1
|
Skinner A, Nolen S, Cerdá M, Rich JD, Marshall BDL. A simple heuristic for allocating opioid settlement funding to reduce overdose mortality in the United States. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2024:1-7. [PMID: 38940829 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2024.2364338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
As resolution for opioid-related claims and litigation against pharmaceutical manufacturers and other stakeholders, state and local governments are newly eligible for millions of dollars of settlement funding to address the overdose crisis in the United States. To inform effective use of opioid settlement funds, we propose a simple framework that highlights the principal determinants of overdose mortality: the number of people at risk of overdose each year, the average annual number of overdoses per person at risk, and the average probability of death per overdose event. We assert that the annual number of overdose deaths is a function of these three determinants, all of which can be modified through public health intervention. Our proposed heuristic depicts how each of these drivers of drug-related mortality - and the corresponding interventions designed to address each term - operate both in isolation and in conjunction. We intend for this framework to be used by policymakers as a tool for identifying and evaluating public health interventions and funding priorities that will most effectively address the structural forces shaping the overdose crisis and reduce overdose deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Skinner
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Shayla Nolen
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Magdalena Cerdá
- Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Josiah D Rich
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- The Center for Health and Justice Transformation, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Brandon D L Marshall
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chandra J, Charpignon ML, Bhaskar A, Therriault A, Chen YH, Mooney A, Dahleh MA, Kiang MV, Dominici F. Excess Fatal Overdoses in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Geography and Substance Type: March 2020-August 2021. Am J Public Health 2024; 114:599-609. [PMID: 38718338 PMCID: PMC11079842 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2024.307618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Objectives. To assess heterogeneity in pandemic-period excess fatal overdoses in the United States, by location (state, county) and substance type. Methods. We used seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) models to estimate counterfactual death counts in the scenario that no pandemic had occurred. Such estimates were subtracted from actual death counts to assess the magnitude of pandemic-period excess mortality between March 2020 and August 2021. Results. Nationwide, we estimated 25 668 (95% prediction interval [PI] = 2811, 48 524) excess overdose deaths. Specifically, 17 of 47 states and 197 of 592 counties analyzed had statistically significant excess overdose-related mortality. West Virginia, Louisiana, Tennessee, Kentucky, and New Mexico had the highest rates (20-37 per 100 000). Nationally, there were 5.7 (95% PI = 1.0, 10.4), 3.1 (95% PI = 2.1, 4.2), and 1.4 (95% PI = 0.5, 2.4) excess deaths per 100 000 involving synthetic opioids, psychostimulants, and alcohol, respectively. Conclusions. The steep increase in overdose-related mortality affected primarily the southern and western United States. We identified synthetic opioids and psychostimulants as the main contributors. Public Health Implications. Characterizing overdose-related excess mortality across locations and substance types is critical for optimal allocation of public health resources. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(6):599-609. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307618).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay Chandra
- Jay Chandra is with Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Marie-Laure Charpignon and Munther A. Dahleh are with the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Anushka Bhaskar and Andrew Therriault are with the Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. Yea-Hung Chen is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. Alyssa Mooney is with the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Mathew V. Kiang is with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Francesca Dominici is with the Department of Biostatistics, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston
| | - Marie-Laure Charpignon
- Jay Chandra is with Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Marie-Laure Charpignon and Munther A. Dahleh are with the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Anushka Bhaskar and Andrew Therriault are with the Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. Yea-Hung Chen is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. Alyssa Mooney is with the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Mathew V. Kiang is with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Francesca Dominici is with the Department of Biostatistics, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston
| | - Anushka Bhaskar
- Jay Chandra is with Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Marie-Laure Charpignon and Munther A. Dahleh are with the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Anushka Bhaskar and Andrew Therriault are with the Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. Yea-Hung Chen is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. Alyssa Mooney is with the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Mathew V. Kiang is with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Francesca Dominici is with the Department of Biostatistics, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston
| | - Andrew Therriault
- Jay Chandra is with Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Marie-Laure Charpignon and Munther A. Dahleh are with the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Anushka Bhaskar and Andrew Therriault are with the Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. Yea-Hung Chen is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. Alyssa Mooney is with the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Mathew V. Kiang is with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Francesca Dominici is with the Department of Biostatistics, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston
| | - Yea-Hung Chen
- Jay Chandra is with Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Marie-Laure Charpignon and Munther A. Dahleh are with the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Anushka Bhaskar and Andrew Therriault are with the Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. Yea-Hung Chen is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. Alyssa Mooney is with the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Mathew V. Kiang is with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Francesca Dominici is with the Department of Biostatistics, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston
| | - Alyssa Mooney
- Jay Chandra is with Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Marie-Laure Charpignon and Munther A. Dahleh are with the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Anushka Bhaskar and Andrew Therriault are with the Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. Yea-Hung Chen is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. Alyssa Mooney is with the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Mathew V. Kiang is with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Francesca Dominici is with the Department of Biostatistics, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston
| | - Munther A Dahleh
- Jay Chandra is with Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Marie-Laure Charpignon and Munther A. Dahleh are with the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Anushka Bhaskar and Andrew Therriault are with the Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. Yea-Hung Chen is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. Alyssa Mooney is with the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Mathew V. Kiang is with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Francesca Dominici is with the Department of Biostatistics, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston
| | - Mathew V Kiang
- Jay Chandra is with Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Marie-Laure Charpignon and Munther A. Dahleh are with the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Anushka Bhaskar and Andrew Therriault are with the Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. Yea-Hung Chen is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. Alyssa Mooney is with the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Mathew V. Kiang is with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Francesca Dominici is with the Department of Biostatistics, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston
| | - Francesca Dominici
