1
|
Hand LJ, Paterson LM, Lingford-Hughes AR. Re-evaluating our focus in addiction: emotional dysregulation is a critical driver of relapse to drug use. Transl Psychiatry 2024; 14:467. [PMID: 39521844 PMCID: PMC11550421 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-03159-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 10/10/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Most addiction research has focused on reward- and impulsivity-related neurocircuitry. However, the impact of the withdrawal/negative affect stage in the addiction cycle has been somewhat overlooked, despite it being commonly evident in the clinic. This stage crucially drives negative reinforcement of repeated drug use and relapse, yet less is known about its neural underpinnings. How negative emotional processing is dysregulated in substance dependence is incompletely understood and may manifest differentially across the types of substances. In turn, the regions involved in negative emotional processing may show different patterns of dysregulation. Understanding how neurocircuitry involved in negative states differs across various substances may help inform new targets for treatments. Following a comprehensive literature search of studies examining negative emotional processing in substance dependence, a quantitative approach was deemed inappropriate. Instead, we employed a narrative approach to exploring neural responses to tasks involving emotional processing in alcohol, cocaine, opioid and cannabis dependence. Regions that were found to be dysregulated included the amygdala, insula, anterior cingulate, and medial prefrontal cortex. However, patterns of reactivity differed across alcohol, cocaine, opioid and cannabis dependence. Brain activation in alcohol dependence broadly appeared blunted in response to negative affective stimuli and emotional faces, whilst conversely appeared heightened in cocaine dependence. In opioid dependence, the amygdala was consistently implicated, whilst the insula, anterior cingulate, and medial prefrontal cortex were implicated in cannabis dependence. However, there was wide variability amongst the studies, with very few studies investigating opioid and cannabis dependence. These findings suggest emotional dysregulation varies according to the type of substance dependence. However, the variability in findings and lack of studies highlights the need for more research in this area. Further characterisation of emotional dysregulation in substance dependence will enable identification of treatment targets. More targeted treatments that modulate negative emotional processing could substantially improve outcomes by aiding relapse prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lexi J Hand
- Imperial College London, Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, 2nd Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom
| | - Louise M Paterson
- Imperial College London, Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, 2nd Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
| | - Anne R Lingford-Hughes
- Imperial College London, Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, 2nd Floor Commonwealth Building, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ekhtiari H, Zare-Bidoky M, Sangchooli A, Valyan A, Abi-Dargham A, Cannon DM, Carter CS, Garavan H, George TP, Ghobadi-Azbari P, Juchem C, Krystal JH, Nichols TE, Öngür D, Pernet CR, Poldrack RA, Thompson PM, Paulus MP. Reporting checklists in neuroimaging: promoting transparency, replicability, and reproducibility. Neuropsychopharmacology 2024; 50:67-84. [PMID: 39242922 PMCID: PMC11525976 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-01973-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
Neuroimaging plays a crucial role in understanding brain structure and function, but the lack of transparency, reproducibility, and reliability of findings is a significant obstacle for the field. To address these challenges, there are ongoing efforts to develop reporting checklists for neuroimaging studies to improve the reporting of fundamental aspects of study design and execution. In this review, we first define what we mean by a neuroimaging reporting checklist and then discuss how a reporting checklist can be developed and implemented. We consider the core values that should inform checklist design, including transparency, repeatability, data sharing, diversity, and supporting innovations. We then share experiences with currently available neuroimaging checklists. We review the motivation for creating checklists and whether checklists achieve their intended objectives, before proposing a development cycle for neuroimaging reporting checklists and describing each implementation step. We emphasize the importance of reporting checklists in enhancing the quality of data repositories and consortia, how they can support education and best practices, and how emerging computational methods, like artificial intelligence, can help checklist development and adherence. We also highlight the role that funding agencies and global collaborations can play in supporting the adoption of neuroimaging reporting checklists. We hope this review will encourage better adherence to available checklists and promote the development of new ones, and ultimately increase the quality, transparency, and reproducibility of neuroimaging research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Ekhtiari
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.
| | - Mehran Zare-Bidoky
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arshiya Sangchooli
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alireza Valyan
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Anissa Abi-Dargham
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos School of Medicine and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dara M Cannon
- Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Center for Neuroimaging, Cognition & Genomics, College of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Cameron S Carter
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Hugh Garavan
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Tony P George
- Institute for Mental Health Policy and Research at CAMH, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peyman Ghobadi-Azbari
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Christoph Juchem
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University Fu Foundation, School of Engineering and Applied Science, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - John H Krystal
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Clinical Neurosciences Division, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Thomas E Nichols
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dost Öngür
- McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cyril R Pernet
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Paul M Thompson
- Imaging Genetics Center, Mark & Mary Stevens Neuroimaging & Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rosenthal A, Haslacher D, Garbusow M, Pangratz L, Apfel B, Soekadar S, Romanczuk-Seiferth N, Beck A. Neuromodulation and mindfulness as therapeutic treatment in detoxified patients with alcohol use disorder. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:635. [PMID: 39334026 PMCID: PMC11438385 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06085-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol use disorder (AUD) poses a significant global health challenge. Traditional management strategies often face high relapse rates, leading to a need for innovative approaches. Mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) has emerged as a promising intervention to enhance cognitive control, reduce cue-related craving and improve interoceptive processing. Neuroimaging studies suggest that mindfulness training can modulate brain networks associated with these factors, potentially improving treatment outcomes for AUD. Neuroimaging studies suggest that mindfulness training can modulate brain networks linked to these brain functions, potentially improving treatment outcomes for AUD. However, it is unclear how MBRP links to neurophysiological measures such as frontal midline theta oscillations (FMΘ) and whether the beneficial effects of MBRP can be increased by enhancing FMΘ. Here, we will use two different forms of neuromodulation to target and enhance these oscillations, and evaluate their impact on the effectiveness of MBRP. METHODS This study will employ a four-arm randomized controlled trial to evaluate the synergistic effects of MBRP augmented with transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) or closed-loop amplitude-modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (CLAM-tACS) on cognitive control, cue reactivity and interoceptive processing in AUD patients. Participants will undergo six weekly group MBRP sessions and daily individual mindfulness practices. Assessments will include an inhibition task, cue-induced craving task, and heartbeat discrimination task, alongside heart rate variability and 32-channel EEG recordings. Participants will be assessed pre and post treatment, with a three-month follow-up to evaluate long-term effects on abstinence and alcohol consumption. DISCUSSION This study will not only elucidate the causal link between FMΘ and efficacy of MBRP, but contribute to a better understanding of how combined psychological and neuromodulation interventions can improve treatment outcomes for AUD, potentially leading to more effective therapeutic strategies. This study also seeks to explore individual differences in response to treatment, which could inform future approaches to AUD management. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study received approval by the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Institutional Review Board (EA1/030/23, 10.11.2023). It was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06308484).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Rosenthal
- Institute for Mental Health and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Psychology, HMU Health and Medical University Potsdam, 14471, Potsdam, Germany.
