1
|
Aljuaid J, Al-Moteri M. Implementation lead nurses to lead EBP quality improvement project using the PEACE framework. Nurs Health Sci 2024; 26:e13153. [PMID: 39128874 DOI: 10.1111/nhs.13153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) in clinical practice is an ongoing challenge for nurses. EQUIP-Evidence-based QUality Improvement Project- is a multiphase project aimed at equipping nurses with the essential skills to implement EBP and advanced nursing practice. EQUIP embraces the assumption that implementation science models and partnership models can facilitate the implementation process of EBP, leading to successful and sustainable change. The current study is one of the EQUIP feasibility investigations in which the perspective of 12 implementation lead nurses (IL nurses) who attended a 1-day PEACE-based workshop was explored. Thematic analysis identified 2 overarching themes, 6 themes, and 18 subthemes. The first overarching theme showed that the PEACE-based workshop has successfully achieved its intended training implications, and the second overarching theme gave insight into factors that may influence the role of IL nurses. IL nurses reported general satisfaction and willingness to use the PEACE model at work; however, some IL nurses found Step 3 difficult to apply. The study's findings provide evidence of the perceived usefulness of adopting the PEACE model as an augmented approach in the EQUIP and the interest and enthusiasm of IL nurses in receiving more training on the implementation process of EBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamil Aljuaid
- Medical Surgical Nursing Department, College of Nursing, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
- Children's Hospital, MOH, Taif, Saudi Arabia
| | - Modi Al-Moteri
- Medical Surgical Nursing Department, College of Nursing, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maisto SA, Moskal D, Firkey MK, Bergman BG, Borsari B, Hallgren KA, Houck JM, Hurlocker M, Kiluk BD, Kuerbis A, Reid AE, Magill M. From alcohol and other drug treatment mediator to mechanism to implementation: A systematic review and the cases of self-efficacy, social support, and craving. ALCOHOL, CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH 2024. [PMID: 39182214 DOI: 10.1111/acer.15411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
Research designed to establish alcohol and other drug (AOD) mechanisms of behavioral change (MOBC) has centered on what variables mediate the relation between AOD treatment and outcomes. The purpose of this paper was to review this research evidence to identify empirically supported mediators of alcohol and other drug use and related outcomes and then to evaluate their potential as being AOD treatment MOBC. The first phase was a systematic review of reviews (2008-2023) to identify the variables with the strongest empirical support as mediators of AOD treatment effects. Eligible reviews focused on AOD treatment modalities, included empirically tested mediators, and targeted adult samples. The second phase was a systematic review of empirical studies (1990-2023) testing the hypothesis that variables identified in phase one were AOD treatment mediators/mechanisms and then evaluating each eligible stage two study according to the Kazdin and Nock (Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 1116) criteria. Eligible articles included empirical studies with adult samples attending AOD treatment and empirically tested one of the three treatment mechanisms as a mediator of an AOD-related outcome. Databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. This systematic review was not preregistered. The first review of 11 eligible review articles identified self-efficacy, social support, and craving as having the strongest empirical support. The second review captured 48 individual studies. An evaluation of each of these studies by the Kazdin and Nock criteria suggested that they likely are MOBC and therefore are ready for implementation. The implementation of self-efficacy, social support, and craving into clinical practice and training is warranted. Six directions for future research to solidify and generalize empirical support for the case that self-efficacy, social support, and craving are MOBC are presented, as are five implications for clinical practice and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dezarie Moskal
- VA Center for Integrated Healthcare, VA Western New York Healthcare System, Buffalo, USA
| | | | | | - Brian Borsari
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morgan RM, Trejo C, Trager BM, Boyle SC, Koning IM, LaBrie JW. Process Evaluation and Investigation of Cultural Adaptations for an Online Parent-Based Intervention Using a Mixed-Method Approach. JOURNAL OF PREVENTION (2022) 2024; 45:557-577. [PMID: 38678484 PMCID: PMC11271356 DOI: 10.1007/s10935-024-00781-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Most alcohol intervention research focuses on program efficacy, yet few studies have investigated the acceptability of a program's design and implementation to the target population or adapting existing alcohol interventions to different populations. To address these gaps in the literature, we (1) examined participant responsiveness to and implementation quality of FITSTART+, a web-app delivered parent-based alcohol intervention designed for incoming first-year college students in the United States, and (2) gathered feedback on how this intervention could be adapted to other populations of parents. A sample of U.S. parents of 17-20-year-old first-year college students (N = 109) participated in FITSTART+ during their child's first year of college and completed a survey about parents' responsiveness to the app and its quality. Next, a sample of non-U.S. parents of adolescents aged 13 to 19 (N = 44) participated in one of 11 focus groups in which they briefly explored the app and then discussed how it could be adapted to be applicable and culturally relevant for them and their context. Results revealed that U.S. parents rated the intervention's quality as high and parents were responsive to the web-app's content, but some did not visit one of the most critical aspects of the intervention (i.e., alcohol-related parenting resources). Non-U.S. participants provided a range of suggestions for adapting the intervention to their context, which varied by culture. Results identify areas for improvement, particularly regarding the use of alcohol-related parenting resources, in this intervention and for web-delivered PBIs more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reed M Morgan
- Department of Psychology, Fordham University, New York, USA
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA
| | - Constanza Trejo
- Psychology Department of Health and Student Welfare, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Bradley M Trager
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA.
| | - Sarah C Boyle
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA
| | - Ina M Koning
- Department of Clinical Child and Family Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joseph W LaBrie
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, 1 LMU Drive Suite 4700, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Danielsen SO, Lie I. Evidence-based strategies for movement after sternotomy. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2024; 23:e54-e56. [PMID: 38206819 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Stein Ove Danielsen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, St.Olavs plass, Oslo 0130, Norway
- Centre for Patient Centered Heart and Lung Research, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo 0450, Norway
| | - Irene Lie
- Centre for Patient Centered Heart and Lung Research, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo 0450, Norway
- Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tan BXH, Chong SY, Ho DWS, Wee YX, Jamal MH, Tan RKJ. Fostering citizen-engaged HIV implementation science. J Int AIDS Soc 2024; 27 Suppl 1:e26278. [PMID: 38965981 PMCID: PMC11224582 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Successful implementation of evidence-based practices depends on contextual factors like stakeholder engagement, the socio-political environment, resource availability, and stakeholders' felt needs and preferences. Nevertheless, inequities in implementation exist and undermine efforts to address HIV in marginalized key populations. Implementation science shows promise in addressing such inequities in the HIV response, but can be limited without meaningful engagement from citizens or communities. DISCUSSION We define the concept of a citizen-engaged HIV implementation science as one that involves citizens and communities deeply in HIV implementation science activities. In this commentary, we discuss how citizen science approaches can be leveraged to spur equity in HIV implementation science. Drawing on three areas previously defined by Geng and colleagues that serve to drive impactful implementation science in the HIV response, we discuss how citizens can be engaged when considering "whose perspectives?", "what questions are being asked?" and "how are questions asked?". With respect to "whose perspectives?" a citizen-engaged HIV implementation science would leverage participatory methods and tools, such as co-creation, co-production and crowdsourcing approaches, to engage the public in identifying challenges, solve health problems and implement solutions. In terms of "what questions are being asked?", we discuss how efforts are being made to synthesize citizen or community-led approaches with existing implementation science frameworks and approaches. This also means that we ensure communities have a say in interrogating and deconstructing such frameworks and adapting them to local contexts through participatory approaches. Finally, when considering "how are questions asked?", we argue for the development and adoption of broad, guiding principles and frameworks that account for dynamic contexts to promote citizen-engaged research in HIV implementation science. This also means avoiding narrow definitions that limit the creativity, innovation and ground-up wisdom of local citizens. CONCLUSIONS By involving communities and citizens in the development and growth of HIV implementation science, we can ensure that our implementation approaches remain equitable and committed to bridging divides and ending AIDS as a public health threat. Ultimately, efforts should be made to foster a citizen- and community-engaged HIV implementation science to spur equity in our global HIV response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Rayner Kay Jin Tan
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public HealthNational University of Singapore and National University Health SystemSingaporeSingapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Enns B, Sui Y, Guerra‐Alejos BC, Humphrey L, Piske M, Zang X, Doblecki‐Lewis S, Feaster DJ, Frye VA, Geng EH, Liu AY, Marshall BDL, Rhodes SD, Sullivan PS, Nosyk B. Estimating the potential value of MSM-focused evidence-based implementation interventions in three Ending the HIV Epidemic jurisdictions in the United States: a model-based analysis. J Int AIDS Soc 2024; 27 Suppl 1:e26265. [PMID: 38965982 PMCID: PMC11224592 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improving the delivery of existing evidence-based interventions to prevent and diagnose HIV is key to Ending the HIV Epidemic in the United States. Structural barriers in the access and delivery of related health services require municipal or state-level policy changes; however, suboptimal implementation can be addressed directly through interventions designed to improve the reach, effectiveness, adoption or maintenance of available interventions. Our objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness and potential epidemiological impact of six real-world implementation interventions designed to address these barriers and increase the scale of delivery of interventions for HIV testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in three US metropolitan areas. METHODS We used a dynamic HIV transmission model calibrated to replicate HIV microepidemics in Atlanta, Los Angeles (LA) and Miami. We identified six implementation interventions designed to improve HIV testing uptake ("Academic detailing for HIV testing," "CyBER/testing," "All About Me") and PrEP uptake/persistence ("Project SLIP," "PrEPmate," "PrEP patient navigation"). Our comparator scenario reflected a scale-up of interventions with no additional efforts to mitigate implementation and structural barriers. We accounted for potential heterogeneity in population-level effectiveness across jurisdictions. We sustained implementation interventions over a 10-year period and evaluated HIV acquisitions averted, costs, quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios over a 20-year time horizon (2023-2042). RESULTS Across jurisdictions, implementation interventions to improve the scale of HIV testing were most cost-effective in Atlanta and LA (CyBER/testing cost-saving and All About Me cost-effective), while interventions for PrEP were most cost-effective in Miami (two of three were cost-saving). We estimated that the most impactful HIV testing intervention, CyBER/testing, was projected to avert 111 (95% credible interval: 110-111), 230 (228-233) and 101 (101-103) acquisitions over 20 years in Atlanta, LA and Miami, respectively. The most impactful implementation intervention to improve PrEP engagement, PrEPmate, averted an estimated 936 (929-943), 860 (853-867) and 2152 (2127-2178) acquisitions over 20 years, in Atlanta, LA and Miami, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results highlight the potential impact of interventions to enhance the implementation of existing evidence-based interventions for the prevention and diagnosis of HIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Enns
- Centre for Advancing Health OutcomesVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Yi Sui
- Centre for Advancing Health OutcomesVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | | | - Lia Humphrey
- Centre for Advancing Health OutcomesVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Micah Piske
- Centre for Advancing Health OutcomesVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Xiao Zang
- School of Public HealthUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| | - Susanne Doblecki‐Lewis
- Division of Infectious DiseasesUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA
| | - Daniel J. Feaster
- Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA
| | | | - Elvin H. Geng
- Center for Dissemination and ImplementationInstitute for Public HealthDivision of Infectious DiseasesDepartment of MedicineSchool of MedicineWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Albert Y. Liu
- Bridge HIVSan Francisco Department of Public HealthSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Brandon D. L. Marshall
- Department of EpidemiologySchool of Public HealthBrown UniversityProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | - Scott D. Rhodes
- Department of Social Sciences and Health PolicyWake Forest University School of MedicineWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Bohdan Nosyk
- Centre for Advancing Health OutcomesVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- Faculty of Health SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Velloza J, Ndimande‐Khoza N, Mills L, Concepcion T, Gumede S, Chauke H, Verhey R, Chibanda D, Hosek S, Weiner BJ, Celum C, Delany‐Moretlwe S. Integrating a mental health intervention into PrEP services for South African young women: a human-centred implementation research approach to intervention development. J Int AIDS Soc 2024; 27 Suppl 1:e26274. [PMID: 38965973 PMCID: PMC11224591 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) who may benefit from HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) face high levels of common mental disorders (e.g. depression, anxiety). Common mental disorders can reduce PrEP adherence and increase HIV risk, yet mental health interventions have not been well-integrated into PrEP delivery. METHODS We conducted a four-phase human-centred design process, from December 2020 to April 2022, to understand mental health challenges among AGYW in Johannesburg, South Africa and barriers to integrated mental health and PrEP services. In the "Discover" phase, we conducted in-depth interviews with AGYW and key informants (KIs) in Johannesburg. We conducted a rapid qualitative analysis, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to identify facilitators and barriers of integrated mental health and PrEP services and mapped barriers to potential implementation strategies. In the "Design" and "Build" phases, we conducted stakeholder workshops to iteratively adapt an evidence-based mental health intervention, the Friendship Bench, and refine implementation strategies for South African PrEP delivery settings. In the "Test" phase, we piloted our adapted Friendship Bench package. RESULTS Interviews with 70 Discover phase participants (48 AGYW, 22 KIs) revealed the importance of integrated mental health and PrEP services for South African AGYW. Interviewees described barriers and implementation strategies for mental health and PrEP services around the CFIR domains: intervention characteristics (e.g. challenges with AGYW "opening up"); outer Johannesburg setting (e.g. community stigma); inner clinic setting (e.g. judgemental healthcare providers); characteristics of counsellors (e.g. training gaps); and the implementation process (e.g. need for demand creation). The Design and Build workshops included 13 AGYW and 15 KIs. Implementation barriers related to the quality and accessibility of public-sector clinic services, lay counsellor training, and community education and demand creation activities were prioritized. This led to 12 key Friendship Bench adaptations and the specification of 10 implementation strategies that were acceptable and feasible in initial pilot testing with three AGYW. CONCLUSIONS Using a human-centred approach, we identified determinants and potential solutions for integrating mental health interventions within PrEP services for South African AGYW. This design process centred stakeholders' perspectives, enabling rapid development of an adapted Friendship Bench intervention implementation package.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Velloza
