Integrating patient preferences into health outcomes assessment: the multiattribute Asthma Symptom Utility Index

Omega-3 fatty acid intake potentiates bronchodilator response in patients with obesity and poorly controlled asthma

RATIONALE

Obesity is linked to poorly controlled asthma and may impair bronchodilator response. This study examines dietary factors affecting asthma symptoms, control, and lung function.

METHODS

In a multi-center, cross-sectional study of 102 individuals with obesity and poorly controlled asthma, we assessed dietary intake (Arizona Food Frequency Questionnaire), asthma symptoms and control (standardized questionnaires), and lung function (spirometry and bronchodilator response). Correlations between omega-3 and -6 fatty acids with asthma outcomes and lung function were examined using Pearson correlations and multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Median age was 56 (IQR 41-64) years, and median BMI was 37 (35-42) kg/m2. Fifty-four percent were African American and 75 % were female. Median total calorie intake was 2029 (1199-3837) kcal, median total omega-3 intake was 1.07 (0.63-2.04) g, and median omega-6 intake was 24.54 (13.31-45.35) g. No significant relationship was found between fatty acid intake and asthma symptoms, asthma control, or baseline lung function. However, percent bronchodilator response was positively correlated with omega-3 fatty acids (r = 0.273, p = 0.0074). After adjusting for caloric intake, for every 1 g increase in omega-3 intake, there was a 4 % increase in percent bronchodilator response.

CONCLUSIONS

Dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids may influence bronchodilator response in patients with poorly controlled asthma and obesity. Interventions to improve overall dietary quality, such as increased omega-3 intake, may improve medication response in people with obesity and poorly controlled asthma. Future research is needed to better understand this association and determine if additional dietary factors might affect medication responses.

An Update on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Asthma

TOPIC IMPORTANCE

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are information provided by patients on their condition, function, well-being, or experience. Instruments to quantify PROs, called patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), allow standardized assessment of a unique dimension of health that cannot be measured physically. Herein, we discuss how to appraise PROMs critically and provide an update on their use in asthma clinical practice and research.

REVIEW FINDINGS

Asthma-specific PROMs have been developed to measure a wide array of disease characteristics, including symptoms, medication use, exacerbations, and impairments to emotional and physical function. Some PROMs also include spirometry or expand questions to overlap with rhinitis symptoms. Use of PROMs to understand asthma control is included in management guidelines, yet real-world evidence of their effectiveness in improving asthma care remains limited. These instruments may be less accurate in characterizing patients with poorly controlled asthma and have modest correlation with exacerbation risk. Two new PROMs are highlighted, the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire as an instrument to assess asthma control that incorporates domains related to exacerbation risk and impairment, and the CompEx as a composite of daily diary reporting combined with exacerbation events as an early efficacy signal for interventional trials.

SUMMARY

PROMs are fundamental to asthma assessment. Novel instruments may improve the detection of patients at risk for poor outcomes and shorten the drug discovery pipeline. However, urgent research is needed to understand their practical utility in clinical settings.

Applicable predictive factors extracted from peak flow trajectory for the prediction of asthma exacerbation

BACKGROUND

Real-time asthma exacerbation prediction and acute asthma attack detection are essential for patients with severe asthma. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) exhibits a potential for use in long-term asthma self-monitoring. However, the method for processing PEF calculations remains to be clarified.

OBJECTIVE

To develop clinically applicable novel exacerbation predictors calculated using PEF records.

METHODS

Previously proposed exacerbation predictors, including the slope of PEF, percentage predicted PEF, percentage best PEF, the highest PEF over the lowest PEF within specific periods, and PEF coefficient of variation, in addition to a novel indicator delta PEF moving average (ΔMA), defined as the difference between 14-day and 3-day average PEF values, along with moving average (MA) adjusted for PEF reference (%ΔMA), were verified using the Hokkaido-based Investigative Cohort Analysis for Refractory Asthma data of 127 patients with severe asthma from whom 73,503 PEF observations were obtained. Receiver operating characteristic curves for all predictors were drawn, and the corresponding areas under the curve (AUCs) were computed. Regression analysis for MA and percentage MA were conducted.

RESULTS

The most outstanding performance was shown by ΔMA and %ΔMA, with AUC values of 0.659 and 0.665 in the univariate model, respectively. When multivariate models were incorporated with random intercepts for individual participants, the AUC for ΔMA and %ΔMA increased to 0.907 and 0.919, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MA and percentage MA are valuable indicators that should be considered when deriving predictors from the PEF trajectory for monitoring exacerbations in patients with severe asthma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Hokkaido-based Investigative Cohort Analysis for Refractory Asthma was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN ID: 000003254). https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000003917.

Asthma morbidity measures across Black ethnic subgroups

BACKGROUND

Black adults are disproportionately affected by asthma and are often considered a homogeneous group in research studies despite cultural and ancestral differences.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if asthma morbidity differs across adults in Black ethnic subgroups.

METHODS

Adults with moderate-severe asthma were recruited across the continental United States and Puerto Rico for the PREPARE (PeRson EmPowered Asthma RElief) trial. Using self-identifications, we categorized multiethnic Black (ME/B) participants (n = 226) as Black Latinx participants (n = 146) or Caribbean, continental African, or other Black participants (n = 80). African American (AA/B) participants (n = 518) were categorized as Black participants who identified their ethnicity as being American. Baseline characteristics and retrospective asthma morbidity measures (self-reported exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids [SCs], emergency department/urgent care [ED/UC] visits, hospitalizations) were compared across subgroups using multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Compared with AA/B participants, ME/B participants were more likely to be younger, residing in the US Northeast, and Spanish speaking and to have lower body mass index, health literacy, and <1 comorbidity, but higher blood eosinophil counts. In a multivariable analysis, ME/B participants were significantly more likely to have ED/UC visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.04-1.72) and SC use (IRR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.00-1.62) for asthma than AA/B participants. Of the ME/B subgroups, Puerto Rican Black Latinx participants (n = 120) were significantly more likely to have ED/UC visits (IRR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.22-2.21) and SC use for asthma (IRR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.06-1.92) than AA/B participants. There were no significant differences in hospitalizations for asthma among subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

ME/B adults, specifically Puerto Rican Black Latinx adults, have higher risk of ED/UC visits and SC use for asthma than other Black subgroups.

Definitions of non-response and response to biological therapy for severe asthma: a systematic review

Background

Biologics have proven efficacy for patients with severe asthma but there is lack of consensus on defining response. We systematically reviewed and appraised methodologically developed, defined and evaluated definitions of non-response and response to biologics for severe asthma.

Methods

We searched four bibliographic databases from inception to 15 March 2021. Two reviewers screened references, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of development, measurement properties of outcome measures and definitions of response based on COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). A modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach and narrative synthesis were undertaken.

Results

13 studies reported three composite outcome measures, three asthma symptoms measures, one asthma control measure and one quality of life measure. Only four measures were developed with patient input; none were composite measures. Studies utilised 17 definitions of response: 10 out of 17 (58.8%) were based on minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or minimal important difference (MID) and 16 out of 17 (94.1%) had high-quality evidence. Results were limited by poor methodology for the development process and incomplete reporting of psychometric properties. Most measures rated "very low" to "low" for quality of measurement properties and none met all quality standards.

Conclusions

This is the first review to synthesise evidence about definitions of response to biologics for severe asthma. While high-quality definitions are available, most are MCIDs or MIDs, which may be insufficient to justify continuation of biologics in terms of cost-effectiveness. There remains an unmet need for universally accepted, patient-centred, composite definitions to aid clinical decision making and comparability of responses to biologics.

Canadian multidisciplinary expert consensus on the use of biologics in upper airways: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) often coexists with lower airway disease. With the overlap between upper and lower airway disease, optimal management of the upper airways is undertaken in conjunction with that of the lower airways. Biologic therapy with targeted activity within the Type 2 inflammatory pathway can improve the clinical signs and symptoms of both upper and lower airway diseases. Knowledge gaps nevertheless exist in how best to approach patient care as a whole. There have been sixteen randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trails performed for CRSwNP targeted components of the Type 2 inflammatory pathway, notably interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13, IL- 5R, IL-33, and immunoglobulin (Ig)E. This white paper considers the perspectives of experts in various disciplines such as rhinology, allergy, and respirology across Canada, all of whom have unique and valuable insights to contribute on how to best approach patients with upper airway disease from a multidisciplinary perspective.

