The American Psychiatric Association Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia

Dissemination of VMAT-2 Inhibitors: A New Class Drug for Tardive Dyskinesia and Huntington Disease

Background and Objectives

In 2017, the FDA approved deutetrabenazine (AUSTEDO) for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia (TD) and chorea associated with Huntington disease (HD). Concurrently, valbenazine (INGREZZA) was approved specifically for TD. The adoption of new medications is influenced by various factors, including patient's medical needs, the prescriber's adoption of new practice, and external environmental factors (e.g., cost). Our analysis aims to examine the dissemination of 2 vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT-2) inhibitors, deutetrabenazine and valbenazine, in the market.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we conducted a descriptive statistical analysis of the 2017-2020 prescription records for deutetrabenazine and valbenazine using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Part D Prescriber public use file. In addition, we linked this data set to the Open Payment database to analyze industry payments.

Results

We identified a total of 3,706 deutetrabenazine prescribers and 4,895 valbenazine prescribers. Prescription volume (standardized 30-day prescription) increased annually across different specialties for both VMAT-2 inhibitors from 2017 to 2020. Neurologists were the highest contributors to deutetrabenazine prescriptions (N = 50,017; 35.2%), and psychiatrists were the highest contributors to valbenazine prescriptions (N = 77,799; 42.3%). A total of 1,217 deutetrabenazine physician prescribers (47.5%) and 1,509 valbenazine physician prescribers (49.7%) received industry payments from TEVA Pharmaceuticals and Neurocrine Biosciences, respectively. Receipt of industry payments was associated with higher prescription volume for both deutetrabenazine (p < 0.001) and valbenazine (p < 0.001). Approximately three-quarters of the industry payments were used in nonconsulting services, with a median payment value per physician of $18,101 for deutetrabenazine and $25,920 for valbenazine.

Discussion

The findings illustrate a yearly increase in Medicare prescription volume for deutetrabenazine and valbenazine after FDA approval, with neurologists and psychiatrists as primary prescribers of deutetrabenazine and valbenazine, respectively. There was a statistical difference in the prescription volume between those who received industry payments and those who did not, suggesting that receipt of payments may be associated with prescription volume. Nonconsulting services constituted the largest sum of industry payments for both medications. Further research exploring the causative factors of new medication uptake is needed to better understand how medications disseminate across the market.

Medication burden reduction and early clinical benefit through aripiprazole once monthly in schizophrenia patients with polypharmacy

Antipsychotic polypharmacy is commonly used in clinical settings, with a growing trend in using long-acting injections to mitigate many side effects of polypharmacy. A previous study demonstrated that long-acting aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM) injection increased treatment adherence, restored functionality, and improved symptoms. However, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate the therapeutic effects of AOM in polypharmacy practice. This observational study aimed to investigate the real-world clinical benefits and effectiveness of AOM by assessing changes in drug dosage, the number of drugs, clinical functioning, psychotic symptoms, and the duration of drug efficacy. Study participants were recruited from eight study sites, with the baseline visit marking the initiation of drug treatment. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records at screening, baseline, and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Over 12 months, we analyzed changes in drug dosage, the number of drugs, and scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-6 (PANSS-6), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGIS). Data from 139 participants were analyzed. Total 12-month antipsychotic doses calculated in chlorpromazine equivalents (CPE) were reduced by 32.6%. A comparison of total monthly antipsychotic doses in CPE between the first and last months showed a 24.6% reduction in the dose. Additionally, the quantity of benzodiazepine tablets/capsules, total benzodiazepine doses calculated in lorazepam equivalents, and quantity of tablets/capsules of mood stabilizers, anticholinergics, and beta blockers were significantly reduced. GAF scores increased by 14.1% over 12 months, and PANSS-6 total scores reduced by 17.3% over 12 months, with significant differences observed from month 1 and baseline, respectively. The scores steadily improved until month 9 compared to those of the previous months, continuing to improve through month 12. The CGI-S score reduced by 14.3% over 12 months, showing a significant decrease from month 1 and a steady improvement until month 6, maintaining this improvement until month 12. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the early effectiveness of AOM in treating Korean patients with schizophrenia on polypharmacy. AOM improved function and clinical symptoms in patients with schizophrenia from treatment onset and caused a decrease in the quantity and dosage of drugs taken by the patients.

Developing STEP-SE: A Qualitative Usability Study of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Managing Side Effects in Shared Decision-Making for Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder Care

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia treatment with antipsychotics often results in side effects that impact adherence and quality of life. Managing these effects remains challenging, as it requires balancing efficacy and tolerability. The Schizophrenia Technological Evaluation of Patient Side Effects (STEP-SE) app aims to aid side effects monitoring and management through shared decision-making (SDM).

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the usability of the STEP-SE app for patients and clinicians in managing antipsychotic side effects.

METHODS

Sixteen stable outpatients and 14 psychiatrists participated in semi-structured interviews after using the STEP-SE app. Questions explored ease of use, information clarity, user needs fulfilment, patient-clinician collaboration, treatment adherence improvement, patient empowerment and clinical utility. Data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Overall satisfaction with STEP-SE was high. Both groups found that the tool improved patient involvement, provided reliable information to enhance therapeutic alliance, posed low risks of misunderstanding and had an intuitive interface. Patients felt more motivated and empowered. Clinicians appreciated guideline consistency. Preferences differed regarding data visualization formats.

DISCUSSION

STEP-SE shows potential for aiding SDM on antipsychotic side effects. Patients gained motivation, and clinicians felt reassured. Refinements around mobile access, graphics and features could augment utility. Generalizability is limited given the stable patient sample.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary findings suggest that STEP-SE effectively engages patients, empowers them and supports clinicians in collaborative side effect management. Further testing with diverse user groups is warranted.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The current study was designed to gather patient and public feedback for the development of our decision aid tool, STEP-SE. Participants interacted with the tool's prototype in interactive sessions, providing insights and identifying technical issues. Their feedback was crucial for enhancing the tool, with each suggestion and bug report carefully considered for future iterations. The participants' contributions were key in optimizing STEP-SE's features and ensuring its relevance and reliability. We thank all who shared their time and perspectives, significantly shaping the tool's user-centred design.

Successful Electroconvulsive Therapy for Tardive Dyskinesia and Tardive Dystonia Refractory to Valbenazine Treatment: A Case Report and Narrative Literature Review

Tardive dyskinesia and dystonia are intractable extrapyramidal symptoms caused by the blockade of dopamine receptors by antipsychotic drugs. In addition to the reduction or discontinuation of the causative drug, valbenazine for tardive dyskinesia and botulinum toxin for tardive dystonia have been reported to be effective. However, their efficacy has not been fully demonstrated. In this study, we report the case of a female patient with bipolar disorder, valbenazine-resistant tardive dystonia, and tardive dyskinesia who achieved improvement in extrapyramidal symptoms with electroconvulsive therapy. Additionally, we conducted a narrative literature review on the safety and efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy for tardive dyskinesia and dystonia.

Who can benefit more from its twelve-week treatment: A prospective cohort study of blonanserin for patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Blonanserin (BNS) is a well-tolerated and effective drug for treating schizophrenia.

AIM

To investigate which types of patients would obtain the most benefit from BNS treatment.

METHODS

A total of 3306 participants were evaluated in a 12-week, prospective, multicenter, open-label post-marketing surveillance study of BNS. Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) scores were calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of BNS, and its safety was assessed with the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Linear regression was used to screen the influencing factors for the reduction of BPRS total score, and logistic regression was used to identify patients with a better response to BNS.

RESULTS

The baseline BPRS total score (48.8 ± 15.03) decreased to 27.7 ± 10.08 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001). Extrapyramidal symptoms (14.6%) were found to be the most frequent adverse drug reactions. The acute phase, baseline BPRS total score, current episode duration, number of previous episodes, dose of concomitant antipsychotics, and number of types of sedative-hypnotic agents were found to be independent factors affecting the reduction of BPRS total score after treatment initiation. Specifically, patients in the acute phase with baseline BPRS total score ≥ 45, current episode duration < 3 months, and ≤ 3 previous episodes derived greater benefit from 12-week treatment with BNS.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the acute phase with more severe symptoms, shorter current episode duration, fewer previous episodes, and a lower psychotropic drug load derived the greatest benefit from treatment with BNS.

Antipsychotic Use and Risk of Breast Cancer in Women With Severe Mental Illness: Replication of a Nationwide Nested Case-Control Database Study

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Breast cancer is more prevalent in women with severe mental illness than in the general population, and use of prolactin-increasing antipsychotics may be a contributing factor.

