1
|
Hoelzen JP, Fortmann L, Roy D, Szardenings C, Holstein M, Eichelmann AK, Rijcken E, Frankauer BE, Barth P, Wardelmann E, Pascher A, Juratli MA. Robotic-assisted esophagectomy with total mesoesophageal excision enhances R0-resection in patients with esophageal cancer: A single-center experience. Surgery 2024; 176:721-729. [PMID: 38944589 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The focus of this research is to examine the growing use of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Specifically, it evaluates the immediate clinical and cancer-related results of combining robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with a systematic approach to total mesoesophageal excision, as opposed to traditional open transthoracic esophagectomy methods that do not employ a structured total mesoesophageal excision protocol. METHODS A propensity score-matched analysis of 185 robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies and 223 open transthoracic esophagectomies after standardized Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was performed. After 1:1 nearest neighbor matching to account for confounding by covariates, outcomes of 181 robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and 181 open transthoracic esophagectomy were compared. RESULTS The patient characteristics showed significant differences in the age distribution and in comorbidities such as coronary heart disease, arterial hypertension, and anticoagulant intake. The R0-resection rate of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (96.7%) was significantly higher than open transthoracic esophagectomy (89.0%, P = .004). Thirty-day mortality and hospital mortality showed no significant differences. Postoperative pneumonia rate after robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (12.7%) was significantly reduced (open transthoracic esophagectomy 28.7%, P < .001). Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy had a significantly shorter intensive care unit stay (P < .001) and shorter hospital stay (P < .001). CONCLUSION This single-center, retrospective study employing propensity score matching found that combining robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with structured total mesoesophageal excision results in better short-term clinical and oncologic outcomes than open transthoracic esophagectomy. This finding is significant because the increased rate of R0 resection could indicate a higher likelihood of improved long-term survival. Additionally, enhanced overall postoperative recovery may contribute to better risk management in esophagectomy procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens P Hoelzen
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Germany
| | - Lukas Fortmann
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Germany
| | - Dhruvajyoti Roy
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Carsten Szardenings
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Germany
| | - Martina Holstein
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Eichelmann
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Germany
| | - Emile Rijcken
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Germany
| | - Brooke E Frankauer
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Germany
| | - Peter Barth
- Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, Germany
| | - Eva Wardelmann
- Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, Germany
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Germany
| | - Mazen A Juratli
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, University of Muenster, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu D, van der Zalm AP, Koster J, Bootsma S, Oyarce C, van Laarhoven HWM, Bijlsma MF. Predictive biomarkers for response to TGF- β inhibition in resensitizing chemo(radiated) esophageal adenocarcinoma. Pharmacol Res 2024; 207:107315. [PMID: 39059615 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been identified as a driver of therapy resistance, particularly in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), where transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) can induce this process. Inhibitors of TGF-β may counteract the occurrence of mesenchymal, resistant tumor cell populations following chemo(radio)therapy and improve treatment outcomes in EAC. Here, we aimed to identify predictive biomarkers for the response to TGF-β targeting. In vitro approximations of neoadjuvant treatment were applied to publicly available primary EAC cell lines. TGF-β inhibitors fresolimumab and A83-01 were employed to inhibit EMT, and mesenchymal markers were quantified via flow cytometry to assess efficacy. Our results demonstrated a robust induction of mesenchymal cell states following chemoradiation, with TGF-β inhibition leading to variable reductions in mesenchymal markers. The cell lines were clustered into responders and non-responders. Genomic expression profiles were obtained through RNA-seq analysis. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis identified 10 positively- and 23 negatively-associated hub genes, which were bioinformatically identified. Furthermore, the correlation of DEGs with response to TGF-β inhibition was examined using public pharmacogenomic databases, revealing 9 positively associated and 11 negatively associated DEGs. Among these, ERBB2, EFNB1, and TNS4 were the most promising candidates. Our findings reveal a distinct gene expression pattern associated with the response to TGF-β inhibition in chemo(radiated) EAC. The identified DEGs and predictive markers may assist patient selection in clinical studies investigating TGF-β targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dajia Liu
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Amber P van der Zalm
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Koster
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne Bootsma
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cesar Oyarce
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ren R, Zhang Z, Zhai S, Yang J, Tusong B, Wang J. Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab for gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2024:10.1007/s00228-024-03734-1. [PMID: 39102039 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-024-03734-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Based on the comparison of ramucirumab monoclonal antibody with control treatments in randomized controlled trials, this study aims to elucidate the role of ramucirumab monoclonal antibody in cancer therapy and its potential side effects, providing scientific evidence for clinical treatment. METHODS PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched systematically to obtain the trials on ramucirumab in the treatment of gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma up to April 13, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab as monotherapy and in combination with other chemotherapy agents as interventions for treating gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. RESULTS After screening 2200 studies, we finally included 8 eligible studies (involving a total of 3,283 participants). Meta-analysis results showed that compared to the control group, ramucirumab monotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.67, 0.89]) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.40, 0.58]). Similar results were obtained for ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel. In the treatment combining ramucirumab with paclitaxel, compared to monotherapy, three severe adverse reactions (grade ≥ 3) were observed with significantly increased risks (OR > 2). These include proteinuria (OR = 5.37, 95% CI [1.22, 23.54]), hypertension (OR = 4.02, 95% CI [2.63, 6.14]), and gastrointestinal perforation (OR = 4.64, 95% CI [1.00, 21.60]). Subgroup analysis further indicated that ramucirumab is effective in both non-East Asian and East Asian populations, with East Asian patients more prone to developing proteinuria, while having a lower incidence of hypertension. Additionally, ramucirumab demonstrated comparable efficacy between first-line and second-line treatments, with a higher incidence of proteinuria observed in second-line therapy. CONCLUSION Ramucirumab significantly improves the prognosis of patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. When used in combination with paclitaxel, close monitoring of adverse reactions such as proteinuria (especially in East Asian populations), hypertension (especially in non-East Asian populations), and gastrointestinal perforation is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiqi Ren
- Shihezi University School of Medicine, Bei-Er-Lu, Shihezi, 832000, Xinjiang, China
| | - Zhewei Zhang
- Shihezi University School of Medicine, Bei-Er-Lu, Shihezi, 832000, Xinjiang, China
| | - Shaokun Zhai
- Shihezi University School of Medicine, Bei-Er-Lu, Shihezi, 832000, Xinjiang, China
| | - Jiahui Yang
- Shihezi University School of Medicine, Bei-Er-Lu, Shihezi, 832000, Xinjiang, China
| | - BaihaiTihan Tusong
- Shihezi University School of Medicine, Bei-Er-Lu, Shihezi, 832000, Xinjiang, China
| | - Jingzhou Wang
- Shihezi University School of Medicine, Bei-Er-Lu, Shihezi, 832000, Xinjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Song Y, Hirata Y, Ajani JA, Blum Murphy M, Li JJ, Das P, Minsky BD, Mansfield PF, Ikoma N, Badgwell BD. Survival Outcomes in Patients with Resectable Gastric Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15893-7. [PMID: 39048909 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15893-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative chemotherapy has become the standard of care for locally advanced gastric cancer. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), including both chemotherapy and chemoradiation, is utilized in other gastrointestinal malignancies. We determined survival in a contemporary cohort of gastric cancer patients treated with TNT. METHODS Using a prospective institutional database, patients diagnosed with cT2-4 or cN+ gastric adenocarcinoma (January 2012 to June 2022) who underwent staging laparoscopy, received TNT, and underwent gastrectomy were identified. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were determined using standard statistical methods. RESULTS The study included 203 patients. The most common TNT sequence was induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (n = 186 [91.6%]). A total of 195 (96.1%) patients completed planned neoadjuvant treatments. Surgery included total gastrectomy in 108 (53.2%), extended (D1+/D2) lymphadenectomy in 193 (95.1%), and adjacent organ resection in 19 (9.4%) patients. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in 32 (15.8%) patients. The 5-year OS rate was 65.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.8-73.5%), and the 5-year DSS rate was 70.8% (95% CI 63.6-78.9%) in the study cohort. Among patients with pCR, the 5-year OS rate was 89.1% (95% CI 78.1-100.0%), and the 5-year DSS rate was 96.9% (95% CI 91-100%). Posttreatment pathologic N and M stages were the strongest prognostic indicators associated with both OS and DSS. CONCLUSIONS Total neoadjuvant therapy for resectable gastric cancer is associated with a high rate of treatment completion and promising survival outcomes. Prospective comparisons with perioperative treatment are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from TNT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Song
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yuki Hirata
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mariela Blum Murphy
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jenny J Li
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul F Mansfield
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian D Badgwell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li Z, Zhang X, Sun C, Fei H, Li Z, Zhao D, Guo C, Du C. Evaluation of pathologic response and surgical safety of total neoadjuvant therapy for patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer in a real-world setting. J Gastrointest Surg 2024:S1091-255X(24)00539-0. [PMID: 39019340 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the potential benefit of extending therapy before surgery remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without immune checkpoint blockade. METHODS A cohort of 174 patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy from October 2021 to March 2024 in the real-world setting were included in this study. Among these patients, 101 were treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and 73 were treated with perioperative neoadjuvant therapy (PNT). We compared the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, ypN0 rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with pCR or ypN0. RESULTS Compared with the PNT group, the patients in the TNT group were more frequently treated with intensive chemotherapy with triplets + immunotherapy. Apart from this, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences in pCR (16.8% vs 12.3%), ypN0 (49.5% vs 38.4%), RFS, OS, and postoperative complications (27.7% vs 26.0%) between the TNT and PNT groups. Older age, diffuse type, and stable disease/progressive disease based on clinical efficacy evaluation were independently associated with non-pCR. Stable disease/progressive disease, linitis plastica, and poor differentiation were independently associated with ypN+. Neither the number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles nor the specific regimens were associated with pCR or ypN0. In the subgroup analysis of patients receiving total gastrectomy, there were still no statistically significant differences in pCR (16.7% vs 2.6%), ypN0 (43.8% vs 39.5%), and postoperative complications (45.8% vs 36.8%) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION Although TNT did not increase the postoperative complication rate, it also did not provide any additional short-term benefits compared with PNT for clinical stage III gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zefeng Li
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaojie Zhang
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chongyuan Sun
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - He Fei
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Li
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dongbing Zhao
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Chunguang Guo
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chunxia Du
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li N, Wu H, Xu X, Wei Q, Ding Y, Liu S, Wu J, Zheng Y, Xu N, Gao Y, Jiang H. A retrospective study of adjuvant albumin-bound paclitaxel plus S-1 after D2 gastrectomy versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 in gastric cancer. Sci Rep 2024; 14:15150. [PMID: 38956232 PMCID: PMC11219745 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65724-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC) after D2 gastrectomy has been proven effective. There has yet to be a study that evaluates adjuvant nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus S-1. In this single-center, retrospective study, GC patients after D2 gastrectomy received either nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS group) or SOX group were recruited between January 2018 and December 2020 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Intravenous nab-paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 or 260 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 were administered as eight 3 week cycle, especially in the AS and SOX group. Patients received S-1 twice daily with a dose of 40 mg/m2 in the two groups on days 1-14 of each cycle. The end points were disease-free survival (DFS) rate at 3 years and adverse events (AEs). There were 56 eligible patients, 28 in the AS group and 35 in the SOX group. The 3 year DFS rate was 78.0% in AS group versus 70.7% in SOX group (p = 0.46). Subgroup analysis showed that the patients with signet-ring positive in the AS group had a prolonged DFS compared with the SOX group (40.0 vs. 13.8 m, p = 0.02). The diffuse-type GC or low differentiation in the AS group was associated with numerically prolonged DFS compared with the SOX group, but the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.27 and p = 0.15 especially). Leukopenia (14.3%) were the most prevalent AEs in the AS group, while thrombocytopenia (28.5%) in the SOX group. Neutropenia (7.1% in AS group) and thrombocytopenia (22.8% in SOX group) were the most common grade 3 or 4 AEs. In this study analyzing past data, a tendency towards a greater 3 year DFS was observed when using AS regimen in signet-ring positive patients. AS group had fewer thrombocytopenia compared to SOX group. More studies should be conducted with larger sample sizes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Li
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China
| | - Hui Wu
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China
| | - Xin Xu
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China
| | - Qinming Wei
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China
| | - Yongfeng Ding
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China
| | - Shan Liu
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China
| | - Jinqiong Wu
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China
| | - Yulong Zheng
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China
| | - Nong Xu
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China
| | - Yuan Gao
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China
| | - Haiping Jiang
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alemdar A, Duman MG, Sengiz Erhan S, Sasako M. Histopathologic response in patients with curative resection with D2 dissection following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108428. [PMID: 38795679 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
AIM This study evaluated pathologic response rate, overall survival (OS), and postoperative complications in locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative gastric resection D2 lymph node dissection with neoadjuvant treatment. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 122 patients with locally advanced GC and EGJ adenocarcinoma who had neoadjuvant treatment and curative resection with D2 dissection between January 2014 and December 2022. Patients were divided into responders and nonresponders. Grades 1a-1b were responders, while 2-3 were non-responders. Patients' clinicopathological features, pathologic response rate, survival, and postoperative complications were evaluated. We assessed complications using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. Total survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier model. Overall survival was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS The mean age of the study participants was 61 (N = 89 males; N = 33 females). There were 79 GC and 43 EGJ adenocarcinomas. Overall postoperative complications (CD ≥ II) were 27 %. Postoperative complications were similar in responders and non-responders (p = 0.316). YpT0N0 had a 2.5 % pathological complete response rate. Responders had better overall survival, but there was no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS Both responder and non-responder groups have similar postoperative complications. A complete pathologic response is discouraging for assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer, but a positive treatment response is acceptable. Pathologic response rate helps stage and predict gastric cancer prognosis. Responder groups survive slightly better.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Alemdar
- University of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Mehmet Güray Duman
- University of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkiye.
