51
|
Abbott TEF, Fowler AJ, Dobbs TD, Gibson J, Shahid T, Dias P, Akbari A, Whitaker IS, Pearse RM. Mortality after surgery with SARS-CoV-2 infection in England: a population-wide epidemiological study. Br J Anaesth 2021; 127:205-214. [PMID: 34148733 PMCID: PMC8192173 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has heavily impacted elective and emergency surgery around the world. We aimed to confirm the incidence of perioperative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and associated mortality after surgery. METHODS Analysis of routine electronic health record data from NHS hospitals in England. We extracted data from Hospital Episode Statistics in England describing adult patients undergoing surgery between January 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021. The exposure was SARS-CoV-2 infection defined by International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes. The primary outcome measure was 90 day in-hospital mortality. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Index of Multiple Deprivation, presence of cancer, surgical procedure type and admission acuity. Results are presented as n (%) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS We identified 2 666 978 patients undergoing surgery of whom 28 777 (1.1%) had SARS-CoV-2 infection. In total, 26 364 (1.0%) patients died in hospital. SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a much greater risk of death (SARS-CoV-2: 6153/28 777 [21.4%] vs no SARS-CoV-2: 20 211/2 638 201 [0.8%]; OR=5.7 [95% CI, 5.5-5.9]; P<0.001). Amongst patients undergoing elective surgery, 2412/1 857 586 (0.1%) had SARS-CoV-2, of whom 172/2412 (7.1%) died, compared with 1414/1 857 586 (0.1%) patients without SARS-CoV-2 (OR=25.8 [95% CI, 21.7-30.9]; P<0.001). Amongst patients undergoing emergency surgery, 22 918/582 292 (3.9%) patients had SARS-CoV-2, of whom 5752/22 918 (25.1%) died, compared with 18 060/559 374 (3.4%) patients without SARS-CoV-2 (OR=5.5 [95% CI, 5.3-5.7]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The low incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in NHS surgical pathways suggests current infection prevention and control policies are highly effective. However, the high mortality amongst patients with SARS-CoV-2 suggests these precautions cannot be safely relaxed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T E F Abbott
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - A J Fowler
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - T D Dobbs
- Reconstructive and Regenerative Medicine Group (ReconRegen), Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK; Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastics, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - J Gibson
- Reconstructive and Regenerative Medicine Group (ReconRegen), Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK; Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastics, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - T Shahid
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - P Dias
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - A Akbari
- Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK
| | - I S Whitaker
- Reconstructive and Regenerative Medicine Group (ReconRegen), Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK; Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastics, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - R M Pearse
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Whitmer RA, Gilsanz P, Quesenberry CP, Karter AJ, Lacy ME. Association of Type 1 Diabetes and Hypoglycemic and Hyperglycemic Events and Risk of Dementia. Neurology 2021; 97:e275-e283. [PMID: 34078717 PMCID: PMC8302147 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000012243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether severe hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events are associated with longitudinal dementia risk in older adults with type 1 diabetes. METHODS A longitudinal cohort study followed up 2,821 members of an integrated health care delivery system with type 1 diabetes from 1997 to 2015. Hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events requiring emergency room or hospitalization were abstracted from medical records beginning January 1, 1996, through cohort entry. Participants were followed up for dementia diagnosis through September 30, 2015. Dementia risk was examined with Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age (as time scale), sex, race/ethnicity, hemoglobin A1c, depression, stroke, and nephropathy. RESULTS Among 2,821 older adults (mean age 56 years) with type 1 diabetes, 398 (14%) had a history of severe hypoglycemia, 335 (12%) had severe hyperglycemia, and 87 (3%) had both. Over a mean 6.9 years of follow-up, 153 individuals (5.4%) developed dementia. In fully adjusted models, individuals with hypoglycemic events had 66% greater risk of dementia than those without a hypoglycemic event (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09, 2.53), while those with hyperglycemic events had >2 times the risk (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.24, 3.59) than those without a hyperglycemic event. There was a 6-fold greater risk of dementia in individuals with both severe hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia vs those with neither (HR 6.20, 95% CI 3.02, 12.70). CONCLUSIONS For older individuals with type 1 diabetes, severe hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic events are associated with increased future risk of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Whitmer
- From the Division of Epidemiology (R.A.W.), Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine; Division of Research (R.A.W., P.G., C.P.Q., A.J.K., M.E.L.), Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA; Department of Epidemiology (M.E.L.), University of Kentucky, Lexington; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.E.L.), University of California, San Francisco.
| | - Paola Gilsanz
- From the Division of Epidemiology (R.A.W.), Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine; Division of Research (R.A.W., P.G., C.P.Q., A.J.K., M.E.L.), Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA; Department of Epidemiology (M.E.L.), University of Kentucky, Lexington; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.E.L.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Charles P Quesenberry
- From the Division of Epidemiology (R.A.W.), Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine; Division of Research (R.A.W., P.G., C.P.Q., A.J.K., M.E.L.), Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA; Department of Epidemiology (M.E.L.), University of Kentucky, Lexington; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.E.L.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Andrew J Karter
- From the Division of Epidemiology (R.A.W.), Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine; Division of Research (R.A.W., P.G., C.P.Q., A.J.K., M.E.L.), Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA; Department of Epidemiology (M.E.L.), University of Kentucky, Lexington; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.E.L.), University of California, San Francisco
| | - Mary E Lacy
- From the Division of Epidemiology (R.A.W.), Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine; Division of Research (R.A.W., P.G., C.P.Q., A.J.K., M.E.L.), Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA; Department of Epidemiology (M.E.L.), University of Kentucky, Lexington; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (M.E.L.), University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Machado-Fragua MD, Dugravot A, Dumurgier J, Kivimaki M, Sommerlad A, Landré B, Fayosse A, Sabia S, Singh-Manoux A. Comparison of the predictive accuracy of multiple definitions of cognitive impairment for incident dementia: a 20-year follow-up of the Whitehall II cohort study. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2021; 2:e407-e416. [PMID: 34240063 PMCID: PMC8245324 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00117-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies generally use cognitive assessment done at one timepoint to define cognitive impairment in order to examine conversion to dementia. Our objective was to examine the predictive accuracy and conversion rate of seven alternate definitions of cognitive impairment for dementia. METHODS In this prospective study, we included participants from the Whitehall II cohort study who were assessed for cognitive impairment in 2007-09 and were followed up for clinically diagnosed dementia. Algorithms based on poor cognitive performance (defined using age-specific and sex-specific thresholds, and subsequently thresholds by education or occupation levels) and objective cognitive decline (using data from cognitive assessments in 1997-99, 2002-04, and 2007-09) were used to generate seven alternate definitions of cognitive impairment. We compared predictive accuracy using Royston's R 2, the Akaike information criterion (AIC), sensitivity, specificity, and Harrell's C-statistic. FINDINGS 5687 participants, with a mean age of 65·7 years (SD 5·9) in 2007-09, were included and followed up for a median of 10·5 years (IQR 10·1-10·9). Over follow-up, 270 (4·7%) participants were clinically diagnosed with dementia. Cognitive impairment defined using both cognitive performance and decline had higher hazard ratios (from 5·08 [95% CI 3·82-6·76] to 5·48 [4·13-7·26]) for dementia than did definitions based on cognitive performance alone (from 3·25 [2·52-4·17] to 3·39 [2·64-4·36]) and cognitive decline alone (3·01 [2·37-3·82]). However, all definitions had poor predictive performance (C-statistic ranged from 0·591 [0·565-0·616] to 0·631 [0·601-0·660]), primarily due to low sensitivity (21·6-48·4%). A predictive model containing age, sex, and education without measures of cognitive impairment had better predictive performance (C-statistic 0·783 [0·758-0·809], sensitivity 74·2%, specificity 72·2%) than all seven definitions of cognitive impairment (all p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION These findings suggest that cognitive impairment in early old age might not be useful for dementia prediction, even when it is defined using longitudinal data on cognitive decline and thresholds of poor cognitive performance additionally defined by education or occupation. FUNDING National Institutes of Health, UK Medical Research Council.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos D Machado-Fragua
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Paris, France
| | - Aline Dugravot
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Paris, France
| | - Julien Dumurgier
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Paris, France
- Cognitive Neurology Center, Saint Louis-Lariboisiere-Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Mika Kivimaki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
- Helsinki Institute of Life Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrew Sommerlad
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Benjamin Landré
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Paris, France
| | - Aurore Fayosse
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Paris, France
| | - Séverine Sabia
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Eyles E, Redaniel MT, Purdy S, Tilling K, Ben-Shlomo Y. Associations of GP practice characteristics with the rate of ambulatory care sensitive conditions in people living with dementia in England: an ecological analysis of routine data. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:613. [PMID: 34182996 PMCID: PMC8240405 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06634-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital admissions for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (ACSCs) are potentially avoidable. Dementia is one of the leading chronic conditions in terms of variability in ACSC admissions by general practice, as well as accounting for around a third of UK emergency admissions. METHODS Using Bayesian multilevel linear regression models, we examined the ecological association of organizational characteristics of general practices (ACSC n=7076, non-ACSC n=7046 units) and Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG n=212 units) in relation to ACSC and non-ACSC admissions for people with dementia in England. RESULTS The rate of hospital admissions are variable between GP practices, with deprivation and being admitted from home as risk factors for admission for ACSC and non-ACSC admissions. The budget allocated by the CCG to mental health shows diverging effects for ACSC versus non-ACSC admissions, so it is likely there is some geographic variation. CONCLUSIONS A variety of factors that could explain avoidable admissions for PWD at the practice level were examined; most were equally predictive for avoidable and non-avoidable admissions. However, a high amount of variation found at the practice level, in conjunction with the diverging effects of the CCG mental health budget, implies that guidance may be applied inconsistently, or local services may have differences in referral criteria. This indicates there is potential scope for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Eyles
- The National Institute for Health Research and Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK. .,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 58 Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK.
