Weight maintenance and additional weight loss with liraglutide after low-calorie-diet-induced weight loss: the SCALE Maintenance randomized study

Unlocking the multifaceted roles of GLP-1: Physiological functions and therapeutic potential

Glucagon (GCG) like peptide 1 (GLP-1) has emerged as a powerful player in regulating metabolism and a promising therapeutic target for various chronic diseases. This review delves into the physiological roles of GLP-1, exploring its impact on glucose homeostasis, insulin secretion, and satiety. We examine the compelling evidence supporting GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in managing type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity, and other diseases. The intricate molecular mechanisms underlying GLP-1RAs are explored, including their interactions with pathways like extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), activated protein kinase (AMPK), cyclic adenine monophosphate (cAMP), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and protein kinase C (PKC). Expanding our understanding, the review investigates the potential role of GLP-1 in cancers. Also, microribonucleic acid (RNA) (miRNAs), critical regulators of gene expression, are introduced as potential modulators of GLP-1 signaling. We delve into the link between miRNAs and T2D obesity and explore specific miRNA examples influencing GLP-1R function. Finally, the review explores the rationale for seeking alternatives to GLP-1RAs and highlights natural products with promising GLP-1 modulatory effects.

GLP-1 receptor agonists, are we witnessing the emergence of a paradigm shift for neuro-cardio-metabolic disorders?

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as groundbreaking therapeutic agents in managing a spectrum of metabolic disorders, demonstrating remarkable efficacy across multiple organ systems and disease states. These compounds are not only well-established in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity-conditions for which they have received widespread approval-but also exhibit promising potential in addressing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Recent investigations have begun to illuminate the utility of GLP-1RAs in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), as well as neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease and various behavioral disorders. A plethora of clinical trials have consistently validated the capacity of GLP-1RAs to improve glycemic control, promote weight loss, and mitigate cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with T2D and obesity. While their application in T1D remains limited due to safety concerns-particularly regarding the risks of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemic ketoacidosis-emerging data suggest that GLP-1RAs may offer hepatoprotective benefits, potentially reducing liver fat content and decelerating the progression of MASLD. The neuroprotective attributes of GLP-1 RAs have garnered significant interest, with research indicating their potential to alleviate cognitive decline associated with neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, preliminary findings highlight the role of GLP-1 RAs in addressing behavioral disorders, emphasizing their extensive therapeutic promise. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current evidence supporting the diverse therapeutic applications of GLP-1RAs, positioning them as "magic drug" therapies for metabolic and neurological disorders. As ongoing research continues to explore innovative applications and combinations of GLP-1RAs, the landscape of disease management in metabolic and neurological contexts is poised for transformative advancements. This review will also critically assess safety considerations and underscore the need for personalized treatment strategies to optimize patient outcomes in these complex and often comorbid conditions.

Real-world use of liraglutide for weight management according to label in the United Kingdom: A cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink primary care databases

AIMS

To assess real-world use of Saxenda® (liraglutide 3.0 mg) and off-label use of Victoza® (liraglutide 1.2 mg/1.8 mg) for weight management and Saxenda® posology in the United Kingdom. Their similar doses and formulation pose a risk of inadvertent use due to their use for different indications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, non-interventional drug utilization cohort study (DUS), based on anonymized patient data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink databases (CPRD Aurum, GOLD), included adult liraglutide initiators without prior prescription 12 months before the index date. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize Saxenda® and Victoza® user demographics and drug utilization.

RESULTS

Totally 604 Saxenda® and 4853 Victoza® patients were included. Approximately half of the Saxenda® initiators (Si's) (N = 306) had available body weight, of which 96.4% initiated treatment according to the weight loss indication. Si's were more likely female than Victoza® initiators (Vi's) (86.4% vs. 52.1%), younger (mean age ± SD: 46.5 ± 11.7 years) versus (57.5 ± 12.0 years) and with shorter duration of follow-up observation (18.8 ± 13.9 months) versus (32.9 ± 15.9 months). N < 5 of 16 patients with 24-weeks body mass index (BMI) data did not adhere to the Saxenda® stopping rule. N < 5 of 92 patients with valid dose used Victoza® outside the diabetes indication.

CONCLUSIONS

This DUS provides descriptive data for initiators of liraglutide in the initial 5-year period following the launch of Saxenda® in the United Kingdom. Real-world use of Saxenda® and Victoza® raised no new safety concerns. Where assessment was possible, Saxenda® and Victoza® were mostly prescribed by physicians according to their approved indications.

Effects of six months treatment with liraglutide among patients with psoriasis and obesity, beyond metabolic control?

INTRODUCTION

Obesity and psoriasis are two closely related chronic diseases and share multiple comorbidities. The common etiopathogenic basis would be a low-grade chronic inflammation, with a cross talk between adipose tissue and the skin. Obesity in patients with psoriasis results in a worse prognosis of the lesions and reduces the effectiveness of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the mid-term effect of liraglutide 3mg on anthropometric and morphofunctional, biochemical, and dermatological parameters in patients with psoriasis and obesity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

48 patients were included (52.1%♀, age 48.7±11.8 years, BMI 37.9±5.6kg/m2, psoriasis duration 17.8±11.1 years). The severity of the lesions was evaluated with the PASI (Psoriasis Area Severity Index) and the VAS (pain visual analog scale), and DLQI (Dermatology Quality Index) and the Beck depression test (BDI). Also, biochemical and anthropometric determinations were performed baseline and after 6 months.

RESULTS

There was a reduction in BMI (37.9±5.6 vs 35±4.9; p<0.001), waist circumference (111.6±7 vs 104.7±9.3cm; p=0.001) and preperitoneal fat (1.6±0.6 vs 1.2±0.6cm; p<0.0001). PASI (12±8.4 to 4.3±2.9; p<0.0001), VAS (4.4±1.9 vs 2.2±1.6; p=0.003), DLQI (11.9±6.2 vs 4.8±3.4; p<0.0001) and BDI (15.5±3.6 vs 7.6±2.5; p<0.0001) improved significantly. C-reactive protein (3.9±3.1 vs 1.8±3.2mg/L; p<0.0001), homocysteine (13±3.3 vs 9.6±2.5μmol/L; p<0.0001), and plasma cortisol (12.5±4 vs 8.9±3.7μg/dL; p=0.001). In multiple regression analysis, dermatological improvement was independent of weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Liraglutide exerts beneficial effects not only on BMI and visceral fat, but also reduces inflammatory parameters in patients with psoriasis and obesity, improving skin lesions and quality of life.

Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and incretin mimetics for type 2 diabetes and obesity: A narrative review

Incretin mimetics, including glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonists, have become first-line treatment options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Their therapeutic status is attributed to their high level of efficacy as well as positive impact on related comorbidities, such as sleep apnea and heart failure. Multiple incretin mimetics are currently available with different durations of drug action, dosing frequencies, and delivery devices. Patients may benefit from education on the proper drug administration, anticipated adverse effects, and nutrition considerations with treatment. Practitioners must monitor progress and support the patient to achieve maintenance doses for optimal weight reduction and diabetes-related outcomes. This review aims to present the current literature supporting US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications of incretin mimetics, equip healthcare professionals to optimize care for patients who are prescribed these agents, and provide insights into potential future applications, which may include dual- or triple-mechanism agents that are injected or administered orally. Additional studies are anticipated with existing and future incretin mimetics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and related comorbidities in a rapidly developing therapeutic pipeline.

Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-Based Therapies on Cardiovascular Events and Cardiometabolic Parameters in Obese Individuals Without Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The cardioprotective effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA)-based therapies in nondiabetic individuals with overweight or obesity remain underexplored. This meta-analysis evaluates their impact on cardiovascular events and metabolic parameters in this population.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception to June 18, 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling nondiabetic adults with overweight or obesity. These studies compared GLP-1RA-based therapies with placebo and reported cardiovascular events and metabolic parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 29 RCTs involving 9 GLP-1RA-based drugs and 37 348 eligible participants were included. Compared to placebo, GLP-1RA-based therapies significantly reduced the risk of total cardiovascular events (relative risk: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.76, 0.87]), major adverse cardiovascular events (0.80, [0.72, 0.89]), myocardial infarction (0.72, [0.61, 0.85]), and all-cause mortality (0.81, [0.71, 0.93]). No significant differences were observed in cardiovascular death or stroke. Additionally, GLP-1RA-based therapies were associated with significant reductions in some cardiometabolic parameters. Among GLP-1RA-based therapies, orfroglipron demonstrated strong benefits in reducing systolic blood pressure (mean difference: -7.10 mmHg, 95% CI: [-11.00, -2.70]). Tirzepatide induced the greatest reduction in body mass index (-6.50 kg/m2, [-7.90, -5.10]) and hemoglobin A1c concentrations (-0.39%, [-0.52, -0.26]). Retatrutide and semaglutide were most effective in improving lipid profiles and reducing C-reactive protein levels (-1.20 mg/dL, [-1.80, -0.63]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In nondiabetic individuals with overweight or obesity, GLP-1RA-based therapies significantly reduce cardiovascular events and improve cardiometabolic parameters. These findings underscore the potential for individualized GLP-1RA-based therapies targeting cardiovascular risk factors.

