1
|
Flowers E, Stroebel B, Lewis KA, Aouizerat BE, Gadgil M, Kanaya AM, Zhang L, Gong X. Longitudinal associations between microRNAs and weight in the diabetes prevention program. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15:1419812. [PMID: 39359416 PMCID: PMC11445047 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1419812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Circulating microRNAs show cross-sectional associations with overweight and obesity. Few studies provided data to differentiate between a snapshot perspective on these associations versus how microRNAs characterize prodromal risk from disease pathology and complications. This study assessed longitudinal relationships between circulating microRNAs and weight at multiple time-points in the Diabetes Prevention Program trial. Research design and methods A subset of participants (n=150) from the Diabetes Prevention Program were included. MicroRNAs were measured from banked plasma using a Fireplex Assay. We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate relationships between microRNAs and changes in weight at baseline, year-1, and year-2. Logistic regression was used to evaluate whether microRNAs at baseline were associated with weight change after 2 years. Results In fully adjusted models that included relevant covariates, seven miRs (i.e., miR-126, miR-15a, miR-192, miR-23a, and miR-27a) were statistically associated with weight over 2 years. MiR-197 and miR-320a remained significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Baseline levels of let-7f, miR-17, and miR-320c were significantly associated with 3% weight loss after 2 years in fully adjusted models. Discussion This study provided evidence for longitudinal relationships between circulating microRNAs and weight. Because microRNAs characterize the combined effects of genetic determinants and responses to behavioral determinants, they may provide insights about the etiology of overweight and obesity in the context or risk for common, complex diseases. Additional studies are needed to validate the potential genes and biological pathways that might be targeted by these microRNA biomarkers and have mechanistic implications for weight loss and disease prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Flowers
- Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Benjamin Stroebel
- Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Kimberly A. Lewis
- Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Bradley E. Aouizerat
- Bluestone Center for Clinical Research, New York University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Meghana Gadgil
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Alka M. Kanaya
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Xingyue Gong
- Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang W, Wu Y, Chen Y, Chen S, Gao X, Wu S, Sun L. Different levels of physical activity and risk of developing type 2 diabetes among adults with prediabetes: a population-based cohort study. Nutr J 2024; 23:107. [PMID: 39289701 PMCID: PMC11406853 DOI: 10.1186/s12937-024-01013-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the association between different levels of physical activity and risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) mellitus among adults with prediabetes in Chinese population. METHODS This prospective population-based cohort study included 12,424 participants (mean [SD] age, 52.8 [16.8] years; 82.2% men) with prediabetes at 2014 survey of the Kailuan study. Physical activity information was collected through the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form and categorized by metabolic equivalent (MET) of task as low, moderate, and high. Cox regression models were built to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between physical activity levels and incident T2D. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 3.6 years, 2,207 (17.8%) participants developed T2D. The incident rate of T2D were 55.83/1000, 35.14/1000, and 39.61/1000 person-years in the low, moderate, and high physical activity level group, respectively. Both moderate (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.67) and high (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.89) physical activity levels were associated with lower risks of developing T2D compared to low physical activity level (P for trend < 0.001). The association between high physical activity level and T2D was primarily observed in participants without metabolic syndrome (P for interaction < 0.001). Moreover, participants with moderate or high levels of physical activity had significantly decreased fasting blood glucose levels during follow-up when compared to those with low level (P group*time < 0.001). CONCLUSION This study suggested that individuals with prediabetes might benefit from moderate and high levels of physical activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenchang Yang
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Institute of Nutrition, Clinical Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yuntao Wu
- Department of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital, 57 Xinhua East Rd, Tangshan, 063000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Yue Chen
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Institute of Nutrition, Clinical Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Shuohua Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital, 57 Xinhua East Rd, Tangshan, 063000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Xiang Gao
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Institute of Nutrition, Clinical Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Shouling Wu
- Department of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital, 57 Xinhua East Rd, Tangshan, 063000, Hebei Province, China.
| | - Liang Sun
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Institute of Nutrition, Clinical Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cortes TM, Vasquez L, Serra MC, Robbins R, Stepanenko A, Brown K, Barrus H, Campos A, Espinoza SE, Musi N. Effect of Semaglutide on Physical Function, Body Composition, and Biomarkers of Aging in Older Adults With Overweight and Insulin Resistance: Protocol for an Open-Labeled Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e62667. [PMID: 39269759 PMCID: PMC11437224 DOI: 10.2196/62667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or prediabetes are at increased risk of adverse changes in body composition, physical function, and aging-related biomarkers compared to those with normal glucose tolerance. Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist that has been approved for T2DM and chronic weight management. Although semaglutide is effective for weight loss and T2DM management, its effects on lean body mass, physical function, and biomarkers of aging are understudied in older adults. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare the effects of lifestyle counseling with and that without semaglutide on body composition, physical function, and biomarkers of aging in older adults. METHODS This is an open-label randomized controlled trial. A total of 20 adults (aged 65 years and older) with elevated BMI (27-40 kg/m2) and prediabetes or well-controlled T2DM (hemoglobin A1c 5.7%-7.5%) are recruited, stratified by sex, and randomized 1:1 to one of 2 groups (semaglutide plus lifestyle counseling vs lifestyle counseling alone) and followed up for 5 months. Those in the semaglutide group are titrated to 1 mg weekly, as tolerated, for 12 weeks. Lifestyle counseling is given by registered dietitians and based on the Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Change Program. Our primary outcomes include changes in lean mass, physical function, and biomarkers of aging. Body composition is measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and includes total fat mass and lean mass. Physical function is measured by 6-minute walk distance, grip strength, and short physical performance battery. Biomarkers of aging are measured in blood, skeletal muscle, and abdominal adipose tissue to include C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factors α, and β galactosidase staining. RESULTS The study was funded in December 2021 with a projected data collection period from spring 2023 through summer 2024. CONCLUSIONS Despite the elevated risk of adverse changes in body composition, physical function, and biomarkers of aging among older adults with glucose intolerance and elevated adiposity, the benefits and risks of commonly prescribed antihyperglycemic or weight loss medications such as semaglutide are understudied. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap to inform clinicians about the potential for additional clinically meaningful, nonglycemic effects of semaglutide. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05786521; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05786521. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/62667.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany M Cortes
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
- Sam & Ann Barshop Institute for Longevity & Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
- San Antonio Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Libia Vasquez
- Texas Diabetes Institute, University Health System, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Monica C Serra
- Sam & Ann Barshop Institute for Longevity & Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
- San Antonio Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, United States
- Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology & Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Ronna Robbins
- Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Texas Woman's University, Denton, TX, United States
| | - Allison Stepanenko
- Sam & Ann Barshop Institute for Longevity & Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Kevin Brown
- Sam & Ann Barshop Institute for Longevity & Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Hannah Barrus
- Sam & Ann Barshop Institute for Longevity & Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Annalisa Campos
- Sam & Ann Barshop Institute for Longevity & Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Sara E Espinoza
- Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology & Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
- Center for Translational Geroscience, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Diabetes and Aging Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Nicolas Musi
- Center for Translational Geroscience, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Diabetes and Aging Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Andrews RR, Anderson KR, Fry JL. Sex-Specific Variation in Metabolic Responses to Diet. Nutrients 2024; 16:2921. [PMID: 39275236 PMCID: PMC11397081 DOI: 10.3390/nu16172921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Suboptimal nutrition is a leading cause of cardiometabolic disease and mortality. Biological sex is a variable that influences individual responses to dietary components and may modulate the impact of diet on metabolic health and disease risk. This review describes findings of studies reporting how biological sex may associate with or affect metabolic outcomes or disease risk in response to varying dietary macronutrient content, Mediterranean diet, Western diet, and medical very low-calorie diet. Although few dietary interventions have been specifically designed to identify sex-diet interactions, future studies improving understanding how sex influences dietary responses could inform precision nutrition interventions for disease prevention and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reya R Andrews
- Department of Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| | - Kayla R Anderson
- Center for Muscle Biology, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Jean L Fry
- Center for Muscle Biology, College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Flaxman HR, Hernandez NG, Critelli B, Chong BK, Sadowska K, Pain K, Gonzalez CJ. Behavioral Weight Management Interventions for Hispanic Men in the United States: A Systematic Review. Am J Mens Health 2024; 18:15579883241290344. [PMID: 39466001 PMCID: PMC11528914 DOI: 10.1177/15579883241290344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Revised: 08/24/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Hispanic men have the highest prevalence of obesity relative to other racial and ethnic subgroups; however, this population is consistently underrepresented in weight management interventions. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of behavioral weight management interventions adapted for Hispanic men and describe their tailoring strategies and efficacy. Six online databases were selected for their abundant collection of high-quality, peer-reviewed literature and searched for studies which evaluated and reported weight outcomes for a cohort of adult (>18 years) Hispanic men. Of 6,508 unique publications screened, 12 interventions met inclusion criteria, the majority of which were published in the past 10 years. Only one study regarding an intervention tailored for Hispanic men was a randomized controlled trial adequately powered to assess a weight-based outcome; the remaining assessed feasibility or utilized quasi-experimental methods. Intervention characteristics and tailoring strategies varied considerably, but content was most frequently based on the Diabetes Prevention Program. Tailoring strategies commonly focused on improving linguistic access and incorporating social or family support. Follow-up varied from 1 month to 30 months and mean change in weight, the most common outcome, ranged from 0.6 to -6.3 kg. Our findings reveal a need for more fully powered randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions systematically tailored specifically for Hispanic men. Although the majority were not fully powered, these interventions showed some efficacy among their small cohorts for short-term weight loss. Future directions include exploring how to tailor goals, concepts, and metaphors included in interventions and comparing individual to group delivery settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hana R. Flaxman
- M.D. Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | - Brian Critelli
- M.D. Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Kevin Pain
- Samuel J. Wood Library & C. V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pagoto SL, Goetz JM, Xu R, Wang ML, Palmer L, Lemon SC. Randomized non-inferiority trial comparing an asynchronous remotely-delivered versus clinic-delivered lifestyle intervention. Int J Obes (Lond) 2024:10.1038/s41366-024-01617-0. [PMID: 39191926 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-024-01617-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lifestyle interventions are effective, but those delivered via in-person group meetings have poor scalability and reach. Research is needed to establish if remotely delivered lifestyle interventions are non-inferior to in-person delivered lifestyle interventions. METHODS We conducted a randomized non-inferiority trial (N = 329) to compare a lifestyle intervention delivered remotely and asynchronously via an online social network (Get Social condition) to one delivered via in-person groups (Traditional condition). We hypothesized that the Get Social condition would result in a mean percent weight loss at 12 months that was not inferior to the Traditional condition. Additional outcomes included intervention delivery costs per pound lost and acceptability (e.g., convenience, support, modality preferences). RESULTS At 12 months, no significant difference in percent weight change was observed between the Get Social and Traditional conditions (2.7% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.17) however, criteria for non-inferiority were not met. The Get Social condition costs $21.45 per pound lost versus $26.24 for the Traditional condition. A greater percentage of Get Social condition participants rated participation as convenient (65% vs 44%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Results revealed a remotely-delivered asynchronous lifestyle intervention resulted in slightly less weight loss than an in-person version but may be more economical and convenient. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02646618; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02646618 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry L Pagoto
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
| | - Jared M Goetz
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Ran Xu
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Monica L Wang
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lindsay Palmer
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Stephenie C Lemon
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Billings LK, Jablonski KA, Pan Q, Florez JC, Franks PW, Goldberg RB, Hivert MF, Kahn SE, Knowler WC, Lee CG, Merino J, Huerta-Chagoya A, Mercader JM, Raghavan S, Shi Z, Srinivasan S, Xu J, Udler MS. Increased Genetic Risk for β-Cell Failure Is Associated With β-Cell Function Decline in People With Prediabetes. Diabetes 2024; 73:1352-1360. [PMID: 38758294 PMCID: PMC11262049 DOI: 10.2337/db23-0761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Partitioned polygenic scores (pPS) have been developed to capture pathophysiologic processes underlying type 2 diabetes (T2D). We investigated the association of T2D pPS with diabetes-related traits and T2D incidence in the Diabetes Prevention Program. We generated five T2D pPS (β-cell, proinsulin, liver/lipid, obesity, lipodystrophy) in 2,647 participants randomized to intensive lifestyle, metformin, or placebo arms. Associations were tested with general linear models and Cox regression with adjustment for age, sex, and principal components. Sensitivity analyses included adjustment for BMI. Higher β-cell pPS was associated with lower insulinogenic index and corrected insulin response at 1-year follow-up with adjustment for baseline measures (effect per pPS SD -0.04, P = 9.6 × 10-7, and -8.45 μU/mg, P = 5.6 × 10-6, respectively) and with increased diabetes incidence with adjustment for BMI at nominal significance (hazard ratio 1.10 per SD, P = 0.035). The liver/lipid pPS was associated with reduced 1-year baseline-adjusted triglyceride levels (effect per SD -4.37, P = 0.001). There was no significant interaction between T2D pPS and randomized groups. The remaining pPS were associated with baseline measures only. We conclude that despite interventions for diabetes prevention, participants with a high genetic burden of the β-cell cluster pPS had worsening in measures of β-cell function. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liana K. Billings
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem/Endeavor Health, Skokie, IL
- Department of Medicine, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Qing Pan
- Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Jose C. Florez
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Center for Genomic Medicine and Diabetes Unit, Endocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Program in Metabolism and Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Paul W. Franks
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | - Marie-France Hivert
- Division of Chronic Disease Research Across the Lifecourse (CoRAL), Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Steven E. Kahn
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle
| | - William C. Knowler
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Christine G. Lee
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jordi Merino
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Center for Genomic Medicine and Diabetes Unit, Endocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Program in Metabolism and Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alicia Huerta-Chagoya
- Center for Genomic Medicine and Diabetes Unit, Endocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Program in Metabolism and Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Josep M. Mercader
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Center for Genomic Medicine and Diabetes Unit, Endocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Program in Metabolism and Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sridharan Raghavan
- Department of Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Zhuqing Shi
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Shylaja Srinivasan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jianfeng Xu
- Program for Personalized Cancer Care, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Miriam S. Udler
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Center for Genomic Medicine and Diabetes Unit, Endocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Program in Metabolism and Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Eli and Edythe L. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McMullen B, Duncanson K, Collins C, MacDonald-Wicks L. A systematic review of the mechanisms influencing engagement in diabetes prevention programmes for people with pre-diabetes. Diabet Med 2024; 41:e15323. [PMID: 38829966 DOI: 10.1111/dme.15323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To identify barriers and enablers that influence engagement in and acceptability of diabetes prevention programmes for people with pre-diabetes. The results will provide insights for developing strategies and recommendations to improve design and delivery of diabetes prevention programmes with enhanced engagement and acceptability for people with pre-diabetes. METHODS This review used a critical realist approach to examine context and mechanisms of diabetes prevention programmes. Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Cinahl, Web of Science, Scopus and Pre-Medline were searched for English language studies published between 2000 and 2023. A quality assessment was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. RESULTS A total of 90 papers met inclusion criteria. The included studies used a variety of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Data extracted focused on barriers and enablers to engagement in and acceptability of diabetes prevention programmes, with seven key mechanisms identified. These included financial, environmental, personal, healthcare, social and cultural, demographic and programme mechanisms. Findings highlighted diverse factors that influenced engagement in preventive programmes and the importance of considering these factors when planning, developing and implementing future diabetes prevention programmes. CONCLUSIONS Mechanisms identified in this review can inform design and development of diabetes prevention programmes for people with pre-diabetes and provide guidance for healthcare professionals and policymakers. This will facilitate increased participation and engagement in preventive programmes, potentially reducing progression and/or incidence of pre-diabetes to type 2 diabetes and improving health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britney McMullen
- Mid North Coast Local Health District, University of Newcastle, Coffs Harbour, Australia
| | - Kerith Duncanson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Clare Collins
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
- Food and Nutrition Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| | - Lesley MacDonald-Wicks
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sinclair AJ, Laosa O, Antonio Carnicero J, Rodriguez-Mañas L, Álvarez-Bustos A. Disability and Quality of Life Measures in older frail and prefrail people with type 2 diabetes. The MIDFRAIL-Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2024; 214:111797. [PMID: 39074514 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
AIM To explore the individual response to a multimodal intervention on quality of life (QOL) and disability. METHODS 843 (77.83 years, 50.65 % men) prefrail and frail individuals ≥ 70 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Participants were randomized to the usual care group (UCG) or the multicomponent intervention (IG). Intervention consisted in 16-week progressive resistance training program, 7 educational sessions and the achievement of HbA1c (7-8 %, 53-64 mmol/mol)) and BP (<150 mmHg) targets. QOL (EuroQol EQ-5D-5L), basic (Barthel Index, BI) and instrumental (Lawton and Brody Index) activities of daily living (ADL) were assessed. Multivariate binomial and multinomial logistic regression models were used to explore the effect of the IG, and adherence on the outcomes studied. RESULTS The IG was associated with a significant higher probability of improvement in the QOL [OR(95 %CI): 1.75 (1.20, 2.54), p-value 0.004] and a lower probability of deterioration in QoL [0.61 (0.87, 0.54), 0.006] and Barthel Index [0.59 (0.37, 0.93), 0.023]. A high adherence (≥93 %) was needed to achieve benefits in the QOL while > 84.38 % was needed for achieving the benefits in Barthel Index. CONCLUSIONS IG has proven to be effective in increasing QOL and avoiding the worsening of QOL and basic ADL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan J Sinclair
- Foundation for Diabetes Research in Older People (fDROP), and King'College, London, UK.