- Department of Epidemiology & BiostatisticsUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Lisa Mills
- Wits RHIUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Tessa Concepcion
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Sanele Gumede
- Wits RHIUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Hlukelo Chauke
- Wits RHIUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | | | | | - Sybil Hosek
- Department of MedicineUniversity of Illinois ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Bryan J. Weiner
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Connie Celum
- Department of Global HealthUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsui J, Shin M, Sloan K, Mackie TI, Garcia S, Fehrenbacher AE, Crabtree BF, Palinkas LA. Use of concept mapping to inform a participatory engagement approach for implementation of evidence-based HPV vaccination strategies in safety-net clinics. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:71. [PMID: 38926886 PMCID: PMC11210134 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00607-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple evidence-based strategies (EBS) for promoting HPV vaccination exist. However, adolescent HPV vaccination rates remain below target levels in communities at high risk for HPV-associated cancers and served by safety-net clinics. Participatory engaged approaches are needed to leverage the expertise of community and clinical partners in selecting EBS relevant to their local context. We engaged concept mapping as a method to inform the adoption and adaptation of EBS that seeks to empower implementation partners to prioritize, select, and ultimately implement context-relevant EBS for HPV vaccination. METHODS Using 38 EBS statements generated from qualitative interviews and national HPV vaccine advocacy sources, we conducted a modified concept mapping activity with partners internal to safety-net clinics and external community members in two study sites of a larger implementation study (Greater Los Angeles and New Jersey), to sort EBS into clusters and rate each EBS by importance and feasibility for increasing HPV vaccination within safety-net clinics. Concept mapping findings (EBS statement ratings, ladder graphs and go-zones) were shared with leaders from a large federally qualified health center (FQHC) system (focusing on three clinic sites), to select and implement EBS over 12 months. RESULTS Concept mapping participants (n=23) sorted and rated statements, resulting in an eight-cluster solution: 1) Community education and outreach; 2) Advocacy and policy; 3) Data access/quality improvement monitoring; 4) Provider tracking/audit and feedback; 5) Provider recommendation/communication; 6) Expanding vaccine access; 7) Reducing missed opportunities; and 8) Nurse/staff workflow and training. The FQHC partner then selected to intervene on eight of 17 EBS statements in the "go-zone" for action, with three from "reducing missed opportunities," two from "nurse/staff workflow and training," and one each from "provider tracking/audit and feedback," "provider recommendation/communication," and "expanding vaccine access," which the research team addressed through the implementation of three multi-level intervention strategies (e.g., physician communication training, staff training and workflow assessment, audit and feedback of clinic processes). CONCLUSIONS Concept mapping provided a powerful participatory approach to identify multilevel EBS for HPV vaccination relevant to the local safety-net clinic context, particularly when several strategies exist, and prioritization is necessary. This study demonstrates how a clinic system benefited directly from the ratings and prioritization of EBS by multilevel clinic and community partners within the broader safety-net clinic context to identify and adapt prioritized solutions needed to advance HPV vaccine equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Tsui
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Michelle Shin
- Department of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kylie Sloan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Thomas I Mackie
- School of Public Health, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Samantha Garcia
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Anne E Fehrenbacher
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Benjamin F Crabtree
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Lawrence A Palinkas
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Krishnamoorthy S, Mathieu S, Armstrong G, Ross V, Francis J, Reifels L, Kõlves K. Implementation of Complex Suicide Prevention Interventions: Insights into Barriers, Facilitators and Lessons Learned. Arch Suicide Res 2024:1-24. [PMID: 38900080 DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2024.2368127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Effective suicide prevention interventions are infrequently translated into practice and policy. One way to bridge this gap is to understand the influence of theoretical determinants on intervention delivery, adoption, and sustainment and lessons learned. This study aimed to examine barriers, facilitators and lessons learned from implementing complex suicide prevention interventions across the world. METHODS AND MATERIALS This study was a secondary analysis of a systematic review of complex suicide prevention interventions, following updated PRISMA guidelines. English published records and grey literature between 1990 and 2022 were searched on PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest, SCOPUS and CENTRAL. Related reports were organized into clusters. Data was extracted from clusters of reports on interventions and were mapped using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS The most frequently-reported barriers were reported within the intervention setting and were related to the perceived appropriateness of interventions within settings; shared norms, beliefs; and maintaining formal and informal networks and connections. The most frequently reported facilitators concerned individuals' motivation, capability/capacity, and felt need. Lessons learned focused on the importance of tailoring the intervention, responding to contextual needs and the importance of community engagement throughout the process. CONCLUSION This study emphasizes the importance of documenting and analyzing important influences on implementation. The complex interplay between the contextual determinants and implementation is discussed. These findings contribute to a better understanding of barriers and facilitators salient for implementation of complex suicide prevention interventions.
Collapse
|
10
|
Laroche HH, Andino J, O'Shea AMJ, Engebretsen B, Rice S, DeJear M, Nicholson C, Yeh HW, Snetselaar L. Family-Based Motivational Interviewing and Resource Mobilization to Prevent Obesity: Living Well Together Trial. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR 2024:S1499-4046(24)00327-0. [PMID: 38904597 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Test an obesity intervention for families with low incomes. METHODS A total of 208 families were included (a parent with a body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 and a child aged 6-12 years). A 12-month randomized controlled trial combining family health coaching (motivational interviewing) and connection to community resources. Comparison group: referrals for basic needs, written educational materials. Questionnaires, accelerometry, and anthropometrics. Intention-to-treat analysis of change in outcomes. Two-sided t test with multiple imputation. RESULTS Parents were 95% female, 31% Black, and 27% Hispanic. Children had a mean BMI-Z score of 1.15. Primary outcomes did not differ between groups at 12 months. Both groups significantly (P < 0.05) improved on the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity Scale for behaviors related to childhood obesity (mean ± SE: comparison, 2.8 ± 1.0; intervention, 2.2 ± 0.9), increased child sedentary activity (comparison, 32.5 ± 12.1; intervention, 39.9 ± 12.4 min/d), and decreased child moderate-vigorous physical activity (comparison, -9.6 ± 3.3; intervention -7.0 ± 3.0 min/d). Parents had no change in BMI. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS We successfully embedded screening and referral to address social needs within an obesity intervention. The coaching intervention did not provide additional benefits. Future research could explore ways to make these interventions more accessible, valuable, and effective for families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena H Laroche
- Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition, Kansas City, MO; Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.
| | - Jessica Andino
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Amy M J O'Shea
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for Comprehensive Access & Delivery Research & Evaluation, Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA
| | | | - Sarai Rice
- Des Moines Area Religious Council, Des Moines, IA
| | | | | | - Hung-Wen Yeh
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO; Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
| | - Linda Snetselaar
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leeman J, Rohweder C, Lafata JE, Wangen M, Ferrari R, Shea CM, Brenner A, Roth I, Fleming O, Toles M. A streamlined approach to classifying and tailoring implementation strategies: recommendations to speed the translation of research to practice. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:65. [PMID: 38886763 PMCID: PMC11181609 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00606-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation science emerged from the recognized need to speed the translation of effective interventions into practice. In the US, the science has evolved to place an ever-increasing focus on implementation strategies. The long list of implementation strategies, terminology used to name strategies, and time required to tailor strategies all may contribute to delays in translating evidence-based interventions (EBIs) into practice. To speed EBI translation, we propose a streamlined approach to classifying and tailoring implementation strategies. MAIN TEXT A multidisciplinary team of eight scholars conducted an exercise to sort the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies into three classes: implementation processes (n = 25), capacity-building strategies (n = 20), and integration strategies (n = 28). Implementation processes comprise best practices that apply across EBIs and throughout the phases of implementation from exploration through sustainment (e.g., conduct local needs assessment). Capacity-building strategies target either general or EBI-specific knowledge and skills (e.g., conduct educational meetings). Integration strategies include "methods and techniques" that target barriers or facilitators to implementation of a specific EBI beyond those targeted by capacity building. Building on these three classes, the team collaboratively developed recommendations for a pragmatic, five-step approach that begins with the implementation processes and capacity-building strategies practice-settings are already using prior to tailoring integration strategies. A case study is provided to illustrate use of the five-step approach to tailor the strategies needed to implement a transitional care intervention in skilled nursing facilities. CONCLUSIONS Our proposed approach streamlines the formative work required prior to implementing an EBI by building on practice partner preferences, expertise, and infrastructure while also making the most of prior research findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Catherine Rohweder
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Women's Health Research, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Elston Lafata
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mary Wangen
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Renee Ferrari
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christopher M Shea
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alison Brenner
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Isabel Roth
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Oscar Fleming
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mark Toles
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Howlett N, Fakoya O, Bontoft C, Simmons I, Miners L, Wagner AP, Brown K. A realist evaluation of community champion and participatory action approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1355944. [PMID: 38939557 PMCID: PMC11208485 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1355944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, public health teams tried several approaches to circulate accurate health information and engage with community members to understand what they need from public health services. Two such approaches were community champions and community participatory action research (CPAR). This study evaluates two champion programmes and a CPAR programme in terms of what worked, for whom, and in what contexts, including the funding and resourcing associated with implementation. Methods Between June 2022 and June 2023, a realist evaluation of three distinct case studies (COVID-19 champions, Vaccine Champions, and CPAR programmes) in the city of Southampton in England was conducted in three stages: development of initial programme theories and collection of additional contextual information, including funding and resources associated with delivering each programme; initial programme theory testing; synthesis of final programme theories. Data was collected primarily through semi-structured interviews (n = 29) across programme and training leads, voluntary services, community organisations, volunteers, and local community members, and one focus group with local community members (n = 8). Results The City Council used £642 k from two funding awards to deliver the programmes: COVID-19 Champions £41 k; Vaccine Champions £485 k; and CPAR programmes £115 k. Twenty-eight initial programme theories were generated, which were "tested" to support, refine, or refute context-mechanism-outcome relationships, resulting finally in a set of 22 programme theories across the three programmes. Six demi-regularities were generated, each featuring in multiple programme theories, and providing data on how and why these programmes can work, and in which contexts: (1) building trust through community connections; (2) fostering relationships and collaboration; (3) provision of training and resources; (4) local community knowledge and expertise; (5) community representation and leadership; (6) appropriate communication and information sharing. Conclusion This study provides new knowledge and understanding of the factors affecting the implementation of community champion and CPAR approaches during public health emergencies. These findings suggest that representation and involvement of community members, establishing and building on trust, adequate training and resources, and clear communication from trusted community members and organisations are catalysts for meaningful engagement with communities.Evaluation registration: Research Registry identifier: researchregistry8094.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Howlett
- Department of Psychology, Sport, and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Olujoke Fakoya
- Department of Psychology, Sport, and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Charis Bontoft
- Department of Psychology, Sport, and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Isobel Simmons
- Department of Psychology, Sport, and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Miners
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Adam P. Wagner
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Brown
- Department of Psychology, Sport, and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ramanadhan S, Alemán R, Bradley CD, Cruz JL, Safaeinili N, Simonds V, Aveling EL. Using Participatory Implementation Science to Advance Health Equity. Annu Rev Public Health 2024; 45:47-67. [PMID: 38109515 PMCID: PMC11251496 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060722-024251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Participatory approaches to implementation science (IS) offer an inclusive, collaborative, and iterative perspective on implementing and sustaining evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to advance health equity. This review provides guidance on the principles and practice of participatory IS, which enables academic researchers, community members, implementers, and other actors to collaboratively integrate practice-, community-, and research-based evidence into public health and health care services. With a foundational focus on supporting academics in coproducing knowledge and action, participatory IS seeks to improve health, reduce inequity, and create transformational change. The three main sections of this review provide (a) a rationale for participatory approaches to research in implementation science, (b) a framework for integrating participatory approaches in research utilizing IS theory and methods, and (c) critical considerations for optimizing the practice and impact of participatory IS. Ultimately, participatory approaches can move IS activities beyond efforts to make EBIs work within harmful systems toward transformative solutions that reshape these systems to center equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Rosa Alemán
- American Civil Liberties Union-Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cory D Bradley
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jennifer L Cruz
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Nadia Safaeinili
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Vanessa Simonds
- College of Education, Health and Human Development, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA
| | - Emma-Louise Aveling
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shelton RC, Brownson RC. Advancing the Science and Application of Implementation Science to Promote Health Equity: Commentary on the Symposium. Annu Rev Public Health 2024; 45:1-5. [PMID: 38134404 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-062723-055935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
