1
|
Kishinchand R, Boyce M, Vyas H, Sewell L, Mohi A, Brengartner L, Miller R, Gorr MW, Wold LE, Cray J. In Utero Exposure to Maternal Electronic Nicotine Delivery System use Demonstrate Alterations to Craniofacial Development. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2024; 61:1389-1397. [PMID: 36916055 DOI: 10.1177/10556656231163400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Develop a model for the study of Electronic Nicotine Device (ENDS) exposure on craniofacial development. DESIGN Experimental preclinical design followed as pregnant murine dams were randomized and exposed to filtered air exposure, carrier exposure consisting of 50% volume of propylene glycol and vegetable glycine (ENDS Carrier) respectively, or carrier exposure with 20 mg/ml of nicotine added to the liquid vaporizer (ENDS carrier with nicotine). SETTING Preclinical murine model exposure using the SciReq exposure system. PARTICIPANTS C57BL6 adult 8 week old female pregnant mice and exposed in utero litters. INTERVENTIONS Exposure to control filtered air, ENDS carrier or ENDS carrier with nicotine added throughout gestation at 1 puff/minute, 4 h/day, five days a week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cephalometric measures of post-natal day 15 pups born as exposed litters. RESULTS Data suggests alterations to several facial morphology parameters in the developing offspring, suggesting electronic nicotine device systems may alter facial growth if used during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS Future research should concentrate on varied formulations and exposure regimens of ENDS to determine timing windows of exposures and ENDS formulations that may be harmful to craniofacial development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv Kishinchand
- Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Mark Boyce
- Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Heema Vyas
- Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Leslie Sewell
- Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Amr Mohi
- Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Lexie Brengartner
- Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Roy Miller
- School of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Matthew W Gorr
- School of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Loren E Wold
- School of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - James Cray
- Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
- Division of Biosciences, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deng H, Fang L, Zhang L, Li J, Wang J, Wang F, Zheng P. Susceptibility to e-cigarette among high school students: a study based on the ecological model of health behavior. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1395717. [PMID: 39056081 PMCID: PMC11269252 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Youth e-cigarette (EC) use has rapidly increased in the last few years. It is crucial to identify the susceptible youth and prevent them from EC uptake. This study was conducted to investigate factors that affect youth susceptibility to EC use. Methods This study employed a cross-sectional survey design, utilizing multi-center stratified cluster sampling method to select two junior high schools and two senior high schools in Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chengdu. One-third of classes of each grade in the selected schools were involved in this survey. After obtaining the informed consent of parents, an anonymous and self-administered questionnaire was distributed to students. Questionnaire was designed based on the Ecological Models of Health Behavior. Associations between EC susceptibility and covariates were identified using multivariate logistic regression. Results Among 2,270 students who had never vaped, 38.0% were susceptible to ECs. Logistic regression analysis identified factors on different levels affecting the susceptibility. Individual factors included senior high school students (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.08-1.65), sensation seeker (OR = 1.11, 95%CI: 1.08-1.14), poor academic performance (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.01-1.54), ever cigarette user (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.29-4.01), unaware of the second-hand smoke from vaping (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.25-1.96), agreeable with "I do not want to hang around vapers" (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.97), agreeable with "ECs are more fashionable than cigarette" (OR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.72-3.62) and favorable attitudes toward vaping (OR = 5.09, 95% CI: 3.78-6.85) were significantly associated with susceptibility to ECs. At interpersonal level, students who believe they would not be punished by parents for vaping increased susceptibility (OR = 1.27, 95% CI:1.01-1.59). At community level, exposure of EC advertising (OR = 1.81, 95% CI:1.46-2.25), exposure to hazard information (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97) and seeing vaping in daily life (OR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.62-2.74), were statistically significantly associated with youth susceptibility to ECs. Conclusion EC susceptibility was observed in a substantial proportion of adolescents who had never vaped, influenced by factors on different levels. This research underscores the urgent need for comprehensive intervention strategies to prevent the youth susceptibility to ECs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Deng
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Institute of Health Communication, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ling Fang
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Institute of Health Communication, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lingyun Zhang
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Institute of Health Communication, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Li
- School of Journalism and Communication/National Media and Experimental Teaching Center, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jing Wang
- General office, Pudong New Area Center for Patriotic Sanitation Campaign and Health Promotion Counsel, Shanghai, China
| | - Fan Wang
- Fudan Development Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Pinpin Zheng
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Institute of Health Communication, Key Lab of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wysota CN, Duan Z, Wang Y, Niaura RS, Abroms LC. Noticing Voluntary E-Cigarette Warning Labels and Associations With Harm Perceptions and Use Intentions: A Baseline Cross-Sectional Analysis of Wave 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Prior to the Food and Drug Administration Mandate. Am J Health Promot 2024:8901171241249144. [PMID: 38709540 DOI: 10.1177/08901171241249144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the effect of e-cigarette warning labels (EWLs) prior to the August 2018 FDA-warning label mandate to establish a baseline for future research. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING United States. PARTICIPANTS A cohort of adult participants in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study (n = 30,004) at Wave 4 (Dec 2016-Jan 2018). MEASURES Correlates (e.g., sociodemographics, substance use, social influence, cigarette warnings, and mental health) of noticing EWLs in the past 30-days (noticed vs did not notice), perceived harm of e-cigarettes/nicotine (from 1 = not at all harmful to 5 = extremely harmful), relative harm of e-cigarettes (from 1 = less harmful to 3 = more harmful than cigarettes), intention to quit (yes/no) and intention to try e-cigarettes (from 1 = definitely not to 4 = definitely yes). RESULTS The prevalence of noticing EWLs was 22.1%. Those who currently use electronic nicotine products, established and experimentally, were more likely to notice EWLs relative to never users (aOR = 3.55; 95% CI: 2.96-4.25; P < .001 and aOR = 2.42; 95% CI: 1.88-3.10; P < .001, respectively). Those with past 30-day alcohol and cigarette use were less likely to notice EWLs (aOR = .27; 95% CI: .24-.31 and aOR = .91; 95% CI: .83-.99; respectively). Those who noticed cigarette warnings were more likely to notice EWLs (aOR = 12.00; 95% CI: 10.46-13.77; P < .001). Among those who noticed EWLs, there were higher odds of perceiving e-cigarettes to be equally or more harmful than cigarettes (aOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.30), but no association was found between noticing EWLs and perceived harm of e-cigarettes/nicotine or use intentions. CONCLUSION Noticing voluntary EWLs was not associated with increased perceived harm of e-cigarettes and nicotine harm, or e-cigarette use intentions. Future research is warranted to examine the effect of the FDA mandated EWLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina N Wysota
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Zongshuan Duan
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Yan Wang
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Raymond S Niaura
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lorien C Abroms
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Galper EF, Gottfredson O'Shea N, Ritchie C, Kresovich A, Ma H, Sutfin EL, Sheeran P, Noar SM. Identifying promising themes and messages for youth vaping prevention: A national study. Soc Sci Med 2024; 348:116864. [PMID: 38608483 PMCID: PMC11056295 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
Use of e-cigarettes and vapes among adolescents continues to be a major public health concern. Health communication efforts can discourage e-cigarette use among adolescents by influencing beliefs and behavior. However, to do so, studies need to identify the most promising themes and messages based on the latest evidence about the harms of e-cigarettes and vaping. Participants were a nationally representative sample of 1,603 US adolescents aged 13-17 years, recruited in the summer of 2022. Adolescents were randomly assigned to view 7 vaping prevention statements (one from each theme: nicotine addiction, chemical harms, health symptoms, mental health, organ effects, cosmetic effects, and monetary cost) and 1 control statement (vape litter theme) from a pool of 46 statements that were developed through a systematic process. Participants rated each statement on perceived message effectiveness (PME), awareness, and believability. Results of linear mixed models indicated that all vaping prevention themes out-performed control messages on PME, with chemical harms and organ effects having the largest effects, followed by nicotine addiction and then other themes. For most message themes, PME effects were stronger for youth susceptible to vaping compared to non-susceptible youth and users. Both awareness and believability predicted higher levels of PME. In secondary analyses, we found that statements specifying the target ("you") and longer statements were also rated higher on PME. Results suggests that the most potent vaping prevention messages for adolescents are those that focus on vape chemicals and the potential of vaping to damage organs and increase disease risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily F Galper
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | | | - Caroline Ritchie
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alex Kresovich
- Public Health Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Haijing Ma
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Erin L Sutfin
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Paschal Sheeran
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Seth M Noar
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sánchez-Romero LM, Li Y, Zavala-Arciniega L, Gallegos-Carrillo K, Thrasher JF, Meza R, Levy DT. The potential impact of removing a ban on electronic nicotine delivery systems using the Mexico smoking and vaping model (SAVM). MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.04.28.24306511. [PMID: 38746147 PMCID: PMC11092684 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.28.24306511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Objective To develop the Mexico Smoking and Vaping Model (Mexico SAVM) to estimate cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) prevalence and the public health impact of legalizing ENDS use. Methods SAVM, a cohort-based discrete-time simulation model, compares two scenarios. The ENDS-Restricted Scenario estimates smoking prevalence and associated mortality outcomes under the current policy of an ENDS ban, using Mexico-specific population projections, death rates, life expectancy, and smoking and e-cigarette prevalence. The ENDS-Unrestricted Scenario projects smoking and vaping prevalence under a hypothetical scenario where ENDS use is allowed. The impact of legalizing ENDS use is estimated as the difference in smoking- and vaping-attributable deaths (SVADs) and life-years lost (LYLs) between the ENDS-Restricted and Unrestricted scenarios. Results Compared to a national ENDS ban, The Mexico SAVM projects that legalizing ENDS use could decrease smoking prevalence by 40.1% in males and 30.9% in females by 2049 compared to continuing the national ENDS ban. This reduction in prevalence would save 2.9 (2.5 males and 0.4 females) million life-years and avert almost 106 (91.0 males and 15.5 females) thousand deaths between 2025 and 2049. Public health gains decline by 43% to 59,748 SVADs averted when the switching rate is reduced by half and by 24.3% (92,806 SVADs averted) with a 25% ENDS risk level from that of cigarettes but increased by 24.3% (121,375 SVADs averted) with the 5% ENDS risk. Conclusions Mexico SAVM suggests that greater access to ENDS and a more permissive ENDS regulation, simultaneous with strong cigarette policies, would reduce smoking prevalence and decrease smoking-related mortality. The unanticipated effects of an ENDS ban merit closer scrutiny, with further consideration of how specific ENDS restrictions may maximize public health benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luz María Sánchez-Romero
