044) but similar risk of hemorrhagic stroke compared to GLP-1RA users. Although SGLT2i was associated with lower risk of incident AF (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.79, p = 0.006), risk of cardioembolic stroke was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world study demonstrated that GLP-1RA use was associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke, despite the association between SGLT2i use and lower risk of incident AF. There was no significant difference in hemorrhagic stroke risk. GLP-1RA may be the preferred agent for patients with type 2 diabetes at risk of ischemic stroke.

Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)

The American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes convened a panel to update the previous consensus statements on the management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes in adults, published since 2006 and last updated in 2019. The target audience is the full spectrum of the professional healthcare team providing diabetes care in the USA and Europe. A systematic examination of publications since 2018 informed new recommendations. These include additional focus on social determinants of health, the healthcare system and physical activity behaviours including sleep. There is a greater emphasis on weight management as part of the holistic approach to diabetes management. The results of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes trials involving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, including assessment of subgroups, inform broader recommendations for cardiorenal protection in people with diabetes at high risk of cardiorenal disease. After a summary listing of consensus recommendations, practical tips for implementation are provided.

Protection against stroke with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a comprehensive review of potential mechanisms

Several randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the benefits of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on ischemic stroke in patients with diabetes. In this review, we summarize and discuss the potential mechanisms of stroke protection by GLP-1RAs. GLP-1RAs exert multiple anti-atherosclerotic effects contributing to stroke prevention such as enhanced plaque stability, reduced vascular smooth muscle proliferation, increased nitric oxide, and improved endothelial function. GLP-1RAs also lower the risk of stroke by reducing traditional stroke risk factors including hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Independently of these peripheral actions, GLP-1RAs show direct cerebral effects in animal stroke models, such as reduction of infarct volume, apoptosis, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity, blood-brain barrier permeability, and increased neurogenesis, neuroplasticity, angiogenesis, and brain perfusion. Despite these encouraging findings, further research is still needed to understand more thoroughly the mechanisms by which GLP-1RAs may mediate stroke protection specifically in the human diabetic brain.

Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)

The American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes convened a panel to update the previous consensus statements on the management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes in adults, published since 2006 and last updated in 2019. The target audience is the full spectrum of the professional health care team providing diabetes care in the U.S. and Europe. A systematic examination of publications since 2018 informed new recommendations. These include additional focus on social determinants of health, the health care system, and physical activity behaviors, including sleep. There is a greater emphasis on weight management as part of the holistic approach to diabetes management. The results of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes trials involving sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, including assessment of subgroups, inform broader recommendations for cardiorenal protection in people with diabetes at high risk of cardiorenal disease. After a summary listing of consensus recommendations, practical tips for implementation are provided.

The Role of Nondiabetic Hyperglycemia in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

In this study, we aim to elucidate the association between nondiabetic hyperglycemia and the short-term prognosis of critically ill patients with acute ischemic stroke. We extracted data using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV from 2008 to 2019. The primary outcomes were set as intensive care units (ICU) and in-hospital mortality. We developed a Cox proportional hazards model to determine the nonlinear association between serum glucose levels and primary outcomes. Of the 1086 patients included, 236 patients had hyperglycemia. Patients with hyperglycemia were associated with higher ages, female gender, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and higher Acute Physiology Score III scores. After propensity score matching, 222 pairs remained. The hyperglycemia group had a significantly higher ICU mortality (17.6% vs. 10.8%; p = 0.041). Meanwhile, no significant differences in ICU length of stay (5.2 vs. 5.2; p = 0.910), in-hospital mortality (26.6% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.054), and hospital length of stay (10.0 vs. 9.1; p = 0.404) were observed between the two groups. The Kaplan–Meier curves for ICU and in-hospital survival before matching suggested significant differences; however, after matching, they failed to prove any disparity. Non-diabetic patients with acute ischemic stroke have poor clinical characteristic while encountering hyperglycemic events; therefore, careful monitoring in the acute phase is still required.