- Jay Chandra is with Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA. Marie-Laure Charpignon and Munther A. Dahleh are with the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge. Anushka Bhaskar and Andrew Therriault are with the Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge. Yea-Hung Chen is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. Alyssa Mooney is with the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco. Mathew V. Kiang is with the Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Francesca Dominici is with the Department of Biostatistics, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown CH, Johnson KA, Hills HA, Vermeer W, Clarke DL, Barnett JT, Newman RT, Burns TL, Pellan WA. Overdose deaths before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a US county. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1366161. [PMID: 38859894 PMCID: PMC11163089 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1366161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Globally, overdose deaths increased near the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, which created availability and access barriers to addiction and social services. Especially in times of a crisis like a pandemic, local exposures, service availability and access, and system responses have major influence on people who use drugs. For policy makers to be effective, an understanding at the local level is needed. Methods This retrospective epidemiologic study from 2019 through 2021 compares immediate and 20-months changes in overdose deaths from the pandemic start to 16 months before its arrival in Pinellas County, FL We examine toxicologic death records of 1,701 overdoses to identify relations with interdiction, and service delivery. Results There was an immediate 49% increase (95% CI 23-82%, p < 0.0001) in overdose deaths in the first month following the first COVID deaths. Immediate increases were found for deaths involving alcohol (171%), heroin (108%), fentanyl (78%), amphetamines (55%), and cocaine (45%). Overdose deaths remained 27% higher (CI 4-55%, p = 0.015) than before the pandemic through 2021.Abrupt service reductions occurred when the pandemic began: in-clinic methadone treatment dropped by two-thirds, counseling by 38%, opioid seizures by 29%, and drug arrests by 56%. Emergency transport for overdose and naloxone distributions increased at the pandemic onset (12%, 93%, respectively) and remained higher through 2021 (15%, 377%,). Regression results indicate that lower drug seizures predicted higher overdoses, and increased 911 transports predicted higher overdoses. The proportion of excess overdose deaths to excess non-COVID deaths after the pandemic relative to the year before was 0.28 in Pinellas County, larger than 75% of other US counties. Conclusions Service and interdiction interruptions likely contributed to overdose death increases during the pandemic. Relaxing restrictions on medical treatment for opioid addiction and public health interventions could have immediate and long-lasting effects when a major disruption, such as a pandemic, occurs. County level data dashboards comprised of overdose toxicology, and interdiction and service data, can help explain changes in overdose deaths. As a next step in predicting which policies and practices will best reduce local overdoses, we propose using simulation modeling with agent-based models to examine complex interacting systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Hendricks Brown
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Kimberly A. Johnson
- Department of Mental Health Law and Policy (MHC 2636), College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Holly A. Hills
- Department of Mental Health Law and Policy (MHC 2636), College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Wouter Vermeer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | - Joshua T. Barnett
- Department of Human Services, Pinellas County Government, Clearwater, FL, United States
| | - Reta T. Newman
- Pinellas County Forensic Lab, District Six Medical Examiner Office, Largo, FL, United States
| | - Tim L. Burns
- Department of Human Services, Pinellas County Government, Clearwater, FL, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Allen B, Schell RC, Jent VA, Krieger M, Pratty C, Hallowell BD, Goedel WC, Basta M, Yedinak JL, Li Y, Cartus AR, Marshall BDL, Cerdá M, Ahern J, Neill DB. PROVIDENT: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Neighborhood-level Overdose Risk in Rhode Island. Epidemiology 2024; 35:232-240. [PMID: 38180881 PMCID: PMC10842082 DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug overdose persists as a leading cause of death in the United States, but resources to address it remain limited. As a result, health authorities must consider where to allocate scarce resources within their jurisdictions. Machine learning offers a strategy to identify areas with increased future overdose risk to proactively allocate overdose prevention resources. This modeling study is embedded in a randomized trial to measure the effect of proactive resource allocation on statewide overdose rates in Rhode Island (RI). METHODS We used statewide data from RI from 2016 to 2020 to develop an ensemble machine learning model predicting neighborhood-level fatal overdose risk. Our ensemble model integrated gradient boosting machine and super learner base models in a moving window framework to make predictions in 6-month intervals. Our performance target, developed a priori with the RI Department of Health, was to identify the 20% of RI neighborhoods containing at least 40% of statewide overdose deaths, including at least one neighborhood per municipality. The model was validated after trial launch. RESULTS Our model selected priority neighborhoods capturing 40.2% of statewide overdose deaths during the test periods and 44.1% of statewide overdose deaths during validation periods. Our ensemble outperformed the base models during the test periods and performed comparably to the best-performing base model during the validation periods. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated the capacity for machine learning models to predict neighborhood-level fatal overdose risk to a degree of accuracy suitable for practitioners. Jurisdictions may consider predictive modeling as a tool to guide allocation of scarce resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bennett Allen
- From the Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert C Schell
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Victoria A Jent
- From the Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maxwell Krieger
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Claire Pratty
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Benjamin D Hallowell
- Center for Health Data and Analysis, Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - William C Goedel
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Melissa Basta
- Center for Health Data and Analysis, Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jesse L Yedinak
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Yu Li
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Abigail R Cartus
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Brandon D L Marshall
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Magdalena Cerdá
- From the Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer Ahern
- Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Daniel B Neill
- Center for Urban Science and Progress, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Courant Institute for Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA
- Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shekhar AC, Nathanson BH, Mader TJ, Coute RA. Cardiac Arrest Following Drug Overdose in the United States: An Analysis of the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e031245. [PMID: 38293840 PMCID: PMC11056133 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given increases in drug overdose-associated mortality, there is interest in better understanding of drug overdose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). A comparison between overdose-attributable OHCA and nonoverdose-attributable OHCA will inform public health measures. METHODS AND RESULTS We analyzed data from 2017 to 2021 in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), comparing overdose-attributable OHCA (OD-OHCA) with OHCA from other nontraumatic causes (non-OD-OHCA). Arrests involving patients <18 years, health care facility residents, patients with cancer diagnoses, and patients with select missing data were excluded. Our main outcome of interest was survival with good neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Category score 1 or 2. From a data set with 537 100 entries, 29 500 OD-OHCA cases and 338 073 non-OD-OHCA cases met inclusion criteria. OD-OHCA cases involved younger patients with fewer comorbidities, were less likely to be witnessed, and less likely to present with a shockable rhythm. Unadjusted survival to hospital discharge with Cerebral Performance Category score =1 or 2 was significantly higher in the OD-OHCA cohort (OD: 15.2% versus non-OD: 6.9%). Adjusted results showed comparable survival with Cerebral Performance Category score =1 or 2 when the first monitored arrest rhythm was shockable (OD: 28.9% versus non-OD: 23.5%, P=0.087) but significantly higher survival rates with Cerebral Performance Category score =1 or 2 for OD-OHCA when the first monitored arrest rhythm was nonshockable (OD: 9.6% versus non-OD: 3.1%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Among patients presenting with nonshockable rhythms, OD-OHCA is associated with significantly better outcomes. Further research should explore cardiac arrest causes, and public health efforts should attempt to reduce the burden from drug overdoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Timothy J. Mader
