1
|
Thiesmeier R, Abbadi A, Rizzuto D, Calderón-Larrañaga A, Hofer SM, Orsini N. Multiple imputation of systematically missing data on gait speed in the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care. Aging (Albany NY) 2024; 16:3056-3067. [PMID: 38358907 PMCID: PMC10929840 DOI: 10.18632/aging.205552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is insufficient investigation of multiple imputation for systematically missing discrete variables in individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) with a small number of included studies. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the performance of three multiple imputation strategies - fully conditional specification (FCS), multivariate normal (MVN), conditional quantile imputation (CQI) - on systematically missing data on gait speed in the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care (SNAC). METHODS In total, 1 000 IPDMA were simulated with four prospective cohort studies based on the characteristics of the SNAC. The three multiple imputation strategies were analysed with a two-stage common-effect multivariable logistic model targeting the effect of three levels of gait speed (100% missing in one study) on 5-years mortality with common odds ratios set to OR1 = 0.55 (0.8-1.2 vs ≤0.8 m/s), and OR2 = 0.29 (>1.2 vs ≤0.8 m/s). RESULTS The average combined estimate for the mortality odds ratio OR1 (relative bias %) were 0.58 (8.2%), 0.58 (7.5%), and 0.55 (0.7%) for the FCS, MVN, and CQI, respectively. The average combined estimate for the mortality odds ratio OR2 (relative bias %) were 0.30 (2.5%), 0.33 (10.0%), and 0.29 (0.9%) for the FCS, MVN, and CQI respectively. CONCLUSIONS In our simulations of an IPDMA based on the SNAC where gait speed data was systematically missing in one study, all three imputation methods performed relatively well. The smallest bias was found for the CQI approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Thiesmeier
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ahmad Abbadi
- Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Debora Rizzuto
- Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Stockholm Gerontology Research Center, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga
- Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Scott M. Hofer
- Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Nicola Orsini
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heslehurst N, Vinogradov R, Nguyen GT, Bigirumurame T, Teare D, Hayes L, Lennie SC, Murtha V, Tothill R, Smith J, Allotey J, Vale L. Study of How Adiposity in Pregnancy has an Effect on outcomeS (SHAPES): protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073545. [PMID: 37699635 PMCID: PMC10503385 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maternal obesity increases the risk of multiple maternal and infant pregnancy complications, such as gestational diabetes and pre-eclampsia. Current UK guidelines use body mass index (BMI) to identify which women require additional care due to increased risk of complications. However, BMI may not accurately predict which women will develop complications during pregnancy as it does not determine amount and distribution of adipose tissue. Some adiposity measures (eg, waist circumference, ultrasound measures of abdominal visceral fat) can better identify where body fat is stored, which may be useful in predicting those women who need additional care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This prospective cohort study (SHAPES, Study of How Adiposity in Pregnancy has an Effect on outcomeS) aims to evaluate the prognostic performance of adiposity measures (either alone or in combination with other adiposity, sociodemographic or clinical measures) to estimate risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Pregnant women (n=1400) will be recruited at their first trimester ultrasound scan (11+2-14+1 weeks') at Newcastle upon Tyne National Health Service Foundation Trust, UK. Early pregnancy adiposity measures and clinical and sociodemographic data will be collected. Routine data on maternal and infant pregnancy outcomes will be collected from routine hospital records. Regression methods will be used to compare the different adiposity measures with BMI in terms of their ability to predict pregnancy complications. If no individual measure performs better than BMI, multivariable models will be developed and evaluated to identify the most parsimonious model. The apparent performance of the developed model will be summarised using calibration, discrimination and internal validation analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical favourable opinion has been obtained from the North East: Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 22/NE/0035). All participants provide informed consent to take part in SHAPES. Planned dissemination includes peer-reviewed publications and additional dissemination appropriate to target audiences, including policy briefs for policymakers, media/social-media coverage for public and conferences for research TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN82185177.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Heslehurst
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Raya Vinogradov
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Maternity Services, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Giang T Nguyen
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Theophile Bigirumurame
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dawn Teare
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Louise Hayes
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Susan C Lennie
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Victoria Murtha
- Maternity Services, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rebecca Tothill
- Maternity Services, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Janine Smith
- Janine Smith Practice, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyneside, UK
| | - John Allotey
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma J, Dhiman P, Qi C, Bullock G, van Smeden M, Riley RD, Collins GS. Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 161:140-151. [PMID: 37536504 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES When developing a clinical prediction model, assuming a linear relationship between the continuous predictors and outcome is not recommended. Incorrect specification of the functional form of continuous predictors could reduce predictive accuracy. We examine how continuous predictors are handled in studies developing a clinical prediction model. METHODS We searched PubMed for clinical prediction model studies developing a logistic regression model for a binary outcome, published between July 01, 2020, and July 30, 2020. RESULTS In total, 118 studies were included in the review (18 studies (15%) assessed the linearity assumption or used methods to handle nonlinearity, and 100 studies (85%) did not). Transformation and splines were commonly used to handle nonlinearity, used in 7 (n = 7/18, 39%) and 6 (n = 6/18, 33%) studies, respectively. Categorization was most often used method to handle continuous predictors (n = 67/118, 56.8%) where most studies used dichotomization (n = 40/67, 60%). Only ten models included nonlinear terms in the final model (n = 10/18, 56%). CONCLUSION Though widely recommended not to categorize continuous predictors or assume a linear relationship between outcome and continuous predictors, most studies categorize continuous predictors, few studies assess the linearity assumption, and even fewer use methodology to account for nonlinearity. Methodological guidance is provided to guide researchers on how to handle continuous predictors when developing a clinical prediction model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Ma
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, United Kingdom.
| | - Paula Dhiman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, United Kingdom
| | - Cathy Qi
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park Swansea, SA2 8PP, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Garrett Bullock
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten van Smeden
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard D Riley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhana A, Gupta RK, Hamada Y, Kengne AP, Kerkhoff AD, Yoon C, Cattamanchi A, Reeve BWP, Theron G, Ndlangalavu G, Wood R, Drain PK, Calderwood CJ, Noursadeghi M, Boyles T, Meintjes G, Maartens G, Barr DA. Clinical utility of WHO-recommended screening tools and development and validation of novel clinical prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis screening among outpatients living with HIV: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32:230021. [PMID: 37286216 PMCID: PMC10245131 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0021-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that outpatient people living with HIV (PLHIV) undergo tuberculosis screening with the WHO four-symptom screen (W4SS) or C-reactive protein (CRP) (5 mg·L-1 cut-off) followed by confirmatory testing if screen positive. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis to determine the performance of WHO-recommended screening tools and two newly developed clinical prediction models (CPMs). METHODS Following a systematic review, we identified studies that recruited adult outpatient PLHIV irrespective of tuberculosis signs and symptoms or with a positive W4SS, evaluated CRP and collected sputum for culture. We used logistic regression to develop an extended CPM (which included CRP and other predictors) and a CRP-only CPM. We used internal-external cross-validation to evaluate performance. RESULTS We pooled data from eight cohorts (n=4315 participants). The extended CPM had excellent discrimination (C-statistic 0.81); the CRP-only CPM had similar discrimination. The C-statistics for WHO-recommended tools were lower. Both CPMs had equivalent or higher net benefit compared with the WHO-recommended tools. Compared with both CPMs, CRP (5 mg·L-1 cut-off) had equivalent net benefit across a clinically useful range of threshold probabilities, while the W4SS had a lower net benefit. The W4SS would capture 91% of tuberculosis cases and require confirmatory testing for 78% of participants. CRP (5 mg·L-1 cut-off), the extended CPM (4.2% threshold) and the CRP-only CPM (3.6% threshold) would capture similar percentages of cases but reduce confirmatory tests required by 24, 27 and 36%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CRP sets the standard for tuberculosis screening among outpatient PLHIV. The choice between using CRP at 5 mg·L-1 cut-off or in a CPM depends on available resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashar Dhana
- Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Rishi K Gupta
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Yohhei Hamada
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
- Centre for International Cooperation and Global TB Information, The Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Andre P Kengne
- Non-communicable Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Andrew D Kerkhoff
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christina Yoon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Adithya Cattamanchi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Byron W P Reeve
- DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Grant Theron
- DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Gcobisa Ndlangalavu
- DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Robin Wood
- Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Paul K Drain
- Departments of Global Health, Medicine, and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Claire J Calderwood
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
- Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- The Research Unit Zimbabwe, Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Mahdad Noursadeghi
- Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tom Boyles
- Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Graeme Meintjes
- Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa (CIDRI-Africa), Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Gary Maartens
- Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa (CIDRI-Africa), Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - David A Barr
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ribero VA, Alwan H, Efthimiou O, Abolhassani N, Bauer DC, Henrard S, Christiaens A, Waeber G, Rodondi N, Gencer B, Del Giovane C. Cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in older adults: a combined protocol for an individual participant data analysis for risk prediction and a network meta-analysis of novel anti-diabetic drugs. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.03.13.23287105. [PMID: 36993427 PMCID: PMC10055459 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.13.23287105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Older and multimorbid adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Estimating risk and preventing CVD is a challenge in this population notably because it is underrepresented in clinical trials. Our study aims to (1) assess if T2D and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are associated with the risk of CVD events and mortality in older adults, (2) develop a risk score for CVD events and mortality for older adults with T2D, (3) evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of novel antidiabetics. Methods and analysis For Aim 1, we will analyse individual participant data on individuals aged ≥65 years from five cohort studies: the Optimising Therapy to Prevent Avoidable Hospital Admissions in Multimorbid Older People study; the Cohorte Lausannoise study; the Health, Aging and Body Composition study; the Health and Retirement Study; and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. We will fit flexible parametric survival models (FPSM) to assess the association of T2D and HbA1c with CVD events and mortality. For Aim 2, we will use data on individuals aged ≥65 years with T2D from the same cohorts to develop risk prediction models for CVD events and mortality using FPSM. We will assess model performance, perform internal-external cross validation, and derive a point-based risk score. For Aim 3, we will systematically search randomized controlled trials of novel antidiabetics. Network meta-analysis will be used to determine comparative efficacy in terms of CVD, CKD, and retinopathy outcomes, and safety of these drugs. Confidence in results will be judged using the CINeMA tool. Ethics and dissemination Aims 1 and 2 were approved by the local ethics committee (Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern); no approval is required for Aim 3. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented in scientific conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Aponte Ribero
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Heba Alwan
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Orestis Efthimiou
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nazanin Abolhassani
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante), University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Douglas C Bauer
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Séverine Henrard
- Clinical Pharmacy research group, Louvain Drug Research Institute (LDRI), Université catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
- Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Université catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antoine Christiaens
- Clinical Pharmacy research group, Louvain Drug Research Institute (LDRI), Université catholique de Louvain, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
- Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique – FNRS, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gérard Waeber
- Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Baris Gencer
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
- Cardiology Division, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cinzia Del Giovane
