1
|
Ogi-Gittins I, Hart WS, Song J, Nash RK, Polonsky J, Cori A, Hill EM, Thompson RN. A simulation-based approach for estimating the time-dependent reproduction number from temporally aggregated disease incidence time series data. Epidemics 2024; 47:100773. [PMID: 38781911 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Tracking pathogen transmissibility during infectious disease outbreaks is essential for assessing the effectiveness of public health measures and planning future control strategies. A key measure of transmissibility is the time-dependent reproduction number, which has been estimated in real-time during outbreaks of a range of pathogens from disease incidence time series data. While commonly used approaches for estimating the time-dependent reproduction number can be reliable when disease incidence is recorded frequently, such incidence data are often aggregated temporally (for example, numbers of cases may be reported weekly rather than daily). As we show, commonly used methods for estimating transmissibility can be unreliable when the timescale of transmission is shorter than the timescale of data recording. To address this, here we develop a simulation-based approach involving Approximate Bayesian Computation for estimating the time-dependent reproduction number from temporally aggregated disease incidence time series data. We first use a simulated dataset representative of a situation in which daily disease incidence data are unavailable and only weekly summary values are reported, demonstrating that our method provides accurate estimates of the time-dependent reproduction number under such circumstances. We then apply our method to two outbreak datasets consisting of weekly influenza case numbers in 2019-20 and 2022-23 in Wales (in the United Kingdom). Our simple-to-use approach will allow accurate estimates of time-dependent reproduction numbers to be obtained from temporally aggregated data during future infectious disease outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Ogi-Gittins
- Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research (SBIDER), University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - W S Hart
- Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - J Song
- Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, Health Protection Division, Public Health Wales, Cardiff CF10 4BZ, UK
| | - R K Nash
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London W2 1PG, UK
| | - J Polonsky
- Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, University of Geneva, Geneva 1205, Switzerland
| | - A Cori
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London W2 1PG, UK
| | - E M Hill
- Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research (SBIDER), University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - R N Thompson
- Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ozdenerol E, Bingham-Byrne RM, Seboly J. Female Leadership during COVID-19: The Effectiveness of Diverse Approaches towards Mitigation Management during a Pandemic. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:7023. [PMID: 37947579 PMCID: PMC10649683 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20217023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
This paper tackles the question of how female leaders at national levels of government managed COVID-19 response and recovery from the first COVID-19 case in their respective countries through to 30 September 2021. The aim of this study was to determine which COVID-19 mitigations were effective in lowering the viral reproduction rate and number of new cases (per million) in each of the fourteen female presidents' countries-Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgium, Bolivia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Lithuania, New Zealand, Norway, Serbia, and Taiwan. We first compared these countries by finding a mean case rate (29,420 per million), mean death rate (294 per million), and mean excess mortality rate (+1640 per million). We then analyzed the following mitigation measures per country: school closing, workplace closing, canceling public events, restrictions on gatherings, closing public transport, stay-at-home requirements, restrictions on internal movement, international travel controls, income support, debt/contract relief, fiscal measures, international support, public information campaigns, testing policy, contact tracing, emergency investment in healthcare, investment in vaccines, facial coverings, vaccination policy, and protection of the elderly. We utilized the random forest approach to examine the predictive significance of these variables, providing more interpretability. Subsequently, we then applied the Wilcoxon rank-sum statistical test to see the differences with and without mitigation in effect for the variables that were found to be significant by the random forest model. We observed that different mitigation strategies varied in their effectiveness. Notably, restrictions on internal movement and the closure of public transportation proved to be highly effective in reducing the spread of COVID-19. Embracing qualities such as community-based, empathetic, and personable leadership can foster greater trust among citizens, ensuring continued adherence to governmental policies like mask mandates and stay-at-home orders, ultimately enhancing long-term crisis management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esra Ozdenerol
- Spatial Analysis and Geographic Education Laboratory, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA;
| | - Rebecca Michelle Bingham-Byrne
- Spatial Analysis and Geographic Education Laboratory, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA;
| | - Jacob Seboly
- Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dobson A, Ricci C, Boucekkine R, Gozzi F, Fabbri G, Loch-Temzelides T, Pascual M. Balancing economic and epidemiological interventions in the early stages of pathogen emergence. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eade6169. [PMID: 37224240 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade6169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The global pandemic of COVID-19 has underlined the need for more coordinated responses to emergent pathogens. These responses need to balance epidemic control in ways that concomitantly minimize hospitalizations and economic damages. We develop a hybrid economic-epidemiological modeling framework that allows us to examine the interaction between economic and health impacts over the first period of pathogen emergence when lockdown, testing, and isolation are the only means of containing the epidemic. This operational mathematical setting allows us to determine the optimal policy interventions under a variety of scenarios that might prevail in the first period of a large-scale epidemic outbreak. Combining testing with isolation emerges as a more effective policy than lockdowns, substantially reducing deaths and the number of infected hosts, at lower economic cost. If a lockdown is put in place early in the course of the epidemic, it always dominates the "laissez-faire" policy of doing nothing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Dobson
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
- Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama
| | - Cristiano Ricci
- Department of Economics and Management, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Raouf Boucekkine
- Centre for Unframed Thinking, Rennes School of Business, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Fausto Gozzi
- Department of Economics and Finance, Luiss University, Roma, Italy
| | - Giorgio Fabbri
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRAE, Grenoble INP, GAEL, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Ted Loch-Temzelides
- Department of Economics and Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Mercedes Pascual
- Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moy N, Antonini M, Kyhlstedt M, Fiorentini G, Paolucci F. Standardising policy and technology responses in the immediate aftermath of a pandemic: a comparative and conceptual framework. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:10. [PMID: 36698139 PMCID: PMC9875766 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00951-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The initial policy response to the COVID-19 pandemic has differed widely across countries. Such variability in government interventions has made it difficult for policymakers and health research systems to compare what has happened and the effectiveness of interventions across nations. Timely information and analysis are crucial to addressing the lag between the pandemic and government responses to implement targeted interventions to alleviate the impact of the pandemic. METHODS To examine the effect government interventions and technological responses have on epidemiological and economic outcomes, this policy paper proposes a conceptual framework that provides a qualitative taxonomy of government policy directives implemented in the immediate aftermath of a pandemic announcement and before vaccines are implementable. This framework assigns a gradient indicating the intensity and extent of the policy measures and applies the gradient to four countries that share similar institutional features but different COVID-19 experiences: Italy, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. RESULTS Using the categorisation framework allows qualitative information to be presented, and more specifically the gradient can show the dynamic impact of policy interventions on specific outcomes. We have observed that the policy categorisation described here can be used by decision-makers to examine the impacts of major viral outbreaks such as SARS-CoV-2 on health and economic outcomes over time. The framework allows for a visualisation of the frequency and comparison of dominant policies and provides a conceptual tool to assess how dominant interventions (and innovations) affect different sets of health and non-health related outcomes during the response phase to the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS Policymakers and health researchers should converge toward an optimal set of policy interventions to minimize the costs of the pandemic (i.e., health and economic), and facilitate coordination across governance levels before effective vaccines are produced. The proposed framework provides a useful tool to direct health research system resources and build a policy benchmark for future viral outbreaks where vaccines are not readily available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Moy
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Department of Sociology and Business Law, University of Bologna, Strada Maggiore 45, 40126 Bologna, Italy ,grid.1024.70000000089150953Present Address: Centre for Behavioural Economics, Society and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia
| | - Marcello Antonini
- grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Dr , Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia
| | | | - Gianluca Fiorentini
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Department of Economics, University of Bologna, Piazza Scaravilli 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Paolucci
- grid.6292.f0000 0004 1757 1758Department of Sociology and Business Law, University of Bologna, Strada Maggiore 45, 40126 Bologna, Italy ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XNewcastle Business School, University of Newcastle, Hunter St &, Auckland St, Newcastle, NSW 2300 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bandyopadhyay A, Schips M, Mitra T, Khailaie S, Binder SC, Meyer-Hermann M. Testing and isolation to prevent overloaded healthcare facilities and reduce death rates in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Italy. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2022; 2:75. [PMID: 35774529 PMCID: PMC9237078 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-022-00139-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background During the first wave of COVID-19, hospital and intensive care unit beds got overwhelmed in Italy leading to an increased death burden. Based on data from Italian regions, we disentangled the impact of various factors contributing to the bottleneck situation of healthcare facilities, not well addressed in classical SEIR-like models. A particular emphasis was set on the undetected fraction (dark figure), on the dynamically changing hospital capacity, and on different testing, contact tracing, quarantine strategies. Methods We first estimated the dark figure for different Italian regions. Using parameter estimates from literature and, alternatively, with parameters derived from a fit to the initial phase of COVID-19 spread, the model was optimized to fit data (infected, hospitalized, ICU, dead) published by the Italian Civil Protection. Results We show that testing influenced the infection dynamics by isolation of newly detected cases and subsequent interruption of infection chains. The time-varying reproduction number (R t) in high testing regions decreased to <1 earlier compared to the low testing regions. While an early test and isolate (TI) scenario resulted in up to ~31% peak reduction of hospital occupancy, the late TI scenario resulted in an overwhelmed healthcare system. Conclusions An early TI strategy would have decreased the overall hospital usage drastically and, hence, death toll (∼34% reduction in Lombardia) and could have mitigated the lack of healthcare facilities in the course of the pandemic, but it would not have kept the hospitalization amount within the pre-pandemic hospital limit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnab Bandyopadhyay
- Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Marta Schips
- Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Tanmay Mitra
- Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Sahamoddin Khailaie
- Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Sebastian C. Binder
- Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Michael Meyer-Hermann
- Department of Systems Immunology and Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany
