Induction of monocyte tissue factor expression by antibodies to heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes developed in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Structural and functional changes underlying activation of monocytes in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated disorder associated with thrombosis developing in response to anticoagulation with heparin. Monocytes targeted by HIT antibodies contribute to the prothrombotic state, but structural and functional alterations of the activated monocytes have not been described.

OBJECTIVES

To study morphologic and functional changes in monocytes caused by HIT antibodies interacting with membrane-associated platelet factor 4 (PF4) in vitro.

METHODS

THP-1, isolated human, or FcγRIIA-positive and FcγRIIA-negative mouse monocytes were incubated with recombinant human PF4 and/or anti-PF4/heparin antibodies followed by scanning electron microscopy and confocal microscopy.

RESULTS

Binding of PF4 to monocytes induced formation of "knobs" ∼150 nm in size that protruded from the cell surface. Addition of pathogenic HIT-like monoclonal antibodies (KKO) caused profound remodeling of the cell membrane and time-dependent formation and clustering of KKO/PF4/glycosaminoglycan complexes into large "blebs" ranging in size from 500 to 1200 nm. Dynamic confocal microscopy revealed formation of monocyte-derived microvesicles in response to PF4 and KKO. In contrast, RTO, a monoclonal antibody that blocks PF4 oligomerization and prevents thrombocytopenia/thrombosis in an animal HIT model, inhibited PF4-induced modification of monocyte surfaces. Comparing monocytes from transgenic mice expressing hFcγRIIA to wild-type mice lacking FcγRIIA indicated that bleb formation results from clustering of knobs caused by bivalent HIT antibodies through crosslinking of FcγRIIA.

CONCLUSIONS

Binding of pathogenic HIT antibodies to PF4-containing antigenic complexes assembled on the monocyte surface promotes large-scale plasma membrane remodeling as part of cell activation through the FcγRIIA receptors, resulting in the release of procoagulant microvesicles, which together may contribute to thrombosis in HIT.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy: A Case Report

Portal vein thrombosis and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) caused by postoperative heparin administration is a potentially fatal disease. There have been a few cases of portal vein thrombosis and HIT developing after hepatectomy. We report a rare case of HIT and portal vein thrombosis after hepatectomy. A 79-year-old woman with liver cirrhosis and hypertension was referred to our hospital for the evaluation of the elevated tumor marker and liver tumor diagnosed by ultrasonography. In laboratory findings, alpha-fetoprotein and protein induced by vitamin K absence were elevated. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan findings showed that 28 mm and 17 mm diameter, round-shaped tumors enhanced heterogeneously with infiltration in the left hepatic vein and pulmonary embolization. Hepatocellular carcinoma and pulmonary embolism were diagnosed. She underwent lateral segmentectomy along with venous tumor embolus resection. Pathological findings showed that the tumor was moderate to well-differentiated adenocarcinoma invading the capsule with liver cirrhosis. Tumor embolization was suspected preoperatively to be an organizing thrombus. After surgery, she was treated with heparin for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis. At postoperative day 15, the sudden onset of the decline of platelets, the activity of antithrombin III, and the elevation of D-dimer were found. On physical examination, there were no symptoms. The 4T's score was 7. CT scan showed a portal vein thrombosis. The antibody for HIT was elevated. HIT was diagnosed. We stopped the heparin and started the argatroban administration. The platelet level increased to the normal range, and the D-dimer level decreased. After the reduction of portal vein and pulmonary thrombosis, she was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 28.

How to assess hypercoagulability in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia? Biomarkers of potential value to support therapeutic intensity of non-heparin anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

In case of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the switch to a non-heparin anticoagulant is mandatory, at a therapeutic dose. Such a treatment has limitations though, especially for patients with renal and/or hepatic failure. Candidate laboratory tests could detect the more coagulable HIT patients, for whom therapeutic anticoagulation would be the more justified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a monocentre observational prospective study in which 111 patients with suspected HIT were included. Nineteen were diagnosed with HIT (ELISA and platelet activation assay), among whom 10 were classified as HITT + when a thrombotic event was present at diagnosis or during the first following week. Two plasma prethrombotic biomarkers of in vivo activation of the haemostasis system, procoagulant phospholipids (ProcoagPPL) associated with extracellular vesicles and fibrin monomers (FM test), as well as in vitro thrombin potential (ST Genesia; low picomolar tissue factor) after heparin neutralization (heparinase), were studied. The results were primarily compared between HITT + and HITT- patients.

RESULTS

Those HIT + patients with thrombotic events in acute phase or shortly after (referred as HITT+) had a more coagulable phenotype than HIT + patients without thrombotic events since: (i) clotting times related to plasma procoagulant phospholipids tended to be shorter; (ii) fibrin monomers levels were statistically significantly higher (p = 0.0483); (iii) thrombin potential values were statistically significantly higher (p = 0.0404). Of note, among all patients suspected of suffering from HIT, we did not evidence a hypercoagulable phenotype in patients diagnosed with HIT compared to patients for whom the diagnosis of HIT was ruled out.

CONCLUSION

The three tests could help identify those HIT patients the most prone to thrombosis.

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia - Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment: A Narrative Review

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening, immune-mediated complication following heparin exposure and is considered to be the most severe adverse reaction to heparin treatment that is not associated with bleeding. Development of autoantibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4) - heparin complex constitutes the basis of the pathophysiological changes in patients suffering from HIT, which then binds to the surface of platelets and monocytes, thus provoking their activation and subsequent aggregation, ultimately leading to the formation of thrombosis. Formation of arterial and venous thrombosis is aggravated by the simultaneous activation of platelets and monocytes with a substantial mortality rate. The incidence of HIT is reported to be significantly lower in pediatric patients compared with adults. Diagnosis of HIT in pediatric population remains a clinical entity supplemented by laboratory evaluation. The positive predictive value of laboratory evaluation is further elevated by the use of scoring systems and predictive models used for hastening the diagnosis of HIT. Use of alternative anticoagulants like direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors form the mainstay of treatment in cases of HIT, however, more prospective studies would be required in the pediatric population to delineate definitive guidelines for proper management of patients in this age-group. This article delivers diagnostic and treatment approach in case of patients with HIT, wherein the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approach and the management of patients with HIT has been described.

