Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Predict Survival and Hospitalization in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Impact of SGLT2 inhibition on markers of reverse cardiac remodelling in heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Several landmark randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the efficacy of sodium-glucose co-transport 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in reducing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. Much interest surrounds their mechanism of action and whether they have direct effects on reverse cardiac remodelling. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of placebo controlled RCTs evaluating the impact of SGLT2 inhibition on imaging derived markers of reverse cardiac remodelling in patients with HF.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement and Cochrane Collaboration. Data interrogation of each major database including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library was performed. RCTs evaluating HF patients >18 years comparing SGLT2 inhibitor versus placebo-control were included. Outcome measures included left ventricular end-diastolic volume and volume index (LVEDV/LVEDVi), left ventricular end-systolic volume and volume index (LVSDV/LVSDVi), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular mass index (LVMi), left atrial volume index (LAVi) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS). Studies with an HF with preserved ejection fraction population were excluded from analysis of parameters, which would be significantly affected by baseline LVEF, such as volumes and LVEF. The mean difference and standard error were extracted from each study and a random effects model used pool the mean difference and standard error across studies. A pre-specified sub-group analysis was performed to stratify results according to imaging modality used (cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography). This study is registered on PROSPERO: CRD42023482722.

RESULTS

Seven randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients with HF comprising a total population of 657 patients were included. Overall LVEF of included studies ranged from 29 ± 8.0% to 55.5 ± 4.2%. In studies included in analysis of HFrEF parameters, baseline LVEF ranged from 29 ± 8% to 45.5 ± 12%. Pooled data demonstrated SGLT2 inhibition, compared with placebo control, resulted in significant improvements in mean difference of LVEDV [-11.62 ml (95% confidence interval, CI -17.90 to -5.25; z = 3.67, P = 0.0004)], LVEDVi [-6.08 ml (95% CI -9.96 to -2.20; z = 3.07; P = 0.002)], LVESV [-12.47 ml (95% CI -19.12 to -5.82; z = 3.68; P = 0.0002)], LVESVi [-6.02 ml (95% CI -10.34 to -1.70; z = 2.73; P = 0.006)], LVM [-9.77 g (95% CI -17.65 to -1.89; z = 2.43; P = 0.02)], LVMi (-3.52 g [95% CI -7.04 to 0.01; z = 1.96; P = 0.05)] and LVEF [+2.54 mL (95% CI 1.10 to 3.98; z = 3.62; P = 0.0005)]. No significant difference in GLS (n = 327) [+0.42% (95%CI -0.19 to 1.02; P = 0.18)] or LAVi [-3.25 ml (95% CI -8.20 to 1.69; z = 1.29; P = 0.20)] was noted.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provides additional data and insight into the effects of SGLT2 inhibition on reverse cardiac remodelling in patients with HF. Compared with placebo control, we found that treatment with a SGLT2 inhibitor produced significant improvements in several markers of reverse cardiac remodelling.

Cardiac contractility modulation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients with QRS duration 120-149 ms: Reduction in heart failure hospitalizations and improvement in functional outcome

BACKGROUND

A subset of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients qualifies for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a 30% CRT nonresponder rate persists, with patients having narrower QRS durations (ie, QRSd 120-149 ms) receiving less or inconsistent benefit. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) may be an important alternative therapy option but has largely been evaluated only in HFrEF patients with QRSd <120 ms.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of CCM on HF-related hospitalizations and on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as well as quality of life in HFrEF patients with QRSd 120-149 ms compared to QRSd <120 ms.

METHODS

The CCM-REG Registry enrolled a total of 503 HFrEF patients with follow-up up to 2 years. Hospitalization rates were available for 1 year preimplant. Safety was assessed by comparison of actual vs Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score- or Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)-predicted mortality.

RESULTS

Among 111 of 455 patients with QRSd 120-149 ms (mean QRSd 130 ± 9 ms; 20% female; age 68 ± 11 years; LVEF 29% ± 9%; 82% New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III), CCM diminished HF-related hospitalization rate by 72% (pre- vs postimplant 0.90 vs 0.25 events per patient-year over 2 years; P <.001). LVEF improved by 7% ± 9% (P = .014 vs baseline), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score by 10 ± 23 points (P = .010 vs baseline), and NYHA class by 0.5 ± 0.7 classes (<0.001 vs baseline). The effect sizes were similar to those in QRSd <120 ms patients. Mortality within the first year was 19% in QRSd 120-149 ms patients (ie, not significantly different from the MAGGIC risk score or SHFM prediction).

CONCLUSIONS

CCM significantly improved HF control in NYHA class III HFrEF with reduced ejection fraction patients with moderately prolonged QRSd of 120-149 ms. The effect was comparable to that in patients with QRSd <120 ms.

Cardiac shockwave therapy in addition to coronary bypass surgery improves myocardial function in ischaemic heart failure: the CAST-HF trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In chronic ischaemic heart failure, revascularisation strategies control symptoms but are less effective in improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The aim of this trial is to investigate the safety of cardiac shockwave therapy (SWT) as a novel treatment option and its efficacy in increasing cardiac function by inducing angiogenesis and regeneration in hibernating myocardium.

METHODS

In this single-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial (cardiac shockwave therapy for ischemic heart failure, CAST-HF; NCT03859466) patients with LVEF ≤40% requiring surgical revascularisation were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo direct cardiac SWT or sham treatment in addition to coronary bypass surgery. The primary efficacy endpoint was the improvement in LVEF measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging from baseline to 360 days.

RESULTS

Overall, 63 patients were randomized, out of which 30 patients of the SWT group and 28 patients of the Sham group attained 1-year follow-up of the primary endpoint. Greater improvement in LVEF was observed in the SWT group (Δ from baseline to 360 days: SWT 11.3%, SD 8.8; Sham 6.3%, SD 7.4, P = .0146). Secondary endpoints included the 6-minute walking test, where patients randomized in the SWT group showed a greater Δ from baseline to 360 days (127.5 m, SD 110.6) than patients in the Sham group (43.6 m, SD 172.1) (P = .028) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score on day 360, which was 11.0 points (SD 19.1) for the SWT group and 17.3 points (SD 15.1) for the Sham group (P = .15). Two patients in the treatment group died for non-device-related reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the CAST-HF trial indicates that direct cardiac SWT, in addition to coronary bypass surgery improves LVEF and physical capacity in patients with ischaemic heart failure.

Combination therapy of acupuncture and herbal medicine for heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by functional or structural dysfunction of the heart, resulting in impaired blood ejection or ventricular filling. Conventional Western Medicine (CWM) remains the mainstay of treatment for HF; however, the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) necessitates the exploration of alternative treatments. Herbal medicine and acupuncture are adjunctive therapies for HF and have shown potential for improving heart function. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and herbal medicine in treating HF.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Citation Information by National Institute of Informatics, KoreaMed, Research Information Sharing Service, and DBpia were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of acupuncture and herbal medicine along with CWM as adjunctive treatments for HF, published from inception to May 31, 2024. Treatment effectiveness was determined by evaluating the left ventricular ejection fraction as the primary metric, along with the measurement of the total effective rate, brain natriuretic peptide level, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide level, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and left ventricular end-systolic volume; the administration of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; and the conduct of a 6-minute walk test. Treatment safety was evaluated based on the incidence of AEs. The methodological quality of all included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager, version 5.4.1.

RESULTS

Of the 133 publications identified, 8 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction, brain natriuretic peptide levels, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels, left ventricular end-systolic volume, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, and 6-minute walk test results. Additionally, significant differences were observed in the total effective rate and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire responses. No significant medication-related AEs occurred in the intervention group. Conversely, 7 control patients developed well-known AEs associated with CWM.

CONCLUSION

Acupuncture combined with herbal medicine and CWM is more effective than CWM alone, indicating a safe treatment approach. Consequently, the proactive administration of acupuncture alongside herbal medicine to patients with HF can be undertaken without concerns regarding AEs.

Coronary Artery Disease Is A Stronger Predictor of All-Cause Mortality Than Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure: Insights From the WDHR

BACKGROUND

In patients with newly diagnosed heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, little is known whether LVEF per se or presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) provides independent prognostic information on all-cause mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the WDHR (Western Denmark Heart Registry), we identified 3620 patients with newly diagnosed HF and LVEF 10% to 49% referred for first-time coronary angiography as part of general workup of HF. Patients were stratified by LVEF (10%-35% versus 36%-49%) and presence of CAD. We estimated 10-year all-cause mortality risk and calculated hazard ratios adjusted for relevant comorbidities and risk factors (aHRs). CAD was present in 1592 (44%) patients. Lower LVEF was associated with a relative 15% increased 10-year mortality: 37% for LVEF 36% to 49% versus 42% for LVEF 10% to 35% (aHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.99-1.34]). This result did not change when stratified into those with CAD (52% versus 56%; aHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.91-1.35]) and those without CAD (27% versus 33%; aHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.97-1.57]). In comparison, presence and extent of CAD were associated with a relative 43% increased 10-year mortality (CAD versus no CAD, 55.0% versus 31.5%; aHR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.25-1.64]). Compared with a matched general population, excess mortality risk was higher for patients with HF and CAD (54.7% versus 26.3%; aHR, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.85-2.39]) versus those with HF and no CAD (31.4% versus 17.2%; aHR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.52-2.02]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among newly diagnosed patients with HF and LVEF <50%, presence and extent of CAD are associated with substantial higher all-cause mortality risk than lower LVEF.