- Institute for Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence RESIST (EXC 2155), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kretzschmar ME, Ashby B, Fearon E, Overton CE, Panovska-Griffiths J, Pellis L, Quaife M, Rozhnova G, Scarabel F, Stage HB, Swallow B, Thompson RN, Tildesley MJ, Villela D. Challenges for modelling interventions for future pandemics. Epidemics 2022; 38:100546. [PMID: 35183834 PMCID: PMC8830929 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Mathematical modelling and statistical inference provide a framework to evaluate different non-pharmaceutical and pharmaceutical interventions for the control of epidemics that has been widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this paper, lessons learned from this and previous epidemics are used to highlight the challenges for future pandemic control. We consider the availability and use of data, as well as the need for correct parameterisation and calibration for different model frameworks. We discuss challenges that arise in describing and distinguishing between different interventions, within different modelling structures, and allowing both within and between host dynamics. We also highlight challenges in modelling the health economic and political aspects of interventions. Given the diversity of these challenges, a broad variety of interdisciplinary expertise is needed to address them, combining mathematical knowledge with biological and social insights, and including health economics and communication skills. Addressing these challenges for the future requires strong cross-disciplinary collaboration together with close communication between scientists and policy makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam E Kretzschmar
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ben Ashby
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
| | - Elizabeth Fearon
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - Christopher E Overton
- Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester, UK; Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research, UK; Clinical Data Science Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths
- The Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; The Queen's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lorenzo Pellis
- Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester, UK; Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research, UK; The Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - Matthew Quaife
- TB Modelling Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | - Ganna Rozhnova
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; BioISI-Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Francesca Scarabel
- Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester, UK; Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research, UK; CDLab - Computational Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Udine, Italy
| | - Helena B Stage
- Department of Mathematics, University of Manchester, UK; Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research, UK; University of Potsdam, Germany; Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany
| | - Ben Swallow
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Scottish Covid-19 Response Consortium, UK
| | - Robin N Thompson
- Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research, UK; Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Michael J Tildesley
- Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research, UK; Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Daniel Villela
- Program of Scientific Computing, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Summan A, Nandi A. Timing of non-pharmaceutical interventions to mitigate COVID-19 transmission and their effects on mobility: a cross-country analysis. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2022; 23:105-117. [PMID: 34304325 PMCID: PMC8310614 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01355-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
In the early stages of a pandemic, non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) that encourage physical distancing and reduce contact can decrease and delay disease transmission. Although NPIs have been implemented globally during the COVID-19 pandemic, their intensity and timing have varied widely. This paper analyzed the country-level determinants and effects of NPIs during the early stages of the pandemic (January 1st to April 29th, 2020). We examined countries that had implemented NPIs within 30 or 45 days since first case detection, as well as countries in which 30 or 45 days had passed since first case detection. The health and socioeconomic factors associated with delay in implementation of three NPIs-national school closure, national lockdown, and global travel ban-were analyzed using fractional logit and probit models, and beta regression models. The probability of implementation of national school closure, national lockdown, and strict national lockdown by a country was analyzed using a probit model. The effects of these three interventions on mobility changes were analyzed with propensity score matching methods using Google's social mobility reports. Countries with larger populations and better health preparedness measures had greater delays in implementation. Countries with greater population density, higher income, more democratic political systems, and later arrival of first cases were more likely to implement NPIs within 30 or 45 days of first case detection. Implementation of lockdowns significantly reduced physical mobility. Mobility was further reduced when lockdowns were enforced with curfews or fines, or when they were more strictly defined. National school closures did not significantly change mobility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Summan
- Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy, 5636 Connecticut Ave NW, PO Box 42735, Washington, DC 20015 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saeidpour A, Rohani P. Optimal non-pharmaceutical intervention policy for Covid-19 epidemic via neuroevolution algorithm. Evol Med Public Health 2022; 10:59-70. [PMID: 35169480 PMCID: PMC8841015 DOI: 10.1093/emph/eoac002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
National responses to the Covid-19 pandemic varied markedly across countries, from business-as-usual to complete shutdowns. Policies aimed at disrupting the viral transmission cycle and preventing the overwhelming of healthcare systems inevitably exact an economic toll.
Methodology
We developed an intervention policy model that comprised the relative human, implementation and healthcare costs of non-pharmaceutical epidemic interventions and identified the optimal strategy using a neuroevolution algorithm. The proposed model finds the minimum required reduction in transmission rates to maintain the burden on the healthcare system below the maximum capacity.
Results
We find that such a policy renders a sharp increase in the control strength during the early stages of the epidemic, followed by a steady increase in the subsequent ten weeks as the epidemic approaches its peak, and finally the control strength is gradually decreased as the population moves towards herd immunity. We have also shown how such a model can provide an efficient adaptive intervention policy at different stages of the epidemic without having access to the entire history of its progression in the population.
Conclusions and implications
This work emphasizes the importance of imposing intervention measures early and provides insights into adaptive intervention policies to minimize the economic impacts of the epidemic without putting an extra burden on the healthcare system.
Lay Summary
We developed an intervention policy model that comprised the relative human, implementation and healthcare costs of non-pharmaceutical epidemic interventions and identified the optimal strategy using a neuroevolution algorithm. Our work emphasizes the importance of imposing intervention measures early and provides insights into adaptive intervention policies to minimize the economic impacts of the epidemic without putting an extra burden on the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Saeidpour
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
- Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
| | - Pejman Rohani
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
- Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
- Center for Influenza Disease & Emergence Research (CIDER), Athens, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hensel L, Witte M, Caria AS, Fetzer T, Fiorin S, Götz FM, Gomez M, Haushofer J, Ivchenko A, Kraft-Todd G, Reutskaja E, Roth C, Yoeli E, Jachimowicz JM. Global Behaviors, Perceptions, and the Emergence of Social Norms at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION 2022. [PMID: 34955573 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/3kfmh] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a large-scale survey covering 58 countries and over 100,000 respondents between late March and early April 2020 to study beliefs and attitudes towards citizens' and governments' responses at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most respondents reported holding normative beliefs in support of COVID-19 containment measures, as well as high rates of adherence to these measures. They also believed that their government and their country's citizens were not doing enough and underestimated the degree to which others in their country supported strong behavioral and policy responses to the pandemic. Normative beliefs were strongly associated with adherence, as well as beliefs about others' and the government's response. Lockdowns were associated with greater optimism about others' and the government's response, and improvements in measures of perceived mental well-being; these effects tended to be larger for those with stronger normative beliefs. Our findings highlight how social norms can arise quickly and effectively to support cooperation at a global scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Hensel
- Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, China
| | - Marc Witte
- IZA - Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Margarita Gomez
- Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andriy Ivchenko
- London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Erez Yoeli
- MIT Sloan School of Management, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hensel L, Witte M, Caria AS, Fetzer T, Fiorin S, Götz FM, Gomez M, Haushofer J, Ivchenko A, Kraft-Todd G, Reutskaja E, Roth C, Yoeli E, Jachimowicz JM. Global Behaviors, Perceptions, and the Emergence of Social Norms at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION 2022; 193:473-496. [PMID: 34955573 PMCID: PMC8684329 DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a large-scale survey covering 58 countries and over 100,000 respondents between late March and early April 2020 to study beliefs and attitudes towards citizens' and governments' responses at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Most respondents reported holding normative beliefs in support of COVID-19 containment measures, as well as high rates of adherence to these measures. They also believed that their government and their country's citizens were not doing enough and underestimated the degree to which others in their country supported strong behavioral and policy responses to the pandemic. Normative beliefs were strongly associated with adherence, as well as beliefs about others' and the government's response. Lockdowns were associated with greater optimism about others' and the government's response, and improvements in measures of perceived mental well-being; these effects tended to be larger for those with stronger normative beliefs. Our findings highlight how social norms can arise quickly and effectively to support cooperation at a global scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Hensel
- Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, China
| | - Marc Witte
- IZA - Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Margarita Gomez
- Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andriy Ivchenko
- London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Erez Yoeli
- MIT Sloan School of Management, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Anderson RM, Vegvari C, Hollingsworth TD, Pi L, Maddren R, Ng CW, Baggaley RF. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: remaining uncertainties in our understanding of the epidemiology and transmission dynamics of the virus, and challenges to be overcome. Interface Focus 2021; 11:20210008. [PMID: 34956588 PMCID: PMC8504893 DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2021.0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Great progress has been made over the past 18 months in scientific understanding of the biology, epidemiology and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2. Extraordinary advances have been made in vaccine development and the execution of clinical trials of possible therapies. However, uncertainties remain, and this review assesses these in the context of virus transmission, epidemiology, control by social distancing measures and mass vaccination and the effect on all of these on emerging variants. We briefly review the current state of the global pandemic, focussing on what is, and what is not, well understood about the parameters that control viral transmission and make up the constituent parts of the basic reproductive number R 0. Major areas of uncertainty include factors predisposing to asymptomatic infection, the population fraction that is asymptomatic, the infectiousness of asymptomatic compared to symptomatic individuals, the contribution of viral transmission of such individuals and what variables influence this. The duration of immunity post infection and post vaccination is also currently unknown, as is the phenotypic consequences of continual viral evolution and the emergence of many viral variants not just in one location, but globally, given the high connectivity between populations in the modern world. The pattern of spread of new variants is also examined. We review what can be learnt from contact tracing, household studies and whole-genome sequencing, regarding where people acquire infection, and how households are seeded with infection since they constitute a major location for viral transmission. We conclude by discussing the challenges to attaining herd immunity, given the uncertainty in the duration of vaccine-mediated immunity, the threat of continued evolution of the virus as demonstrated by the emergence and rapid spread of the Delta variant, and the logistics of vaccine manufacturing and delivery to achieve universal coverage worldwide. Significantly more support from higher income countries (HIC) is required in low- and middle-income countries over the coming year to ensure the creation of community-wide protection by mass vaccination is a global target, not one just for HIC. Unvaccinated populations create opportunities for viral evolution since the net rate of evolution is directly proportional to the number of cases occurring per unit of time. The unit for assessing success in achieving herd immunity is not any individual country, but the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy M. Anderson
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Carolin Vegvari
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - T. Déirdre Hollingsworth