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yoneoka D, Omae K, Henmi M, Eguchi S. Area under the curve-optimized synthesis of prediction models from a meta-analytical perspective. Res Synth Methods 2023; 14:234-246. [PMID: 36424356 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The number of clinical prediction models sharing the same prediction task has increased in the medical literature. However, evidence synthesis methodologies that use the results of these prediction models have not been sufficiently studied, particularly in the context of meta-analysis settings where only summary statistics are available. In particular, we consider the following situation: we want to predict an outcome Y, that is not included in our current data, while the covariate data are fully available. In addition, the summary statistics from prior studies, which share the same prediction task (i.e., the prediction of Y), are available. This study introduces a new method for synthesizing the summary results of binary prediction models reported in the prior studies using a linear predictor under a distributional assumption between the current and prior studies. The method provides an integrated predictor combining all predictors reported in the prior studies with weights. The vector of the weights is designed to achieve the hypothetical improvement of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on the current available data under a practical situation where there are different sets of covariates in the prior studies. We observe a counterintuitive aspect in typical situations where a part of weight components in the proposed method becomes negative. It implies that flipping the sign of the prediction results reported in each individual study would improve the overall prediction performance. Finally, numerical and real-world data analysis were conducted and showed that our method outperformed conventional methods in terms of AUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Yoneoka
- Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Omae
- Department of Data Science, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shinto Eguchi
- The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Debray TPA, Collins GS, Riley RD, Snell KIE, Van Calster B, Reitsma JB, Moons KGM. Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2023; 380:e071058. [PMID: 36750236 PMCID: PMC9903176 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P A Debray
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard D Riley
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Kym I E Snell
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- EPI-centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Johannes B Reitsma
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Karel G M Moons
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Forbes G, Kent R, Charman T, Baird G, Pickles A, Simonoff E. How do autistic people fare in adult life and can we predict it from childhood? Autism Res 2023; 16:458-473. [PMID: 36519265 PMCID: PMC10947100 DOI: 10.1002/aur.2868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
This study describes social, mental health, and quality of life outcomes in early adulthood, and examines childhood predictors in the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP), a longitudinal population-based cohort. Young autistic adults face variable but often substantial challenges across many areas of life. Prediction of outcomes is important to set expectations and could lead to the development of targeted early intervention. Autistic children were enrolled at age 12 and parents reported outcomes 11 years later when their children were age 23 (n = 121). Thirty six percent of autistic adults were in competitive employment or education and 54% had frequent contact with friends. Only 5% of autistic adults were living independently, and 37% required overnight care. Moderate or severe anxiety and depression symptoms were found for 11% and 12% of young adults, respectively. Subjective quality of life was similar to UK averages except for social relationships. Using childhood IQ, autism traits and adaptive functioning meaningful predictions can be made of living situation, employment and education and physical health. Prediction was poor for friendships, mental health outcomes and other aspects of quality of life. Our results suggest that although young autistic adults face challenges across normative, social outcomes, they may be faring better in regard to mental health or quality of life. Childhood IQ, autism traits and adaptive functioning are most useful for predicting outcomes. After accounting for these factors, childhood measurements of behavioral and emotional problems and language offered little improvement in prediction of adult outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Forbes
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics London, Kings College LondonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| | - Rachel Kent
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Kings College LondonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Tony Charman
- Department of Psychology, Kings College LondonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| | | | - Andrew Pickles
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics London, Kings College LondonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
- NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South LondonMaudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's CollegeLondonUK
| | - Emily Simonoff
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Kings College LondonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
- NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South LondonMaudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's CollegeLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chowdhury MZI, Leung AA, Walker RL, Sikdar KC, O’Beirne M, Quan H, Turin TC. A comparison of machine learning algorithms and traditional regression-based statistical modeling for predicting hypertension incidence in a Canadian population. Sci Rep 2023; 13:13. [PMID: 36593280 PMCID: PMC9807553 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-27264-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Risk prediction models are frequently used to identify individuals at risk of developing hypertension. This study evaluates different machine learning algorithms and compares their predictive performance with the conventional Cox proportional hazards (PH) model to predict hypertension incidence using survival data. This study analyzed 18,322 participants on 24 candidate features from the large Alberta's Tomorrow Project (ATP) to develop different prediction models. To select the top features, we applied five feature selection methods, including two filter-based: a univariate Cox p-value and C-index; two embedded-based: random survival forest and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso); and one constraint-based: the statistically equivalent signature (SES). Five machine learning algorithms were developed to predict hypertension incidence: penalized regression Ridge, Lasso, Elastic Net (EN), random survival forest (RSF), and gradient boosting (GB), along with the conventional Cox PH model. The predictive performance of the models was assessed using C-index. The performance of machine learning algorithms was observed, similar to the conventional Cox PH model. Average C-indexes were 0.78, 0.78, 0.78, 0.76, 0.76, and 0.77 for Ridge, Lasso, EN, RSF, GB and Cox PH, respectively. Important features associated with each model were also presented. Our study findings demonstrate little predictive performance difference between machine learning algorithms and the conventional Cox PH regression model in predicting hypertension incidence. In a moderate dataset with a reasonable number of features, conventional regression-based models perform similar to machine learning algorithms with good predictive accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Ziaul Islam Chowdhury
- grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada ,grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1 Canada ,grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Present Address: Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada
| | - Alexander A. Leung
- grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada ,grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada
| | - Robin L. Walker
- grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada ,grid.413574.00000 0001 0693 8815Primary Health Care Integration Network, Primary Health Care, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Khokan C. Sikdar
- grid.413574.00000 0001 0693 8815Health Status Assessment, Surveillance and Reporting, Public Health Surveillance and Infrastructure, Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, 10101 Southport Rd. SW, Calgary, AB T2W 3N2 Canada
| | - Maeve O’Beirne
- grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1 Canada
| | - Hude Quan
- grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada
| | - Tanvir C. Turin
- grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada ,grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang Y, Zhang X, Razbek J, Li D, Xia W, Bao L, Mao H, Daken M, Cao M. Opening the black box: interpretable machine learning for predictor finding of metabolic syndrome. BMC Endocr Disord 2022; 22:214. [PMID: 36028865 PMCID: PMC9419421 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-022-01121-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The internal workings ofmachine learning algorithms are complex and considered as low-interpretation "black box" models, making it difficult for domain experts to understand and trust these complex models. The study uses metabolic syndrome (MetS) as the entry point to analyze and evaluate the application value of model interpretability methods in dealing with difficult interpretation of predictive models. METHODS The study collects data from a chain of health examination institution in Urumqi from 2017 ~ 2019, and performs 39,134 remaining data after preprocessing such as deletion and filling. RFE is used for feature selection to reduce redundancy; MetS risk prediction models (logistic, random forest, XGBoost) are built based on a feature subset, and accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and AUROC value are used to evaluate the model classification performance; post-hoc model-agnostic interpretation methods (variable importance, LIME) are used to interpret the results of the predictive model. RESULTS Eighteen physical examination indicators are screened out by RFE, which can effectively solve the problem of physical examination data redundancy. Random forest and XGBoost models have higher accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and AUROC values compared with logistic regression. XGBoost models have higher sensitivity, Youden index, and AUROC values compared with random forest. The study uses variable importance, LIME and PDP for global and local interpretation of the optimal MetS risk prediction model (XGBoost), and different interpretation methods have different insights into the interpretation of model results, which are more flexible in model selection and can visualize the process and reasons for the model to make decisions. The interpretable risk prediction model in this study can help to identify risk factors associated with MetS, and the results showed that in addition to the traditional risk factors such as overweight and obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, MetS was also associated with other factors, including age, creatinine, uric acid, and alkaline phosphatase. CONCLUSION The model interpretability methods are applied to the black box model, which can not only realize the flexibility of model application, but also make up for the uninterpretable defects of the model. Model interpretability methods can be used as a novel means of identifying variables that are more likely to be good predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Xiaoxu Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Jaina Razbek
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Deyang Li
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Wenjun Xia
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Liangliang Bao
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Hongkai Mao
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Mayisha Daken
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Mingqin Cao
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van Bentem K, van der Hoorn ML, van Lith J, le Cessie S, Lashley E. Development of hypertensive complications in oocyte donation pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (DONOR IPD). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059594. [PMID: 35851011 PMCID: PMC9297201 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The assisted reproductive technique of oocyte donation (OD) is comparable to in vitro fertilisation (IVF), with the distinction of using a donated oocyte and thus involving two women. Compared with IVF and naturally conceived (NC) pregnancies, OD pregnancies have a higher risk for pregnancy complications as pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and pre-eclampsia (PE). Various covariates among women pregnant by OD, however, also contribute to an increased risk for developing hypertensive complications. Therefore, we will conduct the DONation of Oocytes in Reproduction individual participant data (DONOR IPD) meta-analysis to determine the risk for the development of hypertensive complications in OD pregnancy, in comparison to autologous oocyte pregnancy (non-donor IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and NC pregnancy). The DONOR IPD meta-analysis will provide an opportunity to adjust for confounders and perform subgroup analyses. Furthermore, IPD will be used to externally validate a prediction model for the development of PE in OD pregnancy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A systematic literature search will be performed to search for studies that included women pregnant by OD, and documented on hypertensive complications in OD pregnancy. The authors from each study will be asked to collaborate and share IPD. Using the pseudoanonymised combined IPD, we will perform statistical analyses with one-stage and two-stage approaches, subgroup analyses and possibly time-to-event analyses to investigate the risk of developing hypertensive complications in OD pregnancy. Furthermore, we will formally assess a prediction model on its performance in an external validation with the use of IPD. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval and individual patient consent will not be required in most cases since this IPD meta-analysis will use existing pseudoanonymised data from cohort studies. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021267908.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim van Bentem
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan van Lith
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia le Cessie
- Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eileen Lashley
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Haller MC, Aschauer C, Wallisch C, Leffondré K, van Smeden M, Oberbauer R, Heinze G. Prediction models for living organ transplantation are poorly developed, reported and validated: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 145:126-135. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
13
|
Machine Learning Model to Identify Sepsis Patients in the Emergency Department: Algorithm Development and Validation. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11111055. [PMID: 34834406 PMCID: PMC8623760 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate stratification of sepsis can effectively guide the triage of patient care and shared decision making in the emergency department (ED). However, previous research on sepsis identification models focused mainly on ICU patients, and discrepancies in model performance between the development and external validation datasets are rarely evaluated. The aim of our study was to develop and externally validate a machine learning model to stratify sepsis patients in the ED. We retrospectively collected clinical data from two geographically separate institutes that provided a different level of care at different time periods. The Sepsis-3 criteria were used as the reference standard in both datasets for identifying true sepsis cases. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm was developed to stratify sepsis patients and the performance of the model was compared with traditional clinical sepsis tools; quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS). There were 8296 patients (1752 (21%) being septic) in the development and 1744 patients (506 (29%) being septic) in the external validation datasets. The mortality of septic patients in the development and validation datasets was 13.5% and 17%, respectively. In the internal validation, XGBoost achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.86, exceeding SIRS (0.68) and qSOFA (0.56). The performance of XGBoost deteriorated in the external validation (the AUROC of XGBoost, SIRS and qSOFA was 0.75, 0.57 and 0.66, respectively). Heterogeneity in patient characteristics, such as sepsis prevalence, severity, age, comorbidity and infection focus, could reduce model performance. Our model showed good discriminative capabilities for the identification of sepsis patients and outperformed the existing sepsis identification tools. Implementation of the ML model in the ED can facilitate timely sepsis identification and treatment. However, dataset discrepancies should be carefully evaluated before implementing the ML approach in clinical practice. This finding reinforces the necessity for future studies to perform external validation to ensure the generalisability of any developed ML approaches.