Novel Knowledge about Molecular Mechanisms of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Type II and Treatment Targets

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II), as stated in the literature, occurs in about 3% of all patients and in 0.1-5% of surgical patients. Thrombosis develops in 20-64% of patients with HIT. The mortality rate in HIT II has not decreased using non-heparin treatment with anticoagulants such as argatroban and lepirudin. An improved understanding of the pathophysiology of HIT may help identify targeted therapies to prevent thrombosis without subjecting patients to the risk of intense anticoagulation. The review will summarize the current knowledge about the pathogenesis of HIT II, potential new therapeutic targets related to it, and new treatments being developed. HIT II pathogenesis involves multi-step immune-mediated pathways dependent on the ratio of PF4/heparin and platelet, monocyte, neutrophil, and endothelium activation. For years, only platelets were known to take part in HIT II development. A few years ago, specific receptors and signal-induced pathways in monocytes, neutrophils and endothelium were revealed. It had been shown that the cells that had become active realised different newly formed compounds (platelet-released TF, TNFα, NAP2, CXCL-7, ENA-78, platelet-derived microparticles; monocytes-TF-MPs; neutrophils-NETs), leading to additional cell activation and consequently thrombin generation, resulting in thrombosis. Knowledge about FcγIIa receptors on platelets, monocytes, neutrophils and FcγIIIa on endothelium, chemokine (CXCR-2), and PSGL-1 receptors on neutrophils could allow for the development of a new non-anticoagulant treatment for HIT II. IgG degradation, Syk kinase and NETosis inhibition are in the field of developing new treatment possibilities too. Accordingly, IdeS and DNases-related pathways should be investigated for better understanding of HIT pathogenesis and the possibilities of being the HIT II treatment targets.

Modulation of ultralarge immune complexes in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious thrombotic disorder caused by ultralarge immune complexes (ULICs) containing platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin that form the HIT antigen, together with a subset of anti-PF4 antibodies. ULICs initiate prothrombotic responses by engaging Fcγ receptors on platelets, neutrophils, and monocytes. Contemporary anti-thrombotic therapy for HIT is neither entirely safe nor entirely successful and acts downstream of ULIC formation and Fcγ receptor-initiated generation of thrombin.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether HIT antigen and ULIC formation and stability could be modified favorably by inhibiting PF4-heparin interactions with fondaparinux, together with blocking formation of PF4 tetramers using a humanized monoclonal anti-PF4 antibody (hRTO).

METHODS

Results: The combination of fondaparinux and hRTO inhibited HIT antigen formation, promoted antigen dissociation, inhibited ULIC formation, and promoted ULIC disassembly at concentrations below the effective concentration of either alone and blocked Fcγ receptor-dependent induction of factor Xa activity by monocytic THP1 cells and activation of human platelets in whole blood. Combined with hRTO, fondaparinux inhibited HIT antigen and immune complex formation and activation through Fcγ receptors at concentrations at or below those used clinically to inhibit FXa coagulant activity.

CONCLUSIONS

HIT antigen and immune complexes are dynamic and amenable to modulation. Fondaparinux can be converted from an anticoagulant that acts at a downstream amplification step into a rationale, disease-specific intervention that blocks ULIC formation. Interventions that prevent ULIC formation and stability might increase the efficacy, permit use of lower doses, shorten the duration of antithrombotic therapy, and help prevent this serious thrombotic disorder.

Pharmacology of Heparin and Related Drugs: An Update

Heparin has been used extensively as an antithrombotic and anticoagulant for close to 100 years. This anticoagulant activity is attributed mainly to the pentasaccharide sequence, which potentiates the inhibitory action of antithrombin, a major inhibitor of the coagulation cascade. More recently it has been elucidated that heparin exhibits anti-inflammatory effect via interference of the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps and this may also contribute to heparin's antithrombotic activity. This illustrates that heparin interacts with a broad range of biomolecules, exerting both anticoagulant and nonanticoagulant actions. Since our previous review, there has been an increased interest in these nonanticoagulant effects of heparin, with the beneficial role in patients infected with SARS2-coronavirus a highly topical example. This article provides an update on our previous review with more recent developments and observations made for these novel uses of heparin and an overview of the development status of heparin-based drugs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This state-of-the-art review covers recent developments in the use of heparin and heparin-like materials as anticoagulant, now including immunothrombosis observations, and as nonanticoagulant including a role in the treatment of SARS-coronavirus and inflammatory conditions.

Unique features of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia; a new anti-platelet factor 4 antibody-mediated disorder

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a highly prothrombotic disorder caused by anti-PF4 antibodies that activate platelets and neutrophils, leading to thrombosis. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a related anti-PF4 mediated disorder, with similar pathophysiology and clinical manifestations but different triggers (i.e., heparin vs adenoviral vector vaccine). Clinically, both HIT and VITT typically present with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis, although the risk of thrombosis is significantly higher in VITT, and the thromboses occur in unusual anatomical sites (e.g., cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and hepatic vein thrombosis). The diagnostic accuracy of available laboratory testing differs between HIT and VITT; for VITT, ELISAs have better specificity compared to HIT and platelet activation assays require the addition of PF4. Treatment of VITT and HIT is anticoagulation non-heparin anticoagulants; however, heparin may be considered for VITT if no other option is available.

Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) are rare, iatrogenic immune-mediated conditions with high rates of thrombosis-related morbidity and mortality. HIT is a long-recognized reaction to the administration of the common parenterally administered anticoagulant heparin (or its derivatives), while VITT is a new, distinct syndrome occurring in response to adenovirus-based vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 and potentially other types of vaccines. A feature of both HIT and VITT is paradoxical thrombosis despite a characteristic low platelet count, mediated by the presence of platelet-activating antibodies to platelet factor 4. Several additional factors have also been suggested to contribute to clot formation in HIT and/or VITT, including monocytes, tissue factor, microparticles, endothelium, the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps, complement, procoagulant platelets, and vaccine components. In this review, we discuss the literature to date regarding mechanisms contributing to thrombosis in both HIT and VITT and explore the pathophysiological similarities and differences between the two conditions.

Procoagulant platelets: novel players in thromboinflammation

Platelets play a key role in maintaining hemostasis. However, dysregulated platelet activation can lead to pathological thrombosis or bleeding. Once a platelet gets activated, it will either become an aggregatory platelet or eventually a procoagulant platelet with both types playing distinct roles in thrombosis and hemostasis. Although aggregatory platelets have been extensively studied, procoagulant platelets have only recently come into the spotlight. Procoagulant platelets are a subpopulation of highly activated platelets that express phosphatidylserine and P-selectin on their surface, allowing for coagulation factors to bind and thrombin to be generated. In recent years, novel roles for procoagulant platelets have been identified and they have increasingly been implicated in thromboinflammatory diseases. Here, we provide an up-to-date review on the mechanisms resulting in the formation of procoagulant platelets and how they contribute to hemostasis, thrombosis, and thromboinflammation.