There has been an increasing focus on making health equity a more explicit and foundational aspect of the research being conducted in public health and implementation science. This commentary provides an overview of five reviews in this Annual Review of Public Health symposium on Implementation Science and Health Equity. These articles reflect on and advance the application of core implementation science principles and concepts, with a focus on promoting health equity across a diverse range of public health and health care settings. Taken together, the symposium articles highlight critical conceptual, methodological, and empirical advances in the study designs, frameworks, and approaches that can help address equity considerations in the use of implementation science in both domestic and global contexts. Finally, this commentary highlights how work featured in this symposium can help inform future directions for rapidly taking public health to scale, particularly among systemically marginalized populations and communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Shelton
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA;
- Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA;
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Petro-Petro J, Arango-Paternina CM, Patiño-Villada FA, Ramirez-Villada JF, Brownson RC. Implementation processes of social network interventions for physical activity and sedentary behavior among children and adolescents: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1101. [PMID: 38649855 PMCID: PMC11034017 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18615-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The characteristics of the implementation process of interventions are essential for bridging the gap between research and practice. This scoping review aims to identify the implementation process of social network interventions (SNI) to address physical activity and sedentary behaviors in children and adolescents. METHODS The scoping review was conducted adhering to the established guidelines. The search was carried out in the ERIC, EBSCO, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Lilacs databases in April 2023. Social network intervention studies in children and adolescents were included, addressing physical activity or sedentary behaviors. Replicability (TIDieR), applicability (PRECIS-2), and generalizability (RE-AIM) were the explored components of the implementation process. Each component was quantitatively and separately analyzed. Then, a qualitative integration was carried out using a narrative method. RESULTS Most SNI were theoretically framed on the self-determination theory, used social influence as a social mechanism, and used the individual typology of network intervention. Overall, SNI had strong replicability, tended to be pragmatic, and three RE-AIM domains (reach, adoption (staff), and implementation) showed an acceptable level of the generalizability of findings. CONCLUSIONS The analyzed SNI for physical activity and sedentary behaviors in adolescents tended to be reported with high replicability and were conducted pragmatically, i.e., with very similar conditions to real settings. The RE-AIM domains of reach, adoption (staff), and implementation support the generalizability of SNI. Some domains of the principles of implementation strategies of SNI had acceptable external validity (actor, action targets, temporality, dose, and theoretical justification).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Petro-Petro
- Instituto de Educación Física, Universidad de Antioquia, Carrera 75 Nº 65-87 - Bloque 45, Medellín, Colombia.
- Departamento de Cultura Física, Universidad de Córdoba, Montería, Colombia.
| | - Carlos Mario Arango-Paternina
- Research Group on Physical Activity for Health (AFIS), Instituto Universitario de Educación Física y Deportes; Universidad de Antioquia, Ciudadela Robledo, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Fredy Alonso Patiño-Villada
- Research Group on Physical Activity for Health (AFIS), Instituto Universitario de Educación Física y Deportes; Universidad de Antioquia, Ciudadela Robledo, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Jhon Fredy Ramirez-Villada
- Research Group on Physical Activity for Health (AFIS), Instituto Universitario de Educación Física y Deportes; Universidad de Antioquia, Ciudadela Robledo, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine; Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fjordkvist E, Eldh AC, Winberg M, Joelsson-Alm E, Hälleberg Nyman M. First-line managers' experience of guideline implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Adv Nurs 2024. [PMID: 38644671 DOI: 10.1111/jan.16204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
AIM(S) To explore first-line managers' experience of guideline implementation in orthopaedic care during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN A descriptive, qualitative study. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with 30 first-line nursing and rehabilitation managers in orthopaedic healthcare at university, regional and local hospitals. The interviews were analysed by thematic analysis. RESULTS First-line managers described the implementation of guidelines related to the pandemic as different from everyday knowledge translation, with a swifter uptake and time freed from routine meetings in order to support staff in adoption and adherence. The urgent need to address the crisis facilitated guideline implementation, even though there were specific pandemic-related barriers such as staffing and communication issues. An overarching theme, Hanging on to guidelines for dear life, is substantiated by three themes: Adapting to facilitate change, Anchoring safety through guidelines and Embracing COVID guidelines. CONCLUSION A health crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic can generate enabling elements for guideline implementation in healthcare, despite prevailing or new hindering components. The experience of guideline implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic can improve understanding of context aspects that can benefit organizations in everyday translation of evidence into practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE Recognizing what enabled guideline implementation in a health crisis can help first-line managers to identify local enabling context elements and processes. This can facilitate future guideline implementation. IMPACT During the COVID-19 pandemic, the healthcare context and staff's motivation for guideline recognition and adoption changed. Resources and ways to bridge barriers in guideline implementation emerged, although specific challenges arose. Nursing managers can draw on experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic to support implementation of new evidence-based practices in the future. REPORTING METHOD This study adheres to the EQUATOR guidelines by using Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR). No Patient or Public Contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Fjordkvist
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Ann Catrine Eldh
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Madeleine Winberg
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Eva Joelsson-Alm
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Hälleberg Nyman
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- University Health Care Research Center and Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tiankanon K, Aniwan S, Kerr SJ, Mekritthikrai K, Kongtab N, Wisedopas N, Piyachaturawat P, Kulpatcharapong S, Linlawan S, Phromnil P, Muangpaisarn P, Orprayoon T, Chanyaswad J, Sunthornwechapong P, Vateekul P, Kullavanijaya P, Rerknimitr R. Improvement of adenoma detection rate by two computer-aided colonic polyp detection systems in high adenoma detectors: a randomized multicenter trial. Endoscopy 2024; 56:273-282. [PMID: 37963587 DOI: 10.1055/a-2210-7999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of a self-developed computer-aided polyp detection system (SD-CADe) and a commercial system (CM-CADe) for high adenoma detectors compared with white-light endoscopy (WLE) as a control. METHODS Average-risk 50-75-year-old individuals who underwent screening colonoscopy at five referral centers were randomized to SD-CADe, CM-CADe, or WLE groups (1:1:1 ratio). Trainees and staff with an adenoma detection rate (ADR) of ≥35% were recruited. The primary outcome was ADR. Secondary outcomes were the proximal adenoma detection rate (pADR), advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR), and the number of adenomas, proximal adenomas, and advanced adenomas per colonoscopy (APC, pAPC, and AAPC, respectively). RESULTS The study enrolled 1200 participants. The ADR in the control, CM-CADe, and SD-CADe groups was 38.3%, 50.0%, and 54.8%, respectively. The pADR was 23.0%, 32.3%, and 38.8%, respectively. AADR was 6.0%, 10.3%, and 9.5%, respectively. After adjustment, the ADR and pADR in both intervention groups were significantly higher than in controls (all P<0.05). The APC in the control, CM-CADe, and SD-CADe groups was 0.66, 1.04, and 1.16, respectively. The pAPC was 0.33, 0.53, and 0.64, respectively, and the AAPC was 0.07, 0.12, and 0.10, respectively. Both CADe systems showed significantly higher APC and pAPC than WLE. AADR and AAPC were improved in both CADe groups versus control, although the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Even in high adenoma detectors, CADe significantly improved ADR and APC. The AADR tended to be higher with both systems, and this may enhance colorectal cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasenee Tiankanon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Satimai Aniwan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Stephen J Kerr
- Biostatistics Excellence Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Krittaya Mekritthikrai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Natanong Kongtab
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Naruemon Wisedopas
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | | | - Poonrada Phromnil
- Department of Medicine, Khlong Khlung Hospital, Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand
| | - Puth Muangpaisarn
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Prapokklao Hospital, Chanthaburi, Thailand
| | - Theerapat Orprayoon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Prapokklao Hospital, Chanthaburi, Thailand
| | - Jaruwan Chanyaswad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Prapokklao Hospital, Chanthaburi, Thailand
| | | | - Peerapon Vateekul
- Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pinit Kullavanijaya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Excellence Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shelton RC, Brownson RC. Enhancing Impact: A Call to Action for Equitable Implementation Science. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2024; 25:174-189. [PMID: 37878237 PMCID: PMC11133096 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-023-01589-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
Despite investments in evidence-based interventions and Implementation Science, most evidence-based interventions are not widely or routinely adopted, delivered, or sustained in many real-world community and healthcare settings. This gap is even greater in settings and populations experiencing numerous social and structural barriers to health, with important implications for persistent patterns in health inequities. In this Viewpoint, as part of a Special Issue on Advancing the Adaptability of Chronic Disease Prevention and Management through Implementation Science, we outline seven calls to action for the field of Implementation Science, with the goal of encouraging researchers, practitioners, and funders to be more intentional and accountable in applying Implementation Science to have greater impact on promoting health equity. Calls to action include (1) enhance public health, community, and multi-sectoral partnerships to promote health equity and equitable implementation; (2) revisit and build the evidence base needed to promote health equity and impact at multiple levels; (3) prioritize focus on policy development, dissemination, and implementation; (4) be agile and responsive in application of Implementation Science frameworks, processes, and methods; (5) identify and redefine meaningful metrics for equity and impact; (6) disseminate scientific evidence and research to a diverse range of partners and potential beneficiaries; and (7) extend focus on de-implementation, mis-implementation, and sustainability which are central to enhancing health equity. Additionally, we outline why a focus on prevention and public health is essential to making progress towards health equity in Implementation Science, summarize important advancements that the field has made towards making equity more foundational, and pose important research questions to enhance equitable impact of work in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Shelton
- Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, 722 W 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
- Columbia University, Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, Campus, Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Figueroa R, Houghtaling B. Food is Medicine and implementation science: A recipe for health equity. Transl Behav Med 2024; 14:234-240. [PMID: 38366890 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibae005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Diet-related chronic diseases such as Type II diabetes, cardiometabolic diseases, and cancer are among the leading causes of death in the USA. Nutrition security has emerged as a target outcome and a national priority for preventative medicine and the treatment of diet-related chronic diseases. Food is Medicine (FIM) initiatives encompass programs and interventions to meet priority population's needs across food and nutrition security continuums as a mechanism to address persistent food and nutrition inequities. In this position statement, we draw on implementation science, specifically the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework and health equity principles to provide guidance on FIM initiatives. As the FIM evidence base continues to grow, we encourage the EPIS framework be applied as one lens through which we can improve our understanding of FIM implementation among multiple contexts to understand what works, for whom, and under what circumstances. Ultimately, this position statement aims to call to action the incorporation of implementation science and equity principles into FIM efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Figueroa
- Division of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Bailey Houghtaling
- Gretchen Swanson Center for Nutrition, Omaha, NE, USA
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Paniagua-Avila A, Shelton RC, Figueroa JC, Guzman AL, Gutierrez L, Hernandez-Galdamez DR, Ramirez JM, Rodriguez J, Irazola V, Ramirez-Zea M, Fort MP. Assessing the implementation of a multi-component hypertension program in a Guatemalan under-resourced dynamic context: an application of the RE-AIM/PRISM extension for sustainability and health equity. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:23. [PMID: 38491376 PMCID: PMC10941412 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00560-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid changes in healthcare delivery in Guatemala's public primary care settings. A new hypertension program, implemented as part of a type 2 hybrid trial since 2019, exemplifies an implementation effort amidst a changing context in an under-resourced setting. We assessed the implementation of an evidence-based intervention (EBI; protocol-based hypertension treatment) and one of its main implementation strategies (team-based collaborative care), raising implications for health equity and sustainability. We present innovative application of systems thinking visuals. METHODS Conducting a convergent mixed methods analysis, we assessed implementation in response to contextual changes across five Ministry of Health (MoH) districts at the pandemic's onset. Utilizing quantitative programmatic data and qualitative interviews with stakeholders (n=18; health providers, administrators, study staff), we evaluated dimensions of "Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance," RE-AIM (Reach, Implementation delivery + adaptations), and "Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model," PRISM (Organizational perspective on the EBI, Fit, Implementation and sustainability infrastructure) frameworks. We assessed representativeness by comparing participants to census data. To assess implementation delivery, we built behavior-over-time (BOT) graphs with quantitative programmatic data (July 2019-July 2021). To assess adaptations and contextual changes, we performed matrix-based thematic qualitative analysis. We converged quantitative implementation delivery data + qualitative adaptations data in joint displays. Finally, we analyzed qualitative and quantitative results across RE-AIM/PRISM and health districts to identify equity and sustainability considerations. RESULTS Contextual factors that facilitated program delivery included the perception that the EBI was beneficial, program champions, and staff communication. Key barriers to implementation delivery included competition with other primary care activities and limited implementation infrastructure (e.g., equipment, medications). Contextual changes related to COVID-19 hindered implementation delivery, threatened sustainability, and may have exacerbated inequities. However, adaptations that were planned enhanced implementation delivery and may have supported improved equity and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS Recognition of an EBI's benefits and program champions are important for supporting initial uptake. The ability to plan adaptations amid rapid contextual changes has potential advantages for sustainability and equitable delivery. Systems thinking tools and mixed methods approaches may shed light on the relations between context, adaptations, and equitable and sustainable implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03504124.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Paniagua-Avila
- Epidemiology Department, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
- INCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala.