| | - Maria Theresa Redaniel
- The National Institute for Health Research and Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 58 Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK
| | - Sarah Purdy
- The National Institute for Health Research and Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 58 Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK
| | - Kate Tilling
- The National Institute for Health Research and Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 58 Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK
| | - Yoav Ben-Shlomo
- The National Institute for Health Research and Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, 9th Floor, Whitefriars, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 58 Whiteladies Rd, Bristol, BS8 2PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Gallini A, Jegou D, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Couret A, Bourrel R, Ousset PJ, Fabre D, Andrieu S, Gardette V. Development and Validation of a Model to Identify Alzheimer's Disease and Related Syndromes in Administrative Data. Curr Alzheimer Res 2021; 18:142-156. [PMID: 33882802 DOI: 10.2174/1567205018666210416094639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Administrative data are used in the field of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Syndromes (ADRS), however their performance to identify ADRS is unknown. OBJECTIVE i) To develop and validate a model to identify ADRS prevalent cases in French administrative data (SNDS), ii) to identify factors associated with false negatives. METHODS Retrospective cohort of subjects ≥ 65 years, living in South-Western France, who attended a memory clinic between April and December 2013. Gold standard for ADRS diagnosis was the memory clinic specialized diagnosis. Memory clinics' data were matched to administrative data (drug reimbursements, diagnoses during hospitalizations, registration with costly chronic conditions). Prediction models were developed for 1-year and 3-year periods of administrative data using multivariable logistic regression models. Overall model performance, discrimination, and calibration were estimated and corrected for optimism by resampling. Youden index was used to define ADRS positivity and to estimate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative probabilities. Factors associated with false negatives were identified using multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS 3360 subjects were studied, 52% diagnosed with ADRS by memory clinics. Prediction model based on age, all-cause hospitalization, registration with ADRS as a chronic condition, number of anti-dementia drugs, mention of ADRS during hospitalizations had good discriminative performance (c-statistic: 0.814, sensitivity: 76.0%, specificity: 74.2% for 2013 data). 419 false negatives (24.0%) were younger, had more often ADRS types other than Alzheimer's disease, moderate forms of ADRS, recent diagnosis, and suffered from other comorbidities than true positives. CONCLUSION Administrative data presented acceptable performance for detecting ADRS. External validation studies should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeline Gallini
- CERPOP, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - David Jegou
- CERPOP, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Anaïs Couret
- CERPOP, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Robert Bourrel
- Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Maladie des Travailleurs Salaries (CNAMTS), Echelon Regional du Service Medical Midi-Pyrenees - F31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre-Jean Ousset
- CHU Toulouse, Centre Memoire de Ressources et de Recherches - F31000 Toulouse, France
| | - D Fabre
- CHU Toulouse, Departement D'information Medicale - F31000 Toulouse, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
56
|
Grande G, Vetrano DL, Mazzoleni F, Lovato V, Pata M, Cricelli C, Lapi F. Detection and Prediction of Incident Alzheimer Dementia over a 10-Year or Longer Medical History: A Population-Based Study in Primary Care. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2021; 49:384-389. [PMID: 33242874 DOI: 10.1159/000509379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the crucial role played by general practitioners in the identification and care of people with cognitive impairment, few data are available on how they may improve the early recognition of patients with Alzheimer dementia (AD), especially those with long (i.e., 10 years and longer) medical history. AIMS To investigate the occurrence and the predictors of AD during a 10-year or longer period prior AD diagnosis in primary care patients aged 60 years or older. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cohort study with a nested case-control analysis has been conducted. Data were extracted from the Italian Health Search Database (HSD), an Italian database with primary care data. AD cases have been defined in accordance with the International Classification of Diseases, ninth edition (ICD-9-CM) codes and coupled with the use of anti-dementia drugs. Prevalence and incidence rates of AD have been calculated. To test the association between candidate predictors, being identified in a minimum period of 10 years, and incident cases of AD, we used a multivariate conditional logistic regression model. RESULTS As recorded in the primary care database, AD prevalence among patients aged 60 years or older was 0.8% during 2016, reaching 2.4% among nonagenarians. Overall, 1,889 incident cases of AD have been identified, with an incidence rate as high as 0.09% person-year. Compared with 18,890 matched controls, history of hallucinations, agitation, anxiety, aberrant motor behavior, and memory deficits were positively associated with higher odds of AD (p < 0.001 for all) diagnosis. A previous diagnosis of depression and diabetes and the use of low-dose aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were associated with higher odds of AD (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION Our findings show that, in accordance with primary care records, 1% of patients aged 60 years and older have a diagnosis of AD, with an incident AD diagnosis of 0.1% per year. AD is often under-reported in primary care settings; yet, several predictors identified in this study may support general practitioners to early identify patients at risk of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Grande
- Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Davide L Vetrano
- Aging Research Center, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Geriatrics, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Centro di Medicina dell'Invecchiamento, Fondazione Policlinico "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Claudio Cricelli
- Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Lapi
- Health Search, Italian College of General Practitioners and Primary Care, Florence, Italy,
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Pendlebury ST, Lovett NG, Thomson RJ, Smith SC. Impact of a system-wide multicomponent intervention on administrative diagnostic coding for delirium and other cognitive frailty syndromes: observational prospective study. Clin Med (Lond) 2021; 20:454-464. [PMID: 32934037 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We determined the impact of a system-wide multicomponent intervention to improve recognition and documentation of cognitive frailty syndromes on hospital administrative coding for delirium. METHODS A multicomponent intervention including introduction of structured patient assessment including cognitive/delirium screen, regular audit/feedback and educational seminars was undertaken (2012-17). Sensitivity and specificity of administrative International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) delirium codes for the gold standard of prospectively clinically diagnosed delirium were calculated in consecutive patients admitted to acute medicine over five 8-week cycles (2010-18). RESULTS Among 1,281 consecutive unselected admissions to acute medicine overall (mean / standard deviation age = 70.0/19.2 years; n=615 (48.0%) male), 320 had clinical delirium diagnosis (n=220 delirium only; n=100 delirium on dementia). Sensitivity of delirium coding increased from 12.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6-26.7) in 2010 to 60.2% (95% CI 50.1-69.7; ptrend<0.0001) in 2018 while specificity remained at >99% throughout. CONCLUSION A multicomponent intervention increased sensitivity of hospital administrative diagnostic coding for delirium almost six-fold without increasing the false positive diagnosis rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah T Pendlebury
- Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Oxford, UK and NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicola G Lovett
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Ross J Thomson
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK and Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sarah C Smith
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Alsharif AA, Wei L, Ma T, Man KKC, Lau WCY, Brauer R, Almetwazi M, Howard R, Wong ICK. Prevalence and Incidence of Dementia in People with Diabetes Mellitus. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 75:607-615. [PMID: 32310163 DOI: 10.3233/jad-191115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have shown that an increased risk of dementia is associated with diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE To estimate the prevalence and incidence of dementia in people with diabetes in primary care in the UK. METHODS We conducted a descriptive study using the UK The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. People diagnosed with diabetes from 2000 to 2016 were included in the study. Prevalence and incidence rates of dementia were calculated annually, stratified by age and gender. RESULTS The prevalence of dementia was 0.424% [95% CI (0.420%-0.427%)] in 2000 and 2.508% [95% CI (2.501%-2.515%)] in 2016. The highest prevalence was in those aged 85+ from 2.9% [95% CI (2.890%-2.974%)] in 2000 to 11.3% [95% CI (11.285%-11.384%)] in 2016. The incidence of dementia increased 3.7 times, from 0.181 cases per 100 persons [95% CI (0.179-0.183)] in 2000 to 0.683 cases per 100 persons [95% CI (0.679-0.686)] in 2016, respectively. Women had a higher prevalence and incidence of dementia than men 3.138% [95% CI (3.127%-3.150%)] versus 2.014% [95% CI (2.006%-2.022%)] and 0.820 [95% CI (0.814-0.826)] versus 0.576 cases per 100 persons [95% CI (0.571-0.580)] in 2016, respectively. CONCLUSION There was a trend of increasing prevalence and incidence of dementia in people with diabetes over the period of 2000 to 2016. This study adds to the evidence on dementia prevalence and incidence, particularly in the diabetic population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alaa A Alsharif
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Princess Norah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom
| | - Li Wei
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tiantian Ma
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kenneth K C Man
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom.,Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wallis C Y Lau
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom.,Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ruth Brauer
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mansour Almetwazi
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rob Howard
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian C K Wong
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom.,Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Kumaradev S, Fayosse A, Dugravot A, Dumurgier J, Roux C, Kivimäki M, Singh-Manoux A, Sabia S. Timeline of pain before dementia diagnosis: a 27-year follow-up study. Pain 2021; 162:1578-1585. [PMID: 33003109 PMCID: PMC7985036 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study examines the importance of length of follow-up on the association between pain and incident dementia. Further objective was to characterize pain trajectories in the 27 years preceding dementia diagnosis and compare them with those among persons free of dementia during the same period. Pain intensity and pain interference (averaged as total pain) were measured on 9 occasions (1991-2016) using the Short-Form 36 Questionnaire amongst 9046 (women = 31.4%) dementia-free adults aged 40 to 64 years in 1991; 567 dementia cases were recorded between 1991 and 2019. Cox regression was used to assess the association between pain measures at different time points and incident dementia and mixed models to assess pain trajectories preceding dementia diagnosis or end point for dementia-free participants. Results from Cox regression showed moderate/severe compared with mild/no total pain, pain intensity, and pain interference not to be associated with dementia when the mean follow-up was 25.0, 19.6, 14.5, or 10.0 years. These associations were evident for a mean follow-up of 6.2 years: for total pain (hazard ratio = 1.72; 95% confidence intervals = 1.28-2.33), pain intensity (1.41; 1.04-1.92), and pain interference (1.80; 1.30-2.49). These associations were stronger when the mean follow-up for incidence of dementia was 3.2 years. Twenty-seven-year pain trajectories differed between dementia cases and noncases with small differences in total pain and pain interference evident 16 years before dementia diagnosis (difference in the total pain score = 1.4, 95% confidence intervals = 0.1-2.7) and rapidly increasing closer to diagnosis. In conclusion, these findings suggest that pain is a correlate or prodromal symptom rather than a cause of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushmithadev Kumaradev
- Inserm 1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Aurore Fayosse
- Inserm 1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Aline Dugravot
- Inserm 1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Julien Dumurgier
- Inserm 1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christian Roux
- Inserm 1153, Clinical Epidemiology Applied to Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Helsinki Institute of Life Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Inserm 1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Séverine Sabia
- Inserm 1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Barbiellini Amidei C, Fayosse A, Dumurgier J, Machado-Fragua MD, Tabak AG, van Sloten T, Kivimäki M, Dugravot A, Sabia S, Singh-Manoux A. Association Between Age at Diabetes Onset and Subsequent Risk of Dementia. JAMA 2021; 325:1640-1649. [PMID: 33904867 PMCID: PMC8080220 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.4001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Trends in type 2 diabetes show an increase in prevalence along with younger age of onset. While vascular complications of early-onset type 2 diabetes are known, the associations with dementia remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To determine whether younger age at diabetes onset is more strongly associated with incidence of dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based study in the UK, the Whitehall II prospective cohort study, established in 1985-1988, with clinical examinations in 1991-1993, 1997-1999, 2002-2004, 2007-2009, 2012-2013, and 2015-2016, and linkage to electronic health records until March 2019. The date of final follow-up was March 31, 2019. EXPOSURES Type 2 diabetes, defined as a fasting blood glucose level greater than or equal to 126 mg/dL at clinical examination, physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes, use of diabetes medication, or hospital record of diabetes between 1985 and 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Incident dementia ascertained through linkage to electronic health records. RESULTS Among 10 095 participants (67.3% men; aged 35-55 years in 1985-1988), a total of 1710 cases of diabetes and 639 cases of dementia were recorded over a median follow-up of 31.7 years. Dementia rates per 1000 person-years were 8.9 in participants without diabetes at age 70 years, and rates were 10.0 per 1000 person-years for participants with diabetes onset up to 5 years earlier, 13.0 for 6 to 10 years earlier, and 18.3 for more than 10 years earlier. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, compared with participants without diabetes at age 70, the hazard ratio (HR) of dementia in participants with diabetes onset more than 10 years earlier was 2.12 (95% CI, 1.50-3.00), 1.49 (95% CI, 0.95-2.32) for diabetes onset 6 to 10 years earlier, and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.70-1.76) for diabetes onset 5 years earlier or less; linear trend test (P < .001) indicated a graded association between age at onset of type 2 diabetes and dementia. At age 70, every 5-year younger age at onset of type 2 diabetes was significantly associated with an HR of dementia of 1.24 (95% CI, 1.06-1.46) in analyses adjusted for sociodemographic factors, health behaviors, and health-related measures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this longitudinal cohort study with a median follow-up of 31.7 years, younger age at onset of diabetes was significantly associated with higher risk of subsequent dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Barbiellini Amidei
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France
- Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Aurore Fayosse
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France
| | - Julien Dumurgier
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France
- Cognitive Neurology Center, Lariboisière – Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marcos D. Machado-Fragua
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France
| | - Adam G. Tabak
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, United Kingdom
- Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Public Health, Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thomas van Sloten
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Department of Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Aline Dugravot
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France
| | - Séverine Sabia
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Sabia S, Fayosse A, Dumurgier J, van Hees VT, Paquet C, Sommerlad A, Kivimäki M, Dugravot A, Singh-Manoux A. Association of sleep duration in middle and old age with incidence of dementia. Nat Commun 2021; 12:2289. [PMID: 33879784 PMCID: PMC8058039 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22354-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 244] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Sleep dysregulation is a feature of dementia but it remains unclear whether sleep duration prior to old age is associated with dementia incidence. Using data from 7959 participants of the Whitehall II study, we examined the association between sleep duration and incidence of dementia (521 diagnosed cases) using a 25-year follow-up. Here we report higher dementia risk associated with a sleep duration of six hours or less at age 50 and 60, compared with a normal (7 h) sleep duration, although this was imprecisely estimated for sleep duration at age 70 (hazard ratios (HR) 1.22 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.48), 1.37 (1.10-1.72), and 1.24 (0.98-1.57), respectively). Persistent short sleep duration at age 50, 60, and 70 compared to persistent normal sleep duration was also associated with a 30% increased dementia risk independently of sociodemographic, behavioural, cardiometabolic, and mental health factors. These findings suggest that short sleep duration in midlife is associated with an increased risk of late-onset dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Séverine Sabia
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Paris, France.