METHODS

A Delphi Method process was utilized involving three rounds of questionnaires in which the first two were completed individually online and the third was discussed on a virtual platform with all the panelists. A national multidisciplinary expert panel of 34 certified specialists was created, composed of 16 rhinologists, 7 allergists, and 11 respirologists who evaluated the 20 original statements on a scale of 1-9 and provided comments. All ratings were quantitively reviewed by mean, median, mode, range, standard deviation and inter-rater reliability. Consensus was defined by relative interrater reliability measures-kappa coefficient ([Formula: see text]) value > 0.61.

RESULTS

After three rounds, a total of 22 statements achieved consensus. This white paper only contains the final agreed upon statements and clear rationale and support for the statements regarding the use of biologics in patients with upper airway disease.

CONCLUSION

This white paper provides guidance to Canadian physicians on the use of biologic therapy for the management of upper airway disease from a multidisciplinary perspective, but the medical and surgical regimen should ultimately be individualized to the patient. As more biologics become available and additional trials are published we will provide updated versions of this white paper every few years.

Comparing asthma control assessment using the Asthma Control Test and the Asthma APGAR in African American/Black and Hispanic/Latinx populations

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this analysis was to compare the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and the Asthma APGAR asthma control assessment tools in African-Ancestry/Black (AA/B) and Hispanic/Latinx (H/L) adults with moderate to severe asthma.

METHODS

This pre-planned sub-study of the PREPARE clinical trial compares the baseline ACT and Asthma APGAR scores for the PREPARE populations using correlation coefficients, generalized linear modeling and receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses. Correlations were also assessed for both control tests and the Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI).

RESULTS

Among the 1201 adults (603 AA/B and 598 H/L) with moderate to severe asthma, most had uncontrolled asthma by both the ACT and the Asthma APGAR. Correlation coefficients between the ACT, Asthma APGAR and ASUI were strong and did not differ significantly by race/ethnicity. The ACT consistently assessed more patients as uncontrolled compared with the Asthma APGAR. The differences in ACT and Asthma APGAR scores did not differ by age, gender, race/ethnicity, self-reported health literacy or medication adherence but did differ by education level. Both the ACT and Asthma APGAR had similar ROCs for predicting an asthma exacerbation in the next 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the ACT and the Asthma APGAR can be used for asthma control assessment in AA/B and H/L populations with moderate to severe asthma, providing comparable rates of uncontrolled asthma and similar limited ability to predict exacerbations. Further work is required to better understand the basis and clinical implications of the higher rates of uncontrolled asthma identified using the ACT.

Roflumilast May Increase Risk of Exacerbations When Used to Treat Poorly Controlled Asthma in People with Obesity

Rationale: People with obesity often have severe, difficult-to-control asthma. There is a need to develop better treatments for this population. One potential treatment is roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, as it is reported to have efficacy for the treatment of asthma and can promote weight loss. Objectives: To investigate the potential efficacy of roflumilast for the treatment of poorly controlled asthma in people with obesity. Methods: A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial of 24 weeks of roflumilast versus placebo for the treatment of poorly controlled asthma in people with obesity (body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher). The primary outcome was a change in ACT (Asthma Control Test) score. Results: Twenty-two people were randomized to roflumilast and 16 to placebo. Roflumilast had no effect on change in the ACT (increased by 2.6 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.5-4.4] in those on roflumilast vs. 2.0 [IQR, 0.7-3.3] in those on placebo). Participants assigned to roflumilast had a 3.5-fold (relative risk [RR] 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-9.4) increased risk of an episode of poor asthma control and an 8.1-fold (RR 95% CI, 1.01-65.0) increased risk of an urgent care visit for asthma. Ten participants (56%) assigned to roflumilast required a course of oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations, and none in the placebo group. Participants losing 5% or more of their body weight experienced a clinically and statistically significant improvement in asthma control (ACT increased by 4.4 [IQR, 2.5-6.3] vs. 1.5 [IQR, 0.0-3.0] in those who lost less than 5%). Conclusions: Roflumilast had no effect on asthma control. Of concern, roflumilast was associated with an increased risk of exacerbation in obese individuals with poorly controlled asthma. These results highlight the importance of studying interventions in different subpopulations of people with asthma, particularly people with obesity and asthma who may respond differently to medications than lean people with asthma. Weight loss of at least 5% was associated with improved asthma control, indicating that interventions other than roflumilast promoting weight loss may have efficacy for the treatment of poorly controlled asthma in people with obesity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03532490).

Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Trial of the Effects of Positive Messaging on Patient-Reported Outcomes with Asthma - Effect of Obesity

Objective

Asthma in obese patients represents a specific phenotype that is associated with increased symptoms, more frequent and severe exacerbations, reduced responsiveness to treatment, and decreased quality of life. Marketing and placebos have been shown to alter subjective responses to interventions in both asthma and obesity. We evaluated obesity as a potential treatment effect modifier of the effects enhanced drug messaging or placebos on subjective asthma outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial that studied the effect of messaging and placebos on asthma outcomes. A total of 601 participants were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to one of 5 groups: enhanced messaging with montelukast or placebo, neutral messaging with montelukast or placebo, or usual care and followed for 4 weeks after randomization. We compared baseline characteristics by obesity status for 600 participants with data on body weight. Obesity was evaluated as an effect modifier for enhanced messaging (versus neutral messaging) and on placebo effects (versus usual care) in 362 participants assigned to a placebo group or usual care for three asthma questionnaires: Asthma Control Questionnaire, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and Asthma Symptoms Utility Index.

Results

Overall, 227 (37%) of participants were obese. Obese participants were older (mean age 41 vs 34), more likely female (82% vs 67%) and self-identified as Black (44% vs 25%) than non-obese participants. As previously published, enhanced messaging was associated with improvements in patient-reported asthma scores, but there was no evidence for a placebo effect. Obesity status did not influence the message effects nor did it modify responses to placebo.

Conclusion

Obesity has been shown to be an important factor associated with asthma outcomes and an effect modifier of drug treatment effects. We conducted a post hoc, subgroup analysis of data from a multicenter randomized trial of enhanced messaging and placebo associated with drug treatment on asthma outcomes. Our findings suggest that observed differences in treatment effects between obese and non-obese patients sometimes seen in trials of asthma treatments are unlikely to be due to different "placebo" effects of treatment and may reflect differential physiologic effects of active agents.

Health-related quality of life in adult patients with asthma according to asthma control and severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The utility values are increasingly being used in economic evaluations and health policy decision making. This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the utility values for asthma, particularly with respect to severity and asthma control. Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for studies published until July, 2020, reporting the utilities of adult asthma. We extracted utility values derived by nine indirect and four direct utility instruments. Meta-analyses were performed for each utility instrument according to health states based on the level of asthma control and severity. Results: Fifty-two eligible studies were included in our systematic review, of which forty studies were used in the meta-analyses. Among the 13 utility instruments, the most used was EQ-5D-3L, whereas EQ-5D-5L showed the narrowest 95% confidence interval (95% CI, 0.83-0.86) of pooled utility. The pooled utility of asthma declined with worsening control levels and severity. The pooled utility value of EQ-5D-3L was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.80) for uncontrolled, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.88) for partly controlled, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90) for well-controlled asthma. Conclusion: Our study shows that EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L are appropriate for economic evaluations in terms of availability and variability of information, respectively. Asthma patients had poorer utility values with worsened severity and level of asthma control. This study will be useful for health economists conducting economic evaluations of asthma treatments.

Caribbean Latinx with moderate-severe asthma bear greater asthma morbidity than other Latinx

BACKGROUND

Hispanic/Latinx (HL) ethnicity encompasses racially and culturally diverse subgroups. Studies suggest that Puerto Ricans (PR) may bear greater asthma-related morbidity than Mexicans, but these were conducted in children or had limited clinical characterization.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether disparities in asthma morbidity exist among HL adult subgroups.

METHODS

Adults with moderate-severe asthma were recruited from US clinics, including from Puerto Rico, for the Person Empowered Asthma Relief (PREPARE) trial. Considering the shared heritage between PR and other Caribbean HL (Cubans and Dominicans [C&D]), the investigators compared baseline self-reported clinical characteristics between Caribbean HL (CHL) (PR and C&D: n = 457) and other HLs (OHL) (Mexicans, Spaniards, Central/South Americans; n = 141), and between CHL subgroups (C&D [n = 56] and PR [n = 401]). This study compared asthma morbidity measures (self-reported exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids, emergency department/urgent care (ED/UC) visits, hospitalizations, health care utilization) through negative binomial regression.

