Species differences in sequence and activity of the peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) within the acyl CoA oxidase gene promoter

Interactions between nuclear receptors glucocorticoid receptor α and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α form a negative feedback loop

Both nuclear receptors glucocorticoid receptor α (GRα) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) are involved in energy and lipid metabolism, and possess anti-inflammation effects. Previous studies indicate that a regulatory loop may exist between them. In vivo and in vitro studies showed that glucocorticoids stimulate hepatic PPARα expression via GRα at the transcriptional level. This stimulation of PPARα by GRα has physiological relevance and PPARα is involved in many glucocorticoid-induced pathophysiological processes, including gluconeogenesis and ketogenesis during fasting, insulin resistance, hypertension and anti-inflammatory effects. PPARα also synergizes with GRα to promote erythroid progenitor self-renewal. As the feedback, PPARα inhibits glucocorticoid actions at pre-receptor and receptor levels. PPARα decreases glucocorticoid production through inhibiting the expression and activity of type-1 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, which converts inactive glucocorticoids to active glucocorticoids at local tissues, and also down-regulates hepatic GRα expression, thus forming a complete and negative feedback loop. This negative feedback loop sheds light on prospective multi-drug therapeutic treatments in inflammatory diseases through a combination of glucocorticoids and PPARα agonists. This combination may potentially enhance the anti-inflammatory effects while alleviating side effects on glucose and lipid metabolism due to GRα activation. More investigations are needed to clarify the underlying mechanism and the relevant physiological or pathological significance of this regulatory loop.

Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α on the synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids in goat mammary epithelial cells

A key member of the nuclear receptor superfamily is the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARA) isoform, which in nonruminants is closely associated with fatty acid oxidation. Whether PPARA plays a role in milk fatty acid synthesis in ruminants is unknown. The main objective of the present study was to use primary goat mammary epithelial cells (GMEC) to activate PPARA via the agonist WY-14643 (WY) or to silence it via transfection of small-interfering RNA (siRNA). Three copies of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor response element (PPRE) contained in a luciferase reporter vector were transfected into GMEC followed by incubation with WY at 0, 10, 20, 30, 50, or 100 µM. A dose of 50 µM WY was most effective at activating PPRE without influencing PPARA mRNA abundance. Transfecting siRNA targeting PPARA decreased its mRNA abundance to 20% and protein level to 50% of basal levels. Use of WY upregulated FASN, SCD1, ACSL1, DGAT1, FABP4, and CD36 (1.1-, 1.5-, 2-, 1.4-, 1.5-, and 5-fold, respectively), but downregulated DGAT2 and PGC1A (-20% and -40%, respectively) abundance. In contrast, triacylglycerol concentration decreased and the content and desaturation index of C16:1 and C18:1 increased. Thus, activation of PPARA via WY appeared to channel fatty acids away from esterification. Knockdown of PPARA via siRNA downregulated ACACA, SCD1, AGPAT6, CD36, HSL, and SREBF1 (-43%, -67%, -16%, -56%, -26%, and -29%, respectively), but upregulated ACSL1, DGAT2, FABP3, and PGC1A (2-, 1.4-, 1.3-, and 2.5-fold, respectively) mRNA abundance. A decrease in the content and desaturation index of C16:1 and C18:1 coupled with an increase in triacylglycerol content accompanied those effects at the mRNA level. Overall, data suggest that PPARA could promote the synthesis of MUFA in GMEC through its effects on mRNA abundance of genes related to fatty acid synthesis, oxidation, transport, and triacylglycerol synthesis.

[The fenofibrate effect on genotoxicity in brain and liver and on the expression of genes regulating fatty acids metabolism of mice]

Fibrates are well-known agonists of the PPAR family (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors). This class of drugs is used for the treatment of dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis. Fenofibrate is one of the members of this class of synthetic PPARα receptor ligands. The oral administration of 0.3% fenofibrate caused a decrease in strength due to loss of body weight in laboratory animals when improving behavioural features. Analysis of the mitochondrial DNA of liver cells showed a genotoxic effect of fenofibrate, due to accumulation of reactive oxygen species, which could be attributed to activation of peroxisomal β-oxidation processes, as well as to the lack of increase in the expression of genes encoding antioxidant defense proteins. Treatment with fenofibrate did not cause brain mtDNA damage. It has been shown that fenofibrate induced mitochondrial β-oxidation in the brain, as indicated by the increased expression of the Acadm and Cpt1a and Ppargc1a and Ppara. The study found no effect of fenofibrate on the increase of mitochondrial biogenesis in brain and liver cells. Thus, we can conclude that fenofibrate significantly affects lipid metabolism in the liver and brain, but in the liver it is associated with an increase of oxidative stress, resulting in mtDNA oxidative damage. However, fenofibrate-induced increase in the expression of Ppargc1a is not associated with an increase of mitochondrial biogenesis. This is consistent with the recent suggestion that PGC-1α might not be a master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis.

Silencing of PPARαBb mRNA in brown trout primary hepatocytes: effects on molecular and morphological targets under the influence of an estrogen and a PPARα agonist

The crosstalk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) and estrogenic pathways are shared from fish to humans. Salmonid fish had an additional genome duplication, and two PPARα isoforms (PPARαBa and PPARαBb) were previously identified. Since a negative regulation between estrogen signaling and PPARα was described, a post-transcriptional gene silencing for PPARαBb was designed in primary brown trout hepatocytes. The aims of the study were to: (i) decipher the effects of PPARαBb knock-down on peroxisome morphology and on mRNA expression of potential target genes, and (ii) to assess the cross-interferences caused by an estrogenic compound (17α-ethinylestradiol - EE2) and a PPARα agonist (Wy-14,643 - Wy) using the established knock-down model. A knock-down efficiency of 70% was achieved for PPARαBb and its silencing significantly reduced the volume density of peroxisomes, but did not alter mRNA levels of the studied genes. Exposure to Wy did not change peroxisome morphology or mRNA expression, but under silencing conditions Wy rescued the volume density of peroxisomes to control levels, and increased acyl-coenzyme A oxidase 1-3l (Acox1-3l) mRNA. Exposure to EE2 caused a reduction of peroxisome volume density, but under silencing conditions this effect was abolished and ApoA1 mRNA level was diminished. The morphological alterations of peroxisomes by WY and EE2 demonstrated that obtained results are PPARαBb dependent, and suggest the regulation of unknown downstream targets of PPARαBb. In summary, PPARαBb is involved in the control of peroxisome size and/or number, which opens future opportunities to explore its regulation and molecular targets.

Editor's Highlight: Clofibrate Decreases Bile Acids in Livers of Male Mice by Increasing Biliary Bile Acid Excretion in a PPARα-Dependent Manner

Fibrates and their receptor, namely peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), have been reported to regulate bile acid (BA) synthesis and transport. However, the effect of fibrate treatment and PPARα activation on BA homeostasis remains controversial. In this study, both wild-type (WT) and PPARα-null male mice were treated with clofibrate (CLOF) for 4 days to evaluate the effects of short-term PPARα activation on BA homeostasis. Although a decrease in total BAs (ΣBAs) was observed in livers of CLOF-treated WT mice, it was not observed in PPARα-null mice. CLOF-mediated decrease in ΣBAs in the liver was not likely due to the reduction in BA synthesis or BA uptake, as evidenced by an increase in the BA synthetic enzyme (Cyp7a1) and 2 BA uptake transporters (Na (+)-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide [Ntcp] and organic anion transporting polypeptide [Oatp]1b2). Instead, the decrease in liver BAs by CLOF is largely a result of increased biliary excretion of BAs, which was associated with a significant induction of the canalicular efflux transporter (bile salt export pump [Bsep]) in the liver. The PPARα-mediated increase in Cyp7a1 in CLOF-treated WT mice was not due to farnesoid X receptor (Fxr)-small heterodimer partner (Shp) signaling in the liver, but due to suppression of Fxr- fibroblast growth factor15 signaling in the ileum. Additionally, CLOF also suppressed intestinal BA transporters (apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter and organic solute transporterβ) and cholesterol efflux transporters (Abcg5 and Abcg8) in a PPARα-dependent manner. In summary, this study provides the first comprehensive analysis on the effect of a short-term CLOF treatment on BA homeostasis, and revealed an essential role of PPARα in regulating BA synthesis, transport and signaling.