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Aurore Fayosse
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Paris, France
| | - Julien Dumurgier
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1144, Cognitive Neurology Center, GHU APHP Nord Lariboisière - Fernand Widal Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Claire Paquet
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1144, Cognitive Neurology Center, GHU APHP Nord Lariboisière - Fernand Widal Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Andrew Sommerlad
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
- Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aline Dugravot
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Paris, France
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Trapp W, Röder S, Heid A, Billman P, Daiber S, Hajak G. Sensitivity and specificity of the Bamberg Dementia Screening Test's (BDST) full and short versions: brief screening instruments for geriatric patients that are suitable for infectious environments. BMC Med 2021; 19:65. [PMID: 33663471 PMCID: PMC7934397 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-01927-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, many patients suffering from dementia do not have a diagnosis when admitted to geriatric hospitals. This is the case despite an increased risk of complications affecting the length of stay and outcome. Unfortunately, many dementia screening tests cannot be used on geriatric inpatients, who are often bedridden. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of a small battery of bedside tasks that require minimal vision and fine motor skills in patients with suspected dementia. METHODS In this prospective study, the Bamberg Dementia Screening Test (BDST) was administered to a consecutive series of 1295 patients referred for neuropsychological testing. The diagnosis of dementia was confirmed in 1159 and excluded in 136 patients. Sensitivity and specificity for the first subtest (ultra-short form), the first two subtests (short form), and the total score of the BDST were obtained via receiver operating characteristic curves and compared with the sensitivity and specificity values of the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE). RESULTS The overall diagnostic quality of the BDST was superior to the MMSE for mild Alzheimer's dementia (sensitivity and specificity = .94 (95% CI .92 to .96) and .82 (95% CI .75 to .88) vs. .79 (95% CI .76 to .83) and .88 (95% CI .82 to .93)) as well as for other subtypes of mild dementia (sensitivity and specificity = .91 (95% CI .88 to .94) and .82 (95% CI .75 to .88) vs. .72 (95% CI .67 to .76) and .88 (95% CI .82 to .93)). Even the short form of the BDST was comparable to the MMSE regarding sensitivity and specificity. For moderate dementia, it was possible to identify dementia cases with sufficient and excellent diagnostic quality by using the ultra-short and the short form. CONCLUSIONS The BDST is able to detect dementia in geriatric hospital settings. If the adaptive algorithm is used, administration time can be reduced to less than 2 min in most cases. Because no test materials have to be exchanged, this test is particularly suitable for infectious environments where contact between the examiner and the person being tested should be minimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Trapp
- Department of Psychiatry, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, St-.Getreu-Straße 18, 96049, Bamberg, Germany. .,Department of Physiological Psychology, Otto-Friedrich University Bamberg, Markusplatz 3, 96045, Bamberg, Germany.
| | - Susanne Röder
- Department of Psychiatry, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, St-.Getreu-Straße 18, 96049, Bamberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Heid
- Department of Psychiatry, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, St-.Getreu-Straße 18, 96049, Bamberg, Germany
| | - Pia Billman
- Department of Psychiatry, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, St-.Getreu-Straße 18, 96049, Bamberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Daiber
- Department of Geriatric Rehabilitation, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, St-.Getreu-Straße 18, 96049, Bamberg, Germany
| | - Göran Hajak
- Department of Psychiatry, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, St-.Getreu-Straße 18, 96049, Bamberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although age and pre-existent dementia are robust risk factors for developing delirium, evidence for patients older than 90 years is lacking. Therefore, this study assesses the delirium prevalence rates and sequelae in this age group. METHOD Based on a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-5, Delirium Observation screening scale (DOS), and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) construct, in this prospective cohort study, the prevalence rates and sequelae of delirium were determined in 428 patients older than 90 years by simple logistic regressions and corresponding odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS The overall prevalence delirium rate was 45.2%, with a wide range depending upon specialty: intermediate and intensive care services (83.1%), plastic surgery and palliative care (75%), neurology (72%), internal medicine (69%) vs. dermatology (26.5%), and angiology (14.5%). Delirium occurred irrespective of age and gender; however, pre-existent dementia was the strongest delirium predictor (OR 36.05). Delirious patients were less commonly admitted from home (OR 0.47) than from assisted living (OR 2.24), indicating functional impairment. These patients were more severely ill, as indicated by emergency (OR 3.25) vs. elective admission (OR 0.3), requirement for intensive care management (OR 2.12) and ventilation (OR 5.56-8.33). At discharge, one-third did not return home (OR 0.22) and almost half were transferred to assisted living (OR 2.63), or deceased (OR 47.76). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS At age older than 90 years, the prevalence and sequelae of delirium are substantial. In particular, functional impairment and pre-existent dementia predicted delirium and subsequently, the loss of independence and death were imminent.
Collapse
|
64
|
Sommerlad A, Sabia S, Livingston G, Kivimäki M, Lewis G, Singh-Manoux A. Leisure activity participation and risk of dementia: An 18-year follow-up of the Whitehall II Study. Neurology 2020; 95:e2803-e2815. [PMID: 33115773 PMCID: PMC7734721 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000010966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that leisure activity participation is associated with lower dementia risk, we examined the association between participation in leisure activities and incident dementia in a large longitudinal study with average 18-year follow-up. METHODS We used data from 8,280 participants of the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. A 13-item scale assessed leisure activity participation in 1997-1999, 2002-2004, and 2007-2009, and incidence of dementia (n cases = 360, mean age at diagnosis 76.2 years, incidence rate 2.4 per 1,000 person-years) was ascertained from 3 comprehensive national registers with follow-up until March 2017. Primary analyses were based on complete cases (n = 6,050, n cases = 247) and sensitivity analyses used multiple imputation for missing data. RESULTS Participation in leisure activities at mean age 55.8 (1997-1999 assessment), with 18.0-year follow-up, was not associated with dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.79-1.06]), but those with higher participation at mean age 65.7 (2007-2009 assessment) were less likely to develop dementia with 8.3-year follow-up (HR 0.82 [0.69-0.98]). No specific type of leisure activity was consistently associated with dementia risk. Decline in participation between 1997-1999 and 2007-2009 was associated with subsequent dementia risk. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that participation in leisure activities declines in the preclinical phase of dementia; there was no robust evidence for a protective association between leisure activity participation and dementia. Future research should investigate the sociobehavioral, cognitive, and neurobiological drivers of decline in leisure activity participation to determine potential approaches to improving social participation of those developing dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Sommerlad
- From the Division of Psychiatry (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis) and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (S.S., M.K., A.-S.M.), University College London; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis), London, UK; Université de Paris (S.S., A.-S.M.), Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, France; and Clinicum and Helsinki Institute of Life Science (M.K.), University of Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Séverine Sabia
- From the Division of Psychiatry (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis) and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (S.S., M.K., A.-S.M.), University College London; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis), London, UK; Université de Paris (S.S., A.-S.M.), Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, France; and Clinicum and Helsinki Institute of Life Science (M.K.), University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Gill Livingston
- From the Division of Psychiatry (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis) and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (S.S., M.K., A.-S.M.), University College London; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis), London, UK; Université de Paris (S.S., A.-S.M.), Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, France; and Clinicum and Helsinki Institute of Life Science (M.K.), University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- From the Division of Psychiatry (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis) and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (S.S., M.K., A.-S.M.), University College London; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis), London, UK; Université de Paris (S.S., A.-S.M.), Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, France; and Clinicum and Helsinki Institute of Life Science (M.K.), University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Glyn Lewis
- From the Division of Psychiatry (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis) and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (S.S., M.K., A.-S.M.), University College London; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis), London, UK; Université de Paris (S.S., A.-S.M.), Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, France; and Clinicum and Helsinki Institute of Life Science (M.K.), University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- From the Division of Psychiatry (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis) and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (S.S., M.K., A.-S.M.), University College London; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (A.S., G. Livingston, G. Lewis), London, UK; Université de Paris (S.S., A.-S.M.), Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, France; and Clinicum and Helsinki Institute of Life Science (M.K.), University of Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Impact of Dementia on Health Service Use in the Last 2 Years of Life for Women with Other Chronic Conditions. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21:1651-1657.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
66
|
Sipilä PN, Lindbohm JV, Singh-Manoux A, Shipley MJ, Kiiskinen T, Havulinna AS, Vahtera J, Nyberg ST, Pentti J, Kivimäki M. Long-term risk of dementia following hospitalization due to physical diseases: A multicohort study. Alzheimers Dement 2020; 16:1686-1695. [PMID: 32886434 PMCID: PMC7754402 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Conventional risk factors targeted by prevention (e.g., low education, smoking, and obesity) are associated with a 1.2‐ to 2‐fold increased risk of dementia. It is unclear whether having a physical disease is an equally important risk factor for dementia. Methods In this exploratory multicohort study of 283,414 community‐dwelling participants, we examined 22 common hospital‐treated physical diseases as risk factors for dementia. Results During a median follow‐up of 19 years, a total of 3416 participants developed dementia. Those who had erysipelas (hazard ratio = 1.82; 95% confidence interval = 1.53 to 2.17), hypothyroidism (1.94; 1.59 to 2.38), myocardial infarction (1.41; 1.20 to 1.64), ischemic heart disease (1.32; 1.18 to 1.49), cerebral infarction (2.44; 2.14 to 2.77), duodenal ulcers (1.88; 1.42 to 2.49), gastritis and duodenitis (1.82; 1.46 to 2.27), or osteoporosis (2.38; 1.75 to 3.23) were at a significantly increased risk of dementia. These associations were not explained by conventional risk factors or reverse causation. Discussion In addition to conventional risk factors, several physical diseases may increase the long‐term risk of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pyry N Sipilä
- Clinicum, Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joni V Lindbohm
- Clinicum, Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.,INSERM U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Martin J Shipley
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tuomo Kiiskinen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aki S Havulinna
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jussi Vahtera
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Solja T Nyberg
- Clinicum, Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jaana Pentti