- Department of Emergency MedicineUMass Chan Medical School—BaystateSpringfieldMAUSA
- Department of Healthcare Delivery and Population ScienceUMass Chan Medical School—BaystateSpringfieldMAUSA
| | - Ryan A. Coute
- Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of MedicineBirminghamALUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Apsley HB, Santos-Lozada AR, Gray J, Hard G, Jones AA. Substance Use Treatment Utilization Among Individuals With Substance Use Disorders in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings on the Role of Polysubstance Use, Criminal Justice Involvement, and Mental Illness From the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. SUBSTANCE USE : RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2024; 18:29768357241259947. [PMID: 38881556 PMCID: PMC11177729 DOI: 10.1177/29768357241259947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
This study used the National Survey on Drug Use and Health to assess a nationally representative sample (N = 4596) weighted to represent 35.2 million adults with DSM-5 criteria-determined substance use disorders (SUDs). This study explored substance use treatment utilization in 2020, emphasizing populations with high vulnerability (e.g., criminal justice involvement (CJI) through parole or probation, polysubstance use, severe mental illness, and HIV/STI). Substance use treatment was broadly defined (any inpatient, outpatient/doctor's office, self-help/other for alcohol/drugs). Our results indicated that among adults with SUDs in 2020, 7 million (20%) had multiple SUDs, 1.75 million (5%) had CJI, 5.3 million (15%) had a severe mental illness, and 1.8 million (5%) had a diagnosis of HIV/STI in the last year. Only 7% of individuals with SUD sought any substance use treatment in the past year. CJI (aOR: 13.39, 95% CI: [7.82, 22.94]), serious mental illness (aOR: 3.27, 95% CI: [1.93, 5.55]), and having both 2 (aOR: 2.10, 95% CI: [1.29, 3.42]) or 3 or more SUDs (aOR: 3.46, 95% CI: [1.82, 6.58]) were all associated with a greater likelihood of receiving treatment. Marriage (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: [0.25, 0.74]) and having an income twice the poverty threshold (aOR: 0.53, 95% CI: [0.29, 0.94]) were associated with reduced odds of receiving any substance use treatment. Compared to those 18 to 25, older individuals had increased odds (2-4 times) of receiving treatment. Interventions are crucially needed to increase access to treatment among those with SUDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah B. Apsley
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Alexis R. Santos-Lozada
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Joy Gray
- Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, & Special Education College of Education, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Gregory Hard
- MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Abenaa A. Jones
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
- Consortium on Substance Use and Addiction, Penn State University, University Park, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chu R, Sarnala S, Doan T, Cheng T, Chen AW, Jamal A, Kim G, Huang R, Srinivasan M, Palaniappan L, Gross ER. COVID-19 pandemic impact on opioid overdose deaths among racial groups within the United States: an observational cross-sectional study. Br J Anaesth 2024; 132:201-204. [PMID: 37977954 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Richie Chu
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Asian American Studies Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sai Sarnala
- Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Thanh Doan
- Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tina Cheng
- Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Annabel W Chen
- Stanford University Medical School, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Armaan Jamal
- Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Gloria Kim
- Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Robert Huang
- Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Malathi Srinivasan
- Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Latha Palaniappan
- Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Eric R Gross
- Stanford Center for Asian Health Research and Education, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Weinberger DM, Bhaskaran K, Korves C, Lucas BP, Columbo JA, Vashi A, Davies L, Justice AC, Rentsch CT. Excess mortality in US Veterans during the COVID-19 pandemic: an individual-level cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2023; 52:1725-1734. [PMID: 37802889 PMCID: PMC10749763 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyad136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most analyses of excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic have employed aggregate data. Individual-level data from the largest integrated healthcare system in the US may enhance understanding of excess mortality. METHODS We performed an observational cohort study following patients receiving care from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) between 1 March 2018 and 28 February 2022. We estimated excess mortality on an absolute scale (i.e. excess mortality rates, number of excess deaths) and a relative scale by measuring the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality comparing pandemic and pre-pandemic periods, overall and within demographic and clinical subgroups. Comorbidity burden and frailty were measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index, respectively. RESULTS Of 5 905 747 patients, the median age was 65.8 years and 91% were men. Overall, the excess mortality rate was 10.0 deaths/1000 person-years (PY), with a total of 103 164 excess deaths and pandemic HR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.25-1.26). Excess mortality rates were highest among the most frail patients (52.0/1000 PY) and those with the highest comorbidity burden (16.3/1000 PY). However, the largest relative mortality increases were observed among the least frail (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.30-1.32) and those with the lowest comorbidity burden (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.43-1.46). CONCLUSIONS Individual-level data offered crucial clinical and operational insights into US excess mortality patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Notable differences emerged among clinical risk groups, emphasizing the need for reporting excess mortality in both absolute and relative terms to inform resource allocation in future outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Weinberger
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Krishnan Bhaskaran
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Caroline Korves
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Clinical Epidemiology Program, White River Junction, VT, USA
| | - Brian P Lucas
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction, VT, USA
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Jesse A Columbo
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction, VT, USA
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Anita Vashi
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Louise Davies
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, VA Outcomes Group, White River Junction, VT, USA
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
- Department of Surgery—Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Amy C Justice
- Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Christopher T Rentsch
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mannes ZL, Wheeler-Martin K, Terlizzi K, Hasin DS, Perry A, Pamplin JR, Crystal S, Cerdá M, Martins SS. Risks of opioid overdose among New York State Medicaid recipients with chronic pain before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prev Med 2023; 177:107789. [PMID: 38016582 PMCID: PMC10842754 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to healthcare disruptions for patients with chronic pain. Following initial disruptions, national policies were enacted to expand access to long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment services, which may have modified risk of opioid overdose. We examined associations between LTOT and/or OUD with fatal and non-fatal opioid overdoses, and whether the pandemic moderated overdose risk in these groups. METHODS We analyzed New York State Medicaid claims data (3/1/2019-12/31/20) of patients with chronic pain (N = 236,391). We used generalized estimating equations models to assess associations between LTOT and/or OUD (neither LTOT or OUD [ref], LTOT only, OUD only, and LTOT and OUD) and the pandemic (03/2020-12/2020) with opioid overdose. RESULTS The pandemic did not significantly (ns) affect opioid overdose among patients with LTOT and/or OUD. While patients with LTOT (vs. no LTOT) had a slight increase in opioid overdose during the pandemic (pre-pandemic: aOR:1.65, 95% CI:1.05, 2.57; pandemic: aOR:2.43, CI:1.75,3.37, ns), patients with OUD had a slightly attenuated odds of overdose during the pandemic (pre-pandemic: aOR:5.65, CI:4.73, 6.75; pandemic: aOR:5.16, CI:4.33, 6.14, ns). Patients with both LTOT and OUD also experienced a slightly reduced odds of opioid overdose during the pandemic (pre-pandemic: aOR:5.82, CI:3.58, 9.44; pandemic: aOR:3.70, CI:2.11, 6.50, ns). CONCLUSIONS Findings demonstrated no significant effect of the pandemic on opioid overdose among people with chronic pain and LTOT and/or OUD, suggesting pandemic policies expanding access to chronic pain and OUD treatment services may have mitigated the risk of opioid overdose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary L Mannes