Integrated physiology and systems biology of PPARα

The Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor alpha (PPARα) is a transcription factor that plays a major role in metabolic regulation. This review addresses the functional role of PPARα in intermediary metabolism and provides a detailed overview of metabolic genes targeted by PPARα, with a focus on liver. A distinction is made between the impact of PPARα on metabolism upon physiological, pharmacological, and nutritional activation. Low and high throughput gene expression analyses have allowed the creation of a comprehensive map illustrating the role of PPARα as master regulator of lipid metabolism via regulation of numerous genes. The map puts PPARα at the center of a regulatory hub impacting fatty acid uptake, fatty acid activation, intracellular fatty acid binding, mitochondrial and peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation, ketogenesis, triglyceride turnover, lipid droplet biology, gluconeogenesis, and bile synthesis/secretion. In addition, PPARα governs the expression of several secreted proteins that exert local and endocrine functions.

Discovery, design and synthesis of Y-shaped peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ agonists as potent anti-obesity agents in vivo

We have discovered and demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo PPARδ-selective activity of novel Y-shaped agonists. These compounds activated hPPARδ with EC(50) values between 1 and 523 nM. Surprisingly, compounds 10a, 11d, 11e and 11f were the most potent and most selective hPPARδ agonists with 10(4)-fold selectivity over the other two subtypes, namely, hPPARα and hPPARγ. The PPARδ ligands 10a, 11e and 11f showed good bioavailability and in vivo efficacy.

The Role of PPARs in Cancer

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factors that belong to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. PPARalpha is mainly expressed in the liver, where it activates fatty acid catabolism. PPARalpha activators have been used to treat dyslipidemia, causing a reduction in plasma triglyceride and elevation of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. PPARdelta is expressed ubiquitously and is implicated in fatty acid oxidation and keratinocyte differentiation. PPARdelta activators have been proposed for the treatment of metabolic disease. PPARgamma2 is expressed exclusively in adipose tissue and plays a pivotal role in adipocyte differentiation. PPARgamma is involved in glucose metabolism through the improvement of insulin sensitivity and represents a potential therapeutic target of type 2 diabetes. Thus PPARs are molecular targets for the development of drugs treating metabolic syndrome. However, PPARs also play a role in the regulation of cancer cell growth. Here, we review the function of PPARs in tumor growth.

Fine metabolic regulation in ruminants via nutrient–gene interactions: saturated long-chain fatty acids increase expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism and immune response partly through PPAR-α activation

Madin–Darby Bovine Kidney cells cultured with 150 μm of Wy-14 643 (WY, PPARα agonist) or twelve long-chain fatty acids (LCFA; 16 : 0, 18 : 0, cis-9–18 : 1, trans-10–18 : 1, trans-11–18 : 1, 18 : 2n-6, 18 : 3n-3, cis-9, trans-11–18 : 2, trans-10, cis-12–18 : 2, 20 : 0, 20 : 5n-3 and 22 : 6n-3) were used to uncover PPAR-α target genes and determine the effects of LCFA on expression of thirty genes with key functions in lipid metabolism and inflammation. Among fifteen known PPAR-α targets in non-ruminants, ten had greater expression with WY, suggesting that they are bovine PPAR-α targets. The expression of SPP1 and LPIN3 was increased by WY, with no evidence of a similar effect in the published literature, suggesting that both represent bovine-specific PPAR-α targets. We observed the strongest effect on the expression of PPAR-α targets with 16 : 0, 18 : 0 and 20 : 5n-3.When considering the overall effect on expression of the thirty selected genes 20 : 5n-3, 16 : 0 and 18 : 0 had the greatest effect followed by 20 : 0 and c9t11–18 : 2. Gene network analysis indicated an overall increase in lipid metabolism by WY and all LCFA with a central role of PPAR-α but also additional putative transcription factors. A greater increase in the expression of inflammatory genes was observed with 16 : 0 and 18 : 0. Among LCFA, 20 : 5n-3, 16 : 0 and 18 : 0 were the most potent PPAR-α agonists. They also affected the expression of non-PPAR-α targets, eliciting an overall increase in the expression of genes related to lipid metabolism, signalling and inflammatory response. Data appear to highlight a teleological evolutionary adaptation of PPAR in ruminants to cope with the greater availability of saturated rather than unsaturated LCFA.

Omega-3 fatty acids and metabolic syndrome: effects and emerging mechanisms of action

Epidemiological, human, animal, and cell culture studies show that n-3 fatty acids, especially α-linolenic acid (ALA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), reduce the risk factors of cardiovascular diseases. EPA and DHA, rather than ALA, have been the focus of research on the n-3 fatty acids, probably due to the relatively inefficient conversion of ALA to EPA and DHA in rodents and humans. This review will assess our current understanding of the effects and potential mechanisms of actions of individual n-3 fatty acids on multiple risk factors of metabolic syndrome. Evidence for pharmacological responses and the mechanism of action of each of the n-3 fatty acid trio will be discussed for the major risk factors of metabolic syndrome, especially adiposity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and diabetes, hypertension, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Metabolism of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids as well as the interactions of n-3 fatty acids with nutrients, gene expression, and disease states will be addressed to provide a rationale for the use of n-3 fatty acids to reduce the risk factors of metabolic syndrome.

Effect of fenofibrate and niacin on intrahepatic triglyceride content, very low-density lipoprotein kinetics, and insulin action in obese subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

CONTEXT

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with risk factors for cardiovascular disease, particularly increased plasma triglyceride (TG) concentrations and insulin resistance. Fenofibrate and extended release nicotinic acid (Niaspan) are used to treat hypertriglyceridemia and can affect fatty acid oxidation and plasma free fatty acid concentrations, which influence intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) content and metabolic function.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the effects of fenofibrate and nicotinic acid therapy on IHTG content and cardiovascular risk factors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to determine the effects of fenofibrate (8 wk, 200 mg/d), Niaspan (16 wk, 2000 mg/d), or placebo (8 wk) on IHTG content, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) kinetics, and insulin sensitivity.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-seven obese subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (body mass index 36 +/- 1 kg/m(2), IHTG 23 +/- 2%) were studied at Washington University.

RESULTS

Neither fenofibrate nor Niaspan affected IHTG content, but both decreased plasma TG, VLDL-TG, and VLDL-apolipoprotein B concentrations (P < 0.05). Fenofibrate increased VLDL-TG clearance from plasma (33 to 54 ml/min; P < 0.05) but not VLDL-TG secretion. Niaspan decreased VLDL-TG secretion (27 to 15 micromol/min; P < 0.05) without affecting clearance. Both fenofibrate and Niaspan decreased VLDL-apolipoprotein B secretion (1.6 to 1.2 and 1.3 to 0.9 nmol/min, respectively; P < 0.05). Niaspan reduced hepatic, adipose tissue, and muscle insulin sensitivity (P < 0.05), whereas fenofibrate had no effect on insulin action.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate and Niaspan decrease plasma VLDL-TG concentration without altering IHTG content. However, the mechanism responsible for the change in VLDL-TG concentration is different for each drug; fenofibrate increases plasma VLDL-TG clearance, whereas nicotinic acid decreases VLDL-TG secretion.