- Clinicum, Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- Clinicum, Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Kivimäki M, Singh-Manoux A, Batty GD, Sabia S, Sommerlad A, Floud S, Jokela M, Vahtera J, Beydoun MA, Suominen SB, Koskinen A, Väänänen A, Goldberg M, Zins M, Alfredsson L, Westerholm PJM, Knutsson A, Nyberg ST, Sipilä PN, Lindbohm JV, Pentti J, Livingston G, Ferrie JE, Strandberg T. Association of Alcohol-Induced Loss of Consciousness and Overall Alcohol Consumption With Risk for Dementia. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2016084. [PMID: 32902651 PMCID: PMC7489835 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Evidence on alcohol consumption as a risk factor for dementia usually relates to overall consumption. The role of alcohol-induced loss of consciousness is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To examine the risk of future dementia associated with overall alcohol consumption and alcohol-induced loss of consciousness in a population of current drinkers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Seven cohort studies from the UK, France, Sweden, and Finland (IPD-Work consortium) including 131 415 participants were examined. At baseline (1986-2012), participants were aged 18 to 77 years, reported alcohol consumption, and were free of diagnosed dementia. Dementia was examined during a mean follow-up of 14.4 years (range, 12.3-30.1). Data analysis was conducted from November 17, 2019, to May 23, 2020. EXPOSURES Self-reported overall consumption and loss of consciousness due to alcohol consumption were assessed at baseline. Two thresholds were used to define heavy overall consumption: greater than 14 units (U) (UK definition) and greater than 21 U (US definition) per week. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Dementia and alcohol-related disorders to 2016 were ascertained from linked electronic health records. RESULTS Of the 131 415 participants (mean [SD] age, 43.0 [10.4] years; 80 344 [61.1%] women), 1081 individuals (0.8%) developed dementia. After adjustment for potential confounders, the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.98-1.37) for consuming greater than 14 vs 1 to 14 U of alcohol per week and 1.22 (95% CI, 1.01-1.48) for greater than 21 vs 1 to 21 U/wk. Of the 96 591 participants with data on loss of consciousness, 10 004 individuals (10.4%) reported having lost consciousness due to alcohol consumption in the past 12 months. The association between loss of consciousness and dementia was observed in men (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.77-4.63) and women (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.34-3.25) during the first 10 years of follow-up (HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.78-4.15), after excluding the first 10 years of follow-up (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.16-2.99), and for early-onset (<65 y: HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.46-3.34) and late-onset (≥65 y: HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.38-3.66) dementia, Alzheimer disease (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.28-3.07), and dementia with features of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR, 4.18; 95% CI, 1.86-9.37). The association with dementia was not explained by 14 other alcohol-related conditions. With moderate drinkers (1-14 U/wk) who had not lost consciousness as the reference group, the HR for dementia was twice as high in participants who reported having lost consciousness, whether their mean weekly consumption was moderate (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.42-3.37) or heavy (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.57-3.54). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that alcohol-induced loss of consciousness, irrespective of overall alcohol consumption, is associated with a subsequent increase in the risk of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, INSERM U1153, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - G. David Batty
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Oregon State University School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Corvallis, Oregon
| | - Séverine Sabia
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, INSERM U1153, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Andrew Sommerlad
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Floud
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Markus Jokela
- Department of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jussi Vahtera
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Centre for Population Health Research, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - May A. Beydoun
- Laboratory of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sakari B. Suominen
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- University of Skövde School of Health and Education, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Aki Koskinen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ari Väänänen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marcel Goldberg
- Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, INSERM UMS 011, Villejuif, France
| | - Marie Zins
- Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, INSERM UMS 011, Villejuif, France
| | - Lars Alfredsson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Anders Knutsson
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
| | - Solja T. Nyberg
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pyry N. Sipilä
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joni V. Lindbohm
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jaana Pentti
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jane E. Ferrie
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Timo Strandberg
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Mansour H, Mueller C, Davis KAS, Burton A, Shetty H, Hotopf M, Osborn D, Stewart R, Sommerlad A. Severe mental illness diagnosis in English general hospitals 2006-2017: A registry linkage study. PLoS Med 2020; 17:e1003306. [PMID: 32941435 PMCID: PMC7498001 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The higher mortality rates in people with severe mental illness (SMI) may be partly due to inadequate integration of physical and mental healthcare. Accurate recording of SMI during hospital admissions has the potential to facilitate integrated care including tailoring of treatment to account for comorbidities. We therefore aimed to investigate the sensitivity of SMI recording within general hospitals, changes in diagnostic accuracy over time, and factors associated with accurate recording. METHODS AND FINDINGS We undertook a cohort study of 13,786 adults with SMI diagnosed during 2006-2017, using data from a large secondary mental healthcare database as reference standard, linked to English national records for 45,706 emergency hospital admissions. We examined general hospital record sensitivity across patients' subsequent hospital records, for each subsequent emergency admission, and at different levels of diagnostic precision. We analyzed time trends during the study period and used logistic regression to examine sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with psychiatric recording accuracy, with multiple imputation for missing data. Sensitivity for recording of SMI as any mental health diagnosis was 76.7% (95% CI 76.0-77.4). Category-level sensitivity (e.g., proportion of individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (F20-29) who received any F20-29 diagnosis in hospital records) was 56.4% (95% CI 55.4-57.4) for schizophrenia spectrum disorder and 49.7% (95% CI 48.1-51.3) for bipolar affective disorder. Sensitivity for SMI recording in emergency admissions increased from 47.8% (95% CI 43.1-52.5) in 2006 to 75.4% (95% CI 68.3-81.4) in 2017 (ptrend < 0.001). Minority ethnicity, being married, and having better mental and physical health were associated with less accurate diagnostic recording. The main limitation of our study is the potential for misclassification of diagnosis in the reference-standard mental healthcare data. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that there have been improvements in recording of SMI diagnoses, but concerning under-recording, especially in minority ethnic groups, persists. Training in culturally sensitive diagnosis, expansion of liaison psychiatry input in general hospitals, and improved data sharing between physical and mental health services may be required to reduce inequalities in diagnostic practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Mansour
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Christoph Mueller
- King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katrina A. S. Davis
- King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Burton
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Hitesh Shetty
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Hotopf
- King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Stewart
- King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, United Kingdom
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Sommerlad
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Brayne C, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, Cooper C, Costafreda SG, Dias A, Fox N, Gitlin LN, Howard R, Kales HC, Kivimäki M, Larson EB, Ogunniyi A, Orgeta V, Ritchie K, Rockwood K, Sampson EL, Samus Q, Schneider LS, Selbæk G, Teri L, Mukadam N. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet 2020; 396:413-446. [PMID: 32738937 PMCID: PMC7392084 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30367-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4245] [Impact Index Per Article: 1061.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Jonathan Huntley
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Sommerlad
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David Ames
- National Ageing Research Institute and Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Sube Banerjee
- Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Carol Brayne
- Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alistair Burns
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jiska Cohen-Mansfield
- Department of Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Heczeg Institute on Aging, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Minerva Center for Interdisciplinary Study of End of Life, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sergi G Costafreda
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Amit Dias
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Goa Medical College, Goa, India
| | - Nick Fox
- Dementia Research Centre, UK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, UK; Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Laura N Gitlin
- Center for Innovative Care in Aging, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MA, USA
| | - Robert Howard
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Helen C Kales
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, UC Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Eric B Larson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Vasiliki Orgeta
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karen Ritchie
- Inserm, Unit 1061, Neuropsychiatry: Epidemiological and Clinical Research, La Colombière Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Centre for the Health Care of Elderly People, Geriatric Medicine Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Elizabeth L Sampson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Barnet, Enfield, and Haringey Mental Health Trust, London, UK
| | - Quincy Samus
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MA, USA
| | - Lon S Schneider
- Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioural Sciences and Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Geir Selbæk
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Geriatric Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Linda Teri
- Department Psychosocial and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Naaheed Mukadam
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
The prevalence rates and adversities of delirium: Too common and disadvantageous. Palliat Support Care 2020; 19:161-169. [DOI: 10.1017/s1478951520000632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveThe prevalence rates and adversities of delirium have not yet been systematically evaluated and are based on selected populations, limited sample sizes, and pooled studies. Therefore, this study assesses the prevalence rates and outcome of and odds ratios for managing services for delirium.MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) 5, the Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) scale, and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) construct, 28,118 patients from 35 managing services were included, and the prevalence rates and adverse outcomes were determined by simple logistic regressions and their corresponding odds ratios (ORs).ResultsDelirious patients were older, admitted from institutions (OR 3.44–5.2), admitted as emergencies (OR 1.87), hospitalized twice longer, and discharged, transferred to institutions (OR 5.47–6.6) rather than home (OR 0.1), or deceased (OR 43.88). The rate of undiagnosed delirium was 84.2%. The highest prevalence rates were recorded in the intensive care units (47.1–84.2%, pooled 67.9%); in the majority of medical services, rates ranged from 20% to 40% (pooled 26.2%), except, at both ends, palliative care (55.9%), endocrinology (8%), and rheumatology (4.4%). Conversely, in surgery and its related services, prevalence rates were lower (pooled 13.1%), except for cardio- and neurosurgical services (53.3% and 46.4%); the lowest prevalence rate was recorded in obstetrics (2%).Significance of resultsDelirium remains underdiagnosed, and novel screening approaches are required. Furthermore, this study identified the impact of delirium on patients, determined the prevalence rates for 32 services, and elucidated the association between individual services and delirium.