Impact of a Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion on the Incidence of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks and Mortality: A Substudy of the Dutch Outcome in ICD Therapy (DO-IT)) Registry

BACKGROUND

Chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) substantially increase the risk for sudden cardiac death. Among patients with chronic ischemic heart disease at risk for sudden cardiac death, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the favored therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. This study sought to investigate the impact of CTOs on the risk for appropriate ICD shocks and mortality within a nationwide prospective cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a subanalysis of the nationwide Dutch-Outcome in ICD Therapy (DO-IT) registry of primary prevention ICD recipients in The Netherlands between September 2014 and June 2016 (n=1442). We identified patients with chronic ischemic heart disease (n=663) and assessed available coronary angiograms for CTO presence (n=415). Patients with revascularized CTOs were excluded (n=79). The primary end point was the composite of all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shocks. Clinical follow-up was conducted for at least 2 years. A total of 336 patients were included, with an average age of 67±9 years, and 20.5% was female (n=69). An unrevascularized CTO was identified in 110 patients (32.7%). During a median follow-up period of 27 months (interquartile range, 24-32), the primary end point occurred in 21.1% of patients with CTO (n=23) compared with 11.9% in patients without CTO (n=27; P=0.034). Corrected for baseline characteristics including left ventricular ejection fraction, and the presence of a CTO was an independent predictor for the primary end point (hazard ratio, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.03-3.22]; P=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Within this nationwide prospective registry of primary prevention ICD recipients, the presence of an unrevascularized CTO was an independent predictor for the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shocks.

Physiological and psychological outcomes of high intensity interval training in patients with heart failure compared to moderate continuous training and usual care: A systematic review with meta analysis

BACKGROUND

An important component of secondary prevention of CVD (including HF) is comprehensive cardiac rehab, including exercise. Novel, individualised approaches are needed to increase uptake and adherence to exercise programmes, one area offering potential is HIIT. HIIT has been shown to be both safe and effective for improving cardiovascular fitness in both coronary artery disease and HF patients.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a current and up to date evaluation of the physiological and psychological outcomes of HIIT in patients with HF compared to MCT and UC. Secondly to perform sub-group analyses comparing short and long HIIT protocols.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was undertaken. Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and SportDISCUS were searched up to July 2022. Trials were included if they carried out a HIIT intervention (defined at intensity ≥ 80% peak HR or ≥ 80% VO2peak) in HF patients (HFpEF or HFrEF) for at least 6 weeks. Comparator group was UC or MCT.

RESULTS

HIIT was shown to be superior to MCT and UC for improving VO2peak (HIIT mean improvement 3.1 mL.kg-1min-1). HITT was superior to MCT and UC for improving LVEF (HIIT mean improvement 5.7%). HIIT was superior to MCT and UC for improving HRQoL, using the MLHFQ (HIIT mean point change of -12.8). Subgroup analysis showed no difference between long and short HIIT.

CONCLUSION

HIIT improves VO2peak, LVEF and HRQoL in patients with HF, the improvements seen in VO2peak and LVEF are superior in HIIT compared to MCT and UC.

Area-weighted unipolar voltage to predict heart failure outcomes in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia

AIMS

Patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) referred for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) are at risk for end-stage heart failure (HF) due to adverse remodelling. Local unipolar voltages (UV) decrease with loss of viable myocardium. A UV parameter reflecting global viable myocardium may predict prognosis. We evaluate if a newly proposed parameter, area-weighted unipolar voltage (awUV), can predict HF-related outcomes [HFO; HF death/left ventricular (LV) assist device/heart transplant] in ICM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From endocardial voltage maps of consecutive patients with ICM referred for VT ablation, awUV was calculated by weighted interpolation of local UV. Associations between clinical and mapping parameters and HFO were evaluated and validated in a second cohort. The derivation cohort consisted of 90 patients [age 68 ±8 years; LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 35% interquartile range (IQR) (24-40)] and validation cohort of 60 patients [age 67 ± 9, LVEF 39% IQR (29-45)]. In the derivation cohort, during a median follow-up of 45 months [IQR (34-83)], 36 (43%) patients died and 23 (26%) had HFO. Patients with HFO had lower awUV [4.51 IQR (3.69-5.31) vs. 7.03 IQR (6.08-9.2), P < 0.001]. A reduction in awUV [optimal awUV (5.58) cut-off determined by receiver operating characteristics analysis] was a strong predictor of HFO (3-year HFO survival 97% vs. 57%). The cut-off value was confirmed in the validation cohort (2-year HFO-free survival 96% vs. 60%).

CONCLUSION

The newly proposed parameter awUV, easily available from routine voltage mapping, may be useful at identifying ICM patients at high risk for HFO.

Effect of short-term cardiac function changes after cardiac resynchronization therapy on long-term prognosis in heart failure patients with and without diabetes

Background

The relationship between short-term cardiac function changes and long-term outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains uncertain, especially when stratified by diabetes status.

Objectives

This study aims to assess the association between short-term cardiac function changes and outcomes such as all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization in patients undergoing CRT, stratified by diabetes status.

Design

This is a cohort longitudinal retrospective study.

Methods

A total of 666 HF patients, treated with CRT between March 2007 and March 2019, were included in this study. Among them, 166 patients (24.9%) were diagnosed with diabetes. Cardiac function was assessed at baseline and again at 6 months, incorporating evaluations of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left atrial diameter (LAD), N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and QRS duration. The QRS duration represents the time required for a stimulus to spread through the ventricles (ventricular depolarization). The primary endpoints of the study were all-cause mortality and HF-related hospitalization.

Results

During a median follow-up of 2.51 years, 172 (25.8%) patients died and 197 (29.6%) were hospitalized for HF. Changes in LVEF, LVEDD, and LAD within 6 months had similar effects on adverse outcomes in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. However, the presence of diabetes significantly modified the association between changes in NT-proBNP and QRS duration and adverse outcomes. Short-term changes in NT-proBNP and QRS duration were positively associated with all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization in patients without diabetes. However, the relationship between short-term changes in NT-proBNP and QRS duration and adverse outcomes was non-linear in diabetic patients.

Conclusion

Improvement of cardiac function after CRT implantation can reduce long-term risk of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization in HF patients. However, the presence of diabetes may affect the association between short-term changes in NT-proBNP and QRS duration and adverse outcomes.

Parameters associated with improvement of systolic function in patients with heart failure

AIMS

Identifying clinical and echocardiographic parameters associated with improvement in systolic function in outpatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) could lead to more targeted treatment improving systolic function and outcome.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, echocardiographic examinations from the first and final visit of 686 patients with HFrEF at the heart failure clinic at Gentofte Hospital were retrieved and analysed. Parameters associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement and survival according to LVEF improvement were assessed using linear regression and Cox regression, respectively. Beta-coefficients (β-coef) are standardised. Strain values are absolute.

RESULTS

While undergoing heart failure treatment, 559 (81.5%) patients improved systolic function ( Δ LVEF >0%), with 100 (14.6%) being super responders defined by LVEF improvement >20%. After multivariable adjustment, LVEF improvement was significantly associated with a less impaired global longitudinal strain (β-coef 0.25, p<0.001), higher tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (β-coef 0.09, p=0.018), smaller left ventricular internal dimension in diastole (β-coef -0.15, p=0.011), lower E-wave/A-wave ratio (β-coef -0.13, p=0.003), higher heart rate (β-coef 0.18, p<0.001) and absence of ischaemic cardiomyopathy (β-coef -0.11, p=0.010) and diabetes (β-coef -0.081, p=0.033) at baseline. Mortality incidence rates differed with LVEF improvement ( Δ LVEF <0% vs Δ LVEF >0%, 8.3 vs 4.3 per 100 person years, p=0.012). Greater improvement in LVEF was associated with significantly lower mortality risk (tertile 1 vs tertile 3, HR 3.23, 95% CI 1.39 to 7.51, p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

In this outpatient HFrEF cohort, most patients improved systolic function. Heart failure aetiology, comorbidities and echocardiographic measures of heart structure and function were significantly, independently associated with future LVEF improvement. Greater LVEF improvement was significantly associated with lower mortality.

Cardiac magnetic resonance left ventricular filling pressure is linked to symptoms, signs and prognosis in heart failure

AIMS

Left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) can be estimated from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We aimed to investigate whether CMR-derived LVFP is associated with signs, symptoms, and prognosis in patients with recently diagnosed heart failure (HF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study recruited 454 patients diagnosed with HF who underwent same-day CMR and clinical assessment between February 2018 and January 2020. CMR-derived LVFP was calculated, as previously, from long- and short-axis cines. CMR-derived LVFP association with symptoms and signs of HF was investigated. Patients were followed for median 2.9 years (interquartile range 1.5-3.6 years) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization, non-fatal stroke, and non-fatal myocardial infarction. The mean age was 62 ± 13 years, 36% were female (n = 163), and 30% (n = 135) had raised LVFP. Forty-seven per cent of patients had an ejection fraction < 40% during CMR assessment. Patients with raised LVFP were more likely to have pleural effusions [hazard ratio (HR) 3.2, P = 0.003], orthopnoea (HR 2.0, P = 0.008), lower limb oedema (HR 1.7, P = 0.04), and breathlessness (HR 1.7, P = 0.01). Raised CMR-derived LVFP was associated with a four-fold risk of HF hospitalization (HR 4.0, P < 0.0001) and a three-fold risk of MACE (HR 3.1, P < 0.0001). In the multivariable model, raised CMR-derived LVFP was independently associated with HF hospitalization (adjusted HR 3.8, P = 0.0001) and MACE (adjusted HR 3.0, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Raised CMR-derived LVFP is strongly associated with symptoms and signs of HF. In addition, raised CMR-derived LVFP is independently associated with subsequent HF hospitalization and MACE.

Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: The Role of Cardiovascular and Lung Ultrasound beyond Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is considered a major health care problem with frequent decompensations, high hospitalization and mortality rates. In severe heart failure (HF), the symptoms are refractory to medical treatment and require advanced therapeutic strategies. Early recognition of HF sub- and decompensation is the cornerstone of the timely treatment intensification and, therefore, improvement in the prognosis. Echocardiography is the gold standard for the assessment of systolic and diastolic functions. It allows one to obtain accurate and non-invasive measurements of the ventricular function in HF. In severely compromised HF patients, advanced cardiovascular ultrasound modalities may provide a better assessment of intracardiac hemodynamic changes and subclinical congestion. Particularly, cardiovascular and lung ultrasound allow us to make a more accurate diagnosis of subclinical congestion in HFrEF. The aim of this review was to summarize the advantages and limitations of the currently available ultrasound modalities in the ambulatory monitoring of patients with HFrEF.

Timing of cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation

AIMS

The optimum timing of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation is unknown. We explored long-term outcomes after CRT in relation to the time interval from a first heart failure hospitalization (HFH) to device implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A database covering the population of England (56.3 million in 2019) was used to quantify clinical outcomes after CRT implantation in relation to first HFHs. From 2010 to 2019, 64 968 patients [age: 71.4 ± 11.7 years; 48 606 (74.8%) male] underwent CRT implantation, 57% in the absence of a previous HFH, 12.9% during the first HFH, and 30.1% after ≥1 HFH. Over 4.54 (2.80-6.71) years [median (interquartile range); 272 989 person-years], the time in years from the first HFH to CRT implantation was associated with a higher risk of total mortality [hazard ratio (HR); 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)] (1.15; 95% CI 1.14-1.16, HFH (HR: 1.26; 95% CI 1.24-1.28), and the combined endpoint of total mortality or HFH (HR: 1.19; 95% CI 1.27-1.20) than CRT in patients with no previous HFHs, after co-variate adjustment. Total mortality (HR: 1.67), HFH (HR: 2.63), and total mortality or HFH (HR: 1.92) (all P < 0.001) were highest in patients undergoing CRT ≥2 years after the first HFH.

CONCLUSION

In this study of a healthcare system covering an entire nation, delays from a first HFH to CRT implantation were associated with progressively worse long-term clinical outcomes. The best clinical outcomes were observed in patients with no previous HFH and in those undergoing CRT implantation during the first HFH.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

The optimum timing of CRT implantation is unknown. In this study of 64 968 consecutive patients, delays from a first heart failure hospitalization (HFH) to CRT implantation were associated with progressively worse long-term clinical outcomes. Each year from a first HFH to CRT implantation was associated with a 21% higher risk of total mortality and a 34% higher risk of HFH. The best outcomes after CRT were observed in patients with no previous HFHs and in those undergoing implantation during their first HFH.

Clinical course and therapy optimization of patients after discharge from a specialized heart failure clinic

Aim: We aimed to describe the clinical course of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after discharge from the heart failure clinics (HFC). Patients & methods: We reviewed the hospital's records of 610 patients that were discharged between 2013 and 2018 from the HFC at a single centre. Patients with no recurrent contact to ambulatory cardiac care were invited to an echocardiographic assessment. Results: Of the survivors, 72% were re-referred after discharge. Nearly 30% of the patients with no recurrent contact with ambulatory cardiac care had persistent HFrEF and further therapeutical optimizations were indicated in half of them. Conclusion: This highlights the importance to identify high-risk patients that would benefit from extended management in the HFC.

Iron therapy and severe arrhythmias in HFrEF: rationale, study design, and baseline results of the RESAFE-HF trial

AIMS

The Iron Intravenous Therapy in Reducing the burden of Severe Arrhythmias in HFrEF (RESAFE-HF) registry study aims to provide real-word evidence on the impact of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) on the arrhythmic burden of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), iron deficiency (ID), and implanted cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The RESAFE-HF (NCT04974021) study was designed as a prospective, single-centre, and open-label registry study with baseline, 3, 6, and 12 month visits. Adult patients with HFrEF and CIEDs scheduled to receive IV FCM as treatment for ID as part of clinical practice were eligible to participate. The primary endpoint is the composite iron-related endpoint of haemoglobin ≥ 12 g/dL, ferritin ≥ 50 ng/L, and transferrin saturation > 20%. Secondary endpoints include unplanned HF-related hospitalizations, ventricular tachyarrhythmias detected by CIEDs and Holter monitors, echocardiographic markers, functional status (VO2 max and 6 min walk test), blood biomarkers, and quality of life. In total, 106 patients with a median age of 72 years (14.4) were included. The majority were male (84.9%), whereas 92.5% of patients were categorized to New York Heart Association II/III. Patients' arrhythmic burden prior to FCM administration was significant-19 patients (17.9%) received appropriate CIED therapy for termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia in the preceding 12 months, and 75.5% of patients have frequent, repetitive multiform premature ventricular contractions.

CONCLUSIONS

The RESAFE-HF trial is expected to provide evidence on the effect of treating ID with FCM in HFrEF based on real-world data. Special focus will be given on the arrhythmic burden post-FCM administration.

Thyroid Hormone and Heart Failure: Charting Known Pathways for Cardiac Repair/Regeneration

Heart failure affects more than 64 million people worldwide, having a serious impact on their survival and quality of life. Exploring its pathophysiology and molecular bases is an urgent need in order to develop new therapeutic approaches. Thyroid hormone signaling, evolutionarily conserved, controls fundamental biological processes and has a crucial role in development and metabolism. Its active form is L-triiodothyronine, which not only regulates important gene expression by binding to its nuclear receptors, but also has nongenomic actions, controlling crucial intracellular signalings. Stressful stimuli, such as acute myocardial infarction, lead to changes in thyroid hormone signaling, and especially in the relation of the thyroid hormone and its nuclear receptor, which are associated with the reactivation of fetal development programmes, with structural remodeling and phenotypical changes in the cardiomyocytes. The recapitulation of fetal-like features of the signaling may be partially an incomplete effort of the myocardium to recapitulate its developmental program and enable cardiomyocytes to proliferate and finally to regenerate. In this review, we will discuss the experimental and clinical evidence about the role of the thyroid hormone in the recovery of the myocardium in the setting of heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction and its future therapeutic implications.

Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of the Left Anterior Descending Artery

The left anterior descending artery (LAD) subtends a large myocardial territory. The outcomes of LAD chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have received limited study. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent LAD CTO PCI at a high-volume single center. Outcomes included in-hospital and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We performed a subgroup analysis of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, defined as an LVEF of 40% or less. From December 2014 to February 2021, 237 patients underwent LAD CTO PCI. The technical success rate was 97.4%, and the in-hospital MACE rate was 5.4%, A landmark analysis after hospital discharge showed an overall survival of 92% and 85% MACE-free survival at 2 years. There was no difference in overall survival or MACE-free survival between those who had ischemic cardiomyopathy versus those who did not. In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, LAD CTO PCI was associated with significant improvement in LVEF (10.9% at 9 months), which was further pronounced when these patients had a proximal LAD CTO and were on optimal medical therapy (14% at 6 months). In a single high-volume center, LAD CTO PCI was associated with 92% overall survival at 2 years, with no difference in survival between patients with or without ischemic cardiomyopathy. LAD CTO PCI was associated with an absolute 10% increase in LVEF at 9 months in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Survival of Myocardial Infarction Patients with Diabetes Mellitus at the Invasive Era (Results from the Városmajor Myocardial Infarction Registry)

Due to the lifelong nature of diabetes mellitus (DM), it has been demonstrated to have significant effects on patients' morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to assess the effects of DM on the clinical outcome and survival in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to myocardial infarction (MI) and to examine the relationship of DM to the type of the MI and to left ventricular (LV) and renal functions. A total of 12,270 patients with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) were revascularized at our Institution between 2005 and 2013. In this pool of patients, 4388 subjects had DM, while 7018 cases had no DM. In both STEMI and NSTEMI, the 30-day and 1-year survival were worse in diabetic patients as compared to non-diabetic cases. In the patients with DM, NSTEMI showed worse prognosis within 1-year than STEMI similarly to non-diabetic subjects. Regarding survival, the presence of DM seemed to be more important than the type of MI. Regardless of the presence of DM, reduced LV function was a maleficent prognostic sign and DM significantly reduced the prognosis both in case of reduced and normal LV function. Survival is primarily affected by LV function, rather than DM. Worse renal function is associated with worse 30-day and 1-year survival in both cases with and without DM. Considering different renal functions, the presence of DM worsens both short- and long-term survival. Survival is primarily affected by renal function, rather than DM. The results from a high-volume PCI center confirm significant the negative prognostic impact of DM on survival in MI patients. DM is a more important prognostic factor than the type of the MI. However, survival is primarily affected by LV and renal functions, rather than DM. These results could highlight our attention on the importance of recent DM treatment with new drugs including SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 antagonists with beneficial effects on survival.

Prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction changes in heart failure patients using machine learning and electronic health records: a multi-site study

Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is a key measure in the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure (HF) and many patients experience changes in EF overtime. Large-scale analysis of longitudinal changes in EF using electronic health records (EHRs) is limited. In a multi-site retrospective study using EHR data from three academic medical centers, we investigated longitudinal changes in EF measurements in patients diagnosed with HF. We observed significant variations in baseline characteristics and longitudinal EF change behavior of the HF cohorts from a previous study that is based on HF registry data. Data gathered from this longitudinal study were used to develop multiple machine learning models to predict changes in ejection fraction measurements in HF patients. Across all three sites, we observed higher performance in predicting EF increase over a 1-year duration, with similarly higher performance predicting an EF increase of 30% from baseline compared to lower percentage increases. In predicting EF decrease we found moderate to high performance with low confidence for various models. Among various machine learning models, XGBoost was the best performing model for predicting EF changes. Across the three sites, the XGBoost model had an F1-score of 87.2, 89.9, and 88.6 and AUC of 0.83, 0.87, and 0.90 in predicting a 30% increase in EF, and had an F1-score of 95.0, 90.6, 90.1 and AUC of 0.54, 0.56, 0.68 in predicting a 30% decrease in EF. Among features that contribute to predicting EF changes, baseline ejection fraction measurement, age, gender, and heart diseases were found to be statistically significant.

Association between sacubitril/valsartan initiation and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction: Insights from ARIADNE registry

AIMS

We tested the hypothesis that initiation versus non-initiation of sacubitril/valsartan is associated with a more favorable subsequent change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A prospective, non-randomized, double-arm, open-label, cohort study had been conducted across 687 centers in 17 European countries enrolling HFrEF patients aged ≥18 years with symptoms of HF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] II-IV) and "reduced LVEF". For the current analysis, 2602 patients with LVEF measured at baseline and follow-up were chosen, of which 860 (33%, mean age 67 years, 26% women) were started on sacubitril/valsartan at baseline and 1742 (67%, 68 years, 23% women) were not. Patients started on sacubitril/valsartan had higher NYHA class and lower LVEF.

RESULTS

LVEF increased from mean 32.7% to 38.1% in the sacubitril/valsartan group versus from 35.9% to 38.7% in the non-sacubitril/valsartan group (mean difference in increase 2.6%, p < 0.001). LVEF increased from baseline in 64% versus 53% of patients and increased by ≥5% (absolute %) in 50% versus 35% of patients in the sacubitril/valsartan versus non-sacubitril/valsartan groups, respectively. In the overall cohort, initiation of sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with any increase in LVEF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.49 [1.26-1.75]) and with increase by ≥5% (OR 1.65 [1.39-1.95]).

CONCLUSION

Initiating versus not initiating sacubitril/valsartan was independently associated with a greater subsequent increase in LVEF in this real-world setting. Reverse cardiac remodeling may be one mechanism of benefit of sacubitril/valsartan.

Empagliflozin in acute myocardial infarction: the EMMY trial

AIMS

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition reduces the risk of hospitalization for heart failure and for death in patients with symptomatic heart failure. However, trials investigating the effects of this drug class in patients following acute myocardial infarction are lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this academic, multicentre, double-blind trial, patients (n = 476) with acute myocardial infarction accompanied by a large creatine kinase elevation (>800 IU/L) were randomly assigned to empagliflozin 10 mg or matching placebo once daily within 72 h of percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was the N-terminal pro-hormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) change over 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in echocardiographic parameters. Baseline median (interquartile range) NT-proBNP was 1294 (757-2246) pg/mL. NT-proBNP reduction was significantly greater in the empagliflozin group, compared with placebo, being 15% lower [95% confidence interval (CI) -4.4% to -23.6%] after adjusting for baseline NT-proBNP, sex, and diabetes status (P = 0.026). Absolute left-ventricular ejection fraction improvement was significantly greater (1.5%, 95% CI 0.2-2.9%, P = 0.029), mean E/e' reduction was 6.8% (95% CI 1.3-11.3%, P = 0.015) greater, and left-ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes were lower by 7.5 mL (95% CI 3.4-11.5 mL, P = 0.0003) and 9.7 mL (95% CI 3.7-15.7 mL, P = 0.0015), respectively, in the empagliflozin group, compared with placebo. Seven patients were hospitalized for heart failure (three in the empagliflozin group). Other predefined serious adverse events were rare and did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with a recent myocardial infarction, empagliflozin was associated with a significantly greater NT-proBNP reduction over 26 weeks, accompanied by a significant improvement in echocardiographic functional and structural parameters.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION

NCT03087773.

Trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction in response to therapies in patients with muscular dystrophy

BACKGROUND

Patients with muscular dystrophy (MD) are at elevated risk of serious cardiac complications and clinical assessment is limited due to inherent physical limitations. We assessed the utility of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) derived from transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) as a prognostic marker for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in a mixed adult MD cohort.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-five MD patients (median age: 36 (interquartile range [IQR]: 23.0-49.0) years; 65 [39.4%] females) were enrolled in our prospective cohort study. Diagnoses included dystrophinopathies (n = 42), limb-girdle MD (n = 31), type 1 myotonic dystrophy (n = 71), and facioscapulohumeral MD (n = 21). Left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular dimensions at end-diastole and end-systole, and serial measures (n = 124; follow-up period: 2.19 [IQR: 1.05-3.32] years) stratified patients for MACE risk.

RESULTS

Cardiomyopathy was diagnosed in 60 (36.4%) patients of the broader cohort (median LVEF: 45.0 [IQR: 35.0-50.0] %). Ninety-eight MACE occurred over the 7-year study period. At baseline, patients with a LVEF < 55.0% had a high risk of MACE (adjusted odds ratio: 8.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.18-21.7), concordant with the analysis of LV dimensions. Forty-one percent of these patients showed an improvement in LVEF with the optimization of medical and device therapies. Relative to patients with preserved LVEF, patients with reduced LVEF were at an elevated risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 7.21; 95% CI: 1.99-26.1), and improved LVEF resulted in comparable outcomes (aHR: 1.84; 95% CI: .49-6.91) associated with optimization of medical and device therapies. Reduction in QRS duration by CRT therapy was associated with an improvement in LVEF (average improvement: 12.8 [± 2.30] %; p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction in LVEF indicates an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with MD. Baseline and serial LVEF obtained by TTE can prognosticate patients for MACE and guide clinical management.

Positive airway pressure therapy in heart failure patients comorbid with obstructive sleep apnea: Cardiovascular outcomes and nighttime-duration effect

BACKGROUND

Comorbidity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and heart failure (HF) is becoming increasingly common. This is a global analysis of positive airway pressure (PAP) efficacy for the cardiovascular outcomes in those HF Patients with comorbid OSA.

METHODS

Related randomized controlled trials were included. Analysed indicators covered primary outcomes (cardiac function, motor ability and life quality) and secondary outcomes (blood pressure and OSA-accompanying symptoms). Weighted mean difference was used to analyse the PAP-control difference in different experimental phases and the baseline-post difference in different groups.

RESULTS

Compared with control group, PAP was associated with a 3.48% increase in left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) (p < .00001) and little decrease in heart rate (HR) (p = .67). Over 6 h of mean nighttime use was associated with a greater increase in LVEF of 5.21% (p = .0002) and a significant reduction in HR of 3.81 bpm (p = .03). There was no significant difference between PAP and control group in their association with change in motor ability and life quality. Besides, PAP was associated with a 13.08 mm Hg decrease in systolic blood pressure and great improvements in OSA-accompanying symptoms: Apnea-Hypopnea Index, -23.73 e/h; mean oxygen saturation, 1.86%; minimum oxygen saturation, 8.78%; Epworth Sleepiness Scale, -1.39 point; arousal index, -16.41 e/h. There was also no significant difference in diastolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive airway pressure treatment improves cardiac function in HF patients with comorbid OSA, but the improved magnitude is associated with the duration of nighttime use rather than the duration of treatment.

Rationale and Design of the Cardiac CARE Trial: A Randomized Trial of Troponin-Guided Neurohormonal Blockade for the Prevention of Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity

BACKGROUND

Anthracyclines are effective cytotoxic drugs used in the treatment of breast cancer and lymphoma but are associated with myocardial injury, left ventricular dysfunction, and heart failure. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity is highly variable in severity and without a proven therapeutic intervention. β-Adrenergic receptor blockers and renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor therapies have been associated with modest cardioprotective effects in unselected patients.