Suicide and Self-Harm Events With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Adults With Diabetes or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Bariatric surgery, once the criterion standard in obesity treatment, has a small but concerning association with increased suicidality. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), originally developed to treat diabetes, now provide substantial efficacy in the treatment of obesity. However, concerns of risk of suicidality with these medicines have been raised.

Objective

To evaluate the risk of suicidality and self-harm in randomized, placebo-controlled trials of GLP-1 RAs in adults with diabetes or obesity.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from inception to August 29, 2023.

Study Selection

Reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) lasting 6 or more months comparing GLP-1 RAs with placebo for the treatment of diabetes or obesity published in peer-reviewed journals were identified. Two independent reviewers screened all search-identified studies for inclusion. Records of outcomes were queried from primary papers, ClinicalTrials.gov entries, and corresponding authors.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two independent researchers abstracted data and assessed data quality and validity using PRISMA guidelines. Data were pooled using random-effects models.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Pooled incidence of completed or attempted suicide, occurrences of suicidal ideation, or self-harm.

Results

A total of 27 of 144 RCTs meeting inclusion criteria systematically recorded suicide and/or self-harm-related events and included 32 357 individuals receiving GLP-1 RAs and 27 046 treated with placebo, over 74 740 and 68 095 person-years of follow-up, respectively. Event incidence was very low in the GLP-1 RA (0.044 per 100 person-years) and placebo (0.040 per 100 person-years) groups, with no statistically significant difference (rate ratio [RR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.48-1.21; P = .24). Subgroup analyses did not suggest differences in outcomes based on diabetes status or GLP-1 RA used. Five studies were considered at risk of bias due to the loss of more than 5% of participants to follow-up. Otherwise, studies were not found to be heterogeneous nor at high risk of bias.

Conclusions and Relevance

There is unlikely to be an increase in the very low incidence of suicide-related adverse events among individuals receiving GLP-1 RAs within the context of RCTs. While these findings may further ease concerns about these adverse effects, continued monitoring is warranted to identify particular patients who may be at risk as extended use of GLP-1 RAs expands.

Weight Reduction with GLP-1 Agonists and Paths for Discontinuation While Maintaining Weight Loss

Worldwide, nearly 40% of adults are overweight and 13% are obese. Health consequences of excess weight include cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and increased mortality. Treating obesity is challenging and calorie restriction often leads to rebound weight gain. Treatments such as bariatric surgery create hesitancy among patients due to their invasiveness. GLP-1 medications have revolutionized weight loss and can reduce body weight in obese patients by between 15% and 25% on average after about 1 year. Their mode of action is to mimic the endogenous GLP-1, an intestinal hormone that regulates glucose metabolism and satiety. However, GLP-1 drugs carry known risks and, since their use for weight loss is recent, may carry unforeseen risks as well. They carry a boxed warning for people with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. Gastrointestinal adverse events (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) are fairly common while pancreatitis and intestinal obstruction are rarer. There may be a loss of lean body mass as well as premature facial aging. A significant disadvantage of using these medications is the high rate of weight regain when they are discontinued. Achieving success with pharmacologic treatment and then weaning to avoid future negative effects would be ideal.

What is the evidence regarding the safety of new obesity pharmacotherapies

The use of gut-hormone receptors agonists as new therapeutic options for obesity and some of its related comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes, has resulted in an unprecedented efficacy in the medical management of people living with obesity (PLWO). Appraisal of the safety of these drugs is of utmost importance considering the large number of PLWO, and the potentially long exposure to these pharmacotherapies. In this narrative review we summarize the evidence on the safety of liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide as derived from randomized clinical trials conducted in adults living with obesity. Additionally, the safety of these drugs is put into perspective with that of other drugs currently approved for the treatment of PLWO. Overall, the available data support a favorable efficacy versus safety balance for gut-hormone hormone receptor analogues in the treatment of these subjects. Nonetheless, it should be acknowledged that in the context of a chronic disease that has reached epidemic proportions, data from randomized clinical trials aimed primarily at proving the efficacy of these drugs may have been insufficient to unveil all the safety issues. Thus, continuous surveillance on the adverse effects of liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide is required as we use these drugs in a broader population than that represented in currently available clinical trials.

Obesity in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Are GLP-1 Receptor Agonists the New Frontier?

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disorder presenting with painful and draining nodules in intertriginous areas that may progress to sinus tracts. There is an increased prevalence of obesity in HS, and obesity may predispose patients to HS. Weight loss has been associated with improvement of HS symptoms. However, weight loss through diet modification, exercise or bariatric surgery has mixed results. Recently, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have been investigated for weight loss in HS. These drugs are effective for weight loss and reduce weight-related comorbidities, with few significant side effects. Early studies of liraglutide and semaglutide in HS have demonstrated improvement in disease severity and quality of life. GLP-1 receptor agonists are a promising therapy for patients with HS and may improve symptoms through decreased mechanical stress and moderation of inflammation.

Comparative Effectiveness of Semaglutide, Liraglutide, Orlistat, and Phentermine for Weight Loss in Obese Individuals: A Systematic Review

Obesity, a multifaceted and chronic condition characterized by excessive fat accumulation, poses significant risks to overall health and is associated with various metabolic and cardiovascular complications. This literature review evaluates and compares the effectiveness of four pharmacological agents semaglutide, liraglutide, orlistat, phentermine, and emerging agents like setmelanotide, amycretin, retatrutide, cagrilintide, and cotadutide in managing weight loss among obese. A detailed analysis was conducted on their mechanisms of action, dosing regimens, efficacy in weight loss, safety profiles, and their impact on obesity-related comorbidities. Although all agents presented distinct benefits, side effects such as gastrointestinal discomfort with orlistat and GLP-1 receptor agonists, and potential dependency with phentermine, necessitate tailored treatment approaches. This review highlights the importance of integrating pharmacotherapy with lifestyle interventions to achieve sustainable weight management and identifies areas for future research to optimize therapeutic outcomes for individuals with obesity.

Cutting-Edge Approaches to Obesity Management: The Latest Pharmacological Options

Successful treatment of obesity requires a multidisciplinary approach including dietary strategy, physical activity, and behavioral modification. The seven FDA-approved anti-obesity medications are phentermine, orlistat, phentermine/topiramate ER, naltrexone SR/bupropion SR, liraglutide 3.0 mg, semaglutide 2.4 mg, and tirzepatide. Obesity is a chronic disease and these medications should be prescribed with the intention of long-term use. In this article, we summarize data from phase 3 clinical trials which led to drug approval, and we review the clinical indications, mechanism of action, dosing/administration, side effects, drug interactions and contraindications for each medication.

The pleiotropic effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a review for gastroenterologists

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), and dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) or glucagon receptor agonists have emerged as promising agents to treat metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Although the beneficial effects of GLP-1RAs on glycemic control and weight are well-established, clinicians may be unfamiliar with other potential benefits of this class.

AREAS COVERED

We examined the pleiotropic effects of GLP-1RAs and how they relate to gastroenterologists for MASLD/MASH treatment. Our narrative review of English articles included four GLP-1RAs (subcutaneous semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and efpeglenatide), a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist (tirzepatide), a dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist (survodutide), MASLD/MASH, related disorders, clinical management, treatment outcomes and landscape.

EXPERT OPINION

In Phase I - III trials, GLP-1RAs are associated with clinically relevant hepatic improvements including MASH resolution, liver fat reduction, and preventing worsening fibrosis. Effects on cardiometabolic parameters align with type 2 diabetes/obesity Phase III data, comprising substantial improvements in glycemic, weight, and cardiovascular outcomes. Promising data also suggest benefits in common comorbidities, including obstructive sleep apnea, polycystic ovary syndrome, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.GLP-1RAs represent a valuable pharmacotherapeutic option for gastroenterologists managing individuals with MASLD/MASH and cardiometabolic comorbid conditions.

Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence

The prevalence of obesity in older adults (people aged >60 years) is increasing in line with the demographic shift in global populations. Despite knowledge of obesity-related complications in younger adults (increased risk of type 2 diabetes, liver and cardiovascular disease and malignancy), these considerations may be outweighed, in older adults, by concerns regarding weight-loss induced reduction in skeletal muscle and bone mass, and the awareness of the 'obesity paradox'. Obesity in the elderly contributes to various obesity-related complications from cardiometabolic disease and cancer, to functional decline, worsening cognition, and quality of life, that will have already suffered an age-related decline. Lifestyle interventions remain the cornerstone of obesity management in older adults, with emphasis on resistance training for muscle strength and bone mineral density preservation. However, in older adults with obesity refractory to lifestyle strategies, pharmacotherapy, using anti-obesity medicines (AOMs), can be a useful adjunct. Recent evidence suggests that intentional weight loss in older adults with overweight and obesity is effective and safe, hence a diminishing reluctance to use AOMs in this more vulnerable population. Despite nine AOMs being currently approved for the treatment of obesity, limited clinical trial evidence in older adults predominantly focuses on incretin therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide). AOMs enhance weight loss and reduce cardiometabolic events, while maintaining muscle mass. Future randomised controlled trials should specifically evaluate the effectiveness of novel AOMs for long-term weight management in older adults with obesity, carefully considering the impact on body composition and functional ability, as well as health economics.

The promise of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) for the treatment of obesity: a look at phase 2 and 3 pipelines

INTRODUCTION

GLP-1-based therapies have changed the treatment of overweight/obesity. Liraglutide 3.0 mg daily, the first GLP-1 RA approved for treatment of overweight, induced a weight loss of 6-8%, Semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly improved weight loss to about 12-15%, while the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide once weekly has induced a weight loss of about 20% in obese people without diabetes.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes results obtained with GLP-1 mono-agonists, GLP-1/GIP dual agonists, GLP-1/glucagon co-agonists, and the triple agonist retatrutide (GIP/GLP-1/glucagon), which have shown beneficial effect both on body weight and steatotic liver disease. A combination of semaglutide (a GLP-1 agonist) and cagrilintide (a long-acting amylin analogue) for weekly administration is currently in phase III development, and so is oral semaglutide and several non-peptide small molecule GLP-1 agonists for oral administration. The adverse events with the GLP-1-based therapies are primarily gastrointestinal and include nausea, vomiting, obstipation, or diarrhea, which often can be mitigated by slow up titration.

EXPERT OPINION

The GLP-1-based therapies will change the treatment of obesity and its comorbidities including steatotic liver disease in the future. Outstanding question is maintenance of the weight loss, possibly pharmacological treatment needs to be life-long.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement

The global prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past four decades, currently affecting more than a billion individuals. Beyond its recognition as a high-risk condition that is causally linked to many chronic illnesses, obesity has been declared a disease per se that results in impaired quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Notably, two-thirds of obesity-related excess mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease. Despite the increasingly appreciated link between obesity and a broad range of cardiovascular disease manifestations including atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, thromboembolic disease, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, obesity has been underrecognized and sub-optimally addressed compared with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. In the view of major repercussions of the obesity epidemic on public health, attention has focused on population-based and personalized approaches to prevent excess weight gain and maintain a healthy body weight from early childhood and throughout adult life, as well as on comprehensive weight loss interventions for persons with established obesity. This clinical consensus statement by the European Society of Cardiology discusses current evidence on the epidemiology and aetiology of obesity; the interplay between obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac conditions; the clinical management of patients with cardiac disease and obesity; and weight loss strategies including lifestyle changes, interventional procedures, and anti-obesity medications with particular focus on their impact on cardiometabolic risk and cardiac outcomes. The document aims to raise awareness on obesity as a major risk factor and provide guidance for implementing evidence-based practices for its prevention and optimal management within the context of primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Long-Term Weight Loss Outcomes in a Virtual Weight Care Clinic Prescribing a Broad Range of Medications Alongside Behavior Change

Background

Virtually-delivered obesity care has the potential to increase access to weight loss interventions at scale. While there is ample literature assessing various weight loss interventions, studies specifically demonstrating outcomes of commercial programs offering antiobesity medications in virtual care settings are lacking.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study assessed the weight loss outcomes of 66,094 participants in a virtual weight care program that prescribes antiobesity medications alongside a digital behavior change program. Outcomes included the primary endpoint of percent weight loss at 12 months, as well as absolute change in body weight, change in body mass index (BMI), categorical weight loss at three, six, and 12 months, and stratifications by program engagement and medication type (first vs. second generation antiobesity medications).

Results

At program enrollment, members were on average 42.6 years old and 91.5% female, with a BMI of 36.0 kg/m2. At 12 months, the mean percent weight loss was 8.0%, with weight loss increasing over time from 2.9 kg (SD = 3.7, Cohen's d = 0.8) at 3 months, to 5.8 kg (SD = 6.1, Cohen's d = 0.9) at 6 months, to 8.0 kg (SD = 8.7, Cohen's d = 0.9) at 12 months (p < 0.001 for all time points). At 12 months, 64.2% had achieved ≥ 5% weight loss. Weight loss outcomes increased with program engagement. At 12 months, those engaging at least once weekly lost 10.0% of body weight, while those logging weight at least weekly lost 12.0%.

Conclusion

This study provides real-world evidence that users of a virtual commercial weight care clinic who were prescribed antiobesity medications achieved clinically significant weight loss at six and 12 months. These findings support the value of virtual platforms in efficiently scaling access to high-quality weight care.

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on blood pressure in overweight or obese patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are novel medications with proven efficacy in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, and are increasingly being used for weight loss. They may potentially have benefit in treating metabolic disorders; however, evidence is sparse with regards to treating high blood pressure (BP). We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression investigating the efficacy of GLP-1 RAs in lowering BP in obese or overweight patients.

METHODS

Three electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception to 13 February 2024. Pair-wise meta-analysis and random effects meta-regression models were utilized. Fixed effects meta-analysis was used to unify treatment effects across different GLP-1 RA doses.

RESULTS

We included a total of 30 RCTs with a combined population of 37 072 patients. GLP-1 RAs demonstrated a mean systolic BP (SBP) reduction of -3.37 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.95 to -2.80] and a mean diastolic BP (DBP) reduction of -1.05 mmHg (95% CI -1.46 to -0.65) compared with placebo. This effect was consistent across subgroups for diabetic status, formulation of GLP-1 RA, follow-up duration and route of administration for both SBP and DBP, with the exception of subgroups investigating exenatide. Meta-regression suggested no significant correlation between BP reduction and baseline characteristics such as age, percentage of male patients, HbA1c, weight, BMI, and percentage of patients with hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis suggests significant BP reduction benefits from GLP-1 RA use in obese or overweight patients, consistent across diabetic status, duration of treatment, and across route of administration.

GLP-1 and the Neurobiology of Eating Control: Recent Advances

Obesity is now considered a chronic relapsing progressive disease, associated with increased all-cause mortality that scales with body weight, affecting more than 1 billion people worldwide. Excess body fat is strongly associated with excess energy intake, and most successful anti-obesity medications (AOMs) counter this positive energy balance through the suppression of eating to drive weight loss. Historically, AOMs have been characterized by modest weight loss and side effects which are compliance-limiting, and in some cases life-threatening. However, the field of obesity pharmacotherapy has now entered a new era of AOMs based on analogues of the gut hormone and neuropeptide glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). The latest versions of these drugs elicit unprecedented levels of weight loss in clinical trials, which are now starting to be substantiated in real-world usage. Notably, these drugs reduce weight primarily by reducing energy intake, via activation of the GLP-1 receptor on multiple sites of action primarily in the central nervous system, although the most relevant sites of action, and the neural circuits recruited remain contentious. Here we provide a targeted synthesis of recent developments in the field of GLP-1 neurobiology, highlighting studies which have advanced our understanding of how GLP-1 signaling modulates eating, and identify open questions and future challenges we believe still need to be addressed to aid the prevention and/or treatment of obesity.

Management of obesity

PURPOSE

This review summarizes the comprehensive management of obesity with a focus on the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of anti-obesity medications.

