1
|
Mulay AL, Lenger KA, Waugh MH, Cain NM, Florimbio AR, Gottfried ED, Lenzenweger MF, Lewis KC, Shier EK. Contributions of Multimethod Personality Assessment in Indirect Evaluation. J Pers Assess 2022:1-12. [PMID: 35771230 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2090370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Indirect assessment is a useful tool in forensic evaluation, especially in cases of threat assessment. To this end, we illustrated the ability to conceptualize a complicated case (i.e., Theodore John Kaczynski) using an indirect approach, with a particular emphasis upon dimensional frameworks of personality. Raters who were unrelated to Mr. Kaczynski's case and with expertise in relevant domains were asked to study information available in the public domain about Mr. Kaczynski and provide ratings using several assessment instruments. Our aim was not to provide a professional clinical opinion, but rather engage in scholarly discourse about the utility of instruments. Mr. Kaczynski was rated to demonstrate characteristics associated with lone actor terrorists. He showed an elevation on a measure of psychosis, and raters conceptualized trauma as an important aspect of his functioning. He demonstrated impairments in detachment and psychoticism (Criterion B of the AMPD) and interpersonal functioning (Criterion A of the AMPD). Clinical conceptualizations for Mr. Kaczynski emphasized schizotypal and paranoid personality disorders. This analysis of an infamous case about which considerable data are publicly available demonstrates the ease with which indirect and multimethod assessment can be applied and integrated in forensic assessment, using modern conceptualizations of personality pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby L Mulay
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Community and Public Safety Psychiatry Division, Medical University of South Carolina
| | | | - Mark H Waugh
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
| | - Nicole M Cain
- Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University
| | | | - Emily D Gottfried
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Community and Public Safety Psychiatry Division, Medical University of South Carolina
| | - Mark F Lenzenweger
- Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton, & Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College
| | | | - Emily K Shier
- College of Humanities & Social Sciences, Grand Canyon University
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Waugh MH, Mulay AL, Rossi G, Meehan KB. Editorial: The AMPD in Clinical and Applied Practice: Emerging Trends and Empirical Support. Front Psychol 2022; 13:867933. [PMID: 35369200 PMCID: PMC8970333 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark H. Waugh
- Health Services Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States
| | - Abby L. Mulay
- Community and Public Safety Psychiatry Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Gina Rossi
- Personality and Psychopathology Research Group, Department of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kevin B. Meehan
- Department of Psychology, Long Island University – Brooklyn, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garner AR, Blocher N, Tierney D, Baumgardner M, Watson A, Romero G, Skadberg R, Younginer T, Waugh MH. Applying the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders and the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure to the Classic Case of "Madeline G.": Novice and Expert Rater Convergences and Divergence. Front Psychol 2022; 13:794616. [PMID: 35242078 PMCID: PMC8885620 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior research supports the learnability of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). However, researchers have yet to compare novice ratings on the AMPD's Level of Personality Functioning Scale and the 25 pathological personality traits with expert ratings. Furthermore, the AMPD has yet to be examined with the idiographic Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP). We compared the aggregated AMPD clinical profile of a group of psychology doctoral students who learned the AMPD to high levels of reliability to that of an expert rater using the crucible of the classical case of "Madeline G." Examination of AMPD and SWAP ratings of "Madeline G." revealed excellent overall concordance but suggests that novice raters tend to perceive lower levels of personality impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alisa R Garner
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States
| | - Natalie Blocher
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States
| | - David Tierney
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States
| | - Megan Baumgardner
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States
| | - Alayna Watson
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States
| | - Gloria Romero
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States
| | - Rebecca Skadberg
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States
| | - Taylor Younginer
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States
| | - Mark H Waugh
