Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19

NETosis: A key player in autoimmunity, COVID-19, and long COVID

NETosis, the process through which neutrophils release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), has emerged as a crucial mechanism in host defense and the pathogenesis of autoimmune responses. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, this process received significant attention due to the central role of neutrophil recruitment and activation in infection control. However, elevated neutrophil levels and dysregulated NET formation have been linked to coagulopathy and endothelial damage, correlating with disease severity and poor prognosis in COVID-19. Moreover, it is known that SARS-CoV-2 can induce persistent low-grade systemic inflammation, known as long COVID, although the underlying causes remain unclear. It has been increasingly acknowledged that excessive NETosis and NET generation contribute to further pathophysiological abnormalities following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This review provides an updated overview of the role of NETosis in autoimmune diseases, but also the relationship between COVID-19 and long COVID with autoimmunity (e.g., latent and overt autoimmunity, molecular mimicry, epitope spreading) and NETosis (e.g., immune responses, NET markers). Finally, we discuss potential therapeutic strategies targeting dysregulated NETosis to mitigate the severe complications of COVID-19 and long COVID.

The Prognostic Value of Circulating Cytokines and Complete Blood Count-Based Inflammatory Markers in COVID-19 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a high burden of cardiovascular disease, which has been worsened during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between clinical markers, especially interleukin-6 (IL-6) and other inflammatory biomarkers, and the severity of COVID-19 in patients with AF.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study categorized patients based on clinical presentations and laboratory results to investigate the prognostic significance of inflammatory markers in COVID-19 outcomes among those with AF. The study included 100 hospitalized COVID-19 patients aged between 40 to 80 years and was conducted at the Chapidze Hospital in Tbilisi, Georgia. Patients were then grouped by disease severity according to computed tomography (CT) scores, clinical symptoms, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation. Levels of IL-6 were obtained at three time points during hospitalization. A broad range of laboratory tests, including C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and D-dimer, were also conducted.

Results

Patients with AF demonstrated significantly elevated levels of IL-6 (P = 0.024), CRP (P = 0.001), and ferritin (P < 0.001), suggesting a severe inflammatory response. D-dimer levels were also notably higher in the AF group (P < 0.005), indicating an increased risk of thrombotic complications. Oxygen saturation levels were significantly lower (P = 0.004) and CT scores higher in patients with AF. Furthermore, the length of hospitalization was longer among patients with AF (median duration significantly higher, P = 0.032), indicating a more severe disease course.

Conclusions

The proinflammatory markers such as IL-6 are independent predictive markers of COVID-19 severity in AF patients. Overall, it highlights urgent treatment approaches, such as available anti-inflammatory drugs, for COVID-19 patients with arrhythmias. Combining these biomarkers into clinical routines helps us better identify patients at risk and how to treat them.

Comprehensive Review of Thrombophilia: Pathophysiology, Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Molecular Diagnosis

Thrombophilia, characterized by an imbalance between fibrinolysis and coagulation leading to inappropriate blood clotting, is a significant medical condition. The CDC has designated it as an underdiagnosed, serious, and potentially preventable disorder, contributing to an estimated 600,000-900,000 cases and 100,000 deaths annually in the United States. These figures surpass the combined annual mortality of AIDS, breast cancer, and motor vehicle accidents. The pathogenesis of thrombophilia involves complex interactions between genetic predispositions, such as mutations in Factor V Leiden, Factor II, MTHFR, and Serpine-1, and environmental factors, including unhealthy lifestyles, prolonged hospitalization, obesity, and cancer. Prevalence of specific genetic mutations varies across populations. Additional risk factors include age, family history, and pregnancy, with recent attention to increased susceptibility in SARS-CoV-2 infection. While molecular diagnostic techniques are available, there remains a need for robust, cost-effective, and accurate screening methods for large populations. This systematic review provides an updated overview of thrombophilia, encompassing pathophysiology, epidemiology, genetic and environmental risk factors, coagulation cascade, population-specific mutation prevalence, and diagnostic approaches. By synthesizing clinical and molecular evidence, this review aims to guide researchers, hematologists, and clinicians in the diagnosis and management of thrombophilia.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women and incidence of thromboembolic disease: an analysis of the Covid-19-Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS) in Germany

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to quantify the rate of thromboembolic events (TE) in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection and to characterize risk factors to provide a basis for individualized recommendation on prophylactic measures.

METHODS

CRONOS is a multicenter, prospective observational study conducted in Germany and Austria during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pregnant women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. Data on demographics, medical history, COVID-19-related aspects, and pregnancy and birth outcomes were collected. TE was particularly queried and used as the primary outcome. A combination of "TE," "maternal or fetal death," or "severe postpartum hemorrhage" was defined as a secondary endpoint. Risk analyses were performed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Data from 8033 pregnant patients showed 40 TEs (0.5% incidence). TE rates were 10% in ICU patients, 0.2-0.4% in those with moderate-to-mild COVID-19, and < 0.1% in asymptomatic women. Pulmonary embolism occurred in 21 cases, deep vein thrombosis in 12, and 7 had atypical or arterial TE. Risk factors included advanced gestational age, COVID-19 symptoms, hospitalization or ICU admission, premature birth, cesarean section, delivery within 4 weeks of infection, higher weight gain, anemia, and chronic inflammatory bowel disease. COVID-19 vaccination reduced risk. The logistic risk model yielded an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.94).

CONCLUSION

The TE rate in pregnant women is largely determined by the severity of the disease. In asymptomatic or mild cases, other factors outweigh TE risk, while severe COVID-19 requiring ICU admission poses a high TE risk despite prophylaxis.

Assessing differential application of thromboprophylaxis regimes related to risk of pulmonary embolism and mortality in COVID-19 patients through instrumental variable analysis

Thrombotic complications are common in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, with pulmonary embolism (PE) being the most frequent. Randomised trials have provided inconclusive results on the optimal dosage of thromboprophylaxis in critically ill COVID-19 patients. We utilized data from the multicentre CAPACITY-COVID patient registry to assess the effect of differential application of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) dose protocols on PE and in-hospital mortality risk in critically ill COVID-19 patients. An instrumental variable analysis was performed to estimate the intention-to-treat effect, utilizing differences in thromboprophylaxis prescribing behaviour between hospitals. We included 939 patients with PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from 34 hospitals. Two-hundred-and-one patients (21%) developed a PE. The adjusted cause-specific HR of PE was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.73-1.16) per doubling of LMWH dose. The adjusted cause-specific HR for in-hospital mortality was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.65-1.02) per doubling of LMWH dose. This dose-response relationship was shown to be non-linear. To conclude, this study did not find evidence for an effect of LMWH dose on the risk of PE, but suggested a non-linear decreased risk of in-hospital mortality for higher doses of LMWH. However, uncertainty remains, and the dose-response relationship between LMWH dose and in-hospital mortality needs further investigation in well-designed studies.

Effect of mild-to-moderate COVID‑19 on the incidence and risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in patients with hip fracture: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effect of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 on the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with hip fractures. Hip fractures are common in the elderly, and previous research has shown that they accounted for 58.3% of traumatic fractures in older inpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Meanwhile, the relationship between COVID-19 and DVT is complex. Some studies have reported that the incidence of DVT in critically ill COVID-19 patients can be as high as 46%, and 20% in those with moderate-to-severe cases. However, the impact of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 on DVT risk in hip fracture patients remains unclear.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent surgery for hip fractures between December 8, 2022, and January 9, 2023, were included in the study. All patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and were assessed for DVT preoperatively using doppler ultrasonography (DUS). Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for DVT.

RESULTS

The records of 98 patients with hip fractures, were included in the analysis, of whom 63 were SARS-CoV-2 positive and 35 were SARS-CoV-2 negative. Pre-operative DUS showed that 36/98 patients (37%) had DVT, including 25/63 (40%) patients with COVID-19, and 11/35 (31%) patients without COVID-19. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that pre-operative leukocyte count and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were independent risk factors for DVT, whereas mild-to-moderate COVID-19 was not an independent risk factor for DVT. In patients with hip fractures, COVID-19 did not significantly increase the risk of DVT.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, in patients with hip fractures, DVT prevention measures should be implemented routinely, regardless of COVID-19 status.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination reduces the risk of thrombotic complications in severe COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the occurrence of thrombotic complications in patients admitted to intensive care for severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

DESIGN

Observational, descriptive, prospective, multicentre study.

SETTING

Intensive care units of five university hospitals.

PATIENTS

A total of 255 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, confirmed by RT-PCR in throat swab or tracheal aspirate, starting the date the first vaccinated patient against SARS-CoV-2 was admitted in one of the participating ICUs, were included in the analysis.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

Vaccination status against SARS-CoV-2 and thrombotic events.

RESULTS

18.8% of patients had received some form of vaccination. Thrombotic events occurred in 21.2% of patients. Lack of vaccination was associated with thrombotic events (OR 5.024; 95% CI: 1.104-23.123; p = 0.0037) and death (OR 5.161; 95% CI: 1.075-24.787; p = 0.04). ICU mortality was not associated with the occurrence of thrombotic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of patients, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 reduced the risk of thrombotic events and mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to the ICU. Thrombotic complications did not alter ICU mortality.

