1
|
de Souza GT, Torquato IHS, Castro CC. Understanding the relations between Solanaceae crops and their pollinators: a global meta-network. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2024; 26:157-165. [PMID: 38192089 DOI: 10.1111/plb.13616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Crop-pollinator interactions are essential for world food security. Studying crop pollination from a network approach allows identification of target pollinators for conservation and management, and gaps in our knowledge. Solanaceae represents the third highest ranked family based on economic value, and its production is highly improved by animal pollination. This study aimed to integrate global data on solanaceous crop pollination and analyse the interaction patterns using a meta-network approach. Our questions were: (i) how are interactions structured and what are the structuring roles of species; and (ii) what are the main gaps in our knowledge? Data were obtained through a systematic review of the main scientific databases. The network structure was described using connectivity and modularity calculations, and the role of species using centrality metrics. The 251 pollinator species reported were in seven orders, mainly Hymenoptera (84.9%). The generalists Bombus and Apis species were the most common pollinators. The meta-network was modular, and all modules mostly included bees. Most species were peripherals, around 12% were connectors, and there were no module hubs. Apis mellifera was the only network hub (supergeneralist). The most important pollinators are the most managed pollinators worldwide; however, many native species play a role in structuring the meta-network. Main gaps include species of importance to pepper pollination, lack of species-specific identification, and the need for more robust experimental studies evaluating the pollination efficiency of native, manageable bees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G T de Souza
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
| | - I H S Torquato
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
| | - C C Castro
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Agreste de Pernambuco, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cane JH. The Extraordinary Alkali Bee, Nomia melanderi (Halictidae), the World's Only Intensively Managed Ground-Nesting Bee. Annu Rev Entomol 2024; 69:99-116. [PMID: 37585607 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020623-013716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Among the ground-nesting bees are several proven crop pollinators, but only the alkali bee (Nomia melanderi) has been successfully managed. In <80 years, it has become the world's most intensely studied ground-nesting solitary bee. In many ways, the bee seems paradoxical. It nests during the torrid, parched midsummer amid arid valleys and basins of the western United States, yet it wants damp nesting soil. In these basins, extensive monocultures of an irrigated Eurasian crop plant, alfalfa (lucerne), subsidize millions of alkali bees. Elsewhere, its polylectic habits and long foraging range allow it to stray into neighboring crops contaminated with insecticides. Primary wild floral hosts are either non-native or poorly known. Kleptoparasitic bees plague most ground nesters, but not alkali bees, which do, however, host other well-studied parasitoids. Building effective nesting beds requires understanding the hydraulic conductivity of silty nesting soils and its important interplay with specific soil mineral salts. Surprisingly, some isolated populations endure inhospitably cold climates by nesting amid hot springs. Despite the peculiarities and challenges associated with its management, the alkali bee remains the second most valuable managed solitary bee for US agriculture and perhaps the world.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hung KLJ, Fan SL, Strang CG, Park MG, Thomson JD. Pollen carryover, pollinator movement, and spatial context impact the delivery of pollination services in apple orchards. Ecol Appl 2023; 33:e2917. [PMID: 37661589 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Assessing the relative contributions of different pollinator taxa to pollination services is a central task in both basic eco-evolutionary research and applied conservation and agriculture. To that end, many studies have quantified single-visit pollen deposition and visitation frequency, which together determine a pollinator species' rate of conspecific pollen delivery. However, for plant species that require or benefit from outcrossing, pollination service quality further depends upon the ratio of outcross to self-pollen deposited, which is determined by two additional pollinator traits: pollen carryover and movement patterns among genetically compatible plant individuals. Here, we compare the pollination capacities of managed honey bees, native bumble bees, and native mining bees in apple-a varietally self-incompatible commercial crop-when pollen carryover and pollinator movement patterns are considered. We constructed simulation models of outcross pollen deposition parameterized using empirically measured single-visit pollen deposition, visitation frequency, and probabilities of intertree movement exhibited by each pollinator type, as well as pollen carryover