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.,Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mariotti EC, Waugh MH, McClain CM, Beevers LG, Clemence AJ, Lewis KC, Miller R, Mulay AL, Ridenour JM, Huprich SK, Pitman SR, Meehan KB. Assessing Self-Definition and Relatedness in Level of Personality Functioning. J Pers Disord 2021; 35:857-880. [PMID: 33764821 DOI: 10.1521/pedi_2021_35_516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The two polarities model (TPM) of personality organizes psychological assessment and psychotherapy and connects to personality disorder diagnosis using the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). The authors developed scales assessing the TPM from an existing self-report measure for level of personality functioning (LPF), a core component of the AMPD. Iterative content analyses of the LPF measure yielded scales for Autonomy and Communion corresponding to dimensions of the TPM. The scales were refined via internal consistency analyses using a measure of psychological attachment and studied in development and validation samples. Associations with relevant external criteria were explored in a series of multiple regressions. The new content-based LPF scales were illustrated with a case vignette. Although the new Autonomy/Communion scales await further validation prior to clinical use, initial evidence suggests that they may bridge the nomological nets of the TPM and AMPD and potentially offer clinical utility in assessment and treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark H Waugh
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville.,Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | | | | | | | | | - Racheli Miller
- Center for Compassion Focused Therapy, New York, New York
| | - Abby L Mulay
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Waugh MH, Mulay AL, Crittenden EB, Rossi G. Criterion A of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in MMPI-2/RF Personality Disorder Scales. Front Psychol 2021; 12:735848. [PMID: 34899478 PMCID: PMC8663922 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) instruments are frequently used to assess personality and psychopathology. Recent publications of personality disorder (PD) spectra scales for dimensionalized PD syndromes with MMPI instruments may advance PD assessment. To this end, we examined MMPI-Second Edition (2) and MMPI-2-Restructured Form (-RF) PD Spectra scales within the lens of a contemporary dimensional model of PDs, the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD). The core dimension of PD, Criterion A of the AMPD or level of personality functioning (LPF), was characterized quantitatively within the PD Spectra scales. By sequentially factor analyzing the scales of the Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118) to a common general factor of PD, an index of LPF external to the MMPI item pool was established. This LPF dimension was strongly represented across most PD Spectra scales. LPF variances within the PD Spectra scales were deconstructed using measures of general demoralization (RCdemoralization) and maladaptive personality traits indexed by the Personality Psychopathology-5 (PSY-5). Nuanced LPF and PD Spectra scale relationships were discerned. Dimensionalized Antisocial PD, Borderline PD, Dependent PD, and Paranoid PD showed meaningful association with LPF after demoralization, and maladaptive trait variances were removed. The examination of the MMPI-3 item pool reveals that the existing PD Spectra scale item sets are largely carried forward in the new edition of the MMPI. This suggests PD Spectra scale correlates, including LPF relationships, may be discernable in the newest edition of the MMPI, pending future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark H. Waugh
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States
- Health Services Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
| | - Abby L. Mulay
- Community and Public Safety Psychiatry Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | | | - Gina Rossi
- Personality and Psychopathology Research Group, Department of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Garcia DJ, Crittenden EB, Skadberg RM, Finn MTM, Schmidt M, Kurdziel-Adams G, Waugh MH. Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale as level of personality functioning. Psychoanalytic Psychology 2021. [DOI: 10.1037/pap0000369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
7
|
Iddins BO, Waugh MH, Buck B, Cato T, Graham DE, Attia K, Jones D, Partin A, Shourbaji R, Wesh C. Benchmarking SARS CoV-2 Infection in the Workplace to Support Continuity of Operations. J Occup Environ Med 2021; 63:548-556. [PMID: 33741830 PMCID: PMC8247538 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic jeopardizes continuity of operations of workplaces and the health and safety of workers. Exemplar workplace-related SARS-CoV-2 benchmarks are described and illustrated with empirical data. METHODS Benchmarks were collected over a 9-month period on a large workplace (N = 5500+). These ranged from quantitative indices associated with RT-qPCR targeted testing and random surveillance screening, surveillance for new variants of SARS-CoV-2, intensive contact tracing, case management, return to work procedures, to monitoring of antibody seropositive status. RESULTS Data and analyses substantiated effectiveness of interventions. This was evidenced in suppressed infection rates, rapid case identification and isolation, acceptance of the program by employees, documentation of presumptive immunity, and working relationships with senior management. CONCLUSIONS These SARS-CoV-2 exemplar benchmarks provided an evidence-base for practice and contributed strategically to organizational decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart O Iddins