Enhanced prediction of thrombotic events in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with soluble thrombomodulin

We aimed to determine the predictive accuracy of elevated soluble thrombomodulin (sTM) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang2) for thrombotic events (TE) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We conducted a nested case-control study within a cohort of people admitted to hospital with COVID-19 from March 2020 to August 2022. The cases (people with TE within 28 days after hospital admission) were matched by propensity score to comparable patients without TE. We determined plasma levels of sTM and Ang2 in all available frozen samples, prioritizing the earliest post-admission samples, using an automated immunoassay technique. Among 2,524 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (43% females; median age 67 years), 73 had TE (incidence 1.15 events per 1000 patient-days of follow-up). Frozen plasma samples were available for 43 cases and 176 controls. Elevated plasma concentration of sTM was significantly associated with TE (2.8 [1.8, 4] vs. 1.52 [1.1, 2.65] ng/mL; p =  0.001) and mortality (median [Q1, Q3], 3.32 [2.16, 4.65] vs. 1.58 [1.11, 2.73] ng/mL; p =  0.001), while D-dimer showed a specific association with TE (2.3 [0.8, 7.4] vs. 0.75 [0.4, 1.6] mcg/mL; p =  0.001). In contrast, Ang2 was not associated with any of these events. The association with thrombotic events remained in adjusted models (HR [95%CI] per unit increase, 1.24 [1.04-1.47] for sTM; 1.07 [1.03-1.10] for D-dimer). The adjusted regression model that included both biomarkers, sTM and D-dimer, improved (AUC 73%, sensitivity 77% and specificity 65% for TE diagnosis; p =  0.007) the predictive capacity of the same model without sTM. In conclusion, determination of soluble thrombomodulin along with D-dimer enhances thrombotic risk assessment in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Post-transfusion activation of coagulation pathways during severe COVID-19 correlates with COVID-19 convalescent plasma antibody profiles

Early antibody therapy can prevent severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). However, the effectiveness of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) therapy in treating severe COVID-19 remains inconclusive. To test a hypothesis that some CCP units are associated with a coagulopathy hazard in severe disease that offsets its benefits, we tracked 304 CCP units administered to 414 hospitalized COVID-19 patients to assess their association with the onset of unfavorable post-transfusion D-dimer trends. CCP recipients with increasing or persistently elevated D-dimer trajectories after transfusion experienced higher mortality than those whose D-dimer levels were persistently low or decreasing after transfusion. Within the CCP donor-recipient network, recipients with increasing or persistently high D-dimer trajectories were skewed toward association with a minority of CCP units. In in vitro assays, CCP from "higher-risk" units had higher cross-reactivity with the spike protein of human seasonal betacoronavirus OC43. "Higher-risk" CCP units also mediated greater Fcγ receptor IIa signaling against cells expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike compared with "lower-risk" units. This study finds that post-transfusion activation of coagulation pathways during severe COVID-19 is associated with specific CCP antibody profiles and supports a potential mechanism of immune complex-activated coagulopathy.

Severely Ill COVID-19 Patients May Exhibit Hypercoagulability Despite Escalated Anticoagulation

Introduction: Severely ill COVID-19 patients receiving prophylactic-dose anticoagulation exhibit high rates of thrombosis and mortality. The escalation of anticoagulation also does not reduce mortality and has an uncertain impact on thrombosis rates. The reasons why escalated doses fail to outperform prophylactic doses in reducing risks of thrombosis and death in severely ill COVID-19 patients remain unclear. We hypothesized that escalated anticoagulation would not effectively prevent hypercoagulability and, consequently, would not reduce the risk of thrombosis and death in some severely ill patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study that enrolled 3860 COVID-19 patients, including 1654 severely ill. They received different doses of low-molecular-weight or unfractionated heparin, and their blood coagulation was monitored with activated partial thromboplastin time, D-dimer, and Thrombodynamics. A primary outcome was hypercoagulability detected by Thrombodynamics. Blood samples were collected at the trough level of anticoagulation. Results: We found that escalated anticoagulation did not prevent hypercoagulability in 28.3% of severely ill patients at the trough level of the pharmacological activity. Severely ill patients with such hypercoagulability had higher levels of inflammation markers and better creatinine clearance compared to severely ill patients without it. Hypercoagulability detected by Thrombodynamics was associated with a 1.68-fold higher hazard rate for death and a 3.19-fold higher hazard rate for thrombosis. Elevated D-dimer levels were also associated with higher hazard rates for thrombosis and death, while shortened APTTs were not. The simultaneous use of Thrombodynamics and D-dimer data enhanced the accuracy for predicting thrombotic events and fatal outcomes in severely ill patients. Conclusions: Thrombodynamics reliably detects hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients and can be used in conjunction with D-dimer to assess the risk of thrombosis and death in severely ill patients. The pharmacological effect of LMWH at the trough level might be too low to prevent thrombosis in some severely ill patients with severe inflammation and better creatinine clearance, even if escalated doses are used.

The Prevalence of Previous Coronavirus Disease-19 in Patients with Pulmonary Thromboembolism and Its Effect on Embolism Severity

Background/Objectives: The association between past coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) infection and pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a potential research topic. We aimed to research the prevalence of previous COVID-19 infection in patients with PTE and to determine whether there is a difference in embolism severity in these cases. Methods: Study design: Multicenter, observational, cross-sectional. Patients diagnosed with PTE between 11 March 2022 and 11 March 2023 were prospectively included in this study, excluding cases with PTE along with active COVID-19, patients under the age of 18, and pregnant patients. Group 1 consisted of PTE cases with previous COVID-19, and Group 2 consisted of PTE cases without previous COVID-19. Key variables are D-Dimer level, right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio, simplified pulmonary embolism severity score, and treatment type. Results: A total of 1185 patients (Group 1; n = 360, Group 2; n = 825) were included in this study. The proportion of patients with RV/LV ratio > 1 on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was significantly high in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (27.9% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.003). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the absence of any identifiable risk factor for PTE was found to be a 0.46-fold protective factor in the presence of previous COVID-19 (OR: 0.456 95% CI: 0.274-0.760, Wald = 9.070, df = 1, p = 0.003) and an RV/LV ratio > 1 on CTPA was found to be a 0.60-fold protective factor (OR: 0.603, 95% CI: 0.365-0.998, Wald = 3.874, df = 1, p = 0.049). Conclusions: The prevalence of previous COVID-19 infection in PTE cases was 30.4%, and 26.3% of idiopathic cases had previous COVID-19 infection. Although the parameters related to embolism severity were higher in the non-COVID-19 group, multivariate analyses revealed a 2.2-fold increased risk for idiopathic PTE and a 1.7-fold increased risk for RV/LV ratio > 1 on CTPA in patients without COVID-19 compared to those with prior COVID-19.

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective study

Background

The global impact of SARS-CoV-2 and its associated coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has necessitated urgent characterization of prognostic biomarkers. This study aimed to delineate the epidemiological and clinical predictors of mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 123 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to Huoshenshan Hospital (Wuhan, China) from 1 February 2020 to 30 April 2020. Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariate Cox regression were used to assess the independent factors with survival time. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of <0.05.

Results

The cohort exhibited a mortality rate of 49.6% (61/123), with the critical clinical type (HR = 7.970, p = 0.009), leukocytosis (HR = 3.408, p = 0.006), and lymphopenia (HR = 0.817, p = 0.038) emerging as independent predictors of reduced survival. Critical-type patients demonstrated significantly elevated inflammatory markers (neutrophils: 10.41 ± 6.23 × 109/L; CRP: 104.47 ± 29.18 mg/L) and coagulopathy (D-dimer: 5.21 ± 2.34 μg/ml) compared to non-critical cases. Deceased patients exhibited pronounced metabolic derangements, including hyperglycemia (9.81 ± 2.07 mmol/L) and hepatic dysfunction (ALP: 174.03 ± 30.13 U/L).

Conclusion

We revealed the epidemiological and clinical features of different clinical types of SARS-CoV-2 as summarized in this paper. We found that critical type, leukocyte, and lymphocyte are risk factors that affect survival time, which could be an early and helpful marker to improve management of COVID-19 patients.

Assessing the impact of COmorbidities and Sociodemographic factors on Multiorgan Injury following COVID-19: rationale and protocol design of COSMIC, a UK multicentre observational study of COVID-negative controls

INTRODUCTION

SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) has had an enormous health and economic impact globally. Although primarily a respiratory illness, multi-organ involvement is common in COVID-19, with evidence of vascular-mediated damage in the heart, liver, kidneys and brain in a substantial proportion of patients following moderate-to-severe infection. The pathophysiology and long-term clinical implications of multi-organ injury remain to be fully elucidated. Age, gender, ethnicity, frailty and deprivation are key determinants of infection severity, and both morbidity and mortality appear higher in patients with underlying comorbidities such as ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and diabetes. Our aim is to gain mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of multiorgan dysfunction in people with COVID-19 and maximise the impact of national COVID-19 studies with a comparison group of COVID-negative controls.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

COmorbidities and Sociodemographic factors on Multiorgan Injury following COVID-19 (COSMIC) is a prospective, multicentre UK study which will recruit 200 subjects without clinical evidence of prior COVID-19 and perform extensive phenotyping with multiorgan imaging, biobank serum storage, functional assessment and patient reported outcome measures, providing a robust control population to facilitate current work and serve as an invaluable bioresource for future observational studies.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee East Midlands (REC reference 19/EM/0295). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

COSMIC is registered as an extension of C-MORE (Capturing Multi-ORgan Effects of COVID-19) on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04510025).