| | - Olga Laosa
- Fundación de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Center Network for Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Antonio Carnicero
- Fundación de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Research Center Network for Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas
- Biomedical Research Center Network for Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain; Service of Geriatrics, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Álvarez-Bustos
- Biomedical Research Center Network for Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Parast L, Tian L, Cai T. Assessing heterogeneity in surrogacy using censored data. Stat Med 2024; 43:3184-3209. [PMID: 38812276 DOI: 10.1002/sim.10122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Determining whether a surrogate marker can be used to replace a primary outcome in a clinical study is complex. While many statistical methods have been developed to formally evaluate a surrogate marker, they generally do not provide a way to examine heterogeneity in the utility of a surrogate marker. Similar to treatment effect heterogeneity, where the effect of a treatment varies based on a patient characteristic, heterogeneity in surrogacy means that the strength or utility of the surrogate marker varies based on a patient characteristic. The few methods that have been recently developed to examine such heterogeneity cannot accommodate censored data. Studies with a censored outcome are typically the studies that could most benefit from a surrogate because the follow-up time is often long. In this paper, we develop a robust nonparametric approach to assess heterogeneity in the utility of a surrogate marker with respect to a baseline variable in a censored time-to-event outcome setting. In addition, we propose and evaluate a testing procedure to formally test for heterogeneity at a single time point or across multiple time points simultaneously. Finite sample performance of our estimation and testing procedure are examined in a simulation study. We use our proposed method to investigate the complex relationship between change in fasting plasma glucose, diabetes, and sex hormones using data from the diabetes prevention program study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Layla Parast
- Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Lu Tian
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Tianxi Cai
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pang S, Wang Y, Sun S, Wang S, Li F, Zhao W, Wu X. Associations Between Life's Essential 8 and Insulin Resistance Among Nondiabetic Adults. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e033997. [PMID: 38904231 PMCID: PMC11255688 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.033997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insulin resistance (IR) is closely linked to cardiometabolic diseases. Preventing and improving IR in nondiabetic populations is critically important. We aimed to investigate the relationship between Life's Essential 8 (LE8), the latest tool from the American Heart Association quantifying cardiovascular health, and IR among nondiabetic populations in the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS This cross-sectional study used data on 11 246 nondiabetic adults aged ≥20 years from the 2005 to 2018 the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The LE8 score was classified into 2 subscale scores: health factor score and health behavior score. IR was measured by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Weighted logistic and linear regression models analyzed associations among the LE8 score, health behavior score, health factor score, and IR. Restricted cubic spline models assessed dose-response relationships. Adjusted subgroup analyses and inverse probability of treatment weighting method also evaluated the LE8-IR relationship. Of the 11 246 participants, 4860 (43.2%) had IR. The mean LE8 score was 70.07 (95% CI, 69.57-70.58). In fully adjusted models, higher LE8 scores were associated with lower IR odds (odds ratio per 10-unit increase, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.54-0.61]). Nonlinear LE8-IR dose-response was observed. Similar patterns were seen for health behavior and health factor subscores, with stronger IR correlations for health factors. The inverse LE8-IR association was significantly more pronounced among White participants and those with higher education, higher income, and without hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or chronic kidney disease. Significant negative LE8-IR associations persisted after inverse probability of treatment weighting. CONCLUSIONS LE8 and subscale scores are negatively associated with IR in a nonlinear relationship. Promoting optimal cardiovascular health adherence may improve IR in nondiabetic populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Pang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Yue Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Shuaifeng Sun
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Shen Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Fadong Li
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Wenxin Zhao
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Xiaofan Wu
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen HospitalCapital Medical UniversityBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Borkar DS, Parke DW, Lee AY. Leveraging Real-World Evidence to Enhance Clinical Trials. Ophthalmology 2024; 131:756-758. [PMID: 38906640 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
|
13
|
Valentine Y, Nikolajczyk BS. T cells in obesity-associated inflammation: The devil is in the details. Immunol Rev 2024; 324:25-41. [PMID: 38767210 DOI: 10.1111/imr.13354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Obesity presents a significant health challenge, affecting 41% of adults and 19.7% of children in the United States. One of the associated health challenges of obesity is chronic low-grade inflammation. In both mice and humans, T cells in circulation and in the adipose tissue play a pivotal role in obesity-associated inflammation. Changes in the numbers and frequency of specific CD4+ Th subsets and their contribution to inflammation through cytokine production indicate declining metabolic health, that is, insulin resistance and T2D. While some Th subset alterations are consistent between mice and humans with obesity, some changes mainly characterize male mice, whereas female mice often resist obesity and inflammation. However, protection from obesity and inflammation is not observed in human females, who can develop obesity-related T-cell inflammation akin to males. The decline in female sex hormones after menopause is also implicated in promoting obesity and inflammation. Age is a second underappreciated factor for defining and regulating obesity-associated inflammation toward translating basic science findings to the clinic. Weight loss in mice and humans, in parallel with these other factors, does not resolve obesity-associated inflammation. Instead, inflammation persists amid modest changes in CD4+ T cell frequencies, highlighting the need for further research into resolving changes in T-cell function after weight loss. How lingering inflammation after weight loss affecting the common struggle to maintain lower weight is unknown. Semaglutide, a newly popular pharmaceutical used for treating T2D and reversing obesity, holds promise for alleviating obesity-associated health complications, yet its impact on T-cell-mediated inflammation remains unexplored. Further work in this area could significantly contribute to the scientific understanding of the impacts of weight loss and sex/hormones in obesity and obesity-associated metabolic decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolander Valentine
- Department of Pharmacology and Nutritional Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Barbara S Nikolajczyk
- Department of Pharmacology and Nutritional Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
- Barnstable Brown Diabetes and Obesity Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Flowers E, Stroebel B, Gong X, Lewis K, Aouizerat BE, Gadgil M, Kanaya AM, Zhang L. Longitudinal Associations Between MicroRNAs and Weight in the Diabetes Prevention Program. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.06.05.597590. [PMID: 38895330 PMCID: PMC11185725 DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.05.597590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Circulating microRNAs show cross-sectional associations with overweight and obesity. Few studies provided data to differentiate between a snapshot perspective on these associations versus how microRNAs characterize prodromal risk from disease pathology and complications. This study assessed longitudinal relationships between circulating microRNAs and weight at multiple time-points in the Diabetes Prevention Program trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A subset of participants (n=150) from the Diabetes Prevention Program were included. MicroRNAs were measured from banked plasma using a Fireplex Assay. We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate relationships between microRNAs and changes in weight at baseline, year-1, and year-2. Logistic regression was used to evaluate whether microRNAs at baseline were associated with weight change after 2 years. RESULTS In fully adjusted models that included relevant covariates, seven miRs (i.e., miR-126, miR-15a, miR-192, miR-23a, and miR-27a) were statistically associated with weight over 2 years. MiR-197 and miR-320a remained significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Baseline levels of let-7f, miR-17, and miR-320c were significantly associated with 3% weight loss after 2 years in fully adjusted models. DISCUSSION This study provided evidence for longitudinal relationships between circulating microRNAs and weight. Because microRNAs characterize the combined effects of genetic determinants and responses to behavioral determinants, they may provide insights about the etiology of overweight and obesity in the context or risk for common, complex diseases. Additional studies are needed to validate the potential genes and biological pathways that might be targeted by these microRNA biomarkers and have mechanistic implications for weight loss and disease prevention.
