1
|
Marciniak MA, Shanahan L, Myin-Germeys I, Veer IM, Yuen KSL, Binder H, Walter H, Hermans EJ, Kalisch R, Kleim B. Imager-A mobile health mental imagery-based ecological momentary intervention targeting reward sensitivity: A randomized controlled trial. Appl Psychol Health Well Being 2024; 16:576-596. [PMID: 37942875 DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Robust reward sensitivity may help preserve mental well-being in the face of adversity and has been proposed as a key stress resilience factor. Here, we present a mobile health application, "Imager," which targets reward sensitivity by training individuals to create mental images of future rewarding experiences. We conducted a two-arm randomized controlled trial with 95 participants screened for reward sensitivity. Participants in the intervention group received an ecological momentary intervention-Imager, which encouraged participants to create mental images of rewarding events for 1 week. The control group participants received only ecological momentary assessment, without the instruction to generate mental images. Adherence to Imager was high; participants in the intervention group engaged in 88% of the planned activities. In the follow-up assessment, the intervention group reported less mental health symptoms, mainly in depression (β = -0.34, df = 93, p = .004) and less perceived stress (β = -0.18, df = 93, p = .035), than control group participants and compared with the baseline assessment. Our results show the positive effects of Imager on mental health symptoms. The encouraging effects of the app on mental health outcomes may lead to greater use of ecological momentary interventions in the clinical preventive practice of affective disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Anna Marciniak
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital (PUK), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lilly Shanahan
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Inez Myin-Germeys
- Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ilya Milos Veer
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Harald Binder
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Henrik Walter
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Erno J Hermans
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Raffael Kalisch
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Birgit Kleim
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital (PUK), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marciniak MA, Shanahan L, Yuen KSL, Veer IM, Walter H, Tuescher O, Kobylińska D, Kalisch R, Hermans E, Binder H, Kleim B. Burst versus continuous delivery design in digital mental health interventions: Evidence from a randomized clinical trial. Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076241249267. [PMID: 38698832 PMCID: PMC11064753 DOI: 10.1177/20552076241249267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Digital mental health interventions delivered via smartphone-based apps effectively treat various conditions; however, optimizing their efficacy while minimizing participant burden remains a key challenge. In this study, we investigated the potential benefits of a burst delivery design (i.e. interventions delivered only in pre-defined time intervals) in comparison to the continuous delivery of interventions. Methods We randomly assigned 93 participants to the continuous delivery (CD) or burst delivery (BD) group. The CD group engaged in ReApp, a mobile app that increases positive cognitive reappraisal with a consistent delivery schedule that provides five prompts per day throughout the 3-week-long study, while the BD group received five daily prompts only in the first and third weeks of the study. Results No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of adherence, mental health outcomes (specifically depressive and anxiety symptoms), level of perceived stress, and perceived helpfulness of intervention. The BD group showed a significantly decreased perceived difficulty of intervention over time. Conclusions The results suggest that the burst delivery may be as suitable for digital mental health interventions as the continuous delivery. The perceived difficulty of the intervention declined more steeply for the BD group, indicating that it improved the feasibility of the positive cognitive reappraisal intervention without hurting its efficacy. This outcome may inform the design of less burdensome interventions with improved outcomes in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Anna Marciniak
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital (PUK), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lilly Shanahan
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Jacobs Center for Productive Youth Development, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ilya Milos Veer
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henrik Walter
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Tuescher
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- Institute for Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Raffael Kalisch
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Erno Hermans
- Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Harald Binder
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Birgit Kleim
- Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bögemann SA, Puhlmann LMC, Wackerhagen C, Zerban M, Riepenhausen A, Köber G, Yuen KSL, Pooseh S, Marciniak MA, Reppmann Z, Uściƚko A, Weermeijer J, Lenferink DB, Mituniewicz J, Robak N, Donner NC, Mestdagh M, Verdonck S, van Dick R, Kleim B, Lieb K, van Leeuwen JMC, Kobylińska D, Myin-Germeys I, Walter H, Tüscher O, Hermans EJ, Veer IM, Kalisch R. Psychological Resilience Factors and Their Association With Weekly Stressor Reactivity During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Europe: Prospective Longitudinal Study. JMIR Ment Health 2023; 10:e46518. [PMID: 37847551 PMCID: PMC10618882 DOI: 10.2196/46518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cross-sectional relationships between psychosocial resilience factors (RFs) and resilience, operationalized as the outcome of low mental health reactivity to stressor exposure (low "stressor reactivity" [SR]), were reported during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. OBJECTIVE Extending these findings, we here examined prospective relationships and weekly dynamics between the same RFs and SR in a longitudinal sample during the aftermath of the first wave in several European countries. METHODS Over 5 weeks of app-based assessments, participants reported weekly stressor exposure, mental health problems, RFs, and demographic data in 1 of 6 different languages. As (partly) preregistered, hypotheses were tested cross-sectionally at baseline (N=558), and longitudinally (n=200), using mixed effects models and mediation analyses. RESULTS RFs at baseline, including positive appraisal style (PAS), optimism (OPT), general self-efficacy (GSE), perceived good stress recovery (REC), and perceived social support (PSS), were negatively associated with SR scores, not only cross-sectionally (baseline SR scores; all P<.001) but also prospectively (average SR scores across subsequent weeks; positive appraisal (PA), P=.008; OPT, P<.001; GSE, P=.01; REC, P<.001; and PSS, P=.002). In both associations, PAS mediated the effects of PSS on SR (cross-sectionally: 95% CI -0.064 to -0.013; prospectively: 95% CI -0.074 to -0.0008). In the analyses of weekly RF-SR dynamics, the RFs PA of stressors generally and specifically related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and GSE were negatively associated with SR in a contemporaneous fashion (PA, P<.001; PAC,P=.03; and GSE, P<.001), but not in a lagged fashion (PA, P=.36; PAC, P=.52; and GSE, P=.06). CONCLUSIONS We identified psychological RFs that prospectively predict resilience and cofluctuate with weekly SR within individuals. These prospective results endorse that the previously reported RF-SR associations do not exclusively reflect mood congruency or other temporal bias effects. We further confirm the important role of PA in resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie A Bögemann
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Lara M C Puhlmann
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Carolin Wackerhagen
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Zerban
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Antje Riepenhausen
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Faculty of Philosophy, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Göran Köber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Shakoor Pooseh
- Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marta A Marciniak
- Division of Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital (PUK), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Zala Reppmann
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jeroen Weermeijer
- Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dionne B Lenferink
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Natalia Robak
- College of Inter-Faculty Individual Studies in Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Nina C Donner
- Concentris Research Management GmbH, Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany
| | - Merijn Mestdagh
- Research Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stijn Verdonck
- Research Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rolf van Dick
- Institute of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Birgit Kleim
- Division of Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital (PUK), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Klaus Lieb
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Judith M C van Leeuwen
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Inez Myin-Germeys
- Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Henrik Walter
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Faculty of Philosophy, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Tüscher
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany
| | - Erno J Hermans
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ilya M Veer
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Raffael Kalisch
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bögemann SA, Riepenhausen A, Puhlmann LMC, Bar S, Hermsen EJC, Mituniewicz J, Reppmann ZC, Uściƚko A, van Leeuwen JMC, Wackerhagen C, Yuen KSL, Zerban M, Weermeijer J, Marciniak MA, Mor N, van Kraaij A, Köber G, Pooseh S, Koval P, Arias-Vásquez A, Binder H, De Raedt W, Kleim B, Myin-Germeys I, Roelofs K, Timmer J, Tüscher O, Hendler T, Kobylińska D, Veer IM, Kalisch R, Hermans EJ, Walter H. Investigating two mobile just-in-time adaptive interventions to foster psychological resilience: research protocol of the DynaM-INT study. BMC Psychol 2023; 11:245. [PMID: 37626397 PMCID: PMC10464364 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01249-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stress-related disorders such as anxiety and depression are highly prevalent and cause a tremendous burden for affected individuals and society. In order to improve prevention strategies, knowledge regarding resilience mechanisms and ways to boost them is highly needed. In the Dynamic Modelling of Resilience - interventional multicenter study (DynaM-INT), we will conduct a large-scale feasibility and preliminary efficacy test for two mobile- and wearable-based just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs), designed to target putative resilience mechanisms. Deep participant phenotyping at baseline serves to identify individual predictors for intervention success in terms of target engagement and stress resilience. METHODS DynaM-INT aims to recruit N = 250 healthy but vulnerable young adults in the transition phase between adolescence and adulthood (18-27 years) across five research sites (Berlin, Mainz, Nijmegen, Tel Aviv, and Warsaw). Participants are included if they report at least three negative burdensome past life events and show increased levels of internalizing symptoms while not being affected by any major mental disorder. Participants are characterized in a multimodal baseline phase, which includes neuropsychological tests, neuroimaging, bio-samples, sociodemographic and psychological questionnaires, a video-recorded interview, as well as ecological momentary assessments (EMA) and ecological physiological assessments (EPA). Subsequently, participants are randomly assigned to one of two ecological momentary interventions (EMIs), targeting either positive cognitive reappraisal or reward sensitivity. During the following intervention phase, participants' stress responses are tracked using EMA and EPA, and JITAIs are triggered if an individually calibrated stress threshold is crossed. In a three-month-long follow-up phase, parts of the baseline characterization phase are repeated. Throughout the entire study, stressor exposure and mental health are regularly monitored to calculate stressor reactivity as a proxy for outcome resilience. The online monitoring questionnaires and the repetition of the baseline questionnaires also serve to assess target engagement. DISCUSSION The DynaM-INT study intends to advance the field of resilience research by feasibility-testing two new mechanistically targeted JITAIs that aim at increasing individual stress resilience and identifying predictors for successful intervention response. Determining these predictors is an important step toward future randomized controlled trials to establish the efficacy of these interventions.