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection therapies on the risk of venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular events from the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry

This study aimed to assess the impact of SARS-CoV-2 therapies on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and other cardiovascular events. A retrospective, multicenter, observational study included hospitalized patients in Spain due to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 2020 to March 2022. A total of 184,324 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were included, with a mean age of 67.5 (± 16) years of whom 58.4% were male. Among the comorbidities, arterial hypertension was the most common, affecting 52.5% (9618 patients), followed by dyslipidemia in 39.5% (7237 patients), diabetes mellitus in 23.7% (1748 patients), and atrial fibrillation in 10.6% (1948 patients). The overall mortality rate was 17.4% (3183 patients) and 9.9% (1819 patients) required admission to an intensive care unit. Cardiovascular events occurred in 4.08% (748 patients), with VTE occurring in 2.78% (510 patients), myocardial infarction in 0.75% (137 patients), and ischemic stroke in 0.55% (101 patients). Among therapies, beta-lactams were used in 66.7% (12,228 patients), systemic corticosteroids in 56.9% (10,424 patients), and tocilizumab in 11.6% (2128 patients). Multivariate analysis revealed an independent association between VTE and the use of tocilizumab (adjusted OR 2.07; p < 0.01), corticosteroids (adjusted OR 1.44; p = 0.02), and macrolides (adjusted OR 0.58; p < 0.01). None of the therapies were associated with the risk of myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke. In this large national cohort, tocilizumab and corticosteroids exhibited an independent association for the risk of VTE, but not for myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke.

Patterns of Prophylactic Anticoagulation Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: An Analysis of the American Heart Association COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry

BACKGROUND

Limited knowledge exists about prophylactic anticoagulation patterns in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using American Heart Association COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry data from May 2020 to March 2022. We included patients without preexisting indications for or contraindications to anticoagulation, excluding those with missing anticoagulation data. Patients were categorized by the highest anticoagulation dose received. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between anticoagulation use/dose, patient demographics, clinical presentation, in-hospital course, institutional characteristics, and admission date, accounting for hospital clustering. Among 26 775 patients, 4157 (16%) received no anticoagulation, 15 617 (58%) low-dose, 3071 (11%) intermediate-dose, and 3930 (15%) full-dose anticoagulation. Significant hospital-level variability occurred for any anticoagulation use (range, 0%-98%; P<0.0001) and by dose (full anticoagulation range, 0%-85%; P<0.0001). Controlling for hospital variability, older age, male sex, non-White race, higher body mass index, higher platelets, corticosteroid use, and intensive care unit admission were positively associated with any anticoagulation use. Older age, male sex, higher body mass index, higher platelets, corticosteroid use, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and admission before October 2020 were associated with higher anticoagulation dose (full versus low dose). Rates of no anticoagulation significantly increased in both intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit strata over time (P trend=0.01 and <0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large real-world analysis, nearly 1 in 6 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 received no prophylactic anticoagulation. Patient and disease characteristics associated with thrombotic risk and COVID-19 severity correlated with anticoagulation strategy. Importantly, substantial institutional differences emerged, highlighting gaps between clinical practice and guideline recommendations.

Aortic floating thrombus in patients with COVID-19: a report of eight cases

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic events of COVID-19 are due to hyperinflammatory process associated with hypercoagulable state. The aim of the study was to determine characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who presented with aortic thrombus.

METHODS

We retrospectively conducted a single-center, descriptive study over a period of 1 year and 7 months, between June 2021 and December 2022, involving eight patients with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with aortic thrombus revealed by acute limb ischemia.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 67 years with a median of 64, 5 ± 14. Of the eight included patients, six were men and two were women. Aortic thrombus was diagnosed in all cases. Six patients developed one episode of acute limb ischemia and one patient had recurrent upper and lower ischemia despite full anticoagulation whereas one patient had distal embolization with palpable pulses. In six patients, the thrombi were located in descending and abdominal aorta, while two patients presented with ascending aorta floating thrombus. Seven patients required urgent revascularization whereas medical treatment was recommended for one patient. The primary outcomes were successful in five cases, one patient had to be amputated above elbow, whereas two patients died due to a rapid deterioration of respiratory condition.

CONCLUSION

Aortic thrombosis is a rare clinical presentation in SARS-CoV-2 infection but with potentially fatal embolic complication. Physicians should maintain a high degree of clinical suspicion to diagnose thromboembolic consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection for timely management and avoiding morbidities like ischemic stroke and major amputations.

Influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on cerebrovascular diseases in the Sao Paulo region of Brazil

BACKGROUND

The rapid spread of covid-19 overwhelmed healthcare systems. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on hospitalizations and hospital deaths due to cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) in São Paulo state, Brazil.

METHODS

This ecologic study evaluated the CVD hospitalizations and hospital deaths (2017-2021) by demographic features and CVD type. During the pandemic (2020-2021), segmented regression models were used to detect changes in CVD trends. We also evaluated the detrended cross-correlation between CVD deaths and hospitalization with the SARS-Cov-2 infection series.

RESULTS

During the pandemic, there is a 35% reduction in CVD hospitalizations, mainly in elective admissions and ischemic stroke, but a 6.5% increase in deaths, especially in Black and Brown individuals, and those aged 20-29 years. From 2020 to 2021, Black and Brown individuals experience an earlier and more prolonged increase in hospital deaths. Ischemic CVD hospitalizations decrease in the first quarter of 2020. Older people exhibit a monthly increase of 2.9% in hospitalizations and 5.3% in deaths in the 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2021. SARS-Cov-2 infections are inversely correlated to CVD hospitalizations and directly correlated to CVD hospital deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Covid-19 pandemic negatively affects CVD hospitalizations and deaths, particularly in Black and Brown individuals. The decrease in hospitalizations and increase in hospital deaths of ischemic CVD highlights vulnerability in accessing healthcare resources during the pandemic.

Inflammatory Biomarkers Demonstrate Predictive Capacity for Mortality in COVID-19-Related ARDS Patients Receiving High-Dose Corticosteroids: A Longitudinal Analysis

Purpose

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who lack clinical improvement are frequently treated with high-dose corticosteroids (HDS). Since HDS is used to reduce hyperinflammation in these patients, levels of (pro-)inflammatory biomarkers after commencing HDS treatment could be useful in predicting mortality. This study aims to evaluate biomarker levels after commencing HDS over time, along with their capacity to predict mortality.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients with COVID-19 ARDS treated with HDS in the intensive care unit (ICU) at an academic hospital in the Netherlands between March 2020-March 2022. Inflammatory biomarkers (ie, C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, ferritin, leukocyte count, interleukin-6 (IL-6), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and procalcitonin (PCT)) were assessed daily from start of HDS (ie baseline) until day 7. Associations between biomarker levels and all-cause-hospital-mortality were evaluated each day using logistic regression, with cut-offs identified by optimizing sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp).

Results

Of the 122 patients included, 53 (43.4%) died during hospitalization. HDS was initiated for a median 7 days (IQR=1-11) after ICU admission. At baseline, a moderately high predictive capacity for mortality was observed at a ferritin level >1281 µg/L (Se=62%/Sp=64%), leukocyte count >13.7 × 109/L (Se=42%/Sp=79%), and NLR >12.1 (Se=61%/Sp=77%). During follow-up, CRP >50 mg/L on day 6 (Se=50%/Sp=75%) and >42 mg/L on day 7 (Se=50%/Sp=75%), ferritin >1082 µg/L on day 6 (Se 63%/Sp=71%) and >1852 µg/L on day 7 (Se=31%/Sp=79%), IL-6 >67 mg/L on day 7 (Se=56%/Sp=79%) and LDH >396U/L on day 6 (Se=38%/Sp=83%) and >373 U/L on day 7 (Se=47%/Sp=72%) showed moderate capacity to predict mortality. NLR was consistently associated with mortality for all days, except day 1 (Se=36-68%/Sp=72-92%).

Conclusion

In COVID-19 ARDS patients receiving HDS, several clinically available inflammatory biomarkers moderately predicted all-cause-hospital-mortality after the start of HDS, particularly on days 6 and 7. NLR demonstrated the most consistent association with mortality over time. The use of these markers requires validation in larger cohorts.

Genetic and Epigenetic Intersections in COVID-19-Associated Cardiovascular Disease: Emerging Insights and Future Directions

The intersection of COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has emerged as a significant area of research, particularly in understanding the impact of antiplatelet therapies like ticagrelor and clopidogrel. COVID-19 has been associated with acute cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarction, thrombosis, and heart failure, exacerbated by the virus's ability to trigger widespread inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a critical role in regulating these processes by modulating the gene expressions involved in platelet function, inflammation, and vascular homeostasis. This study explores the potential of miRNAs such as miR-223 and miR-126 as biomarkers for predicting resistance or responsiveness to antiplatelet therapies in COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular disease. Identifying miRNA signatures linked to drug efficacy could optimize treatment strategies for patients at high risk of thrombotic events during COVID-19 infection. Moreover, understanding miRNA-mediated pathways offers new insights into how SARS-CoV-2 exacerbates CVD, particularly through mechanisms like cytokine storms and endothelial damage. The findings of this research could lead to personalized therapeutic approaches, improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality in COVID-19-associated cardiovascular events. With global implications, this study addresses the urgent need for effective management of CVD in the context of COVID-19, focusing on the integration of molecular biomarkers to enhance the precision of antiplatelet therapy.