Collapse
|
71
|
Welberry HJ, Brodaty H, Hsu B, Barbieri S, Jorm LR. Measuring dementia incidence within a cohort of 267,153 older Australians using routinely collected linked administrative data. Sci Rep 2020; 10:8781. [PMID: 32472058 PMCID: PMC7260191 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65273-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
To estimate dementia incidence rates using Australian administrative datasets and compare the characteristics of people identified with dementia across different datasets. This data linkage study used a cohort of 267,153 from the Australian 45 and Up Study. Participants completed a survey in 2006-2009 and subsequent dementia was identified through pharmaceutical claims, hospitalisations, aged care eligibility assessments, care needs at residential aged care entry and death certificates. Age-specific, and age-standardised incidence rates, incidence rate ratios and survival from first dementia diagnosis were estimated. Estimated age-standardised dementia incidence rates using all linked datasets was 16.8 cases per 1000 person years for people aged 65+. Comparing incidence rates to the global published rates suggested 77% of cases were identified but this varied by age with highest coverage among those aged 80-84 years (92%). Incidence rate ratios were inconsistent across datasets for: sex, socio-economic disadvantage, size of support network, marital status, functional limitations and diabetes. Median survival from first dementia diagnosis ranged from 1.80 years in the care needs dataset to 3.74 years in the pharmaceutical claims dataset. Characteristics of people identified with dementia in different administrative datasets reflect the factors that drive interaction with specific services; this may introduce bias in observational studies using a single data-source to identify dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi J Welberry
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Benjumin Hsu
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sebastiano Barbieri
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louisa R Jorm
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Fayosse A, Nguyen DP, Dugravot A, Dumurgier J, Tabak AG, Kivimäki M, Sabia S, Singh-Manoux A. Risk prediction models for dementia: role of age and cardiometabolic risk factors. BMC Med 2020; 18:107. [PMID: 32423410 PMCID: PMC7236124 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01578-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) risk score is the only currently available midlife risk score for dementia. We compared CAIDE to Framingham cardiovascular Risk Score (FRS) and FINDRISC diabetes score as predictors of dementia and assessed the role of age in their associations with dementia. We then examined whether these risk scores were associated with dementia in those free of cardiometabolic disease over the follow-up. METHODS A total of 7553 participants, 39-63 years in 1991-1993, were followed for cardiometabolic disease (diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke) and dementia (N = 318) for a mean 23.5 years. Cox regression was used to model associations of age at baseline, CAIDE, FRS, and FINDRISC risk scores with incident dementia. Predictive performance was assessed using Royston's R2, Harrell's C-index, Akaike's information criterion (AIC), the Greenwood-Nam-D'Agostino (GND) test, and calibration-in-the-large. Age effect was also assessed by stratifying analyses by age group. Finally, in multistate models, we examined whether cardiometabolic risk scores were associated with incidence of dementia in persons who remained free of cardiometabolic disease over the follow-up. RESULTS Among the risk scores, the predictive performance of CAIDE (C-statistic = 0.714; 95% CI 0.690-0.739) and FRS (C-statistic = 0.719; 95% CI 0.693-0.745) scores was better than FINDRISC (C-statistic = 0.630; 95% CI 0.602-0.659); p < 0.001), AIC difference > 3; R2 32.5%, 32.0%, and 12.5%, respectively. When the effect of age in these risk scores was removed by drawing data on risk scores at age 55, 60, and 65 years, the association with dementia in all age groups remained for FRS and FINDRISC, but not for CAIDE. Only FRS at age 55 was associated with dementia in persons who remained free of cardiometabolic diseases prior to dementia diagnosis while no such association was observed at older ages for any risk score. CONCLUSIONS Our analyses of CAIDE, FRS, and FINDRISC show the FRS in midlife to predict dementia as well as the CAIDE risk score, its predictive value being also evident among individuals who did not develop cardiometabolic events. The importance of age in the predictive performance of all three risk scores highlights the need for the development of multivariable risk scores in midlife for primary prevention of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurore Fayosse
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 10 avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Dinh-Phong Nguyen
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 10 avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Aline Dugravot
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 10 avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Julien Dumurgier
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 10 avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Adam G Tabak
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 10 avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France.,First Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Séverine Sabia
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 10 avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 10 avenue de Verdun, 75010, Paris, France. .,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Walesby KE, Exeter DJ, Gibb S, Wood PC, Starr JM, Russ TC. Prevalence and geographical variation of dementia in New Zealand from 2012 to 2015: Brief report utilising routinely collected data within the Integrated Data Infrastructure. Australas J Ageing 2020; 39:297-304. [PMID: 32394527 DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There are no national dementia epidemiological studies using New Zealand (NZ) data. NZ routinely collects health-care data within the Integrated Data Infrastructure (IDI). The study objectives were to 1) investigate late-onset dementia estimates using the IDI between 2012-2015 and compare these with 2) published estimates, and 3) variations between North and South Islands and ethnicity. METHODS A population-based, retrospective cohort design was applied to routinely collected de-identified health/administrative IDI data. Dementia was defined by ICD-10-AM dementia codes or anti-dementia drugs. RESULTS Approximately 2% of those aged ≥60 years had dementia, lower than published estimates. Dementia was higher in North Island; in 80- to 89-year-olds; among the Māori population when age-standardised, and 9% of all dementia cases had >1 dementia sub-type. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first study ascertaining dementia estimates using NZ's whole-of-population IDI data. Estimates were lower than existing NZ estimates, for several reasons. Further work is required, including expanding IDI data sets, to develop future estimates that better reflect NZ's diverse population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Elizabeth Walesby
- Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Daniel John Exeter
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sheree Gibb
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Philip Clive Wood
- North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Auckland Dementia Prevention Research Clinic, Auckland, New Zealand.,Healthy Ageing, Ministry of Health New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - John Michael Starr
- Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tom Charles Russ
- Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Dementia Prevention, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Division of Psychiatry, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Ogliari G, Turner Z, Khalique J, Gordon AL, Gladman JRF, Chadborn NH. Ethnic disparity in access to the memory assessment service between South Asian and white British older adults in the United Kingdom: A cohort study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020; 35:507-515. [PMID: 31943347 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Equality of access to memory assessment services by older adults from ethnic minorities is both an ethical imperative and a public health priority. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether timeliness of access to memory assessment service differs between older people of white British and South Asian ethnicity. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort. SETTING Nottingham Memory Study; outpatient secondary mental healthcare. SUBJECTS Our cohort comprised 3654 white British and 32 South Asian older outpatients. METHODS The criterion for timely access to memory assessment service was set at 90 days from referral. Relationships between ethnicity and likelihood of timely access to memory assessment service were analysed using binary logistic regression. Analyses were adjusted for socio-demographic factors, deprivation and previous access to rapid response mental health services. RESULTS Among white British outpatients, 2272 people (62.2%) achieved timely access to memory assessment service. Among South Asian outpatients, fourteen people (43.8%) achieved timely access to memory assessment service. After full adjustment, South Asian outpatients had a 0.47-fold reduced likelihood of timely access, compared to white British outpatients (odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.95, P value = .035). The difference became non-significant when restricting analyses to outpatients reporting British nationality or English as first language. Older age, lower index of deprivation and previous access to rapid response mental health services were associated with reduced likelihood of timely access, while gender was not. CONCLUSIONS In a UK mental healthcare service, older South Asian outpatients are less likely to access dementia diagnostic services in a timely way, compared to white British outpatients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Ogliari
- Department of Medicine for the Elderly, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.,Clinical Development Unit, Medical Directorate, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Zoë Turner
- Clinical Development Unit, Medical Directorate, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Javid Khalique
- Independent Community Engagement Consultant, Nottingham, UK
| | - Adam L Gordon
- Department of Medicine for the Elderly, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.,School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) East Midlands, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - John R F Gladman
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) East Midlands, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Neil H Chadborn
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) East Midlands, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Singh-Manoux A, Yerramalla MS, Sabia S, Kivimäki M, Fayosse A, Dugravot A, Dumurgier J. Association of big-5 personality traits with cognitive impairment and dementia: a longitudinal study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2020; 74:799-805. [PMID: 32303596 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2019-213014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Personality traits have been liked to cognitive outcomes such as dementia, but whether these associations are robust to the effects of third variables remains the subject of debate. We examined the role of socioeconomic status, depression (history and depressive symptoms), health behaviours and chronic conditions in the association of the big-5 personality traits with cognitive performance, cognitive impairment and incidence of dementia. METHODS Data on 6135 persons (30% women), aged 60-83 years in 2012/13, are drawn from the Whitehall II Study. Participants responded to the 26-item Midlife Development Inventory to assess personality traits (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism), underwent cognitive testing in 2012/13 and 2015/16 and were followed for incidence of dementia (N=231) until 2019. RESULTS Logistic regression, adjusted for sociodemographic factors, suggested a cross-sectional association with cognitive impairment for four of the five traits but only neuroticism was associated with incident cognitive impairment. All associations were completely attenuated when the analyses were adjusted for depression. Cox regression (mean follow-up: 6.18 years) adjusted for sociodemographic variables showed higher conscientiousness (HR per SD increment=0.72; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.81) and extraversion (HR=0.85; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97) to be associated with lower dementia risk; higher neuroticism (HR=1.32; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.49) was associated with increased risk. Further adjustment for depression led to only conscientiousness retaining an association with dementia (HR=0.81; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.96), which was robust to adjustment for all covariates (HR=0.84; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.91; P=0.001). CONCLUSION Our results show that only conscientiousness has an association with incidence of dementia that is not attributable to socioeconomic status or depression. The association of neuroticism with dementia was explained by depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Singh-Manoux
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France .,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - M S Yerramalla
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France
| | - S Sabia
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Fayosse
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France
| | - A Dugravot
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, Inserm U1153, Paris, France
| | - J Dumurgier
- Cognitive Neurology Center, Saint Louis -Lariboisiere - Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP; Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Kivimäki M, Batty GD, Pentti J, Shipley MJ, Sipilä PN, Nyberg ST, Suominen SB, Oksanen T, Stenholm S, Virtanen M, Marmot MG, Singh-Manoux A, Brunner EJ, Lindbohm JV, Ferrie JE, Vahtera J. Association between socioeconomic status and the development of mental and physical health conditions in adulthood: a multi-cohort study. Lancet Public Health 2020; 5:e140-e149. [PMID: 32007134 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30248-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 286] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Socioeconomic disadvantage is a risk factor for many diseases. We characterised cascades of these conditions by using a data-driven approach to examine the association between socioeconomic status and temporal sequences in the development of 56 common diseases and health conditions. METHODS In this multi-cohort study, we used data from two Finnish prospective cohort studies: the Health and Social Support study and the Finnish Public Sector study. Our pooled prospective primary analysis data comprised 109 246 Finnish adults aged 17-77 years at study entry. We captured socioeconomic status using area deprivation and education at baseline (1998-2013). Participants were followed up for health conditions diagnosed according to the WHO International Classification of Diseases until 2016 using linkage to national health records. We tested the generalisability of our findings with an independent UK cohort study-the Whitehall II study (9838 people, baseline in 1997, follow-up to 2017)-using a further socioeconomic status indicator, occupational position. FINDINGS During 1 110 831 person-years at risk, we recorded 245 573 hospitalisations in the Finnish cohorts; the corresponding numbers in the UK study were 60 946 hospitalisations in 186 572 person-years. Across the three socioeconomic position indicators and after adjustment for lifestyle factors, compared with more advantaged groups, low socioeconomic status was associated with increased risk for 18 (32·1%) of the 56 conditions. 16 diseases formed a cascade of inter-related health conditions with a hazard ratio greater than 5. This sequence began with psychiatric disorders, substance abuse, and self-harm, which were associated with later liver and renal diseases, ischaemic heart disease, cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive bronchitis, lung cancer, and dementia. INTERPRETATION Our findings highlight the importance of mental health and behavioural problems in setting in motion the development of a range of socioeconomically patterned physical illnesses. Policy and health-care practice addressing psychological health issues in social context and early in the life course could be effective strategies for reducing health inequalities. FUNDING UK Medical Research Council, US National Institute on Aging, NordForsk, British Heart Foundation, Academy of Finland, and Helsinki Institute of Life Science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - G David Batty
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Jaana Pentti
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland; Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Martin J Shipley
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Pyry N Sipilä
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Solja T Nyberg
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sakari B Suominen
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; School of Health and Education, University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Tuula Oksanen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sari Stenholm
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Marianna Virtanen
- School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
| | - Michael G Marmot