Breast cancer cell-based ELISA: a potential material for better detection of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by newly formed platelet-activating antibodies against complexes formed between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (H). HIT can result in life-threatening complications; thus, early detection of HIT antibodies is crucial for the treatment of the disease. The enzyme-linked immune absorbance assay (ELISA) for the identification of HIT antibodies is widely used in many laboratories, but in general, this test provides only ∼50% accuracy while other methods show multiple limitations. Here, we developed a new cell-based ELISA to improve the detection of HIT antibodies. Instead of immobilizing PF4 or PF4/H complexes directly onto a plate as in the standard ELISA, we added the complexes on breast cancer cells, i.e., cell line MDA-MB-231, and applied the same protocol for antibody detection. Using confocal laser scanning microscopy and flow cytometry for the characterization of bound complexes, we identified two types of HIT-mimicked antibodies (KKO and 1E12), which were able to differentiate from the non-HIT antibody (RTO). PF4-treated MDA-MB-231 cells allowed binding of HIT-mimicked antibodies better than PF4/H complexes. With human sera, the cell-based ELISA allowed better differentiation of clinically relevant from non-clinically relevant HIT antibodies as compared with the standard ELISA. Our findings provide a potential approach that contributes to the development of better assays for the detection of HIT antibodies.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in an older patient: Minireview and a case report

Rare cases of unusual thrombosis and thrombocytopenia after administration of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AstraZeneca) have been reported. The unusual symptoms are called vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). In the present study, a brief background about cases of unusual thrombosis and thrombocytopenia after administration of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was provided. In addition, a description of a case of a 66-year-old woman who had received this vaccine and developed VITT was done. She presented to the hospital complaining of hematomas in the right upper limb 14 days after the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, without a history of trauma (Glasgow coma scale of 14) and thrombocytopenia even though signs of thrombosis were absent. Cranium computed tomography scan indicated intraparenchymal hematoma and cerebral thrombosis, besides anastomotic Labbé vein thrombosis. The woman received platelets transfusion, dexamethasone, and neuroprotection measures, but even so, on the twelfth postoperative day, she died of cerebral rebleeding. In conclusion, it is crucial to point out the immuno-hypersensitivity mechanisms associated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine reactions, helping to reduce their occurrences and reinforcing confidence in vaccine administration.

Elucidation of Cellular Contributions to Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Using Omic Approaches

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an unpredictable, complex, immune-mediated adverse drug reaction associated with a high mortality. Despite decades of research into HIT, fundamental knowledge gaps persist regarding HIT likely due to the complex and unusual nature of the HIT immune response. Such knowledge gaps include the identity of a HIT immunogen, the intrinsic roles of various cell types and their interactions, and the molecular basis that distinguishes pathogenic and non-pathogenic PF4/heparin antibodies. While a key feature of HIT, thrombocytopenia, implicates platelets as a seminal cell fragment in HIT pathogenesis, strong evidence exists for critical roles of multiple cell types. The rise in omic technologies over the last decade has resulted in a number of agnostic, whole system approaches for biological research that may be especially informative for complex phenotypes. Applying multi-omics techniques to HIT has the potential to bring new insights into HIT pathophysiology and identify biomarkers with clinical utility. In this review, we review the clinical, immunological, and molecular features of HIT with emphasis on key cell types and their roles. We then address the applicability of several omic techniques underutilized in HIT, which have the potential to fill knowledge gaps related to HIT biology.

Platelet factor 4 polyanion immune complexes: heparin induced thrombocytopenia and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

This is a review article on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an adverse effect of heparin therapy, and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, occurring in some patients administered certain coronavirus vaccines.

MAIN BODY/TEXT

Immune-mediated thrombocytopenia occurs when specific antibodies bind to platelet factor 4 /heparin complexes. Platelet factor 4 is a naturally occurring chemokine, and under certain conditions, may complex with negatively charged molecules and polyanions, including heparin. The antibody-platelet factor 4/heparin complex may lead to platelet activation, accompanied by other cascading reactions, resulting in cerebral sinus thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, lower limb arterial thrombosis, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, skin necrosis, and thrombotic stroke. If untreated, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can be life threatening. In parallel, rare incidents of spontaneous vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia can also occur in some patients administered certain coronavirus vaccines. The role of platelet factor 4 in vaccine-induced thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome further reinforces the importance the platelet factor 4/polyanion immune complexes and the complications that this might pose to susceptible individuals. These findings demonstrate, how auxiliary factors can complicate heparin therapy and drug development. An increasing interest in biomanufacturing heparins from non-animal sources has driven a growing interest in understanding the biology of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and therefore, the development of safe and effective biosynthetic heparins.

SHORT CONCLUSION

In conclusion, these findings further reinforce the importance of the binding of platelet factor 4 with known and unknown polyanions, and the complications that these might pose to susceptible patients. In parallel, these findings also demonstrate how auxiliary factors can complicate the heparin drug development.

[Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Update]

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin therapy. It is due to the synthesis of antibodies most often directed against platelet factor 4 (FP4) modified by heparin (H). HIT is manifested by a platelet count fall, associated with a high risk of venous or arterial thrombosis. The diagnosis of HIT is based on the assessment of clinical probability (4Ts score or change in platelet count after cardiac surgery) and the demonstration of heparin-modified anti-FP4 antibodies (FP4/H). If the immunological tests are positive, functional tests should be performed. In case of suspicion of HIT, it is necessary to urgently stop heparin therapy, to perform a doppler ultrasound of the lower limbs, and to prescribe an alternative anticoagulation agent at a curative dose. Currently, danaparoid sodium and argatroban are authorized. The diagnosis and management of HIT remain complex and requires multidisciplinary collaboration.

Vaccine induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia: The shady chapter of a success story

The recognition of the rare but serious and potentially lethal complication of vaccine induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) raised concerns regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and led to the reconsideration of vaccination strategies in many countries. Following the description of VITT among recipients of adenoviral vector ChAdOx1 vaccine, a review of similar cases after Ad26.COV2·S vaccination gave rise to the question whether this entity may constitute a potential class effect of all adenoviral vector vaccines. Most cases are females, typically younger than 60 years who present shortly (range: 5-30 days) following vaccination with thrombocytopenia and thrombotic manifestations, occasionally in multiple sites. Following initial incertitude, concrete recommendations to guide the diagnosis (clinical suspicion, initial laboratory screening, PF4-polyanion-antibody ELISA) and management of VITT (non-heparin anticoagulants, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin) have been issued. The mechanisms behind this rare syndrome are currently a subject of active research and include the following: 1) production of PF4-polyanion autoantibodies; 2) adenoviral vector entry in megacaryocytes and subsequent expression of spike protein on platelet surface; 3) direct platelet and endothelial cell binding and activation by the adenoviral vector; 4) activation of endothelial and inflammatory cells by the PF4-polyanion autoantibodies; 5) the presence of an inflammatory co-signal; and 6) the abundance of circulating soluble spike protein variants following vaccination. Apart from the analysis of potential underlying mechanisms, this review aims to synopsize the clinical and epidemiologic features of VITT, to present the current evidence-based recommendations on diagnostic and therapeutic work-up of VITT and to discuss new dilemmas and perspectives that emerged after the description of this entity.