Examining the lifespan of red blood cells in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to examine the lifespan of red blood cells (RBCs) in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), explore the factors influencing this lifespan, and assess its significance in clinical contexts.

METHODS

The experimental group comprised of 182 patients with SLE, while the control group consisted of 90 healthy participants. By using a non-invasive breath test, we measured the RBC lifespan in both groups. Subsequently, we conducted a comparative analysis of general clinical data and laboratory findings to explore the correlation between RBC lifespan in patients with SLE and various parameters associated with RBC characteristics, inflammatory markers, and immunological indicators. Furthermore, we examined the impact of COVID-19 infection on RBC lifespan among patients with SLE and assessed the diagnostic efficacy of RBC lifespan.

RESULTS

RBC lifespan was notably reduced in the SLE group in comparison to the healthy control group (P = 0.002). A positive correlation was observed between RBC lifespan and hemoglobin (HB), complement 3, and complement 4, whereas a negative correlation was noted with IgG, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, and anti-dsDNA levels (all P < 0.05). Noteworthy independent contributors to the reduction in RBC lifespan among patients with SLE included disease activity and presence of anemia. While RBC lifespan remained unchanged in the control group before and after COVID-19 infection (P > 0.05), a reduction in RBC lifespan post-COVID-19 infection was observed among patients with SLE (P < 0.05). Also, RBC lifespan was notably shorter during the active disease phase of SLE compared to the stable phase, with post-COVID-19 active patients with SLE exhibiting even shorter RBC lifespan compared to the pre-COVID-19 active group (all P < 0.05). An optimal cutoff for the prediction of anemia in patients with SLE on the day of assessment was determined to be 93.5 days (AUC 0.792, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with SLE exhibited shorter RBC lifespan in contrast to the healthy population, which is notably linked with levels of inflammatory and immune markers, as well as the incidence of COVID-19 infection. This discovery holds crucial significance for both the diagnosis of anemia and the comprehension of its underlying pathogenic mechanisms within the context of SLE.

The prevalence of thromboembolic events among COVID-19 patients admitted to a single centre intensive care unit (ICU): an epidemiological study from a Malaysian population

Introduction

Thromboembolic (TE) complications in COVID-19 patients are rising globally, contributing significantly to mortality, particularly in severe cases. However, their prevalence, characteristics, and impact on mortality in Malaysia remain unclear.

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of thromboembolic (TE) events and associated mortality among COVID-19 patients admitted within a single centre intensive care unit (ICU). The proportions of patients with TE events who died, and factors associated with TE events were explored.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 virus and who received thromboprophylaxis within February 2020-2021 were included. TE event is a combination of venous [(deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE)] and arterial (myocardial infarction (MI), stroke) thromboembolism.

Results

Mean (SD) age 56.6 (13.7), 63.5% were male, 61.6% Malays, median (IQR) 7 (3-14) days of ICU stay, 64.2%, 53.2% and 20.9% had underlying hypertension, diabetes and obesity respectively. In total, 240 (44.9%) developed TE event. Significantly higher proportions of COVID-19 patients who developed complications of DVT (2.5% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.013), PE (47.5% vs 34.0%; p = 0.006), stroke (12.3% vs. 1.5; p<0.001) and MI (16.4% vs. 4.6%; p<0.001) died. Predictors of TE events were age [HR 1.01 (95% CI 1.00-1.02)], obesity [HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.51-2.6)], D-dimer [HR 1.01 (95% CI 1.00-1.01)], and duration of ICU stay [HR 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99)].

Conclusion

In severely ill COVID-19 patients, TE complications were common, and patients with DVT, PE, stroke, or MI faced increased mortality, even with thromboprophylaxis. Age, obesity, elevated D-Dimer levels, and longer ICU stays were significant predictors of TE events. Considering these findings, a more aggressive approach, combining thromboprophylaxis with enhanced anti-inflammatory treatments, may be necessary for high-risk COVID-19 ICU patients to reduce TE events and mortality.

Cardiac events and procedures following COVID-19 compared with other pneumonias: a national register study

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown an increased risk of cardiac disease following COVID-19, but how it compares to pneumonia of other etiologies is unclear.

AIMS

To determine the incidence and HRs of cardiac disease in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 compared with other viral or bacterial pneumonias.

METHODS

Using nationwide registry data, we estimated the incidence of cardiac events after hospitalisation with COVID-19 (n=2082) in February to November 2020 vs hospitalisation with viral (n=9018) or bacterial (n=29 339) pneumonia in 2018-2019. We defined outcomes using ICD-10 codes for incident myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation/flutter, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, other cardiac disease and total cardiac disease (any heart condition). We used Cox regression and logistic regression for analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with COVID-19 had a mean (SD) age of 60 (18) years, compared with 69 (19) years for viral and 72 (17) years for bacterial pneumonia. Those with COVID-19 were more often male and had fewer comorbidities and fewer prior hospitalisations. Patients with COVID-19 had a lower hazard of new-onset cardiac disease compared with viral (HR 0.79 [95%CI 0.66 to 0.93]) and bacterial pneumonia (HR 0.66 [95%CI 0.57 to 0.78]), adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, hospital admission prior year and respiratory support. Results were similar when including recurrent events.

CONCLUSION

Patients hospitalised with COVID-19 had a lower hazard of new-onset cardiac disease during the first 9 months after hospitalisation compared with patients with other viral or bacterial pneumonias after adjusting for multiple possible confounders. However, there may still be residual confounding from other or unknown factors.

Impact of COVID-19 on Thrombotic Complications in Microsurgery: Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Outcomes Amid Pandemic

Background

Emerging research underscores the heightened risk of vasculitis and microvascular thrombosis in COVID-19 patients, alongside concerns about prothrombotic events post-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination. Following the pandemic's end, we sought a comprehensive analysis to elucidate its impact on microsurgical thrombosis rates, informed by empirical and anecdotal evidence.

Methods

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review analyzed autologous breast reconstruction cases in women from January 2019 to March 2022. Data on patient history, COVID-19 infection, vaccination status, and postoperative complications were collected. Patients were categorized as prepandemic and pandemic, and based on COVID-19 influence (infection or vaccination) for statistical evaluation.

Results

Among 527 patients, 216 underwent surgery prepandemic and 311 during the pandemic, revealing thrombotic event rates of 3.2% and 5.4%, respectively. Further comparative analysis showed no significant difference in thrombotic events among patients affected by COVID-19 through infection or vaccination during the pandemic.

Conclusions

Contrary to concerns, COVID-19 infection or vaccination status does not significantly increase thrombotic event rates in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions. This study offers vital insights, affirming the safety and efficacy of microsurgical procedures amid the pandemic, thereby guiding microsurgeons in optimizing patient care in the post-COVID-19 era.

Epidemiology, clinical features and prognostic factors in patients with Covid-19 and acute limb ischaemia - A single center study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, clinical and paraclinical characteristics and outcomes of Covid-19 positive patients presenting in the Emergency Department (ED) with and treated for acute limb ischaemia (ALI) during a 2-year period.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in the ED of St. Spiridon County Clinical Emergency Hospital in Iasi, north-east region of Romania. The patients included in this study presented in the ED between March 1st, 2020 and February 28th, 2022 with ALI and Covid-19.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total number of 141018 patients were evaluated in our ED, 8578 (representing 6,08%) patients being diagnosed with Covid-19. Of them, 98 (1.14% of all with Covid-19) presented ALI. The mean age was 70.9 ± 10.23 and 67.3% of the patients were males. At admission, 57% of patients had Covid-19-related pneumonia, identified on X-ray or CT scan. Of all patients, 81 (82%) were diagnosed with ALI in lower limbs with 10% of them having affected both limbs. 95% of the patients presented comorbidities, the main being cardiac (85%), diabetes mellitus (37%), vascular (24%) and neurological (22.6%). Non-survivor patients were more likely to have Covid-19 pneumonia on chest X-ray or CT scan, 92% versus 44% (OR 15, CI 3.3; 68, p < .01), lymphopenia 96% versus 70% (OR 10.2, CI 1.30; 80.9, p < .01), a NLR over 9.77% versus 30% (OR 7.5, CI 2.6; 21.4, p < .01), acidosis 65% versus 33% (OR 3.8, CI 1.4; 9.7, p < .01), abnormal AST, 69% versus 29% (OR 5.4, CI 2; 14.5, p < .01) and secondary amputation, 38.5 versus 11.1% (OR 5, CI 1.7; 14.7, p < 0.1). Overall, the mortality rate was 26.5%.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of ALI in patients infected with Covid-19 who were evaluated in our ED was 1.14%. The highest mortality rate was probably related to Covid-19 pneumonia. We observed that patients with Covid-19 pneumonia, lymphopenia, a NLR >9, metabolic acidosis, increased AST at ED admission and secondary amputation had a higher mortality.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies and COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Clinical Implications

INTRODUCTION

As the COVID-19 pandemic transitions, understanding the intricate dynamics of the disease becomes paramount. This systematic review explores the role of antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19, focusing on their potential clinical implications.