patterns simulated based on parameters reported in the literature. In these models, we also explicitly specified the spatial relationships among cross-compatible trees based on field-realistic orchard layout schemes. We found that estimated pollination service delivery was considerably reduced for all pollinator types when pollen carryover and pollinator movement patterns were considered, as compared to when only single-visit pollen deposition and visitation frequency were considered. We also found that the performance of different pollinator types varied greatly across simulated orchard layout schemes and pollen carryover scenarios, including one instance where bumble and mining bees reversed their relative rankings. In all simulations, native bumble and mining bees outperformed managed honey bees in terms of both outcross pollen delivery per unit time and per flower visited, with disparities being greatest under scenarios of low pollen carryover. We demonstrate the degree to which pollination studies may reach inaccurate conclusions regarding pollination service delivery when pollen carryover and pollinator movement patterns are ignored. Our finding of the strong context dependence of pollination efficiency, even within a single plant-pollinator taxon pair, cautions that future studies in both basic and applied pollination biology should explicitly consider the ecological context in which pollination interactions take place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keng-Lou James Hung
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Sophia L Fan
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caroline G Strang
- College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Mia G Park
- Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - James D Thomson
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blareau E, Sy P, Daoud K, Requier F. Insect-Mediated Pollination of Strawberries in an Urban Environment. Insects 2023; 14:877. [PMID: 37999076 PMCID: PMC10671972 DOI: 10.3390/insects14110877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
Pollination services provided by a diversity of pollinators are critical in agriculture because they enhance the yield of many crops. However, few studies have assessed pollination services in urban agricultural systems. We performed flower-visitor observations and pollination experiments on strawberries (Fragaria × ananassa) in an urban area near Paris, France, in order to assess the effects of (i) insect-mediated pollination service and (ii) potential pollination deficit on fruit set, seed set, and fruit quality (size, weight, and malformation). Flower-visitor observations revealed that the pollinator community solely comprised unmanaged pollinators, despite the presence of beehives in the surrounding landscape. Based on the pollination experiments, we found that the pollination service mediated by wild insects improved the fruit size as a qualitative value of production, but not the fruit set. We also found no evidence of pollination deficit in our urban environment. These results suggest that the local community of wild urban pollinators is able to support strawberry crop production and thus plays an important role in providing high-quality, local, and sustainable crops in urban areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsa Blareau
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
- Institut d’Ecologie et des Sciences de l’Environnement de Paris, Sorbonne Université, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Pauline Sy
- LAB3S Sols Savoirs Saveurs, 32 Avenue Henri Varagnat, 93140 Bondy, France
| | - Karim Daoud
- Laboratoire Régional du Suivi de la Faune Sauvage, 32 Avenue Henri Varagnat, 93140 Bondy, France
| | - Fabrice Requier
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, UMR Évolution, Génomes, Comportement et Écologie, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ikemoto M, Tanaka Y, Kohno K, Yokoi T. Diurnal and geographic variations of pollinator importance for Cucurbita maxima Duchesne. Ecol Evol 2023; 13:e10651. [PMID: 37915802 PMCID: PMC10616738 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite growing awareness of the importance of monitoring wild crop pollinators worldwide, there are still few reports, especially in East Asia. Considering ongoing global warming may change the distribution range and diurnal activity of pollinators, it is necessary to describe current geographic and diurnal patterns. We clarified pollinators of Cucurbita maxima Duchesne (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae) in three geographically distinct (>350 km, minimum) areas in Japan, focusing on diurnal variation. Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and Halictidae (Hymenoptera) were observed in all of the experimental gardens. Apis cerana japonica Radoszkowski (Hymenoptera: Apidae) were mainly observed in Mie and Kagoshima, while Bombus diversus diversus Smith (Hymenoptera: Apidae) were observed only in Ibaraki. The peak time of flower visits depended both on bee taxa and area, and interestingly, did not necessarily synchronize with the timing of the highest pollen loads and the probability of stigma contact. In particular, visits and probability of contacting stigmas of Halictidae tended to increase as time passed, whereas pollen grains on their bodies sharply decreased with time; only a few individuals of Halictidae that visit early can become effective pollinators. There were no differences in yields between supplementary hand and natural pollination in all areas, and flower-enclosure experiments using different mesh sizes clarified that small insects that can go across an approximately 4-mm mesh may not transport sufficient pollen for fruit set. Our study demonstrated that pollination effectiveness, which is usually regarded as a static value, within a taxon can fluctuate in the space of just several hours. Considering such diurnal patterns can be altered by climate change, we need to carefully monitor the diurnal temporal patterns of pollinators worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mito Ikemoto