Complement mediates binding and procoagulant effects of ultra-large HIT immune complexes

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic disorder mediated by ultra-large immune complexes (ULICs) containing IgG antibodies to a multivalent antigen composed of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. The limitations of current anti-thrombotic therapy in HIT supports the need to identify additional pathways that may be targets for therapy. Activation of FcgRIIA by HIT ULICs initiates diverse procoagulant cellular effector functions. HIT ULICs are also known to activate complement, but the contribution of this pathway to the pathogenesis of HIT has not been studied in detail. We observed that HIT ULICs physically interact with C1q in buffer and plasma, activate complement via the classical pathway, promote co-deposition of IgG and activated C3 complement fragments (C3c) on neutrophil and monocyte cell surfaces. Complement activation by ULICs, in turn, facilitates Fcg receptor(R)-independent monocyte tissue factor expression, enhances IgG binding to the cell surface FcgRs and promotes platelet adhesion to injured endothelium. Inhibition of the proximal, but not terminal, steps in the complement pathway, abrogates monocyte tissue factor expression by HIT ULICs. Together, these studies suggest a major role for complement activation in regulating Fc-dependent effector functions of HIT ULICs, identify potential non-anticoagulant targets for therapy, and provide insights into the broader roles of complement in immune complex-mediated thrombotic disorders.

A comparative study of platelet factor 4-enhanced platelet activation assays for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Functional platelet activation assays, such as the serotonin release assay (SRA), are the gold standard for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Recently, platelet activation assays using added platelet factor 4 (PF4) have been described and suggest improved sensitivity. Direct comparisons of these assays have not been performed.

OBJECTIVE

We compare the performance characteristics of three PF4-enhanced platelet activation assays, the PF4/heparin-SRA (PF4/hep-SRA), the PF4-SRA, and the P-selectin expression assay (PEA), at a single reference laboratory.

METHODS

Serum samples from two cohorts of patients were used. The referral cohort (n = 84) included samples that had previously undergone routine diagnostic testing for HIT and tested positive or negative using the SRA. The clinical cohort (n = 101) consisted of samples from patients with clinically confirmed HIT whose serum contained platelet-activating antibodies. We simultaneously tested all samples in PF4-enhanced SRA-based assays (PF4/hep-SRA, PF4-SRA) and the flow cytometry-based PEA.

RESULTS

In the referral cohort, the three PF4-enhanced assays identified all samples that were previously determined to be positive in the SRA. However, specificity of the PF4/hep-SRA was 96.6%, the PF4-SRA was 84.7%, and the PEA was 67.8%. In the clinical cohort of samples, all SRA-based assays displayed high performance characteristics (>92.1% sensitivity, >98.4% specificity). Sensitivity and specificity of the PEA was the lowest, 65.8% and 63.5%, respectively; but improved to 92.1% and 96.8% using preselected platelet donors.

CONCLUSIONS

All PF4-enhanced assays demonstrated good performance characteristics when platelet donors were preselected. Further comparisons across multiple laboratories should be conducted for consensus on optimal HIT diagnostic testing.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Review of New Concepts in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management

Knowledge on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia keeps increasing. Recent progress on diagnosis and management as well as several discoveries concerning its pathogenesis have been made. However, many aspects of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia remain partly unknown, and exact application of these new insights still need to be addressed. This article reviews the main new concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Focus on Thrombosis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an immune-mediated disorder caused by antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Thrombosis is a central and unpredictable feature of this syndrome. Despite optimal management, disease morbidity and mortality from thrombosis remain high. The hypercoagulable state in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is biologically distinct from other thrombophilic disorders in that clinical complications are directly attributable to circulating ultra-large immune complexes. In some individuals, ultra-large immune complexes elicit unchecked cellular procoagulant responses that culminate in thrombosis. To date, the clinical and biologic risk factors associated with thrombotic risk in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia remain elusive. This review will summarize our current understanding of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with attention to its clinical features, cellular mechanisms, and its management.

The role of fluid-phase immune complexes in the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Immune complexes assemble on the platelet surface and cause Fc-mediated platelet activation in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT); however, it is not known if fluid-phase immune complexes contribute to HIT. The objective of this study was to understand the role of fluid-phase immune complexes in platelet activation and HIT. Binding of wild-type and 15 platelet factor 4 (PF4) mutants to platelets was measured using flow cytometry. Platelet activation was measured using the PF4-dependent ¹⁴C-serotonin release assay (PF4-SRA) with KKO and a HIT-patient plasma in the presence of wild-type or PF4 mutants. To activate platelets, we found that a minimal level of wild-type PF4 is required to bind the platelet surface in the presence of KKO (2.67 relative MFI) or HIT-patient plasma (1.71 relative MFI). Only a subset of PF4 mutants was able to support platelet activation, despite having lower surface binding than the minimum binding required of wild-type PF4 (9 mutants with KKO and 2 mutants with HIT-patient plasma). Using individual PF4 mutants, we identified that HIT immune complexes can be formed in fluid-phase and induce platelet activation. Further studies are required to investigate the role of fluid-phase HIT immune complexes in the development of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis associated with clinical HIT.

COVID-19 versus HIT hypercoagulability

A striking feature of COVID-19 is the high frequency of thrombosis, particularly in patients who require admission to intensive care unit because of respiratory complications (pneumonia/adult respiratory distress syndrome). The spectrum of thrombotic events is wide, including in situ pulmonary thrombosis, deep-vein thrombosis and associated pulmonary embolism, as well as arterial thrombotic events (stroke, myocardial infarction, limb artery thrombosis). Unusual thrombotic events have also been reported, e.g., cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, mesenteric artery and vein thrombosis. Several hematology abnormalities have been observed in COVID-19 patients, including lymphopenia, neutrophilia, thrombocytopenia (usually mild), thrombocytosis, elevated prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin times (the latter abnormality often indicating lupus anticoagulant phenomenon), hyperfibrinogenemia, elevated von Willebrand factor levels, and elevated fibrin d-dimer. Many of these abnormal hematologic parameters—even as early as the time of initial hospital admission—indicate adverse prognosis, including greater frequency of progression to severe respiratory illness and death. Progression to overt disseminated intravascular coagulation in fatal COVID-19 has been reported in some studies, but not observed in others. We compare and contrast COVID-19 hypercoagulability, and associated increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis, from the perspective of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), including the dilemma of providing thromboprophylaxis and treatment recommendations when available data are limited to observational studies. The frequent use of heparin—both low-molecular-weight and unfractionated—in preventing and treating COVID-19 thrombosis, means that vigilance for HIT occurrence is required in this patient population.

•

HIT and COVID-19 are associated with a high risk of thrombosis (venous > arterial).

•

HIT and COVID-19 both feature coagulation and “pancellular” activation.

•

Therapeutic anticoagulation is indicated for HIT, but dosing unknown for COVID-19.