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Joint Universities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research (JUNIPER) consortium, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Li Pi
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Joint Universities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research (JUNIPER) consortium, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Rosie Maddren
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Chi Wai Ng
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Talic S, Shah S, Wild H, Gasevic D, Maharaj A, Ademi Z, Li X, Xu W, Mesa-Eguiagaray I, Rostron J, Theodoratou E, Zhang X, Motee A, Liew D, Ilic D. Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2021; 375:e068302. [PMID: 34789505 PMCID: PMC9423125 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 274] [Impact Index Per Article: 91.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence on the effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Biosis, Joanna Briggs, Global Health, and World Health Organization COVID-19 database (preprints). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION Observational and interventional studies that assessed the effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome measure was incidence of covid-19. Secondary outcomes included SARS-CoV-2 transmission and covid-19 mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS DerSimonian Laird random effects meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effect of mask wearing, handwashing, and physical distancing measures on incidence of covid-19. Pooled effect estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were computed, and heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the I2 metrics, with two tailed P values. RESULTS 72 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 35 evaluated individual public health measures and 37 assessed multiple public health measures as a "package of interventions." Eight of 35 studies were included in the meta-analysis, which indicated a reduction in incidence of covid-19 associated with handwashing (relative risk 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 1.12, I2=12%), mask wearing (0.47, 0.29 to 0.75, I2=84%), and physical distancing (0.75, 0.59 to 0.95, I2=87%). Owing to heterogeneity of the studies, meta-analysis was not possible for the outcomes of quarantine and isolation, universal lockdowns, and closures of borders, schools, and workplaces. The effects of these interventions were synthesised descriptively. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that several personal protective and social measures, including handwashing, mask wearing, and physical distancing are associated with reductions in the incidence covid-19. Public health efforts to implement public health measures should consider community health and sociocultural needs, and future research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of public health measures in the context of covid-19 vaccination. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020178692.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella Talic
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004 VIC, Australia
- Monash Outcomes Research and health Economics (MORE) Unit, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - Shivangi Shah
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004 VIC, Australia
| | - Holly Wild
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004 VIC, Australia
- Torrens University, VIC, Australia
| | - Danijela Gasevic
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004 VIC, Australia
- Centre for Global Health, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ashika Maharaj
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004 VIC, Australia
| | - Zanfina Ademi
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004 VIC, Australia
- Monash Outcomes Research and health Economics (MORE) Unit, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - Xue Li
- Centre for Global Health, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- School of Public Health and The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Xu
- Centre for Global Health, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray
- Centre for Global Health, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jasmin Rostron
- Centre for Global Health, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Evropi Theodoratou
- Centre for Global Health, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Xiaomeng Zhang
- Centre for Global Health, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ashmika Motee
- Centre for Global Health, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004 VIC, Australia
- Monash Outcomes Research and health Economics (MORE) Unit, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - Dragan Ilic
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, 3004 VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Arutkin M, Faranda D, Alberti T, Vallée A. Delayed epidemic peak caused by infection and recovery rate fluctuations. CHAOS (WOODBURY, N.Y.) 2021; 31:101107. [PMID: 34717319 DOI: 10.1063/5.0067625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Forecasting epidemic scenarios has been critical to many decision-makers in imposing various public health interventions. Despite progresses in determining the magnitude and timing of epidemics, epidemic peak time predictions for H1N1 and COVID-19 were inaccurate, with the peaks delayed with respect to predictions. Here, we show that infection and recovery rate fluctuations play a critical role in peak timing. Using a susceptible-infected-recovered model with daily fluctuations on control parameters, we show that infection counts follow a lognormal distribution at the beginning of an epidemic wave, similar to price distributions for financial assets. The epidemic peak time of the stochastic solution exhibits an inverse Gaussian probability distribution, fitting the spread of the epidemic peak times observed across Italian regions. We also show that, for a given basic reproduction number R0, the deterministic model anticipates the peak with respect to the most probable and average peak time of the stochastic model. The epidemic peak time distribution allows one for a robust estimation of the epidemic evolution. Considering these results, we believe that the parameters' dynamical fluctuations are paramount to accurately predict the epidemic peak time and should be introduced in epidemiological models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxence Arutkin
- UMR CNRS 7083 Gulliver, ESPCI Paris, 10 rue Vauquelin, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Davide Faranda
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA Saclay l'Orme des Merisiers, UMR 8212 CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay & IPSL, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Tommaso Alberti
- INAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Alexandre Vallée
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Foch hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Crellen T, Pi L, Davis EL, Pollington TM, Lucas TCD, Ayabina D, Borlase A, Toor J, Prem K, Medley GF, Klepac P, Déirdre Hollingsworth T. Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 with waning immunity in the UK population. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2021; 376:20200274. [PMID: 34053264 PMCID: PMC8165597 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The dynamics of immunity are crucial to understanding the long-term patterns of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Several cases of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 have been documented 48-142 days after the initial infection and immunity to seasonal circulating coronaviruses is estimated to be shorter than 1 year. Using an age-structured, deterministic model, we explore potential immunity dynamics using contact data from the UK population. In the scenario where immunity to SARS-CoV-2 lasts an average of three months for non-hospitalized individuals, a year for hospitalized individuals, and the effective reproduction number after lockdown ends is 1.2 (our worst-case scenario), we find that the secondary peak occurs in winter 2020 with a daily maximum of 387 000 infectious individuals and 125 000 daily new cases; threefold greater than in a scenario with permanent immunity. Our models suggest that longitudinal serological surveys to determine if immunity in the population is waning will be most informative when sampling takes place from the end of the lockdown in June until autumn 2020. After this period, the proportion of the population with antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is expected to increase due to the secondary wave. Overall, our analysis presents considerations for policy makers on the longer-term dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in the UK and suggests that strategies designed to achieve herd immunity may lead to repeated waves of infection as immunity to reinfection is not permanent. This article is part of the theme issue 'Modelling that shaped the early COVID-19 pandemic response in the UK'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Crellen
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Li Pi
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Emma L. Davis
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Timothy M. Pollington
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
- MathSys CDT, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Tim C. D. Lucas
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Diepreye Ayabina
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Anna Borlase
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Jaspreet Toor
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Kiesha Prem
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Graham F. Medley
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Petra Klepac
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - T. Déirdre Hollingsworth
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
A hybrid simulation model to study the impact of combined interventions on Ebola epidemic. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254044. [PMID: 34228758 PMCID: PMC8259970 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Pandemics have been recognized as a serious global threat to humanity. To effectively prevent the spread and outbreak of the epidemic disease, theoretical models intended to depict the disease dynamics have served as the main tools to understand its underlying mechanisms and thus interrupt its transmission. Two commonly-used models are mean-field compartmental models and agent-based models (ABM). The former ones are analytically tractable for describing the dynamics of subpopulations by cannot explicitly consider the details of individual movements. The latter one is mainly used to the spread of epidemics at a microscopic level but have limited simulation scale for the randomness of the results. To overcome current limitations, a hierarchical hybrid modeling and simulation method, combining mean-field compartmental model and ABM, is proposed in this paper. Based on this method, we build a hybrid model, which takes both individual heterogeneity and the dynamics of sub-populations into account. The proposed model also investigates the impact of combined interventions (i. e. vaccination and pre-deployment training) for healthcare workers (HCWs) on the spread of disease. Taking the case of 2014-2015 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in Sierra Leone as an example, we examine its spreading mechanism and evaluate the effect of prevention by our parameterized and validated hybrid model. According to our simulation results, an optimal combination of pre-job training and vaccination deployment strategy has been identified. To conclude, our hybrid model helps informing the synergistic disease control strategies and the corresponding hierarchical hybrid modeling and simulation method can further be used to understand the individual dynamics during epidemic spreading in large scale population and help inform disease control strategies for different infectious disease.
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang C, Hong L, Ma N, Sun G. Logic Analysis of How the Emergency Management Legal System Used to Deal with Public Emerging Infectious Diseases under Balancing of Competing Interests-The Case of COVID-19. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9070857. [PMID: 34356235 PMCID: PMC8306266 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9070857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Development of measures for mitigating public emerging infectious diseases is now a focal point for emergency management legal systems. COVID-19 prevention and containment policies can be considered under the core goal of social and individual interests. In this study we analyzed the complexity between individual and public interests as they conflict when implementing disease preventative measures on an epidemic scale. The analysis was used to explore this complex landscape of conflicting social, public, and legal interests to quantify the potential benefits of public acceptance. Here we use the large-scale COVID-19 epidemic backdrop to examine legal norms of the emergency management legal framework. We find that the implementation of emergency management legal system measures involves the resolution of both direct and indirect conflicts of interest among public groups, individual groups, and various subsets of each. When competing interests are not balanced, optimal policies cannot be achieved to serve and safeguard shared social and community stability, whereas effective social outcomes are obtainable through the development of targeted policies as defined within the emergency management legal system. A balanced legal framework in regards to emergency management legal norms can more effectively serve to mitigate and prevent the continued spread of emerging infectious diseases. Further developing innovative procedural mechanisms as a means to ensure emergency response intervention should take into account the weighted interest of the different social parties to determine priorities and aims to protect legitimate public interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Zhang
- School of Law, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
- Publicity Department of Party Committee, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
| | - Lei Hong
- BlueFocus Intelligent Communications Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100015, China;
| | - Ning Ma
- Graduate School, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, China
- Correspondence: (N.M.); (G.S.); Tel.: +86-189-0102-0568 (N.M.); +86-10-6739-6139 (G.S.)