METHODS

This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, assesses studies exploring the link between antiphospholipid antibodies and COVID-19. PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Scopus were searched for relevant studies published up to December 22, 2024. Inclusion criteria comprised studies involving patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and reporting on the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The risk of bias in individual studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool.

RESULTS

Our Study includes 59 records involving a total of 28,489 COVID-19 patients. Antiphospholipid antibodies were tested in 14,498 COVID-19 patients. It was observed that 50.84% of patients tested positive for antiphospholipid antibodies. Various types of antiphospholipid antibodies, including Anticardiolipin, Anti beta2 glycoproteins, and Lupus anticoagulant antibody, displayed prevalence rates in the patients with thrombosis. The overall frequency of antiphospholipid antibodies in thrombosis patients was 38.55%.

CONCLUSION

The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in a significant proportion of COVID-19 patients underscores the need for a detailed investigation into their role in thrombotic events. Our study highlights potential avenues for targeted interventions. However, the evolving nature of COVID-19 necessitates continued research efforts to clarify clinical implications and optimize management strategies in this complex landscape of thrombosis and immunology. The review reveals some limitations, such as variability in study designs and demographics and inherent differences in methodologies among included studies. Future studies should address these limitations with standardized methodologies for more conclusive findings.

Myocardial ischaemia following COVID-19: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

The pathophysiology of myocardial injury following COVID-19 remains uncertain. COVID-HEART was a prospective, multicentre study utilising cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to characterise COVID-related myocardial injury. In this pre-specified analysis, the objectives were to examine (1) the frequency of myocardial ischaemia following COVID-19, and (2) the association between ischaemia and myocardial injury. We studied 59 patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and elevated serum troponin (COVID + /troponin + , age 61 ± 11 years) and 37 control subjects without COVID-19 or elevated troponin and similar by age and cardiovascular comorbidities (COVID -/comorbidity + , 64 ± 10 years). Subjects underwent multi-parametric CMR (comprising assessment of ventricular volumes, stress perfusion, T1/T2 mapping and scar). The primary endpoint was the frequency of inducible myocardial ischaemia. Inducible ischaemia was evident in 11 (19%) COVID + /troponin + patients and in 8 (22%) control subjects (p = 0.72). In COVID + /troponin + patients with ischaemia, epicardial coronary disease pattern ischaemia was present in eight patients and microvascular disease pattern, in three patients. There was no significant difference in the frequency of inducible ischaemia in COVID + /troponin + patients with previous myocardial infarction and/or revascularisation compared to those without (2/12 [17%] vs. 9/47 [19%] respectively, p = 0.84), or in those with and without scar (7/27 [26%] vs. 4/32 [13%] respectively, p = 0.19). Myocardial ischaemia was present in ~ 20% of patients recently hospitalised with COVID-19 and with elevated cardiac troponin, but this was not different to matched comorbid controls. This finding coupled with the lack of an association between ischaemia and myocardial scar suggests that coronary artery abnormalities are unlikely to be the predominant mechanism underlying COVID-19 induced myocardial injury.

Therapeutic Versus Non-Therapeutic Dose Anticoagulation in COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Background

Abnormal coagulation and thrombotic complications prompted many guidelines to recommend thromboprophylaxis for patients hospitalised with COVID-19, but the dose required for prophylaxis remains unclear. This systematic review (SR) analyses the safety and efficacy of therapeutic dose anticoagulation (TDA) versus non-therapeutic dose anticoagulation (NDA) in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

According to the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Review of Interventions, we performed an SR. The protocol is registered in Prospero (CRD42021269197, date 12 August 2021).

Results

In this SR of 18 studies, TDA was shown to reduce all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.83; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.70, 0.99) in COVID-19 infection. TDA also reduced thrombosis (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.48, 0.72) but increased major bleeding (RR 1.87; 95% CI 1.29, 2.69). A stratified analysis according to severity revealed that, in non-critical patients, TDA resulted in mortality benefit (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67, 0.94). In critical patients, TDA did not affect all-cause mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.89, 1.18) but reduced thrombosis (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48, 0.86) and increased major bleeding (RR 1.85; 95% CI 1.06, 3.23).

Conclusion

TDA significantly reduced all-cause mortality and thrombosis in non-critical COVID-19 patients at the expense of increased major bleeding. In critical COVID-19, this mortality benefit was not observed.

Validating International Classification of Diseases Code 10th Revision algorithms for accurate identification of pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Many research investigations for pulmonary embolism (PE) rely on the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes for analyses of electronic databases. The validity of ICD-10 codes in identifying PE remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to validate an algorithm to efficiently identify pulmonary embolism using ICD-10 codes.

METHODS

Using a prespecified protocol, patients in the Mass General-Brigham hospitals (2016-2021) with ICD-10 principal discharge codes for PE, those with secondary codes for PE, and those without PE codes were identified (n = 578 from each group). Weighting was applied to represent each group proportionate to their true prevalence. The accuracy of ICD-10 codes for identifying PE was compared with adjudication by independent physicians. The F1 score, which incorporates sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV), was assessed. Subset validation was performed at Yale-New Haven Health System.

RESULTS

A total of 1712 patients were included (age: 60.6 years; 52.3% female). ICD-10 PE codes in the principal discharge position had sensitivity and PPV of 58.3% and 92.1%, respectively. Adding secondary discharge codes to the principal discharge codes improved the sensitivity to 83.2%, but the PPV was reduced to 79.1%. Using a combination of ICD-10 PE principal discharge codes or secondary codes plus imaging codes for PE led to sensitivity and PPV of 81.6% and 84.7%, respectively, and the highest F1 score (83.1%; P < .001 compared with other methods). Validation yielded largely similar results.

CONCLUSION

Although the principal discharge codes for PE show excellent PPV, they miss 40% of acute PEs. A combination of principal discharge codes and secondary codes plus PE imaging codes led to improved sensitivity without severe reduction in PPV.

Targeting Cytokines: Evaluating the Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Derived Extracellular Vesicles in the Management of COVID-19

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by virus SARS-CoV-2, is characterized by massive inflammation and immune system imbalance. Despite the implementation of vaccination protocols, the accessibility of treatment remains uneven. Furthermore, the persistent threat of new variants underscores the urgent need for expanded research into therapeutic options for SARS-CoV-2. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known for their immunomodulatory potential through the release of molecules into the extracellular space, either as soluble elements or carried by extracellular vesicles (EVs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory potential of EVs obtained from human adipose tissue (ASC-EVs) against SARS-CoV-2 infection. ASC-EVs were purified by size-exclusion chromatography, and co-culture assays confirmed that ASC-EVs were internalized by human lung cells and could colocalize with SARS-CoV-2 into early and late endosomes. To determine the functionality of ASC-EVs, lung cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the presence of increasing concentrations of ASC-EVs, and the release of cytokines, chemokines and viruses were measured. While SARS-CoV-2 replication was significantly reduced only at the highest concentrations tested, multiplex analysis highlighted that lower concentrations of ASC-EV sufficed to prevent the production of immune modulators. Importantly, ASC-EVs did not contain detectable inflammatory cytokines, nor did they trigger inflammatory mediators, nor affect cellular viability. In conclusion, this work suggests that ASC-EVs have the potential to attenuate inflammation by decreasing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in lung cells following SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Cerebromicrovascular mechanisms contributing to long COVID: implications for neurocognitive health

Long COVID (also known as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection [PASC] or post-COVID syndrome) is characterized by persistent symptoms that extend beyond the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, affecting approximately 10% to over 30% of those infected. It presents a significant clinical challenge, notably due to pronounced neurocognitive symptoms such as brain fog. The mechanisms underlying these effects are multifactorial, with mounting evidence pointing to a central role of cerebromicrovascular dysfunction. This review investigates key pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to cerebrovascular dysfunction in long COVID and their impacts on brain health. We discuss how endothelial tropism of SARS-CoV-2 and direct vascular infection trigger endothelial dysfunction, impaired neurovascular coupling, and blood-brain barrier disruption, resulting in compromised cerebral perfusion. Furthermore, the infection appears to induce mitochondrial dysfunction, enhancing oxidative stress and inflammation within cerebral endothelial cells. Autoantibody formation following infection also potentially exacerbates neurovascular injury, contributing to chronic vascular inflammation and ongoing blood-brain barrier compromise. These factors collectively contribute to the emergence of white matter hyperintensities, promote amyloid pathology, and may accelerate neurodegenerative processes, including Alzheimer's disease. This review also emphasizes the critical role of advanced imaging techniques in assessing cerebromicrovascular health and the need for targeted interventions to address these cerebrovascular complications. A deeper understanding of the cerebrovascular mechanisms of long COVID is essential to advance targeted treatments and mitigate its long-term neurocognitive consequences.