Collapse
Grants
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- 777084 European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
- DFG Grant CRC 1193, subprojects B01, C01, C04, Z03 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- DFG Grant CRC 1193, subprojects B01, C01, C04, Z03 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- 01KX2021 German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) as part of the Network for University Medicine
- MARP program, DRZ program, Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research State of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
- MARP program, DRZ program, Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research State of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
- European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Bögemann
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 29, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands.
| | - A Riepenhausen
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Faculty of Philosophy, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - L M C Puhlmann
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - S Bar
- Sagol Brain Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - E J C Hermsen
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 29, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands
| | - J Mituniewicz
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Z C Reppmann
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Uściƚko
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - J M C van Leeuwen
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 29, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands
| | - C Wackerhagen
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - K S L Yuen
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - M Zerban
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Weermeijer
- Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - M A Marciniak
- Division of Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital (PUK), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N Mor
- Sagol Brain Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - A van Kraaij
- OnePlanet Research Center, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - G Köber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - S Pooseh
- Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - P Koval
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Vic, 3010, Australia
| | - A Arias-Vásquez
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 29, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands
| | - H Binder
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - W De Raedt
- Life Sciences Department, Imec, Louvain, Belgium
| | - B Kleim
- Division of Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital (PUK), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - I Myin-Germeys
- Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - K Roelofs
- Center for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Timmer
- Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - O Tüscher
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - T Hendler
- Sagol Brain Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- School of Psychological Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - D Kobylińska
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - I M Veer
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Kalisch
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - E J Hermans
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Kapittelweg 29, Nijmegen, 6525 EN, The Netherlands
| | - H Walter
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Faculty of Philosophy, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li AWY, Chak WH, Yuen KSL. Corrigendum to "Snapshot of a social movement: Mental health and protest classes in Hong Kong" [J. Affect. Disord. 295 (2021) 883-892]. J Affect Disord 2023; 326:267. [PMID: 36740486 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne W Y Li
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Canada; York University, Toronto, Canada.
| | - W H Chak
- Department of Applied Mathematics, University of California Davis, USA
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany; Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wackerhagen C, Veer IM, van Leeuwen JMC, Reppmann Z, Riepenhausen A, Bögemann SA, Mor N, Puhlmann LM, Uściƚko A, Zerban M, Yuen KSL, Köber G, Pooseh S, Weermeijer J, Marciniak MA, Arias-Vásquez A, Binder H, de Raedt W, Kleim B, Myin-Germeys I, Roelofs K, Timmer J, Tüscher O, Hendler T, Kobylińska D, Hermans EJ, Kalisch R, Walter H. Study protocol description: Dynamic Modelling of Resilience - Observational Study (DynaM-OBS) (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2022. [DOI: 10.2196/39817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
7
|
Köber G, Pooseh S, Engen H, Chmitorz A, Kampa M, Schick A, Sebastian A, Tüscher O, Wessa M, Yuen KSL, Walter H, Kalisch R, Timmer J, Binder H. Individualizing deep dynamic models for psychological resilience data. Sci Rep 2022; 12:8061. [PMID: 35577829 PMCID: PMC9110739 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11650-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep learning approaches can uncover complex patterns in data. In particular, variational autoencoders achieve this by a non-linear mapping of data into a low-dimensional latent space. Motivated by an application to psychological resilience in the Mainz Resilience Project, which features intermittent longitudinal measurements of stressors and mental health, we propose an approach for individualized, dynamic modeling in this latent space. Specifically, we utilize ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and develop a novel technique for obtaining person-specific ODE parameters even in settings with a rather small number of individuals and observations, incomplete data, and a differing number of observations per individual. This technique allows us to subsequently investigate individual reactions to stimuli, such as the mental health impact of stressors. A potentially large number of baseline characteristics can then be linked to this individual response by regularized regression, e.g., for identifying resilience factors. Thus, our new method provides a way of connecting different kinds of complex longitudinal and baseline measures via individualized, dynamic models. The promising results obtained in the exemplary resilience application indicate that our proposal for dynamic deep learning might also be more generally useful for other application domains.
Collapse
|
8
|
Li AWY, Chak WH, Yuen KSL. Snapshot of a social movement: Mental health and protest classes in Hong Kong. J Affect Disord 2021; 295:883-892. [PMID: 34706459 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Popular protests have broken out worldwide, particularly in the last few years. In 2019, numerous demonstrations against an extradition bill occurred in Hong Kong until pandemic restrictions were imposed. The policing response relied heavily on methods such as batons, tear gas and rubber bullets. Given the relevance for other geographical contexts, the current study investigated the mental health impacts on protest participants and spillover to community members. METHODS Surveys were disseminated on social media in August and October 2019 to collect demographics, political views, protest participation, exposure to (protest-related) potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and mental health symptoms. A latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted using demographic data and inter-class differences in PTEs and mental health symptoms were examined. RESULTS There were 37,541 (59.8% female) and 40,703 (50.0% female) responses in August and October. Respondents, even those with low participation, reported significant levels of depression, anxiety, and symptoms of traumatic stress (STS). The LCA suggested a 5-class solution (youth, allies, supporters, sympathizers, and frontliners). Mental health symptoms and PTEs varied with class membership, with 50.8% of frontliners reporting severe STS. LIMITATIONS The non-random sampling and self-reported measures may over-estimate the prevalence of mental distress in the wider population. CONCLUSIONS Large numbers of pro-democracy supporters in Hong Kong reported high rates of depression, anxiety and STS during mass protests. Younger and more heavily involved respondents faced the highest mental health risks, however elevated rates were also observed for respondents with low participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrienne W Y Li
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Canada; York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - W H Chak
- Department of Applied Mathematics, University of California Davis, United States
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany; Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kalisch R, Köber G, Binder H, Ahrens KF, Basten U, Chmitorz A, Choi KW, Fiebach CJ, Goldbach N, Neumann RJ, Kampa M, Kollmann B, Lieb K, Plichta MM, Reif A, Schick A, Sebastian A, Walter H, Wessa M, Yuen KSL, Tüscher O, Engen H. The Frequent Stressor and Mental Health Monitoring-Paradigm: A Proposal for the Operationalization and Measurement of Resilience and the Identification of Resilience Processes in Longitudinal Observational Studies. Front Psychol 2021; 12:710493. [PMID: 34539510 PMCID: PMC8444985 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Resilience has been defined as the maintenance or quick recovery of mental health during and after times of adversity. How to operationalize resilience and to determine the factors and processes that lead to good long-term mental health outcomes in stressor-exposed individuals is a matter of ongoing debate and of critical importance for the advancement of the field. One of the biggest challenges for implementing an outcome-based definition of resilience in longitudinal observational study designs lies in the fact that real-life adversity is usually unpredictable and that its substantial qualitative as well as temporal variability between subjects often precludes defining circumscribed time windows of inter-individually comparable stressor exposure relative to which the maintenance or recovery of mental health can be determined. To address this pertinent issue, we propose to frequently and regularly monitor stressor exposure (E) and mental health problems (P) throughout a study's observation period [Frequent Stressor and Mental Health Monitoring (FRESHMO)-paradigm]. On this basis, a subject's deviation at any single monitoring time point from the study sample's normative E-P relationship (the regression residual) can be used to calculate that subject's current mental health reactivity to stressor exposure ("stressor reactivity," SR). The SR score takes into account the individual extent of experienced adversity and is comparable between and within subjects. Individual SR time courses across monitoring time points reflect intra-individual temporal variability in SR, where periods of under-reactivity (negative SR score) are associated with accumulation of fewer mental health problems than is normal for the sample. If FRESHMO is accompanied by regular measurement of potential resilience factors, temporal changes in resilience factors can be used to predict SR time courses. An increase in a resilience factor measurement explaining a lagged decrease in SR can then be considered to index a process of adaptation to stressor exposure that promotes a resilient outcome (an allostatic resilience process). This design principle allows resilience research to move beyond merely determining baseline predictors of resilience outcomes, which cannot inform about how individuals successfully adjust and adapt when confronted with adversity. Hence, FRESHMO plus regular resilience factor monitoring incorporates a dynamic-systems perspective into resilience research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffael Kalisch
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Göran Köber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Freiburg Center of Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Harald Binder
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Freiburg Center of Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kira F. Ahrens
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ulrike Basten
- Department of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Psychology, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany
| | - Andrea Chmitorz
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- Faculty of Social Work, Health Care and Nursing Science, Esslingen University of Applied Sciences, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Karmel W. Choi
