Dapagliflozin across the range of ejection fraction in patients with heart failure: a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis of DAPA-HF and DELIVER

Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone Across the Ejection Fraction Spectrum in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Prespecified Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Trial

BACKGROUND

The effects of treatments for heart failure (HF) may vary among patients according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In FINEARTS-HF (Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure), the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone reduced the risk of cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. We examined the effect of finerenone according to LVEF in FINEARTS-HF.

METHODS

FINEARTS-HF was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial examining the efficacy and safety of finerenone in patients with HF and LVEF ≥40%. The treatment effect of finerenone was examined in prespecified analyses according to LVEF categories (<50%, ≥50% to <60%, and ≥60%) and with LVEF as a continuous variable. The primary outcome was a composite of total (first and recurrent) worsening HF events and cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

Baseline LVEF data were available for 5993 of the 6001 participants in FINEARTS-HF. Mean and median LVEF were 53±8% and 53% (interquartile range, 46%-58%), respectively. LVEF was <50% in 2172 (36%), between 50% and <60% in 2674 (45%), and ≥60% in 1147 (19%). Patients with higher LVEF were older, were more commonly female, were less likely to have a history of coronary artery disease, and more frequently had a history of hypertension and chronic kidney disease compared with those with a lower LVEF. Finerenone reduced the risk of cardiovascular death and total HF events consistently across LVEF categories (LVEF <50% rate ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.68-1.03]; LVEF ≥50% to <60% rate ratio, 0.80 [0.66-0.97]; and LVEF ≥60% rate ratio, 0.94 [0.70-1.25]; Pinteraction=0.70). There was no modification of the benefit of finerenone across the range of LVEF when analyzed as a continuous variable (Pinteraction=0.28). There was a similar consistent effect of finerenone on reducing the total number of worsening HF events (continuous Pinteraction=0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, finerenone reduced the risk of cardiovascular death and worsening HF events, irrespective of LVEF.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04435626. URL: https://eudract.ema.europa.eu; Unique identifier: 2020-000306-29.

Sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors: Will these drugs benefit non-diabetic veterinary patients with cardiac and kidney diseases?

Sodium glucose transporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been introduced into human medicine where their beneficial effects go beyond the expected improvement in blood glucose control. These drugs appear to prevent progression of both cardiovascular and kidney diseases, not only in diabetic but also in non-diabetic human patients. As these drugs have received conditional approval for use in diabetic cats and are being used in other veterinary species, the intriguing question as to whether they will have similar cardioprotective and nephroprotective effects in dogs and cats is being asked. The primary mechanism(s) by which SGLT2 inhibitors are cardio- and nephroprotective remain to be fully characterized. This paper reviews these suggested mechanisms in the context of the pathophysiology of progressive cardiovascular and kidney diseases in dogs and cats with the goal of predicting which categories of non-diabetic veterinary patients these drugs might be of most benefit.

Research on rheumatic heart disease from 2013 to early 2024: a bibliometric analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to highlight potential future areas for the practical application of research on rheumatic heart disease (RHD), considering past and current research efforts.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in the WoSCC to find articles and reviews focused on RHD published between 2013 and 2024. Microsoft Excel 2019 was used to chart the annual productivity of research relevant to RHD, while ArcGIS (version 10.8) was employed to visualize the global distribution of publications. Analysis tools such as CiteSpace (version 6.1.R6) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.18) were utilized to identify the most prolific countries or regions, authors, journals, and resource-, intellectual-, and knowledge-sharing in RHD research, and to perform co-citation analysis of references and keywords. Additionally, the Bibliometrix R Package was used to analyze topic dynamics.

RESULTS

From the search, a total of 2,428 publications were retrieved. In terms of countries or regions, the United States was the most productive country (566, 23.31%). As for institutions, most publications have been contributed by the University of Cape Town (149, 6.14%). Regarding authors, Jonathan R. Carapetis produced the most published works, and he received the most co-citations. The most prolific journal was identified as the International Journal of Cardiology (70, 2.88%). The study published in Circulation received the most co-citations. Keywords with ongoing strong citation bursts included "surgical treatment" and "valvular heart disease".

CONCLUSION

Despite the rapid advancements in the field of RHD research, future efforts should prioritize strengthening collaboration among national institutions to facilitate information dissemination. Current research on RHD mainly focuses on prognosis of patients. While, the emerging research trends in RHD encompass treatment strategies for complications, including atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), and infective endocarditis, as well as screening strategies for RHD and surgical interventions for patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Fasting substrates predict chronic kidney disease progression in CREDENCE trial patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUNDSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors slow down progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We tested whether the circulating substrate mix is related to CKD progression and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and albuminuric CKD in the CREDENCE trial.METHODSWe measured fasting substrates in 2,543 plasma samples at baseline and 1 year after randomization to either 100 mg canagliflozin or placebo and used multivariate Cox models to explore their association with CKD progression, heart failure hospitalization/cardiovascular death (hHF/CVD), and mortality.RESULTSHigher baseline lactate and free fatty acids (FFAs) were independently associated with a lower risk of CKD progression (HR = 0.73 [95% CI: 0.54-0.98] and HR = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.48-0.95], respectively) and hHF/CVD HR = 0.70 [95% CI: 0.50-0.99] and HR = 0.63 [95% CI: 0.42-0.94]). Canagliflozin led to a rise in plasma FFAs, glycerol, β-hydroxybutyrate, and acetoacetate. Changes in substrate between baseline and year 1 predicted an approximately 30% reduction in relative risk of both CKD progression and hHF/CVD independently of treatment. More patients who did not respond to canagliflozin treatment in terms of CKD progression belonged to the bottom lactate and FFA distribution tertiles.CONCLUSIONIn T2D patients with albuminuric CKD, basic energy substrates selectively influenced major long-term endpoints; canagliflozin treatment amplified their effects by chronically raising their circulating levels.

Impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes and metabolic events in Chinese han patients with chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the real-world impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on the efficacy, safety, and metabolic profiles of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), both with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

A cohort of 1,130 patients with reduced ejection fraction chronic heart failure (HFrEF) was recruited from Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, spanning January 2021 to August 2023. Among these, 154 patients received SGLT2i therapy, while 131 patients were assigned to a non-SGLT2i group, following specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. The association between SGLT2i therapy and the risk of primary and secondary endpoints was analyzed, alongside the effect of guideline-recommended heart failure medications at varying dosages on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE).

RESULTS

SGLT2i treatment led to reductions in blood pressure, uric acid, NT-proBNP, and pulmonary artery pressure, while increasing body mass index (BMI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in CHF patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that SGLT2i therapy reduced the primary endpoint risk by 40.3% (HR 0.597, 95% CI 0.356-0.973, p = 0.047). Univariate Cox regression indicated that SGLT2i might also reduce the incidence of new diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, and MACE in CHF patients. Moreover, the use of a four-drug combination for heart failure management was associated with a lower risk of MACE compared to monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

SGLT2i therapy not only enhances LVEF but also significantly reduces ambulatory blood pressure, uric acid, fasting blood glucose, pulmonary artery pressure, and NT-proBNP levels in CHF patients. Additionally, SGLT2i improves prognosis by lowering the risk of both primary and secondary endpoints. Compared to monotherapy, a four-drug regimen for CHF substantially reduces the risk of MACE, supporting the effectiveness of comprehensive treatment strategies.

New and future heart failure drugs

In the past decade, our understanding of heart failure pathophysiology has advanced significantly, resulting in the development of new medications such as angiotensin-neprilysin inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators. Backed by positive findings from large randomized controlled trials, recommendations for their use were recently included in the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines and 2023 ESC guidelines for management of heart failure. Promising drugs for future heart failure treatment include agents that modulate the neurohormonal system, vasodilators, anti-inflammatory drugs, mitotropes, which improve deranged energy metabolism of the failing heart, and myotropes, which increase cardiac contractility by affecting cardiac sarcomere function. Here, we discuss these new and future heart failure drugs. We explain their mechanisms of action, critically evaluate their performance in clinical trials and summarize the clinical scenarios in which the latest guidelines recommend their use. This Review aims to offer clinicians and researchers a comprehensive overview of novel therapeutic classes in heart failure treatment.