METHODS

The Cardiac CARE trial is a multicentre prospective randomized open-label blinded end point trial of combination β-adrenergic receptor blocker and renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor therapy in patients with breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving anthracycline chemotherapy that is associated with myocardial injury. Patients at higher risk of cardiotoxicity with plasma high-sensitivity cTnI (cardiac troponin I) concentrations in the upper tertile at the end of chemotherapy are randomized to standard of care plus combination candesartan and carvedilol therapy or standard of care alone. All patients undergo cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after anthracycline treatment. The primary end point is the change in left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months after chemotherapy. In low-risk nonrandomized patients, left ventricular ejection fraction before and 6 months after anthracycline will be compared with define the specificity of the high-sensitivity cTnI assay for identifying low-risk participants who do not develop left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

DISCUSSION

Cardiac CARE will examine whether cardiac biomarker monitoring identifies patients at risk of left ventricular dysfunction following anthracycline chemotherapy and whether troponin-guided treatment with combination candesartan and carvedilol therapy prevents the development of left ventricular dysfunction in these high-risk patients.

Effects of Acute Triiodothyronine Treatment in Patients with Anterior Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Angioplasty: Evidence from a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial (ThyRepair Study)

Background: Thyroid hormone has a differential action on healthy and ischemic heart. Triiodothyronine (T3) administration improved postischemic cardiac function while it limited apoptosis in experimentally induced ischemia. Thus, the present study investigated the potential effects of acute liothyronine (LT3) treatment in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. Methods: This study is a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ThyRepair study). We randomized 52 patients and analyzed data from 37 patients (n = 16 placebo and n = 21 LT3), per prespecified per protocol analysis. We excluded three patients who had died of cardiovascular causes (one in placebo and two in LT3 arm), four with small infarct size below a pre-specified threshold (in the placebo arm), and the rest, who lacked follow-up data. LT3 treatment started after stenting as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus injection of 0.8 μg/kg of LT3 followed by a constant infusion of 0.113 μg/kg/h i.v. for 48 hours. All patients had cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at hospital discharge and 6 months follow-up. The primary end point was CMR left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and secondary endpoints were LV volumes, infarct volume (IV), and safety. Results: The CMR LVEF% at 6 months was 53.6 ± 9.5 for the LT3-treated group and 48.6 ± 11 for placebo, p = 0.15. Acute LT3 treatment resulted in a significantly lower LV end-diastolic volume index (92.2 ± 16.8 mL/m² vs. 107.5 ± 22.2, p = 0.022) and LV systolic volume index (47.5 ± 13.9 mL/m² vs. 61.3 ± 21.7, p = 0.024) at hospital discharge, but not at 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in CMR IV at hospital discharge between the groups (p = 0.24). CMR IV tended to be lower in the LT3-treated group at 6 months (18.7 ± 9.5 vs. 25.9 ± 11.7, in placebo, p = 0.05). Serious, life-threatening events related to LT3 treatment were not observed. A tendency for an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was found in the LT3 group during the first 48 hours (19% for T3 group vs. 5% for placebo, p = 0.13). Conclusion: This pilot randomized, placebo-controlled trial study suggests potential favorable effects (acute cardiac dilatation and 6-month IV) as well as potential concerns regarding a higher risk of AF after LT3 administration early after myocardial infarction, which should be tested in a larger scale study.

Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction With Coronary Artery Revascularization and Subsequent Risk for Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Coronary revascularization is recommended to treat ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, the relations of revascularization-associated ejection fraction (EF) change to subsequent outcomes have not been elucidated.

METHODS

In 10 071 veterans (mean age 67 years; 1% women; 15% non-White) who underwent a first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2010, and had prerevascularization and postrevascularization EF measured, we calculated delta-EF (postprocedure EF-preprocedure EF). We related delta-EF as a continuous measure and as categories (≤-5, -5<delta-EF<0, delta-EF=0, 0<delta-EF<5, and delta-EF≥5) to death (using Cox regression) and heart failure hospitalization days (using negative binomial regression) in multivariable-adjusted models, for total sample, and PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting strata.

RESULTS

Over follow-up (mean/maximum 5/14 years) 56% died. Each 5% improvement in delta-EF was associated with statistically significant reductions in death and heart failure hospitalization days of 5% (95% CI, 3%-7%) and 10% (95% CI, 5%-15%), respectively, in the total sample and 6% (95% CI, 4%-8%) and 10% (95% CI, 5%-16%), respectively, in the PCI subgroup. Patients in the highest delta-EF category had 27% (95% CI, 19%-34%) lower mortality (30% [95% CI, 21%-37%] lower in PCI stratum) and ≈40% lower heart failure hospitalization days in total sample and PCI stratum, compared with those in the lowest category. Relations of delta-EF and outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting subgroup did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Revascularization-associated EF improvement was associated with significant reductions in mortality and heart failure hospitalization burden, particularly in the PCI subgroup.

Usefulness of Upstroke Time per Cardiac Cycle for Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality Prediction in Patients with Normal Ankle-Brachial Index

AIM

Abnormal ankle-brachial index (ABI) is regarded as peripheral artery disease and can be used to predict cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. However, the usefulness of ABI for the prediction of CV outcome in patients with normal ABI is limited. Upstroke time per cardiac cycle (UTCC) is recently reported to be associated with mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction and the elderly. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate UTCC, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), and ABI for the prediction of mortality in patients with normal ABI.

METHODS

Patients arranged for echocardiographic examinations were enrolled, and 1076 patients with normal ABI were included. ABI, baPWV, and UTCC were measured by an ABI-form device.

RESULTS

The median follow-up to mortality was 95 months. There were 88 CV and 244 all-cause deaths. After multivariate analysis, UTCC was associated with increased CV and all-cause mortality (P ≤ 0.004). Age, diabetes, heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, baPWV, and LVEF were also independent predictors of CV and all-cause mortality, but ABI was not. Furthermore, UTCC had a better additive predictive value than ABI, baPWV, and LVEF for CV mortality ( P ≤ 0.012). It also had a better additive predictive value than ABI and LVEF for all-cause mortality (P ≤ 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

UTCC is an independent predictor for CV and all-cause mortality in patients with normal ABI. It also has a better additive predictive value of CV and all-cause mortality than ABI and LVEF. Therefore, UTCC is a simple, novel, and useful parameter for identifying high-risk patients with normal ABI.

Personalised reprogramming to prevent progressive pacemaker-related left ventricular dysfunction: A phase II randomised, controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Pacemakers are widely utilised to treat bradycardia, but right ventricular (RV) pacing is associated with heightened risk of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and heart failure. We aimed to compare personalised pacemaker reprogramming to avoid RV pacing with usual care on echocardiographic and patient-orientated outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective phase II randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial in 100 patients with a pacemaker implanted for indications other than third degree heart block for ≥2 years. Personalised pacemaker reprogramming was guided by a published protocol. Primary outcome was change in LV ejection fraction on echocardiography after 6 months. Secondary outcomes included LV remodeling, quality of life, and battery longevity.

RESULTS

Clinical and pacemaker variables were similar between groups. The mean age (SD) of participants was 76 (+/-9) years and 71% were male. Nine patients withdrew due to concurrent illness, leaving 91 patients in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 6 months, personalised programming compared to usual care, reduced RV pacing (-6.5±1.8% versus -0.21±1.7%; p<0.01), improved LV function (LV ejection fraction +3.09% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 5.70%; p = 0.02]) and LV dimensions (LV end systolic volume indexed to body surface area -2.99mL/m2 [95% CI -5.69 to -0.29; p = 0.03]). Intervention also preserved battery longevity by approximately 5 months (+0.38 years [95% CI 0.14 to 0.62; p<0.01)) with no evidence of an effect on quality of life (+0.19, [95% CI -0.25 to 0.62; p = 0.402]).

CONCLUSIONS

Personalised programming in patients with pacemakers for bradycardia can improve LV function and size, extend battery longevity, and is safe and acceptable to patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03627585.

Effect of catheter ablation on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and significant functional mitral regurgitation

Background

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and functional mitral regurgitation (MR), catheter ablation reduces the severity of MR and improves cardiac remodeling. However, its effects on prognosis are uncertain.

Methods

This retrospective study included 151 consecutive patients with AF and functional MR, 82 (54.3%) of whom were treated by catheter ablation (Ablation group) and 69 (45.7%) with drug therapy without ablation (Non-ablation group). Forty-three pairs of these patients were propensity matched on the basis of age, CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The primary outcome evaluated was severity of MR, cardiac remodeling and the combined incidence of subsequent heart failure-related hospitalization and strokes/transient ischemic attacks.

Results

Patients in the Ablation group showed a significant decrease in the severity of MR (p < 0.001), a significant decrease in the left atrial diameter (p = 0.010), and significant improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.015). However, patients in the Non-ablation group showed only a significant decrease in the severity of MR (p = 0.004). The annual incidence of the studied events was 4.9% in the Ablation group and 16.7% in the Non-ablation group, the incidence being significantly lower in the ablation than Non-ablation group (p = 0.026) according to Kaplan–Meier curve analyses. According to multivariate Cox regression analysis, catheter ablation therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09–0.84; p = 0.024) and heart failure at baseline (HR 3.84, 95% CI 1.07–13.74; p = 0.038) were independent predictors of the incidence of the studied events.

Conclusions

Among patients with AF and functional MR, catheter ablation was associated with a significantly lower combined risk of heart failure-related hospitalization and stroke than in a matched cohort of patients receiving drug therapy alone.