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. United States of America
| | - Yameng Li
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. United States of America
| | - Luis Zavala-Arciniega
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Katia Gallegos-Carrillo
- Epidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, Morelos, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico
- Evaluation and Surveys Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - James F Thrasher
- Department of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States of America
| | - Rafael Meza
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, British Columbia, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - David T Levy
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Asfar T, Schmidt M, Oluwole OJ, Casas A, Friedman L, Ferdous T, Noar SM, Eissenberg T, Maziak W. Building consensus on a set of ENDS-specific pictorial health warnings: a Delphi study among a tobacco control expert panel. Tob Control 2024:tc-2023-058384. [PMID: 38346872 DOI: 10.1136/tc-2023-058384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study reports on the development of pictorial health warning labels for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) using the Delphi approach with a panel of tobacco control experts. Twenty-four evidence-based ENDS-specific warnings corresponding to three themes (toxicity, health risks and specific harm) were developed and used in the Delphi study. METHODS We conducted a three-round online Delphi study among 60 experts (55% female) between June 2022 and April 2023. We balanced the panel in areas of expertise and positions relevant to ENDS (risks, benefits). In round 1, participants rated the warnings on attention, relevance to evidence and perceived effectiveness (harm perception, motivation to quit) and provided suggestions for improvement. In rounds 2 and 3, participants ranked the revised warnings based on importance in each theme. We assessed levels of agreement between participants using interquartile deviations and medians. RESULTS Warnings in theme 1, toxicity, received the highest ratings for perceived effectiveness on harm perception and encouraging quitting ENDS (p<0.05). Experts recommended using clear and affirmative text paired with emotion-provoking pictures and avoiding the rare side effects of ENDS. Most of the top-ranked warnings were from theme 3, ENDS-specific harm, pertained to lung damage, dual use of ENDS and cigarettes, nicotine addiction among youth, anti-ENDS industry sentiment and toxicity. DISCUSSION This study developed 24 evidence-based ENDS health warning labels using a systematic process that included several rounds of expert panel feedback. These warnings can be used to advance ENDS prevention and tobacco control policies and further target different populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taghrid Asfar
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Schmidt
- Department of Art, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Olusanya Joshua Oluwole
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alejandra Casas
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Lily Friedman
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Tarana Ferdous
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Seth M Noar
- Husssman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas Eissenberg
- Psychology and Inst. for Drug/Alc. Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Wasim Maziak
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhao X, Cai X, Malterud A. Framing Effects in Youth E-Cigarette Use Prevention: Individual Text Messages Versus Simulated Text Exchanges. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2023; 50:683-692. [PMID: 36722218 DOI: 10.1177/10901981221148965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Electronic cigarettes are the most widely used tobacco product among youth in the United States. Although rapidly growing, research on effective message strategies for e-cigarette use prevention is still limited. This study examined the relative effectiveness of gain framing versus loss framing in youth-targeting prevention text messages delivered either as individual expository texts or simulated text exchanges between a youth patient and a pediatrician. A national sample of 1,084 youth susceptible to future e-cigarette use was randomized to condition in an online message testing experiment featuring a 2 (framing: gain vs. loss) × 2 (format: individual texts vs. simulated exchange) factorial design. Results revealed a consistent interaction between framing and messaging format in message liking, positive affect, attitude toward e-cigarette use, and future e-cigarette use intentions. The gain frame outperformed the loss frame in the simulated exchange conditions while the reverse trend was true for the individual text conditions. Furthermore, the main effect of messaging format was significant on multiple outcomes in favor of simulated text exchanges. The main effect of framing was only significant on negative affective response with the loss frame eliciting stronger responses. These findings suggest that the relative effectiveness of gain framing versus loss framing depends on how messages are presented in youth-targeting text messaging interventions. When messages are likely to be delivered in a discrete manner, the loss frame should be preferred. When greater interactivity and narrative development are possible, the gain frame should be favored. E-cigarette prevention efforts should leverage these insights to enhance message effectiveness.
Collapse
|
8
|
Duan Z, Levine H, Bar-Zeev Y, Cui Y, LoParco CR, Wang Y, Abroms LC, Khayat A, Berg CJ. The impacts of electronic cigarette health warning labels on use intentions and perceptions: A cross-sectional study of US and Israeli adults who use tobacco. J Public Health Res 2023; 12:22799036231214396. [PMID: 38020219 PMCID: PMC10666698 DOI: 10.1177/22799036231214396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Health warning labels (HWLs) are evidence-based tobacco control strategies; however, their application to e-cigarettes and related impacts (e.g. on perceived risk), including across countries with different regulations, are understudied. Design and Methods Using 2021 survey data from 927 US and Israeli adults reporting past-month tobacco use, multivariate analyses examined: (1) sociodemographics in relation to self-reported impact of e-cigarette HWLs (i.e. more concerned about e-cigarette use, reassured, no effect) among those who noticed e-cigarette HWLs (multinomial regressions); and (2) HWL impacts in relation to use intentions and perceived addictiveness and harm (linear regressions). Results Among those who noticed HWLs (n = 835, 90.1%), 34.1% reported HWLs resulted in greater concern about e-cigarette use, 45.5% no effect, and 20.4% reassurance. Factors associated with greater concern (vs no effect) included e-cigarette non-use (vs use; aOR = 1.69, 95% CI:1.22, 2.38), US (vs Israel) resident (aOR = 1.65, 95% CI:1.16, 2.34), age 18-25 (vs 36-45; aOR = 1.72, 95% CI:1.11, 2.67), and more education (aOR = 1.85, 95% CI:1.30, 2.63). Factors associated with being reassured (vs no effect) included use of cigarettes (aOR = 1.71, 95% CI:1.06, 2.75), e-cigarettes (aOR = 2.64, 95% CI:1.77, 3.94), and other tobacco (aOR = 2.11, 95% CI:1.39, 3.21), and Israeli resident (aOR = 2.33, 95% CI:1.47, 3.70). Not noticing HWLs (vs no effect) correlated with lower intentions (β = -0.44, 95% CI:-0.87, -0.01), perceived addictiveness (β = -0.61, 95% CI:-1.05, -0.18), and harm (β = -0.56, 95% CI:-0.95, -0.18); reassurance correlated with greater use intentions (β = 0.48, 95% CI:0.12, 0.83); and greater concern was unassociated with use intentions or perceived risk. Conclusion Effects of differing e-cigarette HWLs in distinct subpopulations warrant research. Despite being noticed, they may have no effect or encourage e-cigarette use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongshuan Duan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Hagai Levine
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yael Bar-Zeev
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yuxian Cui
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Cassidy R LoParco
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
- George Washington Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Lorien C Abroms
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
- George Washington Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Amal Khayat
- Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Carla J Berg
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
- George Washington Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jancey J, Leaver T, Wolf K, Freeman B, Chai K, Bialous S, Bromberg M, Adams P, Mcleod M, Carey RN, McCausland K. Promotion of E-Cigarettes on TikTok and Regulatory Considerations. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:5761. [PMID: 37239490 PMCID: PMC10217796 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20105761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
E-cigarettes are promoted extensively on TikTok and other social media platforms. Platform policies to restrict e-cigarette promotion seem insufficient and are poorly enforced. This paper aims to understand how e-cigarettes are being promoted on TikTok and provide insights into the effectiveness of current TikTok policies. Seven popular hashtag-based keywords were used to identify TikTok accounts and associated videos related to e-cigarettes. Posts were independently coded by two trained coders. Collectively, the 264 videos received 2,470,373 views, 166,462 likes and 3426 comments. The overwhelming majority of videos (97.7%) portrayed e-cigarettes positively, and these posts received 98.7% of the total views and 98.2% of the total likes. A total of 69 posts (26.1%) clearly violated TikTok's own content policy. The findings of the current study suggest that a variety of predominantly pro-vaping content is available on TikTok. Current policies and moderation processes appear to be insufficient in restricting the spread of pro-e-cigarette content on TikTok, putting predominantly young users at potential risk of e-cigarette use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonine Jancey
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Tama Leaver
- Internet Studies, School of Media, Creative Arts and Social Inquiry, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Katharina Wolf
- School of Marketing, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Becky Freeman
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Kevin Chai
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Stella Bialous
- School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Marilyn Bromberg
- UWA Law School, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Phoebe Adams
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Meghan Mcleod
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Renee N. Carey
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Kahlia McCausland
- Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pan Z, Wang Q, Guo Y, Xu S, Pan S, Xu S, Zhou Q, Li L. Association of dual electronic cigarettes and marijuana use with sleep duration among adults from the United States, NHANES 2015–2018. Prev Med Rep 2023; 33:102190. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
|
11
|