- Faculty of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
- National Institute for Environmental StudiesTsukubaJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Tanaka
- Kagoshima Prefectural Institute for Agricultural DevelopmentMinamisatsumaJapan
| | - Katsuyuki Kohno
- Institute of Vegetable and Floriculture Science, National Agriculture and Food Research OrganizationTsuJapan
| | - Tomoyuki Yokoi
- Faculty of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of TsukubaTsukubaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pyke GH, Prendergast KS, Ren Z. Pollination crisis Down-Under: Has Australasia dodged the bullet? Ecol Evol 2023; 13:e10639. [PMID: 37915803 PMCID: PMC10615657 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Since mid-1990s, concerns have increased about a human-induced "pollination crisis." Threats have been identified to animals that act as plant pollinators, plants pollinated by these animals, and consequently human well-being. Threatening processes include loss of natural habitat, climate change, pesticide use, pathogen spread, and introduced species. However, concern has mostly been during last 10-15 years and from Europe and North America, with Australasia, known as Down-Under, receiving little attention. So perhaps Australasia has "dodged the bullet"? We systematically reviewed the published literature relating to the "pollination crisis" via Web of Science, focusing on issues amenable to this approach. Across these issues, we found a steep increase in publications over the last few decades and a major geographic bias towards Europe and North America, with relatively little attention in Australasia. While publications from Australasia are underrepresented, factors responsible elsewhere for causing the "pollination crisis" commonly occur in Australasia, so this lack of coverage probably reflects a lack of awareness rather than the absence of a problem. In other words, Australasia has not "dodged the bullet" and should take immediate action to address and mitigate its own "pollination crisis." Sensible steps would include increased taxonomic work on suspected plant pollinators, protection for pollinator populations threatened with extinction, establishing long-term monitoring of plant-pollinator relationships, incorporating pollination into sustainable agriculture, restricting the use of various pesticides, adopting an Integrated Pest and Pollinator Management approach, and developing partnerships with First Nations peoples for research, conservation and management of plants and their pollinators. Appropriate Government policy, funding and regulation could help.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham H. Pyke
- CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East AsiaKunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
- School of Natural SciencesMacquarie UniversityRydeNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kit S. Prendergast
- School of Biological Sciences & BiotechnologyMurdoch UniversityPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Zong‐Xin Ren
- CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East AsiaKunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bixby M, Cunningham M, Foster L, Higo H, Morfin N. British Columbia beekeeping revenues and costs: survey data and profit modeling. J Insect Sci 2023; 23:22. [PMID: 38055942 PMCID: PMC11025375 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iead070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
British Columbia beekeepers, like many beekeepers around the world, are currently facing declines in honey bee health and high overwinter colony losses. To better understand the economics and the cycle of yearly colony loss and replacement of this critical agricultural industry, we collected and analyzed survey data on beekeeping costs and returns. Forty British Columbia beekeepers provided details about revenue sources, variable costs, capital costs, and investments. Ten surveyed beekeepers managed between 1 and 9 colonies, 10 managed between 10 and 39 colonies, 9 managed between 40 and 100 colonies, 5 managed between 101 and 299 colonies, 3 managed between 300 and 699 colonies, and 3 managed 700 colonies or more. The data was used to calculate beekeeping profit and to parameterize a model that explores the economic impact of colony loss rates and replacement strategies. Survey results show that when the data is aggregated, revenues exceed costs for beekeeping operations in British Columbia with a per colony profit of $56.92 or $0.87 per pound of honey produced. Surveyed operations with fewer than 100 colonies have negative profits, while operations with 100-299 colonies have positive profits. Surveyed operations in the Cariboo, North Coast, and Okanagan regions have the highest profits while surveyed operations in the Peace region have the lowest profits. Profit modeling shows that replacing losses with packages generates lower profit than replacing losses with split colonies. Our modeling shows that operations that diversify their revenue to include bee sales and commercial pollination accrue higher profits and can withstand higher winter loss rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Bixby