Collapse
|
14
|
Internal-external cross-validation helped to evaluate the generalizability of prediction models in large clustered datasets. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 137:83-91. [PMID: 33836256 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To illustrate how to evaluate the need of complex strategies for developing generalizable prediction models in large clustered datasets. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We developed eight Cox regression models to estimate the risk of heart failure using a large population-level dataset. These models differed in the number of predictors, the functional form of the predictor effects (non-linear effects and interaction) and the estimation method (maximum likelihood and penalization). Internal-external cross-validation was used to evaluate the models' generalizability across the included general practices. RESULTS Among 871,687 individuals from 225 general practices, 43,987 (5.5%) developed heart failure during a median follow-up time of 5.8 years. For discrimination, the simplest prediction model yielded a good concordance statistic, which was not much improved by adopting complex strategies. Between-practice heterogeneity in discrimination was similar in all models. For calibration, the simplest model performed satisfactorily. Although accounting for non-linear effects and interaction slightly improved the calibration slope, it also led to more heterogeneity in the observed/expected ratio. Similar results were found in a second case study involving patients with stroke. CONCLUSION In large clustered datasets, prediction model studies may adopt internal-external cross-validation to evaluate the generalizability of competing models, and to identify promising modelling strategies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Tian J, Gao Y, Zhang J, Yang Z, Dong S, Zhang T, Sun F, Wu S, Wu J, Wang J, Yao L, Ge L, Li L, Shi C, Wang Q, Li J, Zhao Y, Xiao Y, Yang F, Fan J, Bao S, Song F. Progress and challenges of network meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med 2021; 14:218-231. [PMID: 34463038 DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In the past years, network meta-analysis (NMA) has been widely used among clinicians, guideline makers, and health technology assessment agencies and has played an important role in clinical decision-making and guideline development. To inform further development of NMAs, we conducted a bibliometric analysis to assess the current status of published NMA methodological studies, summarized the methodological progress of seven types of NMAs, and discussed the current challenges of NMAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhui Tian
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ya Gao
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Junhua Zhang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhirong Yang
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Shengjie Dong
- Orthopedic Department, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Tiansong Zhang
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jing'an District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Sun
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Shanshan Wu
- National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiarui Wu
- Department of Clinical Chinese Pharmacy, School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Junfeng Wang
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Liang Yao
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Long Ge
- Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Lun Li
- Department of Breast Cancer, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Chunhu Shi
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Quan Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiang Li
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ye Zhao
- First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Yue Xiao
- China National Health Development Research Center, Beijing, China
| | - Fengwen Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Jinchun Fan
- Epidemiology and Evidence Based-Medicine, School of Public Health, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shisan Bao
- Epidemiology and Evidence Based-Medicine, School of Public Health, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
- Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Fujian Song
- Public Health and Health Services Research, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Su N, Lagerweij MD, van der Heijden GJMG. Assessment of predictive performance of caries risk assessment models based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2021; 110:103664. [PMID: 33984413 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the predictive performance of caries risk assessment (CRA) models for prediction of caries increment for individuals based on a systematic review and meta-analyses. DATA/SOURCES We included external validation studies assessing the predictive performance of CRA models for prediction of caries increment for individuals, using discrimination and calibration as the outcome parameters. PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched electronically on 10th September 2020 to identify prediction modeling studies on external validation of CRA models. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). STUDY SELECTION A total of 22 studies with seven different CRA models were included. As for full Cariogram, the pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.78 (95 %CI: 0.68; 0.85) based on eight studies regardless of the risk of bias levels, and 0.82 (95 %CI: 0.58; 0.93) based on four studies with low risk of bias only. The pooled observed: expected ratio (O:E ratio) of full Cariogram was 0.91 (95 %CI: 0.72; 1.14) based on 12 studies regardless of the risk of bias levels, and 0.89 (95 %CI: 0.71; 1.12) based on five studies with low risk of bias only. As for reduced Cariogram, the pooled AUC was 0.72 (95 %CI: 0.67; 0.77) based on six studies regardless of the risk of bias levels, and 0.74 (95 %CI: 0.45; 0.91) based on two studies with low risk of bias only. The pooled O:E ratio of reduced Cariogram was 0.84 (95 %CI: 0.59; 1.18) based on six studies regardless of the risk of bias levels, and 1.05 (95 %CI: 0.43; 2.59) based on two studies with low risk of bias only. Based on an insufficient number of studies for the other CRA models, the pooled AUCs ranged from 0.50 to 0.88, while the pooled O:E ratio ranged from 0.38 to 1.00. CONCLUSION The average predictive performance of both full and reduced Cariogram seems to be acceptable. However, the evidence from research does not allow a firm conclusion on the performance of the other included CRA models, due to the insufficient number of high-quality studies. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Both full and reduced Cariogram were found to be reliable CRA models for prediction of caries increment in clinical practices for dental patients and communities for general populations. The reduced Cariogram showed better predictive performance and less burden in terms of time and resources to individuals than the full Cariogram. Therefore, the reduced Cariogram could be more recommended than the full Cariogram.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naichuan Su
- Department of Social Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amasterdam and VU University, the Netherlands.
| | - Maxim D Lagerweij
- Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Pedodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amasterdam and VU University, the Netherlands
| | - Geert J M G van der Heijden
- Department of Social Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amasterdam and VU University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
de Jong VMT, Moons KGM, Eijkemans MJC, Riley RD, Debray TPA. Developing more generalizable prediction models from pooled studies and large clustered data sets. Stat Med 2021; 40:3533-3559. [PMID: 33948970 PMCID: PMC8252590 DOI: 10.1002/sim.8981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Prediction models often yield inaccurate predictions for new individuals. Large data sets from pooled studies or electronic healthcare records may alleviate this with an increased sample size and variability in sample characteristics. However, existing strategies for prediction model development generally do not account for heterogeneity in predictor‐outcome associations between different settings and populations. This limits the generalizability of developed models (even from large, combined, clustered data sets) and necessitates local revisions. We aim to develop methodology for producing prediction models that require less tailoring to different settings and populations. We adopt internal‐external cross‐validation to assess and reduce heterogeneity in models' predictive performance during the development. We propose a predictor selection algorithm that optimizes the (weighted) average performance while minimizing its variability across the hold‐out clusters (or studies). Predictors are added iteratively until the estimated generalizability is optimized. We illustrate this by developing a model for predicting the risk of atrial fibrillation and updating an existing one for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis, using individual participant data from 20 cohorts (N = 10 873) and 11 diagnostic studies (N = 10 014), respectively. Meta‐analysis of calibration and discrimination performance in each hold‐out cluster shows that trade‐offs between average and heterogeneity of performance occurred. Our methodology enables the assessment of heterogeneity of prediction model performance during model development in multiple or clustered data sets, thereby informing researchers on predictor selection to improve the generalizability to different settings and populations, and reduce the need for model tailoring. Our methodology has been implemented in the R package metamisc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentijn M T de Jong
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karel G M Moons
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J C Eijkemans
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard D Riley
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Thomas P A Debray
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sharma V, Ali I, van der Veer S, Martin G, Ainsworth J, Augustine T. Adoption of clinical risk prediction tools is limited by a lack of integration with electronic health records. BMJ Health Care Inform 2021; 28:bmjhci-2020-100253. [PMID: 33608259 PMCID: PMC7898839 DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Videha Sharma
- Centre for Health Informatics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK .,Department of Renal and Pancreatic Transplantation, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Ibrahim Ali
- Department of Renal Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | | | - Glen Martin
- Centre for Health Informatics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Centre for Health Informatics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Titus Augustine
- Department of Renal and Pancreatic Transplantation, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Carr E, Bendayan R, Bean D, Stammers M, Wang W, Zhang H, Searle T, Kraljevic Z, Shek A, Phan HTT, Muruet W, Gupta RK, Shinton AJ, Wyatt M, Shi T, Zhang X, Pickles A, Stahl D, Zakeri R, Noursadeghi M, O'Gallagher K, Rogers M, Folarin A, Karwath A, Wickstrøm KE, Köhn-Luque A, Slater L, Cardoso VR, Bourdeaux C, Holten AR, Ball S, McWilliams C, Roguski L, Borca F, Batchelor J, Amundsen EK, Wu X, Gkoutos GV, Sun J, Pinto A, Guthrie B, Breen C, Douiri A, Wu H, Curcin V, Teo JT, Shah AM, Dobson RJB. Evaluation and improvement of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) for COVID-19: a multi-hospital study. BMC Med 2021; 19:23. [PMID: 33472631 PMCID: PMC7817348 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01893-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Early Warning Score (NEWS2) is currently recommended in the UK for the risk stratification of COVID-19 patients, but little is known about its ability to detect severe cases. We aimed to evaluate NEWS2 for the prediction of severe COVID-19 outcome and identify and validate a set of blood and physiological parameters routinely collected at hospital admission to improve upon the use of NEWS2 alone for medium-term risk stratification. METHODS Training cohorts comprised 1276 patients admitted to King's College Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust with COVID-19 disease from 1 March to 30 April 2020. External validation cohorts included 6237 patients from five UK NHS Trusts (Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, University Hospitals Southampton, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, University College London Hospitals, University Hospitals Birmingham), one hospital in Norway (Oslo University Hospital), and two hospitals in Wuhan, China (Wuhan Sixth Hospital and Taikang Tongji Hospital). The outcome was severe COVID-19 disease (transfer to intensive care unit (ICU) or death) at 14 days after hospital admission. Age, physiological measures, blood biomarkers, sex, ethnicity, and comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular, respiratory and kidney diseases) measured at hospital admission were considered in the models. RESULTS A baseline model of 'NEWS2 + age' had poor-to-moderate discrimination for severe COVID-19 infection at 14 days (area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in training cohort = 0.700, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.680, 0.722; Brier score = 0.192, 95% CI 0.186, 0.197). A supplemented model adding eight routinely collected blood and physiological parameters (supplemental oxygen flow rate, urea, age, oxygen saturation, C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, neutrophil count, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio) improved discrimination (AUC = 0.735; 95% CI 0.715, 0.757), and these improvements were replicated across seven UK and non-UK sites. However, there was evidence of miscalibration with the model tending to underestimate risks in most sites. CONCLUSIONS NEWS2 score had poor-to-moderate discrimination for medium-term COVID-19 outcome which raises questions about its use as a screening tool at hospital admission. Risk stratification was improved by including readily available blood and physiological parameters measured at hospital admission, but there was evidence of miscalibration in external sites. This highlights the need for a better understanding of the use of early warning scores for COVID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewan Carr
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Rebecca Bendayan
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Bean
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- Health Data Research UK London, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matt Stammers
- Clinical Informatics Research Unit, University of Southampton, Coxford Rd., Southampton, SO16 5AF, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Coxford Road, Southampton, UK
- UHS Digital, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Wenjuan Wang
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Huayu Zhang
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Thomas Searle
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Zeljko Kraljevic
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Anthony Shek
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Hang T T Phan
- Clinical Informatics Research Unit, University of Southampton, Coxford Rd., Southampton, SO16 5AF, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Coxford Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Walter Muruet
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rishi K Gupta
- UCL Institute for Global Health, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Anthony J Shinton
- UHS Digital, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Mike Wyatt
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Ting Shi
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force 920th Hospital, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Andrew Pickles
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Stahl
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Rosita Zakeri
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Cardiovascular Medicine & Sciences, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, London, SE5 9NU, UK
| | - Mahdad Noursadeghi
- UCL Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Kevin O'Gallagher
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Cardiovascular Medicine & Sciences, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, London, SE5 9NU, UK
| | - Matt Rogers
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Amos Folarin
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- Health Data Research UK London, University College London, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andreas Karwath
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Health Data Research UK Midlands, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kristin E Wickstrøm
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Blood Cell Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alvaro Köhn-Luque
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Luke Slater
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Health Data Research UK Midlands, Birmingham, UK
| | - Victor Roth Cardoso
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Health Data Research UK Midlands, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Aleksander Rygh Holten
- Department of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Simon Ball
- Health Data Research UK Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chris McWilliams
- Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lukasz Roguski
- Health Data Research UK London, University College London, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Florina Borca
- Clinical Informatics Research Unit, University of Southampton, Coxford Rd., Southampton, SO16 5AF, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Coxford Road, Southampton, UK
- UHS Digital, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - James Batchelor
- Clinical Informatics Research Unit, University of Southampton, Coxford Rd., Southampton, SO16 5AF, UK
| | - Erik Koldberg Amundsen
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Blood Cell Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Xiaodong Wu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Taikang Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Georgios V Gkoutos
- College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Health Data Research UK Midlands, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jiaxing Sun
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ashwin Pinto
- UHS Digital, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Bruce Guthrie
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Cormac Breen
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Abdel Douiri
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Honghan Wu
- Health Data Research UK London, University College London, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Vasa Curcin
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - James T Teo
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ajay M Shah
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Cardiovascular Medicine & Sciences, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, London, SE5 9NU, UK
| | - Richard J B Dobson
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