Be different--the diversity of peroxisomes in the animal kingdom

Peroxisomes represent so-called "multipurpose organelles" as they contribute to various anabolic as well as catabolic pathways. Thus, with respect to the physiological specialization of an individual organ or animal species, peroxisomes exhibit a functional diversity, which is documented by significant variations in their proteome. These differences are usually regarded as an adaptational response to the nutritional and environmental life conditions of a specific organism. Thus, human peroxisomes can be regarded as an in part physiologically unique organellar entity fulfilling metabolic functions that differ from our animal model systems. In line with this, a profound understanding on how peroxisomes acquired functional heterogeneity in terms of an evolutionary and mechanistic background is required. This review summarizes our current knowledge on the heterogeneity of peroxisomal physiology, providing insights into the genetic and cell biological mechanisms, which lead to the differential localization or expression of peroxisomal proteins and further gives an overview on peroxisomal biochemical pathways, which are specialized in different animal species and organs. Moreover, it addresses the impact of proteome studies on our understanding of differential peroxisome function describing the utility of mass spectrometry and computer-assisted algorithms to identify peroxisomal target sequences for the detection of new organ- or species-specific peroxisomal proteins.

Role of Oxidative Stress in Peroxisome Proliferator-Mediated Carcinogenesis

In this review, the evidence about the role of oxidative stress in the induction of hepatocellular carcinomas by peroxisome proliferators is examined. The activation of PPAR-alpha by peroxisome proliferators in rats and mice may produce oxidative stress, due to the induction of enzymes like fatty acyl coenzyme A (CoA) oxidase (AOX) and cytochrome P-450 4A1. The effect of peroxisome proliferators on the antioxidant defense system is reviewed, as is the effect on endpoints resulting from oxidative stress that may be important in carcinogenesis, such as lipid peroxidation, oxidative DNA damage, and transcription factor activation. Peroxisome proliferators clearly inhibit several enzymes in the antioxidant defense system, but studies examining effects on lipid peroxidation and oxidative DNA damage are conflicting. There is a profound species difference in the induction of hepatocellular carcinomas by peroxisome proliferators, with rats and mice being sensitive, whereas species such as nonhuman primates and guinea pigs are not susceptible to the effects of peroxisome proliferators. The possible role of oxidative stress in these species differences is also reviewed. Overall, peroxisome proliferators produce changes in oxidative stress, but whether these changes are important in the carcinogenic process is not clear at this time.

PPARα Agonist-Induced Rodent Tumors: Modes of Action and Human Relevance

Widely varied chemicals--including certain herbicides, plasticizers, drugs, and natural products--induce peroxisome proliferation in rodent liver and other tissues. This phenomenon is characterized by increases in the volume density and fatty acid oxidation of these organelles, which contain hydrogen peroxide and fatty acid oxidation systems important in lipid metabolism. Research showing that some peroxisome proliferating chemicals are nongenotoxic animal carcinogens stimulated interest in developing mode of action (MOA) information to understand and explain the human relevance of animal tumors associated with these chemicals. Studies have demonstrated that a nuclear hormone receptor implicated in energy homeostasis, designated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha), is an obligatory factor in peroxisome proliferation in rodent hepatocytes. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the state of the science on several topics critical to evaluating the relationship between the MOA for PPARalpha agonists and the human relevance of related animal tumors. Topics include a review of existing tumor bioassay data, data from animal and human sources relating to the MOA for PPARalpha agonists in several different tissues, and case studies on the potential human relevance of the animal MOA data. The summary of existing bioassay data discloses substantial species differences in response to peroxisome proliferators in vivo, with rodents more responsive than primates. Among the rat and mouse strains tested, both males and females develop tumors in response to exposure to a wide range of chemicals including DEHP and other phthalates, chlorinated paraffins, chlorinated solvents such as trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene, and certain pesticides and hypolipidemic pharmaceuticals. MOA data from three different rodent tissues--rat and mouse liver, rat pancreas, and rat testis--lead to several different postulated MOAs, some beginning with PPARalpha activation as a causal first step. For example, studies in rodent liver identified seven "key events," including three "causal events"--activation of PPARalpha, perturbation of cell proliferation and apoptosis, and selective clonal expansion--and a series of associative events involving peroxisome proliferation, hepatocyte oxidative stress, and Kupffer-cell-mediated events. Similar in-depth analysis for rat Leydig-cell tumors (LCTs) posits one MOA that begins with PPARalpha activation in the liver, but two possible pathways, one secondary to liver induction and the other direct inhibition of testicular testosterone biosynthesis. For this tumor, both proposed pathways involve changes in the metabolism and quantity of related hormones and hormone precursors. Key events in the postulated MOA for the third tumor type, pancreatic acinar-cell tumors (PACTs) in rats, also begin with PPARalpha activation in the liver, followed by changes in bile synthesis and composition. Using the new human relevance framework (HRF) (see companion article), case studies involving PPARalpha-related tumors in each of these three tissues produced a range of outcomes, depending partly on the quality and quantity of MOA data available from laboratory animals and related information from human data sources.

Role of peroxisome proliferators-activated receptors in the pathogenesis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is highly prevalent and can result in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and progressive liver disease including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. A growing body of literature implicates the peroxisome proliferators-activated receptors (PPARs) in the pathogenesis and treatment of NAFLD. These nuclear hormone receptors impact on hepatic triglyceride accumulation and insulin resistance. The aim of this review is to describe the data linking PPARα and PPARγ to NAFLD/NASH and to discuss the use of PPAR ligands for the treatment of NASH.

Genomic profiling in nuclear receptor-mediated toxicity

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are attractive drug targets due to their role in regulation of a wide range of physiologic responses. In addition to providing therapeutic value, many pharmaceutical agents along with environmental chemicals are ligands for NRs and can cause adverse health effects that are directly related to activation of NRs. Identifying the molecular events that produce a toxic response may be confounded by the fact that there is a significant overlap in the biological processes that NRs regulate. Microarrays and other methods for gene expression profiling have served as useful, sensitive tools for discerning the mechanisms by which therapeutics and environmental chemicals invoke toxic effects. The capability to probe thousands of genes simultaneously has made genomics a prime technology for identifying drug targets, biomarkers of exposure/toxicity and key players in the mechanisms of disease. The complex intertwining networks regulated by NRs are hard to probe comprehensively without global approaches and genomics has become a key technology that facilitates our understanding of NR-dependent and -independent events. The future of drug discovery, design and optimization, and risk assessment of chemical toxicants that activate NRs will inevitably involve genomic profiling. This review will focus on genomics studies related to PPAR, CAR, PXR, RXR, LXR, FXR, and AHR.

PPARs and their metabolic modulation: new mechanisms for transcriptional regulation?