| | - Guohui Sun
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Environment and Viral Oncology, College of Life Science and Chemistry, Faculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
- Correspondence: (N.M.); (G.S.); Tel.: +86-189-0102-0568 (N.M.); +86-10-6739-6139 (G.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gog JR, Hollingsworth TD. Epidemic interventions: insights from classic results. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2021; 376:20200263. [PMID: 34053265 PMCID: PMC8165583 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Analytical expressions and approximations from simple models have performed a pivotal role in our understanding of infectious disease epidemiology. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, while there has been proliferation of increasingly complex models, still the most basic models have provided the core framework for our thinking and interpreting policy decisions. Here, classic results are presented that give insights into both the role of transmission-reducing interventions (such as social distancing) in controlling an emerging epidemic, and also what would happen if insufficient control is applied. Though these are simple results from the most basic of epidemic models, they give valuable benchmarks for comparison with the outputs of more complex modelling approaches. This article is part of the theme issue 'Modelling that shaped the early COVID-19 pandemic response in the UK'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia R Gog
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
| | - T Déirdre Hollingsworth
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Basco S, Domènech J, Rosés JR. The redistributive effects of pandemics: Evidence on the Spanish flu. WORLD DEVELOPMENT 2021; 141:105389. [PMID: 36570099 PMCID: PMC9758399 DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Which are the effects of pandemics on the returns to factors of production? Are these effects persistent over time? These questions have received renewed interest after the out-burst of deaths caused by Covid-19. The Spanish Flu is the closest pandemic to Covid-19. In this paper, we analyze the impact of the Spanish Flu on the returns to labor and capital in Spain. Spain is an ideal country to perform this exercise. First, the "excess death rate" was one of the largest in Western Europe and it varied substantially across regions. Second, Spain was transitioning towards industrialization, with regions in different stages of development. Third, Spain was developed enough to have reliable data. We identify the effect of the Spanish Flu by exploiting within-country variation in "excess death rate". Our main result is that the effect of the Spanish Flu on daily real wages was large, negative, and broadly short-lived. The effects are heterogeneous across occupations and regions. The negative effects are exacerbated in (i) occupations producing non-essential goods like shoemakers and (ii) more urbanized provinces. Quantitatively, relative to pre-1918, the decline for the average region ranges from null to around 30 percent. In addition, we fail to find significant negative effects of the flu on returns to capital. Whereas the results for dividends are imprecisely estimated (we cannot reject a null effect), the effect on real estate prices (houses and land), driven by the post-1918 recovery, is positive. Experts on inequality have argued that pandemics have equalizing effects especially in a Malthusian setting, due to real wage increases. Our findings suggest that, at least, for a developing economy like Spain in the early 20th century, this result does not apply. Indeed, we document that the flu pandemic was conducive to a (short-run) reduction in real wages. In addition, we interpret our heterogeneous results as suggestive evidence that pandemics represent a demand shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joan R Rosés
- London School of Economics and CEPR, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Angulo MT, Castaños F, Moreno-Morton R, Velasco-Hernández JX, Moreno JA. A simple criterion to design optimal non-pharmaceutical interventions for mitigating epidemic outbreaks. J R Soc Interface 2021; 18:20200803. [PMID: 33975462 PMCID: PMC8113910 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
For mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic, much emphasis is made on implementing non-pharmaceutical interventions to keep the reproduction number below one. However, using that objective ignores that some of these interventions, like bans of public events or lockdowns, must be transitory and as short as possible because of their significant economic and societal costs. Here, we derive a simple and mathematically rigorous criterion for designing optimal transitory non-pharmaceutical interventions for mitigating epidemic outbreaks. We find that reducing the reproduction number below one is sufficient but not necessary. Instead, our criterion prescribes the required reduction in the reproduction number according to the desired maximum of disease prevalence and the maximum decrease of disease transmission that the interventions can achieve. We study the implications of our theoretical results for designing non-pharmaceutical interventions in 16 cities and regions during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, we estimate the minimal reduction of each region's contact rate necessary to control the epidemic optimally. Our results contribute to establishing a rigorous methodology to design optimal non-pharmaceutical intervention policies for mitigating epidemic outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Tulio Angulo
- CONACyT - Institute of Mathematics, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Juriquilla 76230, México
| | - Fernando Castaños
- Department of Automatic Control, Cinvestav-IPN, Ciudad de México 07360, México
| | - Rodrigo Moreno-Morton
- Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, México
| | | | - Jaime A. Moreno
- Institute of Engineering, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, México
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cohen K, Leshem A. Suppressing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic using controlled testing and isolation. Sci Rep 2021; 11:6279. [PMID: 33737580 PMCID: PMC7973790 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85458-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The Corona virus disease has significantly affected lives of people around the world. Existing quarantine policies led to large-scale lock-downs because of the slow tracking of the infection paths, and indeed we see new waves of the disease. This can be solved by contact tracing combined with efficient testing policies. Since the number of daily tests is limited, it is crucial to exploit them efficiently to improve the outcome of contact tracing (technological or human-based epidemiological investigations). We develop a controlled testing framework to achieve this goal. The key is to test individuals with high probability of being infected to identify them before symptoms appear. These probabilities are updated based on contact tracing and test results. We demonstrate that the proposed method could reduce the quarantine and morbidity rates compared to existing methods by up to a 50%. The results clearly demonstrate the necessity of accelerating the epidemiological investigations by using technological contact tracing. Furthermore, proper use of the testing capacity using the proposed controlled testing methodology leads to significantly improved results under both small and large testing capacities. We also show that for small new outbreaks controlled testing can prevent the large spread of new waves. Author contributions statement: The authors contributed equally to this work, including conceptualization, analysis, methodology, software, and drafting the work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kobi Cohen
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Amir Leshem
- Faculty of Engineering, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Di Lauro F, Kiss IZ, Miller JC. Optimal timing of one-shot interventions for epidemic control. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1008763. [PMID: 33735171 PMCID: PMC8009413 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The interventions and outcomes in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic are highly varied. The disease and the interventions both impose costs and harm on society. Some interventions with particularly high costs may only be implemented briefly. The design of optimal policy requires consideration of many intervention scenarios. In this paper we investigate the optimal timing of interventions that are not sustainable for a long period. Specifically, we look at at the impact of a single short-term non-repeated intervention (a "one-shot intervention") on an epidemic and consider the impact of the intervention's timing. To minimize the total number infected, the intervention should start close to the peak so that there is minimal rebound once the intervention is stopped. To minimise the peak prevalence, it should start earlier, leading to initial reduction and then having a rebound to the same prevalence as the pre-intervention peak rather than one very large peak. To delay infections as much as possible (as might be appropriate if we expect improved interventions or treatments to be developed), earlier interventions have clear benefit. In populations with distinct subgroups, synchronized interventions are less effective than targeting the interventions in each subcommunity separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Lauro
- Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton United Kingdom
| | - István Z. Kiss
- Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton United Kingdom
| | - Joel C. Miller
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, School of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Martinez-Valle A. Public health matters: why is Latin America struggling in addressing the pandemic? J Public Health Policy 2021; 42:27-40. [PMID: 33510400 PMCID: PMC7841039 DOI: 10.1057/s41271-020-00269-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This article examines how Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru addressed the COVID-19 pandemic and the effectiveness of these policy responses from the date each country declared a sanitary emergency, between middle and late March 2020 to the most recent available measurement on 23 September 2020. To analyze how governments responded to the COVID-19 pandemic in these six Latin American countries, we use an index of government response, created by the University of Oxford. To explore the effects of these governmental mitigation policies on reducing social mobility, we use Google mobility reports. We also analyze how these policies may have influenced COVID-19 mortality rates. Overall, the results showed that both timelier and more stringent implementation of the public policies analyzed to address the COVID-19 pandemic seem to be associated with higher mobility reductions and lower mortality rates. We draw five policy lessons from the way each country implemented these mitigation policies. KEY MESSAGE: Timelier and more stringent implementation of these public policies may contribute to a higher mobility reduction in several public spaces and to lower mortality rates. The effectiveness of the closure and containment policies in each Latin American country seem to depend on the degree of compliance of their respective populations and to their socioeconomic living conditions. Economic and social policies of income support and debt relief provided by governments allowed people to comply with closure and containment policies. Health systems should maintain high levels of policy stringency together with effective surveillance through testing policy and contact tracing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adolfo Martinez-Valle
- Head of Academic Unit, Health Policy and Population Research Center (CIPPS), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, CDMX, Ciudad Universitaria, Edificio CIPPS- Piso 2, 04510, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lieberthal B, Gardner AM. Connectivity, reproduction number, and mobility interact to determine communities' epidemiological superspreader potential in a metapopulation network. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1008674. [PMID: 33735223 PMCID: PMC7971523 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Disease epidemic outbreaks on human metapopulation networks are often driven by a small number of superspreader nodes, which are primarily responsible for spreading the disease throughout the network. Superspreader nodes typically are characterized either by their locations within the network, by their degree of connectivity and centrality, or by their habitat suitability for the disease, described by their reproduction number (R). Here we introduce a model that considers simultaneously the effects of network properties and R on superspreaders, as opposed to previous research which considered each factor separately. This type of model is applicable to diseases for which habitat suitability varies by climate or land cover, and for direct transmitted diseases for which population density and mitigation practices influences R. We present analytical models that quantify the superspreader capacity of a population node by two measures: probability-dependent superspreader capacity, the expected number of neighboring nodes to which the node in consideration will randomly spread the disease per epidemic generation, and time-dependent superspreader capacity, the rate at which the node spreads the disease to each of its neighbors. We validate our analytical models with a Monte Carlo analysis of repeated stochastic Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) simulations on randomly generated human population networks, and we use a random forest statistical model to relate superspreader risk to connectivity, R, centrality, clustering, and diffusion. We demonstrate that either degree of connectivity or R above a certain threshold are sufficient conditions for a node to have a moderate superspreader risk factor, but both are necessary for a node to have a high-risk factor. The statistical model presented in this article can be used to predict the location of superspreader events in future epidemics, and to predict the effectiveness of mitigation strategies that seek to reduce the value of R, alter host movements, or both.
