Cobicistat versus ritonavir boosting and differences in the drug-drug interaction profiles with co-medications

Plausible mechanism of drug resistance and side-effects of COVID-19 therapeutics: a bottleneck for its eradication

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 pandemic has turned our world upside down by meddling with our normal lives. While there is no definitive drug against SARS-CoV-2, antiviral drugs that are already in the market, are being repurposed against it, could now complete long-term as well as all age-specific investigations, and they are successful in saving millions of lives. Nevertheless, side-effects are emergingly seen in the patients undergoing treatment, and ineffectiveness is increasingly found due to the emerging notorious variants of the virus. Many of them are also facing serious co-infections including black fungus, Zika, and H1N1 virus to name a few.

OBJECTIVES

Therefore, this review highlights both drug resistance, their side-effects, and the significance for proper and long-term clinical trials of all age groups including children.

METHODS

We have explored and proposed the mechanisms of drug resistance that may arise due to the misuse or overuse of drugs based on available experimental reports.

RESULTS

The review provides solutions to the aforesaid issues of drug-resistance and side-effects by providing combination therapies, ancillary treatments, and other preventive strategies that can be useful in preventing drawbacks thereby curbing COVID-19 or similar future infections to maintain our normal lives.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 and its long-term effects, if any, can be eradicated with strategic and mindful use of related therapeutics in a controlled manner.

An update on drug-drug interactions in older adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

INTRODUCTION

People with HIV are living longer due to advances in antiretroviral therapy. With improved life expectancy comes an increased lifetime risk of comorbid conditions - such as cardiovascular disease and cancer - and polypharmacy. Older adults, particularly those living with HIV, are more vulnerable to drug interactions and adverse effects, resulting in negative health outcomes.

AREA COVERED

Antiretrovirals are involved in many potential drug interactions with medications used to treat common comorbidities and geriatric conditions in an aging population of people with HIV. We review the mechanisms and management of significant drug-drug interactions involving antiretroviral medications and non-antiretroviral medications commonly used among older people living with HIV. The management of these interactions may require dose adjustments, medication switches to alternatives, enhanced monitoring, and considerations of patient- and disease-specific factors.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinicians managing comorbid conditions among older people with HIV must be particularly vigilant to side effect profiles, drug-drug interactions, pill burden, and cost when optimizing treatment. To support healthier aging among people living with HIV, there is a growing need for antiretroviral stewardship, multidisciplinary care models, and advances that promote insight into the correlations between an individual, their conditions, and their medications.

Common antiretroviral combinations are associated with somatic depressive symptoms in women with HIV

OBJECTIVE

While modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) is highly effective and safe, depressive symptoms have been associated with certain ART drugs. We examined the association between common ART regimens and depressive symptoms in women with HIV (WWH) with a focus on somatic vs. nonsomatic symptoms.

DESIGN

Analysis of longitudinal data from the Women's Interagency HIV Study.

METHODS

Participants were classified into three groups based on the frequency of positive depression screening (CES-D ≥16): chronic depression (≥50% of visits since study enrollment), infrequent depression (<50% of visits), and never depressed (no visits). Novel Bayesian machine learning methods building upon a subset-tree kernel approach were developed to estimate the combined effects of ART regimens on depressive symptoms in each group after covariate adjustment.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1538 WWH who participated in 12 924 (mean = 8.4) visits. The mean age was 49.9 years, 72% were Black, and 14% Hispanic. In the chronic depression group, combinations including tenofovir alafenamide and cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir and/or darunavir were associated with greater somatic symptoms of depression, whereas those combinations containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz or rilpivirine were associated with less somatic depressive symptoms. ART was not associated with somatic symptoms in the infrequent depression or never depressed groups. ART regimens were not associated with nonsomatic symptoms in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific ART combinations are associated with somatic depressive symptoms in WWH with chronic depression. Future studies should consider specific depressive symptoms domains as well as complete drug combinations when assessing the relationship between ART and depression.

Involvement of multiple cytochrome P450 isoenzymes in drug interactions between ritonavir and direct oral anticoagulants

Herein, we aimed to determine the significance of drug interactions (DIs) between ritonavir and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and identify the involved cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes. Using an in vitro cocktail method with human liver microsomes (HLM), we observed that ritonavir strongly inhibited CYPs in the following order: CYP3A, CYP2C8, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2B6, and CYP2J2 (IC50: 0.023-6.79 μM). The degree of CYP2J2 inhibition was inconclusive, given the substantial discrepancy between the HLM and human expression system. Selective inhibition of CYP3A decreased the O-demethylation of apixaban by only 13.4%, and the involvement of multiple CYP isoenzymes was suggested, all of which were inhibited by ritonavir. Multiple CYP isoenzymes contributed also to the metabolism of rivaroxaban. Replacement of the incubation medium with phosphate buffer instead of HEPES enhanced apixaban hydroxylation. On surveying the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, we detected that the signal of the proportional reporting ratio of "death" and found increase for "hemoglobin decreased" (12.5-fold) and "procedural hemorrhage" (201.9-fold) on administering apixaban with ritonavir; these were far less significant for other CYP3A inhibitors. Overall, these findings suggest that co-administration of ritonavir-boosted drugs with DOACs may induce serious DIs owing to the simultaneous inhibition of multiple CYP isoenzymes.

Pharmacokinetic boosting of olaparib: A randomised, cross-over study (PROACTIVE-study)

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic (PK) boosting is the intentional use of a drug-drug interaction to enhance systemic drug exposure. PK boosting of olaparib, a CYP3A-substrate, has the potential to reduce PK variability and financial burden. The aim of this study was to investigate equivalence of a boosted, reduced dose of olaparib compared to the non-boosted standard dose.

METHODS

This cross-over, multicentre trial compared olaparib 300 mg twice daily (BID) with olaparib 100 mg BID boosted with the strong CYP3A-inhibitor cobicistat 150 mg BID. Patients were randomised to the standard therapy followed by the boosted therapy, or vice versa. After seven days of each therapy, dense PK sampling was performed for noncompartmental PK analysis. Equivalence was defined as a 90% Confidence Interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the boosted versus standard therapy area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-12 h) within no-effect boundaries. These boundaries were set at 0.57-1.25, based on previous pharmacokinetic studies with olaparib capsules and tablets.

RESULTS

Of 15 included patients, 12 were eligible for PK analysis. The GMR of the AUC0-12 h was 1.45 (90% CI 1.27-1.65). No grade ≥3 adverse events were reported during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Boosting a 100 mg BID olaparib dose with cobicistat increases olaparib exposure 1.45-fold, compared to the standard dose of 300 mg BID. Equivalence of the boosted olaparib was thus not established. Boosting remains a promising strategy to reduce the olaparib dose as cobicistat increases olaparib exposure Adequate tolerability of the boosted therapy with higher exposure should be established.

Hydrocodone, Oxycodone, and Morphine Metabolism and Drug-Drug Interactions

Awareness of drug interactions involving opioids is critical for patient treatment as they are common therapeutics used in numerous care settings, including both chronic and disease-related pain. Not only do opioids have narrow therapeutic indexes and are extensively used, but they have the potential to cause severe toxicity. Opioids are the classical pain treatment for patients who suffer from moderate to severe pain. More importantly, opioids are often prescribed in combination with multiple other drugs, especially in patient populations who typically are prescribed a large drug regimen. This review focuses on the current knowledge of common opioid drug-drug interactions (DDIs), focusing specifically on hydrocodone, oxycodone, and morphine DDIs. The DDIs covered in this review include pharmacokinetic DDI arising from enzyme inhibition or induction, primarily due to inhibition of cytochrome p450 enzymes (CYPs). However, opioids such as morphine are metabolized by uridine-5'-diphosphoglucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), principally UGT2B7, and glucuronidation is another important pathway for opioid-drug interactions. This review also covers several pharmacodynamic DDI studies as well as the basics of CYP and UGT metabolism, including detailed opioid metabolism and the potential involvement of metabolizing enzyme gene variation in DDI. Based upon the current literature, further studies are needed to fully investigate and describe the DDI potential with opioids in pain and related disease settings to improve clinical outcomes for patients. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A review of the literature focusing on drug-drug interactions involving opioids is important because they can be toxic and potentially lethal, occurring through pharmacodynamic interactions as well as pharmacokinetic interactions occurring through inhibition or induction of drug metabolism.