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - D Haslacher
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Garbusow
- Department of Psychology, MSB Medical School Berlin, 14197, Berlin, Germany
| | - L Pangratz
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - B Apfel
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Soekadar
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - A Beck
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ekhtiari H, Sangchooli A, Carmichael O, Moeller FG, O'Donnell P, Oquendo M, Paulus MP, Pizzagalli DA, Ramey T, Schacht J, Zare-Bidoky M, Childress AR, Brady K. Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Addiction. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.09.02.24312084. [PMID: 39281741 PMCID: PMC11398440 DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.02.24312084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/18/2024]
Abstract
As a neurobiological process, addiction involves pathological patterns of engagement with substances and a range of behaviors with a chronic and relapsing course. Neuroimaging technologies assess brain activity, structure, physiology, and metabolism at scales ranging from neurotransmitter receptors to large-scale brain networks, providing unique windows into the core neural processes implicated in substance use disorders. Identified aberrations in the neural substrates of reward and salience processing, response inhibition, interoception, and executive functions with neuroimaging can inform the development of pharmacological, neuromodulatory, and psychotherapeutic interventions to modulate the disordered neurobiology. Based on our systematic search, 409 protocols registered on ClinicalTrials.gov include the use of one or more neuroimaging paradigms as an outcome measure in addiction, with the majority (N=268) employing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), followed by positron emission tomography (PET) (N=71), electroencephalography (EEG) (N=50), structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (N=35) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) (N=35). Furthermore, in a PubMed systematic review, we identified 61 meta-analyses including 30 fMRI, 22 structural MRI, 8 EEG, 7 PET, and 3 MRS meta-analyses suggesting potential biomarkers in addictions. These studies can facilitate the development of a range of biomarkers that may prove useful in the arsenal of addiction treatments in the coming years. There is evidence that these markers of large-scale brain structure and activity may indicate vulnerability or separate disease subtypes, predict response to treatment, or provide objective measures of treatment response or recovery. Neuroimaging biomarkers can also suggest novel targets for interventions. Closed or open loop interventions can integrate these biomarkers with neuromodulation in real-time or offline to personalize stimulation parameters and deliver the precise intervention. This review provides an overview of neuroimaging modalities in addiction, potential neuroimaging biomarkers, and their physiologic and clinical relevance. Future directions and challenges in bringing these putative biomarkers from the bench to the bedside are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Ekhtiari
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Arshiya Sangchooli
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Owen Carmichael
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - F Gerard Moeller
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Patricio O'Donnell
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Maria Oquendo
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Martin P Paulus
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Diego A Pizzagalli
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Tatiana Ramey
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Joseph Schacht
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Mehran Zare-Bidoky
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Anna Rose Childress
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| | - Kathleen Brady
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Ekhtiari); Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA (Ekhtiari, Paulus); School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Sangchooli); Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA (Carmichael); Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Oquendo, Childress); Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA (Moeller); Translational Medicine, Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA and McLean Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, USA (O'Donnell); Division of Depression and Anxiety, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA (Pizzaggali); National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA (Ramey); Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA (Schacht); Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Zare-Bidoky); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA (Brady)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guidetti M, Bocci T, De Pedro Del Álamo M, Deuschl G, Fasano A, Fernandez RM, Gasca-Salas C, Hamani C, Krauss J, Kühn AA, Limousin P, Little S, Lozano A, Maiorana N, Marceglia S, Okun M, Oliveri S, Ostrem JL, Scelzo E, Schnitzler A, Starr P, Temel Y, Timmermann L, Tinkhauser G, Visser-Vandewalle V, Volkmann J, Priori A. Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Delphi Consensus Study. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.08.26.24312580. [PMID: 39252901 PMCID: PMC11383503 DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.26.24312580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
Importance If history teaches, as cardiac pacing moved from fixed-rate to on-demand delivery in in 80s of the last century, there are high probabilities that closed-loop and adaptive approaches will become, in the next decade, the natural evolution of conventional Deep Brain Stimulation (cDBS). However, while devices for aDBS are already available for clinical use, few data on their clinical application and technological limitations are available so far. In such scenario, gathering the opinion and expertise of leading investigators worldwide would boost and guide practice and research, thus grounding the clinical development of aDBS. Observations We identified clinical and academically experienced DBS clinicians (n=21) to discuss the challenges related to aDBS. A 5-point Likert scale questionnaire along with a Delphi method was employed. 42 questions were submitted to the panel, half of them being related to technical aspects while the other half to clinical aspects of aDBS. Experts agreed that aDBS will become clinical practice in 10 years. In the present scenario, although the panel agreed that aDBS applications require skilled clinicians and that algorithms need to be further optimized to manage complex PD symptoms, consensus was reached on aDBS safety and its ability to provide a faster and more stable treatment response than cDBS, also for tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease patients and for those with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Conclusions and Relevance Despite the need of further research, the panel concluded that aDBS is safe, promises to be maximally effective in PD patients with motor fluctuation and dyskinesias and therefore will enter into the clinical practice in the next years, with further research focused on algorithms and markers for complex symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Guidetti
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - T. Bocci
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | | | - G. Deuschl
- Department of Neurology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel and Christian Albrechts-University of Kiel Kiel Germany
| | - A. Fasano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson’s Disease Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R. Martinez Fernandez
- HM CINAC, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Carlos III, CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain
| | - C. Gasca-Salas
- HM CINAC, Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Carlos III, CIBERNED, Madrid, Spain
| | - C. Hamani
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, M4N 3M5, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, 149 College Street, Toronto, M5T 1P5, ON, Canada
| | - J.K. Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - A. A. Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure, Exzellenzcluster, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- DZNE, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - P. Limousin
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - S. Little
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - A.M. Lozano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - N.V. Maiorana
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - S. Marceglia
- Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - M.S. Okun
- Department of Neurology, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, United States
| | - S. Oliveri
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - J. L. Ostrem
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Centre, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - E. Scelzo
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - A. Schnitzler
- Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - P.A. Starr
- UCSF Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- UCSF Department of Physiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Y. Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - L. Timmermann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - G. Tinkhauser
- Department of Neurology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - V. Visser-Vandewalle
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - J. Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - A. Priori
- “Aldo Ravelli” Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
- Clinical Neurology Unit, “Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo”, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Via Antonio di Rudinì 8, 20142 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Asl FM, Maserat E, Vaezi M, Mohammadzadeh Z. Designing a core data set for benign hysterectomy registration system and its implementation in a referral teaching hospital in Northwest Iran. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024; 24:460. [PMID: 38961444 PMCID: PMC11223272 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06656-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Although minimally invasive hysterectomy offers advantages, abdominal hysterectomy remains the predominant surgical method. Creating a standardized dataset and establishing a hysterectomy registry system present opportunities for early interventions in reducing volume and selecting benign hysterectomy methods. This research aims to develop a dataset for designing benign hysterectomy registration system. METHODS Between April and September 2020, a qualitative study was carried out to create a data set for enrolling patients who were candidate for hysterectomy. At this stage, the research team conducted an information needs assessment, relevant data element identification, registry software development, and field testing; Subsequently, a web-based application was designed. In June 2023the registry software was evaluated using data extracted from medical records of patients admitted at Al-Zahra Hospital in Tabriz, Iran. RESULTS During two months, 40 patients with benign hysterectomy were successfully registered. The final dataset for the hysterectomy patient registry comprise 11 main groups, 27 subclasses, and a total of 91 Data elements. Mandatory data and essential reports were defined. Furthermore, a web-based registry system designed and evaluated based on data set and various scenarios. CONCLUSION Creating a hysterectomy registration system is the initial stride toward identifying and registering hysterectomy candidate patients. this system capture information about the procedure techniques, and associated complications. In Iran, this registry can serve as a valuable resource for assessing the quality of care delivered and the distribution of clinical measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Moghadami Asl
- Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Daneshgah St, Tabriz, 5165665811, Iran
| | - Elham Maserat
- Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Vaezi
- Associate professor of Gynecology, Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Reproductive Health Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Alzahra Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Zeinab Mohammadzadeh
- Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Daneshgah St, Tabriz, 5165665811, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Belnap MA, McManus KR, Grodin EN, Ray LA. Endpoints for Pharmacotherapy Trials for Alcohol Use Disorder. Pharmaceut Med 2024; 38:291-302. [PMID: 38967906 PMCID: PMC11272707 DOI: 10.1007/s40290-024-00526-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a debilitating disorder, yet currently approved pharmacotherapies to treat AUD are under-utilized. The three medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the indication of AUD are disulfiram, acamprosate, and naltrexone. The current landscape of pharmacotherapies for AUD suggests opportunities for improvement. Clinical trials investigating novel pharmacotherapies for AUD traditionally use abstinence-based drinking outcomes or no heavy drinking days as trial endpoints to determine the efficacy of pharmacotherapies. These outcomes are typically measured through patient self-report endorsements of their drinking. Apart from these traditional outcomes, there have been recent developments in novel endpoints for AUD pharmacotherapies. These novel endpoints include utilizing the World Health Organization (WHO) risk drinking level reductions to promote a harm-reduction endpoint rather than an abstinence-based endpoint. Additionally, in contrast to patient self-report measurements, biological markers of alcohol use may serve as objective endpoints in AUD pharmacotherapy trials. Lastly, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) definition of recovery from AUD and patient-oriented outcomes offer new frameworks to consider endpoints associated with more than alcohol consumption itself, such as the provider-patient experiences with novel pharmacotherapies. These recent developments in new endpoints for AUD pharmacotherapies offer promising future opportunities for pharmacotherapy development, so long as validity and reliability measures are demonstrated for the endpoints. A greater breadth of endpoint utilization may better capture the complexity of AUD symptomatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malia A Belnap
- Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kaitlin R McManus
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erica N Grodin
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lara A Ray
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dejoie JM, Senia N, Konova A, Smith D, Fareri D. Common and Distinct Drug Cue Reactivity Patterns Associated with Cocaine and Heroin: An fMRI Meta-Analysis. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2023.10.19.23297268. [PMID: 37905133 PMCID: PMC10615011 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.19.23297268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Substance use and substance use disorders represent ongoing major public health crises. Specifically, the use of substances such as cocaine and heroin are responsible for over 50,000 drug related deaths combined annually. We used a comparative meta-analysis procedure to contrast activation patterns associated with cocaine and heroin cue reactivity, which may reflect substance use risk for these substances. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for studies with within-subject whole brain analyses comparing drug to neutral cues for users of cocaine and heroin published between 1995 and 2022. A total of 18 studies were included, 9 in each subgroup. Voxel-based meta-analyses were performed using seed-based d mapping with permuted subject images (SDM-PSI) for subgroup mean analyses and a contrast meta-regression comparing the two substances. Results from our mean analysis indicated that users of heroin showed more widespread activation in the nucleus accumbens, right inferior and left middle temporal gyrus, right thalamus, and right cerebellum. Cocaine use was associated with recruitment of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during cue reactivity. Direct comparison of cue reactivity studies in heroin relative to cocaine users revealed greater activation in dopaminergic targets for users of heroin compared to users of cocaine. Differential activation patterns between substances may underlie differences in the clinical characteristics observed in users of cocaine and heroin, including seeking emotional blunting in users of heroin. More consistent research methodology is needed to provide adequate studies for stringent meta-analyses examining common and distinct neural activation patterns across substances and moderation by clinically relevant factors.