SUMMARY

Obesity is a highly prevalent chronic disease with significant health risks, requiring a multifaceted approach to treatment. While most approved weight loss medications have modest effects, newer medications such as semaglutide and tirzepatide have shown greater than 15% reduction in baseline weight. Optimal selection of therapy requires taking into consideration patient factors, such as comorbidities and goals, and medication-related factors, including weight loss efficacy, contraindications, and improvements in cardiovascular risk. As the availability of anti-obesity medications increases, multidisciplinary care teams will play an important role in selecting optimal strategies for long-term health benefits in individuals with obesity.

CONCLUSION

The expanding array of anti-obesity medications provides valuable treatment options alongside lifestyle interventions and surgical approaches for managing obesity and reducing weight-related health risks. As this therapeutic area continues to grow, selecting optimal agents and educating patients on administration, monitoring, and potential adverse effects will be critical for improving overall outcomes.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonists: A Practical Overview for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, such as exenatide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide, effectively manage type 2 diabetes by promoting insulin release, suppressing glucagon secretion, and enhancing glucose metabolism. They also aid weight reduction and cardiovascular health, potentially broadening their therapeutic scope. In plastic surgery, they hold promise for perioperative weight management and glycemic control, potentially impacting surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted to assess GLP-1 agonists' utilization in plastic surgery. We analyzed relevant studies, meta-analyses, and trials to evaluate their benefits and limitations across surgical contexts, focusing on weight reduction, glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and potential complications.

RESULTS

Studies demonstrate GLP-1 agonists' versatility, spanning weight management, cardiovascular health, neurological disorders, and metabolic dysfunction-associated liver diseases. Comparative analyses highlight variations in glycemic control, weight loss, and cardiometabolic risk. Meta-analyses reveal significant reductions in hemoglobin A1C levels, especially with high-dose semaglutide (2 mg) and tirzepatide (15 mg). However, increased dosing may lead to gastrointestinal side effects and serious complications like pancreatitis and bowel obstruction. Notably, GLP-1 agonists' efficacy in weight reduction and glycemic control may impact perioperative management in plastic surgery, potentially expanding surgical candidacy for procedures like autologous flap-based breast reconstruction and influencing outcomes related to lymphedema. Concerns persist regarding venous thromboembolism and delayed gastric emptying, necessitating further investigation into bleeding and aspiration risk with anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1 agonists offer advantages in perioperative weight management and glycemic control in plastic surgery patients. They may broaden surgical candidacy and mitigate lymphedema risk but require careful consideration of complications, particularly perioperative aspiration risk. Future research should focus on their specific impacts on surgical outcomes to optimize their integration into perioperative protocols effectively. Despite challenges, GLP-1 agonists promise to enhance surgical outcomes and patient care in plastic surgery.

Medical Weight Management Considerations in Plastic Surgery

SUMMARY

Obesity is one of the greatest public health concerns in the United States and has reached an epidemic scope over the past few decades. Plastic surgery in patients with obesity has been linked to higher complication rates both before and after weight loss. This article discusses the evolution and landscape of antiobesity medications as they apply to plastic surgery. Although bariatric surgery has been effective in long-term treatment, new pharmacologic advances in glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, such as semaglutide, have demonstrated promising effectiveness. These medications pose several unique challenges, particularly with regard to perioperative management and risk of weight regain after discontinuation. An understanding of these new pharmacologic agents is crucial for plastic surgeons, who treat patients with obesity.

Revised definition of obesity in Asian Indians living in India

AIM

The prevailing guidelines for obesity in Asian Indians, published in 2009, relied solely on body mass index (BMI) criteria. Recognizing the limitations of BMI in accurately diagnosing obesity and the emergence of new research revealing the association between generalized and abdominal adiposity in Asian Indians and early-onset co-morbid diseases, a comprehensive redefinition was needed.

METHOD

In a Delphi process focused on obesity in India, experts were invited via email to participate in five rounds. The survey questions were administered through Google Form to gather insights from the selected experts.

RESULTS

In Stage 1 Obesity, individuals exhibit increased adiposity (BMI>23 kg/m2) without discernible effects on organ functions or daily activities. Stage 2 Obesity denotes a more advanced state characterized by heightened adiposity (generalized and abdominal), impacting both physical and organ functions, resulting in functional limitations during day-to-day activities, and contributing to co-morbid diseases. The criteria for Stage 2 Obesity include a mandatory BMI exceeding 23 kg/m2 and at least one of the following: excess waist circumference or waist-to-height ratio. Additionally, the presence of one or more symptoms indicative of limitations in daily activities or one or more obesity-related comorbid conditions/diseases are needed to support the stage 2 obesity.

CONCLUSION

This refined framework seeks to enhance precision in identifying obesity and its associated health risks among Asian Indians living in India, and facilitation of rational management, and aligns with worldwide initiative of new definition of obesity.

Efficacy of antiobesity medications for weight reduction in older adults: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine weight reduction and adverse events associated with use of antiobesity medications (AOMs) in older adults ages ≥65 years.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched for studies evaluating weight reduction of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved AOMs. Studies had to include adults ages ≥65 years with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 or ≥27 kg/m2 with one weight-related condition), with independent analysis of weight reduction for adults ages ≥65 years. Two coauthors extracted and evaluated studies for risk of bias using standardized forms.

RESULTS

Six experimental studies (five secondary analyses of randomized clinical trial data and one single-arm trial) and two observational studies met inclusion criteria. Seven medications were studied. Sample size of older adults ranged from 13 to 6728. Experimental studies predominantly included patients with concurrent prediabetes or cardiovascular disease. All studies found statistically significant weight reduction between intervention and placebo groups or compared with baseline weight. Few studies reported on adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence suggests weight reduction of AOMs in older adults, with the best current evidence for the use of semaglutide in older adults with obesity and cardiovascular disease. Larger, more inclusive studies of older adults are needed to guide clinical care and determine the tolerability of AOMs for older adults.

[The GLP-1 analogue battle: effects of semaglutide 0,5 mg/weekly versus liraglutide 3 mg/daily on anthropometric parameters after 3 months in a real world-scenario]

Introduction

Background: the prevalence of obesity is reaching a pandemic status. The SCALE trials showed that liraglutide 3 mg among people with obesity (PwO) was effective to reduce bodyweight and related complications. The fact that almost two-thirds of patients did not achieve the desired weight loss with the maximum dose of liraglutide made almost mandatory the development of other pharmacological options. The STEP 1-5 trials showed the effectiveness of semaglutide in reducing bodyweight in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, the STEP 8 trial proved the superiority of semaglutide 2,4 mg/week versus liraglutide 3 mg/daily. We aimed to assess the effects of subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide 0.5 mg/weekly compared with s.c. liraglutide 3 mg/daily in PwO on anthropometric parameters in a real world-scenario for 3 months. Methods: we retrospectively evaluated 179 PwO (91.9 % ♀, 45.7 ± 10 years, and 33.3 ± 7 kg/m2) who received treatment with aGLP-1 as add-on therapy to lifestyle interventions. Patients were evaluated at baseline and after 3 months. Ninety-nine patients were prescribed s.c. semaglutide 0.5 mg/weekly with an off-label indication for weight reduction. These patients were compared with 80 patients treated with s.c. liraglutide 3 mg/daily. The main reason for prescribing of s.c. semaglutide was economic. Body composition was evaluated using a bioimpedance device (Tanita MC 580M®). Results: baseline weight was significantly greater with semaglutide compared to liraglutide (97.19 ± 21.09 vs. 90.73 ± 21.88 kg; p < 0.01) as was fat mass (42.43 ± 15.04 vs. 34.84 ± 16.07 kg; p < 0.01), whereas baseline lean mass was lesser among subjects treated with semaglutide (31.62 ± 7.56 vs 45.69 ± 15.51 kg; p < 0.01). PwO experienced a significant reduction in weight using s.c. semaglutide 0.5 mg/weekly (96.67 ± 20.83 vs. 91.44 ± 19.6 kg; p < 0.01) or s.c. liraglutide 3 mg/daily (90.73 ± 21.88 vs. 80.13 ± 18.38 kg; p < 0.01) No significant differences were seen between the amount of weight lost (5.28 ± 4.22 vs 5.72 ± 1.62 kg; p = 0.5) in the two groups. Furthermore, both groups were comparable in fat mass (2.69 ± 5.34 vs 0.96 ± 4.22 kg; p = 0.3) and fat-free mass (0.86 ± 1.63 vs 1.03 ± 0.94 kg; p = 0.07) after 3 months of treatment with both aGLP1. Side effects were gastrointestinal and transient/comparable between groups Conclusions: subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 mg and subcutaneous liraglutide 3 mg are effective treatments for reducing weight safely among PwO in a real-world scenario at short term and without a negative impact on fat-free mass. Moreover, low doses of semaglutide were similar to liraglutide 3 mg in reducing bodyweight at short term.