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Katherine Wheeler-Martin
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Kelly Terlizzi
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 1st Ave., New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Deborah S Hasin
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY 10032, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Allison Perry
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - John R Pamplin
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Stephen Crystal
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, 112 Paterson Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, 683 Hoes Ln W, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; School of Social Work, Rutgers University, 120 Albany St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Magdalena Cerdá
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 180 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Silvia S Martins
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 West 168th St., New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
El Ibrahimi S, Hendricks MA, Little K, Ritter GA, Flores D, Loy B, Wright D, Weiner SG. The association between community social vulnerability and prescription opioid availability with individual opioid overdose. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 252:110991. [PMID: 37862877 PMCID: PMC10754350 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to assess the association of community social vulnerability and community prescription opioid availability with individual non-fatal or fatal opioid overdose. METHODS We identified patients 12 years of age or older from the Oregon All Payer Claims database (APCD) linked to other public health datasets. Community-level characteristics were captured in an exposure period (EP) (1/1/2018-12/31/2018) and included: census tract-level social vulnerability domains (socio-economic status, household composition, racial and ethnic minority status, and housing type and transportation), census tract-level prescriptions and community-level opioid use disorder (OUD) diagnoses per 100 capita binned into quartiles or quintiles. We employed Cox models to estimate the risk of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdoses events in the 12 months following the EP. MAIN FINDINGS We identified 1,548,252 individuals. Patients were mostly female (54%), White (61%), commercially insured (54%), and lived in metropolitan areas (81%). Of the total sample, 2485 (0.2%) experienced a non-fatal opioid overdose and 297 died of opioid overdose. There was higher hazard for non-fatal overdose in communities with greater OUD per 100 capita. We also found higher non-fatal and fatal hazards for opioid overdose among patients in communities with higher housing type and transportation-related vulnerability compared to the lowest quintile. Conversely, patients were at less risk of opioid overdose when living in communities with greater prevalence of the young or the elderly, the disabled, single parent families or low English proficiency. CONCLUSION These findings underscore the importance of the environmental context when considering public health policies to reduce opioid harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanae El Ibrahimi
- Division of Research and Evaluation, Comagine Health, Portland, OR, United States; School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, United States.
| | - Michelle A Hendricks
- General Medical Sciences division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Luis, MO, United States
| | - Kacey Little
- Division of Research and Evaluation, Comagine Health, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Grant A Ritter
- Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States
| | - Diana Flores
- Division of Research and Evaluation, Comagine Health, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Bryan Loy
- Injury and Violence Prevention Program - Public Health Division - Oregon Health Authority, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Dagan Wright
- Injury and Violence Prevention Program - Public Health Division - Oregon Health Authority, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Scott G Weiner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Allen B, Neill DB, Schell RC, Ahern J, Hallowell BD, Krieger M, Jent VA, Goedel WC, Cartus AR, Yedinak JL, Pratty C, Marshall BDL, Cerdá M. Translating Predictive Analytics for Public Health Practice: A Case Study of Overdose Prevention in Rhode Island. Am J Epidemiol 2023; 192:1659-1668. [PMID: 37204178 PMCID: PMC10558193 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwad119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Prior applications of machine learning to population health have relied on conventional model assessment criteria, limiting the utility of models as decision support tools for public health practitioners. To facilitate practitioners' use of machine learning as a decision support tool for area-level intervention, we developed and applied 4 practice-based predictive model evaluation criteria (implementation capacity, preventive potential, health equity, and jurisdictional practicalities). We used a case study of overdose prevention in Rhode Island to illustrate how these criteria could inform public health practice and health equity promotion. We used Rhode Island overdose mortality records from January 2016-June 2020 (n = 1,408) and neighborhood-level US Census data. We employed 2 disparate machine learning models, Gaussian process and random forest, to illustrate the comparative utility of our criteria to guide interventions. Our models predicted 7.5%-36.4% of overdose deaths during the test period, illustrating the preventive potential of overdose interventions assuming 5%-20% statewide implementation capacities for neighborhood-level resource deployment. We describe the health equity implications of use of predictive modeling to guide interventions along the lines of urbanicity, racial/ethnic composition, and poverty. We then discuss considerations to complement predictive model evaluation criteria and inform the prevention and mitigation of spatially dynamic public health problems across the breadth of practice. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bennett Allen
- Correspondence to Dr. Bennett Allen, Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, 180 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, Room 4-15, New York, NY 10016 (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Feder KA, Patel EU, Buresh M, Kirk GD, Mehta SH, Genberg BL. Trends in self-reported non-fatal overdose and patterns of substance use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a prospective cohort of adults who have injected drugs - Baltimore, Maryland, 2014-2022. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 251:110954. [PMID: 37716287 PMCID: PMC10538370 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overdose deaths increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Less is known about drug use behavior changes during the same time period. We examined differences in non-fatal overdose and drug use behaviors before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in a community-recruited cohort of adults who have injected drugs. METHODS 721 participants attended 7401 visits between Jan 2014 and Mar 2022. Outcomes (non-fatal overdose, drug route of administration, type of drugs used) were assessed via self-report in the last six months. We compared pre-pandemic (Jan 2014-Mar 2020) to inter-pandemic (Dec 2020-Mar 2022) prevalence of each outcome using Cohcrane-Maentel-Haeszel odds ratios (CMH-OR). We then estimated probabilities for transitioning between specific behaviors from participants' last pre-pandemic visit to their first inter-pandemic visit. RESULTS Comparing pre-pandemic visits to inter-pandemic visits, the prevalence of non-fatal overdose did not change (CMH-OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.75-1.50); the prevalence of injection (CMH-OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.1-0.17) and non-injection (CMH-OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42-0.61) drug use declined. More than a third (35.7%) of persons using both injection and non-injection drugs pre-pandemic transitioned to exclusive non-injection use during the pandemic. By contrast, few (4.0%) persons using non-injection drugs exclusively pre-pandemic transitioned to injecting during the pandemic. CONCLUSION Among adults who have injected drugs, the start of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a reduced drug use prevalence and transitions from injection to non-injection use. Average overdose prevalence was unchanged, but these behavior changes may have helped mitigate overdose harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth A Feder
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.