Collapse
|
9
|
Niemann F, Riemann S, Hubert AK, Antonenko D, Thielscher A, Martin AK, Unger N, Flöel A, Meinzer M. Electrode positioning errors reduce current dose for focal tDCS set-ups: Evidence from individualized electric field mapping. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 162:201-209. [PMID: 38643613 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electrode positioning errors contribute to variability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects. We investigated the impact of electrode positioning errors on current flow for tDCS set-ups with different focality. METHODS Deviations from planned electrode positions were determined using data acquired in an experimental study (N = 240 datasets) that administered conventional and focal tDCS during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Comparison of individualized electric field modeling for planned and empirically derived "actual" electrode positions was conducted to quantify the impact of positioning errors on the electric field dose in target regions for tDCS. RESULTS Planned electrode positions resulted in higher current dose in the target regions for focal compared to conventional montages (7-12%). Deviations from planned positions significantly reduced current flow in the target regions, selectively for focal set-ups (26-30%). Dose reductions were significantly larger for focal compared to conventional set-ups (29-43%). CONCLUSIONS Precise positioning is crucial when using focal tDCS set-ups to avoid significant reductions of current dose in the intended target regions. SIGNIFICANCE Our results highlight the urgent need to routinely implement methods for improving electrode positioning, minimization of electrode drift, verification of electrode positions before and/or after tDCS and also to consider positioning errors when investigating dose-response relationships, especially for focal set-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Niemann
- University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Steffen Riemann
- University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Hubert
- University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Daria Antonenko
- University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Axel Thielscher
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Technical University of Denmark, Department of Health Technology, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Andrew K Martin
- Kent University, School of Psychology, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Nina Unger
- University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Agnes Flöel
- University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE Site Greifswald), Greifswald, Germany
| | - Marcus Meinzer
- University Medicine Greifswald, Department of Neurology, Greifswald, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tap S, van Stipriaan E, Goudriaan AE, Kaag AM. Sex-Dependent Differences in the Neural Correlates of Cocaine and Emotional Cue-Reactivity in Regular Cocaine Users and Non-Drug-Using Controls: Understanding the Role of Duration and Severity of Use. Eur Addict Res 2024; 30:163-180. [PMID: 38710170 DOI: 10.1159/000538599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The development of cocaine use disorder in females is suggested to be more strongly related to neural mechanisms underlying stress-reactivity, whereas in males it is suggested to be more strongly related to neural mechanisms underlying drug cue-reactivity. Existing evidence, however, is based on neuroimaging studies that either lack a control group and/or have very small sample sizes that do not allow to investigate sex differences. METHODS The main objective of the current study was to investigate sex differences in the neural correlates of cocaine and negative emotional cue-reactivity within high-risk intranasal cocaine users (CUs: 31 males and 26 females) and non-cocaine-using controls (non-CUs: 28 males and 26 females). A region of interest (ROI) analysis was applied to test for the main and interaction effects of group, sex, and stimulus type (cocaine cues vs. neutral cocaine cues and negative emotional cues vs. neutral emotional cues) on activity in the dorsal striatum, ventral striatum (VS), amygdala, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). RESULTS There were no significant sex or group differences in cocaine cue-reactivity in any of the ROIs. Results did reveal significant emotional cue-reactivity in the amygdala and VS, but these effects were not moderated by group or sex. Exploratory analyses demonstrated that emotional cue-induced activation of the dACC and VS was negatively associated with years of regular cocaine use in female CUs, while this relationship was absent in male CUs. CONCLUSIONS While speculative, the sex-specific associations between years of regular use and emotional cue-reactivity in the dACC and VS suggest that, with longer years of use, female CUs become less sensitive to aversive stimuli, including the negative consequences of cocaine use, which could account for the observed "telescoping effect" in female CUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Tap
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Eila van Stipriaan
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Sleep and Cognition Lab, The Netherlands Institute of Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna E Goudriaan
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Arkin Mental Health and Jellinek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Marije Kaag
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Harp NR, Wager TD, Kober H. Neuromarkers in addiction: definitions, development strategies, and recent advances. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2024; 131:509-523. [PMID: 38630190 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-024-02766-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Substance use disorders (SUDs) are the most costly and prevalent psychiatric conditions. Recent calls emphasize a need for biomarkers-measurable, stable indicators of normal and abnormal processes and response to treatment or environmental agents-and, in particular, brain-based neuromarkers that will advance understanding of the neurobiological basis of SUDs and clinical practice. To develop neuromarkers, researchers must be grounded in evidence that a putative marker (i) is sensitive and specific to the psychological phenomenon of interest, (ii) constitutes a predictive model, and (iii) generalizes to novel observations (e.g., through internal cross-validation and external application to novel data). These neuromarkers may be used to index risk of developing SUDs (susceptibility), classify individuals with SUDs (diagnostic), assess risk for progression to more severe pathology (prognostic) or index current severity of pathology (monitoring), detect response to treatment (response), and predict individualized treatment outcomes (predictive). Here, we outline guidelines for developing and assessing neuromarkers, we then review recent advances toward neuromarkers in addiction neuroscience centering our discussion around neuromarkers of craving-a core feature of SUDs. In doing so, we specifically focus on the Neurobiological Craving Signature (NCS), which show great promise for meeting the demand of neuromarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas R Harp
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Tor D Wager
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Hedy Kober
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kronberg G, Ceceli AO, Huang Y, Gaudreault PO, King SG, McClain N, Alia-Klein N, Goldstein RZ. Naturalistic drug cue reactivity in heroin use disorder: orbitofrontal synchronization as a marker of craving and recovery. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2023.11.02.23297937. [PMID: 37961156 PMCID: PMC10635268 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.02.23297937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Movies captivate groups of individuals (the audience), especially if they contain themes of common motivational interest to the group. In drug addiction, a key mechanism is maladaptive motivational salience attribution whereby drug cues outcompete other reinforcers within the same environment or context. We predicted that while watching a drug-themed movie, where cues for drugs and other stimuli share a continuous narrative context, fMRI responses in individuals with heroin use disorder (iHUD) will preferentially synchronize during drug scenes. Results revealed such drug-biased synchronization in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), ventromedial and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and insula. After 15 weeks of inpatient treatment, there was a significant reduction in this drug-biased shared response in the OFC, which correlated with a concomitant reduction in dynamically-measured craving, suggesting synchronized OFC responses to a drug-themed movie as a neural marker of craving and recovery in iHUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Kronberg
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - Ahmet O Ceceli
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - Yuefeng Huang
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | | | - Sarah G King
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sangchooli A, Zare-Bidoky M, Fathi Jouzdani A, Schacht J, Bjork JM, Claus ED, Prisciandaro JJ, Wilson SJ, Wüstenberg T, Potvin S, Ahmadi P, Bach P, Baldacchino A, Beck A, Brady KT, Brewer JA, Childress AR, Courtney KE, Ebrahimi M, Filbey FM, Garavan H, Ghahremani DG, Goldstein RZ, Goudriaan AE, Grodin EN, Hanlon CA, Haugg A, Heilig M, Heinz A, Holczer A, Van Holst RJ, Joseph JE, Juliano AC, Kaufman MJ, Kiefer F, Khojasteh Zonoozi A, Kuplicki RT, Leyton M, London ED, Mackey S, McClernon FJ, Mellick WH, Morley K, Noori HR, Oghabian MA, Oliver JA, Owens M, Paulus MP, Perini I, Rafei P, Ray LA, Sinha R, Smolka MN, Soleimani G, Spanagel R, Steele VR, Tapert SF, Vollstädt-Klein S, Wetherill RR, Witkiewitz K, Yuan K, Zhang X, Verdejo-Garcia A, Potenza MN, Janes AC, Kober H, Zilverstand A, Ekhtiari H. Parameter Space and Potential for Biomarker Development in 25 Years of fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity: A Systematic Review. JAMA Psychiatry 2024; 81:414-425. [PMID: 38324323 PMCID: PMC11304510 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.5483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Importance In the last 25 years, functional magnetic resonance imaging drug cue reactivity (FDCR) studies have characterized some core aspects in the neurobiology of drug addiction. However, no FDCR-derived biomarkers have been approved for treatment development or clinical adoption. Traversing this translational gap requires a systematic assessment of the FDCR literature evidence, its heterogeneity, and an evaluation of possible clinical uses of FDCR-derived biomarkers. Objective To summarize the state of the field of FDCR, assess their potential for biomarker development, and outline a clear process for biomarker qualification to guide future research and validation efforts. Evidence Review The PubMed and Medline databases were searched for every original FDCR investigation published from database inception until December 2022. Collected data covered study design, participant characteristics, FDCR task design, and whether each study provided evidence that might potentially help develop susceptibility, diagnostic, response, prognostic, predictive, or severity biomarkers for 1 or more addictive disorders. Findings There were 415 FDCR studies published between 1998 and 2022. Most focused on nicotine (122 [29.6%]), alcohol (120 [29.2%]), or cocaine (46 [11.1%]), and most used visual cues (354 [85.3%]). Together, these studies recruited 19 311 participants, including 13 812 individuals with past or current substance use disorders. Most studies could potentially support biomarker development, including diagnostic (143 [32.7%]), treatment response (141 [32.3%]), severity (84 [19.2%]), prognostic (30 [6.9%]), predictive (25 [5.7%]), monitoring (12 [2.7%]), and susceptibility (2 [0.5%]) biomarkers. A total of 155 interventional studies used FDCR, mostly to investigate pharmacological (67 [43.2%]) or cognitive/behavioral (51 [32.9%]) interventions; 141 studies used FDCR as a response measure, of which 125 (88.7%) reported significant interventional FDCR alterations; and 25 studies used FDCR as an intervention outcome predictor, with 24 (96%) finding significant associations between FDCR markers and treatment outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance Based on this systematic review and the proposed biomarker development framework, there is a pathway for the development and regulatory qualification of FDCR-based biomarkers of addiction and recovery. Further validation could support the use of FDCR-derived measures, potentially accelerating treatment development and improving diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive clinical judgments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arshiya Sangchooli
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mehran Zare-Bidoky
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Fathi Jouzdani
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Joseph Schacht
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | - James M Bjork
- Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | - Eric D Claus
- Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park
| | - James J Prisciandaro
- Addiction Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Stephen J Wilson
- Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College
| | - Torsten Wüstenberg
- Field of Focus IV, Core Facility for Neuroscience of Self-Regulation (CNSR), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stéphane Potvin
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pooria Ahmadi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Patrick Bach
- Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health (CIMH), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Alex Baldacchino
- School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland
| | - Anne Beck
- Faculty of Health, Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathleen T Brady
- Addiction Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Judson A Brewer
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | | | - Mohsen Ebrahimi
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Francesca M Filbey
- Center for BrainHealth, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas
| | - Hugh Garavan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - Dara G Ghahremani
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Rita Z Goldstein
- Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Anneke E Goudriaan