| | - Selma Sengiz Erhan
- University of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkiye
| | - Mitsuru Sasako
- Yodogawa Christian Hospital, 1-7-50, Kunijima, Higashiyodogawa, Postal code: 533-0024, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mohammed O, Gizaw ST, Degef M. Potential diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers of gastric cancer. Health Sci Rep 2024; 7:e2261. [PMID: 39040881 PMCID: PMC11260885 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Gastric cancer (GC), a malignant epithelial tumor, is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Therapeutic strategies for GC, despite the biggest challenges, can significantly improve survival rates through early detection and effective screening methods. Aim To provide brief information on the necessity of multiple specific diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers for GC. Methods This review was conducted using a variety of search engines, including PubMed Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and others. Results Some potential biomarkers that provide essential information include circulating tumor cells (CTCs), DNA methylation, claudin 18.2, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), microRNAs, and serum pepsinogens. Conclusion Multiple tumor markers are essential for screening, tumor identification, staging, prognostic assessment, and monitoring recurrence after therapy due to the absence of a single tumor indicator for diagnosing, prognosticating, and predicting GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ousman Mohammed
- Department of Medical Laboratory SciencesCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo UniversityDessieEthiopia
| | - Solomon Tebeje Gizaw
- Department of Medical BiochemistrySchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, AAUAddis AbabaEthiopia
| | - Maria Degef
- Department of Medical BiochemistrySchool of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, AAUAddis AbabaEthiopia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mayanagi S, Inoue M, Tokizawa K, Fushiki K, Tsushima T, Yokota T, Yamazaki K, Yasui H, Tsubosa Y. Survival outcome of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients >75 years of age. Thorac Cancer 2024; 15:1656-1664. [PMID: 38898742 PMCID: PMC11260550 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gold standard for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is surgery-based treatment; however, it is unclear whether esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy is suitable for older patients. This retrospective study aimed to identify the treatment outcomes of surgery-based therapy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an initial treatment for older patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC. METHODS Data from 434 patients who received radical treatment for resectable, locally advanced ESCC were collected from January 2011 to December 2020. Of the patients >75 years of age, 49 underwent radical esophagectomy and 26 received dCRT. Survival was compared between the surgery and dCRT groups. RESULTS The mean ages of the surgery and chemoradiotherapy groups were 77.3 and 78.8 years, respectively. Differences in overall survival (OS) between the two groups were not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 66.2%, dCRT 55.7%, p = 0.236). Multivariate analysis for OS showed a hazard ratio of 1.229 for dCRT versus surgery (90% confidence interval 0.681-2.217). OS did not differ between the groups in any of the performance statuses. For patients who were able to receive chemotherapy using fluorouracil and cisplatin, OS tended to be better in the surgery group, but the difference was not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 68.1%, dCRT 51.8%, p = 0.117). CONCLUSIONS There was no clear difference in survival outcome between surgery-based therapy and dCRT as an initial treatment for esophageal cancer in older patients. Either treatment may be an option for older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhei Mayanagi
- Division of Esophageal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan
| | - Masazumi Inoue
- Division of Esophageal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan
| | - Kazunori Tokizawa
- Division of Esophageal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan
| | - Kunihiro Fushiki
- Division of Gastrointestinal OncologyShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan
| | - Takahiro Tsushima
- Division of Gastrointestinal OncologyShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan
| | - Tomoya Yokota
- Division of Gastrointestinal OncologyShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan
| | - Kentaro Yamazaki
- Division of Gastrointestinal OncologyShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan
| | - Hirofumi Yasui
- Division of Gastrointestinal OncologyShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan
| | - Yasuhiro Tsubosa
- Division of Esophageal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer Center HospitalShizuokaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abboretti F, Mantziari S, Didisheim L, Schäfer M, Teixeira Farinha H. Prognostic value of tumor regression grade (TRG) after oncological gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:199. [PMID: 38935163 PMCID: PMC11211110 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03388-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Perioperative chemotherapy combined with surgical resection represent the gold standard in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer. The Mandard tumor regression score (TRG) is widely used to evaluate pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of TRG in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DFS). METHODS Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent oncological gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2007 to December 2019 for gastric adenocarcinoma was performed. Based on their TRG status they were categorized into two groups: good responders (TRG 1-2) and poor responders (TRG 3-5). Subsequent multivariable analyses were conducted. RESULTS Seventy-four patients were included, whereby 15 (20.3%) were TRG 1-2. Neoadjuvant regimens for TRG 1-2 vs. TRG 3-5 were similar: MAGIC (53% vs. 39%), FLOT (40% vs. 36%), FOLFOX (7% vs. 15%, p = 0.462). Histologic types according to Lauren classification for TRG 1-2 vs. TRG 3-5 were: 13% vs. 29% intestinal, 53% vs. 44% diffuse and 34% vs. 27% indeterminate (p = 0.326). TRG 1-2 group exhibited significantly less advanced ypT (46% vs. 10%, p = 0.001) and ypN stages (66% vs. 37%, p = 0.008), alongside a diminished recurrence rate (20% vs. 42%, p = 0.111). The 3-year DFS was significantly better in this group (81% vs. 47%, p = 0.041) whereas the disparity in three-year OS (92% vs. 55%, p = 0.054) did not attain statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS TRG 1-2 was associated with less advanced ypT and ypN stage and better DFS compared to TRG 3-5 patients, without a significant impact on OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Abboretti
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, CHUV Rue du Bugnon 46, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland
| | - Styliani Mantziari
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, CHUV Rue du Bugnon 46, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland
| | - Laura Didisheim
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, CHUV Rue du Bugnon 46, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
| | - Markus Schäfer
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, CHUV Rue du Bugnon 46, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland.
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
| | - Hugo Teixeira Farinha
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, CHUV Rue du Bugnon 46, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goetze TO, Reichart A, Bankstahl US, Pauligk C, Loose M, Kraus TW, Elshafei M, Bechstein WO, Trojan J, Behrend M, Homann N, Venerito M, Bohle W, Varvenne M, Bolling C, Behringer DM, Kratz-Albers K, Siegler GM, Hozaeel W, Al-Batran SE. Adjuvant Gemcitabine Versus Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: The Randomized Multicenter Phase II NEPAFOX Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4073-4083. [PMID: 38459418 PMCID: PMC11076394 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15011-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although addition of adjuvant chemotherapy is the current standard, the prognosis of pancreatic cancers still remains poor. The NEPAFOX trial evaluated perioperative treatment with FOLFIRINOX in resectable pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter phase II trial randomized patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer without metastases into arm (A,) upfront surgery plus adjuvant gemcitabine, or arm (B,) perioperative FOLFIRINOX. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Owing to poor accrual, recruitment was prematurely stopped after randomization of 40 of the planned 126 patients (A: 21, B: 19). Overall, approximately three-quarters were classified as primarily resectable (A: 16, B: 15), and the remaining patients were classified as borderline resectable (A: 5, B: 4). Of the 12 evaluable patients, 3 achieved partial response under neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Of the 21 patients in arm A and 19 patients in arm B, 17 and 7 underwent curative surgery, and R0-resection was achieved in 77% and 71%, respectively. Perioperative morbidity occurred in 72% in arm A and 46% in arm B, whereas non-surgical toxicity was comparable in both arms. Median RFS/PFS was almost doubled in arm B (14.1 months) compared with arm A (8.4 months) in the population with surgical resection, whereas median OS was comparable between both arms. CONCLUSIONS Although the analysis was only descriptive owing to small patient numbers, no safety issues regarding surgical complications were observed in the perioperative FOLFIRINOX arm. Thus, considering the small number of patients, perioperative treatment approach appears feasible and potentially effective in well-selected cohorts of patients. In pancreatic cancer, patient selection before initiation of neoadjuvant therapy appears to be critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten O Goetze
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, Institut für Klinisch Onkologische Forschchung IKF, University Cancer Center (UCT) Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
- University Cancer Center (UCT) Frankfurt, Goethe Universität, Frankfurt, Germany.
- Frankfurter Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Alexander Reichart
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, Institut für Klinisch Onkologische Forschchung IKF, University Cancer Center (UCT) Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ulli S Bankstahl
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, Institut für Klinisch Onkologische Forschchung IKF, University Cancer Center (UCT) Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claudia Pauligk
- Frankfurter Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Maria Loose
- Frankfurter Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Thomas W Kraus
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Minimal Invasive Chirurgie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Moustafa Elshafei
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Minimal Invasive Chirurgie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Wolf O Bechstein
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Gastrointestinale Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Matthias Behrend
- Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, DONAUISAR Klinikum Deggendorf, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Nils Homann
- Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Marino Venerito
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Wolfram Bohle
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Gastroenterologische Onkologie, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
- Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | - Claus Bolling
- Hämatologie/Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Dirk M Behringer
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Augusta-Kranken-Anstalt Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Gabriele M Siegler
- Klinikum Nürnberg Nord/Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Medizinische Klinik, Hämatologie/Onkologie, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Wael Hozaeel
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, Institut für Klinisch Onkologische Forschchung IKF, University Cancer Center (UCT) Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, Institut für Klinisch Onkologische Forschchung IKF, University Cancer Center (UCT) Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- University Cancer Center (UCT) Frankfurt, Goethe Universität, Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurter Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jagric T, Hladnik G, Kolaric R, Arpad I, Horvat M, Potrc S. The outcomes of laparoscopic omentum-preserving gastrectomy compared to open surgery with omentectomy in gastric cancer patients: a propensity score matched study of 249 UICC stage 0-IV gastric cancer patients. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3096-3105. [PMID: 38622224 PMCID: PMC11133033 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10835-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a propensity score matched study comparing patients' short- and long-term results after laparoscopic omentum-preserving gastrectomy and open surgery with omentectomy with UICC stages 0-IV. METHODS Between 2015 and 2022, 311 patients with gastric cancer underwent surgery at the University Clinical Centre Maribor. Of these, 249 met the inclusion criteria and 198 were included in the study group after PSM. RESULTS Patients in both groups were well-balanced in demographic and pathological characteristics after PSM. There was no significant difference in the 5-year survival between groups (LAP: 62.2% vs. OPN: 54.4%; p = 0.950). The Cox regression model identified UICC stage and age as significant predictors for survival. In both groups, peritoneal dissemination was the most common site of recurrence. The multivariate analysis identified the UICC stage as a significant predictor for peritoneal recurrence, while omental preservation was not associated with a higher risk of peritoneal dissemination. Omentum preservation was not associated with more intestinal obstruction. Patients in the LAP group had significantly shorter hospital stays (LAP: 9(6) vs. OPN: 10(5); p = 0.009), less postoperative morbidity (LAP: 17% vs. OPN: 23.4%; p = 0.009), and significantly more extracted LNs per operation compared to open surgery (LAP: 31 ± 11 LNs vs. OPN: 25 ± 12 LNs; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION Based on our results, we recommend the use of laparoscopic omentum-preserving gastrectomy in patients with early and advanced gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Jagric
- Clinical Department for Abdominal and General Surgery, University Clinical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
| | - G Hladnik
- Department for Oncology, University Clinical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - R Kolaric
- Department for Oncology, University Clinical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - I Arpad
- Department for Oncology, University Clinical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - M Horvat
- Department for Oncology, University Clinical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - S Potrc
- Department for Oncology, University Clinical Center Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee G, Strickland MR, Wo JY. Role of Preoperative Radiation Therapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 55:584-598. [PMID: 38353901 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-00985-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE While surgery is the primary curative treatment for resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, rates of locoregional and distant recurrence remain high with surgery alone, especially in more advanced disease. Multimodal approaches with perioperative therapy including chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy (RT) have thus evolved as ways to reduce the rates of disease recurrence and improve survival outcomes. This review article provides a comprehensive literature review on the role of preoperative RT for resectable gastric and GEJ cancer. METHODS A literature review on the role of preoperative RT for resectable gastric and GEJ cancer was conducted. RESULTS Preoperative RT has the potential to facilitate tumor downstaging and improved R0 resection, allowing for better locoregional control and thereby survival. For resectable locally advanced GEJ cancer, preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is currently a standard of care option along with perioperative chemotherapy, based on evidence from randomized trials. In resectable gastric cancer, however, the role of preoperative CRT is less defined with no randomized data to date, although phase II single-arm studies have shown promising results. Current standard of care for gastric cancer remains perioperative chemotherapy, with consideration for preoperative CRT in select cases. CONCLUSION Results from ongoing and future randomized controlled trials are expected to help define the role of preoperative CRT compared to perioperative chemotherapy alone as well as postoperative CRT for gastric and GEJ cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew R Strickland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brito ABC, Felismino TC, e Silva DRM, Curado MP, Durant LC, Taboada RG, Pelosof AG, Diniz AL, Coimbra FJF. Survival trends in gastric cancer in Brazil: real-life data from a large cancer center. Ecancermedicalscience 2024; 18:1706. [PMID: 39021546 PMCID: PMC11254403 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths globally. There is a paucity of real-life data on GC in Brazil. Our study aimed to evaluate survival trends in gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) in a large cancer center in Brazil during 2000-2017. Methods Based on our Hospital Cancer Registry Database, all individuals diagnosed with GA between 2000 and 2017, and treated at A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, were retrospectively included. The primary objectives were to describe the patient demographics, clinicopathological characteristics, treatment modalities and survival trends during four separate periods of diagnosis (2000-2004; 2005-2009; 2010-2014 and 2015-2017). χ2 test was performed between two specified periods (2000-2004 and 2015-2017) to compare categorical variables. Overall survival (OS) curves were stratified by four separate periods and compared with log-rank tests. Results This analysis included 1,406 individuals. Across all periods, most patients were men aged 50-69 and presented with Lauren's intestinal subtype. The frequency of stage IV disease significantly decreased between 2000-2004 and 2015-2017 (43.6% to 32.8%, p < 0.001). In contrast, we observed a rise in stage II (9.4% to 24.8%, p < 0.001) in the same comparison. We noticed an increased utilization of a combined approach involving chemotherapy and surgery (12% in 2000-2004 and 36.3% in 2015-2017, p < 0.001). The predicted 5-year OS of patients with GA in 2000-2004 was 27.8%, which increased to 53.9% in 2015-2017 (p < 0.001). Conclusion Our retrospective cohort showed an upward trend in survival rates during the period. We observed that 5-year OS almost doubled among men and women during 2000-2017. Mini Abstract The present retrospective cohort showed an upward trend in survival rates during the period from 2000 to 2017, in which the OS almost doubled among men and women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Maria Paula Curado