STUDY DESIGN

A nested case-control study was conducted using the Swedish nationwide registers (inpatient/outpatient care, sickness absence, disability pension, prescribed drugs, cancers). All women aged 18-85 years with schizophrenia/schizoaffective/other nonaffective psychotic disorder/bipolar disorder and breast cancer (cases) were matched for age, primary psychiatric diagnosis, and disease duration with five women without cancer (controls). The association between cumulative exposure to prolactin-increasing/prolactin-sparing antipsychotics and breast cancer was analyzed using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for comorbidities and co-medications.

STUDY RESULTS

Among 132 061 women, 1642 (1.24%) developed breast cancer between 2010 and 2021, at a mean age of 63.3 ± 11.8 years. Compared with 8173 matched controls, the odds of breast cancer increased in women with prior exposure to prolactin-increasing antipsychotics for 1-4 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.41), and for ≥ 5 years (aOR = 1.47, 95%CI = 1.26-1.71). There were no increased or decreased odds of breast cancer with exposure to prolactin-sparing antipsychotics of either 1-4 years (aOR = 1.17, 95%CI = 0.98-1.40) or ≥5 years (aOR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.78-1.26). The results were consistent across all sensitivity analyses (ie, according to different age groups, cancer types, and primary psychiatric diagnosis).

CONCLUSIONS

Although causality remains uncertain, exposure to prolactin-elevating antipsychotics for ≥ 1 year was associated with increased odds of breast cancer in women with severe mental illness. When prescribing antipsychotics, a shared decision-making process should consider individual risk factors for breast cancer.

Making Sense of Recovery From First Psychosis With Antipsychotic Medication: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Recovering from a first psychosis is a highly individual process and requires the person to make sense of their experiences. Clinicians, in turn, need to comprehend these first-person perspectives, creating a mutual sense-making dynamic. Antipsychotic medication is a substantial part of psychosis treatment. Providing insight in the lived experience of recovery with antipsychotics could improve the mutual understanding and help bridge the gap between the perspective of the clinician and that of the person recovering from psychosis.

STUDY DESIGN

14 persons in recovery from a first psychosis with the use of antipsychotics were interviewed. Their narratives were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).

STUDY RESULTS

Five overarching themes were found, representing important and meaningful experiences in recovering with antipsychotic medication. Theme 1: antipsychotics as external dampening (4 subthemes); Theme 2: shifting of realities; Theme 3: pace of recovery; Theme 4: antipsychotics' influence on identity; and Theme 5: is it truly the antipsychotics?

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that recovery from psychosis with antipsychotics is an all-encompassing, multi-faceted, and ambivalent experience. The themes found in this research could inspire clinicians to discuss less obvious aspects of the experience of recovering with antipsychotics. Even more so, paying attention to the first-person perspective could lead to a more thorough understanding and benefit therapeutic relationships.

The association between benzodiazepine prescriptions and the risk of laxative use in schizophrenia treatment

AIM

Constipation is one of the most common adverse effects in schizophrenia treatment, and it can sometimes cause severe gastrointestinal disease. However, the results of association studies between constipation and psychotropic medications in patients with schizophrenia are inconsistent. Therefore, we investigated the characteristics of psychotropic and laxative prescriptions at discharge in patients with schizophrenia to clarify the association between psychotropics and constipation.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 139 patients with schizophrenia with or without laxative prescriptions at discharge from eight institutions in 2020.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were prescribed laxatives at discharge. The prescription of benzodiazepines in the laxative use group (66.1%) was significantly higher than that in the non-laxative use group (39.0%) (p = 1.4 × 10-3), and the mean number of benzodiazepines in the laxative use group (1.2 ± 1.1/day) was significantly higher than that in the non-laxative use group (0.7 ± 0.9/day) (p = 2.6 × 10-3). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that benzodiazepine prescriptions were significantly associated with laxative usage (odds ratio, 3.059; 95% confidence interval, 1.523-6.144; p = 2.0 × 10-3).

CONCLUSION

Benzodiazepines may be associated with constipation in patients with schizophrenia. Therefore, clinicians should be cautious when prescribing benzodiazepines for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Treatment satisfaction and effectiveness of Lurasidone on quality of life and functioning in adult patients with schizophrenia in the real-world Italian clinical practice: a prospective 3-month observational study

BACKGROUND

Although second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have proven to be effective therapeutic options for patients with schizophrenia, there is a notable lack of evidence on patients' subjective perspectives regarding their well-being, quality of life, and satisfaction with these medications. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment satisfaction and effectiveness of lurasidone on quality of life and functioning in adult patients with schizophrenia in real-world Italian clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, national, non-interventional, single-arm, 3-month prospective study. Patients who were naive to lurasidone treatment and whose treating physician had decided to start them on this medication were enrolled and evaluated over a 3-month period. Eligible patients were adults (≥ 18 years of age) with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia who were being treated with lurasidone (for the first time [i.e., they were lurasidone naive]) as part of routine clinical practice. Efficacy endpoints were changes in patient/caregiver treatment satisfaction (seven-point Likert scale from the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication), patient quality of life and functioning (QLS), investigator-rated global assessment of functioning (CGI-S, IAQ) after 6 weeks and 3 months of lurasidone, and number of relapses and hospitalizations.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were enrolled and 59 completed the study. The median dosage of lurasidone at baseline was 37.00 mg/day. The median duration of titration was 86.0 days (Min 28; Max 115 days); the median number of dosage changes was 1.0. At the end of 3-month observation period, the median dose of lurasidone was 74.00 mg/day. QoL and Functioning Score showed a trend of improvement over time, reaching a mean change from baseline of 9.8 at the end of the study. According to the CGI-S, the percentage of patients who were "markedly or severely ill" showed a continuous decrease from baseline to 3 months, from 62.29% to 8.20%. Patient satisfaction increased over time, with 80.32% of patients reporting that they were somewhat, fairly, or very satisfied (including 63.93% who were completely or very satisfied) at the end of the study. No relapses/hospitalizations for psychiatric reasons were reported. Lurasidone was well tolerated with no safety concerns or discontinuations due to AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Lurasidone represents a valid option for the treatment of schizophrenia and positively affects subjective well-being, quality of life and satisfaction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06527885 retrospectively registered (01/08/2024).

Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Aripiprazole Addition to Clozapine in Patients with Clozapine-Resistant Symptoms (EMECLO): A Protocol of a Single-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized-Controlled Feasibility Trial

BACKGROUND

Currently, guidance on the most effective treatment for patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSD) is lacking. While augmentation strategies to clozapine with aripiprazole and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) have been demonstrated to be effective in patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorders (CRS), head-to-head comparisons between these addition strategies are unavailable. We therefore aim to examine the feasibility of a larger randomized, single-blind trial comparing the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety of aripiprazole addition vs. ECT addition in CRS.

METHODS

In this multi-center, randomized, single-blind feasibility study, the feasibility of recruiting 20 participants with CRS who will be randomized to either aripiprazole or bilateral ECT addition will be assessed. The main endpoint is the number of patients willing to be randomized. The number of screened individuals and reasons to decline participation will be recorded. Effects will be estimated for the benefit of the foreseen larger trial. To that end, differences between both arms in symptom severity will be assessed using blinded video assessments. In addition, tolerability (e. g., cognitive functioning), safety, quality of life, recovery, and all-cause discontinuation will be compared. The follow-up period is 16 weeks, after which non-responders will be given the option to switch to the other treatment.

DISCUSSION

Strengths of this feasibility trial include maintaining blinding with video assessment, a possibility to switch groups in case of non-response, and a broad set of outcome measures. Identification of factors contributing to non-participation and drop-out will generate valuable information on trial feasibility and may enhance recruitment strategies in a follow-up RCT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, and was registered on 1 May 2022 in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) under the trial name 'EMECLO' (2021-006333-19).

State of the Science: The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP)

The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is a dimensional framework for psychopathology advanced by a consortium of nosologists. In the HiTOP system, psychopathology is grouped hierarchically from super-spectra, spectra, and subfactors at the upper levels to homogeneous symptom components and maladaptive traits and their constituent symptoms, and maladaptive behaviors at the lower levels. HiTOP has the potential to improve clinical outcomes by planning treatment based on symptom severity rather than heterogeneous diagnoses, targeting treatment across different levels of the hierarchy, and assessing distress and impairment separately from the observed symptom profile. Assessments can be performed according to this framework with the recently developed HiTOP-Self-Report (HiTOP-SR). Examples of how to use HiTOP in clinical practice are provided for the internalizing spectrum, including the use of the Unified Protocol and other modularized treatments, measurement-based care, psychopharmacology, and in traditionally underserved populations. Future directions are discussed in this State of the Science review including HiTOP's use in further developing transdiagnostic treatments, extending the model to include other information such as environmental factors, establishing the treatment utility of clinical assessment for the HiTOP-SR, developing new treatments, and disseminating the model.