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erica N Grodin
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Colleen A Hanlon
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
- BrainsWay Inc, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Amelie Haugg
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Markus Heilig
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Andreas Heinz
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Adrienn Holczer
- Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ruth J Van Holst
- Amsterdam Institute for Addiction Research, Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jane E Joseph
- Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | | | - Marc J Kaufman
- McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts
| | - Falk Kiefer
- Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health (CIMH), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Arash Khojasteh Zonoozi
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Marco Leyton
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Edythe D London
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Scott Mackey
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | - F Joseph McClernon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - William H Mellick
- Addiction Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Kirsten Morley
- Specialty of Addiction Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Hamid R Noori
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
| | - Mohammad Ali Oghabian
- Neuroimaging and Analysis Group, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jason A Oliver
- TSET Health Promotion Research Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
| | - Max Owens
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington
| | | | - Irene Perini
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Parnian Rafei
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Lara A Ray
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Rajita Sinha
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michael N Smolka
- Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Soleimani
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Rainer Spanagel
- Institute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Vaughn R Steele
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susan F Tapert
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego
| | - Sabine Vollstädt-Klein
- Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health (CIMH), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | - Kai Yuan
- School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
| | - Xiaochu Zhang
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui, China
| | | | - Marc N Potenza
- Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Amy C Janes
- Cognitive and Pharmacological Neuroimaging Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hedy Kober
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Anna Zilverstand
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Hamed Ekhtiari
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ekhtiari H, Khojasteh Zonoozi A, Rafei P, Abolghasemi FS, Pemstein D, Abdelgawad T, Achab S, Ghafri HA, Al’Absi M, Bisch M, Conti AA, Ambekar A, Arunogiri S, Bhad R, Bilici R, Brady K, Bunt G, Busse A, Butner JL, Danesh A, El-Khoury J, Omari FE, Jokūbonis D, de Jong C, Dom G, Ebrahimi M, Fathi Jouzdani A, Ferri M, Galea-Singer S, Parker DG, Higuchi S, Kathiresan P, Khelifa E, Kouimtsidis C, Krupitsky EM, Long J, Maremmani I, McGovern G, Mohaddes Ardabili H, Rahimi-Movaghar A, Rataemane ST, Sangchooli A, Sibeko G, Vella AM, Vista SBD, Zare-Bidoky M, Zhao M, Javed A, Potenza MN, Baldacchino AM. World addiction medicine reports: formation of the International Society of Addiction Medicine Global Expert Network (ISAM-GEN) and its global surveys. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1230318. [PMID: 38528974 PMCID: PMC10961370 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1230318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Addiction medicine is a dynamic field that encompasses clinical practice and research in the context of societal, economic, and cultural factors at the local, national, regional, and global levels. This field has evolved profoundly during the past decades in terms of scopes and activities with the contribution of addiction medicine scientists and professionals globally. The dynamic nature of drug addiction at the global level has resulted in a crucial need for developing an international collaborative network of addiction societies, treatment programs and experts to monitor emerging national, regional, and global concerns. This protocol paper presents methodological details of running longitudinal surveys at national, regional, and global levels through the Global Expert Network of the International Society of Addiction Medicine (ISAM-GEN). The initial formation of the network with a recruitment phase and a round of snowball sampling provided 354 experts from 78 countries across the globe. In addition, 43 national/regional addiction societies/associations are also included in the database. The surveys will be developed by global experts in addiction medicine on treatment services, service coverage, co-occurring disorders, treatment standards and barriers, emerging addictions and/or dynamic changes in treatment needs worldwide. Survey participants in categories of (1) addiction societies/associations, (2) addiction treatment programs, (3) addiction experts/clinicians and (4) related stakeholders will respond to these global longitudinal surveys. The results will be analyzed and cross-examined with available data and peer-reviewed for publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Ekhtiari
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States
| | - Arash Khojasteh Zonoozi
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Parnian Rafei
- Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fateme Sadat Abolghasemi
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Dan Pemstein
- Political Science and Public Policy & Challey Institute, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States
| | | | - Sophia Achab
- Faculty of Medicine, Sociological and Psychological Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hamad Al Ghafri
- National Rehabilitation Center, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Mustafa Al’Absi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Michaël Bisch
- Pôle Hospitalo-Universitaire de Psychiatrie d’Adultes et d’Addictologie du Grand Nancy, Centre Psychothérapique de Nancy, Laxou, France
| | - Aldo Alberto Conti
- Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Atul Ambekar
- National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Shalini Arunogiri
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roshan Bhad
- National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rabia Bilici
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychology, Istanbul Ticaret University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Kathleen Brady
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Gregory Bunt
- School of Medicine, New York University, New York City, NY, United States
| | - Anja Busse
- Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Section, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jenna L. Butner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Ahmad Danesh
- Division of Prevention Science, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Fatima El Omari
- Faculty of Medicine, University Mohammed Vth of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Darius Jokūbonis
- Republican Center for Addictive Disorders, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Cor de Jong
- Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Geert Dom
- Collaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Mohsen Ebrahimi
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Fathi Jouzdani
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marica Ferri
- European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Susanna Galea-Singer
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
- National Health Service (NHS) Fife Addiction Services, Cameron Hospital, Windygates, United Kingdom
| | | | - Susumu Higuchi
- National Hospital Organization Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center, Yokosuka, Japan
| | - Preethy Kathiresan
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India
| | - Emira Khelifa
- Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Christos Kouimtsidis
- National Office for Addressing Drugs, Athens, Greece
- Surrey and Borders Partnership, National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Leatherhead, United Kingdom
- Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Evgeny M. Krupitsky
- Department of Addictions, Bekhterev National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Jiang Long
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Icro Maremmani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- UniCamillus, International Medical University in Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Garrett McGovern
- Irish Chapter of International Society of Addiction Medicine (IRE-ISAM), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hossein Mohaddes Ardabili
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Arshiya Sangchooli
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Goodman Sibeko
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Anna Maria Vella
- Foundation for Social Welfare Services (FSWS), Sedqa, Santa Venera, Malta
| | - Salvador Benjamin D. Vista
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, College of Medicine and Philippines General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Mehran Zare-Bidoky
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Min Zhao
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Afzal Javed
- Pakistan Psychiatric Research Centre, Fountain House, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Marc N. Potenza
- Department of Psychiatry and Child Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT, United States
- Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling, Wethersfield, CT, United States
- Wu Tsai Institute and Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Alexander Mario Baldacchino
- DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kirsch DE, Ray LA, Wassum KM, Grodin EN. Anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex alcohol cue reactivity varies as a function of drink preference in alcohol use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 256:111123. [PMID: 38367535 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional MRI visual cue reactivity studies have not considered that brain responses to various alcohol-containing beverage types may vary as a function of an individual's drinking patterns and preferences. This study tested whether the brain's reward system responds differently to visual cues associated with an individuals' most commonly consumed ("preferred") alcohol beverage compared with less commonly consumed ("non-preferred") alcohol beverages in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD). METHODS Participants (N=70) with current AUD completed a standard visual alcohol cue reactivity procedure during fMRI and reported recent alcohol use through the Timeline Followback interview. Alcohol use patterns were used to infer drink preference. Repeated measure ANCOVAs were used to evaluate differences in subjective craving (alcohol urge) and neural reactivity to cues of individual's "preferred" versus "non-preferred" alcohol beverages. RESULTS Fifty-four (77%) participants were determined to have a "preferred" alcohol beverage, as defined by their pattern of alcohol use. These participants reported greater subjective alcohol urge (p=0.02) and activation in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) (p=0.005) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (p=0.001)) in response to visual cues associated with their "preferred" versus "non-preferred" alcohol beverage. Individuals with an alcohol preference did not differ from those with no alcohol preference on subjective or neural responses to their "preferred" and "non-preferred" alcohol cues. DISCUSSION Results suggest alcohol cue-elicited subjective and neural responses vary as a function of alcohol beverage preference in individuals with AUD and a behaviorally defined alcohol preference. Stronger ACC and mPFC activation may reflect greater subjective value of an individual's "preferred" alcohol beverage cue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan E Kirsch
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA
| | - Lara A Ray
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Kate M Wassum
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA
| | - Erica N Grodin
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Naqvi NH, Srivastava AB, Sanchez-Peña J, Lee JK, Drysdale AT, Mariani JJ, Ochsner KN, Morgenstern J, Patel GH, Levin FR. Neural correlates of drinking reduction during a clinical trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder. ALCOHOL, CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH 2024; 48:260-272. [PMID: 38225187 PMCID: PMC11015435 DOI: 10.1111/acer.15259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD). We hypothesized that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a region implicated in cognitive control and goal-directed behavior, plays a role in behavior change during CBT by facilitating the regulation of craving (ROC). METHODS Treatment-seeking participants with AUD (N = 22) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning both before and after a 12-week, single-arm trial of CBT, using an ROC task that was previously shown to engage the DLPFC. RESULTS We found that both the percentage of heavy drinking days (PHDD) and the overall self-reported alcohol craving measured during the ROC task were significantly reduced from pre- to post-CBT. However, we did not find significant changes over time in either the ability to regulate craving or regulation-related activity in any brain region. We found a significant 3-way interaction between the effects of cue-induced craving, cue-induced brain activity and timepoint of assessment (pre- or post-CBT) on PHDD in the left DLPFC. Follow-up analysis showed that cue-induced craving was associated with cue-induced activity in the left DLPFC among participants who ceased heavy drinking during CBT, both at pre-CBT and post-CBT timepoints. No such associations were present at either timepoint among participants who continued to drink heavily. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that patients in whom DLPFC functioning is more strongly related to cue-induced craving may preferentially respond to CBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasir H Naqvi