Grummon AH, Ruggles PR, Greenfield TK, Hall MG. Designing Effective Alcohol Warnings: Consumer Reactions to Icons and Health Topics. Am J Prev Med 2023; 64:157-166. [PMID: 37575887 PMCID: PMC10421534 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction New warning labels for alcohol could reduce alcohol-related health harms. This study examined consumer responses to alcohol warnings with different designs. Methods A national sample of 3,051 U.S. adults completed an online survey in August 2021. Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 warning topics (addiction, liver damage, early death, or colon cancer). Participants viewed 3 labels, presented in random order: 2 types of warning labels (text-only and icon) showing a newly developed warning message about their assigned topic and a text-only control label showing a neutral message. Participants rated each label on effectiveness at discouraging alcohol consumption (primary outcome) and attention (secondary outcome) using 1 to 5 Likert-type scales. Participants also rated warnings with different causal language variants (e.g., "increases risk of," "contributes to") and marker words (e.g., "WARNING," "SURGEON GENERAL WARNING"). Results Both the text-only and icon warnings were perceived as more effective (Average Differential Effects [ADEs]=0.79 and 0.86, respectively) and more attention-grabbing (ADEs=0.43 and 0.69, respectively) than control labels (all ps<0.001). The icon warnings were rated as more effective and attention-grabbing than the text-only warnings (ADEs=0.07 and 0.27, respectively, both ps<0.001). Although all warning topics outperformed the control messages, warnings about addiction were rated as less effective and attention-grabbing than the other topics. A majority (60%) of participants selected "increases risk of" as the most discouraging causal variant and a plurality (47%) selected "SURGEON GENERAL WARNING" as the most discouraging marker word. Conclusions New alcohol warnings could discourage alcohol consumption, especially if warnings include icons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna H. Grummon
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Phoebe R. Ruggles
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Marissa G. Hall
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Czaplicki L, Marynak K, Kelley D, Moran MB, Trigger S, Kennedy RD. Presence of Nicotine Warning Statement on US Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) Advertisements 6 Months Before and After the August 10, 2018 Effective Date. Nicotine Tob Res 2022; 24:1720-1726. [PMID: 35486959 PMCID: PMC10546915 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Effective in August 10, 2018, FDA requires advertisements for electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) that meet the definition of a "covered tobacco product" to feature a standard nicotine warning statement. To date, limited data exist on the presence of warning statements in ENDS advertising. METHODS We acquired ENDS ads (n = 459) that first ran six months before (February 10, 2018-August 9, 2018) and after (August 10, 2018-February 9, 2019) the effective date. The sample included online, print, and outdoor static ads (ie, without video or animated graphics) (n = 166 before, n = 198 after), online and television video ads (n = 16 before, n = 49 after), and radio ads (n = 9 before, n = 21 after). We coded ads for the presence of the verbatim FDA warning. Ads with verbatim warnings were coded for required formatting and additional features. RESULTS Overall, 28% of static (n = 46/166), 62% of video (n = 10/16), and 67% of radio (n = 6/9) ads that ran before the effective date contained the verbatim warning versus 84% (n = 167/198, p < .001), 96% (n = 47/49, p = .002), and 86% (n = 18/21, p =.329) of ads that ran after, respectively. Following the effective date, nearly all static ads placed the warning as required at the top of the ad (76% [n = 35/46] before, 97% [n = 162/167] after, p < .001), and many video ads featured the warning statement for the entire ad duration (0% [n = 0/10] before, 60% [n = 28/47] after, p < .001). Half (n = 9/18) of radio warnings running after the effective date were read faster than the other promotional content. CONCLUSIONS The presence of the nicotine warning statement on paid promotional static, video, and radio ENDS ads in this sample increased after August 10, 2018, but a notable number still lacked the warning. IMPLICATIONS Results from this study provide initial insights into the extent to which required nicotine warning statements appear in ENDS ads in the study sample across traditional (eg, magazines, television, radio) and digital (eg, online/mobile ads) advertising mediums. Following the August 10, 2018, effective date, we observed a substantial increase in the presence of the required FDA warning statement on the ENDS ads in this sample. However, a notable number of ads in the study lacked the required warning and warnings did not always include the required formatting displays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Czaplicki
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kristy Marynak
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dannielle Kelley
- Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Meghan Bridgid Moran
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sarah Trigger
- Center for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Ryan David Kennedy
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li J, Hui X, Fu J, Ahmed MM, Yao L, Yang K. Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tob Induc Dis 2022; 20:90. [PMID: 36339933 PMCID: PMC9582581 DOI: 10.18332/tid/154075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nicotine-replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been frequently used for smoking cessation. The aim of this review is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library from inception to 10 October 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts for eligibility. Paired authors extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and used GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to rate the certainty of evidence. RESULTS The study included five RCTs with 1748 participants. The meta-analysis suggested the e-cigarettes versus NRT increased the ≥6 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.67; 95% CI: 1.21-2.28; 55 more per 1000 participants, low certainty), and 7-day point abstinence rate at ≥6 months follow-up (RR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.19-1.72; 84 more per 1000, low certainty). However, we found no evidence that e-cigarettes versus NRT increased 3-6 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.07; 95% CI: 0.73-1.57; 10 more per 1000, very low certainty) and <3 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.20; 95% CI: 0.90-1.60; 54 more per 1000, low certainty); similar results were found at <3 months follow-up (RR=1.19; 95% CI: 0.92-1.54; 55 more per 1000, very low certainty) and 3-6 months follow-up in 7-day point abstinence rate (RR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.70-1.44; 2 more per 1000, very low certainty). The adverse events were not significant between e-cigarettes and NRT other than throat irritation (RR=1.27; 95% CI: 1.13-1.42; 118 more per 1000, low certainty). CONCLUSIONS E-cigarettes appeared to be superior to NRT in ≥6 months continuous abstinence rate and 7-day point abstinence rate. At short-term duration, we found no evidence that e-cigarettes compared to NRT increased the <6 months continuous abstinence rate and 7-day point abstinence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Li
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xu Hui
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiani Fu
- Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | | | - Liang Yao
- Department of Health Research Methodology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Kehu Yang
- Health Technology Assessment Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China,Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China,Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Noar SM, Gottfredson NC, Kieu T, Rohde JA, Hall MG, Ma H, Fendinger NJ, Brewer NT. Impact of Vaping Prevention Advertisements on US Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2236370. [PMID: 36227597 PMCID: PMC9561946 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Understanding whether prevention advertisements reduce susceptibility to vaping is important owing to concerning levels of adolescent vaping. Objective To examine whether vaping prevention advertisements from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) national Real Cost campaign lead to lower susceptibility to vaping among adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants For this 3-group randomized clinical trial with parallel assignment, participants were US adolescents aged 13 to 17 years who were susceptible to vaping or current e-cigarette users, recruited from online panels. Adolescents were randomized to 1 of 2 Real Cost vaping prevention trial groups (health harms- or addiction-themed advertisements) or to a control group (investigator-created neutral videos about vaping). Adolescents completed 4 weekly online surveys at visits 1 to 4 over a 3-week period. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2021, to August 25, 2022. Interventions Adolescents saw 3 randomly ordered 30-second video advertisements online at each of 3 weekly study visits (visits 1, 2, and 3). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary trial outcome was susceptibility to vaping. Surveys also assessed susceptibility to smoking cigarettes to examine any spillover effects of vaping prevention advertisements on smoking outcomes. Both susceptibility measures had 3 items and ranged from 1 (indicating not susceptible) to 4 (indicating highly susceptible). The primary analyses compared Real Cost groups (combined) with the control group, while exploratory analyses compared the Real Cost groups with each other. Results Participants were 1514 adolescents (1140 [75.3%] boys; mean [SD] age, 15.22 [1.18] years), including 504 randomized to the Real Cost health harms group, 506 randomized to the Real Cost addiction group, and 504 randomized to the control group. Adolescents in the Real Cost groups (combined) had lower susceptibility to vaping at visit 4 than those in the control group (b = -0.21; 95% CI, -0.32 to -0.10). The Real Cost groups did not differ from one another on susceptibility to vaping (visit 4: b = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.07). Adolescents in the Real Cost groups (combined) also had lower susceptibility to smoking cigarettes than those in the control group (b = -0.21; 95% CI, -0.32 to -0.10). For both vaping and smoking, Real Cost groups had less positive attitudes (vaping: b = -0.27; 95% CI, -0.40 to -0.14; smoking: b = -0.23; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.08) compared with the control group. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that vaping prevention advertisements from the FDA Real Cost campaign led to lower adolescent susceptibility to vaping and had beneficial spillover effects on cigarette smoking outcomes. Tobacco prevention campaigns can help reduce youth tobacco use. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04836455.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth M. Noar
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Nisha C. Gottfredson
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Talia Kieu
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Jacob A. Rohde
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Marissa G. Hall
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | - Haijing Ma
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| | | | - Noel T. Brewer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Asfar T, Jebai R, Li W, Oluwole OJ, Ferdous T, Gautam P, Schmidt M, Noar SM, Lindblom EN, Eissenberg T, Bursac Z, Vallone D, Maziak W. Risk and safety profile of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS): an umbrella review to inform ENDS health communication strategies. Tob Control 2022:tobaccocontrol-2022-057495. [PMID: 36252567 PMCID: PMC10043882 DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This umbrella review aims to summarise the evidence about electronic nicotine delivery systems' (ENDS) risk and safety health profile to inform ENDS health communication strategies. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION Six databases were searched for systematic reviews presenting evidence on ENDS-related health effects. Ninety reviews divided into five categories were included: toxicity=20, health effects=40, role in smoking cessation=24, role in transition to combustible cigarettes (CCs)=13 and industry marketing claims=4. DATA EXTRACTION Findings were synthesised in narrative summaries. Meta-analyses were conducted by study type when appropriate. Quality assessment was conducted using the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews. The Institute of Medicine's Levels of Evidence Framework was used to classify the evidence into high-level, moderate, limited-suggestive and limited-not-conclusive. DATA SYNTHESIS We found high-level evidence that ENDS exposes users to toxic substances; increases the risk of respiratory disease; leads to nicotine dependence; causes serious injuries due to explosion or poisoning; increases smoking cessation in clinical trials but not in observational studies; increases CC initiation; and exposure to ENDS marketing increases its use/intention to use. Evidence was moderate for ENDS association with mental health and substance use, limited-suggestive for cardiovascular, and limited-not-conclusive for cancer, ear, ocular and oral diseases, and pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS As evidence is accumulating, ENDS communication can focus on high-level evidence on ENDS association with toxicity, nicotine addiction, respiratory disease, ENDS-specific harm (explosion, poisoning) and anti-ENDS industry sentiment. Direct comparison between the harm of CCs and ENDS should be avoided. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021241630.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taghrid Asfar