| | - Rachel C Shelton
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juan Carlos Figueroa
- INCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
- Department of Epidemiology, Dornsife School of Public Health, Urban Health Collaborative, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ana Lissette Guzman
- INCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Laura Gutierrez
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Diego Rolando Hernandez-Galdamez
- INCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Juan Manuel Ramirez
- INCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Javier Rodriguez
- INCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Vilma Irazola
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Manuel Ramirez-Zea
- INCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - Meredith P Fort
- INCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (CIIPEC), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
- Colorado School of Public Health, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yu X, Wu S, Sun Y, Wang P, Wang L, Su R, Zhao J, Fadlallah R, Boeira L, Oliver S, Abraha YG, Sewankambo NK, El-Jardali F, Norris SL, Chen Y. Exploring the diverse definitions of 'evidence': a scoping review. BMJ Evid Based Med 2024; 29:37-43. [PMID: 37940419 PMCID: PMC10850639 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically collect and analyse diverse definitions of 'evidence' in both health and social sciences, and help users to correctly use the term 'evidence' and rethink what is the definition of 'evidence' in scientific research. DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS Definitions of evidence in the health sciences and social sciences were included. We have excluded the definition of evidence applied in the legal field, abstracts without full text, documents not published in either Chinese or English and so on. We established a multidisciplinary working group and systematically searched five electronic databases including Medline, Web of Science, EBSCO, the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index and the Chinese Science Citation Database from their inception to 26 February 2022. We also searched websites and reviewed the reference lists of the identified studies. Six reviewers working in pairs, independently, selected studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and extracted information. Any differences were discussed in pairs, and if there was disagreement, it was resolved via discussion or with the help of a third reviewer. Reviewers extracted document characteristics, the original content for the definitions of 'evidence', assessed definitions as either intensional or extensional, and any citations for the given definition. RESULTS Forty-nine documents were finally included after screening, and 68 definitions were obtained. After excluding duplicates, a total of 54 different definitions of 'evidence' were identified. There were 42 intensional definitions and 12 extensional definitions. The top three definiens were 'information', 'fact' and 'research/study'. The definition of 'evidence' differed between health and social sciences. The term 'research' appeared most frequently in the definitions. CONCLUSIONS The definition of 'evidence' has gradually attracted the attention of many scholars and decision-makers in health and social sciences. Nevertheless, there is no widely recognised and accepted definition in scientific research. Given the wide use of the term, we need to think about whether, or under what circumstances, a standardised, clear, meaningful and widely applicable definition of 'evidence' might be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Yu
- Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shouyuan Wu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Lanzhou University School of Public Health, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Yajia Sun
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Lanzhou University School of Public Health, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Ping Wang
- Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Lanzhou University School of Public Health, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Renfeng Su
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Lanzhou University School of Public Health, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Junxian Zhao
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Lanzhou University School of Public Health, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Racha Fadlallah
- Department of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Sandy Oliver
- EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Africa Centre for Evidence, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Yoseph G Abraha
- Knowledge Translation Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Fadi El-Jardali
- Department of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Susan L Norris
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Yaolong Chen
- Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021RU017), Lanzhou University School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hart J, Edwards AD, Stainthorpe A. Insights into implementation planning for point-of-care testing to guide treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: a mixed methods feasibility study. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2024; 3:1302653. [PMID: 38235389 PMCID: PMC10792000 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1302653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
The purpose of this mixed methods feasibility study was to gain insights into unmet clinical needs, stakeholder preferences and potential barriers and enablers to adoption for planning the implementation of point-of-care testing for earlier detection and guided treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) acute exacerbation in the NHS in England. Exacerbations of COPD cause considerable mortality and morbidity. Earlier identification of exacerbations and guided treatment would lead to reduced exacerbation duration, reduced hospitalizations and mortality, improve health-related quality of life, reduce unnecessary treatments (including inappropriate antibiotic prescribing) which could save the NHS over £400 per patient. During the early stages of product design, we took a multi-disciplinary approach to evidence generation, gaining insights from key stakeholders to test the product concept and inform evidence-based implementation planning. Primary data was collected from 11 health care and service professionals involved in the management of acute COPD exacerbations. Overall, participants agreed that by earlier differentiation of acute exacerbation from stable COPD, patients could be started on appropriate treatment. To implement point-of-care testing into clinical practice, evidence is required to demonstrate the accuracy of differentiating between exacerbation etiologies and to provide information on the beneficial impact to the system in terms of optimized management, reduced long-term side effects, admission avoidance, and cost-effectiveness. This research provides an evidence base for future implementation planning of point-of-care testing for earlier detection and guided treatment of COPD acute exacerbation. Moreover, the technology developers can decide whether to refine the product design and value proposition thereby de-risking product development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Hart
- School of Pharmacy, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Academic Health Science Network, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew Stainthorpe
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Academic Health Science Network, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Research Health Limited, Corsham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Houlihan BV, Ethier E, Veerakone R, Eaves M, Turchi R, Louis CJ, Comeau M. Trauma-Informed Leadership in Quality Improvement: What We Learned From Practicing in a Pandemic. Pediatrics 2024; 153:e2023063424G. [PMID: 38165240 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-063424g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
In 2020, midway through the Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network to Advance Care for Children with Medical Complexity project, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic erupted and caused significant disruptions for the 10 participating state teams, the project leadership, and collaborative partner organizations. Clinics shut down for in-person care, a scramble ensued to quickly leverage telehealth to fill the gap, and the trauma caused by anxiety, isolation, and exhaustion affected the health and wellbeing of children, families, and clinicians alike. We conducted a series of key informant interviews and surveys, alongside other process measures, to learn from state teams what it was like "on the ground" to try to continue improving care delivery, child quality of life, and family wellbeing under such upheaval. In this article, we synthesize qualitative and descriptive findings from these varied data sources within the framework of the trauma-informed principles we applied as a leadership team to prevent burnout, increase resilience, and maintain progress among all project participants, especially clinicians and the uniquely vulnerable family leaders. Lessons learned will be offered that can be applied to future natural and human-made emergencies that impact responsive pediatric care delivery improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethlyn Vergo Houlihan
- Boston University School of Social Work, Center for Innovation in Social Work & Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth Ethier
- Boston University School of Social Work, Center for Innovation in Social Work & Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rubina Veerakone
- Boston University School of Social Work, Center for Innovation in Social Work & Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Megan Eaves
- Boston University School of Social Work, Center for Innovation in Social Work & Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Renee Turchi
- St Christopher's Hospital for Children & Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Meg Comeau
- Boston University School of Social Work, Center for Innovation in Social Work & Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Manns BJ, Thomas S, Farinu O, Woolfork M, Walker CL. Hyperlocal lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: Toward an equity-centered implementation science approach. SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES OPEN 2024; 9:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100844. [PMID: 38463244 PMCID: PMC10922000 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccination campaigns across the US were implemented to mitigate the disproportionate hospitalizations and unnecessary deaths across many communities that experienced unequal gaps in initial vaccine distribution rollout and uptake. In parallel, the COVID-19 pandemic created declines in routine vaccination coverage for adults, adolescents, and children; particularly, in communities experiencing overlapping social disadvantage. Community-based efforts offer a solution to narrow immunization gaps but have not been replicated consistently nor demonstrated widespread success during the pandemic as evidenced by prevailing disparities in immunization uptake. We offer an equity centered implementation science approach that involves co-designing, co-implementing, and co-evaluating solutions with the community and all partners investing in the shared goal of sustainable improvement in health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J. Manns
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stephen Thomas
- Maryland Center for Health Equity, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Oluyemi Farinu
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bhuiya AR, Sutherland J, Boateng R, Bain T, Skidmore B, Perrier L, Makarski J, Munce S, Lewis I, Graham ID, Holroyd-Leduc J, Straus SE, Stelfox HT, Strifler L, Lokker C, Li LC, Leung FH, Dobbins M, Puchalski Ritchie LM, Squires JE, Rac VE, Fahim C, Kastner M. A scoping review reveals candidate quality indicators of knowledge translation and implementation science practice tools. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 165:111205. [PMID: 37939744 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify candidate quality indicators from existing tools that provide guidance on how to practice knowledge translation and implemenation science (KT practice tools) across KT domains (dissemination, implementation, sustainability, and scalability). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. We systematically searched multiple electronic databases and the gray literature. Documents were independently screened, selected, and extracted by pairs of reviewers. Data about the included articles, KT practice tools, and candidate quality indicators were analyzed, categorized, and summarized descriptively. RESULTS Of 43,060 titles and abstracts that were screened from electronic databases and gray literature, 850 potentially relevant full-text articles were identified, and 253 articles were included in the scoping review. Of these, we identified 232 unique KT practice tools from which 27 unique candidate quality indicators were generated. The identified candidate quality indicators were categorized according to the development (n = 17), evaluation (n = 5) and adaptation (n = 3) of the tools, and engagement of knowledge users (n = 2). No tools were identified that appraised the quality of KT practice tools. CONCLUSIONS The development of a quality appraisal instrument of KT practice tools is needed. The results will be further refined and finalized in order to develop a quality appraisal instrument for KT practice tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aunima R Bhuiya
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Justin Sutherland
- North York General Hospital, Research and Innovation, North York, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rhonda Boateng
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Téjia Bain
- North York General Hospital, Research and Innovation, North York, Ontario, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laure Perrier
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Makarski
- North York General Hospital, Research and Innovation, North York, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Munce
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Iveta Lewis
- North York General Hospital, Research and Innovation, North York, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa and Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jayna Holroyd-Leduc
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Henry T Stelfox
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and the O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lisa Strifler
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cynthia Lokker
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linda C Li
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fok-Han Leung
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maureen Dobbins
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa M Puchalski Ritchie
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janet E Squires
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valeria E Rac
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Program for Health System and Technology Evaluation, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine Fahim
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika Kastner
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; North York General Hospital, Research and Innovation, North York, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Houlihan BV, Coleman C, Kuo DZ, Plant B, Comeau M. What Families of Children With Medical Complexity Say They Need: Humanism in Care Delivery Change. Pediatrics 2024; 153:e2023063424F. [PMID: 38165241 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-063424f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
There is growing consensus that centering lived experience is needed to meaningfully transform the burdensome systems of care for children with medical complexity (CMC) and their families. The Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network to Advance Care for Children with Medical Complexity quality improvement initiative, co-led with family colleagues, illuminates a critical real-world view of systems change to address unintended bias and demystify the medical model of care. We share candid themes in which families describe the need for systems to counteract widespread misconceptions and bias to achieve meaningful system change. We held family-designed, family-led focus groups (N = 127 across 27 groups) within 10 diverse state teams. Families were asked about CMC quality of life and family wellbeing. We transcribed and coded the responses to uncover salient themes. We uncovered 2 major themes from families with direct applicability to systems of care: "What's Missing - Human Dignity" and "What Families Really Need and Recommend in Care." Families shared that valuing each child and creating opportunities for the child and family to enjoy their lives were most important in addressing human dignity in systems of care. They recommended centering the whole child, building relationships of trust and communication, and valuing family-to-family supports to transform the system of care aligned to humanism in care. Families express an urgency for systems to uphold dignity, valuing their child as a whole human being whose quality of life holds meaning and joy, not just as a diagnosis. The highly untenable cost of navigating dehumanizing systems of care reduces quality of life and wellbeing and must be transformed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethlyn Vergo Houlihan