- Health Services Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (Dr Iddins, Dr Waugh, Mr Buck, Ms Cato, Mr Attia, Mr Jones, Mr Partin, Ms Shourbaji, and Mr Wesh); University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee (Dr Waugh); Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (Dr Graham)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Iddins BO, Buck B, Cato T, Partin A, Attia K, Wesh C, Shourbaji R, Waugh MH. mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Immunization Confers Robust Antibody Response in Occupational Healthcare Workers and Fosters Workplace Safety. J Occup Environ Med 2021; 63:e314-e317. [PMID: 33928943 PMCID: PMC8091905 DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rania Shourbaji
- Health Services Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Krueger RF, Kotov R, Watson D, Forbes MK, Eaton NR, Ruggero CJ, Simms LJ, Widiger TA, Achenbach TM, Bach B, Bagby RM, Bornovalova MA, Carpenter WT, Chmielewski M, Cicero DC, Clark LA, Conway C, DeClercq B, DeYoung CG, Docherty AR, Drislane LE, First MB, Forbush KT, Hallquist M, Haltigan JD, Hopwood CJ, Ivanova MY, Jonas KG, Latzman RD, Markon KE, Miller JD, Morey LC, Mullins-Sweatt SN, Ormel J, Patalay P, Patrick CJ, Pincus AL, Regier DA, Reininghaus U, Rescorla LA, Samuel DB, Sellbom M, Shackman AJ, Skodol A, Slade T, South SC, Sunderland M, Tackett JL, Venables NC, Waldman ID, Waszczuk MA, Waugh MH, Wright AG, Zald DH, Zimmermann J. Les progrès dans la réalisation de la classification quantitative de la psychopathologie ☆. Ann Med Psychol (Paris) 2021; 179:95-106. [PMID: 34305151 PMCID: PMC8309948 DOI: 10.1016/j.amp.2020.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Shortcomings of approaches to classifying psychopathology based on expert consensus have given rise to contemporary efforts to classify psychopathology quantitatively. In this paper, we review progress in achieving a quantitative and empirical classification of psychopathology. A substantial empirical literature indicates that psychopathology is generally more dimensional than categorical. When the discreteness versus continuity of psychopathology is treated as a research question, as opposed to being decided as a matter of tradition, the evidence clearly supports the hypothesis of continuity. In addition, a related body of literature shows how psychopathology dimensions can be arranged in a hierarchy, ranging from very broad "spectrum level" dimensions, to specific and narrow clusters of symptoms. In this way, a quantitative approach solves the "problem of comorbidity" by explicitly modeling patterns of co-occurrence among signs and symptoms within a detailed and variegated hierarchy of dimensional concepts with direct clinical utility. Indeed, extensive evidence pertaining to the dimensional and hierarchical structure of psychopathology has led to the formation of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) Consortium. This is a group of 70 investigators working together to study empirical classification of psychopathology. In this paper, we describe the aims and current foci of the HiTOP Consortium. These aims pertain to continued research on the empirical organization of psychopathology; the connection between personality and psychopathology; the utility of empirically based psychopathology constructs in both research and the clinic; and the development of novel and comprehensive models and corresponding assessment instruments for psychopathology constructs derived from an empirical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert F. Krueger
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Roman Kotov
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - David Watson
- Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Miriam K. Forbes
- Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas R. Eaton
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Camilo J. Ruggero
- Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA
| | - Leonard J. Simms
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas A. Widiger
- Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Bo Bach
- Psychiatric Research Unit, Slagelse Psychiatric Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - R. Michael Bagby
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - David C. Cicero
- Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Lee Anna Clark
- Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Christopher Conway
- Department of Psychology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA
| | - Barbara DeClercq
- Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Colin G. DeYoung
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Anna R. Docherty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Laura E. Drislane
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael B. First
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Michael Hallquist
- Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - John D. Haltigan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Masha Y. Ivanova
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | | | - Robert D. Latzman
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Joshua D. Miller
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Leslie C. Morey
- Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | | | - Johan Ormel
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Praveetha Patalay
- Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - Aaron L. Pincus
- Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - Darrel A. Regier
- Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ulrich Reininghaus