| | - Eshan U Patel
- Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, USA
| | - Megan Buresh
- Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, USA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Gregory D Kirk
- Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, USA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Shruti H Mehta
- Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, USA
| | - Becky L Genberg
- Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lundstrom EW, Groth CP, Harrison JE, Hendricks B, Smith GS. Excess US Firearm Mortality During the COVID-19 Pandemic Stratified by Intent and Urbanization. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2323392. [PMID: 37440234 PMCID: PMC10346122 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
This cross-sectional study used time series forecasting to estimate excess firearm mortality in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric W. Lundstrom
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - Caroline P. Groth
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - James E. Harrison
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Brian Hendricks
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| | - Gordon S. Smith
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Allen B, Basaraba C, Corbeil T, Rivera BD, Levin FR, Martinez DM, Schultebraucks K, Henry BF, Pincus HA, Arout C, Krawczyk N. Racial differences in COVID-19 severity associated with history of substance use disorders and overdose: Findings from multi-site electronic health records in New York City. Prev Med 2023; 172:107533. [PMID: 37146730 PMCID: PMC10155467 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Substance use disorders (SUD) are associated with increased risk of worse COVID-19 outcomes. Likewise, racial/ethnic minority patients experience greater risk of severe COVID-19 disease compared to white patients. Providers should understand the role of race and ethnicity as an effect modifier on COVID-19 severity among individuals with SUD. This retrospective cohort study assessed patient race/ethnicity as an effect modifier of the risk of severe COVID-19 disease among patients with histories of SUD and overdose. We used merged electronic health record data from 116,471 adult patients with a COVID-19 encounter between March 2020 and February 2021 across five healthcare systems in New York City. Exposures were patient histories of SUD and overdose. Outcomes were risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and subsequent COVID-19-related ventilation, acute kidney failure, sepsis, and mortality. Risk factors included patient age, sex, and race/ethnicity, as well as medical comorbidities associated with COVID-19 severity. We tested for interaction between SUD and patient race/ethnicity on COVID-19 outcomes. Findings showed that Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic/Latino, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients experienced a higher prevalence of all adverse COVID-19 outcomes compared to non-Hispanic white patients. Past-year alcohol (OR 1.24 [1.01-1.53]) and opioid use disorders (OR 1.91 [1.46-2.49]), as well as overdose history (OR 4.45 [3.62-5.46]), were predictive of COVID-19 mortality, as well as other adverse COVID-19 outcomes. Among patients with SUD, significant differences in outcome risk were detected between patients of different race/ethnicity groups. Findings indicate that providers should consider multiple dimensions of vulnerability to adequately manage COVID-19 disease among populations with SUDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bennett Allen
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, United States of America.
| | - Cale Basaraba
- Area Mental Health Data Science, New York State Psychiatric Institute, United States of America
| | - Thomas Corbeil
- Area Mental Health Data Science, New York State Psychiatric Institute, United States of America
| | - Bianca D Rivera
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Frances R Levin
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, United States of America; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America
| | - Diana M Martinez
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, United States of America; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America
| | - Katharina Schultebraucks
- Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, United States of America; Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, United States of America
| | - Brandy F Henry
- College of Education, Consortium on Substance Use and Addiction, Social Science Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, United States of America
| | - Harold A Pincus
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, United States of America; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, United States of America; Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University, United States of America
| | - Caroline Arout
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, United States of America
| | - Noa Krawczyk
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chhatwal J, Mueller PP, Chen Q, Kulkarni N, Adee M, Zarkin G, LaRochelle MR, Knudsen AB, Barbosa C. Estimated Reductions in Opioid Overdose Deaths With Sustainment of Public Health Interventions in 4 US States. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2314925. [PMID: 37294571 PMCID: PMC10257094 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance In 2021, more than 80 000 US residents died from an opioid overdose. Public health intervention initiatives, such as the Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEALing) Communities Study (HCS), are being launched with the goal of reducing opioid-related overdose deaths (OODs). Objective To estimate the change in the projected number of OODs under different scenarios of the duration of sustainment of interventions, compared with the status quo. Design, Setting, and Participants This decision analytical model simulated the opioid epidemic in the 4 states participating in the HCS (ie, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio) from 2020 to 2026. Participants were a simulated population transitioning from opioid misuse to opioid use disorder (OUD), overdose, treatment, and relapse. The model was calibrated using 2015 to 2020 data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other sources for each state. The model accounts for reduced initiation of medications for OUD (MOUDs) and increased OODs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exposure Increasing MOUD initiation by 2- or 5-fold, improving MOUD retention to the rates achieved in clinical trial settings, increasing naloxone distribution efforts, and furthering safe opioid prescribing. An initial 2-year duration of interventions was simulated, with potential sustainment for up to 3 additional years. Main Outcomes and Measures Projected reduction in number of OODs under different combinations and durations of sustainment of interventions. Results Compared with the status quo, the estimated annual reduction in OODs at the end of the second year of interventions was 13% to 17% in Kentucky, 17% to 27% in Massachusetts, 15% to 22% in New York, and 15% to 22% in Ohio. Sustaining all interventions for an additional 3 years was estimated to reduce the annual number of OODs at the end of the fifth year by 18% to 27% in Kentucky, 28% to 46% in Massachusetts, 22% to 34% in New York, and 25% to 41% in Ohio. The longer the interventions were sustained, the better the outcomes; however, these positive gains would be washed out if interventions were not sustained. Conclusions and Relevance In this decision analytical model study of the opioid epidemic in 4 US states, sustained implementation of interventions, including increased delivery of MOUDs and naloxone supply, was found to be needed to reduce OODs and prevent deaths from increasing again.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jagpreet Chhatwal
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter P. Mueller
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Qiushi Chen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harold and Inge Marcus Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park
| | - Neeti Kulkarni
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Madeline Adee
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Gary Zarkin
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Marc R. LaRochelle
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amy B. Knudsen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Allen B, Urmanche A. NYC RxStat: Stakeholder perspectives on a national model public health and public safety partnership to reduce overdose deaths. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING 2023; 98:102275. [PMID: 36924570 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
NYC RxStat, the United States' first public health and public safety partnership aiming to reduce overdose deaths, began in 2012 and established a national model for cross-sector partnerships. The partnership aimed to integrate data-driven policing with actionable public health interventions and surveillance to develop and implement cross-sector overdose responses. With federal support, jurisdictions nationally have implemented public health and public safety partnerships modeled on RxStat. To inform partnership replication efforts, we conducted a stakeholder evaluation of RxStat. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 25 current and former RxStat stakeholders. Interviews probed stakeholder perceptions of RxStat's successes, challenges, and opportunities for growth. Interview data were iteratively coded and thematically analyzed. Stakeholders reported certainty about the need for cross-sector collaboration and described cross-disciplinary tensions, challenges to collaboration and implementation, and opportunities for partnership optimization and growth. Findings informed 12 strategies to improve RxStat and partnerships in its model, organized into three opportunity areas: (1) ensure stakeholder and agency accountability; (2) build secure and mutually beneficial data systems; and (3) structure partnerships to facilitate equitable collaboration. Cross-sector partnerships offer a promising strategy to integrate the public health and safety sectors, but disciplinary tensions in approach may hamper implementation. Findings can inform efforts to implement and scale cross-sector partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bennett Allen
- Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, United States.