Mechanisms and Clinical Significance of Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions Mediated by FDA and EMA-approved Hepatitis C Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents

The treatment of patients infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been revolutionised by the development of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) that target specific HCV proteins involved in viral replication. The first DAAs were associated with clinical problems such as adverse drug reactions and pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Current FDA/EMA-approved treatments are combinations of DAAs that simultaneously target the HCV N5A-protein, the HCV N5B-polymerase and the HCV NS3/4A-protease. Adverse events and DDIs are less likely with these DAA combinations but several DDIs of potential clinical significance remain. Much of the available information on the interaction of DAAs with CYP drug-metabolising enzymes and influx and efflux transporters is contained in regulatory summaries and is focused on DDIs of likely clinical importance. Important DDIs perpetrated by current DAAs include increases in the pharmacokinetic exposure to statins and dabigatran. Some mechanistic information can be deduced. Although the free concentrations of DAAs in serum are very low, a number of these DDIs are likely mediated by the inhibition of systemic influx transporters, especially OATP1B1/1B3. Other DDIs may arise by DAA-mediated inhibition of intestinal efflux transporters, which increases the systemic concentrations of some coadministered drugs. Conversely, DAAs are victims of DDIs mediated by cyclosporin, ketoconazole, omeprazole and HIV antiretroviral drug combinations, especially when boosted by ritonavir and, to a lesser extent, cobicistat. In addition, concurrent administration of inducers, such as rifampicin, carbamazepine and efavirenz, decreases exposure to some DAAs. Drug-drug interactions that increase the accumulation of HCV N3/4A-protease inhibitors like grazoprevir may exacerbate hepatic injury in HCV patients.

A retrospective study: Can dual ART mitigate the risk of potential drug-drug interactions among PLWH under stable ART?

Background/aim

People living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) are getting older. Age-related comorbidities in PLWH result in polypharmacy and increase the risk for potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). This study aimed to evaluate how the rate of pDDIs would change if the treatment of patients receiving different combined antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) were theoretically changed with dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG+3TC) or cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB+RPV).

Materials and methods

This study was conducted at the infectious disease outpatient clinic of a university hospital as a follow-up of a previous study. The data of PLWH receiving at least 1 comedication other than antiretrovirals (ARVs) were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The Drugs.com/Drug Interactions Checker and University of Liverpool HIV Drug Interactions Checker databases were used to identify pDDIs and their severities.

Results

A total of 75 PLWH, of whom 83% were male, with a mean age (± standard deviation) of 46.5 (±12.98) years were included. Polypharmacy was observed in 59 (79%) of the participants; however, with dual ARV options, the probability of polypharmacy was 35 (47%) (p < 0.001). In the Drugs.com database, no significant difference was found in terms of pDDIs between the treatment of current ARTs (64%) and DTG/3TC (%44) (p = 0.06) or CAB/RPV (%64) (p = 0.521). However, in the University of Liverpool database, the current rate of pDDIs (55%) was significantly higher compared to the theoretical treatment of DTG/3TC (40%) (p = 0.029), oral CAB/RPV (48%) (p = 0.003), and injectable CAB/RPV (31%) use (p = 0.006).

Conclusion

The results suggest that dual treatment regimens can reduce pDDIs, resulting in better tolerance and probably higher quality of life among PLWH.

HIV infection

The AIDS epidemic has been a global public health issue for more than 40 years and has resulted in ~40 million deaths. AIDS is caused by the retrovirus, HIV-1, which is transmitted via body fluids and secretions. After infection, the virus invades host cells by attaching to CD4 receptors and thereafter one of two major chemokine coreceptors, CCR5 or CXCR4, destroying the host cell, most often a T lymphocyte, as it replicates. If unchecked this can lead to an immune-deficient state and demise over a period of ~2-10 years. The discovery and global roll-out of rapid diagnostics and effective antiretroviral therapy led to a large reduction in mortality and morbidity and to an expanding group of individuals requiring lifelong viral suppressive therapy. Viral suppression eliminates sexual transmission of the virus and greatly improves health outcomes. HIV infection, although still stigmatized, is now a chronic and manageable condition. Ultimate epidemic control will require prevention and treatment to be made available, affordable and accessible for all. Furthermore, the focus should be heavily oriented towards long-term well-being, care for multimorbidity and good quality of life. Intense research efforts continue for therapeutic and/or preventive vaccines, novel immunotherapies and a cure.

A four-drug combination oral tablet of darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults

INTRODUCTION

Darunavir (DRV)/cobicistat (COBI)/emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is the only protease inhibitor-based single-tablet regimen (STR) approved for the treatment of HIV infection of adults and pediatric patients weighing at least 40 kg. DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF has demonstrated to be an effective regimen, to have a high genetic barrier to resistance, and to be well tolerated.

AREAS COVERED

The authors summarize the chemistry and pharmacology of DRV, COBI, FTC, and TAF and discuss trials conducted on antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and -experienced people living with HIV designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the STR. This work also reports studies comparing DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF with competitive agents in real-world settings.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the availability of newer antiretroviral drugs and strategies in the management of HIV infection, including long-acting therapies, DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF is still considered an alternative regimen for the treatment of ART-naïve adults. DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF is an effective, well-tolerated, and safe antiretroviral regimen and represents a valid option for people who need to switch therapy due to tolerability issues, such as the onset of neuropsychiatric effects related to integrase strand transfer inhibitors, or virological failure.

Potential herb‒drug interactions between anti-COVID-19 drugs and traditional Chinese medicine

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread worldwide. Effective treatments against COVID-19 remain urgently in need although vaccination significantly reduces the incidence, hospitalization, and mortality. At present, antiviral drugs including Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid^TM), Remdesivir, and Molnupiravir have been authorized to treat COVID-19 and become more globally available. On the other hand, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used for the treatment of epidemic diseases for a long history. Currently, various TCM formulae against COVID-19 such as Qingfei Paidu decoction, Xuanfei Baidu granule, Huashi Baidu granule, Jinhua Qinggan granule, Lianhua Qingwen capsule, and Xuebijing injection have been widely used in clinical practice in China, which may cause potential herb-drug interactions (HDIs) in patients under treatment with antiviral drugs and affect the efficacy and safety of medicines. However, information on potential HDIs between the above anti-COVID-19 drugs and TCM formulae is lacking, and thus this work seeks to summarize and highlight potential HDIs between antiviral drugs and TCM formulae against COVID-19, and especially pharmacokinetic HDIs mediated by metabolizing enzymes and/or transporters. These well-characterized HDIs could provide useful information on clinical concomitant medicine use to maximize clinical outcomes and minimize adverse and toxic effects.