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Douglas B. Samuel
- Department of Psychology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Martin Sellbom
- Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Andrew Skodol
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Tim Slade
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Susan C. South
- Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Matthew Sunderland
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Noah C. Venables
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Mark H. Waugh
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, University of Tennessee, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
| | - Aidan G.C. Wright
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David H. Zald
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hopwood CJ, Krueger RF, Watson D, Widiger TA, Althoff RR, Ansell EB, Bach B, Bagby RM, Blais MA, Bornovalova MA, Chmielewski M, Cicero DC, Conway C, De Clerq B, De Fruyt F, Docherty AR, Eaton NR, Edens JF, Forbes MK, Forbush KT, Hengartner MP, Ivanova MY, Leising D, Lukowitsky MR, Lynam DR, Markon KE, Miller JD, Morey LC, Mullins-Sweatt SN, Ormel J, Patrick CJ, Pincus AL, Ruggero C, Samuel DB, Sellbom M, Tackett JL, Thomas KM, Trull TJ, Vachon DD, Waldman ID, Waszczuk MA, Waugh MH, Wright AGC, Yalch MM, Zald DH, Zimmermann J. Commentary on "The Challenge of Transforming the Diagnostic System of Personality Disorders". J Pers Disord 2020; 34:1-4. [PMID: 30802176 DOI: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_00] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bo Bach
- Region Zealand Psychiatry, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Garcia DJ, Waugh MH, Skadberg RM, Crittenden EB, Finn MTM, Schmidt MR, Kurdziel-Adams G. Deconstructing criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders. Personal Disord 2020; 12:320-330. [PMID: 32730062 DOI: 10.1037/per0000431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The construct composition of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS; Criterion A) of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition alternative model for personality disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) was examined in a clinical vignette rating study. Multiple indices of level of personality functioning, psychiatric and psychosocial impairment, Criterion B maladaptive personality traits, and conceptually divergent variables (intellectual level, socioeconomic status, and likability) were used to deconstruct the LPFS. Most variables were highly intercorrelated, but partial correlational analyses showed the LPFS possesses meaningful personality construct variance not fully explained by severity of pathological traits, psychiatric and psychosocial impairment, or the conceptually divergent variables. This exploratory study offers initial evidence that the LPFS contains substantive LPF variance beyond PD severity. Results are framed and discussed in terms of the known conceptual and empirical overlap between Criterion A and Criterion B as well as the differing ways a dimension of personality disorder (PD) severity may be interpreted. We propose the LPFS is more than statistical artifact created by empirical covariation but less than a true latent dimension of PD severity. The LPFS may be understood as a methodologically pragmatic but theoretically substantive dimension of PD severity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
12
|
Waugh MH, McClain CM, Mariotti EC, Mulay AL, DeVore EN, Lenger KA, Russell AN, Florimbio AR, Lewis KC, Ridenour JM, Beevers LG. Comparative Content Analysis of Self-Report Scales for Level of Personality Functioning. J Pers Assess 2020; 103:161-173. [PMID: 31917602 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1705464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Content validity analyses of eight self-report instruments for assessing severity of personality disorder (PD), also known as Level of Personality Functioning (LPF), were conducted using the conceptual scheme of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD; APA, 2013). The item contents of these eight inventories were characterized for the LPF constructs of Identity (ID), Self-Direction (SD), Empathy (EM), and Intimacy (IN) along with the pathological personality trait domains of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism. Severity of pathology (SV) reflected in item content was also rated. Raters demonstrated robust agreement for AMPD and SV constructs across instruments. Similarity between instrument AMPD construct profiles was quantified by intraclass correlations (ICC). Results showed the instruments were generally similar in AMPD-construct coverage, but some important differences emerged. The subscales of the instruments also were characterized for the degree to which they reflect the four LPF (ID, SD, EM, IN) domain constructs. Collectively, these content validity comparisons clarify the equivalence of instruments for AMPD constructs and the relative proportions of construct coverage within instrument subscales. These results can inform future research with LPF self-report instruments and guide clinicians in selecting an LPF-related instrument for use in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark H Waugh
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory.,University of Tennessee, Knoxville