Cardiomyopathy Management and In-Hospital Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Center: Clinical Components and Venues of Advanced Care

Background

There are few reports on the prevalence of different types of cardiomyopathy, clinical presentation, severity, short-term outcomes, and implementation of advanced heart failure treatment. This study aimed to assess the prevalence, clinical background of different types of cardiomyopathy and to identify the candidate for advanced treatment in a tertiary care cardiac center with many advantages 

Method

A single-center retrospective cohort study included 1069 patients admitted to our center and diagnosed with cardiomyopathy during 2019 and 2020 

Results

Out of 1069 cardiomyopathy patients admitted and diagnosed at our center between 2019 and 2020, 62% had ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), 36% had dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and 2% had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HOCM). ICM patients were older, showed a higher prevalence of both male gender and pilgrims, and they had more frequent cardiovascular risk factors compared to dilated cardiomyopathy group of patients. However, DCM patients with more severe heart failure symptoms (NYHA class III/IV), much worse LVEF, were subsequently considered deemed for aggressive diuretic therapy, and further advanced therapy (Sacubitril-Valsartan and device therapy) compared to ICM patients. ICM patients showed poor in-hospital outcomes compared to DCM group of patients (0.05 and <0.001) for an indication for mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality, respectively). Increased age, presence of renal dysfunction and lower LVEF were found the independent predictors of in-hospital mortality among our studied patients 

Conclusion

There are discrepancies between DCM and ICM patients. Although DCM patients were younger at age and had fewer cardiovascular risk factors, they presented with severe symptoms and dysfunction, hence more eligible candidates for advanced heart failure treatment, and finally showed a lower mortality rate. Increased age, presence of renal dysfunction and lower LVEF were found the independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. 

Echocardiographic Killip Classification

BACKGROUND

Although routine echocardiographic parameters such as ejection fraction are used to risk-stratify for death in patients referred for echocardiography, they have limited predictive value. The authors speculated that noninvasive hemodynamic echocardiographic data, assessing left ventricular filling pressure and output, stratified on the basis of the clinical Killip score, might have additive prognostic value on top of routine echocardiographic parameters. The authors created an echocardiographic correlate of this classification, using diastolic grade and stroke volume index (SVI) as indicators of pulmonary congestion and systemic perfusion, respectively, and evaluated the prognostic value of this correlate.

METHODS

A retrospective study of consecutive patients (hospitalized or not) referred for echocardiography for a range of cardiac diagnoses in a tertiary medical center. A total of 556 patients in sinus rhythm who were evaluated by two sonographers, and reviewed by a single cardiologist, were included. Normal filling pressure and normal SVI (>35 mL/m²) defined echocardiographic Killip (eKillip) class 1. Patients with pseudonormal or restrictive diastolic patterns and normal SVI were ascribed to eKillip class 2 or 3, respectively. A pseudonormal or restrictive diastolic pattern and a subnormal SVI defined eKillip class 4.

RESULTS

eKillip class 1 was present in 382 patients (68%); 115 (20%), 26 (5%), and 42 (7%) patients were in eKillip classes 2 to 4, respectively. Median follow-up time was 1,056 days (interquartile range, 729-1,390 days). A total of 105 deaths occurred. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that eKillip class was associated with all-cause mortality; hazard ratios (HR) -2.73 (95% CI, 1.67-4.48), 3.19 (95% CI, 1.42-7.17), and 4.79 (95% CI, 2.58-8.89) for each eKillip class above 1 (P < .001). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for the Charlson comorbidity index, eKillip class remained independently associated with all-cause mortality (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

eKillip class was associated with all-cause mortality among all patients undergoing echocardiography at a tertiary hospital.

Severe Atrial Functional Mitral Regurgitation: Clinical and Echocardiographic Characteristics, Management and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to compare the clinical and echocardiographic characteristics, management, and outcomes of severe atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) to primary mitral regurgitation (PMR).

BACKGROUND

AFMR remains poorly defined clinically.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent transesophageal echocardiography at our institution between 2011 and 2018 for severe mitral regurgitation with preserved left ventricular function were screened. We excluded patients with endocarditis, any form of cardiomyopathy, or prior mitral intervention. The absence of leaflet pathology defined AFMR. Outcomes included death and heart failure hospitalizations.

RESULTS

A total of 283 patients were included (AFMR = 14%, PMR = 86%). Compared to PMR, patients with AFMR had more comorbidities, including hypertension (94.9% vs. 76.2%; p = 0.015), diabetes mellitus (46.2% vs. 18.4%; p < 0.001), long-standing atrial fibrillation (28.2% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.015), prior nonmitral cardiac surgery (25.6% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.004), and pacemaker placement (33.3% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.002). They also had higher average E/e' (median [interquartile range]:16.04 [13.1 to 22.46] vs. 14.1 [10.89 to 19]; p = 0.036) and worse longitudinal left atrial strain peak positive value (16.86 ± 12.15% vs. 23.67 ± 14.09%; p = 0.002) compared to PMR. During follow-up (median: 22 months), patients with AFMR had worse survival (log-rank p = 0.009) and more heart failure hospitalizations (log-rank p = 0.002). They were also less likely to undergo mitral valve intervention (59.0% vs. 83.6%; p = 0.001), although surgery was associated with improved survival (log-rank p = 0.021). On multivariable regression analysis, AFMR was independently associated with mortality [adjusted odds ratio: 2.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.17 to 5.83; p = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

AFMR constitutes an under-recognized high-risk group, with significant comorbidities, limited therapeutic options, and poor outcomes.

Routine Use of Contrast on Admission Transthoracic Echocardiography for Heart Failure Reduces the Rate of Repeat Echocardiography during Index Admission

BACKGROUND

The authors retrospectively evaluated the impact of ultrasound enhancing agent (UEA) use in the first transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) examination, regardless of baseline image quality, on the number of repeat TTEs and length of stay (LOS) during a heart failure (HF) admission.

METHODS

There were 9,115 HF admissions associated with admission TTE examinations over a 4-year period (5,337 men; mean age, 67.6 ± 15.0 years). Patients were grouped into those who received UEAs (contrast group) in the first TTE study and those who did not (noncontrast group). Repeat TTE examinations were classified as justified if performed for concrete clinical indications during hospitalization.

RESULTS

In the 9,115 admissions for HF (5,600 in the contrast group, 3,515 in the noncontrast group), 927 patients underwent repeat TTE studies (505 in the contrast group, 422 in the noncontrast group), which were considered justified in 823 patients. Of the 104 patients who underwent unjustified repeat TTE studies, 80 (76.7%) belonged to the noncontrast group and 24 to the contrast group. Also, UEA use increased from 50.4% in 2014 to 74.3%, and the rate of unjustified repeat studies decreased from 1.3% to 0.9%. The rates of unjustified repeat TTE imaging were 2.3% and 0.4% (in the noncontrast and contrast groups, respectively), and patients in the contrast group were less likely to undergo unjustified repeat examinations (odds ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.12-0.29; P < .0001). The mean LOS was significantly lower in the contrast group (9.5 ± 10.5 vs 11.1 ± 13.7 days). The use of UEA in the first TTE study was also associated with reduced LOS (linear regression, β₁ = -0.47, P = .036), with 20% lower odds for odds of prolonged (>6 days) LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine use of UEA in the first TTE examination for HF irrespective of image quality is associated with reduced unjustified repeat TTE testing and may reduce LOS during an index HF admission.

Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction and the effect of β-blockers after acute myocardial infarction

There is currently an ongoing debate about the 'grey area' of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF). We evaluated characteristics, prognosis, and the effect of β-blockers on clinical outcomes in patients with HFmrEF after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We included a total of 10,785 patients and divided them into three groups: EF 40-49% (HFmrEF; n = 2717; reference); EF < 40% (reduced EF [HFrEF]; n = 1194); and EF ≥ 50% (preserved EF [HFpEF]; n = 6874). The primary outcome was 2-year all-cause mortality. HFmrEF was intermediate between HFrEF and HFpEF for baseline characteristics. The risk of all-cause mortality was lower for HFmrEF patients compared to HFrEF patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.710; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.544-0.927; P = 0.012). However, HFmrEF patients tended to be at higher risk for 2-year all-cause mortality than HFpEF patients (adjusted HR 1.235; 95% CI 0.989-1.511; P = 0.090). β-blockers were associated with reductions in all-cause mortality for the entire cohort (adjusted HR 0.760; 95% CI 0.592-0.975; P = 0.031). β-blockers were effective in patients with HFrEF (adjusted HR 0.667; 95% CI 0.471-0.944; P = 0.022), tended to be effective in patients with HFmrEF (adjusted HR 0.665; 95% CI 0.426-1.038; P = 0.072), but not effective in patients with HFpEF (adjusted HR 0.852; 95% CI 0.548-1.326; P = 0.478; interaction P = 0.026). In conclusion, clinical profiles and prognosis of patients with post-AMI HFmrEF are largely intermediate between HFrEF and HFpEF. β-blockers reduced or tended to reduce 2-year all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF or HFmrEF, respectively, but not those with HFpEF after AMI.