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Lee Kum Sheung Center for Health and Happiness, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Christian J. Fiebach
- Department of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Brain Imaging Center, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nele Goldbach
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Rebecca J. Neumann
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Miriam Kampa
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany
- Department of Psychology, Bender Institute of Neuroimaging, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany
| | - Bianca Kollmann
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Klaus Lieb
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael M. Plichta
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Andreas Reif
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Anita Schick
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Alexandra Sebastian
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Henrik Walter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michèle Wessa
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kenneth S. L. Yuen
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Oliver Tüscher
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Haakon Engen
- Neuroimaging Center, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Veer IM, Riepenhausen A, Zerban M, Wackerhagen C, Puhlmann LMC, Engen H, Köber G, Bögemann SA, Weermeijer J, Uściłko A, Mor N, Marciniak MA, Askelund AD, Al-Kamel A, Ayash S, Barsuola G, Bartkute-Norkuniene V, Battaglia S, Bobko Y, Bölte S, Cardone P, Chvojková E, Damnjanović K, De Calheiros Velozo J, de Thurah L, Deza-Araujo YI, Dimitrov A, Farkas K, Feller C, Gazea M, Gilan D, Gnjidić V, Hajduk M, Hiekkaranta AP, Hofgaard LS, Ilen L, Kasanova Z, Khanpour M, Lau BHP, Lenferink DB, Lindhardt TB, Magas DÁ, Mituniewicz J, Moreno-López L, Muzychka S, Ntafouli M, O’Leary A, Paparella I, Põldver N, Rintala A, Robak N, Rosická AM, Røysamb E, Sadeghi S, Schneider M, Siugzdaite R, Stantić M, Teixeira A, Todorovic A, Wan WWN, van Dick R, Lieb K, Kleim B, Hermans EJ, Kobylińska D, Hendler T, Binder H, Myin-Germeys I, van Leeuwen JMC, Tüscher O, Yuen KSL, Walter H, Kalisch R. Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown. Transl Psychiatry 2021; 11:67. [PMID: 33479211 PMCID: PMC7817958 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-01150-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is not only a threat to physical health but is also having severe impacts on mental health. Although increases in stress-related symptomatology and other adverse psycho-social outcomes, as well as their most important risk factors have been described, hardly anything is known about potential protective factors. Resilience refers to the maintenance of mental health despite adversity. To gain mechanistic insights about the relationship between described psycho-social resilience factors and resilience specifically in the current crisis, we assessed resilience factors, exposure to Corona crisis-specific and general stressors, as well as internalizing symptoms in a cross-sectional online survey conducted in 24 languages during the most intense phase of the lockdown in Europe (22 March to 19 April) in a convenience sample of N = 15,970 adults. Resilience, as an outcome, was conceptualized as good mental health despite stressor exposure and measured as the inverse residual between actual and predicted symptom total score. Preregistered hypotheses (osf.io/r6btn) were tested with multiple regression models and mediation analyses. Results confirmed our primary hypothesis that positive appraisal style (PAS) is positively associated with resilience (p < 0.0001). The resilience factor PAS also partly mediated the positive association between perceived social support and resilience, and its association with resilience was in turn partly mediated by the ability to easily recover from stress (both p < 0.0001). In comparison with other resilience factors, good stress response recovery and positive appraisal specifically of the consequences of the Corona crisis were the strongest factors. Preregistered exploratory subgroup analyses (osf.io/thka9) showed that all tested resilience factors generalize across major socio-demographic categories. This research identifies modifiable protective factors that can be targeted by public mental health efforts in this and in future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya M. Veer
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antje Riepenhausen
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany ,grid.7468.d0000 0001 2248 7639Faculty of Philosophy, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Zerban
- grid.410607.4Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carolin Wackerhagen
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lara M. C. Puhlmann
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany ,grid.4372.20000 0001 2105 1091Research Group Social Stress and Family Health, Max Planck Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Haakon Engen
- grid.410607.4Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany ,grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Göran Köber
- grid.5963.9Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany ,grid.5963.9Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sophie A. Bögemann
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Weermeijer
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aleksandra Uściłko
- grid.12847.380000 0004 1937 1290Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Netali Mor
- grid.413449.f0000 0001 0518 6922Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sagol Brain Institute Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel ,grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Marta A. Marciniak
- grid.7400.30000 0004 1937 0650Division of Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital (PUK), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Dahl Askelund
- grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Abbas Al-Kamel
- grid.33236.370000000106929556University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Sarah Ayash
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Giulia Barsuola
- grid.5335.00000000121885934MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vaida Bartkute-Norkuniene
- grid.466222.60000 0004 0382 1349Faculty of Business and Technologies at Utena University of Applied Sciences, Utena, Lithuania
| | - Simone Battaglia
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Center for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Yaryna Bobko
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Economics and Human Sciences, Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Sven Bölte
- grid.467087.a0000 0004 0442 1056Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden ,grid.467087.a0000 0004 0442 1056Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden ,grid.1032.00000 0004 0375 4078Curtin Autism Research Group, School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Paolo Cardone
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Edita Chvojková
- grid.7177.60000000084992262Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kaja Damnjanović
- grid.7149.b0000 0001 2166 9385Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Joana De Calheiros Velozo
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lena de Thurah
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yacila I. Deza-Araujo
- grid.8591.50000 0001 2322 4988Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland ,grid.8591.50000 0001 2322 4988Laboratory for Behavioral Neurology and Imaging of Cognition, Department of Neuroscience, Medical School, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Annika Dimitrov
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kinga Farkas
- grid.11804.3c0000 0001 0942 9821Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary ,grid.6759.d0000 0001 2180 0451Department of Cognitive Science, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Clémence Feller
- grid.8591.50000 0001 2322 4988Clinical Psychology Unit for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mary Gazea
- grid.424223.1Concentris Research Management GmbH, Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany
| | - Donya Gilan
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany ,grid.410607.4Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Vedrana Gnjidić
- grid.4808.40000 0001 0657 4636Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Michal Hajduk
- grid.7634.60000000109409708Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic ,grid.7634.60000000109409708Center for Psychiatric Disorders Research, University in Bratislava, Science Park Comenius, Bratislava, Slovak Republic ,grid.7634.60000000109409708Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Anu P. Hiekkaranta
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Live S. Hofgaard
- grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921PROMENTA Research Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Laura Ilen
- grid.8591.50000 0001 2322 4988Clinical Psychology Unit for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Zuzana Kasanova
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Leuven Research and Development, Spin-off and Innovation Unit, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mohsen Khanpour
- grid.46072.370000 0004 0612 7950University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Bobo Hi Po Lau
- grid.445012.60000 0001 0643 7658Department of Counselling and Psychology, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Dionne B. Lenferink
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas B. Lindhardt
- grid.7048.b0000 0001 1956 2722Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN) and MINDLab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Århus University, Århus, Denmark
| | - Dávid Á. Magas
- grid.6759.d0000 0001 2180 0451Department of Cognitive Science, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Julian Mituniewicz
- grid.12847.380000 0004 1937 1290Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Laura Moreno-López
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sofiia Muzychka
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Economics and Human Sciences, Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria Ntafouli
- grid.5216.00000 0001 2155 0800Sleep Research Unit, First Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Aet O’Leary
- grid.411088.40000 0004 0578 8220Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,grid.10939.320000 0001 0943 7661Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Ilenia Paparella
- grid.465537.6Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, Lyon, France
| | - Nele Põldver
- grid.10939.320000 0001 0943 7661Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Aki Rintala
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ,grid.508322.eFaculty of Social Services and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lahti, Finland
| | - Natalia Robak
- grid.12847.380000 0004 1937 1290College of Inter-faculty Individual Studies in Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna M. Rosická
- grid.10267.320000 0001 2194 0956Faculty of Social Studies, Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Espen Røysamb
- grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921PROMENTA Research Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siavash Sadeghi
- grid.5802.f0000 0001 1941 7111Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Maude Schneider
- grid.8591.50000 0001 2322 4988Clinical Psychology Unit for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Roma Siugzdaite
- grid.5335.00000000121885934MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK ,grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Mirta Stantić
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ana Teixeira
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ana Todorovic
- grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Wendy W. N. Wan
- grid.265231.10000 0004 0532 1428Department of International Business, Tunghai University, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Rolf van Dick
- grid.7839.50000 0004 1936 9721Institute of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Klaus Lieb
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany ,grid.410607.4Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Birgit Kleim
- grid.7400.30000 0004 1937 0650Division of Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital (PUK), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Erno J. Hermans