Shared genes and relevant potential molecular linkages between COVID-19 and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and COVID-19 share molecular pathways yet remain poorly understood in their interrelation. Using RNA-seq datasets (GSE130391 and GSE169687), we identified 645, 206, and 1,543 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for long-COVID (16 and 24 weeks post-infection) and CTEPH, respectively. Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) pinpointed 234 intersecting key module genes. Three hub genes-DNAJA1, NDUFA5, and SLC2A14-were identified with robust discriminatory capabilities (AUC ≥ 0.7). Enrichment analyses revealed shared pathways linked to immune modulation, oxidative stress, and metabolic dysfunction. Immune analysis highlighted activated CD8 T cells as critical regulators. Regulatory networks implicated TFs and miRNAs, including STAT1 and hsa-mir-23a-3p. Drug prediction identified potential therapeutic compounds with strong molecular docking interactions. These findings unravel critical molecular linkages, emphasizing shared pathogeneses and guiding experimental validations for improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in COVID-19 and CTEPH.

Long-term mitochondrial and metabolic impairment in lymphocytes of subjects who recovered after severe COVID-19

The underlying mechanisms explaining the differential course of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the potential clinical consequences after COVID-19 resolution have not been fully elucidated. As a dysregulated mitochondrial activity could impair the immune response, we explored long-lasting changes in mitochondrial functionality, circulating cytokine levels, and metabolomic profiles of infected individuals after symptoms resolution, to evaluate whether a complete recovery could be achieved. Results of this pilot study evidenced that different parameters of aerobic respiration in lymphocytes of individuals recuperated from a severe course lagged behind those shown upon mild COVID-19 recovery, in basal conditions and after simulated reinfection, and they also showed altered glycolytic capacity. The severe groups showed trends to enhanced superoxide production in parallel to lower OPA1-S levels. Unbalance of pivotal mitochondrial fusion (MFN2, OPA1) and fission (DRP1, FIS1) proteins was detected, suggesting a disruption in mitochondrial dynamics, as well as a lack of structural integrity in the electron transport chain. In serum, altered cytokine levels of IL-1β, IFN-α2, and IL-27 persisted long after clinical recovery, and growing amounts of the latter after severe infection correlated with lower basal and maximal respiration, ATP production, and glycolytic capacity. Finally, a trend for higher circulating levels of 3-hydroxybutyrate was found in individuals recovered after severe compared to mild course. In summary, long after acute infection, mitochondrial and metabolic changes seem to differ in a situation of full recovery after mild infection versus the one evolving from severe infection.

Distinct response patterns of endothelial markers to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine are associated with the spike-specific IgG antibody production

Introduction

Despite the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, inflammatory and/or thrombotic episodes have been reported. Since the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on the endothelium remains uncertain, our objective was to assess endothelial activation status before and 90 days after the third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

Methods

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted at University General Hospital of Albacete, involving 38 healthy health-care workers. Serum levels of endothelial markers (endocan and sVCAM-1) and spike S1-specific IgG antibodies were determined before and at 7, 15, 24 and 90days following vaccination. To analyze each participant´s individual response, we calculated relative increases/decreases (delta values) in endothelial markers and antibodies concentrations compared to their pre-vaccination levels.

Results

We identified two significantly distinct profiles of endothelial markers response, characterized by either increased or decreased serum levels of endocan and sVCAM. Incremental and decremental response groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and influenza vaccine co-administration. However, these responses were significantly associated with the relative spike-specific antibody production. Specifically, the greatest relative increase in antibodies was found in the decremental responders. Additionally, the higher delta antibody production was observed in non-previously infected individuals.

Conclusion

Administration of the BNT162b2 booster vaccine triggered a non-homogenous response of endothelial function markers among the study participants. Our findings improve the understanding of individual responses to the mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine, which could be useful in assessing the need for booster doses, particularly in population at risk of vascular complications.

Prediction of pulmonary embolism by an explainable machine learning approach in the real world

In recent years, large amounts of researches showed that pulmonary embolism (PE) has become a common disease, and PE remains a clinical challenge because of its high mortality, high disability, high missed and high misdiagnosed rates. To address this, we employed an artificial intelligence-based machine learning algorithm (MLA) to construct a robust predictive model for PE. We retrospectively analyzed 1480 suspected PE patients hospitalized in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between May 2015 and April 2020. 126 features were screened and diverse MLAs were utilized to craft predictive models for PE. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were used to evaluate their performance and SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values were utilized to elucidate the prediction model. Regarding the efficacy of the single model that most accurately predicted the outcome, RF demonstrated the highest efficacy in predicting outcomes, with an AUC of 0.776 (95% CI 0.774-0.778). The SHAP summary plot delineated the positive and negative effects of features attributed to the RF prediction model, including D-dimer, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrin and fibrinogen degradation products (FFDP), platelet count, albumin, cholesterol, and sodium. Furthermore, the SHAP dependence plot illustrated the impact of individual features on the RF prediction model. Finally, the MLA based PE predicting model was designed as a web page that can be applied to the platform of clinical management. In this study, PE prediction model was successfully established and designed as a web page, facilitating the optimization of early diagnosis and timely treatment strategies to enhance PE patient outcomes.

Do dynamic changes in haematological and biochemical parameters predict mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients?

BACKGROUND

Critically ill COVID-19 patients are usually subjected to clinical, laboratory, and radiological diagnostic procedures resulting in numerous findings. Utilizing these findings as indicators for disease progression or outcome prediction is particularly intriguing.

OBJECTIVES

Exploring the significance of dynamic changes in haematological and biochemical parameters in predicting the mortality of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

The present study was a prospective and observational study involving mechanically ventilated 75 critically ill adult COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. The collected data included baseline patient characteristics, treatment options, outcome, and laboratory findings at admission and 7 days after. The dynamics of the obtained findings were compared between survivors and non-survivors.

RESULTS

The 28-day survival rate was 61.3%. In the group of non-survivors significant dynamic changes were found for C-reactive protein (p= 0.001), interleukin-6 (p< 0.001), lymphocyte (p= 0.003), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (p= 0.003), platelets (p< 0.001), haemoglobin (p< 0.001), iron (p= 0.012), and total iron-binding capacity (p< 0.001). Statistically significant changes over time were found for ferritin (p= 0.010), D-dimer (p< 0.001), hs-troponin T (p< 0.002), lactate dehydrogenase (p= 0.001), glucose (p= 0.023), unsaturated iron-binding capacity (p= 0.008), and vitamin D (p< 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The dynamic changes in inflammatory, haematological and biochemical parameters can predict disease severity, and outcome.

Relevance of anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies and platelet activation in systemic inflammatory diseases and thrombosis disorders: insight from the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

The increased interest in anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)-heparin complex (anti-PF4/H) antibodies following the COVID-19 pandemic has established them as crucial players in immunothrombosis.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the involvement of anti-PF4/H antibodies during COVID-19 and after vaccination, particularly in patients with systemic inflammatory disease (SID).

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed the presence of anti-PF4/H antibodies and their ability to induce platelet activation in COVID-19 patients with and without suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) patients, and in controls and SID patients following COVID-19 vaccination.

Results

No significant increase in anti-PF4/H antibody levels was observed during COVID-19 regardless of disease severity. Despite a 2-fold increase in HIT suspicion observed during the pandemic, there was no corresponding increase in HIT diagnoses. Additionally, no significant increase in anti-PF4/H levels was noted after vaccination, even in SID patients. None of the positive anti-PF4/H antibodies detected in COVID-19 or vaccination cohorts induced platelet activation, measured by soluble P-selectin levels and flow cytometry-based on platelet microvesicle generation. Finally, in VITT patients, unlike in HIT patients, anti-PF4/H levels were strongly associated with platelet microvesicle assay and moderately with soluble P-selectin levels.

Conclusion

Our study found no significant increase in anti-PF4/H antibodies in COVID-19 or after vaccination, including in SID patients. However, in VITT patients, but not in HIT patients, these antibodies were correlated with platelet activation. This finding suggests that anti-PF4/H antibodies play a different role in the pathophysiology of VITT but that their interest is limited outside clear contexts of HIT/VITT suspicion.

Possible mechanisms of spermatogenic dysfunction induced by viral infections: Insights from COVID-19

Background

As the COVID-19 pandemic nears resolution in 2024, the mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 and other viral infections induce spermatogenic dysfunction remain poorly understood. This review examines the mechanisms by which viral infections, particularly COVID-19, disrupt spermatogenesis and highlights the implications for male reproductive health. While reports suggest that spermatogenic dysfunction caused by COVID-19 is mild and transient, these findings may have broader applications in understanding and treating spermatogenic dysfunction caused by future viral infections.

Methods

The PubMed database was searched to identify original and review articles investigating the mechanisms by which viral infections, particularly SARS-CoV-2, contribute to spermatogenic dysfunction.

Main Findings

SARS-CoV-2 affects the testis through multiple mechanisms, including ACE2 receptor-mediated entry, direct viral damage, inflammatory response, blood-testis barrier disruption, hormonal imbalance, oxidative stress, and impaired spermatogenesis. The combination of these factors can disrupt testicular function and highlights the complexity of the effects of COVID-19 on male reproductive health.

Conclusion

COVID-19 may disrupt spermatogenesis through direct testicular infection, systemic inflammation, hormonal disruption, and oxidative stress. Ongoing research, vaccination efforts, and clinical vigilance are essential to address these challenges and develop effective treatment and prevention strategies.