RESULTS

CHL compared to OHL were similar in age, body mass index, poverty status, blood eosinophils, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide but were prescribed more asthma controller therapies. Relative to OHL, CHL had significantly increased odds of asthma exacerbations (odds ratio [OR]: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.4-2.4), ED/UC visits (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.4-2.5), hospitalization (OR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.06-3.7), and health care utilization (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.44-2.53). Of the CHL subgroups, PR had significantly increased odds of asthma exacerbations, ED/UC visits, hospitalizations, and health care utilization compared to OHL, whereas C&D only had increased odds of exacerbations compared to OHL. PR compared to C&D had greater odds of ED/UC and health care utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

CHL adults, compared with OHL, adults reported nearly twice the asthma morbidity; these differences are primarily driven by PR. Novel interventions are needed to reduce morbidity in this highly impacted population.

Socioeconomic status associates with worse asthma morbidity among Black and Latinx adults

BACKGROUND

Asthma disproportionately affects African American/Black (AA/B) and Hispanic/Latinx (H/L) patients and individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES), but the relationship between SES and asthma morbidity within these racial/ethnic groups is inadequately understood.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relationship between SES and asthma morbidity among AA/B and H/L adults with moderate to severe asthma using multidomain SES frameworks and mediation analyses.

METHODS

We analyzed enrollment data from the PeRson EmPowered Asthma RElief randomized trial, evaluating inhaled corticosteroid supplementation to rescue therapy. We tested for direct and indirect relationships between SES and asthma morbidity using structural equation models. For SES, we used a latent variable defined by poverty, education, and unemployment. For asthma morbidity, we used self-reported asthma exacerbations in the year before enrollment (corticosteroid bursts, emergency room/urgent care visits, or hospitalizations), and Asthma Control Test scores. We tested for mediation via health literacy, perceived stress, and self-reported discrimination. All models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, ethnicity, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Among 990 AA/B and H/L adults, low SES (latent variable) was directly associated with hospitalizations (β = 0.24) and worse Asthma Control Test scores (β = 0.20). Stress partially mediated the relationship between SES and increased emergency room/urgent care visits and worse asthma control (β = 0.03 and = 0.05, respectively). Individual SES domains were directly associated with asthma morbidity. Stress mediated indirect associations between low educational attainment and unemployment with worse asthma control (β = 0.05 and = 0.06, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower SES is directly, and indirectly through stress, associated with asthma morbidity among AA/B and H/L adults. Identification of stressors and relevant management strategies may lessen asthma-related morbidity among these populations.

Use of a Non-parametric Bayesian Method to Model Health State Preferences: An Application to Polish and Irish EQ-5D-5L Valuations

Valuations of preference-based measures for health are conducted in different countries. There is scope to use results from existing countries' valuations to generate better valuation estimates than analyzing the data from each country separately. We analyse data from two smaller design EQ-5D-5L valuation studies where a sample of 119 Polish migrants and 123 native Irish valued 30 common health states using similar composite time trade-off protocols. We apply a non-parametric Bayesian method to provide better predictions of the Polish (Irish) population utility function when the existing Irish (Polish) results were used as informative priors. The resultant new estimates were then compared to those obtained by analyzing the data from each country by itself via different prediction criterions. The results suggest that existing countries' valuations could be used as potential informative priors to produce better valuation estimates under all prediction criterions used. The implications of these results will be hugely important in countries where valuation studies are expensive and hard to conduct. Future application to other countries and to other preference-based health measures are encouraged.

An Online Weight Loss Intervention for People With Obesity and Poorly Controlled Asthma

BACKGROUND

Weight loss might improve asthma control in people with obesity. However, people with asthma might have particular challenges losing weight and the amount of weight loss needed to improve asthma control is not clear.

OBJECTIVES

To pilot-test an online weight loss intervention and to estimate the impact of weight loss on asthma control.

METHODS

We performed a 6-month, single-arm, futility trial of an online weight loss intervention at 2 centers. To reject the assumption of futility, 9 or more participants had to lose at least 5% of their body weight. We also assessed the association between weight loss (≥5%) and asthma outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-three participants (85% women) started the weight loss intervention. The median and interquartile range for the body mass index was 40.3 kg/m² (range 34.7-46.8 kg/m²), and 14 (range 12-17 kg/m²) for the Asthma Control Test score. At 6 months, 10 participants (23%; 95% CI 12%-39%) lost at least 5% of their initial weight. Weight loss of at least 5% was associated with a clinically and statistically significant improvements in their Asthma Control Test (median [interquartile range] increase of 3 [1 to 7]; P < .05), Marks Asthma Quality of Life Score (-9.5 [-18 to -3]; P = .008), and their general health-related quality of life score (RAND-36; improved by 9.4 [2.8 to 22.5]; P =.014).

CONCLUSIONS

An online weight loss intervention has the potential to meet U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance for product evaluation (at least a 5% weight loss in 35% of people) for treating obesity, and is associated with a clinically significant improvement in asthma control, quality of life, and overall health-related quality of life.

Reliever-Triggered Inhaled Glucocorticoid in Black and Latinx Adults with Asthma

BACKGROUND

Black and Latinx patients bear a disproportionate burden of asthma. Efforts to reduce the disproportionate morbidity have been mostly unsuccessful, and guideline recommendations have not been based on studies in these populations.

METHODS

In this pragmatic, open-label trial, we randomly assigned Black and Latinx adults with moderate-to-severe asthma to use a patient-activated, reliever-triggered inhaled glucocorticoid strategy (beclomethasone dipropionate, 80 μg) plus usual care (intervention) or to continue usual care. Participants had one instructional visit followed by 15 monthly questionnaires. The primary end point was the annualized rate of severe asthma exacerbations. Secondary end points included monthly asthma control as measured with the Asthma Control Test (ACT; range, 5 [poor] to 25 [complete control]), quality of life as measured with the Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI; range, 0 to 1, with lower scores indicating greater impairment), and participant-reported missed days of work, school, or usual activities. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 1201 adults (603 Black and 598 Latinx), 600 were assigned to the intervention group and 601 to the usual-care group. The annualized rate of severe asthma exacerbations was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.78) in the intervention group and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.92) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.999; P = 0.048). ACT scores increased by 3.4 points (95% CI, 3.1 to 3.6) in the intervention group and by 2.5 points (95% CI, 2.3 to 2.8) in the usual-care group (difference, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.2); ASUI scores increased by 0.12 points (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.13) and 0.08 points (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.09), respectively (difference, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.05). The annualized rate of missed days was 13.4 in the intervention group and 16.8 in the usual-care group (rate ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95). Serious adverse events occurred in 12.2% of the participants, with an even distribution between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Black and Latinx adults with moderate-to-severe asthma, provision of an inhaled glucocorticoid and one-time instruction on its use, added to usual care, led to a lower rate of severe asthma exacerbations. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and others; PREPARE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02995733.).

Socioeconomic impact of COVID-19 and willingness to be vaccinated in African American/Black and Hispanic/Latinx adults

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

The challenge of addressing obesity in people with poorly controlled asthma

Objective

There is a high prevalence of obesity in people with asthma, and obesity is associated with poorly controlled asthma. Significant weight loss might improve asthma control: the purpose of this study was to investigate patient characteristics and factors that might affect implementation of a weight loss and/or roflumilast intervention, to target both obesity and asthma.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of people with obesity and poorly controlled asthma performed at 13 sites across the United States.

Results

One hundred and two people participated in this study. Median BMI was 37 (IQR 35-42). The majority, 55%, were African American and 76% were female. Fifty two percent had very poorly controlled asthma. Most participants were quite sedentary (70% reported being inactive or participating only in light-intensity activities according to the Stanford Brief Activity Survey). Participants reported significant impairments related to physical function on the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite questionnaire (median score 67 [IQR 41-84]). Thirty-five percent of participants reported mild, and 2 % moderate, depressive symptoms as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

Conclusions

Poorly controlled asthma and obesity often affect minority populations and are associated with significant impairments in health related to physical function and low levels of physical activity that might complicate efforts to lose weight. Interventions targeted at poorly controlled asthma associated with obesity in the United States need to address factors complicating health in underserved communities, such as increasing opportunities for physical activity, while also managing activity limitations related to the combination of asthma and obesity.

A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach for Modeling Short-Form 6-Dimension Health State Utility Scores

OBJECTIVES

Typically, models that were used for health state valuation data have been parametric. Recently, many researchers have explored the use of nonparametric Bayesian methods in this field. In this article, we report on the results from using a nonparametric model to predict a Bayesian short-form 6-dimension (SF-6D) health state valuation algorithm along with estimating the effect of the individual characteristics on health state valuations.

METHODS

A sample of 126 Lebanese members from the American University of Beirut valued 49 SF-6D health states using the standard gamble technique. Results from applying the nonparametric model were reported and compared with those obtained using a standard parametric model. The covariates' effect on health state valuations was also reported.