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dorota Kobylińska
- grid.12847.380000 0004 1937 1290Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Talma Hendler
- grid.413449.f0000 0001 0518 6922Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sagol Brain Institute Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel ,grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel ,grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546School of Psychological Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel ,grid.12136.370000 0004 1937 0546Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Harald Binder
- grid.5963.9Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany ,grid.5963.9Freiburg Center for Data Analysis and Modelling, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Inez Myin-Germeys
- grid.5596.f0000 0001 0668 7884Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Judith M. C. van Leeuwen
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver Tüscher
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany ,grid.410607.4Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kenneth S. L. Yuen
- grid.410607.4Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany ,Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Henrik Walter
- Research Division of Mind and Brain, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy CCM, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany ,grid.7468.d0000 0001 2248 7639Faculty of Philosophy, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Raffael Kalisch
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. .,Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gilan* D, Röthke* N, Blessin M, Kunzler A, Stoffers-Winterling J, Müssig M, S. L. Yuen K, Tüscher O, Thrul J, Kreuter F, Sprengholz P, Betsch C, Dieter Stieglitz R, Lieb K. Psychomorbidity, Resilience, and Exacerbating and Protective Factors During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 117:625-630. [PMID: 33200744 PMCID: PMC7817784 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused mental stress in a number of ways: overstrain of the health care system, lockdown of the economy, restricted opportunities for interpersonal contact and excursions outside the home and workplace, and quarantine measures where necessary. In this article, we provide an overview of psychological distress in the current pandemic, identifying protective factors and risk factors. METHODS The PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for relevant publications (1 January 2019 - 16 April 2020). This study was registered in OSF Registries (osf.io/34j8g). Data on mental stress and resilience in Germany were obtained from three surveys carried out on more than 1000 participants each in the framework of the COSMO study (24 March, 31 March, and 21 April 2020). RESULTS 18 studies from China and India, with a total of 79 664 participants, revealed increased stress in the general population, with manifestations of depression and anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and sleep disturbances. Stress was more marked among persons working in the health care sector. Risk factors for stress included patient contact, female sex, impaired health status, worry about family members and significant others, and poor sleep quality. Protective factors included being informed about the increasing number of persons who have recovered from COVID, social support, and a lower perceived infectious risk. The COSMO study, though based on an insufficiently representative population sample because of a low questionnaire return rate (<20%), revealed increased rates of despondency, loneliness, and hopelessness in the German population as compared to norm data, with no change in estimated resilience. CONCLUSION Stress factors associated with the current pandemic probably increase stress by causing anxiety and depression. Once the protective factors and risk factors have been identified, these can be used to develop psychosocial interventions. The informativeness of the results reported here is limited by the wide variety of instruments used to acquire data and by the insufficiently representative nature of the population samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donya Gilan*
- * These two authors share first authorship
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Nikolaus Röthke*
- * These two authors share first authorship
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Angela Kunzler
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jutta Stoffers-Winterling
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Müssig
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kenneth S. L. Yuen
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Human Neuroimaging Center, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN) of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Oliver Tüscher
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Johannes Thrul
- Department of mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Philipp Sprengholz
- Institute of media and communication sciences, University of Erfurt, Germany
| | - Cornelia Betsch
- Institute of media and communication sciences, University of Erfurt, Germany
| | | | - Klaus Lieb
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Meyer B, Yuen KSL, Saase V, Kalisch R. The Functional Role of Large-scale Brain Network Coordination in Placebo-induced Anxiolysis. Cereb Cortex 2020; 29:3201-3210. [PMID: 30124792 DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Anxiety reduction through mere expectation of anxiolytic treatment effects (placebo anxiolysis) has enormous clinical importance. Recent behavioral and electrophysiological data suggest that placebo anxiolysis involves reduced vigilance and enhanced internalization of attention; however, the underlying neurobiological mechanisms are not yet clear. Given the fundamental function of intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) in basic cognitive processes, we investigated ICN activity patterns associated with externally and internally directed mental states under the influence of an anxiolytic placebo medication. Based on recent findings, we specifically analyzed the functional role of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) in coordinating placebo-dependent cue-related (phasic) and cue-unrelated (sustained) network activity. Under placebo, we observed a down-regulation of the entire salience network (SN), particularly in response to threatening cues. The rACC exhibited enhanced cue-unrelated functional connectivity (FC) with the SN, which correlated with reductions in tonic arousal and anxiety. Hence, apart from the frequently reported modulation of aversive cue responses, the rACC appears to be crucially involved in exerting a tonically dampening control over salience-responsive structures. In line with a more internally directed mental state, we also found enhanced FC within the default mode network (DMN), again predicting reductions in anxiety under placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Meyer
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany.,Deutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany.,Deutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Victor Saase
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany.,Deutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Raffael Kalisch
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany.,Deutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Botvinik-Nezer R, Holzmeister F, Camerer CF, Dreber A, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, Iwanir R, Mumford JA, Adcock RA, Avesani P, Baczkowski BM, Bajracharya A, Bakst L, Ball S, Barilari M, Bault N, Beaton D, Beitner J, Benoit RG, Berkers RMWJ, Bhanji JP, Biswal BB, Bobadilla-Suarez S, Bortolini T, Bottenhorn KL, Bowring A, Braem S, Brooks HR, Brudner EG, Calderon CB, Camilleri JA, Castrellon JJ, Cecchetti L, Cieslik EC, Cole ZJ, Collignon O, Cox RW, Cunningham WA, Czoschke S, Dadi K, Davis CP, Luca AD, Delgado MR, Demetriou L, Dennison JB, Di X, Dickie EW, Dobryakova E, Donnat CL, Dukart J, Duncan NW, Durnez J, Eed A, Eickhoff SB, Erhart A, Fontanesi L, Fricke GM, Fu S, Galván A, Gau R, Genon S, Glatard T, Glerean E, Goeman JJ, Golowin SAE, González-García C, Gorgolewski KJ, Grady CL, Green MA, Guassi Moreira JF, Guest O, Hakimi S, Hamilton JP, Hancock R, Handjaras G, Harry BB, Hawco C, Herholz P, Herman G, Heunis S, Hoffstaedter F, Hogeveen J, Holmes S, Hu CP, Huettel SA, Hughes ME, Iacovella V, Iordan AD, Isager PM, Isik AI, Jahn A, Johnson MR, Johnstone T, Joseph MJE, Juliano AC, Kable JW, Kassinopoulos M, Koba C, Kong XZ, Koscik TR, Kucukboyaci NE, Kuhl BA, Kupek S, Laird AR, Lamm C, Langner R, Lauharatanahirun N, Lee H, Lee S, Leemans A, Leo A, Lesage E, Li F, Li MYC, Lim PC, Lintz EN, Liphardt SW, Losecaat Vermeer AB, Love BC, Mack ML, Malpica N, Marins T, Maumet C, McDonald K, McGuire JT, Melero H, Méndez Leal AS, Meyer B, Meyer KN, Mihai G, Mitsis GD, Moll J, Nielson DM, Nilsonne G, Notter MP, Olivetti E, Onicas AI, Papale P, Patil KR, Peelle JE, Pérez A, Pischedda D, Poline JB, Prystauka Y, Ray S, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Reynolds RC, Ricciardi E, Rieck JR, Rodriguez-Thompson AM, Romyn A, Salo T, Samanez-Larkin GR, Sanz-Morales E, Schlichting ML, Schultz DH, Shen Q, Sheridan MA, Silvers JA, Skagerlund K, Smith A, Smith DV, Sokol-Hessner P, Steinkamp SR, Tashjian SM, Thirion B, Thorp JN, Tinghög G, Tisdall L, Tompson SH, Toro-Serey C, Torre Tresols JJ, Tozzi L, Truong V, Turella L, van 't Veer AE, Verguts T, Vettel JM, Vijayarajah S, Vo K, Wall MB, Weeda WD, Weis S, White DJ, Wisniewski D, Xifra-Porxas A, Yearling EA, Yoon S, Yuan R, Yuen KSL, Zhang L, Zhang X, Zosky JE, Nichols TE, Poldrack RA, Schonberg T. Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature 2020; 582:84-88. [PMID: 32483374 PMCID: PMC7771346 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 423] [Impact Index Per Article: 105.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Data analysis workflows in many scientific domains have become increasingly complex and flexible. Here we assess the effect of this flexibility on the results of functional magnetic resonance imaging by asking 70 independent teams to analyse the same dataset, testing the same 9 ex-ante hypotheses1. The flexibility of analytical approaches is exemplified by the fact that no two teams chose identical workflows to analyse the data. This flexibility resulted in sizeable variation in the results of hypothesis tests, even for teams whose statistical maps were highly correlated at intermediate stages of the analysis pipeline. Variation in reported results was related to several aspects of analysis methodology. Notably, a meta-analytical approach that aggregated information across teams yielded a significant consensus in activated regions. Furthermore, prediction markets of researchers in the field revealed an overestimation of the likelihood of significant findings, even by researchers with direct knowledge of the dataset2-5. Our findings show that analytical flexibility can have substantial effects on scientific conclusions, and identify factors that may be related to variability in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging. The results emphasize the importance of validating and sharing complex analysis workflows, and demonstrate the need for performing and reporting multiple analyses of the same data. Potential approaches that could be used to mitigate issues related to analytical variability are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rotem Botvinik-Nezer
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Neurobiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Felix Holzmeister
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Colin F Camerer
- HSS and CNS, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Anna Dreber
- Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Economics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Juergen Huber
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Magnus Johannesson
- Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Kirchler
- Department of Banking and Finance, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Roni Iwanir
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Neurobiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jeanette A Mumford
- Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - R Alison Adcock
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paolo Avesani
- Neuroinformatics Laboratory, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Blazej M Baczkowski
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Aahana Bajracharya
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Leah Bakst