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, 2125 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Morgan Cunningham
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Beaverlodge Research Farm, P.O. Box 29, Beaverlodge, AB T0H 0C0, Canada
- Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
| | - Leonard Foster
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, 2125 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Heather Higo
- The BC Honey Producers’ Association, P.O. Box 5609, Station B, Victoria, BC V8R 6S4, Canada
| | - Nuria Morfin
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, 2125 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- British Columbia Technology Transfer Program, The BC Honey Producers’ Association, P.O. Box 5609, Station B, Victoria, BC V8R 6S4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Osterman J, Benton F, Hellström S, Luderer‐Pflimpfl M, Pöpel‐Eisenbrandt A, Wild BS, Theodorou P, Ulbricht C, Paxton RJ. Mason bees and honey bees synergistically enhance fruit set in sweet cherry orchards. Ecol Evol 2023; 13:e10289. [PMID: 37435028 PMCID: PMC10329911 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Mason bees (Osmia spp.) are efficient fruit tree pollinators that can be encouraged to occupy and breed in artificial nesting material. In sweet cherry orchards, they are occasionally used as an alternative managed pollinator as a replacement for or in addition to honey bees (Apis mellifera). Yet, the lack of practical guidelines on management practices, for example optimal stocking rates, for both mason bee nesting material and honey bees might compromise pollination service provision. In this study, we assessed the relationship between stocking rates (honey bee hives and mason bee nesting material) and the abundance of honey bees and mason bees in 17 sweet cherry (Prunus avium) orchards in Central Germany. We furthermore performed a pollination experiment to explore the interactive effect of mason bees and honey bees on sweet cherry fruit set. In the orchards, both honey bee and mason bee abundance increased with increasing stocking rates of hives or nesting material, respectively. Honey bee abundance increased linearly with stocking rates. In contrast, mason bee abundance asymptoted at 2-3 nesting boxes per ha, beyond which more boxes resulted in little increase in visitation rate. Our pollination experiment demonstrated that orchards were pollen limited, with only 28% of insect-pollinated flowers setting fruit versus 39% of optimally hand-pollinated flowers. Honey bees and mason bees enhanced sweet cherry fruit set, but only when both were present and not when either was present alone in an orchard. Our findings demonstrate that offering nesting material for mason bees and employing honey bee hives can enhance bee abundance in sweet cherry orchards. By increasing honey bee abundance in combination with enhanced mason bee abundance, farmers can substantially boost fruit set and potentially sweet cherry yield. To enhance pollination services, farmers should consider the benefits of increasing pollinator biodiversity as an immediate benefit to improve crop yields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Osterman
- General Zoology, Institute for BiologyMartin‐Luther‐University of Halle‐WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany
- Department of Computational Landscape EcologyHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research‐UFZ Leipzig, ESCALATELeipzigGermany
- Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Environment and Natural ResourcesUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
- Gothenburg Global Biodiversity CentreUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden
| | - Frances Benton
- General Zoology, Institute for BiologyMartin‐Luther‐University of Halle‐WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany
- Queen's University BelfastBelfastUK
| | - Sara Hellström
- General Zoology, Institute for BiologyMartin‐Luther‐University of Halle‐WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany
| | | | | | - Bilyana Stoykova Wild
- General Zoology, Institute for BiologyMartin‐Luther‐University of Halle‐WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany
- Faculty of BiologySofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”SofiaBulgaria
| | - Panagiotis Theodorou
- General Zoology, Institute for BiologyMartin‐Luther‐University of Halle‐WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Christin Ulbricht
- Dezernat GartenbauLandesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und GartenbauQuedlinburgGermany
| | - Robert J. Paxton