The inhibitory and inducing effects of ritonavir on hepatic and intestinal CYP3A and other drug-handling proteins

Ritonavir, originally developed as HIV protease inhibitor, is widely used as a booster in several HIV pharmacotherapy regimens and more recently in Covid-19 treatment (e.g., Paxlovid). Its boosting capacity is due to the highly potent irreversible inhibition of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3 A enzyme, thereby enhancing the plasma exposure to coadministered drugs metabolized by CYP3A. Typically used booster doses of ritonavir are 100-200 mg once or twice daily. This review aims to address several aspects of this booster drug, including the possibility to use lower ritonavir doses, 20 mg for instance, resulting in partial CYP3A inactivation in patients. If complete CYP3A inhibition is not needed, lower ritonavir doses could be used, thereby reducing unwanted side effects. In this context, there are contradictory reports on the actual recovery time of CYP3A activity after ritonavir discontinuation, but probably this will take at least one day. In addition to ritonavir's CYP3A inhibitory effect, it can also induce and/or inhibit other CYP enzymes and drug transporters, albeit to a lesser extent. Although ritonavir thus exhibits gene induction capacities, with respect to CYP3A activity the inhibition capacity clearly predominates. Another potent CYP3A inhibitor, the ritonavir analog cobicistat, has been reported to lack the ability to induce enzyme and transporter genes. This might result in a more favorable drug-drug interaction profile compared to ritonavir, although the actual benefit appears to be limited. Indeed, ritonavir is still the clinically most used pharmacokinetic enhancer, indicating that its side effects are well manageable, even in chronic administration regimens.

Switch from a ritonavir to a cobicistat containing antiretroviral regimen and impact on tacrolimus levels in a kidney transplant recipient

BACKGROUND

Solid-organ transplantation due to end-stage organ disease is increasingly performed in people living with HIV. Despite improved transplant outcomes, management of these patients remains challenging due to higher risk for allograft rejection, infection and drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Complex regimens for multi-drug resistant HIV-viruses may cause DDIs particularly if the regimen contains drugs such as ritonavir or cobicistat.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we report on a case of an HIV-infected renal transplant recipient on long-term immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus dosed at 0.5 mg every 11 days due to the co-administration of a darunavir/ritonavir containing antiretroviral regimen. In the presented case the pharmacokinetic booster was switched from ritonavir to cobicistat for treatment simplification. A close monitoring of tacrolimus drug levels was performed in order to prevent possible sub- or supratherapeutic tacrolimus trough levels. A progressive decrease in tacrolimus concentrations was observed after switch requiring shortening of tacrolimus dosing interval. This observation was unexpected considering that cobicistat is devoid of inducing properties.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the fact that the pharmacokinetic boosters ritonavir and cobicistat are not fully interchangeable. Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is warranted to maintain levels within the therapeutic range.

Understanding the Risk of Drug Interactions Between Ritonavir-Containing COVID-19 Therapies and Small-Molecule Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer

PURPOSE

The introduction of COVID-19 therapies containing ritonavir has markedly expanded the scope of use for this medicine. As a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor, the use of ritonavir is associated with a high drug interaction risk. There are currently no data to inform clinician regarding the likely magnitude and duration of interaction between ritonavir-containing COVID-19 therapies and small-molecule kinase inhibitors (KIs) in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was used to conduct virtual clinical trials with a parallel group study design in the presence and absence of ritonavir (100 mg twice daily for 5 days). The magnitude and time course of changes in KI exposure when coadministered with ritonavir was evaluated as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Dosing of ritonavir resulted in a > 2-fold increase in steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximal concentration for six of the 10 KIs. When the KI was coadministered with ritonavir, dose reductions to between 10% and 75% of the original dose were required to achieve an area under the plasma concentration-time curve within 1.25-fold of the value in the absence of ritonavir.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this study provides the first data to assist clinicians' understanding of the drug interaction risk associated with administering ritonavir-containing COVID-19 therapies to patients with cancer who are currently being treated with KIs. These data may support clinicians to make more informed dosing decisions for patients with cancer undergoing treatment with KIs who require treatment with ritonavir-containing COVID-19 antiviral therapies.

Exposure and virologic outcomes of dolutegravir combined with ritonavir boosted darunavir in treatment-naïve individuals enrolled in the Netherlands Cohort Study on Acute HIV infection (NOVA)

To the authors' knowledge, there is currently no literature or guidance recommendation regarding whether the dose of dolutegravir (DTG) should be increased when co-administered with darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) in patients with acute human immunodeficiency virus infection (AHI). This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of twice-daily (BID) DTG and once-daily (QD) DRV/r, and compared this with DTG QD without DRV/r in patients with AHI. Forty-six participants initiated antiretroviral therapy within <24 h of enrolment: DTG 50 mg BID, DRV/r 800/100 mg QD, and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for 4 weeks (Phase I); and DTG 50 mg QD with two NRTIs thereafter (Phase II: reference). Total DTG trough concentration (C_trough) and area under the concentration-time profile of 0-24 h (AUC_0-24h) were predicted using a population PK model. DTG glucuronidation metabolic ratio (MR) and DTG free fraction were determined and compared per treatment phase using geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI). Participants had a predicted geometric mean steady-state DTG C_trough of 2.83 [coefficient of variation (CV%) 30.3%] mg/L (Phase I) and 1.28 (CV% 52.4%) mg/L (Phase II), with GMR of 2.20 (90% CI 1.90-2.55). Total exposure during DTG BID increased but did not double [AUC_0-24h GMR 1.65 (90% CI 1.50-1.81) h.mg/L]. DTG glucuronidation MR increased by approximately 29% during Phase I. DTG C_trough was above in-vivo EC₉₀ (0.32 mg/L) during both phases, except in one participant during Phase I. At Week 8, 84% of participants had viral loads ≤40 copies/mL. The drug-drug interaction between DTG (BID) and DRV/r (QD) was due to induced glucuronidation, and is not clinically relevant in patients with AHI.

Drug-Drug Interactions in the Management of Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

The management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has become more complex in recent years because of increased pharmacotherapy options and longer patient survival with increasing numbers of comorbidities. As such, more opportunities exist for drug-drug interactions between PAH-targeted medications and medications potentially used to treat comorbid conditions. In this review, we provide an overview of pharmaceutical metabolism by cytochrome P450 and discuss important drug-drug interactions for the 14 Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for PAH in the nitric oxide (NO), endothelin, and prostacyclin pathways. Among the targets in the NO pathway (sildenafil, tadalafil, and riociguat), important interactions with nitrates, protease inhibitors, and other phosphodiesterase inhibitors can cause profound hypotension. In the endothelin pathway, bosentan is associated with more drug interactions via CYP3A4 inhibition; macitentan and ambrisentan have fewer interactions of note. Although the parenteral therapies in the prostacyclin pathway bypass significant liver metabolism and avoid drug interactions, selexipag and oral treprostinil may exhibit interactions with CYP2C8 inhibitors such as gemfibrozil and clopidogrel, which can raise drug levels. Finally, we provide a framework for identifying potential drug-drug interactions and avoiding errors.

Recommendations for the Management of Drug-Drug Interactions Between the COVID-19 Antiviral Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (Paxlovid) and Comedications

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antiviral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) has been granted authorization or approval in several countries for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 at high risk of progression to severe disease and with no requirement for supplemental oxygen. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir will be primarily administered outside the hospital setting as a 5-day course oral treatment. The ritonavir component boosts plasma concentrations of nirmatrelvir through the potent and rapid inhibition of the key drug-metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Thus nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, even given as a short treatment course, has a high potential to cause harm from drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with other drugs metabolized through this pathway. Options for mitigating risk from DDIs with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir are limited due to the clinical illness, the short window for intervention, and the related difficulty of implementing clinical monitoring or dosage adjustment of the comedication. Pragmatic options are largely confined to preemptive or symptom-driven pausing of the comedication or managing any additional risk through counseling. This review summarizes the effects of ritonavir on drug disposition (i.e., metabolizing enzymes and transporters) and discusses factors determining the likelihood of having a clinically significant DDI. Furthermore, it provides a comprehensive list of comedications likely to be used in COVID-19 patients which are categorized according to their potential DDI risk with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. It also discusses recommendations for the management of DDIs which balance the risk of harm from DDIs with a short course of ritonavir, against unnecessary denial of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment.

Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism and Excretion of Radiolabeled Fostemsavir Administered with or without Ritonavir in Healthy Male Subjects

The pharmacokinetics, elimination, and metabolism of fostemsavir (FTR), a prodrug of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor temsavir (TMR), were investigated in healthy volunteers. FTR was administered with and without ritonavir (RTV), a protease inhibitor previously shown to boost TMR exposures. In vitro studies were also used to identify the enzymes responsible for the metabolism of TMR.Total recovery of the administered dose ranged from 78% to 89%. Approximately 44% to 58% of the dose was excreted in urine, 20% to 36% in feces, and 5% in bile, as TMR and metabolites. RTV had no effect on the recovery of radioactivity in any matrix.Compared to FTR alone, pretreatment of subjects with RTV increased the exposure of TMR by ∼66% and reduced the exposure of plasma total radioactivity by ∼68%.The major route of TMR elimination was through biotransformation. TMR, M28 (N-dealkylation), and M4 (amide hydrolysis) were the major circulating components in plasma. Pretreatment with RTV increased the amount of TMR present, decreased the amount of circulating M28, and M4 was unchanged.CYP3A4 metabolism accounted for 21% of the dose, forming multiple oxidative metabolites. This pathway was inhibited by coadministration of RTV.

The Mechanism-Based Inactivation of CYP3A4 by Ritonavir: What Mechanism?

Ritonavir is the most potent cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor in clinical use and is often applied as a booster for drugs with low oral bioavailability due to CYP3A4-mediated biotransformation, as in the treatment of HIV (e.g., lopinavir/ritonavir) and more recently COVID-19 (Paxlovid or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir). Despite its clinical importance, the exact mechanism of ritonavir-mediated CYP3A4 inactivation is still not fully understood. Nonetheless, ritonavir is clearly a potent mechanism-based inactivator, which irreversibly blocks CYP3A4. Here, we discuss four fundamentally different mechanisms proposed for this irreversible inactivation/inhibition, namely the (I) formation of a metabolic-intermediate complex (MIC), tightly coordinating to the heme group; (II) strong ligation of unmodified ritonavir to the heme iron; (III) heme destruction; and (IV) covalent attachment of a reactive ritonavir intermediate to the CYP3A4 apoprotein. Ritonavir further appears to inactivate CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 with similar potency, which is important since ritonavir is applied in patients of all ethnicities. Although it is currently not possible to conclude what the primary mechanism of action in vivo is, it is unlikely that any of the proposed mechanisms are fundamentally wrong. We, therefore, propose that ritonavir markedly inactivates CYP3A through a mixed set of mechanisms. This functional redundancy may well contribute to its overall inhibitory efficacy.

Population pharmacokinetics of ethambutol in African children: a pooled analysis

OBJECTIVES

Ethambutol protects against the development of resistance to co-administered drugs in the intensive phase of first-line anti-TB treatment in children. It is especially relevant in settings with a high prevalence of HIV or isoniazid resistance. We describe the population pharmacokinetics of ethambutol in children with TB to guide dosing in this population.

METHODS

We pooled data from 188 intensively sampled children from the DATiC, DNDi and SHINE studies, who received 15-25 mg/kg ethambutol daily according to WHO guidelines. The median (range) age and weight of the cohort were 1.9 (0.3-12.6) years and 9.6 (3.9-34.5) kg, respectively. Children with HIV (HIV+; n = 103) received ART (lopinavir/ritonavir in 92%).

RESULTS

Ethambutol pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination and absorption transit compartments. Clearance was estimated to reach 50% of its mature value by 2 months after birth and 99% by 3 years. Typical steady-state apparent clearance in a 10 kg child was 15.9 L/h. In HIV+ children on lopinavir/ritonavir, bioavailability was reduced by 32% [median (IQR) steady-state Cmax = 0.882 (0.669-1.28) versus 1.66 (1.21-2.15) mg/L). In young children, bioavailability correlated with age. At birth, bioavailability was 73.1% of that in children 3.16 years or older.

CONCLUSIONS

To obtain exposure within the 2-6 mg/L recommended range for Cmax, the current doses must be doubled (or tripled with HIV+ children on lopinavir/ritonavir) for paediatric patients. This raises concerns regarding the potential for ocular toxicity, which would require evaluation.

Characteristics of 2-drug regimen users living with HIV-1 in a real-world setting: A large-scale medical claim database analysis in Japan

Background

Regimen simplification to 2-drug antiretroviral therapy (2-ART) may address potential tolerability issues, increase adherence, and reduce toxicity and potential drug-drug-interactions among people living with HIV-1 (PLWH). However, real-world treatment patterns and characteristics of 2-ART users are unclear.

Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study employed a large-scale medical claim database of Japanese hospitals to extract data on 4,293 PLWH aged ≥18 years with diagnosis of HIV and treated with any ART regimens between April 2008 and April 2019. A 2-ART cohort was compared with a 3-drug antiretroviral therapy (3-ART) cohort in terms of population characteristics, comorbid conditions, and treatment patterns. Treatment switching rates were calculated for each cohort followed by sensitivity analysis to confirm the robustness of the findings.

Results

There were 94 individuals identified in the 2-ART cohort. Compared to the standard 3-ART cohort (n = 3,993), the 2-ART cohort was older (median age 53 [IQR 44–64] vs 42 years [IQR 35–50]), with a lower proportion of males (87.2% vs 93.8%), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (median score 6 [IQR 5–8] vs 5 [IQR 4–6]), more co-medications (median 6 [IQR 4–11] vs 3 [IQR 2–7]), and a higher percentage of AIDS-defining conditions (66.0% vs 42.8%). The most common 2-ART were protease inhibitor (PI) + integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) + INSTI (33.0% and 31.9%, respectively). Overall, most of the regimens were nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing (71.3%), with a decreasing trend over time (76.2% to 70.2%). ART regimen switch occurred more often in the 2-ART cohort than in the 3-ART cohort (33.0% vs 21.2%).

Conclusion

The profiles of individuals on 2-ART in Japan were demonstrated to be complex. Most were treated with NRTI-sparing regimens which may reflect an effort to reduce treatment-related toxicities.

COVID-19 Global Pandemic Fight by Drugs: A Mini-Review on Hope and Hype

:

Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), a serious disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Corona Virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), was firstly identified in the city of Wuhan of China in December 2019, which then spread and became a global issue due to its high transmission rate. To date, the outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in infection to 230,868,745 people and the death of 4,732,669 patients. It has paralyzed the economy of all the countries worldwide. Considering the possible mutations of SARS-CoV-2, the current medical emergency requires a longer time for drug design and vaccine development. Drug repurposing is a promising option for potent therapeutics against the pandemic. The present review encompasses various drugs or appropriate combinations of already FDA-approved antimalarial, antiviral, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antibiotic therapeutic candidates for use in the clinical trials as a ray of hope against COVID-19. It is expected to deliver better clinical and laboratory outcomes of drugs as a prevention strategy for the eradication of the disease.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Human CYP3A4 Crystal Structures as a Potential Tool for Molecular Docking-Based Site of Metabolism and Enzyme Inhibition Studies

The notable ability of human liver cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) to metabolize diverse xenobiotics encourages researchers to explore in-depth the mechanism of enzyme action. Numerous CYP3A4 protein crystal structures have been deposited in protein data bank (PDB) and are majorly used in molecular docking analysis. The quality of the molecular docking results depends on the three-dimensional CYP3A4 protein crystal structures from the PDB. Present review endeavors to provide a brief outline of some technical parameters of CYP3A4 PDB entries as valuable information for molecular docking research. PDB entries between 22 April 2004 and 2 June 2021 were compiled and the active sites were thoroughly observed. The present review identified 76 deposited PDB entries and described basic information that includes CYP3A4 from human genetic, Escherichia coli (E. coli) use for protein expression, crystal structure obtained from X-ray diffraction method, taxonomy ID 9606, Uniprot ID P08684, ligand–protein structure description, co-crystal ligand, protein site deposit and resolution ranges between 1.7[Formula: see text]Å and 2.95[Formula: see text]Å. The observation of protein–ligand interactions showed the various residues on the active site depending on the ligand. The residues Ala305, Ser119, Ala370, Phe304, Phe108, Phe213 and Phe215 have been found to frequently interact with ligands from CYP3A4 PDB. Literature surveys of 17 co-crystal ligands reveal multiple mechanisms that include competitive inhibition, noncompetitive inhibition, mixed-mode inhibition, mechanism-based inhibition, substrate with metabolite, inducer, or combination modes of action. This overview may help researchers choose a trustworthy CYP3A4 protein structure from the PDB database to apply the protein in molecular docking analysis for drug discovery.

