Semaglutide versus placebo in people with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised trials

Echocardiographic phenotypes of diabetic myocardial disorder: evolution over 15 months follow-up in the ARISE-HF trial

BACKGROUND

Diabetic myocardial disorder (DbMD, evidenced by abnormal echocardiography or cardiac biomarkers) is a form of stage B heart failure (SBHF) at high risk for progression to overt HF. SBHF is defined by abnormal LV morphology and function and/or abnormal cardiac biomarker concentrations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the evolution of four DbMD groups based on biomarkers alone, systolic and diastolic dysfunction alone, or their combination.

METHODS

The Aldose Reductase Inhibition for Stabilization of Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure (ARISE-HF) trial was a Phase 3 randomised trial of an aldose reductase inhibitor in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The 1858 potential participants (age 67 ± 7 years; 50% women) were screened for SBHF based on abnormal echocardiography or biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ≥ 40 ng/L or high sensitivity cardiac troponin T ≥ 10 ng/L [women] and ≥ 16 ng/L [men]). Exercise capacity (peak VO2) was reduced in 669 with DbMD (age 68 ± 7, 50% women), and peak VO2 was reassessed at 15 months.

RESULTS

The 1463 (79%) participants with DbMD were allocated to four clusters; 907 (49%) showed isolated elevation of cardiac biomarkers, 301 (16%) with systolic dysfunction/hypertrophy, 162 (9%) with diastolic dysfunction and 93 (5%) comprised an overlap cluster (combined diastolic, systolic or LV geometric abnormalities). Reduced VO2 (< 75% predicted) was present in 669 (46%); 72% of those with both systolic and diastolic dysfunction, 56% of those with systolic dysfunction and LVH, 53% of those with diastolic dysfunction and 38% with biomarkers alone (p < 0.0001). In 669 patients followed over 15 months, there was a similar small decrement in VO2 in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among individuals with T2DM and SBHF, reduced functional capacity is most prevalent in those with multiple physiological disturbances. However, there was no difference between phenogroups in the evolution of exercise intolerance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ARISE-HF, NCT04083339.

Integrated Management of Cardiovascular–Renal–Hepatic–Metabolic Syndrome: Expanding Roles of SGLT2is, GLP-1RAs, and GIP/GLP-1RAs

Cardiovascular–Kidney–Metabolic syndrome, introduced by the American Heart Association in 2023, represents a complex and interconnected spectrum of diseases driven by shared pathophysiological mechanisms. However, this framework notably excludes the liver—an organ fundamental to metabolic regulation. Building on this concept, Cardiovascular–Renal–Hepatic–Metabolic (CRHM) syndrome incorporates the liver’s pivotal role in this interconnected disease spectrum, particularly through its involvement via metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Despite the increasing prevalence of CRHM syndrome, unified management strategies remain insufficiently explored. This review addresses the following critical question: How can novel anti-diabetic agents, including sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and dual gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1RA, offer an integrated approach to managing CRHM syndrome beyond the boundaries of traditional specialties? By synthesizing evidence from landmark clinical trials, we highlight the paradigm-shifting potential of these therapies. SGLT2is, such as dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, have emerged as cornerstone guideline-directed treatments for heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), providing benefits that extend beyond glycemic control and are independent of diabetes status. GLP-1RAs, e.g., semaglutide, have transformed obesity management by enabling weight reductions exceeding 15% and improving outcomes in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), diabetic CKD, HF, and MASLD. Additionally, tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1RA, enables unprecedented weight loss (>20%), reduces diabetes risk by over 90%, and improves outcomes in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), MASLD, and obstructive sleep apnea. By moving beyond the traditional organ-specific approach, we propose a unified framework that integrates these agents into holistic management strategies for CRHM syndrome. This paradigm shift moves away from fragmented, organ-centric management toward a more unified approach, fostering collaboration across specialties and marking progress in precision cardiometabolic medicine.

Dietary Interventions in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Scoping Review

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are burdened by multiple diet-sensitive comorbidities, including obesity and malnutrition. Despite this, a low percentage of patients with HFpEF have been enrolled in dietary intervention trials in heart failure and few dietary interventions have been conducted in HFpEF exclusively. This scoping review will examine available evidence regarding dietary interventions in patients with HFpEF, highlight existing gaps in knowledge, and discuss emerging dietary therapies in this population.

GLP-1 receptor agonists as promising anti-inflammatory agents in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) represents a significant challenge in modern cardiovascular medicine, characterized by diastolic dysfunction and a chronic pro-inflammatory milieu. The high prevalence of comorbidities such as diabetes, visceral obesity, and aging, which contribute to systemic inflammation, plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and progression of HFpEF. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs), a class of glucose-lowering drugs, have demonstrated a wide range of pleiotropic effects that extend beyond glycaemic control. These effects include the reduction of inflammation and oxidative stress, vasodilation, decreased arterial stiffness, and a reduction in myocardial fibrosis-key factors in the pathophysiology of HFpEF. Recent evidence from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials provides the first robust data supporting the efficacy of GLP-1 RAs, specifically semaglutide, in improving the quality of life in obese patients with HFpEF. These trials also demonstrated a significant reduction in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) levels, reinforcing the hypothesis that suppressing the pro-inflammatory state may yield substantial clinical benefits in this patient population. These findings suggest that GLP-1 RAs could play a crucial role in the management of HFpEF, particularly in patients with obesity, by targeting the underlying inflammatory processes and contributing to better overall cardiovascular outcomes.

Beyond weight loss: the potential of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for treating heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome with various phenotypes, and obesity is one of the most common and clinically relevant phenotypes of HFpEF. Obesity contributes to HFpEF through multiple mechanisms, including sodium retention, neurohormonal dysregulation, altered energy substrate metabolism, expansion of visceral adipose tissue, and low-grade systemic inflammation. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a hormone in the incretin family. It is produced by specialized cells called neuroendocrine L cells located in the distal ileum and colon. GLP-1 reduces blood glucose levels by promoting glucose-dependent insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells, suppressing glucagon release from pancreatic α cells, and blocking hepatic gluconeogenesis. Recent evidence suggests that GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) can significantly improve physical activity limitations and exercise capacity in obese patients with HFpEF. The possible cardioprotective mechanisms of GLP-1 RAs include reducing epicardial fat tissue thickness, preventing activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, improving myocardial energy metabolism, reducing systemic inflammation and cardiac oxidative stress, and delaying the progression of atherosclerosis. This review examines the impact of obesity on the underlying mechanisms of HFpEF, summarizes the trial data on cardiovascular outcomes of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and highlights the potential cardioprotective mechanisms of GLP-1 RAs to give a pathophysiological and clinical rationale for using GLP-1 RAs in obese HFpEF patients.