RESULTS

The nonparametric Bayesian model was found to perform better than the parametric model at (1) predicting health state values within the full estimation data and in an out-of-sample validation in terms of mean predictions, root mean squared error, and the patterns of standardized residuals and (2) allowing for the covariates' effect to vary by health state. The findings also suggest a potential age effect with some gender effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The nonparametric model is theoretically more flexible and produces better utility predictions from the SF-6D than previously used classical parametric model. In addition, the Bayesian model is more appropriate to account the covariates' effect. Further research is encouraged.

Nebulizer Use by Black and Latinx Adults with Moderate to Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND

Generally, a short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) delivered via metered-dose inhaler (MDI) is recommended for quick relief of asthma symptoms. However, in the PeRson EmPowered Asthma RElief (PREPARE) pragmatic trial, 67% of patients reported having used a nebulizer for SABA administration.

OBJECTIVE

To understand preferences, experiences, and decision making regarding the use of nebulizers in Black and Latinx adults with uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

We interviewed 40 of the 1,201 PREPARE patients employing a matrix analysis. Those interviewed were Black (n = 20) and Latinx (n = 20) adults with uncontrolled asthma seeking primary or specialty care in clinics throughout the United States. Data were analyzed used a Rapid Assessment Procedures qualitative methodology, informed by grounded theory.

RESULTS

Substudy participants, on average, reported using a nebulizer 3.5 times/wk. Daily use was common, and frequency ranged from less than daily to up to 6 times daily. Nearly all participants reported a longstanding history of nebulizer use. Participants tended to use their nebulizer at home, and some shared it with others in the home. Many reported preferring a nebulizer over an MDI for relief of severe symptoms and to avoid emergency room visits or hospitalizations. The extent to which cost affected nebulizer use varied among participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite asthma guideline recommendations that MDIs be used rather than nebulizers for SABA administration, nebulizer use was common among PREPARE study participants. Clinicians should explore patients' history and experiences with nebulizer use as part of evaluation of asthma control.

Dexamethasone-Induced FKBP51 Expression in CD4+ T-Lymphocytes Is Uniquely Associated With Worse Asthma Control in Obese Children With Asthma

Introduction

There is evidence that obesity, a risk factor for asthma severity and morbidity, has a unique asthma phenotype which is less atopic and less responsive to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) are important to the immunologic pathways of obese asthma and steroid resistance. However, the cellular source associated with steroid resistance has remained elusive. We compared the lymphocyte landscape among obese children with asthma to matched normal weight children with asthma and assessed relationship to asthma control.

Methods

High-dimensional flow cytometry of PBMC at baseline and after dexamethasone stimulation was performed to characterize lymphocyte subpopulations, T-lymphocyte polarization, proliferation (Ki-67+), and expression of the steroid-responsive protein FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP51). T-lymphocyte populations were compared between obese and normal-weight participants, and an unbiased, unsupervised clustering analysis was performed. Differentially expressed clusters were compared with asthma control, adjusted for ICS and exhaled nitric oxide.

Results

In the obese population, there was an increased cluster of CD4+ T-lymphocytes expressing Ki-67 and FKBP51 at baseline and CD4+ T-lymphocytes expressing FKBP51 after dexamethasone stimulation. CD4+ Ki-67 and FKBP51 expression at baseline showed no association with asthma control. Dexamethasone-induced CD4+ FKBP51 expression was associated with worse asthma control in obese participants with asthma. FKBP51 expression in CD8+ T cells and CD19+ B cells did not differ among groups, nor did polarization profiles for Th1, Th2, Th9, or Th17 percentage.

Discussion

Dexamethasone-induced CD4+ FKBP51 expression is uniquely associated with worse asthma control in obese children with asthma and may underlie the corticosteroid resistance observed in this population.

Modeling SF-6D Health Utilities: Is Bayesian Approach Appropriate?

Background: Valuation studies of preference-based health measures like SF6D have been conducted in many countries. However, the cost of conducting such studies in countries with small populations or low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) can be prohibitive. There is potential to use results from readily available countries’ valuations to produce better valuation estimates. Methods: Data from Lebanon and UK SF-6D value sets were analyzed, where values for 49 and 249 health states were extracted from samples of Lebanon and UK populations, respectively, using standard gamble techniques. A nonparametric Bayesian model was used to estimate a Lebanon value set using the UK data as informative priors. The resulting estimates were then compared to a Lebanon value set obtained using Lebanon data by itself via various prediction criterions. Results: The findings permit the UK evidence to contribute potential prior information to the Lebanon analysis by producing more precise valuation estimates than analyzing Lebanon data only under all criterions used. Conclusions: The positive findings suggest that existing valuation studies can be merged with a small valuation set in another country to produce value sets, thereby making own country value sets more attainable for LMICs.

Functional significance of 8-isoprostanes in sinonasal disease and asthma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate how 8-isoprostanes, used as a marker of airway oxidative stress, were related to sinus disease and asthma.

METHODS

We analyzed samples and data from two separate studies, one investigating sinonasal disease in asthma, the other investigating the effect of BMI on airway disease. We measured airway (nasal lavage) 8-isoprostanes and investigated the relationship with measures of sinus and asthma symptoms, asthma control and lung function.

RESULTS

The study of people with sinonasal disease and poorly controlled asthma included 48 obese, 31 overweight and 23 lean participants. In multivariate analysis, nasal lavage 8-isoprostane levels increased with increasing BMI (p < 0.01), and were higher in Caucasian than African American participants (p = 0.01). Sinus symptoms were inversely related to nasal 8-isoprostanes (p = 0.02) independent of BMI and Race. In the study investigating the effect of BMI on airway disease, we enrolled 13 controls with obesity and 21 people with obesity and asthma: 8-isoprostane levels were higher in obese controls than in obese people with asthma (p < 0.01), and levels were inversely related to sinus symptoms (p = 0.02) and asthma control (p < 0.01).

INTERPRETATION

8-isoprostanes in nasal lavage are increased in obesity, and increased in Caucasians compared with African Americans. However, levels are higher in obese controls than obese people with asthma, and appear inversely related to symptoms of airway disease.

CLINICAL IMPLICATION

Airway 8-isoprostanes likely reflect complex oxidative signaling pathways, which are altered in obesity and those of different race, rather than being a simple marker of airway oxidative injury.

CAPSULE SUMMARY

Increased airway oxidative signaling (8-isoprostanes), may reflect normal physiology in the setting of obesity, as decreased levels are associated with disease activity in people with chronic sinonasal disease and asthma.

Positive change in asthma control using therapeutic patient education in severe uncontrolled asthma: a one-year prospective study

Background

Severe asthma is difficult to control. Therapeutic patient education enables patients to better understand their disease and cope with treatment, but the effect of therapeutic patient education in severe uncontrolled asthma is unclear. We evaluated whether therapeutic patient education is effective in improving asthma control and decreasing the frequency of exacerbations in severe uncontrolled asthma.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational, and self-controlled study that enrolled 40 subjects with severe uncontrolled asthma. Patients were seen at a clinic four times (on day 1 and after 3, 6, and 12 months). After baseline data collection, the subjects completed a therapeutic patient education program and were also followed-up via telephone after 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 months to monitor asthma medication adherence and collect asthma-related information.

Results

Within the 1-year study period, a total of 23 exacerbations were recorded in 14 patients, seven of whom required emergency treatment and two of whom were hospitalized. Twelve months after the standardized therapeutic patient education program, pulmonary function and fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels improved significantly in all 40 patients. Moreover, the scores from three standardized asthma questionnaires and indices suggested improved quality of life in these patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. Serum levels of biomarkers reflecting asthma immune responses did not change between baseline and the 1-year follow-up time point.

Conclusions

Therapeutic patient education is effective in improving asthma control and decreasing exacerbations in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40733-021-00076-y.

Bayesian modeling of health state preferences: could borrowing strength from existing countries' valuations produce better estimates

BACKGROUND

Valuations of preference-based measure such as EQ-5D and/or SF6D have been conducted in different countries. There is potential to borrow strength from existing countries' valuations to generate better representative utility estimates. This is explored using two case studies modelling UK data alongside Japan samples to generate Japan estimates.

METHODS

Data from two SF-6D valuation studies were analyzed, where using similar standard gamble protocols, values for 241 and 249 states were devised from representative samples of Japan and UK general adult populations, respectively. Two nonparametric Bayesian models were applied to estimate a Japan value set, where the UK results were used as informative priors in the first model and subsets of the Japan data set for 25 and 50 health states were modelled alongside the full UK data set in the second. Generated estimates were compared to a Japan value set estimated using Japan values alone using different prediction criterion.