Neuroimaging for precision medicine in psychiatry

Although the lifetime burden due to mental disorders is increasing, we lack tools for more precise diagnosing and treating prevalent and disabling disorders such as major depressive disorder. We lack strategies for selecting among available treatments or expediting access to new treatment options. This critical review concentrates on functional neuroimaging as a modality of measurement for precision psychiatry, focusing on major depressive and anxiety disorders. We begin by outlining evidence for the use of functional neuroimaging to stratify the heterogeneity of these disorders, based on underlying circuit dysfunction. We then review the current landscape of how functional neuroimaging-derived circuit predictors can predict treatment outcomes and clinical trajectories in depression and anxiety. Future directions for advancing clinically appliable neuroimaging measures are considered. We conclude by considering the opportunities and challenges of translating neuroimaging measures into practice. As an illustration, we highlight one approach for quantifying brain circuit function at an individual level, which could serve as a model for clinical translation.

The economic burden of schizophrenia spectrum disorders: clinical and functional correlates and predictors of direct costs. A retrospective longitudinal study

The economic burden of schizophrenia amounts for 1.5-3 % of healthcare expenses in developed countries, and ∼50 % derives from direct costs: 81 % of these are due to hospitalization, residential facilities and semi-residential facilities. Therefore, a better characterization of variables that influence direct costs represents a relevant issue. A total of 276 individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders receiving treatment from the Community Mental Health Centers of Brescia (Italy) were included in the study: for each participant socio-demographic, clinical and functional characteristics were assessed, and data related to the use of services in 2022 (then converted to costs) were collected. Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of costs. A direct healthcare expenditure of 16477.23 (±32856.47) € per patient per year was identified. The main cost predictor was the PSP total score (p=0.005), followed by age of onset (p=0.020), and PANSS total score (p=0.033). Including PANSS sub-scales scores and PSP single items as potential predictors, the main predictor was the "socially useful activities" PSP item (p=0.002), followed by age of onset (p=0.011), and PANSS negative scale score (p=0.027). Our findings underline the need to implement rehabilitative intervention focused on the improvement of psychosocial functioning and negative symptoms, also to reduce healthcare expenses.

Antipsychotic prescribing practices and their association with rehospitalization in a forensic psychiatric sample

While there is extensive literature examining the effectiveness of antipsychotic prescribing to patients with schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorders in general psychiatric services, there is a dearth of studies examining antipsychotic prescribing practices and their effectiveness in forensic psychiatric services. Forensic psychiatric patients have unique challenges often due to their high-profile offences, public scrutiny, and legal requirements. This longitudinal, retrospective study aimed to examine antipsychotic prescribing and rehospitalization rates in a forensic psychiatric sample, along with relevant socio-demographic, clinical, and forensic characteristics. All patients had a psychotic illness and were prescribed antipsychotic medication. The sample included 153 patients, of which the majority were male (85.6%), Caucasian (71.2%), middle aged (30s to 50s), had schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (76.5%), had a substance use disorder (62.1%), and had a most serious index offence against the person (80.4%). Atypical antipsychotics accounted for the majority of antipsychotic prescriptions (75.9%) and the sample had an antipsychotic polypharmacy rate of 39.9%. The sample was divided into four primary antipsychotic formulation types, which were oral (34.0%), injection (39.2%), clozapine (19.0%), and subtherapeutic (7.8%). Regarding rehospitalization, 52.9% of the sample was rehospitalized, with the average number of rehospitalizations being 1.2 (SD = 1.7) and proportion of the follow up period rehospitalized being 16.4% (SD = 27.7%). Patients prescribed clozapine had numerically lower rates of rehospitalization than those prescribed oral and injection formulation types, but it was not statistically significant. With a 19.0% prescription rate, clozapine may be underutilized in this sample. Further research is needed to demonstrate the potential benefits of clozapine regarding rehospitalization in forensic psychiatric patients, as has already been done in general psychiatry. Advancing treatment of the high-profile forensic population can reduce stigma toward people with mental illness and criminal justice involvement.

Clinical, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization Outcomes of Switching the Administration Route of Antipsychotic Medications Among People With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Using long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications can improve the outcomes of patients with schizophrenia, such as reducing symptom severity and hospitalization risk. However, the outcomes of switching from oral to LAI antipsychotic medications are unclear.

AIMS

The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the clinical, quality of life, and health care utilization outcomes of switching from oral to LAI antipsychotics among patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder.

METHODS

We thoroughly searched the PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases. To conduct the meta-analysis, we used the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Program.

RESULTS

Forty-one articles met our inclusion criteria. After switching to LAIs, symptom severity, the number of rehospitalizations, emergency department visits, and overall health care costs were reduced. Also, social functioning significantly improved. However, no differences were observed in the frequency of outpatient visits. Pharmacy costs were increased between pre- and post-LAI initiation.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support evidence that changing the route of administration of antipsychotic medications from oral to long-acting intramuscular injections can improve the clinical, quality of life, and health care utilization outcomes in people with schizophrenia. Health care practitioners might consider encouraging LAI use earlier during treatment for schizophrenia for better clinical outcomes and to reduce health care utilization associated with treatment.

Introducing S.C.O.P.E.™ (Schizophrenia Clinical Outcome Scenarios and Patient-Provider Engagement), an Interactive Digital Platform to Educate Healthcare Professionals on Schizophrenia Care

Despite evidence of benefits beyond those of oral antipsychotics, long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are underused in schizophrenia treatment. Underuse may be partially a result of misconceptions held by some healthcare professionals (HCPs) pertaining to LAIs. A panel of four experts convened between January 2022 and May 2022 to identify these misconceptions, and example cases or scenarios were created to illustrate common clinical situations relevant to these beliefs. Ultimately, an online platform and heuristic tool, Schizophrenia Clinical Outcome Scenarios and Patient-Provider Engagement (S.C.O.P.E.™), was developed to help prescribing clinicians and other HCPs better understand common clinical dilemmas, as well as the place for LAIs in schizophrenia treatment. Three main misconceptions related to the use of LAIs to treat schizophrenia were identified and included "physicians/providers know when patients are nonadherent", "patients do not accept/want LAI treatment", and "LAIs are only appropriate for patients who have demonstrated nonadherence". All misconceptions are refuted by current evidence and were used to develop clinical scenarios with questions to consider when patients present to various sites of care for treatment. These cases are presented on the S.C.O.P.E. educational platform. The platform also includes videos designed to help non-prescribing HCPs and mental health professionals address patient/caregiver concerns and to communicate LAI benefits. In addition, S.C.O.P.E. provides a section with information about each LAI that is currently FDA approved in the United States for the treatment of schizophrenia, to help familiarize HCPs with characteristics of LAIs. S.C.O.P.E. is an educational tool designed for HCPs to help improve their understanding of how to manage common clinical dilemmas in the treatment of people with schizophrenia, to clarify the role of LAIs in medication management, and to increase understanding of the characteristics of available LAIs. S.C.O.P.E. also aims to improve care in schizophrenia by facilitating increased awareness to patients and caregivers.

The Practical and Social Functioning (PSF) scale: development and measurement properties of an instrument for assessing activity and social participation among people with serious mental illness

BACKGROUND

Participation in society and the ability to perform various activities are crucial aspects of everyday functioning. The intertwined relationship between functioning, disability, and health is emphasized in the "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)" framework. In recent decades, mental health care units have increasingly focused on this aspect. The Practical and Social Functioning scale (PSF) was developed and validated in Norwegian as an easy-to-administer instrument to assess practical and social functioning among patients with serious mental illness in different clinical settings.

METHODS

The PSF was developed and revised using data from different Norwegian studies. Data from a total of 562 patients with serious mental illness in different clinical settings were included. The validation process included the evaluation of items into categories by 25 professionals. Development and revision took place in three different stages, and factor analyses were conducted. The quality of the PSF was assessed according to the COSMIN standards for systematic reviews on patient-reported outcome measures.

RESULTS

The final version of the PSF comprises seven subscales, each consisting of four items, resulting in a total of 28 items. These subscales, along with their corresponding items, are loaded onto two factors representing the main dimensions of functioning: activity and participation. Content validity comprises three domains: relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility. Relevance and comprehensibility were found to be adequate, whereas comprehensiveness was doubtful. Structural validity was adequate, internal consistency was very good, and construct validity was adequate compared to the Global Assessment of Functioning scale. Responsiveness was found to be doubtful in our study with data from an 18-month observation period. Nearly 60% of the items showed a ceiling effect. No items showed a floor effect.

CONCLUSION

The development and validation of the Norwegian version of the PSF resulted in an instrument consisting of seven subscales and a total of 28 items. The items and subscales assess functioning related to two key factors according to the ICF framework: activity and participation. Our results show that the PSF is an easy-to-administer instrument that may be particularly sensitive for detecting variation among persons with severely impaired functioning.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study Implementation of Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychoses was registered retrospectively on 31 August 2017 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03271242).