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mulay AL, Waugh MH, Fillauer JP, Bender DS, Bram A, Cain NM, Caligor E, Forbes MK, Goodrich LB, Kamphuis JH, Keeley JW, Krueger RF, Kurtz JE, Jacobsson P, Lewis KC, Rossi GMP, Ridenour JM, Roche M, Sellbom M, Sharp C, Skodol AE. Borderline personality disorder diagnosis in a new key. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul 2019; 6:18. [PMID: 31827801 PMCID: PMC6886204 DOI: 10.1186/s40479-019-0116-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conceptualizations of personality disorders (PD) are increasingly moving towards dimensional approaches. The definition and assessment of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in regard to changes in nosology are of great importance to theory and practice as well as consumers. We studied empirical connections between the traditional DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for BPD and Criteria A and B of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). METHOD Raters of varied professional backgrounds possessing substantial knowledge of PDs (N = 20) characterized BPD criteria with the four domains of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) and 25 pathological personality trait facets. Mean AMPD values of each BPD criterion were used to support a nosological cross-walk of the individual BPD criteria and study various combinations of BPD criteria in their AMPD translation. The grand mean AMPD profile generated from the experts was compared to published BPD prototypes that used AMPD trait ratings and the DSM-5-III hybrid categorical-dimensional algorithm for BPD. Divergent comparisons with DSM-5-III algorithms for other PDs and other published PD prototypes were also examined. RESULTS Inter-rater reliability analyses showed generally robust agreement. The AMPD profile for BPD criteria rated by individual BPD criteria was not isomorphic with whole-person ratings of BPD, although they were highly correlated. Various AMPD profiles for BPD were generated from theoretically relevant but differing configurations of BPD criteria. These AMPD profiles were highly correlated and showed meaningful divergence from non-BPD DSM-5-III algorithms and other PD prototypes. CONCLUSIONS Results show that traditional DSM BPD diagnosis reflects a common core of PD severity, largely composed of LPFS and the pathological traits of anxiousness, depressively, emotional lability, and impulsivity. Results confirm the traditional DSM criterion-based BPD diagnosis can be reliably cross-walked with the full AMPD scheme, and both approaches share substantial construct overlap. This relative equivalence suggests the vast clinical and research literatures associated with BPD may be brought forward with DSM-5-III diagnosis of BPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby L Mulay
- 1Medical University of South Carolina, 29C Leinbach Drive, Charleston, SC 29407 USA
| | - Mark H Waugh
- 2Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) & University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
| | | | - Donna S Bender
- 4Tulane University, 6823 St. Charles Ave., Bldg. 92, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
| | | | - Nicole M Cain
- 6Rutgers University, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, 152 Frelinghuysen Rd, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020 USA
| | - Eve Caligor
- 7Columbia University, 1501 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Miriam K Forbes
- 8Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd., Macquarie Park, NSW 2109 Australia
| | | | - Jan H Kamphuis
- 10University of Amsterdam (UvA), Nieuwe Achtergracht, 129B, 1001 NK Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jared W Keeley
- 11Virginia Commonwealth University, 806 West Franklin Street, Box 842018, Richmond, VA 23284-2018 USA
| | - Robert F Krueger
- 12University of Minnesota, 101 Pleasant St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
| | - John E Kurtz
- 13Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085 USA
| | - Peter Jacobsson
- 14Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Katie C Lewis
- 15Austen Riggs Center, 25 Main Street, P.O. Box 962, Stockbridge, MA 01262 USA
| | - Gina M P Rossi
- 16Department of Psychology, Personality and Psychopathology Research group Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jeremy M Ridenour
- 15Austen Riggs Center, 25 Main Street, P.O. Box 962, Stockbridge, MA 01262 USA
| | - Michael Roche
- 17Penn State Altoona, 3000 Ivyside Park, Altoona, PA 16601 USA
| | - Martin Sellbom
- 18University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054 New Zealand
| | - Carla Sharp
- 19University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Boulevard Room 126, Houston, TX 77204-5022 USA
| | - Andrew E Skodol