RESULTS

The results allowed the UK data to provide significant prior information to the Japan analysis by generating better estimates than using Japan data alone. Also, using Japan data elicited for 50 health states alongside the existing UK data produces roughly similar predicted valuations as the Japan data by itself.

CONCLUSION

The promising results suggest that the existing preference data could be combined with data from a valuation study in a new country to generate preference weights, thus making own country value sets more achievable for low-middle income countries. Further research and application to other countries and preference-based measures are encouraged.

Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care (IBH-PC) to improve patient-centered outcomes in adults with multiple chronic medical and behavioral health conditions: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic diseases that drive morbidity, mortality, and health care costs are largely influenced by human behavior. Behavioral health conditions such as anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders can often be effectively managed. The majority of patients in need of behavioral health care are seen in primary care, which often has difficulty responding. Some primary care practices are providing integrated behavioral health care (IBH), where primary care and behavioral health providers work together, in one location, using a team-based approach. Research suggests there may be an association between IBH and improved patient outcomes. However, it is often difficult for practices to achieve high levels of integration. The Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care study responds to this need by testing the effectiveness of a comprehensive practice-level intervention designed to improve outcomes in patients with multiple chronic medical and behavioral health conditions by increasing the practice's degree of behavioral health integration.

METHODS

Forty-five primary care practices, with existing onsite behavioral health care, will be recruited for this study. Forty-three practices will be randomized to the intervention or usual care arm, while 2 practices will be considered "Vanguard" (pilot) practices for developing the intervention. The intervention is a 24-month supported practice change process including an online curriculum, a practice redesign and implementation workbook, remote quality improvement coaching services, and an online learning community. Each practice's degree of behavioral health integration will be measured using the Practice Integration Profile. Approximately 75 patients with both chronic medical and behavioral health conditions from each practice will be asked to complete a series of surveys to measure patient-centered outcomes. Change in practice degree of behavioral health integration and patient-centered outcomes will be compared between the two groups. Practice-level case studies will be conducted to better understand the contextual factors influencing integration.

DISCUSSION

As primary care practices are encouraged to provide IBH services, evidence-based interventions to increase practice integration will be needed. This study will demonstrate the effectiveness of one such intervention in a pragmatic, real-world setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02868983 . Registered on August 16, 2016.

Is Bariatric Surgery Better than Nonsurgical Weight Loss for Improving Asthma Control? A Systematic Review

Obesity is associated with increased severity of asthma. Bariatric surgery can be effective in weight loss and improvement in asthma. Two reviewers conducted a systematic review using search terms: 'weight loss', 'bariatric surgery', and 'asthma'. Adult studies including all bariatric procedures and nonsurgical weight loss regimes were included. Thirty-nine studies, including twenty-six bariatric studies and thirteen nonsurgical studies, were found. No study directly compared bariatric surgery to nonsurgical techniques. Bariatric surgery offered greater weight loss (22-36%) than nonsurgical programmes (4.1-14.2%) and more consistently improved medication use, airway hyperresponsiveness, hospitalisation rate or ED attendance and lung function, while change in inflammatory markers were variable. Bariatric surgery appears to be superior in treating asthma; however, further study on surgery for both mild and severe asthma is required.

A randomized, open-label, pragmatic study to assess reliever-triggered inhaled corticosteroid in African American/Black and Hispanic/Latinx adults with asthma: Design and methods of the PREPARE trial

BACKGROUND

Asthma prevalence, morbidity, and mortality disproportionately impact African American/Black (AA/B) and Hispanic/Latinx (H/L) communities. Adherence to daily inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), recommended by asthma guidelines in all but the mildest cases of asthma, is generally poor. As-needed ICS has shown promise as a patient-empowering asthma management strategy, but it has not been rigorously studied in AA/B or H/L patients or in a real-world setting. Design and Aim The PeRson EmPowered Asthma RElief (PREPARE) Study is a randomized, open-label, pragmatic study which aims to assess whether a patient-guided, reliever-triggered ICS strategy called PARTICS (Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered Inhaled CorticoSteroid) can improve asthma outcomes in AA/B and H/L adult patient populations. In designing and implementing the study, the PREPARE research team has relied heavily on advice from AA/B and H/L Patient Partners and other stakeholders. Methods PREPARE is enrolling 1200 adult participants (600 AA/Bs, 600H/Ls) with asthma. Participants are randomized to PARTICS + Usual Care (intervention) versus Usual Care (control). Following a single in-person enrollment visit, participants complete monthly questionnaires for 15 months. The primary endpoint is annualized asthma exacerbation rate. Secondary endpoints include asthma control; preference-based quality of life; and days lost from work, school, or usual activities. Discussion The PREPARE study features a pragmatic design allowing for the real-world assessment of a patient-centered, reliever-triggered ICS strategy in AA/B and H/L patients. Outcomes of this study have the potential to offer powerful evidence supporting PARTICS as an effective asthma management strategy in patient populations that suffer disproportionately from asthma morbidity and mortality.

Analysis of SF-6D Health State Utility Scores: Is Beta Regression Appropriate?

Background: Typically, modeling of health-related quality of life data is often troublesome since its distribution is positively or negatively skewed, spikes at zero or one, bounded and heteroscedasticity. Objectives: In the present paper, we aim to investigate whether Bayesian beta regression is appropriate for analyzing the SF-6D health state utility scores and respondent characteristics. Methods: A sample of 126 Lebanese members from the American University of Beirut valued 49 health states defined by the SF-6D using the standard gamble technique. Three different models were fitted for SF-6D via Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation methods. These comprised a beta regression, random effects and random effects with covariates. Results from applying the three Bayesian beta regression models were reported and compared based on their predictive ability to previously used linear regression models, using mean prediction error (MPE), root mean squared error (RMSE) and deviance information criterion (DIC). Results: For the three different approaches, the beta regression model was found to perform better than the normal regression model under all criteria used. The beta regression with random effects model performs best, with MPE (0.084), RMSE (0.058) and DIC (−1621). Compared to the traditionally linear regression model, the beta regression provided better predictions of observed values in the entire learning sample and in an out-of-sample validation. Conclusions: Beta regression provides a flexible approach to modeling health state values. It also accounted for the boundedness and heteroscedasticity of the SF-6D index scores. Further research is encouraged.

A Scoring Algorithm for Deriving Utility Values from the Neuro-QoL for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

The Neuro-QoL is a standardized approach to assessing health-related quality of life in people with neurological conditions, including multiple sclerosis (MS). Item banks were developed with item response theory (IRT) methodology so items are calibrated along a continuum of each construct. The purpose of this study was to develop a preference-based scoring algorithm for the Neuro-QoL to derive utilities that could be used in economic modeling.

METHODS

With input from neurologists, 6 Neuro-QoL domains were selected based on relevance to MS and used to define health states for a utility elicitation study in the United Kingdom. General population participants and individuals with MS valued the health states and completed questionnaires (including Neuro-QoL short forms). The Neuro-QoL Utility Scoring System (NQU) was derived based on multi-attribute utility theory using data from the general population sample. Single-attribute disutility functions for 6 Neuro-QoL domains were estimated using isotonic regression with linear interpolation and then combined with a multiplicative model. NQU validity was assessed using MS participant data.

RESULTS

Interviews were completed with 203 general population participants (50.2% female; mean age = 45.0 years) and 62 participants with MS (62.9% female; mean age = 46.1 years). Mean (SD) NQU scores were 0.94 (0.06) and 0.82 (0.13) for the general population and MS samples, respectively. The NQU demonstrated known-groups validity by differentiating among subgroups categorized based on level of disability. The NQU demonstrated convergent validity via correlations with generic measures (0.66 and 0.63 with EQ-5D-5L and Health Utilities Index Mark 3, respectively; both P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

With the NQU, utilities can be derived from any MS treatment group, subgroup, or patient sample who completes items from 6 Neuro-QoL domains. Because the Neuro-QoL is frequently used with MS patients, the NQU greatly expands the options for quantifying outcomes in cost-utility analyses conducted to inform allocation of resources for MS treatment.

Psychometric Properties of the Asthma Symptom Index in Patients with Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of symptoms is essential in asthma clinical research. Daily symptom diaries require once- or twice-daily recording, making them less suited to real-world use. A modified version of the established Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) that includes symptom attributes (Asthma Symptom Index [ASI]) was developed as a less-burdensome measure of asthma symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ASI and replicate ASUI psychometric properties, including validity, reliability, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) estimation in patients ≥12 years of age with severe asthma.

METHODS

Patients from a randomized trial (MUSCA [n = 497]) and a cross-sectional study (IDEAL [n = 721]) were analyzed post hoc. Demographic information, spirometry, ASI and ASUI scores, and other patient-reported outcome measures such as Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at baseline and during follow-up (MUSCA only) were obtained.