Pathophysiology and Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia

Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia (DITP) is a life-threatening clinical syndrome that is under-recognized and difficult to diagnose. Many drugs can cause immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, but the most commonly implicated are abciximab, carbamazepine, ceftriaxone, eptifibatide, heparin, ibuprofen, mirtazapine, oxaliplatin, penicillin, quinine, quinidine, rifampicin, suramin, tirofiban, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin. Several different mechanisms have been identified in typical DITP, which is most commonly characterized by severe thrombocytopenia due to clearance and/or destruction of platelets sensitized by a drug-dependent antibody. Patients with typical DITP usually bleed when symptomatic, and biological confirmation of the diagnosis is often difficult because detection of drug-dependent antibodies (DDabs) in the patient's serum or plasma is frequently not possible. This is in contrast to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), which is a particular DITP caused in most cases by heparin-dependent antibodies specific for platelet factor 4, which can strongly activate platelets in vitro and in vivo, explaining why affected patients usually have thrombotic complications but do not bleed. In addition, laboratory tests are readily available to diagnose HIT, unlike the methods used to detect DDabs associated with other DITP that are mostly reserved for laboratories specialized in platelet immunology.

Detection of Platelet-Activating Antibodies Associated with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic immune drug reaction caused by platelet-activating antibodies that in most instances recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion complexes. Platelet activation assays (i.e., functional assays) are more specific than immunoassays, since they are able to discern clinically relevant heparin-induced antibodies. All functional assays used for HIT diagnosis share the same principle, as they assess the ability of serum/plasma from suspected HIT patients to activate fresh platelets from healthy donors in the presence of several concentrations of heparin. Depending on the assay, donors’ platelets are stimulated either in whole blood (WB), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or in a buffer medium (washed platelets, WP). In addition, the activation endpoint studied varies from one assay to another: platelet aggregation, membrane expression of markers of platelet activation, release of platelet granules. Tests with WP are more sensitive and serotonin release assay (SRA) is considered to be the current gold standard, but functional assays suffer from certain limitations regarding their sensitivity, specificity, complexity, and/or accessibility. However, the strict adherence to adequate preanalytical conditions, the use of selected platelet donors and the inclusion of positive and negative controls in each run are key points that ensure their performances.

Evaluation of functional assays for the diagnosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia using 5B9, a monoclonal IgG that mimics human antibodies

BACKGROUND

Serotonin release assay (SRA) is considered as the "gold standard" for detecting pathogenic heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies. However, this method is time consuming, expensive, and uses radioelements. Heparin-induced multiple electrode aggregometry (HIMEA), light transmission aggregometry (LTA) with platelet rich plasma (PRP) or washed platelets (WP), adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release, and flow cytometry (FC) are available alternatives.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of these assays, comparatively with SRA, for detecting HIT antibodies, using 5B9, a monoclonal IgG fully mimicking human HIT antibodies.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Heparin-dependent platelet activation induced by 5B9 (50/20/10 µg/mL) was evaluated by all assays performed on the same day using platelets from 20 healthy donors. The three methods exhibiting the highest sensitivity to 5B9 were then assessed by testing samples from patients with either likely (n = 10), or indeterminate/unlikely HIT (n = 10).

RESULTS

All methods exhibited good sensitivity for detecting 5B9 50 µg/mL, but only SRA and HIMEA were positive with 100% of donors using 5B9 20 µg/mL, followed by FC (83%). SRA detected 5B9 10 μg/mL with 90% of donors, while HIMEA and FC were positive in 45% and 44% of cases, respectively. Whereas SRA was positive with 9/10 samples from likely HIT, HIMEA and FC were positive with 6 and 7 of them, respectively. Neither SRA nor HIMEA was positive with indeterminate/unlikely HIT samples, while FC was positive or doubtful in three cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Serotonin release assay likely remains the most sensitive and specific assay for detecting platelet activating HIT antibodies, but HIMEA or FC are potential alternatives, despite being less performant.

Use of a whole-cell ELISA to detect additional antibodies in setting of suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVES

Type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is mediated by formation of antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4)-heparin complexes. We evaluated anti-PF4-heparin-negative samples for the presence of additional anti-platelet and anti-red blood cell (RBC) antibodies using whole-cell platelet/ RBC ELISAs we developed.

METHODS

Seventy-three samples tested for anti-PF4-heparin by ELISA were included: 62 tested negative, 9 tested positive, and 2 had equivocal results. Plasma specimens from healthy donors were used as controls.

RESULTS

100% (9/9) anti-PF4-positive samples had anti-platelet antibodies detected by whole-cell platelet ELISA. 42.2% (27/64) anti-PF4-heparin-negative samples were negative for anti-platelet and anti-RBC antibodies. 32.8% (21/64) negative samples showed reactivity to both platelets and RBC; 12.5% (8/64) negative samples were each reactive with either platelet or RBC ELISA, respectively. Additionally, two samples that tested equivocal by anti-PF4-heparin ELISA had antibodies to both platelets and RBC by whole-cell ELISA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that patients with thrombocytopenia testing negative for anti-PF4-heparin may still harbor antibodies to platelets. However, additional research is needed to determine the significance of these antibodies. Nevertheless, these findings may encourage clinicians to further investigate patients with possible immune-mediated etiologies of thrombocytopenia and anemia.

Cleavage of anti-PF4/heparin IgG by a bacterial protease and potential benefit in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is due to immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, which bind platelet factor 4 (PF4) modified by polyanions, such as heparin (H). IgG/PF4/polyanion complexes directly activate platelets via Fc gamma type 2 receptor A (FcγRIIA) receptors. A bacterial protease, IgG-degrading enzyme of Streptococcus pyogenes (IdeS), cleaves the hinge region of heavy-chain IgG, abolishing its ability to bind FcγR, including FcγRIIA. We evaluated whether cleavage of anti-PF4/H IgG by IdeS could suppress the pathogenicity of HIT antibodies. IdeS quickly cleaved purified 5B9, a monoclonal chimeric anti-PF4/H IgG1, which led to the formation of single cleaved 5B9 (sc5B9), without any reduction in binding ability to the PF4/H complex. However, as compared with uncleaved 5B9, the affinity of sc5B9 for platelet FcγRIIA was greatly reduced, and sc5B9 was also unable to induce heparin-dependent platelet activation. In addition, incubating IdeS in whole blood containing 5B9 or HIT plasma samples led to cleavage of anti-PF4/H antibodies, which fully abolished the ability to induce heparin-dependent platelet aggregation and tissue factor messenger RNA synthesis by monocytes. Also, when whole blood was perfused in von Willebrand factor-coated microfluidic channels, platelet aggregation and fibrin formation induced by 5B9 with heparin was strongly reduced after IdeS treatment. Finally, IdeS prevented thrombocytopenia and hypercoagulability induced by 5B9 with heparin in transgenic mice expressing human PF4 and FcγRIIA receptors. In conclusion, cleavage of anti-PF4/H IgG by IdeS abolishes heparin-dependent cellular activation induced by HIT antibodies. IdeS injection could be a potential treatment of patients with severe HIT.