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) as ligand-activated nuclear receptors involved in the transcriptional regulation of lipid metabolism, energy balance, inflammation, and atherosclerosis are at the intersection of key pathways involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Synthetic PPAR agonists like fibrates (PPAR-alpha) and thiazolidinediones (PPAR-gamma) are in therapeutic use to treat dyslipidaemia and diabetes. Despite strong encouraging in vitro, animal model, and human surrogate marker studies with these agents, recent prospective clinical cardiovascular trials have yielded mixed results, perhaps explained by concomitant drug use, study design, or a lack of efficacy of these agents on cardiovascular disease (independent of their current metabolic indications). The use of PPAR agents has also been limited by untoward effects. An alternative strategy to PPAR therapeutics is better understanding PPAR biology, the nature of natural PPAR agonists, and how these molecules are generated. Such insight might also provide valuable information about pathways that protect against the metabolic problems for which PPAR agents are currently indicated. This approach underscores the important distinction between the effects of synthetic PPAR agonists and the unequivocal biologic role of PPARs as key transcriptional regulators of metabolic and inflammatory pathways relevant to diabetes and atherosclerosis.

Renoprotective Effects of Rosiglitazone in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Rosiglitazone (RGTZ) has a protective effect against various types of injury. We evaluated the effects of RGTZ on renal injury in a stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHRSP) model.

METHODS

Male SHRSP rats were observed with or without RGTZ treatment for 10 weeks. Age-matched male Wistar-Kyoto rats were used as controls. The effect of RGTZ on hypertensive nephropathy was evaluated by assessing renal function, pathology, pro-inflammatory cytokine (osteopontin), profibrotic cytokine (betaig-h3), apoptotic cell death (TUNEL staining and caspase 3 expression), marker of oxidative stress (8-OHdG) and endothelial damage (eNOS).

RESULTS

RGTZ treatment improved renal function and histopathology compared with SHRSP rats without treatment (p < 0.05). Osteopontin and betaig-h3 were significantly increased in SHRSP rat kidneys, but RGTZ treatment decreased both mediators. Apoptotic cell death was increased in renal tubular cells in the injured area in SHRSP rat kidneys, but RGTZ treatment decreased apoptotic cell death and caspase 3 expression. Increased urinary 8-OHdG excretion and decreased eNOS in SHRSP rats was reversed with RGTZ treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

RGTZ protects hypertensive nephropathy in SHRSP rats.

Underlying mechanisms of pharmacology and toxicity of a novel PPAR agonist revealed using rodent and canine hepatocytes

Marked species-specific responses to agonists of the peroxisome proliferator-activated alpha receptor (PPAR alpha) have been observed in rats and dogs, two species typically used to assess the potential human risk of pharmaceuticals in development. In this study, we used primary cultured rat and dog hepatocytes to investigate the underlying mechanisms of a novel PPAR alpha and -gamma coagonist, LY465608, relative to fenofibrate, a prototypical PPAR alpha agonist. As expected, rat hepatocytes incubated with these two agonists demonstrated an increase in peroxisome number as evaluated by electron microscopy, whereas the peroxisome number remained unchanged in dog hepatocytes. Biochemical analysis showed that rat hepatocytes responded to PPAR agonists with an induction of both peroxisomal and mitochondrial beta-oxidation (PBox and MBox) activities. Dog hepatocytes treated with both PPAR agonists, however, did not show increased PBox activity but did demonstrate increased MBox activity. Analysis of peroxisomal beta-oxidation gene expression markers by quantitative real-time PCR confirmed that PPAR agonists induced the peroxisomal enzymes, acyl-coenzyme A (CoA) oxidase (Acox), enoyl-CoA hydratase/L-3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (Ehhadh), and 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase (Acaa1) at the transcriptional level in rat hepatocytes, but not dog hepatocytes. Expression of mRNA for the mitochondrial beta-oxidation gene hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase (Hadhb), however, increased in both rat and dog hepatocytes, consistent with biochemical measurements of peroxisomal and mitochondrial beta-oxidation. Repeat-dose nonclinical safety studies of LY465608 revealed abnormities in mitochondrial morphology and evidence of single-cell necrosis following 30 days of dosing exclusively in dogs, but not in rats. Microarray analysis indicated that dog hepatocytes, but not rat hepatocytes, treated with LY465608 had an expression profile consistent with abnormalities in the regulation of cell renewal and death, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial bioenergetics, which may explain the canine-specific toxicity observed in vivo with this compound. This increased sensitivity to mitochondrial toxicity of canine hepatocytes relative to rat hepatocytes identified using gene expression was confirmed using the fluorescent indicator tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester (TMRE) and flow cytometry. At doses of 0.1 microM LY465608, canine hepatocytes showed a greater shift in fluorescence indicative of mitochondrial damage than observed with rat hepatocytes treated at 10 microM. In summary, using rat and dog primary hepatocytes, we replicated the pharmacologic and toxicologic effects of LY465608 observed in vivo during preclinical development and propose an underlying mechanism for these species-specific effects.

Differential regulation of the cynomolgus, human, and rat acyl-CoA oxidase promoters by PPARα

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) is a member of the nuclear receptor family of transcription factors and is recognized as the molecular target of the hypolipidemic fibrate drugs. Fibrates promote lipid catabolism by inducing genes involved in fatty acid beta-oxidation. In rodents this is accompanied by peroxisome proliferation, and after chronic dosing hepatocarcinoma, whereas epidemiological studies suggest these adverse events are lacking in humans. Rodents such as rats and mice appear particularly sensitive to PPARalpha-induced peroxisome proliferation while humans are resistant. These findings question the utility of rodent models for safety monitoring of experimental PPARalpha agonists and highlight the need for additional preclinical models that display greater physiological relevance for human response. Thus we have focused on elucidating the molecular mechanism of species-dependent peroxisome proliferation by understanding the PPARalpha-dependent regulation of the acyl-CoA oxidase (AOX) promoter, the rate-limiting step of peroxisomal beta-oxidation. We have chosen the cynomolgus monkey as a model that is modestly responsive to peroxisome proliferation and functionally characterized it against the highly responsive rat and non-responsive human species. We report the identification of a putative peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) within the 2.3 kb proximal promoter of the cynomolgus monkey AOX gene. Characterization of these promoters using a series of constitutively active, PPARalpha constructs demonstrate that the PPREs within the proximal cynomolgus and human AOX promoters are non-responsive to PPARalpha whereas the rat PPRE is highly responsive. These findings were verified in vivo using a small molecule PPARalpha agonist. Taken together, we demonstrate concordant regulation of the AOX promoter by PPARalpha in cynomolgus monkeys and humans and suggest that this model is superior to rodent models with respect to preclinical evaluation of PPARalpha agonists.

Gene Expression Profiles in Fathead Minnow Exposed to 2,4-DNT: Correlation with Toxicity in Mammals

Toxicogenomics, the genome-wide analysis of gene expression to study the effect of toxicants, has great potential for use in environmental toxicology. Applied to standard test organisms, it has possible applications in aquatic toxicology as a sensitive monitoring tool to detect the presence of contaminants while providing information on the mechanisms of action of these pollutants. We describe the use of a complementary DNA (cDNA) microarray of the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) a standard sentinel organism in aquatic toxicology, to better understand the mechanisms of toxicity of 2,4-dinitrotoluene (2,4-DNT) which is released in the environment through military and industrial use. We have constructed a fathead minnow microarray containing 5000 randomly picked anonymous cDNAs from a whole fish cDNA library. Expression profiles were analyzed in fish exposed to 2,4-DNT for 10 days at three concentrations (11, 22, and 44 microM, respectively) below the measured median lethal concentration (58 microM). Sequence analysis of cDNAs corresponding to differentially expressed genes affected by exposure revealed that lipid metabolism and oxygen transport genes were prominently affected in a dose-specific manner. We measured liver lipids and demonstrate that lipid metabolism is indeed perturbed following exposure. These observations correlate well with available toxicological data on 2,4-DNT. We present possible modes of action of 2,4-DNT toxicity and suggest that fathead minnow cDNA microarrays can be useful to identify mechanisms of toxicity in fish and as a predictive tool for toxicity in mammals.