- Hospital Cancer Registry, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01509-010, Brazil
| | - Lais Corsino Durant
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01509-010, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Gomes Taboada
- Department of Clinical Oncology, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo 01509-010, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dawood T, Rashid YA, Khan SR, Jabbar AA, Zahir MN, Moosajee MS. Outcomes of locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma cancers treated with neoadjuvant FLOT in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Ecancermedicalscience 2024; 18:1705. [PMID: 39021541 PMCID: PMC11254397 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and aim Docetaxel, oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (FLOT) may improve overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal cancer. Our study aims to determine the pathological response in these patients with the FLOT chemotherapy in the Neoadjuvant setting. This is the first study conducted in our country. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study from March 2018 to December 2020. After ethical review committee approval, all patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and received treatment at our tertiary care center were included in the study. SPSS version 22 was used for data analysis. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical. Values were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. The chi-square test was used to determine the difference between categorical variables. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered the level of significance. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to calculate survival analysis. Results Out of 41, 35 patients with locally advanced resectable gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma were included in our study analysis. The entire cohort had a male predominance, with a mean age of 59. All patients received neoadjuvant FLOT. Pathological treatment response achieved was 77%, of which 66% had partial and 11% had complete response. There is a significant association of pathological response with age, gender, stage, grade, co-morbid and number of chemotherapy cycles received (p-value =<0.05). The OS was 80% with the mean OS was 2.6 years (31 months). Conclusion Our study shows comparable response rates to other studies conducted internationally. Our findings confirm that FLOT is an effective and well-tolerated perioperative regimen with reasonable response rates in the Pakistani population. A more extensive longitudinal study would ensure these preliminary results in the local patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasneem Dawood
- Department of Medical Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Yasmin Abdul Rashid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Saqib Raza Khan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Adnan Abdul Jabbar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi 74700, Pakistan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Egebjerg K, Andersen TS, Bæksgaard L, Garbyal R, Siemsen M, Achiam M, Mau-Sørensen PM. Implementation of perioperative FLOT compared to ECX/EOX chemotherapy regimens in resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinomas: an analysis of real-world data. Acta Oncol 2024; 63:322-329. [PMID: 38745482 PMCID: PMC11332447 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.35431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Perioperative 5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) is recommended in resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma based on randomised trials. However, the effectiveness of FLOT in routine clinical practice remains unknown as randomised trials are subject to selection bias limiting their generalisability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of FLOT in real-world patients. METHODS Retrospectively collected data were analysed in consecutive patients treated before or after the implementation of FLOT. The primary endpoint was complete pathological response (pCR) and secondary endpoints were margin-free resection (R0), overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) tolerability of chemotherapy and surgical complications. RESULTS Mean follow-up time for patients treated with FLOT (n = 205) was 37.7 versus 47.0 months for epirubicin, cis- or oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (ECX/EOX, n = 186). Surgical resection was performed in 88.0% versus 92.0%; pCR were observed in 3.8% versus 2.4%; and R0 resections were achieved in 78.0% versus 86.0% (p = 0.03) in the ECX/EOX and FLOT cohorts, respectively. Survival analysis indicated no significant difference in RFS (p = 0.17) or OS (p = 0.37) between the cohorts with a trend towards increased OS in performance status 0 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-1.04). More patients treated with ECX/EOX completed chemotherapy (39% vs. 28%, p = 0.02). Febrile neutropenia was more common in the FLOT cohort (3.8% vs. 11%, p = 0.0086). 90-days mortality (1.2% vs. 0%) and frequency of anastomotic leakage (8% vs. 6%) were equal and low. INTERPRETATION Patients receiving FLOT did not demonstrate improved pCR, RFS or OS. However, R0 rate was improved and patients in good PS trended towards improved OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Egebjerg
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Tobias Sørup Andersen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lene Bæksgaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. k
| | - Rajendra Garbyal
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Siemsen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Achiam
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhao Y, Li D, Zhuang J, Li Z, Xia Q, Li Z, Yu J, Wang J, Zhang Y, Li K, Xu S, Li S, Ma P, Cao Y, Liu C, Xu C, Liu Z, Wei J, Zhang C, Qiao L, Gao X, Hou Z, Liu C, Zheng R, Wang D, Liu Y. Comprehensive multi-omics analysis of resectable locally advanced gastric cancer: Assessing response to neoadjuvant camrelizumab and chemotherapy in a single-center, open-label, single-arm phase II trial. Clin Transl Med 2024; 14:e1674. [PMID: 38685486 PMCID: PMC11058238 DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.1674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current standard of care for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery. Recently, neoadjuvant treatment for this condition has involved the exploration of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy as a potential approach. However, the efficacy remains uncertain. METHODS A single-arm, phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with mFOLFOX6 and identify potential biomarkers of response through multi-omics analysis in patients with resectable locally advanced GC. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included the R0 rate, near pCR rate, progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Multi-omics analysis was assessed by whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing, and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) using biopsies pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS This study involved 60 patients, of which 55 underwent gastrectomy. Among these, five (9.1%) attained a pathological complete response (pCR), and 11 (20.0%) reached near pCR. No unexpected treatment-emergent adverse events or perioperative mortality were observed, and the regimen presented a manageable safety profile. Molecular changes identified through multi-omics analysis correlated with treatment response, highlighting associations between HER2-positive and CTNNB1 mutations with treatment sensitivity and a favourable prognosis. This finding was further supported by immune cell infiltration analysis and mIF. Expression data uncovered a risk model with four genes (RALYL, SCGN, CCKBR, NTS) linked to poor response. Additionally, post-treatment infiltration of CD8+ T lymphocytes positively correlates with pathological response. CONCLUSION The findings suggest the combination of PD-1-inhibitor and mFOLFOX6 showed efficacy and acceptable toxicity for locally advanced GC. Extended follow-up is required to determine the duration of the response. This study lays essential groundwork for developing precise neoadjuvant regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhou Zhao
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Danyang Li
- Department of Medical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Jing Zhuang
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Zhimeng Li
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Qingxin Xia
- Department of PathologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Zhi Li
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Juan Yu
- Department of Endoscopy CenterThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Jinbang Wang
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Yong Zhang
- Department of ImmunotherapyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Ke Li
- Department of Medical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Shuning Xu
- Department of Medical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Sen Li
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Pengfei Ma
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Yanghui Cao
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Chenyu Liu
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Chunmiao Xu
- Department of RadiologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Zhentian Liu
- Department of translational medicineGeneplus‐Beijing InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Jinwang Wei
- GenomiCare Biotechnology LA Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina
| | - Chengjuan Zhang
- Department of PathologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Lei Qiao
- Department of Medical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| | - Xuan Gao
- Department of translational medicineGeneplus‐Beijing InstituteBeijingChina
| | - Zhiguo Hou
- Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina
| | - Chenxuan Liu
- Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina
| | | | - Du Wang
- Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.ShanghaiChina
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Medical OncologyThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jiang Z, Xie Y, Zhang W, Du C, Zhong Y, Zhu Y, Jiang L, Dou L, Shao K, Sun Y, Xue Q, Tian Y, Gao S, Zhao D, Zhou A. Perioperative chemotherapy with docetaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) for the treatment of locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (MATCH): an open-label, randomized, phase 2 clinical trial. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27:571-579. [PMID: 38457083 PMCID: PMC11016518 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01471-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains unclear whether addition of docetaxel to the combination of a platinum and fluoropyrimidine could provide more clinical benefits than doublet chemotherapies in the perioperative treatment for locally advanced gastric/gastro-esophageal junction (LAG/GEJ) cancer in Asia. In this randomized, phase 2 study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of perioperative docetaxel plus oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS) versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) in LAG/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS Patients with cT3-4 Nany M0 G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were randomized (1:1) to receive 4 cycles of preoperative DOS or SOX followed by D2 gastrectomy and another 4 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR). RESULTS From Aug, 2015 to Dec, 2019,154 patients were enrolled and 147 patients included in final analysis, with a median age of 60 (26-73) years. DOS resulted in significantly higher MPR (25.4 vs. 11.8%, P = 0.04). R0 resection rate, the 3-year PFS and 3-year OS rates were 78.9 vs. 61.8% (P = 0.02), 52.3 vs. 35% (HR 0.667, 95% CI: 0.432-1.029, Log rank P = 0.07) and 57.5 vs. 49.2% (HR 0.685, 95% CI: 0.429-1.095, Log rank P = 0.11) in the DOS and SOX groups, respectively. Patients who acquired MPR experienced significantly better survival. DOS had similar tolerance to SOX. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative DOS improved MPR significantly and tended to produce longer PFS compared to SOX in LAG/GEJ cancer in Asia, and might be considered as a preferred option for perioperative chemotherapy and worth further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhichao Jiang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuannanli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yibin Xie
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wen Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuannanli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Chunxia Du
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuannanli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yuxin Zhong
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yuelu Zhu
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Liming Jiang
- Department of Imaging Diagnosis, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lizhou Dou
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Kang Shao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yongkun Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuannanli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qi Xue
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yantao Tian
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shugeng Gao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Dongbing Zhao
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Aiping Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuannanli Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhao S, Liu Y, Ding L, Zhang C, Ye J, Sun K, Song W, Cai S, He Y, Peng J, Xu J. Gastric cancer immune microenvironment score predicts neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy and prognosis. J Pathol Clin Res 2024; 10:e12378. [PMID: 38778559 PMCID: PMC11112142 DOI: 10.1002/2056-4538.12378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) varies greatly. Thus, we aimed to verify the predictive value of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) on the treatment response to NACT and the prognosis of patients with advanced GC, and to explore the impact of NACT on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Paired tumor tissues (pre- and post-NACT) from patients with advanced GC were collected for this study. TIICs were assessed using immunohistochemistry staining and analyzed using logistic regression to establish an immune microenvironment score for GC (ISGC score) and predict NACT efficacy. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the survival outcome of patients. The results showed that TIME was dramatically heterogeneous between NACT response and nonresponse patients. In the validation cohort, the ISGC score demonstrated good predictive performance for treatment response to NACT. Moreover, high ISGC indicated better long-term survival in patients with advanced GC. Furthermore, tumor-infiltrated T cells (CD3+ and CD8+) and CD11c+ macrophages were significantly increased in the response group, while CD163+ macrophages and FOXP3+ Treg cells were decreased after NACT. However, opposite results were exhibited in the nonresponse group. Finally, we found that the percentage of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors was 31% (32/104) pre-NACT and 49% (51/104) post-NACT, and almost all patients with elevated PD-L1 were in the NACT response group. The ISGC model accurately predicted NACT efficacy and classified patients with GC into different survival groups. NACT regulates the TIME in GC, which may provide strategies for personalized immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoji Zhao
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
| | - Yinan Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
| | - Li Ding
- Department of PathologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
| | - Chaoyue Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
| | - Jinning Ye
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
| | - Kaiyu Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
| | - Wu Song
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
| | - Shirong Cai
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
| | - Yulong He
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
- Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research CenterThe Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityShenzhenPR China
| | - Jianjun Peng
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