Retrospective review of seven patients with obesity simultaneously treated with a combination of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and a meal replacement product

Background

The use of meal replacement products (MRPs) to obtain a caloric deficit while maintaining micro- and macronutrient requirements, has a long tradition in obesity medicine. Limitations include low compliance, variability in efficacy, adverse events (related to acute changes in nutrient intake), and risk of weight regain when discontinued, and their popularity has declined after the emergence of potent GLP-1 receptor analogues (GLP1-RAs). However, GLP-1RAs have limitations, including dose-dependent risk for adverse events (AEs), high cost, as well as weight regain when discontinued. Although concomitant use of MRPs and GLP-1RAs could address some of the limitations, there is a scarcity of data reported on this. Herein we report real world clinical experience of such combined use.

Methods

This retrospective case evaluation involved people with obesity that concomitantly used MRPs (Optifast) and a GLP-1RA and were followed at one of three weight management centers in Australia or South Africa. Parameters collected were gender, age, co-morbidities, height, weight, frequency/amount of MRPs used, dose/type of GLP-1RA used, duration of combined use, and occurrence of AEs. Written informed consent for use of data was obtained from each individual, and the data were managed in an anonymized form and summarized descriptively.

Result

A total of seven (5 females) individuals (mean [min, max] age 49 [30,66] years, BMI 44.8 [30.7, 57.9] kg/m2) initiated either semaglutide (n=4) or liraglutide (n=3) concomitantly with daily MRPs (starting number of servings/day 2.7 [1,6]) for a duration of 12 [4, 25] months. Change in weight/BMI/% TBW was -32.0 (-9.6, -77.8) kg/-10.3 (-3.4, -24.5) kg/m2/-24.2 %. Five individuals experienced ≥1 GLP-1RA related AE (nausea, reflux, burping, diarrhea, constipation). One individual discontinued GLP-1RA, whereas two persons discontinued the use of MRPs.

Conclusions

MRPs can be initiated concomitantly with a GLP-1 RA for weight management. This might enhance weight-loss effectiveness, with potential additional benefits that should be elucidated in further and larger studies.

Representation of racialised and ethnically diverse populations in multicentre randomised controlled trials of GLP-1 medicines for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of gaps

INTRODUCTION

Trials of GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) medicines have changed the paradigm of obesity treatment. Diversity in trial participation is imperative considering that obesity disproportionately impacts marginalised populations worldwide. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to evaluate the representation of racialised and ethnically diverse populations in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of GLP-1 medicines for obesity.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/Embase/ClinicalTrials.gov. Prevalence of each racial/ethnic group was compared in relation to the USA, Canada, the UK, Brazil and South Africa. The geographical locations of the trial sites were extracted.

RESULTS

27 RCTs were identified (n=21 547 participants). Meta-analyses of prevalence demonstrated the vast predominance of white/Caucasians (79%) with smaller proportion of blacks (9%), Asians (13%), Indigenous (2%) and Hispanics (22%). The gaps in representation were evidenced by the significantly under-represented proportion of non-white individuals in these RCTs as compared with the prevalence of non-white individuals in the general population of the USA (-23%, p=0.002) and Canada (-34%, p<0.0001), reaching an alarming gap of -58% in relation to Brazil and striking under-representation of -68% as compared with South Africa. Similar discrepancies in proportions of blacks, Asians and Indigenous peoples as compared with reference nations were found. Moreover, the trial sites (n=1859) were predominately located in high-income countries (84.2%), in sharp contrast to the global prevalence of obesity that is predominantly in low-income and middle-income countries.

CONCLUSION

There are discrepancies in representation of racialised and ethnically diverse populations in obesity trials as compared with multiethnic populations worldwide. These data highlight the need for broader reform in the research process in order to ultimately address health inequities.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Obesity in adults and its impact on comorbidities: 2024 Update and Position Statement of Specialists from the Brazilian Association for the Study of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome (Abeso) and the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM)

Pharmacological treatment of obesity is passing through many changes in the last decades; different agents have been approved, and newer options are leaning towards higher efficacy and a more favourable safety profile; however, medications approved for a longer time are still available and useful for many patients. This document is an 2024 Update Position Statement of Specialists from the Brazilian Association for the Study of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome (Abeso) and the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM), with the aim of reviewing all the approved medications for the management of obesity in Brazil (sibutramine, orlistat, liraglutide, semaglutide and bupropion/naltrexone fixed dose), with the addition of tirzepatide, that is approved in other countries and likely approved soon in Brazil. The review is focused on efficacy, safety profile and the impact of drugs (based on existing studies) on different comorbidities.

First-Generation Anti-Obesity Medications

The development of second-generation anti-obesity medications (AOMs) has transformed the treatment of obesity. However, the first-generation AOMs are still essential tools in the treatment of obesity. The decision of which AOM to initiate must be individualized taking into account patient preference, safety, tolerability, cost, and supply.

Effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on weight and cardiovascular outcomes: A review

Diet and lifestyle modifications remain the foundation of obesity treatment, but they have historically proven insufficient for significant, long-term weight loss. As a result, there is a high demand for new pharmacologic treatments to promote weight loss and prevent life-threatening diseases associated with obesity. Researchers are particularly interested in 1 type of drug, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), because of its promising potential in addressing the limitations of non-pharmacologic treatments. In addition to their role in weight loss, these drugs have shown promising early evidence of cardiovascular benefits in obese patients, further enhancing their clinical relevance. Semaglutide and liraglutide, which were initially approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, have since been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as weight loss medications due to their effectiveness in promoting significant and sustained weight loss. In this narrative review, we will explore the mechanism of GLP-1 RAs, their effects on weight loss, cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes, common adverse effects, and strategies for managing these effects.

Lead-in calorie restriction enhances the weight-lowering efficacy of incretin hormone-based pharmacotherapies in mice

OBJECTIVES

The potential benefits of combining lifestyle changes with weight loss pharmacotherapies for obesity treatment are underexplored. Building on recent clinical observations, this study aimed to determine whether "lead-in" calorie restriction before administering clinically approved weight loss medications enhances the maximum achievable weight loss in preclinical models.

METHODS

Diet-induced obese mice (DIO) were exposed to 7 or 14 days of calorie restriction before initiating treatment with semaglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist), tirzepatide (a GLP-1R/glucose insulinotropic peptide receptor (GIPR) co-agonist), or setmelanotide (a melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) agonist). Follow-up assessments using indirect calorimetry determined the contributions of energy intake and expenditure linked to consecutive exposure to dieting followed by pharmacotherapy.

RESULTS

Calorie restriction prior to treatment with semaglutide or tirzepatide enhanced the weight loss magnitude of both incretin-based therapies in DIO mice, reflected by a reduction in fat mass and linked to reduced energy intake and a less pronounced adaptive drop in energy expenditure. These benefits were not observed with the MC4R agonist, setmelanotide.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide compelling evidence that calorie restriction prior to incretin-based therapy enhances the achievable extent of weight loss, as reflected in a weight loss plateau at a lower level compared to that of treatment without prior calorie reduction. This work suggests that more intensive lifestyle interventions should be considered prior to pharmacological treatment, encouraging further exploration and discussion of the current standard of care.

Real-World Clinical Effectiveness of Liraglutide for Weight Management in Türkiye: Insights from the LIRA-TR Study

Introduction: Obesity is a complicated chronic disease associated with a series of other conditions. A weight loss of 5-10% has been shown to reduce obesity-related complications and improve quality of life. The efficacy and safety of liraglutide for reducing body weight have been demonstrated in clinical trials. This study evaluated the weight loss efficacy and adverse effects of liraglutide in those with obesity in the Turkish population. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study; the patients that were included had a body mass index (BMI) of 27 or greater with additional comorbidities or a BMI of 30 or greater, and the patients were prescribed liraglutide for obesity treatment from the tertiary private clinic between January 2022 and January 2024. Their metabolic and anthropometric parameters were recorded at the initial appointment, and their body weight and adverse effects were followed up on during therapy. Results: For the 568 patients, of whom 487 (85.6%) were female, the mean values for age, weight, and BMI were 42.37 ± 10.50, 98.09 ± 17.48 kg, and 35.77 ± 5.45 kg/m2, respectively. Reductions in body weight at the 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th weeks were 6.45 ± 2.32 kg, 10.66 ± 3.41 kg, 15.38 ± 8.30 kg, and 19 ± 9.06 kg, respectively; reductions in BMI at the 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th weeks were 2.36 ± 1.00, 3.88 ± 1.25, 5.36 ± 1.76, and 7.09 ± 2.93, respectively; and the percentages of overall body weight loss at the 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th weeks were 6.62 ± 2.1%, 10.75 ± 2.71%, 14.97 ± 6.8%, and 18.55 ± 4.63%, respectively (all p values < 0.0001). The percentage of patients who lost more than 5% and more than 10% of their initial weight was 100% at the 24th week. The most common side effect was nausea; no pancreatitis was observed. Conclusions: The results of our study indicate that liraglutide is an efficacious and safe treatment option for obesity in the Turkish population, in accordance with the findings from previous research.