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - A Benjamin Srivastava
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Juan Sanchez-Peña
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jessica K Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew T Drysdale
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - John J Mariani
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kevin N Ochsner
- Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jon Morgenstern
- Department of Psychiatry, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University/Northwell Health, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Gaurav H Patel
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Frances R Levin
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bach P, Zaiser J, Zimmermann S, Gessner T, Hoffmann S, Gerhardt S, Berhe O, Bekier NK, Abel M, Radler P, Langejürgen J, Tost H, Lenz B, Vollstädt-Klein S, Stallkamp J, Kirschbaum C, Kiefer F. Stress-Induced Sensitization of Insula Activation Predicts Alcohol Craving and Alcohol Use in Alcohol Use Disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2024; 95:245-255. [PMID: 37678541 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stress and alcohol cues trigger alcohol consumption and relapse in alcohol use disorder. However, the neurobiological processes underlying their interaction are not well understood. Thus, we conducted a randomized, controlled neuroimaging study to investigate the effects of psychosocial stress on neural cue reactivity and addictive behaviors. METHODS Neural alcohol cue reactivity was assessed in 91 individuals with alcohol use disorder using a validated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) task. Activation patterns were measured twice, at baseline and during a second fMRI session, prior to which participants were assigned to psychosocial stress (experimental condition) or a matched control condition or physical exercise (control conditions). Together with fMRI data, alcohol craving and cortisol levels were assessed, and alcohol use data were collected during a 12-month follow-up. Analyses tested the effects of psychosocial stress on neural cue reactivity and associations with cortisol levels, craving, and alcohol use. RESULTS Compared with both control conditions, psychosocial stress elicited higher alcohol cue-induced activation in the left anterior insula (familywise error-corrected p < .05) and a stress- and cue-specific dynamic increase in insula activation over time (F22,968 = 2.143, p = .007), which was predicted by higher cortisol levels during the experimental intervention (r = 0.310, false discovery rate-corrected p = .016). Cue-induced insula activation was positively correlated with alcohol craving during fMRI (r = 0.262, false discovery rate-corrected p = .032) and alcohol use during follow-up (r = 0.218, false discovery rate-corrected p = .046). CONCLUSIONS Results indicate a stress-induced sensitization of cue-induced activation in the left insula as a neurobiological correlate of the effects of psychosocial stress on alcohol craving and alcohol use in alcohol use disorder, which likely reflects changes in salience attribution and goal-directed behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Bach
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; Feuerlein Center on Translational Addiction Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Judith Zaiser
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sina Zimmermann
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tatjana Gessner
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Hoffmann
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Biostatistics, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sarah Gerhardt
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oksana Berhe
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nina Kim Bekier
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Abel
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Radler
- Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation Institute for Production Technology and Automation, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jens Langejürgen
- Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation Institute for Production Technology and Automation, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Heike Tost
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Lenz
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine Vollstädt-Klein
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jan Stallkamp
- Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens Kirschbaum
- Department of Psychology, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Falk Kiefer
- Department of Addictive Behavior and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany; Feuerlein Center on Translational Addiction Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, Medical Faculty of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brevers D, Billieux J, de Timary P, Desmedt O, Maurage P, Perales JC, Suárez-Suárez S, Bechara A. Physical Exercise to Redynamize Interoception in Substance use Disorders. Curr Neuropharmacol 2024; 22:1047-1063. [PMID: 36918784 PMCID: PMC10964100 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x21666230314143803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Physical exercise is considered a promising medication-free and cost-effective adjunct treatment for substance use disorders (SUD). Nevertheless, evidence regarding the effectiveness of these interventions is currently limited, thereby signaling the need to better understand the mechanisms underlying their impact on SUD, in order to reframe and optimize them. Here we advance that physical exercise could be re-conceptualized as an "interoception booster", namely as a way to help people with SUD to better decode and interpret bodily-related signals associated with transient states of homeostatic imbalances that usually trigger consumption. We first discuss how mismatches between current and desired bodily states influence the formation of reward-seeking states in SUD, in light of the insular cortex brain networks. Next, we detail effort perception during physical exercise and discuss how it can be used as a relevant framework for re-dynamizing interoception in SUD. We conclude by providing perspectives and methodological considerations for applying the proposed approach to mixed-design neurocognitive research on SUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Brevers
- Louvain Experimental Psychopathology Research Group (LEP), Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), UCLouvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
- Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, Institute for Health and Behaviour, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Joël Billieux
- Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Centre for Excessive Gambling, Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospitals (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philippe de Timary
- Louvain Experimental Psychopathology Research Group (LEP), Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), UCLouvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
- Department of Adult Psychiatry, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc and Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Desmedt
- Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Maurage
- Louvain Experimental Psychopathology Research Group (LEP), Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), UCLouvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - José Cesar Perales
- Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Samuel Suárez-Suárez
- Louvain Experimental Psychopathology Research Group (LEP), Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), UCLouvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Antoine Bechara
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kang D, Baker TE, Steele VR. Editorial: New discoveries in the field of brain stimulation and addiction disorders. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1337773. [PMID: 38094005 PMCID: PMC10716533 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1337773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dongyu Kang
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Travis E. Baker
- Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Rutgers University—Newark, Newark, NJ, United States
| | - Vaughn R. Steele
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Epp T, Skrenes A, Chao T, Krigolson OE, Schütz CG. Associations of the P300 Event-Related Potentials and Self-Reported Craving in Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review. Eur Addict Res 2023; 29:406-416. [PMID: 37820586 DOI: 10.1159/000533147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The phenomenon of craving and attention bias towards drug cues is theorized to operate cooperatively, owing to the principles of associative learning. In this context, the conditioned response to drug-related stimuli activates reward mechanisms within the brain, consequently inducing craving and fostering the underlying mechanisms that contribute to relapse in individuals with substance use disorders. Multiple studies have assessed the relationship between attention to substance-related cues and subjective craving through electroencephalography (EEG), but their findings have yet to be synthesized and examined. This review summarizes the association between the amplitude of the P300 event-related potential (ERP) and substance use craving, compares discrepancies in results by type of substance, and discusses gaps in the literature to inform future research. METHODS A systematic search was conducted on Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases. Studies were published in English and included peer-reviewed human research investigating the relationship between EEG P300 ERP and self-reported substance use craving. The included study samples comprised of in treatment or non-treatment-seeking participants who use substances. The primary outcomes of interest were those derived from inferential statistics assessing P300 amplitude and substance use craving. RESULTS Ten studies were included in the final search and were organized by substance type: three alcohol, three cocaine, two tobacco, one heroin, and one cannabis. Results were mixed for alcohol and cocaine. Studies on tobacco, heroin, and cannabis use were congruent for associations between the P300 amplitude and craving. CONCLUSIONS Overall findings are mixed between studies addressing the association of the EEG P300 amplitude and craving. These results should be considered in the context of the limited sample size, underpowered analyses, and methodological differences that potentially contribute to discrepancies in outcomes. Further research is required to assess the role of craving assessment, EEG methodology, and substance-related factors on the association between P300 amplitude and self-reported craving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanisse Epp
- Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Asal Skrenes
- Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Thomas Chao
- Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Olave E Krigolson
- Theoretical and Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christian G Schütz
- Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Larsen JK, Hollands GJ, Garland EL, Evers AWM, Wiers RW. Be more mindful: Targeting addictive responses by integrating mindfulness with cognitive bias modification or cue exposure interventions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2023; 153:105408. [PMID: 37758008 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
This review provides an overview of the most prominent neurocognitive effects of cognitive bias modification (CBM), cue-exposure therapy and mindfulness interventions for targeting addictive responses. It highlights the key insights that have stemmed from cognitive neuroscience and brain imaging research and combines these with insights from behavioural science in building a conceptual model integrating mindfulness with response-focused CBM or cue-exposure interventions. This furthers our understanding of whether and how mindfulness strategies may i) facilitate or add to the induced response-focused effects decreasing cue-induced craving, and ii) further weaken the link between craving and addictive responses. Specifically, awareness/monitoring may facilitate, and decentering may add to, response-focused effects. Combined awareness acceptance strategies may also diminish the craving-addiction link. The conceptual model presented in this review provides a specific theoretical framework to deepen our understanding of how mindfulness strategies and CBM or cue-exposure interventions can be combined to greatest effect. This is important in both suggesting a roadmap for future research, and for the further development of clinical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junilla K Larsen
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, PO Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Gareth J Hollands
- EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, UK
| | - Eric L Garland
- Center on Mindfulness and Integrative Health Intervention Development, College of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Andrea W M Evers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, NL, and Medical Delta, Leiden University, TU Delft and Erasmus University, UK
| | - Reinout W Wiers