| | - Adelya Urmanche
- Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Palzes VA, Chi FW, Metz VE, Sterling S, Asyyed A, Ridout KK, Campbell CI. Overall and Telehealth Addiction Treatment Utilization by Age, Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status in California After COVID-19 Policy Changes. JAMA HEALTH FORUM 2023; 4:e231018. [PMID: 37204804 PMCID: PMC10199344 DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Addiction treatment rapidly transitioned to a primarily telehealth modality (telephone and video) during the COVID-19 pandemic, raising concerns about disparities in utilization. Objective To examine whether there were differences in overall and telehealth addiction treatment utilization after telehealth policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic by age, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study examined electronic health record and claims data from Kaiser Permanente Northern California for adults (age ≥18 years) with drug use problems before the COVID-19 pandemic (from March 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019) and during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020; hereafter referred to as COVID-19 onset). Analyses were conducted between March 2021 and March 2023. Exposure The expansion of telehealth services during COVID-19 onset. Main Outcomes and Measures Generalized estimating equation models were fit to compare addiction treatment utilization during COVID-19 onset with that before the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilization measures included the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set of treatment initiation and engagement (including inpatient, outpatient, and telehealth encounters or receipt of medication for opioid use disorder [OUD]), 12-week retention (days in treatment), and OUD pharmacotherapy retention. Telehealth treatment initiation and engagement were also examined. Differences in changes in utilization by age group, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) were examined. Results Among the 19 648 participants in the pre-COVID-19 cohort (58.5% male; mean [SD] age, 41.0 [17.5] years), 1.6% were American Indian or Alaska Native; 7.5%, Asian or Pacific Islander; 14.3%, Black; 20.8%, Latino or Hispanic; 53.4%, White; and 2.5%, unknown race. Among the 16 959 participants in the COVID-19 onset cohort (56.5% male; mean [SD] age, 38.9 [16.3] years), 1.6% were American Indian or Alaska Native; 7.4%, Asian or Pacific Islander; 14.6%, Black; 22.2%, Latino or Hispanic; 51.0%, White; and 3.2%, unknown race. Odds of overall treatment initiation increased from before the COVID-19 pandemic to COVID-19 onset for all age, race, ethnicity, and SES subgroups except for patients aged 50 years or older; patients aged 18 to 34 years had the greatest increases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.40). Odds of telehealth treatment initiation increased for all patient subgroups without variation by race, ethnicity, or SES, although increases were greater for patients aged 18 to 34 years (aOR, 7.17; 95% CI, 6.24-8.24). Odds of overall treatment engagement increased (aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24) without variation by patient subgroups. Retention increased by 1.4 days (95% CI, 0.6-2.2 days), and OUD pharmacotherapy retention did not change (adjusted mean difference, -5.2 days; 95% CI, -12.7 to 2.4 days). Conclusions In this cohort study of insured adults with drug use problems, there were increases in overall and telehealth addiction treatment utilization after telehealth policies changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no evidence that disparities were exacerbated, and younger adults may have particularly benefited from the transition to telehealth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa A. Palzes
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health Research, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Felicia W. Chi
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health Research, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Verena E. Metz
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health Research, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
| | - Stacy Sterling
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health Research, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California
| | - Asma Asyyed
- Northern California Addiction Medicine and Recovery Services, The Permanente Medical Group, Inc, Santa Rosa
| | - Kathryn K. Ridout
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health Research, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
- The Permanente Medical Group, Inc, Santa Rosa, California
| | - Cynthia I. Campbell
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health Research, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
D’Orsogna MR, Böttcher L, Chou T. Fentanyl-driven acceleration of racial, gender and geographical disparities in drug overdose deaths in the United States. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 3:e0000769. [PMID: 36962959 PMCID: PMC10032521 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
We examine trends in drug overdose deaths by race, gender, and geography in the United States during the period 2013-2020. Race and gender specific crude rates were extracted from the final National Vital Statistics System multiple cause-of-death mortality files for several jurisdictions and used to calculate the male-to-female ratios of crude rates between 2013 and 2020. We established 2013-2019 temporal trends for four major drug types: psychostimulants with addiction potential (T43.6, such as methamphetamines); heroin (T40.1); natural and semi-synthetic opioids (T40.2, such as those contained in prescription pain-killers); synthetic opioids (T40.4, such as fentanyl and its derivatives) through a quadratic regression and determined whether changes in the pandemic year 2020 were statistically significant. We also identified which race, gender and states were most impacted by drug overdose deaths. Nationwide, the year 2020 saw statistically significant increases in overdose deaths from all drug categories except heroin, surpassing predictions based on 2013-2019 trends. Crude rates for Black individuals of both genders surpassed those for White individuals for fentanyl and psychostimulants in 2018, creating a gap that widened through 2020. In some regions, mortality among White persons decreased while overdose deaths for Black persons kept rising. The largest 2020 mortality statistic is for Black males in the District of Columbia, with a record 134 overdose deaths per 100,000 due to fentanyl, 9.4 times more than the fatality rate among White males. Male overdose crude rates in 2020 remain larger than those of females for all drug categories except in Idaho, Utah and Arkansas where crude rates of overdose deaths by natural and semisynthetic opioids for females exceeded those of males. Drug prevention, mitigation and no-harm strategies should include racial, geographical and gender-specific efforts, to better identify and serve at-risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria R. D’Orsogna
- Department of Computational Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Mathematics, California State University at Northridge, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Lucas Böttcher
- Department of Computational Science and Philosophy, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Tom Chou