Intravenous and oral administration of the synthetic RNA drug, TY1, reverses heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in mice

TY1, a synthetic non-coding RNA (ncRNA) bioinspired by small Y RNAs abundant in extracellular vesicles (EVs), decreases cGAS/STING activation in myocardial infarction and thereby attenuates inflammation. Motivated by the concept that heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a systemic inflammatory disease, we tested TY1 in a murine model of HFpEF. Intravenous TY1, packaged in a transfection reagent, reversed the cardiac and systemic manifestations of HFpEF in two-hit obese-hypertensive mice, without inducing weight loss. The effects of TY1 were specific, insofar as they were not reproduced by a control RNA of the same nucleotide content but in scrambled order. TY1 consistently suppressed myocardial stress-induced MAP kinase signaling, as well as downstream inflammatory, fibrotic, and hypertrophic gene pathways in heart tissue. TY1 not only prevented but actually reversed key pathological processes underlying HFpEF, with no evidence of toxicity. Most noteworthy from a practical perspective, the effects of intravenous TY1 were reproduced by feeding HFpEF mice an oral micellar formulation of TY1. As the prototype for a novel class of ncRNA drugs which target cell stress, TY1 exhibits exceptional disease-modifying bioactivity in HFpEF.

Finerenone, Obesity, and Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced/Preserved Ejection Fraction: Prespecified Analysis of FINEARTS-HF

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with excessive adipocyte-derived aldosterone secretion, independent of the classical renin-angiotensin-aldosterone cascade, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may be more effective in patients with heart failure (HF) and obesity.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine the effects of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone compared with placebo, according to body mass index (BMI) in FINEARTS-HF (FINerenone trial to investigate Efficacy and sAfety superioR to placebo in paTientS with Heart Failure).

METHODS

A total of 6,001 patients with HF with NYHA functional class II, III, and IV, a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥40%, evidence of structural heart disease, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels were randomized to finerenone or placebo. BMI (kg/m2) was examined using World Health Organization categories, namely, underweight/normal weight (<25.0 kg/m2; n = 1,306); overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2; n = 1,990); obesity class I (30.0-34.9 kg/m2; n = 1,546); obesity class II (35.0-39.9 kg/m2; n = 751); and obesity class III (≥40 kg/m2; n = 395). The primary outcome was cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events.

RESULTS

Data on baseline BMI were available for 5,988 patients (median: 29.2 kg/m2; Q1-Q3: 25.5-33.6 kg/m2). Compared with patients who were underweight/normal weight, those with obesity class II or III had a higher risk of the primary outcome (underweight/normal weight, reference; overweight, unadjusted rate ratio: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.81-1.15]; obesity class I: 1.04 [95% CI: 0.86-1.26]; obesity class II-III: 1.26 [95% CI: 1.03-1.54]). The effect of finerenone on the primary outcome did not vary by baseline BMI (underweight/normal weight, rate ratio: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.62-1.04]; overweight: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.72-1.15]; obesity class I: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.72-1.19]; obesity class II-III: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.50-0.89]; Pinteraction = 0.32). However, when BMI was examined as a continuous variable, the beneficial effect of finerenone seemed to be greater in those with a higher BMI (Pinteraction = 0.005). A similar pattern was observed for total worsening HF events. Consistent effects across baseline BMI were observed for cardiovascular and all-cause death and improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HF with mildly reduced/preserved ejection fraction, the beneficial effects of finerenone on clinical events and symptoms were consistent, irrespective of BMI at baseline, possibly with a greater effect on the primary outcome in patients with higher BMI. (FINEARTS-HF [FINerenone trial to investigate Efficacy and sAfety superioR to placebo in paTientS with Heart Failure]; NCT04435626).

Clinical phenotypes of heart failure patients with supranormal ejection fraction

AIMS

Heart failure (HF) with supranormal ejection fraction (HFsnEF) represents a distinct clinical entity characterized by limited treatment options and an unfavourable prognosis. Revealing its phenotypic diversity is crucial for understanding disease mechanism and optimizing patient management. We aim to identify phenotypic subgroups in HFsnEF using unsupervised clustering analysis.

METHODS

Consecutive hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥65% at baseline echocardiographic evaluations were included for analysis. We conducted unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis on principal components (HCPC) to identify HFsnEF phenogroups using mixed data variables including demographics, HF duration, vital signs, anthropometrics, smoking/drinking status, HF aetiology, comorbid diseases, laboratory tests and echocardiographic parameters. We then employed decision tree modelling to identify parameters capable of distinguishing distinct clusters. Clinical outcomes, including all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death and CV readmission for different clusters, were examined.

RESULTS

Three mutually exclusive clusters were identified from the cohort of 221 HFsnEF patients. Cluster 1 (52.5%) predominantly consisted of patients with valvular heart disease, who had larger cardiac chambers and a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter. Cluster 2 (26.2%) primarily comprised older ischaemic patients with a higher prevalence of metabolic comorbidities. Cluster 3 (21.3%) were mainly hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Two clinical variables were identified that could be used to group all HFsnEF patients into one of the clusters; they were HF aetiology and comorbid diabetes. During the median follow-up of 53.4 months, 46 (20.8%) all-cause deaths occurred, among them 39 of CV causes. Seventy (31.7%) patients experienced CV readmissions. Three clusters showed distinct differences in mortality outcomes, with Cluster 1 exhibiting the highest risk of all-cause mortality [Cluster 1 vs. Cluster 2: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 3.32, P = 0.022; Cluster 1 vs. Cluster 3: aHR = 3.81, P = 0.036; Cluster 2 vs. Cluster 3: aHR = 1.15, P = 0.865] and CV mortality (Cluster 1 vs. Cluster 2: aHR = 3.73, P = 0.022; Cluster 1 vs. Cluster 3: aHR = 4.27, P = 0.020; Cluster 2 vs. Cluster 3: aHR = 1.15, P = 0.870). CV readmission risk was comparable among the three clusters (Cluster 1 vs. Cluster 2: aHR = 0.82, P = 0.590; Cluster 1 vs. Cluster 3: aHR = 1.04, P = 0.900; Cluster 2 vs. Cluster 3: aHR = 1.28, P = 0.580).

CONCLUSIONS

In a heterogeneous HFsnEF cohort, three clusters were identified by unsupervised HCPC with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Recent achievements and future directions of anti-obesity medications

Pharmacological management of obesity long suffered from a reputation of a 'Mission Impossible,' with inefficient weight loss and/or unacceptable tolerability. However, the tide has turned with recent progress in biochemical engineering and the development of long-acting agonists at the receptor for glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and with unimolecular peptides that simultaneously possess activity at the receptors for GLP-1, the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon. Some of these novel therapeutics not only improve body weight and glycemic control in individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes with hitherto unmet efficacy and tolerable safety, but also exhibit potential therapeutic value in diverse areas such as neurodegenerative diseases, fatty liver disease, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular diseases. In this review, we highlight recent advances in incretin-based therapies and discuss their pharmacological potential within and beyond the treatment of obesity and diabetes, as well as their limitations in use, side effects, and underlying molecular mechanisms.

Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Safety Outcomes With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Alone and in Combination With SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) receptor agonists and SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitors both improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists on clinical outcomes with and without SGLT2 inhibitors.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases from inception until July 12, 2024, for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outcome trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes that reported treatment effects by baseline use of SGLT2 inhibitors, with findings supplemented by unpublished data. We estimated treatment effects by baseline SGLT2 inhibitor use using inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis. The main cardiovascular outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) and hospitalization for heart failure. Kidney outcomes included a composite of ≥50% reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate, kidney failure or death caused by kidney failure, and annualized rate of decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (estimated glomerular filtration rate slope). Serious adverse events and severe hypoglycemia were also evaluated. This meta-analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42024565765).

RESULTS

We identified 3 trials with 1743 of 17 072 (10.2%) participants with type 2 diabetes receiving an SGLT2 inhibitor at baseline. GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events by 21% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.71-0.87]), with consistent effects in those receiving and not receiving SGLT2 inhibitors at baseline (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.54-1.09] and HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.71-0.87], respectively; P-heterogeneity=0.78). The effect on hospitalization for heart failure was similarly consistent regardless of SGLT2 inhibitor use (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.36-0.93] and HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.63-0.85]; P-heterogeneity=0.26). Effects on the composite kidney outcome (risk ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66-0.95]) and estimated glomerular filtration rate slope (0.78 mL/min/1.73 m2/y [95% CI, 0.57-0.98]) also did not vary according to SGLT2 inhibitor use (P-heterogeneity=0.53 and 0.94, respectively). Serious adverse effects and severe hypoglycemia were also similar regardless of SGLT2 inhibitor use (P-heterogeneity=0.29 and 0.50, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In people with type 2 diabetes, the cardiovascular and kidney benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists are consistent regardless of SGLT2 inhibitor use.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction management: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations

Multiple guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We systematically reviewed current guidelines and recommendations, developed by national and international medical organizations, on the management of HFpEF in adults to aid clinical decision-making. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE on 28 February 2024 for publications over the last 10 years as well as websites of organizations relevant to guideline development. Of the 10 guidelines and recommendations retrieved, 7 showed considerable rigour of development and were subsequently retained for analysis. There was consensus on the definition of HFpEF and the diagnostic role of serum natriuretic peptides and resting transthoracic echocardiography. Discrepancies were identified in the thresholds of serum natriuretic peptides and transthoracic echocardiography parameters used to diagnose HFpEF. There was agreement on the general pharmacological and supportive management of acute and chronic HFpEF. However, differences exist in strategies to identify and address specific phenotypes. Contemporary guidelines for HFpEF management agree on measures to avoid its development and the consideration of cardiac transplantation in advanced diseases. There were discrepancies in recommended frequency of surveillance for patients with HFpEF and sparse recommendations on screening for HFpEF in the general population, use of diagnostic scoring systems, and the role of newly emerging therapies.

Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Families With MASLD: A Population-Based Multigenerational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, whether family members of individuals with MASLD also share an increased cardiovascular risk is unknown.

METHODS

We created a nationwide multigenerational cohort study identifying all family members of Swedish adults diagnosed with biopsy-proven MASLD (1969-2017) and of matched general population comparators (by age, sex, calendar year, and county of residence). We calculated incidence rates and used Cox models to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs for incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including acute myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death. Cox models were adjusted for education, country of birth, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the Charlson comorbidity index.

RESULTS

We identified 22 267 MASLD first-degree relatives (FDRs; parents, siblings, and offspring) and 5687 MASLD spouses, as well as 118 056 comparator FDRs and 29 389 comparator spouses without earlier cardiovascular disease. Overall, the mean age was 41.8 years (SD, 18.0), and 51.5% were females. Over a median of 24.6 years, the incidence rate for MACE was higher in MASLD FDRs than in comparator FDRs (65.0 versus 62.5/10 000 person-years; aHR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01-1.11]). MASLD FDRs had higher rates of acute myocardial infarction (23.0 versus 20.9/10 000 person-years; aHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.18]) and cardiovascular death (aHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.18]). Across generations of FDRs, the risk of MACE was uniformly increased with no differences by relationship (ie, parents, siblings, and offspring; Pinteraction>0.05). MASLD spouses were also at an increased risk of MACE (117.6 versus 103.5/10 000 person-years; aHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01-1.18]).

CONCLUSIONS

First-degree relatives of individuals with biopsy-proven MASLD are at slightly higher risk of incident MACE, but absolute risks do not support early screening for cardiovascular disease. Shared lifestyle factors may be the main contributors, as spouses of MASLD patients also had higher risks of MACE.

The aging heart in focus: The advanced understanding of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for 50 % of heart failure (HF) cases, making it the most common type of HF, and its prevalence continues to increase in the aging society. HFpEF is a systemic syndrome resulting from many risk factors, such as aging, metabolic syndrome, and hypertension, and its clinical features are highly heterogeneous in different populations. HFpEF syndrome involves the dysfunction of multiple organs, including the heart, lung, muscle, and vascular system. The heart shows dysfunction of various cells, including cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, adipocytes, and immune cells. The complex etiology and pathobiology limit experimental research on HFpEF in animal models, delaying a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms and making treatment difficult. Recently, many scientists and cardiologists have attempted to improve the clinical outcomes of HFpEF. Recent advances in clinically related animal models and systemic pathology studies have improved our understanding of HFpEF, and clinical trials involving sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors have significantly enhanced our confidence in treating HFpEF. This review provides an updated comprehensive discussion of the etiology and pathobiology, molecular and cellular mechanisms, preclinical animal models, and therapeutic trials in animals and patients to enhance our understanding of HFpEF and improve clinical outcomes.

Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Hospital: A Multicentre Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are effective medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity, yet their uptake among patients most likely to benefit has been slow.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of medication exposure in adults hospitalized at 16 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 2015 and 2022. We estimated the proportions of those with T2DM, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. We identified the frequency of GLP-1RA use and conducted multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with their use.

RESULTS

Across 1,278,863 hospitalizations, 396,084 (31%) patients had T2DM and approximately 327,844 (26%) had obesity. GLP-1RA use (n=1,274) was low among those with a diagnosis of T2DM (0.3%) or obesity (0.7%), despite a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (36%). In contrast, the use of diabetes medications lacking cardiovascular benefit was high during inpatient hospitalizations related to diabetes: 60% (n=236,612) received insulin and 14% (n=54,885) received a sulfonylurea. Apart from T2DM (odds ratio [OR]=29.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 23.5 to 37.2), characteristics associated with greater odds of receiving a GLP-1RA were seen in those 50 to 70 years of age (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.11) compared with those <50 years of age, glycated hemoglobin >9% (OR=1.83, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.47) compared with <6.5%, and highest income quintile (OR=1.73, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.07) compared with lowest income quintile.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge translation interventions are needed to address the low adoption of GLP-1RA among hospitalized patients with T2DM and obesity, who are the most likely to benefit from this treatment.