Multi-level barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based antipsychotics in the treatment of early-phase schizophrenia

Introduction

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications and clozapine are effective yet underutilized medical therapies in early intervention services. The purpose of this study was to conduct a pre-implementation evaluation of contextual determinants of early intervention programs to implement innovations optimizing LAI antipsychotic and clozapine use within a shared decision-making model.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews explored barriers and facilitators to implementing LAI antipsychotics and clozapine in early intervention services. Participants were: prescribers (n = 2), non-prescribing clinicians (n = 5), administrators (n = 3), clients (n = 3), and caregivers (n = 3). Interviews were structured and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0).

Results

Participants were supportive of using LAI antipsychotics, despite barriers (e.g., transportation, insurance coverage), while most were unfamiliar with clozapine (Innovation). Critical incidents (e.g., COVID-19) did not interfere with implementation, while barriers included lack of performance measures; stigma affecting willingness to take medication; and clozapine considered to be a "last resort" (Outer Setting). Treatment culture was described as client-centered and collaborative, and most participants indicated LAI antipsychotic use was compatible with clinic workflows, but some were in need of resources (e.g., individuals trained to administer LAI antipsychotics; Inner Setting). Participants on the healthcare team expressed confidence in their roles. Family education and collaborative decision-making were recommended to improve client/family engagement (Individuals). Participants related the importance of tracking medication compliance, addressing client concerns, and providing prescribers with updated guidelines on evidence-based treatment (Implementation Process).

Discussion

Results may guide implementation strategy selection for future programs seeking to optimize the use of LAI antipsychotics and clozapine for early-phase schizophrenia, when appropriate.

Changes in Antipsychotic Medication Adherence Among Medicaid Beneficiaries with Schizophrenia During COVID-19

To identify patterns of medication adherence during the pandemic and factors associated with these patterns among Medicaid-enrolled individuals with schizophrenia who had highly adherent medication use prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. We used Medicaid claims from Philadelphia to identify individuals with schizophrenia ≥ 18 years of age, their demographic characteristics, and health service use. We used group trajectory models to identify adherence trends, and ANOVA to examine associations between adherence groups and demographic characteristics and service use. The sample included 1,622 individuals. A 4-group trajectory model best fit our data. Seventy percent of individuals averaged about 92% adherence throughout the study period; 10% experienced a pronounced decline when the pandemic started (pandemic non-adherers); 11% experienced a sharp decline mid-pandemic (late non-adherers); and 9% experienced a sharp decline at the beginning of the pandemic and returned to higher adherence after a year (disrupted adherers). Adherers were least likely to be diagnosed with a substance use disorder, and had more telehealth visits, mental health outpatient visits, and fewer emergency department visits on average. Late non-adherers were more likely than adherers to have substance use disorders and physical health conditions. Pandemic non-adherers had more co-occurring psychiatric disorders than adherers and had the lowest use of case management. Three in ten previously adherent individuals with schizophrenia became less adherent to antipsychotic medications, either at the onset or later in the pandemic. Our findings point to telehealth and case management as critical strategies for treatment engagement, especially during public health crises, and well as the need to address co-occurring conditions.

Relapse Following Electroconvulsive Therapy for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding schizophrenia relapse following acute electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is sparse compared with that for depression, and we have no clear consensus on relapse proportions. We aimed to provide longitudinal information on schizophrenia relapse following acute ECT.

STUDY DESIGN

This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on post-acute ECT relapse and rehospitalization for schizophrenia and related disorders. For the primary outcome, we calculated the post-acute ECT pooled relapse estimates at each timepoint (3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-acute ECT) using a random effects model. For subgroup analyses, we investigated post-acute ECT relapse proportions by the type of maintenance therapy.

STUDY RESULTS

Among a total of 6413 records, 29 studies (3876 patients) met our inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was consistently low for all included RCTs (4 studies), although it ranged from low to high for observational studies (25 studies). Pooled estimates of relapse proportions among patients with schizophrenia responding to acute ECT were 24% (95% CI: 15-35), 37% (27-47), 41% (34-49), and 55% (40-69) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. When continuation/maintenance ECT was added to antipsychotics post-acute ECT, the 6-month relapse proportion was 20% (11-32).

CONCLUSION

Relapse occurred mostly within 6 months post-acute ECT for schizophrenia, particularly within the first 3 months. Relapse proportions plateaued after 6 months, although more than half of all patients could be expected to relapse within 2 years. Further high-quality research is needed to optimise post-acute ECT treatment strategies in patients with schizophrenia.

Risperidone ISM®: review and update of its usefulness in all phases of schizophrenia

One of the most important challenges in the management of patients with schizophrenia is to ensure adherence to antipsychotic treatment. The contribution of long-acting injectables (LAI) is undeniable in this matter, but there are still some unmet medical needs not covered by these drugs (e.g. quick onset of action for patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia). This article summarises the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of Risperidone ISM (in situ microparticles). The aim of this review is to provide information about the potential uses of this new LAI formulation of risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia, contextualising and diving into the published evidence. Risperidone ISM shows a rapid release which allows achieving within 12 h risperidone active moiety levels similar to those observed in the steady-state for oral risperidone treatment, achieving a mean average concentration of 38.63 ng/mL. The plasma concentration of active moiety achieved by Risperidone ISM comes with a predictable dopamine D2 receptor occupancy above 65% throughout the 28-day dosing period, which is accepted as a threshold for the efficacy of the antipsychotic treatment. This can be associated with the positive efficacy findings throughout its clinical development. In the short term, it provides an early and progressive reduction of symptoms in adult patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia without the need for loading doses or oral risperidone supplementation, which could contribute to reinforcing the therapeutic alliance between the patient and the psychiatrist. In addition, long-term treatment was effective, safe and well tolerated regardless of the initial disease severity or whether patients were previously treated with Risperidone ISM during an acute exacerbation or switched from stable doses of oral risperidone. Improvement and maintenance of personal and social functioning and health-related quality of life were observed in each setting, respectively. All these findings endorse Risperidone ISM as a useful and valuable treatment for the acute and maintenance management of patients with schizophrenia.

Real-world healthcare resource utilization, costs, and predictors of relapse among US patients with incident schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder present burdens to patients and health systems through elevated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. However, there is a paucity of evidence describing these burdens across payor types. To identify unmet needs, this study characterized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder by payor type. We identified patients aged 12-94 years with newly diagnosed schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (index date) between 01/01/2014 and 08/31/2020 with continuous enrollment for 12 months before and after index date from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database. After stratifying by post-index relapse frequency (0, 1, or ≥2) and payor type (commercial, Medicare Advantage/Supplemental (Medigap)/Part D, or managed Medicaid), we examined patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, costs, and relapse patterns and predictors. During follow-up, 25% of commercial patients, 29% of Medicare patients, and 37% of Medicaid patients experienced relapse. Atypical antipsychotic discontinuation was most common among Medicaid patients, with 65% of these patients discontinuing during follow-up. Compared to commercial patients, Medicare and Medicaid patients had approximately half as many psychotherapy visits during follow-up (12 vs. 5 vs. 7 visits, respectively). Relative to baseline, average unadjusted all-cause costs during follow-up increased by 105% for commercial patients, 66% for Medicare patients, and 77% for Medicaid patients. Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder had high HCRU and costs but consistently low psychotherapy utilization, and they often discontinued pharmacologic therapy and experienced relapse. These findings illustrate the high burden and unmet need for managing these conditions and opportunities to improve care for underserved patients.

The relationship between self-reported antipsychotics side effects and depression in Saudi Arabia

Background

The utilization rate of antipsychotics to treat different mental disorders is rising. However, little is known about their side effects' impact on depression levels. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the association between antipsychotic side effects and depression among psychiatric patients treated with antipsychotics.

Methods

This is a prospective, single-center, interview-based, cross-sectional study that examined the association between antipsychotic side effects and depression among adult patients (e.g., ≥18 yrs.) with psychiatric illnesses (e.g., depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder) visiting outpatient clinics in a university-affiliated tertiary care center. Antipsychotic side effects were assessed using the Arabic version of the Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-effect Scale (GASS), while depression was assessed using the Arabic version of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Univariate and multiple linear regressions were conducted to examine the association between the PHQ-9 and GASS scores.