Characterization of platelet factor 4 amino acids that bind pathogenic antibodies in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Essentials Many patients produce antibodies but few lead to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Pathogenic epitopes are difficult to identify as HIT antibodies are polyclonal and polyspecific. KKO binding to platelet factor 4 (PF4) depends on 13 amino acids, three of which are newly observed. Five amino acids in PF4 can help distinguish pathogenic from non-pathogenic antibodies. SUMMARY: Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction that results in thrombocytopenia and, in some patients, thrombotic complications. HIT is mediated by antibodies that bind to complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. The antigenic epitopes of these anti-PF4/heparin antibodies have not yet been precisely defined, because of the polyspecific immune response that characterizes HIT. Objectives To identify PF4 amino acids essential for binding pathogenic HIT antibodies. Methods Alanine scanning mutagenesis was utilized to produce 70 single point mutations of PF4. Each PF4 mutant was used in an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to test their capacity to bind a platelet-activating murine monoclonal anti-PF4/heparin antibody (KKO) and HIT patient sera (n = 9). Results and Conclusions We identified 13 amino acids that were essential for binding KKO because they directly affected either the binding site or the antigenic conformation of PF4. We also identified 10 amino acids that were required for the binding of HIT patient sera and five of these amino acids were required for binding both KKO and the HIT patient sera. The 10 amino acids required for binding HIT sera were further tested to differentiate pathogenic HIT antibodies (platelet activating, n = 45) and non-pathogenic antibodies (EIA-positive but not platelet activating, n = 28). We identified five mutations of PF4 that were recognized to be essential for binding pathogenic HIT antibodies. Using alanine scanning mutagenesis, we characterized possible binding sites of pathogenic HIT antibodies on PF4.

Distinct Binding Characteristics of Pathogenic Anti-Platelet Factor-4/Polyanion Antibodies to Antigens Coated on Different Substrates: A Perspective on Clinical Application

The polyanion heparin, which is frequently used in patients, complexes with the platelet-derived cationic chemokine platelet factor (PF4, CXCL4). This results in the formation of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies (anti-PF4/H Abs). Anti-PF4/H Abs are classified into three groups: (i) nonpathogenic Abs (group 1) with no clinical relevance; (ii) pathogenic heparin-dependent Abs (group 2), which activate platelets and can cause the severe adverse drug effect heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT); and (iii) pathogenic autoimmune-HIT Abs (group 3), in which group 3 anti-PF4/H Abs causes a HIT-like autoimmune disease in the absence of heparin. Enzyme immunoassays using PF4/H complexes coated on the solid phase for detection of anti-PF4/H Abs cannot differentiate between pathogenic and nonpathogenic anti-PF4/H Abs. By single-molecule force spectroscopy, we identify a specific feature of pathogenic group 2 and group 3 Abs antibodies that (in contrast to nonpathogenic group 1 Abs) their binding forces to PF4/H complexes coated on platelets were significantly higher compared with those of PF4/H complexes immobilized on a solid phase. Only group 3 Abs showed high binding forces to platelets without the addition of PF4. In the presence of 50 μg/mL PF4, group 2 Abs also showed high binding forces to platelets. In contrast, binding forces of group 1 Abs always remained low (<100 pN). Our findings may have major relevance for the development of clinically applicable solid-phase assays, which allow differentiation of pathogenic platelet-activating from nonpathogenic anti-PF4/H Abs. Membrane-based expression of antigens might also increase the specificity of other assays for the detection of pathogenic (auto)-antibodies in clinical medicine.

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction mediated by platelet-activating antibodies that target complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Patients are at markedly increased risk of thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about diagnosis and management of HIT.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 33 recommendations. The recommendations address screening of asymptomatic patients for HIT, diagnosis and initial management of patients with suspected HIT, treatment of acute HIT, and special situations in patients with acute HIT or a history of HIT, including cardiovascular surgery, percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, renal replacement therapy, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations include use of the 4Ts score rather than a gestalt approach for estimating the pretest probability of HIT and avoidance of HIT laboratory testing and empiric treatment of HIT in patients with a low-probability 4Ts score. Conditional recommendations include the choice among non-heparin anticoagulants (argatroban, bivalirudin, danaparoid, fondaparinux, direct oral anticoagulants) for treatment of acute HIT.

An update on evidence based diagnostic and confirmatory testing strategies for heparin induced thrombocytopenia using combined immunological and functional assays

This manuscript aims to provide a concise review on current diagnostic/ confirmatory strategies of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) with the combined use of immunological / functional assays in addition to the clinical probability. Laboratory diagnosis of HIT is of primordial importance as the related complications could become rapidly severe and life-threatening and can provoke limb amputation in some cases. The first action in the presence of HIT suspicion is to withdraw heparin and to initiate an alternative anticoagulant. Whilst vitamin K antagonists are not appropriate, anticoagulant options include Fondaparinux, Sodium Danaparoid, DOACs, Argatroban, and Bivalirudin. However, if HIT is excluded, patients can benefit again from the high therapeutic and antithrombotic efficacy of this drug, which remains superior to all the substitutive anticoagulant treatments. HIT is suspected in the presence of a platelet count drop > 50% on 2 successive counts, or a platelet count < 100 G/L, and of a significant clinical probability (4 Ts score). Testing patients' plasma is required for establishing the diagnosis. Laboratory investigation involves first the immunological measurement of heparin dependent IgG antibodies (mainly targeted to Heparin-Platelet Factor 4 complexes). When positive, a functional assay for platelet activation, performed at a low and high heparin concentration, allows confirming this disease. In any case, if the immuno-assay is negative, HIT can be excluded with a high probability, and heparin can be continued (if clinical examination favors this decision). Conversely, the higher the IgG antibody concentration is (and affinity), the higher is the probability of developing HIT. The functional assay has now become for confirming the platelet activation capacity of antibodies, and therefore confirming the presence of HIT. Up to now, the gold reference method for testing antibody-dependent platelet activation is the C14-Serotonin Release Assay, available only in very few laboratories working with radio-isotopes. A simple, sensitive, and accurate flow cytometry assay becomes now available to all clinical sites, and it can be easily used for testing the capacity of heparin dependent-antibodies to activate platelets, at low heparin concentration. This technique can be performed in any laboratory equipped with a flow cytometer and can make the HIT confirmation diagnosis rapidly available, which introduces a great improvement for management of patients with HIT. We believe that an evidence-based update on this topic is timely and well warranted.

Dynamic intercellular redistribution of HIT antigen modulates heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic disorder initiated by antibodies to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. PF4 released from platelets binds to surface glycosaminoglycans on hematopoietic and vascular cells that are heterogenous in composition and differ in affinity for PF4. PF4 binds to monocytes with higher affinity than to platelets, and depletion of monocytes exacerbates thrombocytopenia in a murine HIT model. Here we show that the expression of PF4 on platelets and development of thrombocytopenia are modulated by the (re)distribution of PF4 among hematopoietic and endothelial cell surfaces. Binding of PF4 to platelets in whole blood in vitro varies inversely with the white cell count, likely because of the greater affinity of monocytes for PF4. In mice, monocyte depletion increased binding of PF4 to platelets by two- to three-fold. Induction of HIT in mice caused a transient >80-fold increase in binding of HIT antibody to monocytes vs 3.5-fold increase to platelets and rapid transient monocytopenia. Normalization of monocyte counts preceded the return in platelet counts. Exposure of blood to endothelial cells also depletes PF4 from platelet surfaces. These studies demonstrate a dynamic interchange of surface-bound PF4 among hematopoetic and vascular cells that may limit thrombocytopenia at the expense of promoting prothrombotic processes in HIT.