- General Zoology, Institute for BiologyMartin‐Luther‐University of Halle‐WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pérez-Marcos M, Ortiz-Sánchez FJ, López-Gallego E, Ibáñez H, Carrasco A, Sanchez JA. Effects of Managed and Unmanaged Floral Margins on Pollination Services and Production in Melon Crops. Insects 2023; 14:296. [PMID: 36975981 PMCID: PMC10051670 DOI: 10.3390/insects14030296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Melon is among the most consumed fruits in the world, being a crop that depends almost entirely on insects for its reproduction, which is why it is especially sensitive to declining pollination services. Restoration and maintenance of hedgerows and agricultural borders around crops are generally carried out by sowing flowering herbaceous plants or establishing shrubby species; however, a cost-effective and lower-maintenance alternative for farmers could be as simple as allowing vegetation to regenerate naturally without any management actions. This work aimed to test the effects of three different types of margins (managed herbaceous, managed shrubby, and unmanaged herbaceous) on the overall abundance and richness of wild pollinators in melon crops. The work was performed in three localities in southern Spain over two years. Pollinators were monitored visually using 1 × 1 m sampling squares and pan traps within melon fields. Moreover, crop yield was estimated by measuring fruit weight and the number of seeds. In general, higher abundances of pollinators were observed in melon fields during the second year. In addition, the abundances of Syrphidae, Andrenidae, Apidae (excl. Apis mellifera), and pollinators other than bees, belonging to the orders Diptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera, showed higher values in melon fields with shrubby margins than in fields with herbaceous margins (managed or unmanaged). However, no effect of floral margins on the yield of melon crops was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Pérez-Marcos
- Biological Pest Control & Ecosystem Services Laboratory, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Research and Development (IMIDA), C/Mayor s/n, 30150 Murcia, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Ortiz-Sánchez
- Research Group “R&D Transfer in the Area of Natural Resources”, University of Almería, Ctra. de Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120 Almería, Spain
| | - Elena López-Gallego
- Biological Pest Control & Ecosystem Services Laboratory, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Research and Development (IMIDA), C/Mayor s/n, 30150 Murcia, Spain
| | - Helena Ibáñez
- Biological Pest Control & Ecosystem Services Laboratory, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Research and Development (IMIDA), C/Mayor s/n, 30150 Murcia, Spain
| | - Aline Carrasco
- Biological Pest Control & Ecosystem Services Laboratory, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Research and Development (IMIDA), C/Mayor s/n, 30150 Murcia, Spain
| | - Juan Antonio Sanchez
- Biological Pest Control & Ecosystem Services Laboratory, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Research and Development (IMIDA), C/Mayor s/n, 30150 Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barda M, Karamaouna F, Kati V, Perdikis D. Do Patches of Flowering Plants Enhance Insect Pollinators in Apple Orchards? Insects 2023; 14:insects14020208. [PMID: 36835777 PMCID: PMC9960344 DOI: 10.3390/insects14020208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Apples depend on insect pollination but intensification of agriculture jeopardizes pollination services in agroecosystems. Concerns about the dependency of crop pollination exclusively on honey bees increase the interest in agricultural practices that safeguard wild pollinators in agroecosystems. The purpose of the study was to assess the potential of floral resource provision in apple orchards to enhance the conservation of hymenopterous pollinating insects and potentially the pollination service to the crop. For this reason, flowering plant mixtures sown in patches inside apple orchards were tested against wild plant patches. Pollinator taxa recorded on the sown and wild plant patches were honey bees, wild bees (Andrena, Anthophora, Eucera, Halictus, Lasioglossum, Megachilidae on both; Systropha only on wild plants; Bombus, Hylaeus, Sphecodes, Nomada, Xylocopa only on sown mixture), syrphids, bee flies. The most abundant pollinator of apple was A. mellifera but wild bees were also recorded (Andrena, Anthophora, Bombus, Xylocopa, Lasioglossum, Megachilidae). The sown mixture attracted a more diverse taxa of pollinators and in greater numbers compared to the weed flora, but it did not have an effect on pollinators visiting apple flowers. Groundcover management with patches of suitable flowering mixtures can enhance pollinator conservation in apple orchards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrto Barda
- Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece
- Scientific Directorate of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta Str., 14561 Kifissia, Greece
- Correspondence: (M.B.); (F.K.)
| | - Filitsa Karamaouna
- Scientific Directorate of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta Str., 14561 Kifissia, Greece
- Correspondence: (M.B.); (F.K.)