- Boston University School of Social Work, Center for Innovation in Social Work & Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Dennis Z Kuo
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Benjamin Plant
- Boston University School of Social Work, Center for Innovation in Social Work & Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meg Comeau
- Boston University School of Social Work, Center for Innovation in Social Work & Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mody A, Filiatreau LM, Goss CW, Powell BJ, Geng EH. Instrumental variables for implementation science: exploring context-dependent causal pathways between implementation strategies and evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:157. [PMID: 38124203 PMCID: PMC10731809 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00536-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of both implementation strategies (IS) and evidence-based interventions (EBI) can vary across contexts, and a better understanding of how and why this occurs presents fundamental but challenging questions that implementation science as a field will need to grapple with. We use causal epidemiologic methods to explore the mechanisms of why sharp distinctions between implementation strategies (IS) and efficacy of an evidence-based intervention (EBI) may fail to recognize that the effect of an EBI can be deeply intertwined and dependent on the context of the IS leading to its uptake. METHODS We explore the use of instrumental variable (IV) analyses as a critical tool for implementation science methods to isolate three relevant quantities within the same intervention context when exposure to an implementation strategy is random: (1) the effect of an IS on implementation outcomes (e.g., uptake), (2) effect of EBI uptake on patient outcomes, and (3) overall effectiveness of the IS (i.e., ~ implementation*efficacy). We discuss the mechanisms by which an implementation strategy can alter the context, and therefore effect, of an EBI using the underlying IV assumptions. We illustrate these concepts using examples of the implementation of new ART initiation guidelines in Zambia and community-based masking programs in Bangladesh. RESULTS Causal questions relevant to implementation science are answered at each stage of an IV analysis. The first stage assesses the effect of the IS (e.g., new guidelines) on EBI uptake (e.g., same-day treatment initiation). The second stage leverages the IS as an IV to estimate the complier average causal effect (CACE) of the EBI on patient outcomes (e.g., effect of same-day treatment initiation on viral suppression). The underlying assumptions of CACE formalize that the causal effect of EBI may differ in the context of a different IS because (1) the mechanisms by which individuals uptake an intervention may differ and (2) the subgroup of individuals who take up an EBI may differ. IV methods thus provide a conceptual framework for how IS and EBIs are linked and that the IS itself needs to be considered a critical contextual determinant. Moreover, it also provides rigorous methodologic tools to isolate the effect of an IS, EBI, and combined effect of the IS and EBI. DISCUSSION Leveraging IV methods when exposure to an implementation strategy is random helps to conceptualize the context-dependent nature of implementation strategies, EBIs, and patient outcomes. IV methods formalize that the causal effect of an EBI may be specific to the context of the implementation strategy used to promote uptake. This integration of implementation science concepts and theory with rigorous causal epidemiologic methods yields novel insights and provides important tools for exploring the next generation of questions related to mechanisms and context in implementation science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaloke Mody
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8051, 4523 Clayton Avenue, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Lindsey M Filiatreau
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8051, 4523 Clayton Avenue, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Charles W Goss
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Byron J Powell
- Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Elvin H Geng
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8051, 4523 Clayton Avenue, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Prince SA, Lang JJ, de Groh M, Badland H, Barnett A, Littlejohns LB, Brandon NC, Butler GP, Casu G, Cerin E, Colley RC, de Lannoy L, Demchenko I, Ellingwood HN, Evenson KR, Faulkner G, Fridman L, Friedenreich CM, Fuller DL, Fuselli P, Giangregorio LM, Gupta N, Hino AA, Hume C, Isernhagen B, Jalaludin B, Lakerveld J, Larouche R, Lemon SC, Loucaides CA, Maddock JE, McCormack GR, Mehta A, Milton K, Mota J, Ngo VD, Owen N, Oyeyemi AL, Palmeira AL, Rainham DG, Rhodes RE, Ridgers ND, Roosendaal I, Rosenberg DE, Schipperijn J, Slater SJ, Storey KE, Tremblay MS, Tully MA, Vanderloo LM, Veitch J, Vietinghoff C, Whiting S, Winters M, Yang L, Geneau R. Prioritizing a research agenda on built environments and physical activity: a twin panel Delphi consensus process with researchers and knowledge users. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2023; 20:144. [PMID: 38062460 PMCID: PMC10704660 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01533-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The growth of urban dwelling populations globally has led to rapid increases of research and policy initiatives addressing associations between the built environment and physical activity (PA). Given this rapid proliferation, it is important to identify priority areas and research questions for moving the field forward. The objective of this study was to identify and compare research priorities on the built environment and PA among researchers and knowledge users (e.g., policy makers, practitioners). METHODS Between September 2022 and April 2023, a three-round, modified Delphi survey was conducted among two independent panels of international researchers (n = 38) and knowledge users (n = 23) to identify similarities and differences in perceived research priorities on the built environment and PA and generate twin 'top 10' lists of the most important research needs. RESULTS From a broad range of self-identified issues, both panels ranked in common the most pressing research priorities including stronger study designs such as natural experiments, research that examines inequalities and inequities, establishing the cost effectiveness of interventions, safety and injuries related to engagement in active transportation (AT), and considerations for climate change and climate adaptation. Additional priorities identified by researchers included: implementation science, research that incorporates Indigenous perspectives, land-use policies, built environments that support active aging, and participatory research. Additional priorities identified by knowledge users included: built environments and PA among people living with disabilities and a need for national data on trip chaining, multi-modal travel, and non-work or school-related AT. CONCLUSIONS Five common research priorities between the two groups emerged, including (1) to better understand causality, (2) interactions with the natural environment, (3) economic evaluations, (4) social disparities, and (5) preventable AT-related injuries. The findings may help set directions for future research, interdisciplinary and intersectoral collaborations, and funding opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Prince
- Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, 785 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, K1A 0K9, Canada.
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - Justin J Lang
- Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, 785 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, K1A 0K9, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, City East Campus, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Margaret de Groh
- Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, 785 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, K1A 0K9, Canada
| | - Hannah Badland
- Social and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anthony Barnett
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lori Baugh Littlejohns
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Population and Public Health, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Gregory P Butler
- Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, 785 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, K1A 0K9, Canada
| | - Géna Casu
- Association pour la santé publique du Québec (ASPQ), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ester Cerin
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Rachel C Colley
- Health Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Iryna Demchenko
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kelly R Evenson
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Guy Faulkner
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Liraz Fridman
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine M Friedenreich
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel L Fuller
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | - Lora M Giangregorio
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neeru Gupta
- Department of Sociology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Adriano A Hino
- Health Sciences Graduate Program, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Clare Hume
- School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Bin Jalaludin
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeroen Lakerveld
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Health Behaviours and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Upstream Team, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Richard Larouche
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | - Stephenie C Lemon
- Prevention Research Center, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Jay E Maddock
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Gavin R McCormack
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- School of Planning, Architecture, and Landscape, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Aman Mehta
- Maroondah City Council, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen Milton
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Jorge Mota
- Research Center in Physical Activity, health and Leisure (CIAFEL)-Faculty of Sports-University of Porto (FADEUP) and Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
| | - Victor D Ngo
- Canadian Institute of Planners, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neville Owen
- Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adewale L Oyeyemi
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Daniel G Rainham
- Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ryan E Rhodes
- School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nicola D Ridgers
- Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), University of South Australia, City East Campus, Adelaide, South Australia
| | | | - Dori E Rosenberg
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jasper Schipperijn
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sandra J Slater
- Bachelor of Science in Public Health Program, School of Pharmacy, Concordia University Wisconsin, Mequon, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Kate E Storey
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mark S Tremblay
- Outdoor Play Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark A Tully
- School of Medicine, Ulster University, Londonberry, United Kingdom
| | - Leigh M Vanderloo
- ParticipACTION, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenny Veitch
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Stephen Whiting
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Meghan Winters
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Linchuan Yang
- Department of Urban and Rural Planning, School of Architecture, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
| | - Robert Geneau
- Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, 785 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, K1A 0K9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fazel M, Soneson E. Current evidence and opportunities in child and adolescent public mental health: a research review. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2023; 64:1699-1719. [PMID: 37771261 DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A public mental health lens is increasingly required to better understand the complex and multifactorial influences of interpersonal, community and institutional systems on the mental health of children and adolescents. METHODS This research review (1) provides an overview of public mental health and proposes a new interactional schema that can guide research and practice, (2) summarises recent evidence on public mental health interventions for children and adolescents, (3) highlights current challenges for this population that might benefit from additional attention and (4) discusses methodological and conceptual hurdles and proposes potential solutions. RESULTS In our evidence review, a broad range of universal, selective and indicated interventions with a variety of targets, mechanisms and settings were identified, some of which (most notably parenting programmes and various school-based interventions) have demonstrated small-to-modest positive effects. Few, however, have achieved sustained mental health improvements. CONCLUSIONS There is an opportunity to re-think how public mental health interventions are designed, evaluated and implemented. Deliberate design, encompassing careful consideration of the aims and population-level impacts of interventions, complemented by measurement that embraces complexity through more in-depth characterisation, or 'phenotyping', of interpersonal and environmental elements is needed. Opportunities to improve child and adolescent mental health outcomes are gaining unprecedented momentum. Innovative new methodology, heightened public awareness, institutional interest and supportive funding can enable enhanced study of public mental health that does not shy away from complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Fazel
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emma Soneson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sagatun Å, Engell T, Brekke M, Sjølie H, Ekornes SM, Waldum-Grevboe KS, Pape K, Kvaløy K, Jeneson A, Trøan AS, Askeland AL, Stien L, Holen S. Guideline evaluation and implementation mechanisms in school health services (GuideMe): protocol for a hybrid randomized factorial trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1259. [PMID: 37968693 PMCID: PMC10652429 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10179-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Norwegian school health services received a national best-practice guideline in 2017. To promote healthy life skills and identify adolescents needing support, the guideline includes strong recommendations for individual consultations with all 8th graders and increased collaboration with schools. To help implement the recommendations, a blended implementation strategy (SchoolHealth) was co-created with school nurses, students, and stakeholders. SchoolHealth consists of three implementation elements: Digital dialog and administration tool (audit and feedback +), Dialog support (external consultation), and Collaboration materials (targeted dissemination). This hybrid study will test the main and combined effects of the elements on guideline fidelity and effectiveness. METHODS The GuideMe study is a factorial cluster randomized controlled trial examining SchoolHealth's effectiveness on guideline fidelity and guideline effectiveness goals. Forty Norwegian secondary schools will be randomized to eight different combinations of the elements in SchoolHealth. Participants will include school nurses and school personnel from these schools, and 8th grade students (n = 1200). Primary outcomes are school nurses' fidelity to the guidelines and student's ability to cope with their life (i.e., health literacy, positive health behaviors and self-efficacy). Quantitative methods will be used to test effects and mechanisms, while mixed- and qualitative methods will be used to explore mechanisms, experiences, and other phenomena in depth. Participants will complete digital questionnaires at the start and end of the schoolyear, and after the consultation during the schoolyear. The study will run in two waves, each lasting for one school year. The multifactorial design allows testing of interactions and main effects due to equal distribution of all factors within each main effect. Sustainment and scale-up of optimized SchoolHealth elements using national infrastructure are simultaneously prepared. DISCUSSION The study will investigate possible effects of the implementation elements in isolation and in combination, and hypothesized implementation mechanisms. In-depth study of user experiences will inform improvements to elements in SchoolHealth. The results will yield causal knowledge about implementation strategies and the mechanisms through which they assert effects. Mixed-methods will provide insights into how and when the elements work. Optimizing guideline implementation elements can support adolescents in a crucial life phase. TRAIL REGISTRATION ISRCTN24173836. Registration date 8 August 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åse Sagatun
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway (RBUP/PILAR), Oslo, Norway.