Cloning, Tissue Expression, and Regulation of Beagle Dog CYP4A Genes

In addition to its function as a fatty acid hydroxylase, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) target gene, CYP4A, has been shown to be important in the conversion of arachidonic acid to the potent vasoconstrictor 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, suggesting a role for this enzyme in mediating vascular tone. In the present study, the cDNA sequence of beagle dog CYP4A37, CYP4A38, and CYP4A39 from the liver was determined. Open reading frame analysis predicted that CYP4A37, CYP4A38, and CYP4A39 each comprised 510 amino acids with approximately 90% sequence identity to one another, and approximately 71 and 78% sequence identity to rat CYP4A1 and human CYP4A11, respectively. PCR analysis revealed that the three dog CYP4A isoforms are expressed in kidney > liver >> lung >> intestine > skeletal muscle > heart. Treatment of primary dog hepatocytes with the PPARalpha agonists GW7647X and clofibric acid resulted in an increase in CYP4A37, CYP4A38, and CYP4A39 mRNA expression (up to fourfold), whereas HMG-CoA synthase mRNA expression was increased to a greater extent (up to 10-fold). These results suggest that dog CYP4A37, CYP4A38, and CYP4A39 are expressed in a tissue-dependent manner and that beagle dog CYP4A is not highly inducible by PPARalpha agonists, similar to the human CYP4A11 gene.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and liver cancer: where do we stand?

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha), first identified in 1990 as a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, has a central role in the regulation of numerous target genes encoding proteins that modulate fatty acid transport and catabolism. PPARalpha is the molecular target for the widely prescribed lipid-lowering fibrate drugs and the diverse class of chemicals collectively referred to as peroxisome proliferators. The lipid-lowering function of PPARalpha occurs across a number of mammalian species, thus demonstrating the essential role of this nuclear receptor in lipid homeostasis. In contrast, prolonged administration of PPARalpha agonists causes hepatocarcinogenesis, specifically in rats and mice, indicating that PPARalpha also mediates this effect. There is no strong evidence that the low-affinity fibrate ligands are associated with cancer in humans, but it still remains a possibility that chronic activation with high-affinity ligands could be carcinogenic in humans. It is now established that the species difference between rodents and humans in response to peroxisome proliferators is due in part to PPARalpha. The cascade of molecular events leading to liver cancer in rodents involves hepatocyte proliferation and oxidative stress, but the PPARalpha target genes that mediate this response are unknown. This review focuses on the current understanding of the role of PPARalpha in hepatocarcinogenesis and identifies future research directions that should be taken to delineate the mechanisms underlying PPARalpha agonist-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.

A PPAR response element regulates transcription of the gene for human adipose differentiation-related protein

Lipid droplets are cytoplasmic organelles which serve as storage sites for neutral lipids. Adipose differentiation-related protein (ADRP) is intrinsically associated with the surface of lipid droplets and is believed to play a major role in the maintenance of lipid stores in non-adipocytes. ADRP abundance is intimately linked to the amount of lipid found within cells and agents which increase the levels of intracellular lipid, such as certain agonists of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), also are capable of modulating ADRP gene transcription. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms and promoter control elements, which regulate the transcription of the human gene. Using a reporter system to investigate ADRP transcription, we have identified a PPAR response element (PPRE) with the sequence 5'-AGGTGA A AGGGCG-3' within its promoter region. Mutational analysis revealed that the ADRP PPRE specifically mediated the upregulation of transcription in response to activation by agonists of PPAR subtypes alpha and delta in both rat and human hepatocyte-derived cell lines. These findings offer insight into the mechanisms which serve to regulate ADRP transcription and intracellular lipid storage.

Promoter rearrangements cause species-specific hepatic regulation of the glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase gene by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha

In liver, the glyoxylate cycle contributes to two metabolic functions, urea and glucose synthesis. One of the key enzymes in this pathway is glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase (GRHPR) whose dysfunction in human causes primary hyperoxaluria type 2, a disease resulting in oxalate accumulation and formation of kidney stones. In this study, we provide evidence for a transcriptional regulation by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) of the mouse GRHPR gene in liver. Mice fed with a PPARalpha ligand or in which PPARalpha activity is enhanced by fasting increase their GRHPR gene expression via a peroxisome proliferator response element located in the promoter region of the gene. Consistent with these observations, mice deficient in PPARalpha present higher plasma levels of oxalate in comparison with their wild type counterparts. As expected, the administration of a PPARalpha ligand (Wy-14,643) reduces the plasma oxalate levels. Surprisingly, this effect is also observed in null mice, suggesting a PPARalpha-independent action of the compound. Despite a high degree of similarity between the transcribed region of the human and mouse GRHPR gene, the human promoter has been dramatically reorganized, which has resulted in a loss of PPARalpha regulation. Overall, these data indicate a species-specific regulation by PPARalpha of GRHPR, a key gene of the glyoxylate cycle.

Peroxisome proliferators and receptor-mediated hepatic carcinogenesis

The peroxisome proliferators represent an important group of hepatic carcinogens in rodents that act via the nuclear receptor PPARalpha. The primary role of PPARalpha in mediating this response had led to the further characterization of potential events downstream that likely enable the carcinogenic response, including increased peroxisomal fatty acid beta oxidation and the modulation of hepatocellular replication and death, either generally or in preneoplastic lesions. A cooperative role of Kupffer cell activation has been proposed to function in the modulation of hepatocellular proliferation in rodent liver by peroxisome proliferators, but data that confirm or refute this proposal are mixed. Presently there is no evidence that links the Kupffer cell activation by peroxisome proliferators directly to the development of liver tumors. There are marked species differences in susceptibility to peroxisomal proliferation, and active investigation concerning the molecular basis of these differences continues.

Utilization of juvenile animal studies to determine the human effects and risks of environmental toxicants during postnatal developmental stages

BACKGROUND

Toxicology studies utilizing animals and in vitro cellular or tissue preparations have been used to study the toxic effects and mechanism of action of drugs and chemicals and to determine the effective and safe dose of drugs in humans and the risk of toxicity from chemical exposures. Testing in animals could be improved if animal dosing using the mg/kg basis was abandoned and drugs and chemicals were administered to compare the effects of pharmacokinetically and toxicokinetically equivalent serum levels in the animal model and human. Because alert physicians or epidemiology studies, not animal studies, have discovered most human teratogens and toxicities in children, animal studies play a minor role in discovering teratogens and agents that are deleterious to infants and children. In vitro studies play even a less important role, although they are helpful in describing the cellular or tissue effects of the drugs or chemicals and their mechanism of action. One cannot determine the magnitude of human risks from in vitro studies when they are the only source of toxicology data.

METHODS

Toxicology studies on adult animals is carried out by pharmaceutical companies, chemical companies, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), many laboratories at the National Institutes of Health, and scientific investigators in laboratories throughout the world. Although there is a vast amount of animal toxicology studies carried out on pregnant animals and adult animals, there is a paucity of animal studies utilizing newborn, infant, and juvenile animals. This deficiency is compounded by the fact that there are very few toxicology studies carried out in children. That is one reason why pregnant women and children are referred to as "therapeutic orphans."