- Addiction Development and Psychopathology (ADAPT)-lab, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam and Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Meredith LR, Burnette EM, Nieto SJ, Du H, Donato S, Grodin EN, Green R, Magill M, Baskerville WA, Ray LA. Testing pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder with cue exposure paradigms: A systematic review and quantitative synthesis of human laboratory trial methodology. ALCOHOL, CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH 2023; 47:1629-1645. [PMID: 37423771 DOI: 10.1111/acer.15143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Alcohol cue exposure is a widely used experimental paradigm for screening pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Medication-related reductions in cue-reactivity signal early efficacy and inform medications development. Yet, across trials, the design of cue exposure, parameter testing, and outcome reporting is heterogeneous. This systematic review is a quantitative synthesis of trial methodologies and effect size estimation for AUD medication-related craving and psychophysiological outcomes under the cue exposure paradigm. A PubMed search was conducted on January 3, 2022 based on identified pharmacotherapies for peer-reviewed articles reported in English. Study-level characteristics, including sample descriptors, paradigm design, analytic approach, and Cochrane Risk of Bias, along with descriptive statistics for cue-exposure outcomes, were coded by two independent raters. Study-level effect sizes were estimated for craving and psychophysiological outcomes separately and sample-level effect sizes were calculated for each medication. Thirty-six trials, comprising 1640 participants and testing 19 different medications satisfied eligibility criteria. All studies reported on biological sex (71% male participants on average). The exposure paradigms implemented used in vivo (n = 26), visual (n = 8), and audio script (n = 2) cues. Some trials included means for craving by medication condition in text (k = 7) or figures (k = 18). The quantitative synthesis included 63 effect sizes (craving kes = 47; psychophysiological kes = 16) from 28 unique randomized trials testing 15 medications for effects on cue reactivity. For cue-induced craving, eight medications (kes range: 1-12) demonstrated small-to-medium effects (Cohen's d range: |0.24-0.64|) compared to placebo, with individuals randomized to receive medication reporting lower craving following cue exposure. Recommendations are provided to promote further consilience, so that the utility of cue exposure paradigms can be maximized in the development of effective AUD pharmacotherapies. Future work should explore the predictive utility of medication-related reductions in cue-reactivity on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay R Meredith
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Burnette
- Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Steven J Nieto
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Han Du
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Suzanna Donato
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Erica N Grodin
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - ReJoyce Green
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Molly Magill
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Wave-Ananda Baskerville
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lara A Ray
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Verdejo-Garcia A, Rezapour T, Giddens E, Khojasteh Zonoozi A, Rafei P, Berry J, Caracuel A, Copersino ML, Field M, Garland EL, Lorenzetti V, Malloy-Diniz L, Manning V, Marceau EM, Pennington DL, Strickland JC, Wiers R, Fairhead R, Anderson A, Bell M, Boendermaker WJ, Brooks S, Bruno R, Campanella S, Cousijn J, Cox WM, Dean AC, Ersche KD, Franken I, Froeliger B, Gamito P, Gladwin TE, Goncalves PD, Houben K, Jacobus J, Jones A, Kaag AM, Lindenmeyer J, McGrath E, Nardo T, Oliveira J, Pennington CR, Perrykkad K, Piercy H, Rupp CI, Schulte MHJ, Squeglia LM, Staiger P, Stein DJ, Stein J, Stein M, Stoops WW, Sweeney M, Witkiewitz K, Woods SP, Yi R, Zhao M, Ekhtiari H. Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study. Addiction 2023; 118:935-951. [PMID: 36508168 PMCID: PMC10073279 DOI: 10.1111/add.16109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Substance use disorders (SUD) are associated with cognitive deficits that are not always addressed in current treatments, and this hampers recovery. Cognitive training and remediation interventions are well suited to fill the gap for managing cognitive deficits in SUD. We aimed to reach consensus on recommendations for developing and applying these interventions. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS We used a Delphi approach with two sequential phases: survey development and iterative surveying of experts. This was an on-line study. During survey development, we engaged a group of 15 experts from a working group of the International Society of Addiction Medicine (Steering Committee). During the surveying process, we engaged a larger pool of experts (n = 54) identified via recommendations from the Steering Committee and a systematic review. MEASUREMENTS Survey with 67 items covering four key areas of intervention development: targets, intervention approaches, active ingredients and modes of delivery. FINDINGS Across two iterative rounds (98% retention rate), the experts reached a consensus on 50 items including: (i) implicit biases, positive affect, arousal, executive functions and social processing as key targets of interventions; (ii) cognitive bias modification, contingency management, emotion regulation training and cognitive remediation as preferred approaches; (iii) practice, feedback, difficulty-titration, bias modification, goal-setting, strategy learning and meta-awareness as active ingredients; and (iv) both addiction treatment work-force and specialized neuropsychologists facilitating delivery, together with novel digital-based delivery modalities. CONCLUSIONS Expert recommendations on cognitive training and remediation for substance use disorders highlight the relevance of targeting implicit biases, reward, emotion regulation and higher-order cognitive skills via well-validated intervention approaches qualified with mechanistic techniques and flexible delivery options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Verdejo-Garcia
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Tara Rezapour
- Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran
| | - Emily Giddens
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Arash Khojasteh Zonoozi
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parnian Rafei
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jamie Berry
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia
| | - Alfonso Caracuel
- Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Matt Field
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Eric L Garland
- Center on Mindfulness and Integrative Health Intervention Development, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Valentina Lorenzetti
- Neuroscience of Addiction and Mental Health Program, Healthy Brain and Mind Research Centre, School of Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Leandro Malloy-Diniz
- Mental Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Victoria Manning
- Turning Point Drug and Alcohol Centre and Monash Addiction Research Centre (MARC), Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ely M Marceau
- School of Psychology and Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - David L Pennington
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Justin C Strickland
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Reinout Wiers
- Addiction Development and Psychopathology (ADAPT) Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rahia Fairhead
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Alexandra Anderson
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Morris Bell
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Wouter J Boendermaker
- Addiction, Development, and Psychopathology (ADAPT) Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Samantha Brooks
- Research Centre for Brain and Behaviour, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, UK
| | - Raimondo Bruno
- School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, TAS, Hobart, Australia
| | - Salvatore Campanella
- Laboratoire de Psychologie Médicale et d'Addictologie, ULB Neuroscience Institute (UNI), CHU Brugmann-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Janna Cousijn
- Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W Miles Cox
- School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Andrew C Dean
- Department of Psychiatry and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karen D Ersche
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ingmar Franken
- Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Brett Froeliger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Priscila D Goncalves
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katrijn Houben
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Joanna Jacobus
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Jones
- Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Anne M Kaag
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Elly McGrath
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Talia Nardo
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Kelsey Perrykkad
- Cognition and Philosophy Laboratory, Monash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hugh Piercy
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Claudia I Rupp
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, University Clinics of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mieke H J Schulte
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lindsay M Squeglia
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Petra Staiger
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dan J Stein
- SAMRC Unit on Risk and Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jeff Stein
- Center for Health Behaviors Research, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginial Tech, VA, USA
| | - Maria Stein
- Department for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - William W Stoops
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mary Sweeney
- Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Katie Witkiewitz
- Department of Psychology and Center on Alcohol, Substance Use and Addictions, University of New Mexico, NM, USA
| | - Steven P Woods
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Yi
- Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Min Zhao
- Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hamed Ekhtiari
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Beck A. Disentangling Brain Network Connectivity During Monetary and Drug-Related Reward Processing in Stimulant Use Disorder. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2023; 8:490-491. [PMID: 37150583 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Beck
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt, Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brevers D, Baeken C, De Smet S, Catoira B, De Witte S, He Q, Maurage P, Schulze-Steinen L, Sescousse G, Verde CV, Vögele C, Billieux J. Stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates brain cue reactivity to reward (un)availability. Cortex 2023; 164:51-62. [PMID: 37172533 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Brain imaging studies have shown that stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), which plays a pivotal role in high-order cognitive control processes, modulates brain reactivity to reward-related cues. Nevertheless, the impact of contextual factors such as reward availability (the reward that is depicted in the cue exposure task) on such modulation effect remains unclear. Here we tested whether a single session of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) over the left dlPFC differently impacts brain reactivity to cues signalling either availability or unavailability of a sports betting opportunity. Employing a within-subject design (verum versus sham HF-rTMS) among thirty-two frequent sports bettors, we first observed that, as compared to the sham condition, verum HF-rTMS modulated brain reactivity to game cues prior to being made (un)available for betting, through simultaneous increases (posterior insula and caudate nucleus) and decreases (occipital pole) in brain activation. Second, verum HF-rTMS led to increased ventral striatal activity towards cues available for betting but did not modulate brain response to cues unavailable for betting. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that transient stimulation of the left dlPFC led to a general modulation in brain activity in responses to cues, and that this effect is only partly dependent on cues signalling for reward (un)availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Brevers
- Louvain for Experimental Psychopathology Research Group (LEP), Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Institute for Health and Behaviour, Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
| | - Chris Baeken
- Department of Psychiatry University Hospital (UZBrussel), Brussels, Belgium; Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Beatriz Catoira
- Department of Psychiatry University Hospital (UZBrussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sara De Witte
- Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Qinghua He
- Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, 2 Tiansheng Rd, Chongqing, China
| | - Pierre Maurage
- Louvain for Experimental Psychopathology Research Group (LEP), Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Laimi Schulze-Steinen
- Institute for Health and Behaviour, Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Guillaume Sescousse
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Center - INSERM U1028 - CNRS UMR5292, PSYR2 Team, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Claudia Vila Verde
- Institute for Health and Behaviour, Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Claus Vögele
- Institute for Health and Behaviour, Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Joël Billieux
- Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Centre for Excessive Gambling, Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospitals (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kulkarni KR, Schafer M, Berner LA, Fiore VG, Heflin M, Hutchison K, Calhoun V, Filbey F, Pandey G, Schiller D, Gu X. An Interpretable and Predictive Connectivity-Based Neural Signature for Chronic Cannabis Use. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2023; 8:320-330. [PMID: 35659965 PMCID: PMC9708942 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis is one of the most widely used substances in the world, with usage trending upward in recent years. However, although the psychiatric burden associated with maladaptive cannabis use has been well established, reliable and interpretable biomarkers associated with chronic use remain elusive. In this study, we combine large-scale functional magnetic resonance imaging with machine learning and network analysis and develop an interpretable decoding model that offers both accurate prediction and novel insights into chronic cannabis use. METHODS Chronic cannabis users (n = 166) and nonusing healthy control subjects (n = 124) completed a cue-elicited craving task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Linear machine learning methods were used to classify individuals into chronic users and nonusers based on whole-brain functional connectivity. Network analysis was used to identify the most predictive regions and communities. RESULTS We obtained high (∼80% out-of-sample) accuracy across 4 different classification models, demonstrating that task-evoked connectivity can successfully differentiate chronic cannabis users from nonusers. We also identified key predictive regions implicating motor, sensory, attention, and craving-related areas, as well as a core set of brain networks that contributed to successful classification. The most predictive networks also strongly correlated with cannabis craving within the chronic user group. CONCLUSIONS This novel approach produced a neural signature of chronic cannabis use that is both accurate in terms of out-of-sample prediction and interpretable in terms of predictive networks and their relation to cannabis craving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaustubh R Kulkarni