| | - Jianbo Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryThe First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen UniversityGuangzhouPR China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chubenko VA, Navmatulya AY, Gerk IA, Sarmatov AA, Egorenkov VV, Shelekhova KA, Zykov EN, Chernobrivceva VV, Volkov NM, Moiseyenko VM. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Effectiveness in Patients With Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) Gastric Cancer. Cureus 2024; 16:e61344. [PMID: 38947586 PMCID: PMC11214122 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This research work evaluates monotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). as a neoadjuvant treatment for patients with Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) locally advanced gastric cancer. Methods Here we present the results of the retrospective study from Napalkov Cancer Center over 4.5 years on patients with MSI-H locally advanced gastric cancer. A total of 566 patients were analyzed, 18 of whom were included in the research, focusing on clinical response rate, surgical pathology, 'watch and wait' strategy, and safety outcomes on an exploratory basis. Patients were assigned to four to eight neoadjuvant cycles of CPI, followed by surgery. Results The objective response to neoadjuvant CPI in patients with MSI-H gastric cancer was 77.8%. Complete response was achieved in five (27.8%) and partial response in nine (50%) patients, accordingly. Surgery was performed on 14 patients. Complete margin-free (R0) resection rates were 100%. Downstaging was observed in 12 out of 14 patients. Histopathologic complete response rates (pathologic complete response or Tumor Regression Grade-major response (TRG1)) were achieved in eight (57.1%) patients. No disease progression was detected with a median follow-up of 33.7 months (4.4-55.7 months). Clinically significant adverse events were not observed. Conclusion CPI in a neoadjuvant setting for patients with MSI-H locally advanced gastric cancer is highly effective and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viacheslav A Chubenko
- Department of Chemotherapy, Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Saint Petersburg Clinical, Scientific, and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint Petersburg, RUS
| | - Alexander Y Navmatulya
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Saint Petersburg Clinical, Scientific, and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint Petersburg, RUS
| | - Ivan A Gerk
- Department of Chemotherapy, Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Saint Petersburg Clinical, Scientific, and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint Petersburg, RUS
| | - Artem A Sarmatov
- Department of Chemotherapy, Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Saint Petersburg Clinical, Scientific, and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint Petersburg, RUS
| | - Vitaliy V Egorenkov
- Department of Surgery, Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Saint Petersburg Clinical, Scientific, and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint Petersburg, RUS
| | - Ksenia A Shelekhova
- Department of Pathology, Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Saint Petersburg Clinical, Scientific, and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint Petersburg, RUS
| | - Evgeny N Zykov
- Department of Radioisotope, Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Saint Petersburg Clinical, Scientific, and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint Petersburg, RUS
| | - Vera V Chernobrivceva
- Department of Radiology, Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Saint Petersburg Clinical, Scientific, and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint Petersburg, RUS
| | - Nikita M Volkov
- Department of Medical and Radiation Therapy, Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Saint Petersburg Clinical, Scientific, and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint Petersburg, RUS
| | - Vladimir M Moiseyenko
- Department of the Director, Napalkov State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Saint Petersburg Clinical, Scientific, and Practical Center for Specialised Types of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint Petersburg, RUS
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Loch FN, Beyer K, Kreis ME, Kamphues C, Rayya W, Schineis C, Jahn J, Tronser M, Elsholtz FHJ, Hamm B, Reiter R. Diagnostic performance of Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) for regional lymph node staging of gastric cancer by CT. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3183-3193. [PMID: 37921924 PMCID: PMC11126430 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10352-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Diagnostic performance of imaging for regional lymph node assessment in gastric cancer is still limited, and there is a lack of consensus on radiological evaluation. At the same time, there is an increasing demand for structured reporting using Reporting and Data Systems (RADS) to standardize oncological imaging. We aimed at investigating the diagnostic performance of Node-RADS compared to the use of various individual criteria for assessing regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer using histopathology as reference. METHODS In this retrospective single-center study, consecutive 91 patients (median age, 66 years, range 33-91 years, 54 men) with CT scans and histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma were assessed using Node-RADS assigning scores from 1 to 5 for the likelihood of regional lymph node metastases. Additionally, different Node-RADS criteria as well as subcategories of altered border contour (lobulated, spiculated, indistinct) were assessed individually. Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index were calculated for Node-RADS scores, and all criteria investigated. Interreader agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS Among all criteria, best performance was found for Node-RADS scores ≥ 3 and ≥ 4 with a sensitivity/specificity/Youden's index of 56.8%/90.7%/0.48 and 48.6%/98.1%/0.47, respectively, both with substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.73 and 0.67, p < 0.01). Among individual criteria, the best performance was found for short-axis diameter of 10 mm with sensitivity/specificity/Youden's index of 56.8%/87.0%/0.44 (κ = 0.65, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION This study shows that structured reporting of combined size and configuration criteria of regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer slightly improves overall diagnostic performance compared to individual criteria including short-axis diameter alone. The results show an increase in specificity and unchanged sensitivity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The results of this study suggest that Node-RADS may be a suitable tool for structured reporting of regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer. KEY POINTS • Assessment of lymph nodes in gastric cancer is still limited, and there is a lack of consensus on radiological evaluation. • Node-RADS in gastric cancer improves overall diagnostic performance compared to individual criteria including short-axis diameter. • Node-RADS may be a suitable tool for structured reporting of regional lymph nodes in gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian N Loch
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Beyer
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin E Kreis
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Kamphues
- Department of Surgery, Parkklinik Weißensee, Schönstraße 80, 13086, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wael Rayya
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Schineis
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Janosch Jahn
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Tronser
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian H J Elsholtz
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Hamm
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rolf Reiter
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
- BIH Charité Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pelc Z, Sędłak K, Leśniewska M, Mielniczek K, Chawrylak K, Skórzewska M, Ciszewski T, Czechowska J, Kiszczyńska A, Wijnhoven BPL, Van Sandick JW, Gockel I, Gisbertz SS, Piessen G, Eveno C, Bencivenga M, De Manzoni G, Baiocchi GL, Morgagni P, Rosati R, Fumagalli Romario U, Davies A, Endo Y, Pawlik TM, Roviello F, Bruns C, Polkowski WP, Rawicz-Pruszyński K. Textbook Neoadjuvant Outcome-Novel Composite Measure of Oncological Outcomes among Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Multimodal Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1721. [PMID: 38730672 PMCID: PMC11083243 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is expected to increase to 1.77 million cases by 2040. To improve treatment outcomes, GC patients are increasingly treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to curative-intent resection. Although NAC enhances locoregional control and comprehensive patient care, survival rates remain poor, and further investigations should establish outcomes assessment of current clinical pathways. Individually assessed parameters have served as benchmarks for treatment quality in the past decades. The Outcome4Medicine Consensus Conference underscores the inadequacy of isolated metrics, leading to increased recognition and adoption of composite measures. One of the most simple and comprehensive is the "All or None" method, which refers to an approach where a specific set of criteria must be fulfilled for an individual to achieve the overall measure. This narrative review aims to present the rationale for the implementation of a novel composite measure, Textbook Neoadjuvant Outcome (TNO). TNO integrates five objective and well-established components: Treatment Toxicity, Laboratory Tests, Imaging, Time to Surgery, and Nutrition. It represents a desired, multidisciplinary care and hospitalization of GC patients undergoing NAC to identify the treatment- and patient-related data required to establish high-quality oncological care further. A key strength of this narrative review is the clinical feasibility and research background supporting the implementation of the first and novel composite measure representing the "ideal" and holistic care among patients with locally advanced esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) and GC in the preoperative period after NAC. Further analysis will correlate clinical outcomes with the prognostic factors evaluated within the TNO framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuzanna Pelc
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| | - Katarzyna Sędłak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| | - Magdalena Leśniewska
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| | - Katarzyna Mielniczek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| | - Katarzyna Chawrylak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| | - Magdalena Skórzewska
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| | - Tomasz Ciszewski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| | - Joanna Czechowska
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| | - Agata Kiszczyńska
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| | - Bas P. L. Wijnhoven
- Department of General Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Johanna W. Van Sandick
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Ines Gockel
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, and Claude Huriez University Hospital, 59000 Lille, France; (G.P.); (C.E.)
| | - Clarisse Eveno
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, and Claude Huriez University Hospital, 59000 Lille, France; (G.P.); (C.E.)
| | - Maria Bencivenga
- Upper G.I. Surgery Division, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (M.B.); (G.D.M.)
| | - Giovanni De Manzoni
- Upper G.I. Surgery Division, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (M.B.); (G.D.M.)
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, and Third Division of General Surgery, Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Paolo Morgagni
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forlì, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita Salute University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | | | - Andrew Davies
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK;
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (Y.E.); (T.M.P.)
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (Y.E.); (T.M.P.)
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy;
| | - Christiane Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Wojciech P. Polkowski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| | - Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland; (Z.P.); (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (K.C.); (M.S.); (T.C.); (J.C.); (A.K.); (W.P.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Erdat EC, Yalciner M, Urun Y. Accuracy and usability of artificial intelligence chatbot generated chemotherapy protocols. Future Oncol 2024:1-6. [PMID: 38646965 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Medical practitioners are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots for easier and faster access to information. To our knowledge, the accuracy and availability of AI-generated chemotherapy protocols has not yet been studied. Methods: Nine simulated cancer patient cases were designed and AI chatbots, ChatGPT version 3.5 (OpenAI) and Bing (Microsoft), were used to generate chemotherapy protocols for each case. Results: Generated chemotherapy protocols were compared with the original protocols for nine simulated cancer patients. ChatGPT's overall performance was 5 out of 9 on protocol generation, and Bing's was 4 out of 9; this was statistically nonsignificant (p = 1). Conclusion: AI chatbots show both potential and limitations in generating chemotherapy protocols. The overall performance is low, and they should be used carefully in oncological practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efe Cem Erdat
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Merih Yalciner
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Ankara University Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu X, Ma B, Zhao L. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1342162. [PMID: 38686192 PMCID: PMC11056579 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1342162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients suffering from locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma often face a high postoperative recurrence rate. Despite aggressive treatment, less than 50% survive beyond five years. Ongoing clinical studies are exploring ways to prolong patient survival, revealing that perioperative chemotherapy can extend both the period of recurrence-free survival and overall survival for this group of patients. Currently, combining chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors has become a critical treatment approach for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. However, the effectiveness of this approach in locally advanced patients remains unverified. This article delves into the latest research concerning the use of perioperative chemotherapy coupled with immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treatment, and highlights prospective challenges and discusses how to best identify patients who may benefit from combined chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Liu
- Radiotherapy Department, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Baozhen Ma
- Immunotherapy Department, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lingdi Zhao
- Immunotherapy Department, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chen F, Xian J, Huo J. Prognostic significance of a pathological response in metastatic lymph nodes of patients with gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery. Surg Today 2024:10.1007/s00595-024-02829-7. [PMID: 38587668 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02829-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To grade the pathological response of lymph nodes (LNs) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) and investigate its prognostic significance. METHODS This retrospective study included 196 patients who underwent NAC, followed by radical gastrectomy for LAGC between January 2010 and October 2019. Pathological responses were evaluated based on the proportion of residual tumor cells within the tumor area in the primary tumor (PT) and LNs and included the following categories: 1a (0%), 1b (< 10%), 2 (10-50%), and 3 (> 50%). RESULTS Among 166 patients with clinically node-positive disease, 38/27/39/62 were classified as having LN regression grade (LRG) 1a/1b/2/3, respectively. Compared to LN non-responders (LRG 2 or 3), LN responders (LRG 1a or 1b) had significantly higher 5-year overall survival (72.5% vs. 19.0%, P < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival rates (67.8% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001), irrespective of PT response. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis revealed that the LN response was an independent risk factor for the overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.417, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.181-0.962, P = 0.040) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.490, 95% CI 0.242-0.991, P = 0.047), but not the PT response (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The pathological LN response may be a reliable prognostic prediction tool in patients with LAGC who received NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengju Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, No. 618 Gangtie North Road, Xingtai, 054000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Jia Xian
- Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, No. 618 Gangtie North Road, Xingtai, 054000, Hebei Province, China
| | - Junjie Huo
- Department of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, No. 618 Gangtie North Road, Xingtai, 054000, Hebei Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yee EJ, Gilbert D, Kaplan J, Wani S, Kim SS, McCarter MD, Stewart CL. Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Resectable Gastric Cancer: Analysis from a Western Academic Center. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1428. [PMID: 38611107 PMCID: PMC11010931 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are an emerging biomarker predictive of response to immunotherapy across a spectrum of solid organ malignancies. The characterization of TILs in gastric cancer (GC) treated with contemporary, multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is understudied. In this retrospective investigation, we analyzed the degree of infiltration, phenotype, and spatial distribution of TILs via immunohistochemistry within resected GC specimens treated with or without NAC at a Western center. We hypothesized that NAC executes immunostimulatory roles, as evidenced by an increased number of anti-tumor TILs in the tumor microenvironment. We found significantly elevated levels of conventional and memory CD8+ T cells, as well as total TILs (CD4+, CD8+, Treg, B cells), within chemotherapy-treated tumors compared with chemotherapy-naïve specimens. We also revealed important associations between survival and pathologic responses with enhanced TIL infiltration. Taken together, our findings advocate for an immunostimulatory role of chemotherapy and underscore the potential synergistic effect of combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy in resectable gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliott J. Yee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.G.); (M.D.M.); (C.L.S.)