- Health Data Research UK London, University College London, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Boyles T, Stadelman A, Ellis JP, Cresswell FV, Lutje V, Wasserman S, Tiffin N, Wilkinson R. The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in adults and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to inform a multivariable prediction model. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 4:19. [PMID: 33585702 PMCID: PMC7863992 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15056.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most lethal and disabling form of tuberculosis. Delayed diagnosis and treatment, which is a risk factor for poor outcome, is caused in part by lack of availability of diagnostic tests that are both rapid and accurate. Several attempts have been made to develop clinical scoring systems to fill this gap, but none have performed sufficiently well to be broadly implemented. We aim to identify and validate a set of clinical predictors that accurately classify TBM using individual patient data (IPD) from published studies. Methods: We will perform a systematic review and obtain IPD from studies published from the year 1990 which undertook diagnostic testing for TBM in adolescents or adults using at least one of, microscopy for acid-fast bacilli, commercial nucleic acid amplification test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis or mycobacterial culture of cerebrospinal fluid. Clinical data that have previously been shown to be associated with TBM, and can inform the final diagnosis, will be requested. The data-set will be divided into training and test/validation data-sets for model building. A predictive logistic model will be built using a training set with patients with definite TBM and no TBM. Should it be warranted, factor analysis may be employed, depending on evidence for multicollinearity or the case for including latent variables in the model. Discussion: We will systematically identify and extract key clinical parameters associated with TBM from published studies and use a 'big data' approach to develop and validate a clinical prediction model with enhanced generalisability. The final model will be made available through a smartphone application. Further work will be external validation of the model and test of efficacy in a randomised controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Boyles
- Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2001, South Africa.,Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Anna Stadelman
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jayne P Ellis
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fiona V Cresswell
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.,Research Department, Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Vittoria Lutje
- Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sean Wasserman
- Wellcome Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Nicki Tiffin
- Wellcome Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.,Division of Computational Biology, Integrative Biomedical Sciences, University of Cape Town, University of Cape, South Africa
| | - Robert Wilkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Boyles T, Stadelman A, Ellis JP, Cresswell FV, Lutje V, Wasserman S, Tiffin N, Wilkinson R. The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in adults and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to inform a multivariable prediction model. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 4:19. [PMID: 33585702 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15056.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most lethal and disabling form of tuberculosis. Delayed diagnosis and treatment, which is a risk factor for poor outcome, is caused in part by lack of availability of diagnostic tests that are both rapid and accurate. Several attempts have been made to develop clinical scoring systems to fill this gap, but none have performed sufficiently well to be broadly implemented. We aim to identify and validate a set of clinical predictors that accurately classify TBM using individual patient data (IPD) from published studies. Methods: We will perform a systematic review and obtain IPD from studies published from the year 1990 which undertook diagnostic testing for TBM in adolescents or adults using at least one of, microscopy for acid-fast bacilli, commercial nucleic acid amplification test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis or mycobacterial culture of cerebrospinal fluid. Clinical data that have previously been shown to be associated with TBM, and can inform the final diagnosis, will be requested. The data-set will be divided into training and test/validation data-sets for model building. A predictive logistic model will be built using a training set with patients with definite TBM and no TBM. Should it be warranted, factor analysis may be employed, depending on evidence for multicollinearity or the case for including latent variables in the model. Discussion: We will systematically identify and extract key clinical parameters associated with TBM from published studies and use a 'big data' approach to develop and validate a clinical prediction model with enhanced generalisability. The final model will be made available through a smartphone application. Further work will be external validation of the model and test of efficacy in a randomised controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Boyles
- Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2001, South Africa.,Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Anna Stadelman
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jayne P Ellis
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fiona V Cresswell
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.,Research Department, Infectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Vittoria Lutje
- Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sean Wasserman
- Wellcome Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Nicki Tiffin
- Wellcome Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.,Division of Computational Biology, Integrative Biomedical Sciences, University of Cape Town, University of Cape, South Africa
| | - Robert Wilkinson
- Wellcome Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sexton JK, Coory M, Kumar S, Smith G, Gordon A, Chambers G, Pereira G, Raynes-Greenow C, Hilder L, Middleton P, Bowman A, Lieske SN, Warrilow K, Morris J, Ellwood D, Flenady V. Protocol for the development and validation of a risk prediction model for stillbirths from 35 weeks gestation in Australia. Diagn Progn Res 2020; 4:21. [PMID: 33323131 PMCID: PMC7739473 DOI: 10.1186/s41512-020-00089-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in the care of women and their babies in the past century, an estimated 1.7 million babies are born still each year throughout the world. A robust method to estimate a pregnant woman's individualized risk of late-pregnancy stillbirth is needed to inform decision-making around the timing of birth to reduce the risk of stillbirth from 35 weeks of gestation in Australia, a high-resource setting. METHODS This is a protocol for a cross-sectional study of all late-pregnancy births in Australia (2005-2015) from 35 weeks of gestation including 5188 stillbirths among 3.1 million births at an estimated rate of 1.7 stillbirths per 1000 births. A multivariable logistic regression model will be developed in line with current Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines to estimate the gestation-specific probability of stillbirth with prediction intervals. Candidate predictors were identified from systematic reviews and clinical consultation and will be described through univariable regression analysis. To generate a final model, elimination by backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression will be performed. The model will be internally validated using bootstrapping with 1000 repetitions and externally validated using a temporally unique dataset. Overall model performance will be assessed with R2, calibration, and discrimination. Calibration will be reported using a calibration plot with 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05). Discrimination will be measured by the C-statistic and area underneath the receiver-operator curves. Clinical usefulness will be reported as positive and negative predictive values, and a decision curve analysis will be considered. DISCUSSION A robust method to predict a pregnant woman's individualized risk of late-pregnancy stillbirth is needed to inform timely, appropriate care to reduce stillbirth. Among existing prediction models designed for obstetric use, few have been subject to internal and external validation and many fail to meet recommended reporting standards. In developing a risk prediction model for late-gestation stillbirth with both providers and pregnant women in mind, we endeavor to develop a validated model for clinical use in Australia that meets current reporting standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica K Sexton
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Level 3 Aubigny Place, Brisbane, 4101, Australia.
| | - Michael Coory
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Level 3 Aubigny Place, Brisbane, 4101, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sailesh Kumar
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Gordon Smith
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adrienne Gordon
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Gavin Pereira
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Telelethon Kids Institute, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Lisa Hilder
- National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Philippa Middleton
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, SAHMRI Women and Kids, Adelaide, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Anneka Bowman
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, SAHMRI Women and Kids, Adelaide, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Kara Warrilow
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Level 3 Aubigny Place, Brisbane, 4101, Australia
| | - Jonathan Morris
- Women and Babies Research, The University of Sydney Northern Clinical School, St. Leonards, Australia
- Northern Sydney Local Health District, Kolling Institute, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Ellwood
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Level 3 Aubigny Place, Brisbane, 4101, Australia
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, Australia
| | - Vicki Flenady
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, Mater Research Institute - University of Queensland, Level 3 Aubigny Place, Brisbane, 4101, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Luo Y, Chalkou K, Yamada R, Funada S, Salanti G, Furukawa TA. Predicting the treatment response of certolizumab for individual adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis: protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2020; 9:140. [PMID: 32532307 PMCID: PMC7477831 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01401-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A model that can predict treatment response for a patient with specific baseline characteristics would help decision-making in personalized medicine. The aim of the study is to develop such a model in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who receive certolizumab (CTZ) plus methotrexate (MTX) therapy, using individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA). METHODS We will search Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, and Scopus as well as clinical trial registries, drug regulatory agency reports, and the pharmaceutical company websites from their inception onwards to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating CTZ plus MTX compared with MTX alone in treating RA. We will request the individual-level data of these trials from an independent platform (http://vivli.org). The primary outcome is efficacy defined as achieving either remission (based on ACR-EULAR Boolean or index-based remission definition) or low disease activity (based on either of the validated composite disease activity measures). The secondary outcomes include ACR50 (50% improvement based on ACR core set variables) and adverse events. We will use a two-stage approach to develop the prediction model. First, we will construct a risk model for the outcomes via logistic regression to estimate the baseline risk scores. We will include baseline demographic, clinical, and biochemical features as covariates for this model. Next, we will develop a meta-regression model for treatment effects, in which the stage 1 risk score will be used both as a prognostic factor and as an effect modifier. We will calculate the probability of having the outcome for a new patient based on the model, which will allow estimation of the absolute and relative treatment effect. We will use R for our analyses, except for the second stage which will be performed in a Bayesian setting using R2Jags. DISCUSSION This is a study protocol for developing a model to predict treatment response for RA patients receiving CTZ plus MTX in comparison with MTX alone, using a two-stage approach based on IPD-MA. The study will use a new modeling approach, which aims at retaining the statistical power. The model may help clinicians individualize treatment for particular patients. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number pending (ID#157595).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Luo
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
| | - Konstantina Chalkou
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ryo Yamada
- Unit of Statistical Genetics, Center for Genomic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoshi Funada
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.,Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Georgia Salanti
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Toshi A Furukawa
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Breedvelt JJF, Warren FC, Brouwer ME, Karyotaki E, Kuyken W, Cuijpers P, van Oppen P, Gilbody S, Bockting CLH. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of psychological relapse prevention interventions versus control for patients in remission from depression: a protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e034158. [PMID: 32060157 PMCID: PMC7044815 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Psychological interventions and antidepressant medication can be effective interventions to prevent depressive relapse for patients currently in remission of depression. Less is known about overall factors that predict or moderate treatment response for patients receiving a psychological intervention for recurrent depression. This is a protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis which aims to assess predictors and moderators of relapse or recurrence for patients currently in remission from depression. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were completed on 13 October 2019. Study extractions and risk of bias assessments have been completed. Study authors will be asked to contribute IPD. Standard aggregate meta-analysis and IPD analysis will be conducted, and the outcomes will be compared with assess whether results differ between studies supplying data and those that did not. IPD files of individual data will be merged and variables homogenised where possible for consistency. IPD will be analysed via Cox regression and one and two-stage analyses will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The results will be published in peer review journals and shared in a policy briefing as well as accessible formats and shared with a range of stakeholders. The results will inform patients and clinicians and researchers about our current understanding of more personalised ways to prevent a depressive relapse. No local ethics approval was necessary following consultation with the legal department. Guidance on patient data storage and management will be adhered to. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019127844.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefien J F Breedvelt
- Department of Psychiatry and Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre - Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fiona C Warren
- Institute of Health Research, College of Medicine & Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Marlies E Brouwer
- Department of Psychiatry and Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre - Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eirini Karyotaki
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Willem Kuyken
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia van Oppen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, location VUmc and GGZ InGeest, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group - Department of Health Sciences, The University of York, York, UK
| | - Claudi L H Bockting
- Department of Psychiatry and Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre - Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Du M, Haag D, Song Y, Lynch J, Mittinty M. Examining Bias and Reporting in Oral Health Prediction Modeling Studies. J Dent Res 2020; 99:374-387. [DOI: 10.1177/0022034520903725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent efforts to improve the reliability and efficiency of scientific research have caught the attention of researchers conducting prediction modeling studies (PMSs). Use of prediction models in oral health has become more common over the past decades for predicting the risk of diseases and treatment outcomes. Risk of bias and insufficient reporting present challenges to the reproducibility and implementation of these models. A recent tool for bias assessment and a reporting guideline—PROBAST (Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool) and TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis)—have been proposed to guide researchers in the development and reporting of PMSs, but their application has been limited. Following the standards proposed in these tools and a systematic review approach, a literature search was carried out in PubMed to identify oral health PMSs published in dental, epidemiologic, and biostatistical journals. Risk of bias and transparency of reporting were assessed with PROBAST and TRIPOD. Among 2,881 papers identified, 34 studies containing 58 models were included. The most investigated outcomes were periodontal diseases (42%) and oral cancers (30%). Seventy-five percent of the studies were susceptible to at least 4 of 20 sources of bias, including measurement error in predictors ( n = 12) and/or outcome ( n = 7), omitting samples with missing data ( n = 10), selecting variables based on univariate analyses ( n = 9), overfitting ( n = 13), and lack of model performance assessment ( n = 24). Based on TRIPOD, at least 5 of 31 items were inadequately reported in 95% of the studies. These items included sampling approaches ( n = 15), participant eligibility criteria ( n = 6), and model-building procedures ( n = 16). There was a general lack of transparent reporting and identification of bias across the studies. Application of the recommendations proposed in PROBAST and TRIPOD can benefit future research and improve the reproducibility and applicability of prediction models in oral health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Du
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - D. Haag
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Y. Song
- Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - J. Lynch
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - M. Mittinty
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kent DM, van Klaveren D, Paulus JK, D'Agostino R, Goodman S, Hayward R, Ioannidis JPA, Patrick-Lake B, Morton S, Pencina M, Raman G, Ross JS, Selker HP, Varadhan R, Vickers A, Wong JB, Steyerberg EW. The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement: Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172:W1-W25. [PMID: 31711094 PMCID: PMC7750907 DOI: 10.7326/m18-3668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The PATH (Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity) Statement was developed to promote the conduct of, and provide guidance for, predictive analyses of heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) in clinical trials. The goal of predictive HTE analysis is to provide patient-centered estimates of outcome risk with versus without the intervention, taking into account all relevant patient attributes simultaneously, to support more personalized clinical decision making than can be made on the basis of only an overall average treatment effect. The authors distinguished 2 categories of predictive HTE approaches (a "risk-modeling" and an "effect-modeling" approach) and developed 4 sets of guidance statements: criteria to determine when risk-modeling approaches are likely to identify clinically meaningful HTE, methodological aspects of risk-modeling methods, considerations for translation to clinical practice, and considerations and caveats in the use of effect-modeling approaches. They discuss limitations of these methods and enumerate research priorities for advancing methods designed to generate more personalized evidence. This explanation and elaboration document describes the intent and rationale of each recommendation and discusses related analytic considerations, caveats, and reservations.