- 20University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, PO Box 245017, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Krueger RF, Kotov R, Watson D, Forbes MK, Eaton NR, Ruggero CJ, Simms LJ, Widiger TA, Achenbach TM, Bach B, Bagby RM, Bornovalova MA, Carpenter WT, Chmielewski M, Cicero DC, Clark LA, Conway C, DeClercq B, DeYoung CG, Docherty AR, Drislane LE, First MB, Forbush KT, Hallquist M, Haltigan JD, Hopwood CJ, Ivanova MY, Jonas KG, Latzman RD, Markon KE, Miller JD, Morey LC, Mullins-Sweatt SN, Ormel J, Patalay P, Patrick CJ, Pincus AL, Regier DA, Reininghaus U, Rescorla LA, Samuel DB, Sellbom M, Shackman AJ, Skodol A, Slade T, South SC, Sunderland M, Tackett JL, Venables NC, Waldman ID, Waszczuk MA, Waugh MH, Wright AGC, Zald DH, Zimmermann J. Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology. World Psychiatry 2018; 17:282-293. [PMID: 30229571 PMCID: PMC6172695 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 244] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Shortcomings of approaches to classifying psychopathology based on expert consensus have given rise to contemporary efforts to classify psychopathology quantitatively. In this paper, we review progress in achieving a quantitative and empirical classification of psychopathology. A substantial empirical literature indicates that psychopathology is generally more dimensional than categorical. When the discreteness versus continuity of psychopathology is treated as a research question, as opposed to being decided as a matter of tradition, the evidence clearly supports the hypothesis of continuity. In addition, a related body of literature shows how psychopathology dimensions can be arranged in a hierarchy, ranging from very broad "spectrum level" dimensions, to specific and narrow clusters of symptoms. In this way, a quantitative approach solves the "problem of comorbidity" by explicitly modeling patterns of co-occurrence among signs and symptoms within a detailed and variegated hierarchy of dimensional concepts with direct clinical utility. Indeed, extensive evidence pertaining to the dimensional and hierarchical structure of psychopathology has led to the formation of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) Consortium. This is a group of 70 investigators working together to study empirical classification of psychopathology. In this paper, we describe the aims and current foci of the HiTOP Consortium. These aims pertain to continued research on the empirical organization of psychopathology; the connection between personality and psychopathology; the utility of empirically based psychopathology constructs in both research and the clinic; and the development of novel and comprehensive models and corresponding assessment instruments for psychopathology constructs derived from an empirical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert F Krueger
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Roman Kotov
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - David Watson
- Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Miriam K Forbes
- Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas R Eaton
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Camilo J Ruggero
- Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA
| | - Leonard J Simms
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas A Widiger
- Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Bo Bach
- Psychiatric Research Unit, Slagelse Psychiatric Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - R Michael Bagby
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - David C Cicero
- Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Lee Anna Clark
- Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | - Christopher Conway
- Department of Psychology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA
| | - Barbara DeClercq
- Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Colin G DeYoung
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Anna R Docherty
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Laura E Drislane
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael B First
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kelsie T Forbush
- Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Michael Hallquist
- Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - John D Haltigan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Masha Y Ivanova
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Katherine G Jonas
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Robert D Latzman
- Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Joshua D Miller
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Leslie C Morey
- Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | | | - Johan Ormel
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Praveetha Patalay
- Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Aaron L Pincus
- Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA
| | - Darrel A Regier
- Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ulrich Reininghaus
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Douglas B Samuel
- Department of Psychology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Martin Sellbom
- Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | | | - Andrew Skodol
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Tim Slade
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Susan C South
- Department of Psychology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Matthew Sunderland
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Noah C Venables
- Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Irwin D Waldman
- Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Monika A Waszczuk
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Mark H Waugh
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory, University of Tennessee, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
| | - Aidan G C Wright
- Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David H Zald
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mulay AL, Cain NM, Waugh MH, Hopwood CJ, Adler JM, Garcia DJ, Kurtz JE, Lenger KA, Skadberg R. Personality Constructs and Paradigms in the AlternativeDSM-5Model of Personality Disorder. J Pers Assess 2018; 100:593-602. [DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1477787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Abby L. Mulay