RESULTS

When animal studies are carried out with newborn and developing animals, the results demonstrate that generalizations are less applicable and less predictable than the toxicology studies in pregnant animals. Although many studies show that infants and developing animals may have difficulty in metabolizing drugs and are more vulnerable to the toxic effects of environmental chemicals, there are exceptions that indicate that infants and developing animals may be less vulnerable and more resilient to some drugs and chemicals. In other words, the generalization indicating that developing animals are always more sensitive to environmental toxicants is not valid. For animal toxicology studies to be useful, animal studies have to utilize modern concepts of pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics, as well as "mechanism of action" (MOA) studies to determine whether animal data can be utilized for determining human risk. One example is the inability to determine carcinogenic risks in humans for some drugs and chemicals that produce tumors in rodents, When the oncogenesis is the result of peroxisome proliferation, a reaction that is of diminished importance in humans.

CONCLUSIONS

Scientists can utilize animal studies to study the toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic aspects of drugs and environmental toxicants. But they have to be carried out with the most modern techniques and interpreted with the highest level of scholarship and objectivity. Threshold exposures, no-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) exposures, and toxic effects can be determined in animals, but have to be interpreted with caution when applying them to the human. Adult problems in growth, endocrine dysfunction, neurobehavioral abnormalities, and oncogenesis may be related to exposures to drugs, chemicals, and physical agents during development and may be fruitful areas for investigation. Maximum permissible exposures have to be based on data, not on generalizations that are applied to all drugs and chemicals. Epidemiology studies are still the best methodology for determining the human risk and the effects of environmental toxicants. Carrying out these focused studies in developing humans will be difficult. Animal studies may be our only alternative for answering many questions with regard to specific postnatal developmental vulnerabilities.

Fibrates induce hepatic peroxisome and mitochondrial proliferation without overt evidence of cellular proliferation and oxidative stress in cynomolgus monkeys

There is little primate risk factor data in the literature evaluating the relationship between proposed mechanisms of PPAR agonist-induced hepatocarcinogenesis at clinically relevant therapeutic exposures. These studies were conducted to characterize the hepatic effects of fenofibrate and ciprofibrate in the cynomolgus monkey. Male cynomolgus monkeys were given fenofibrate (250, 1250 or 2500 mg/kg/day) or ciprofibrate (3, 30, 150 or 400 mg/kg/day) for up to 15 days. The highest doses used were approximately 4 times (fenofibrate) and 9.4 times (ciprofibrate) the human therapeutic exposure for these agents based on AUC (area under the curve). For both compounds, there was a treatment-related increase in liver weight and periportal hepatocellular hypertrophy, which was related to increases in peroxisomes (up to 2.8 times controls) and mitochondria (up to 2.5 times controls). An increase in smooth endoplasmic reticulum probably contributed to the hypertrophy. There was no indication of cell proliferation as determined by the number of mitotic figures and this was confirmed by evaluating cell proliferation by immunohistochemical staining for the Ki-67 antigen. Consistent with the findings by light microscopy, there was no treatment-related effect on the level of mRNA for proteins known to be involved in the control of hepatocyte cell division or apoptosis (e.g. P21, Cyclin D1, PCNA, CDKN1A). Furthermore, there was minimal indication of oxidative stress. Thus, there was no evidence of lipofuscin accumulation, and there was no remarkable increase in the mRNA levels for most proteins known to respond to oxidative stress (e.g. catalase, glutathione peroxidase). A mild induction in the mRNA levels of cellular beta-oxidation and detoxification enzymes (e.g. acyl CoA oxidase, thioredoxin reductase) was observed. Collectively, the data from these studies suggest that the primate responds to PPARalpha agonists in a manner that is different from the rodent suggesting that the primate may be refractory to PPAR-induced hepatocarcinogenesis.

Molecular analysis of peroxisome proliferation in the hamster

Three novel P450 members of the cytochrome P450 4A family were cloned as partial cDNAs from hamster liver, characterised as novel members of the CYP4A subfamily, and designated CYP4A17, 18, and 19. Hamsters were treated with the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) agonists, methylclofenapate (MCP) or Wy-14,643, and shown to develop hepatomegaly and induction of CYP4A17 RNA, and concomitant induction of lauric acid 12- hydroxylase. This treatment also resulted in hypolipidaemia, which was most pronounced in the VLDL fraction, with up to 50% reduction in VLDL-triglycerides; by contrast, blood cholesterol concentration was unaffected by this treatment. These data show that hamster is highly responsive to induction of CYP4A by peroxisome proliferators. To characterise the molecular basis of peroxisome proliferation, the hamster PPARalpha was cloned and shown to encode a 468-amino-acid protein, which is highly similar to rat and mouse PPARalpha proteins. The level of expression of hamster PPARalpha in liver is intermediate between mouse and guinea pig. These results fail to support the hypothesis that the level of PPARalpha in liver is directly responsible for species differences in peroxisome proliferation.

Alcoholic liver injury in the rat is associated with reduced expression of peroxisome proliferator-alpha (PPARalpha)-regulated genes and is ameliorated by PPARalpha activation

Alcoholic liver disease is associated with a state of hepatic fatty acid overload. We examined the effect of ethanol and different types of dietary fat on the expression of mRNA for liver fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha), and peroxisomal fatty acyl CoA oxidase (FACO). Four groups of rats (n = 5) were fed intragastrically, a liquid diet with or without ethanol (10-16 g/kg/day) for 4 weeks. Pair-fed controls received isocaloric amounts of dextrose. The source of fat was either corn oil or fish oil. Ethanolfed rats developed fatty liver, necrosis, and inflammation; the changes were more severe in the fish oil-ethanol (FE) rats. PPARalpha mRNA levels were not different between groups, although there was a trend toward increased levels in ethanol-fed rats. We calculated L-FABP/PPARalpha and FACO/PPARalpha ratios as a measure of FACO and L-FABP up-regulation relative to PPARalpha expression. Both FACO/PPARalpha and L-FABP/PPARalpha ratios were significantly decreased in FE rats. However, only L-FABP/PPARalpha was decreased in corn oil plus ethanol rats. Also, the level of L-FABP/mRNA correlated inversely with the degree of fatty liver in ethanol-fed rats. Since expression of PPARalpha response genes was impaired in ethanol-fed rats, we determined whether activation of PPARalpha would normalize the PPARalpha response and prevent the pathological changes in ethanol-fed rats. Treatment with clofibrate, a PPARalpha-activating ligand, led to a marked decrease in fatty liver and complete abrogation of necroinflammatory changes in FE rats. Also, nuclear factor kappaB activation and up-regulation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and cyclooxygenase-2 was also abolished in clofibrate-treated rats. We conclude that adaptive gene regulation of FACO and L-FABP by PPARalpha is impaired in ethanol-fed rats and that treatment with clofibrate, a PPARalpha ligand, prevents alcohol-induced pathological liver injury, possibly by reversing the above changes.