| | - Vaya Kati
- Scientific Directorate of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta Str., 14561 Kifissia, Greece
- Laboratory of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dionysios Perdikis
- Laboratory of Agricultural Zoology and Entomology, Faculty of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ferreira AIS, da Silva NFF, Mesquita FN, Rosa TC, Monzón VH, Mesquita-Neto JN. Automatic acoustic recognition of pollinating bee species can be highly improved by Deep Learning models accompanied by pre-training and strong data augmentation. Front Plant Sci 2023; 14:1081050. [PMID: 37123860 PMCID: PMC10140520 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1081050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Bees capable of performing floral sonication (or buzz-pollination) are among the most effective pollinators of blueberries. However, the quality of pollination provided varies greatly among species visiting the flowers. Consequently, the correct identification of flower visitors becomes indispensable to distinguishing the most efficient pollinators of blueberry. However, taxonomic identification normally depends on microscopic characteristics and the active participation of experts in the decision-making process. Moreover, the many species of bees (20,507 worldwide) and other insects are a challenge for a decreasing number of insect taxonomists. To overcome the limitations of traditional taxonomy, automatic classification systems of insects based on Machine-Learning (ML) have been raised for detecting and distinguishing a wide variety of bioacoustic signals, including bee buzzing sounds. Despite that, classical ML algorithms fed by spectrogram-type data only reached marginal performance for bee ID recognition. On the other hand, emerging systems from Deep Learning (DL), especially Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have provided a substantial boost to classification performance in other audio domains, but have yet to be tested for acoustic bee species recognition tasks. Therefore, we aimed to automatically identify blueberry pollinating bee species based on characteristics of their buzzing sounds using DL algorithms. Methods We designed CNN models combined with Log Mel-Spectrogram representations and strong data augmentation and compared their performance at recognizing blueberry pollinating bee species with the current state-of-the-art models for automatic recognition of bee species. Results and Discussion We found that CNN models performed better at assigning bee buzzing sounds to their respective taxa than expected by chance. However, CNN models were highly dependent on acoustic data pre-training and data augmentation to outperform classical ML classifiers in recognizing bee buzzing sounds. Under these conditions, the CNN models could lead to automating the taxonomic recognition of flower-visiting bees of blueberry crops. However, there is still room to improve the performance of CNN models by focusing on recording samples for poorly represented bee species. Automatic acoustic recognition associated with the degree of efficiency of a bee species to pollinate a particular crop would result in a comprehensive and powerful tool for recognizing those that best pollinate and increase fruit yields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Thierson Couto Rosa
- Instituto de Informatica, Universidade Federal de Goias, Goiania, Goias, Brazil
| | - Victor Hugo Monzón
- Laboratorio Ecologıa de Abejas, Departamento de Biologıa y Quımica, Facultad de Ciencias Basicas, Universidad Catolica del Maule, Talca, Chile
| | - José Neiva Mesquita-Neto
- Laboratorio Ecologıa de Abejas, Departamento de Biologıa y Quımica, Facultad de Ciencias Basicas, Universidad Catolica del Maule, Talca, Chile
- *Correspondence: José Neiva Mesquita-Neto,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tscharntke T, Ocampo‐Ariza C, Vansynghel J, Ivañez‐Ballesteros B, Aycart P, Rodriguez L, Ramirez M, Steffan‐Dewenter I, Maas B, Thomas E. Socio-ecological benefits of fine-flavor cacao in its center of origin. Conserv Lett 2023; 16:e12936. [PMID: 38440357 PMCID: PMC10909533 DOI: 10.1111/conl.12936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
In the tropics, combining food security with biodiversity conservation remains a major challenge. Tropical agroforestry systems are among the most biodiversity-friendly and productive land-use systems, and 70% of cocoa is grown by >6 million smallholder farmers living on <2$ per day. In cacao's main centre of diversification, the western Amazon region, interest is growing to achieve premium prices with the conversion of high-yielding, but mostly bulk-quality cacao to native fine-flavor cacao varieties, culturally important since pre-Columbian times. Conversion to native cacao can be expected to favor adaptation to regional climate and growth conditions, and to enhance native biodiversity and ecosystem services such as biological pest control and pollination, but possibly also imply susceptibility to diseases. Experience from successful conversion of non-native cacao plantations to fine-flavor cacao agroforestry with rejuvenation by grafting and under medium-canopy cover levels (30%-40%) can ensure a smooth transition with only minor temporary productivity gaps. This includes ongoing selection programs of high yielding and disease resistant native fine-flavor cacao genotypes and organizing in cooperatives to buffer the high market volatility. In conclusion, the recent interest on converting bulk cacao to a diversity of native fine-flavor varieties in countries like Peru is a challenge, but offers promising socio-ecological perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teja Tscharntke
- Department of AgroecologyUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
| | - Carolina Ocampo‐Ariza
- Department of AgroecologyUniversity of GöttingenGöttingenGermany
- Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Lima officeLimaPeru