Changes in the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Outcomes in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients with Mid-range Ejection Fraction: A Prospective Observational Study

Objective Current clinical guidelines have proposed heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40-49%, but the proportion and prognosis of patients transitioning toward HF with a reduced LVEF (LVEF <40%, HFrEF) or HF with a preserved LVEF (LVEF ≥50%, HFpEF) are not fully clear. The present study prospectively evaluated the changes in the LVEF one year after discharge and the outcomes of hospitalized patients with HFmrEF. Methods We prospectively studied 259 hospitalized patients with HFmrEF who were discharged alive at our institutions between 2015 and 2019. Among them, 202 patients with HFmrEF who underwent echocardiography at the one-year follow-up were included in this study. Patient characteristics, echocardiographic data and all-cause death were collected. Results Eighty-seven (43%) patients transitioned to HFpEF (improved group), and 35 (17%) transitioned to HFrEF (worsened group). During a median follow-up of 33 months, 27 (13%) patients died. After adjustment, patients in the worsened group had an increased risk of all-cause mortality compared with those in the improved group [hazard ratio 7.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-43.48]. The baseline LVEF (per 1% decrease) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (per 1 mm decrease) were independent predictors of the worsened LVEF category (odds ratio 2.13, 95% CI 1.25-3.63 and odds ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.70, respectively). Conclusion Our study showed that a worsened LVEF one year after discharge was associated with a poor prognosis in hospitalized patients with HFmrEF.

Combination pharmacotherapies for cardiac reverse remodeling in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Pharmacotherapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor II blockers (ARBs), β-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), have played a pivotal role in reducing in-hospital and mortality in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, effects of the five drug categories used alone or in combination for cardiac reverse remodeling (CRR) in these patients have not been systematically evaluated. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted based on 55 randomized controlled trials published between 1989 and 2019 involving 12,727 patients from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020170457). Our primary outcomes were CRR indicators, including changes of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume (LVESV), indexed LVEDV (LVEDVI) and LVESV (LVESVI), and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and end-systolic dimension (LVESD); Secondary outcomes were functional capacity comprising New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and 6-min walking distance (6MWD); cardiac biomarkers involving B type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP). The effect sizes were presented as the mean difference with 95% credible intervals. According to the results, all dual-combination therapies except ACEI+ARB were significantly more associated with LVEF or NYHA improvement than placebo, ARB+BB and ARNI+BB were the top two effective dual-combinations in LVEF improvement (+7.59% [+4.27, +11.25] and +7.31% [+3.93, +10.97] respectively); ACEI+BB was shown to be superior to ACEI in reducing LVEDVI and LVESVI (-6.88 mL/m² [-13.18, -1.89] and -10.64 mL/m² [-18.73, -3.54] respectively); ARNI+BB showed superiority over ACEI+BB in decreasing the level of NT-proBNP (-240.11 pg/mL [-456.57, -6.73]). All tri-combinations were significantly more effective than placebo in LVEF improvement, and ARNI+BB+MRA ranked first (+21.13% [+14.34, +28.13]); ACEI+BB+MRA was significantly more associated with a decrease in LVEDD than ACEI (-6.57 mm [-13.10, -0.84]). A sensitivity analysis ignoring concomitant therapies for LVEF illustrated that all the five drug types except ARB were shown to be superior to placebo, and ARNI ranked first (+4.83% [+1.75, +7.99]). In conclusion, combination therapies exert more benefits on CRR for patients with HFrEF. Among them, ARNI+BB, ARB+BB, ARNI+BB+MRA and ARB+BB+MRA were the top two effective dual and triple combinations in LVEF improvement, respectively; The new "Golden Triangle" of ARNI+BB+MRA was shown to be superior to ACEI+BB+MRA or ARB+BB+MRA in LVEF improvement.

Impact of Reactive Oxidative Metabolites Among New Categories of Nonischemic Heart Failure

Background We investigated the clinical significance of derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (DROMs), a new marker of reactive oxygen species, in patients with nonischemic heart failure (HF) and compared them among new categories of HF. Methods and Results We recruited 201 consecutively hospitalized patients with HF and measured DROM under stable conditions. Then, we divided them according to new categories of HF (HF with reduced ejection fraction [EF], HF with midrangeEF, and HF with preserved EF) without coronary artery disease. In subgroup analysis, we followed EF changes in patients with HF with reduced EF and classified them into HF with recovered EF or nonrecovered EF according to whether EF had improved to >40%. DROMs are significantly and independently associated with HF-related events in patients with NIHF. There were no significant differences in DROM and the probability of HF-related events among HF categories in Kaplan-Meier analysis. However, patients with HF with reduced EF and HF with preserved EF but not HF with midrange EF with HF-related events had higher DROM than those without HF-related events. In subgroup analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the probabilities of HF-related events in HF with recovered EF were dramatically decreased. DROM were significantly higher in patients with HF with nonrecovered EF than in HF with recovered EF. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the cutoff level of DROM for predicting improvements in HF with recovered EF was 347 Carratelli units. Furthermore, the C-statistic value for predicting EF improvement for the DROM levels was 0.703. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, DROM was independently and significantly associated with the prediction of HF with recovered EF. Conclusions DROM measurements can provide important prognostic information for risk stratification in any category of NIHF. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique identifier: UMIN000035827.

Usefulness of the ratio of brachial pre-ejection period to brachial ejection time in prediction of cardiovascular and overall mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Left ventricular systolic function is a good indicator of cardiac function and a powerful predictor of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. High ratio of pre-ejection period (PEP) to ejection time (ET) is associated with reduced left ventricular systolic function. Brachial PEP (bPEP) and brachial ET (bET) can be automatically calculated from an ankle-brachial index (ABI)-form device and bPEP/bET was recently reported to be a new and useful parameter of cardiac performance. However, there were no studies evaluating the utility of bPEP/bET for prediction of CV and overall mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We included 139 cases of AMI admitted to our cardiac care unit consecutively. ABI, bPEP, and bET were obtained from the ABI-form device within the 24 hours of admission. There were 87 overall and 22 CV mortality and the median follow-up to mortality event was 98 months. After multivariable analysis, high bPEP/bET was not only associated with increased long-term CV mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.046; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005–1.088; P = 0.029), but also associated with long-term overall mortality (HR = 1.023; 95% CI: 1.001–1.045; P = 0.042). In addition, age was also a significant predictor for CV and overall mortality after the multivariable analysis. In conclusion, bPEP/bET was shown to be a significant predictor for CV and overall mortality in AMI patients after multivariable analysis. Therefore, by means of this novel parameter, we could easily find out the high-risk AMI patients with increased CV and overall mortality.

Resting Heart Rate as an Important Predictor of Mortality and Morbidity in Ambulatory Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Resting heart rate is a risk factor of adverse heart failure outcomes; however, studies have shown controversial results. This meta-analysis evaluates the association of resting heart rate with mortality and hospitalization and identifies factors influencing its effect.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically searched electronic databases in February 2019 for studies published in 2005 or before that evaluated the resting heart rate as a primary predictor or covariate of multivariable models of mortality and/or hospitalization in adult ambulatory patients with heart failure. Random effects inverse variance meta-analyses were performed to calculate pooled hazard ratios. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to assess evidence quality. Sixty-two studies on 163,445 patients proved eligible. Median population heart rate was 74 bpm (interquartile range 72-76 bpm). A 10-bpm increase was significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.13, high quality). Overall, subgroup analyses related to patient characteristics showed no changes to the effect estimate; however, there was a strongly positive interaction with age showing increasing risk of all-cause mortality per 10 bpm increase in heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality evidence demonstrates increasing resting heart rate is a significant predictor of all-cause mortality in ambulatory patients with heart failure on optimal medical therapy, with consistent effect across most patient factors and an increased risk trending with older age.

Impact of Left Ventricular Function and Heart Failure Symptoms on Outcomes Post Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: CASTLE-AF Trial

BACKGROUND

Recent data demonstrate promising effects on left ventricular dysfunction and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement following ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure. We sought to study the relationship between LVEF, New York Heart Association class on presentation, and the end points of mortality and heart failure admissions in the CASTLE-AF study (Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure) population. Furthermore, predictors for LVEF improvement were examined.

METHODS

The CASTLE-AF patients with coexisting heart failure and AF (n=363) were randomized in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to ablation (n=179) versus pharmacological therapy (n=184). Left ventricular function and New York Heart Association class were assessed at baseline (after randomization) and at each follow-up visit.

RESULTS

In the ablation arm, a significantly higher number of patients experienced an improvement in their LVEF to >35% at the end of the study (odds ratio, 2.17; P<0.001). Compared with the pharmacological therapy arm, both ablation patient groups with severe (<20%) or moderate/severe (≥20% and <35%) baseline LVEF had a significantly lower number of composite end points (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; P=0.006), all-cause mortality (HR, 0.54; P=0.019), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (HR, 0.66; P=0.017). In the ablation group, New York Heart Association I/II patients at the time of treatment had the strongest improvement in clinical outcomes (primary end point: HR, 0.43; P<0.001; mortality: HR, 0.30; P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with pharmacological treatment, AF ablation was associated with a significant improvement in LVEF, independent from the severity of left ventricular dysfunction. AF ablation should be performed at early stages of the patient's heart failure symptoms.