A Novel Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α Agonist, 2-Methyl-c-5-[4-[5-methyl-2-(4-methylphenyl)-4-oxazolyl]butyl]-1,3-dioxane-r-2-carboxylic acid (NS-220), Potently Decreases Plasma Triglyceride and Glucose Levels and Modifies Lipoprotein Profiles in KK-Ay Mice

2-Methyl-c-5-[4-[5-methyl-2-(4-methylphenyl)-4-oxazolyl]butyl]-1,3-dioxane-r-2-carboxylic acid (NS-220) was newly synthesized and demonstrated to be a novel potent peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) agonist with high subtype selectivity. In cell-based reporter gene assays, the EC(50) values of NS-220 for human PPARalpha, PPARgamma, and PPARdelta were 1.9 x 10(-8), 9.6 x 10(-6), and >10(-4) M, respectively, and for mouse PPARalpha, PPARgamma, and PPARdelta were 5.5 x 10(-8), 3.3 x 10(-5), and >10(-4) M, respectively. In addition, [(3)H]NS-220 bound to the ligand-binding domain of human PPARalpha with a K(D) value of 1.85 x 10(-7) M. Fenofibric acid and bezafibrate showed weak agonist activity for PPARalpha (EC(50), 2-8 x 10(-5) M), with poor subtype selectivity. NS-220 (0.1-3 mg/kg p.o.) decreased plasma triglyceride levels in ddY mice in a dose-dependent manner, but its hypolipidemic activity was abolished in PPARalpha-deficient mice. In KK-A(y) mice, an animal model of type-2 diabetes, NS-220 (0.3-1 mg/kg p.o.; 4 days) and fenofibrate (100-300 mg/kg p.o.; 4 days) decreased plasma triglyceride and glucose levels in a dose-dependent manner. In a 2-week repeated administration test, NS-220 (0.3-1 mg/kg p.o.) decreased plasma glucose levels markedly without increasing in plasma insulin levels. Furthermore, NS-220 increased high-density lipoprotein levels and decreased triglyceride-rich lipoprotein levels. In conclusion, a newly synthesized dioxanecarboxylic acid derivative, NS-220, is a potent and highly selective PPARalpha agonist that ameliorates metabolic disorders in diabetic mice. These results strongly suggest that it will be a promising drug for the treatment of hyperlipidemia or metabolic disorders in type-2 diabetes.

Transcription profiling distinguishes dose-dependent effects in the livers of rats treated with clofibrate

Peroxisome proliferators such as the fibrates act via the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha as hypolipidemic agents. Many peroxisome proliferators are also nongenotoxic hepatic carcinogens and hepatotoxicants in rodents. We performed transcription profiling using cDNA microarrays on livers of rats treated for 5 days with 3 doses of the peroxisome proliferator clofibrate. All 3 doses had hepatic effects as assessed by liver to body weight ratio, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increases and histopathology examination. Analysis of the transcription profiling data identified changes in the expression of many genes within several mechanistic pathways that support existing hypotheses regarding peroxisome proliferator mediated carcinogenicity. Additionally, the transcription profiling, histopathology, and clinical chemistry results suggested a biphasic response to clofibrate. These findings provide insight into the pathogenesis of toxic and carcinogenic effects of clofibrate in rodents and demonstrate the ability of cDNA microarrays to provide information regarding mechanisms of toxicity identified during the drug development process.

The role of investigative molecular toxicology in early stage drug development

Molecular toxicology, the application of molecular biology principles and technologies to preclinical safety assessment, represents a key tool for understanding mechanisms of toxicity and assessing the risks associated with specific toxicities. The application of gene expression markers to early stage preclinical safety assessment has the potential to impact pipelines in two main areas: lead optimisation and issue management. Lead optimisation focuses on deprioritising leads with significant, development-limiting toxicological liabilities while advancing those compounds with the greatest chance of successfully navigating the gauntlet of preclinical and clinical safety studies. Issue management utilises mechanistic toxicology studies to position non-development-limiting findings prior to the onset of Good Laboratory Practice studies in full development, and can help to identify and validate gene expression markers predictive of adverse events to avoid issues in second-generation projects. In this review, the authors describe the application of molecular toxicology to a standard pharmaceutical testing funnel, provide examples of the successful application of gene expression markers, and discuss the potential for future impact in several broad categories of clinically relevant toxicity.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, hyperlipidaemia, and atherosclerosis

Dyslipidaemia is a major risk factor in the development of atherosclerosis, and lipid lowering is achieved clinically using fibrate drugs and statins. Fibrate drugs are ligands for the fatty acid receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha, and the lipid-lowering effects of this class of drugs are mediated by the control of lipid metabolism, as directed by PPARalpha. PPARalpha ligands also mediate potentially protective changes in the expression of several proteins that are not involved in lipid metabolism, but are implicated in the pathogenesis of heart disease. Clinical studies with bezafibrate and gemfibrozil support the hypothesis that these drugs may have a significant protective effect against cardiovascular disease. The thiazolidinedione group of insulin-sensitising drugs are PPARgamma ligands, and these have beneficial effects on serum lipids in diabetic patients and have also been shown to inhibit the progression of atherosclerosis in animal models. However, their efficacy in the prevention of cardiovascular-associated mortality has yet to be determined. Recent studies have found that PPARdelta is also a regulator of serum lipids. However, there are currently no drugs in clinical use that selectively activate this receptor. It is clear that all three forms of PPARs have mechanistically different modes of lipid lowering and that drugs currently available have not been optimised on the basis of PPAR biology. A new generation of rationally designed PPAR ligands may provide substantially improved drugs for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

The mechanisms of action of PPARs

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a group of three nuclear receptor isoforms, PPAR gamma, PPAR alpha, and PPAR delta, encoded by different genes. PPARs are ligand-regulated transcription factors that control gene expression by binding to specific response elements (PPREs) within promoters. PPARs bind as heterodimers with a retinoid X receptor and, upon binding agonist, interact with cofactors such that the rate of transcription initiation is increased. The PPARs play a critical physiological role as lipid sensors and regulators of lipid metabolism. Fatty acids and eicosanoids have been identified as natural ligands for the PPARs. More potent synthetic PPAR ligands, including the fibrates and thiazolidinediones, have proven effective in the treatment of dyslipidemia and diabetes. Use of such ligands has allowed researchers to unveil many potential roles for the PPARs in pathological states including atherosclerosis, inflammation, cancer, infertility, and demyelination. Here, we present the current state of knowledge regarding the molecular mechanisms of PPAR action and the involvement of the PPARs in the etiology and treatment of several chronic diseases.

Differential gene regulation in human versus rodent hepatocytes by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha. PPAR alpha fails to induce peroxisome proliferation-associated genes in human cells independently of the level of receptor expresson

We compared the ability of rat and human hepatocytes to respond to fenofibric acid and a novel potent phenylacetic acid peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha agonist (compound 1). Fatty acyl-CoA oxidase (FACO) activity and mRNA were increased after treatment with either fenofibric acid or compound 1 in rat hepatocytes. In addition, apolipoprotein CIII mRNA was decreased by both fenofibric acid and compound 1 in rat hepatocytes. Both agonists decreased apolipoprotein CIII mRNA in human hepatocytes; however, very little change in FACO activity or mRNA was observed. Furthermore, other peroxisome proliferation (PP)-associated genes including peroxisomal 3-oxoacyl-CoA thiolase (THIO), peroxisomal enoyl-CoA hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (HD), peroxisomal membrane protein-70 (PMP-70) were not regulated by PPAR alpha agonists in human hepatocytes. Moreover, other genes that are regulated by PPAR alpha ligands in human hepatocytes such as mitochondrial HMG-CoA synthase and carnitine palmitoyl transferase-1 (CPT-1) were also regulated in HepG2 cells by PPAR alpha agonists. Several stably transfected HepG2 cell lines were established that overexpressed human PPAR alpha to levels between 6- and 26-fold over normal human hepatocytes. These PPAR alpha-overexpressing cells had higher basal mRNA levels of mitochondrial HMG-CoA synthase and CPT-1; however, basal FACO mRNA levels and other PP-associated genes including THIO, HD, or PMP-70 mRNA were not substantially affected. In addition, FACO, THIO, HD, and PMP-70 mRNA levels did not increase in response to PPAR alpha agonist treatment in the PPAR alpha-overexpressing cells, although mitochondrial HMG-CoA synthase and CPT-1 mRNAs were both induced. These results suggest that other factors besides PPAR alpha levels determine the species-specific response of human and rat hepatocytes to the induction of PP.