Collapse
|
27
|
Iwakami N, Nagai T, Furukawa TA, Nishimura K, Anzai T. Evidence-Based Utilization of Prognostic Prediction Models in Cardiovascular Medicine. Circ Rep 2019; 2:10-16. [PMID: 33693169 PMCID: PMC7929709 DOI: 10.1253/circrep.cr-19-0111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Prediction models are combinations of predictors to assess the risks of specific endpoints such as the presence or prognosis of a disease. Many novel predictors have been developed, modelling techniques have been evolving, and prediction models are currently abundant in the medical literature, especially in cardiovascular medicine, but evidence is still lacking regarding how to use them. Recent methodological advances in systematic reviews and meta-analysis have enabled systematic evaluation of prediction model studies and quantitative analysis to identify determinants of model performance. Knowing what is critical to model performance, under what circumstances model performance remains adequate, and when a model might require further adjustment and improvement will facilitate effective utilization of prediction models and will enhance diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in clinical practice. In this review article, we provide a current methodological overview of the attempts to implement evidence-based utilization of prognostic prediction models for all potential model users, including patients and their families, health-care providers, administrators, researchers, guideline developers and policy makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naotsugu Iwakami
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan.,Department of Research Promotion and Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan.,Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/Public Health Kyoto Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Nagai
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan.,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan
| | - Toshiaki A Furukawa
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/Public Health Kyoto Japan
| | - Kunihiro Nishimura
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology Informatics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan
| | - Toshihisa Anzai
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Suita Japan.,Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tolksdorf J, Kattan MW, Boorjian SA, Freedland SJ, Saba K, Poyet C, Guerrios L, De Hoedt A, Liss MA, Leach RJ, Hernandez J, Vertosick E, Vickers AJ, Ankerst DP. Multi-cohort modeling strategies for scalable globally accessible prostate cancer risk tools. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19:191. [PMID: 31615451 PMCID: PMC6792191 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0839-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Online clinical risk prediction tools built on data from multiple cohorts are increasingly being utilized for contemporary doctor-patient decision-making and validation. This report outlines a comprehensive data science strategy for building such tools with application to the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group prostate cancer risk prediction tool. METHODS We created models for high-grade prostate cancer risk using six established risk factors. The data comprised 8492 prostate biopsies collected from ten institutions, 2 in Europe and 8 across North America. We calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discrimination, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test statistic (HLS) for calibration and the clinical net benefit at risk threshold 15%. We implemented several internal cross-validation schemes to assess the influence of modeling method and individual cohort on validation performance. RESULTS High-grade disease prevalence ranged from 18% in Zurich (1863 biopsies) to 39% in UT Health San Antonio (899 biopsies). Visualization revealed outliers in terms of risk factors, including San Juan VA (51% abnormal digital rectal exam), Durham VA (63% African American), and Zurich (2.8% family history). Exclusion of any cohort did not significantly affect the AUC or HLS, nor did the choice of prediction model (pooled, random-effects, meta-analysis). Excluding the lowest-prevalence Zurich cohort from training sets did not statistically significantly change the validation metrics for any of the individual cohorts, except for Sunnybrook, where the effect on the AUC was minimal. Therefore the final multivariable logistic model was built by pooling the data from all cohorts using logistic regression. Higher prostate-specific antigen and age, abnormal digital rectal exam, African ancestry and a family history of prostate cancer increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer, while a history of a prior negative prostate biopsy decreased risk (all p-values < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS We have outlined a multi-cohort model-building internal validation strategy for developing globally accessible and scalable risk prediction tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Tolksdorf
- Departments of Mathematics and Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr.3, 85747 Garching near Munich, Germany
| | - Michael W. Kattan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
| | - Stephen A. Boorjian
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW W4, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Stephen J. Freedland
- Department of Urology, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, 508 Fulton St, Durham, NC 27705 USA
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
| | - Karim Saba
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 71, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cedric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 71, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lourdes Guerrios
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, Veterans Affairs Caribbean Healthcare System, 10 Calle Casia, San Juan, 00921-3201 Puerto Rico
| | - Amanda De Hoedt
- Department of Urology, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, 508 Fulton St, Durham, NC 27705 USA
| | - Michael A. Liss
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
| | - Robin J. Leach
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
| | - Javier Hernandez
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
| | - Emily Vertosick
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Andrew J. Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Donna P. Ankerst
- Departments of Mathematics and Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr.3, 85747 Garching near Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Steyerberg EW, Nieboer D, Debray TPA, van Houwelingen HC. Assessment of heterogeneity in an individual participant data meta-analysis of prediction models: An overview and illustration. Stat Med 2019; 38:4290-4309. [PMID: 31373722 PMCID: PMC6772012 DOI: 10.1002/sim.8296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Clinical prediction models aim to provide estimates of absolute risk for a diagnostic or prognostic endpoint. Such models may be derived from data from various studies in the context of a meta‐analysis. We describe and propose approaches for assessing heterogeneity in predictor effects and predictions arising from models based on data from different sources. These methods are illustrated in a case study with patients suffering from traumatic brain injury, where we aim to predict 6‐month mortality based on individual patient data using meta‐analytic techniques (15 studies, n = 11 022 patients). The insights into various aspects of heterogeneity are important to develop better models and understand problems with the transportability of absolute risk predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daan Nieboer
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas P A Debray
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans C van Houwelingen
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Debray TP, de Jong VM, Moons KG, Riley RD. Evidence synthesis in prognosis research. Diagn Progn Res 2019; 3:13. [PMID: 31338426 PMCID: PMC6621956 DOI: 10.1186/s41512-019-0059-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past few years, evidence synthesis has become essential to investigate and improve the generalizability of medical research findings. This strategy often involves a meta-analysis to formally summarize quantities of interest, such as relative treatment effect estimates. The use of meta-analysis methods is, however, less straightforward in prognosis research because substantial variation exists in research objectives, analysis methods and the level of reported evidence. We present a gentle overview of statistical methods that can be used to summarize data of prognostic factor and prognostic model studies. We discuss how aggregate data, individual participant data, or a combination thereof can be combined through meta-analysis methods. Recent examples are provided throughout to illustrate the various methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P.A. Debray
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht, 3584 CG The Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht, 3584 CG The Netherlands
| | - Valentijn M.T. de Jong
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht, 3584 CG The Netherlands
| | - Karel G.M. Moons
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht, 3584 CG The Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht, 3584 CG The Netherlands
| | - Richard D. Riley
- Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wilder-Smith A, Wei Y, de Araújo TVB, VanKerkhove M, Turchi Martelli CM, Turchi MD, Teixeira M, Tami A, Souza J, Sousa P, Soriano-Arandes A, Soria-Segarra C, Sanchez Clemente N, Rosenberger KD, Reveiz L, Prata-Barbosa A, Pomar L, Pelá Rosado LE, Perez F, Passos SD, Nogueira M, Noel TP, Moura da Silva A, Moreira ME, Morales I, Miranda Montoya MC, Miranda-Filho DDB, Maxwell L, Macpherson CNL, Low N, Lan Z, LaBeaud AD, Koopmans M, Kim C, João E, Jaenisch T, Hofer CB, Gustafson P, Gérardin P, Ganz JS, Dias ACF, Elias V, Duarte G, Debray TPA, Cafferata ML, Buekens P, Broutet N, Brickley EB, Brasil P, Brant F, Bethencourt S, Benedetti A, Avelino-Silva VL, Ximenes RADA, Alves da Cunha A, Alger J. Understanding the relation between Zika virus infection during pregnancy and adverse fetal, infant and child outcomes: a protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of longitudinal studies of pregnant women and their infants and children. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026092. [PMID: 31217315 PMCID: PMC6588966 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Zika virus (ZIKV) infection during pregnancy is a known cause of microcephaly and other congenital and developmental anomalies. In the absence of a ZIKV vaccine or prophylactics, principal investigators (PIs) and international leaders in ZIKV research have formed the ZIKV Individual Participant Data (IPD) Consortium to identify, collect and synthesise IPD from longitudinal studies of pregnant women that measure ZIKV infection during pregnancy and fetal, infant or child outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will identify eligible studies through the ZIKV IPD Consortium membership and a systematic review and invite study PIs to participate in the IPD meta-analysis (IPD-MA). We will use the combined dataset to estimate the relative and absolute risk of congenital Zika syndrome (CZS), including microcephaly and late symptomatic congenital infections; identify and explore sources of heterogeneity in those estimates and develop and validate a risk prediction model to identify the pregnancies at the highest risk of CZS or adverse developmental outcomes. The variable accuracy of diagnostic assays and differences in exposure and outcome definitions means that included studies will have a higher level of systematic variability, a component of measurement error, than an IPD-MA of studies of an established pathogen. We will use expert testimony, existing internal and external diagnostic accuracy validation studies and laboratory external quality assessments to inform the distribution of measurement error in our models. We will apply both Bayesian and frequentist methods to directly account for these and other sources of uncertainty. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The IPD-MA was deemed exempt from ethical review. We will convene a group of patient advocates to evaluate the ethical implications and utility of the risk stratification tool. Findings from these analyses will be shared via national and international conferences and through publication in open access, peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42017068915).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies Wilder-Smith
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yinghui Wei
- Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Maria VanKerkhove
- Health Emergencies Programme, Organisation mondiale de la Sante, Geneve, Switzerland
| | | | - Marília Dalva Turchi
- Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Brazil
| | - Mauro Teixeira
- Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Adriana Tami
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - João Souza
- Department of Social Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Patricia Sousa
- Reference Center for Neurodevelopment, Assistance, and Rehabilitation of Children, State Department of Health of Maranhão, Sao Luís, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Kerstin Daniela Rosenberger
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Section Clinical Tropical Medicine, UniversitatsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ludovic Reveiz
- Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa
- Department of Pediatrics, D’Or Institute for Research & Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Léo Pomar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Ouest Guyanais, Saint-Laurent du Maroni, French Guiana
| | | | - Freddy Perez
- Communicable Diseases and Environmental Determinants of Health Department, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Mauricio Nogueira
- Faculdade de Medicina de Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Department of Dermatologic Diseases, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil
| | - Trevor P. Noel
- Windward Islands Research and Education Foundation, St. George’s University, True Blue Point, Grenada
| | - Antônio Moura da Silva
- Department of Public Health, Universidade Federal do Maranhão – São Luís, São Luís, Brazil
| | | | - Ivonne Morales
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Section Clinical Tropical Medicine, UniversitatsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lauren Maxwell
- Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Calum N. L. Macpherson
- Windward Islands Research and Education Foundation, St. George’s University, True Blue Point, Grenada
| | - Nicola Low
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Zhiyi Lan
- McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | | | - Marion Koopmans
- Department of Virology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caron Kim
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Esaú João
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Thomas Jaenisch
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Section Clinical Tropical Medicine, UniversitatsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cristina Barroso Hofer
- Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Paul Gustafson
- Statistics, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Patrick Gérardin
- INSERM CIC1410 Clinical Epidemiology, CHU La Réunion, Saint Pierre, Réunion