| | - Justine Vansynghel
- Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Lima officeLimaPeru
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical BiologyBiocenter, University of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | | | - Pablo Aycart
- Department of Botany and Biodiversity ResearchUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Lily Rodriguez
- Centro de conservación, investigación y manejo de áreas naturales, CIMALimaPeru
| | - Marleni Ramirez
- Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Lima officeLimaPeru
| | - Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical BiologyBiocenter, University of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
| | - Bea Maas
- Department of Botany and Biodiversity ResearchUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Evert Thomas
- Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Lima officeLimaPeru
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Eigenbrode SD, Adhikari S, Kistner-Thomas E, Neven L. Introduction to the Collection: Climate Change, Insect Pests, and Beneficial Arthropods in Production Systems. J Econ Entomol 2022; 115:1315-1319. [PMID: 35899796 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toac107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Climate change is expected to alter pressure from insect pests and the abundance and effectiveness of insect pollinators across diverse agriculture and forestry systems. In response to warming, insects are undergoing or are projected to undergo shifts in their geographic ranges, voltinism, abundance, and phenology. Drivers include direct effects on the focal insects and indirect effects mediated by their interactions with species at higher or lower trophic levels. These climate-driven effects are complex and variable, sometimes increasing pest pressure or reducing pollination and sometimes with opposite effects depending on climatic baseline conditions and the interplay of these drivers. This special collection includes several papers illustrative of these biological effects on pests and pollinators. In addition, in response to or anticipating climate change, producers are modifying production systems by introducing more or different crops into rotations or as cover crops or intercrops or changing crop varieties, with potentially substantial effects on associated insect communities, an aspect of climate change that is relatively understudied. This collection includes several papers illustrating these indirect production system-level effects. Together, biological and management-related effects on insects comprise the necessary scope for anticipating and responding to the effects of climate change on insects in agriculture and forest systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanford D Eigenbrode
- Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Subodh Adhikari
- Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Erica Kistner-Thomas
- Institute of Food Production and Sustainability, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Lisa Neven
- USDA-ARS, Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Research Unit, Wapato, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ariza D, Meeus I, Eeraerts M, Pisman M, Smagghe G. Linking remote sensing data to the estimation of pollination services in agroecosystems. Ecol Appl 2022; 32:e2605. [PMID: 35365918 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Wild bees are key providers of pollination services in agroecosystems. The abundance of these pollinators and the ecosystem services they provide rely on supporting resources in the landscape. Spatially explicit models that quantify wild bee abundance and pollination services in food crops are built on the foundations of foraging and nesting resources. This dependence limits model implementation as land-cover maps and pollination experts capable of evaluating habitat resource quality are scarce. This study presents a novel approach to assessing crop pollination services using remote sensing data (RSD) as an alternative to the more conventional use of land-cover data and local expertise on spatially explicit models. We used landscape characteristics derived from remote sensors to qualify nesting resources in the landscape and to evaluate the delivery of pollination services by mining bees (Andrena spp.) in 30 fruit orchards located in the Flemish region of Belgium. For this study, we selected mining bees for their importance as local pollinators and underground nesting behavior. We compared the estimated pollination services derived from RSD with those derived from the conventional qualification of nesting resources. We did not observe significant differences (p = 0.68) in the variation in mining bee activity predicted by the two spatial models. Estimated pollination services derived from RSD and conventional characterizations explained 69% and 72% of the total variation, respectively. These results confirmed that RSD can deliver nesting suitability characterizations sufficient for estimating pollination services. This research also illustrates the importance of nesting resources and landscape characteristics when estimating pollination services delivered by insects like mining bees. Our results support the development of holistic agroenvironmental policies that rely on modern tools like remote sensors and promote pollinators by considering nesting resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ariza
- Department of Plants and Crops, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Gent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ivan Meeus
- Department of Plants and Crops, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Gent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maxime Eeraerts
- Department of Plants and Crops, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Gent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Matti Pisman