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Rime Jebai
- Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Department of Epidemiology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Wei Li
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Olusanya Joshua Oluwole
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Tarana Ferdous
- Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Department of Epidemiology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Prem Gautam
- Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Department of Epidemiology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael Schmidt
- Department of Art, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Seth M Noar
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina System, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Eric N Lindblom
- O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Thomas Eissenberg
- Psychology and Institute for Drug/Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Zoran Bursac
- Biostatistics, Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Donna Vallone
- Schroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USA
- Truth Initiative Schroeder Institute, New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wasim Maziak
- Epidemiology, Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rohde JA, Noar SM, Sheldon JM, Hall MG, Kieu T, Brewer NT. Identifying Promising Themes for Adolescent Vaping Warnings: A National Experiment. Nicotine Tob Res 2022; 24:1379-1385. [PMID: 35397474 PMCID: PMC9356688 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adolescent vaping remains a problem in the United States, yet little is known about what health warning themes most discourage vaping among adolescents. We sought to identify the most compelling themes for vaping warnings for US adolescents. METHODS Participants were a national probability sample of 623 US adolescents aged 13-17 years, recruited in the summer of 2020. Adolescents were randomized to one of the five warning message themes about the potential health effects of vaping: 1. chemical harms, 2. lung harms, 3. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) harms, 4. nicotine addiction, or 5. control (messages about vape litter). The primary outcome was perceived message effectiveness (PME; 3-item scale). Secondary outcomes were negative affect (fear), attention, anticipated social interactions, and message novelty. RESULTS Adolescents rated the chemical, lung, and COVID-19 harms warning messages higher on PME than nicotine addiction and control (all p < .05), while nicotine addiction was rated higher than control (p < .05). The chemical, lung, and COVID-19 harms warning themes also elicited greater negative affect than nicotine addiction and control (all p < .05). For all other secondary outcomes, the COVID-19 harms warning message theme was rated higher than nicotine addiction and control (all p < .05). CONCLUSION Adolescents perceived warning message themes about lung, chemical and COVID-19 health effects of vaping as more effective than nicotine addiction. To discourage vaping, the FDA and others should communicate to youth about the health effects of vaping beyond nicotine addiction. IMPLICATIONS Adolescents rated warning message themes about the lung, chemical, and COVID-19 health effects of vaping as more effective than nicotine addiction, while nicotine addiction was rated as more effective than control themes about vaping litter. To discourage vaping among adolescents, health messaging should expand message themes to communicate about a broader set of health effects of vaping beyond nicotine addiction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob A Rohde
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Seth M Noar
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Mendel Sheldon
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Marissa G Hall
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health at Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Talia Kieu
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health at Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Noel T Brewer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health at Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Marynak KL, Robichaud MO, Puryear T, Kennedy RD, Moran MB. #Nicotineaddiction on TikTok: A quantitative content analysis of top-viewed posts. Tob Induc Dis 2022; 20:69. [PMID: 35979474 PMCID: PMC9353672 DOI: 10.18332/tid/151868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION TikTok, the video-sharing app popular among youth, is a source of user-generated content about nicotine addiction with the potential to endorse or deter nicotine use among young viewers. We systematically analyzed content and themes of TikTok posts tagged #nicotineaddiction. METHODS We conducted a quantitative content analysis of the visual and textual content of the 149 top-viewed English-language TikTok posts tagged #nicotineaddiction as of 1 March 2021. Posts were double-coded using a shared codebook, noting content creator characteristics, nicotine products featured, references to quitting, and overall themes of #nicotineaddiction expressed. We assessed the prevalence of post characteristics and themes overall and by apparent age of content creators (aged ≥21 years versus <21 years). RESULTS The 149 posts analyzed received a mean and median of 62433 and 15800 likes, respectively. E-cigarettes were referenced or featured in 75% of posts; 58% featured a specific nicotine product brand, most commonly Puff Bar (23% of total) and JUUL (19%). Overall, 22% of posts mentioned quitting nicotine. The top themes of #nicotineaddiction expressed were physical or psychological consequences (e.g. withdrawal symptoms, 46%), physical or psychological benefits (e.g. tasting good, feeling ‘buzzed’, 28%), and social benefits (e.g. bonding with fellow users, 28%). Compared to those aged ≥21 years, posts by content creators likely <21 years (26%) less commonly mentioned quitting (p<0.01), had fewer followers (p<0.01), were more commonly from Canada (p<0.01) and less commonly from the US (p<0.01), and more commonly featured JUUL (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS While reaching a large and engaged audience, TikTok content creators suggest a range of benefits and consequences of nicotine addiction. Future research is warranted to examine this content’s potential to influence young people’s intentions to use or quit nicotine products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy L. Marynak
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Meagan O. Robichaud
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Tyler Puryear
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Ryan D. Kennedy
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Meghan B. Moran
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wills TA, Choi K, Pokhrel P, Pagano I. Tests for confounding with cigarette smoking in the association of E-cigarette use with respiratory disorder: 2020 National-Sample Data. Prev Med 2022; 161:107137. [PMID: 35820496 PMCID: PMC9328844 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Associations of e-cigarette use with respiratory disorder have been demonstrated but it has been unclear whether these are confounded by current or previous cigarette smoking. We address this question through studying different time frames for e-cigarette use and respiratory disorders in 2020 BRFSS data (N = 214,945). E-cigarette use and combustible cigarette smoking were classified into four categories: Participant never used either (Nonuse); used e-cigarettes/cigarettes but not in the past 30 days (Former Use), used in past 30 days on some days (Nondaily Use), or used past 30 days on all days (Daily Use). Contrasts for e-cigarette status and cigarette status (with nonuse as reference group) were entered with covariates in logistic regression with asthma or COPD as criterion. Stratified analyses of e-cigarette use were also performed for smokers and nonsmokers. In the total sample, results showed independent positive associations with both lifetime and current asthma for Former, Nondaily, and Daily e-cigarette use (mostly p < .0001) and the three cigarette indices. Significant positive associations with COPD were found for the three e-cigarette indices (p < .0001) and all the cigarette indices. Stratified analyses showed significant associations of e-cigarette use with respiratory disorder among nonsmokers as well as among smokers. We conclude that independent associations for former e-cigarette use (controlling for current/former smoking) and significant associations of e-cigarette use with respiratory disorder among nonsmokers indicate these associations are not confounded with cigarette smoking and suggest reverse causation is implausible. Findings for former use are discussed with reference to possible mechanisms including sensitization effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Wills
- Cancer Prevention in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
| | - Kelvin Choi
- Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Pallav Pokhrel
- Cancer Prevention in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Ian Pagano
- Cancer Prevention in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Grummon AH, Goodman D, Jaacks LM, Taillie LS, Chauvenet CA, Salvia MG, Rimm EB. Awareness of and reactions to health and environmental harms of red meat among parents in the United States. Public Health Nutr 2022; 25:893-903. [PMID: 34321133 PMCID: PMC8799779 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980021003098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evidence of the health and environmental harms of red meat is growing, yet little is known about which harms may be most impactful to include in meat reduction messages. This study examined which harms consumers are most aware of and which most discourage them from wanting to eat red meat. DESIGN Within-subjects randomised experiment. Participants responded to questions about their awareness of, and perceived discouragement in response to, eight health and eight environmental harms of red meat presented in random order. Discouragement was assessed on a 1-to-5 Likert-type scale. SETTING Online survey. PARTICIPANTS 544 US parents. RESULTS A minority of participants reported awareness that red meat contributes to health harms (ranging from 8 % awareness for prostate cancer to 28 % for heart disease) or environmental harms (ranging from 13 % for water shortages and deforestation to 22 % for climate change). Among specific harms, heart disease elicited the most discouragement (mean = 2·82 out of 5), followed by early death (mean = 2·79) and plants and animals going extinct (mean = 2·75), though most harms elicited similar discouragement (range of means, 2·60-2·82). In multivariable analyses, participants who were younger, identified as Black, identified as politically liberal, had higher general perceptions that red meat is bad for health and had higher usual red meat consumption reported being more discouraged from wanting to eat red meat in response to health and environmental harms (all P < 0·05). CONCLUSIONS Messages about a variety of health and environmental harms of red meat could inform consumers and motivate reductions in red meat consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna H Grummon
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dina Goodman
- Department of Global Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lindsay M Jaacks
- Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lindsey Smith Taillie
- Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Meg G Salvia
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric B Rimm
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McLeish AC, Hart JL, Walker KL. College Student E-Cigarette Users' Knowledge about E-Cigarettes: Ingredients, Health Risks, Device Modifications, and Information Sources. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19041962. [PMID: 35206150 PMCID: PMC8871630 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19041962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Although college students represent a growing demographic of e-cigarette users, it is unclear how knowledgeable they are about the product they use. The lack of such knowledge could result in unsafe practices and greater health risks. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to examine college student e-cigarette users’ knowledge about e-cigarette ingredients and health risks, how often they modify their devices, and whether they utilize reputable sources when searching for information regarding e-cigarettes. The participants were 183 undergraduate e-cigarette users (Mage = 19.98, SD = 1.98; 71.6% female; 85.8% White). Most participants correctly recognized that e-cigarettes increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and lung disease, but fewer than half recognized the increased risk of seizures and depression. Only one-third to one-half of participants correctly identified the toxic compounds commonly found in e-cigarettes, and most indicated that they would consult Google or a friend with questions about e-cigarettes. College student e-cigarette users are well-informed about many health risks associated with e-cigarettes. However, they are relatively unaware of the harmful substances in e-cigarettes and are seeking information from less reliable sources. Targeted public health campaigns educating college students about e-cigarettes, including where to seek reliable information, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison C. McLeish