- VID Specialized University (VID), Oslo, Norway.
| | - Thomas Engell
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway (RBUP/PILAR), Oslo, Norway
| | - Malene Brekke
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway (RBUP/PILAR), Oslo, Norway
- VID Specialized University (VID), Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege Sjølie
- VID Specialized University (VID), Oslo, Norway
| | - Stine M Ekornes
- Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare (RKBU Central Norway), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Kristine Pape
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kirsti Kvaløy
- HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Annette Jeneson
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway (RBUP/PILAR), Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna Stigum Trøan
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway (RBUP/PILAR), Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Liv Askeland
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway (RBUP/PILAR), Oslo, Norway
| | - Line Stien
- Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare (RKBU Central Norway), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Solveig Holen
- Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway (RBUP/PILAR), Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Harkko J, Sipilä N, Nordquist H, Lallukka T, Appelqvist-Schmidlechner K, Donnelly M, Kouvonen A. External context in individual placement and support implementation: a scoping review with abductive thematic analysis. Implement Sci 2023; 18:61. [PMID: 37946209 PMCID: PMC10636871 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01316-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Context including the external context may considerably affect the adoption, implementation, sustainment, and scale-up of evidence-based practices. We investigated external contextual features by conducting a scoping review of empirical research regarding the implementation of an evidence-based psychiatric or mental health vocational rehabilitation service called Individual Placement and Support (IPS). METHODS The protocol for the scoping review was registered with the Open Science Framework. We used the methodology by Joanna Briggs Institute for conducting the scoping review and reported it according to the PRISMA-ScR checklist. We searched 12 databases for research regarding 'Individual Placement and Support' or 'Evidence-Based Supported Employment'. We retained peer-reviewed empirical studies investigating external contextual factors and their impact on IPS implementation outcomes. We extracted data from the eligible articles and conducted descriptive and thematic analyses. RESULTS Fifty-nine original research papers met our eligibility requirements and were retained after reviewing 1124 titles and abstracts and 119 full texts. The analysis generated two main themes: (1) external contextual determinants of service delivery and (2) external systems influencing the evidence-to-practice process. The first main theme encompassed policies and laws, financing, and administratively instituted support resources, and organizational arrangements associated with external stakeholders that may facilitate or hinder the local implementation. The second main theme comprised strategies and actions used by different stakeholders to facilitate implementation locally or scale-up efforts at a system level. DISCUSSION Our scoping review illustrates the important role that external contextual factors play and how they may facilitate or hinder the implementation and scale-up of the IPS model across mental health services in different countries. Consideration of these factors by decision-makers in mental health and welfare services, planners, providers, and practitioners is likely to facilitate the development of effective strategies for bridging the evidence-practice gap in implementing the EBPs. Finally, the scoping review identified gaps in knowledge and offered suggestions for future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION Open Science Framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaakko Harkko
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Noora Sipilä
- The Equality Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hilla Nordquist
- South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences, Kotka, Finland
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tea Lallukka
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Michael Donnelly
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Anne Kouvonen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wortham WK, Rodwin AH, Purtle J, Munson MR, Raghavan R. Revisiting the policy ecology framework for implementation of evidence-based practices in mental health settings. Implement Sci 2023; 18:58. [PMID: 37936123 PMCID: PMC10629012 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01309-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past three decades, policy actors and actions have been highly influential in supporting the implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in mental health settings. An early examination of these actions resulted in the Policy Ecology Framework (PEF), which was originally developed as a tactical primer for state and local mental health regulators in the field of child mental health. However, the policy landscape for implementation has evolved significantly since the original PEF was published. An interrogation of the strategies originally proposed in the PEF is necessary to provide an updated menu of strategies to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of policy action and promote system improvement. OBJECTIVES This paper builds upon the original PEF to address changes in the policy landscape for the implementation of mental health EBPs between 2009 and 2022. We review the current state of policy strategies that support the implementation of EBPs in mental health care and outline key areas for policy-oriented implementation research. Our review identifies policy strategies at federal, state, agency, and organizational levels, and highlights developments in the social context in which EBPs are implemented. Furthermore, our review is organized around some key changes that occurred across each PEF domain that span organizational, agency, political, and social contexts along with subdomains within each area. DISCUSSION We present an updated menu of policy strategies to support the implementation of EBPs in mental health settings. This updated menu of strategies considers the broad range of conceptual developments and changes in the policy landscape. These developments have occurred across the organizational, agency, political, and social contexts and are important for policymakers to consider in the context of supporting the implementation of EBPs. The updated PEF expands and enhances the specification of policy levers currently available, and identifies policy targets that are underdeveloped (e.g., de-implementation and sustainment) but are becoming visible opportunities for policy to support system improvement. The updated PEF clarifies current policy efforts within the field of implementation science in health to conceptualize and better operationalize the role of policy in the implementation of EBPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney K Wortham
- Silver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
| | - Aaron H Rodwin
- Silver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Jonathan Purtle
- Department of Public Health Policy & Management, Global Center for Implementation Science, School of Global Public Health, New York University, 708 Broadway, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Michelle R Munson
- Silver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Ramesh Raghavan
- Silver School of Social Work, New York University, 1 Washington Square North, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tyler A, Pérez Jolles M. Methodological progress note: Implementation science contributions to healthcare research and practice. J Hosp Med 2023; 18:920-925. [PMID: 37301730 DOI: 10.1002/jhm.13147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Tyler
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Monica Pérez Jolles
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS) and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Shelton RC, Hailemariam M, Iwelunmor J. Making the connection between health equity and sustainability. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1226175. [PMID: 37822544 PMCID: PMC10562623 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1226175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Sustainability and health inequities are key challenges in public health and healthcare. Research suggests that only about half of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) are sustained over time, and settings and populations experiencing systemic and structural barriers to health (e.g., poverty, racism, stigma, and discrimination) experience even greater challenges to sustainability. In this article, we argue that an enhanced focus on sustainability in the field of implementation science is critical in order to maximize the long-term health benefits and broader societal impacts of EBIs for all populations and settings. From an equity perspective, a focus on sustainability is particularly critical to prioritize among population sub-groups that have not historically received the benefits of health-related EBIs. We discuss how a health equity framing is essential to sustaining EBIs in under-resourced communities, and requires moving away from a deficit mindset that focuses on why EBIs are challenging to sustain, to one that focuses more on identifying and nurturing existing assets within individuals and communities to increase the likelihood that EBIs are sustained. We conclude with a discussion of future directions as well as recommendations and resources (e.g., frameworks, tools) to advance and make progress toward sustainability from a health equity mindset, including: (1) Actively planning early for sustainability alongside key partners; (2) Tracking progress toward enhancing sustainability and being accountable in doing so equitably for all settings and populations; and (3) Focusing on both equity and engagement early and often throughout the research process and all implementation phases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C. Shelton
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Maji Hailemariam
- C. S. Mott Department of Public Health and Department of OBGYN and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, United States
| | - Juliet Iwelunmor
- Behavioral Science and Health Education, College for Public Health and Social Justice, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gravitt PE. How to turn evidence into policy in resource-limited settings. Nat Med 2023; 29:2166. [PMID: 37198456 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02349-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patti E Gravitt
- US National Cancer Institute, Center for Global Health, Rockville, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Milko LV, Berg JS. Age-Based Genomic Screening during Childhood: Ethical and Practical Considerations in Public Health Genomics Implementation. Int J Neonatal Screen 2023; 9:36. [PMID: 37489489 PMCID: PMC10366892 DOI: 10.3390/ijns9030036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic sequencing offers an unprecedented opportunity to detect inherited variants that are implicated in rare Mendelian disorders, yet there are many challenges to overcome before this technology can routinely be applied in the healthy population. The age-based genomic screening (ABGS) approach is a novel alternative to genome-scale sequencing at birth that aims to provide highly actionable genetic information to parents over the course of their child's routine health care. ABGS utilizes an established metric to identify conditions with high clinical actionability and incorporates information about the age of onset and age of intervention to determine the optimal time to screen for any given condition. Ongoing partnerships with parents and providers are instrumental to the co-creation of educational resources and strategies to address potential implementation barriers. Implementation science frameworks and informative empirical data are used to evaluate strategies to establish this unique clinical application of targeted genomic sequencing. Ultimately, a pilot project conducted in primary care pediatrics clinics will assess patient and implementation outcomes, parent and provider perspectives, and the feasibility of ABGS. A validated, stakeholder-informed, and practical ABGS program will include hundreds of conditions that are actionable during infancy and childhood, setting the stage for a longitudinal implementation that can assess clinical and health economic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura V. Milko
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 120 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7264, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Glasgow L, Clayton M, Honeycutt A, Bayer EM, Plescia M, Holtgrave PL, Hacker K. Key insights on multisector community partnerships from real-world efforts to address social determinants of health. EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING 2023; 99:102298. [PMID: 37187118 DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To better understand and inform how multisector community partnerships (MCPs) perform meaningful work to prevent chronic disease and advance health equity by addressing social determinants of health (SDOH). METHODS We conducted a rapid retrospective evaluation of SDOH initiatives implemented within the past three years by 42 established MCPs across the United States. The mixed methods evaluation included document review and coding of available outcomes data, virtual discussions, and Prevention Impacts Simulation Model (PRISM) analysis. RESULTS All 42 MCPs built community capacity for addressing SDOH through new or strengthened data systems, leveraged resources, or engaged residents, for example. Most MCPs (N = 38, 90%) reported contributions to community changes that promote healthy living. More than half of the MCPs (N = 22) reported health outcomes data for their SDOH initiatives, including improved health behaviors and clinical outcomes. Based on reach data provided by 27 MCPs, PRISM analysis results suggest that sustained initiatives could save over $633 million in productivity and medical costs cumulatively through 20 years. CONCLUSIONS With sufficient technical assistance and funding resources, MCPs are a key component of the public health strategy to address SDOH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LaShawn Glasgow
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle, NC 27709, USA.