SGLT2 inhibitors, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality across the spectrum of kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To evaluate the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality across KDIGO and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR] groups.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL up to August 8th, 2023. In pairs, researchers selected large randomized placebo-controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, with minimum duration of one year. Researchers independently extracted study-level data and assessed within-study risk of bias with RoB 2.0 and certainty of evidence with GRADE. Meta-analyses employed a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included 14 trials, encompassing 97,412 participants and a median follow-up of 2.5 years. Risk of bias was overall low. Overall, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 0.89, 95 %-CI 0.85-0.93), cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) (HR 0.78, 95 %-CI 0.75-0.82), all-cause death (HR 0.89, 95 %-CI 0.83-0.94), and HHF (HR 0.71, 95 %-CI 0.67-0.75). The effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on MACE was different across KDIGO (Pinteraction = 0.038) and UACR (Pinteraction = 0.008) groups, with greater benefits in KDIGO Very High (HR 0.72, 95 %-CI 0.61-0.86) and UACR > 300 mg/g (HR 0.76, 95 %-CI 0.68-0.86) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with reductions in cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. Greater reductions in MACE are expected in subjects in high-risk groups for kidney disease.

Rediscovery of the implication of albuminuria in heart failure: emerging classic index for cardiorenal interaction

The development of new drugs and device therapies has led to remarkable advancements in heart failure (HF) treatment in the past couple of decades. However, it becomes increasingly evident that guideline-directed medical therapy cannot be one-size-fits-all across a wide range of ejection fractions (EFs) and various aetiologies. Therefore, classifications solely relying on EF and natriuretic peptide make optimization of treatment challenging, and there is a growing exploration of new indicators that enable efficient risk stratification of HF patients. Particularly when considering HF as a multi-organ interaction syndrome, the cardiorenal interaction plays a central role in its pathophysiology, and albuminuria has gained great prominence as its biomarker, independent from glomerular filtration rate. Albuminuria has been shown to exhibit a linear correlation with cardiovascular disease and HF prognosis in multiple epidemiological studies, ranging from normal (<30 mg/g) to high levels (>300 mg/g). However, on the other hand, it is only recently that the details of the pathological mechanisms that give rise to albuminuria have begun to be elucidated, including the efficient compaction/tightening of the glomerular basement membrane by podocytes and mesangial cells. Interestingly, renal disease, diabetes, and HF damage these components associated with albuminuria, and experimental models have demonstrated that recently developed HF drugs reduce albuminuria by ameliorating these pathological phenotypes. In this review, facing the rapid expansion of horizons in HF treatment, we aim to clarify the current understanding of the pathophysiology of albuminuria and explore the comprehensive understanding of albuminuria by examining the clinically established evidence to date, the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to its occurrence, and the outcomes of clinical studies utilizing various drug classes committed to specific pathological mechanisms to put albuminuria as a novel axis to depict the pathophysiology of HF.

Why Have We Not Been Able to Demonstrate Reduced Mortality in Patients With HFmrEF/HFpEF?

No randomized controlled trial has yet demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in mortality in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection (HFmrEF) or heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in contrast to the benefits observed in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, this probably reflects the statistical power of trials to date to show an effect on mortality rather than mechanistic differences between HFmEF/HFpEF and HFrEF or differences in treatment efficacy. Compared to patients with HFrEF, those with HFmrEF/HFpEF have lower mortality rates and a smaller proportion of potentially modifiable cardiovascular deaths (as opposed to unmodifiable noncardiovascular deaths). In addition, some causes of cardiovascular deaths may not be reduced by treatments for HF. Therefore, the low rate of potentially modifiable deaths in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF, compared with HFrEF, has made it challenging to demonstrate a reduction in death (or cardiovascular death) in trials to date.

Protective Influence of SGLT-2 Inhibitors Against Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Through Longitudinal Clinical Database Analysis

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, initially designed for type 2 diabetes, promote glucose excretion and lower blood glucose. Newer analogs like empagliflozin and dapagliflozin improve cardiovascular outcomes through mechanisms other than glycemic control, including blood pressure reduction and anti-inflammatory effects. Given the high cardiovascular risk present in diabetes, our study aims to emphasize the cardioprotective benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors as a preventive therapy for heart failure (HF) in high-risk T2DM patients. Methods: Using data from 2542 patients identified by the ICD-10 E11 code from 2016 to 2020, this longitudinal study excluded those with E10 codes or those undergoing insulin treatment to focus on non-insulin-dependent T2DM. a multiple logistic regression model assessed HF incidence while adjusting for demographics and HbA1c. Results: SGLT-2 inhibitor use significantly lowered the odds of heart failure events (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.31-0.99, p = 0.046), with a significant difference by gender (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.28-0.71, p = 0.001) and eGFR (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, p = 0.004). Conclusions: The real-world data highlight SGLT-2 inhibitors as promising for HF prevention and broader cardiometabolic health in T2DM, with potential value in managing complex comorbid profiles.

Could SGLT2 inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with heart failure and significant valvular heart disease? Need for action

Delivering valvular intervention for all eligible patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) in a timely manner remains a challenge. Therefore, a high number of patients with heart failure (HF) and VHD receive pharmacotherapy while awaiting intervention or as destination therapy if they are deemed inoperable. The sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are recommended with a class I indication for patients with chronic HF throughout the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. However, all randomized trials of SGLT2i in HF patients have consistently excluded patients with significant VHD. Considering the proven benefit of SGLT2i for stable outpatients and acutely hospitalized patients with HF, SGLT2i could potentially be used for patients with HF secondary to significant VHD. This article highlights the unmet need to produce robust clinical evidence for the pharmacological management of patients with HF and significant VHD while summarizing the potential benefit from SGLT2i in the management of these patients.

Characteristics, Predictors, and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction According to a 1-Year Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Sacubitril/Valsartan Treatment

BACKGROUND

Optimal medical treatment can lead to improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF). We investigated the characteristics, predictors, and outcomes of HFrEF according to the 1-year LVEF following angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors therapy (ARNI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the STRATS-HF-ARNI (Strain for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Strategies in Patients With Heart Failure Treated With Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor) registry, we identified 1074 patients with HFrEF who took ARNI and underwent baseline and 1-year echocardiography. Patients were classified as HF with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) and persistent HFrEF (perHFrEF) (1-year LVEF >40% and ≤40%). The primary and secondary outcomes were all-cause and cardiac mortality from the 1-year follow-up. Among 1074 included patients, 498 (46.4%) had HFimpEF, and 576 (53.6%) had perHFrEF. Older age, male sex, and large LV end-diastolic volumes were positive predictors of perHFrEF, whereas atrial fibrillation and high systolic blood pressure were identified as inverse predictors. Patients with HFimpEF showed lower all-cause and cardiac mortality rates (both log-rank P<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, perHFrEF (hazard ratio, 2.402 [95% CI, 1.251-4.610]; P=0.008) was an independent predictor of poor outcomes. The risk of all-cause mortality decreased as the 1-year LVEF increased up to 40%; however, no additional risk reduction was observed beyond 40%. Compared with patients taking renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in the STRATS-AHF (Strain for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Strategies in Patients With Acute Heart Failure) registry, those in the STRATS-HF-ARNI registry demonstrated better outcomes in both HFimpEF and perHFrEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HFimpEF had better prognosis than those with perHFrEF, and ARNI treatment in HFrEF could be more beneficial than renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors for both HFimpEF and perHFrEF.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.who.int/clinical-trials-registry-platform; Unique identifier: KCT0008098.

Causes and predictors of recurrent unplanned hospital admissions in heart failure patients: a cohort study

Despite progress in therapy, heart failure (HF) inflicts a heavy burden of hospital admissions. In this study, we identified among 1360 community-dwelling HF patients (mean age 70.7 ± 11.3 years, 72.5% men) subgroups sharing similar profiles of unplanned hospital admissions, based on the admission causes and frequency of each cause. Hospital discharge summaries were reviewed for the main admission cause. Patient subgroups were identified via cluster analysis. We investigated baseline predictors associated with these subgroups, using multinomial logistic models. During 3421 patient-years, there were 5192 hospital admissions, of which 4252 (82%) were unplanned. We identified five patient subgroups (clusters 1-5) with distinctive hospitalization profiles. HF accounted for approximately one-third of admissions in the first patient cluster (23% of the patient sample). In contrast, patients in the second cluster (39% of the patient sample) were hospitalized for various reasons, with no single prominent admission cause identified. The other three clusters, comprising 16% of the patient sample, accounted for 42% of all unplanned hospitalizations. While patients in the third cluster were hospitalized mainly due to ischemic heart disease and arrhythmia, patients in the fourth and fifth clusters shared a high burden of recurrent HF admissions. The five patient clusters differed by baseline predictors, including age, functional capacity, comorbidity burden, hemoglobin, and cause of HF. HF patients differ significantly in the causes and overall burden of unplanned hospitalizations. The patient subgroups identified and predictors for these subgroups may guide personalized interventions to reduce the burden of unplanned hospitalizations among HF patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00533013. Registered 20 September 2007. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00533013 .

Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis on Functional Capacity, Symptoms, and Safety Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the comparative effects of dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients with heart failure (HF), focusing on functional capacity, symptoms, and safety outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Despite advancements in heart failure (HF) therapy, HF is still a significant cause of recurrent hospitalization and death worldwide. Dapagliflozin has demonstrated potential in lowering hospitalizations and mortality associated with heart failure; however, its impact on functional capacity, particularly the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and the comprehensive assessment of safety outcomes in diverse HF populations, including those with preserved or reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF and HFrEF, respectively), requires further investigation.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were comprehensively searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of dapagliflozin in comparison with control interventions for heart failure. The primary outcome was a change in the 6MWD, KCCQ score, and safety measures included hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and adverse events.

RESULTS

In our meta-analysis of ten studies involving 12,695 patients with heart failure, dapagliflozin showed significantly improved Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores [risk ratio (RR) of 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.95-3.569), p < 0.00001] and no significant differences in 6-min walk distance [6MWD; RR of 3.59, 95% CI (- 1.44 to 8.63), p = 0.16]. Dapagliflozin demonstrated a notable reduction in hospitalization for heart failure [RR of 0.76, 95% CI (0.68-0.84), p < 0.00001], significant overall reduction on the effect of any cause mortality [RR of 0.90, 95% CI (0.83-0.99), p = 0.03). There was, however, no significant effect on adverse events [RR of 0.96, 95% CI (0.98-1.03), p = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis of ten trials concluded that dapagliflozin significantly improved KCCQ scores in both HFrEF and HFpEF. The improvement in 6MWD was not statistically significant but trended toward dapagliflozin. Dapagliflozin also showed a mortality benefit in patients with reduced ejection fraction; however, in patients with preserved ejection fraction, the result was not statistically significant. There was also a statistically significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations across all classes.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment strategies

The prevalence of HF with preserved ejection raction (HFpEF, with EF ≥50%) is increasing across all populations with high rates of hospitalization and mortality, reaching up to 80% and 50%, respectively, within a 5-year timeframe. Comorbidity-driven systemic inflammation is thought to cause coronary microvascular dysfunction and increased epicardial adipose tissue, leading to downstream friborsis and molecular changes in the cardiomyocyte, leading to increased stiffness and diastolic dynsfunction. HFpEF poses unique challenges in terms of diagnosis due to its complex and diverse nature. The diagnosis of HFpEF relies on a combination of clinical assessment, imaging studies, and biomarkers. An additional important step in diagnosing HFpEF involves excluding certain cardiac diagnoses that may be specific underlying causes of HFpEF or may be masquerading as HFpEF and require specific alternative treatment approaches. In addition to administering sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors to all patients, the most effective approach to enhance clinical outcomes may involve tailored therapy based on each patient's unique clinical profile. Exercise should be recommended for all patients to improve the quality of life. Glucagon-like peptide-1 1 agonists are a promising treatment option in obese HFpEF patients. Novel approaches targeting inflammation are also in early phase trials.

Racial Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fixed-dose Combination of Dapagliflozin/Sitagliptin in Western and Korean Healthy Adults

PURPOSE

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin/sitagliptin versus individual component (IC) tablets in healthy Western and Korean participants. The combination of these antihyperglycemic drugs provides efficient glucose control, and the use of FDC has generally been shown to improve medication adherence in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

Two randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment, single-dose, single-center, crossover bioequivalence studies conducted on healthy fasted German participants (aged 18-55 years; Western study) and South Korean participants (aged 19-55 years; Korean study) were included. In both studies, pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum [peak] plasma concentration [Cmax], area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the last quantifiable concentration [AUClast], and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity [AUCinf]) were used to assess the bioequivalence of 10 mg dapagliflozin/100 mg sitagliptin FDC (Treatment A) with their ICs (Treatment B) under fasted conditions. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study.

FINDINGS

Forty-six healthy participants (male, 60.9%; mean age, 39.5 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 23.9 kg/m2) were randomized in the Western study, and 51 healthy participants (male, 100.0%; mean age, 24.6 years; mean BMI, 23.9 kg/m2) were randomized in the Korean study. In both studies, the participants were randomized 1:1 into treatment sequence AB and treatment sequence BA. Dapagliflozin/sitagliptin FDC was bioequivalent to IC tablets in both Western and Korean studies, as the 90% confidence interval of the FDC to IC ratios of the geometric least-squares means of the pharmacokinetic parameters for both dapagliflozin and sitagliptin was within the 0.8000-1.2500 bioequivalence criterion limit. The observed differences in pharmacokinetic parameters, such as Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf, between the Western and Korean studies were not clinically meaningful. Dapagliflozin/sitagliptin FDC and their ICs were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported in any of the study populations.

IMPLICATIONS

The 10 mg dapagliflozin/100 mg sitagliptin FDC and IC formulations were bioequivalent in fasted healthy Western and Korean participants, with no new safety concerns identified, thus offering a useful alternative for patients currently receiving individual medications as part of their treatment regimen.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Western study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05266404) and Korean study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05453786).

Dapagliflozin and Timing of Prior Heart Failure Hospitalization: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of DAPA-HF and DELIVER

BACKGROUND

Patients recently hospitalized for heart failure (HF) are at a higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes, but they may experience a greater absolute and relative benefit from effective therapies than individuals who are considered more "stable."

OBJECTIVES

The authors examined the effects of dapagliflozin according to the timing of prior HF hospitalization in a patient-level pooled analysis of DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure) and DELIVER (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure).

METHODS

A total of 11,007 patients were randomized in DAPA-HF and DELIVER. The primary outcome was the composite of worsening HF or cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

In total, 12.4% were hospitalized for HF within 3 months of randomization, 14.2% between 3 and 12 months, and 16.8% more than 1 year before randomization, whereas 56.5% had not been hospitalized. The risk of the primary endpoint was inversely associated with time from prior HF hospitalization, and patients with a recent HF hospitalization had the highest risk. Compared with placebo, dapagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary outcome across HF hospitalization category (0-3 months, HR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.55-0.81]; 3-12 months, HR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.59-0.90]; >1 year, HR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.74-1.12]; and no prior hospitalization, HR: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.73-0.94]; Pinteraction = 0.09). The number of patients needed to treat with dapagliflozin to prevent 1 event over the median follow-up of 22 months was 13, 20, 23, and 28, respectively. The beneficial effect was consistent across the range of LVEF regardless of HF hospitalization category.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative benefits of dapagliflozin were consistent across the range of LVEF regardless of the timing of the most recent HF hospitalization with a greater absolute benefit in patients with recent hospitalization.

Prescription Patterns for Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in U.S. Health Systems

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, recurrent cardiovascular events, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, and thus constitute a Class 1a recommendation in people with diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, HF, or CKD and in people with severe albuminuria or HF, regardless of diabetes status.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to comprehensibly characterize the rate of SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions among people with a Class 1a recommendation for SGLT2 inhibitor use.

METHODS

Among 3,189,827 adults from 28 U.S. health systems within Optum Labs Data Warehouse between April 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023, we assessed SGLT2 inhibitor prescription rates, stratified by presence of diabetes and Class 1a recommendation.

RESULTS

Among 716,387 adults with diabetes, 63.4% had a Class 1a recommendation for SGLT2 inhibitor therapy. There was little difference by Class 1a recommendation status (present: 11.9%; 95% CI: 11.9%-12.0% vs absent: 11.4%; 95% CI: 11.3%-11.6%; standardized mean difference: 1.3%). Among 2,473,440 adults without diabetes, 6.2% had a Class 1a recommendation for SGLT2 inhibitor therapy, and 3.1% (3.0%-3.2%) of those received a prescription. Internists/family practitioners initiated SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions most commonly among people with diabetes, whereas specialists initiated SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions most commonly among people without diabetes. No health system had >25% SGLT2 inhibitor prescription rate among people with a Class 1a recommendation. Health systems with higher proportions of patients with commercial insurance and lower proportions with Medicare had higher SGLT2 inhibitor prescription rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis of U.S. data from 2022 to 2023, SGLT2 inhibitor prescription among people with a Class 1a recommendation is low. Interventions are needed to increase uptake of guideline-recommended SGLT2 inhibitor use.