Collapse
|
24
|
Berger L, Berger N, Bosetti V, Gilboa I, Hansen LP, Jarvis C, Marinacci M, Smith RD. Rational policymaking during a pandemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2012704118. [PMID: 33472971 PMCID: PMC7848715 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2012704118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Policymaking during a pandemic can be extremely challenging. As COVID-19 is a new disease and its global impacts are unprecedented, decisions are taken in a highly uncertain, complex, and rapidly changing environment. In such a context, in which human lives and the economy are at stake, we argue that using ideas and constructs from modern decision theory, even informally, will make policymaking a more responsible and transparent process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïc Berger
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IÉSEG School of Management, University of Lille, Unité Mixte de Recherche 9221-Lille Economics Management, 59000 Lille, France;
- Resources for the Future-Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (RFF-CMCC) European Institute on Economics and the Environment, Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici, 20123 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolas Berger
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano (Belgian Scientific Institute of Public Health), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Valentina Bosetti
- Resources for the Future-Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (RFF-CMCC) European Institute on Economics and the Environment, Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici, 20123 Milan, Italy
- Department of Economics, Bocconi University, 20136 Milan, Italy
- Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research, Bocconi University, 20136 Milan, Italy
| | - Itzhak Gilboa
- Economics and Decision Sciences Department, École des Hautes Études Commerciales de Paris, 78351 Jouy-en-Josas, France
- Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
| | - Lars Peter Hansen
- Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
- Department of Statistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
- Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
| | - Christopher Jarvis
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
| | - Massimo Marinacci
- Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research, Bocconi University, 20136 Milan, Italy
- Department of Decision Sciences, Bocconi University, 20136 Milan, Italy
| | - Richard D Smith
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bliman PA, Duprez M, Privat Y, Vauchelet N. Optimal Immunity Control and Final Size Minimization by Social Distancing for the SIR Epidemic Model. JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS 2021; 189:408-436. [PMID: 33678904 PMCID: PMC7918002 DOI: 10.1007/s10957-021-01830-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this article is to understand how to apply partial or total containment to SIR epidemic model during a given finite time interval in order to minimize the epidemic final size, that is the cumulative number of cases infected during the complete course of an epidemic. The existence and uniqueness of an optimal strategy are proved for this infinite-horizon problem, and a full characterization of the solution is provided. The best policy consists in applying the maximal allowed social distancing effort until the end of the interval, starting at a date that is not always the closest date and may be found by a simple algorithm. Both theoretical results and numerical simulations demonstrate that it leads to a significant decrease in the epidemic final size. We show that in any case the optimal intervention has to begin before the number of susceptible cases has crossed the herd immunity level, and that its limit is always smaller than this threshold. This problem is also shown to be equivalent to the minimum containment time necessary to stop at a given distance after this threshold value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Alexandre Bliman
- Inria, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris-Diderot SPC, CNRS, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, équipe Mamba, Paris, France
| | - Michel Duprez
- Inria, équipe MIMESiS, Université de Strasbourg, ICUBE, équipe MLMS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Yannick Privat
- Université de Strasbourg, CNRS UMR 7501, INRIA, Institut de Recherche Mathématique Avancée (IRMA), 7 rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg, France
| | - Nicolas Vauchelet
- LAGA, UMR 7539, CNRS, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 99 avenue Jean-Baptiste Clément, 93430 Villetaneuse, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Saxena C, Baber H, Kumar P. Examining the Moderating Effect of Perceived Benefits of Maintaining Social Distance on E-learning Quality During COVID-19 Pandemic. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS 2020. [PMCID: PMC7746950 DOI: 10.1177/0047239520977798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Technology has influenced every aspect of our living, and education is not an
exception. During the current pandemic period of COVID-19, the latent motive of
maintaining social distancing is leading to be one of the prime reasons for the
students to get enrolled in online courses. Although the benefits of e-learning
have been discussed in various previous studies, it is important to understand
the quality of e-learning and the satisfaction level of learners during this
forceful shift toward e-learning amid the pandemic of COVID-19. This research
proposes a conceptual model for understanding the variables influencing
e-learning quality (ELQ) and learner satisfaction under the moderating effect of
maintaining social distancing. The model is empirically validated by means of
the partial least square approach through structural equation modeling based on
435 responses of university students in India. The results suggest that
assurance, reliability, responsiveness, and website content are the factors that
influence the ELQ of the online courses during the pandemic. ELQ also strongly
influences the learner’s satisfaction. Interestingly, perceived benefits of
maintaining social distancing have a significant negative moderating effect only
between empathy and ELQ, which leads to the satisfaction of the learners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charu Saxena
- University School of Business, Chandigarh University, Mohali, India
| | - Hasnan Baber
- Endicott College of International Studies, Woosong University, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Pardeep Kumar
- University School of Business, Chandigarh University, Mohali, India
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Molenberghs G, Buyse M, Abrams S, Hens N, Beutels P, Faes C, Verbeke G, Van Damme P, Goossens H, Neyens T, Herzog S, Theeten H, Pepermans K, Abad AA, Van Keilegom I, Speybroeck N, Legrand C, De Buyser S, Hulstaert F. Infectious diseases epidemiology, quantitative methodology, and clinical research in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspective from a European country. Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 99:106189. [PMID: 33132155 PMCID: PMC7581408 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Starting from historic reflections, the current SARS-CoV-2 induced COVID-19 pandemic is examined from various perspectives, in terms of what it implies for the implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions, the modeling and monitoring of the epidemic, the development of early-warning systems, the study of mortality, prevalence estimation, diagnostic and serological testing, vaccine development, and ultimately clinical trials. Emphasis is placed on how the pandemic had led to unprecedented speed in methodological and clinical development, the pitfalls thereof, but also the opportunities that it engenders for national and international collaboration, and how it has simplified and sped up procedures. We also study the impact of the pandemic on clinical trials in other indications. We note that it has placed biostatistics, epidemiology, virology, infectiology, and vaccinology, and related fields in the spotlight in an unprecedented way, implying great opportunities, but also the need to communicate effectively, often amidst controversy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert Molenberghs
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Belgium; Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Buyse
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Belgium; International Drug Development Institute, Belgium; CluePoints, Belgium.
| | - Steven Abrams
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Belgium; Global Health Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Niel Hens
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Belgium; Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling of Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Belgium; Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Philippe Beutels
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling of Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Belgium; Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Christel Faes
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Belgium
| | - Geert Verbeke
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Belgium; Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pierre Van Damme
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling of Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Belgium; Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Thomas Neyens
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Belgium; Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sereina Herzog
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling of Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Belgium; Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Heidi Theeten
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling of Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Belgium; Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Koen Pepermans
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling of Infectious Diseases, University of Antwerp, Belgium; Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ariel Alonso Abad
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Catherine Legrand
- Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences, UC Louvain, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Thompson RN, Gilligan CA, Cunniffe NJ. Will an outbreak exceed available resources for control? Estimating the risk from invading pathogens using practical definitions of a severe epidemic. J R Soc Interface 2020; 17:20200690. [PMID: 33171074 PMCID: PMC7729054 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Forecasting whether or not initial reports of disease will be followed by a severe epidemic is an important component of disease management. Standard epidemic risk estimates involve assuming that infections occur according to a branching process and correspond to the probability that the outbreak persists beyond the initial stochastic phase. However, an alternative assessment is to predict whether or not initial cases will lead to a severe epidemic in which available control resources are exceeded. We show how this risk can be estimated by considering three practically relevant potential definitions of a severe epidemic; namely, an outbreak in which: (i) a large number of hosts are infected simultaneously; (ii) a large total number of infections occur; and (iii) the pathogen remains in the population for a long period. We show that the probability of a severe epidemic under these definitions often coincides with the standard branching process estimate for the major epidemic probability. However, these practically relevant risk assessments can also be different from the major epidemic probability, as well as from each other. This holds in different epidemiological systems, highlighting that careful consideration of how to classify a severe epidemic is vital for accurate epidemic risk quantification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. N. Thompson
- Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Christ Church, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - C. A. Gilligan
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - N. J. Cunniffe
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Brett TS, Rohani P. Transmission dynamics reveal the impracticality of COVID-19 herd immunity strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:25897-25903. [PMID: 32963094 PMCID: PMC7568326 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2008087117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The rapid growth rate of COVID-19 continues to threaten to overwhelm healthcare systems in multiple countries. In response, severely affected countries have had to impose a range of public health strategies achieved via nonpharmaceutical interventions. Broadly, these strategies have fallen into two categories: 1) "mitigation," which aims to achieve herd immunity by allowing the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus to spread through the population while mitigating disease burden, and 2) "suppression," aiming to drastically reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates and halt endogenous transmission in the target population. Using an age-structured transmission model, parameterized to simulate SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the United Kingdom, we assessed the long-term prospects of success using both of these approaches. We simulated a range of different nonpharmaceutical intervention scenarios incorporating social distancing applied to differing age groups. Our modeling confirmed that suppression of SARS-CoV-2 transmission is possible with plausible levels of social distancing over a period of months, consistent with observed trends. Notably, our modeling did not support achieving herd immunity as a practical objective, requiring an unlikely balancing of multiple poorly defined forces. Specifically, we found that 1) social distancing must initially reduce the transmission rate to within a narrow range, 2) to compensate for susceptible depletion, the extent of social distancing must be adaptive over time in a precise yet unfeasible way, and 3) social distancing must be maintained for an extended period to ensure the healthcare system is not overwhelmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias S Brett
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602;
- Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602
| | - Pejman Rohani
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602
- Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Searching for Digital Technologies in Containment and Mitigation Strategies: Experience from South Korea COVID-19. Ann Glob Health 2020; 86:109. [PMID: 32944506 PMCID: PMC7473184 DOI: 10.5334/aogh.2993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Korea has achieved health policy objectives in pandemic management so far, namely minimizing mortality, flattening the epidemic curve, and limiting the socio-economic burden of its measures. The key to the Korean government’s success in combating COVID-19 lies with the latest digital technologies (DTs). The prompt and effective application of DTs facilitates both containment as well as mitigation strategies and their sub-policy measures. Methods: This article uses an experiential analysis based on an exploratory case study – analysis on field applications of the government’s interventions. Information is collected by qualitative methods such as literature analysis, meeting materials, and a review of various government reports (including internal ones) along with academic and professional experiences of the authors. Findings: The article presents the unique Korean health policy approaches in the COVID-19 crisis. First, DTs allow the Korean government to embrace various policy measures together listed in containment strategy, namely altering and warning, epidemiological investigation, quarantine of contacts, case-finding, social distancing, and mask-wearing. Second, DTs allow Korea to integrate containment and mitigation strategies simultaneously. Along with the above measures in containment, healthcare service, medical treatment, and prophylaxis (presymptomatic testing) within mitigation are utilized to prevent a COVID-19 spread. Conclusions: Korea develops DTs in an integrated manner in the early pandemic stage under strong and coordinated government leadership. Above all, the DTs’ functions in each pandemic developmental stage are continuously upgraded. Instead of prioritizing policy measures or strategies, therefore, Korea can implement diverse policies simultaneously by integrating DTs effectively. During the COVID-19 outbreak, DTs work as the enablers to connect these two strategies and their measures in Korea. Recommendations: DTs should be at the center of the disaster management paradigm, especially during a pandemic. DTs are facilitators and integrators of containing and mitigating strategies and their policy measures.