RESULTS

Internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were considered good (>0.70 [Cronbach's alpha] and 0.87-0.90 [intraclass correlation]). ASI/ASUI scores correlated strongly with ACQ-5 and SGRQ scores (spearman correlation [r_s] magnitude: 0.67-0.85). ASI and ASUI scores differed for asthma control (defined by ACQ-5) and lung function (% predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second). Changes in ASI and ASUI scores from baseline to week 4 and week 12 had high correlations with changes in ACQ-5 (r_s magnitude: 0.57-0.69). MCIDs ranged from -0.42 to -0.26 (ASI) and 0.07 to 0.11 (ASUI).

CONCLUSION

Findings show the good reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the ASI, indicating potential value for real-world symptom assessment in severe asthma.

Biomarkers of Type 2 Airway Inflammation as Predictors of Loss of Asthma Control During Step-Down Therapy for Well-Controlled Disease: The Long-Acting Beta-Agonist Step-Down Study (LASST)

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers that can predict loss of asthma control among patients being considered for step-down therapy in well-controlled disease are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether baseline biomarkers of type 2 airway inflammation and/or serial measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) predict loss of asthma control as therapy is stepped down.

METHODS

In subanalyses of a multicenter randomized, double-blind, parallel 3-arm trial comparing strategies for step-down therapy in well-controlled asthma (Long-Acting Beta-Agonist Step-Down Study), we assessed whether baseline atopy as determined by serum aeroallergen allergy screening test (Phadiatop), baseline serum eosinophil peroxidase, or baseline or serial Feno measurements during follow-up predicted the time to loss of asthma control among participants. Loss of asthma control was defined in the study protocol. We analyzed these associations in adjusted models including all participants, after testing for interactions with assignment to each of the 3 treatment groups (continuation of stable dose of combination inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting beta-agonist, step-down of inhaled corticosteroid, or discontinuation of long-acting bronchodilator).

RESULTS

Four hundred forty-seven of the 553 Long-Acting Beta-Agonist Step-Down Study participants who were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms and had at least 1 biomarker measurement were included in this analysis. At baseline, higher levels of Feno were significantly associated with greater levels of multiallergen IgE levels (P < .001), but not with serum eosinophil peroxidase (P = .742). Among all participants as a group, elevations in baseline biomarkers were not predictive of a higher risk of treatment failure. In addition, Feno levels measured serially at 6-week intervals demonstrated that compared with participants with low levels (<25 parts per billion), those with intermediate (25-50 parts per billion) and high (>50 parts per billion) levels did not have significantly increased likelihood of subsequent treatment failure (hazard ratios, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.59-1.78] and 1.29 [95% CI, 0.65-2.54], respectively). There were no significant interactions of treatment group and baseline biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with well-controlled asthma, neither baseline levels of type 2 airway inflammatory biomarkers nor serial measures of Feno are strong predictors of treatment failure.

Minimal clinically important difference for asthma endpoints: an expert consensus report

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) can be defined as the smallest change or difference in an outcome measure that is perceived as beneficial and would lead to a change in the patient's medical management.

The aim of the current expert consensus report is to provide a “state-of-the-art” review of the currently available literature evidence about MCID for end-points to monitor asthma control, in order to facilitate optimal disease management and identify unmet needs in the field to guide future research.

A series of MCID cut-offs are currently available in literature and validated among populations of asthmatic patients, with most of the evidence focusing on outcomes as patient reported outcomes, lung function and exercise tolerance. On the contrary, only scant and partial data are available for inflammatory biomarkers. These clearly represent the most interesting target for future development in diagnosis and clinical management of asthma, particularly in view of the several biologic drugs in the pipeline, for which regulatory agencies will soon require personalised proof of efficacy and treatment response predictors.

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) cut-offs in asthma are validated for patient reported outcomes and lung function, but not for inflammatory biomarkers. MCID represents a key target for future development in asthma management. http://bit.ly/33hcWIe

Modelling a preference-based index for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L + Sleep using a Bayesian framework

BACKGROUND

Conventionally, frequentist approach has been used to model health state valuation data. Recently, researchers started to explore the use of Bayesian methods in this area.

OBJECTIVES

This paper presents an alternative approach to modelling health state valuation data of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L + Sleep descriptive systems, using a Bayesian framework, and demonstrates its superiority to conventional frequentist methods.

METHODS

The valuation study is composed of 18 EQ-5D-3L health states and 18 EQ-5D-3L + Sleep health states valued by 160 members of the general public in South Yorkshire, UK, using the time tradeo-ff technique. Three different models were developed for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L + Sleep accordingly using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation methods. Bayesian methods were applied to models fitted included a linear regression, random effect and random effect with covariates. The models are compared based on their predictive performance using mean predictions, root mean squared error (RMSE) and deviance information criterion (DIC). All analyses were performed using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation methods.

RESULTS

The random effects with covariates model performs best under all criterions for the two preference-based measures, with RMSE (0.037) and DIC (637.5) for EQ-5D-3L and RMSE (0.019), DIC (416.4) for EQ-5D + Sleep. Compared with models previously estimated using frequentist approach, the Bayesian models reported in this paper provided better predictions of observed values.

CONCLUSION

Bayesian methods provide a better way to model EQ-5D-3L valuation data with and without a sleep 'bolt-on' and provide a more flexible in characterizing the full range of uncertainty inherent in these estimates.

Risk Factors for Asthma Exacerbation and Treatment Failure in Adults and Adolescents with Well-controlled Asthma during Continuation and Step-Down Therapy

RATIONALE

Although national and international guidelines recommend reduction of asthma controller therapy or "step-down" therapy in patients with well-controlled asthma, it is expected that some individuals may experience worsening of asthma symptoms or asthma exacerbations during step-down. Characteristics associated with subsequent exacerbations during step-down therapy have not been well defined. The effect of environmental tobacco smoke exposure on risk of treatment failure during asthma step-down therapy has not been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To identify baseline characteristics associated with treatment failure and asthma exacerbation during maintenance and guideline-based step-down therapy.

METHODS

The present analysis uses data collected from a completed randomized controlled trial of optimal step-down therapy in patients with well-controlled asthma taking moderate-dose combination inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists. Participants were 12 years or older with physician-diagnosed asthma and were enrolled between December 2011 and May 2014.

RESULTS

An emergency room visit in the previous year was associated with subsequent treatment failure (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.21). For every 10% increase in baseline forced expiratory volume in one second percent predicted, the hazard ratio of treatment failure was 14% lower (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.99). There was no difference in the risk of treatment failure between adults and children, nor was the duration of asthma associated with the risk of treatment failure. Age of asthma onset was not associated with an increased risk of treatment failure. Unexpected emergency room visit in the previous year was the only risk factor significantly associated with subsequent asthma exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids. Time to treatment failure or exacerbation did not differ in participants with and without self-report of environmental tobacco smoke exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings can help clinicians identify adults and adolescents with asthma who are more likely to develop treatment failure and exacerbations and who may therefore require closer monitoring during asthma step-down treatment. Those with reduced pulmonary function, a history of exacerbations, and early-onset disease, even if otherwise well controlled, may require closer observation to prevent treatment failures and asthma exacerbations. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01437995).

Genotype tailored treatment of mild symptomatic acid reflux in children with uncontrolled asthma (GenARA): Rationale and methods

Asthma causes enormous suffering and cost for children in the US and around the world [1-3]. Co-morbid gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) makes asthma management more difficult due to increased symptoms. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) drugs are effective at improving to GERD symptoms, however they have demonstrated only modest and variable effects on asthma control in the setting of co-morbid GERD. Importantly, PPI metabolism and efficacy depend on CYP2C19 genotype. The Genotype Tailored Treatment of Symptomatic Acid Reflux in Children with Uncontrolled Asthma (GenARA) study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine if genotype-tailored PPI dosing improves asthma symptoms among children with inadequately controlled asthma and GERD symptoms. This study has an innovative design to both assess the efficacy of genotype-tailored PPI dosing and perform pharmacokinetic modeling of the oral PPI Lansoprazole. Children ages 6-17 years old with clinician-diagnosed asthma and mild GERD symptoms will submit a saliva sample for CYP2C19 genotyping. Participants will undergo a two-step randomization to: (1) genotype-tailored versus conventional dosing of open-label oral lansoprazole for pharmacokinetic modeling, and (2) genotype-tailored lansoprazole daily versus placebo for 24 weeks to determine the effect of genotype-tailored PPI dosing on asthma control. Measures of asthma control, spirometry, and nasal washes during acute illnesses will be collected at 8-week intervals throughout the study. GenARA will better define the effects of CYP2C19 genotype on the dose response of lansoprazole in children and adolescents and assess if a novel dosing regimen improves GERD and asthma control.