Contemporary treatment options in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes approximately half of the heart failure population, with its prevalence markedly increasing with older age and the presence of cardio-metabolic comorbidities. Although HFpEF is associated with a high symptom- and mortality burden, historically there have been few evidence-based treatment options for patients with HFpEF. Recent randomized clinical trials have expanded evidence on pharmacological treatment options, introducing new agents for managing HFpEF. Given the complex clinical phenotype with pathophysiological heterogeneity and evolving diagnostic standards, the evidence-based management of HFpEF remains challenging for clinicians. This review summarizes the latest evidence from contemporary randomized clinical trials and recent guideline recommendations to provide guidance for the treatment of patients with HFpEF.

Imaging and mechanisms of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a state-of-the-art review

Understanding of the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has advanced rapidly over the past two decades. Currently, HFpEF is recognized as a heterogeneous syndrome, and there is a growing movement towards developing personalized treatments based on phenotype-guided strategies. Left ventricular dysfunction is a fundamental pathophysiological abnormality in HFpEF; however, recent evidence also highlights significant roles for the atria, right ventricle, pericardium, and extracardiac contributors. Imaging plays a central role in characterizing these complex and highly integrated domains of pathophysiology. This review focuses on established evidence, recent insights, and the challenges that need to be addressed concerning the pathophysiology of HFpEF, with a focus on imaging-based evaluations and opportunities for further research.

Innovative Glucagon-based Therapies for Obesity

Obesity poses a significant global health challenge, with an alarming rise in prevalence rates. Traditional interventions, including lifestyle modifications, often fall short of achieving sustainable weight loss, ultimately leading to surgical interventions, which carry a significant burden and side effects. This necessitates the exploration of effective and relatively tolerable pharmacological alternatives. Among emerging therapeutic avenues, glucagon-based treatments have garnered attention for their potential to modulate metabolic pathways and regulate appetite. This paper discusses current research on the physiological mechanisms underlying obesity and the role of glucagon in energy homeostasis. Glucagon, traditionally recognized for its glycemic control functions, has emerged as a promising target for obesity management due to its multifaceted effects on metabolism, appetite regulation, and energy expenditure. This review focuses on the pharmacological landscape, encompassing single and dual agonist therapies targeting glucagon receptors (GcgRs), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors (GLP-1Rs), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptors (GIPRs), amylin, triiodothyronine, fibroblast growth factor 21, and peptide tyrosine tyrosine. Moreover, novel triple-agonist therapies that simultaneously target GLP-1R, GIPR, and GcgR show promise in augmenting further metabolic benefits. This review paper tries to summarize key findings from preclinical and clinical studies, elucidating the mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and therapeutic potential of glucagon-based therapies in combating obesity and its comorbidities. Additionally, it explores ongoing research endeavors, including phase III trials, aimed at further validating the efficacy and safety of these innovative treatment modalities.

Impact of semaglutide on weight and functional outcomes among obese heart failure patients: a propensity scores matching analysis

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Obesity is a common comorbidity in heart failure, yet effective pharmacological options for weight loss in these patients are limited. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, has shown promise for weight reduction in obese adults. This study aims to evaluate semaglutide's impact on weight loss, functional status, and clinical outcomes in obese patients with heart failure.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on all consecutive obese (BMI > 30 kg/m²) patients with heart failure at the University Hospital Bonn outpatient clinic from July 2019 to July 2022. Propensity score matching paired patients receiving semaglutide as an add-on therapy (SEMA) with those on medical therapy alone (Control).

RESULTS

Among 1,942 patients with heart failure screened, 26 matched pairs were identified. At one year, the SEMA group exhibited significant weight loss, with a mean BMI reduction of -2.91 kg/m² (95% CI: -4.27 to -1.55; p < 0.001), while the control group showed a non-significant mean change of -0.41 kg/m² (95% CI: -1.08 to 0.26; p = 0.22). The difference in BMI between the two groups was statistically significant (mean difference: 3.42 kg/m², 95% CI: 1.43 to 5.42; p = 0.001). Improvements by at least one NYHA class were observed in 65% of the SEMA group (p < 0.001) compared to 15% of the control group (p = 0.18). The SEMA group also showed a significant increase in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), with a mean difference of 75 m between the groups at one year (95% CI: 0.53 to 150.02; p = 0.049). NT-proBNP levels significantly decreased in the SEMA group (p < 0.001) compared to the control group (p = 0.78), with a statistically significant difference in NT-proBNP between the groups (p = 0.048). Both improvements in 6MWD and reductions in NT-proBNP were significantly correlated with BMI percentage reductions.

CONCLUSIONS

Semaglutide was associated with significant weight reduction in obese patients with heart failure, accompanied by improved NYHA classification and 6-minute walk distance. Larger, multi-center trials and prospective, randomized controlled trials are warranted. These studies should focus on assessing long-term outcomes, optimizing dosage, and exploring the potential cardiovascular benefits beyond weight reduction.

Inflammation in Obesity-Related HFpEF: The STEP-HFpEF Program

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is thought to be an important mechanism for the development and progression of obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In the STEP-HFpEF Program, once-weekly 2.4 mg semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, reduced the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of inflammation, and reduced body weight in participants with obesity-related HFpEF. However, neither the prevalence nor the clinical characteristics of patients who have various magnitudes of inflammation in the context of obesity-related HFpEF have been well described. Furthermore, whether the beneficial effects of semaglutide on the various HF efficacy endpoints in the STEP-HFpEF Program are modified by the baseline levels of inflammation has not been fully established. Finally, the relationship between weight reduction and changes in CRP across the STEP-HFpEF Program have not been fully defined.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to: 1) evaluate baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with obesity-related HFpEF that have various levels of inflammation in the STEP-HFpEF Program; 2) determine if the effects of weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo across all key outcomes are influenced by baseline levels of inflammation assessed by CRP levels; and 3) determine the relationship between change in CRP and weight loss in the STEP-HFpEF Program.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of pooled data from 2 international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials (STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM). The outcomes were change in the dual primary endpoints (health status [measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS)] and body weight) from baseline to 52 weeks according to baseline CRP levels. Additional efficacy endpoints included change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), a hierarchical composite endpoint that included death, heart failure events, and differences in the change in the KCCQ-CSS and 6MWD, and levels of CRP in semaglutide- vs placebo-treated patients. Patients were stratified into 3 categories based on baseline CRP levels (<2, ≥2 to <10, and ≥10 mg/L).