Collapse
|
15
|
Dobbie LJ, Coelho C, Mgaieth F, Chauhan K, Campbell S, Shuriye S, Hollington J, Appleton S, Sen Gupta P, Duncan A, McGowan B. Liraglutide 3.0 mg in the treatment of adults with obesity and prediabetes using real-world UK data: A clinical evaluation of a multi-ethnic population. Clin Obes 2024; 14:e12649. [PMID: 38438339 DOI: 10.1111/cob.12649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
UK guidelines recommend liraglutide 3.0 mg in adults treated within specialist weight management services with BMI ≥35 kg/m2, prediabetes and high cardiovascular disease risk. We aimed to clinically evaluate liraglutide 3.0 mg in specialist weight management services. We evaluated liraglutide 3.0 mg in weight management services at Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Objective body weight (BW) was measured at baseline and 4 months, allowing classification as 'responders' (≥5% BW reduction) and 'non-responders' (<5% BW reduction). One hundred and twenty-one patients were evaluated. At 4 months, 76.0% attended follow-up (82.6% responders, 17.4% non-responders); BW (-8.6 kg, 95%CI:-9.8, -7.4 kg), BMI (-3.2 kg/m2, 95%CI: -3.6, -2.8) and %-BW (-6.6%, IQR: -8.8%, -5.2%) significantly reduced. In responders, HbA1c reduced by -5.0 mmol/mol (IQR: -7.0. -4.0 mmol/mol). In responders BW continued to reduce up to 12 months (4 m: -10.2 kg, p < .0001; 6 m: -15.6 kg, p < .0001; 9 m: -16.5 kg, p < .0001; 12 m: -16.7 kg, p < .01). Those of Black African and Caribbean ethnicity experienced less BW loss than those of white ethnicity (4.12 kg, p = .017) and had a greater attrition rate. In adults with obesity and prediabetes who are treated within specialist weight management services, liraglutide 3.0 mg reduces BW and HbA1c. Those of Black African and Caribbean ethnicity experienced less BW reduction and greater attrition at 4 months. Further evaluation of the ethnic differences in response to obesity pharmacotherapy is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence J Dobbie
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Claudia Coelho
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Farah Mgaieth
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Keisha Chauhan
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Scott Campbell
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sumaya Shuriye
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joanna Hollington
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sarah Appleton
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Piya Sen Gupta
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alastair Duncan
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Barbara McGowan
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lee CG, Ciarleglio A, Edelstein SL, Crandall JP, Dabelea D, Goldberg RB, Kahn SE, Knowler WC, Ma MT, White NH, Herman WH. Prevalence of Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy by Diabetes Prevention Program Treatment Group, Diabetes Status, Duration of Diabetes, and Cumulative Glycemic Exposure. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:810-817. [PMID: 38502874 PMCID: PMC11043227 DOI: 10.2337/dc23-2009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess associations between distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) and Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) treatment groups, diabetes status or duration, and cumulative glycemic exposure approximately 21 years after DPP randomization. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In the DPP, 3,234 adults ≥25 years old at high risk for diabetes were randomized to an intensive lifestyle (ILS), metformin, or placebo intervention to prevent diabetes. After the DPP ended, 2,779 joined the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS). Open-label metformin was continued, placebo was discontinued, ILS was provided in the form of semiannual group-based classes, and all participants were offered quarterly lifestyle classes. Symptoms and signs of DSPN were assessed in 1,792 participants at DPPOS year 17. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate DSPN associations with treatment group, diabetes status/duration, and cumulative glycemic exposure. RESULTS At 21 years after DPP randomization, 66% of subjects had diabetes. DSPN prevalence did not differ by initial DPP treatment assignment (ILS 21.5%, metformin 21.5%, and placebo 21.9%). There was a significant interaction between treatment assignment to ILS and age (P < 0.05) on DSPN. At DPPOS year 17, the odds ratio for DSPN in comparison with ILS with placebo was 17.4% (95% CI 3.0, 29.3) lower with increasing 5-year age intervals. DSPN prevalence was slightly lower for those at risk for diabetes (19.6%) versus those with diabetes (22.7%) and was associated with longer diabetes duration and time-weighted HbA1c (P values <0.001). CONCLUSIONS The likelihood of DSPN was similar across DPP treatment groups but higher for those with diabetes, longer diabetes duration, and higher cumulative glycemic exposure. ILS may have long-term benefits on DSPN for older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine G. Lee
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Adam Ciarleglio
- Biostatistics Center and Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD
| | - Sharon L. Edelstein
- Biostatistics Center and Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD
| | - Jill P. Crandall
- Division of Endocrinology and Fleischer Institute for Diabetes and Metabolism, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Dana Dabelea
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Steven E. Kahn
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - William C. Knowler
- Biostatistics Center and Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD
| | - Maxwell T. Ma
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Neil H. White
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, MO
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yu L, Wang J, Gong Q, An Y, Chen F, Chen Y, Chen X, He S, Qian X, Chen B, Dong F, Li H, Zhao F, Zhang B, Li G. Influence of a diet and/or exercise intervention on long-term mortality and vascular complications in people with impaired glucose tolerance: Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024; 26:1188-1196. [PMID: 38168886 DOI: 10.1111/dom.15413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
AIM We aimed to investigate the long-term influence of a diet and/or exercise intervention on long-term mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. METHODS The Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study had 576 participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) randomized to diet-only, exercise-only and diet-plus-exercise intervention group and control group. The participants underwent lifestyle interventions for 6 years. The subsequent Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Outcome Study was a prospective cohort study to follow-up the participants for up to 24 years after the end of 6-year intervention. In total, 540 participants completed the follow-up, while 36 subjects lost in follow-up. Cox proportional hazards analysis was applied to assess the influence of lifestyle interventions on targeted outcomes. RESULTS Compared with controls, the diet-only intervention in people with IGT was significantly associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.61-0.97)], CVD death [HR 0.67, 95% CI (0.46-0.97)] and CVD events [HR 0.72, 95% CI (0.54-0.96)]. The diet-plus-exercise intervention was significantly associated with a decreased risk of all-cause death [HR 0.64, 95% CI (0.48-0.84)], CVD death [HR 0.54, 95% CI (0.30-0.97)] and CVD events [HR 0.68, 95% CI (0.52-0.90)]. Unexpectedly, the exercise-only intervention was not significantly associated with the reduction of any of these outcomes, although there was a consistent trend towards reduction. CONCLUSIONS A diet-only intervention and a diet-plus-exercise intervention in people with IGT were significantly associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death, CVD death and CVD events, while an exercise-only intervention was not. It suggests that diet-related interventions may have a potentially more reliable influence on long-term vascular complications and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Yu
- Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jinping Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Da Qing First Hospital, Da Qing, China
| | - Qiuhong Gong
- Center of Endocrinology, National Center of Cardiology & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yali An
- Center of Endocrinology, National Center of Cardiology & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Chen
- Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yanyan Chen
- Center of Endocrinology, National Center of Cardiology & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - XiaoPing Chen
- Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Siyao He
- Center of Endocrinology, National Center of Cardiology & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Qian
- Center of Endocrinology, National Center of Cardiology & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Division of Non-Communicable Disease Control and Community Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Fen Dong
- Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Cardiology, Da Qing First Hospital, Da Qing, China
| | - Fang Zhao
- Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Zhang
- Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guangwei Li
- Department of Endocrinology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- Center of Endocrinology, National Center of Cardiology & Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gupta P, Doherty L, Temprosa M, Pop-Busui R, Gadde KM, Singh P, Owora AH, Wessells H, Sarma AV. Prevalence and predictors of female sexual dysfunction among sexually active women in the diabetes prevention program outcomes study. Neurourol Urodyn 2024; 43:977-990. [PMID: 38501372 DOI: 10.1002/nau.25436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the burden and identify correlates of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) among women with prediabetes (PreD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) enrolled in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Outcomes Study (DPPOS). METHODS The DPPOS visit included the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) to determine sexual function. Of 1464 participants, 1320 (90%) completed the (FSFI) and 426 were sexually active. A backward selection multivariable logistic regression model estimated the odds of FSD for sociodemographic, clinical, and diabetes-related covariates. RESULTS One hundred and eighty-five (43%) had a score of ≤26.55 and met the criteria for FSD. After adjustment for DPP treatment and age, urinary incontinence (UI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-3.17) and hysterectomy (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.01-3.53) were associated with increased odds of FSD. Increased body mass index was protective for FSD (OR = 0.93 per kg/m2, 95% CI = 0.89-0.96). Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument-based peripheral neuropathy (mean±SD scores 1.1±1.3 vs. 0.9±1.1, p < 0.0001) and Electrocardiogram (ECG)-based autonomic dysfunction measures (mean ± SD heart rate levels 64.3 ± 6.8 vs. 65.6 ± 10.2, p = 0.008) were associated with FSD. There were no differences in diabetes rates between women who did (66.5%) and did not (66%) have (p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS FSD is prevalent in women with PreD and T2D. Our findings suggest that FSD is associated with neuropathic complications commonly observed in PreD and T2D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Gupta
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lindsay Doherty
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Biostatistics Center, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Marinella Temprosa
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Biostatistics Center, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Rodica Pop-Busui
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Kishore M Gadde
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Prachi Singh
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
| | - Arthur H Owora
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Hunter Wessells
- Department of Urology and Diabetes, Research Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Aruna V Sarma
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Andreae SJ, Reeves H, Casey T, Lindberg A, Pickett KA. A systematic review of diabetes prevention programs adapted to include family members. Prev Med Rep 2024; 39:102655. [PMID: 38390312 PMCID: PMC10882182 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Family-based programs may be a strategy to prevent health conditions with hereditary risk such as diabetes. This review examined the state of the science regarding interventions that adapted the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle change curriculum to include family members. Methods CINAHL, Cochrane Central, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for reports that were peer reviewed, written in English, evaluated interventions that adapted the DPP lifestyle change curriculum to be family-based, reported diabetes risk related outcomes, and published between 2002 and August 2023. Records were reviewed, data extracted, and quality assessed by two researchers working independently. A narrative synthesis was completed. Meta-analysis was not completed due to the small number of studies and the heterogeneity of the study characteristics. Results 2177 records were identified with four meeting inclusion criteria. Primary participants for three studies were adults and one study focused on youth. Family participants were adult family members, children of the primary participant, or caregivers of the enrolled youth. For primary participants, two studies found significant intervention effects on weight-related outcomes. Of the studies with no intervention effects, one was a pilot feasibility study that was not powered to detect changes in weight outcomes. Three studies assessed outcomes in family participants with one finding significant intervention effects on weight. Conclusions While DPP interventions adapted to include family showed promising or similar results as individual-based DPP interventions, additional studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms of action and the most effective methods to engage family members in the programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan J Andreae
- Kinesiology Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Hailey Reeves
- Kinesiology Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Thomas Casey
- Kinesiology Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Anna Lindberg
- Kinesiology Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Kristen A Pickett
- Kinesiology Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- Program in Occupational Therapy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Duan Y, Parast L. Flexible evaluation of surrogate markers with Bayesian model averaging. Stat Med 2024; 43:774-792. [PMID: 38081586 PMCID: PMC10897582 DOI: 10.1002/sim.9986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
When long-term follow up is required for a primary endpoint in a randomized clinical trial, a valid surrogate marker can help to estimate the treatment effect and accelerate the decision process. Several model-based methods have been developed to evaluate the proportion of the treatment effect that is explained by the treatment effect on the surrogate marker. More recently, a nonparametric approach has been proposed allowing for more flexibility by avoiding the restrictive parametric model assumptions required in the model-based methods. While the model-based approaches suffer from potential mis-specification of the models, the nonparametric method fails to give desirable estimates when the sample size is small, or when the range of the data does not follow certain conditions. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian model averaging approach to estimate the proportion of treatment effect explained by the surrogate marker. Our procedure offers a compromise between the model-based approach and the nonparametric approach by introducing model flexibility via averaging over several candidate models and maintains the strength of parametric models with respect to inference. We compare our approach with previous model-based methods and the nonparametric method. Simulation studies demonstrate the advantage of our method when surrogate supports are inconsistent and sample sizes are small. We illustrate our method using data from the Diabetes Prevention Program study to examine hemoglobin A1c as a surrogate marker for fasting glucose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunshan Duan
- Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Layla Parast
- Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Parast L, Tian L, Cai T, Palaniappan L. Statistical Methods to Evaluate Surrogate Markers. Med Care 2024; 62:102-108. [PMID: 38079232 PMCID: PMC10842261 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is tremendous interest in evaluating surrogate markers given their potential to decrease study time, costs, and patient burden. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this statistical workshop article is to describe and illustrate how to evaluate a surrogate marker of interest using the proportion of treatment effect (PTE) explained as a measure of the quality of the surrogate marker for: (1) a setting with a general fully observed primary outcome (eg, biopsy score); and (2) a setting with a time-to-event primary outcome which may be censored due to study termination or early drop out (eg, time to diabetes). METHODS The methods are motivated by 2 randomized trials, one among children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease where the primary outcome was a change in biopsy score (general outcome) and another study among adults at high risk for Type 2 diabetes where the primary outcome was time to diabetes (time-to-event outcome). The methods are illustrated using the Rsurrogate package with a detailed R code provided. RESULTS In the biopsy score outcome setting, the estimated PTE of the examined surrogate marker was 0.182 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.121, 0.240), that is, the surrogate explained only 18.2% of the treatment effect on the biopsy score. In the diabetes setting, the estimated PTE of the surrogate marker was 0.596 (95% CI: 0.404, 0.760), that is, the surrogate explained 59.6% of the treatment effect on diabetes incidence. CONCLUSIONS This statistical workshop provides tools that will support future researchers in the evaluation of surrogate markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Layla Parast
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Lu Tian
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Tianxi Cai
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Latha Palaniappan
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kent-Marvick J, Knysheva M, Gibson B, Simonsen SE. Why Do People Choose to Enroll or Not Enroll in the National Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Change Program? A Mixed-Methods Analysis From a Sample of Adults With a Prediabetes Diagnosis. J Prim Care Community Health 2024; 15:21501319241282862. [PMID: 39305089 PMCID: PMC11418364 DOI: 10.1177/21501319241282862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is effective; enrollment is low. Little research has examined factors driving individuals' enrollment decisions. METHODS In our final survey of a randomized trial comparing methods to increase enrollment in the DPP, we asked participants about factors impacting enrollment. We conducted interviews with a subgroup. RESULTS Participants who completed the survey (n = 299) were primarily female (96 male); middle-aged (mean 52.9, SD = 14.7); white (86%); non-Hispanic (85%). Only 19% reported awareness of the DPP prior to the study. Cost, online availability, and behavior-change motivation were the most highly rated factors influencing enrollment. The median amount participants were willing to pay for the program was $66.50. Phone interviews included 17 individuals who were/were not interested in receiving a referral to the DPP. Those interested described risk awareness, family history, social support, and healthcare-provider influence as facilitating enrollment. Cost, time, travel, unsupportive family, incomplete knowledge about the program's impact and low self-efficacy were barriers. Among those uninterested, some were already engaging in lifestyle change, and some didn't see a benefit. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that, even among high-risk individuals, efforts to increase awareness and benefits of the DPP are needed, as are efforts to address cost of enrollment and low motivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov protocol ID: 00132307. The Effect of 360 Video and MAPS on Enrollment in the DPP. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04746781?id=00132307&rank=1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marina Knysheva
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Bryan Gibson
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Buckley JP, Braun JM. Invited Perspective: Long-Term Effects of Gestational PFAS Exposures on Adiposity-Time for Solutions. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2023; 131:121301. [PMID: 38054702 PMCID: PMC10699166 DOI: 10.1289/ehp13966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie P. Buckley
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joseph M. Braun
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Lifestyle intervention is an alluring concept. Changing behaviors to reduce food intake and increase energy expenditure will reduce body weight and body fat. Large randomized clinical trials in academic settings demonstrate lifestyle intervention can produce weight loss and significant health benefits. However, they also demonstrate the problems-not all participants are able to lose even 5%, and weight regain is common. Studies conducted in real-world settings achieve modest weight loss, but no reimbursement model supports it. Health care providers need to understand the benefits and limitations of lifestyle intervention delivery in the medical office setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna H Ryan