Effects of 6-month administration of tofogliflozin on cardiac function in elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A retrospective study of a patient cohort

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are frequently hospitalized for heart failure. The ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/e'), measured by echocardiography, is a simple and convenient indicator of diastolic dysfunction. Various large clinical trials have reported that sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitor therapy reduced cardiovascular events and hospitalizations in heart failure patients. We examined the effect of tofogliflozin on various physiological and cardiac function. A retrospective analysis was performed on elderly patients aged 65 years or older with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending Himi Municipal Hospital who were taking oral tofogliflozin 20 mg/day. Measurement of physiological and hormonal variables, blood sampling, and echocardiographic evaluations at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months were performed on those with ejection fraction (EF) of 40% or greater at the time of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests and mixed-effects models, with brain natriuretic peptide less than or not less than 100 pg/mL, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than or not less than 50 mL/min/1.73 m2, and diuretics administered or not. Hypoglycemic effects were observed at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months. At each time point, EF was retained and E/e' was significantly reduced. On the other hand, most physiological parameters and laboratory results showed no clinical abnormalities. Mixed-effects models showed time-dependent reduction of E/e' in high/low brain natriuretic peptide, high/low eGFR, with or without diuretics between baseline and at 6 months. The interaction with time was significant in high/low eGFR. Tofogliflozin was shown to improve E/e', a measure of diastolic function, while maintaining EF, with hypoglycemic effects and no clinical side effects.

SGLT2 inhibitor Dapagliflozin alleviates cardiac dysfunction and fibrosis after myocardial infarction by activating PXR and promoting angiogenesis

BACKGROUND

Myocardial infarction (MI) has emerged as the primary cause of global mortality. Managing blood sugar levels could play a vital role in the treatment of MI. Dapagliflozin (DPG), a commonly used hypoglycemic drug, has demonstrated efficacy in treating heart failure. However, the impact of DPG on MI remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effects and mechanisms of DPG in relation to MI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

DPG administration alleviated MI-induced cardiac dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis. We also found that DPG administration mitigated cardiomyocyte apoptosis through TUNEL staining. CD31 and α-Sma staining revealed that DPG promotes post-MI angiogenesis in mice. In vitro, using scratch assays, transwell assays, and tube formation assays, we discovered that DPG enhanced HUVEC proliferation capacity. Mechanistically, DPG promoted the expression of extracellular matrix genes and mitochondrial function-related genes. Additionally, molecular docking identified the interaction between DPG and PXR, which activated PXR and recruited it to the promoters of Pgam2 and Tcap, promoting their expressions, thus facilitating angiogenesis and post-MI heart repair.

CONCLUSIONS

DPG promotes angiogenesis by activating PXR, thereby alleviating cardiac dysfunction and fibrosis after myocardial infarction. This study provides new strategies and targets for the treatment of ischemic disease.

Cause-Specific Health Care Costs Following Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Cost Offset With SGLT2i Therapy

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding differences in cause-specific costs between heart failure (HF) with ejection fraction (EF) ≤40% vs >40%, and potential cost implications of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare cause-specific health care costs following hospitalization for HF with EF ≤40% vs >40% and estimate the cost offset with implementation of SGLT2i therapy.

METHODS

This study examined Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HF in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure registry from 2016 to 2020. Mean per-patient total (excluding drug costs) and cause-specific costs from discharge through 1-year follow-up were calculated and compared between EF ≤40% vs >40%. Next, risk reductions on total all-cause and HF hospitalizations were estimated in a trial-level meta-analysis of 5 pivotal trials of SGLT2is in HF. Finally, these relative treatment effects were applied to Medicare beneficiaries eligible for SGLT2i therapy to estimate the projected cost offset with implementation of SGLT2i, excluding drug costs.

RESULTS

Among 146,003 patients, 50,598 (34.7%) had EF ≤40% and 95,405 (65.3%) had EF >40%. Mean total cost through 1 year was $40,557. Total costs were similar between EF groups overall but were higher for EF ≤40% among patients surviving the 1-year follow-up period. Patients with EF >40% had higher costs caused by non-HF and noncardiovascular hospitalizations, and skilled nursing facilities (all P < 0.001). Trial-level meta-analysis of the 5 SGLT2i clinical trials estimated 11% (rate ratio: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.93; P < 0.001) and 29% (rate ratio: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.66-0.76; P < 0.001) relative reductions in rates of total all-cause and HF hospitalizations, respectively, regardless of EF. Reductions in all-cause and HF hospitalizations were projected to reduce annual costs of readmission by $2,451 to $2,668 per patient with EF ≤40% and $1,439 to $2,410 per patient with EF >40%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of older U.S. adults hospitalized for HF, cause-specific costs of care differed among patients with EF ≤40% vs >40%. SGLT2i significantly reduced the rate of HF and all-cause hospitalizations irrespective of EF in clinical trials, and implementation of SGLT2i therapy in clinical practice is projected to reduce costs by $1,439 to $2,668 per patient over the 1 year post-discharge, excluding drug costs.

The Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms on the Anti-Hyperglycemic Effect of Dapagliflozin

Background

The influence of genetic variants on the glucose-lowering effects of dapagliflozin remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the impact of polymorphisms in solute carrier family 5 member 2 (SLC5A2), uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 (UGT1A9), solute carrier family 2 member 2 (SLC2A2) and member 4 (SLC2A4) on the anti-hyperglycemic effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

A total of 141 patients with T2DM were included in this prospective cohort study. Twenty-nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected and genotyped using the Sequenom MassArray platform or Sanger sequencing. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were compared before and after the treatment with dapagliflozin.

Results

Among the 29 SNPs selected, 27 were successfully analyzed. After three months of dapagliflozin treatment, FBG levels were significantly reduced (8.00 mmol/L (5.45-10.71) mmol/L vs 6.40 mmol/L (5.45-9.20) mmol/L, p = 0.003) in patients with T2DM. However, there was no significant change in HbA1c levels (8.10% (6.88-10.00)% vs 8.10% (6.83-10.00)%, p = 0.452). Analysis of covariance showed that patients with the minor allele homozygote or heterozygote of rs12471030 (CT/TT), rs12988520 (AC/CC) or rs2602381 (TC/CC) had higher FBG levels compared to those with the major allele homozygote (p = 0.014, p = 0.024, and p = 0.044, respectively). After adjusting for baseline FBG level, age, gender, body mass index, use of insulin and use of metformin, three SNPs-rs12471030, rs12988520 and rs2602381-were associated with the anti-hyperglycemic effect of dapagliflozin. However, using a stringent significance threshold (p < 0.002 with Bonferroni correction), none of these selected SNPs were significantly associated with FBG and HbA1c levels after dapagliflozin treatment.

Conclusion

After adjusting for confounding variables, polymorphisms in SLC5A2, UGT1A9, SLC2A2 and SLC2A4 genes were not associated with the anti-hyperglycemic effect of dapagliflozin in the Chinese population.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

ChiCTR2200059645.

Beyond clinical trials - The cost saving associated with dapagliflozin use in Portugal hospital clinical practice

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Dapagliflozin has proven efficacy in reducing the risk of death and hospitalization in HF patients, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This paper aimed to project the potential impact of dapagliflozin on healthcare costs related to HF subsequent hospitalizations (HFHs) in Portuguese hospitals.

METHODS

The total number of HF-related hospitalizations (hHF), HFHs, and the average length of stay for patients with a primary diagnosis of HF from six Portuguese hospitals, between January 2019 and December 2021, were collected and aggregated by hospital classification. Costs associated with HFHs were calculated according to Portuguese legislation and considering conservative, average, and complex approaches. Cost-saving projections were based on extrapolations from hHF risk reductions reported in dapagliflozin clinical trials.

RESULTS

Considering a 26% risk reduction in hHF reported on pooled-analysis of DAPA-HF and DELIVER as the expected reduction in HFHs, the use of dapagliflozin would be associated with cost savings ranging from EUR 1612851.54 up to EUR 6587360.09, when considering all hospitals and the different approaches, between 2019 and 2021. A similar projection is observed based on 24% RRR derived by weighting DAPA-HF and DELIVER sub-analyses and PORTHOS epidemiological data.