5B9, a monoclonal antiplatelet factor 4/heparin IgG with a human Fc fragment that mimics heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

Essentials No humanized monoclonal antibody was available to study heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We developed the first anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibody with a human Fc fragment. This antibody (5B9) fully mimics the effects of human HIT antibodies. 5B9 binds two regions within PF4 that may be critical for the pathogenicity of HIT antibodies.

SUMMARY

Background The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is based on clinical and biological criteria, but a standard is lacking for laboratory assays. Moreover, no humanized HIT antibody is available for pathophysiological studies. Objective To characterise 5B9, a chimeric monoclonal antibody, which fully mimics the effects of human HIT antibodies. Methods/Results 5B9, a chimeric anti-platelet factor 4/heparin complexes IgG1 antibody, was obtained after immunizing specific transgenic mice. 5B9 induced heparin FcγRIIA-dependent platelet aggregation and tissue factor mRNA synthesis in monocytes. It also induced significant thrombocytopenia and thrombin generation in mice expressing human PF4 and FcγRIIA receptors. The binding of 5B9 to PF4/H complexes was inhibited by 15 of 25 HIT plasma samples and only three of 25 samples containing non-pathogenic anti-PF4/H antibodies. KKO, a murine IgG2b HIT antibody, also inhibited the binding of 5B9 to PF4/H, suggesting that epitopes recognized by both antibodies are close. A docking analysis based on VH and VL sequences of 5B9 showed that binding of 5B9 Fab to PF4 involved 12 and 12 residues in B and D monomers, respectively, including seven previously identified as critical to the formation of a PF4/KKO complex. Two regions (Asp-7 to Thr-15 and Ala-32 to Thr-38) therefore appeared important for the binding of 5B9 and KKO on PF4 modified by heparin. Conclusions 5B9 is the first anti-PF4/H monoclonal antibody with a human Fc fragment, which induces similar cellular activation as HIT antibodies. Moreover, 5B9 binds epitopes within PF4 that are likely to be critical for the pathogenicity of HIT antibodies.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune complication of heparin therapy caused by antibodies to complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Pathogenic antibodies to PF4/heparin bind and activate cellular FcγRIIA on platelets and monocytes to propagate a hypercoagulable state culminating in life-threatening thrombosis. It is now recognized that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies develop commonly after heparin exposure, but only a subset of sensitized patients progress to life-threatening complications of thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Recent scientific developments have clarified mechanisms underlying PF4/heparin immunogenicity, disease susceptibility, and clinical manifestations of disease. Insights from clinical and laboratory findings have also been recently harnessed for disease prevention. This review will summarize our current understanding of HIT by reviewing pathogenesis, essential clinical and laboratory features, and management.

Role of monocytes and endothelial cells in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. The mechanisms leading to platelet destruction are complex and the thrombotic complications of HIT appear to be due to multiple different intravascular targets. The dual binding of HIT antibodies to platelet surface PF4/GAG complexes and to FcγRIIA likely leads to both platelet clearance and to their direct activation. Monocytes and endothelial cells bind PF4 with higher avidity than platelets and are more resistant to competitive removal of surface-bound PF4 in the presence of heparin. Binding of HIT antibodies to PF4/glycosaminoglycan complexes on the surface on these cells leads to their activation and increased procoagulant activity. Binding of higher levels of PF4 released from activated platelets to the endothelium may lead to changes of the anticoagulant properties of the glycocalyx and target the endothelial cells for HIT antibodies. Pathogenic antibodies bound to endothelial cells further promote prothrombotic conditions by a mechanism that is independent of FcγR activation, yet not completely understood. A more detailed understanding of the role of monocytes and endothelium may identify new targets for intervention to mitigate the risk of thrombosis with less impact on systemic haemostasis than current approaches to treatment for this serious disorder.

Risk factors for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Focus on Fcγ receptors

Fcγ receptors have critical roles in the pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a severe immune-mediated complication of heparin treatment. Activation of platelets, monocytes and neutrophils by platelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibodies results in thrombocytopenia, hypercoagulability and thrombosis in susceptible patients, effects that depend on FcγRIIA. In addition, FcγRIIIA receptors probably contribute to clearance of platelets sensitised by HIT immune complexes. FcγRI has also been reported to be involved in monocyte activation by HIT IgG antibodies and synthesis of tissue factor. This review focuses on the role of these FcγRs in HIT pathophysiology, including the potential influence of several gene variations associated with variable risk of HIT and related thrombosis. In particular, the 276P and 326Q alleles of CD148, a protein tyrosine phosphatase that regulates FcγRIIA signalling, are associated with a lower risk of HIT, and platelets from healthy donors expressing these alleles are hyporesponsive to anti-PF4/H antibodies. It was also recently demonstrated that the risk of thrombosis is higher in HIT patients expressing the R isoform of the FcγRIIA H131R polymorphism, with HIT antibodies shown to activate RR platelets more efficiently, mainly explained by an inhibitory effect of normal IgG2, which bound to the FcγRIIA 131H isoform more efficiently. Environmental risk factors probably interact with these gene polymorphisms affecting FcγRs, thereby increasing thrombosis risk in HIT.

Drug-Induced Thrombosis—Experimental, Clinical, and Mechanistic Considerations

Awareness of the dangers of drug-induced thrombosis has recently been heightened and led to demand for improved testing methodology. For example, reports indicating that some selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) increase the risk of myocardial infarction and atherothrombotic events caused the withdrawal of rofecoxib from global markets and the issuance of warnings concerning the usage of other COX-2 inhibitors. Drugs may exert a prothrombotic state by a variety of mechanisms–those affecting the vessel wall, the blood flow, and/or different blood constituents. Our review serves as an update to that of Gerhard Zbinden published in 1976 by presenting recently acquired data that more fully elucidate the different mechanisms by which drugs are believed to induce thrombogenic effects and discussing new methods used to detect these without losing sight of the classical pathology of thrombosis. We offer correlations between experimental findings and clinical data and conclude that, because drugs may induce a prothrombotic state by a variety of mechanisms, they should be tested for these using appropriate experimental methods and animal models.

Pharmacology of Heparin and Related Drugs

Heparin has been recognized as a valuable anticoagulant and antithrombotic for several decades and is still widely used in clinical practice for a variety of indications. The anticoagulant activity of heparin is mainly attributable to the action of a specific pentasaccharide sequence that acts in concert with antithrombin, a plasma coagulation factor inhibitor. This observation has led to the development of synthetic heparin mimetics for clinical use. However, it is increasingly recognized that heparin has many other pharmacological properties, including but not limited to antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and antimetastatic actions. Many of these activities are independent of its anticoagulant activity, although the mechanisms of these other activities are currently less well defined. Nonetheless, heparin is being exploited for clinical uses beyond anticoagulation and developed for a wide range of clinical disorders. This article provides a "state of the art" review of our current understanding of the pharmacology of heparin and related drugs and an overview of the status of development of such drugs.