| | - Danielle Gilbert
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.G.); (M.D.M.); (C.L.S.)
| | - Jeffrey Kaplan
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
| | - Sunnie S. Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
| | - Martin D. McCarter
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.G.); (M.D.M.); (C.L.S.)
| | - Camille L. Stewart
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.G.); (M.D.M.); (C.L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Heinrich K, Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Müller L, Ettrich TJ, Büchner-Steudel P, Geißler M, Trojan J, Moosmann N, Folprecht G, Schmidt J, Kanzler S, Kullmann F, Moulin JC, Werner J, Angele MK, Probst V, Held S, Schulz C, Boukovala M. Adjuvant Treatment with S-1 in Patients after R0-Resection of Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Esophagogastric Junction: A Multicenter Phase I/II Feasibility Study (GMBH-STO-0114). Oncol Res Treat 2024; 47:251-261. [PMID: 38565089 PMCID: PMC11151986 DOI: 10.1159/000538143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION S-1 has been shown to be an effective adjuvant treatment option for East Asian patients who underwent gastrectomy for stage II/III gastric cancer. We conducted a phase I/II study to evaluate the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of administering S-1 in the adjuvant setting after R0-resection of adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) in Caucasian patients. METHODS In this single-cohort, open-label, phase I/II trial, we enrolled patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or EGJ having undergone R0-resection with or without neoadjuvant treatment. One treatment cycle consisted of oral S-1 (30 mg/m2 bid) for 14 days. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for 18 cycles (54 weeks). Primary endpoint was feasibility and tolerability. Safety was evaluated according to the Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Secondary endpoints were 1-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate, RFS, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Between October 2015 and February 2018, 32 patients were enrolled in 12 German centers, and 30 started adjuvant study treatment. Seventeen patients completed all 18 cycles. Two patients terminated study treatment early due to adverse events (AEs), 7 due to patient's or investigator's decision, and 4 due to recurrence or distant metastasis during adjuvant therapy. Dose levels were reduced to 25 mg/m2 in 9 patients and to 20 mg/m2 in 1 patient. Of patients completing all 18 cycles, 5 did so with reduced dosage of S-1. Documented grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia, diarrhea, vomiting, polyneuropathy, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia, and rash. Serious AEs were observed in 7 patients. Median RFS was 32.2 months. One-year RFS rate was 77%. Data on OS were still premature at the end of the study. CONCLUSION Adjuvant treatment with S-1 for 1 year is a feasible and safe treatment option for Caucasian patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma or cancer of the EGJ after R0-resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Petra Büchner-Steudel
- Martin-Luther-University Halle Wittenberg, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Jörg Trojan
- Medical Clinic 1, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicolas Moosmann
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Gunnar Folprecht
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine and Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Johannes Schmidt
- Department of Surgery, LAKUMED, Teaching Hospital Technical University Munich (TUM), Landshut, Germany
| | - Stephan Kanzler
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Frank Kullmann
- Department of Medicine I, Klinikum Weiden, Weiden, Germany
| | - Jean-Charles Moulin
- Ortenau Klinikum Lahr, Medizinische Klinik, Sektion Hämatologie/Onkologie, Lahr, Germany
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin K. Angele
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Victoria Probst
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Swantje Held
- ClinAssess GmbH, Department of Biometry, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - Christoph Schulz
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Hospital Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany
| | - Myrto Boukovala
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Alkan A, Mızrak D, Yaşar A, Karcı E, Köksoy EB, Ürün M, Özyurt N, Kuştaş AA, Kütük T, Ürün Y, Şenler FÇ, Akyürek S, Utkan G, Demirkazık A, Gökçe ŞÇ, Akbulut H. Adjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus Docetaxel-Cisplatin-Fluorouracil (DCF) versus CRT plus Fluorouracil-Folinic Acid (FUFA) in Stage III Gastric Cancer. J Cancer Res Ther 2024; 20:913-917. [PMID: 39023597 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1009_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the optimal management strategy in resectable gastric cancer. There is a debate about the efficacy of more aggressive CRT plus chemotherapy regimens in adjuvant setting. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of adjuvant CRT plus docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (DCF) versus CRT plus fluorouracil-folinic acid (FUFA) in stage III gastric cancer. METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of stage III gastric cancer treated with adjuvant therapy after curative resection were analyzed. Patients' disease characteristics and impacts of the regimens on median disease-free survival (DFS) and median overall survival (OS) were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS One hundred sixty-one patients (102 in FUFA arm and 59 in DCF arm) with a median age of 56.0 (29-79) were evaluated. In the DCF arm, there were more renal toxicities (31.6% vs 6.4% P < 0.001), emergency department admissions (64.9% vs 23.7%, P < 0.001), and dose reductions/treatment modifications in the DCF arm (51.6% vs 37.2, P < 0.001). The median follow-up was 23 months (1-124) in the FUFA arm and 26.0 months (1-77) in the DCF arm. The median DFS was 25.0 months (%95 CI, 12.7-37.2) in the DCF arm and 17.0 months (%95 CI, 2.6-31.3) in the FUFA arm, P = 0.66. The median OS was 28.0 months (%95 CI, 17.0-38.9) in the DCF arm and 25.0 months (%95 CI, 11.9-36.0) in the FUFA arm, P = 0.70. CONCLUSION In conclusion, when compared with FUFA regimen, more aggressive therapy with DCF was more toxic and did not improve OS in adjuvant setting of stage III gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Alkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey
| | - Dilşa Mızrak
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Arzu Yaşar
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ebru Karcı
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Berna Köksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Muslih Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Neslihan Özyurt
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali Aytuğ Kuştaş
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tuğçe Kütük
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Filiz Çay Şenler
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serap Akyürek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Güngör Utkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Demirkazık
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Şaban Çakır Gökçe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Akbulut
- Department of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bremm J, Brunner S, Celik E, Damanakis A, Schlösser H, Fuchs HF, Schmidt T, Zander T, Maintz D, Bruns CJ, Quaas A, Pinto Dos Santos D, Schroeder W. Correlation of primary tumor volume and histopathologic response following neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108003. [PMID: 38401351 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In esophageal cancer, histopathologic response following neoadjuvant therapy and transthoracic esophagectomy is a strong predictor of long-term survival. At the present, it is not known whether the initial tumor volume quantified by computed tomography (CT) correlates with the degree of pathologic regression. METHODS In a retrospective analysis of a consecutive patient cohort with esophageal adenocarcinoma, tumor volume in CT prior to chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone was quantified using manual segmentation. Primary tumor volume was correlated to the histomorphological regression based on vital residual tumor cells (VRTC) (Cologne regression scale, CRS: grade I, >50% VRTC; grade II, 10-50% VRTC; grade III, <10% VRTC and grade IV, complete response without VRTC). RESULTS A total of 287 patients, 165 with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy according to the CROSS protocol and 122 with chemotherapy according to the FLOT regimen, were included. The initial tumor volume for patients following CROSS and FLOT therapy was measured (CROSS: median 24.8 ml, IQR 13.1-41.1 ml, FLOT: 23.4 ml, IQR 10.6-37.3 ml). All patients underwent an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. 180 patients (62.7 %) were classified as minor (CRS I/II) and 107 patients (37.3 %) as major or complete responder (CRS III/IV). The median tumor volume was calculated as 24.2 ml (IQR 11.9-40.3 ml). Ordered logistic regression revealed no significant dependence of CRS from tumor volume (OR = 0.99, p-value = 0.99) irrespective of the type of multimodal treatment. CONCLUSION The initial tumor volume on diagnostic CT does not aid to differentiate between potential histopathological responders and non-responders to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer patients. The results emphasize the need to establish other biological markers of prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Bremm
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany
| | - Stefanie Brunner
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, Germany
| | - Erkan Celik
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany
| | - Alexander Damanakis
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, Germany
| | - Hans Schlösser
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, Germany
| | - Hans F Fuchs
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, Germany
| | - Thomas Zander
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Internal Medicine, Germany
| | - David Maintz
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany
| | - Christiane J Bruns
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, Germany
| | - Alexander Quaas
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Pathology, Germany
| | - Daniel Pinto Dos Santos
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany; University Hospital of Frankfurt, Department of Radiology, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schroeder
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mineur L, Plat F, Desseigne F, Deplanque G, Belkacemi M, Moureau-Zabotto L, Beyrne CD, Jalali K, Obled S, Smith D, Vazquez L, Boustany R. NESC Multicenter Phase II Trial in the Preoperative Treatment of Gastric Adenocarcinoma with Chemotherapy (Docetaxel-Cisplatin-5FU+Lenograstim) Followed by Chemoradiation Based 5FU and Oxaliplatin and Surgery. Cancer Res Treat 2024; 56:580-589. [PMID: 37817565 PMCID: PMC11016650 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2023.812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is expected to increase the rate of curative resection and complete histological response. In this trial, we investigated the efficacy of a neoadjuvant CRT regimen in gastric adenocarcinoma (NCT01565109 trial). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with stage IB to IIIC gastric adenocarcinoma, endoscopy ultrasound and computed tomography-scan diagnosed, were eligible for this phase II trial. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of 2 cycles of chemotherapy with DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil [5FU]) followed by preoperative CRT with oxaliplatin, continuous 5FU and radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy, 5 fractions per week for 5 weeks) administered before surgery. R0-resection rate, pathological complete response (pathCR) rate, and survival (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) were evaluated as primary endpoints. RESULTS Among 33 patients included, 32 patients (97%) received CRT and 26 (78.8%) were resected (R0 resection for all patients resected). Among resected patients, we report pathCR in 23,1% and pathologic major response (tumor regression grade 2 according to Mandard's classification) in 26,9%. With a median follow-up duration of 5.82 years (range, 0.4 to 9.24 years), the estimated median OS for all 33 patients was not reached; 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 85%, 61%, and 52%, respectively. Among resected patients, those whose histological response was tumor grade regression (TRG) 1-2 had significantly better OS and PFS rates than those with a TRG 3-4-5 response (p=0.019 and p=0.016, respectively). CONCLUSION Promising results from trials involving preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery in gastric cancer need to be further evaluated in a phase III trial.