- Center for Computational Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Matthew Schafer
- Center for Computational Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Laura A Berner
- Center for Computational Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Vincenzo G Fiore
- Center for Computational Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Matt Heflin
- Center for Computational Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Kent Hutchison
- Institute for Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
| | - Vince Calhoun
- Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science, Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Francesca Filbey
- Center for BrainHealth, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
| | - Gaurav Pandey
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Daniela Schiller
- Center for Computational Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Xiaosi Gu
- Center for Computational Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cousijn J, Mies G, Runia N, Derksen M, Willuhn I, Lesscher H. The impact of age on olfactory alcohol cue-reactivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in adolescent and adult male drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2023; 47:668-677. [PMID: 36855285 DOI: 10.1111/acer.15037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescence is marked not only by rapid surges in the prevalence of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) but also by remarkable recovery rates, as most adolescent-onset AUDs naturally resolve over time. Little is known about the differential vulnerability of adolescents and adults. Therefore, this study aimed to unravel the moderating role of age by comparing neural alcohol cue-reactivity, an important AUD biomarker, between low-to-high beer-drinking adolescent (n = 50, 16 to 18 years), and adult (n = 51, 30 to 35 years) males matched on drinking severity. METHODS Associations between beer odor-induced brain activity and AUD diagnosis, severity of alcohol use-related problems, recent alcohol use, binge-drinking frequency, and task-induced craving were investigated across and between age groups in regions of interest thought to be central in alcohol cue-reactivity: the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and striatal subregions (nucleus accumbens and caudate putamen). These analyses were complemented by exploratory whole-brain analyses. RESULTS Pre-task beer craving increased pre-to-post task in adolescents only. Individual differences in alcohol use, binge drinking, and craving did not relate to beer odor-induced activity. Although region-of-interest analyses did not reach significance, whole-brain analyses showed that adolescents with AUD, compared with adolescents without AUD and adults with AUD, had higher beer odor-induced activity in a large mesocorticolimbic cluster encompassing the right caudate, nucleus accumbens, orbitofrontal cortex, and the olfactory sulcus. Activity in the right caudate and putamen was positively associated with the severity of alcohol use-related problems in adolescents but negatively associated in adults. CONCLUSION These findings suggest a differential role of alcohol cue-reactivity in adolescents compared with adults with AUD and highlight the need for further studies investigating the role of age in the fundamental processes underlying the development of and recovery from of AUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janna Cousijn
- Neuroscience of Addiction (NofA) Lab, Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gabry Mies
- Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Karakter Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nora Runia
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maik Derksen
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingo Willuhn
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heidi Lesscher
- Unit Animals in Science and Society, Division of Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Naqvi NH, Srivastava AB, Sanchez-Peña J, Lee J, Mariani JJ, Patel GH, Levin FR. Neural correlates of drinking reduction during cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.02.08.527703. [PMID: 36798260 PMCID: PMC9934652 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.08.527703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD). We hypothesized that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a brain region implicated in cognitive control and goal-directed behavior, plays a role behavior change during CBT by facilitating regulation of craving. To examine this, treatment-seeking participants with AUD (N=22) underwent functional MRI scanning both before and after a 12-week single-arm trial of CBT, using a regulation of craving (ROC) fMRI task designed to measure an individual's ability to control alcohol craving and previously shown to engage the DLPFC. We found that both the number of heavy drinking days (NHDD, the primary clinical outcome) and the self-reported alcohol craving measured during the ROC paradigm were significantly reduced from pre- to post-CBT [NHDD: t=15.69, p<0.0001; alcohol craving: (F(1,21)=16.16; p=0.0006)]. Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no change in regulation effects on self-reported craving over time (F(1,21)=0.072; p=0.79), nor was there was a significant change in regulation effects over time on activity in any parcel. Searching the whole brain for neural correlates of reductions in drinking and craving after CBT, we found a significant 3-way interaction between the effects of cue-induced alcohol craving, cue-induced brain activity and timepoint of assessment (pre- or post-CBT) on NHDD in a parcel corresponding to area 46 of the right DLPFC (ß=-0.37, p=0.046, FDR corrected). Follow-up analyses showed that reductions in cue-induced alcohol craving from pre- to post-CBT were linearly related to reductions in alcohol cue-induced activity in area 46 only among participants who ceased heavy drinking during CBT (r=0.81, p=0.005) but not among those who continued to drink heavily (r=0.28, p=0.38). These results are consistent with a model in which CBT impacts heavy drinking by increasing the engagement of the DLPFC during cue-induced craving.
Collapse
|
29
|
Beck A, Ebrahimi C, Rosenthal A, Charlet K, Heinz A. The Dopamine System in Mediating Alcohol Effects in Humans. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2023. [PMID: 36705911 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2022_415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Brain-imaging studies show that the development and maintenance of alcohol use disorder (AUD) is determined by a complex interaction of different neurotransmitter systems and multiple psychological factors. In this context, the dopaminergic reinforcement system appears to be of fundamental importance. We focus on the excitatory and depressant effects of acute versus chronic alcohol intake and its impact on dopaminergic neurotransmission. Furthermore, we describe alterations in dopaminergic neurotransmission as associated with symptoms of alcohol dependence. We specifically focus on neuroadaptations to chronic alcohol consumption and their effect on central processing of alcohol-associated and reward-related stimuli. Altered reward processing, complex conditioning processes, impaired reinforcement learning, and increased salience attribution to alcohol-associated stimuli enable alcohol cues to drive alcohol seeking and consumption. Finally, we will discuss how the neurobiological and neurochemical mechanisms of alcohol-associated alterations in reward processing and learning can interact with stress, cognition, and emotion processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Beck
- Faculty of Health, Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Claudia Ebrahimi
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Rosenthal
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katrin Charlet
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Heinz
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Carmichael O. The Role of fMRI in Drug Development: An Update. ADVANCES IN NEUROBIOLOGY 2023; 30:299-333. [PMID: 36928856 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21054-9_13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain is a technology that holds great potential for increasing the efficiency of drug development for the central nervous system (CNS). In preclinical studies and both early- and late-phase human trials, fMRI has the potential to improve cross-species translation of drug effects, help to de-risk compounds early in development, and contribute to the portfolio of evidence for a compound's efficacy and mechanism of action. However, to date, the utilization of fMRI in the CNS drug development process has been limited. The purpose of this chapter is to explore this mismatch between potential and utilization. This chapter provides introductory material related to fMRI and drug development, describes what is required of fMRI measurements for them to be useful in a drug development setting, lists current capabilities of fMRI in this setting and challenges faced in its utilization, and ends with directions for future development of capabilities in this arena. This chapter is the 5-year update of material from a previously published workshop summary (Carmichael et al., Drug DiscovToday 23(2):333-348, 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Carmichael
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rosenthal A, Garbusow M, Romanczuk-Seiferth N, Beck A. Effects of a brief mindfulness meditation practice on Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in alcohol use disorder - a pilot study. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1134458. [PMID: 37168079 PMCID: PMC10164967 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1134458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pavlovian conditioned contextual cues have been suggested to modulate instrumental action and might explain maladaptive behavior such as relapse in participants suffering from alcohol use disorder (AUD). Pavlovian-to-Instrumental transfer (PIT) experimentally assesses the magnitude of this context-dependent effect and studies have shown a larger PIT effect in AUD populations. Taken this into account, a reduction of the influence of cues on behavior seems warranted and one approach that could alter such cue reactivity is mindfulness. Mindfulness-based interventions have been shown to be efficient in the treatment of AUD, but underlying mechanisms are yet to be elucidated. Therefore, we aim at investigating the effect of a brief mindful body scan meditation on the magnitude of the PIT effect in AUD subjects and matched controls. Methods Using a randomized within-subjects design, we compared the effect of a short audio guided body scan meditation against a control condition (audio of nature sounds) on PIT in healthy (n = 35) and AUD (n = 27) participants. Results We found no differences in PIT effect between healthy and AUD participants as well as between conditions. However, a significant interaction effect points to a decreased PIT effect after body scan meditation in AUD subjects only. Discussion These pilot results suggest that AUD might be susceptible to mindfulness-induced changes in PIT, with these findings contributing to entangling the underlying mechanisms of the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions in AUD. However, further investigation should confirm these preliminary results and the efficacy of mindfulness meditation practice in decreasing the PIT effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Rosenthal
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité – Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- *Correspondence: Annika Rosenthal,
| | - Maria Garbusow
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité – Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Romanczuk-Seiferth
- Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité – Berlin University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, MSB Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Beck
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Health and Medical University, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brunoni AR, Ekhtiari H, Antal A, Auvichayapat P, Baeken C, Benseñor IM, Bikson M, Boggio P, Borroni B, Brighina F, Brunelin J, Carvalho S, Caumo W, Ciechanski P, Charvet L, Clark VP, Cohen Kadosh R, Cotelli M, Datta A, Deng ZD, De Raedt R, De Ridder D, Fitzgerald PB, Floel A, Frohlich F, George MS, Ghobadi-Azbari P, Goerigk S, Hamilton RH, Jaberzadeh SJ, Hoy K, Kidgell DJ, Zonoozi AK, Kirton A, Laureys S, Lavidor M, Lee K, Leite J, Lisanby SH, Loo C, Martin DM, Miniussi C, Mondino M, Monte-Silva K, Morales-Quezada L, Nitsche MA, Okano AH, Oliveira CS, Onarheim B, Pacheco-Barrios K, Padberg F, Nakamura-Palacios EM, Palm U, Paulus W, Plewnia C, Priori A, Rajji TK, Razza LB, Rehn EM, Ruffini G, Schellhorn K, Zare-Bidoky M, Simis M, Skorupinski P, Suen P, Thibaut A, Valiengo LCL, Vanderhasselt MA, Vanneste S, Venkatasubramanian G, Violante IR, Wexler A, Woods AJ, Fregni F. Digitalized transcranial electrical stimulation: A consensus statement. Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 143:154-165. [PMID: 36115809 PMCID: PMC10031774 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although relatively costly and non-scalable, non-invasive neuromodulation interventions are treatment alternatives for neuropsychiatric disorders. The recent developments of highly-deployable transcranial electric stimulation (tES) systems, combined with mobile-Health technologies, could be incorporated in digital trials to overcome methodological barriers and increase equity of access. The study aims are to discuss the implementation of tES digital trials by performing a systematic scoping review and strategic process mapping, evaluate methodological aspects of tES digital trial designs, and provide Delphi-based recommendations for implementing digital trials using tES. METHODS We convened 61 highly-productive specialists and contacted 8 tES companies to assess 71 issues related to tES digitalization readiness, and processes, barriers, advantages, and opportunities for implementing tES digital trials. Delphi-based recommendations (>60% agreement) were provided. RESULTS The main strengths/opportunities of tES were: (i) non-pharmacological nature (92% of agreement), safety of these techniques (80%), affordability (88%), and potential scalability (78%). As for weaknesses/threats, we listed insufficient supervision (76%) and unclear regulatory status (69%). Many issues related to methodological biases did not reach consensus. Device appraisal showed moderate digitalization readiness, with high safety and potential for trial implementation, but low connectivity. CONCLUSIONS Panelists recognized the potential of tES for scalability, generalizability, and leverage of digital trials processes; with no consensus about aspects regarding methodological biases. SIGNIFICANCE We further propose and discuss a conceptual framework for exploiting shared aspects between mobile-Health tES technologies with digital trials methodology to drive future efforts for digitizing tES trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre R Brunoni
- Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo & Hospital Universitário, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Neurosciences (LIM-27), Instituto Nacional de Biomarcadores em Neuropsiquiatria (INBioN), Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Hamed Ekhtiari
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research (LIBR), Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Andrea Antal
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Paradee Auvichayapat
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Chris Baeken
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB): Department of Psychiatry University Hospital (UZBrussel), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium; Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering, the Netherlands
| | - Isabela M Benseñor
- Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marom Bikson
- The Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, The City University of New York, NY, USA
| | - Paulo Boggio
- Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Center for Biological Science and Health, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Barbara Borroni
- Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - Filippo Brighina
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Jerome Brunelin
- Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Bron, France; INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR 5292, PSYR2 Team, Centre de recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL), Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Sandra Carvalho
- Translational Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Education and Psychology and William James Center for Research (WJCR), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Wolnei Caumo
- Post-Graduate Program in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brazil; Laboratory of Pain and Neuromodulation at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil; Pain and Palliative Care Service at HCPA, Brazil; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, UFRGS, Brazil
| | - Patrick Ciechanski
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 1-002 Katz Group Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Leigh Charvet
- Department of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vincent P Clark
- Psychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, Department of Psychology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Roi Cohen Kadosh
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Maria Cotelli
- Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Abhishek Datta
- Research and Development, Soterix Medical Inc., New York, USA
| | - Zhi-De Deng
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics & Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rudi De Raedt
- Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare and Monash University Department of Psychiatry, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia
| | - Agnes Floel
- Department of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Germany
| | - Flavio Frohlich
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Carolina Center for Neurostimulation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Neurology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Peyman Ghobadi-Azbari
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Stephan Goerigk
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Hospital, Munich, Germany; Department of Psychological Methodology and Assessment, LMU, Munich, Germany; Hochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany
| | - Roy H Hamilton
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shapour J Jaberzadeh
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate Hoy
- Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare and Monash University Department of Psychiatry, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dawson J Kidgell
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Arash Khojasteh Zonoozi
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Adam Kirton
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven Laureys
- Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness, GIGA Institute, University of Liège, Liege, Belgium
| | - Michal Lavidor
- Bar Ilan University, Department of Psychology, and the Gonda Brain Research Center, Israel
| | - Kiwon Lee
- Ybrain Corporation, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jorge Leite
- INPP, Portucalense University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sarah H Lisanby
- Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics & Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Colleen Loo
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Donel M Martin
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carlo Miniussi
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Marine Mondino
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Bron, France
| | - Katia Monte-Silva
- Applied Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, UFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil; NAPeN Network (Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil
| | - Leon Morales-Quezada
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Alexandre H Okano
- NAPeN Network (Núcleo de Assistência e Pesquisa em Neuromodulação), Brazil; Center for Mathematics, Computation, and Cognition, Universidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil; Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (BRAINN/CEPID-FAPESP), University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Claudia S Oliveira
- Master's and Doctoral Program in Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Master's and Doctoral Program in Human Movement and Rehabilitation, Evangelical University of Goiás, Anápolis, Brazil
| | | | - Kevin Pacheco-Barrios
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Lima, Peru
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ester M Nakamura-Palacios
- Laboratory of Cognitive Sciences and Neuropsychopharmacology, Program of Post-Graduation in Physiological Sciences, Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil
| | - Ulrich Palm
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany; Medical Park Chiemseeblick, Rasthausstr. 25, 83233 Bernau-Felden, Germany
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Neurology. Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Klinikum Großhadern, Marchioninistr, München, Germany
| | - Christian Plewnia
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Neurophysiology and Interventional Neuropsychiatry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alberto Priori
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Tarek K Rajji
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Toronto Dementia Research Alliance, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lais B Razza
- Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Mehran Zare-Bidoky
- Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; School of Medicine, Shahid-Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Marcel Simis
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Institute, General Hospital, Medical School of the University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Paulo Suen
- Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Aurore Thibaut
- Coma Science Group, GIGA-Consciousness & Centre du Cerveau, University and University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Leandro C L Valiengo
- Laboratory of Neurosciences (LIM-27), Instituto Nacional de Biomarcadores em Neuropsiquiatria (INBioN), Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation (SIN), Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
- Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) Lab, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sven Vanneste
- Lab for Clinical & Integrative Neuroscience, Trinity College of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ganesan Venkatasubramanian
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Ines R Violante
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Anna Wexler
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam J Woods
- Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Felipe Fregni
- Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chen J, Wang S, Li Z, Li Y, Huang P, Zhu J, Wang F, Li Y, Liu W, Xue J, Shi H, Li W, Liang Z, Wang W, Li Q. The effect of long-term methadone maintenance treatment on coupling among three large-scale brain networks in male heroin-dependent individuals: A resting-state fMRI study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 238:109549. [PMID: 35810622 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is considered as an effective and mainstream therapy for heroin dependence. However, whether long-term MMT would improve the coupling among the three core large-scale brain networks (salience, default mode, and executive control) and its relationship with the craving for heroin is unknown. METHODS Forty-four male heroin-dependent individuals during long-term MMT, 27 male heroin-dependent individuals after short-term detoxification/abstinence (SA), and 26 demographically matched healthy controls (HC) underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. We analyzed the difference in coupling among the salience, default mode, and executive control networks among the three groups and examined how the coupling among these large-scale networks was associated with craving before and after drug-cue exposure. RESULTS Compared with the SA group, the MMT group showed lower craving before and after cue exposure and stronger connectivity between the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (a key node of the salience network) and key regions of the bilateral executive control network, including the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. Among the heroin-dependent individuals, the functional connectivity was negatively correlated with the craving before and after heroin-cue exposure. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that long-term MMT could increase the coupling between the salience and bilateral executive control networks and decrease craving for heroin. These findings contribute to the understanding of the neural mechanism of MMT, from the perspective of large-scale brain networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiajie Chen
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Shu Wang
- Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhe Li
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yiyao Li
- School of basic medicine, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi 'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Peng Huang
- School of basic medicine, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi 'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jia Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Fan Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yongbin Li
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jiuhua Xue
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Hong Shi
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zifei Liang
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York 10012, USA
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710038, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ekhtiari H, Soleimani G, Kuplicki R, Yeh H, Cha Y, Paulus M. Transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate fMRI drug cue reactivity in methamphetamine users: A randomized clinical trial. Hum Brain Mapp 2022; 43:5340-5357. [PMID: 35915567 PMCID: PMC9812244 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied as a therapeutic option to alter maladaptive brain functions associated with chronic substance use. We present a randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled, clinical trial to determine the neural substrates of tDCS effects on drug craving. Sixty participants with methamphetamine use disorder were assigned to two groups: active tDCS (5 x 7 cm2 , 2 mA, 20 min, anode/cathode over the F4/Fp1) and sham stimulation. Neuroimaging data of a methamphetamine cue reactivity task were collected immediately before and after stimulation. There was a significant reduction in self-reported craving after stimulation without any significant effect of time-by-group interaction. Our whole-brain analysis demonstrated that there was a global decrease in brain reactivity to cues following sham but not active tDCS. There were significant time-by-group interactions in five main clusters in middle and inferior frontal gyri, anterior insula, inferior parietal lobule, and precuneus with higher activations after active stimulation. There was a significant effect of stimulation type in the relationship between electrical current at the individual level and changes in task-modulated activation. Brain regions with the highest electric current in the prefrontal cortex showed a significant time-by-group interaction in task-modulated connectivity in the frontoparietal network. In this trial, there was no significant effect of the one session of active-F4/Fp1 tDCS on drug craving self-report compared to sham stimulation. However, activation and connectivity differences induced by active compared to sham stimulation suggested some potential mechanisms of tDCS to modulate neural response to drug cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ghazaleh Soleimani
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran,Iranian National Center for Addiction StudiesTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | | | - Hung‐Wen Yeh
- UMKC School of MedicineUniversity of Missouri‐Kansas City School of MedicineKansa CityMissouriUSA
| | - Yoon‐Hee Cha
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical schoolUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Martin Paulus
- Laureate Institute for Brain ResearchTulsaOklahomaUSA
| |
Collapse
|