Endovascular Management of Noncirrhotic Acute Portomesenteric Venous Thrombosis

Acute portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PVT) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition in individuals without cirrhosis. Initial management typically involves anticoagulation therapy, but the optimal approach to interventional treatment remains a topic of ongoing research. This article explores both traditional and emerging endovascular techniques, providing an overview of the existing evidence supporting their use. Additionally, it delves into the significance of acute PVT in the context of contemporary pathologies, notably coronavirus disease 2019 infection, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, and liver transplantation.

Incidence of Thrombotic Complications in COVID-19 Patients and the Impact of Antithrombotic Therapy on ICU Mortality

Aim We aimed to determine the incidence of thrombotic complications and outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and evaluate the association between combined antithrombotic therapy and mortality in ICU patients admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods We retrospectively collected data of adult critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU in a major hospital in Dubai during the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of major complications, such as thrombotic complications during the ICU stay. The study population was classified into two groups based on the type of prophylactic anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy received. Results The study included 257 ICU patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia. The mean duration of their ICU stay was 24.95 days, ranging from one day to 327 days. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. In our study, 151 patients (58.7%) suffered in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of major complications during the ICU stay. A total of 202 patients (78.6%) presented with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ninety-nine (38.5%) of the patients had progressed to acute kidney injury. Thirty-three patients (12.8%) had various thrombotic complications. Three of these (9%) had venous thrombosis, and 30 patients (91%) had arterial thrombosis. Ischemic stroke was the major thrombotic complication of COVID-19 (36.3% of overall thrombotic events, n = 12), followed by myocardial infarction (27.2%; n = 9) and pulmonary embolism (21.2%; n = 7). Out of 257 COVID-19 ICU patients, 73 patients (28.4%) received both anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy, and 183 patients (70.8%) received only anticoagulant therapy. We compared the mortality of COVID-19 ICU patients who received anticoagulants alone to those with added antiplatelets. The application of combined antiplatelet and anticoagulants as thromboprophylaxis for COVID-19 ICU patients was not associated with a significant reduction in mortality (P = 0.868). Peak serum levels of D-dimer significantly correlate with the length of ICU stay (rho = 0.137, P = 0.031). Peak D-dimer level during the ICU stay was statistically significantly higher in non-survivors (mean = 11.87) compared to survivors (mean = 8.59) (P < 0.001). D-dimer on ICU admission had a good prognostic value for ICU patients with COVID-19 infection (P = 0.018). Conclusion The incidence of thrombotic complications among COVID-19 pneumonia patients admitted to ICU is remarkably high, which reinforces the recommendation to apply thrombosis prophylaxis strictly to all ICU patients admitted with COVID-19. The application of combined antiplatelets with anticoagulants as thromboprophylaxis for COVID-19 ICU patients was not associated with a significant reduction in ICU mortality. D-dimer has a significant correlation with prognosis and length of ICU stay of COVID-19 patients.

The Top 100 Most-Cited Articles in Venous Disease and Management

BACKGROUND

Advancements in the management of venous disease have been documented in scientific literature. We performed a bibliometric analysis using citations as an indication of impact to analyze the most influential articles on venous disease and treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective search of the Web of Science database was conducted in May 2023. Key search terms were queried to generate relevant articles. Articles were ranked on total number of citations and average number of citations per year. Metrics analyzed included top journals, impact factor, journal discipline, institution and country of publication, author degree and gender, number of publications per year, level of evidence, and article topic area.

RESULTS

The top 100 articles on venous disease were published between 1994 and 2020, with a total of 102,856 citations, average 1,028 citations/article, and mean of 70 citations/year. The most popular article was "Incidence of thrombotic complications of in critically ill Intensive Care Unit patients with COVID-19" with 3,482 citations in total. The most popular journals were New England Journal of Medicine (22 articles), Lancet (14 articles), and CHEST (13 articles), pertaining to management of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The Journal of Vascular surgery had 2 influential articles, focused on management of chronic venous disease. Many articles were published in the United States (52), Canada (38), and Netherlands (25). Prolific authors were predominantly male (96%) and 59% were MDs versus 29% combined MD/PhD and 12% PhDs. Popular venous articles included guidelines/standards for DVT management (12%), epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (12%), and anticoagulation for DVT (12%). Specific venous thromboembolism risk factors within popular literature included prothrombotic genes, malignancy, pregnancy, trauma, and COVID-19. Articles on surgical interventions included inferior vena cava filter placement, catheter-directed thrombolysis, and risks of femoral and subclavian vein catheterization. Venous stenting and mechanical thrombectomy were not within the top articles.

CONCLUSIONS

Top-cited articles on venous disease emphasized management of DVT, followed by chronic venous disease, through the collaboration of multiple medical and surgical specialties. The largest number of citations in recent DVT literature was driven by COVID-19 complications.

Immature Platelets and Platelet Reactivity in Patients with COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a high incidence of thromboembolic events, both venous and arterial. There are currently no specific clinical or laboratory markers to guide antithrombotic therapy for COVID-19 patients. Immature platelets represent a population of hyper-reactive platelets associated with arterial thrombotic events. This prospective study compared consecutive severe COVID-19 patients (n = 53, median age = 73 years) versus patients with sepsis from another origin (n = 41, median age = 69 years). Total platelet counts, immature platelet fraction (IPF) and immature platelet count (IPC) were determined by the Sysmex XN-3000 auto-analyzer on admission and at subsequent time-points. IPC levels three days after admission were significantly higher in the COVID-19 group compared to the sepsis group (13.4 × 109/ L [IQR 9.1-18.5] in the COVID-19 group vs 9 × 109/ L [5.5-14.7] in the sepsis group, P = 0.007). COVID-19 patients with respiratory disease show increased platelet turnover and reactivity, as seen in higher levels of immature platelet indices, especially IPC, compared to the sepsis control group. While these platelet indices remained high, CRP levels decreased, particularly in patients treated with tocilizumab. This reduction in CRP was not accompanied by any apparent clinical improvement. These findings suggest that immature platelets may serve as a biomarker for disease severity in COVID-19 patients and their CRP may not be a reliable marker for disease severity.

Hypercoagulable Rotational Thromboelastometry During Hospital Stay Is Associated with Post-Discharge DLco Impairment in Patients with COVID-19-Related Pneumonia

Hypercoagulation is central to the pathogenesis of acute and post-acute COVID-19. This prospective observational study explored whether rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), a method that unveils coagulation status, predicts outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We investigated 62 patients using ROTEM that was conducted at enrollment, clinical deterioration, discharge and follow-up visits 1 and 3 months post-discharge. A hypercoagulable ROTEM was more common at clinical deterioration than at enrollment and the levels of hypercoagulable ROTEM indices correlated with the clinical severity score. Hypercoagulable ROTEM at enrollment was not associated with in-hospital death. Patients with hypercoagulable ROTEM at enrollment, discharge and 1 month post-discharge had an increased risk of persistent symptoms 1 and 3 months after discharge. Patients with hypercoagulable ROTEM at enrollment, discharge, and 1 month after discharge were more likely to have lung diffusion capacity (DLco) impairment 3 months after discharge. High levels of hypercoagulable ROTEM indices were associated with the increased risk of persistent symptoms at later stages of the disease. In a multivariate analysis, (i) hypercoagulable ROTEM at discharge and female gender were linked to the presence of symptoms at one month post-discharge, (ii) hypercoagulable ROTEM at one month after discharge was linked to the presence of symptoms at three months post-discharge, (iii) hypercoagulable ROTEM at enrollment and at discharge and female gender were linked to the presence of impaired DLco at three months post-discharge. Excessive coagulation may contribute to long-COVID pathogenesis and ROTEM findings during hospitalization may predict post-acute-COVID-19 sequelae in patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia.

Human genetics implicate thromboembolism in the pathogenesis of long COVID in individuals of European ancestry

SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in long COVID, characterized by post-acute symptoms from multiple organs. Current hypotheses on mechanisms underlying long COVID include persistent inflammation and thromboembolism; however, compelling evidence from humans is limited and causal associations remain unclear. Here, we tested the association of thromboembolism-related genetic variants with long COVID in the Long COVID Host Genetics Initiative ( n cases =3,018; n controls =994,582). Primary analyses revealed that each unit increase in the log-odds of genetically predicted venous thromboembolism risk was associated with 1.21-fold odds of long COVID (95%CI: 1.08-1.35; P =1.2 × 10 -3 ). This association was independent of acute COVID-19 severity, robust across genetic instruments and methods, and replicated in external datasets for both venous thromboembolism and long COVID. Downstream analyses using gene-specific instruments, along with protein and gene expression data, suggested the protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1) as a potential molecular contributor to long COVID. These findings provide human genetic evidence implicating thromboembolism in long COVID pathogenesis. .