Weight Loss Therapies and Hypertension Benefits

Obesity and hypertension have become an international health issue, with detrimental consequences on patients. Obesity and hypertension share common pathophysiological mechanisms, such as overactivity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and the sympathetic nervous systems, insulin resistance, and disruption of the leptin pathway. Approved therapies for obesity and overweight include phentermine/topiramate, orlistat, naltrexone/bupropion, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists liraglutide and semaglutide, tirzepatide, and bariatric surgery. This review gives the clinical data in a thorough manner and explains in detail how each of the previously mentioned therapies affects blood pressure levels.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement

The global prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past four decades, currently affecting more than a billion individuals. Beyond its recognition as a high-risk condition that is causally linked to many chronic illnesses, obesity has been declared a disease per se that results in impaired quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Notably, two-thirds of obesity-related excess mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease. Despite the increasingly appreciated link between obesity and a broad range of cardiovascular disease manifestations including atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, thromboembolic disease, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, obesity has been underrecognized and sub-optimally addressed compared with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. In the view of major repercussions of the obesity epidemic on public health, attention has focused on population-based and personalized approaches to prevent excess weight gain and maintain a healthy body weight from early childhood and throughout adult life, as well as on comprehensive weight loss interventions for persons with established obesity. This clinical consensus statement by the European Society of Cardiology discusses current evidence on the epidemiology and aetiology of obesity; the interplay between obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac conditions; the clinical management of patients with cardiac disease and obesity; and weight loss strategies including lifestyle changes, interventional procedures, and anti-obesity medications with particular focus on their impact on cardiometabolic risk and cardiac outcomes. The document aims to raise awareness on obesity as a major risk factor and provide guidance for implementing evidence-based practices for its prevention and optimal management within the context of primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Weight Loss Pharmacotherapy: Current and Future Therapies

The rising prevalence of obesity is of major concern. There are currently 5 Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for the treatment of obesity: orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, naltrexone/bupropion, liraglutide 3.0 mg, and semaglutide 2.4 mg. Surgical options such as bariatric surgery and endoscopic surgery induce more durable weight loss than pharmacotherapy or lifestyle interventions alone. However, patients often experience weight regain and weight loss plateau after surgery. The addition of multimodal or multihormonal pharmacotherapy is a promising tool to address these challenges. The optimal timing of obesity pharmacotherapy with surgical and endoscopic interventions requires further investigation.

Remission of type 2 diabetes: position statement of the Italian society of diabetes (SID)

The primary cause of the pandemic scale of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the excessive and/or abnormal accumulation of adiposity resulting from a chronic positive energy balance. Any form of weight loss dramatically affects the natural history of T2D, favoring prevention, treatment, and even remission in the case of significant weight loss. However, weight regain, which is often accompanied by the recurrence or worsening of obesity complications such as T2D, is an inevitable biological phenomenon that is an integral part of the pathophysiology of obesity. This can occur not only after weight loss, but also during obesity treatment if it is not effective enough to counteract the physiological responses aimed at restoring adiposity to its pre-weight-loss equilibrium state. Over the past few years, many controlled and randomized studies have suggested a superior efficacy of bariatric surgery compared to conventional therapy in terms of weight loss, glycemic control, and rates of T2D remission. Recently, the therapeutic armamentarium in the field of diabetology has been enriched with new antihyperglycemic drugs with considerable efficacy in reducing body weight, which could play a pathogenetic role in the remission of T2D, not through the classical incretin effect, but by improving adipose tissue functions. All these concepts are discussed in this position statement, which aims to deepen the pathogenetic links between obesity and T2D, shift the paradigm from a "simple" interaction between insulin resistance and insulin deficiency, and evaluate the efficacy of different therapeutic interventions to improve T2D management and induce diabetes remission whenever still possible.

The role of incretin receptor agonists in the treatment of obesity

INTRODRODUCTION

Obesity and its associated metabolic conditions have become a significant global health problem in recent years, with many people living with obesity fulfilling criteria for pharmacological treatment. The development of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for chronic weight management has triggered new interest in the incretins and other hormones as targets for obesity, and investigations into dual and triple co-agonists.

METHODS

The objective of this narrative review was to summarize the available data on approved and emerging incretin-based agents for the treatment of obesity.

RESULTS

In clinical trials of currently available agents in people with overweight or obesity, weight loss of between 6% and 21% of baseline body weight has been observed, with between 23% and 94% of participants achieving 10% or higher weight loss, depending on the study and the agent used. Favourable outcomes have also been seen with regard to cardiovascular risk and outcomes, diabetes prevention, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/steatohepatitis and prevention of weight regain after metabolic surgery. Limitations associated with these agents include high costs, the potential for weight regain once treatment is stopped, the potential loss of lean body mass and gastrointestinal adverse events; potential issues with respect to gallbladder and biliary diseases require further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Many dual and triple co-agonists are still in development, and more data are needed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of these emerging therapies versus the established incretin-based therapies; however, data are promising, and further results are eagerly awaited.

Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for Behavior Change in Physiological Health Outcomes and the Use Case for Knee Osteoarthritis: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in the adult population is high and patients profit from individualized therapy approaches. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) are upcoming digital interventions for behavior change.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review summarizes the features and effectiveness of existing JITAIs regarding important physiological health outcomes and derives the most promising features for the use case of KOA.

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO were searched using keywords related to JITAIs, physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB), physical function, quality of life, pain, and stiffness. JITAIs for adults that focused on the effectiveness of at least 1 of the selected outcomes were included and synthesized qualitatively. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment Tool Effective Public Health Practice Project.

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies with mainly weak overall quality were included in this review. The studies were mostly focused on PA and SB and no study examined stiffness. The design of JITAIs varied, with a frequency of decision points from a minute to a day, device-based measured and self-reported tailoring variables, intervention options including audible or vibration prompts and tailored feedback, and decision rules from simple if-then conditions based on 1 variable to more complex algorithms including contextual variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of frequent decision points, device-based measured tailoring variables accompanied by user input, intervention options tailored to user preferences, and simple decision rules showed the most promising results in previous studies. This can be transferred to a JITAI for the use case of KOA by using target variables that include breaks in SB and an optimum of PA considering individual knee load for the health benefits of patients.

Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality under treatment with GLP-1 RAs or the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide in overweight or obese adults without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Among the currently approved antiobesity medications, the glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor-agonists (GLP-1 RAs) liraglutide and semaglutide, and the dual glucose-dependent-insulinotropic-polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 RA tirzepatide have been suggested to reduce cardiovascular-risk in overweight or obesity without diabetes.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to evaluate the cardio- and neuroprotective potential of these novel agents in the nondiabetic overweight/obese adult population.

Data sources and methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to estimate the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in overweight or obese adults without diabetes treated with GLP-1 or GIP/GLP-1 RAs (vs placebo). Secondary outcomes included the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke.

Results

Sixteen RCTs (13 and 3 on GLP-1 RAs and tirzepatide, respectively) comprising 28,168 participants were included. GLP-1 or GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduced MACE (odds ratio (OR): 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-0.89; p < 0.01; I 2 = 0) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.70-0.92; p < 0.01; I 2 = 0), while there was a trend toward lower cardiovascular-mortality (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-1.01; p = 0.06; I 2 = 0%) compared to placebo. Additionally, GLP-1 or GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduced the odds of MI (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61-0.86; p < 0.01; I 2 = 0%) and nonfatal-MI (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61-0.85; p < 0.01; I 2 = 0%); while no associations between antiobesity treatment and fatal-MI, stroke, nonfatal, or fatal stroke were uncovered.