- Department of Psychology, Long Island University, Brooklyn
| | - Nicole M. Cain
- Department of Psychology, Long Island University, Brooklyn
| | - Mark H. Waugh
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Widiger TA, Bach B, Chmielewski M, Clark LA, DeYoung C, Hopwood CJ, Kotov R, Krueger RF, Miller JD, Morey LC, Mullins-Sweatt SN, Patrick CJ, Pincus AL, Samuel DB, Sellbom M, South SC, Tackett JL, Watson D, Waugh MH, Wright AGC, Zimmermann J, Bagby RM, Cicero DC, Conway CC, De Clercq B, Docherty AR, Eaton NR, Forbush KT, Haltigan JD, Ivanova MY, Latzman RD, Lynam DR, Markon KE, Reininghaus U, Thomas KM. Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. J Pers Assess 2018; 101:345-355. [PMID: 29746190 DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1465431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The categorical model of personality disorder classification in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed. [DSM-5]; American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ) is highly and fundamentally problematic. Proposed for DSM-5 and provided within Section III (for Emerging Measures and Models) was the Alternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD) classification, consisting of Criterion A (self-interpersonal deficits) and Criterion B (maladaptive personality traits). A proposed alternative to the DSM-5 more generally is an empirically based dimensional organization of psychopathology identified as the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP; Kotov et al., 2017 ). HiTOP currently includes, at the highest level, a general factor of psychopathology. Further down are the five domains of detachment, antagonistic externalizing, disinhibited externalizing, thought disorder, and internalizing (along with a provisional sixth somatoform dimension) that align with Criterion B. The purpose of this article is to discuss the potential inclusion and placement of the self-interpersonal deficits of the DSM-5 Section III Criterion A within HiTOP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bo Bach
- b Psychiatric Research Unit, Slagelse Psychiatric Hospital , Slagelse , Denmark
| | | | | | - Colin DeYoung
- e Department of Psychology , University of Minnesota
| | | | - Roman Kotov
- g Department of Psychiatry , Stony Brook University
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Aaron L Pincus
- l Department of Psychology , Pennsylvania State University
| | | | - Martin Sellbom
- n Department of Psychology , University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand
| | - Susan C South
- m Department of Psychological Sciences , Purdue University
| | | | - David Watson
- d Department of Psychology , University of Notre Dame
| | - Mark H Waugh
- p Department of Psychology , University of Tennessee
| | | | | | - R Michael Bagby
- s Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | - David C Cicero
- t Department of Psychology , University of Hawaii at Manoa
| | | | - Barbara De Clercq
- v Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium
| | | | | | | | - J D Haltigan
- z Department of Psychiatry , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | | | | | - Donald R Lynam
- m Department of Psychological Sciences , Purdue University
| | | | - Ulrich Reininghaus
- ad Department of Psychiatry and Psychology , Masstricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands , and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College , London
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Garcia DJ, Skadberg RM, Schmidt M, Bierma S, Shorter RL, Waugh MH. It's not that Difficult: An Interrater Reliability Study of the DSM–5 Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. J Pers Assess 2018; 100:612-620. [DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1428982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Shane Bierma
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee
| | | | - Mark H. Waugh
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hopwood CJ, Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D, Widiger TA, Althoff RR, Ansell EB, Bach B, Michael Bagby R, Blais MA, Bornovalova MA, Chmielewski M, Cicero DC, Conway C, De Clercq B, De Fruyt F, Docherty AR, Eaton NR, Edens JF, Forbes MK, Forbush KT, Hengartner MP, Ivanova MY, Leising D, John Livesley W, Lukowitsky MR, Lynam DR, Markon KE, Miller JD, Morey LC, Mullins-Sweatt SN, Hans Ormel J, Patrick CJ, Pincus AL, Ruggero C, Samuel DB, Sellbom M, Slade T, Tackett JL, Thomas KM, Trull TJ, Vachon DD, Waldman ID, Waszczuk MA, Waugh MH, Wright AGC, Yalch MM, Zald DH, Zimmermann J. The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis. Personal Ment Health 2018; 12:82-86. [PMID: 29226598 PMCID: PMC5811364 DOI: 10.1002/pmh.1408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roman Kotov
- Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bo Bach
- Region Zealand Psychiatry, Roskilde, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - J Hans Ormel
- University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tim Slade
- University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Sellbom
- Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Mark H. Waugh
- Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee & Oak Ridge National Laboratory