Collapse
|
31
|
Mancastroppa M, Burioni R, Colizza V, Vezzani A. Active and inactive quarantine in epidemic spreading on adaptive activity-driven networks. Phys Rev E 2020; 102:020301. [PMID: 32942487 DOI: 10.1103/physreve.102.020301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
We consider an epidemic process on adaptive activity-driven temporal networks, with adaptive behavior modeled as a change in activity and attractiveness due to infection. By using a mean-field approach, we derive an analytical estimate of the epidemic threshold for susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) and susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) epidemic models for a general adaptive strategy, which strongly depends on the correlations between activity and attractiveness in the susceptible and infected states. We focus on strong social distancing, implementing two types of quarantine inspired by recent real case studies: an active quarantine, in which the population compensates the loss of links rewiring the ineffective connections towards nonquarantining nodes, and an inactive quarantine, in which the links with quarantined nodes are not rewired. Both strategies feature the same epidemic threshold but they strongly differ in the dynamics of the active phase. We show that the active quarantine is extremely less effective in reducing the impact of the epidemic in the active phase compared to the inactive one and that in the SIR model a late adoption of measures requires inactive quarantine to reach containment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Mancastroppa
- Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Informatiche, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze, 7/A 43124 Parma, Italy.,INFN-Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Gruppo Collegato di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 7/A, 43124 Parma, Italy
| | - Raffaella Burioni
- Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Informatiche, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze, 7/A 43124 Parma, Italy.,INFN-Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Gruppo Collegato di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 7/A, 43124 Parma, Italy
| | - Vittoria Colizza
- INSERM-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), 75012 Paris, France
| | - Alessandro Vezzani
- Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Informatiche, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze, 7/A 43124 Parma, Italy.,IMEM-CNR, Parco Area delle Scienze 37/A 43124 Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yang P, Qi J, Zhang S, Wang X, Bi G, Yang Y, Sheng B, Yang G. Feasibility study of mitigation and suppression strategies for controlling COVID-19 outbreaks in London and Wuhan. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236857. [PMID: 32760081 PMCID: PMC7410247 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent outbreaks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led a global pandemic cross the world. Most countries took two main interventions: suppression like immediate lockdown cities at epicenter or mitigation that slows down but not stopping epidemic for reducing peak healthcare demand. Both strategies have their apparent merits and limitations; it becomes extremely hard to conduct one intervention as the most feasible way to all countries. Targeting at this problem, this paper conducted a feasibility study by defining a mathematical model named SEMCR, it extended traditional SEIR (Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered) model by adding two key features: a direct connection between Exposed and Recovered populations, and separating infections into mild and critical cases. It defined parameters to classify two stages of COVID-19 control: active contain by isolation of cases and contacts, passive contain by suppression or mitigation. The model was fitted and evaluated with public dataset containing daily number of confirmed active cases including Wuhan and London during January 2020 and March 2020. The simulated results showed that 1) Immediate suppression taken in Wuhan significantly reduced the total exposed and infectious populations, but it has to be consistently maintained at least 90 days (by the middle of April 2020). Without taking this intervention, we predict the number of infections would have been 73 folders higher by the middle of April 2020. Its success requires efficient government initiatives and effective collaborative governance for mobilizing of corporate resources to provide essential goods. This mode may be not suitable to other countries without efficient collaborative governance and sufficient health resources. 2) In London, it is possible to take a hybrid intervention of suppression and mitigation for every 2 or 3 weeks over a longer period to balance the total infections and economic loss. While the total infectious populations in this scenario would be possibly 2 times than the one taking suppression, economic loss and recovery of London would be less affected. 3) Both in Wuhan and London cases, one important issue of fitting practical data was that there were a portion (probably 62.9% in Wuhan) of self-recovered populations that were asymptomatic or mild symptomatic. This finding has been recently confirmed by other studies that the seroprevalence in Wuhan varied between 3.2% and 3.8% in different sub-regions. It highlights that the epidemic is far from coming to an end by means of herd immunity. Early release of intervention intensity potentially increased a risk of the second outbreak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po Yang
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- The State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Electronic Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, China
| | - Jun Qi
- Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China
| | - Shuhao Zhang
- School of Software, Yunnan University, Yunnan, China
| | - Xulong Wang
- School of Software, Yunnan University, Yunnan, China
| | - Gaoshan Bi
- School of Software, Yunnan University, Yunnan, China
| | - Yun Yang
- School of Software, Yunnan University, Yunnan, China
| | - Bin Sheng
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Shanghai JiaoTong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Geng Yang
- The State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Electronic Systems, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Meier K, Glatz T, Guijt MC, Piccininni M, van der Meulen M, Atmar K, Jolink ATC, Kurth T, Rohmann JL, Zamanipoor Najafabadi AH. Public perspectives on protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy: A survey study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236917. [PMID: 32756573 PMCID: PMC7406072 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent to which people implement government-issued protective measures is critical in preventing further spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Our study aimed to describe the public belief in the effectiveness of protective measures, the reported implementation of these measures, and to identify communication channels used to acquire information on COVID-19 in European countries during the early stage of the pandemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS An online survey available in multiple languages was disseminated starting on March 19th, 2020. After five days, we computed descriptive statistics for countries with more than 500 respondents. Each day, we assessed enacted community containment measures by stage of stringency (I-IV). In total, 9,796 adults responded, of whom 8,611 resided in the Netherlands (stage III), 604 in Germany (stage III), and 581 in Italy (stage IV). To explore possible dynamics as containment strategies intensified, we also included 1,365 responses submitted during the following week. Participants indicated support for governmental measures related to avoiding social gatherings, selective closure of public places, and hand hygiene and respiratory measures (range for all measures: 95.0%-99.7%). Respondents from the Netherlands less frequently considered a complete social lockdown effective (59.2%), compared to respondents in Germany (76.6%) or Italy (87.2%). Italian residents applied enforced social distancing measures more frequently (range: 90.2%-99.3%, German and Dutch residents: 67.5%-97.0%) and self-initiated hygienic and social distancing behaviors (range: 36.3%-96.6%, German and Dutch residents: 28.3%-95.7%). Respondents reported being sufficiently informed about the outbreak and behaviors to avoid infection (range: 90.2%-91.1%). Information channels most commonly reported included television newspapers, official health websites, and social media. One week later, we observed no major differences in submitted responses. CONCLUSIONS During the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, belief in the effectiveness of protective measures among survey respondents from three European countries was high and participants reported feeling sufficiently informed. In March 2020, implementation of measures differed between countries and were highest among respondents from Italy, who were subjected to the most stringent lockdown measures and greatest COVID-19 burden in Europe during this period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karien Meier
- Leiden University Medical School, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Toivo Glatz
- Institute of Public Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mathijs C. Guijt
- Leiden University Medical School, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Piccininni
- Institute of Public Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Khaled Atmar
- Leiden University Medical School, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Tess C. Jolink
- Leiden University Medical School, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Kurth
- Institute of Public Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jessica L. Rohmann
- Institute of Public Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lee KS, Zhang JJY. Letter to the Editor: "Medical Student Concerns Relating to Neurosurgery Education During COVID-19". World Neurosurg 2020; 140:484-485. [PMID: 32540294 PMCID: PMC7291956 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Keng Siang Lee
- Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - John J Y Zhang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Walker PGT, Whittaker C, Watson OJ, Baguelin M, Winskill P, Hamlet A, Djafaara BA, Cucunubá Z, Olivera Mesa D, Green W, Thompson H, Nayagam S, Ainslie KEC, Bhatia S, Bhatt S, Boonyasiri A, Boyd O, Brazeau NF, Cattarino L, Cuomo-Dannenburg G, Dighe A, Donnelly CA, Dorigatti I, van Elsland SL, FitzJohn R, Fu H, Gaythorpe KAM, Geidelberg L, Grassly N, Haw D, Hayes S, Hinsley W, Imai N, Jorgensen D, Knock E, Laydon D, Mishra S, Nedjati-Gilani G, Okell LC, Unwin HJ, Verity R, Vollmer M, Walters CE, Wang H, Wang Y, Xi X, Lalloo DG, Ferguson NM, Ghani AC. The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries. Science 2020; 369:413-422. [PMID: 32532802 PMCID: PMC7292504 DOI: 10.1126/science.abc0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 483] [Impact Index Per Article: 120.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a severe threat to public health worldwide. We combine data on demography, contact patterns, disease severity, and health care capacity and quality to understand its impact and inform strategies for its control. Younger populations in lower-income countries may reduce overall risk, but limited health system capacity coupled with closer intergenerational contact largely negates this benefit. Mitigation strategies that slow but do not interrupt transmission will still lead to COVID-19 epidemics rapidly overwhelming health systems, with substantial excess deaths in lower-income countries resulting from the poorer health care available. Of countries that have undertaken suppression to date, lower-income countries have acted earlier. However, this will need to be maintained or triggered more frequently in these settings to keep below available health capacity, with associated detrimental consequences for the wider health, well-being, and economies of these countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick G T Walker
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Charles Whittaker
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Oliver J Watson
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Marc Baguelin
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Peter Winskill
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Arran Hamlet
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Bimandra A Djafaara
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Zulma Cucunubá
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Daniela Olivera Mesa
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Will Green
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hayley Thompson
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Shevanthi Nayagam
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kylie E C Ainslie
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sangeeta Bhatia
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Samir Bhatt
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Adhiratha Boonyasiri
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Olivia Boyd
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas F Brazeau
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lorenzo Cattarino
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Amy Dighe
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christl A Donnelly
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ilaria Dorigatti
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sabine L van Elsland
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rich FitzJohn
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Han Fu
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Katy A M Gaythorpe
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lily Geidelberg
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Grassly
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Haw
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Hayes
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Wes Hinsley
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Natsuko Imai
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Jorgensen
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Edward Knock
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Laydon
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Swapnil Mishra
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma Nedjati-Gilani
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lucy C Okell
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - H Juliette Unwin
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Verity
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Michaela Vollmer
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline E Walters
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Haowei Wang
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Yuanrong Wang
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Xiaoyue Xi
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Neil M Ferguson
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Azra C Ghani
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Walker PGT, Whittaker C, Watson OJ, Baguelin M, Winskill P, Hamlet A, Djafaara BA, Cucunubá Z, Olivera Mesa D, Green W, Thompson H, Nayagam S, Ainslie KEC, Bhatia S, Bhatt S, Boonyasiri A, Boyd O, Brazeau NF, Cattarino L, Cuomo-Dannenburg G, Dighe A, Donnelly CA, Dorigatti I, van Elsland SL, FitzJohn R, Fu H, Gaythorpe KAM, Geidelberg L, Grassly N, Haw D, Hayes S, Hinsley W, Imai N, Jorgensen D, Knock E, Laydon D, Mishra S, Nedjati-Gilani G, Okell LC, Unwin HJ, Verity R, Vollmer M, Walters CE, Wang H, Wang Y, Xi X, Lalloo DG, Ferguson NM, Ghani AC. The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries. Science 2020; 369:413-422. [PMID: 32532802 DOI: 10.25561/77735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a severe threat to public health worldwide. We combine data on demography, contact patterns, disease severity, and health care capacity and quality to understand its impact and inform strategies for its control. Younger populations in lower-income countries may reduce overall risk, but limited health system capacity coupled with closer intergenerational contact largely negates this benefit. Mitigation strategies that slow but do not interrupt transmission will still lead to COVID-19 epidemics rapidly overwhelming health systems, with substantial excess deaths in lower-income countries resulting from the poorer health care available. Of countries that have undertaken suppression to date, lower-income countries have acted earlier. However, this will need to be maintained or triggered more frequently in these settings to keep below available health capacity, with associated detrimental consequences for the wider health, well-being, and economies of these countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick G T Walker