RESULTS

In total, 1,145 patients were randomized, of which 71% of patients had evidence of inflammation (CRP ≥2 mg/L). At baseline, those with higher levels of inflammation were younger, were more likely to be female, and had higher body mass index, worse health status (KCCQ-CSS), and shorter 6MWD. Semaglutide vs placebo led to reductions in HF-related symptoms and physical limitations as well as body weight, and to improvements in 6MWD and the hierarchical composite endpoint that were consistent across baseline CRP categories (all P interaction nonsignificant). Semaglutide also reduced CRP to a greater extent than placebo regardless of baseline CRP levels (P interaction = 0.32). Change in CRP from baseline to 52 weeks was similar regardless of the magnitude of weight loss (P interaction = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation is highly prevalent in obesity-related HFpEF. Semaglutide consistently improved HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, and reduced body weight across the categories of baseline CRP. Semaglutide also reduced inflammation, regardless of either baseline CRP or magnitude of weight loss during the trials. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF; NCT04788511]; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP HFpEF DM; NCT04916470]).

Atrial Fibrillation and Semaglutide Effects in Obesity-Related Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: STEP-HFpEF Program

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a key factor in the development and progression of both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). In the STEP-HFpEF Program (comprising the STEP-HFpEF [Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity] and STEP-HFpEF DM [Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes] trials), once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg improved HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function and reduced body weight in patients with obesity-related HFpEF. Whether the effects of semaglutide in this patient group differ in participants with and without AF (and across various AF types) has not been fully examined.

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were: 1) to evaluate baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with obesity-related HFpEF with and without a history of AF; and 2) to determine if the efficacy of semaglutide across all key trial outcomes are influenced by baseline history of AF (and AF types) in the STEP-HFpEF Program.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials. Patients with heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) <90 points were randomized 1:1 to receive once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or matching placebo for 52 weeks. Dual primary endpoints (change in KCCQ-CSS and percent change in body weight), confirmatory secondary endpoints (change in 6-minute walk distance; hierarchical composite endpoint comprising all-cause death, HF events, thresholds of change in KCCQ-CSS, and 6-minute walk distance; and C-reactive protein [CRP]), and exploratory endpoint (change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) were examined according to investigator-reported history of AF (yes/no). Responder analyses examined the proportions of patients who experienced a ≥5-, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥20-point improvement in KCCQ-CSS per history of AF.

RESULTS

Of the 1,145 participants, 518 (45%) had a history of AF (40% paroxysmal, 24% persistent AF, and 35% permanent AF) and 627 (55%) did not. Participants with (vs without) AF were older, more often male, had higher NT-proBNP levels, included a higher proportion of those with NYHA functional class III symptoms, and used more antithrombotic therapies, beta-blockers, and diuretics. Semaglutide led to larger improvements in KCCQ-CSS (11.5 points [95% CI: 8.3-14.8] vs 4.3 points [95% CI: 1.3-7.2]; P interaction = 0.001) and the hierarchal composite endpoint (win ratio of 2.25 [95% CI: 1.79-2.83] vs 1.30 [95% CI: 1.06-1.59]; P interaction < 0.001) in participants with AF vs without AF, respectively. The proportions of patients receiving semaglutide vs those receiving placebo experiencing ≥5-, ≥10-, ≥15-, and ≥20-point improvement in KCCQ-CSS were also higher in those with (vs without) AF (all P interaction values <0.05). Semaglutide consistently reduced CRP, NT-proBNP, and body weight regardless of AF status (all P interaction values not significant). There were fewer serious adverse events and serious cardiac disorders in participants treated with semaglutide vs placebo irrespective of AF history.

CONCLUSIONS

In the STEP-HFpEF Program, AF was observed in nearly one-half of patients with obesity-related HFpEF and was associated with several features of more advanced HF. Treatment with semaglutide led to significant improvements in HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, as well as reductions in weight, CRP, and NT-proBNP in people with and without AF and across AF types. The magnitude of semaglutide-mediated improvements in HF-related symptoms and physical limitations was more pronounced in those with AF vs without AF at baseline. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF; NCT04788511]; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP-HFpEF DM; NCT04916470]).

Effects of Semaglutide on Heart Failure Outcomes in Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease in the FLOW Trial

BACKGROUND

People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for heart failure (HF) and premature death from cardiovascular (CV) causes. The FLOW (Research Study To See How Semaglutide Works Compared to Placebo in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease), which enrolled participants with T2D and CKD, demonstrated that semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, reduced the incidence of the primary composite outcome (persistent ≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, persistent estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, kidney replacement therapy, and kidney or CV death) by 24%.

OBJECTIVES

This prespecified analysis examined the effects of semaglutide on HF outcomes in this high-risk population.

METHODS

Participants were randomized (1:1) to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1 mg or placebo. The prespecified main outcome was a composite of HF events (new onset or worsening of HF leading to an unscheduled hospital admission or an urgent visit, with initiation of or intensified diuretic/vasoactive therapy) or CV death. HF data were collected by the investigator. CV death was adjudicated by an independent committee.

RESULTS

A total of 3,533 randomized participants were followed for a median of 3.4 years. HF was present at baseline in 342 participants (19.4%) in the semaglutide group and 336 (19.0%) in the placebo group. In the overall trial population, semaglutide increased time to first HF events or CV death (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62-0.87; P = 0.0005), HF events alone (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.92; P = 0.0068), and CV death alone (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.56-0.89; P = 0.0036). The risk reduction for the composite HF outcome was similar in those with (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.54-0.98; P = 0.0338) and without (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58-0.89; P = 0.0028) HF at baseline. The risk of HF outcomes (HF events or CV death) was generally higher in participants categorized as NYHA functional class III and those with the HF reduced ejection fraction subtype, regardless of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Semaglutide substantially reduced the risk of time to first composite outcome of HF events or CV death, as well as HF events and CV death alone, in a high-risk population with T2D and CKD. These effects were consistent regardless of history of HF. (A Research Study To See How Semaglutide Works Compared to Placebo in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease [FLOW]; NCT03819153).

Effect of Semaglutide on Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Obesity-Related Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with adverse cardiac remodeling and is a key driver for the development and progression of heart failure (HF). Once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) has been shown to improve HF-related symptoms and physical limitations, body weight, and exercise function in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but the effects of semaglutide on cardiac structure and function in this population remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

In this echocardiography substudy of the STEP-HFpEF Program, we evaluated treatment effects of once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) vs placebo on cardiac structure and function.

METHODS

Echocardiography at randomization and 52 weeks was performed in 491 of 1,145 participants (43%) in the STEP-HFpEF Program (pooled STEP-HFpEF [Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity and HFpEF] and STEP-HFpEF DM [Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity, HFpEF, and Type 2 Diabetes] trials). The prespecified primary outcome was change in left atrial (LA) volume, with changes in other echocardiography parameters evaluated as secondary outcomes. Treatment effects of semaglutide vs placebo were assessed using analysis of covariance stratified by trial and body mass index, with adjustment for baseline parameter values.