Clinical significance of reactive oxidative metabolites in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

We investigated the clinical significance of the derivative of reactive oxygen metabolites (DROM), a new marker of reactive oxygen species (ROS), in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HFrEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Serum DROM concentrations were measured in 201 consecutive patients with HFrEF (EF < 50%) in stable condition. DROM values were significantly higher in patients with HFrEF than in risk-matched patients without HF (P < 0.01). They also correlated significantly with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and B-type natriuretic peptide. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly higher probabilities of HF-related events in the high-DROM group than in the low-DROM group (log-rank test, P < 0.01). Multivariable Cox hazard analysis revealed that DROM were independent and significant predictors of cardiovascular events. In a subgroup analysis, DROM levels were also measured at the aortic root and coronary sinus in 49 patients. The transcardiac gradient of DROM values was significantly higher in patients with HFrEF than in patients without HF (P = 0.04), indicating an association between DROM production in the coronary circulation and HFrEF development. Changes in DROM following optimal therapy were significantly associated with LVEF improvement (r = 0.34, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The higher levels of DROM and their association with cardiovascular events suggest the clinical benefit of DROM measurements in the risk stratification of patients with HFrEF.

Automatic positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Background

Moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent in heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), and is associated with worsening cardiac function and increased mortality.

Objectives

The automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) trial tested the impact of APAP treatment on changes for the pre-specified endpoints: changes in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO₂), percent-predicted peak VO₂ and oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (VO₂-AT).

Methods

This randomized, controlled pilot study included patients with chronic, stable HFrEF who had moderate-to-severe OSA. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either APAP (AutoSet™, ResMed) or nasal strips (control) for 6 months.

Results

76 patients have been randomized and 58 had complete data for final analysis. There was a statistically significant change in the APAP intervention arm for the primary endpoint percent-predicted peak VO₂ in comparison to control (67 ± 17 to 73 ± 19%; p = 0.01). Additional primary endpoints peak VO₂ and VO₂-AT showed a trend in increase in the APAP group. Moreover, there were significant improvements within the APAP group for hypoxemia, left ventricular function and quality of life from baseline to 6 months, but not within the control group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively).

Conclusion

APAP intervention was shown to significantly improve outcome compared to control group, represented in percent-predicted peak VO₂, an established surrogate marker for cardiovascular prognosis in HFrEF. APAP has additional beneficial effects on hypoxemia, cardiac function and quality of life.

Current evidence of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Heart failure (HF) is one of the most common reasons for hospital admission in western countries. The measurement of the left ventricular ejection fraction is essential for the classification of HF and deciding on HF treatment. The treatment of HF has been improved in both diagnostic and therapeutic fields over the past two decades. The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor decreased the cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction. Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) improves the imbalance between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and natriuretic peptide systems. We present the clinical efficacy, real-world experience, safety and tolerability, the relevance of etiology of cardiomyopathy, and gender differences and regulatory affairs of LCZ696 in the treatment of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.

Integrated Yoga Practice in Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: A Randomized Control Trial

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a detrimental noncommunicable disease, which is increasing due to sedentary lifestyle and urbanization in the young population. It is further elevated with risk factors such as stress, anxiety, depression, an increase in triglycerides, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and so on, which manifests as atherosclerotic disease. Yoga-based lifestyle intervention is a noninvasive effective treatment method to control and prevent cardiac risk factors in CAD patients. Yoga has been used in India as a therapeutic method to manage hypertension and other chronic disorders and is fast gaining popularity as an effective means for the alleviation of stress, improvement of fitness, and enhancement of well-being. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of introducing the integrated approach of yoga therapy (IAYT) in a cardiac rehabilitation center in India and understand its usefulness in improving the cardiac function and managing the cardiac risk factors in acute myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Methods and Design: Cardiac patients were randomized to a yoga-practicing group (n = 33) and a control group (n = 33). The yoga-practicing group was instructed to attend three supervised IAYT classes 3 days per week for 12 weeks at the hospital yoga center. The control group received standard care that included pharmacologic treatment and the instructions of the cardiologist. The outcome measures were assessed at baseline (T1 = 0) and completion (T2 = 3 months). The primary outcome measure was the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results: There was no statistically significant difference in LVEF (U = 420.500, p value = 0.218) between the two groups. However, the yoga-practicing group showed significant reduction in depression (Cardiac Depression Scale [CDS], U = 71, p value = 0.0), anxiety (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A], U = 128, p value = 0.0), and a significant increase in quality of life (QOL) scores (Duke Activity Status Index [DASI], U = 146, p value = 0.0; and metabolic equivalents (METs), U = 136, p value = 0.0) at 3 months compared to control. Overall, the CAD patients practicing yoga showed a favorable profile compared to control individuals on CDS, HAM-A, DASI, and MET outcomes. Control and yoga practicing groups did not differ significantly in the lipid levels. Conclusion: This study indicated that the integration of yoga practice in a cardiac rehabilitation program is feasible and has no added benefit in improving the cardiac function. However, the addition of yoga to cardiac rehabilitation may be beneficial in reducing depression and anxiety and improving QOL in patients.

Analysis of the incidence and baseline predictors of the left ventricular ejection fraction returning to normal after dilated cardiomyopathy in postmenopausal women: a retrospective, observational study

Objective

To analyse the incidence and baseline predictors of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) returning to normal after dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) following intervention with standard anti-heart failure (HF) medication in postmenopausal women.

Methods

Data from consecutive postmenopausal women who were first diagnosed with DCM and received anti-HF treatment during 2011 to 2018 were prospectively retrieved. The study population was divided into the LVEF recovery (LVR) group and the LVEF unrecovered (LVU) group according to whether LVEF was > 50%. The primary endpoint was baseline predictors of LVEF returning to normal.

Results

LVEF returned to normal in 49.3% (210/426) of patients with DCM. LVEF was significantly higher in the LVR group than in the LVU group (57.4% ± 6.9% vs 44.2% ± 5.3%; hazard ratio 1.312, 95% confidence interval 1.015–1.726) at the final follow-up. High systolic pressure, a short history of HF, a short QRS interval, a small left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), and high LVEF at admission were independent predictors of LVEF returning to normal.

Conclusions

LVEF returning to normal in postmenopausal women with DCM who receive standard anti-HF treatment is associated with systolic pressure, a history of HF, QRS interval, LVEDd, LVEF at admission, and favourable outcome.

Trends in long-term prognosis according to left ventricular ejection fraction after acute coronary syndrome

AIMS

Our aim was to investigate trends in prognosis among survivors of acute coronary syndrome according to left ventricular ejection fraction during a 16-year period.

METHODS

Data were derived from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey during the years 2000-2016. Patients aged 18 years and older were included in the analysis (N=11,725). Patients were classified into two groups based on their left ventricular ejection fraction: preserved (≥50%) and reduced (<50%) and also according to their acute coronary syndrome onset (2000-2006 early period vs. 2008-2016 late period). Endpoints were all-cause mortality rates at one and three years after the index event.

RESULTS

Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction was present in 5047/11,725 (43%) of patients. As expected, patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction had lower 1 and 3-year mortality rates as compared with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction regardless of the acute coronary syndrome period onset (6% vs. 19%, p<0.001). Nevertheless, in the late period the prevalence of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction decreased significantly, becoming equal to preserved left ventricular ejection fraction [2761 (50.5%) vs. 2713 (49.5%) respectively, p=0.3]. Moreover, prognosis during the late period as compared with the early period was improved only in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.70-0.89, p=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction has decreased and prognosis has improved during the past several years but is still much worse than the prognosis of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

Prognostic impacts of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Background

It has been reported that recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with better prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced EF (rEF). However, change of LVEF has not yet been investigated in cases of HF with preserved EF (HFpEF).

Methods and results

Consecutive 1082 HFpEF patients, who had been admitted to hospital due to decompensated HF (EF >50% at the first LVEF assessment at discharge), were enrolled, and LVEF was reassessed within 6 months in the outpatient setting (second LVEF assessment). Among the HFpEF patients, LVEF of 758 patients remained above 50% (pEF group), 138 patients had LVEF of 40%–49% (midrange EF, mrEF group) and 186 patients had LVEF of less than 40% (rEF group). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, younger age and presence of higher levels of troponin I were predictors of rEF (worsened HFpEF). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cardiac event rate of the groups progressively increased from pEF, mrEF to rEF (log-rank, p<0.001), whereas all-cause mortality did not significantly differ among the groups. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, rEF (vs pEF) was not a predictor of all-cause mortality, but an independent predictor of increased cardiac event rates (HR 1.424, 95% CI 1.020 to 1.861, p=0.039).

Conclusion

An initial assessment of LVEF and LVEF changes are important for deciding treatment and predicting prognosis in HFpEF patients. In addition, several confounding factors are associated with LVEF changes in worsened HFpEF patients.

Heterogeneous Outcomes of Heart Failure with Better Ejection Fraction

We evaluated the heterogeneity of outcomes among heart failure patients with ventricular recovery. The BEST trial studied patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%. Serial LVEF assessment was performed at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Heart failure with better ejection fraction (HFbEF) was defined as an LVEF > 40% at any point. Of the patients who survived to 1 year, 399 (21.3%) had HFbEF. Among subjects with HFbEF, 173 (43.4%) had "extended" recovery, 161 (40.4%) had "late" recovery, and 65 (16.3%) patients had "transient" recovery. Subjects with HFbEF had an improved event-free survival from death or first HF hospitalization compared to subjects without recovery (HR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.39-0.64, p < 0.001). Compared to "transient" recovery, "late" and "extended" recovery were associated with an improved event-free survival from all-cause death and HF hospitalization (HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.34-0.90, p = 0.016). Our study shows patients with HFbEF to be a heterogeneous population with differing prognoses.