Results

One hundred patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate. Most of the patients were females (72 %) with a mean age of 38 years. Schizophrenia (37 %) and bipolar disorder (54 %) were the most common mental disorders among the recruited patients. The majority of patients were treated with atypical (e.g., second-generation) antipsychotics (88 %) for at least six months (74 %). Controlling for age, gender, annual family income, education, employment status, marital status, number of comorbidities, duration of treatment with antipsychotics, the type of antipsychotic, and psychiatric illness, higher GASS scores, which indicate more severe antipsychotic side effects, predicted higher PHQ-9 score (e.g., higher levels of depression) (β = 0.419, 95 % CI=[0.307-0.532], p-value < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Early identification and management of antipsychotic side effects among psychiatric patients should enhance patient adherence and improve treatment outcomes. Future studies should verify the findings of this study using more robust study designs.

Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Quality of Care Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to update and expand the evidence on the quality of health care and disparities in care among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Adult beneficiaries of New York State Medicaid with schizophrenia receiving care during 2016-2019 were identified. Composite quality scores were derived from item response theory models by using evidence-based indicators of the quality of mental and general medical health care. Risk-adjusted racial-ethnic differences in quality were estimated and summarized as percentiles relative to White beneficiaries' mean quality scores.

RESULTS

The study included 71,013 beneficiaries; 42.8% were Black, 22.9% Latinx, 27.4% White, and 6.9% other race-ethnicity. Overall, 68.8% had a mental health follow-up within 30 days of discharge, and 90.2% had no preventable hospitalizations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Among beneficiaries receiving antipsychotic medications, medication adherence was adequate for 43.7%. Fourteen indicators for mental and general medical health care quality yielded three composites: two for mental health care (pharmacological and ambulatory) and one for acute mental and general medical health care. Mean quality of pharmacological mental health care for Black and Latinx beneficiaries was lower than for White beneficiaries (39th and 44th percentile, respectively). For Black beneficiaries, mean quality of ambulatory mental health care was also lower (46th percentile). In New York City, Black beneficiaries received lower-quality care in all domains. The only meaningful group difference in the quality of acute mental and general medical health care indicated higher-quality care for individuals with other race-ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in the quality of Medicaid-financed health care persist, particularly for Black beneficiaries. Regional differences merit further attention.

Risk factors, prevention and treatment of weight gain associated with the use of antidepressants and antipsychotics: a state-of-the-art clinical review

INTRODUCTION

People with severe mental illness have poor cardiometabolic health. Commonly used antidepressants and antipsychotics frequently lead to weight gain, which may further contribute to adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

We searched MEDLINE up to April 2023 for umbrella reviews, (network-)meta-analyses, trials and cohort studies on risk factors, prevention and treatment strategies of weight gain associated with antidepressants/antipsychotics. We developed 10 clinical recommendations.

EXPERT OPINION

To prevent, manage, and treat antidepressant/antipsychotic-related weight gain, we recommend i) assessing risk factors for obesity before treatment, ii) monitoring metabolic health at baseline and regularly during follow-up, iii) offering lifestyle interventions including regular exercise and healthy diet based on patient preference to optimize motivation, iv) considering first-line psychotherapy for mild-moderate depression and anxiety disorders, v)choosing medications based on medications' and patient's weight gain risk, vi) choosing medications based on acute vs long-term treatment, vii) using effective, tolerated medications, viii) switching to less weight-inducing antipsychotics/antidepressants where possible, ix) using early weight gain as a predictor of further weight gain to inform the timing of intervention/switch options, and x) considering adding metformin or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, or topiramate(second-line due to potential adverse cognitive effects) to antipsychotics, or aripiprazole to clozapine or olanzapine.

A Cluster Randomized Trial: Mixed Methods Comparison of 2 Approaches to Promote Nonpharmacologic, Resident-Centered Dementia Care in Nursing Homes

OBJECTIVES

Nursing home dementia care initiatives have prioritized nonpharmacologic approaches to manage behavioral symptoms. This study compares the effectiveness of 2 nonpharmacologic approaches on resident outcomes.

DESIGN AND INTERVENTION

Cluster randomized controlled trial using a convergent mixed methods design to compare the team-based and problem-based approaches to dementia care. The team-based arm received facility-wide training, providing a shared language and knowledge across staff. The problem-based arm received discipline-specific web-based training for certain staff.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Residents living with dementia (n = 2728) in 53 nursing homes; 327 staff.

METHODS

Outcomes were antipsychotic medication use, behavioral symptoms, rejection of care, and wandering captured with the Minimum Data Set. Exploratory quantitative analysis compared change in outcomes between baseline and 6-month follow-up, across arms using a difference-in-difference model. Qualitative data were collected via staff interviews. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data determined whether these sources provided confirmatory, emergent, or contradictory information on outcomes.

RESULTS

Resident wandering increased 3.51 percentage points (95% CI 0.6, 6.4) in the team-based arm compared to the problem-based arm, without increase in adverse events. Data integration confirmed this finding. Staff in the team-based arm described wandering as a positive coping strategy for the resident. We found mixed results for the other 3 outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference in antipsychotic medication use across arms, but staff interviews did reveal differences. There were trends of increased behavioral symptoms in the team-based arm and increased rejection of care in the problem-based arm (neither statistically significant), which were confirmed by qualitative findings.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Integration results suggest a benefit for resident wandering in the team-based approach, compared with the problem-based approach. Although findings are exploratory, training for all nursing home staff that accounts for diverse education and training needs may influence care delivery and have benefits for residents living with dementia.

Conceptualization and characterization of "primary" and "secondary" cognitive impairment in schizophrenia

Cognitive impairment represents one of the core features of schizophrenia, involves both neurocognition and social cognition domains, and has a significant negative impact on real-world functioning. The present review provides a framework for the conceptualization and characterization of "primary" and "secondary" cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. In this conceptualization, primary cognitive impairment can be defined as a consequence of the neurobiological alterations that underlie psychopathological manifestations of the disorder, while secondary cognitive impairment can be defined as the results of a source issue that has a negative impact on cognitive performance. Sources of secondary cognitive impairment are frequent in people with schizophrenia and include several different factors, such as positive and negative symptoms, depressive symptoms, autistic symptoms, pharmacotherapy, substance abuse, metabolic syndrome, social deprivation, and sleep disorders. It can be hypothesized that secondary cognitive impairment may be improved by effectively resolving the source issue, while primary cognitive impairment may benefit from dedicated treatment. Further research is required to confirm this hypothesis, to better characterize the distinction between primary and secondary cognitive impairment in a clinical and in a neurobiological perspective, and to evaluate the impact of systematically assessing and treating secondary cognitive impairment.

Brain Circuit-Derived Biotypes for Treatment Selection in Mood Disorders: A Critical Review and Illustration of a Functional Neuroimaging Tool for Clinical Translation

Although the lifetime burden due to major depressive disorder is increasing, we lack tools for selecting the most effective treatments for each patient. One-third to one-half of patients with major depressive disorder do not respond to treatment, and we lack strategies for selecting among available treatments or expediting access to new treatment options. This critical review concentrates on functional neuroimaging as a modality of measurement for precision psychiatry. We begin by summarizing the current landscape of how functional neuroimaging-derived circuit predictors can forecast treatment outcomes in depression. Then, we outline the opportunities and challenges in integrating circuit predictors into clinical practice. We highlight one standardized and reproducible approach for quantifying brain circuit function at an individual level, which could serve as a model for clinical translation. We conclude by evaluating the prospects and practicality of employing neuroimaging tools, such as the one that we propose, in routine clinical practice.

Second Opinions for Diagnoses of Psychotic Disorders: Delivering Stage-Specific Recommendations

OBJECTIVE

The impact of obtaining second-opinion consultations on diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorders was evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted for 177 patients referred to a psychosis consultation service at an academic medical center from January 1, 2017, to October 1, 2023; these consultations aimed to clarify a diagnosis of psychosis. Diagnoses made before and after consultations were compared, and treatment recommendations resulting from the consultation visit were summarized.

RESULTS

Among patients without a preconsultation diagnosis of schizophrenia, 28% (N=28 of 100) received a postconsultation diagnosis of schizophrenia. Among 62 patients with a postconsultation diagnosis of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), 56% (N=35) received this diagnosis only after consultation. Nearly all of these patients were advised to begin taking clozapine, and electroconvulsive therapy was less commonly recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert consultation facilitates timely identification and optimal treatment of schizophrenia and its more severe subtype, TRS.

Efficacy and safety of different pharmacological interventions in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to indirectly compare and rank the different drugs that have been studied in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in patients with tardive dyskinesia (TD) in terms of their efficacy in ameliorating the symptoms of TD and safety.

DESIGN

A network meta-analysis and a systematic review were registered prospectively on PROSPERO under the ID: CRD42023407823 and were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-NMA guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Sciences, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched to identify relevant records.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Any parallel randomized blinded controlled clinical trials that studied the use of any medications in treating TD and assessed the symptoms using a functional scale that has been previously validated.