RESULTS

Overall, baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were balanced among those receiving semaglutide (n = 253) and placebo (n = 238). Between baseline and 52 weeks, semaglutide attenuated progression of LA remodeling (estimated mean difference [EMD] in LA volume, -6.13 mL; 95% CI: -9.85 to -2.41 mL; P = 0.0013) and right ventricular (RV) enlargement (EMD in RV end-diastolic area: -1.99 cm2; 95% CI: -3.60 to -0.38 cm2; P = 0.016; EMD in RV end-systolic area: -1.41 cm2; 95% CI: -2.42 to -0.40] cm2; P = 0.0064) compared with placebo. Semaglutide additionally improved E-wave velocity (EMD: -5.63 cm/s; 95% CI: -9.42 to -1.84 cm/s; P = 0.0037), E/A (early/late mitral inflow velocity) ratio (EMD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.24 to -0.04; P = 0.0075), and E/e' (early mitral inflow velocity/early diastolic mitral annular velocity) average (EMD: -0.79; 95% CI: -1.60 to 0.01; P = 0.05). These associations were not modified by diabetes or atrial fibrillation status. Semaglutide did not significantly affect left ventricular dimensions, mass, or systolic function. Greater weight loss with semaglutide was associated with greater reduction in LA volume (Pinteraction = 0.033) but not with changes in E-wave velocity, E/e' average, or RV end-diastolic area.

CONCLUSIONS

In the STEP-HFpEF Program echocardiography substudy, semaglutide appeared to improve adverse cardiac remodeling compared with placebo, further suggesting that treatment with semaglutide may be disease modifying among patients with obesity-related HFpEF. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF]; NCT04788511; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP-HFpEF DM]; NCT04916470).

Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists in Cardio-Oncology: Pathophysiology of Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Cancer Patients

Cancer patients, especially long cancer survivors, are exposed to several cardio-metabolic diseases, including diabetes, heart failure, and atherosclerosis, which increase their risk of cardiovascular mortality. Therapy with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists demonstrated several beneficial cardiovascular effects, including atherosclerosis and heart failure prevention. Cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) suggest that GLP-1 RA could exert cardiorenal benefits and systemic anti-inflammatory effects in patients with type-2 diabetes through the activation of cAMP and PI3K/AkT pathways and the inhibition of NLRP-3 and MyD88. In this narrative review, we highlight the biochemical properties of GLP-1 RA through a deep analysis of the clinical and preclinical evidence of the primary prevention of cardiomyopathies. The overall picture of this review encourages the study of GLP-1 RA in cancer patients with type-2 diabetes, as a potential primary prevention strategy against heart failure and atherosclerosis.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement

The global prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past four decades, currently affecting more than a billion individuals. Beyond its recognition as a high-risk condition that is causally linked to many chronic illnesses, obesity has been declared a disease per se that results in impaired quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Notably, two-thirds of obesity-related excess mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease. Despite the increasingly appreciated link between obesity and a broad range of cardiovascular disease manifestations including atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, thromboembolic disease, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, obesity has been underrecognized and sub-optimally addressed compared with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. In the view of major repercussions of the obesity epidemic on public health, attention has focused on population-based and personalized approaches to prevent excess weight gain and maintain a healthy body weight from early childhood and throughout adult life, as well as on comprehensive weight loss interventions for persons with established obesity. This clinical consensus statement by the European Society of Cardiology discusses current evidence on the epidemiology and aetiology of obesity; the interplay between obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac conditions; the clinical management of patients with cardiac disease and obesity; and weight loss strategies including lifestyle changes, interventional procedures, and anti-obesity medications with particular focus on their impact on cardiometabolic risk and cardiac outcomes. The document aims to raise awareness on obesity as a major risk factor and provide guidance for implementing evidence-based practices for its prevention and optimal management within the context of primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Ferric carboxymaltose and exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and iron deficiency: the FAIR-HFpEF trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Evidence is lacking that correcting iron deficiency (ID) has clinically important benefits for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

METHODS

FAIR-HFpEF was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial designed to compare intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) with placebo (saline) in 200 patients with symptomatic HFpEF and ID (serum ferritin < 100 ng/mL or ferritin 100-299 ng/mL with transferrin saturation < 20%). The primary endpoint was change in 6-min walking test distance (6MWTD) from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included changes in New York Heart Association class, patient global assessment, and health-related quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

The trial was stopped because of slow recruitment after 39 patients had been included (median age 80 years, 62% women). The change in 6MWTD from baseline to week 24 was greater for those assigned to FCM compared to placebo [least square mean difference 49 m, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5-93; P = .029]. Changes in secondary endpoints were not significantly different between groups. The total number of adverse events (76 vs. 114) and serious adverse events (5 vs. 19; rate ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.96; P = .043) was lower with FCM than placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HFpEF and markers of ID, intravenous FCM improved 6MWTD and was associated with fewer serious adverse events. However, the trial lacked sufficient power to identify or refute effects on symptoms or QoL. The potential benefits of intravenous iron in HFpEF with ID should be investigated further in a larger cohort.

GLP-1 physiology in obesity and development of incretin-based drugs for chronic weight management

The introduction of the highly potent incretin receptor agonists semaglutide and tirzepatide has marked a new era in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. With normalisation of glycated haemoglobin levels and weight losses around 15-25%, therapeutic goals that were previously unrealistic are now within reach, and clinical trials have documented that these effects are associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular events and premature mortality. Here, I review this remarkable development from the earliest observations of glucose lowering and modest weight losses with native glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and short acting compounds, to the recent development of highly active formulations and new molecules. I will classify these agents as GLP-1-based therapies in the understanding that these compounds or combinations may have actions on other receptors as well. The physiology of GLP-1 is discussed as well as its mechanisms of actions in obesity, in particular, the role of sensory afferents and GLP-1 receptors in the brain. I provide details regarding the development of GLP-1 receptor agonists for anti-obesity therapy and discuss the possible mechanism behind their beneficial effects on adverse cardiovascular events. Finally, I highlight new pharmacological developments, including oral agents, and discuss important questions regarding maintenance therapy.

Effect of Finerenone on the KCCQ in Patients With HFmrEF/HFpEF: A Prespecified Analysis of FINEARTS-HF

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure (HF) are limited by symptoms and have impaired quality of life. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure that enables evaluation of the effect of HF and the impact of new therapies on health status in patients with HF.

OBJECTIVES

This prespecified analysis of FINEARTS-HF (Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure) assessed the efficacy and safety of finerenone according to baseline KCCQ Total Symptom Score (TSS) and the effect of finerenone on KCCQ-TSS.

METHODS

FINEARTS-HF tested the efficacy of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) finerenone, compared with placebo, in patients with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction/preserved ejection fraction. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events. The KCCQ was completed by patients at randomization and at 6, 9, and 12 months after randomization. Change in KCCQ-TSS was a key secondary endpoint. Patients were stratified by KCCQ-TSS tertiles at baseline. The association between KCCQ tertile and clinical outcomes was evaluated using semiparametric proportional-rates models for total events and Cox models for time-to-first-event data, and the effects of finerenone vs placebo on the primary endpoint were assessed across tertiles of KCCQ-TSS.