- UM 134 PIMIT (CNRS 9192, INSERM U1187, IRD 249, Université de la Réunion), Universite de la Reunion, Sainte Clotilde, Réunion
| | | | - Ana Carolina Fialho Dias
- Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Vanessa Elias
- Sustainable Development and Environmental Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Geraldo Duarte
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Thomas Paul Alfons Debray
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - María Luisa Cafferata
- Mother and Children Health Research Department, Instituto de Efectividad Clinica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Pierre Buekens
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA
| | - Nathalie Broutet
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Elizabeth B. Brickley
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Patrícia Brasil
- Instituto de pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas, Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Fátima Brant
- Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Sarah Bethencourt
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Carabobo, Valencia, Carabobo, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
| | - Andrea Benedetti
- Departments of Medicine and of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Vivian Lida Avelino-Silva
- Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Jackeline Alger
- Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Malda A, Boonstra N, Barf H, de Jong S, Aleman A, Addington J, Pruessner M, Nieman D, de Haan L, Morrison A, Riecher-Rössler A, Studerus E, Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, An SK, Koike S, Kasai K, Nelson B, McGorry P, Wood S, Lin A, Yung AY, Kotlicka-Antczak M, Armando M, Vicari S, Katsura M, Matsumoto K, Durston S, Ziermans T, Wunderink L, Ising H, van der Gaag M, Fusar-Poli P, Pijnenborg GHM. Individualized Prediction of Transition to Psychosis in 1,676 Individuals at Clinical High Risk: Development and Validation of a Multivariable Prediction Model Based on Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:345. [PMID: 31178767 PMCID: PMC6537857 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The Clinical High Risk state for Psychosis (CHR-P) has become the cornerstone of modern preventive psychiatry. The next stage of clinical advancements rests on the ability to formulate a more accurate prognostic estimate at the individual subject level. Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses (IPD-MA) are robust evidence synthesis methods that can also offer powerful approaches to the development and validation of personalized prognostic models. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an individualized, clinically based prognostic model for forecasting transition to psychosis from a CHR-P stage. Methods: A literature search was performed between January 30, 2016, and February 6, 2016, consulting PubMed, Psychinfo, Picarta, Embase, and ISI Web of Science, using search terms ("ultra high risk" OR "clinical high risk" OR "at risk mental state") AND [(conver* OR transition* OR onset OR emerg* OR develop*) AND psychosis] for both longitudinal and intervention CHR-P studies. Clinical knowledge was used to a priori select predictors: age, gender, CHR-P subgroup, the severity of attenuated positive psychotic symptoms, the severity of attenuated negative psychotic symptoms, and level of functioning at baseline. The model, thus, developed was validated with an extended form of internal validation. Results: Fifteen of the 43 studies identified agreed to share IPD, for a total sample size of 1,676. There was a high level of heterogeneity between the CHR-P studies with regard to inclusion criteria, type of assessment instruments, transition criteria, preventive treatment offered. The internally validated prognostic performance of the model was higher than chance but only moderate [Harrell's C-statistic 0.655, 95% confidence interval (CIs), 0.627-0.682]. Conclusion: This is the first IPD-MA conducted in the largest samples of CHR-P ever collected to date. An individualized prognostic model based on clinical predictors available in clinical routine was developed and internally validated, reaching only moderate prognostic performance. Although personalized risk prediction is of great value in the clinical practice, future developments are essential, including the refinement of the prognostic model and its external validation. However, because of the current high diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic heterogeneity of CHR-P studies, IPD-MAs in this population may have an limited intrinsic power to deliver robust prognostic models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaltsje Malda
- GGZ Friesland Mental Health Institute, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
- University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Nynke Boonstra
- GGZ Friesland Mental Health Institute, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
- NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | - Hans Barf
- NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | | | - Andre Aleman
- University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Cognitive Neuroscience Center, Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jean Addington
- Department of Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marita Pruessner
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Dorien Nieman
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lieuwe de Haan
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anthony Morrison
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Psychosis Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Erich Studerus
- University of Basel Psychiatric Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Ruhrmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Frauke Schultze-Lutter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Suk Kyoon An
- Department of Psychiatry, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Shinsuke Koike
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity and Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Tokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behaviour (CiSHuB), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN) at The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyoto Kasai
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity and Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Tokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behaviour (CiSHuB), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN) at The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Barnaby Nelson
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Patrick McGorry
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen Wood
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ashleigh Lin
- Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Alison Y. Yung
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Marco Armando
- Child and Adolescence Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Children Hospital Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy
- Office Médico-Pédagogique Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Geneva, School of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Vicari
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Masahiro Katsura
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kazunori Matsumoto
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
- Department of Preventive Psychiatry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Sarah Durston
- NICHE Lab, Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tim Ziermans
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lex Wunderink
- GGZ Friesland Mental Health Institute, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Helga Ising
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mark van der Gaag
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychosis Research, Den Haag, Netherlands
| | - Paolo Fusar-Poli
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gerdina Hendrika Maria Pijnenborg
- University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Care Center, Department of Psychotic Disorders, Assen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Towards more Accessible Precision Medicine: Building a more Transferable Machine Learning Model to Support Prognostic Decisions for Micro- and Macrovascular Complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Med Syst 2019; 43:185. [PMID: 31098679 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1321-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Although machine learning models are increasingly being developed for clinical decision support for patients with type 2 diabetes, the adoption of these models into clinical practice remains limited. Currently, machine learning (ML) models are being constructed on local healthcare systems and are validated internally with no expectation that they would validate externally and thus, are rarely transferrable to a different healthcare system. In this work, we aim to demonstrate that (1) even a complex ML model built on a national cohort can be transferred to two local healthcare systems, (2) while a model constructed on a local healthcare system's cohort is difficult to transfer; (3) we examine the impact of training cohort size on the transferability; and (4) we discuss criteria for external validity. We built a model using our previously published Multi-Task Learning-based methodology on a national cohort extracted from OptumLabs® Data Warehouse and transferred the model to two local healthcare systems (i.e., University of Minnesota Medical Center and Mayo Clinic) for external evaluation. The model remained valid when applied to the local patient populations and performed as well as locally constructed models (concordance: .73-.92), demonstrating transferability. The performance of the locally constructed models reduced substantially when applied to each other's healthcare system (concordance: .62-.90). We believe that our modeling approach, in which a model is learned from a national cohort and is externally validated, produces a transferable model, allowing patients at smaller healthcare systems to benefit from precision medicine.
Collapse
|
34
|
Braga JR, Lee DS. Mortality Models for Heart Failure: Should they be De Novo or Recalibrated? J Card Fail 2019; 25:576-578. [PMID: 31096021 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Juarez R Braga
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Douglas S Lee
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Boyles T, Stadelman A, Ellis JP, Cresswell FV, Lutje V, Wasserman S, Tiffin N, Wilkinson R. The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in adults and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis to inform a multivariable prediction model. Wellcome Open Res 2019; 4:19. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15056.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most lethal and disabling form of tuberculosis. Delayed diagnosis and treatment, which is a risk factor for poor outcome, is caused in part by lack of availability of diagnostic tests that are both rapid and accurate. Several attempts have been made to develop clinical scoring systems to fill this gap, but none have performed sufficiently well to be broadly implemented. We aim to identify and validate a set of clinical predictors that accurately classify TBM using individual patient data (IPD) from published studies. Methods: We will perform a systematic review and obtain IPD from studies published from the year 1990 which undertook diagnostic testing for TBM in adolescents or adults using at least one of, microscopy for acid-fast bacilli, commercial nucleic acid amplification test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis or mycobacterial culture of cerebrospinal fluid. Clinical data that have previously been shown to be associated with TBM, and can inform the final diagnosis, will be requested. The data-set will be divided into training and test/validation data-sets for model building. A predictive logistic model will be built using a training set with patients with definite TBM and no TBM. Should it be warranted, factor analysis may be employed, depending on evidence for multicollinearity or the case for including latent variables in the model. Discussion: We will systematically identify and extract key clinical parameters associated with TBM from published studies and use a ‘big data’ approach to develop and validate a clinical prediction model with enhanced generalisability. The final model will be made available through a smartphone application. Further work will be external validation of the model and test of efficacy in a randomised controlled trial.
Collapse
|
36
|
Moons KGM, Wolff RF, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Kleijnen J, Mallett S. PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170:W1-W33. [PMID: 30596876 DOI: 10.7326/m18-1377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 652] [Impact Index Per Article: 130.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Prediction models in health care use predictors to estimate for an individual the probability that a condition or disease is already present (diagnostic model) or will occur in the future (prognostic model). Publications on prediction models have become more common in recent years, and competing prediction models frequently exist for the same outcome or target population. Health care providers, guideline developers, and policymakers are often unsure which model to use or recommend, and in which persons or settings. Hence, systematic reviews of these studies are increasingly demanded, required, and performed. A key part of a systematic review of prediction models is examination of risk of bias and applicability to the intended population and setting. To help reviewers with this process, the authors developed PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool) for studies developing, validating, or updating (for example, extending) prediction models, both diagnostic and prognostic. PROBAST was developed through a consensus process involving a group of experts in the field. It includes 20 signaling questions across 4 domains (participants, predictors, outcome, and analysis). This explanation and elaboration document describes the rationale for including each domain and signaling question and guides researchers, reviewers, readers, and guideline developers in how to use them to assess risk of bias and applicability concerns. All concepts are illustrated with published examples across different topics. The latest version of the PROBAST checklist, accompanying documents, and filled-in examples can be downloaded from www.probast.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karel G M Moons
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care and Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (K.G.M., J.B.R.)
| | - Robert F Wolff
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews, York, United Kingdom (R.F.W., M.W.)
| | - Richard D Riley
- Centre for Prognosis Research, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom (R.D.R.)
| | - Penny F Whiting
- Bristol Medical School of the University of Bristol and National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West, University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom (P.F.W.)
| | - Marie Westwood
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews, York, United Kingdom (R.F.W., M.W.)
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (G.S.C.)
| | - Johannes B Reitsma
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care and Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (K.G.M., J.B.R.)