| | - Megan Clayton
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle, NC 27709, USA
| | - Amanda Honeycutt
- RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle, NC 27709, USA
| | - Erin M Bayer
- The Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, 2231 Crystal Drive, Suite 450, Arlington, VA 22202, USA
| | - Marcus Plescia
- The Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, 2231 Crystal Drive, Suite 450, Arlington, VA 22202, USA
| | - Peter L Holtgrave
- National Association of County and City Health Officials, 1201 I St NW, #400, Washington DC 20005, USA
| | - Karen Hacker
- National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kasman M, Hammond RA, Purcell R, Saliba LF, Mazzucca-Ragan S, Padek M, Allen P, Luke DA, Moreland-Russell S, Erwin PC, Brownson RC. Understanding Misimplementation in U.S. State Health Departments: An Agent-Based Model. Am J Prev Med 2023; 64:525-534. [PMID: 36509634 PMCID: PMC10033358 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The research goal of this study is to explore why misimplementation occurs in public health agencies and how it can be reduced. Misimplementation is ending effective activities prematurely or continuing ineffective ones, which contributes to wasted resources and suboptimal health outcomes. METHODS The study team created an agent-based model that represents how information flow, filtered through organizational structure, capacity, culture, and leadership priorities, shapes continuation decisions. This agent-based model used survey data and interviews with state health department personnel across the U.S. between 2014 and 2020; model design and analyses were conducted with substantial input from stakeholders between 2019 and 2021. The model was used experimentally to identify potential approaches for reducing misimplementation. RESULTS Simulations showed that increasing either organizational evidence-based decision-making capacity or information sharing could reduce misimplementation. Shifting leadership priorities to emphasize effectiveness resulted in the largest reduction, whereas organizational restructuring did not reduce misimplementation. CONCLUSIONS The model identifies for the first time a specific set of factors and dynamic pathways most likely driving misimplementation and suggests a number of actionable strategies for reducing it. Priorities for training the public health workforce include evidence-based decision making and effective communication. Organizations will also benefit from an intentional shift in leadership decision-making processes. On the basis of this initial, successful application of agent-based model to misimplementation, this work provides a framework for further analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matt Kasman
- Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia.
| | - Ross A Hammond
- Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia; Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico
| | - Rob Purcell
- Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Louise Farah Saliba
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Stephanie Mazzucca-Ragan
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Margaret Padek
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Peg Allen
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Douglas A Luke
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sarah Moreland-Russell
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Paul C Erwin
- School of Public Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Public Health Sciences Division, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Krings JG, Gerald JK, Blake KV, Krishnan JA, Reddel HK, Bacharier LB, Dixon AE, Sumino K, Gerald LB, Brownson RC, Persell SD, Clemens CJ, Hiller KM, Castro M, Martinez FD. A Call for the United States to Accelerate the Implementation of Reliever Combination Inhaled Corticosteroid-Formoterol Inhalers in Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023; 207:390-405. [PMID: 36538711 PMCID: PMC9940146 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202209-1729pp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- James G. Krings
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Joe K. Gerald
- Department of Community Environment and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health
- Asthma & Airway Disease Research Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Kathryn V. Blake
- Center for Pharmacogenomics and Translational Research, Nemours Children’s Health, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Helen K. Reddel
- The Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Leonard B. Bacharier
- Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Anne E. Dixon
- Division of Pulmonary Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Kaharu Sumino
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
| | - Lynn B. Gerald
- Population Health Sciences Program, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ross C. Brownson
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, and
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Stephen D. Persell
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and
- Center for Primary Care Innovation, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Katherine M. Hiller
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana; and
| | - Mario Castro
- Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Oh AY, Emmons KM, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE, Foley KL, Lewis CC, Schnoll R, Huguet N, Caplon A, Chambers DA. Speeding implementation in cancer: The National Cancer Institute's Implementation Science Centers in Cancer Control. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:131-138. [PMID: 36315080 PMCID: PMC9905952 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute's Implementation Science Centers in Cancer Control (ISC3) Network represents a large-scale initiative to create an infrastructure to support and enable the efficient, effective, and equitable translation of approaches and evidence-based treatments to reduce cancer risk and improve outcomes. This Cancer MoonshotSM-funded ISC3 Network consists of 7 P50 Centers that support and advance the rapid development, testing, and refinement of innovative approaches to implement a range of evidence-based cancer control interventions. The Centers were designed to have research-practice partnerships at their core and to create the opportunity for a series of pilot studies that could explore new and sometimes risky ideas and embed in their infrastructure a 2-way engagement and collaboration essential to stimulating lasting change. ISC3 also seeks to enhance capacity of researchers, practitioners, and communities to apply implementation science approaches, methods, and measures. The Organizing Framework that guides the work of ISC3 highlights a collective set of 3 core areas of collaboration within and among Centers, including to 1) assess and incorporate dynamic, multilevel context; 2) develop and conduct rapid and responsive pilot and methods studies; and 3) build capacity for knowledge development and exchange. Core operating principles that undergird the Framework include open collaboration, consideration of the dynamic context, and engagement of multiple implementation partners to advance pragmatic methods and health equity and facilitate leadership and capacity building across implementation science and cancer control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Y Oh
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Karen M Emmons
- Department of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Russell E Glasgow
- Dissemination and Implementation Science Program and Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kristie L Foley
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Cara C Lewis
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert Schnoll
- Department of Psychiatry and Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nathalie Huguet
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Amy Caplon
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - David A Chambers
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Velloza J, Roche S, Concepcion T, Ortblad KF. Advancing considerations of context in the evaluation and implementation of evidence-based biomedical HIV prevention interventions: a review of recent research. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2023; 18:1-11. [PMID: 36503876 PMCID: PMC9757852 DOI: 10.1097/coh.0000000000000768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A paradigm shift is needed in how we think about biomedical HIV prevention product effectiveness. Often, we expect randomized trial findings to be generalizable across populations and settings where products will be delivered, without consideration of key contextual drivers that could impact effectiveness. Moreover, researchers and policy-makers generally discount products with varied effect sizes across contexts, rather than explicating the drivers of these differences and using them to inform equitable product choice and delivery. We conducted a review of the recent HIV prevention research to advance considerations of context in choices of when, why, and how to implement biomedical HIV prevention products, with a particular focus on daily oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and the dapivirine vaginal ring (DPV). RECENT FINDINGS Findings across recent studies of PrEP and DPV emphasize that products that do not work well in one context might be highly desirable in another. Key contextual drivers of PrEP and DPV effectiveness, use, and implementation include population, health system, cultural, and historical factors. We recommend conceptualization, measurement, and analysis approaches to fully understand the potential impact of context on prevention product delivery. Execution of these approaches has real-world implications for HIV prevention product choice and could prevent the field from dismissing biomedical HIV prevention products based on trial findings alone. SUMMARY Ending the HIV epidemic will require tailored, person-centered, and equitable approaches to design, implement, and evaluate HIV prevention products which necessitates considerations of context in ongoing research and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Velloza
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Stephanie Roche
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Public Health Sciences Division
| | - Tessa Concepcion
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Crane ME, Purtle J, Becker SJ. Amplifying consumers as partners in dissemination and implementation science and practice. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2023; 4:26334895231205894. [PMID: 37936968 PMCID: PMC10571676 DOI: 10.1177/26334895231205894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This Viewpoint argues for consumers (people with lived experience and their families) to be amplified as key partners in dissemination and implementation science and practice. Method We contend that consumer opinion and consumer demand can be harnessed to influence practitioners and policymakers. Results Amplifying consumers' voices can improve the fit of evidence-based interventions to the intended end user. We offer recommendations of frameworks to engage consumers in the dissemination and implementation of health interventions. We discuss the primary types of evidence consumers may rely upon, including testimonials and lived experience. Conclusions Our intention is for this Viewpoint to continue the momentum in dissemination and implementation science and practice of engaging consumers in our work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret E. Crane
- Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Public Health Policy & Management, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan Purtle
- Department of Public Health Policy & Management, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara J. Becker
- Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Parks RG, Thomas F, Morshed AB, Dodson EA, Tian R, Politi MC, Eyler AA, Thomas I, Brownson RC. Municipal officials' perspectives on policymaking for addressing obesity and health equity. EVIDENCE & POLICY : A JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, DEBATE AND PRACTICE 2023; 19:444-464. [PMID: 38650970 PMCID: PMC11034731 DOI: 10.1332/174426421x16793276974116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Background Obesity evidence-based policies (EBPs) can make a lasting, positive impact on community health; however, policy development and enactment is complex and dependent on multiple forces. Aims and objectives This study investigated key factors affecting municipal officials' policymaking for obesity and related health disparities. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 local officials from a selection of municipalities with high obesity or related health disparities across the United States between December 2020 and April 2021. Findings Policymakers follow a general decision-making process with limited distinction between health and other policy areas. Factors affecting policymaking included: being informed about other local, state, and federal policy, conducting their own research using trustworthy sources, and seeking constituent and stakeholder perspectives. Key facilitators included the need for timely, relevant local data, and seeing or hearing from those impacted. Key local policymaking barriers included constituent opposition, misinformation, controversial issues with contentious solutions, and limited understanding of the connection between issues and obesity/health. Policymakers had a range of understanding about causes of health disparities, including views of individual choices, environmental influences on behaviors, and structural factors impacting health. To address health disparities, municipal officials described: a variety of roles policymakers can take, limitations based on the scope of government, challenges with intergovernmental collaboration or across government levels, ability of policymakers and government employees to understand the problem, and the challenge of framing health disparities given the social-political context. Discussion and conclusion Understanding factors affecting the uptake of EBPs can inform local-level interventions that encourage EBP adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee G. Parks
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Fanice Thomas
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Alexandra B. Morshed
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Elizabeth A. Dodson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ruiyi Tian
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Mary C. Politi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Amy A. Eyler
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Ross C. Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wensing M, Sales A, Aarons GA, Xu D(R, Wilson P. Evidence for objects of implementation in healthcare: considerations for Implementation Science and Implementation Science Communications. Implement Sci 2022; 17:83. [PMID: 36527104 PMCID: PMC9758917 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01249-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The journals Implementation Science and Implementation Science Communications are focused on the implementation of evidence into healthcare practice and policy. This editorial offers reflections on how we handle this as editors. Studies that focus on the simultaneous implementation of implementation objects and (technological or other) structures to enable their implementation are considered on a case-by-case basis regarding their contribution to implementation science. Studies on implementation objects with limited, mixed, or of out-of-context evidence are considered if the evidence for key components of the object of interest is sufficiently robust. We follow GRADE principles in our assessment of the certainty of research findings for health-related interventions in individuals. Adapted thresholds apply to evidence for population health interventions, organizational changes, health reforms, health policy innovations, and medical devices. The added value of a study to the field of implementation science remains of central interest for our journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Wensing
- grid.5253.10000 0001 0328 4908Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne Sales
- grid.134936.a0000 0001 2162 3504Sinclair School of Nursing and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO USA ,grid.413800.e0000 0004 0419 7525Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Gregory A. Aarons
- grid.266100.30000 0001 2107 4242Department of Psychiatry and ACTRI Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Dong (Roman) Xu
- grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471SMU Institute for Global Health (SIGHT), School of Health Management and Dermatology Hospital , Southern Medical University (SMU), Guangzhou, China
| | - Paul Wilson
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK ,NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Egeland KM, Engell T, Halvorsen J, Varsi C. Proceedings from the Second Annual Conference of the Norwegian Network for Implementation Research. GLOBAL IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS 2022; 2:332-339. [PMID: 36465950 PMCID: PMC9684746 DOI: 10.1007/s43477-022-00069-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