Prescribing Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir: How to Recognize and Manage Drug-Drug Interactions

Nirmatrelvir–ritonavir (NMV/r) is now being used to treat high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. This article provides advice to clinicians regarding recognition of medications likely to interact with NMV/r and suggests approaches to managing such drug–drug interactions. An algorithm is provided to assist in decision making.

Drug-Drug Interactions With Over-The-Counter Medicines: Mind the Unprescribed

BACKGROUND

This review provides a summary of the currently available clinical data on drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving over-the-counter (OTC) medicines. It aims to educate and increase awareness among health care providers and to support decisions in daily practice.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed using bibliographic databases available through PubMed.gov. An initial structured search was performed using the keywords "drug-drug-interaction AND (over-the-counter OR OTC)," without further restrictions except for the language. The initial results were screened for all described DDIs involving OTC drugs, and further information was gathered specifically on these drugs using dedicated database searches and references found in the bibliography from the initial hits.

RESULTS

From more than 1200 initial hits (1972-June 2021), 408 relevant publications were screened for DDIs involving OTC drugs, leading to 2 major findings: first, certain types of drug regimens are more prone to DDIs or have more serious DDI-related consequences, such as antiretroviral, anti-infective, and oral anticancer therapies. Second, although most DDIs involve OTC drugs as the perpetrators, some prescription drugs (statins or phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors) that currently have OTC status can be identified as the victims in DDIs. The following groups were identified to be frequently involved in DDIs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, food supplements, antacids, proton-pump inhibitors, H2 antihistamines, laxatives, antidiarrheal drugs, and herbal drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The most significant finding was the lack of high-quality evidence for commonly acknowledged interactions. High-quality interaction studies involving different phenotypes in drug metabolism (cytochrome P450) and distribution (transporters) are urgently needed. This should include modern and critical drugs, such as oral anticancer medications and direct oral anticoagulants.

Cost-savings and potential cost-savings through the distribution of generic antiretroviral drugs within the statutory health insurance market of Germany between January 2017 and June 2019

Abstract

Background

Recent patent losses for antiretroviral drugs (ARV) have led to the debate of cost-saving through the replacement of patented drugs with generic drugs. The split of recommended single-tablet regimens (STR) into their single substance partners is one of the considerations mentioned in said debate. Particularly, generic tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) is expected to hold untapped cost-saving potential, which may curb increasing overall expenditures for combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) within the statutory health insurance (SHI) of Germany.

Methods

Data of ARV reimbursed by the SHI were used to describe the trends of defined daily doses (DDD) as well as the revenue within the German ARV market. They were also used to determine the cost-savings of moving to generic drugs. The time period observed was between January 2017 and June 2019. The potential cost-savings were determined with following assumption in mind: the maximum possible use of generic ARV, including 1) the split of STR and replacing all substance partners with generic ones, and 2) replacing patented tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF/FTC) with generic TDF/FTC.

Results

Throughout the observation period, the DDD of generic ARV increased nearly five-fold while their revenue increased more than four-fold. Total cost-saving showed a sharp increase over the same period, with generic TDF/FTC accounting for a share of around 70%. The largest potential cost-saving could have been achieved through replacing patented TAF/FTC with generic TDF/FTC, peaking at nearly 10% of total revenue, but showing decreasing trends in general.

Conclusion

The progressive distribution of generic ARV ensured increasing cost-savings_, but consequently curbed the potential cost-savings. Unique price reductions of generic TDF/FTC have played a pivotal role for these effects. In any case, substituting with generic ARV should not fail to adhere to the treatment guidelines and continue to consider the medical requirements for the treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07390-4.

Atorvastatin Efficacy in the Management of Mild to Moderate Hospitalized COVID-19: A Pilot Randomized Triple-blind Placebo- controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Statins are first-line lipid-lowering agents with tolerable adverse reactions, low cost, and high availability worldwide. The potent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-thrombotic and immunomodulatory effects of statins propose them as an option against COVID-19 infection.

OBJECTIVE

In this randomized triple-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, we have investigated the atorvastatin efficacy in the management of mild to moderate hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

In this study, 52 mild to moderate hospitalized COVID-19 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were allocated to the treatment group to receive 40 mg atorvastatin orally once daily for two weeks (n=26) or the placebo group (n=26). Patients' symptoms and laboratory investigations were assessed at baseline and during the follow-up period. We also evaluated the duration of hospitalization and supplemental oxygen therapy as endpoints.

RESULTS

After 14-day of follow-up, the oxygen saturation (SaO2) was significantly higher, and the serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level was lower in the treatment group compared to the placebo group. Moreover, at the end of the followup in the treatment group, the lymphocyte count was higher, and the duration of symptom resolution was shorter but not significant. Additionally, in the treatment group, the length of supplemental oxygen therapy and hospitalization duration were meaningfully shorter. Our results revealed that the mortality rate was almost twice higher in the placebo group compared to the treatment group, without any significant adverse drug reaction.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin significantly reduces supplemental oxygen need, hospitalization duration, and serum hs-CRP level in mild to moderate hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Comparison of Tolerability and Impact on Metabolic Profiles of Antiretroviral Regimens Containing Darunavir/Ritonavir or Darunavir/Cobicistat in Romanian HIV Infected Patients

The management of the side effects caused by the antiretroviral therapy is one of the main problems facing clinicians. The patient’s tolerability and safety influence the success of the therapy. This retrospective study assesses the tolerability and impact on metabolic profiles of antiretroviral regimens containing darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) versus those containing darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c), in routine clinical practice. The database of Prof. Dr Matei Bals of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (INBI MB) was studied for the period 2017–2020, allowing the inclusion in the study of 462 HIV-infected patients who received the current regimen at least three months before evaluation. The following parameters were collected and analyzed: significant medical history, associated diseases, serum levels for profile evaluation: carbohydrate, lipidic, serum level of liver and pancreatic enzymes, serum markers of cardiac function, coagulation, and renal function. DRV/c (800 mg/150 mg, once daily) administrated in combination with other antiretroviral (ARV) in HIV-1 infected subjects proved to be better tolerated and with a lower impact on metabolic profile than DRV/r (600 mg/100 mg, twice daily). Patients in DRV/r group are significantly more at risk of developing, over time, side effects and metabolic impairments than those in DRV/c group, in all body functions studied, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two groups. Laboratory data were correlated with patient’s demographic and clinical characteristics and statistically significant outcomes have been found, proving that a personalized regimen is needed to minimize the ART side effects and to maximize the success of therapy. The results of the study showed that DRV/c, associated with other antiretroviral drugs in the regimens of Romanian HIV infected subjects, have a more favorable metabolic profile than those containing DRV/r.