DATA EXTRACTION

The standardized mean difference of improvement along with the reported adverse events for each drug was extracted from each trial, and a network meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

One thousand eight hundred seventeen patients in 33 RCTs were included in the analysis. Twenty-three different drugs were compared to placebo in terms of reduction in TD symptoms. Among these, valbenazine 80 mg (SMD =  - 1.66, 95%CI = [- 2.55; - 0.78]), valbenazine 40 mg (- 1.00, [- 1.89; - 0.11]), and vitamin E (- 0.77, [- 1.45; - 0.1]) significantly reduced TD symptoms in comparison to placebo, while deutetrabenazine 36 mg (- 1.00, [- 2.12; 0.11]) and reserpine (- 0.54, [- 1.09; 0.02]) did not significantly reduce symptoms. Some serious adverse events were reported for valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, which included mainly psychiatric symptoms such as depression, worsening of schizophrenia, and suicidal ideation, while mild adverse events were reported for other drugs, and their incidence in the treatment arms was comparable to those in the placebo arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Valbenazine (80 and 40 mg) and vitamin E demonstrated efficacy in treating tardive dyskinesia. However, the significant side effects of valbenazine should prompt further investigation of alternative treatment modalities.

A network meta-analysis of KarXT and commonly used pharmacological interventions for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Dopaminergic antipsychotics for schizophrenia have modest effects on symptoms and can cause important side effects. KarXT is an investigational drug for schizophrenia with a novel mechanism targeting muscarinic receptors that may limit these side effects.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses of short-term RCTs (3-8 weeks) that enrolled adults with schizophrenia. We compared KarXT to aripiprazole, risperidone, and olanzapine. We sought evidence for symptoms (Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale [PANSS]), weight gain, and all-cause discontinuation.

RESULTS

We included 33 trials with 7193 participants. For total, positive, and negative symptoms, KarXT and the three antipsychotics were significantly more efficacious than placebo (mean difference [MD] vs placebo range for total symptoms: -10.67 to -8.05; positive symptoms: -3.46 to -2.53; negative symptoms: -1.99 to -1.44) but not significantly different from each other. KarXT was ranked as least likely to lead to weight gain. This was significant versus risperidone (-2.06 kg; 95 % CrI: -3.28, -0.87) and olanzapine (-2.86 kg; 95 % CrI: -3.97, -1.82). However, KarXT was ranked highest for all-cause discontinuation. This was significant versus risperidone (RR: 0.64; 95 % CrI: 0.46, 0.89) and olanzapine (RR: 0.6; 95 % CrI: 0.44, 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

KarXT and commonly used antipsychotics were more efficacious than placebo at reducing symptoms, but there were no clear differences in short-term efficacy among the active interventions. KarXT was less likely to cause weight gain, an important outcome for those with schizophrenia; short-term data do not permit evaluation of the risk for tardive dyskinesia. Long-term data are needed.

Definition, assessment and treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia: expert opinion and practical recommendations

A considerable proportion of patients with schizophrenia perform below population norms on standardized neuropsychological tests, and the performance of those performing within normal range is lower than predicted based on parental education. Cognitive impairment predates the onset of psychosis, is observed during symptom remission and in non-affected first-degree relatives of patients. At the present time, cognitive deficits are regarded as key features of schizophrenia, important determinants of poor psychosocial outcome and targets for both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment strategies. A group of eight key opinion leaders reviewed and discussed latest advances in scientific research and current good clinical practices on assessment, management, and treatment of CIAS. In the present paper they summarize the current evidence, identify main gaps between current knowledge and mental health services clinical practice, and provide practical recommendations to reduce the gap.

Dysphagia in schizophrenia: pathological mechanisms and treatment recommendations

Schizophrenia is a chronic, severe, and disabling mental disorder that significantly impacts individuals' lives. Long-term treatment with antipsychotic drugs, coupled with the complications of the disease itself, increases the risk of dysphagia in patients. These disorders further heighten the likelihood of choking and asphyxia death among this population. This project aims to comprehensively review the pathological mechanisms behind dysphagia in schizophrenia, alongside proposing early screening and evaluation methods. It also suggests treatment recommendations to mitigate the risks and complications associated with dysphagia in these patients.

Guideline concordant screening and monitoring of extrapyramidal symptoms in patients prescribed antipsychotic medication: a protocol for a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis

INTRODUCTION

Given the increasing rates of antipsychotic use in multiple psychiatric conditions, greater attention to the assessment, monitoring and documentation of their side effects is warranted. While a significant degree of attention has been provided to metabolic side effect monitoring, comparatively little is known about how clinicians screen for, document and monitor the motor side effects of antipsychotics (ie, parkinsonism, akathisia, dystonia and dyskinesias, collectively 'extrapyramidal side effects', EPS). This review aims to systematically assess the literature for insights into current trends in EPS monitoring practices within various mental health settings globally.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

An electronic search will be performed using the OVID Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and APA PsycINFO databases for studies published in the last quarter century (1998 to present day). Two independent reviewers will conduct the initial title and abstract screenings, using predetermined criteria for inclusion and exclusion. A third reviewer will resolve disagreements if consensus cannot be reached. If selected for inclusion, full-text data extraction will then be conducted using a pilot-tested data extraction form. Quality assessment will be conducted for all included studies using a modified version of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set. A narrative synthesis and summary of the data will be provided. All stages of the review process will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be peer reviewed, published and shared verbally, electronically and in print with interested clinicians and will also be presented as posters or talks at relevant medical conferences and meetings.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023482372.

Detailing Healthcare Claims Data Evidence of Extrapyramidal Symptoms in Medicaid Patients with Schizophrenia after Second-Generation Antipsychotic Medication Initiation

Researchers have used elements of administrative healthcare claims data (e.g., diagnosis codes and medications) to calculate rates of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in patients with schizophrenia who utilize second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). However, a detailed description of claims-based EPS evidence has not been previously provided, which is the objective of the current study. This descriptive study, using 2016-2020 de-identified multi-state Medicaid administrative claims data, followed patients diagnosed with schizophrenia for 12 months after initiation of SGA therapy to identify and describe the first evidence of EPS. Time to EPS evidence was calculated and continuously-eligible patients were followed for an additional 12 months to examine EPS medication utilization and costs. Following SGA initiation, 13.6% (n = 2,288) of patients had evidence of EPS during the 12-month follow-up period. Mean time to first evidence of EPS after SGA initiation was 103.7 days (sd = 112.2, median = 58). For a majority of patients (n = 1,636, 71.5%), an EPS medication claim was the initial evidence of EPS, rather than an EPS diagnostic claim. Additionally, a quarter of patients (25.3%) in the EPS evidence cohort had a claim for an EPS medication on the same date as SGA initiation, possibly indicating prophylactic prescribing to prevent EPS development. Nearly 93% of those with EPS medication claims were treated with benztropine, while less than 2% received deutetrabenazine or valbenazine (indicated for tardive dyskinesia (TD)). Annual per patient EPS medication expenditures were $804 (sd = 7,080) overall, but only $40 (sd = 104) when excluding the higher-cost TD medications. Nearly 14% of Medicaid patients with schizophrenia who initiated SGA treatment had evidence of EPS based on claims data. The majority of the time, this evidence was derived from a prescription claim for a medication to treat EPS, rather than an EPS diagnostic claim. Prophylactic prescribing for EPS occurred more often than expected and should be explored more fully. While the cost of traditional EPS medications minimally contributes to the overall cost of care in schizophrenia, use of newer TD drugs can substantially increase spending.

Treatment patterns and hospitalizations following rejection, reversal, or payment of the initial once-monthly paliperidone palmitate long-acting injectable antipsychotic claim among patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND

Once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) is a long-acting injectable antipsychotic approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder (SCA) in adults.

OBJECTIVE

To assess treatment patterns and schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization following payer rejection, patient reversal, or payment of an initial PP1M claim.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the IQVIA Formulary Impact Analyzer database linked to the Medical Claims, Hospital Charge Detail Master, and Experian consumer databases. Patients with schizophrenia/SCA and ≥1 PP1M pharmacy claim from January 1, 2018, to February 28, 2022, were identified and stratified into 3 cohorts based on the transaction status of the initial PP1M claim (index date): rejected (payer not approved), reversed (payer approved, patient abandoned), and paid (payer approved, patient filled). Patient characteristics during the 12 months before the index date, subsequent treatment patterns, and schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization for patients with >6 months of follow-up were assessed by cohort.