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhu J, Wang Y, Xu B, Pu W, He P, Zhang J, Wang H, Chen H. Photodynamic therapy may salvage chemotherapy failure in gastric cancer: A case report and a literature review. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2024; 46:104038. [PMID: 38447816 DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
Given the highly heterogeneous characteristics of advanced gastric cancer (GC), most patients must receive neoadjuvant therapy or conversion therapy consisting of chemotherapy to decrease tumor grade and improve the likelihood of complete resection. Drug resistance, however, always leads to an aborted conversion therapy and inevitable death. When meet drug resistance, alternative drug regimens will be applied with immunotherapy or targeted therapy, whose clinical efficacy remains limited when new drug resistance or severer liver and kidney toxicity emerge. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a novel treatment, has demonstrated remarkable therapeutic efficacy in different stages of GC. However, no report has been reported so far on the clinical application of photodynamic therapy in conversion therapy after drug resistance. Here we report a case of middle-aged patient with advanced GC, who experienced failure of conversion therapy consisted of multi-line chemotherapy along with immunotherapy. Ultimate success was achieved through a comprehensive conversion therapy of PDT, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. Subsequently, the patient underwent robotic-assisted radical gastrectomy while the surgical specimen showed no tumor cell exists. The patient underwent 3 cycles of systemic adjuvant therapy following surgical intervention. Presently, the patient remains 17 months in a satisfactory state of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyu Zhu
- The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China
| | - Yunpeng Wang
- The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China
| | - Bo Xu
- The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China
| | - Weigao Pu
- The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China
| | - Puyi He
- The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China
| | - Jing Zhang
- The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China
| | - Haiyun Wang
- The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China
| | - Hao Chen
- The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China; Department of Surgical Oncology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China; Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Oncology, Lanzhou 730030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tankel J, Ahmed N, Mueller C, Najmeh S, Spicer J, Mulder D, Cool-Lartigue J, Rousseau M, Frechette D, Sud S, Kavan P, Moghrabi A, Champagne M, Lemay F, Dalfen R, Sirhan S, Asselah J, Alcindor T, Ferri L. Docetaxel-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by En Bloc Resection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A 15-Year Retrospective Analysis from a Regional Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Network. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2461-2469. [PMID: 38142255 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14779-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKROUND Real-world, long-term survival outcomes of neoadjuvant, docetaxel-based therapy for esophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma are lacking. This study describes the long-term survival outcomes of patients with esophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy and en bloc transthoracic esophagectomy. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively maintained database from a regional upper gastrointestinal cancer network in Quebec, Canada, was performed. From January 2007 to December 2021, all patients with locally advanced (cT3 and/or N1) esophageal/Siewert I/II adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant DCFx3 (Docetaxel/Cisplatin/5FU) or FLOTx4 (5FU/Leucovorin/Oxaliplatin/Docetaxel) and transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy were identified. Postoperative, pathological, and survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS Overall, 236 of 420 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tumor location was esophageal/Siewert I/Siewert II (118/33/85), most were cT3-4 (93.6%) and cN+ (61.0%). DCF and FLOT were used in 127 of 236 (53.8%) and 109 of 236 (46.2%). All neoadjuvant cycles were completed in 87.3% with no difference between the regimens. Operative procedures included Ivor Lewis (81.8%), left thoraco-abdominal esophagectomy (10.6%) and McKeown (7.6%) with an R0 resection in 95.3% and pathological complete response in 9.7% (DCF 12.6%/FLOT 6.4%, p = 0.111). The median lymph node yield was 32 (range 4-79), and 60.6% were ypN+. Median follow-up was longer for the DCF group (74.8 months 95% confidence interval [CI] 4-173 vs. 37.8 months 95% CI 2-119, p <0.001. Overall survival was similar between the groups (FLOT 97.3 months, 78.6-115.8 vs. DCF 92.9, 9.2-106.5, p = 0.420). CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant DCF and FLOT followed by transthoracic en bloc resection are both highly effective regimens for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma with equivalent survival outcomes despite high disease load.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Tankel
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nabeel Ahmed
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carmen Mueller
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarah Najmeh
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jonathan Spicer
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David Mulder
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jonathan Cool-Lartigue
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mathieu Rousseau
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Shelly Sud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital de Gatineau, Gatineau, QC, Canada
| | - Petr Kavan
- Deparment of Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Albert Moghrabi
- Department of Oncology, Hopital de Verdun, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Frederic Lemay
- Deparmtent of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Richard Dalfen
- Division of Medical Oncology, St Mary's Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shireen Sirhan
- Department of Oncology, Brome-Missisquoi-Perkins, Cowansville, QC, Canada
| | - Jamil Asselah
- Division of Medical Oncology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Thierry Alcindor
- Division of Medical Oncology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Li N, Li Z, Fu Q, Zhang B, Zhang J, Wan XB, Lu CM, Wang JB, Deng WY, Ma YJ, Bie LY, Wang MY, Li J, Xia QX, Wei C, Luo SX. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab in combination with FLOT chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: an investigator-initiated, single-arm, open-label, phase II study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:2071-2084. [PMID: 38320099 PMCID: PMC11020066 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer aroused wide interest. This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sintilimab, a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) chemotherapy for HER2-negative locally advanced G/GEJ cancer. METHODS Eligible patients with clinical stage cT4 and/or cN+M0 G/GEJ cancer were enroled in this phase II study. Patients received neoadjuvant sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) for three cycles plus FLOT (50 mg/m 2 docetaxel, 80 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin, 200 mg/m 2 calcium levofolinate, 2600 mg/m 2 5-fluorouracil every 2 weeks) for four cycles before surgery, followed by four cycles of adjuvant FLOT with same dosages after resection. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were enroled between August 2019 and September 2021, with a median follow-up of 34.8 (95% CI, 32.8-42.9) months. Thirty-two (100%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy, and 29 underwent surgery with an R0 resection rate of 93.1%. The pCR (TRG0) was achieved in 5 (17.2%; 95% CI, 5.8-35.8%) patients, and the major pathological response was 55.2%. Twenty-three (79.3%) patients had T downstaging, 21 (72.4%) had N downstaging, and 19 (65.5%) had overall TNM downstaging. Six (20.7%) patients experienced recurrence. Patients achieving pCR showed better event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) than non-pCR. The estimated 3-year EFS rate, 3-year DFS rate, and 3-year OS rate were 71.4% (95% CI, 57.2-89.2%), 78.8% (95% CI, 65.1-95.5%), and 70.9% (95% CI, 54.8-91.6%), respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 84.4% (95% CI, 68.3-93.1%) and 96.9% (95% CI, 84.3-99.5%), respectively. Twenty-five (86.2%) received adjuvant therapy. The main grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were lymphopenia (34.4%), neutropenia (28.1%), and leukopenia (15.6%). no patients died from TRAE. The LDH level exhibited a better predictive value to pathological responses than PD-L1 and MSI status. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated an encouraging efficacy and manageable safety profile of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus FLOT in HER2-negative locally advanced G/GEJ cancer, which suggested a potential therapeutic option for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Li
- Departments of Medical Oncology
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Qing-Xin Xia
- Pathology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Putila E, Helminen O, Helmiö M, Huhta H, Jalkanen A, Kallio R, Koivukangas V, Kokkola A, Laine S, Lietzen E, Louhimo J, Meriläinen S, Pohjanen VM, Rantanen T, Junttila A, Ristimäki A, Räsänen JV, Saarnio J, Sihvo E, Toikkanen V, Tyrväinen T, Valtola A, Kauppila JH. Postoperative Complications After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Nationwide Study in Finland. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2689-2698. [PMID: 38153640 PMCID: PMC10908606 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14813-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, no large population-based studies have compared complications and short-term outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and upfront surgery in gastric cancer. More nationwide studies with standardized reporting on complications are needed to enable international comparison between studies. This study aimed to compare postoperative complications between neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in a population-based setting. METHODS This population-based study based on the Finnish National Esophago-Gastric Cancer Cohort included all patients 18 years of age or older undergoing gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland during 2005-2016. Logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), both crude and adjusted for key confounders. Different types of complications were graded based on the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group definitions, and major complications were assessed by the Clavien-Dindo scale. RESULTS This study analyzed 769 patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase major postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with upfront surgery (OR, 1.12; 95% CI 0.81-1.56). Furthermore, it did not increase pneumonia, anastomotic complications, wound complications, or other complications. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant therapy is not associated with increased postoperative complications, reoperations, or short-term mortality compared with upfront surgery in gastric adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Putila
- Surgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
| | - Olli Helminen
- Surgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Mika Helmiö
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Heikki Huhta
- Surgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Aapo Jalkanen
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Vesa Koivukangas
- Surgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Arto Kokkola
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Simo Laine
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Elina Lietzen
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Johanna Louhimo
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sanna Meriläinen
- Surgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Vesa-Matti Pohjanen
- Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Tuomo Rantanen
- Department of Surgery, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anna Junttila
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Ari Ristimäki
- Department of Pathology, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Applied Tumor Genomics Research Program, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jari V Räsänen
- Department of General Thoracic and Oesophageal Surgery, Heart and Lung Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juha Saarnio
- Surgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Eero Sihvo
- Department of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Vesa Toikkanen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Center, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Tuula Tyrväinen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Valtola
- Department of Surgery, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Joonas H Kauppila
- Surgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Adili D, Mohetaer A, Zhang W. Diagnostic accuracy of radiomics-based machine learning for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and survival prediction in gastric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2024; 173:111249. [PMID: 38382422 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, researchers have explored the use of radiomics to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in gastric cancer (GC). Yet, a lingering debate persists regarding the accuracy of these predictions. Against this backdrop, this study was conducted to examine the accuracy of radiomics in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in GC patients. METHODS An exhaustive search of relevant studies was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to February 21, 2023. The radiomics quality scoring (RQS) tool was employed to assess study quality. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes were examined as outcome measures. RESULTS Fourteen studies involving 3,373 GC patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were incorporated in our meta-analysis. The mean RQS score across all studies was 36.3%, ranging between 0 and 63.9%. On the validation cohort, when the modeling variables were restricted to radiomic features alone, the predictive performance was characterized by a c-index of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.710-0.790), with a sensitivity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58-0.75) and a specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84) for the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. When clinical data was integrated with radiomic features as modeling variables, the predictive performance improved, yielding a c-index of 0.814 (95% CI: 0.780-0.847), a sensitivity of 0.78 [95% CI: 0.70-0.84], and a specificity of 0.73 [95% CI: 0.67-0.79]. CONCLUSIONS Radiomics holds promise to noninvasively predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and survival outcomes among patients with locally advanced GC. Additionally, we underscore the need for future multicenter studies and the development of imaging-sourced tools for risk stratification in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diliyaer Adili
- Department of Gastrointestinal (Oncology) Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054 China
| | - Aibibai Mohetaer
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830063 China
| | - Wenbin Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal (Oncology) Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054 China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Scheck MK, Hofheinz RD, Lorenzen S. HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer and Antibody Treatment: State of the Art and Future Developments. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1336. [PMID: 38611014 PMCID: PMC11010911 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite a decreasing incidence in Western countries, gastric cancer is among the most common cancer subtypes globally and is associated with one of the highest tumor-related mortality rates. Biomarkers play an increasing role in the treatment against gastric cancer. HER2 was one of the first biomarkers that found its way into clinical practice. Since the ToGA trial, trastuzumab has been part of first-line palliative chemotherapy in metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer. HER2-targeting agents, such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib, the antibody drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab-emtansine or dual HER2 inhibition (pertuzumab and trastuzumab), have been investigated in the second-line setting but led to negative study results. More recently, the ADC trastuzumab-deruxtecan was authorized after the failure of trastuzumab-based treatment. However, further improvements in HER2-directed therapy are required as resistance mechanisms and HER2 heterogeneity limit the existing treatment options. This review aims to give an overview of the current standard-of-care HER2-directed therapy in gastric cancer, as well as its challenges and future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena K. Scheck
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| | - Ralf D. Hofheinz
- Mannheim Cancer Center, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Sylvie Lorenzen