Lopinavir/Ritonavir and Darunavir/Cobicistat in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: Findings From the Multicenter Italian CORIST Study

Background: Protease inhibitors have been considered as possible therapeutic agents for COVID-19 patients. Objectives: To describe the association between lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or darunavir/cobicistat (DRV/c) use and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. Study Design: Multicenter observational study of COVID-19 patients admitted in 33 Italian hospitals. Medications, preexisting conditions, clinical measures, and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Patients were retrospectively divided in three groups, according to use of LPV/r, DRV/c or none of them. Primary outcome in a time-to event analysis was death. We used Cox proportional-hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weighting by multinomial propensity scores. Results: Out of 3,451 patients, 33.3% LPV/r and 13.9% received DRV/c. Patients receiving LPV/r or DRV/c were more likely younger, men, had higher C-reactive protein levels while less likely had hypertension, cardiovascular, pulmonary or kidney disease. After adjustment for propensity scores, LPV/r use was not associated with mortality (HR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.13), whereas treatment with DRV/c was associated with a higher death risk (HR = 1.89, 1.53 to 2.34, E-value = 2.43). This increased risk was more marked in women, in elderly, in patients with higher severity of COVID-19 and in patients receiving other COVID-19 drugs. Conclusions: In a large cohort of Italian patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in a real-life setting, the use of LPV/r treatment did not change death rate, while DRV/c was associated with increased mortality. Within the limits of an observational study, these data do not support the use of LPV/r or DRV/c in COVID-19 patients.

Disease-drug and drug-drug interaction in COVID-19: Risk and assessment

COVID-19 is announced as a global pandemic in 2020. Its mortality and morbidity rate are rapidly increasing, with limited medications. The emergent outbreak of COVID-19 prompted by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) keeps spreading. In this infection, a patient's immune response plays pivotal role in the pathogenesis. This inflammatory factor was shown by its mediators that, in severe cases, reach the cytokine at peaks. Hyperinflammatory state may sparks significant imbalances in transporters and drug metabolic machinery, and subsequent alteration of drug pharmacokinetics may result in unexpected therapeutic response. The present scenario has accounted for the requirement for therapeutic opportunities to relive and overcome this pandemic. Despite the diminishing developments of COVID-19, there is no drug still approved to have significant effects with no side effect on the treatment for COVID-19 patients. Based on the evidence, many antiviral and anti-inflammatory drugs have been authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat the COVID-19 patients even though not knowing the possible drug-drug interactions (DDI). Remdesivir, favipiravir, and molnupiravir are deemed the most hopeful antiviral agents by improving infected patient’s health. Dexamethasone is the first known steroid medicine that saved the lives of seriously ill patients. Some oligopeptides and proteins have also been using. The current review summarizes medication updates to treat COVID-19 patients in an inflammatory state and their interaction with drug transporters and drug-metabolizing enzymes. It gives an opinion on the potential DDI that may permit the individualization of these drugs, thereby enhancing the safety and efficacy.

A Phase IIa Study Evaluating Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Antiviral Activity of GSK2838232, a Novel, Second-generation Maturation Inhibitor, in Participants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection

BACKGROUND

GSK2838232 is a second-generation, potent, small-molecule, oral human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) maturation inhibitor for once-daily administration boosted with a pharmacoenhancer.

METHODS

The phase 2a, proof-of-concept study was an open-label, adaptive dose-ranging design. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of GSK2838232 boosted by cobicistat were evaluated in individuals with HIV-1 infection. The study participants (N = 33) received GSK2838232 once daily across a range of doses (20-200 mg) with cobicistat 150 mg for 10 days.

RESULTS

GSK2838232 was safe and well tolerated with no clinically meaningful changes in safety parameters or adverse events. Exposure (maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the concentration at 24 hours postdose) increased 2- to 3-fold with repeated dosing in an approximately dose-proportional manner, reaching steady-state by day 8 with a half-life (t½) from 16.3 to 19.2 hours. Clearance and t½ values were not dependent on dose. Viral load declined from baseline with all GSK2838232 doses. Mean maximum declines from baseline to day 11 in HIV-1 RNA log10 copies/mL with the 20-mg, 50-mg, 100-mg, and 200-mg cohorts were -0.67, -1.56, -1.32, and -1.70, respectively. CD4+ cell counts increased at doses ≥50 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

GSK2838232 with cobicistat was well tolerated and exhibited efficacy as a short-term monotherapy in participants with HIV-1. This positive proof-of-concept study supports the continued development of GSK2838232 for the treatment of HIV as part of combination antiretroviral therapy.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT03045861.

Potential metabolic resistance mechanisms to ivermectin in Anopheles gambiae: a synergist bioassay study

Background

Despite remarkable success obtained with current malaria vector control strategies in the last 15 years, additional innovative measures will be needed to achieve the ambitious goals for malaria control set for 2030 by the World Health Organization (WHO). New tools will need to address insecticide resistance and residual transmission as key challenges. Endectocides such as ivermectin are drugs that kill mosquitoes which feed on treated subjects. Mass administration of ivermectin can effectively target outdoor and early biting vectors, complementing the still effective conventional tools. Although this approach has garnered attention, development of ivermectin resistance is a potential pitfall. Herein, we evaluate the potential role of xenobiotic pumps and cytochrome P450 enzymes in protecting mosquitoes against ivermectin by active efflux and metabolic detoxification, respectively.

Methods

We determined the lethal concentration 50 for ivermectin in colonized Anopheles gambiae; then we used chemical inhibitors and inducers of xenobiotic pumps and cytochrome P450 enzymes in combination with ivermectin to probe the mechanism of ivermectin detoxification.

Results

Dual inhibition of xenobiotic pumps and cytochromes was found to have a synergistic effect with ivermectin, greatly increasing mosquito mortality. Inhibition of xenobiotic pumps alone had no effect on ivermectin-induced mortality. Induction of xenobiotic pumps and cytochromes may confer partial protection from ivermectin.

Conclusion

There is a clear pathway for development of ivermectin resistance in malaria vectors. Detoxification mechanisms mediated by cytochrome P450 enzymes are more important than xenobiotic pumps in protecting mosquitoes against ivermectin.

Management of Antiretroviral Therapy with Boosted Protease Inhibitors-Darunavir/Ritonavir or Darunavir/Cobicistat

A major challenge in the management of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is to improve the patient's adherence, reducing the burden caused by the high number of drugs that compose the treatment regimens for human immunodeficiency virus positive (HIV+) patients. Selection of the most appropriate treatment regimen is responsible for therapeutic success and aims to reduce viremia, increase the immune system response capacity, and reduce the incidence rate and intensity of adverse reactions. In general, protease inhibitor (PI) is one of the pillars of regimens, and darunavir (DRV), in particular, is frequently recommended, along with low doses of enzyme inhibitors as cobicistat (COBI) or ritonavir (RTV), by the international guidelines. The potential of clinically significant drug interactions in patients taking COBI or RTV is high due to the potent inhibitory effect on cytochrome CYP 450, which attracts significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of PIs. Regardless of the patient or type of virus, the combined regimens of DRV/COBI or DRV/RTV are available to clinicians, proving their effectiveness, with a major impact on HIV mortality/morbidity. This study presents current information on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacology, drug interactions, and adverse reactions of DRV; it not only compares the bioavailability, pharmacokinetic parameters, immunological and virological responses, but also the efficacy, advantages, and therapeutic disadvantages of DRV/COBI or DRV/RTV combinations.

CNS Neurotoxicity of Antiretrovirals

The development of novel antiretroviral treatments has led to a significant turning point in the fight against HIV. Although therapy leads to virologic suppression and prolonged life expectancies, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) remains prevalent. While various hypotheses have been proposed to explain this phenomenon, a growing body of literature explores the neurotoxic effects of antiretroviral therapy. Research to date brings into question the potential role of such medications in neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric impairment seen in HIV-positive patients. This review highlights recent findings and controversies in cellular, molecular, and clinical neurotoxicity of antiretrovirals. It explores the pathogenesis of such toxicity and relates it to clinical manifestations in each medication class. The concept of accelerated aging in persons living with HIV (PLWH) as well as potential treatments for HAND are also discussed. Ultimately, this article hopes to educate clinicians and basic scientists about the neurotoxic effects of antiretrovirals and spur future scientific investigation into this important topic. Graphical Abstract.