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews, York, United Kingdom, and School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (J.K.)
| | - Sue Mallett
- Institute of Applied Health Research, National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom (S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Joshy G, Banks E, Lowe A, Wolfe R, Tickle L, Armstrong B, Clements M. Predicting 7-year mortality for use with evidence-based guidelines for Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) testing: findings from a large prospective study of 123 697 Australian men. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e022613. [PMID: 30552254 PMCID: PMC6303562 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop and validate a prediction model for short-term mortality in Australian men aged ≥45years, using age and self-reported health variables, for use when implementing the Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing and Early Management of Test-Detected Prostate Cancer. Implementation of one of the Guideline recommendations requires an estimate of 7-year mortality. DESIGN Prospective cohort study using questionnaire data linked to mortality data. SETTING Men aged ≥45years randomly sampled from the general population of New South Wales, Australia, participating in the 45 and Up Study. PARTICIPANTS 123 697 men who completed the baseline postal questionnaire (distributed from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2008) and gave informed consent for follow-up through linkage of their data to population health databases. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS 12 160 died during follow-up (median=5.9 years). Following age-adjustment, self-reported health was the strongest predictor of all-cause mortality (C-index: 0.827; 95% CI 0.824 to 0.831). Three prediction models for all-cause mortality were validated, with predictors: Model-1: age group and self-rated health; Model-2: variables common to the 45 and Up Study and the Australian Health Survey and subselected using stepwise regression and Model-3: all variables selected using stepwise regression. Final predictions calibrated well with observed all-cause mortality rates. The 90th percentile for the 7-year mortality risks ranged from 1.92% to 83.94% for ages 45-85 years. CONCLUSIONS We developed prediction scores for short-term mortality using age and self-reported health measures and validated the scores against national mortality rates. Along with age, simple measures such as self-rated health, which can be easily obtained without physical examination, were strong predictors of all-cause mortality in the 45 and Up Study. Seven-year mortality risk estimates from Model-3 suggest that the impact of the mortality risk prediction tool on men's decision making would be small in the recommended age (50-69 years) for PSA testing, but it may discourage testing at older ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Joshy
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Emily Banks
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Sax Institute, Haymarket, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Lowe
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rory Wolfe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leonie Tickle
- Department of Applied Finance and Actuarial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bruce Armstrong
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mark Clements
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
McGarrigle SA, Hanhauser YP, Mockler D, Gallagher DJ, Kennedy MJ, Bennett K, Connolly EM. Risk prediction models for familial breast cancer. Hippokratia 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A McGarrigle
- Trinity College Dublin; Department of Surgery; Dublin Leinster Ireland Dublin 8
| | - Yvonne P Hanhauser
- St James's Hospital; Breast Care Unit; James' Street Dublin Leinster Ireland Dublin 8
| | - David Mockler
- Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James Hospital; John Stearne Library; Dublin Ireland
| | - David J Gallagher
- St James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin; HOPE Directorate; James' Street Dublin Leinster Ireland Dublin 8
| | - Michael J Kennedy
- St James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin; HOPE Directorate; James' Street Dublin Leinster Ireland Dublin 8
| | - Kathleen Bennett
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland; Division of Population Health Sciences; St Stephens' Green Dublin Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Al-Rubaie ZT, Askie LM, Hudson HM, Ray JG, Jenkins G, Lord SJ. Assessment of NICE and USPSTF guidelines for identifying women at high risk of pre-eclampsia for tailoring aspirin prophylaxis in pregnancy: An individual participant data meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 229:159-166. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
40
|
Davies C, Radua J, Cipriani A, Stahl D, Provenzani U, McGuire P, Fusar-Poli P. Efficacy and Acceptability of Interventions for Attenuated Positive Psychotic Symptoms in Individuals at Clinical High Risk of Psychosis: A Network Meta-Analysis. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9:187. [PMID: 29946270 PMCID: PMC6005890 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Attenuated positive psychotic symptoms represent the defining features of the clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) criteria. The effectiveness of each available treatment for reducing attenuated positive psychotic symptoms remains undetermined. This network meta-analysis (NMA) investigates the consistency and magnitude of the effects of treatments on attenuated positive psychotic symptoms in CHR-P individuals, weighting the findings for acceptability. Methods: Web of Science (MEDLINE), PsycInfo, CENTRAL and unpublished/gray literature were searched up to July 18, 2017. Randomized controlled trials in CHR-P individuals, comparing at least two interventions and reporting on attenuated positive psychotic symptoms at follow-up were included, following PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome (efficacy) was level of attenuated positive psychotic symptoms at 6 and 12 months; effect sizes reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs in mean follow-up scores between two compared interventions. The secondary outcome was treatment acceptability [reported as odds ratio (OR)]. NMAs were conducted for both primary and secondary outcomes. Treatments were cluster-ranked by surface under the cumulative ranking curve values for efficacy and acceptability. Assessments of biases, assumptions, sensitivity analyses and complementary pairwise meta-analyses for the primary outcome were also conducted. Results: Overall, 1,707 patients from 14 studies (57% male, mean age = 20) were included, representing the largest evidence synthesis of the effect of preventive treatments on attenuated positive psychotic symptoms to date. In the NMA for efficacy, ziprasidone + Needs-Based Intervention (NBI) was found to be superior to NBI (SMD = -1.10, 95% CI -2.04 to -0.15), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-French and Morrison protocol (CBT-F) + NBI (SMD = -1.03, 95% CI -2.05 to -0.01), and risperidone + CBT-F + NBI (SMD = -1.18, 95% CI -2.29 to -0.07) at 6 months. However, these findings did not survive sensitivity analyses. For acceptability, aripiprazole + NBI was significantly more acceptable than olanzapine + NBI (OR = 3.73; 95% CI 1.01 to 13.81) at 12 months only. No further significant NMA effects were observed at 6 or 12 months. The results were not affected by inconsistency or evident small-study effects, but only two studies had an overall low risk of bias. Conclusion: On the basis of the current literature, there is no robust evidence to favor any specific intervention for improving attenuated positive psychotic symptoms in CHR-P individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Davies
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joaquim Radua
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- FIDMAG Germanes Hospitalàries, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrea Cipriani
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Stahl
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Umberto Provenzani
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Philip McGuire
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
- OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Fusar-Poli
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- National Institute for Health Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
- OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Liao J, Muniz-Terrera G, Scholes S, Hao Y, Chen YM. Lifestyle index for mortality prediction using multiple ageing cohorts in the USA, UK and Europe. Sci Rep 2018; 8:6644. [PMID: 29703919 PMCID: PMC5923240 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24778-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Current mortality prediction indexes are mainly based on functional morbidity and comorbidity, with limited information for risk prevention. This study aimed to develop and validate a modifiable lifestyle-based mortality predication index for older adults. Data from 51,688 participants (56% women) aged ≥50 years in 2002 Health and Retirement Study, 2002 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and 2004 Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe were used to estimate coefficients of the index with cohort-stratified Cox regression. Models were validated across studies and compared to the Lee index (having comorbid and morbidity predictors). Over an average of 11-year follow-up, 10,240 participants died. The lifestyle index includes smoking, drinking, exercising, sleep quality, BMI, sex and age; showing adequate model performance in internal validation (C-statistic 0.79; D-statistic 1.94; calibration slope 1.13) and in all combinations of internal-external cross-validation. It outperformed Lee index (e.g. differences in C-statistic = 0.01, D-statistic = 0.17, P < 0.001) consistently across health status. The lifestyle index stratified participants into varying mortality risk groups, with those in the top quintile having 13.5% excess absolute mortality risk over 10 years than those in the bottom 50th centile. Our lifestyle index with easy-assessable behavioural factors and improved generalizability may maximize its usability for personalized risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Liao
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, P.R. China.,Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, Institute of State Governance, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 135 Xingang West Road, Guangzhou, 510275, P.R. China
| | - Graciela Muniz-Terrera
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Centre for Dementia Prevention, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Shaun Scholes
- UCL Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Yuantao Hao
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, P.R. China.,Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, Institute of State Governance, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 135 Xingang West Road, Guangzhou, 510275, P.R. China
| | - Yu-Ming Chen
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, No.74 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Li M, Thompson JMD, Cronin RS, Gordon A, Raynes-Greenow C, Heazell AEP, Stacey T, Culling V, Bowring V, Mitchell EA, McCowan LME, Askie L. The Collaborative IPD of Sleep and Stillbirth (Cribss): is maternal going-to-sleep position a risk factor for late stillbirth and does maternal sleep position interact with fetal vulnerability? An individual participant data meta-analysis study protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020323. [PMID: 29643161 PMCID: PMC5898330 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Accumulating evidence has shown an association between maternal supine going-to-sleep position and stillbirth in late pregnancy. Advising women not to go-to-sleep on their back can potentially reduce late stillbirth rate by 9%. However, the association between maternal right-sided going-to-sleep position and stillbirth is inconsistent across studies. Furthermore, individual studies are underpowered to investigate interactions between maternal going-to-sleep position and fetal vulnerability, which is potentially important for producing clear and tailored public health messages on safe going-to-sleep position. We will use individual participant data (IPD) from existing studies to assess whether right-side and supine going-to-sleep positions are independent risk factors for late stillbirth and to test the interaction between going-to-sleep position and fetal vulnerability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS An IPD meta-analysis approach will be used using the Cochrane Collaboration-endorsed methodology. We will identify case-control and prospective cohort studies and randomised trials which collected maternal going-to-sleep position data and pregnancy outcome data that included stillbirth. The primary outcome is stillbirth. A one stage procedure meta-analysis, stratified by study with adjustment of a priori confounders will be carried out. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The IPD meta-analysis has obtained central ethics approval from the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committee, ref: NTX/06/05/054/AM06. Individual studies should also have ethical approval from relevant local ethics committees. Interpretation of the results will be discussed with consumer representatives. Results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42017047703.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minglan Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - John M D Thompson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Robin S Cronin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Adrienne Gordon
- Department of Newborn Care, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Women and Babies, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Camille Raynes-Greenow
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander E P Heazell
- Division of Developmental Biomedicine, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- St. Mary’s Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Edwin A Mitchell
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Lesley M E McCowan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Lisa Askie
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Geersing GJ, Kraaijpoel N, Büller HR, van Doorn S, van Es N, Le Gal G, Huisman MV, Kearon C, Kline JA, Moons KGM, Miniati M, Righini M, Roy PM, van der Wall SJ, Wells PS, Klok FA. Ruling out pulmonary embolism across different subgroups of patients and healthcare settings: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA). Diagn Progn Res 2018; 2:10. [PMID: 31093560 PMCID: PMC6460525 DOI: 10.1186/s41512-018-0032-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in suspected patients is notoriously difficult as signs and symptoms are non-specific. Different diagnostic strategies have been developed, usually combining clinical probability assessment with D-dimer testing. However, their predictive performance differs across different healthcare settings, patient subgroups, and clinical presentation, which are currently not accounted for in the available diagnostic approaches. METHODS This is a protocol for a large diagnostic individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) of currently available diagnostic studies in the field of pulmonary embolism. We searched MEDLINE (search date January 1, 1995, till August 25, 2016) to retrieve all primary diagnostic studies that had evaluated diagnostic strategies for pulmonary embolism. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and subsequently full-text articles for eligibility from 3145 individual studies. A total of 40 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion into our IPDMA set, and principal investigators from these studies were invited to participate in a meeting at the 2017 conference from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. All authors agreed on data sharing and participation into this project. The process of data collection of available datasets as well as potential identification of additional new datasets based upon personal contacts and an updated search will be finalized early 2018. The aim is to evaluate diagnostic strategies across three research domains: (i) the optimal diagnostic approach for different healthcare settings, (ii) influence of comorbidity on the predictive performance of each diagnostic strategy, and (iii) optimize and tailor the efficiency and safety of ruling out PE across a broad spectrum of patients with a new, patient-tailored clinical decision model that combines clinical items with quantitative D-dimer testing. DISCUSSION This pre-planned individual patient data meta-analysis aims to contribute in resolving remaining diagnostic challenges of time-efficient diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by tailoring available diagnostic strategies for different healthcare settings and comorbidity. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION Prospero trial registration: ID 89366.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G.-J. Geersing
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N. Kraaijpoel
- 0000000084992262grid.7177.6Academic Medical Center, Vascular Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H. R. Büller
- 0000000084992262grid.7177.6Academic Medical Center, Vascular Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S. van Doorn
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - N. van Es
- 0000000084992262grid.7177.6Academic Medical Center, Vascular Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G. Le Gal