CONCLUSIONS

In this projection, dapagliflozin use in all eligible hHF patients is associated with a significant reduction in direct costs. Our data support that, in addition to the improvements in HF-related outcomes, dapagliflozin may have a significant economic impact on healthcare costs in Portuguese hospitals.

The contemporary role of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) in the management of heart failure: State-of-the-art review

Novel therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), etc. The purpose of this review is to determine the effects of ARNI and SGLT2i in heart failure (HF), compare the impact of SGLT2i with ARNI, and finally evaluate the current data regarding the combination of these two drugs in HF. Various trials on the respective medications have shown some significant reduction in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) death. The combination of these drugs has shown more CV benefits than monotherapy. There is emerging data about these two drugs in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). At present, there are less head-to-head comparison trials of these two drugs. This review provides insights on the current evidence, comparative efficacy, and combination therapy of ARNI and SGLT2i in managing HF, focussing on HFrEF and HFpEF.

Sex-related similarities and differences in responses to heart failure therapies

Although sex-related differences in the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart failure are well known, investigations in the past decade have shed light on an often overlooked aspect of heart failure: the influence of sex on treatment response. Sex-related differences in anatomy, physiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and psychosocial factors might influence the response to pharmacological agents, device therapy and cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure. In this Review, we discuss the similarities between men and women in their response to heart failure therapies, as well as the sex-related differences in treatment benefits, dose-response relationships, and tolerability and safety of guideline-directed medical therapy, device therapy and cardiac rehabilitation. We provide insights into the unique challenges faced by men and women with heart failure, highlight potential avenues for tailored therapeutic approaches and call for sex-specific evaluation of treatment efficacy and safety in future research.

Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

The evidence for sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes or chronic heart failure was sufficient but lacking in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our aim was to investigate the effects of SGLT2i on cardiovascular outcomes in ACS patients. Studies of SGLT2i selection in ACS patients were searched and pooled. Outcomes included all-cause death, adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac remodeling as measured by the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD), cardiac function as assessed by the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and NT-proBNP, and glycemic control. Twenty-four studies with 12,413 patients were identified. Compared to the group without SGLT2i, SGLT2i showed benefits in reducing all-cause death (OR 0.72, 95% CI [0.61, 0.85]), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 0.44, 95% CI [0.30, 0.64]), cardiovascular death (OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.54, 0.81]), heart failure (OR 0.52, 95% CI [0.44, 0.62]), myocardial infarction (OR 0.68, 95% CI [0.56, 0.83]), angina pectoris (OR 0.37, 95% CI [0.17, 0.78]), and stroke (OR 0.48, 95% CI [0.24, 0.96]). Results favored SGLT2i for LVEDD (MD -2.03, 95% CI [-3.29, -0.77]), LVEF (MD 3.22, 95% CI [1.71, 4.72]), and NT-proBNP (MD -171.53, 95% CI [-260.98, -82.08]). Thus, SGLT2i treatment reduces the risk of all-cause death and MACE and improves cardiac remodeling and function in ACS patients.

Left Ventricular Function, Congestion, and Effect of Empagliflozin on Heart Failure Risk After Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Empagliflozin reduces the risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations but not all-cause mortality when started within 14 days of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the association of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), congestion, or both, with outcomes and the impact of empagliflozin in reducing HF risk post-AMI.

METHODS

In the EMPACT-MI (Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Empagliflozin on Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, patients were randomized within 14 days of an AMI complicated by either newly reduced LVEF<45%, congestion, or both, to empagliflozin (10 mg daily) or placebo and were followed up for a median of 17.9 months.

RESULTS

Among 6,522 patients, the mean baseline LVEF was 41 ± 9%; 2,648 patients (40.6%) presented with LVEF <45% alone, 1,483 (22.7%) presented with congestion alone, and 2,181 (33.4%) presented with both. Among patients in the placebo arm of the trial, multivariable adjusted risk for each 10-point reduction in LVEF included all-cause death or HF hospitalization (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.31-1.69; P < 0.0001), first HF hospitalization (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.37-1.96; P < 0.0001), and total HF hospitalizations (rate ratio [RR]: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.51-2.36; P < 0.0001). The presence of congestion was also associated with a significantly higher risk for each of these outcomes (HR: 1.52, 1.94, and RR: 2.03, respectively). Empagliflozin reduced the risk for first (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.60-0.98) and total (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.89) HF hospitalizations, irrespective of LVEF or congestion, or both. The safety profile of empagliflozin was consistent across baseline LVEF and irrespective of congestion status.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AMI, the severity of left ventricular dysfunction and the presence of congestion was associated with worse outcomes. Empagliflozin reduced first and total HF hospitalizations across the range of LVEF with and without congestion. (Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Empagliflozin on Hospitalization for Heart Failure and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction [EMPACT-MI]; NCT04509674).

Targeting the endothelium by combining endothelin-1 antagonism and SGLT-2 inhibition: better together?

Endothelin A and B receptors, together with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) channels are important targets in improving endothelial function and intervention with inhibitors has been the subject of multiple mechanistic and clinical outcome trials over recent years. Notable successes include the treatment of pulmonary hypertension with endothelin receptor antagonists, and the treatment of heart failure and chronic kidney disease with SGLT-2 inhibitors. With distinct and complementary mechanisms, in this review, we explore the logic of combination therapy for a number of diseases which have endothelial dysfunction at their heart.

Management of Heart Failure in a Resource-Limited Setting: Expert Opinion from India

Heart failure poses a global health challenge affecting millions of individuals, and access to guideline-directed medical therapy is often limited. This limitation is frequently attributed to factors such as drug availability, slow adoption, clinical inertia, and delayed diagnosis. Despite international recommendations promoting the use of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure management, personalized approaches are essential in settings with resource constraints. In India, crucial treatments like angiotensin II receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitors and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors are not fully utilized despite their established safety and efficacy. To address this issue, an expert consensus involving 150 specialists, including cardiologists, nephrologists, and endocrinologists, was convened. They deliberated on patient profiles, monitoring, and adverse side effects and provided tailored recommendations for guideline-directed medical therapy in heart failure management. Stressing the significance of early initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure, especially with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, the consensus also explored innovative therapies like vericiguat. To improve heart failure outcomes in resource-limited settings, the experts proposed several measures, including enhanced patient education, cardiac rehabilitation, improved drug access, and reforms in healthcare policies.

Non-cardiac comorbidities in heart failure: an update on diagnostic and management strategies

Managing non-cardiac comorbidities in heart failure (HF) requires a tailored approach that addresses each patient's specific conditions and needs. Regular communication and coordination among healthcare providers is crucial to providing the best possible care for these patients. Poorly controlled hypertension contributes to left ventricular remodeling and diastolic dysfunction, emphasizing the importance of optimal blood pressure control while avoiding adverse effects. Among HF patients with diabetes, SGLT2 inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have shown promise in reducing HF-related morbidity and mortality. Chronic kidney disease exacerbates HF and vice versa, forming the vicious cardiorenal syndrome, so disease-modifying therapies should be maintained in HF patients with comorbid CKD, even with transient changes in kidney function. Anemia in HF patients may be multifactorial, and there is growing evidence for the benefit of intravenous iron supplementation in HF patients with iron deficiency with or without anemia. Obesity, although a risk factor for HF, paradoxically offers a better prognosis once HF is established, though developing treatment strategies may improve symptoms and cardiac performance. In HF patients with stroke and atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation therapy is recommended. Among HF patients with sleep-disordered breathing, continuous positive airway pressure may improve sleep quality. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease often coexists with HF, and many patients can tolerate cardioselective beta-blockers. Cancer patients with comorbid HF require careful consideration of cardiotoxicity risks associated with cancer therapies. Depression is underdiagnosed in HF patients and significantly impacts prognosis. Cognitive impairment is prevalent in HF patients and impacts their self-care and overall quality of life.