Use of the high-flow helmet CPAP non-invasive ventilation device designed in Peru in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (COVID-19): A prospective multicenter study

High-flow non-invasive ventilation (NIV) devices reduce the morbidity and mortality of COVID-19. The objective was to evaluate the use of the non-invasive ventilation device with high-flow helmet CPAP designed in Peru in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (COVID-19) hospitalized in the emergency services of five hospitals. Prospective multicenter and cross-sectional observational study from five hospitals from July to August 2020. 19 patients were recruited and divided into two groups (G-1 n = 10; G-2 n = 9) applying clinical and gasometric parameters as indicators of disease evolution upon hospital admission and within 24 hours. A progressive increase in these parameters was observed in those patients who used the NIVCPAP helmet within the first 24 hours. In G-01, improvement was evident in 90% (n = 9/10): PaO2 (range 48–137; average: 82.49 ± 8.07; p-value = 0.008), CO2 (25.2–51.0; 36.62 ± 2.62; p-value p = 0.327), and the PaO2/FiO2 coefficient (87–318; 191.5 ± 18.68). 10% of patients did not progress optimally, being subjected to endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. In G-02 the values ​​were %SatO2 (range 92–98; 96 ± 0.76) and the SaO2/FiO2 coefficient (214–228; 223.2 ± 1.80), indicating significant improvement within 24 hours (p &lt; 0.001). It is concluded that the use of the CPAP helmet non-invasive ventilation (NIV) device contributes to improving gasometric values ​​and clinical condition. Being an alternative to recover typical cases of COVID-19 in all hospitals in Peru.

Blood Transfusion Utilization in Patients with Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the Republic of Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly affected both supply and demand for blood transfusion. This study aimed to investigate the prescription patterns of blood products and identify the risk factors for blood transfusion in patients with severe COVID-19. Methods: This nationwide population-based cohort study was performed in the Republic of Korea between January 2021 and December 2021. Adult patients (≥19 years) with severe COVID-19 who received oxygen therapy were examined. Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service database. Results: During the study period, 41,203 patients developed severe COVID-19. The overall transfusion rate was 7.11%, with 14,477 units of packed red blood cells, 4501 units of fresh frozen plasma, 20,532 units of platelet concentrates, and 1875 units of cryoprecipitate. Blood transfusion was independently associated with 90-day mortality (hazard ratio: 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-1.53, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified underlying chronic kidney disease; exposure to surgery, thrombolysis, or thrombectomy; renal replacement therapy; mechanical ventilation; and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as significant risk factors for blood transfusion in patients with severe COVID-19. Conversely, underlying cerebrovascular diseases, a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of ≥6, admission to intensive care units, and anticoagulant use were identified as protective factors. Conclusions: This study provides an overview of blood transfusion patterns in patients with severe COVID-19. Understanding these patterns may help optimize the stockpiling of medical resources.

Angiotensin-II and Thromboembolic Events: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and synthesize the existing evidence for the association of angiotensin-II with thromboembolic events.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases.

STUDY SELECTION

This systematic review included randomized trials and comparative observational studies that reported on the occurrence of venous and/or arterial thromboembolic events in adult patients receiving treatment for shock with angiotensin-II vs. a comparator.

DATA EXTRACTION

A total of 1689 records were screened by two independent investigators. Seven studies were deemed eligible for inclusion, encompassing 1461 patients. This included two randomized controlled trials and five nonrandomized studies of intervention. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. Risk of bias assessments were performed using the Risk of Bias 2 and Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tools.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The included studies reported on a variety of individual and composite thromboembolic events as exploratory endpoints. Overall, they demonstrated an elevated risk of bias, predominantly related to confounding, measurement of outcomes and selection of reported results, which precluded quantitative synthesis. Within these limitations, we found that thromboembolic event rates were similar between the angiotensin-II and comparator groups. Venous thromboembolic events were described in 8.8% of patients receiving angiotensin-II and 9.4% of controls, while arterial thromboembolic events were reported in 11.3% and 12.7%, respectively. Total event rates were broadly comparable when utilizing data derived from the primary publications and when adjusted for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration account of trial data.

CONCLUSIONS

Published evidence does not currently support or refute an association between angiotensin-II and an increased risk of venous or arterial thromboembolic events. Given the limited quality of available data, future studies should explicitly define diagnostic and reporting criteria for such events.

Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria: Diagnostic Accuracy and Impact of COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC), developed to minimize unnecessary testing in low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) cases, lacks clear validation in the context of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the validity of the PERC in emergency department patients having undergone computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of emergency department patients who underwent CTPA for suspected PE. COVID-19 status was based on the results of a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test performed in the emergency department, or within 30 days prior to visiting the emergency department. We collected data on demographics, symptoms, d-dimer levels, and medical history relevant to thrombosis and conducted the PERC test using the criteria including age, oxygen saturation, heart rate, and the absence of hemoptysis or recent trauma. We categorized outcomes based on the concordance between the PERC results and CTPA findings, with specific definitions for true positive and negative, as well as false positive and negative results. We also evaluated the impact of COVID-19 status on the diagnostic performance of the PERC by analyzing the prevalence of PE in patients testing positive and negative for COVID-19.

RESULTS

Among the 2.430 participants, 45.1% tested negative for COVID-19, 43.4% tested positive, and 11.5% were untested. The PERC identified 91.2% of the cases as positive, 6.9% of which were confirmed to have PE. Overall, 84.9% of cases (n = 2.062) showed a discordant result between the PERC and CTPA findings. The lack of significant correspondence between the PERC positivity and actual PE presence (p = 0.001; p < 0.01) indicated low diagnostic concordance. In patients with a positive COVID-19 test result, the PERC demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.3% (95% CI: 86.91-99.02), a specificity of 9.1% (95% CI: 7.46-11.15), a positive predictive value of 6.3% (95% CI: 6.01-6.70), a negative predictive value of 96.8% (95% CI: 90.81-98.94), and an accuracy of 14.4% (95% CI: 12.34-16.67). In patients who tested negative for COVID-19, the sensitivity was 95.4% (95% CI: 88.64-98.73), the specificity was 7.8% (95% CI: 6.25-9.66), the positive predictive value was 8.1% (95% CI: 7.83-8.57), the negative predictive value was 95.1% (95% CI: 88.11-98.14), and the accuracy was 14.7% (95% CI: 12.73-17.02).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that the sensitivity and negative predictive value of the PERC are comparable in COVID-19 positive and negative patients. Furthermore, the incidence of PE among patients presenting to the emergency department did not significantly differ based on COVID-19 status. While this study highlights the relevance of the PERC in clinical decision-making, caution is advised as the PERC may not always provide reliable results when used as the sole diagnostic test.

Cushing's syndrome and COVID-19

PURPOSE

This review aims to present current data on the course of COVID-19 in patients with Cushing syndrome (CS) and discuss treatment for CS during to the pandemic.

METHODS

Literature review using PubMed (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The search included the following terms: "COVID19" in combination with "Cushing syndrome", "Hypercortisolism" and "Glucocorticoid".

RESULTS

Chronic hypercortisolism has been reported to increase infectious risk and worsens prognostic of patients with COVID-19 potentially due to its direct impact on the immune system: lymphopenia, impairment of monocytes and neutrophils activity, diminution of complement activation. Main metabolic complications of CS - i.e. diabetes, hypertension and obesity - have been recognized as COVID-19 complications risk factors. Patients with CS treated with steroidogenesis inhibitors might experience adrenal insufficiency during COVID-19. Special attention should be paid to patients with CS and COVID-19. The pandemic has impacted - and delayed - care of chronic illnesses including CS. Specific recommendations had been provided during the pandemic: favor telemedicine consultations, limit in-hospital explorations and postpone surgery when feasible.

CONCLUSION

There are enough evidence for an increased prevalence and severity of COVID-19 to recommend a specific attention and caution in patients with CS.

Anticoagulation management during veno-venous ECMO support because of ARDS: Single-center experience

Background

Patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) show a high mortality rate of up to 60 %. In such cases, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is often required, which would necessitate anticoagulation therapy, predominantly with heparin. Some bleeding events occurred more frequently in patients during the COVID-19 pandemic who were on venovenous (V-V) ECMO, so it is necessary to investigate whether anticoagulation management should be adjusted.

Methods

We collected data on 90 patients with severe ARDS who underwent ECMO support at the University Hospital Magdeburg between 2014 and 2022. In order to estimate the role of anticoagulation therapy as a cause of bleeding, patients were divided into two groups based on their mean activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT): one group with a mean aPTT of more than 58 s (45 patients) and another with a mean aPTT of less than 58 s (45 patients). Demographic data, data before, during ECMO support, and bleeding complications were retrospectively recorded. We compared laboratory parameters before ECMO, essential coagulation parameters on days 3, 7, 10 of ECMO support, before the bleeding event occurred, and analyzed hospital survival in both groups.

Results

The incidence of major bleeding complications was significantly higher in the group of patients with higher aPTT (68.9 % vs 33.3 %, p < 0.001), the differences in the occurrence of hemothorax were especially significant (28.9 % vs 2.2 %, p < 0.001). We observed better hospital patients' survival in the group with lower aPTT (40.0 % vs 68.9 %, p = 0.006). The results of the bivariate analysis indicate that the independent predictors of hospital mortality in adult patients receiving V-V ECMO support due to severe ARDS were COVID-19 (OR: 3.504; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.415-8.681, p = 0.007) acute liver failure (OR: 8.0000; 95 % CI: 1.692-37.822; p = 0.009), high antithrombin level (%) (OR: 1.036; 95 % CI: 1.003-1.071, p = 0.035). A high mean aPTT level increased the risk of major bleeding (OR: 1.080; 95 % CI: 1.016-1.148, p = 0.014) without a significant increase in mortality.

Conclusion

Prolonged aPTT during V-V ECMO support in patients with ARDS significantly impacts the risk of major bleeding, especially hemothorax, without significant increase in hospital mortality.