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sheryl Ball
- Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- School of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Marco Barilari
- Crossmodal Perception and Plasticity Laboratory, Institutes for Research in Psychology (IPSY) and Neurosciences (IoNS), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Nadège Bault
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Derek Beaton
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Beitner
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Roland G Benoit
- Max Planck Research Group: Adaptive Memory, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ruud M W J Berkers
- Max Planck Research Group: Adaptive Memory, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jamil P Bhanji
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Bharat B Biswal
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | | | - Tiago Bortolini
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Alexander Bowring
- Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Senne Braem
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hayley R Brooks
- Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Emily G Brudner
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | | - Julia A Camilleri
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jaime J Castrellon
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Luca Cecchetti
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Edna C Cieslik
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Zachary J Cole
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Olivier Collignon
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
- Crossmodal Perception and Plasticity Laboratory, Institutes for Research in Psychology (IPSY) and Neurosciences (IoNS), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Robert W Cox
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Stefan Czoschke
- Institute of Medical Psychology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Charles P Davis
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Alberto De Luca
- PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lysia Demetriou
- Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Xin Di
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Erin W Dickie
- Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ekaterina Dobryakova
- Center for Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Kessler Foundation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Claire L Donnat
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Juergen Dukart
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Niall W Duncan
- Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain and Consciousness Research Centre, TMU-ShuangHo Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Joke Durnez
- Department of Psychology and Stanford Center for Reproducible Neuroscience, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Amr Eed
- Instituto de Neurociencias, CSIC-UMH, Alicante, Spain
| | - Simon B Eickhoff
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrew Erhart
- Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Laura Fontanesi
- Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - G Matthew Fricke
- Computer Science Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Shiguang Fu
- School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Neuromanagement, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Adriana Galván
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Remi Gau
- Crossmodal Perception and Plasticity Laboratory, Institutes for Research in Psychology (IPSY) and Neurosciences (IoNS), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Sarah Genon
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tristan Glatard
- Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Enrico Glerean
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Jelle J Goeman
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sergej A E Golowin
- Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - Cheryl L Grady
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mikella A Green
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - João F Guassi Moreira
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Olivia Guest
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- Research Centre on Interactive Media, Smart Systems and Emerging Technologies - RISE, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Shabnam Hakimi
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - J Paul Hamilton
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Roeland Hancock
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Giacomo Handjaras
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Bronson B Harry
- The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Colin Hawco
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peer Herholz
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gabrielle Herman
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephan Heunis
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, The Netherlands
| | - Felix Hoffstaedter
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jeremy Hogeveen
- Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Susan Holmes
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Chuan-Peng Hu
- Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung (LIR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Scott A Huettel
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew E Hughes
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vittorio Iacovella
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | | | - Peder M Isager
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ayse I Isik
- Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andrew Jahn
- fMRI Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew R Johnson
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Tom Johnstone
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael J E Joseph
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony C Juliano
- Center for Neuropsychology and Neuroscience Research, Kessler Foundation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Joseph W Kable
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- MindCORE, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michalis Kassinopoulos
- Graduate Program in Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Cemal Koba
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Xiang-Zhen Kong
- Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Timothy R Koscik
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Nuri Erkut Kucukboyaci
- Center for Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Kessler Foundation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Brice A Kuhl
- Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA
| | - Sebastian Kupek
- Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Angela R Laird
- Department of Physics, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Claus Lamm
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Langner
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Nina Lauharatanahirun
- US CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
- Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hongmi Lee
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sangil Lee
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Leemans
- PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Leo
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Elise Lesage
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Flora Li
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA
- Economics Experimental Lab, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China
| | - Monica Y C Li
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Phui Cheng Lim
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Evan N Lintz
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | | | - Annabel B Losecaat Vermeer
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bradley C Love
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Michael L Mack
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Norberto Malpica
- Laboratorio de Análisis de Imagen Médica y Biometría (LAIMBIO), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Theo Marins
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Camille Maumet
- Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, Empenn ERL U 1228, Rennes, France
| | - Kelsey McDonald
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joseph T McGuire
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Helena Melero
- Laboratorio de Análisis de Imagen Médica y Biometría (LAIMBIO), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- Departamento de Psicobiología, División de Psicología, CES Cardenal Cisneros, Madrid, Spain
- Northeastern University Biomedical Imaging Center, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adriana S Méndez Leal
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin Meyer
- Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kristin N Meyer
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Glad Mihai
- Max Planck Research Group: Neural Mechanisms of Human Communication, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- Chair of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Georgios D Mitsis
- Department of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jorge Moll
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Dylan M Nielson
- Data Science and Sharing Team, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gustav Nilsonne
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael P Notter
- The Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology (The LINE), Department of Radiology, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emanuele Olivetti
- Neuroinformatics Laboratory, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Adrian I Onicas
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Paolo Papale
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
- Department of Vision and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kaustubh R Patil
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jonathan E Peelle
- Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alexandre Pérez
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Doris Pischedda
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience and Berlin Center for Advanced Neuroimaging and Clinic for Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Science of Intelligence, Technische Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroMI - Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milan, Italy
| | - Jean-Baptiste Poline
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Henry H. Wheeler, Jr. Brain Imaging Center, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Yanina Prystauka
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Shruti Ray
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
| | | | - Richard C Reynolds
- Scientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Emiliano Ricciardi
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Jenny R Rieck
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anais M Rodriguez-Thompson
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Anthony Romyn
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Taylor Salo
- Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Emilio Sanz-Morales
- Laboratorio de Análisis de Imagen Médica y Biometría (LAIMBIO), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Douglas H Schultz
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Qiang Shen
- School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Neuromanagement, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Margaret A Sheridan
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer A Silvers
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kenny Skagerlund
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Alec Smith
- Department of Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- School of Neuroscience, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - David V Smith
- Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Simon R Steinkamp
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience (INM-3), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Sarah M Tashjian
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - John N Thorp
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gustav Tinghög
- Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Loreen Tisdall
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Center for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Steven H Tompson
- US CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA
| | - Claudio Toro-Serey