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
- VapeRace Center, Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; (J.L.H.); (K.L.W.)
- Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, TX 75231, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Joy L. Hart
- VapeRace Center, Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; (J.L.H.); (K.L.W.)
- Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, TX 75231, USA
- Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
| | - Kandi L. Walker
- VapeRace Center, Christina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA; (J.L.H.); (K.L.W.)
- Tobacco Center for Regulatory Science, American Heart Association, Dallas, TX 75231, USA
- Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rubenstein D, Pacek LR, McClernon FJ. Multiple Tobacco Product Use Conceptual Framework: A 2021 Update on Evidence. Nicotine Tob Res 2022; 24:1208-1217. [PMID: 35137194 PMCID: PMC9278823 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One-third of adults in the United States who use tobacco regularly use two or more types of tobacco products. As the use of e-cigarettes and other noncombusted tobacco products increases-making multiple tobacco product (MTP) use increasingly common-it is essential to evaluate the complex factors that affect product use. AIMS AND METHODS In this update to our 2019 conceptual framework, we review and evaluate recent literature and expand the model to include ways in which MTP use may be affected by market factors such as the introduction of new products and socioenvironmental factors like marketing and advertising. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS MTP use patterns are complex, dynamic, and multiply determined by factors at the level of individuals, products, situations or contexts, and marketplace. Substitution, or using one product with the intent of decreasing use of another, and complementarity, or using multiple products for different reasons or purposes, explain patterns in MTP use. Moreover, substitution and complementarity may inform our understanding of how market changes targeted at one product, for instance, new product standards, bans, product pricing, and taxation, affect consumption of other tobacco products. New data from natural experiments and novel laboratory-based techniques add additional data and expand the framework. IMPLICATIONS A substantial proportion of people who use tobacco use more than one product. This review synthesizes and evaluates recent evidence on the diverse factors that affect MTP use in addition to expanding our framework. Our review is accompanied by suggested research questions that can guide future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Rubenstein
- Corresponding Author: Dana Rubenstein, BA, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 2608 Erwin Road, Suite 300, Durham, NC 27705, USA. Telephone: 919-668-3987; Fax: 919-681-1600; E-mail:
| | - Lauren R Pacek
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - F Joseph McClernon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Taylor E, Aleyan S, East K, Cummings KM, Thrasher JF, Fong GT, Quah ACK, Li G, Borland R, Hammond D, Hitchman SC. Associations Between Noticing Nicotine Vaping Product Health Warning Labels, Harm Perceptions, and Use among adult vapers, current and former smokers. Findings From the 2018 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2021; 24:1020-1027. [PMID: 34893915 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of countries mandating a nicotine addiction warning label ('warnings') on nicotine vaping products (NVPs) has been increasing. This study examined associations between noticing NVP warnings, perceptions of NVPs, and intentions to use NVPs. METHODS Cross-sectional analysis of 12,619 adult NVP users, cigarette smokers, concurrent users of both cigarettes and NVPs, and quitters who participated in the 2018 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Project Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey (England, Australia, Canada, US). Logistic regression analyses examined associations between noticing warnings in the past 30 days and perceptions of nicotine harm, NVP harm relative to cigarettes, and NVP addictiveness relative to cigarettes. Associations were also explored between noticing warnings and intentions to use NVPs. RESULTS Noticing warnings was higher among NVP users (18.8%) than non-users (2.1%). Noticing warnings was associated with perceiving nicotine to pose little or no harm to health among NVP users, but there was no association among non-users. There was little evidence of an association between noticing warnings and perceptions of NVP harms relative to smoking among NVP users and non-users. Noticing warnings was associated with perceiving NVPs as less addictive than cigarettes among non-users but not NVP users. Among exclusive smokers, noticing warnings was associated with intending to start using NVPs. Among NVP users, there was little evidence of an association between noticing warnings and intentions to continue using/stopping NVPs. CONCLUSIONS Noticing NVP warnings was not associated with increased NVP and nicotine harm perceptions or decreased intentions to use NVPs among adult smokers and vapers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Taylor
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Aleyan
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine East
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom.,School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - K Michael Cummings
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Hollings Cancer Centre, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - James F Thrasher
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behaviour, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.,Tobacco Research Department, Centre for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico
| | - Geoffrey T Fong
- Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.,School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.,Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne C K Quah
- Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Grace Li
- Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ron Borland
- Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Hammond
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara C Hitchman
- Department of Communication and Media Research, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Taillie LS, Chauvenet C, Grummon AH, Hall MG, Waterlander W, Prestemon CE, Jaacks LM. Testing front-of-package warnings to discourage red meat consumption: a randomized experiment with US meat consumers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2021; 18:114. [PMID: 34493289 PMCID: PMC8423585 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01178-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing red meat is a strategy to improve public health and mitigate climate change in the United States and other high-income countries. Policies requiring warnings on the front of red meat packages are a promising intervention to shift consumers towards healthier and more sustainable food choices. We aimed to explore participants' reactions to health and environmental warning messages about red meat. METHODS Between June and July 2020, we recruited a national convenience sample of US red meat consumers (n = 1,235; mean age 44 years) for an online survey. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four label conditions: no-label control, health warning, environment warning, and combined health and environment warning (both warnings shown side-by-side). Participants viewed three types of burritos (red meat [steak], chicken, and vegetarian) and selected their preferred item (primary outcome), the item they perceived to be most damaging to health, and the item they perceived to be most damaging to the environment (secondary outcomes). Participants then viewed their assigned warning on a series of other red meat products (no-label control participants were randomly re-assigned to one of the warning conditions) and rated the warnings on perceived message effectiveness, believability, negative emotions, perceived risk, attention, and learning something new. Finally, participants reported their intentions to reduce red meat consumption. RESULTS There were no significant differences in selection of the steak burrito between label conditions or in selection of the item most damaging to the environment. Those exposed to the health warning were more likely to select the steak burrito as most damaging to health compared to those exposed to other label conditions (health 73 %, combined 64 %, environment 60 %, no-label control 63 %, p < 0.05). The combined and health warnings elicited higher perceived message effectiveness ratings than the environment warning (combined mean 2.91, health 2.84, environment 2.61, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Warnings did not have a significant effect on item preference in the choice experiment. However, combined and health warnings performed better than the environment warning across a variety of warning label reaction measures. More research will be needed to understand whether warnings elicit behavioral change in real-world environments. TRIAL REGISTRATION Analyses and hypotheses were preregistered on https://aspredicted.org/ph7mb.pdf on 23 June 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Smith Taillie
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, 123 West Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Christina Chauvenet
- Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, 915 Greene Street , Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Anna H Grummon
- Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Marissa G Hall
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, 123 West Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Wilma Waterlander
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carmen E Prestemon
- Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, 123 West Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA
| | - Lindsay M Jaacks
- Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yang JS, Sou A, Faruqui A, Mackey TK. A qualitative examination of e-cigarette use among California young adults during the EVALI outbreak. Prev Med Rep 2021; 24:101506. [PMID: 34401219 PMCID: PMC8351914 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The 2019 outbreak of E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use-Associated Lung Injury (EVALI) increased awareness of potential health risks associated with vaping among the general public. Little is known, however, about how unfolding information regarding EVALI affected knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among e-cigarette users, particularly among young adults. This study describes attitudinal and behavioral responses to EVALI among young adult e-cigarette users. In October and November 2019, seven focus groups were held with college-going young adult tobacco users from two four-year public universities in California. Focus groups included questions regarding knowledge of and reaction to EVALI news, and how the news affected product use. Text from current e-cigarette users was extracted to develop individual phenomenological textural-structural descriptions of e-cigarette use for 38 individuals which were used to create a composite experience of e-cigarette use in light of EVALI. Experiences indicated that e-cigarette users were aware of information regarding EVALI and received information from numerous sources. Information was filtered for legitimacy of EVALI claims and causes of EVALI. Risk rationalizations were developed to assess potential harm of continued e-cigarette use and provided reasoning for behavioral responses to EVALI. The emerging harm associated with EVALI prompted e-cigarette users to engage in a cognitive process resulting in employment of a range of rationalities to justify continued use. These results suggest how environmental, cognitive, and behavioral factors may interact as young adults negotiate e-cigarette-related harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S. Yang
- Department of Public Health, California State University, Fullerton, 800
N. State College Boulevard, KHS 161-A, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA
- Corresponding author.