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, 81675 Munich, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bao Z, Du J, Zheng Y, Guo Q, Ji R. Deep learning or radiomics based on CT for predicting the response of gastric cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1363812. [PMID: 38601765 PMCID: PMC11004479 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1363812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) models, clinical models (CM), and the integrated model (IM) are utilized to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer. Objective The objective is to identify the diagnostic test of the AI model and to compare the accuracy of AI, CM, and IM through a comprehensive summary of head-to-head comparative studies. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched until September 5, 2023, to compile English language studies without regional restrictions. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Forest plots were utilized to illustrate the findings of diagnostic accuracy, while Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were generated to estimate sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE). Meta-regression was applied to analyze heterogeneity across the studies. To assess the presence of publication bias, Deeks' funnel plot and an asymmetry test were employed. Results A total of 9 studies, comprising 3313 patients, were included for the AI model, with 7 head-to-head comparative studies involving 2699 patients. Across the 9 studies, the pooled SEN for the AI model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66, 0.82), and SPE was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84). Meta-regression was conducted, revealing that the cut-off value, approach to predicting response, and gold standard might be sources of heterogeneity. In the head-to-head comparative studies, the pooled SEN for AI was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84) with SPE at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.85). For CM, the pooled SEN was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.77) with SPE at 0.59 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.64), while for IM, the pooled SEN was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.86) with SPE at 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.79). Notably, there was no statistical difference, except that IM exhibited higher SEN than AI, while maintaining a similar level of SPE in pairwise comparisons. In the Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis subgroup, the CT-based Deep Learning (DL) subgroup, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline subgroup, the AI model exhibited higher SEN but lower SPE compared to the IM. Conversely, in the training cohort subgroup and the internal validation cohort subgroup, the AI model demonstrated lower SEN but higher SPE than the IM. The subgroup analysis underscored that factors such as the number of cohorts, cohort type, cut-off value, approach to predicting response, and choice of gold standard could impact the reliability and robustness of the results. Conclusion AI has demonstrated its viability as a tool for predicting the response of GC patients to NACT Furthermore, CT-based DL model in AI was sensitive to extract tumor features and predict the response. The results of subgroup analysis also supported the above conclusions. Large-scale rigorously designed diagnostic accuracy studies and head-to-head comparative studies are anticipated. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, CRD42022377030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhixian Bao
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xi’an NO.1 Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jie Du
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ya Zheng
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qinghong Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Rui Ji
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Gansu Province Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kuang ZY, Sun QH, Cao LC, Ma XY, Wang JX, Liu KX, Li J. Efficacy and safety of perioperative therapy for locally resectable gastric cancer: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1046-1058. [PMID: 38577462 PMCID: PMC10989386 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.1046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide, with over 1 million new cases per year, and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. AIM To determine the optimal perioperative treatment regimen for patients with locally resectable GC. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted, focusing on phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing perioperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in treating locally resectable GC. The R0 resection rate, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and incidence of grade 3 or higher nonsurgical severe adverse events (SAEs) associated with various perioperative regimens were analyzed. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare treatment regimens and rank their efficacy. RESULTS Thirty RCTs involving 8346 patients were included in this study. Neoadjuvant XELOX plus neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant CF were found to significantly improve the R0 resection rate compared with surgery alone, and the former had the highest probability of being the most effective option in this context. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant FLOT was associated with the highest probability of being the best regimen for improving OS. Owing to limited data, no definitive ranking could be determined for DFS. Considering nonsurgical SAEs, FLO has emerged as the safest treatment regimen. CONCLUSION This study provides valuable insights for clinicians when selecting perioperative treatment regimens for patients with locally resectable GC. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Yu Kuang
- Graduate College, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Qian-Hui Sun
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Lu-Chang Cao
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Xin-Yi Ma
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Jia-Xi Wang
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Ke-Xin Liu
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| | - Jie Li
- Oncology Department, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Angulo-Elizari E, Henriquez-Figuereo A, Morán-Serradilla C, Plano D, Sanmartín C. Unlocking the potential of 1,4-naphthoquinones: A comprehensive review of their anticancer properties. Eur J Med Chem 2024; 268:116249. [PMID: 38458106 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
Cancer encompasses a group of pathologies with common characteristics, high incidence, and prevalence in all countries. Although there are treatments available for this disease, they are not always effective or safe, often failing to achieve the desired results. This is why it is necessary to continue the search for new therapies. One of the strategies for obtaining new antitumor drugs is the use of 1,4-naphthoquinone as a scaffold in synthetic or natural products with antitumor activity. This review focuses on compiling studies related to the antitumor activity of 1,4-naphthoquinone and its natural and synthetic derivatives over the last 10 years. The work describes the main natural naphthoquinones with antitumor activity and classifies the synthetic naphthoquinones based on the structural modifications made to the scaffold. Additionally, the formation of metal complexes using naphthoquinones as a ligand is considered. After a thorough review, 197 synthetic compounds with potent biological activity against cancer have been classified according to their chemical structures and their mechanisms of action have been described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Angulo-Elizari
- University of Navarra, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Andreina Henriquez-Figuereo
- University of Navarra, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cristina Morán-Serradilla
- University of Navarra, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Daniel Plano
- University of Navarra, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdisNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
| | - Carmen Sanmartín
- University of Navarra, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdisNA), 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Acs M, Piso P, Glockzin G. Peritoneal Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Local Treatment Options and Recommendations. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1445-1459. [PMID: 38534942 PMCID: PMC10969192 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis is a common finding in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Beyond systemic chemotherapy, additive local treatments such as cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy are considered an inherent part of different multimodal treatment concepts for selected patients with peritoneal metastatic gastric cancer. This review article discusses the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy, including HIPEC, NIPS, and PIPAC, as additive therapeutic options with curative and palliative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miklos Acs
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, 93049 Regensburg, Germany;
| | - Gabriel Glockzin
- Department of Surgery, Muenchen Klinik Bogenhausen, 81925 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kurokawa Y, Doki Y, Kitabayashi R, Yoshikawa T, Nomura T, Tsuji K, Goto M, Cho H, Hihara J, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Mizusawa J, Boku N, Terashima M. Short-term outcomes of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis (JCOG1704). Gastric Cancer 2024; 27:366-374. [PMID: 38180622 PMCID: PMC10896774 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-023-01453-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis for marginally resectable gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis (ELM) remains unfavorable, even after R0 resection. To assess the safety and efficacy of preoperative docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS), we conducted a multicenter phase II trial. METHODS Eligibility criteria included histologically proven HER2-negative gastric adenocarcinoma with bulky nodal (bulky N) involvement around major branched arteries or para-aortic node (PAN) metastases. Patients received three cycles of docetaxel (40 mg/m2, day 1), oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2, day 1), and S-1 (80-120 mg/body, days 1-14), followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus PAN dissection. Subsequently, patients underwent postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year. The primary endpoint was major (grade ≥ 2a) pathological response rate (pRR) according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma criteria. RESULTS Between October 2018 and March 2022, 47 patients (bulky N, 20; PAN, 17; both, 10) were enrolled in the trial. One patient was ineligible. Another declined any protocol treatments before initiation. Among the 45 eligible patients who initiated DOS chemotherapy, 44 (98%) completed 3 cycles and 42 (93%) underwent R0 resection. Major pRR and pathological complete response rates among the 46 eligible patients, including the patient who declined treatment, were 57% (26/46) and 24% (11/46), respectively. Common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (24%), anorexia (16%), febrile neutropenia (9%), and diarrhea (9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative chemotherapy with DOS yielded favorable pathological responses with an acceptable toxicity profile. This multimodal approach is highly promising for treating gastric cancer with ELM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Ryo Kitabayashi
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaki Yoshikawa
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Nomura
- Department of Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Tsuji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ishikawa Prefectural Chuo Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Masahiro Goto
- Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Cho
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Hihara
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Naoki Hiki
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Souya Nunobe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junki Mizusawa
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Narikazu Boku
- Department of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pelc Z, Sędłak K, Mlak R, Leśniewska M, Mielniczek K, Rola P, Januszewski J, Zhaldak O, Rekowska A, Gęca K, Skórzewska M, Polkowski WP, Pawlik TM, Rawicz-Pruszyński K. Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Burden Index in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Multimodal Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:828. [PMID: 38398218 PMCID: PMC10886992 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Since increasing evidence underlines the prominent role of systemic inflammation in carcinogenesis, the inflammation burden index (IBI) has emerged as a promising biomarker to estimate survival outcomes among cancer patients. The IBI has only been validated in Eastern gastric cancer (GC) patients; therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the IBI as a prognostic biomarker in Central European GC patients undergoing multimodal treatment. Ninety-three patients with histologically confirmed GC who underwent multimodal treatment between 2013 and 2021 were included. Patient recruitment started with the standardization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Blood samples were obtained one day prior to surgical treatment. The textbook outcome (TO) served as the measure of surgical quality, and tumor responses to NAC were evaluated according to Becker's system tumor regression grade (TRG). A high IBI was associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.13-7.72). In multivariate analysis, a high IBI (HR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.28-5.13) and a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR, HR = 2.55, 95% CI 1.32-4.94) were associated with an increased risk of death, while NAC administration (HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.90) and TO achievement (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.81) were associated with a lower risk of death. The IBI was associated with postoperative complications and mortality among GC patients undergoing multimodal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuzanna Pelc
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Katarzyna Sędłak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Radosław Mlak
- Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Magdalena Leśniewska
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Katarzyna Mielniczek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Piotr Rola
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Jacek Januszewski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Olena Zhaldak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Anna Rekowska
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Katarzyna Gęca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Magdalena Skórzewska
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Wojciech P. Polkowski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-080 Lublin, Poland; (K.S.); (M.L.); (K.M.); (J.J.); (O.Z.); (A.R.); (K.G.); (M.S.); (W.P.P.); (K.R.-P.)
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhu M, Yoon HH. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Promising Early Signal? J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:373-377. [PMID: 37963321 PMCID: PMC10824372 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mojun Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gaber CE, Sarker J, Abdelaziz AI, Okpara E, Lee TA, Klempner SJ, Nipp RD. Pathologic complete response in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7076. [PMID: 38457244 PMCID: PMC10923050 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and chemotherapy are recommended for the treatment of nonmetastatic esophageal cancer. The benefit of neoadjuvant treatment is mostly limited to patients who exhibit pathologic complete response (pCR). Existing estimates of pCR rates among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy have not been synthesized and lack precision. METHODS We conducted an independently funded systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023397402) of pCR rates among patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemo(radiation). Studies were identified from Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL database searches. Eligible studies included trials published from 1992 to 2022 that focused on nonmetastatic esophageal cancer, including the gastroesophageal junction. Histology-specific pooled pCR prevalence was determined using the Freeman-Tukey transformation and a random effects model. RESULTS After eligibility assessment, 84 studies with 6451 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinomas was 9% (95% CI: 6%-14%), ranging from 0% to 32%. The pooled prevalence of pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in squamous cell carcinomas was 32% (95% CI: 26%-39%), ranging from 8% to 66%. For adenocarcinoma, the pooled prevalence of pCR was 6% (95% CI: 1%-12%) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 22% (18%-26%) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS Under one-third of patients with esophageal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemo(radiation) experience pCR. Patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas had higher rates of pCR than those with adenocarcinomas. As pCR represents an increasingly utilized endpoint in neoadjuvant trials, these estimates of pooled pCR rates may serve as an important benchmark for future trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles E. Gaber
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Jyotirmoy Sarker
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Abdullah I. Abdelaziz
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Ebere Okpara
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Todd A. Lee
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of PharmacyUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Ryan D. Nipp
- OU Health Stephenson Cancer CenterOklahoma UniversityOklahoma CityOklahomaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
De Ruvo N, Fenocchi S, Veronesi L, Missori G, Ricciardolo AA, Rossi EG, Sorrentino L, Cautero N, Serra F, Gelmini R. Prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients: a 10-year mono-institutional experience. Front Surg 2024; 11:1321981. [PMID: 38362460 PMCID: PMC10867173 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1321981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the main causes of death from cancer globally. Long-term survival, especially in Western countries, remains dismal, with no significant improvements in recent years. Therefore, precise identification of clinical and pathological risk factors is crucial for prognosis, as it allows a better selection of patients suitable for oncologically radical treatments and contributes to longer survivals. Methods We devised a retrospective observational longitudinal study over 10 years of experience with GC patients operated with curative intent. Results Several factors were thoroughly investigated in a multivariate analysis to look for significance as independent risk factors for disease-free survival. Our results showed that only BMI, pTNM, and lymph node ratio expressed hazard ratios with implications for survival in our series of patients. Discussion Although limited by the retrospective nature of the study, this is one of the few cancer reports from Northern Italy showing results over 10 years, which may in our view, have an impact on decision-making processes for multidisciplinary teams dedicated to the care of gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - F. Serra