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Leonardo Tozzi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Vuong Truong
- Graduate Institute of Mind, Brain and Consciousness, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Brain and Consciousness Research Centre, TMU-ShuangHo Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Luca Turella
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Anna E van 't Veer
- Methodology and Statistics Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tom Verguts
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jean M Vettel
- US Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD, USA
- University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sagana Vijayarajah
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Khoi Vo
- Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew B Wall
- Invicro, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Wouter D Weeda
- Methodology and Statistics Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Weis
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - David J White
- Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Wisniewski
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alba Xifra-Porxas
- Graduate Program in Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily A Yearling
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Sangsuk Yoon
- Department of Management and Marketing, School of Business, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, USA
| | - Rui Yuan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung (LIR), Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Xu Zhang
- Brain Imaging Research Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
| | - Joshua E Zosky
- Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
- Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
| | - Thomas E Nichols
- Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | | | - Tom Schonberg
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
- Department of Neurobiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Droby A, Yuen KSL, Muthuraman M, Reitz SC, Fleischer V, Klein J, Gracien RM, Ziemann U, Deichmann R, Zipp F, Groppa S. Changes in brain functional connectivity patterns are driven by an individual lesion in MS: a resting-state fMRI study. Brain Imaging Behav 2017; 10:1117-1126. [PMID: 26553579 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-015-9476-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Diffuse inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) extends beyond focal lesion sites, affecting interconnected regions; however, little is known about the impact of an individual lesion affecting major white matter (WM) pathways on brain functional connectivity (FC). Here, we longitudinally assessed the effects of acute and chronic lesions on FC in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients using resting-state fMRI. 45 MRI data sets from 9 RRMS patients were recorded using 3T MR scanner over 5 time points at 8 week intervals. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence (n = 5; MS+) and absence (n = 4; MS-) of a lesion at a predilection site for MS. While FC levels were found not to fluctuate significantly in the overall patient group, the MS+ patient group showed increased FC in the contralateral cuneus and precuneus and in the ipsilateral precuneus (p < 0.01, corrected). This can be interpreted as the recruitment of intact cortical regions to compensate for tissue damage. During the study, one patient developed an acute WM lesion in the left posterior periventricular space. A marked increase in FC in the right pre-, post-central gyrus, right superior frontal gyrus, the left cuneus, the vermis and the posterior and anterior lobes of the cerebellum was noted following the clinical relapse, which gradually decreased in subsequent follow-ups, suggesting short-term functional reorganization during the acute phase. This strongly suggests that the lesion-related network changes observed in patients with chronic lesions occur as a result of reorganization processes following the initial appearance of an acute lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amgad Droby
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC) of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC) of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Muthuraman Muthuraman
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC) of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sarah-Christina Reitz
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Brain Imaging Center (BIC), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Vinzenz Fleischer
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Johannes Klein
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Brain Imaging Center (BIC), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - René-Maxime Gracien
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Brain Imaging Center (BIC), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ralf Deichmann
- Brain Imaging Center (BIC), Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Frauke Zipp
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC) of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC) of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Braem S, De Houwer J, Demanet J, Yuen KSL, Kalisch R, Brass M. Pattern Analyses Reveal Separate Experience-Based Fear Memories in the Human Right Amygdala. J Neurosci 2017; 37:8116-8130. [PMID: 28733358 PMCID: PMC6596782 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0908-17.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Revised: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Learning fear via the experience of contingencies between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) is often assumed to be fundamentally different from learning fear via instructions. An open question is whether fear-related brain areas respond differently to experienced CS-US contingencies than to merely instructed CS-US contingencies. Here, we contrasted two experimental conditions where subjects were instructed to expect the same CS-US contingencies while only one condition was characterized by prior experience with the CS-US contingency. Using multivoxel pattern analysis of fMRI data, we found CS-related neural activation patterns in the right amygdala (but not in other fear-related regions) that dissociated between whether a CS-US contingency had been instructed and experienced versus merely instructed. A second experiment further corroborated this finding by showing a category-independent neural response to instructed and experienced, but not merely instructed, CS presentations in the human right amygdala. Together, these findings are in line with previous studies showing that verbal fear instructions have a strong impact on both brain and behavior. However, even in the face of fear instructions, the human right amygdala still shows a separable neural pattern response to experience-based fear contingencies.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In our study, we addressed a fundamental problem of the science of human fear learning and memory, namely whether fear learning via experience in humans relies on a neural pathway that can be separated from fear learning via verbal information. Using two new procedures and recent advances in the analysis of brain imaging data, we localized purely experience-based fear processing and memory in the right amygdala, thereby making a direct link between human and animal research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senne Braem
- Department of Experimental Psychology and
- Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, and
| | - Jan De Houwer
- Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, and
| | | | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Neuroimaging Center Mainz, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and
| | - Raffael Kalisch
- Neuroimaging Center Mainz, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience and
- Deutsches Resilienz-Zentrum, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz 55131, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Salas CE, Yuen KSL. Revisiting the left convexity hypothesis: changes in the mental apparatus after left dorso-medial prefrontal damage. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/15294145.2016.1219937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
17
|
Leek EC, Yuen KSL, Johnston SJ. Domain General Sequence Operations Contribute to Pre-SMA Involvement in Visuo-spatial Processing. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10:9. [PMID: 26858623 PMCID: PMC4727040 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2015] [Accepted: 01/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This study used 3T MRI to elucidate the functional role of supplementary motor area (SMA) in relation to visuo-spatial processing. A localizer task contrasting sequential number subtraction and repetitive button pressing was used to functionally delineate non-motor sequence processing in pre-SMA, and activity in SMA-proper associated with motor sequencing. Patterns of BOLD responses in these regions were then contrasted to those from two tasks of visuo-spatial processing. In one task participants performed Mental Rotation (MR) in which recognition memory judgments were made to previously memorized 2D novel patterns across image-plane rotations. The other task involved abstract grid navigation (GN) in which observers computed a series of imagined location shifts in response to directional (arrow) cues around a mental grid. The results showed overlapping activation in pre-SMA for sequential subtraction and both visuo-spatial tasks. These results suggest that visuo-spatial processing is supported by non-motor sequence operations that involve pre-SMA. More broadly, these data further highlight the functional heterogeneity of pre-SMA, and show that its role extends to processes beyond the planning and online control of movement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Charles Leek
- Wolfson Centre for Clinical and Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Bangor University Gwynedd, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Salas CE, Radovic D, Yuen KSL, Yeates GN, Castro O, Turnbull OH. "Opening an emotional dimension in me": changes in emotional reactivity and emotion regulation in a case of executive impairment after left fronto-parietal damage. Bull Menninger Clin 2015; 78:301-34. [PMID: 25495435 DOI: 10.1521/bumc.2014.78.4.301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Dysexecutive impairment is a common problem after brain injury, particularly after damage to the lateral surface of the frontal lobes. There is a large literature describing the cognitive deficits associated with executive impairment after dorsolateral damage; however, little is known about its impact on emotional functioning. This case study describes changes in a 72-year-old man (Professor F) who became markedly dysexecutive after a left fron-to-parietal stroke. Professor F's case is remarkable in that, despite exhibiting typical executive impairments, abstraction and working memory capacities were spared. Such preservation of insight-related capacities allowed him to offer a detailed account of his emotional changes. Quantitative and qualitative tools were used to explore changes in several well-known emotional processes. The results suggest that Professor F's two main emotional changes were in the domain of emotional reactivity (increased experience of both positive and negative emotions) and emotion regulation (down-regulation of sadness). Professor F related both changes to difficulties in his thinking process, especially a difficulty generating and manipulating thoughts during moments of negative arousal. These results are discussed in relation to the literature on executive function and emotion regulation. The relevance of these findings for neuropsychological rehabilitation and for the debate on the neural basis of emotional processes is addressed.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Emotion plays an essential role in the perception of time such that time is perceived to “fly” when events are enjoyable, while unenjoyable moments are perceived to “drag.” Previous studies have reported a time-drag effect when participants are presented with emotional facial expressions, regardless of the emotion presented. This effect can hardly be explained by induced emotion given the heterogeneous nature of emotional expressions. We conducted two experiments (n = 44 and n = 39) to examine the cognitive mechanism underlying this effect by presenting dynamic sequences of emotional expressions to participants. Each sequence started with a particular expression, then morphed to another. The presentation of dynamic facial expressions allows a comparison between the time-drag effect of homogeneous pairs of emotional expressions sharing similar valence and arousal to heterogeneous pairs. Sequences of seven durations (400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1400, 1600 ms) were presented to participants, who were asked to judge whether the sequences were closer to 400 or 1600 ms in a two-alternative forced choice task. The data were then collated according to conditions and fit into cumulative Gaussian curves to estimate the point of subjective equivalence indicating the perceived duration of 1000 ms. Consistent with previous reports, a feeling of “time dragging” is induced regardless of the sequence presented, such that 1000 ms is perceived to be longer than 1000 ms. In addition, dynamic facial expressions exert a greater effect on perceived time drag than static expressions. The effect is most prominent when the dynamics involve an angry face or a change in valence. The significance of this sensitivity is discussed in terms of emotion perception and its evolutionary significance for our attention mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang On Li