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Charles Whittaker
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Oliver J Watson
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Marc Baguelin
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Peter Winskill
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Arran Hamlet
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Bimandra A Djafaara
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Zulma Cucunubá
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Daniela Olivera Mesa
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Will Green
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Hayley Thompson
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Shevanthi Nayagam
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kylie E C Ainslie
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sangeeta Bhatia
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Samir Bhatt
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Adhiratha Boonyasiri
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Olivia Boyd
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas F Brazeau
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lorenzo Cattarino
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Amy Dighe
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christl A Donnelly
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ilaria Dorigatti
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sabine L van Elsland
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rich FitzJohn
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Han Fu
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Katy A M Gaythorpe
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lily Geidelberg
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Grassly
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Haw
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Hayes
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Wes Hinsley
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Natsuko Imai
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Jorgensen
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Edward Knock
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Laydon
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Swapnil Mishra
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gemma Nedjati-Gilani
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Lucy C Okell
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - H Juliette Unwin
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Verity
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Michaela Vollmer
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline E Walters
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Haowei Wang
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Yuanrong Wang
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Xiaoyue Xi
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Neil M Ferguson
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Azra C Ghani
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- I Nae Park
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho Kee Yum
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mansuri FMA, Zalat MM, Khan AA, Alsaedi EQ, Ibrahim HM. Estimating the public response to mitigation measures and self-perceived behaviours towards the COVID-19 pandemic. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2020; 15:278-283. [PMID: 32837504 PMCID: PMC7334963 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Since March 2020, a rapid increase has been observed in the prevalence of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has essentially resulted from increased disease transmission and intensified testing and reporting. The international guidelines for the prevention and treatment of the COVID-19 pandemic have been frequently updated. Such guidelines assist the governmental regulatory bodies in taking optimal measures and safeguarding their citizens against the pandemic. We conducted a short survey with a Saudi cohort to understand the awareness about COVID-19 and estimate the responses for mitigation strategies. Methods An electronic survey was conducted, and the first 388 responses were analysed for publishing an initial report. The questionnaire comprised 27 items and was divided into three sections, namely demographic, awareness, and response to mitigation strategies and participants' self-perceived behaviours regarding COVID-19. The perceptions of the participants were compared with their responses to mitigation measures. Results In our study, 89.7% understood the meaning of pandemic, while 82.2% correctly identified that the elderly belonged to a high-risk group for the COVID-19 infection. As many as 96.1% agreed that staying at home was one of the mitigation strategies. Nearly 35% preferred self-medication. Higher educational level (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.02–4.29) and longer working hours were found to be significantly associated with a positive response to mitigation measures with p < 0.04 and p < 0.02, respectively. Conclusions We report better understanding and appropriate response to mitigation measures towards the COVID-19 pandemic among the general population in KSA. Nevertheless, the tendency towards self-medication was reported by one-third of the responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah M A Mansuri
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Taibah University, KSA
| | - Marwa M Zalat
- Department of Community, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, College of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
| | - Adeel A Khan
- Faculty, Saudi Board Program of Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health, Makkah Al Mukarramah, KSA
| | - Esraa Q Alsaedi
- Resident Saudi Board Preventive Medicine Program, Almadinah Almunawwarah, KSA
| | - Hanan M Ibrahim
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Teslya A, Pham TM, Godijk NG, Kretzschmar ME, Bootsma MCJ, Rozhnova G. Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study. PLoS Med 2020; 17:e1003166. [PMID: 32692736 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3555213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread to nearly every country in the world since it first emerged in China in December 2019. Many countries have implemented social distancing as a measure to "flatten the curve" of the ongoing epidemics. Evaluation of the impact of government-imposed social distancing and of other measures to control further spread of COVID-19 is urgent, especially because of the large societal and economic impact of the former. The aim of this study was to compare the individual and combined effectiveness of self-imposed prevention measures and of short-term government-imposed social distancing in mitigating, delaying, or preventing a COVID-19 epidemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS We developed a deterministic compartmental transmission model of SARS-CoV-2 in a population stratified by disease status (susceptible, exposed, infectious with mild or severe disease, diagnosed, and recovered) and disease awareness status (aware and unaware) due to the spread of COVID-19. Self-imposed measures were assumed to be taken by disease-aware individuals and included handwashing, mask-wearing, and social distancing. Government-imposed social distancing reduced the contact rate of individuals irrespective of their disease or awareness status. The model was parameterized using current best estimates of key epidemiological parameters from COVID-19 clinical studies. The model outcomes included the peak number of diagnoses, attack rate, and time until the peak number of diagnoses. For fast awareness spread in the population, self-imposed measures can significantly reduce the attack rate and diminish and postpone the peak number of diagnoses. We estimate that a large epidemic can be prevented if the efficacy of these measures exceeds 50%. For slow awareness spread, self-imposed measures reduce the peak number of diagnoses and attack rate but do not affect the timing of the peak. Early implementation of short-term government-imposed social distancing alone is estimated to delay (by at most 7 months for a 3-month intervention) but not to reduce the peak. The delay can be even longer and the height of the peak can be additionally reduced if this intervention is combined with self-imposed measures that are continued after government-imposed social distancing has been lifted. Our analyses are limited in that they do not account for stochasticity, demographics, heterogeneities in contact patterns or mixing, spatial effects, imperfect isolation of individuals with severe disease, and reinfection with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that information dissemination about COVID-19, which causes individual adoption of handwashing, mask-wearing, and social distancing, can be an effective strategy to mitigate and delay the epidemic. Early initiated short-term government-imposed social distancing can buy time for healthcare systems to prepare for an increasing COVID-19 burden. We stress the importance of disease awareness in controlling the ongoing epidemic and recommend that, in addition to policies on social distancing, governments and public health institutions mobilize people to adopt self-imposed measures with proven efficacy in order to successfully tackle COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Teslya
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thi Mui Pham
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Noortje G Godijk
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam E Kretzschmar
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin C J Bootsma
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Mathematical Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ganna Rozhnova
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- BioISI-Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Teslya A, Pham TM, Godijk NG, Kretzschmar ME, Bootsma MCJ, Rozhnova G. Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study. PLoS Med 2020; 17:e1003166. [PMID: 32692736 PMCID: PMC7373263 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread to nearly every country in the world since it first emerged in China in December 2019. Many countries have implemented social distancing as a measure to "flatten the curve" of the ongoing epidemics. Evaluation of the impact of government-imposed social distancing and of other measures to control further spread of COVID-19 is urgent, especially because of the large societal and economic impact of the former. The aim of this study was to compare the individual and combined effectiveness of self-imposed prevention measures and of short-term government-imposed social distancing in mitigating, delaying, or preventing a COVID-19 epidemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS We developed a deterministic compartmental transmission model of SARS-CoV-2 in a population stratified by disease status (susceptible, exposed, infectious with mild or severe disease, diagnosed, and recovered) and disease awareness status (aware and unaware) due to the spread of COVID-19. Self-imposed measures were assumed to be taken by disease-aware individuals and included handwashing, mask-wearing, and social distancing. Government-imposed social distancing reduced the contact rate of individuals irrespective of their disease or awareness status. The model was parameterized using current best estimates of key epidemiological parameters from COVID-19 clinical studies. The model outcomes included the peak number of diagnoses, attack rate, and time until the peak number of diagnoses. For fast awareness spread in the population, self-imposed measures can significantly reduce the attack rate and diminish and postpone the peak number of diagnoses. We estimate that a large epidemic can be prevented if the efficacy of these measures exceeds 50%. For slow awareness spread, self-imposed measures reduce the peak number of diagnoses and attack rate but do not affect the timing of the peak. Early implementation of short-term government-imposed social distancing alone is estimated to delay (by at most 7 months for a 3-month intervention) but not to reduce the peak. The delay can be even longer and the height of the peak can be additionally reduced if this intervention is combined with self-imposed measures that are continued after government-imposed social distancing has been lifted. Our analyses are limited in that they do not account for stochasticity, demographics, heterogeneities in contact patterns or mixing, spatial effects, imperfect isolation of individuals with severe disease, and reinfection with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that information dissemination about COVID-19, which causes individual adoption of handwashing, mask-wearing, and social distancing, can be an effective strategy to mitigate and delay the epidemic. Early initiated short-term government-imposed social distancing can buy time for healthcare systems to prepare for an increasing COVID-19 burden. We stress the importance of disease awareness in controlling the ongoing epidemic and recommend that, in addition to policies on social distancing, governments and public health institutions mobilize people to adopt self-imposed measures with proven efficacy in order to successfully tackle COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Teslya
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thi Mui Pham
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Noortje G. Godijk
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam E. Kretzschmar
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin C. J. Bootsma
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Mathematical Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ganna Rozhnova
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- BioISI—Biosystems & Integrative Sciences Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Endo PT, Silva I, Lima L, Bezerra L, Gomes R, Ribeiro-Dantas M, Alves G, Monteiro KHDC, Lynn T, Sampaio VDS. #StayHome: Monitoring and benchmarking social isolation trends in Caruaru and the Região Metropolitana do Recife during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2020; 53:e20200271. [PMID: 32609249 PMCID: PMC7325600 DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0271-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
This technical report presents information related to the Social Isolation Index (SII) of the city of Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil. The data was provided by In Loco, a technology startup that has collected the movement of around 60 million Brazilians through cell phone location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luciana Lima
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil
| | | | - Rafael Gomes
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil
| | | | - Gisliany Alves
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brasil
| | | | | | - Vanderson de Souza Sampaio
- Fundação de Medicina Tropical Doutor Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, AM, Brasil.,Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mboera LEG, Akipede GO, Banerjee A, Cuevas LE, Czypionka T, Khan M, Kock R, McCoy D, Mmbaga BT, Misinzo G, Shayo EH, Sheel M, Sindato C, Urassa M. Mitigating lockdown challenges in response to COVID-19 in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 96:308-310. [PMID: 32437938 PMCID: PMC7211664 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard E G Mboera
- SACIDS Foundation for One Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
| | - George O Akipede
- College of Medicine, Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Nigeria; Institute of Lassa Fever Research and Control, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, Irrua, Nigeria.
| | - Amitava Banerjee
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Luis E Cuevas
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
| | - Thomas Czypionka
- Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria; London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Mishal Khan
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Richard Kock
- Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom.
| | - David McCoy
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and London Medical and Dental School, Queen Mary University London, United Kingdom.
| | - Blandina T Mmbaga
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College and Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, Tanzania.