Conclusion

GLP-1 and GIP/GLP-1 RAs reduce cardiovascular-risk and all-cause mortality in overweight or obese adults without diabetes. Additionally, GLP-1 RAs and GIP/GLP-1 RAs attenuate the risk of MI. Since data on stroke are still limited, future RCTs are warranted to evaluate the neuroprotective potential of these novel antiobesity agents.

Trial registration

PROSPERO CRD42024515966.

Metabolomic Effects of Liraglutide Therapy on the Plasma Metabolomic Profile of Patients with Obesity

BACKGROUND

Liraglutide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1RA), is a well-established anti-diabetic drug, has also been approved for the treatment of obesity at a dose of 3 mg. There are a limited number of studies in the literature that have looked at changes in metabolite levels before and after liraglutide treatment in patients with obesity. To this end, in the present study we aimed to explore the changes in the plasma metabolomic profile, using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) in patients with obesity.

METHODS

A single-center prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of 3 mg liraglutide therapy in twenty-three patients (M/F: 8/15) with obesity, mean BMI 40.81 ± 5.04 kg/m2, and mean age of 36 ± 10.9 years, in two groups: at baseline (pre-treatment) and after 12 weeks of treatment (post-treatment). An untargeted metabolomic profiling was conducted in plasma from the pre-treatment and post-treatment groups using LC-HRMS, along with bioinformatics analysis using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA).

RESULTS

The metabolomics analysis revealed a significant (FDR p-value ≤ 0.05, FC 1.5) dysregulation of 161 endogenous metabolites (97 upregulated and 64 downregulated) with distinct separation between the two groups. Among the significantly dysregulated metabolites, the majority of them were identified as belonging to the class of oxidized lipids (oxylipins) that includes arachidonic acid and its derivatives, phosphorglycerophosphates, N-acylated amino acids, steroid hormones, and bile acids. The biomarker analysis conducted using MetaboAnalyst showed PGP (a21:0/PG/F1alpha), an oxidized lipid, as the first metabolite among the list of the top 15 biomarkers, followed by cysteine and estrone. The IPA analysis showed that the dysregulated metabolites impacted the pathway related to cell signaling, free radical scavenging, and molecular transport, and were focused around the dysregulation of NF-κB, ERK, MAPK, PKc, VEGF, insulin, and pro-inflammatory cytokine signaling pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that liraglutide treatment reduces inflammation and modulates lipid metabolism and oxidative stress. Our study contributes to a better understanding of the drug's multifaceted impact on overall metabolism in patients with obesity.

Use of liraglutide after bariatric surgery: a 36-month follow-up in a real-world setting in Chile

Objective

Bariatric surgery has several benefits, including sustainable weight loss and improvement or resolution of metabolic comorbidities. However, despite initially successful weight loss, weight regain occurs during long-term follow-up, and many patients are unable to reach or maintain their target weight goals. Liraglutide is a therapy for obesity aimed at preventing weight regain.

Materials and methods

This retrospective, observational, single-arm, pre-post study was performed to analyze the relative change in body weight among patients receiving liraglutide after bariatric surgery in a real-world setting in Chile.

Results

Treatment with liraglutide at a median dose of 1.2 mg was associated with a mean weight loss from baseline to 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of 5%, 7.7%, 7.6%, 5.8%, and 5.1%, respectively. The mean body mass index reduction was 14.8% at 36 months. Dropout rates were consistent with those of usual obesity treatments. Overall, 70% of the patients were receiving other weight-loss drugs. Liraglutide was well tolerated, but cost barriers led to several patients interrupting its use.

Conclusion

Liraglutide is an effective and safe treatment for weight reduction after bariatric surgery in patients receiving routine clinical care in Chile.

Label-free quantitative proteomic profiling reveals differential plasma protein expression in patients with obesity after treatment with liraglutide

Introduction

Treatment and management of obesity is clinically challenging. The inclusion of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) in the medical management of obesity has proven to be efficacious. However, mechanisms underlying the molecular changes arising from GLP1RA treatment in patients with obesity remain to be elucidated.

Methods

A single-center, prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the changes in the plasma proteins after liraglutide 3 mg therapy in twenty patients (M/F: 7/13) with obesity (mean BMI 40.65 ± 3.7 kg/m2). Anthropometric and laboratory parameters were measured, and blood samples were collected at two time points: baseline, before initiating treatment (pretreatment group, PT), and after three months of receiving the full dose liraglutide 3 mg (posttreatment group, PoT). An untargeted label-free LC MSMS mass spectrometric approach combined with bioinformatics and network pathway analysis was used to determine changes in the proteomic profiles.

Results

The mean age of the study participants was 36.0 ± 11.1 years. A statistically significant change was observed in weight, BMI and HbA1c levels between the PT and PoT groups (paired t-test, P < 0.001). A significant dysregulation was noted in the abundances of 151 proteins (31 up and 120 downregulated) between the two groups. The potential biomarkers were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The top ten proteins (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.999 (95% CI)) were identified as potential biomarkers between PT and PoT groups and included Cystatin-B, major vault protein, and plastin-3, which were upregulated, whereas multimerin-2, large ribosomal P2, and proline-rich acidic protein 1 were downregulated in the PoT group compared with the PT group. The top network pathway identified using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), centered around dysregulation of MAPK, AKT, and PKc signaling pathways and related to cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, cellular assembly and organization, cellular compromise and a score of 46 with 25 focus proteins.

Discussion

Through label-free quantitative proteomic analysis, our study revealed significant dysregulation of plasma proteins after liraglutide 3 mg treatment in patients with obesity. The alterations in the proteomic profile between the PT and PoT groups demonstrated a decrease in levels of proteins involved in inflammation and oxidative stress pathways. On the other hand proteins involved in the glycolytic and lipolytic metabolic pathways as well as those participating in cytoskeletal and endothelial reorganization were observed to be increased. Understanding actions of liraglutide at a molecular and proteomic levels provides a holistic look into how liraglutide impacts metabolism, induces weight loss and improves overall metabolic health.

Comparison of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists vs. placebo on any cardiovascular events in overweight or obese non-diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) have been extensively used to treat obesity in recent years. These novel drugs are effective at reducing body weight and also the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, the data of its efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in individuals without type 2 diabetes is not as robust. We aim to update and conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the same.

Methods

The study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guideline. Researchers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Clinicaltrails.gov for English literature from inception to 2024. Randomized Controlled trails enrolling adult participants (age ≥ 18 years) who are overweight or obese (BMI > 25 Kg/m2) with a comparison of all cardiovascular events between patients taking GLP1-RA and placebo were included. The analysis was done by Revman version 5.4.

Results

A total of 17 RCTs among 34,419 participants were included in the analysis. The pooled risk ratio from 17 studies illustrated that patients with GLP-1 RA had a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events compared to patients who had a placebo (RR = 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.89, p-value = 0.0008). Semaglutide was found to have a statistically significant greatest risk reduction than other drug types.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis found that GLP-1 RA significantly reduced all types of cardiovascular events in overweight and obese patients without diabetes. Semaglutide was found to be superior to others in CV event reductions. But still, the results of ongoing trials are needed.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=553048, PROSPERO (CRD42024553048).

Approved and Emerging Hormone-Based Anti-Obesity Medications: A Review Article

Obesity is a heterogeneous, complex, and chronic disease that has a detrimental impact on disability-adjusted life years across the globe. Recent advancements in our understanding of gut-brain communication at the molecular level have driven the development of next-generation anti-obesity medications (AOMs). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) remain the front-runners in this rapidly evolving landscape of hormone-based AOMs. Two GLP1RAs, namely Liraglutide and Semaglutide, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicine Agency (EMA) for use in clinical practice for weight loss. Three oral GLP1RAs, namely Semaglutide, Danuglipron, and Orforglipron, are undergoing advanced clinical trials in individuals with obesity. Amylin receptor agonist (AMYRA) Cagrilintide, when used alone or in combination with Semaglutide, has demonstrated substantial weight reduction in clinical trials. Tirzepatide, a dual agonist for the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and GLP-1 receptors, has been observed to be associated with a significant placebo-subtracted weight reduction of 17.8% in a 72-week randomized controlled trial. Novel approaches targeting glucagon signalling have also yielded promising preliminary results. Three long-acting GLP1R/glucagon receptor (GCGR) dual agonists, namely Survodutide, Mazdutide, and Pemvidutide, exhibited significant weight loss in clinical trials. Retatrutide, a GLP1R/GCGR/GIPR tri-agonist, has been associated with a placebo-subtracted weight reduction of -22.1% in a 48-week phase-II trial. As a note of caution, long-term data on such medications' safety and cardiovascular benefits is yet to be ascertained. Our review provides a comprehensive overview of the approved and emerging hormone-based AOMs, highlighting the diversity of options that might become available in the near future.