| | - Angela Sou
- Department of Public Health, California State University, Fullerton, 800
N. State College Boulevard, KHS 161-A, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA
| | - Afsana Faruqui
- Department of Public Health, California State University, Fullerton, 800
N. State College Boulevard, KHS 161-A, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA
| | - Tim K. Mackey
- Global Health Program, Department of Anthropology, University of
California, San Diego, 8950 Villa La Jolla Drive, A124, La Jolla, CA 92037,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sutfin EL, Lazard AJ, Cornacchione Ross J, Noar SM, Reboussin BA. Waterpipe Tobacco Warnings: An Experimental Study among a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Young Adults. Nicotine Tob Res 2021; 23:1855-1860. [PMID: 34077539 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Waterpipe tobacco (WT) smoking by young adults remains high and misperceptions are common. Product warnings can increase knowledge of harms and reduce use. The goal of this study was to test warning statements, including the FDA-required nicotine warning (prior to implementation), on young adults' thinking about harms of and discouragement from WT smoking. METHODS We conducted a between-subjects experiment in a nationally representative telephone survey of 1,152 young adults ages 18-29. Participants were randomly assigned to hear one of five warning statements and reported how much, on a 4-point scale, the warning made them think about the harms and discouraged them from WT smoking. RESULTS The sample was 36.8% female, 57.8% white, 20.2% Black, 24.1% Hispanic, with a mean age of 23.2 (SE=0.25). Under half (43.5%) had ever smoked WT. There were significant differences among the statements on both thinking about harms (p<.0001) and discouragement (p<.0001). The FDA-required 'nicotine' warning led to the lowest thinking about harms (M=2.85, SE=0.08) and was the least discouraging (M=2.86, SE=0.08), while the '100 cigarettes' warning resulted in the greatest thinking about harms (M=3.62, SE=0.05) and was the most discouraging (M=3.56, SE=0.06). CONCLUSION The nicotine warning resulted in the lowest levels of thinking about harms and discouragement from WT smoking, suggesting limited impact. However, a warning focused on comparing smoke inhalation from WT smoking to cigarettes seems promising. Warnings should cover a broad range of WT health effects, and possibly comparisons to cigarettes. Findings also have implications for the content of international waterpipe warnings. IMPLICATIONS This study indicates that the nicotine warning is the least effective at making young adults think about the harms of and discouraging waterpipe tobacco smoking. The FDA and other countries should consider requiring warnings to cover a broader range of health harms, misperceptions, and possibly comparisons to cigarettes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Sutfin
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Allison J Lazard
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Jennifer Cornacchione Ross
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Seth M Noar
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Beth A Reboussin
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Culbreth RE, Spears CA, Brandenberger K, Feresin R, Self-Brown S, Goodfellow LT, Swahn MH, Gardenhire DS. Dual Use of Electronic Cigarettes and Traditional Cigarettes Among Adults: Psychosocial Correlates and Associated Respiratory Symptoms. Respir Care 2021; 66:951-959. [PMID: 33688088 DOI: 10.4187/respcare.08381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prolonged use of both electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and traditional cigarettes can increase breathing difficulties and other adverse health effects. Research is needed to provide a deeper understanding of predictors of dual use, particularly given rapid changes in the e-cigarette market and related public health communications and policy. METHODS The sample consists of subjects in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health Wave 5 (cross-sectional) subsample (N = 3,800) from 2016 to 2018. Participants were 31-42 y old. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of mutually exclusive categories: e-cigarette use only, cigarette use only, and concurrent e-cigarette and traditional cigarette use (compared to no use). Predictors included sex, age, poverty status, race/ethnicity, self-reported diagnosed depression, self-reported diagnosed anxiety, and previous experience of child maltreatment. RESULTS Among the total sample (N = 3,800), 2% reported e-cigarette use only, 20% reported traditional cigarette use only, and 3% reported dual use of both e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes. Among subjects who reported any e-cigarette or traditional cigarette use (n = 957), 12% reported dual use. In the final adjusted multivariable multinomial model, dual use was associated with living at or below the poverty line (odds ratio 2.49 [95% CI 1.19-5.70]), self-reported diagnosed depression (odds ratio 1.99 [95% CI 1.10-3.61]), and a history of child maltreatment (odds ratio 1.80 [95% CI 1.10-2.95]). Additionally, Hispanic-American individuals were more likely to report dual use compared to cigarette-only use. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged dual use of both e-cigarettes and traditional cigarettes is a considerable public health problem. While our study identified a low percentage of dual usage among U.S. adults, dual use was disproportionately prevalent among those with depression, history of child maltreatment, living at or below the poverty line, and among Hispanic-American individuals. Culturally appropriate interventions and increasing access to cessation programs may help mitigate health disparities pertaining to dual use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel E Culbreth
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Claire A Spears
- Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kyle Brandenberger
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rafaela Feresin
- Department of Nutrition, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Shannon Self-Brown
- Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lynda T Goodfellow
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Monica H Swahn
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Douglas S Gardenhire
- Department of Respiratory Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Carl AE, Taillie LS, Grummon AH, Lazard AJ, Higgins ICA, Sheldon JM, Hall MG. Awareness of and reactions to the health harms of sugary drinks: An online study of U.S. parents. Appetite 2021; 164:105234. [PMID: 33823230 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Evidence about the health problems associated with sugary drink consumption is well-established. However, little is known about which sugary drink health harms are most effective at changing consumers' behavior. We aimed to identify which harms people were aware of and most discouraged them from wanting to buy sugary drinks. Participants were a national convenience sample of diverse parents (n = 1,058), oversampled for Latino parents (48%). Participants rated a list of sugary drink-related health harms occurring in children (7 harms) and in adults (15 harms). Outcomes were awareness of each harm and how much each harm discouraged parents from wanting to purchase sugary drinks. Most participants were aware that sugary drinks contribute to tooth decay in children (75%) and weight gain in both children (73%) and adults (69%). Few participants were aware that sugary drinks contribute to adult infertility (16%), arthritis (18%), and gout (18%). All health harms were rated highly in terms of discouraging parents from wanting to buy sugary drinks (range: 3.59-4.11 on a 1-5 scale), with obesity, pre-diabetes, and tooth decay eliciting the highest discouragement ratings. Harm-induced discouragement was higher for participants who were aware of more health harms (B = 0.05, p < 0.0001), identified as female (B = 0.15 compared to male, p = 0.02), or had an annual household income of $50,000 or more (B = 0.16 compared to less than $50,000, p = 0.03). These findings suggest health messages focused on a variety of health harms could raise awareness and discourage sugary drink purchases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra E Carl
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States.
| | - Lindsey Smith Taillie
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Nutrition, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Population Center, 123 W Franklin St., Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, United States.
| | - Anna H Grummon
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 9 Bow Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States.
| | - Allison J Lazard
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, 101 Manning Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, United States; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Hussman School of Journalism and Media, Carroll Hall, CB 3365, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States.