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stumpf MAM, Cercato C, de Melo ME, Santos RD, Mancini MC. Down the rabbit hole: reviewing the evidence for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with obesity. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2023; 30:1895-1905. [PMID: 37648659 DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Obesity is a prevalent chronic disorder and a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, the evidence of treating obesity for primary prevention of major cardiovascular events is still scarce and controversial. In this review, we provided a comprehensive description of the current evidence in treating obesity regarding cardiovascular protection. Bariatric surgery appears to be the most robust method to reduce events in people without established cardiovascular disease. High compliance to lifestyle interventions can further reduce cardiovascular risk. Concerning pharmacological therapies, a post hoc analysis from SUSTAIN-6 and a meta-analysis from STEP trials suggest that semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, could reduce cardiovascular events in people without established cardiovascular disease. The first study addressed specifically a high-risk population with diabetes and, the second, low- or intermediary-risk individuals without diabetes. Tirzepatide, a novel dual GIP/GLP-1 agonist, although not yet tested in specific cardiovascular outcomes trials, could be an alternative since it induces loss in weight similar to the achieved by bariatric surgery. Therefore, extrapolated data in distinct baseline cardiovascular risk populations suggest that these two drugs could be used in primary prevention with the aim of preventing cardiovascular events, but the grade of this evidence is still low. Specifically designed studies are needed to address this specific topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matheo A M Stumpf
- Obesity Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of São Paulo Medical School Hospital, Street Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 05403-010, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Cintia Cercato
- Obesity Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of São Paulo Medical School Hospital, Street Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 05403-010, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Maria E de Melo
- Obesity Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of São Paulo Medical School Hospital, Street Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 05403-010, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Raul D Santos
- Lipid Clinic Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo Medical School Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
- Academic Research Organization, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcio C Mancini
- Obesity Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of São Paulo Medical School Hospital, Street Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 05403-010, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bolou A, Drymoussi Z, Lanz D, Amaefule CE, Gonzalez Carreras FJ, Pardo Llorente MDC, Dodds J, Pizzo E, Thomas A, Heighway J, Harden A, Sanghi A, Hitman G, Zamora J, Pérez T, Huda MSB, Thangaratinam S. Metformin in the prevention of type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes in postnatal women (OMAhA): a UK multicentre randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind feasibility trial with nested qualitative study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073813. [PMID: 38016790 PMCID: PMC10685917 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility of a definitive trial of metformin to prevent type 2 diabetes in the postnatal period in women with gestational diabetes. DESIGN A multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised feasibility trial with qualitative evaluation. SETTING Three inner-city UK National Health Service hospitals in London. PARTICIPANTS Pregnant women with gestational diabetes treated with medication. INTERVENTIONS 2 g of metformin (intervention) or placebo (control) from delivery until 1 year postnatally. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Rates of recruitment, randomisation, follow-up, attrition and adherence to the intervention. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Preliminary estimates of glycaemic effects, qualitative exploration, acceptability of the intervention and costs. RESULTS Out of 302 eligible women, 57.9% (175/302) were recruited. We randomised 82.3% (144/175) of those recruited, with 71 women in the metformin group and 73 women in the placebo group. Of the participants remaining in the study and providing any adherence information, 54.1% (59/109) took at least 75% of the target intervention dose; the overall mean adherence was 64% (SD 33.6). Study procedures were found to be acceptable to women and healthcare professionals. An increased perceived risk of developing type 2 diabetes, or a positive experience of taking metformin during pregnancy, encouraged participation and adherence to the intervention. Barriers to adherence included disruption to the medication schedule caused by the washout periods ahead of each study visit or having insufficient daily reminders. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to run a full-scale definitive trial on the effectiveness of metformin to prevent type 2 diabetes in women with gestational diabetes, during the early postnatal period. Adherence and engagement with the study could be improved with more regular reminders and potentially the addition of ongoing educational or peer support to reinforce messages around type 2 diabetes prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN20930880.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeliki Bolou
- Institute of Lifecourse Development: Centre of Chronic Illness and Aging, Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK
| | - Zoe Drymoussi
- BARC (Barts Research Centre for Women's Health), Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Doris Lanz
- BARC (Barts Research Centre for Women's Health), Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Chiamaka Esther Amaefule
- BARC (Barts Research Centre for Women's Health), Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Francisco Jose Gonzalez Carreras
- BARC (Barts Research Centre for Women's Health), Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Julie Dodds
- BARC (Barts Research Centre for Women's Health), Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Elena Pizzo
- Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Amy Thomas
- Women's Health Research Unit, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - James Heighway
- BARC (Barts Research Centre for Women's Health), Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Anita Sanghi
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Javier Zamora
- Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Teresa Pérez
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mohammed S B Huda
- Department of Diabetes & Metabolism, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gorin SS, Hirko K. Primary Prevention of Cancer: A Multilevel Approach to Behavioral Risk Factor Reduction in Racially and Ethnically Minoritized Groups. Cancer J 2023; 29:354-361. [PMID: 37963370 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cancer continues to be the second most common cause of death in the United States. Racially and ethnically minoritized populations continue to experience disparities in cancer prevention compared with majority populations. Multilevel interventions-from policy, communities, health care institutions, clinical teams, families, and individuals-may be uniquely suited to reducing health disparities through behavioral risk factor modification in these populations. The aim of this article is to provide a brief overview of the evidence for primary prevention among racially and ethnically minoritized subpopulations in the United States. We focus on the epidemiology of tobacco use, obesity, diet and physical activity, alcohol use, sun exposure, and smoking, as well as increasing uptake of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine (HPV), as mutable behavioral risk factors. We describe interventions at the policy level, including raising excise taxes on tobacco products; within communities and with community partners, for safe greenways and parks, and local healthful food; health care institutions, with reminder systems for HPV vaccinations; among clinicians, by screening for alcohol use and providing tailored weight reduction approaches; families, with HPV education; and among individuals, routinely using sun protection. A multilevel approach to primary prevention of cancer can modify many of the risk factors in racially and ethnically minoritized populations for whom cancer is already a burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
- From the Department of Family Medicine, The School of Medicine, and the School of Public Health, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kelly Hirko
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rahim NE, Flood D, Marcus ME, Theilmann M, Aung TN, Agoudavi K, Aryal KK, Bahendeka S, Bicaba B, Bovet P, Diallo AO, Farzadfar F, Guwatudde D, Houehanou C, Houinato D, Hwalla N, Jorgensen J, Kagaruki GB, Mayige M, Wong-McClure R, Larijani B, Saeedi Moghaddam S, Mwalim O, Mwangi KJ, Sarkar S, Sibai AM, Sturua L, Wesseh C, Geldsetzer P, Atun R, Vollmer S, Bärnighausen T, Davies J, Ali MK, Seiglie JA, Manne-Goehler J. Diabetes risk and provision of diabetes prevention activities in 44 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative, individual-level survey data. Lancet Glob Health 2023; 11:e1576-e1586. [PMID: 37734801 PMCID: PMC10560068 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00348-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global burden of diabetes is rising rapidly, yet there is little evidence on individual-level diabetes prevention activities undertaken by health systems in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Here we describe the population at high risk of developing diabetes, estimate diabetes prevention activities, and explore sociodemographic variation in these activities across LMICs. METHODS We performed a pooled, cross-sectional analysis of individual-level data from nationally representative, population-based surveys conducted in 44 LMICs between October, 2009, and May, 2019. Our sample included all participants older than 25 years who did not have diabetes and were not pregnant. We defined the population at high risk of diabetes on the basis of either the presence of impaired fasting glucose (or prediabetes in countries with a haemoglobin A1c available) or overweight or obesity, consistent with the WHO Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Guidelines for type 2 diabetes management. We estimated the proportion of survey participants that were at high risk of developing diabetes based on this definition. We also estimated the proportion of the population at high risk that reported each of four fundamental diabetes prevention activities: physical activity counselling, weight loss counselling, dietary counselling, and blood glucose screening, overall and stratified by World Bank income group. Finally, we used multivariable Poisson regression models to evaluate associations between sociodemographic characteristics and these activities. FINDINGS The final pooled sample included 145 739 adults (86 269 [59·2%] of whom were female and 59 468 [40·4%] of whom were male) across 44 LMICs, of whom 59 308 (40·6% [95% CI 38·5-42·8]) were considered at high risk of diabetes (20·6% [19·8-21·5] in low-income countries, 38·0% [37·2-38·9] in lower-middle-income countries, and 57·5% [54·3-60·6] in upper-middle-income countries). Overall, the reach of diabetes prevention activities was low at 40·0% (38·6-41·4) for physical activity counselling, 37·1% (35·9-38·4) for weight loss counselling, 42·7% (41·6-43·7) for dietary counselling, and 37·1% (34·7-39·6) for blood glucose screening. Diabetes prevention varied widely by national-level wealth: 68·1% (64·6-71·4) of people at high risk of diabetes in low-income countries reported none of these activities, whereas 49·0% (47·4-50·7) at high risk in upper-middle-income countries reported at least three activities. Educational attainment was associated with diabetes prevention, with estimated increases in the predicted probability of receipt ranging between 6·5 (3·6-9·4) percentage points for dietary fruit and vegetable counselling and 21·3 (19·5-23·2) percentage points for blood glucose screening, among people with some secondary schooling compared with people with no formal education. INTERPRETATION A large proportion of individuals across LMICs are at high risk of diabetes but less than half reported receiving fundamental prevention activities overall, with the lowest receipt of these activities among people in low-income countries and with no formal education. These findings offer foundational evidence to inform future global targets for diabetes prevention and to strengthen policies and programmes to prevent continued increases in diabetes worldwide. FUNDING Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health McLennan Fund: Dean's Challenge Grant Program and the EU's Research and Innovation programme Horizon 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Errol Rahim
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Flood
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Maja E Marcus
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michaela Theilmann
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; Behavioral Science for Disease Prevention and Health Care, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Taing N Aung
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Krishna Kumar Aryal
- Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Silver Bahendeka
- Diabetes and Endocrinology, Saint Francis Hospital Nsambya, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Brice Bicaba
- National Institute of Public Health, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Pascal Bovet
- University Center for General Medicine and Public Health (Unisanté), Lausanne, Switzerland; Ministry of Health, Victoria, Seychelles
| | - Alpha Oumar Diallo
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Farshad Farzadfar
- Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - David Guwatudde
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Corine Houehanou
- Laboratory of Epidemiology of Chronic and Neurological Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin
| | - Dismand Houinato
- Laboratory of Epidemiology of Chronic and Neurological Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin
| | - Nahla Hwalla
- Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jutta Jorgensen
- Institute of Global Health, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Mary Mayige
- National Institute for Medical Research, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | | | - Bagher Larijani
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Kibachio Joseph Mwangi
- Division of Non-Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya; World Health Organization Country Office, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Sudipa Sarkar
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Abla M Sibai
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Lela Sturua
- Non-Communicable Disease Department, National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | | | - Pascal Geldsetzer
- Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Chan Zuckerberg Biohub-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rifat Atun
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sebastian Vollmer
- Department of Economics and Centre for Modern Indian Studies, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Till Bärnighausen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Africa Health Research Institute, Somkhele, South Africa
| | - Justine Davies
- MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit, School of Public Health, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Global Surgery, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mohammed K Ali
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Family and Prevention Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jacqueline A Seiglie
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Manne-Goehler
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Parast L, Tian L, Cai T, Palaniappan LP. Can earlier biomarker measurements explain a treatment effect on diabetes incidence? A robust comparison of five surrogate markers. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2023; 11:e003585. [PMID: 37907279 PMCID: PMC10619035 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We measured and compared five individual surrogate markers-change from baseline to 1 year after randomization in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting glucose, 2-hour postchallenge glucose, triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) index, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)-in terms of their ability to explain a treatment effect on reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus at 2, 3, and 4 years after treatment initiation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Study participants were from the Diabetes Prevention Program study, randomly assigned to either a lifestyle intervention (n=1023) or placebo (n=1030). The surrogate markers were measured at baseline and 1 year, and diabetes incidence was examined at 2, 3, and 4 years postrandomization. Surrogacy was evaluated using a robust model-free estimate of the proportion of treatment effect explained (PTE) by the surrogate marker. RESULTS Across all time points, change in fasting glucose and HOMA-IR explained higher proportions of the treatment effect than 2-hour glucose, TyG index, or HbA1c. For example, at 2 years, glucose explained the highest (80.1%) proportion of the treatment effect, followed by HOMA-IR (77.7%), 2-hour glucose (76.2%), and HbA1c (74.6%); the TyG index explained the smallest (70.3%) proportion. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that, of the five examined surrogate markers, glucose and HOMA-IR were the superior surrogate markers in terms of PTE, compared with 2-hour glucose, HbA1c, and TyG index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Layla Parast
- The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Lu Tian
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Tianxi Cai
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Latha P Palaniappan
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bigford GE, Betancourt LF, Charlifue S, Nash MS. Therapeutic Lifestyle Intervention Targeting Enhanced Cardiometabolic Health and Function for Persons with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury in Caregiver/Care-Receiver Co-Treatment: A Study Protocol of a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6819. [PMID: 37835090 PMCID: PMC10572441 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20196819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) significantly accelerates morbidity and mortality, partly due to the increased risk of cardiometabolic diseases (CMD), including neurogenic obesity, dyslipidemia, and impaired glucose metabolism. While exercise and dietary interventions have shown some transient benefits in reducing CMD risk, they often fail to improve clinically relevant disease markers and cardiovascular events. Moreover, SCI also places caregiving demands on their caregivers, who themselves experience health and functional decline. This underscores the need for more substantial interventions that incorporate appropriate physical activity, heart-healthy nutrition, and behavioral support tailored to the SCI population. OBJECTIVES This randomized clinical trial (RCT) protocol will (1) assess the health and functional effects, user acceptance, and satisfaction of a 6-month comprehensive therapeutic lifestyle intervention (TLI) adapted from the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) for individuals with chronic SCI and (2) examine the impact of a complementary caregiver program on the health and function of SCI caregivers and evaluate user acceptance and satisfaction. Caregivers (linked with their partners) will be randomized to 'behavioral support' or 'control condition'. METHODS Dyadic couples comprise individuals with SCI (18-65 years, >1-year post-injury, ASIA Impairment Scale A-C, injury levels C5-L1) and non-disabled SCI caregivers (18-65 years). Both groups undergo lock-step circuit resistance training, a calorie-restricted Mediterranean-style diet, and 16 educational sessions focused on diet/exercise goals, self-monitoring, psychological and social challenges, cognitive behavioral therapy, and motivational interviewing. The outcome measures encompass the cardiometabolic risks, cardiorespiratory fitness, inflammatory stress, multidimensional function, pain, life quality, independence, self-efficacy, program acceptance, and life satisfaction for SCI participants. The caregiver outcomes include multidimensional function, pain, quality of life, independence, and perceived caregiver burden. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS This study evaluates the effects and durability of a structured, multi-modal intervention on health and function. The results and intervention material will be disseminated to professionals and consumers for broader implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02853149 Registered 2 August 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory E. Bigford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA; (L.F.B.); (M.S.N.)
| | - Luisa F. Betancourt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA; (L.F.B.); (M.S.N.)
| | | | - Mark S. Nash
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA; (L.F.B.); (M.S.N.)