Effectiveness and safety of a GLP-1 agonist in obese patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

obesity affects many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 agonists are a promising therapy for obese patients. However, there is a lack of evidence of the use of these drugs in IBD patients. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of GLP-1 agonists in a cohort of obese patients with IBD.

METHODS

a retrospective series of cases of consecutive IBD patients who received GLP-1 agonists indicated to treat obesity between 2019 and 2021 was analyzed. The GLP-1 agonists included were semaglutide 1.0 mg or liraglutide 3.0 mg. The coprimary endpoints were the percentage of change in body weight from baseline to six months and a weight reduction of 5 % or more at six months. In addition, the safety profile of GLP-1 agonist therapy and its impact on the IBD course were reviewed.

RESULTS

sixteen obese patients with IBD (nine with Crohn's disease [CD] and seven with ulcerative colitis [UC]) were included in the study. The median body mass index at baseline was 35 (32-37). The percentage of change in body weight was -6.2 % (-3.4-[-8.5]) at six months, and a 5 % or more weight reduction was achieved in 58.3 % (7/12) of patients at six months. The most common side effect was nausea (13.3 %), and one patient withdrew due to diarrhea. IBD activity score did not change significantly during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

our results showed that GLP-1 agonists were effective and had a good safety profile in IBD patients. Most adverse effects were mild, and the IBD activity had no significant changes.

Opportunities to optimize lifestyle interventions in combination with glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapy

Obesity is a chronic multi-system disease and major driver of type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic disease. Nutritional interventions form the cornerstone of obesity and type 2 diabetes management. Some interventions such as Mediterranean diet can reduce incident cardiovascular disease, probably independently of weight loss. Weight loss of 5% or greater can improve many adiposity-related comorbidities. Although this can be achieved with lifestyle intervention, it is often difficult to sustain in the longer term due to adaptive endocrine changes. In recent years glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as effective treatments for both type 2 diabetes and obesity. Newer GLP-1RAs can achieve average weight loss of 15% or greater and improve cardiometabolic health. There is heterogeneity in the weight loss response to GLP-1RAs, with a substantial number of patients unable to achieve 5% or greater weight. Weight loss, on average, is lower in older adults, male patients and people with type 2 diabetes. Mechanistic studies are needed to understand the aetiology of this variable response. Gastrointestinal side effects leading to medication discontinuation are a concern with GLP-1RA treatment, based on real-world data. With weight loss of 20% or higher with newer GLP-1RAs, nutritional deficiency and sarcopenia are also potential concerns. Lifestyle interventions that may potentially mitigate the side effects of GLP-1RA treatment and enhance weight loss are discussed here. The efficacy of such interventions awaits confirmation with well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Incretin hormone agonists: Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for obesity management

Obesity continues to be a significant global health challenge, affecting over 800 million individuals worldwide. Traditional management strategies, including dietary, exercise, and behavioral interventions, often result in insufficient and unsustainable weight loss. Lifestyle modification remains the cornerstone of obesity management, providing the foundation for other strategies. While options such as bariatric surgery remain an effective intervention for severe obesity, it is associated with its own set of risks and is typically reserved for patients who have not achieved the desired results with pharmacotherapy and lifestyle interventions. Incretin hormone agonists represent a significant advancement in the pharmacotherapy of obesity, offering substantial weight reduction and cardiometabolic benefits. Agents like liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide supported by key clinical trials such as Satiety and Clinical Adipose Liraglutide Evidence (SCALE), Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity (STEP) program trials, and Tirzepatide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Obesity (SURMOUNT-1) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in promoting weight loss and improving metabolic outcomes. Additionally, novel therapies, including dual and triple incretin agonists, are under investigation and hold the potential for further advancements in obesity treatment. These novel therapies can be categorized by their mechanisms of action and route of administration into oral glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, triple agonists (targeting GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP], and glucagon receptors), and glucagon receptor-GLP-1 receptor co-agonists. Other innovative approaches include oral GIP-GLP-1 receptor co-agonists, and the combination of long-acting amylin receptor agonists with GLP-1 receptor agonists. The ongoing development of incretin-based therapies and the expanding availability of currently available agents are expected to enhance clinical outcomes further and reduce the burden of obesity-related health complications. This review aims to discuss the mechanisms and efficacy of current and emerging incretin hormone agonists for obesity management.

Medications for Obesity: A Review

Importance

Obesity affects approximately 19% of women and 14% of men worldwide and is associated with increased morbidity. Antiobesity medications (AOMs) modify biological processes that affect appetite and significantly improve outcomes, such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.

Observations

AOMs should be administered in combination with lifestyle interventions and can be classified according to their mechanisms of action. Orlistat modifies digestive tract absorption and causes gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as oily fecal spotting and urgency, in more than 25% of patients. Centrally acting drugs, such as phentermine-topiramate and naltrexone-bupropion, regulate appetite in the brain and are associated with constipation in approximately 20% of patients, although the incidence of other adverse effects (eg, paresthesia, nausea) varies by medication. Nutrient-stimulated hormone-based medications, such as liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide, mimic the actions of enteropancreatic hormones that modify central appetite regulation and provide multiple cardiometabolic weight-loss benefits. Adverse effects of these drugs include nausea (28%-44%), diarrhea (21%-30%), and constipation (11%-24%). The relative potency of adult obesity medications has been studied in meta-analyses. Compared with placebo, orlistat was associated with 3.1% greater weight loss (52 randomized clinical trials [RCTs]; 16 964 participants), phentermine-topiramate was associated with 8.0% greater weight loss (5 RCTs; 3407 participants), naltrexone-bupropion was associated with 4.1% greater weight loss (6 RCTs; 9949 participants), liraglutide was associated with 4.7% greater weight loss (18 RCTs; 6321 participants), semaglutide was associated with 11.4% greater weight loss (5 RCTs; 4421 participants), and tirzepatide 15 mg was associated with 12.4% greater weight loss (6 RCTs; 1972 participants).

Conclusion and Relevance

Obesity is associated with increased morbidity. Antiobesity medications are effective adjunctive therapy to lifestyle changes for improved weight loss and health outcomes.

Impact of mitigating obesity, smoking, and physical inactivity on type 2 diabetes mellitus burden in Oman: insights from mathematical modeling

INTRODUCTION

To estimate the impact of reducing obesity, smoking, and physical inactivity (PIA) prevalence, and of introducing physical activity (PA) as an explicit intervention, on the prevalence, incidence, and mortality of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Oman.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A deterministic population-level mathematical model was employed to investigate the impact of different scenarios for reducing T2DM risk factors on T2DM epidemiology. The model was stratified by sex, age group, risk factor status, T2DM status, and intervention status and parameterized with nationally representative data. Intervention scenarios were calculated and compared with a baseline (no-intervention) scenario for changes in T2DM prevalence, incidence, and mortality among adult Omanis between 2020 and 2050.

RESULTS

In the no-intervention scenario, T2DM prevalence increased from 15.2% in 2020 to 23.8% in 2050. Achieving the goals of halting the rise of obesity, reducing smoking by 30%, and reducing PIA by 10% as outlined in the WHO's Global Action Plan for Non-communicable Diseases (implemented between 2020 and 2030 and then maintained between 2031 and 2050) would reduce T2DM prevalence by 32.2%, cumulative incidence by 31.3%, and related deaths by 19.3% by 2050. Halting the rise of or reducing obesity prevalence by 10%-50% would reduce T2DM prevalence by 33.0%-51.3%, cumulative incidence by 31.9%-53.0%, and related deaths by 19.5%-35.6%. Reducing smoking or PIA prevalence by 10%-50% would lead to smaller reductions of less than 5% in T2DM prevalence, cumulative incidence, and related deaths. Introducing PA with varying intensities at a 25% coverage would reduce T2DM prevalence by 4.9%-14.1%, cumulative incidence by 4.8%-13.8%, and related deaths by 3.4%-9.6% by 2050.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention-for-prevention efforts targeting obesity reduction and introducing PA could result in major reductions in the T2DM burden. Prioritizing such interventions could alleviate the burden of T2DM in Oman and other countries with similarly high T2DM and obesity burdens.