BMI but not central obesity predisposes to airway closure during bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Obesity produces restrictive effects on lung function. We previously reported that obese patients with asthma exhibit a propensity towards small airway closure during methacholine challenge which improved with weight loss. We hypothesized that increased abdominal adiposity, a key contributor to the restrictive effects of obesity on the lung, mediates this response. This study investigates the effect of body mass index (BMI) versus waist circumference (WC) on spirometric lung function, sensitivity to airway narrowing and closure, and airway closure during bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma.

METHODS

Participants underwent spirometry and methacholine challenge. Sensitivity to airway closure and narrowing was assessed from the dose-response slopes of the forced vital capacity (FVC) and the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁ ) to FVC, respectively. Airway closure during bronchoconstriction (closing index) was computed as the percent reduction in FVC divided by the percent reduction in FEV₁ at maximal bronchoconstriction.

RESULTS

A total of 116 asthmatic patients (56 obese) underwent methacholine challenge. Spirometric lung function was inversely related to WC (P < 0.05), rather than BMI. Closing index increased significantly during bronchoconstriction in obese patients and was related to increasing BMI (P = 0.01), but not to WC. Sensitivity to airway closure and narrowing was not associated with BMI or WC.

CONCLUSION

Although WC is associated with restrictive effects on baseline lung function, increased BMI, rather than WC, predisposes to airway closure during bronchoconstriction. These findings suggest that obesity predisposes to airway closure during bronchoconstriction through mechanisms other than simple mass loading.

Impact of increasing treatment rates on cost-effectiveness of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in respiratory allergy: a decision analytic modelling approach

BACKGROUND

Specific immunotherapy is the only causal treatment in respiratory allergy. Due to high treatment cost and possible severe side effects subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is not indicated in all patients. Nevertheless, reported treatment rates seem to be low. This study aims to analyze the effects of increasing treatment rates of SCIT in respiratory allergy in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

METHODS

A state-transition Markov model simulates the course of disease of patients with allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma and both diseases over 10 years including a symptom-free state and death. Treatment comprises symptomatic pharmacotherapy alone or combined with SCIT. The model compares two strategies of increased and status quo treatment rates. Transition probabilities are based on routine data. Costs are calculated from the societal perspective applying German unit costs to literature-derived resource consumption. QALYs are determined by translating the mean change in non-preference-based quality of life scores to a change in utility. Key parameters are subjected to deterministic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Increasing treatment rates is a cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 3484€/QALY compared to the status quo. The most influential parameters are SCIT discontinuation rates, treatment effects on the transition probabilities and cost of SCIT. Across all parameter variations, the best case leads to dominance of increased treatment rates while the worst case ICER is 34,315€/QALY. Excluding indirect cost leads to a twofold increase in the ICER.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures to increase SCIT initiation rates should be implemented and also address improving adherence.

The asthma Symptom Free Days Questionnaire: how reliable are patient responses?

Objective: Symptom free days are a widely used patient-reported outcome (PRO) in asthma clinical trials. We assessed the internal consistency of one instrument for this PRO, the Symptom Free Days Questionnaire (SFDQ), in a population of Black adults with asthma enrolled in the Blacks and Exacerbations on Long-acting beta agonists and Tiotropium (BELT) trial. Methods: We assessed responses to the SFDQ collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months as part of the BELT trial. The internal consistency of responses, specifically number of patient-reported days with symptoms in 14 days were compared to the number of patient-reported days with no symptoms in the same 14 days. Lin concordance correlation coefficients (Lin ccc) were calculated over time to assess "learning" and by age, sex, geographic location, and annual family income. Results: The internal consistency of the responses of the 1070 enrolled patients was consistently low over the 12 months of the study; varying from 43.8% at baseline to 52.1% at 12 months. This corresponded to Lin cccs of 0.33-0.32 over the study period. Internal consistency and the Lin ccc did not vary by age group, sex, geographic location or percent poverty. Concordance was slightly but not significantly higher at all time points in those with family annual income of ≥$50,000 compared to those with lower annual incomes. Conclusions: The SFDQ did not work well in the BELT population of Black adults with asthma. Further validation is required before the SFDQ is used in other large clinical trials with any population.

Susceptibility to exacerbations in Black adults with asthma

OBJECTIVE

Exacerbations account for much of the morbidity in asthma. In a large intervention study, we sought to test the hypothesis that a Black adult exacerbation-prone phenotype - a group of Black people with asthma who are at high risk of repeat exacerbation within one year - exists in asthma independent of clinical control.

METHODS

We analyzed exacerbation risk factors in 536 self-identified Black Americans with asthma eligible for, or on, Step 3 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) therapy who participated in a randomized 6-18 month trial of tiotropium versus long acting beta agonist as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids. Exacerbations were defined as events treated by oral or systemic corticosteroids. Clinical control was assessed by a validated asthma control questionnaire (ACQ5).

RESULTS

Exacerbations became more likely with loss of clinical control. The mean baseline ACQs for exacerbators and non-exacerbators were 2.41 and 1.91, respectively (p < 0.001). The strongest independent factor associated with exacerbations across all ACQ levels was an exacerbation in the preceding year (adjusted OR 3.26; p < 0.001). The severity of prior exacerbations did not correlate with the likelihood of a future exacerbation. Lower baseline FEV1/FVC was also associated with increased risk of exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though exacerbations increase with loss of clinical control, an exacerbation susceptibility phenotype exists in Black adults with asthma, independent of clinical control. This phenotype requires precision therapeutic targeting.

Estimation of an inter-rater intra-class correlation coefficient that overcomes common assumption violations in the assessment of health measurement scales

Background

Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) are recommended for the assessment of the reliability of measurement scales. However, the ICC is subject to a variety of statistical assumptions such as normality and stable variance, which are rarely considered in health applications.

Methods

A Bayesian approach using hierarchical regression and variance-function modeling is proposed to estimate the ICC with emphasis on accounting for heterogeneous variances across a measurement scale. As an application, we review the implementation of using an ICC to evaluate the reliability of Observer OPTION⁵, an instrument which used trained raters to evaluate the level of Shared Decision Making between clinicians and patients. The study used two raters to evaluate recordings of 311 clinical encounters across three studies to evaluate the impact of using a Personal Decision Aid over usual care. We particularly focus on deriving an estimate for the ICC when multiple studies are being considered as part of the data.

Results

The results demonstrate that ICC varies substantially across studies and patient-physician encounters within studies. Using the new framework we developed, the study-specific ICCs were estimated to be 0.821, 0.295, and 0.644. If the within- and between-encounter variances were assumed to be the same across studies, the estimated within-study ICC was 0.609. If heteroscedasticity is not properly adjusted for, the within-study ICC estimate was inflated to be as high as 0.640. Finally, if the data were pooled across studies without accounting for the variability between studies then ICC estimates were further inflated by approximately 0.02 while formerly allowing for between study variation in the ICC inflated its estimated value by approximately 0.066 to 0.072 depending on the model.

Conclusion

We demonstrated that misuse of the ICC statistics under common assumption violations leads to misleading and likely inflated estimates of interrater reliability. A statistical analysis that overcomes these violations by expanding the standard statistical model to account for them leads to estimates that are a better reflection of a measurement scale’s reliability while maintaining ease of interpretation. Bayesian methods are particularly well suited to estimating the expanded statistical model.

Impact of reslizumab on outcomes of severe asthmatic patients: current perspectives

Approximately 5%–10% of asthmatics suffer from severe asthma. New biological treatments represent a great opportunity to reduce asthma burden and to improve asthma patients’ lives. Reslizumab will soon be available in several European countries. This anti-IL-5 IgG4/κ monoclonal antibody, administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg/kg over 20–50 minutes every 4 weeks, has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with 400 eosinophils/μL or more in their peripheral blood. The clinical effects in reducing asthma exacerbations and in improving the quality of life and lung function are clear, but further research is needed to determine the best biological compound for a specific cluster of patients. Research data have shown that in patients who were expressing other clinical features of eosinophilic inflammation over asthma (rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis), the clinical benefit of reslizumab was greater. Furthermore, it has also been observed that in patients with unsatisfactory response to mepolizumab, reslizumab is able to significantly improve the clinical and biological parameters. The aim of personalized medicine is to provide the right drug to the right patient at the right dose at the right moment. The biological treatments that were developed to modify specific pathological pathways not only provide us with the tools for the management of asthma patients but also clarify the biological mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis.