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Teo JYC, Ramachandran HJ, Jiang Y, Seah CWA, Lim ST, Nguyen HD, Wang W. The characteristics and acceptance of Technology-Enabled diabetes prevention programs (t-DPP) amongst individuals with prediabetes: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:5562-5578. [PMID: 36775886 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
AIM AND OBJECTIVE As rising global prevalence of diabetes burdens an overstrained healthcare system, it would be prudent to employ primary prevention strategies. This review aims to detail characteristics of technology-enabled diabetes prevention programs (t-DPP) and the technology acceptance amongst prediabetic individuals. DESIGN A scoping review. REVIEW METHODS Summative and direct content analysis. DATA SOURCES Seven electronic databases-PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO and Web of Science-were searched from inception till 9 June 2022 for primary studies conducted on t-DPP. Initial search identified 2412 unique articles. Removal of duplicates and irrelevant articles resulted in 58 full text articles screened and 17 articles meeting the eligibility criteria. There was no limitation to study type or year of publication, but language was limited to English. RESULTS Common t-DPP characteristics include physical activity (n = 17), diet control (n = 16), coaching (n = 12), social support (n = 9) and skills acquisition (n = 12). Technological acceptance of t-DPPs were generally positive as participants found them useful (n = 5) and easy to use (n = 4), with majority of the participants interested (n = 5) and engaging well with it (n = 13). However, personal-, design- and technological-level factors were found to negatively influence t-DPPs acceptance. CONCLUSION This review reported a generally positive technological acceptance. The result encourages remote delivery of diabetes prevention programs, offering researchers a guide to t-DPP development. However, it also highlights the need for integration of behavioural change theories and socio-cultural considerations, with gaps in knowledge amongst men and young adults. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING The success of t-DPP can reinforce clinical advice and sustain health behaviours advocated by nurses. Involvement of diabetes-trained nurses would enable continual risk assessment, monitoring and timely intervention to prevent diabetes and potential complications. REPORTING METHOD PRISMA-ScR checklist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Yi Claire Teo
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Hadassah Joann Ramachandran
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Ying Jiang
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Chuen Wei Alvin Seah
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Suan Tee Lim
- Advanced Practice Nurse, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Hoang D Nguyen
- School of Computing Science and Information Technology, University College Cork - National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland
| | - Wenru Wang
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kariuki D, Aouizerat BE, Asam K, Kanaya AM, Zhang L, Florez JC, Flowers E. MicroRNA biomarkers target genes and pathways associated with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2023; 203:110868. [PMID: 37543292 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Our prior analysis of the Diabetes Prevention Program study identified a subset of five miRNAs that predict incident type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this study was to identify mRNAs and biological pathways targeted by these five miRNAs to elucidate potential mechanisms of risk and responses to the tested interventions. METHODS Using experimentally validated data from miRTarBase version 8.0 and R (2021), we identified mRNAs with strong evidence to be regulated by individual or combinations of the five predictor miRNAs. Overrepresentation of the mRNA targets was assessed in pathways from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway annotation database. RESULTS The five miRNAs targeted 167 pathways and 122 mRNAs. Nine of the pathways have known associations with type 2 diabetes: Insulin signaling, Insulin resistance, Diabetic cardiomyopathy, Type 2 diabetes, AGE-RAGE signaling in diabetic complications, HIF-1 signaling, TGF-beta signaling, PI3K/Akt signaling, and Adipocytokine signaling pathways. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) has prior genetic associations with risk for type 2 diabetes and was the most commonly targeted mRNA for this set of miRNAs. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION These findings show that miRNA predictors of incident type 2 diabetes target mRNAs and pathways known to underlie risk for type 2 diabetes. Future studies should evaluate miRNAs as potential therapeutic targets for preventing and treating type 2 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorian Kariuki
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Physiological Nursing, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bradley E Aouizerat
- New York University Bluestone Center for Clinical Research, New York, NY 10010, USA; New York University Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, New York, NY 10010, USA
| | - Kesava Asam
- New York University Bluestone Center for Clinical Research, New York, NY 10010, USA
| | - Alka M Kanaya
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Francisco, CA, USA; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Li Zhang
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Francisco, CA, USA; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jose C Florez
- Center for Genomic Medicine and Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Programs in Metabolism and Medical &Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Flowers
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Physiological Nursing, San Francisco, CA, USA; University of California, San Francisco, Institute for Human Genetics, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Molitch ME, Tripputi M, Levey AS, Crandall JP, Dabelea D, Herman WH, Knowler WC, Orchard TJ, Schroeder EB, Srikanthan P, Temprosa M, White NH, Nathan DM. Effects of metformin and intensive lifestyle interventions on the incidence of kidney disease in adults in the DPP/DPPOS. J Diabetes Complications 2023; 37:108556. [PMID: 37607422 PMCID: PMC11017540 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2023.108556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
AIMS We analyzed the incidence of kidney disease in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS) by originally randomized treatment group assignment: Intensive Lifestyle (ILS), Metformin (MET) or Placebo (PLB). METHODS The current analyses used a time-to-event approach in which the primary outcome was kidney disease, ascertained as urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥ 3.39 mg/mmol (30 mg/g) or eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73m2, with confirmation required at the next visit, or adjudicated end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). RESULTS At a median of 21 years following randomization in DPP, diabetes development was reduced in both the ILS (HR 0.73 [95%CI = 0.62, 0.85]) and MET groups (HR 0.85 [0.73, 0.99]) compared to the PLB group. Although risk for developing the primary kidney disease outcome was higher among those with incident diabetes compared to those without (HR 1.81 [1.43, 2.30]), it did not differ by intervention groups (ILS vs. PLB 1.02 (0.81, 1.29); MET vs. PLB 1.08 (0.86, 1.35). There was a non-significant metformin by age interaction (p = 0.057), with metformin being beneficial for kidney disease in the younger but potentially harmful in the older participants. CONCLUSIONS Development of kidney disease was increased in participants who developed diabetes but did not differ by original treatment group assignment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONS Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Clinical trial reg. no. NCT00004992 DPP Outcomes Study (DPPOS) Clinical trial reg. no. NCT0038727.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Molitch
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Mark Tripputi
- DPP/DPPOS Coordinating Center, Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States of America
| | - Andrew S Levey
- Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jill P Crandall
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States of America
| | - Dana Dabelea
- Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, United States of America
| | - William H Herman
- Schools of Medicine and Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America
| | - William C Knowler
- DPP/DPPOS Coordinating Center, Biostatistics Center (Consultant), The George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States of America
| | - Trevor J Orchard
- University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Emily B Schroeder
- Division of Endocrinology, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States of America
| | - Preethi Srikanthan
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Marinella Temprosa
- DPP/DPPOS Coordinating Center, Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
| | - Neil H White
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - David M Nathan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Li JH, Perry JA, Jablonski KA, Srinivasan S, Chen L, Todd JN, Harden M, Mercader JM, Pan Q, Dawed AY, Yee SW, Pearson ER, Giacomini KM, Giri A, Hung AM, Xiao S, Williams LK, Franks PW, Hanson RL, Kahn SE, Knowler WC, Pollin TI, Florez JC. Identification of Genetic Variation Influencing Metformin Response in a Multiancestry Genome-Wide Association Study in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). Diabetes 2023; 72:1161-1172. [PMID: 36525397 PMCID: PMC10382652 DOI: 10.2337/db22-0702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Genome-wide significant loci for metformin response in type 2 diabetes reported elsewhere have not been replicated in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). To assess pharmacogenetic interactions in prediabetes, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in the DPP. Cox proportional hazards models tested associations with diabetes incidence in the metformin (MET; n = 876) and placebo (PBO; n = 887) arms. Multiple linear regression assessed association with 1-year change in metformin-related quantitative traits, adjusted for baseline trait, age, sex, and 10 ancestry principal components. We tested for gene-by-treatment interaction. No significant associations emerged for diabetes incidence. We identified four genome-wide significant variants after correcting for correlated traits (P < 9 × 10-9). In the MET arm, rs144322333 near ENOSF1 (minor allele frequency [MAF]AFR = 0.07; MAFEUR = 0.002) was associated with an increase in percentage of glycated hemoglobin (per minor allele, β = 0.39 [95% CI 0.28, 0.50]; P = 2.8 × 10-12). rs145591055 near OMSR (MAF = 0.10 in American Indians) was associated with weight loss (kilograms) (per G allele, β = -7.55 [95% CI -9.88, -5.22]; P = 3.2 × 10-10) in the MET arm. Neither variant was significant in PBO; gene-by-treatment interaction was significant for both variants [P(G×T) < 1.0 × 10-4]. Replication in individuals with diabetes did not yield significant findings. A GWAS for metformin response in prediabetes revealed novel ethnic-specific associations that require further investigation but may have implications for tailored therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine H. Li
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - James A. Perry
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kathleen A. Jablonski
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC
| | - Shylaja Srinivasan
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ling Chen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA
| | - Jennifer N. Todd
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Maegan Harden
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA
| | - Josep M. Mercader
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Qing Pan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC
| | - Adem Y. Dawed
- Division of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, U.K
| | - Sook Wah Yee
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ewan R. Pearson
- Division of Population Health and Genomics, Ninewells Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, U.K
| | - Kathleen M. Giacomini
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ayush Giri
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Adriana M. Hung
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Shujie Xiao
- Center for Individualized and Genomic Medicine Research, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - L. Keoki Williams
- Center for Individualized and Genomic Medicine Research, Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | - Paul W. Franks
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Robert L. Hanson
- Diabetes Epidemiology and Clinical Research Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Steven E. Kahn
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington, Seattle
| | - William C. Knowler
- Diabetes Epidemiology and Clinical Research Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Toni I. Pollin
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jose C. Florez
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Butryn ML, Kerrigan S, Hagerman CJ, Crane NT, Godfrey K. Do monthly coaching calls influence proximal participant adherence in a behavioral weight loss program? J Behav Med 2023; 46:699-706. [PMID: 36723730 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-023-00394-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Participants who receive continued coach contact following behavioral weight loss treatment are more successful in maintaining their weight loss long-term. The current study examines whether these contacts have dynamic effects, such that participants are most adherent to the prescribed weight loss behaviors in the days after the call, when motivation and goal salience may be heightened, than they are as time goes on. The current study examined the trajectory of calorie intake, physical activity, weight, and self-monitoring behavior in the fourteen days after a monthly coaching call among participants completing the maintenance phase of a behavioral weight loss trial. For physical activity outcomes, caloric intake, and weight, there were no changes across time. Participants did have the highest adherence and quality of dietary self-monitoring immediately after the call, which diminished over time. Coach contact may continually renew commitment to this burdensome but critical behavior. Likelihood of self-weighing showed an opposite trend, where participants were more likely to weigh themselves in the days more distal from the coach call. Results can inform the timing and content of future coach contact to promote weight control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan L Butryn
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Weight, Eating and Lifestyle Sciences (WELL Center), Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St., Stratton 286, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | | | - Charlotte J Hagerman
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Weight, Eating and Lifestyle Sciences (WELL Center), Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St., Stratton 286, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Nicole T Crane
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Weight, Eating and Lifestyle Sciences (WELL Center), Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St., Stratton 286, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Kathryn Godfrey
- Center for WorkLife Wellbeing, ChristianaCare, Wilmington, DE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Crane N, Hagerman C, Horgan O, Butryn M. Patterns and Predictors of Engagement With Digital Self-Monitoring During the Maintenance Phase of a Behavioral Weight Loss Program: Quantitative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023; 11:e45057. [PMID: 37463017 PMCID: PMC10394603 DOI: 10.2196/45057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term self-monitoring (SM) of weight, diet, and exercise is commonly recommended by behavioral weight loss (BWL) treatments. However, sustained SM engagement is notoriously challenging; therefore, more must be learned about patterns of engagement with digital SM tools during weight loss maintenance (WLM). In addition, insight into characteristics that may influence SM engagement could inform tailored approaches for participants at risk for poor adherence. OBJECTIVE This study explored patterns of digital SM of weight, diet, and exercise during WLM (aim 1) and examined timing, patterns, and rates of disengagement and reengagement (aim 2). This study also assessed relationships between individual-level factors (weight-related information avoidance and weight bias internalization) and SM engagement (aim 3). METHODS Participants were 72 adults enrolled in a BWL program consisting of a 3-month period of weekly treatment designed to induce weight loss (phase I), followed by a 9-month period of less frequent contact to promote WLM (phase II). Participants were prescribed daily digital SM of weight, diet, and exercise. At baseline, self-report measures assessed weight-related information avoidance and weight bias internalization. SM adherence was objectively measured with the days per month that participants tracked weight, diet, and exercise. Repeated-measures ANOVA examined differences in adherence across SM targets. Multilevel modeling examined changes in adherence across phase II. Relationships between individual-level variables and SM adherence were assessed with Pearson correlations, 2-tailed independent samples t tests, and multilevel modeling. RESULTS During WLM, consistently high rates of SM (≥50% of the days in each month) were observed for 61% (44/72) of the participants for exercise, 40% (29/72) of the participants for weight, and 21% (15/72) of the participants for diet. Adherence for SM of exercise was higher than that for weight or diet (P<.001). Adherence decreased over time for all SM targets throughout phase II (P<.001), but SM of exercise dropped off later in WLM (mean 10.07, SD 2.83 months) than SM of weight (mean 7.92, SD 3.23 months) or diet (mean 7.58, SD 2.92 months; P<.001). Among participants with a period of low SM adherence (ie, <50% of the days in a month), only 33% (17/51 for weight, 19/57 for diet) to 46% (13/28 for exercise) subsequently had ≥1 months with high adherence. High weight-related information avoidance predicted a faster rate of decrease in dietary SM (P<.001). Participants with high weight bias internalization had the highest rates of weight SM (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS Participants in BWL programs have low adherence to the recommendation to sustain daily SM during WLM, particularly for SM of diet and weight. Weight-related information avoidance and weight bias internalization may be relevant indicators for SM engagement. Interventions may benefit from innovative strategies that target participants at key moments of risk for disengagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Crane
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Charlotte Hagerman
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Olivia Horgan
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Meghan Butryn
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Koutoukidis DA, Mozes FE, Jebb SA, Tomlinson JW, Pavlides M, Saffioti F, Huntriss R, Aveyard P, Cobbold JF. A low-energy total diet replacement program demonstrates a favorable safety profile and improves liver disease severity in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2023; 31:1767-1778. [PMID: 37368513 DOI: 10.1002/oby.23793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Low-energy diets are used to treat obesity and diabetes, but there are fears that they may worsen liver disease in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and significant-to-advanced fibrosis. METHODS In this 24-week single-arm trial, 16 adults with NASH, fibrosis, and obesity received one-to-one remote dietetic support to follow a low-energy (880 kcal/d) total diet replacement program for 12 weeks and stepped food reintroduction for another 12 weeks. Liver disease severity was blindly evaluated (magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction [MRI-PDFF], iron-corrected T1 [cT1], liver stiffness on magnetic resonance elastography [MRE], and liver stiffness on vibration-controlled transient elastography [VCTE]). Safety signals included liver biochemical markers and adverse events. RESULTS A total of 14 participants (87.5%) completed the intervention. Weight loss was 15% (95% CI: 11.2%-18.6%) at 24 weeks. Compared with baseline, MRI-PDFF reduced by 13.1% (95% CI: 8.9%-16.7%), cT1 by 159 milliseconds (95% CI: 108-216.5), MRE liver stiffness by 0.4 kPa (95% CI: 0.1-0.8), and VCTE liver stiffness by 3.9 kPa (95% CI: 2.6-7.2) at 24 weeks. The proportions with clinically relevant reductions in MRI-PDFF (≥30%), cT1 (≥88 milliseconds), MRE liver stiffness (≥19%), and VCTE liver stiffness (≥19%) were 93%, 77%, 57%, and 93%, respectively. Liver biochemical markers improved. There were no serious intervention-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The intervention demonstrates high adherence, favorable safety profile, and promising efficacy as a treatment for NASH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios A Koutoukidis
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Ferenc E Mozes
- Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susan A Jebb
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeremy W Tomlinson
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Pavlides
- Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Francesca Saffioti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Paul Aveyard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeremy F Cobbold