- Department of Computational Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Veliz PT, Zhou W, Smith S, Larson JL. Substance Use and the Self-Management of Persistent Symptoms of COVID-19. Subst Use Misuse 2023; 58:835-840. [PMID: 36942996 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2184208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Background: Understanding the self-management practices of persistent symptoms of SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) is critical given the misinformation that has been presented about this disease in the U.S. The purpose of this descriptive study is to assess the self-management of persistent symptoms of COVID-19 with commonly used and misused substances (i.e., alcohol, marijuana and commonly prescribed medications) among adults in the U.S. Methods: The data for this study comes from a cross-sectional survey of U.S. adults that was designed to broadly assess symptom burden, persistent symptom patterns, self-efficacy for symptom management and self-management strategies among people who experienced persistent/Long COVID. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess how symptom length of COVID-19 was associated with the use of several substances to manage these persistent symptoms. Results: The analysis found that adults who had COVID-19 symptoms that persisted for 13 weeks or longer had higher rates of using alcohol (27.3%), marijuana (30.9%) and prescription tranquilizers (21.4%) to manage these symptoms when compared to their adult peers who had COVID-19 symptoms persist for only 4 weeks or less. For instance, the odds of indicating the use of marijuana (AOR = 4.21 95% CI = 1.68,10.5) to manage COVID-19 related symptoms was roughly four times higher for respondents who had COVID-19 symptoms persist for 13 weeks or longer when compared to respondents whose COVID-19 symptoms persisted for only 4 weeks or less. Conclusion: The findings suggest that screening of substance use disorders should be considered among healthcare providers who are treating adults who have persistent symptoms of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip T Veliz
- School of Nursing, Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Weijiao Zhou
- School of Nursing, Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sheree Smith
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - Janet L Larson
- School of Nursing, Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - J. Wesley Boyd
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bart G. When 1 + 1 = 3: the COVID-19 and addiction syndemic. Mol Psychiatry 2023; 28:541-542. [PMID: 36550196 PMCID: PMC9780087 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01927-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Bart
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, 701 Park Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Korona-Bailey J, Mukhopadhyay S. Characteristics of fatal drug overdoses among college age decedents in Tennessee, 2019-2020. DIALOGUES IN HEALTH 2022; 1:100050. [PMID: 38515907 PMCID: PMC10953990 DOI: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Purpose College age persons experienced unique disruptions to their regular lives during the COVID-19 pandemic, sometimes resulting in negative coping mechanisms. We examined changes in the number of and characteristics of college age fatal drug overdoses before and during the early COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We conducted a statewide cross-sectional study to determine the changes in the number and characteristics of college age fatal drug overdose decedents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using 2019-2020 data from the Tennessee State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System. We defined college age as 18-24 years. Frequencies and rates were generated to compare demographics, circumstances, and toxicology between 2019 and 2020. Results From 2019 to 2020, 336 college age persons experienced an unintentional or undetermined fatal drug overdose in Tennessee. Characteristics of college age decedents: mean age 21.7 years, 68.5% males, and 71.4% White. Rates of fatal overdoses among college age persons increased 50.0% overall, 150.1% for female decedents, and 141.7% for Black decedents. Fewer people were treated for substance use disorder or mental health conditions (p = 0.0243) in 2020. Conclusion This analysis can inform local and regional public health workers to implement focused prevention and intervention efforts to curtail the overdose epidemic among college age persons in Tennessee.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Korona-Bailey
- Tennessee Department of Health, Office of Informatics and Analytics, Andrew Johnson Tower 7 Floor, 710 James Robertson Parkway, Nashville, TN 37243, United States
| | - Sutapa Mukhopadhyay
- Tennessee Department of Health, Office of Informatics and Analytics, Andrew Johnson Tower 7 Floor, 710 James Robertson Parkway, Nashville, TN 37243, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Howard KJ, Leong C, Chambless S, Grigsby TJ, Cordaro M, Perrotte JK, Howard JT. Major Depression in Postpartum Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Can Social Support Buffer Psychosocial Risks and Substance Use? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:15748. [PMID: 36497822 PMCID: PMC9738345 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192315748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Rates of mood disorders and substance use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic for postpartum women. The present study's aims were to: (1) examine the prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) in postpartum women during the COVID-19 pandemic, and (2) evaluate whether social support can buffer the associations between MDD, psychosocial factors (perceived stress, generalized anxiety, and intimate partner violence) and substance use (alcohol and drug use). A nationwide survey included 593 postpartum mothers (within 12 months from birth). Participants were assessed for a provisional diagnosis of MDD, and provided responses on validated instruments measuring stress, intimate partner violence, suicidal ideation, generalized anxiety, social support, and substance use. A hierarchical logistic regression model assessed the association of psychosocial factors and substance use with MDD. The final model shows that social support attenuates the association of MDD with perceived stress, alcohol use, and drug use, but does not buffer the relationship of MDD with anxiety or intimate partner violence. Social support was shown to significantly attenuate the effects of stress, alcohol use, and drug use on MDD, suggesting that the presence of a strong, supportive social network should be an area of increased focus for public health and healthcare professionals when caring for postpartum women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista J. Howard
- Department of Psychology, Texas State University, 601 University Dr., San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
| | - Caleb Leong
- Department of Public Health, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
- Consequences of Trauma Working Group, The Center for Community-Based and Applied Health Research, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
| | - Sidney Chambless
- Department of Psychology, Texas State University, 601 University Dr., San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
| | - Timothy J. Grigsby
- Department of Social and Behavioral Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA
| | - Millie Cordaro
- Department of Psychology, Texas State University, 601 University Dr., San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
| | - Jessica K. Perrotte
- Department of Psychology, Texas State University, 601 University Dr., San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
| | - Jeffrey T. Howard
- Department of Public Health, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