RESULTS

The rejected, reversed, and paid cohorts included 1,260, 1,046, and 1,686 patients, respectively. Across these cohorts, the mean ages ranged between 39.2 and 44.5 years; more than half were male (50.8%-51.6%) and White (50.6%-58.3%); 19.8%-24.6% of patients had a Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index score of ≥2. Rates of prior atypical oral and long-acting injectable antipsychotic use ranged between 76.4%-80.3% and 7.8%-12.7%, respectively. Among patients with ≥6 months of follow-up, 52.2% in the rejected and 53.1% in the reversed cohorts had a subsequent paid PP1M claim during the study period; the median (quartile 1-quartile 3) time to the first paid PP1M claim was 22 (5-74) days for rejection and 11 (1-41) days for reversal. In the rejected and reversed cohorts, 10.2% (n = 111) and 9.8% (n = 90) of patients, respectively, did not receive any paid claim for an antipsychotic after the initial PP1M rejection/reversal. The prevalence of schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization during follow-up was similar between patients with a paid (7.4%) and rejected PP1M claim (7.0%; P = 0.689) but higher among patients with a reversed claim (10.8%; P = 0.004). After adjusting for confounders, patients in the reversed cohort were 39% more likely to have a schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalization than those in the paid cohort (odds ratio = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.03-1.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Payer rejection and patient reversal of initial PP1M claims is a form of primary nonadherence and may influence patient trajectory. Data from this study suggest that patient reversal of PP1M may lead to an increased risk of schizophrenia/SCA-related hospitalizations, potentially caused by missed or delayed treatment. Policy initiatives that remove barriers to primary adherence or fulfillment may help improve patients' clinical outcomes.

Constipation-associated factors in outpatients with schizophrenia: A multicenter questionnaire survey

Constipation is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder that affects people globally, decreasing their quality of life and life expectancy. Individuals with schizophrenia often suffer from constipation, which could be a result of the illness itself or the side effects of psychotropic medications. However, little research has been conducted on factors contributing to constipation in individuals with schizophrenia. To address this issue, we conducted a survey using self-administered questionnaires and medical records to identify factors associated with constipation in psychiatric outpatients. This study included 399 patients with schizophrenia, resulting in a high prevalence of constipation (43.4%). The analysis suggested that female gender, the doses of antiparkinsonian medications, and benzodiazepine sleeping pills may be associated with constipation.

An Updated Safety Review of the Relationship Between Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs, the QTc Interval and Torsades de Pointe As: Implications for Clinical Use

INTRODUCTION

The rising prevalence of psychiatric disorders has resulted in a significant increase in the use of antipsychotic medications. These agents may prolong the corrected QT interval (QTc), running the risk of precipitating ventricular arrhythmias, notably Torsades de Pointes (TdP). Current recommendations vary regarding the optimal approach to safe prescribing practices and QTc surveillance for antipsychotics. This review summarizes the current literature addressing these clinical concerns.

AREAS COVERED

The physiologic basis of the QTc interval, mechanisms underlying its susceptibility to pharmacological influence, specific risks associated with atypical antipsychotic agents, and recommendations for safe prescription practices. We performed a literature review using Pubmed and Embase databases, searching for 'antipsychotics' and 'torsades de pointes.'

EXPERT OPINION

Finding a safe and universally accepted protocol for prescribing antipsychotics remains a persistent challenge in medicine. Predictive models that integrate clinical history with demographic and ECG characteristics can help estimate an individual's susceptibility to therapy-associated risks, including QTc prolongation. Agents such as ziprasidone and iloperidone are significantly more likely to prolong the QTc interval compared to others such as brexpiprazole, cariprazine, olanzapine, and clozapine. A personalized approach using low-risk medications when clinically feasible, and at the lowest efficacious dose, offers a promising path toward safer antipsychotic prescribing.

Analysis of risk factors for hospital-acquired pneumonia in schizophrenia

Background

Hospital-acquired pneumonia is one of the most important causes of recurrent illness, disease progression, and even death during hospitalization. Patients with schizophrenia have the special characteristics of their disease, and at the same time, the occurrence of hospital-acquired pneumonia is more common among patients with schizophrenia due to the prolonged stay in closed wards, accompanied by various factors such as age, gender, and nutritional status.

Methods

The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) databases were searched with a timeframe of build to February 2024 to collect studies on factors influencing hospital-acquired pneumonia in patients with schizophrenia. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and analyzed them.

Results

A total of 5 papers including 85246 patients were included in the literature, which suggested that benzodiazepines (especially the use of clozapine), combination of antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT), duration of hospitalization, underlying diseases, hyperglycemia, and salivation/dysphagia were important risk factors for hospital-acquired pneumonia in schizophrenia patients, and that advanced age, smoking and alcohol drinking Older age, smoking and drinking habits, malnutrition, and underlying diseases are also risk factors for hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Conclusions

Patients with schizophrenia are at a higher risk of developing hospital-acquired pneumonia, so identifying the risk factors associated with hospital-acquired pneumonia and evaluating them comprehensively and promptly during hospitalization facilitates the development of early interventions, which are essential for improving the prognosis of patients with schizophrenia.

Real-World Adherence and Discontinuation of Oral Antipsychotics and Associated Factors in a National Sample of US Medicare Beneficiaries with Schizophrenia

Purpose

Little is known about adherence to and discontinuation of newly initiated oral antipsychotics (OAPs) as well as associated factors among Medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia. This study aimed to examine rates of OAP adherence and discontinuation and associated factors in a national sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study used 100% fee-for-service Medicare claims data to identify adult beneficiaries with schizophrenia, initiating a new OAP between 01/01/2017 and 12/31/2019 (index date = date of new OAP prescription). Outcomes included adherence and discontinuation. Factors associated with adherence were assessed using logistic and linear regressions; Cox regressions were used to assess factors associated with discontinuation.

Results

In our final sample of 46,452 Medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia, 35.4% were adherent to their newly initiated OAP (mean [SD] PDC: 0.52 [0.37]) over 12 months after initiation. Most patients (79.4%) discontinued their new OAP (median [IQR] time to discontinuation: 3.6 (1.0, 9.9) months). Factors associated with lower odds of adherence included younger age (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.40-0.47, p <0.001 for patients aged 18-35 relative to patients aged ≥65 years); non-White race (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.69-0.75, p <0.001 relative to White patients); and evidence of prior schizophrenia-related hospitalization (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.77-0.83, p <0.001 relative to patients without evidence of prior schizophrenia-related hospitalization). Similar associations were observed for discontinuation outcomes. Twice-daily dosing frequency was also associated with lower odds of adherence (odds ratio [OR]: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97, p = 0.0014) and higher hazard of discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05, p = 0.0244) relative to once-daily dosing frequency.

Conclusion

We found high rates of non-adherence and discontinuation among Medicare beneficiaries initiated on currently available OAPs. We also identified risk factors that contribute to increased odds of medication non-adherence. By identifying at-risk patient populations, targeted interventions can be initiated to facilitate treatment continuity.

Recommendations for pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice guidelines in the US

PURPOSE

Pharmacogenetic testing can identify patients who may benefit from personalized drug treatment. However, clinical uptake of pharmacogenetic testing has been limited. Clinical practice guidelines recommend biomarker tests that the guideline authors deem to have demonstrated clinical utility, meaning that testing improves treatment outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to describe the current status of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations within clinical practice guidelines in the US.

SUMMARY

Guidelines were reviewed for pharmacogenetic testing recommendations for 21 gene-drug pairs that have well-established drug response associations and all of which are categorized as clinically actionable by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. The degree of consistency within and between organizations in pharmacogenetic testing recommendations was assessed. Relatively few clinical practice guidelines that provide a pharmacogenetic testing recommendation were identified. Testing recommendations for HLA-B*57:01 before initiation of abacavir and G6PD before initiation of rasburicase, both of which are included in drug labeling, were mostly consistent across guidelines. Gene-drug pairs with at least one clinical practice guideline recommending testing or stating that testing could be considered included CYP2C19-clopidogrel, CYP2D6-codeine, CYP2D6-tramadol, CYP2B6-efavirenz, TPMT-thiopurines, and NUDT15-thiopurines. Testing recommendations for the same gene-drug pair were often inconsistent between organizations and sometimes inconsistent between different guidelines from the same organization.

CONCLUSION

A standardized approach to evaluating the evidence of clinical utility for pharmacogenetic testing may increase the inclusion and consistency of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, which could benefit patients and society by increasing clinical use of pharmacogenetic testing.