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Li JH, Brenner LN, Kaur V, Figueroa K, Schroeder P, Huerta-Chagoya A, Udler MS, Leong A, Mercader JM, Florez JC. Genome-wide association analysis identifies ancestry-specific genetic variation associated with acute response to metformin and glipizide in SUGAR-MGH. Diabetologia 2023; 66:1260-1272. [PMID: 37233759 PMCID: PMC10790310 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-023-05922-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Characterisation of genetic variation that influences the response to glucose-lowering medications is instrumental to precision medicine for treatment of type 2 diabetes. The Study to Understand the Genetics of the Acute Response to Metformin and Glipizide in Humans (SUGAR-MGH) examined the acute response to metformin and glipizide in order to identify new pharmacogenetic associations for the response to common glucose-lowering medications in individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes. METHODS One thousand participants at risk for type 2 diabetes from diverse ancestries underwent sequential glipizide and metformin challenges. A genome-wide association study was performed using the Illumina Multi-Ethnic Genotyping Array. Imputation was performed with the TOPMed reference panel. Multiple linear regression using an additive model tested for association between genetic variants and primary endpoints of drug response. In a more focused analysis, we evaluated the influence of 804 unique type 2 diabetes- and glycaemic trait-associated variants on SUGAR-MGH outcomes and performed colocalisation analyses to identify shared genetic signals. RESULTS Five genome-wide significant variants were associated with metformin or glipizide response. The strongest association was between an African ancestry-specific variant (minor allele frequency [MAFAfr]=0.0283) at rs149403252 and lower fasting glucose at Visit 2 following metformin (p=1.9×10-9); carriers were found to have a 0.94 mmol/l larger decrease in fasting glucose. rs111770298, another African ancestry-specific variant (MAFAfr=0.0536), was associated with a reduced response to metformin (p=2.4×10-8), where carriers had a 0.29 mmol/l increase in fasting glucose compared with non-carriers, who experienced a 0.15 mmol/l decrease. This finding was validated in the Diabetes Prevention Program, where rs111770298 was associated with a worse glycaemic response to metformin: heterozygous carriers had an increase in HbA1c of 0.08% and non-carriers had an HbA1c increase of 0.01% after 1 year of treatment (p=3.3×10-3). We also identified associations between type 2 diabetes-associated variants and glycaemic response, including the type 2 diabetes-protective C allele of rs703972 near ZMIZ1 and increased levels of active glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) (p=1.6×10-5), supporting the role of alterations in incretin levels in type 2 diabetes pathophysiology. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION We present a well-phenotyped, densely genotyped, multi-ancestry resource to study gene-drug interactions, uncover novel variation associated with response to common glucose-lowering medications and provide insight into mechanisms of action of type 2 diabetes-related variation. DATA AVAILABILITY The complete summary statistics from this study are available at the Common Metabolic Diseases Knowledge Portal ( https://hugeamp.org ) and the GWAS Catalog ( www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/ , accession IDs: GCST90269867 to GCST90269899).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine H Li
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura N Brenner
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Varinderpal Kaur
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Katherine Figueroa
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Philip Schroeder
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Alicia Huerta-Chagoya
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Miriam S Udler
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aaron Leong
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Josep M Mercader
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jose C Florez
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Programs in Metabolism and Medical & Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Napolitano MA, Bailey CP, Mavredes MN, Neighbors CJ, Whiteley JA, Long MW, Hayman LL, Malin SK, DiPietro L. Personalized versus generic digital weight loss interventions delivered on university campuses: a 6-month cost-benefit analysis. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:358-367. [PMID: 37186191 PMCID: PMC10255761 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Cost-effectiveness analyses of weight loss programs for university students can inform administrator decision-making. This study quantifies and compares the costs and cost-effectiveness of implementing two digitally-delivered weight loss interventions designed for university populations. Healthy Body Healthy U (HBHU) was a randomized controlled trial comparing TAILORED (personalized) versus TARGETED (generic) weight loss interventions adapted specifically for young adults to a CONTROL intervention. Participants (N = 459; 23.3 ± 4.4 years; mean BMI 31.2 ± 4.4 kg/m2) were recruited from two universities. Implementation costs were examined from a payer (i.e., university) perspective, comparing both the average cost effectiveness ratio (ACER) and the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two interventions. Cost-effectiveness measures were calculated for changes in body weight, abdominal circumference, HDL cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and HbA1c. The overall 6-month implementation costs were $105.66 per person for the TAILORED intervention and $91.44 per person for the TARGETED intervention. The ACER for weight change was $107.82 for the TAILORED and $179.29 for the TARGETED interventions. The ICER comparing TAILORED with TARGETED for change in body weight was $5.05, and was even lower ($2.28) when including only those with overweight and not obesity. The ICERs for change in abdominal circumference, HDL cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and HbA1c were $3.49, $59.37, $1.57, $2.64, and $47.49, respectively. The TAILORED intervention was generally more cost-effective compared with the TARGETED intervention, particularly among those with overweight. Young adults with obesity may require more resource-intensive precision-based approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A Napolitano
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Caitlin P Bailey
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Meghan N Mavredes
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Charles J Neighbors
- Department of Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica A Whiteley
- Departmen of Exercise and Health Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael W Long
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Laura L Hayman
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, The University of Massachusetts at Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven K Malin
- Department of Kinesiology and Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Loretta DiPietro
- Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Al-Sofiani ME, Asiri A, Alajmi S, Alkeridy W. Perspectives on Prediabetes and Aging. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2023; 52:377-388. [PMID: 36948785 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecl.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Diabetes prevention programs (DPPs) have been shown to effectively delay, and sometimes prevent, the progression from prediabetes to diabetes; however, labeling someone with prediabetes comes with potential negative psychological, financial, and self-perception consequences. Many older adults with prediabetes nowadays have a relatively "low-risk" form of prediabetes that rarely progresses to diabetes and may regress to normoglycemia. In this article, we review the impact of aging on glucose metabolism and provide a holistic approach to cases of prediabetes in older adults that maximizes the benefit-risk balance of interventions aimed at addressing prediabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed E Al-Sofiani
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Central Region, 12372, Saudi Arabia; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, The Johns Hopkins University, 1830 East Monument Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Alanood Asiri
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Central Region, 12372, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sarah Alajmi
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Central Region, 12372, Saudi Arabia
| | - Walid Alkeridy
- Department of Medicine, King Saud University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Central Region, 12372, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Miller NA, Ehmann MM, Hagerman CJ, Forman EM, Arigo D, Spring B, LaFata EM, Zhang F, Milliron BJ, Butryn ML. Sharing digital self-monitoring data with others to enhance long-term weight loss: A randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 129:107201. [PMID: 37080355 PMCID: PMC10231946 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participants in behavioral weight loss (BWL) programs increasingly use digital tools to self-monitor weight, physical activity, and dietary intake. Data collected with these tools can be systematically shared with other parties in ways that might support behavior change. METHODS Adults age 18 to 70 with overweight/obesity (BMI 27-50 kg/m2) will enroll in a remotely delivered, 24-month BWL program designed to produce and maintain a 10% weight loss. Participants will be asked to use a wireless body weight scale, wearable activity sensor, and dietary intake app daily. All participants will receive individual and group counseling, engage in text messaging with members of their group, and appoint a friend or family member to serve in a support role. A 2x2x2 factorial design will test the effects of three types of data sharing partnerships: 1) Coach Share: The behavioral coach will regularly view digital self-monitoring data and address data observations. 2) Group Share: Participants will view each other's self-monitoring data in small-group text messages. 3) Friend/Family Share: A friend or family member will view the participant's data via automated message. The primary outcome is weight loss at 24 months. Mediators and moderators of intervention effects will be tested. CONCLUSION This study will provide a clear indication of whether data sharing can improve long-term weight loss. This study will be the first to discern the mechanisms of action through which each type of data sharing may be beneficial, and elucidate conditions under which the benefits of data sharing may be maximized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole A Miller
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
| | - Marny M Ehmann
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Charlotte J Hagerman
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Evan M Forman
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Danielle Arigo
- Department of Psychology, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Robinson Hall, Glassboro, NJ 08028, United States
| | - Bonnie Spring
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - Erica M LaFata
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Fengqing Zhang
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Brandy-Joe Milliron
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, Drexel University, 60 N 36th St, 11(th) floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Meghan L Butryn
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut Street Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wang X, Parast L, Han L, Tian L, Cai T. Robust approach to combining multiple markers to improve surrogacy. Biometrics 2023; 79:788-798. [PMID: 35426444 PMCID: PMC10347081 DOI: 10.1111/biom.13677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Identifying effective and valid surrogate markers to make inference about a treatment effect on long-term outcomes is an important step in improving the efficiency of clinical trials. Replacing a long-term outcome with short-term and/or cheaper surrogate markers can potentially shorten study duration and reduce trial costs. There is sizable statistical literature on methods to quantify the effectiveness of a single surrogate marker. Both parametric and nonparametric approaches have been well developed for different outcome types. However, when there are multiple markers available, methods for combining markers to construct a composite marker with improved surrogacy remain limited. In this paper, building on top of the optimal transformation framework of Wang et al. (2020), we propose a novel calibrated model fusion approach to optimally combine multiple markers to improve surrogacy. Specifically, we obtain two initial estimates of optimal composite scores of the markers based on two sets of models with one set approximating the underlying data distribution and the other directly approximating the optimal transformation function. We then estimate an optimal calibrated combination of the two estimated scores which ensures both validity of the final combined score and optimality with respect to the proportion of treatment effect explained by the final combined score. This approach is unique in that it identifies an optimal combination of the multiple surrogates without strictly relying on parametric assumptions while borrowing modeling strategies to avoid fully nonparametric estimation which is subject to the curse of dimensionality. Our identified optimal transformation can also be used to directly quantify the surrogacy of this identified combined score. Theoretical properties of the proposed estimators are derived, and the finite sample performance of the proposed method is evaluated through simulation studies. We further illustrate the proposed method using data from the Diabetes Prevention Program study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Layla Parast
- Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Larry Han
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lu Tian
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Tianxi Cai
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Crane NT, Butryn ML, Gorin AA, Lowe MR, LaFata EM. Overlapping and distinct relationships between hedonic hunger, uncontrolled eating, food craving, and the obesogenic home food environment during and after a 12-month behavioral weight loss program. Appetite 2023; 185:106543. [PMID: 36940743 PMCID: PMC10121957 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Hedonic hunger, reward-driven eating outside of biological need, is a newer construct in eating behavior research. During behavioral weight loss (BWL), greater improvements in hedonic hunger are associated with higher weight loss, but it remains unclear if hedonic hunger predicts weight loss independent of more well-established, similar constructs (uncontrolled eating and food craving). Research also is needed to understand how hedonic hunger interacts with contextual factors (e.g., obesogenic food environment) during weight loss. Adults (N = 283) in a 12-month randomized controlled trial of BWL were weighed at 0, 12, and 24 months, and completed questionnaires assessing hedonic hunger, food craving, uncontrolled eating, and the home food environment. All variables improved at 12 and 24 months. Decreases in hedonic hunger at 12 months were associated with higher concurrent weight loss, but not when accounting for improvements in craving and uncontrolled eating. At 24 months, reduction in craving was a stronger predictor of weight loss than hedonic hunger, but improvement in hedonic hunger was a stronger predictor of weight loss than change in uncontrolled eating. Changes to the obesogenic home food environment failed to predict weight loss, regardless of levels of hedonic hunger. This study adds novel information on the individual and contextual factors associated with short- and long-term weight control, which can help refine conceptual models and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole T Crane
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
| | - Meghan L Butryn
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| | - Amy A Gorin
- Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention and Policy, University of Connecticut, J.Ryan Building, 2006 Hillside Road, Storrs, CT, 06269, United States
| | - Michael R Lowe
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| | - Erica M LaFata
- Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton Hall, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rosta L, Menyhart A, Mahmeed WA, Al-Rasadi K, Al-Alawi K, Banach M, Banerjee Y, Ceriello A, Cesur M, Cosentino F, Firenze A, Galia M, Goh SY, Janez A, Kalra S, Kapoor N, Lessan N, Lotufo P, Papanas N, Rizvi AA, Sahebkar A, Santos RD, Stoian AP, Toth PP, Viswanathan V, Kempler P, Rizzo M. Telemedicine for diabetes management during COVID-19: what we have learnt, what and how to implement. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1129793. [PMID: 37265696 PMCID: PMC10231679 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1129793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The past two decades have witnessed telemedicine becoming a crucial part of health care as a method to facilitate doctor-patient interaction. Due to technological developments and the incremental acquisition of experience in its use, telemedicine's advantages and cost-effectiveness has led to it being recognised as specifically relevant to diabetology. However, the pandemic created new challenges for healthcare systems and the rate of development of digital services started to grow exponentially. It was soon discovered that COVID-19-infected patients with diabetes had an increased risk of both mortality and debilitating sequelae. In addition, it was observed that this higher risk could be attenuated primarily by maintaining optimal control of the patient's glucose metabolism. As opportunities for actual physical doctor-patient visits became restricted, telemedicine provided the most convenient opportunity to communicate with patients and maintain delivery of care. The wide range of experiences of health care provision during the pandemic has led to the development of several excellent strategies regarding the applicability of telemedicine across the whole spectrum of diabetes care. The continuation of these strategies is likely to benefit clinical practice even after the pandemic crisis is over.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adrienn Menyhart
- Department of Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Wael Al Mahmeed
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Kamila Al-Alawi
- Department of Training and Studies, Royal Hospital, Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman
| | - Maciej Banach
- Department of Preventive Cardiology and Lipidology , Medical University of Lodz (MUL), Lodz, Poland
- Department of Medicine, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute (PMMHRI), Lodz, Poland
- Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Gora, Poland
| | - Yajnavalka Banerjee
- Department of Biochemistry, Mohammed Bin Rashid University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Antonio Ceriello
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) MultiMedica, Milan, Italy
| | - Mustafa Cesur
- Clinic of Endocrinology, Ankara Güven Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Francesco Cosentino
- Unit of Cardiology, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alberto Firenze
- Unit of Research and International Cooperation, University Hospital of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Galia
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (Bind), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Su-Yen Goh
- Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrej Janez
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Sanjay Kalra
- Department of Endocrinology, Bharti Hospital, Karnal, India
| | - Nitin Kapoor
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nader Lessan
- The Research Institute, Imperial College London Diabetes Centre, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Paulo Lotufo
- Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nikolaos Papanas
- Diabetes Center, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Ali A. Rizvi
- Department of Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, United States
| | - Amirhossein Sahebkar
- Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
- Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Raul D. Santos
- Heart Institute (InCor), University of Sao Paulo Medical School Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Anca Pantea Stoian
- Faculty of Medicine, Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Carol Davila University, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Peter P. Toth
- Cicarrone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | - Peter Kempler
- Department of Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Manfredi Rizzo
- Department of Biochemistry, Mohammed Bin Rashid University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- Faculty of Medicine, Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Carol Davila University, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Promise), School of Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Haddad F, Dokmak G, Bader M, Karaman R. A Comprehensive Review on Weight Loss Associated with Anti-Diabetic Medications. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1012. [PMID: 37109541 PMCID: PMC10144237 DOI: 10.3390/life13041012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Obesity is a complex metabolic condition that can have a negative impact on one's health and even result in mortality. The management of obesity has been addressed in a number of ways, including lifestyle changes, medication using appetite suppressants and thermogenics, and bariatric surgery for individuals who are severely obese. Liraglutide and semaglutide are two of the five Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-obesity drugs that are FDA-approved agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. In order to highlight the positive effects of these drugs as anti-obesity treatments, we analyzed the weight loss effects of T2DM agents that have demonstrated weight loss effects in this study by evaluating clinical studies that were published for each agent. Many clinical studies have revealed that some antihyperglycemic medications can help people lose weight, while others either cause weight gain or neutral results. Acarbose has mild weight loss effects and metformin and sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter proteins-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have modest weight loss effects; however, some glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists had the greatest impact on weight loss. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors showed a neutral or mild weight loss effect. To sum up, some of the GLP-1 agonist drugs show promise as weight-loss treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Haddad
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem 9103401, Palestine; (F.H.); (G.D.); (M.B.)
- Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK
| | - Ghadeer Dokmak
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem 9103401, Palestine; (F.H.); (G.D.); (M.B.)
| | - Maryam Bader
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem 9103401, Palestine; (F.H.); (G.D.); (M.B.)
| | - Rafik Karaman
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem 9103401, Palestine; (F.H.); (G.D.); (M.B.)
- Department of Sciences, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Halliday TM, McFadden M, Cedillo M, Barone Gibbs B, Hess R, Bryce C, Fischer GS, Huber K, McTigue KM, Conroy MB. Lifestyle strategies after intentional weight loss: results from the MAINTAIN-pc randomized trial. TRANSLATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE 2023; 8:e000220. [PMID: 37458000 PMCID: PMC10348773 DOI: 10.1249/tjx.0000000000000220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Introduction/Purpose Weight maintenance following intentional weight loss is challenging and often unsuccessful. Physical activity and self-monitoring are strategies associated with successful weight loss maintenance. However, less is known about the type and number of lifestyle strategies used following intentional weight loss. The purpose of this study was to determine the types and amounts of strategies associated with successful long-term weight loss maintenance. Methods Data from the 24-month Maintaining Activity and Nutrition Through Technology-Assisted Innovation in Primary Care (MAINTAIN-pc) trial were analyzed. MAINTAIN-pc recruited adults (n=194; 53.4±12.2 years of age, body mass index (BMI): 30.4±5.9 kg/m2, 74% female) with recent intentional weight loss of ≥5%, randomized to tracking tools plus coaching (i.e., coaching group) or tracking tools without coaching (i.e., tracking-only group). At baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, participants reported lifestyle strategies used in the past 6 months, including self-monitoring, group support, behavioral skills, and professional support. General linear models evaluated changes in the number of strategies over time between groups and the consistency of strategies used over the 24-month intervention. Results At baseline, 100% used behavioral skills, 73% used group support, 69% used self-monitoring, and 68% used professional support in the past 6 months; at 24 months, these rates were 98%, 60%, 75%, and 61%, respectively. While the number of participants utilizing individual strategies did not change significantly over time, the overall number of strategies participants reported decreased. More strategies were used at baseline and 6 months compared to 12- and 24-month follow-ups. The coaching group used more strategies at months 6 and 12 than the tracking-only group. Consistent use of professional support strategies over the 24-month study period was associated with less weight regain. Conclusion Weight loss maintenance interventions that incorporate continued follow-up and support from healthcare professionals are likely to prevent weight regain after intentional weight loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya M. Halliday
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Molly McFadden
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Maribel Cedillo
- Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Bethany Barone Gibbs
- Department of Health and Human Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rachel Hess
- Division of Health System Innovation and Research, Departments of Population Health Sciences and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Cindy Bryce
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA, USA
| | - Gary S. Fischer
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kimberly Huber
- Department of Health and Human Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kathleen M. McTigue
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Molly B. Conroy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Petroni ML, Brodosi L, Armandi A, Marchignoli F, Bugianesi E, Marchesini G. Lifestyle Intervention in NAFLD: Long-Term Diabetes Incidence in Subjects Treated by Web- and Group-Based Programs. Nutrients 2023; 15:792. [PMID: 36771497 PMCID: PMC9919358 DOI: 10.3390/nu15030792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioral programs are needed for prevention and treatment of NAFLD and the effectiveness of a web-based intervention (WBI) is similar to a standard group-based intervention (GBI) on liver disease biomarkers. OBJECTIVE We aimed to test the long-term effectiveness of both programs on diabetes incidence, a common outcome in NAFLD progression. METHODS 546 NAFLD individuals (212 WBI, 334 GBI) were followed up to 60 months with regular 6- to 12-month hospital visits. The two cohorts differed in several socio-demographic and clinical data. In the course of the years, the average BMI similarly decreased in both cohorts, by 5% or more in 24.4% and by 10% or more in 16.5% of cases available at follow-up. After excluding 183 cases with diabetes at entry, diabetes was newly diagnosed in 48 cases during follow-up (31 (16.6% of cases without diabetes at entry) in the GBI cohort vs. 17 (9.7%) in WBI; p = 0.073). Time to diabetes was similar in the two cohorts (mean, 31 ± 18 months since enrollment). At multivariable regression analysis, incident diabetes was significantly associated with prediabetes (odds ratio (OR) 4.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.97-9.81; p < 0.001), percent weight change (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.41-0.79; p < 0.001) and higher education (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.27-0.86; p = 0.014), with no effect of other baseline socio-demographic, behavioral and clinical data, and of the type of intervention. The importance of weight change on incident diabetes were confirmed in a sensitivity analysis limited to individuals who completed the follow-up. CONCLUSION In individuals with NAFLD, WBI is as effective as GBI on the pending long-term risk of diabetes, via similar results on weight change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucia Brodosi
- IRCCS-Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelo Armandi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | | | - Elisabetta Bugianesi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Giulio Marchesini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Domalpally A, Whittier SA, Pan Q, Dabelea DM, Darwin CH, Knowler WC, Lee CG, Luchsinger JA, White NH, Chew EY, Gadde KM, Culbert IW, Arceneaux J, Chatellier A, Dragg A, Champagne CM, Duncan C, Eberhardt B, Greenway F, Guillory FG, Herbert AA, Jeffirs ML, Kennedy BM, Levy E, Lockett M, Lovejoy JC, Morris LH, Melancon LE, Ryan DH, Sanford DA, Smith KG, Smith LL, St.Amant JA, Tulley RT, Vicknair PC, Williamson D, Zachwieja JJ, Polonsky KS, Tobian J, Ehrmann DA, Matulik MJ, Temple KA, Clark B, Czech K, DeSandre C, Dotson B, Hilbrich R, McNabb W, Semenske AR, Caro JF, Furlong K, Goldstein BJ, Watson PG, Smith KA, Mendoza J, Simmons M, Wildman W, Liberoni R, Spandorfer J, Pepe C, Donahue RP, Goldberg RB, Prineas R, Calles J, Giannella A, Rowe P, Sanguily J, Cassanova-Romero P, Castillo-Florez S, Florez HJ, Garg R, Kirby L, Lara O, Larreal C, McLymont V, Mendez J, Perry A, Saab P, Veciana B, Haffner SM, Hazuda HP, Montez MG, Hattaway K, Isaac J, Lorenzo C, Martinez A, Salazar M, Walker T, Hamman RF, Nash PV, Steinke SC, Testaverde L, Truong J, Anderson DR, Ballonoff LB, Bouffard A, Bucca B, Calonge BN, Delve L, Farago M, Hill JO, Hoyer SR, Jenkins T, Jortberg BT, Lenz D, Miller M, Nilan T, Perreault L, Price DW, Regensteiner JG, Schroeder EB, Seagle H, Smith CM, VanDorsten B, Horton ES, Munshi M, Lawton KE, Jackson SD, Poirier CS, Swift K, Arky RA, Bryant M, Burke JP, Caballero E, Callaphan KM, Fargnoli B, Franklin T, Ganda OP, Guidi A, Guido M, Jacobsen AM, Kula LM, Kocal M, Lambert L, Ledbury S, Malloy MA, Middelbeek RJ, Nicosia M, Oldmixon CF, Pan J, Quitingon M, Rainville R, Rubtchinsky S, Seely EW, Sansoucy J, Schweizer D, Simonson D, Smith F, Solomon CG, Spellman J, Warram J, Kahn SE, Fattaleh B, Montgomery BK, Colegrove C, Fujimoto W, Knopp RH, Lipkin EW, Marr M, Morgan-Taggart I, Murillo A, O’Neal K, Trence D, Taylor L, Thomas A, Tsai EC, Dagogo-Jack S, Kitabchi AE, Murphy ME, Taylor L, Dolgoff J, Applegate WB, Bryer-Ash M, Clark D, Frieson SL, Ibebuogu U, Imseis R, Lambeth H, Lichtermann LC, Oktaei H, Ricks H, Rutledge LM, Sherman AR, Smith CM, Soberman JE, Williams-Cleaves B, Patel A, Nyenwe EA, Hampton EF, Metzger BE, Molitch ME, Johnson MK, Adelman DT, Behrends C, Cook M, Fitzgibbon M, Giles MM, Heard D, Johnson CK, Larsen D, Lowe A, Lyman M, McPherson D, Penn SC, Pitts T, Reinhart R, Roston S, Schinleber PA, Wallia A, Nathan DM, McKitrick C, Turgeon H, Larkin M, Mugford M, Abbott K, Anderson E, Bissett L, Bondi K, Cagliero E, Florez JC, Delahanty L, Goldman V, Grassa E, Gurry L, D’Anna K, Leandre F, Lou P, Poulos A, Raymond E, Ripley V, Stevens C, Tseng B, Olefsky JM, Barrett-Connor E, Mudaliar S, Araneta MR, Carrion-Petersen ML, Vejvoda K, Bassiouni S, Beltran M, Claravall LN, Dowden JM, Edelman SV, Garimella P, Henry RR, Horne J, Lamkin M, Janesch SS, Leos D, Polonsky W, Ruiz R, Smith J, Torio-Hurley J, Pi-Sunyer FX, Lee JE, Hagamen S, Allison DB, Agharanya N, Aronoff NJ, Baldo M, Crandall JP, Foo ST, Luchsinger JA, Pal C, Parkes K, Pena MB, Rooney ES, Van Wye GE, Viscovich KA, de Groot M, Marrero DG, Mather KJ, Prince MJ, Kelly SM, Jackson MA, McAtee G, Putenney P, Ackermann RT, Cantrell CM, Dotson YF, Fineberg ES, Fultz M, Guare JC, Hadden A, Ignaut JM, Kirkman MS, Phillips EO, Pinner KL, Porter BD, Roach PJ, Rowland ND, Wheeler ML, Aroda V, Magee M, Ratner RE, Youssef G, Shapiro S, Andon N, Bavido-Arrage C, Boggs G, Bronsord M, Brown E, Love Burkott H, Cheatham WW, Cola S, Evans C, Gibbs P, Kellum T, Leon L, Lagarda M, Levatan C, Lindsay M, Nair AK, Park J, Passaro M, Silverman A, Uwaifo G, Wells-Thayer D, Wiggins R, Saad MF, Watson K, Budget M, Jinagouda S, Botrous M, Sosa A, Tadros S, Akbar K, Conzues C, Magpuri P, Ngo K, Rassam A, Waters D, Xapthalamous K, Santiago JV, Brown AL, Das S, Khare-Ranade P, Stich T, Santiago A, Fisher E, Hurt E, Jones T, Kerr M, Ryder L, Wernimont C, Golden SH, Saudek CD, Bradley V, Sullivan E, Whittington T, Abbas C, Allen A, Brancati FL, Cappelli S, Clark JM, Charleston JB, Freel J, Horak K, Greene A, Jiggetts D, Johnson D, Joseph H, Loman K, Mathioudakis N, Mosley H, Reusing J, Rubin RR, Samuels A, Shields T, Stephens S, Stewart KJ, Thomas L, Utsey E, Williamson P, Schade DS, Adams KS, Canady JL, Johannes C, Hemphill C, Hyde P, Atler LF, Boyle PJ, Burge MR, Chai L, Colleran K, Fondino A, Gonzales Y, Hernandez-McGinnis DA, Katz P, King C, Middendorf J, Rubinchik S, Senter W, Crandall J, Shamoon H, Brown JO, Trandafirescu G, Powell D, Adorno E, Cox L, Duffy H, Engel S, Friedler A, Goldstein A, Howard-Century CJ, Lukin J, Kloiber S, Longchamp N, Martinez H, Pompi D, Scheindlin J, Violino E, Walker EA, Wylie-Rosett J, Zimmerman E, Zonszein J, Orchard T, Venditti E, Wing RR, Jeffries S, Koenning G, Kramer MK, Smith M, Barr S, Benchoff C, Boraz M, Clifford L, Culyba R, Frazier M, Gilligan R, Guimond S, Harrier S, Harris L, Kriska A, Manjoo Q, Mullen M, Noel A, Otto A, Pettigrew J, Rockette-Wagner B, Rubinstein D, Semler L, Smith CF, Weinzierl V, Williams KV, Wilson T, Mau MK, Baker-Ladao NK, Melish JS, Arakaki RF, Latimer RW, Isonaga MK, Beddow R, Bermudez NE, Dias L, Inouye J, Mikami K, Mohideen P, Odom SK, Perry RU, Yamamoto RE, Anderson H, Cooeyate N, Dodge C, Hoskin MA, Percy CA, Enote A, Natewa C, Acton KJ, Andre VL, Barber R, Begay S, Bennett PH, Benson MB, Bird EC, Broussard BA, Bucca BC, Chavez M, Cook S, Curtis J, Dacawyma T, Doughty MS, Duncan R, Edgerton C, Ghahate JM, Glass J, Glass M, Gohdes D, Grant W, Hanson RL, Horse E, Ingraham LE, Jackson M, Jay P, Kaskalla RS, Kavena K, Kessler D, Kobus KM, Krakoff J, Kurland J, Manus C, McCabe C, Michaels S, Morgan T, Nashboo Y, Nelson JA, Poirier S, Polczynski E, Piromalli C, Reidy M, Roumain J, Rowse D, Roy RJ, Sangster S, Sewenemewa J, Smart M, Spencer C, Tonemah D, Williams R, Wilson C, Yazzie M, Bain R, Fowler S, Temprosa M, Larsen MD, Brenneman T, Edelstein SL, Abebe S, Bamdad J, Barkalow M, Bethepu J, Bezabeh T, Bowers A, Butler N, Callaghan J, Carter CE, Christophi C, Dwyer GM, Foulkes M, Gao Y, Gooding R, Gottlieb A, Grimes KL, Grover-Fairchild N, Haffner L, Hoffman H, Jablonski K, Jones S, Jones TL, Katz R, Kolinjivadi P, Lachin JM, Ma Y, Mucik P, Orlosky R, Reamer S, Rochon J, Sapozhnikova A, Sherif H, Stimpson C, Hogan Tjaden A, Walker-Murray F, Venditti EM, Kriska AM, Weinzierl V, Marcovina S, Aldrich FA, Harting J, Albers J, Strylewicz G, Eastman R, Fradkin J, Garfield S, Lee C, Gregg E, Zhang P, O’Leary D, Evans G, Budoff M, Dailing C, Stamm E, Schwartz A, Navy C, Palermo L, Rautaharju P, Prineas RJ, Alexander T, Campbell C, Hall S, Li Y, Mills M, Pemberton N, Rautaharju F, Zhang Z, Soliman EZ, Hu J, Hensley S, Keasler L, Taylor T, Blodi B, Danis R, Davis M, Hubbard* L, Endres** R, Elsas** D, Johnson** S, Myers** D, Barrett N, Baumhauer H, Benz W, Cohn H, Corkery E, Dohm K, Gama V, Goulding A, Ewen A, Hurtenbach C, Lawrence D, McDaniel K, Pak J, Reimers J, Shaw R, Swift M, Vargo P, Watson S, Manly J, Mayer-Davis E, Moran RR, Ganiats T, David K, Sarkin AJ, Groessl E, Katzir N, Chong H, Herman WH, Brändle M, Brown MB, Altshuler D, Billings LK, Chen L, Harden M, Knowler WC, Pollin TI, Shuldiner AR, Franks PW, Hivert MF. Association of Metformin With the Development of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol 2023; 141:140-147. [PMID: 36547967 PMCID: PMC9936345 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness with no treatment available for early stages. Retrospective studies have shown an association between metformin and reduced risk of AMD. Objective To investigate the association between metformin use and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design, Setting, and Participants The Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study is a cross-sectional follow-up phase of a large multicenter randomized clinical trial, Diabetes Prevention Program (1996-2001), to investigate the association of treatment with metformin or an intensive lifestyle modification vs placebo with preventing the onset of type 2 diabetes in a population at high risk for developing diabetes. Participants with retinal imaging at a follow-up visit 16 years posttrial (2017-2019) were included. Analysis took place between October 2019 and May 2022. Interventions Participants were randomly distributed between 3 interventional arms: lifestyle, metformin, and placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of AMD in the treatment arms. Results Of 1592 participants, 514 (32.3%) were in the lifestyle arm, 549 (34.5%) were in the metformin arm, and 529 (33.2%) were in the placebo arm. All 3 arms were balanced for baseline characteristics including age (mean [SD] age at randomization, 49 [9] years), sex (1128 [71%] male), race and ethnicity (784 [49%] White), smoking habits, body mass index, and education level. AMD was identified in 479 participants (30.1%); 229 (14.4%) had early AMD, 218 (13.7%) had intermediate AMD, and 32 (2.0%) had advanced AMD. There was no significant difference in the presence of AMD between the 3 groups: 152 (29.6%) in the lifestyle arm, 165 (30.2%) in the metformin arm, and 162 (30.7%) in the placebo arm. There was also no difference in the distribution of early, intermediate, and advanced AMD between the intervention groups. Mean duration of metformin use was similar for those with and without AMD (mean [SD], 8.0 [9.3] vs 8.5 [9.3] years; P = .69). In the multivariate models, history of smoking was associated with increased risks of AMD (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.05-1.61; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance These data suggest neither metformin nor lifestyle changes initiated for diabetes prevention were associated with the risk of any AMD, with similar results for AMD severity. Duration of metformin use was also not associated with AMD. This analysis does not address the association of metformin with incidence or progression of AMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amitha Domalpally
- Wisconsin Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public and Health, Madison
| | - Samuel A. Whittier
- Wisconsin Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public and Health, Madison
| | - Qing Pan
- Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Dana M. Dabelea
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Denver
| | - Christine H. Darwin
- Department of Medicine, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - William C. Knowler
- Diabetes Epidemiology and Clinical Research Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Christine G. Lee
- Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jose A. Luchsinger
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Neil H. White
- Division of Endocrinology & Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Emily Y. Chew
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications–Clinical Trials Branch, National Eye Institute - National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Amber Dragg
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Crystal Duncan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Frank Greenway
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Erma Levy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Monica Lockett
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Donna H. Ryan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Lisa L. Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Janet Tobian
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Bart Clark
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kirsten Czech
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Wylie McNabb
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Jose F. Caro
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kevin Furlong
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Jewel Mendoza
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marsha Simmons
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Wendi Wildman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Renee Liberoni
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Constance Pepe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Ronald Prineas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Anna Giannella
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Patricia Rowe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Rajesh Garg
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Olga Lara
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carmen Larreal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Jadell Mendez
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Arlette Perry
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Patrice Saab
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Bertha Veciana
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Kathy Hattaway
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Juan Isaac
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carlos Lorenzo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Monica Salazar
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tatiana Walker
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brian Bucca
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - B. Ned Calonge
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lynne Delve
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Martha Farago
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - James O. Hill
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Tonya Jenkins
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Dione Lenz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marsha Miller
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Thomas Nilan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - David W. Price
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Helen Seagle
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Medha Munshi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Kati Swift
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ronald A. Arky
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Om P. Ganda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ashley Guidi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Mathew Guido
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Lyn M. Kula
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Margaret Kocal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lori Lambert
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sarah Ledbury
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Jocelyn Pan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Ellen W. Seely
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Dana Schweizer
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Fannie Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - James Warram
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Steven E. Kahn