Is the EQ-5D fit for purpose in asthma? Acceptability and content validity from the patient perspective

Background

The increasing emphasis on patient-reported outcomes in health care decision making has prompted greater rigor in the evidence to support the instruments used. Acceptability and content validity are important properties of any measure to ensure it assesses the relevant aspects of the target concept. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptability and content validity of the EQ-5D 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) to assess the impact of asthma on patients’ lives.

Methods

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 adults with asthma in the United Kingdom. The first 25 interviews used cognitive-debriefing methods to assess the relevance and acceptability of the EQ-5D-5L and two asthma-specific measures for comparison: an asthma-specific, preference-based measure (the Asthma Quality of Life Utility Index–5 Dimensions) and an Asthma Symptom Diary. The final 15 interviews combined concept elicitation to identify patient-perceived asthma impact, and cognitive debriefing to assess relevance and acceptability of the EQ-5D-5L and the Asthma Symptom Diary. Cognitive-debriefing feedback on the content of the measures was collated and summarized descriptively. The concept-elicitation data were analyzed thematically.

Results

Participants were aged 20 to 57 years and 62.5% were female. Although some participants expressed positive opinions on aspects of the EQ-5D-5L, only the usual activities dimension was consistently considered relevant to participants’ asthma experiences. The mobility and self-care dimensions prompted strong negative reactions from some participants. Variations in interpretation of the mobility dimension and difficulties with multiple concepts in the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression dimensions also were noted. Concepts reported by participants as missing included environmental triggers, asthma symptoms, emotions, and sleep. The EQ-5D-5L was the least preferred measure to describe the impact of asthma on participants’ lives. Participants reported shortness of breath and impact on activities as especially salient issues.

Conclusions

The content of the EQ-5D-5L was poorly aligned with the patient-perceived impact of asthma, and the measure failed to meet basic standards for acceptability and content validity as a measure to assess the impact of asthma from the patient perspective. The shortcomings identified raise concerns regarding the appropriateness of the EQ-5D in asthma and further evaluation is warranted.

Validation of the preference-based multiple sclerosis index

Background:

Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life (HRQL) are used as primary or secondary endpoints in multiple sclerosis (MS) research.

Objective:

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the structural, convergent, and known-groups validity of the preference-based multiple sclerosis index (PBMSI) of HRQL in people with MS.

Methods:

Participants were recruited from three MS clinics in Montreal. Structural validity was assessed using polychoric correlation coefficients and factor analysis. To assess convergent validity, hypotheses were formulated about the strength of correlations between the PBMSI and other HRQL measures. Known-groups validity was assessed against different measures of disability.

Results:

The average age of the sample was 46 and 77% were women. Factor analysis supported the structural validity of the PBMSI; the items collectively were measuring one underlying construct. The PBMSI showed convergent validity against generic measures of HRQL, and known-groups validity between persons with different levels of disability.

Conclusion:

The results of this study support the construct validity of the PBMSI as an outcome measure of HRQL in MS. The PBMSI overcomes limitations observed with currently used HRQL measures in MS and may be used to contrast different interventions for people with MS.

Modelling a preference-based index for EQ-5D using a non-parametric Bayesian method

BACKGROUND

Conventionally, models used for health state valuation data have been parametric. Recently, a number of researchers have investigated the use of non-parametric Bayesian methods in this area.

OBJECTIVES

In this paper, we present a non-parametric Bayesian model to estimate a preference-based index for a five-dimensional health state classification, namely EQ-5D.

METHODS

A sample of 2997 members of the UK general population valued 43 health states selected from a total of 243 health states defined by the EQ-5D using time trade-off technique. Findings from non-parametric modelling are reported in this paper and compared to previously used parametric estimations. The impact of respondent characteristics on health state valuations is also reported.

RESULTS

The non-parametric models were found to be better at predicting scores in populations with different distributions of characteristics than observed in the survey sample. Additionally, non-parametric models were found to be better at allowing for the impact of respondent characteristics to vary by health state. The results show an important age effect with sex having some effect.

CONCLUSION

The non-parametric Bayesian models provide more realistic and better utility estimates from the EQ-5D than previously used parametric models have done. Furthermore, the model is more flexible in estimating the impact of covariates.

A comparison of the responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and the QOLIE-31P and mapping of QOLIE-31P to EQ-5D-5L in epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the responsiveness of and correlation between the EQ-5D-5L and the QOLIE-31P in patients with epilepsy, and develop a mapping function to predict EQ-5D-5L values based on the QOLIE-31P for use in economic evaluations.

METHODS

The dataset was derived from two clinical trials, the ZMILE study in the Netherlands and the SMILE study in the UK. In both studies, patients' quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L and QOLIE-31P was measured at baseline and 12 months follow-up. Spearman's correlations, effect sizes (EF) and standardized response means (SRM) were calculated for both the EQ-5D-5L and QOLIE-31P domains and sub scores. Mapping functions were derived using ordinary least square (OLS) and censored least absolute deviations models.

RESULTS

A total of 509 patients were included in this study. Low to moderately strong significant correlations were found between both instruments. The EQ-5D-5L showed high ceiling effects and small EFs and SRMs, whereas the QOLIE-31P did not show ceiling effects and also showed small to moderate EFs and SRMs. Results of the different mapping functions indicate that the highest adjusted R ² we were able to regress was 0.265 using an OLS model with squared terms, leading to a mean absolute error of 0.103.

CONCLUSIONS

Results presented in this study emphasize the shortcomings of the EQ-5D-5L in epilepsy and the importance of the development of condition-specific preference-based instruments which can be used within the QALY framework. In addition, the usefulness of the constructed mapping function in economic evaluations is questionable.

Performance of the Asthma Impact on Quality of Life Scale (A-IQOLS) in diverse asthma research populations and demographic subgroups

BACKGROUND

The Asthma Impact on Quality of Life Scale (A-IQOLS) assesses the patient-perceived negative effect of asthma on quality of life. Its standard error of measurement is known; it has strong construct, convergent, and divergent validity; and it provides information that is unique among asthma outcome measures.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to characterize the psychometric properties of the A-IQOLS and its suitability for use in demographically and clinically diverse adult asthmatic populations.

METHODS

Data from participants in 5 independent asthma studies, with samples ranging from patients with well-controlled moderate asthma to patients with severe poorly controlled asthma, were pooled to determine the psychometric performance of A-IQOLS scores overall and in multiple demographic, disease status, and study subgroups.

RESULTS

Pooled sample (n = 597) age averaged 45 years; 66% were female, 65% were white, 22% were African American, 11% were Hispanic, and 11% had a high school education or less. The rated importance of its underlying life dimensions and associations between A-IQOLS scores and lung function, symptom, Asthma Control Test, Juniper Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, and Marks Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores was very similar, regardless of patients' demographic and clinical characteristics. A-IQOLS scores discriminated among the individual study samples, as well as other patient-reported symptom and functional status measures. Distribution and anchor-based considerations suggest an A-IQOLS minimum clinically important difference in the vicinity of 0.50 and not less than 0.33 scale score units.

CONCLUSIONS

A-IQOLS is valid for research and potentially clinical use in demographically and clinically diverse patients.

Standards for Instrument Migration When Implementing Paper Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments Electronically: Recommendations from a Qualitative Synthesis of Cognitive Interview and Usability Studies

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize the findings of cognitive interview and usability studies performed to assess the measurement equivalence of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments migrated from paper to electronic formats (ePRO), and make recommendations regarding future migration validation requirements and ePRO design best practice.

METHODS

We synthesized findings from all cognitive interview and usability studies performed by a contract research organization between 2012 and 2015: 53 studies comprising 68 unique instruments and 101 instrument evaluations. We summarized study findings to make recommendations for best practice and future validation requirements.

RESULTS

Five studies (9%) identified minor findings during cognitive interview that may possibly affect instrument measurement properties. All findings could be addressed by application of ePRO best practice, such as eliminating scrolling, ensuring appropriate font size, ensuring suitable thickness of visual analogue scale lines, and providing suitable instructions. Similarly, regarding solution usability, 49 of the 53 studies (92%) recommended no changes in display clarity, navigation, operation, and completion without help. Reported usability findings could be eliminated by following good product design such as the size, location, and responsiveness of navigation buttons.

CONCLUSIONS

With the benefit of accumulating evidence, it is possible to relax the need to routinely conduct cognitive interview and usability studies when implementing minor changes during instrument migration. Application of design best practice and selecting vendor solutions with good user interface and user experience properties that have been assessed in a representative group may enable many instrument migrations to be accepted without formal validation studies by instead conducting a structured expert screen review.