- General, Oncological and Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, AOU Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Verschoor YL, van de Haar J, van den Berg JG, van Sandick JW, Kodach LL, van Dieren JM, Balduzzi S, Grootscholten C, IJsselsteijn ME, Veenhof AAFA, Hartemink KJ, Vollebergh MA, Jurdi A, Sharma S, Spickard E, Owers EC, Bartels-Rutten A, den Hartog P, de Miranda NFCC, van Leerdam ME, Haanen JBAG, Schumacher TN, Voest EE, Chalabi M. Neoadjuvant atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the phase 2 PANDA trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:519-530. [PMID: 38191613 PMCID: PMC10878980 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02758-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancers carry a poor prognosis, and despite recent advancements, most patients die of their disease. Although immune checkpoint blockade became part of the standard-of-care for patients with metastatic G/GEJ cancers, its efficacy and impact on the tumor microenvironment (TME) in early disease remain largely unknown. We hypothesized higher efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with nonmetastatic G/GEJ cancer. In the phase 2 PANDA trial, patients with previously untreated resectable G/GEJ tumors (n = 21) received neoadjuvant treatment with one cycle of atezolizumab monotherapy followed by four cycles of atezolizumab plus docetaxel, oxaliplatin and capecitabine. Treatment was well tolerated. There were grade 3 immune-related adverse events in two of 20 patients (10%) but no grade 4 or 5 immune-related adverse events, and all patients underwent resection without treatment-related delays, meeting the primary endpoint of safety and feasibility. Tissue was obtained at multiple time points, allowing analysis of the effects of single-agent anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and the subsequent combination with chemotherapy on the TME. Twenty of 21 patients underwent surgery and were evaluable for secondary pathologic response and survival endpoints, and 19 were evaluable for exploratory translational analyses. A major pathologic response (≤10% residual viable tumor) was observed in 14 of 20 (70%, 95% confidence interval 46-88%) patients, including 9 (45%, 95% confidence interval 23-68%) pathologic complete responses. At a median follow-up of 47 months, 13 of 14 responders were alive and disease-free, and five of six nonresponders had died as a result of recurrence. Notably, baseline anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)+CD8+ T cell infiltration was significantly higher in responders versus nonresponders, and comparison of TME alterations following anti-PD-L1 monotherapy versus the subsequent combination with chemotherapy showed an increased immune activation on single-agent PD-1/L1 axis blockade. On the basis of these data, monotherapy anti-PD-L1 before its combination with chemotherapy warrants further exploration and validation in a larger cohort of patients with nonmetastatic G/GEJ cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03448835 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara L Verschoor
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris van de Haar
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - José G van den Berg
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jolanda M van Dieren
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sara Balduzzi
- Biometrics department, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cecile Grootscholten
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Alexander A F A Veenhof
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen J Hartemink
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke A Vollebergh
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Emilia C Owers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peggy den Hartog
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - John B A G Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Oncology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ton N Schumacher
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Emile E Voest
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Myriam Chalabi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lorenzen S, Götze TO, Thuss-Patience P, Biebl M, Homann N, Schenk M, Lindig U, Heuer V, Kretzschmar A, Goekkurt E, Haag GM, Riera-Knorrenschild J, Bolling C, Hofheinz RD, Zhan T, Angermeier S, Ettrich TJ, Siebenhuener AR, Elshafei M, Bechstein WO, Gaiser T, Loose M, Sookthai D, Kopp C, Pauligk C, Al-Batran SE. Perioperative Atezolizumab Plus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Docetaxel for Resectable Esophagogastric Cancer: Interim Results From the Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II/III DANTE/IKF-s633 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:410-420. [PMID: 37963317 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This trial evaluates the addition of the PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab (ATZ) to standard-of-care fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) as a perioperative treatment for patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA). METHODS DANTE started as multicenter, randomized phase II trial, which was subsequently converted to a phase III trial. Here, we present the results of the phase II proportion, focusing on surgical pathology and safety outcomes on an exploratory basis. Patients with resectable EGA (≥cT2 or cN+) were assigned to either four preoperative and postoperative cycles of FLOT combined with ATZ, followed by eight cycles of ATZ maintenance (arm A) or FLOT alone (arm B). RESULTS Two hundred ninety-five patients were randomly assigned (A, 146; B, 149) with balanced baseline characteristics between arms. Twenty-three patients (8%) had tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI), and 58% patients had tumors with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of ≥1. Surgical morbidity (A, 45%; B, 42%) and 60-day mortality (A, 3%; B, 2%) were comparable between arms. Downstaging favored arm A versus arm B (ypT0, 23% v 15% [one-sided P = .044]; ypT0-T2, 61% v 48% [one-sided P = .015]; ypN0, 68% v 54% [one-sided P = .012]). Histopathologic complete regression rates (pathologic complete response or TRG1a) were higher after FLOT plus ATZ (A, 24%; B, 15%; one-sided P = .032), and the difference was more pronounced in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10 (A, 33%; B, 12%) and MSI (A, 63%; B, 27%) subpopulations. Complete margin-free (R0) resection rates were relatively high in both arms (A, 96%; B, 95%). The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of the exploratory nature of the data, the addition of ATZ to perioperative FLOT is safe and improved postoperative stage and histopathologic regression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Lorenzen
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Thorsten Oliver Götze
- Frankfurter Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Chirurgische Klinik, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Homann
- Klinikum Wolfsburg, MED. Klinik II, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Michael Schenk
- Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Udo Lindig
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | | | | | - Eray Goekkurt
- Haematologisch-Onkologische Praxis Eppendorf, Universitäres Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Georg Martin Haag
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Claus Bolling
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Hämatologie/Onkologie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Tianzuo Zhan
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefan Angermeier
- RKH-Kliniken Ludwigsburg, Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Reinhard Siebenhuener
- Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Hirslanden Zurich AG, Zurich, Switzerland
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Wolf Otto Bechstein
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeral-, Transplantations- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Timo Gaiser
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maria Loose
- Frankfurter Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Disorn Sookthai
- Frankfurter Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christina Kopp
- Frankfurter Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claudia Pauligk
- Frankfurter Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
- Frankfurter Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
- Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yuan SQ, Nie RC, Jin Y, Liang CC, Li YF, Jian R, Sun XW, Chen YB, Guan WL, Wang ZX, Qiu HB, Wang W, Chen S, Zhang DS, Ling YH, Xi SY, Cai MY, Huang CY, Yang QX, Liu ZM, Guan YX, Chen YM, Li JB, Tang XW, Peng JS, Zhou ZW, Xu RH, Wang F. Perioperative toripalimab and chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:552-559. [PMID: 38167937 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02721-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer, and the addition of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor is under investigation. In this randomized, open-label, phase 2 study (NEOSUMMIT-01), patients with resectable gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer clinically staged as cT3-4aN + M0 were randomized (1:1) to receive either three preoperative and five postoperative 3-week cycles of SOX/XELOX (chemotherapy group, n = 54) or PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab plus SOX/XELOX, followed by toripalimab monotherapy for up to 6 months (toripalimab plus chemotherapy group, n = 54). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response or near-complete response rate (tumor regression grade (TRG) 0/1). The results showed that patients in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group achieved a higher proportion of TRG 0/1 than those in the chemotherapy group (44.4% (24 of 54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 30.9%-58.6%) versus 20.4% (11 of 54, 95% CI: 10.6%-33.5%)), and the risk difference of TRG 0/1 between toripalimab plus chemotherapy group and chemotherapy group was 22.7% (95% CI: 5.8%-39.6%; P = 0.009), meeting a prespecified endpoint. In addition, a higher pathological complete response rate (ypT0N0) was observed in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group (22.2% (12 of 54, 95% CI: 12.0%-35.6%) versus 7.4% (4 of 54, 95% CI: 2.1%-17.9%); P = 0.030), and surgical morbidity (11.8% in the toripalimab plus chemotherapy group versus 13.5% in the chemotherapy group) and mortality (1.9% versus 0%), and treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events (35.2% versus 29.6%) were comparable between the treatment groups. In conclusion, the addition of toripalimab to chemotherapy significantly increased the proportion of patients achieving TRG 0/1 compared to chemotherapy alone and showed a manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04250948 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Qiang Yuan
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Run-Cong Nie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Ying Jin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Cheng-Cai Liang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yuan-Fang Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Rui Jian
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Wei Sun
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Ying-Bo Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Wen-Long Guan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zi-Xian Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Hai-Bo Qiu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Shi Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Dong-Sheng Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yi-Hong Ling
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Shao-Yan Xi
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Mu-Yan Cai
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Chun-Yu Huang
- Department of Endoscopy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Qiu-Xia Yang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zhi-Min Liu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yuan-Xiang Guan
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yong-Ming Chen
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Xiong-Wen Tang
- Shanghai Junshi Biosciences, Shanghai, P. R. China
- TopAlliance Biosciences, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Jun-Sheng Peng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zhi-Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bozzarelli I, Orsini A, Isidori F, Mastracci L, Malvi D, Lugaresi M, Fittipaldi S, Gozzellino L, Astolfi A, Räsänen J, D’Errico A, Rosati R, Fiocca R, Seri M, Krishnadath KK, Bonora E, Mattioli S. miRNA-221 and miRNA-483-3p Dysregulation in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:591. [PMID: 38339342 PMCID: PMC10854562 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Alterations in microRNA (miRNA) expression have been reported in different cancers. We assessed the expression of 754 oncology-related miRNAs in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) samples and evaluated their correlations with clinical parameters. We found that miR-221 and 483-3p were consistently upregulated in EAC patients vs. controls (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: miR-221 p < 0.0001; miR-483-3p p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed worse cancer-related survival among all EAC patients expressing high miR-221 or miR-483-3p levels (log-rank p = 0.0025 and p = 0.0235, respectively). Higher miR-221 or miR-483-3p levels also correlated with advanced tumor stages (Mann-Whitney p = 0.0195 and p = 0.0085, respectively), and overexpression of miR-221 was associated with worse survival in low-risk EAC patients. Moreover, a significantly worse outcome was associated with the combined overexpression of miR-221 and miR-483-3p (log-rank p = 0.0410). To identify target genes affected by miRNA overexpression, we transfected the corresponding mimic RNA (miRVANA) for either miR-221 or miR-483-3p in a well-characterized esophageal adenocarcinoma cell line (OE19) and performed RNA-seq analysis. In the miRNA-overexpressing cells, we discovered a convergent dysregulation of genes linked to apoptosis, ATP synthesis, angiogenesis, and cancer progression, including a long non-coding RNA associated with oncogenesis, i.e., MALAT1. In conclusion, dysregulated miRNA expression, especially overexpression of miR-221 and 483-3p, was found in EAC samples. These alterations were connected with a lower cancer-specific patient survival, suggesting that these miRNAs could be useful for patient stratification and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isotta Bozzarelli
- Gastrointestinal Genetics Lab, CIC bioGUNE—BRTA, 48160 Derio, Spain;
| | - Arianna Orsini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy (L.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Federica Isidori
- Dipartimento di Genetica Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.I.); (D.M.); (M.L.); (S.F.); (A.D.)
| | - Luca Mastracci
- Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16100 Genoa, Italy; (L.M.); (R.F.)
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16100 Genoa, Italy
| | - Deborah Malvi
- Dipartimento di Genetica Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.I.); (D.M.); (M.L.); (S.F.); (A.D.)
- Institute of Oncology and Transplant Pathology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marialuisa Lugaresi
- Dipartimento di Genetica Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.I.); (D.M.); (M.L.); (S.F.); (A.D.)
| | - Silvia Fittipaldi
- Dipartimento di Genetica Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.I.); (D.M.); (M.L.); (S.F.); (A.D.)
| | - Livia Gozzellino
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy (L.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Annalisa Astolfi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy (L.G.); (M.S.)
| | - Jari Räsänen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00100 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Antonia D’Errico
- Dipartimento di Genetica Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.I.); (D.M.); (M.L.); (S.F.); (A.D.)
- Institute of Oncology and Transplant Pathology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Vita–Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Roberto Fiocca
- Pathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16100 Genoa, Italy; (L.M.); (R.F.)
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16100 Genoa, Italy
| | - Marco Seri
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy (L.G.); (M.S.)
- Dipartimento di Genetica Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.I.); (D.M.); (M.L.); (S.F.); (A.D.)
| | - Kausilia K. Krishnadath
- Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics (LEMP), Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, 2180 Antwerp, Belgium;
| | - Elena Bonora
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy (L.G.); (M.S.)
- Dipartimento di Genetica Medica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (F.I.); (D.M.); (M.L.); (S.F.); (A.D.)
| | - Sandro Mattioli
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, 48010 Cotignola, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zhou CQ, Gao D, Gui Y, Li NP, Guo WW, Zhou HY, Li R, Chen J, Zhang XM, Chen TW. Computed tomography-based nomogram of Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction to predict response to docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1. World J Radiol 2024; 16:9-19. [PMID: 38312347 PMCID: PMC10835430 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i1.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become the standard care for advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG), although a part of the patients cannot benefit from NAC. There are no models based on baseline computed tomography (CT) to predict response of Siewert type II or III AEG to NAC with docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1 (DOS). AIM To develop a CT-based nomogram to predict response of Siewert type II/III AEG to NAC with DOS. METHODS One hundred and twenty-eight consecutive patients with confirmed Siewert type II/III AEG underwent CT before and after three cycles of NAC with DOS, and were randomly and consecutively assigned to the training cohort (TC) (n = 94) and the validation cohort (VC) (n = 34). Therapeutic effect was assessed by disease-control rate and progressive disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1) criteria. Possible prognostic factors associated with responses after DOS treatment including Siewert classification, gross tumor volume (GTV), and cT and cN stages were evaluated using pretherapeutic CT data in addition to sex and age. Univariate and multivariate analyses of CT and clinical features in the TC were performed to determine independent factors associated with response to DOS. A nomogram was established based on independent factors to predict the response. The predictive performance of the nomogram was evaluated by Concordance index (C-index), calibration and receiver operating characteristics curve in the TC and VC. RESULTS Univariate analysis showed that Siewert type (52/55 vs 29/39, P = 0.005), pretherapeutic cT stage (57/62 vs 24/32, P = 0.028), GTV (47.3 ± 27.4 vs 73.2 ± 54.3, P = 0.040) were significantly associated with response to DOS in the TC. Multivariate analysis of the TC also showed that the pretherapeutic cT stage, GTV and Siewert type were independent predictive factors related to response to DOS (odds ratio = 4.631, 1.027 and 7.639, respectively; all P < 0.05). The nomogram developed with these independent factors showed an excellent performance to predict response to DOS in the TC and VC (C-index: 0.838 and 0.824), with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.838 and 0.824, respectively. The calibration curves showed that the practical and predicted response to DOS effectively coincided. CONCLUSION A novel nomogram developed with pretherapeutic cT stage, GTV and Siewert type predicted the response of Siewert type II/III AEG to NAC with DOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan-Qinyuan Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Dan Gao
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yan Gui
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ning-Pu Li
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Wen-Wen Guo
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hai-Ying Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Rui Li
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jing Chen
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Tian-Wu Chen
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| |
Collapse
|