- Institute of Health Equity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; INSERM U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université de Paris, France
| | - Eric J Brunner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joni V Lindbohm
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jane E Ferrie
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; School of Community and Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jussi Vahtera
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku, Turku, Finland; Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Schnier C, Wilkinson T, Akbari A, Orton C, Sleegers K, Gallacher J, Lyons RA, Sudlow C. The Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank Dementia e-cohort (SAIL-DeC). Int J Popul Data Sci 2020; 5:1121. [PMID: 32935048 PMCID: PMC7473277 DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The rising burden of dementia is a global concern, and there is a need to study its causes, natural history and outcomes. The Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank contains anonymised, routinely-collected healthcare data for the population of Wales, UK. It has potential to be a valuable resource for dementia research owing to its size, long follow-up time and prospective collection of data during clinical care. Objectives We aimed to apply reproducible methods to create the SAIL dementia e-cohort (SAIL-DeC). We created SAIL-DeC with a view to maximising its utility for a broad range of research questions whilst minimising duplication of effort for researchers. Methods SAIL contains individual-level, linked primary care, hospital admission, mortality and demographic data. Data are currently available until 2018 and future updates will extend participant follow-up time. We included participants who were born between 1st January 1900 and 1st January 1958 and for whom primary care data were available. We applied algorithms consisting of International Classification of Diseases (versions 9 and 10) and Read (version 2) codes to identify participants with and without all-cause dementia and dementia subtypes. We also created derived variables for comorbidities and risk factors. Results From 4.4 million unique participants in SAIL, 1.2 million met the cohort inclusion criteria, resulting in 18.8 million person-years of follow-up. Of these, 129,650 (10%) developed all-cause dementia, with 77,978 (60%) having dementia subtype codes. Alzheimer's disease was the most common subtype diagnosis (62%). Among the dementia cases, the median duration of observation time was 14 years. Conclusion We have created a generalisable, national dementia e-cohort, aimed at facilitating epidemiological dementia research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Schnier
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - T Wilkinson
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Akbari
- Health Data Research UK Wales and Northern Ireland, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.,Administrative Data Research Partnership Wales, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - C Orton
- Health Data Research UK Wales and Northern Ireland, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - K Sleegers
- Center for Molecular Neurology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - J Gallacher
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - R A Lyons
- Health Data Research UK Wales and Northern Ireland, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.,National Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Clm Sudlow
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Health Data Research UK Scotland, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Ahmed F, Morbey H, Harding A, Reeves D, Swarbrick C, Davies L, Hann M, Holland F, Elvish R, Leroi I, Burrow S, Burns A, Keady J, Reilly S. Developing the evidence base for evaluating dementia training in NHS hospitals (DEMTRAIN): a mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e030739. [PMID: 31941762 PMCID: PMC7045160 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Around 70% of acute hospital beds in the UK are occupied by older people, approximately 40% of whom have dementia. Improving the quality of care in hospitals is a key priority within national dementia strategies. Limited research has been conducted to evaluate dementia training packages for staff, and evaluation of training often focuses on immediate, on-the-day training feedback and effects. OBJECTIVES Our study aims to answer two research questions: (1) How do variations in content, implementation and intensity of staff dementia training in acute hospitals in England relate to health service outcome/process measures and staff outcomes? and (2) What components of staff dementia training are most strongly related to improved patient and staff outcomes? METHODS AND ANALYSIS Using the principles of programme theory, a mixed-method study will be used to identify mechanisms and the interactions between them, as well as facilitators and barriers to dementia training in hospitals. We will use existing data, such as Hospital Episode Statistics, alongside two surveys (at hospital and staff level).We will recruit up to 193 acute hospitals in England to participate in the hospital level survey. We aim to recruit up to 30 staff members per hospital, from a random sample of 24 hospitals. In addition, we will explore the cost-effectiveness of dementia training packages and carry out an in-depth case study of up to six hospitals. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been reviewed and approved by the Faculty of Health and Medicine Research Ethics Committee (FHMREC 17056) and Health Research Authority (Integrated Research Approval System (IRAS) ID 242166: REC reference 18/HRA/1198). We plan to develop both standard (eg, academic publications, presentations at conferences) and innovative (eg, citizen scientist web portals, online fora, links with hospitals and third sector organisations) means of ensuring the study findings are accessible and disseminated regionally, nationally and internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faraz Ahmed
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Hazel Morbey
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Andrew Harding
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - David Reeves
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline Swarbrick
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Linda Davies
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Hann
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Holland
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth Elvish
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Iracema Leroi
- Division of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Simon Burrow
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Alistair Burns
- Division of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - John Keady
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Siobhan Reilly
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Calvin CM, Wilkinson T, Starr JM, Sudlow C, Hagenaars SP, Harris SE, Schnier C, Davies G, Fawns-Ritchie C, Gale CR, Gallacher J, Deary IJ. Predicting incident dementia 3-8 years after brief cognitive tests in the UK Biobank prospective study of 500,000 people. Alzheimers Dement 2019; 15:1546-1557. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M. Calvin
- Dementias Platform UK; Department of Psychiatry; University of Oxford Warneford Hospital; Oxford UK
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE); Department of Psychology; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
| | - Tim Wilkinson
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
| | - John M. Starr
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE); Department of Psychology; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
- Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
| | - Cathie Sudlow
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
- UK Biobank; Cheadle Stockport UK
| | - Saskia P. Hagenaars
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE); Department of Psychology; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
- Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre; Institute of Psychiatry; Psychology & Neuroscience; Kings College London; Denmark Hill London UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre; South London and Maudsley NHS Trust; London UK
| | - Sarah E. Harris
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE); Department of Psychology; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
- University of Edinburgh Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine and MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine; Western General Hospital; Edinburgh UK
| | - Christian Schnier
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
| | - Gail Davies
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE); Department of Psychology; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
| | - Chloe Fawns-Ritchie
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE); Department of Psychology; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
| | - Catharine R. Gale
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE); Department of Psychology; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
| | - John Gallacher
- Dementias Platform UK; Department of Psychiatry; University of Oxford Warneford Hospital; Oxford UK
| | - Ian J. Deary
- Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (CCACE); Department of Psychology; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Sabia S, Fayosse A, Dumurgier J, Schnitzler A, Empana JP, Ebmeier KP, Dugravot A, Kivimäki M, Singh-Manoux A. Association of ideal cardiovascular health at age 50 with incidence of dementia: 25 year follow-up of Whitehall II cohort study. BMJ 2019; 366:l4414. [PMID: 31391187 PMCID: PMC6664261 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the association between the Life Simple 7 cardiovascular health score at age 50 and incidence of dementia. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Civil service departments in London (Whitehall II study; study inception 1985-88). PARTICIPANTS 7899 participants with data on the cardiovascular health score at age 50. EXPOSURES The cardiovascular health score included four behavioural (smoking, diet, physical activity, body mass index) and three biological (fasting glucose, blood cholesterol, blood pressure) metrics, coded on a three point scale (0, 1, 2). The cardiovascular health score was the sum of seven metrics (score range 0-14) and was categorised into poor (scores 0-6), intermediate (7-11), and optimal (12-14) cardiovascular health. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Incident dementia, identified through linkage to hospital, mental health services, and mortality registers until 2017. RESULTS 347 incident cases of dementia were recorded over a median follow-up of 24.7 years. Compared with an incidence rate of dementia of 3.2 (95% confidence interval 2.5 to 4.0) per 1000 person years among the group with poor cardiovascular health, the absolute rate differences per 1000 person years were -1.5 (95% confidence interval -2.3 to -0.7) for the group with intermediate cardiovascular health and -1.9 (-2.8 to -1.1) for the group with optimal cardiovascular health. Higher cardiovascular health score was associated with a lower risk of dementia (hazard ratio 0.89 (0.85 to 0.95) per 1 point increment in the cardiovascular health score). Similar associations with dementia were observed for the behavioural and biological subscales (hazard ratios per 1 point increment in the subscores 0.87 (0.81 to 0.93) and 0.91 (0.83 to 1.00), respectively). The association between cardiovascular health at age 50 and dementia was also seen in people who remained free of cardiovascular disease over the follow-up (hazard ratio 0.89 (0.84 to 0.95) per 1 point increment in the cardiovascular health score). CONCLUSION Adherence to the Life Simple 7 ideal cardiovascular health recommendations in midlife was associated with a lower risk of dementia later in life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Séverine Sabia
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 75010 Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Aurore Fayosse
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Julien Dumurgier
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 75010 Paris, France
- Cognitive Neurology Center, Lariboisière - Fernand Widal Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Alexis Schnitzler
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Empana
- Inserm, U970, Integrative Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | | | - Aline Dugravot
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
- Helsinki Institute of Life Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Inserm U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Université de Paris, 75010 Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Sommerlad A, Sabia S, Singh-Manoux A, Lewis G, Livingston G. Association of social contact with dementia and cognition: 28-year follow-up of the Whitehall II cohort study. PLoS Med 2019; 16:e1002862. [PMID: 31374073 PMCID: PMC6677303 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is need to identify targets for preventing or delaying dementia. Social contact is a potential target for clinical and public health studies, but previous observational studies had short follow-up, making findings susceptible to reverse causation bias. We therefore examined the association of social contact with subsequent incident dementia and cognition with 28 years' follow-up. METHODS AND FINDINGS We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Whitehall II longitudinal prospective cohort study of employees of London civil service departments, aged 35-55 at baseline assessment in 1985-1988 and followed to 2017. Social contact was measured six times through a self-report questionnaire about frequency of contact with non-cohabiting relatives and friends. Dementia status was ascertained from three linked clinical and mortality databases, and cognition was assessed five times using tests of verbal memory, verbal fluency, and reasoning. Cox regression models with inverse probability weighting to account for attrition and missingness examined the association between social contact at age 50, 60, and 70 years and subsequent incident dementia. Mixed linear models examined the association of midlife social contact between 45 and 55 years and cognitive trajectory during the subsequent 14 years. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, education, health behaviours, employment status, and marital status. Of 10,308 Whitehall II study participants, 10,228 provided social contact data (mean age 44.9 years [standard deviation (SD) 6.1 years] at baseline; 33.1% female; 89.1% white ethnicity). More frequent social contact at age 60 years was associated with lower dementia risk (hazard ratio [HR] for each SD higher social contact frequency = 0.88 [95% CI 0.79, 0.98], p = 0.02); effect size of the association of social contact at 50 or 70 years with dementia was similar (0.92 [95% CI 0.83, 1.02], p = 0.13 and 0.91 [95% CI 0.78, 1.06], p = 0.23, respectively) but not statistically significant. The association between social contact and incident dementia was driven by contact with friends (HR = 0.90 [95% CI 0.81, 1.00], p = 0.05), but no association was found for contact with relatives. More frequent social contact during midlife was associated with better subsequent cognitive trajectory: global cognitive function was 0.07 (95% CI 0.03, 0.11), p = 0.002 SDs higher for those with the highest versus lowest tertile of social contact frequency, and this difference was maintained over 14 years follow-up. Results were consistent in a series of post hoc analyses, designed to assess potential biases. A limitation of our study is ascertainment of dementia status from electronic health records rather than in-person assessment of diagnostic status, with the possibility that milder dementia cases were more likely to be missed. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this study suggest a protective effect of social contact against dementia and that more frequent contact confers higher cognitive reserve, although it is possible that the ability to maintain more social contact may be a marker of cognitive reserve. Future intervention studies should seek to examine whether improving social contact frequency is feasible, acceptable, and efficacious in changing cognitive outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Sommerlad
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Séverine Sabia
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Inserm U1153, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Inserm U1153, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Ponjoan A, Garre-Olmo J, Blanch J, Fages E, Alves-Cabratosa L, Martí-Lluch R, Comas-Cufí M, Parramon D, García-Gil M, Ramos R. How well can electronic health records from primary care identify Alzheimer's disease cases? Clin Epidemiol 2019; 11:509-518. [PMID: 31456649 PMCID: PMC6620769 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s206770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Electronic health records (EHR) from primary care are emerging in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research, but their accuracy is a concern. We aimed to validate AD diagnoses from primary care using additional information provided by general practitioners (GPs), and a register of dementias. Patients and methods This retrospective observational study obtained data from the System for the Development of Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP). Three algorithms combined International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes to identify AD cases in SIDIAP. GPs evaluated dementia diagnoses by means of an online survey. We linked data from the Register of Dementias of Girona and from SIDIAP. We estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity and provided results stratified by age, sex and severity. Results Using survey data from the GPs, PPV of AD diagnosis was 89.8% (95% CI: 84.7–94.9). Using the dataset linkage, PPV was 74.8 (95% CI: 73.1–76.4) for algorithm A1 (AD diagnoses), and 72.3 (95% CI: 70.7–73.9) for algorithm A3 (diagnosed or treated patients without previous conditions); sensitivity was 71.4 (95% CI: 69.6–73.0) and 83.3 (95% CI: 81.8–84.6) for algorithms A1 (AD diagnoses) and A3, respectively. Stratified results did not differ by age, but PPV and sensitivity estimates decreased amongst men and severe patients, respectively. Conclusions PPV estimates differed depending on the gold standard. The development of algorithms integrating diagnoses and treatment of dementia improved the AD case ascertainment. PPV and sensitivity estimates were high and indicated that AD codes recorded in a large primary care database were sufficiently accurate for research purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ponjoan