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Waugh MH, Hopwood CJ, Krueger RF, Morey LC, Pincus AL, Wright AGC. Psychological Assessment with the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Tradition and Innovation. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2017; 48:79-89. [PMID: 28450760 PMCID: PMC5403154 DOI: 10.1037/pro0000071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD; APA, 2013) represents an innovative system for simultaneous psychiatric classification and psychological assessment of personality disorders (PD). The AMPD combines major paradigms of personality assessment and provides an original, heuristic, flexible, and practical framework that enriches clinical thinking and practice. Origins, emerging research, and clinical application of the AMPD for diagnosis and psychological assessment are reviewed. The AMPD integrates assessment and research traditions, facilitates case conceptualization, is easy to learn and use, and assists in providing patient feedback. New as well as existing tests and psychometric methods may be used to operationalize the AMPD for clinical assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark H Waugh
- Private Practice, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, & University of Tennessee
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
|
23
|
Abstract
Interrater and internal consistency reliability of Loevinger's sentence completion test of ego development is examined within a psychology clinic population consisting of relatively pure types of neurotic, psychotic, and character disordered groups. Reliability study of the instrument suggests it is generalizable across populations, thusly supporting the reasonableness of further research with the test in clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H Waugh
- J. Hillis Miller Health Ctr., University of Florida, Gainesville 32601, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Scales tapping the dimensions of personality disorder as represented in the DSM-III were derived using a combined rational/empirical strategy. The final version of the scales demonstrated both content validity as well as internal consistency. Correlations between the derived scales and between these scales and the original MMPI clinical scales were generally found to be in the expected direction providing preliminary evidence of criterion related validity. It is suggested that the derived scales may represent an advance toward the reliable assessment of DSM-III personality constructs.
Collapse
|
25
|
Waugh MH. A temperamental and development model for personality assessment: application to self-control in middle childhood. Personality and Individual Differences 1984. [DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(84)90074-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
26
|
|
27
|
Waugh MH. Predictive accuracy and clinical utility of the Grid Test of Schizophrenic Thought Disorder. Br J Psychiatry 1980; 137:300. [PMID: 7437665 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.137.3.300a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
28
|
Laffan RJ, Goldberg ME, High JP, Schaeffer TR, Waugh MH, Rubin B. Antihypertensive activity in rats for SQ 14,225, an orally active inhibitor of angiotensin I-converting enzyme. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1978; 204:281-8. [PMID: 202693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
SQ 14,225 (D-3-mercapto-2-methylpropanoyl-L-proline) markedly lowered the blood pressure of the renin-dependent aortic-ligated and two-kidney Goldblatt hypertensive rat and failed to reduce blood pressure in the one-kidney Goldblatt hypertensive rat. In the two-kidney Goldblatt rat, SQ 14,225 (p.o.) was about 10 times as potent as teprotide, the nonapeptide SQ 20,881 (s.c.). Oral doses of SQ 14,225 moderately reduced the blood pressure of the Wistar-Kyoto spontaneously hypertensive rat but not that of the normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rat. Bilateral nephrectomy abolished the antihypertensive activity of SQ 14,225 in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. SQ 14,225 and SQ 20,881 elicited parallel dose-response curves in the two-kidney renal hypertensive rat. Post-treatment of spontaneously hypertensive rats with either agent failed to augment the antihypertensive effect produced by effective doses of the other agent. The results suggest that SQ 14,225 acts primarily by inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system to reduce elevated blood pressure, especially in presumably renin-dependent models of hypertension.
Collapse
|
29
|
Engel SL, Schaeffer TR, Waugh MH, Rubin B. Effects of the nonapeptide SQ 20881 on blood pressure of rats with experimental renovascular hypertension. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1973; 143:483-7. [PMID: 4709014 DOI: 10.3181/00379727-143-37348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
30
|
Rubin B, O'Keefe EH, Waugh MH, Kotler DG, DeMaio DA, Horovitz ZP. Activities in vitro of 8-substituted derivatives of adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate on guinea pig trachea and rat portal vein. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1971; 137:1244-8. [PMID: 4333093 DOI: 10.3181/00379727-137-35765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
31
|
Rubin B, Engel SL, Drungis AM, Dzelzkalns M, Grigas EO, Waugh MH, Yiacas E. Cholecystokinin-like activities in guinea pigs and in dogs of the C-terminal octapeptide (SQ 19,844) of cholecystokinin. J Pharm Sci 1969; 58:955-9. [PMID: 5344529 DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600580810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|