- Department of Counselling and Psychology, Hong Kong Shue Yan University Braemar Hill, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Neuroimaging Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wong TY, Yuen KSL, Li WO. A basic need theory approach to problematic Internet use and the mediating effect of psychological distress. Front Psychol 2015; 5:1562. [PMID: 25642201 PMCID: PMC4294141 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2014] [Accepted: 12/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The Internet provides an easily accessible way to meet certain needs. Over-reliance on it leads to problematic use, which studies show can be predicted by psychological distress. Self-determination theory proposes that we all have the basic need for autonomy, competency, and relatedness. This has been shown to explain the motivations behind problematic Internet use. This study hypothesizes that individuals who are psychologically disturbed because their basic needs are not being met are more vulnerable to becoming reliant on the Internet when they seek such needs satisfaction from online activities, and tests a model in which basic needs predict problematic Internet use, fully mediated by psychological distress. Problematic Internet use, psychological distress, and basic needs satisfaction were psychometrically measured in a sample of 229 Hong Kong University students and structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized model. All indices showed the model has a good fit. Further, statistical testing supported a mediation effect for psychological distress between needs satisfaction and problematic Internet use. The results extend our understanding of the development and prevention of problematic Internet use based on the framework of self-determination theory. Psychological distress could be used as an early predictor, while preventing and treating problematic Internet use should emphasize the fulfillment of unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Yat Wong
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Counselling and Psychology, Hong Kong Shue Yan University Hong Kong, China
| | - Kenneth S L Yuen
- Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Neuroimaging Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
| | - Wang On Li
- Department of Counselling and Psychology, Hong Kong Shue Yan University Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Habes I, Krall SC, Johnston SJ, Yuen KSL, Healy D, Goebel R, Sorger B, Linden DEJ. Pattern classification of valence in depression. Neuroimage Clin 2013; 2:675-83. [PMID: 24179819 PMCID: PMC3777671 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2012] [Revised: 05/03/2013] [Accepted: 05/06/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Neuroimaging biomarkers of depression have potential to aid diagnosis, identify individuals at risk and predict treatment response or course of illness. Nevertheless none have been identified so far, potentially because no single brain parameter captures the complexity of the pathophysiology of depression. Multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) may overcome this issue as it can identify patterns of voxels that are spatially distributed across the brain. Here we present the results of an MVPA to investigate the neuronal patterns underlying passive viewing of positive, negative and neutral pictures in depressed patients. A linear support vector machine (SVM) was trained to discriminate different valence conditions based on the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of nine unipolar depressed patients. A similar dataset obtained in nine healthy individuals was included to conduct a group classification analysis via linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Accuracy scores of 86% or higher were obtained for each valence contrast via patterns that included limbic areas such as the amygdala and frontal areas such as the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. The LDA identified two areas (the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and caudate nucleus) that allowed group classification with 72.2% accuracy. Our preliminary findings suggest that MVPA can identify stable valence patterns, with more sensitivity than univariate analysis, in depressed participants and that it may be possible to discriminate between healthy and depressed individuals based on differences in the brain's response to emotional cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Habes
- CUBRIC (Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK ; Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
van Paasschen J, Clare L, Yuen KSL, Woods RT, Evans SJ, Parkinson CH, Rugg MD, Linden DEJ. Cognitive rehabilitation changes memory-related brain activity in people with Alzheimer disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27:448-59. [PMID: 23369983 DOI: 10.1177/1545968312471902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with Alzheimer disease (AD) are capable of new learning when cognitive support is provided, suggesting that there is plasticity even in a degenerating brain. However, it is unclear how a cognition-focused intervention operates on a neural level. OBJECTIVE The present study examined the effects of cognitive rehabilitation (CR) on memory-related brain activation in people with early-stage AD, as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). METHODS A total of 19 participants either received 8 weeks of CR treatment (n = 7) or formed a control group (n = 12). We scanned participants pretreatment and posttreatment while they learned and recognized unfamiliar face-name pairs. RESULTS Following treatment, the CR group showed higher brain activation during recognition of face-name pairs in the left middle and inferior frontal gyri, the left insula, and 2s regions in the right medial parietal cortex. The control group showed decreased activation in these areas during recognition after the intervention period. Neither group showed an activation change during encoding. Behavioral performance on face-name learning did not improve for either group. CONCLUSIONS We suggest that CR may have operated on the process of recognition through partial restoration of function in frontal brain areas that are less compromised in early-stage AD and that physiological markers may be more sensitive indicators of brain plasticity than behavioral performance.
Collapse
|
23
|
Dymond S, Lawrence NS, Yuen KSL. Neurocognitive mechanisms of impaired decision making in pathological gambling. Front Psychiatry 2013; 4:12. [PMID: 23476629 PMCID: PMC3591741 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2013] [Accepted: 02/24/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Dymond
- Department of Psychology, Swansea University Swansea, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kwok TCY, Lam KC, Wong PS, Chau WW, Yuen KSL, Ting KT, Chung EWK, Li JCY, Ho FKY. Effectiveness of coordination exercise in improving cognitive function in older adults: a prospective study. Clin Interv Aging 2011; 6:261-7. [PMID: 22087065 PMCID: PMC3212417 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s19883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Studies on the effect of a low intensity coordination exercise on the elderly with limited mobility are sparse. This prospective study attempted to compare the effectiveness of a customized coordination exercise and a strength exercise in improving the cognitive functioning and physical mobility on the elderly. Methods: Participants from two centers for the elderly were allocated to practice either an 8-week coordination training (CT) program or an 8-week towel exercise (TE) program. The Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination and Chinese Dementia Rating Scale (CDRS) were used to measure cognitive functioning of participants, and Timed Up-and-Go test for physical mobility. These assessments were administered before and after the program. Results: Paired t-tests showed that the CDRS scores of the CT group improved significantly from 114.8 at pre-test to 119.3 after training (P = 0.045). The CDRS scores of the TE group also improved from 114.9 at pre-test to 116.9 after training. Conclusion: Findings from this prospective study demonstrated that low-intensity level mind-body exercise could be beneficial to the cognitive functioning of older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy C Y Kwok
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Paret C, Brenninkmeyer J, Meyer B, Yuen KSL, Gartmann N, Mechias ML, Kalisch R. A test for the implementation-maintenance model of reappraisal. Front Psychol 2011; 2:216. [PMID: 21922013 PMCID: PMC3167376 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2011] [Accepted: 08/18/2011] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Reappraisal has been defined as a conscious, deliberate change in the way an emotional stimulus is interpreted, initiated in order to change its emotion-eliciting character (Gross, 2002). Reappraisal can be used to down-regulate negative emotions, including anxiety (reviewed in Kalisch, 2009). There is currently a strong interest in identifying the cognitive processes and neural substrates that mediate reappraisal. We have recently proposed a model (termed implementation–maintenance model or IMMO) that conceptualizes reappraisal as a temporally extended, dynamic, and multi-componential process (Kalisch, 2009). A key tenet of IMMO is that reappraisal episodes are marked by an early phase of implementation that may comprise strategy selection and retrieval of reappraisal material into working memory, and a later phase of maintenance that may comprise working memory and performance monitoring processes. These should be supported by dissociable neural networks. We here show, using a detachment-from-threat paradigm and concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging, that reappraisal-related brain activity shifts from left posterior to right anterior parts of the lateral frontal cortex during the course of a reappraisal episode. Our data provide first empirical evidence for the existence of two separable reappraisal stages. Implications for further model development are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Paret
- Institute for Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kwok TCY, Chau WW, Yuen KSL, Wong AYM, Li JCY, Shiu RYY, Ho FKY. Who would benefit from memory training? A pilot study examining the ceiling effect of concurrent cognitive stimulation. Clin Interv Aging 2011; 6:83-8. [PMID: 21593999 PMCID: PMC3095555 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s16802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2011] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Diverse effects of memory training were observed in the literature. One possible factor is the amount of concurrent cognitive training received during the training program. In this pilot study, we recruited 24 elderly adults with or without concurrent cognitive stimulations to attend a memory-training program. Findings suggested that elderly people without concurrent cognitive stimulation could benefit from a memory-training program in the form of improved initiation and memory functioning. Self-rated quality of life measure also showed improvements alongside the cognitive benefits. Elderly people with regular concurrent cognitive stimulation, on the other hand, seemed to plateau in their level of performance and did not show any significant change. Our preliminary findings suggested nonlinear concurrent cognitive stimulation in the elderly.