- Vascular Health Research Group (ISV-Girona), Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona , Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI) , Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Josep Garre-Olmo
- Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI) , Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Jordi Blanch
- Vascular Health Research Group (ISV-Girona), Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ester Fages
- Vascular Health Research Group (ISV-Girona), Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Primary Care Services, Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Lia Alves-Cabratosa
- Vascular Health Research Group (ISV-Girona), Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Ruth Martí-Lluch
- Vascular Health Research Group (ISV-Girona), Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona , Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI) , Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Marc Comas-Cufí
- Vascular Health Research Group (ISV-Girona), Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Dídac Parramon
- Vascular Health Research Group (ISV-Girona), Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Primary Care Services, Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - María García-Gil
- Vascular Health Research Group (ISV-Girona), Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Rafel Ramos
- Vascular Health Research Group (ISV-Girona), Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Campus Salut, University of Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Triviño-Ibáñez EM, Sánchez-Vañó R, Sopena-Novales P, Romero-Fábrega JC, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Carnero Pardo C, Martínez Lozano MD, Gómez-Río M. Impact of amyloid-PET in daily clinical management of patients with cognitive impairment fulfilling appropriate use criteria. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e16509. [PMID: 31335725 PMCID: PMC6708756 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the use of amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET) in routine clinical practice, in a selected population with cognitive impairment that meets appropriate use criteria (AUC).A multicenter, observational, prospective case-series study of 211patients from 2 level-3 hospitals who fulfilled clinical AUC for amyloid-PET scan in a naturalistic setting. Certainty degree was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (very low probability); 1 (low probability); 2 (intermediate probability); 3 (high probability); and 4 (practically sure), before and after amyloid PET. The treatment plan was considered as cognition-specific or noncognition-specific.Amyloid-PET was positive in 118 patients (55.9%) and negative in 93 patients (44.1%). Diagnostic prescan confidence according amyloid-PET results showed that in both, negative and positive-PET subgroup, the most frequent category was intermediate probability (45.7% and 55.1%, respectively). After the amyloid-PET, the diagnostic confidence showed a very different distribution, that was, in the negative-PET group the most frequent categories are very unlikely (70.7%) and unlikely (29.3%), while in the positive-PET group were very probable (57.6%) and practically sure (39%). Only in 14/211 patients (6.6%) the result of the amyloid-PET did not influence the diagnostic confidence, while in 194 patients (93.4%), the diagnostic confidence improved significantly after amyloid-PET results. The therapeutic intention was modified in 93 patients (44.1%). Specific treatment for Alzheimer disease was started, before amyloid-PET, in 80 patients (37.9%).This naturalistic study provides evidence that the implementation of amyloid-PET is associated with a significant improvement in diagnostic confidence and has a high impact on the therapeutic management of patients with mild cognitive impairment fulfilled clinical AUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva María Triviño-Ibáñez
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital
- IBS, Granada Bio-Health Research Institute, Granada
| | - Raquel Sánchez-Vañó
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Fe University Hospital, Clinical Medicine and Public Health Doctoral Program of the University of Granada
| | | | | | - Antonio Rodríguez-Fernández
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital
- IBS, Granada Bio-Health Research Institute, Granada
| | | | | | - Manuel Gómez-Río
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital
- IBS, Granada Bio-Health Research Institute, Granada
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Wilkinson T, Schnier C, Bush K, Rannikmäe K, Henshall DE, Lerpiniere C, Allen NE, Flaig R, Russ TC, Bathgate D, Pal S, O'Brien JT, Sudlow CLM. Identifying dementia outcomes in UK Biobank: a validation study of primary care, hospital admissions and mortality data. Eur J Epidemiol 2019. [PMID: 30806901 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-01900499-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
Prospective, population-based studies that recruit participants in mid-life are valuable resources for dementia research. Follow-up in these studies is often through linkage to routinely-collected healthcare datasets. We investigated the accuracy of these datasets for dementia case ascertainment in a validation study using data from UK Biobank-an open access, population-based study of > 500,000 adults aged 40-69 years at recruitment in 2006-2010. From 17,198 UK Biobank participants recruited in Edinburgh, we identified those with ≥ 1 dementia code in their linked primary care, hospital admissions or mortality data and compared their coded diagnoses to clinical expert adjudication of their full-text medical record. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV, the proportion of cases identified that were true positives) for all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia for each dataset alone and in combination, and explored algorithmic code combinations to improve PPV. Among 120 participants, PPVs for all-cause dementia were 86.8%, 87.3% and 80.0% for primary care, hospital admissions and mortality data respectively and 82.5% across all datasets. We identified three algorithms that balanced a high PPV with reasonable case ascertainment. For Alzheimer's disease, PPVs were 74.1% for primary care, 68.2% for hospital admissions, 50.0% for mortality data and 71.4% in combination. PPV for vascular dementia was 43.8% across all sources. UK routinely-collected healthcare data can be used to identify all-cause dementia in prospective studies. PPVs for Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia are lower. Further research is required to explore the geographic generalisability of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Wilkinson
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Christian Schnier
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kathryn Bush
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kristiina Rannikmäe
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David E Henshall
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Chris Lerpiniere
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Naomi E Allen
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robin Flaig
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tom C Russ
- Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Dementia Prevention, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Suvankar Pal
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John T O'Brien
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cathie L M Sudlow
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Sommerlad A, Perera G, Mueller C, Singh-Manoux A, Lewis G, Stewart R, Livingston G. Hospitalisation of people with dementia: evidence from English electronic health records from 2008 to 2016. Eur J Epidemiol 2019; 34:567-577. [PMID: 30649705 PMCID: PMC6497615 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-019-00481-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Hospitalisation of people with dementia is associated with adverse outcomes and high costs. We aimed to examine general, i.e. non-psychiatric, hospitalisation rates, changes since 2008 and factors associated with admission. We also aimed to compare admission rates of people with dementia with age-matched people without dementia. We conducted a cohort study of adults ≥ 65 years, with dementia diagnosed during the 2008-2016 study window, derived from a large secondary mental healthcare database in South London, UK. We used national general hospital records to identify emergency and elective hospitalisations. We calculated the cumulative incidence and rate of hospitalisation and examined predictors of hospitalisation using negative binomial regression, with multiple imputation for missing covariate data. We calculated age-standardised admission ratio for people with dementia compared to those without. Of 10,137 people, 50.6% were admitted to hospital in the year following dementia diagnosis and 75.9% were admitted during median 2.5 years follow-up. Annual admission rate was 1.26/person-year of which 0.90/person-year were in emergency. Emergency hospitalisation rate increased throughout the study period. Compared to controls without diagnosed dementia in the catchment area, the age-standardised emergency admission ratio for people with dementia was 2.06 (95% CI 1.95, 2.18). Male, older, white and socio-economically deprived people and those with clinically significant comorbid physical illness, depressed mood, activity of daily living or living condition problems had more hospitalisations. Emergency hospitalisations of people with dementia are higher than those without, and increasing. Many factors associated with admission are social and psychological, and may be targets for future interventions that aim to reduce avoidable admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Sommerlad
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gayan Perera
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Christoph Mueller
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- INSERM U 1018, Epidemiology of Ageing and Age-related diseases, Villejuif, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Robert Stewart
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Kivimäki M, Singh-Manoux A, Pentti J, Sabia S, Nyberg ST, Alfredsson L, Goldberg M, Knutsson A, Koskenvuo M, Koskinen A, Kouvonen A, Nordin M, Oksanen T, Strandberg T, Suominen SB, Theorell T, Vahtera J, Väänänen A, Virtanen M, Westerholm P, Westerlund H, Zins M, Seshadri S, Batty GD, Sipilä PN, Shipley MJ, Lindbohm JV, Ferrie JE, Jokela M. Physical inactivity, cardiometabolic disease, and risk of dementia: an individual-participant meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 365:l1495. [PMID: 30995986 PMCID: PMC6468884 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l1495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine whether physical inactivity is a risk factor for dementia, with attention to the role of cardiometabolic disease in this association and reverse causation bias that arises from changes in physical activity in the preclinical (prodromal) phase of dementia. DESIGN Meta-analysis of 19 prospective observational cohort studies. DATA SOURCES The Individual-Participant-Data Meta-analysis in Working Populations Consortium, the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, and the UK Data Service, including a total of 19 of a potential 9741 studies. REVIEW METHOD The search strategy was designed to retrieve individual-participant data from prospective cohort studies. Exposure was physical inactivity; primary outcomes were incident all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease; and the secondary outcome was incident cardiometabolic disease (that is, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and stroke). Summary estimates were obtained using random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS Study population included 404 840 people (mean age 45.5 years, 57.7% women) who were initially free of dementia, had a measurement of physical inactivity at study entry, and were linked to electronic health records. In 6.0 million person-years at risk, we recorded 2044 incident cases of all-cause dementia. In studies with data on dementia subtype, the number of incident cases of Alzheimer's disease was 1602 in 5.2 million person-years. When measured <10 years before dementia diagnosis (that is, the preclinical stage of dementia), physical inactivity was associated with increased incidence of all-cause dementia (hazard ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.23 to 1.71) and Alzheimer's disease (1.36, 1.12 to 1.65). When reverse causation was minimised by assessing physical activity ≥10 years before dementia onset, no difference in dementia risk between physically active and inactive participants was observed (hazard ratios 1.01 (0.89 to 1.14) and 0.96 (0.85 to 1.08) for the two outcomes). Physical inactivity was consistently associated with increased risk of incident diabetes (hazard ratio 1.42, 1.25 to 1.61), coronary heart disease (1.24, 1.13 to 1.36), and stroke (1.16, 1.05 to 1.27). Among people in whom cardiometabolic disease preceded dementia, physical inactivity was non-significantly associated with dementia (hazard ratio for physical activity assessed >10 before dementia onset 1.30, 0.79 to 2.14). CONCLUSIONS In analyses that addressed bias due to reverse causation, physical inactivity was not associated with all-cause dementia or Alzheimer's disease, although an indication of excess dementia risk was observed in a subgroup of physically inactive individuals who developed cardiometabolic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Paris, France
| | - Jaana Pentti
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Séverine Sabia
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- INSERM U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative diseases, Paris, France
| | - Solja T Nyberg
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lars Alfredsson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marcel Goldberg
- Inserm UMS 011, Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, Villejuif, France
| | - Anders Knutsson
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid-Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden
| | - Markku Koskenvuo
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aki Koskinen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anne Kouvonen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland
- Administrative Data Research Centre (Northern Ireland), Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Maria Nordin
- Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Tuula Oksanen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Timo Strandberg
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Center for Life Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Sakari B Suominen
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- University of Skövde, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Töres Theorell
- Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jussi Vahtera
- Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Ari Väänänen
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marianna Virtanen
- School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland
| | - Peter Westerholm
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hugo Westerlund
- Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marie Zins
- Inserm UMS 011, Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit, Villejuif, France
| | - Sudha Seshadri
- Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
- Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, USA
| | - G David Batty
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Pyry N Sipilä
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Martin J Shipley
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Joni V Lindbohm
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jane E Ferrie
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, UK
| | - Markus Jokela
- Biomedicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Akbaraly TN, Singh-Manoux A, Dugravot A, Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M, Sabia S. Association of Midlife Diet With Subsequent Risk for Dementia. JAMA 2019; 321:957-968. [PMID: 30860560 PMCID: PMC6436698 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.1432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Observational studies suggest that diet is linked to cognitive health. However, the duration of follow-up in many studies is not sufficient to take into account the long preclinical phase of dementia, and the evidence from interventional studies is not conclusive. OBJECTIVE To examine whether midlife diet is associated with subsequent risk for dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based cohort study established in 1985-1988 that had dietary intake assessed in 1991-1993, 1997-1999, and 2002-2004 and follow-up for incident dementia until March 31, 2017. EXPOSURES Food frequency questionnaire to derive the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), an 11-component diet quality score (score range, 0-110), with higher scores indicating a healthier diet. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES Incident dementia ascertained through linkage to electronic health records. RESULTS Among 8225 participants without dementia in 1991-1993 (mean age, 50.2 years [SD, 6.1 years]; 5686 [69.1%] were men), a total of 344 cases of incident dementia were recorded during a median follow-up of 24.8 years (interquartile range, 24.2-25.1 years). No significant difference in the incidence rate for dementia was observed in tertiles of AHEI exposure during 1991-1993, 1997-1999 (median follow-up, 19.1 years), and 2002-2004 (median follow-up, 13.5 years). Compared with an incidence rate for dementia of 1.76 (95% CI, 1.47-2.12) per 1000 person-years in the worst tertile of AHEI (lowest tertile of diet quality) in 1991-1993, the absolute rate difference for the intermediate tertile was 0.03 (95% CI, -0.43 to 0.49) per 1000 person-years and for the best tertile was 0.04 (95% CI, -0.42 to 0.51) per 1000 person-years. Compared with the worst AHEI tertile in 1997-1999 (incidence rate for dementia, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.62 to 2.61] per 1000 person-years), the absolute rate difference for the intermediate AHEI tertile was 0.14 (95% CI, -0.58 to 0.86) per 1000 person-years and for the best AHEI tertile was 0.14 (95% CI, -0.58 to 0.85) per 1000 person-years. Compared with the worst AHEI tertile in 2002-2004 (incidence rate for dementia, 3.12 [95% CI, 2.49 to 3.92] per 1000 person-years), the absolute rate difference for the intermediate AHEI tertile was -0.61 (95% CI, -1.56 to 0.33) per 1000 person-years and for the best AHEI tertile was -0.73 (95% CI, -1.67 to 0.22) per 1000 person-years. In the multivariable analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for dementia per 1-SD (10-point) AHEI increment were not significant as assessed in 1991-1993 (adjusted HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.08]), in 1997-1999 (adjusted HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.12]), or in 2002-2004 (adjusted HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.00]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this long-term prospective cohort study, diet quality assessed during midlife was not significantly associated with subsequent risk for dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasnime N. Akbaraly
- Université Montpellier, Inserm, U1198, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Montpellier, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, England
- Department of Psychiatry and Autism Resources Centre, University Research and Hospital Center of Montpellier, Inserm, Montpellier, France
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, England
- Inserm, U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Aline Dugravot
- Inserm, U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Eric J. Brunner
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, England
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, England
- Clinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Séverine Sabia
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, England
- Inserm, U1153, Epidemiology of Ageing and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Mukadam N, Lewis G, Mueller C, Werbeloff N, Stewart R, Livingston G. Ethnic differences in cognition and age in people diagnosed with dementia: A study of electronic health records in two large mental healthcare providers. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019; 34:504-510. [PMID: 30675737 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Qualitative studies suggest that people from UK minority ethnic groups with dementia access health services later in the illness than white UK-born elders, but there are no large quantitative studies investigating this. We aimed to investigate interethnic differences in cognitive scores and age at dementia diagnosis. METHODS We used the Clinical Record Interactive Search (CRIS) applied to the electronic health records of two London mental health trusts to identify patients diagnosed with dementia between 2008 and 2016. We meta-analysed mean Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and mean age at the time of diagnosis across trusts for the most common ethnic groups, and used linear regression models to test these associations before and after adjustment for age, sex, index of multiple deprivation, and marital status. We also compared percentage of referrals for each ethnic group with catchment census distributions. RESULTS Compared with white patients (N = 9380), unadjusted mean MMSE scores were lower in Asian (-1.25; 95% CI -1.79, -0.71; N = 642) and black patients (-1.82, 95% CI -2.13, -1.52; N = 2008) as was mean age at diagnosis (Asian patients: -4.27 (-4.92, -3.61); black patients -3.70 (-4.13, -3.27) years). These differences persisted after adjustment. In general, ethnic group distributions in referrals did not differ substantially from those expected in the catchments. CONCLUSIONS People from black and Asian groups were younger at dementia diagnosis and had lower MMSE scores than white referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naaheed Mukadam
- UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.,Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St. Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Christoph Mueller
- Kings College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience), London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nomi Werbeloff
- UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.,Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St. Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | - Robert Stewart
- Kings College London (Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience), London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- UCL Division of Psychiatry, London, UK.,Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St. Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Wilkinson T, Schnier C, Bush K, Rannikmäe K, Henshall DE, Lerpiniere C, Allen NE, Flaig R, Russ TC, Bathgate D, Pal S, O'Brien JT, Sudlow CLM. Identifying dementia outcomes in UK Biobank: a validation study of primary care, hospital admissions and mortality data. Eur J Epidemiol 2019; 34:557-565. [PMID: 30806901 PMCID: PMC6497624 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-019-00499-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Prospective, population-based studies that recruit participants in mid-life are valuable resources for dementia research. Follow-up in these studies is often through linkage to routinely-collected healthcare datasets. We investigated the accuracy of these datasets for dementia case ascertainment in a validation study using data from UK Biobank—an open access, population-based study of > 500,000 adults aged 40–69 years at recruitment in 2006–2010. From 17,198 UK Biobank participants recruited in Edinburgh, we identified those with ≥ 1 dementia code in their linked primary care, hospital admissions or mortality data and compared their coded diagnoses to clinical expert adjudication of their full-text medical record. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV, the proportion of cases identified that were true positives) for all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia for each dataset alone and in combination, and explored algorithmic code combinations to improve PPV. Among 120 participants, PPVs for all-cause dementia were 86.8%, 87.3% and 80.0% for primary care, hospital admissions and mortality data respectively and 82.5% across all datasets. We identified three algorithms that balanced a high PPV with reasonable case ascertainment. For Alzheimer’s disease, PPVs were 74.1% for primary care, 68.2% for hospital admissions, 50.0% for mortality data and 71.4% in combination. PPV for vascular dementia was 43.8% across all sources. UK routinely-collected healthcare data can be used to identify all-cause dementia in prospective studies. PPVs for Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia are lower. Further research is required to explore the geographic generalisability of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Wilkinson
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. .,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. .,Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Christian Schnier
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kathryn Bush
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kristiina Rannikmäe
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David E Henshall
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Chris Lerpiniere
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Naomi E Allen
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Robin Flaig
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tom C Russ
- Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Dementia Prevention, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Suvankar Pal
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John T O'Brien
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cathie L M Sudlow
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
90
|
Lyons A, Romero‐Ortuno R, Hartley P. Functional mobility trajectories of hospitalized older adults admitted to acute geriatric wards: A retrospective observational study in an English university hospital. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19:305-310. [DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Lyons
- School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- Department of Medicine for the ElderlyAddenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge UK
| | - Roman Romero‐Ortuno
- Department of Medicine for the ElderlyAddenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge UK
- Clinical Gerontology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- Discipline of Medical Gerontology, Trinity College Dublin, Mercer's Institute for Successful AgingSt James's Hospital Dublin Ireland
| | - Peter Hartley
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of Cambridge Cambridge UK
- Department of PhysiotherapyAddenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge UK
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
McGuinness LA, Warren‐Gash C, Moorhouse LR, Thomas SL. The validity of dementia diagnoses in routinely collected electronic health records in the United Kingdom: A systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2019; 28:244-255. [PMID: 30667114 PMCID: PMC6519035 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study is to assess the validity of codes or algorithms used to identify dementia in UK electronic health record (EHR) primary care and hospitalisation databases. METHODS Relevant studies were identified by searching the MEDLINE/EMBASE databases from inception to June 2018, hand-searching reference lists, and consulting experts. The search strategy included synonyms for "Dementia", "Europe", and "EHR". Studies were included if they validated dementia diagnoses in UK primary care or hospitalisation databases, irrespective of validation method used. The Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS From 1469 unique records, 14 relevant studies were included. Thirteen validated individual diagnoses against a reference standard, reporting high estimates of validity. Most reported only the positive predictive value (PPV), with estimates ranging between 0.09 and 1.0 and 0.62 and 0.85 in primary care and hospitalisation databases, respectively. One study performed a rate comparison, indicating good generalisability of dementia diagnoses in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database to the UK population. Studies were of low methodological quality. As studies were not comparable, no summary validity estimates were produced. CONCLUSION While heterogenous across studies, reported validity estimates were generally high. However, the credibility of these estimates is limited by the methodological quality of studies, primarily resulting from insufficient blinding of researchers interpreting the reference test. Inadequate reporting, particularly of the specific codes validated, hindered comparison of estimates across studies. Future validation studies should make use of more robust reference tests, follow established reporting guidelines, and calculate all measures of validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charlotte Warren‐Gash
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population HealthLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Louisa R. Moorhouse
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population HealthLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Sara L. Thomas
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population HealthLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Sommerlad A, Perera G, Singh-Manoux A, Lewis G, Stewart R, Livingston G. Re: Accuracy of general hospital dementia diagnoses in England: Sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of diagnostic accuracy 2008-2016. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 15:313-314. [PMID: 30476466 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Sommerlad
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St. Pancras Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Gayan Perera
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- INSERM U 1018, Epidemiology of Ageing and Age-Related Diseases, Villejuif, France; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St. Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | - Robert Stewart
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St. Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Communication between specialities of the mind and the body. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 15:315-316. [PMID: 30339802 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
94
|
Sabia S, Fayosse A, Dumurgier J, Dugravot A, Akbaraly T, Britton A, Kivimäki M, Singh-Manoux A. Alcohol consumption and risk of dementia: 23 year follow-up of Whitehall II cohort study. BMJ 2018; 362:k2927. [PMID: 30068508 PMCID: PMC6066998 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k2927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between alcohol consumption and risk of dementia. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Civil service departments in London (Whitehall II study). PARTICIPANTS 9087 participants aged 35-55 years at study inception (1985/88). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incident dementia, identified through linkage to hospital, mental health services, and mortality registers until 2017. Measures of alcohol consumption were the mean from three assessments between 1985/88 and 1991/93 (midlife), categorised as abstinence, 1-14 units/week, and >14 units/week; 17 year trajectories of alcohol consumption based on five assessments of alcohol consumption between 1985/88 and 2002/04; CAGE questionnaire for alcohol dependence assessed in 1991/93; and hospital admission for alcohol related chronic diseases between 1991 and 2017. RESULTS 397 cases of dementia were recorded over a mean follow-up of 23 years. Abstinence in midlife was associated with a higher risk of dementia (hazard ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 1.89) compared with consumption of 1-14 units/week. Among those drinking >14 units/week, a 7 unit increase in alcohol consumption was associated with a 17% (95% confidence interval 4% to 32%) increase in risk of dementia. CAGE score >2 (hazard ratio 2.19, 1.29 to 3.71) and alcohol related hospital admission (4.28, 2.72 to 6.73) were also associated with an increased risk of dementia. Alcohol consumption trajectories from midlife to early old age showed long term abstinence (1.74, 1.31 to 2.30), decrease in consumption (1.55, 1.08 to 2.22), and long term consumption >14 units/week (1.40, 1.02 to 1.93) to be associated with a higher risk of dementia compared with long term consumption of 1-14 units/week. Analysis using multistate models suggested that the excess risk of dementia associated with abstinence in midlife was partly explained by cardiometabolic disease over the follow-up as the hazard ratio of dementia in abstainers without cardiometabolic disease was 1.33 (0.88 to 2.02) compared with 1.47 (1.15 to 1.89) in the entire population. CONCLUSION The risk of dementia was increased in people who abstained from alcohol in midlife or consumed >14 units/week. In several countries, guidelines define thresholds for harmful alcohol consumption much higher than 14 units/week. The present findings encourage the downward revision of such guidelines to promote cognitive health at older ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Séverine Sabia
- Inserm, U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Université Paris-Saclay, France; Hôpital Paul Brousse, Bât 15/16, Villejuif Cedex, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK
| | - Aurore Fayosse
- Inserm, U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Université Paris-Saclay, France; Hôpital Paul Brousse, Bât 15/16, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - Julien Dumurgier
- Cognitive Neurology Center, Lariboisière-Fernand Widal hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Aline Dugravot
- Inserm, U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Université Paris-Saclay, France; Hôpital Paul Brousse, Bât 15/16, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - Tasnime Akbaraly
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK
- Inserm U1198, Montpellier, France; University Montpellier, Montpellier, France; EPHE, Paris, France
- Department of Psychiatry & Autism Resources Centre, University Research and Hospital Center (CHRU) of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Annie Britton
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK
| | - Mika Kivimäki
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK
| | - Archana Singh-Manoux
- Inserm, U1018, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Université Paris-Saclay, France; Hôpital Paul Brousse, Bât 15/16, Villejuif Cedex, France
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|