| | - Gerald Misinzo
- SACIDS Foundation for One Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania; Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
| | | | - Meru Sheel
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population, ANU College of Health and Medicine, Australia National University, Canberra, Australia.
| | - Calvin Sindato
- SACIDS Foundation for One Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania; National Institute for Medical Research, Tabora, Tanzania.
| | - Mark Urassa
- National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Brett TS, Rohani P. COVID-19 herd immunity strategies: walking an elusive and dangerous tightrope. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2020:2020.04.29.20082065. [PMID: 32511597 PMCID: PMC7276024 DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.29.20082065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The rapid growth in cases of COVID-19 has threatened to overwhelm healthcare systems in multiple countries. In response, severely affected countries have had to consider a range of public health strategies achieved by implementing non-pharmaceutical interventions. Broadly, these strategies have fallen into two categories: i) "mitigation", which aims to achieve herd immunity by allowing the SARS-CoV-2 virus to spread through the population while mitigating disease burden, and ii) "suppression", aiming to drastically reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates and halt endogenous transmission in the target population. Using an age-structured transmission model, parameterised to simulate SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the UK, we assessed the prospects of success using both of these approaches. We simulated a range of different non-pharmaceutical intervention scenarios incorporating social distancing applied to differing age groups. We found that it is possible to suppress SARS-CoV-2 transmission if social distancing measures are sustained at a sufficient level for a period of months. Our modelling did not support achieving herd immunity as a practical objective, requiring an unlikely balancing of multiple poorly-defined forces. Specifically, we found that: i) social distancing must initially reduce the transmission rate to within a narrow range, ii) to compensate for susceptible depletion, the extent of social distancing must be vary over time in a precise but unfeasible way, and iii) social distancing must be maintained for a long duration (over 6 months).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias S Brett
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
- Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Pejman Rohani
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
- Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Weigl J. Herausforderungen in der Seuchenkontrolle und der jetzigen Pandemie durch verzerrte Verteilungen. PRÄVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFÖRDERUNG 2020. [PMCID: PMC7149270 DOI: 10.1007/s11553-020-00775-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Josef Weigl
- Gesundheitsamt Plön, Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburgerstr. 17/18, 24306 Plön, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hoertel N, Blachier M, Blanco C, Olfson M, Massetti M, Limosin F, Leleu H. Facing the COVID-19 epidemic in NYC: a stochastic agent-based model of various intervention strategies. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2020:2020.04.23.20076885. [PMID: 32511467 PMCID: PMC7255787 DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.23.20076885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Global spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created an unprecedented infectious disease crisis worldwide. Despite uncertainties about COVID-19, model-based forecasting of competing mitigation measures on its course is urgently needed to inform mitigation policy. We used a stochastic agent-based microsimulation model of the COVID-19 epidemic in New York City and evaluated the potential impact of quarantine duration (from 4 to 16 weeks), quarantine lifting type (1-step lifting for all individuals versus a 2-step lifting according to age), post-quarantine screening, and use of a hypothetical effective treatment against COVID-19 on the disease's cumulative incidence and mortality, and on ICU-bed occupancy. The source code of the model has been deposited in a public source code repository (GitHub®). The model calibrated well and variation of model parameter values had little impact on outcome estimates. While quarantine is efficient to contain the viral spread, it is unlikely to prevent a rebound of the epidemic once lifted. We projected that lifting quarantine in a single step for the full population would be unlikely to substantially lower the cumulative mortality, regardless of quarantine duration. By contrast, a two-step quarantine lifting according to age was associated with a substantially lower cumulative mortality and incidence, up to 71% and 23%, respectively, as well as lower ICU-bed occupancy. Although post-quarantine screening was associated with diminished epidemic rebound, this strategy may not prevent ICUs from being overcrowded. It may even become deleterious after a 2-step quarantine lifting according to age if the herd immunity effect does not had sufficient time to become established in the younger population when the quarantine is lifted for the older population. An effective treatment against COVID-19 would considerably reduce the consequences of the epidemic, even more so if ICU capacity is not exceeded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Hoertel
- AP-HP.Centre, Paris University, Paris, France
- INSERM U1266, Paris, France
| | - Martin Blachier
- Division of Biostatistics, Modeling and Health Economics, Public Health Expertise, Paris, France
| | - Carlos Blanco
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Mark Olfson
- Columbia University/New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 69, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Marc Massetti
- Division of Biostatistics, Modeling and Health Economics, Public Health Expertise, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Limosin
- AP-HP.Centre, Paris University, Paris, France
- INSERM U1266, Paris, France
| | - Henri Leleu
- Division of Biostatistics, Modeling and Health Economics, Public Health Expertise, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zachreson C, Fair KM, Harding N, Prokopenko M. Interfering with influenza: nonlinear coupling of reactive and static mitigation strategies. J R Soc Interface 2020; 17:20190728. [PMID: 32316882 PMCID: PMC7211476 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
When new, highly infectious strains of influenza emerge, global pandemics can occur before an effective vaccine is developed. Without a strain-specific vaccine, pandemics can only be mitigated by employing combinations of low-efficacy pre-pandemic vaccines and reactive response measures that are carried out as the pandemic unfolds. Unfortunately, the application of reactive interventions can lead to unintended consequences that may exacerbate unpredictable spreading dynamics and cause more drawn-out epidemics. Here, we employ a detailed model of pandemic influenza in Australia to simulate the combination of pre-pandemic vaccination and reactive antiviral prophylaxis. This study focuses on population-level coupling effects between the respective methods, and the associated spatio-temporal fluctuations in pandemic dynamics produced by reactive strategies. Our results show that combining strategies can produce either mutual improvement of performance or interference that reduces the effectiveness of each strategy when they are used together. We demonstrate that these coupling effects between intervention strategies are extremely sensitive to delay times, compliance rates and the type of contact targeting used to administer prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Zachreson
- Complex Systems Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Kristopher M. Fair
- Complex Systems Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Nathan Harding
- Complex Systems Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Mikhail Prokopenko
- Complex Systems Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
- Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hens N, Vranck P, Molenberghs G. The COVID-19 epidemic, its mortality, and the role of non-pharmaceutical interventions. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2020; 9:204-208. [PMID: 32352314 PMCID: PMC7196894 DOI: 10.1177/2048872620924922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 has developed into a pandemic, hitting hard on our communities. As the pandemic continues to bring health and economic hardship, keeping mortality as low as possible will be the highest priority for individuals; hence governments must put in place measures to ameliorate the inevitable economic downturn. The course of an epidemic may be defined by a series of key factors. In the early stages of a new infectious disease outbreak, it is crucial to understand the transmission dynamics of the infection. The basic reproduction number (R0), which defines the mean number of secondary cases generated by one primary case when the population is largely susceptible to infection ('totally naïve'), determines the overall number of people who are likely to be infected, or, more precisely, the area under the epidemic curve. Estimation of changes in transmission over time can provide insights into the epidemiological situation and identify whether outbreak control measures are having a measurable effect. For R0 > 1, the number infected tends to increase, and for R0 < 1, transmission dies out. Non-pharmaceutical strategies to handle the epidemic are sketched and based on current knowledge, the current situation is sketched and scenarios for the near future discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niel Hens
-
Data Science Institute, I-BioStat, Universiteit Hasselt, Belgium
-
Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling of Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pascal Vranck
-
Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessaziekenhuis, Belgium
-
Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universiteit Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Geert Molenberghs
-
Data Science Institute, I-BioStat, Universiteit Hasselt, Belgium
-
I-BioStat, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Anderson RM, Heesterbeek H, Klinkenberg D, Hollingsworth TD. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet 2020; 395:931-934. [PMID: 32164834 PMCID: PMC7158572 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30567-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1772] [Impact Index Per Article: 443.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Roy M Anderson
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, MRC Centre for Global Health Analysis, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK.
| | - Hans Heesterbeek
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Don Klinkenberg
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - T Déirdre Hollingsworth
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Klepac P, Kissler S, Gog J. Contagion! The BBC Four Pandemic - The model behind the documentary. Epidemics 2018; 24:49-59. [PMID: 29576516 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2018.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
To mark the centenary of the 1918 influenza pandemic, the broadcasting network BBC have put together a 75-min documentary called 'Contagion! The BBC Four Pandemic'. Central to the documentary is a nationwide citizen science experiment, during which volunteers in the United Kingdom could download and use a custom mobile phone app called BBC Pandemic, and contribute their movement and contact data for a day. As the 'maths team', we were asked to use the data from the app to build and run a model of how a pandemic would spread in the UK. The headline results are presented in the TV programme. Here, we document in detail how the model works, and how we shaped it according the incredibly rich data coming from the BBC Pandemic app. We have barely scratched the depth of the volunteer data available from the app. The work presented in this article had the sole purpose of generating a single detailed simulation of a pandemic influenza-like outbreak in the UK. When the BBC Pandemic app has completed its collection period, the vast dataset will be made available to the scientific community (expected early 2019). It will take much more time and input from a broad range of researchers to fully exploit all that this dataset has to offer. But here at least we were able to harness some of the power of the BBC Pandemic data to contribute something which we hope will capture the interest and engagement of a broad audience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Klepac
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Stephen Kissler
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Julia Gog
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
House T, Ford A, Lan S, Bilson S, Buckingham-Jeffery E, Girolami M. Bayesian uncertainty quantification for transmissibility of influenza, norovirus and Ebola using information geometry. J R Soc Interface 2017; 13:rsif.2016.0279. [PMID: 27558850 PMCID: PMC5014059 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Infectious diseases exert a large and in many contexts growing burden on human health, but violate most of the assumptions of classical epidemiological statistics and hence require a mathematically sophisticated approach. Viral shedding data are collected during human studies—either where volunteers are infected with a disease or where existing cases are recruited—in which the levels of live virus produced over time are measured. These have traditionally been difficult to analyse due to strong, complex correlations between parameters. Here, we show how a Bayesian approach to the inverse problem together with modern Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms based on information geometry can overcome these difficulties and yield insights into the disease dynamics of two of the most prevalent human pathogens—influenza and norovirus—as well as Ebola virus disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas House
- School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK Warwick Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research Centre (WIDER), Warwick Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Ashley Ford
- School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TW, UK
| | - Shiwei Lan
- Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Samuel Bilson
- Warwick Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research Centre (WIDER), Warwick Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Elizabeth Buckingham-Jeffery
- Warwick Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research Centre (WIDER), Warwick Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK Complexity Science Doctoral Training Centre, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Mark Girolami
- Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| |
Collapse
|