Collapse
|
27
|
Kwok TCY, Yuen KSL, Ho FKY, Chan WM. Getting lost in the community: a phone survey on the community-dwelling demented people in Hong Kong. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 25:427-32. [PMID: 19653244 DOI: 10.1002/gps.2361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Research from Western countries reported that the incidence rate of dementia patients getting lost in the community ranged from 30 to 60%. It had imposed significant burden on the caregivers. In the current study, we investigated the situation on the incidents of getting lost in a densely populated as well as homogenous community environment. METHODS Two hundred and fifty one caregivers of older adults with demented people who had either used dementia day care service or participated in a community survey were interviewed on the telephone. Respondents were asked on older adult's experience of getting lost in the community and their mode of care. Correlating factors of such incidents were examined. RESULTS The overall prevalence of lost history in our subjects was 27.5%. The subjects recruited from day care center were much more likely than those recruited from the community survey to have lost history (39.2% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.0001, chi(2) test). Greater degrees of cognitive decline were associated with greater chance of having had lost episodes. Immobility was associated with lower risk. Both the older people and their caregivers had reported significant degrees of psychological disturbances after the incidents. CONCLUSION Demented people with greater degrees of cognitive decline and with mobility maintained are at greater risk of getting lost.
Collapse
|
28
|
Yuen KSL, Lee TMC, Wai YY, Liu HL, Mok ENH, Li LSW, Chan CCH. Cortical Reorganization for Response Regulation With Unilateral Thalamic Stroke Detected by Functional MRI. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21:467-71. [PMID: 17369511 DOI: 10.1177/1545968306298415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
To understand neural reorganization of response regulation after stroke, a 54-year-old woman with a chronic left thalamic stroke performed a task requiring decisions about the directionality of an arrow during cerebral functional magnetic resonance imaging. Her performance was compared to 13 matched healthy control subjects. Her behavioral responses were slower but as accurate. Bilateral frontal activations were observed in the right medial frontal gyrus (BA 9), left superior frontal gyrus (BA 45), and left frontal rectus gyrus (BA 11). Activation in the right medial frontal gyrus, along with activity in close proximity to the anterior cingulate cortex, was observed, which may reflect reorganization of activity after the loss of function of the anterior cingulate cortex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth S L Yuen
- Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee TMC, Zhang JX, Chan CCH, Yuen KSL, Chu LW, Cheung RTF, Chan YS, Fox PT, Gao JH. Age-related differences in response regulation as revealed by functional MRI. Brain Res 2006; 1076:171-6. [PMID: 16476418 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2003] [Revised: 12/29/2005] [Accepted: 12/29/2005] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
This fMRI study studied age-related differences in neural activities during response regulation. Twenty-one male participants from two age groups, a younger group and an older group (mean ages: 29.9 and 65.2 years, respectively), were scanned while performing a task with response compatibility manipulation. They were presented with a sequence of arrowheads that pointed either upward or downward. In the "Response Compatible" condition, they were required to press an up or a down button consistent with the direction of the arrowhead. In the "Response Incompatible" condition, they were required to press the button opposite to the arrowhead direction so that an upward arrow should elicit a down response, and vice versa. Findings showed age-related differences in response regulation in several brain regions, including the right frontal, the right cingulate, and the left inferior parietal cortexes. The findings suggested a higher level of neural activity in the right prefrontal and left inferior parietal regions during response regulation for the older adults than for the younger adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatia M C Lee
- Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lee TMC, Zhou WH, Luo XJ, Yuen KSL, Ruan XZ, Weng XC. Neural activity associated with cognitive regulation in heroin users: A fMRI study. Neurosci Lett 2005; 382:211-6. [PMID: 15925092 DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.03.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2005] [Revised: 03/06/2005] [Accepted: 03/08/2005] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Previous research has found heroin addicts to be impulsive. This study employed functional magnetic resonance imaging technology to investigate the differences between heroin addicts and normal controls in neural activity associated with cognitive regulation of behavior. Twenty-one Chinese men participated in this study, 11 of whom were newly admitted heroin-addicted patients and 10 of whom were healthy volunteers. In the experimental task, the subjects were required to first identify the correct directions of arrowheads and then give the opposite answers. Behaviorally, the heroin-dependent patients took a much shorter time to complete the more demanding second part of the task but committed more errors than the normal controls. This pattern of behavior, characteristic of people who are disinhibited and who tend to be impulsive, was consistent with previous reports of impulsivity observed in people who have abused heroin. The neural activity of the patients that was associated with performing the experimental task of cognitive regulation was different to that of the normal controls in terms of the pattern of prefrontal activation, the attenuation of activity in the anterior cingulate, and the additional recruitment of the right inferior parietal region. This study is the first that seeks to understand the neural activity associated with impulsive behavior in people who abuse heroin. The pattern of imaging data obtained resembled the pattern of data observed in immature brains attempting to exercise cognitive control of behavior. Further theoretical and clinical implications of the findings are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatia M C Lee
- Neuropsychology Laboratory, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Memory difficulty is one of the most common complaints of older people, with or without psychiatric conditions. It is therefore of utmost important to understand how normal ageing process impacts upon prose memory so as to gain insight into ways to differentiate pathological vs normal age-related changes of the recall of prose observed among older people. OBJECTIVES To understand the differential age-related change of prose memory in older Hong Kong Chinese of higher and lower education. METHOD Forty-eight normal, healthy Cantonese-speaking Chinese were recruited. Seventeen of them were younger, highly educated participants. Among the 31 older people recruited, 19 of them received education comparable with the younger participants and 12 were older people of low education. A prose passage was constructed to measure the different processes of prose memory, including learning efficiency, rate of forgetting, recall accuracy, accuracy of temporal sequence of information recalled, distortions, and recognition memory. RESULTS As expected, ageing affected all the processes of prose memory measured, except the rate of forgetting. Apart from learning efficiency and rate of forgetting, education was observed to modify the effect of ageing on all the processes studied. CONCLUSIONS Changes of prose memory associated with ageing and the differential effect of education on prose recall among older people were discussed. The findings seem to suggest that prose memory is a multifaceted construct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M C Lee
- Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depressed patients are advised by clinicians to avoid making critical life decisions because their decision-making process might be influenced by their pathological mood states. In order to provide empirical support for this practice, we examined the influence of different mood states on risk-taking tendencies that govern one's decision during critical life decisions. METHOD By means of viewing a happy, neutral or sad movie clip, participants were induced to a respective mood. Risk-taking tendencies were then measured with decision tasks modified from the Choice Dilemmas Questionnaire (Kogan N., Wallach, M.A., 1964. Risk Taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality, Holt, New York). RESULTS The findings (SS=54) indicated varying risk-taking tendencies in different mood states: individuals in induced depress mood were significantly more conservative in taking risk than those who were in neutral mood, whilst people in induced elated mood did not differ significantly from those in neutral mood. Correlation between mood-ratings with risk-taking tendency was positive (r=0.319, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS People in induced depress mood would have a lower willingness to take risk than people in neutral and in positive mood. The manner in which decisions were influenced by negative mood was discussed. The asymmetry of influence of different mood states on risk-taking decisions was also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth S L Yuen
- Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lee TMC, Liu HL, Hoosain R, Liao WT, Wu CT, Yuen KSL, Chan CCH, Fox PT, Gao JH. Gender differences in neural correlates of recognition of happy and sad faces in humans assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Lett 2002; 333:13-6. [PMID: 12401549 DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00965-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
To examine the effect of gender on the volume and pattern of brain activation during the viewing of alternating sets of faces depicting happy or sad expressions, 24 volunteers, 12 men and 12 women, participated in this functional magnetic resonance imaging study. The experimental stimuli were 12 photographs of Japanese adults selected from Matsumoto and Ekman's Pictures of Facial Affect. Four of these pictures depicted happy facial emotions, four sad, and four neutral. Half of the photographs were of men and the other half were of women. Consistent with previous findings, distinct sets of neural correlates for processing happy and sad facial emotions were noted. Furthermore, it was observed that male and female subjects used a rather different set of neural correlates when processing faces showing either happy or sad expressions. This was more noticeable when they were processing faces portraying sad emotions than happy emotions. Our findings provide some preliminary support for the speculation that the two genders may be associated with different areas of brain activation during emotion recognition of happy or sad facial expressions. This suggests that the generalizability of findings in regard to neural correlates of facial emotion recognition should consider the gender of the subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatia M C Lee
- Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|