In 2019, Norwegian implementation researchers formed a network to promote implementation research and practice in the Norwegian context. On November 19th, 2021, the second annual Norwegian implementation conference was held in Oslo. Ninety participants from all regions of the country gathered to showcase the frontiers of Norwegian implementation research. The conference also hosted a panel discussion about critical next steps for implementation science in Norway. The conference included 17 presentations from diverse disciplines within health and welfare services, including schools. The themes presented included stakeholder engagement, implementation mechanisms, evaluations of the implementation of specific interventions, the use of implementation guidelines and frameworks, the development and validation of implementation measurements, and barriers and facilitators for implementation. The panel discussion highlighted several critical challenges with the implementation of evidence-informed practices in Norway, including limited implementation competence and capacity among practice leaders and workforces, few opportunities for education in implementation science, limited implementation research in the Norwegian context, scarce funding possibilities for implementation research, and a lack of long-term perspectives on implementation processes. Overall, the 2021 Norwegian implementation conference showed an encouraging sign of a maturing field of science in Norway. The more voluminous proceedings from the 2020 conference called for several important advancements to improve implementation science and practice in Norway, and the 2021 conference indicates that steps have already been taken in favorable directions in terms of, for instance, research designs and measurements. However, there are still unexploited potentials for improvements in implementation research, funding, policies, and practice. Norwegian implementation researcher should be mindful of the challenges and potential pitfalls implementation science currently face as a scientific discipline. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43477-022-00069-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina M. Egeland
- Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS), Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Engell
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jeanette Halvorsen
- Norwegian Centre for Learning Environment and Behavioral Research in Education, Faculty of Arts and Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Feuerstein JL, Douglas NF, Olswang LB. Dissemination Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Tutorial. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2022; 65:4172-4180. [PMID: 36306509 DOI: 10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this tutorial is threefold: (a) to bring attention to the role and value of dissemination research in communication sciences and disorders (CSD), (b) to introduce a model that can be used to guide dissemination research, and (c) to demonstrate strategic steps toward generating research questions and planning methods for dissemination research using an example from the authors' work. METHOD This tutorial begins with a discussion of the role of dissemination in clinical research, with emphasis on differentiating the unique value of dissemination within the broader context of dissemination and implementation (D&I) research. The tutorial next presents a model of dissemination from the extant literature and describes how this model can be applied in CSD using examples from the authors' respective programs of clinical research. This is followed by an example that illustrates how the model can be used to determine research questions and guide the development of methods. Finally, the tutorial ends by discussing the potential impact of dissemination research for advancing efforts in CSD for closing the research-to-practice gap. CONCLUSIONS Dissemination research is an often overlooked but critical component of D&I efforts. When approached systematically and rigorously, dissemination can make meaningful contributions to clinical research in CSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie L Feuerstein
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando
| | - Natalie F Douglas
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant
| | - Lesley B Olswang
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Malone S, Newland J, Kudchadkar SR, Prewitt K, McKay V, Prusaczyk B, Proctor E, Brownson RC, Luke DA. Sustainability in pediatric hospitals: An exploration at the intersection of quality improvement and implementation science. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:1005802. [PMID: 36925889 PMCID: PMC10012775 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1005802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Although new evidence-based practices are frequently implemented in clinical settings, many are not sustained, limiting the intended impact. Within implementation science, there is a gap in understanding sustainability. Pediatric healthcare settings have a robust history of quality improvement (QI), which includes a focus on continuation of change efforts. QI capability and sustainability capacity, therefore, serve as a useful concept for connecting the broader fields of QI and implementation science to provide insights on improving care. This study addresses these gaps in understanding of sustainability in pediatric settings and its relationship to QI. Methods This is a cross-sectional observational study conducted within pediatric academic medical centers in the United States. Clinicians surveyed worked with one of three evidence-based clinical programs: perioperative antimicrobial stewardship prescribing, early mobility in the intensive care unit, and massive blood transfusion administration. Participants completed two assessments: (1) the Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) and (2) a 19-question assessment that included demographics and validation questions, specifically a subset of questions from the Change Process Capability Questionnaire, a QI scale. Initial descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted prior to building mixed-effects models relating perceived QI to clinical sustainability capacity. Results A total of 181 individuals from three different programs and 30 sites were included in the final analyses. QI capability scores were assessed as a single construct (5-point Likert scale), with an average response of 4.16 (higher scores indicate greater QI capability). The overall CSAT score (7-point Likert scale) was the highest for massive transfusion programs (5.51, SD = 0.91), followed by early mobility (5.25, SD = 0.92) and perioperative antibiotic prescribing (4.91, SD = 1.07). Mixed-effects modeling illustrated that after controlling for person and setting level variables, higher perceptions of QI capabilities were significantly related to overall clinical sustainability. Conclusion Organizations and programs with higher QI capabilities had a higher sustainability capacity, even when controlling for differences at the individual and intervention levels. Organizational factors that enable evidence-based interventions should be further studied, especially as they relate to sustainability. Issues to be considered by practitioners when planning for sustainability include bedside provider perceptions, intervention achievability, frequency of delivery, and organizational influences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Malone
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jason Newland
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Sapna R Kudchadkar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Pediatrics, and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kim Prewitt
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Virginia McKay
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Beth Prusaczyk
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Enola Proctor
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Douglas A Luke
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Farah Saliba L, Allen P, Mazzucca SL, Rodriguez Weno E, Moreland-Russell S, Padek M, Brownson RC. Program adaptation by health departments. Front Public Health 2022; 10:892258. [PMID: 36172214 PMCID: PMC9512313 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.892258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The dissemination of evidence-based interventions (i.e., programs, practices, and policies) is a core function of US state health departments (SHDs). However, interventions are originally designed and tested with a specific population and context. Hence, adapting the intervention to meet the real-world circumstances and population's needs can increase the likelihood of achieving the expected health outcomes for the target population from the implemented intervention. This study identified how SHD employees decide to adapt public health programs and what influences decisions on how to adapt them. Materials and methods SHD employees (n = 45) were interviewed using a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Telephone interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were consensus-coded and themes were identified using thematic analysis. Several themes aligned with the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact. Results Data, outcomes, and health department evaluations influenced decisions to adapt a program (pre-adaptation), and reasons to adapt a program included organizational and sociopolitical contextual factors. SHD middle-level managers, program managers and staff, and local agencies were involved in the decisions to adapt the programs. Finally, the goals for adapting a program included enhancing effectiveness/outcomes, reach and satisfaction with the program; funding; and partner engagement. After SHD employees decided to adapt a program, data and evidence guided the changes. Program staff and evaluators were engaged in the adaptation process. Program managers consulted partners to gather ideas on how best to adapt a program based on partners' experiences implementing the program and obtaining community input. Lastly, program managers also received input on adapting content and context from coalition meetings and periodic technical assistance calls. Discussion The findings related to decisions to adapt public health programs provide practitioners with considerations for adapting them. Findings reaffirm the importance of promoting public health competencies in program evaluation and adaptation, as well as systematically documenting and evaluating the adaptation processes. In addition, the themes could be studied in future research as mechanisms, mediators, and moderators to implementation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Farah Saliba
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Peg Allen
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Stephanie L. Mazzucca
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Emily Rodriguez Weno
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Sarah Moreland-Russell
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Margaret Padek
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Ross C. Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Spoelstra SL, Schueller M, Basso V, Sikorskii A. Results of a multi-site pragmatic hybrid type 3 cluster randomized trial comparing level of facilitation while implementing an intervention in community-dwelling disabled and older adults in a Medicaid waiver. Implement Sci 2022; 17:57. [PMID: 36028873 PMCID: PMC9419328 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01232-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence-based interventions that optimize physical function for disabled and older adults living in the community who have difficulty with daily living tasks are available. However, uptake has been limited, particularly in resource-constrained (Medicaid) settings. Facilitation may be an effective implementation strategy. This study’s aim was to compare internal facilitation (IF) versus IF and external facilitation (EF) on adoption and sustainability of an intervention in a Medicaid home and community-based waiver. Methods In a hybrid type 3 trial, waiver sites (N = 18) were randomly assigned to implement the intervention using a bundle of strategies with either IF or IF and EF. Adoption and sustainability were assessed via Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) for each site. Clinician attitudes toward evidence-based practice and self-efficacy were evaluated among 539 registered nurses, social workers, and occupational therapists. Medicaid beneficiary outcomes of activities of daily living, depression, pain, falls, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations were evaluated in a sample of N = 7030 as reflected by electronic health records data of the Medicaid waiver program. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare outcomes between trial arms while accounting for cluster-randomized design. Results The mean SIC scores were 72.22 (standard deviation [SD] = 16.98) in the IF arm (9 sites) and 61.33 (SD = 19.29) in the IF + EF arm (9 sites). The difference was not statistically significant but corresponded to the medium clinically important effect size Cohen’s d = 0.60. Clinician implementation outcomes of attitudes and self-efficacy did not differ by trial arm. Beneficiary depression was reduced significantly in the IF + EF arm compared to the IF arm (p = .04, 95% confidence interval for the difference [0.01, 0.24]). No differences between trial arms were found for other beneficiary outcomes. Conclusions Level of facilitation did not enhance capacity for adoption and sustainability of an evidence-based intervention in a Medicaid setting that cares for disabled and older adults. Improved beneficiary depression favored use of IF and EF compared to IF alone, and no differences were found for other outcomes. These findings also suggest level of facilitation may not have impacted beneficiary outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03634033; date registered August 16, 2018. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01232-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra L Spoelstra
- Kirkhof College of Nursing, Grand Valley State University, 301 Michigan St, Room C352, Grand Rapids, MI, 49504, USA.
| | - Monica Schueller
- Kirkhof College of Nursing, Grand Valley State University, 301 Michigan St, Room C352, Grand Rapids, MI, 49504, USA
| | - Viktoria Basso
- Statistics Department, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, USA
| | - Alla Sikorskii
- Department of Psychiatry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Implementation strategy mapping methods to improve autism intervention use in community settings: a study protocol. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:92. [PMID: 35982456 PMCID: PMC9389766 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00339-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation strategies are purported to facilitate adoption and use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) across settings. The use of tailored implementation strategies may be particularly effective, as they are selected with the explicit purpose of addressing setting-specific implementation determinants. However, methods to select and tailor implementation strategies, including in community settings, remain understudied. This project will identify and describe implementation strategy mapping methods (ISMMs) from extant peer-reviewed literature and pilot test a method to match implementation strategies with determinants in low-resourced community mental health (CMH) agencies that deliver services to children on the autism spectrum. Methods Aim 1: A scoping review, following PRISMA guidelines, will be conducted to identify implementation strategy mapping methods (ISMMs) utilized in child mental health settings. Data extraction will identify and describe each ISMM, including identifying methodological and procedural steps, analyzing the frequency of ISMM use, and identifying outcomes measured in eligible ISMM studies. Aim 2: Using scoping review findings, select and pilot test one ISMM within five community mental health agencies in Michigan that provide services to autistic children. We will recruit five directors/agency leaders, supervisors, and direct providers at each of the eligible agencies (expected N = 25). A sequential explanatory (QUAN➔ QUAL) mixed methods design will be used. Participants will complete a demographics and client survey, as well as a needs assessment to identify implementation determinants. The impact of the ISMM on organizational readiness for change (from pre- to post-ISMM), as well as implementation outcomes of the ISMM (feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, usability), will be examined. Semi-structured interviews will elicit stakeholder perspectives on the mapping method. Discussion The current project aims to advance our knowledge of methods for selecting, tailoring, and mapping implementation strategies to address context-specific determinants to implementation. Additionally, this project will contribute to growing science found at the intersection of implementation science and autism research by utilizing the implementation determinants framework, the CFIR, to guide data collection, analysis, and interpretation of findings. Finally, these findings may support future EBP implementation efforts within low-resourced communities, with the ultimate goal of increasing equity in access to EBPs for autistic children.
Collapse
|