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Basma Fattaleh
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michelle Marr
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Anne Murillo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kayla O’Neal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dace Trence
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lonnese Taylor
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - April Thomas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Elaine C. Tsai
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mary E. Murphy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Laura Taylor
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Debra Clark
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Uzoma Ibebuogu
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Raed Imseis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Helen Lambeth
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Hooman Oktaei
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Harriet Ricks
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Amy R. Sherman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Clara M. Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Avnisha Patel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michelle Cook
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Mimi M. Giles
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Deloris Heard
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Diane Larsen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Anne Lowe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Megan Lyman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Samsam C. Penn
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Thomas Pitts
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Renee Reinhart
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Roston
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Amisha Wallia
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Mary Larkin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Kathy Abbott
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ellen Anderson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Laurie Bissett
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kristy Bondi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Jose C. Florez
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Elaine Grassa
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lindsery Gurry
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kali D’Anna
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Peter Lou
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Elyse Raymond
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Valerie Ripley
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Beverly Tseng
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Karen Vejvoda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Javiva Horne
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marycie Lamkin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Diana Leos
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Rosa Ruiz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jean Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Jane E. Lee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Hagamen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Maria Baldo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Sandra T. Foo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Carmen Pal
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kathy Parkes
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Mary Beth Pena
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Mary de Groot
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Susie M. Kelly
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Gina McAtee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Paula Putenney
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Megan Fultz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - John C. Guare
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Angela Hadden
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Kisha L Pinner
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Paris J. Roach
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Vanita Aroda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Michelle Magee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Sue Shapiro
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Natalie Andon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Susan Cola
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Cindy Evans
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Peggy Gibbs
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tracy Kellum
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lilia Leon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Milvia Lagarda
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Asha K. Nair
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jean Park
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Gabriel Uwaifo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Renee Wiggins
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Karol Watson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Maria Budget
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Medhat Botrous
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Anthony Sosa
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sameh Tadros
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Khan Akbar
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Kathy Ngo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Amer Rassam
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Debra Waters
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Samia Das
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Tamara Stich
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ana Santiago
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Edwin Fisher
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Emma Hurt
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tracy Jones
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Michelle Kerr
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lucy Ryder
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Emily Sullivan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Caroline Abbas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Adrienne Allen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Janice Freel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Alicia Greene
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dawn Jiggetts
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Hope Joseph
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kimberly Loman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Henry Mosley
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - John Reusing
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Alafia Samuels
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Thomas Shields
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - LeeLana Thomas
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Evonne Utsey
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Penny Hyde
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mark R. Burge
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Chai
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ateka Fondino
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ysela Gonzales
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Patricia Katz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carolyn King
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Jill Crandall
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Harry Shamoon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Janet O. Brown
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Elsie Adorno
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Liane Cox
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Helena Duffy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Samuel Engel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Lukin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Stacey Kloiber
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Helen Martinez
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dorothy Pompi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Elissa Violino
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Joel Zonszein
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Trevor Orchard
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Rena R. Wing
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Jeffries
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Gaye Koenning
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - M. Kaye Kramer
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Marie Smith
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Barr
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Miriam Boraz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Clifford
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Rebecca Culyba
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ryan Gilligan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Susan Harrier
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Louann Harris
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Andrea Kriska
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Monica Mullen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Alicia Noel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Amy Otto
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Linda Semler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Tara Wilson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - John S. Melish
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mae K. Isonaga
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ralph Beddow
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Lorna Dias
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jillian Inouye
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kathy Mikami
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Sharon K. Odom
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary A. Hoskin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Carol A. Percy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Alvera Enote
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Camille Natewa
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kelly J. Acton
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Rosalyn Barber
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Shandiin Begay
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Evelyn C. Bird
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Brian C. Bucca
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Sherron Cook
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jeff Curtis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tara Dacawyma
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Roberta Duncan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Cyndy Edgerton
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Justin Glass
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Martia Glass
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dorothy Gohdes
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Wendy Grant
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ellie Horse
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Merry Jackson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Priscilla Jay
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Karen Kavena
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - David Kessler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Jason Kurland
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Cherie McCabe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sara Michaels
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tina Morgan
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Steven Poirier
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Mike Reidy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Debra Rowse
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Robert J. Roy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Miranda Smart
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Darryl Tonemah
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Raymond Bain
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sarah Fowler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Tina Brenneman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Solome Abebe
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Julie Bamdad
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Joel Bethepu
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Anna Bowers
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Nicole Butler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Mary Foulkes
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Yuping Gao
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Robert Gooding
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | - Lori Haffner
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Steve Jones
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tara L. Jones
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Richard Katz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - John M. Lachin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Yong Ma
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Pamela Mucik
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Robert Orlosky
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Reamer
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - James Rochon
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Hanna Sherif
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John Albers
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - R. Eastman
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Judith Fradkin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Christine Lee
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Edward Gregg
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ping Zhang
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Dan O’Leary
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Gregory Evans
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Matthew Budoff
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Chris Dailing
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Ann Schwartz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Caroline Navy
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Palermo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | - Sharon Hall
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Yabing Li
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Margaret Mills
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Zhuming Zhang
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Julie Hu
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Susan Hensley
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Lisa Keasler
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Tonya Taylor
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Barbara Blodi
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ronald Danis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Matthew Davis
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Larry Hubbard*
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ryan Endres**
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Dawn Myers**
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Nancy Barrett
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Wendy Benz
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Holly Cohn
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ellie Corkery
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kristi Dohm
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Vonnie Gama
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Anne Goulding
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Andy Ewen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Kyle McDaniel
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jeong Pak
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - James Reimers
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Ruth Shaw
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Maria Swift
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Pamela Vargo
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Sheila Watson
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Jennifer Manly
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | - Ted Ganiats
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Kristin David
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Erik Groessl
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Naomi Katzir
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Helen Chong
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ling Chen
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | - Maegan Harden
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Toni I. Pollin
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | - Paul W. Franks
- for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research (DPPOS) Group
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Majety P, Lozada Orquera FA, Edem D, Hamdy O. Pharmacological approaches to the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1118848. [PMID: 36967777 PMCID: PMC10033948 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1118848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
About 1 in 10 adults worldwide are estimated to have diabetes mellitus. They are at risk of developing life-threatening complications resulting in reduced quality of life, increased mortality and higher healthcare costs. The ability to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by modifying some of its risk factors has been hypothesized for decades. The long and often gradual time-course of increasing dysglycemia prior to diabetes diagnosis suggests that interventions during that period could be effective in preventing T2DM. In addition to lifestyle modifications, certain drugs prevent or slow development of hyperglycemia. Recently, drugs used for obesity management were shown to prevent T2DM. In this review, we discuss various pharmacotherapeutic options for preventing T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Majety
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, United States
| | | | - Dinesh Edem
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Arkansas Medical Center, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Osama Hamdy
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- *Correspondence: Osama Hamdy,
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Guo M, Wang Z, Wang S, Wang J, Jiang Q. Investigation of risk factors associated with impaired glucose regulation: Using the momentum equation to assess the impact of risk factors on community residents. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1145847. [PMID: 36998481 PMCID: PMC10043464 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1145847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify risk factors for impaired glucose regulation (IGR) and assess their impact on community residents, this study used a questionnaire to conduct cross-sectional surveys and analysis. METHODS Overall, 774 residents of an urban community in northern China (Jian city) participated in this study. Trained investigators conducted surveys using questionnaires. Based on their medical history, respondents were divided into three glucose status groups as follows: normal (NGT), IGR, and diabetes mellitus (DM). Statistical analysis of survey data was performed using SPSS v. 22.0. RESULTS Age, hypertension, family history of diabetes (FHD), dyslipidemia, obesity, and cardiovascular and cerebral disease (CVD) were positively correlated with IGR in men and women. IGR was negatively correlated with a sedentary lifestyle in men and positively correlated with being overweight in women. The number of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) risk factors per subject was positively correlated with age in the NGT group. Glucose status deteriorated with increasing age and the number of risk factors. FHD was the strongest risk factor in both men and women. CONCLUSIONS Prevention of IGR includes weight control, physical activity, and prevention of hypertension and dyslipidemia, especially in subjects with FHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengqian Guo
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan Central Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Jinan Central Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Shumei Wang
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan Central Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jinju Wang
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan Central Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Qiang Jiang
- Department of Endocrinology, Jinan Central Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China
- *Correspondence: Qiang Jiang,
| |
Collapse
|