Population pharmacokinetic modelling to quantify the magnitude of drug-drug interactions between amlodipine and antiretroviral drugs

PURPOSE

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) represent an important issue in elderly people living with HIV (PLWH). Amlodipine is a commonly prescribed antihypertensive drug metabolized by CYP3A4, thus predisposed to a risk of DDIs. Guidance on the management of DDIs is mostly based on theoretical considerations derived from coadministration with other CYP3A4 inhibitors. This study aimed at characterizing the magnitude of DDIs between amlodipine and ARV drugs in order to establish dosing recommendations.

METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic analysis was developed using non-linear mixed effect modelling (NONMEM) and included 163 amlodipine concentrations from 55 PLWH. Various structural and error models were compared to characterize optimally the concentration-time profile of amlodipine. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as comedications were tested as potential influential covariates. Model-based simulations were performed to compare amlodipine exposure (i.e. area under the curve, AUC) between coadministered ARV drugs.

RESULTS

Amlodipine concentration-time profile was best described using a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and a lag-time. Amlodipine apparent clearance was influenced by both CYP3A4 inhibitors and efavirenz (CYP3A4 inducer). Model-based simulations revealed that amlodipine AUC increased by 96% when coadministered with CYP3A4 inhibitors, while efavirenz decreased drug exposure by 59%.

CONCLUSION

Coadministered ARV drugs significantly impact amlodipine disposition in PLWH. Clinicians should adjust amlodipine dosage accordingly, by halving the dosage in PLWH receiving ARV with inhibitory properties (mainly ritonavir-boosted darunavir), whereas they should double amlodipine doses when coadministering it with efavirenz, under appropriate monitoring of clinical response and tolerance.

Multidomain drug delivery systems of β-casein micelles for the local oral co-administration of antiretroviral combinations

The antiretroviral (ARV) cocktailrevolved the treatment of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Drug combinations have been also tested to treat other infectious diseases, including the recentcoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. To simplify administration fixed-dose combinationshave been introduced, however, oral anti-HIV therapy still struggles with low oral bioavailability of many ARVs.This work investigated the co-encapsulation of two clinically relevant ARV combinations,tipranavir (TPV):efavirenz (EFV) anddarunavir (DRV):efavirenz (EFV):ritonavir (RTV),within the core of β-casein (bCN) micelles. Encapsulation efficiency in both systems was ~100%. Cryo-transmission electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering of the ARV-loaded colloidaldispersions indicatefull preservation of the spherical morphology, and x-ray diffraction confirm that the encapsulated drugs are amorphous. To prolong the physicochemical stabilitythe formulations were freeze-driedwithout cryo/lyoprotectant, and successfully redispersed, with minor changes in morphology.Then, theARV-loaded micelles were encapsulated within microparticles of Eudragit® L100, which prevented enzymatic degradation and minimized drug release under gastric-like pH conditionsin vitro. At intestinal pH, the coating polymer dissolved and released the nanocarriers and content. Overall, our results confirm the promise of this flexible and modular technology platform for oral delivery of fixed dose combinations.

Drug-Drug Interactions of Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir Coadministered With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antiretrovirals

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients coinfected with hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency viruses (HCV; HIV) requires careful consideration of potential drug-drug interactions between HCV direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) and HIV antiretrovirals. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a fixed-dose combination of an NS3/4A protease inhibitor and an NS5A inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1-6 infection, including patients with HIV coinfection.

METHODS

A series of phase 1 studies was conducted to evaluate potential interactions of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide, abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine, raltegravir, rilpivirine, atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir, or efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Pharmacokinetics of the antiretrovirals and DAAs were characterized when administered alone and in combination to quantify changes in systemic drug exposure.

RESULTS

Glecaprevir area under the curve increased >4-fold in the presence of ritonavir-boosted HIV protease inhibitors, while pibrentasvir concentrations were not significantly affected; elevations in alanine transaminase occurred in combination with atazanavir/ritonavir only. Exposures of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir may be significantly decreased by efavirenz. Coadministration with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir did not result in clinically significant changes in the exposure of any antiretroviral agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Atazanavir is contraindicated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and use of boosted protease inhibitors or efavirenz is not recommended. No clinically significant interactions were observed with other studied antiretrovirals.

Pharmacogenomics of Antiretroviral Drug Metabolism and Transport

Antiretroviral therapy has markedly reduced morbidity and mortality for persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Individual tailoring of antiretroviral regimens has the potential to further improve the long-term management of HIV through the mitigation of treatment failure and drug-induced toxicities. While the mechanisms underlying anti-HIV drug adverse outcomes are multifactorial, the application of drug-specific pharmacogenomic knowledge is required in order to move toward the personalization of HIV therapy. Thus, detailed understanding of the metabolism and transport of antiretrovirals and the influence of genetics on these pathways is important. To this end, this review provides an up-to-date overview of the metabolism of anti-HIV therapeutics and the impact of genetic variation in drug metabolism and transport on the treatment of HIV. Future perspectives on and current challenges in pursuing personalized HIV treatment are also discussed.

Cushing's syndrome due to interaction between ritonavir or cobicistat and corticosteroids: a case-control study in the French Pharmacovigilance Database

OBJECTIVES

To explore the frequent interaction between antiretroviral-boosting agents and corticosteroids causing Cushing's syndrome (CS) in the French Pharmacovigilance Database (FPVD).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study describing CS recorded in the FPVD between 1996 and 2018. Case was defined as CS occurring in people living with HIV (PLWH) and control was defined as CS in uninfected individuals. Drug-drug interaction (DDI) was defined as an interaction between corticosteroids and CYP3A4 inhibitors. Data concerning the DDI, corticosteroids involved, route of administration and seriousness of the CS were described.

RESULTS

Among the 139 instances of CS identified, 34/35 cases (97%) had DDIs (31 with ritonavir and 3 with cobicistat) and 7/104 controls (7%) had DDIs (6 with itraconazole and 1 with verapamil). The main corticosteroid involved was inhaled fluticasone (28/35, 80%) among the cases and oral prednisone (38/104, 37%) among the controls. More CS cases (30/35, 86%) than CS controls (62/104, 60%) were serious (OR = 4.0, 95% CI = 1.4-14.4; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Antiretroviral-boosting agents were responsible for one out of four iatrogenic CS cases in a French national database. Prescribers should be aware of the risk of potentially serious DDIs between antiretroviral-boosting agents and corticosteroids, including single-tablet regimens containing cobicistat.

Exploration of Reduced Doses and Short-Cycle Therapy for Darunavir/Cobicistat in Patients with HIV Using Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Protease inhibitors such as darunavir are an important therapeutic option in the anti-human immunodeficiency virus arsenal. Current dosage guidelines recommend using cobicistat- or ritonavir-boosted darunavir 800 mg every 24 h (q24h) in protease inhibitor-naïve patients, or ritonavir-boosted darunavir 600 mg q12h in experienced patients. However, darunavir displays a large, poorly characterized, inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. The objectives of this study were to investigate the pharmacokinetics of darunavir and to elucidate the sources of its inter-individual variability using population pharmacokinetic modeling. Then, to determine the appropriateness of current treatment guidelines and the feasibility of alternative dosing regimens in a representative cohort of adult patients using simulations.

METHODS

Sparse pharmacokinetic samples were collected in 127 patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, then supplemented with rich sampling data from a subset of 12 individuals. Data were analyzed using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling software NONMEM. The effect of reduced doses (600 mg q24h and 400 mg q24h) or reduced frequency of administration (800 mg q24h for 5 days followed by 2 days of treatment interruption) was simulated.