- Consequences of Trauma Working Group, The Center for Community-Based and Applied Health Research, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Trends in psychiatric diagnoses by COVID-19 infection and hospitalization among patients with and without recent clinical psychiatric diagnoses in New York city from March 2020 to August 2021. Transl Psychiatry 2022; 12:492. [PMID: 36414624 PMCID: PMC9681844 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02255-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Determining emerging trends of clinical psychiatric diagnoses among patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus is important to understand post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection or long COVID. However, published reports accounting for pre-COVID psychiatric diagnoses have usually relied on self-report rather than clinical diagnoses. Using electronic health records (EHRs) among 2,358,318 patients from the New York City (NYC) metropolitan region, this time series study examined changes in clinical psychiatric diagnoses between March 2020 and August 2021 with month as the unit of analysis. We compared trends in patients with and without recent pre-COVID clinical psychiatric diagnoses noted in the EHRs up to 3 years before the first COVID-19 test. Patients with recent clinical psychiatric diagnoses, as compared to those without, had more subsequent anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and psychosis throughout the study period. Substance use disorders were greater between March and August 2020 among patients without any recent clinical psychiatric diagnoses than those with. COVID-19 positive patients (both hospitalized and non-hospitalized) had greater post-COVID psychiatric diagnoses than COVID-19 negative patients. Among patients with recent clinical psychiatric diagnoses, psychiatric diagnoses have decreased since January 2021, regardless of COVID-19 infection/hospitalization. However, among patients without recent clinical psychiatric diagnoses, new anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and psychosis diagnoses increased between February and August 2021 among all patients (COVID-19 positive and negative). The greatest increases were anxiety disorders (378.7%) and mood disorders (269.0%) among COVID-19 positive non-hospitalized patients. New clinical psychosis diagnoses increased by 242.5% among COVID-19 negative patients. This study is the first to delineate the impact of COVID-19 on different clinical psychiatric diagnoses by pre-COVID psychiatric diagnoses and COVID-19 infections and hospitalizations across NYC, one of the hardest-hit US cities in the early pandemic. Our findings suggest the need for tailoring treatment and policies to meet the needs of individuals with pre-COVID psychiatric diagnoses.
Collapse
|
25
|
Macmadu A, Yolken A, Frueh L, Toussaint JR, Newman R, Jacka BP, Collins AB, Marshall BDL. Characteristics of events in which police responded to overdoses: an examination of incident reports in Rhode Island. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:116. [PMID: 36258209 PMCID: PMC9578237 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-022-00698-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Narrow or non-existent Good Samaritan Law protections and harsh drug selling statutes in the USA have been shown to deter bystanders from seeking medical assistance for overdoses. Additionally, little is known about the actions that police take when responding to overdose events. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence and correlates of naloxone administration by police, as well as to examine overdose events where arrests were made and those in which the person who overdosed was described as combative. Methods We analyzed incident reports of police responding to an overdose between September 1, 2019, and August 31, 2020 (i.e., 6 months prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic), from a city in Rhode Island. We examined characteristics of incidents, as well as individual characteristics of the person who overdosed. Correlates of police naloxone administration were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Fisher’s exact tests, and we examined incidents where arrests occurred and incidents in which the person who overdosed was described as combative descriptively. Results Among the 211 incidents in which police responded to an overdose during the study period, we found that police administered naloxone in approximately 10% of incidents. In most incidents, police were the last group of first responders to arrive on scene (59%), and most often, naloxone was administered by others (65%). Police were significantly more likely to administer naloxone when they were the first professionals to arrive, when naloxone had not been administered by others, and when the overdose occurred in public or in a vehicle. Arrests at overdose events were rarely reported (1%), and people who overdosed were rarely (1%) documented in incident reports as being ‘combative.’ Conclusions Considering these findings, ideally, all jurisdictions should have sufficient first responder staffing and resources to ensure a rapid response to overdose events, with police rarely or never dispatched to respond to overdoses. However, until this ideal can be achieved, any available responders should be dispatched concurrently, with police instructed to resume patrol once other professional responders arrive on scene; additionally, warrant searches of persons on scene should be prohibited. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-022-00698-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandria Macmadu
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S-121-2, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| | | | - Lisa Frueh
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jai'el R Toussaint
- Department of Africana Studies, Brown University Churchill House, 155 Angell Street, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Roxxanne Newman
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S-121-2, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| | - Brendan P Jacka
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S-121-2, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| | - Alexandra B Collins
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S-121-2, Providence, RI, 02912, USA
| | - Brandon D L Marshall
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Box G-S-121-2, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schrepf A. When even the ground was burning: Neuroinflammation in the wake of COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun 2022; 105:27-28. [PMID: 35714917 PMCID: PMC9195410 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2022.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
27
|
Jozaghi E. The overdose epidemic: a study protocol to determine whether people who use drugs can influence or shape public opinion via mass media. HEALTH & JUSTICE 2022; 10:22. [PMID: 35870016 PMCID: PMC9307426 DOI: 10.1186/s40352-022-00189-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We are currently witnessing an ongoing drug overdose death epidemic in many nations linked to the distribution of illegally manufactured potent synthetic opioids. While many health policy makers and researchers have focused on the root causes and possible solutions to the current crisis, there has been little focus on the power of advocacy and community action by people who use drugs (PWUDs). Specifically, there has been no research on the role of PWUDs in engaging and influencing mass media opinion. METHODS By relying on one of the longest and largest peer-run drug user advocacy groups in the world, the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU), newspaper articles, television reports, and magazines that VANDU or its members have been directly involved in will be identified via two data bases (the Canadian Newsstream & Google News). The news articles and videos related to the health of PWUDs and issues affecting PWUDs from 1997 to the end of 2020 will be analyzed qualitatively using Nvivo software. DISCUSSION As our communities are entering another phase of the drug overdose epidemic, acknowledging and partnering with PWUDs could play an integral part in advancing the goals of harm reduction, treatment, and human rights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehsan Jozaghi
- UBC Faculty of Dentistry, Nobel Biocare Oral Health Centre, 2151 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Allen B, Cerdá M. Opportunities for opioid overdose prediction: building a population health approach. Lancet Digit Health 2022; 4:e403-e404. [PMID: 35623796 PMCID: PMC9897051 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00097-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|