RESULTS

Of the 6,001 participants in FINEARTS-HF, 5,986 (99.8%) had baseline KCCQ-TSS recorded (median score 69.8 of a possible 100; higher score = better health status). Lower (worse) KCCQ-TSS was associated with a higher risk of the primary endpoint. Finerenone, compared with placebo, reduced the risk of the primary endpoint across the range of KCCQ-TSS: tertile 1 (score 0-<57): RR: 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68-1.00); tertile 2 (57-<81): 0.88 (95% CI: 0.70-1.11); tertile 3 (81-100): 0.88 (95% CI: 0.69-1.14) (Pinteraction = 0.89). Compared with placebo, finerenone significantly improved KCCQ-TSS from baseline with a mean difference at 12 months of 1.62 points (95% CI: 0.69-2.56 points) (P < 0.001). Numerically fewer finerenone-treated patients experienced clinically meaningful deterioration, and more had improvements in KCCQ-TSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Finerenone significantly reduced HF events and improved health status in patients with HF and mildly reduced ejection fraction/preserved ejection fraction across the spectrum of KCCQ-TSS at baseline. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity [Events Indicating Disease Worsening] & Mortality [Death Rate] in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke] Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF], NCT04435626; Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients with Heart Failure; EudraCT 2020-000306-29).

Evidence of a bi-directional relationship between heart failure and diabetes: a strategy for the detection of glucose abnormalities and diabetes prevention in patients with heart failure

Prevalence of heart failure (HF) and diabetes are markedly increasing globally. In a population of HF patients, approximately 40% have diabetes which is associated with a more severe HF, poorer cardiovascular outcomes and higher hospitalization rates for HF than HF patients without diabetes. Similar trends were shown in HF patients with prediabetes. In addition, the association between HF and renal function decline was demonstrated in patients with or without diabetes. However, the exact prevalence of dysglycemia in HF patients requires further investigation aiming to clarify the most accurate test to detect dysglycemia in this population. The relationship between HF and diabetes is complex and probably bidirectional. In one way, patients with diabetes have a more than two-fold risk of developing incident HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction than those without diabetes. In the other way, patients with HF, when compared with those without HF, show an increased risk for the onset of diabetes due to several mechanisms including insulin resistance (IR), which makes HF emerging as a precursor for diabetes development. This article provides epidemiological evidence of undetected dysglycemia (prediabetes or diabetes) in HF patients and reviews the pathophysiological mechanisms which favor the development of IR and the risks associated with these disorders in HF patients. This review also offers a discussion of various strategies for the prevention of diabetes in HF patients, based first on fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c measurement and if normal on an oral glucose tolerance test as diagnostic tools for prediabetes and unknown diabetes that should be performed more extensively in those patients. It discusses the implementation of diabetes prevention measures and well-structured management programs for HF patients who are generally overweight or obese, as well as current pharmacotherapeutic options for prediabetes, including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors which are among the pillars of HF treatment and which recently showed a benefit in the reduction of incident diabetes in HF patients. Thus, there is an urgent need of routine screening for dysglycemia in all HF patients, which should contribute to reduce the incidence of diabetes and to treat earlier diabetes when already present.

The Emerging Role of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in the Management of Obesity-Related Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Benefits beyond What Scales Can Measure?

Obesity is a significant predisposing factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Although a substantial proportion of individuals with HFpEF also have obesity, those with obesity are under-represented in clinical trials for heart failure. In turn, current guidelines provided limited recommendations for the medical management of this patient population. Both obesity and diabetes induce a pro-inflammatory state that can contribute to endothelial dysfunction and coronary microvascular impairment, finally resulting in HFpEF. Additionally, obesity leads to increased epicardial and chest wall adiposity, which enhances ventricular interdependence. This condition is further aggravated by plasma and blood volume expansion and excessive vasoconstriction, ultimately worsening HFpEF. Despite the well-documented benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists in subjects with diabetes, obesity, or both, their role in obesity-related HFpEF remains unclear. In light of the recently published literature, this review aims to investigate the potential mechanisms and synthesize the available clinical evidence regarding the role of GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with obesity-related HFpEF.

Semaglutide and diuretic use in obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the STEP-HFpEF trial programme, treatment with semaglutide resulted in multiple beneficial effects in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Efficacy may vary according to baseline diuretic use, and semaglutide treatment could modify diuretic dose.

METHODS

In this pre-specified analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials (n = 1145), which randomized participants with HFpEF and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 to once weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo for 52 weeks, we examined whether efficacy and safety endpoints differed by baseline diuretic use, as well as the effect of semaglutide on loop diuretic use and dose changes over the 52-week treatment period.

RESULTS

At baseline, across no diuretic (n = 220), non-loop diuretic only (n = 223), and loop diuretic [<40 (n = 219), 40 (n = 309), and >40 (n = 174) mg/day furosemide equivalents] groups, there was progressively higher prevalence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation; and greater severity of obesity and heart failure. Over 52 weeks of treatment, semaglutide had a consistent beneficial effect on change in body weight across diuretic use categories (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo ranged from -8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) -10.3, -6.3] to -6.9% [95% CI -9.1, -4.7] from no diuretics to the highest loop diuretic dose category; interaction P = .39). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score improvement was greater in patients on loop diuretics compared to those not on loop diuretics (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo: +9.3 [6.5; 12.1] vs. +4.7 points [1.3, 8.2]; P = .042). Semaglutide had consistent beneficial effects on all secondary efficacy endpoints (including 6 min walk distance) across diuretic subgroups (interaction P = .24-.92). Safety also favoured semaglutide vs. placebo across the diuretic subgroups. From baseline to 52 weeks, loop diuretic dose decreased by 17% in the semaglutide group vs. a 2.4% increase in the placebo group (P < .0001). Semaglutide (vs. placebo) was more likely to result in loop diuretic dose reduction (odds ratio [OR] 2.67 [95% CI 1.70, 4.18]) and less likely dose increase (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.23, 0.53]; P < .001 for both) from baseline to 52 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations across diuretic use subgroups, with more pronounced benefits among patients receiving loop diuretics at baseline. Reductions in weight and improvements in exercise function with semaglutide vs. placebo were consistent in all diuretic use categories. Semaglutide also led to a reduction in loop diuretic use and dose between baseline and 52 weeks.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04788511 and NCT04916470.