ELUCIDATE Trial: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, is an epochal oral antidiabetic drug that improves cardiorenal outcomes. However, the effect of early dapagliflozin intervention on left ventricular (LV) remodeling in patients with type 2 diabetes free from cardiovascular disease remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ELUCIDATE trial was a prospective, open-label, randomized, active-controlled study that enrolled 76 patients with asymptomatic type 2 diabetes with LV ejection fraction ≥50%, randomized to the dapagliflozin 10 mg/day add-on or standard-of-care group. Speckle-tracking echocardiography-based measurements of the cardiac global longitudinal strain were performed at baseline and 24 weeks after treatment initiation. Patients who received dapagliflozin had a greater reduction in LV dimension (1.68 mm [95% CI, 0.53-2.84]; P=0.005), LV end-systolic volume (5.51 mL [95% CI, 0.86-10.17]; P=0.021), and LV mass index (4.25 g/m2.7 [95% CI, 2.42-6.09]; P<0.0001) compared with standard of care in absolute mean differences. Dapagliflozin add-on therapy led to a significant LV global longitudinal strain increment (0.74% [95% CI, 1.00-0.49]; P<0.0001) and improved LV systolic and early diastolic strain rates (0.27/s [95% CI, 0.17-0.60]; and 0.11/s [95% CI, 0.06-0.16], respectively; both P<0.0001) but not in global circumferential strain. No significant changes were found in insulin resistance, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels, or other biomarkers at 6 months after the dapagliflozin administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Dapagliflozin add-on therapy could lead to more favorable cardiac remodeling accompanied by enhanced cardiac mechanical function among patients with asymptomatic type 2 diabetes. Our findings provide evidence of the efficacy of dapagliflozin use for the primary prevention of diabetic cardiomyopathy.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03871621.

Obesity and metabolic syndrome in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a cross-sectional analysis of the Veradigm Cardiology Registry

BACKGROUND

The proportion of heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction has been rising over the past decades and has coincided with increases in the prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome. The relationship between these interconnected comorbidities and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is still poorly understood. This study characterized obesity and metabolic syndrome among real-world patients with HFpEF.

METHODS

We identified adults with heart failure in the Veradigm Cardiology Registry, previously the PINNACLE Registry, with a left ventricular ejection fraction measurement ≥ 50% between 01/01/2016 and 12/31/2019. Patients were stratified by obesity diagnosis and presence of metabolic syndrome (≥ 3 of the following: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and obesity). We captured baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and used multivariable logistic regression to examine the odds of having cardiac (atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, and stroke/transient ischemic attack) and non-cardiac (chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, and peripheral artery disease) comorbidities of interest. The models adjusted for age and sex, and the main covariates of interest were obesity and metabolic burden score (0-3 based on the presence of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia). The models were run with and without an obesity*metabolic burden score interaction term.

RESULTS

This study included 264,571 patients with HFpEF, of whom 55.7% had obesity, 52.5% had metabolic syndrome, 42.5% had both, and 34.3% had neither. After adjusting for age, sex, and burden of other metabolic syndrome-associated diagnoses, patients with HFpEF with obesity had lower odds of a diagnosis of other evaluated comorbidities relative to patients without obesity. The presence of metabolic syndrome in HFpEF appears to increase comorbidity burden as each additional metabolic syndrome-associated diagnosis was associated with higher odds of assessed comorbidities except atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSION

Obesity was common among patients with HFpEF and not always co-occurring with metabolic syndrome. Multivariable analysis suggested that patients with obesity may develop HFpEF in the absence of other driving factors such as cardiovascular disease or metabolic syndrome.

Latest pharmaceutical approaches across the spectrum of heart failure

Despite major advances in prevention and medical therapy, heart failure (HF) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in older and frailer patients. Therefore, a complete, guideline-based treatment is essential, even in HF patients with conditions traditionally associated with a problematic initiation and escalation of the medical HF therapy, such as chronic kidney disease and arterial hypotension, as the potential adverse effects are overcome by the overall decrease of the absolute risk. Furthermore, since the latest data suggest that the benefit of a combined medical therapy (MRA, ARNI, SGLT2i, beta-blocker) may extend up to a LVEF of 65%, further trials on these subgroups of patients (HFmrEF, HFpEF) are needed to re-evaluate the guideline-directed medical therapy across the HF spectrum. In particular, the use of SGLT2i was recently extended to HFpEF patients, as evidenced by the DELIVER and EMPEROR-preserved trials. Moreover, the indication for other conservative treatments in HF patients, such as the intravenous iron supplementation, was accordingly strengthened in the latest guidelines. Finally, the possible implementation of newer substances, such as finerenone, in guideline-directed medical practice for HF is anticipated with great interest.

Age-specific mortality trends in heart failure over 25 years: a retrospective Danish nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in heart failure care reducing mortality in clinical trials, it remains unclear whether real-life cohorts have had similar improvements in life expectancy across the age spectrum. We aimed to investigate how mortality trends changed in patients with heart failure over the past 25 years, stratified by age groups.

METHODS

Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients with new-onset heart failure aged 18-95 years. The 5-year all-cause mortality risk and the absolute risk difference of mortality between patients with heart failure and age-matched and sex-matched heart failure-free controls were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression models. Mortality trends were analysed across five calendar periods (1996-2000, 2001-05, 2006-10, 2011-15, and 2016-20) and three age groups (<65 years, 65-79 years, and ≥80 years).

FINDINGS

194 997 patients with heart failure were included. Mortality significantly decreased from 1996-2000 (66% [95% CI 65·5-66·4]) to 2016-20 (43% [42·1-43·4]), with similar results shown in all age groups (<65 years: 35% [33·9-36·1] to 15% [14·6-16·3]; 65-79 years: 64% [63·1-64·5] to 39% [37·6-39·6]; and ≥80 years: 84% [83·1-84·3] to 73% [71·7-73·9]). Adjusted mortality rates supported these associations. The absolute risk difference declined notably in younger age groups (<65 years: 29·9% [28·8-31·0] to 12·7% [12·0-13·4] and 65-79 years: 41·1% [40·3-41·9] to 25·1% [24·4-25·8]), remaining relatively stable in those aged 80 years or older (30·6% [29·9-31·3] to 28% [27·2-28·8]).

INTERPRETATION

Over 25 years, there has been a consistent decrease in mortality among patients with heart failure across age groups, albeit less prominently in patients aged 80 years or older. Further insight is needed to identify effective strategies for improving disease burden in older patients with heart failure.

FUNDING

None.

TRANSLATION

For the Danish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

conTemporary reflectiOns regarding heart failure manaGEmenT - How to ovERcome the PorTuguese barriers (TOGETHER-PT)

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome that is a significant burden in hospitalisations, morbidity, and mortality. Although a significant effort has been made to better understand its consequences and current barriers in its management, there are still several gaps to address. The present work aimed to identify the views of a multidisciplinary group of health care professionals on HF awareness and literacy, diagnosis, treatment and organization of care, identifying current challenges and providing insights into the future.

METHODS

A steering committee was established, including members of the Heart Failure Study Group of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology (GEIC-SPC), the Heart Failure Study Group of the Portuguese Society of Internal Medicine (NEIC-SPMI) and the Cardiovascular Study Group (GEsDCard) of the Portuguese Association of General and Family Medicine (APMGF). This steering committee produced a 16-statement questionnaire regarding different HF domains that was answered to by a diversified group of 152 cardiologists, internists, general practitioners, and nurses with an interest or dedicated to HF using a five-level Likert scale. Full agreement was defined as ≥80% of level 5 (fully agree) responses.

RESULTS

Globally, consensus was achieved in all but one of the 16 statements. Full agreement was registered in seven statements, namely 3 of 4 statements for patient education and HF awareness and 2 in 4 statements of both HF diagnosis and healthcare organization, with proportions of fully agree responses ranging from 82.9% to 96.7%. None of the HF treatment statements registered full agreement but 3 of 4 achieved ≥80% of level 4 (agree) responses.

CONCLUSION

This document aims to be a call-to-action to improve HF patients' quality of life and prognosis, by promoting a change in HF care in Portugal.