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Thrombosis Research Group, Ottawa, Canada
| | - M. V. Huisman
- Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C. Kearon
- 0000 0004 1936 8227grid.25073.33Department of Medicine, The Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, Mc Master University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - J. A. Kline
- 0000 0001 2287 3919grid.257413.6School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | - K. G. M. Moons
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M. Miniati
- 0000 0004 1757 2304grid.8404.8Department of Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M. Righini
- 0000 0001 0721 9812grid.150338.cDivision of Angiology and Haemostasis, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - P.-M. Roy
- 0000 0001 2248 3363grid.7252.2Emergency Department, University of Angers, Angers, France
| | - S. J. van der Wall
- Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P. S. Wells
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Thrombosis Research Group, Ottawa, Canada
| | - F. A. Klok
- Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Haile SR, Guerra B, Soriano JB, Puhan MA. Multiple Score Comparison: a network meta-analysis approach to comparison and external validation of prognostic scores. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017; 17:172. [PMID: 29268701 PMCID: PMC5740913 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0433-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prediction models and prognostic scores have been increasingly popular in both clinical practice and clinical research settings, for example to aid in risk-based decision making or control for confounding. In many medical fields, a large number of prognostic scores are available, but practitioners may find it difficult to choose between them due to lack of external validation as well as lack of comparisons between them. METHODS Borrowing methodology from network meta-analysis, we describe an approach to Multiple Score Comparison meta-analysis (MSC) which permits concurrent external validation and comparisons of prognostic scores using individual patient data (IPD) arising from a large-scale international collaboration. We describe the challenges in adapting network meta-analysis to the MSC setting, for instance the need to explicitly include correlations between the scores on a cohort level, and how to deal with many multi-score studies. We propose first using IPD to make cohort-level aggregate discrimination or calibration scores, comparing all to a common comparator. Then, standard network meta-analysis techniques can be applied, taking care to consider correlation structures in cohorts with multiple scores. Transitivity, consistency and heterogeneity are also examined. RESULTS We provide a clinical application, comparing prognostic scores for 3-year mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using data from a large-scale collaborative initiative. We focus on the discriminative properties of the prognostic scores. Our results show clear differences in performance, with ADO and eBODE showing higher discrimination with respect to mortality than other considered scores. The assumptions of transitivity and local and global consistency were not violated. Heterogeneity was small. CONCLUSIONS We applied a network meta-analytic methodology to externally validate and concurrently compare the prognostic properties of clinical scores. Our large-scale external validation indicates that the scores with the best discriminative properties to predict 3 year mortality in patients with COPD are ADO and eBODE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R. Haile
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Beniamino Guerra
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joan B. Soriano
- Servicio de Neumología, Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Universitario de la Princesa (IISP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Milo A. Puhan
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Epidemiology & Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Martin GP, Mamas MA, Peek N, Buchan I, Sperrin M. A multiple-model generalisation of updating clinical prediction models. Stat Med 2017; 37:1343-1358. [PMID: 29250812 PMCID: PMC5873448 DOI: 10.1002/sim.7586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Revised: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
There is growing interest in developing clinical prediction models (CPMs) to aid local healthcare decision‐making. Frequently, these CPMs are developed in isolation across different populations, with repetitive de novo derivation a common modelling strategy. However, this fails to utilise all available information and does not respond to changes in health processes through time and space. Alternatively, model updating techniques have previously been proposed that adjust an existing CPM to suit the new population, but these techniques are restricted to a single model. Therefore, we aimed to develop a generalised method for updating and aggregating multiple CPMs. The proposed “hybrid method” re‐calibrates multiple CPMs using stacked regression while concurrently revising specific covariates using individual participant data (IPD) under a penalised likelihood. The performance of the hybrid method was compared with existing methods in a clinical example of mortality risk prediction after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, and in 2 simulation studies. The simulation studies explored the effect of sample size and between‐population‐heterogeneity on the method, with each representing a situation of having multiple distinct CPMs and 1 set of IPD. When the sample size of the IPD was small, stacked regression and the hybrid method had comparable but highest performance across modelling methods. Conversely, in large IPD samples, development of a new model and the hybrid method gave the highest performance. Hence, the proposed strategy can inform the choice between utilising existing CPMs or developing a model de novo, thereby incorporating IPD, existing research, and prior (clinical) knowledge into the modelling strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glen P Martin
- Farr Institute, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Mamas A Mamas
- Farr Institute, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Niels Peek
- Farr Institute, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Iain Buchan
- Farr Institute, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthew Sperrin
- Farr Institute, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Individualised prediction model of seizure recurrence and long-term outcomes after withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in seizure-free patients: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16:523-531. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30114-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Revised: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
47
|
Lorenz MW, Abdi NA, Scheckenbach F, Pflug A, Bülbül A, Catapano AL, Agewall S, Ezhov M, Bots ML, Kiechl S, Orth A. Automatic identification of variables in epidemiological datasets using logic regression. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17:40. [PMID: 28407816 PMCID: PMC5390441 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0429-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis, multiple datasets must be transformed in a consistent format, e.g. using uniform variable names. When large numbers of datasets have to be processed, this can be a time-consuming and error-prone task. Automated or semi-automated identification of variables can help to reduce the workload and improve the data quality. For semi-automation high sensitivity in the recognition of matching variables is particularly important, because it allows creating software which for a target variable presents a choice of source variables, from which a user can choose the matching one, with only low risk of having missed a correct source variable. Methods For each variable in a set of target variables, a number of simple rules were manually created. With logic regression, an optimal Boolean combination of these rules was searched for every target variable, using a random subset of a large database of epidemiological and clinical cohort data (construction subset). In a second subset of this database (validation subset), this optimal combination rules were validated. Results In the construction sample, 41 target variables were allocated on average with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 34%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95%. In the validation sample, PPV was 33%, whereas NPV remained at 94%. In the construction sample, PPV was 50% or less in 63% of all variables, in the validation sample in 71% of all variables. Conclusions We demonstrated that the application of logic regression in a complex data management task in large epidemiological IPD meta-analyses is feasible. However, the performance of the algorithm is poor, which may require backup strategies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0429-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias W Lorenz
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16, D-60528, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
| | - Negin Ashtiani Abdi
- Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Frank Scheckenbach
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16, D-60528, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Anja Pflug
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16, D-60528, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Alpaslan Bülbül
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16, D-60528, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Alberico L Catapano
- IRCSS Multimedica, Milan, Italy.,Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefan Agewall
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marat Ezhov
- Atherosclerosis Department, Cardiology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Michiel L Bots
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Kiechl
- Department of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andreas Orth
- Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dagliati A, Malovini A, Decata P, Cogni G, Teliti M, Sacchi L, Cerra C, Chiovato L, Bellazzi R. Hierarchical Bayesian Logistic Regression to forecast metabolic control in type 2 DM patients. AMIA ... ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS. AMIA SYMPOSIUM 2017; 2016:470-479. [PMID: 28269842 PMCID: PMC5333278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
In this work we present our efforts in building a model able to forecast patients' changes in clinical conditions when repeated measurements are available. In this case the available risk calculators are typically not applicable. We propose a Hierarchical Bayesian Logistic Regression model, which allows taking into account individual and population variability in model parameters estimate. The model is used to predict metabolic control and its variation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. In particular we have analyzed a population of more than 1000 Italian type 2 diabetic patients, collected within the European project Mosaic. The results obtained in terms of Matthews Correlation Coefficient are significantly better than the ones gathered with standard logistic regression model, based on data pooling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Giulia Cogni
- IRCCS Fondazione S. Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Luca Chiovato
- IRCCS Fondazione S. Maugeri, Pavia, Italy; University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bellazzi
- University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione S. Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Trojano M, Tintore M, Montalban X, Hillert J, Kalincik T, Iaffaldano P, Spelman T, Sormani MP, Butzkueven H. Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis — insights from real-world observational studies. Nat Rev Neurol 2017; 13:105-118. [DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
50
|
Allotey J, Snell KIE, Chan C, Hooper R, Dodds J, Rogozinska E, Khan KS, Poston L, Kenny L, Myers J, Thilaganathan B, Chappell L, Mol BW, Von Dadelszen P, Ahmed A, Green M, Poon L, Khalil A, Moons KGM, Riley RD, Thangaratinam S. External validation, update and development of prediction models for pre-eclampsia using an Individual Participant Data (IPD) meta-analysis: the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complication Network (IPPIC pre-eclampsia) protocol. Diagn Progn Res 2017; 1:16. [PMID: 31093545 PMCID: PMC6460674 DOI: 10.1186/s41512-017-0016-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-eclampsia, a condition with raised blood pressure and proteinuria is associated with an increased risk of maternal and offspring mortality and morbidity. Early identification of mothers at risk is needed to target management. METHODS/DESIGN We aim to systematically review the existing literature to identify prediction models for pre-eclampsia. We have established the International Prediction of Pregnancy Complication Network (IPPIC), made up of 72 researchers from 21 countries who have carried out relevant primary studies or have access to existing registry databases, and collectively possess data from more than two million patients. We will use the individual participant data (IPD) from these studies to externally validate these existing prediction models and summarise model performance across studies using random-effects meta-analysis for any, late (after 34 weeks) and early (before 34 weeks) onset pre-eclampsia. If none of the models perform well, we will recalibrate (update), or develop and validate new prediction models using the IPD. We will assess the differential accuracy of the models in various settings and subgroups according to the risk status. We will also validate or develop prediction models based on clinical characteristics only; clinical and biochemical markers; clinical and ultrasound parameters; and clinical, biochemical and ultrasound tests. DISCUSSION Numerous systematic reviews with aggregate data meta-analysis have evaluated various risk factors separately or in combination for predicting pre-eclampsia, but these are affected by many limitations. Our large-scale collaborative IPD approach encourages consensus towards well developed, and validated prognostic models, rather than a number of competing non-validated ones. The large sample size from our IPD will also allow development and validation of multivariable prediction model for the relatively rare outcome of early onset pre-eclampsia. TRIAL REGISTRATION The project was registered on Prospero on the 27 November 2015 with ID: CRD42015029349.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Allotey
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Women’s Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (MESH), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Kym I. E. Snell
- 0000 0004 0415 6205grid.9757.cResearch Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Claire Chan
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Richard Hooper
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Julie Dodds
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Women’s Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (MESH), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ewelina Rogozinska
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Women’s Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (MESH), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Khalid S. Khan
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Women’s Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (MESH), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Lucilla Poston
- 0000 0001 2322 6764grid.13097.3cDivision of Women’s Health, Women’s Health Academic Centre, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Kenny
- 0000000123318773grid.7872.aIrish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research [INFANT], University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Jenny Myers
- 0000000121662407grid.5379.8Maternal and Fetal Heath Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Central Manchester NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Basky Thilaganathan
- grid.264200.2Fetal Medicine Unit, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Lucy Chappell
- 0000 0001 2322 6764grid.13097.3cDivision of Women’s Health, Women’s Health Academic Centre, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Ben W. Mol
- 0000 0004 1936 7304grid.1010.0The Robinson Research Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Peter Von Dadelszen
- 0000 0001 2161 2573grid.4464.2Institute of Cardiovascular and Cell Sciences, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Asif Ahmed
- 0000 0004 0376 4727grid.7273.1Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marcus Green
- Action on Pre-eclampsia (APEC) Charity, Worcestershire, UK
| | - Liona Poon
- 0000 0004 0391 9020grid.46699.34Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
- 0000 0004 1937 0482grid.10784.3aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Asma Khalil
- grid.264200.2Fetal Medicine Unit, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George’s University of London, London, UK
| | - Karel G. M. Moons
- 0000000090126352grid.7692.aJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard D. Riley
- 0000 0004 0415 6205grid.9757.cResearch Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Women’s Health Research Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- 0000 0001 2171 1133grid.4868.2Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub (MESH), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|