Treatment of Cognitive Impairment Associated with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: New Evidence, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) represents one of the core features of the disorder and has a significant impact on functional and rehabilitation outcomes of people living with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). The aim of this critical review is to highlight the most recent evidence on effective treatments available for CIAS, to discuss the current challenges in this field, and to present future perspectives that may help to overcome them. Concerning psychopharmacological approaches, among the most indicated strategies for the management and prevention of CIAS is to favor second-generation antipsychotic medications and avoid long-term and high-dose treatments with anticholinergic medications and benzodiazepines. Moreover, non-pharmacological approaches such as cognitive remediation and physical exercise-based programs represent evidence-based interventions in the treatment of CIAS that have shown reliable evidence of effectiveness on both cognitive and functional outcomes. These treatments, however, are still delivered to people accessing mental health services with a diagnosis of CIAS in an uneven manner, even in high-income countries. Academic and clinical partnership and collaboration, as well as advocacy from service users, families, carers, and stakeholders' organizations could help to reduce the bench to bedside gap in the treatment of CIAS. Future perspectives include the development of novel pharmacological agents that could be effective in the treatment of CIAS, the implementation of novel technologies such as telemedicine and virtual reality in the delivery of evidence-based interventions to improve accessibility and engagement, and further research in the field of non-invasive brain stimulation.

Antipsychotic drugs in first-episode psychosis: a target trial emulation in the FEP-CAUSAL Collaboration

Good adherence to antipsychotic therapy helps prevent relapses in first-episode psychosis (FEP). We used data from the FEP-CAUSAL Collaboration, an international consortium of observational cohorts, to emulate a target trial comparing antipsychotics, with treatment discontinuation as the primary outcome. Other outcomes included all-cause hospitalization. We benchmarked our results to estimates from the European First Episode Schizophrenia Trial, a randomized trial conducted in the 2000s. We included 1097 patients with a psychotic disorder and less than 2 years since psychosis onset. Inverse-probability weighting was used to control for confounding. The estimated 12-month risks of discontinuation for aripiprazole, first-generation agents, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, and risperidone were 61.5% (95% CI, 52.5-70.6), 73.5% (95% CI, 60.5-84.9), 76.8% (95% CI, 67.2-85.3), 58.4% (95% CI, 40.4-77.4), 76.5% (95% CI, 62.1-88.5), and 74.4% (95% CI, 67.0-81.2), respectively. Compared with aripiprazole, the 12-month risk differences were -15.3% (95% CI, -30.0 to 0.0) for olanzapine, -12.8% (95% CI, -25.7 to -1.0) for risperidone, and 3.0% (95% CI, -21.5 to 30.8) for paliperidone. The 12-month risks of hospitalization were similar between agents. Our estimates support use of aripiprazole and paliperidone as first-line therapies for FEP. Benchmarking yielded similar results for discontinuation and absolute risks of hospitalization as in the original trial, suggesting that data from the FEP-CAUSAL Collaboration sufficed to remove confounding for these clinical questions. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.

Predictors of psychosocial functioning in people diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders that committed violent offences and in those that did not: Results of the Recoviwel study

Psychosocial functioning represents a core treatment target of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (SSD), and several clinical and cognitive factors contribute to its impairment. However, determinants of psychosocial functioning in people living with SSD that committed violent offences remain to be more thoroughly explored. This study aims to separately assess and compare predictors of psychosocial functioning in people with SSD that did and that did not commit violent offences considering several clinical, cognitive and violence-related parameters. Fifty inmates convicted for violent crimes in a forensic psychiatry setting diagnosed with SSD (OP group) and fifty participants matched for age, gender, education, and diagnosis (Non-OP group) were included in the study. A higher risk of violent relapse as measured by HCR-20 clinical subscale scores (p < 0.002) and greater global clinical severity as measured by CGI-S scores (p = 0.023) emerged as individual predictors of worse psychosocial functioning, as measured by PSP scores, in the OP group. Greater global clinical severity (p < 0.001), worse performance in the processing speed domain as measured by the BACS Symbol Coding (p = 0.002) and TMT-A tests (p = 0.016) and higher levels of non-planning impulsivity as measured by BIS-11 scores (p < 0.001) emerged as individual predictors of worse psychosocial functioning in the Non-OP group. These results confirm that clinical severity impacts psychosocial functioning in all individuals diagnosed with SSD and suggest that while cognitive impairment clearly represents a determinant of worse functional outcomes in most patients, the risk of violent relapse is a specific predictor of worse psychosocial functioning in people with SSD that committed criminal offences.

An overview of the efficacy and safety of brexpiprazole for the treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents

INTRODUCTION

The onset of psychotic symptoms occurs prior to age 19 in 39% of the patients with schizophrenia. There are limited approved treatment options for adolescents with schizophrenia. Brexpiprazole was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents in 2022.

AREAS COVERED

Extrapolation of adult data to youth and use of pharmacologic modeling coupled with open long-term safety data were used by the FDA to approve brexpiprazole for adolescent schizophrenia. They were all reviewed herein.

EXPERT OPINION

D2 receptor partial agonist antipsychotic agents are preferred in the early phase of treatment of psychotic disorders. Approval of brexpiprazole in adolescent schizophrenia provides an additional option. Brexpiprazole was approved by the FDA on the basis of extrapolation of adult data without controlled trials in adolescents. This reduces placebo exposure in young people. Two previous agents (asenapine and ziprasidone) approved for adult schizophrenia failed to separate from placebo in adolescent schizophrenia studies; this partially undermines the process of extrapolation. For brexpiprazole, the paucity of data in adolescents relegates it to a second-line agent. More research on brexpiprazole is needed to delineate its relative role in the management of adolescent schizophrenia.

The effect of second-generation antipsychotics on anxiety/depression in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Despite the high prevalence of anxiety in schizophrenia, no established guideline exists for the management of these symptoms. We aimed to synthesize evidence on the effect of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) on anxiety in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane library to identify randomized controlled trials of SGAs that reporting anxiety measures in schizophrenia. The search was limited to English-language articles published before February 2024. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Among 48 eligible studies, 29 (n = 7712) were included in the meta-analyses comparing SGAs to placebo, haloperidol, or another SGAs for their effect on anxiety/depression. SGAs had a small effect on anxiety/depression versus placebo (SMD = -0.28 (95 % CI [-0.34, -0.21], p < .00001, I2 = 47 %, n = 5576)) associated with efficacy for positive (z = 5.679, p < .001) and negative symptoms (z = 4.490, p < .001). Furthermore, SGAs were superior to haloperidol (SMD = -0.44, 95 % CI [-0.75, -0.13], p = .005, n = 1068) with substantial study-level heterogeneity (I2 = 85 %). Excluding one study of quetiapine in first-episode patients (SMD = -3.05, n = 73), SGAs showed a small effect on anxiety/depression versus haloperidol without heterogeneity (SMD = -0.23, 95 % CI [-0.35, -0.12], p = 01; I2 = %0). Risperidone's effect on anxiety/depression was comparable to olanzapine (SMD = -0.02, 95 % CI [-0.24,0.20], p = .87, I2 = 45 %, n = 753) and amisulpride (SMD = 0.27, 95 % CI [-1.08,0.61], p = .13, I2 = 50 %, n = 315).

CONCLUSION

While SGAs showed a small effect on anxiety/depression, the findings are inconclusive due to scarcity of research on comorbid anxiety in schizophrenia, heterogeneity of anxiety symptoms, and the scales used to measure anxiety. Further studies employing specific anxiety scales are required to explore antipsychotics, considering their receptor affinity and augmentation with serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or benzodiazepines for managing anxiety in schizophrenia.

An overview of the currently available and emerging long-acting formulations of risperidone for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

INTRODUCTION

Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications can help improve treatment adherence in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Despite this, they are underutilized. In 2003, intramuscular risperidone became the first available LAI atypical antipsychotic medication, and since then, a number of competing long-acting risperidone formulations have been brought to market, with additional options under active development. These include intramuscular, subcutaneous, long-acting oral, and implantable formulations.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes currently available and emerging long-acting risperidone formulations, including efficacy and safety data, and practical considerations aimed to help prescribers distinguish one formulation from another.

EXPERT OPINION

There is an expanding number of currently available LAI antipsychotic medications giving patients and providers an opportunity to personalize and individualize care. Rates of adherence to treatment in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are low, and individualizing care can help improve this. The risperidone LAI treatment landscape includes five options approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, with others under clinical development. These options differ in regard to mode of administration, approved indications, available dose strengths, injection intervals, needle size, injection volume, storage, and other variables. Prescribers should be familiar with these differing options to help patients find the best fit for their individual needs.

Schizophrenia and Heart Health: Are Antipsychotics a Friend or Foe?

Schizophrenia is one of the most disabling of the psychiatric diseases. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Extended (BRSE) is used to evaluate the severity of psychiatric symptoms. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are commonly used and are preferred over oral antipsychotic medications. A two-center-based cross-sectional study was performed on 130 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder based on the International Classification of Diseases 10 criteria. We studied the relation between the development of cardiovascular risk factors and the antipsychotic medication that was administered in these patients. Our study demonstrates strong links between several cardiovascular risk factors and the duration of psychosis; the duration of the LAI antipsychotic treatment; the duration between the onset of the disease and the start of LAI antipsychotic treatment; and the use of specific LAI antipsychotic medications.