Effects of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Cardiac Function, Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) are emerging glucose-lowering agents primarily used in managing diabetes and obesity. Recently, GLP-1 RAs have garnered attention for their cardiovascular benefits beyond glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, exhibiting patterns previously seen in cardiovascular outcomes trials on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, which now receive a high level of recommendation for the treatment of heart failure (HF). GLP-1 RAs have been increasingly investigated in HF cohorts, but mainly in small-scale studies reporting inconclusive findings regarding clinical outcomes and different safety profiles in HF patients with reduced and preserved ejection fractions. This review discusses the effects of GLP-1 RAs on surrogate HF outcomes, such as cardiac structure and function, exercise capacity and quality of life, in HF patients across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction, to provide insights into the potential of these agents to be investigated in large clinical trials to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Semaglutide versus placebo in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (hereafter referred to as HFpEF) is the most common type of heart failure and is associated with a high risk of hospitalisation and death, especially in patients with overweight, obesity, or type 2 diabetes. In the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations in participants with HFpEF. Whether semaglutide also reduces clinical heart failure events in this group remains to be established.

METHODS

We conducted a post-hoc pooled, participant-level analysis of four randomised, placebo-controlled trials (SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM) to examine the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (2·4 mg in SELECT, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM; 1·0 mg in FLOW) on heart failure events. The STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpF DM trials enrolled participants with obesity-related HFpEF, the SELECT trial enrolled participants with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity, and the FLOW trial enrolled participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Hence, for this analysis, we include all participants from the STEP-HFpEF trials and those with an investigator-reported history of HFpEF from SELECT and FLOW. The main outcomes for this analysis were the composite endpoint of time to cardiovascular death or first worsening heart failure event (defined as hospitalisation or urgent visit due to heart failure), time to first worsening heart failure event, and time to cardiovascular death. Efficacy and safety endpoints were analysed with the full analysis set (ie, all participants randomly assigned to treatment, according to the intention-to-treat principle). The SELECT, FLOW, STEP-HFpEF, and STEP-HFpEF DM trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03574597, NCT03819153, NCT04788511, and NCT04916470, respectively, and all are complete.

FINDINGS

Across the four trials, 3743 (16·8%) of 22 282 participants had a history of HFpEF (1914 assigned to semaglutide and 1829 assigned to placebo). In this group of participants with HFpEF, semaglutide reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or heart failure events (103 [5·4%] of 1914 in the semaglutide group had events vs 138 [7·5%] of 1829 in the placebo group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69 [95% CI 0·53-0·89]; p=0·0045). Semaglutide also reduced the risk of worsening heart failure events (54 [2·8%] vs 86 [4·7%]; HR 0·59 [0·41-0·82]; p=0·0019). No significant effect on cardiovascular death alone was seen (59 [3·1%] vs 67 [3·7%]; HR 0·82 [0·57-1·16]; p=0·25). A lower proportion of patients treated with semaglutide had serious adverse events than did those who were treated with placebo (572 [29·9%] vs 708 [38·7%]).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with HFpEF, semaglutide reduced the risk of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure events, and worsening heart failure events alone, whereas its effect on cardiovascular death alone was not significant. These data support the use of semaglutide as an efficacious therapy to reduce the risk of clinical heart failure events in patients with HFpEF, for whom few treatment options are currently available.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement

The global prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past four decades, currently affecting more than a billion individuals. Beyond its recognition as a high-risk condition that is causally linked to many chronic illnesses, obesity has been declared a disease per se that results in impaired quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Notably, two-thirds of obesity-related excess mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease. Despite the increasingly appreciated link between obesity and a broad range of cardiovascular disease manifestations including atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, thromboembolic disease, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, obesity has been underrecognized and sub-optimally addressed compared with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. In the view of major repercussions of the obesity epidemic on public health, attention has focused on population-based and personalized approaches to prevent excess weight gain and maintain a healthy body weight from early childhood and throughout adult life, as well as on comprehensive weight loss interventions for persons with established obesity. This clinical consensus statement by the European Society of Cardiology discusses current evidence on the epidemiology and aetiology of obesity; the interplay between obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac conditions; the clinical management of patients with cardiac disease and obesity; and weight loss strategies including lifestyle changes, interventional procedures, and anti-obesity medications with particular focus on their impact on cardiometabolic risk and cardiac outcomes. The document aims to raise awareness on obesity as a major risk factor and provide guidance for implementing evidence-based practices for its prevention and optimal management within the context of primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Efficacy of Semaglutide by Sex in Obesity-Related Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: STEP-HFpEF Trials

BACKGROUND

More women than men have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess baseline characteristics and treatment effect of semaglutide by sex across the STEP-HFpEF (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity) program.

METHODS

In a prespecified secondary analysis of pooled data from STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM (Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes), patients with heart failure (HF), left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) <90 points were randomized 1:1 to once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or matched placebo for 52 weeks. Dual primary endpoints (KCCQ-CSS change and percentage change in body weight) and confirmatory secondary endpoints (6-minute walking distance [6MWD] change; hierarchical composite endpoint comprising all-cause death, HF events, changes in KCCQ-CSS, and 6MWD; and C-reactive protein) were compared between sexes.

RESULTS

Of 1,145 patients, 570 (49.7%) were women. Women had higher body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, C-reactive protein, and worse HF symptoms, and were less likely to have atrial fibrillation or coronary artery disease vs men. Semaglutide improved KCCQ-CSS regardless of sex (mean difference in women +7.6 points [95% CI: 4.5-10.7 points]; men +7.5 points [95% CI: 4.3-10.6 points]; P interaction = 0.94) but reduced body weight more in women (mean difference in women -9.6% [95% CI: -10.9% to -8.4%]; men -7.2% [95% CI: -8.4% to -6.0%]; P interaction = 0.006). Semaglutide improved 6MWD (P interaction = 0.21) and the hierarchical composite endpoint (P interaction = 0.66) in both sexes. Fewer serious adverse events were reported with semaglutide vs placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced body weight to a greater extent in women, and produced similar improvements in HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, regardless of sex. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF]; NCT04788511; and Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP HFpEF DM]; NCT04916470).

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for nearly half of all heart failure cases and has a prevalence that is expected to rise with the growing ageing population. HFpEF is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Specific HFpEF risk factors include age, diabetes, hypertension, obesity and atrial fibrillation. Haemodynamic contributions to HFpEF include changes in left ventricular structure, diastolic and systolic dysfunction, left atrial myopathy, pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular dysfunction, chronotropic incompetence, and vascular dysfunction. Inflammation, fibrosis, impaired nitric oxide signalling, sarcomere dysfunction, and mitochondrial and metabolic defects contribute to the cellular and molecular changes observed in HFpEF. HFpEF impacts multiple organ systems beyond the heart, including the skeletal muscle, peripheral vasculature, lungs, kidneys and brain. The diagnosis of HFpEF can be made in individuals with signs and symptoms of heart failure with abnormality in natriuretic peptide levels or evidence of cardiopulmonary congestion, facilitated by the use of HFpEF risk scores and additional imaging and testing with the exclusion of HFpEF mimics. Management includes initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy and management of comorbidities. Given the significant impact of HFpEF on quality of life, future research efforts should include a particular focus on how patients can live better with this disease.