Weight-of-evidence versus strength-of-evidence in toxicologic hazard identification: Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)

Toxicokinetic and mode of action data for DEHP reduce the concern for its potential carcinogenic hazard to human health. Chronic, high dose ingestion of DEHP and related peroxisome proliferators (PP) by mice and rats precipitate the following: activation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPARalpha) and its binding to peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs) within promoters of PP-responsive genes, peroxisome proliferation, increased microsomal fatty acid oxidation, increased hepatic hydrogen peroxide, hepatomegaly, hyperplasia and subsequent neoplasia. Neither peroxisome proliferation nor increased liver cancer occur in patients treated with pharmacologic doses of PP. Species differences in endogenous PPARalpha expression and differential activity of the peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) contribute to the failure of humans to respond in a manner qualitatively similar to that of rats or mice. Where it can be demonstrated that a mechanism for rodent tumor formation has no relevance for humans, then a substance which elicits a carcinogenic response in the test species via that mechanism should not be classified as anything other than an animal carcinogen. Systemic noncarcinogenic endpoints are available for definition of a DEHP reference dose. Considerable difficulty is encountered in the revision of promulgated regulations and in public risk communication when a material is no longer considered a carcinogenic hazard to humans.

Regulation of xenobiotic metabolism by orphan nuclear receptors

Nuclear receptors control gene transcription by binding to specific promoter regions of DNA in the presence of ligand. Orphan nuclear receptors are nuclear receptors for which the endogenous ligand(s) has yet to be identified. Systematic evaluation of orphan nuclear receptors can elucidate species differences in xenobiotic metabolism in addition to aiding in identification of endogenous ligands. The receptor-binding affinity and specificity of various chemicals, with subsequent determination of the genes controlled by nuclear receptors, are goals of investigations into orphan nuclear receptor structure/function and can provide valuable tools in predicting drug interactions and toxicity.

Gadolinium chloride-induced hepatocyte proliferation is prevented by antibodies to tumor necrosis factor alpha

Gadolinium chloride (GdCl(3)) destroys large Kupffer cells and has been used extensively in mechanistic studies in a number of disease and toxicity processes; however, it cannot be used to study hepatocyte turnover since it increases cell proliferation itself. The mechanism by which GdCl(3) activates cell turnover in liver is unknown, but several possibilities exist. Here it was demonstrated that a direct mitogenic action on hepatocytes is unlikely since GdCl(3) did not stimulate the growth of primary rat hepatocyte in vitro. Therefore, it was hypothesized that GdCl(3) acts indirectly through mitogenic cytokines of nonparenchymal cell origin. Antibodies to tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) were used to evaluate if TNFalpha is causally responsible for GdCl(3)-induced cell proliferation. GdCl(3) treatment of rats in vivo increased hepatocyte replication 5-fold in 24 h and 3-fold in 48 h. Pretreatment with specific anti-TNFalpha antibodies completely prevented these effects. However, when antibody treatment was delayed until 24 h after GdCl(3), increased cell proliferation was not prevented, suggesting that TNFalpha production during the first 24 h after treatment is responsible for activation of a signaling cascade involving other mitogens that sustain hepatocyte replication at 48 h. Twenty-four hours after treatment with GdCl(3), TNFalpha mRNA transcripts were increased 2-fold over control, an effect that was prevented by pretreatment with anti-TNFalpha antibody. NFkappaB, which is known to be involved in TNFalpha transcription, was activated by GdCl(3) about 4.5-fold over control 8 h after treatment in vivo, an increase not observed when antibodies to TNFalpha were present. When GdCl(3) was added to macrophages in culture, TNFalpha was nearly doubled 4 h after treatment. Additionally, conditioned media harvested from macrophages treated with GdCl(3) for 2 to 8 h stimulated the growth of HepG2 cells in culture about 2-fold, while antibodies to TNFalpha completely prevented this effect. Taken together, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that TNFalpha released from Kupffer cells at early time points prior to their destruction is causally responsible for triggering a cascade of events responsible for GdCl(3)-induced cell proliferation.

The role of fibric acids in atherosclerosis

The hypolipidemic fibric acid drugs are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor a (PPAR alpha) ligands. PPAR alpha activated by fibric acids form heterodimers with the 9-cis retinoic acid receptor (RXR). The PPAR/RXR heterodimers bind to peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPRE), which are located in numerous gene promoters and increase the level of the expression of mRNAs encoded by PPAR alpha target genes. Fibric acids decrease triglyceride plasma levels through increases in the expression of genes involved in fatty acid-beta oxidation. Furthermore, they decrease triglycerides by increasing lipoprotein lipase gene expression and by decreasing apolipoprotein C-III gene expression. Fibric acids increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol partly by increasing apolipoprotein A-I and apolipoprotein A-II gene expression. Fibric acids also reduce vascular wall inflammation and the expression of genes involved in different vascular functions (ie, vasomotricity, thrombosis). Fibric acids are used to treat primary hypertriglyceridemia and mixed hyperlipidemia. Some fibric acid molecules are active in essential hypercholesterolemia. Clinical evidence shows that fibric acids reduce coronary atherosclerosis progression in dyslipidemic patients (eg, bezafibrate, gemfibrozil) and in type 2 diabetic patients (fenofibrate). Gemfibrozil decreases coronary morbidity and mortality in patients with low HDL cholesterol, normal triglycerides,and normal low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol plasma levels. Further clinical studies are necessary to investigate if fibric acids decrease cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes and in primary prevention of hypertriglyceridemia and hypolipidemia.

Novel role of oxidants in the molecular mechanism of action of peroxisome proliferators

Peroxisome proliferators are nongenotoxic rodent carcinogens that act as tumor promoters by increasing cell proliferation; however, their precise mechanism of action is not well understood. Oxidative DNA damage caused by leakage of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) from peroxisomes was hypothesized initially as the mechanism by which these compounds cause liver tumors. It seems unlikely that oxidants of peroxisomal origin explain the mechanism of action of peroxisome proliferators because treatment with these compounds in vivo does not lead to increased H2O2 production. On the other hand, Kupffer cell-derived oxidants, such as superoxide, may play a role in initiating tumor nerosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) production that leads to hepatocyte proliferation. Peroxisome proliferators have been shown to activate Kupffer cells both in vitro and in vivo, and the use of Kupffer cell inhibitors such as methyl palmitate and dietary glycine have demonstrated that Kupffer cells are responsible for hepatocyte proliferation by mechanisms involve TNF-alpha. Moreover, peroxisome proliferators activate the transcription factor NF-kappaB, one of the major regulators of TNF-alpha expression, in Kupffer cells. Importantly, activation of NF-kappaB by peroxisome proliferators was shown to be oxidant-dependent, leading to the hypothesis that oxidants of Kupffer cell origin are involved in the mechanism of action. Many of the effects of peroxisome proliferators, including peroxisome induction and hepatomegaly, involve the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARalpha). Recently, it was shown that peroxisome proliferator-induced cell proliferation and tumors require the PPARalpha. However, PPARalpha is not involved in TNF-alpha production by Kupffer cells because it is not expressed in this cell type. How it is involved in liver tumor remains unclear and one possible explanation is that both Kupffer cell TNF-alpha and parenchymal cell PPARalpha are required. Collectively, recent data are consistent with the hypothesis that oxidants play a role in signaling hepatocellular proliferation due to peroxisome proliferators via activation of NF-kappaB and incrase in mitogenic cytokines such as TNF-alpha.