RESULTS

Our model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of darunavir. Predictors of individual exposure were CYP3A5*3 and SLCO3A1 rs8027174 genotypes, sex, and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein level. No relationship was apparent between darunavir area under the curve and treatment efficacy or safety. For reduced dose regimens, darunavir concentrations remained above the protein binding-corrected EC₅₀ in the majority of subjects. More stringent pharmacokinetic targets were not reached in a significant proportion of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results add to the growing body of evidence that darunavir-based therapy could be simplified to reduce costs and toxicity, as well as to improve patient compliance. However, the heterogeneity in pharmacokinetic response should be considered when assessing whether individual patients could benefit from a particular regimen, for instance through the use of population pharmacokinetic models.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03101644, date of registration: 5 April, 2017.

Drug-Drug Interactions with Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnant Women Living with HIV: Are They Different from Non-Pregnant Individuals?

Background and Objective

Although the separate effects of drug–drug interactions and pregnancy on antiretroviral drug pharmacokinetics have been widely studied and described, their combined effect is largely unknown. Physiological changes during pregnancy may change the extent or clinical relevance of a drug–drug interaction in a pregnant woman. This review aims to provide a detailed overview of the mechanisms, magnitude, and clinical significance of antiretroviral drug–drug interactions in pregnant women.

Methods

We performed a literature search and selected studies that compared the magnitude of drug–drug interactions with antiretroviral drugs in pregnant vs non-pregnant women.

Results

Forty-eight papers examining drug–drug interactions during pregnancy were selected, of which the majority focused on pharmacokinetic boosting. Other selected studies examined the drug–drug interactions between efavirenz and lumefantrine, efavirenz and tuberculosis drugs, etravirine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, atazanavir and tenofovir disoproxil, and mefloquine and nevirapine in pregnant compared to non-pregnant women. The clinical significance of antiretroviral drug–drug interactions changed during pregnancy from a minimal effect to a contra-indication. In almost all cases, the clinical significance of a drug–drug interaction was more relevant in pregnant women, owing to the combined effects of pregnancy-induced physiological changes and drug–drug interactions leading to a lower absolute drug exposure.

Conclusions

Multiple studies show that the clinical relevance of a drug–drug interaction can change during pregnancy. Unfortunately, many potential interactions have not been studied in pregnancy, which may place pregnant women living with human immunodeficiency virus and their newborns at risk.

Iatrogenic Cushing's Syndrome Following Intra-Articular Triamcinolone Injection in an HIV-Infected Patient on Cobicistat Presenting as a Pulmonary Embolism: Case Report and Literature Review

Background

Iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome (ICS) typically develops after long-term exposure to corticosteroids, but it can occur after a single dose in patients treated with cobicistat or ritonavir for HIV. We present a patient who developed ICS due to the interaction between cobicistat and triamcinolone, a review of the literature, and what to our knowledge is the first case of ICS presenting as a pulmonary embolism.

Case Presentation

A 55-year old male with a past medical history of human immunodeficiency virus, undetectable for 15 years and currently on elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide, received 2 intra-articular injections of triamcinolone one month apart for a Baker’s cyst in his right knee. He used nasal fluticasone for 9 days in-between the injections. After his second knee injection, he developed easy bruising and friable skin. Over the coming months, he experienced weight gain and Cushingoid facies. Four months after the knee injections he developed a pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis treated with warfarin. The Cushingoid facies prompted an evaluation and diagnosis of ICS along with hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis suppression.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates the need to monitor patients on pharmacological boosters with any exposure to corticosteroids, whether it be injected, inhaled, topical, oral or intravenous, as it can lead to profound adrenal suppression and ICS.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in an Observational Cohort of HIV-1-Infected Adults on Darunavir/Cobicistat-Based Regimens: Beyond Viral Suppression

OBJECTIVE

This prospective, multicenter, non-interventional cohort study enrolling human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected, virally suppressed adult outpatients in Italy aimed to describe results obtained from patient-reported outcome questionnaires regarding treatment satisfaction and symptom perceptions in HIV-1-positive patients who switched to cobicistat-boosted darunavir antiretroviral regimens, coming from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors.

METHODS

Patients entered this study between June 2016 and February 2017, once their treating physician had considered them eligible for cobicistat-boosted darunavir-based treatment as per clinical practice. Patients' satisfaction regarding regimen and current symptom burdens were assessed using two previously validated, patient-reported outcome questionnaires: HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIV-TSQ) and HIV Symptoms Distress Module (HIV-SDM). These questionnaires were administered at prespecified time-points: enrollment (Visit 1), 4-8 weeks later (Visit 2), and 48 ± 6 weeks after study enrollment (Visit 4). Data of patient-reported outcome total scores for both questionnaires are presented as median with 25th-75th percentiles. Questionnaires scores were analyzed overall and stratified by gender when applicable. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the role of lost to follow-up, using the "last observation carried forward" method.

RESULTS

A total of 348 patients were enrolled in this study; 296 patients (208 male and 88 female) provided both evaluable HIV-TSQ and HIV-SDM at enrollment and at 4-8 weeks, while 250 patients (174 male and 76 female) provided questionnaire data at enrollment and at 48 ± 6 weeks. The total scores of HIV-TSQ showed improvements in patient satisfaction in the overall population both at Visit 2 and Visit 4 (p < 0.001, sign test) and also when stratified by gender throughout the study period. In addition, the overall burden of symptoms, as shown by the HIV-SDM scores, decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to a cobicistat-boosted darunavir-based therapy led to overall increased patient satisfaction and reduced symptom burden when compared with previous regimens. The use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical daily practice could provide a useful tool towards achieving guideline goals to achieve "fourth 90", having 90% of virally suppressed patients with a good health-related quality of life.

The challenge of HIV treatment in an era of polypharmacy

INTRODUCTION

The availability of potent antiretroviral therapy has transformed HIV infection into a chronic disease such that people living with HIV (PLWH) have a near normal life expectancy. However, there are continuing challenges in managing HIV infection, particularly in older patients, who often experience age-related comorbidities resulting in complex polypharmacy and an increased risk for drug-drug interactions. Furthermore, age-related physiological changes may affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of both antiretrovirals and comedications thereby predisposing elderly to adverse drug reactions. This review provides an overview of the therapeutic challenges when treating elderly PLWH (i.e. >65 years). Particular emphasis is placed on drug-drug interactions and other common prescribing issues (i.e. inappropriate drug use, prescribing cascade, drug-disease interaction) encountered in elderly PLWH.

DISCUSSION

Prescribing issues are common in elderly PLWH due to the presence of age-related comorbidities, organ dysfunction and physiological changes leading to a higher risk for drug-drug interactions, drugs dosage errors and inappropriate drug use.

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of prescribing issues in elderly PLWH highlights the need for ongoing education on prescribing principles and the optimal management of individual patients. The knowledge of adverse health outcomes associated with polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing should ensure that there are interventions to prevent harm including medication reconciliation, medication review and medication prioritization according to the risks/benefits for each patient.

Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of ritonavir (versus cobicistat) as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of HIV

Introduction: Ritonavir and cobicistat are pharmacoenhancers used to improve the disposition of other HIV antiretrovirals. These drugs are, however, characterized by important pharmacokinetic differences.Areas covered: Here, the authors firstly update the available information on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir and cobicistat. Subsequently, the review focuses on the description of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving cobicistat and comedications that might beneficiate from a shift-back to ritonavir. A MEDLINE Pubmed search for articles published from January 1995 to April 2019 was completed matching the term ritonavir or cobicistat with pharmacokinetics, DDIs, and pharmacology. Moreover, additional studies were identified from the reference list of retrieved articles.Expert opinion: Despite more than 20 years after its introduction on the market, ritonavir still represents a valid option for the treatment of selected HIV-infected patients. The large-scale switch to cobicistat may result in some unexpected DDIs not previously reported for ritonavir. Besides the issue of DDIs, additional advantage of ritonavir over cobicistat is its use in pregnancy, and its availability as single component of pharmaceutical formulations allowing the fine-tuning of antiretroviral regimens in patients with heavy polypharmacy when other unboosted-based therapeutic options cannot be used.