SGLT2 inhibitors: from glucose-lowering to cardiovascular benefits

An increasing number of individuals are at high risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its cardiovascular complications, including heart failure (HF), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and eventually premature death. The sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) protein sits in the proximal tubule of human nephrons to regulate glucose reabsorption and its inhibition by gliflozins represents the cornerstone of contemporary T2D and HF management. Herein, we aim to provide an updated overview of the pleiotropy of gliflozins, provide mechanistic insights and delineate related cardiovascular (CV) benefits. By discussing contemporary evidence obtained in preclinical models and landmark randomized controlled trials, we move from bench to bedside across the broad spectrum of cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases. With landmark randomized controlled trials confirming a reduction in major adverse CV events (MACE; composite endpoint of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke), SGLT2 inhibitors strongly mitigate the risk for heart failure hospitalization in diabetics and non-diabetics alike while conferring renoprotection in specific patient populations. Along four major pathophysiological axes (i.e. at systemic, vascular, cardiac, and renal levels), we provide insights into the key mechanisms that may underlie their beneficial effects, including gliflozins' role in the modulation of inflammation, oxidative stress, cellular energy metabolism, and housekeeping mechanisms. We also discuss how this drug class controls hyperglycaemia, ketogenesis, natriuresis, and hyperuricaemia, collectively contributing to their pleiotropic effects. Finally, evolving data in the setting of cerebrovascular diseases and arrhythmias are presented and potential implications for future research and clinical practice are comprehensively reviewed.

Usefulness of Heart Failure Categories Based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Heart failure guidelines have recently introduced a narrow category with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction; LVEF 41%-49%) between the previous categories of reduced (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; LVEF ≤40%) and preserved (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LVEF ≥50%) ejection fraction. Grouping of continuous measurements into narrow categories can be questioned if their variability is high.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We constructed a cohort of all 9716 new cases of chronic heart failure with an available LVEF in Stockholm, Sweden, from January 1, 2015, until December 31, 2020. All values of LVEF were collected over time, and patients were followed up until death, moving out of Stockholm, or end of study. Mixed models were used to quantify within-person variance in LVEF, and multistate Markov models, with death as an absorbing state, to quantify the stability of LVEF categories. LVEF values followed a normal distribution. The SD of the within-person variance in LVEF over time was 7.4%. The mean time spent in any LVEF category before transition to another category was on average <1 year for heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction. Probabilities of transitioning between categories during the first year were substantial; patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction had a probability of <25% of remaining in that category 1 year later.

CONCLUSIONS

LVEF follows a normal distribution and has considerable variability over time, which may impose a risk for underuse of efficient treatment. The heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction category is especially inconstant. Assumptions of a patient's current LVEF should take this variability and the normal distribution of LVEF into account.

Heart failure management with β-blockers: can we do better?

Heart failure (HF) is associated with disabling symptoms, poor quality of life, and a poor prognosis with substantial excess mortality in the years following diagnosis. Overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system is a key feature of the pathophysiology of HF and is an important driver of the process of adverse remodelling of the left ventricular wall that contributes to cardiac failure. Drugs which suppress the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, including β-blockers, are foundation therapies for the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and despite a lack of specific outcomes trials, are also widely used by cardiologist in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Today, expert opinion has moved away from recommending that treatment for HF should be guided solely by the LVEF and interventions should rather address signs and symptoms of HF (e.g. oedema and tachycardia), the severity of HF, and concomitant conditions. β-blockers improve HF symptoms and functional status in HF and these agents have demonstrated improved survival, as well as a reduced risk of other important clinical outcomes such as hospitalisation for heart failure, in randomised, placebo-controlled outcomes trials. In HFpEF, β-blockers are anti-ischemic and lower blood pressure and heart rate. Moreover, β-blockers also reduce mortality in the setting of HF occurring alongside common comorbid conditions, such as diabetes, CKD (of any severity), and COPD. Higher doses of β-blockers are associated with better clinical outcomes in populations with HF, so that ensuring adequate titration of therapy to their maximal (or maximally tolerated) doses is important for ensuring optimal outcomes for people with HF. In principle, a patient with HF could have combined treatment with a β-blocker, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor/neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and a SGLT2 inhibitor, according to tolerability.

Navigating Heart Failure: Unveiling Sex Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Combinations

Major heart failure (HF) trials remain insufficient in terms of assessing the differences in clinical characteristics, biomarkers, treatment efficacy, and safety because of the under-representation of women. The study aimed to present sex-related disparities in HF management, including differences in demographics, co-morbidities, cardiac biomarkers, prescribed medications, and treatment outcomes. The study utilized anonymized data from the Turkish Ministry of Health's National Electronic Database between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. The cohort analysis included 2,501,231 adult patients with HF. Specific therapeutic combinations were analyzed using a Cox regression model to obtain relative risk reduction for all-cause death. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. In the cohort, 48.7% (n = 1,218,911) were male, whereas 51.3% (n = 1,282,320) were female. Female patients exhibited a higher median age (71 vs 68 years) and manifested higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, anemia, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, and ischemic stroke. Male patients demonstrated higher rates of previous myocardial infarction, dyslipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. Higher concentrations of natriuretic peptides were observed in female patients. Renin-angiotensin aldosterone inhibitor, β blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), and ivabradine were more commonly prescribed in male patients, whereas loop diuretics, digoxin, and ferric carboxymaltose were more frequent in female patients. Male patients had higher rates of cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation rates. All-cause mortality and hospitalization rates were higher in male patients. Compared with monotherapy, all combinations, including SGLT2i, showed a beneficial effect on all-cause mortality in both female and male patients with HF. In hospitalized patients with HF, the addition of digoxin to renin-angiotensin aldosterone inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and β blockers was superior to monotherapy regarding all-cause mortality in female patients with HF compared with male patients with HF. In conclusion, this study highlights that sex-specific responses to HF medication combinations compared with monotherapy and differences in co-morbidities underscore the importance of tailored management strategies. Digoxin showed a contrasting effect on all-cause mortality between both sexes after hospitalization, whereas SGLT2i exhibited a consistent beneficial effect in both sexes when added to all combinations.

Contemporary Use and Implications of Beta-Blockers in Patients With HFmrEF or HFpEF: The DELIVER Trial

BACKGROUND

Although beta-blockers are not recommended for the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) according to the latest European Society of Cardiology and American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America guidelines, these therapies remain commonly used for comorbidity management. There has been concern that beta-blockers may adversely influence clinical outcomes by limiting chronotropic response in HFpEF.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine the contemporary use and implications of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or HFpEF.

METHODS

In the DELIVER (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure) trial, a total of 6,263 patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% were randomized to dapagliflozin or placebo across 20 countries. In this prespecified analysis, efficacy and safety outcomes were examined according to beta-blocker use at randomization. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or worsening HF.

RESULTS

Overall, beta-blockers were used in 5,177 patients (83%), with wide variation by geographic region. Beta-blocker use was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome in covariate-adjusted models (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.60-0.83). Dapagliflozin consistently reduced the risk of the primary outcome in patients taking beta-blockers (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72-0.94) and in patients not taking beta-blockers (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.61-1.03; Pinteraction = 0.85), with similar findings for key secondary endpoints. Adverse events were balanced between patients randomized to dapagliflozin and placebo, regardless of background beta-blocker use.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HFmrEF or HFpEF who were enrolled in DELIVER, 4 out of 5 participants were treated with a beta-blocker. Beta-blocker use was not associated with a higher risk of worsening HF or cardiovascular death. Dapagliflozin consistently and safely reduced clinical events, irrespective of background beta-blocker use. (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure [DELIVER]; NCT03619213).

Pharmacological Treatments in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Medical treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection (HFpEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has weaker evidence compared with reduced ejection fraction, despite recent trials with an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is).

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to estimate the aggregate therapeutic benefit of drugs for HFmrEF and HFpEF.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science for randomized trials including patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40%, treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (analyzed together as renin-angiotensin system inhibitors [RASi]), beta-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), digoxin, ARNI, and SGLT2i. An additive component network meta-analysis was performed. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and first hospitalization for heart failure (HHF); secondary outcomes were CV death, total HHF, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The authors identified 13 studies with a total of 29,875 patients and a mean LVEF of 56.3% ± 8.7%. ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i separately, but not RASi, BB, or digoxin, reduced the primary composite outcome compared with placebo. The combination of ARNI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i was the most effective (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.31-0.70]); this was largely explained by the triple combination of ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i (HR: 0.56 [95% CI 0.43-0.71]). Results were similar for CV death (HR: 0.63 [95% CI 0.43-0.91] for ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i) or total HHF (HR: 0.49 [95% CI 0.33-0.71] for ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i) alone. In a subgroup analysis, only SGLT2i had a consistent benefit among all LVEF subgroups, whereas the triple combination had the greatest benefit in HFmrEF, robust benefit in patients with LVEF 50% to 59%, and a statistically marginal benefit in patients with LVEF ≥60%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HF and LVEF>40%, the quadruple combination of ARNI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i provides the largest reduction in the risk of CV death and HHF; driven by the robust effect of the triple combination of ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i. The benefit was more pronounced in HFmrEF patients.