Distinguishing between anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies that can and cannot cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Many patients exposed to heparin develop antibodies against platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, yet only those antibodies that activate platelets cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Patients who produce anti-PF4/heparin antibodies without developing HIT either have antibodies that do not cause platelet activation or produce pathogenic antibodies at levels that are insufficient to cause HIT. Understanding the differences between anti-PF4/heparin antibodies with and without HIT will improve test methods and reduce overdiagnosis.

AIMS

To investigate the presence of low levels of platelet-activating antibodies in patients investigated for HIT who had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies but failed to cause platelet activation in the (14) C-serotonin release assay (SRA).

MATERIALS/METHODS

We developed a platelet activation assay similar to the SRA using exogenous PF4 without added heparin (PF4-SRA). This assay was able to detect low levels of platelet-activating antibodies. We used this PF4-SRA to test for platelet-activating antibodies in patients investigated for HIT.

RESULTS

The PF4-SRA detected platelet-activating antibodies in seven (100%) of seven SRA-positive sera even after the samples were diluted until they were no longer positive in the standard SRA. Platelet-activating antibodies were detected in 14 (36%) of 39 patients who had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies but tested negative in the SRA and did not have clinical HIT. The clinical diagnosis of HIT was confirmed by chart review and concordant with the SRA results.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of heparin-treated patients produce subthreshold levels of platelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin antibodies that do not cause HIT. An increase in the titer of these pathogenic antibodies, along with permissive clinical conditions, could lead to HIT.

Advances in the pathophysiology and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the recent developments in understanding the pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and in applying this knowledge to the treatment of patients with suspected and proven HIT.

RECENT FINDINGS

HIT pathophysiology is dynamic and complex. HIT pathophysiology is initiated by four essential components--heparin (Hep), platelet factor 4 (PF4), IgG antibodies against the Hep-PF4 complex, and platelet FcγRIIa. HIT is propagated by activated platelets, monocytes, endothelial cells, and coagulation proteins. Insights into the unique HIT antibody response continue to emerge, but without consensus as to the relative roles of B cells, T cells, and antigen-presenting cells. Platelet activation via FcγRIIa, the sine qua non of HIT, has become much better appreciated. Therapy remains challenging for several reasons. Suspected HIT is more frequent than proven HIT, because of the widespread use of Hep and the inadequacies of current diagnostic tests and scoring systems. In proven HIT, approved treatments reduce but do not eliminate thrombosis, and have substantial bleeding risk. Rational novel therapeutic strategies, directed at the initiating steps in HIT pathophysiology and with potential combinations staged over time, are in various phases of development.

SUMMARY

Progress continues in understanding the breadth of molecular and cellular players in HIT. Translation to improved diagnosis and treatment is needed.

Increased risk of thrombosis in FcγRIIA 131RR patients with HIT due to defective control of platelet activation by plasma IgG2

Thrombosis results in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) from cellular activation involving Fc receptors. In this study, the FcγRIIA 131RR genotype was found to increase the risk of thrombosis in HIT patients (odds ratio: 5.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.7-20). When platelet aggregation tests (PATs) were performed with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a shorter lag time was measured in 131RR donors compared to individuals with the HR and HH genotypes in response to HIT plasma or 5B9, a recently developed humanized monoclonal antibody to PF4/heparin. Importantly, this difference was no longer detectable when PATs were performed with washed platelets or immunoglobulin (Ig)G-depleted PRP. Moreover, polyclonal IgG or monoclonal IgG1 added to IgG-depleted PRP increased the lag time in response to 5B9. HH platelets were also sensitive to IgG2, which in contrast, failed to inhibit the response of 131RR platelets to 5B9. Finally, higher tissue factor messenger RNA levels were measured in the whole blood of 131RR donors after activation by HIT antibodies, with increased phospholipid procoagulant activity. These results demonstrate that HIT patients homozygous for the FcγRIIA 131R allele have a higher risk of thrombosis, probably due to increased cell activation by antibodies to PF4/heparin, with a lower inhibitory effect of endogenous IgG, especially from the IgG2 subclass.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin is widely used for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic and particularly cardiovascular disorders. Unfortunately, 0.5 to 3.0% of patients given heparin develop an immune reaction, commonly termed Type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). This is characterized by a moderate thrombocytopenia and in some patients, a venous or arterial thrombosis. This frequently leads to disastrous sequelae, such as limb amputation and death. The pathophysiological basis of this serious adverse drug reaction is the production of an immunoglobulin G antibody that reacts with an antigenic complex consisting of heparin and platelet factor 4. A significant risk factor for the development of HIT is recent surgery, and the frequency of developing an antiheparin-platelet factor 4 or HIT antibody is particularly high in cardiac surgery patients, although surprisingly, only a few of these patients actually develop the clinical syndrome of HIT. This review will discuss the frequency, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis and management of HIT.

Distinct specificity and single-molecule kinetics characterize the interaction of pathogenic and non-pathogenic antibodies against platelet factor 4-heparin complexes with platelet factor 4

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a thrombotic complication of heparin therapy mediated by antibodies to complexes between platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin or cellular glycosaminoglycans. However, only a fraction of patients with anti-PF4-heparin antibodies develop HIT, implying that only a subset of these antibodies is pathogenic. The basis for the pathogenic potential of anti-PF4-heparin antibodies remains unclear. To elucidate the intrinsic PF4-binding properties of HIT-like monoclonal antibody (KKO) versus non-pathogenic antibody (RTO) at the single-molecule level, we utilized optical trap-based force spectroscopy to measure the strength and probability of binding of surface-attached antibodies with oligomeric PF4 to simulate interactions on cells. To mimic the effect of heparin in bringing PF4 complexes into proximity, we chemically cross-linked PF4 tetramers using glutaraldehyde. Analysis of the force histograms revealed that KKO-PF4 interactions had ∼10-fold faster on-rates than RTO-PF4, and apparent equilibrium dissociation constants differed ∼10-fold with similar force-free off-rates (k(off) = 0.0031 and 0.0029 s(-1)). Qualitatively similar results were obtained for KKO and RTO interacting with PF4-heparin complexes. In contrast to WT PF4, KKO and RTO showed lower and similar binding probabilities to cross-linked PF4(K50E), which forms few if any oligomers. Thus, formation of stable PF4 polymers results in much stronger interactions with the pathogenic antibody without a significant effect on the binding of the non-pathogenic antibody. These results suggest a fundamental difference in the antigen-binding mechanisms between model pathogenic and non-pathogenic anti-PF4 antibodies that might underlie their distinct pathophysiological behaviors.