| | - Isabella C A Higgins
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carolina Population Center, 123 W Franklin St., Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, United States.
| | - Jennifer Mendel Sheldon
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, 101 Manning Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, United States.
| | - Marissa G Hall
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, 101 Manning Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Moustafa AF, Rodriguez D, Mazur A, Audrain-McGovern J. Adolescent perceptions of E-cigarette use and vaping behavior before and after the EVALI outbreak. Prev Med 2021; 145:106419. [PMID: 33422576 PMCID: PMC8474118 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
This study sought to determine whether adolescents' e-cigarette risk perceptions, perceived benefits, and positive expectations, and vaping behavior changed after the electronic-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) outbreak. This longitudinal survey studied 1539 high school students in suburban Philadelphia, PA in 11th and 12th grade, before and after the outbreak of EVALI cases in 2019. Adolescents who reported current nicotine vaping at baseline (versus those who did not) had a greater increase in risk perceptions (B = -0.31, p = 0.04) and a greater decrease in positive expectations (B = -1.30, p = 0.003) at follow-up. Adolescents who reported current marijuana vaping at baseline (versus those who did not) had greater perceived benefits (B = 2.19, p < 0.001), lower risk perceptions (B = 0.39, p < 0.001), and greater positive expectations of e-cigarette use (B = 1.43, p < 0.001) across time. Odds of current nicotine vaping at follow-up increased (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.08, 2.41) for adolescents who maintained lower risk perceptions. Odds of current nicotine vaping at follow-up decreased (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.21, 0.50) for adolescents whose positive expectations of e-cigarette use decreased. The odds of current marijuana vaping at follow-up decreased (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.42, 0.98) for adolescents whose positive expectations of e-cigarette use decreased. Perceptions of the risks of e-cigarette use increased and positive expectations of e-cigarette use decreased after the EVALI outbreak. Adolescent risk perceptions and positive expectations of e-cigarette use are two potential targets to impact vaping behavior. Emphasizing the risks of e-cigarette use while decreasing positive expectations of use have the potential to reduce vaping behavior, and perhaps subsequent EVALI cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Rodriguez
- School of Nursing and Health Sciences, LaSalle University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexa Mazur
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Janet Audrain-McGovern
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Villanti AC, LePine SE, West JC, Cruz TB, Stevens EM, Tetreault HJ, Unger JB, Wackowski OA, Mays D. Identifying message content to reduce vaping: Results from online message testing trials in young adult tobacco users. Addict Behav 2021; 115:106778. [PMID: 33341530 PMCID: PMC8085990 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Young adults' e-cigarette use is associated with perceptions that e-cigarettes are less harmful or addictive than cigarettes, socially acceptable, and appealing. This study developed and tested vaping educational messages addressing these factors: 1) Harm Perceptions, 2) Addictiveness, 3) Social Use, and 4) Flavors. METHODS Two message trials were conducted in U.S. Amazon Mechanical Turk workers aged 18-24 using a 2 (content: addiction, harm) × 3 (theme: alone, + flavors, + social) design with multiple messages in each of the six categories. Participants were assigned to view a random subset of messages and report on likeability and perceived message effectiveness (PME). Phase 1 (n = 200) tested 33 messages and 32 images. Phase 2 (n = 769) tested combinations of Phase 1's 24 most effective messages with 6 images rated most likeable or effective. Linear mixed effects models assessed the effect of content, theme, image, and their interactions on message response. RESULTS In both trials, most participants were past 30-day tobacco users. Harm content messages produced higher PME ratings than addiction content messages, and flavor theme messages were correlated with higher likeability scores than "content alone" theme messages. In Phase 2, flavor and social message themes decreased the PME of harm messages. There was no effect of images on either outcome controlling for the independent or interaction effects of content, theme, and image. CONCLUSIONS Messages conveying the harms of vaping may be best for reducing vaping in young adult tobacco users; flavor and social themes may diminish their effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea C Villanti
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, USA.
| | - S Elisha LePine
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, USA
| | - Julia C West
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, USA
| | - Tess Boley Cruz
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA
| | - Elise M Stevens
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, USA
| | - Haley J Tetreault
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, USA
| | - Jennifer B Unger
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA
| | - Olivia A Wackowski
- Center for Tobacco Studies, School of Public Health, Rutgers, the State University, USA
| | - Darren Mays
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wexner Medical Center, Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hoek J, Gendall P, Eckert C, Louviere J, Ling P, Popova L. Analysis of on-pack messages for e-liquids: a discrete choice study. Tob Control 2021; 31:534-542. [PMID: 33495280 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policymakers wishing to encourage smokers unable to quit to switch to using electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) also need to consider how to deter ENDS use among non-smokers. We examined whether reduced-risk messages could increase ENDS' appeal among smokers and if increased-risk messages could decrease appeal among susceptible non-smokers, occasional and former smokers. METHODOLOGY An online discrete choice experiment tested three attributes: information message, nicotine content (0 mg or 3 mg) and flavour (tobacco, menthol or fruit). The sample comprised 352 current smokers, 118 occasional and former smokers, and 216 ENDS-susceptible never smokers. Smokers viewed reduced-risk messages that encouraged switching to ENDS, while other groups viewed increased-risk messages that discouraged ENDS use. All groups saw a typical addiction warning. We analysed the data by estimating multinomial logit regression and adjusted latent class analysis models. RESULTS Relative to no message, reduced risk-messages increased the appeal of ENDS uptake among one class of smokers (33.5%) but decreased appeal among other smokers. However, among all smokers, reduced-risk messages increased preference more than a dissuasive addiction warning. By contrast, among occasional or former smokers, and susceptible non-smokers, all information messages discouraging ENDS use, including an addiction warning, decreased preference relative to no message. CONCLUSIONS On-pack relative-risk messages about ENDS could make transition more attractive to smokers while increased-risk messages could deter ENDS uptake among susceptible non-smokers, occasional and former smokers. Communicating diverse messages via discrete channels could recognise heterogeneity among and between smokers and non-smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Hoek
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Philip Gendall
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Christine Eckert
- School of Marketing, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Pamela Ling
- Centre for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lucy Popova
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rohde JA, Vereen RN, Noar SM. Adolescents and Young Adults Who Vape or Are Susceptible to Vaping: Characteristics, Product Preferences, and Beliefs. Subst Use Misuse 2021; 56:1607-1615. [PMID: 34233573 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1942052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
This study examined differences among current vapers, those susceptible to vaping, and those non-susceptible to vaping among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in the U.S. We sought to understand vaping-related characteristics, preferences, and beliefs across these populations to inform prevention efforts. Methods: Participants were N=543 adolescents and N=557 young adults recruited in mid-2019 in the U.S. In two separate cross-sectional surveys, we assessed vaping preferences, tobacco product use, and both health harm and addiction risk beliefs about vaping. We ran separate multivariate logistic regressions to assess differences in risk beliefs across the three distinct e-cigarette groups among AYAs. Results: A majority of AYAs were either current vapers (adolescents: 32%, young adults: 36%) or susceptible to vaping (adolescents: 34%, young adults: 24%). In both samples, pod-based devices were the most common device type used, and fruit and mint/menthol were the most commonly used flavors. In multivariate analyses, adolescent (p<.05) and young adult (p<.05) current vapers both had lower risk beliefs about the health harms of vaping compared to those susceptible to vaping. Susceptible adolescents also had lower health harm risk beliefs compared to those who were non-susceptible (p<.05). Addiction risk beliefs seldom predicted use or susceptibility in multivariate analyses, with only susceptible young adults having lower addiction beliefs than those non-susceptible (p<.05). Conclusion: Results from this study highlight the role of health harm risk beliefs among AYA vapers and those susceptible to vaping. Prevention efforts should examine the most potent ways to communicate vaping health harms to discourage AYA vaping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob A Rohde
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rhyan N Vereen
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Seth M Noar
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Grummon AH, Hall MG, Mitchell CG, Pulido M, Mendel Sheldon J, Noar SM, Ribisl KM, Brewer NT. Reactions to messages about smoking, vaping and COVID-19: two national experiments. Tob Control 2020; 31:402-410. [PMID: 33188150 PMCID: PMC7669534 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The pace and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, coupled with ongoing efforts by health agencies to communicate harms, have created a pressing need for data to inform messaging about smoking, vaping, and COVID-19. We examined reactions to COVID-19 and traditional health harms messages discouraging smoking and vaping. Methods Participants were a national convenience sample of 810 US adults recruited online in May 2020. All participated in a smoking message experiment and a vaping message experiment, presented in a random order. In each experiment, participants viewed one message formatted as a Twitter post. The experiments adopted a 3 (traditional health harms of smoking or vaping: three harms, one harm, absent) × 2 (COVID-19 harms: one harm, absent) between-subjects design. Outcomes included perceived message effectiveness (primary) and constructs from the Tobacco Warnings Model (secondary: attention, negative affect, cognitive elaboration, social interactions). Results Smoking messages with traditional or COVID-19 harms elicited higher perceived effectiveness for discouraging smoking than control messages without these harms (all p <0.001). However, including both traditional and COVID-19 harms in smoking messages had no benefit beyond including either alone. Smoking messages affected Tobacco Warnings Model constructs and did not elicit more reactance than control messages. Smoking messages also elicited higher perceived effectiveness for discouraging vaping. Including traditional harms in messages about vaping elicited higher perceived effectiveness for discouraging vaping (p <0.05), but including COVID-19 harms did not. Conclusions Messages linking smoking with COVID-19 may hold promise for discouraging smoking and may have the added benefit of also discouraging vaping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna H Grummon
- Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA .,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marissa G Hall
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Chloe G Mitchell
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marlyn Pulido
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer Mendel Sheldon
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Seth M Noar
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kurt M Ribisl
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Noel T Brewer
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Owusu D, Massey Z, Popova L. An experimental study of messages communicating potential harms of electronic cigarettes. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240611. [PMID: 33085686 PMCID: PMC7577451 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been an upsurge of e-cigarette use in the United States in recent years. While e-cigarettes may contain lower levels of toxic chemicals than combusted cigarettes, they still pose serious health hazards, including increased risk for heart and respiratory disease. Despite these risks, public awareness of the health harms of e-cigarettes remains low. Thus, it is important to educate the public about the potential harms of e-cigarettes. This study took themes commonly found in antismoking messages and used them to develop messages about harms of e-cigarettes. A national sample of 2801 current smokers and nonsmokers (aged 18+ years) were randomized to view one of four e-cigarette messages (harmful effect of chemicals, uncertainty about ingredients, distrust of big tobacco, or cost of vaping) or a control message (bottled water ad). Participants' reactions to the messages and behavioral intentions were assessed immediately following the exposure. MANOVA examined effects of the messages on blocks of the outcome variables and univariate analyses estimated adjusted means for each experimental condition for each outcome. The message about harmful chemicals was perceived as the most informative and effective and elicited the highest levels of negative emotions (Ps<0.05). However, on measures of actual effectiveness, the other messages performed equally well. Specifically, messages with different themes (harmful chemicals, uncertainty about ingredients, anti-industry, or financial cost) increased perceived risk of e-cigarettes, support for e-cigarette control, and lowered self-exempting beliefs and intentions to use e-cigarettes (Ps<0.05). Themes commonly used in anti-smoking messages may be effective in educating the public about the potential harm of e-cigarettes. The observed differential effects of the messages suggest the need to use multiple themes in a public education campaign about e-cigarettes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Owusu
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Zachary Massey
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Lucy Popova
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sharma P, Ebbert JO, Rosedahl JK, Philpot LM. Changes in substance use among young adults during a respiratory disease pandemic. SAGE Open Med 2020; 8:2050312120965321. [PMID: 33133603 PMCID: PMC7576913 DOI: 10.1177/2050312120965321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: News articles, commentaries, and opinion articles have suggested that ongoing social distancing measures coupled with economic challenges during COVID-19 may worsen stress, affective state, and substance use across the globe. We sought to advance our understanding of the differences between individuals who change their substance use patterns during a public health crisis and those who do not. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of young adults (18–25 years of age) assessing respondent characteristics and vaping, tobacco, alcohol, and/or marijuana use. We calculated prevalence estimates, prevalence changes, and prevalence ratios with associated 95% confidence intervals and looked for differences with the chi-square test. Results: Of the total sample, 53.2% (n = 542/1018) young adults reported vaping or using tobacco, alcohol, and/or marijuana. Among the 542 respondents reporting use, 34.3% reported a change in their use patterns. Among respondents reporting changes in substance use patterns during the pandemic (n = 186), 68.8% reported an increase in alcohol use, 44.0% reported a decrease in vaping product use, and 47.3% reported a decrease in tobacco product use due to COVID-19. Substance use changed significantly for respondents with increasing degree of loneliness (continuous loneliness score: prevalence ratio = 1.12, 95% confidence interval = 1.01–1.25), anxiety (prevalence ratio = 1.45, 95% confidence interval = 1.14–1.85), and depression (prevalence ratio = 1.44, 95% confidence interval = 1.13–1.82). Conclusion: Self-reported substance use among young adults was observed to change during a pandemic, and the degree of loneliness appears to impact these changes. Innovative strategies are needed to address loneliness, anxiety, depression, and substance use during global health crises that impact social contact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pravesh Sharma
- Department of Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI, USA
| | - Jon O Ebbert
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jordan K Rosedahl
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lindsey M Philpot
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gupta V, Sharma M, Srikant N, Manaktala N. Assessment of knowledge of use of electronic cigarette and its harmful effects among young adults. Open Med (Wars) 2020; 15:796-804. [PMID: 33336037 PMCID: PMC7711978 DOI: 10.1515/med-2020-0224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The practice of young adults smoking e-cigarette may have been adopted as a way of smoking cessation or just to follow a trend. Most people still remain unaware of the detrimental effects of e-cigarette. This study was carried out to assess the prevalence of the habit of smoking e-cigarette and the awareness of its harmful effects among adults aged 18–23 years. Methods A questionnaire adopted from a study conducted in Italy was used in the study following due permission. After taking their consent, participants were requested to fill the survey irrespective of their smoking status. Results In total the study comprised 710 participants aged 20.7 ± 1.7 years (females = 412 and males = 298) from six countries. Most respondents were from India followed by the USA and then the UK. The most common mode of information for the participants on the existence of e-cigarette was from the family members, friends followed by Internet search engines and TV/newspaper advertisements. Among the participants, e-cigarette had a prevalence of 5.63%. Among these, 26 participants were using e-cigarette for less than 1 year and 2 participants for more than 5 years. E-cigarette smokers also experienced sore throat, cough, headache, dizziness and sleeplessness. Conclusion Majority of the young population was unaware about the use and harmful effects of e-cigarette.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidushi Gupta
- Interns, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India
| | - Madhu Sharma
- Interns, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India
| | - Natarajan Srikant
- Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India
| | - Nidhi Manaktala
- Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Boloña E, Felix M, Vanegas E, Vera Paz C, Cherrez-Ojeda I. A Case of Vaping-associated Pulmonary Illness in South America: Highlighting the Need for Awareness and Surveillance Programs in the Region. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201:733-735. [PMID: 31810372 PMCID: PMC7068832 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201910-2002le] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Boloña
- Clínica GuayaquilGuayaquil, Ecuador.,Universidad Espíritu SantoSamborondón, Ecuadorand
| | - Miguel Felix
- Universidad Espíritu SantoSamborondón, Ecuadorand.,Respiralab Research GroupGuayaquil, Ecuador
| | - Emanuel Vanegas
- Universidad Espíritu SantoSamborondón, Ecuadorand.,Respiralab Research GroupGuayaquil, Ecuador
| | - Carlos Vera Paz
- Universidad Espíritu SantoSamborondón, Ecuadorand.,Respiralab Research GroupGuayaquil, Ecuador
| | - Ivan Cherrez-Ojeda
- Universidad Espíritu SantoSamborondón, Ecuadorand.,Respiralab Research GroupGuayaquil, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Balogh E, Wagner Z, Faubl N, Riemenschneider H, Voigt K, Terebessy A, Horváth F, Füzesi Z, Kiss I. Increasing Prevalence of Electronic Cigarette Use among Medical Students. Repeated Cross-Sectional Multicenter Surveys in Germany and Hungary, 2016-2018. Subst Use Misuse 2020; 55:2109-2115. [PMID: 32646285 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1790011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is gaining popularity among young adults. Medical students' nicotine use behavior is of particular interest because of their impending role in health promotion. Objectives: Aim of our study is to assess changes that occurred between 2016 and 2018 in the prevalence of e-cigarette use among medical students and to explore associations between e-cigarette use, demographic characteristics, and cigarette smoking. Self-administered questionnaire surveys were used to obtain cross-sectional data of medical students in Budapest and Pécs, Hungary, and Dresden, Germany. Results: Sample sizes for 2016 and 2018 were 2297 and 1514, respectively. In the whole sample, past-30-day use of e-cigarettes increased from 4.5% to 8.0% (p < 0.001). The increase in e-cigarette use was significant in both genders (from 3.6% to 5.6% among females, p = 0.028, and from 5.9 to 11.4% among males, p < 0.001). Prevalence of e-cigarette use was higher among Hungarian students than among German students (2.2% versus 5.7% in 2016, and 4.1% versus 10.5% in 2018, p < 0.05 for both years). There was no significant difference in e-cigarette use among different academic years. The ratio of e-cigarette users increased significantly among current cigarette smokers but not among nonsmokers. We could not detect a decrease in cigarette smoking. Conclusions: Prevalence of e-cigarette use increased significantly among medical students without a reduction in cigarette smoking. Medical schools should add the topic of e-cigarettes to their curricula and need to develop cessation programs to help their students quit both cigarettes and e-cigarettes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Balogh
- Department of Public Health Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Wagner
- Diabetes Outpatient Clinic, United Health Institutions, City of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Nóra Faubl
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Henna Riemenschneider
- Department of General Practice, Medical Clinic 3, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Karen Voigt
- Department of General Practice, Medical Clinic 3, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - András Terebessy
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ferenc Horváth
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsanna Füzesi
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - István Kiss
- Department of Public Health Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|