Effect of Dapagliflozin Versus Placebo on Symptoms and 6-Minute Walk Distance in Patients With Heart Failure: The DETERMINE Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduce the risk of worsening heart failure (HF) and cardiovascular death in patients with HF irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction. It is important to determine whether therapies for HF improve symptoms and functional capacity.

METHODS

The DETERMINE (Dapagliflozin Effect on Exercise Capacity Using a 6-Minute Walk Test in Patients With Heart Failure) double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials assessed the efficacy of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on the Total Symptom Score (TSS) and Physical Limitation Scale (PLS) of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in 313 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (DETERMINE-Reduced) and in 504 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (DETERMINE-Preserved) with New York Heart Association class II or III symptoms and elevated natriuretic peptide levels. The primary outcomes were changes in the KCCQ-TSS, KCCQ-PLS, and 6MWD after 16 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Among the 313 randomized patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, the median placebo-corrected difference in KCCQ-TSS from baseline at 16 weeks was 4.2 (95% CI, 1.0, 8.2; P=0.022) in favor of dapagliflozin. The median placebo-corrected difference in KCCQ-PLS was 4.2 (95% CI, 0.0, 8.3; P=0.058). The median placebo-corrected difference in 6MWD from baseline at 16 weeks was 3.2 meters (95% CI, -6.5, 13.0; P=0.69). In the 504 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction, the median placebo-corrected 16-week difference in KCCQ-TSS and KCCQ-PLS was 3.2 (95% CI, 0.4, 6.0; P=0.079) and 3.1 (-0.1, 5.4; P=0.23), respectively. The median 16-week difference in 6MWD was 1.6 meters (95% CI, -5.9, 9.0; P=0.67). In an exploratory post hoc analysis of both trials combined (DETERMINE-Pooled), the median placebo-corrected difference from baseline at 16 weeks was 3.7 (1.5, 5.9; P=0.005) for KCCQ-TSS, 4.0 (0.3, 4.9; P=0.036) for KCCQ-PLS, and 2.5 meters (-3.5, 8.4; P=0.50) for 6MWD.

CONCLUSIONS

Dapagliflozin improved the KCCQ-TSS in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction but did not improve KCCQ-PLS or 6MWD. Dapagliflozin did not improve these outcomes in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. In a post hoc analysis including all patients across the full spectrum of ejection fraction, there was a beneficial effect of dapagliflozin on KCCQ-TSS and KCCQ-PLS but not 6MWD.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT03877237 and NCT03877224.

Hospital Readmissions for Fluid Overload among Individuals with Diabetes and Diabetic Kidney Disease: Risk Factors and Multivariable Prediction Models

AIMS

Hospital readmissions due to recurrent fluid overload in diabetes and diabetic kidney disease can be avoided with evidence-based interventions. We aimed to identify at-risk patients who can benefit from these interventions by developing risk prediction models for readmissions for fluid overload in people living with diabetes and diabetic kidney disease.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of 1,531 adults with diabetes and diabetic kidney disease hospitalized for fluid overload, congestive heart failure, pulmonary edema, and generalized edema between 2015 and 2017. The multivariable regression models for 30-day and 90-day readmission for fluid overload were compared with the LACE score for discrimination, calibration, sensitivity, specificity, and net reclassification index (NRI).

RESULTS

Readmissions for fluid overload within 30 days and 90 days occurred in 8.6% and 17.2% of patients with diabetes, and 8.2% and 18.3% of patients with diabetic kidney disease, respectively. After adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, clinical parameters, and medications, a history of alcoholism (HR 3.85, 95% CI: 1.41-10.55) and prior hospitalization for fluid overload (HR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.26-4.96) were independently associated with 30-day readmission in patients with diabetic kidney disease, as well as in individuals with diabetes. Additionally, current smoking, absence of hypertension, and high-dose intravenous furosemide were also associated with 30-day readmission in individuals with diabetes. Prior hospitalization for fluid overload (HR 2.43, 95% CI: 1.50-3.94), cardiovascular disease (HR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.03-2.02), eGFR ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.003-1.93) was independently associated with 90-day readmissions in individuals with diabetic kidney disease. Additionally, thiazide prescription at discharge reduced 90-day readmission in diabetic kidney disease, while the need for high-dose intravenous furosemide predicted 90-day readmission in diabetes. The clinical and clinico-psychological models for 90-day readmission in individuals with diabetes and diabetic kidney disease had better discrimination and calibration than the LACE score. The NRI for the clinico-psychosocial models to predict 30- and 90-day readmissions in diabetes was 22.4% and 28.9%, respectively. The NRI for the clinico-psychosocial models to predict 30- and 90-day readmissions in diabetic kidney disease was 5.6% and 38.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The risk models can potentially be used to identify patients at risk of readmission for fluid overload for evidence-based interventions, such as patient education or transitional care programs to reduce preventable hospitalizations.

Initiation and Up-titration of Guideline-directed Medical Therapy for Patients with Heart Failure: Better, Faster, Stronger!

Treatment for heart failure has experienced a major revolution in recent years, and current evidence shows that a combination of four medications (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors + β-blockers + mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists + sodium.glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors) offer the greatest benefit to our patients with significant reductions in cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalisations and all-cause mortality. Unfortunately, despite their proven benefits, the implementation of these therapies is still low. Clinical inertia, and unfounded fear of using these drugs might contribute to this. Recently, evidence from randomised clinical trials has shown that intensive implementation of these therapies in patients with heart failure is safe and effective. In this review, we attempt to tackle some of these misconceptions/fears regarding medical therapy for heart failure and discuss the available evidence showing the best strategies for implementation of these therapies.

Cost Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin for Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction: An Economic Evaluation Based on Pooled, Individual Participant Data From the DELIVER and DAPA-HF Trials

BACKGROUND

The sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors are guideline-recommended to treat heart failure across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction; however, economic evaluations of adding sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors to standard of care in chronic heart failure across a broad left ventricular ejection fraction range are lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a US-based cost-effectiveness analysis of dapagliflozin added to standard of care in a chronic heart failure population using pooled, participant data from the DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure) and DELIVER (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure) trials. The 3-state Markov model used estimates of transitional probabilities, effectiveness of dapagliflozin, and utilities from the pooled trials. Costs estimates were obtained from published sources, including published rebates in dapagliflozin cost. Adding dapagliflozin to standard of care was estimated to produce an additional 0.53 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared with standard of care alone. Incremental cost effectiveness ratios were $85 554/QALY when using the publicly reported full (undiscounted) Medicare cost ($515/month) and $40 081/QALY, at a published nearly 50% rebate ($263/month). The addition of dapagliflozin to standard of care would be of at least intermediate value (<$150 000/QALY) at a cost of <$872.58/month, of high value (<$50 000/QALY) at <$317.66/month, and cost saving at <$40.25/month. Dapagliflozin was of at least intermediate value in 92% of simulations when using the full (undiscounted) Medicare list cost in probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Cost effectiveness was most sensitive to the dapagliflozin cost and the effect on cardiovascular death.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of dapagliflozin to standard of care in patients with heart failure across the spectrum of ejection fraction was at least of intermediate value at the undiscounted Medicare cost and may be potentially of higher value on the basis of the level of discount, rebates, and price negotiations offered.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01035255 & NCT01920711.

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and the Future of Heart Failure Phenotyping

Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome traditionally classified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutpoints. Although LVEF is prognostic for risk of events and predictive of response to some HF therapies, LVEF is a continuous variable and cutpoints are arbitrary, often based on historical clinical trial enrichment decisions rather than physiology. Holistic evaluation of the treatment effects for therapies throughout the LVEF range suggests the standard categorization paradigm for HF merits modification. The multidisciplinary Heart Failure Collaboratory reviewed data from large-scale HF clinical trials and found that many HF therapies have demonstrated therapeutic benefit across a large range of LVEF, but specific treatment effects vary across that range. Therefore, HF should practically be classified by association with an LVEF that is reduced or not reduced, while acknowledging uncertainty around the precise LVEF cutpoint, and future research should evaluate new therapies across the continuum of LVEF.