- Department of Plants and Crops, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Gent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Guy Smagghe
- Department of Plants and Crops, Laboratory of Agrozoology, Gent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aguirre LA, Adler LS. Interacting Antagonisms: Parasite Infection Alters Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Responses to Herbivory on Tomato Plants. J Econ Entomol 2022; 115:688-692. [PMID: 35244163 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toac023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Little is known about how simultaneous antagonistic interactions on plants and pollinators affect pollination services, even though herbivory can alter floral traits and parasites can change pollinator learning, perception, or behavior. We investigated how a common herbivore and bumble bee (Bombus spp.) parasite impact pollination in tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) (Solanales: Solanaceae). We exposed half the plants to low-intensity herbivory by the specialist Manduca sexta L. (Lepidoptera: Sphigidae), and observed bumble bee visits and time spent on flowers of damaged and control plants. Following observations, we caught the foraging bees and assessed infection by the common gut parasite, Crithidia bombi Lipa & Triggiani (Trypanosomatida: Trypanosomatidae). Interestingly, we found an interactive effect between herbivory and Crithidia infection; bees with higher parasite loads spent less time foraging on damaged plants compared to control plants. However, bees did not visit higher proportions of flowers on damaged or control plants, regardless of infection status. Our study demonstrates that multiple antagonists can have synergistic negative effects on the duration of pollinator visits, such that the consequences of herbivory may depend on the infection status of pollinators. If pollinator parasites indeed exacerbate the negative effects of herbivory on pollination services, this suggests the importance of incorporating bee health management practices to maximize crop production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis A Aguirre
- Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
- Graduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Lynn S Adler
- Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
- Graduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pecenka JR, Ingwell LL, Foster RE, Krupke CH, Kaplan I. IPM reduces insecticide applications by 95% while maintaining or enhancing crop yields through wild pollinator conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2108429118. [PMID: 34697238 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2108429118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Environmental damage from insecticide overuse is a major concern, particularly for conservation of “good” insects such as pollinators that ensure stable production of food crops like fruits and vegetables. However, insecticides are also necessary for farmers to manage “bad” insects (i.e., pests), and thus, a more holistic view of crop management needs to account for the proper balance between the beneficial and detrimental aspects of pesticides. Here, we used multiyear field experiments with a paired corn–watermelon cropping system to show that insecticide use can be dramatically reduced (by ∼95%) while maintaining or even increasing yields through the conservation of wild bees as crop pollinators. These data demonstrate that food production and ecosystem sustainability are not necessarily conflicting goals. Pest management practices in modern industrial agriculture have increasingly relied on insurance-based insecticides such as seed treatments that are poorly correlated with pest density or crop damage. This approach, combined with high invertebrate toxicity for newer products like neonicotinoids, makes it challenging to conserve beneficial insects and the services that they provide. We used a 4-y experiment using commercial-scale fields replicated across multiple sites in the midwestern United States to evaluate the consequences of adopting integrated pest management (IPM) using pest thresholds compared with standard conventional management (CM). To do so, we employed a systems approach that integrated coproduction of a regionally dominant row crop (corn) with a pollinator-dependent specialty crop (watermelon). Pest populations, pollination rates, crop yields, and system profitability were measured. Despite higher pest densities and/or damage in both crops, IPM-managed pests rarely reached economic thresholds, resulting in 95% lower insecticide use (97 versus 4 treatments in CM and IPM, respectively, across all sites, crops, and years). In IPM corn, the absence of a neonicotinoid seed treatment had no impact on yields, whereas IPM watermelon experienced a 129% increase in flower visitation rate by pollinators, resulting in 26% higher yields. The pollinator-enhancement effect under IPM management was mediated entirely by wild bees; foraging by managed honey bees was unaffected by treatments and, overall, did not correlate with crop yield. This proof-of-concept experiment mimicking on-farm practices illustrates that cropping systems in major agricultural commodities can be redesigned via IPM to exploit ecosystem services without compromising, and in some cases increasing, yields.
Collapse
|
17
|
Page ML, Nicholson CC, Brennan RM, Britzman AT, Greer J, Hemberger J, Kahl H, Müller U, Peng Y, Rosenberger NM, Stuligross C, Wang L, Yang LH, Williams NM. A meta-analysis of single visit pollination effectiveness comparing honeybees and other floral visitors. Am J Bot 2021; 108:2196-2207. [PMID: 34622948 DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
PREMISE Many animals provide ecosystem services in the form of pollination including honeybees, which have become globally dominant floral visitors. A rich literature documents considerable variation in single visit pollination effectiveness, but this literature has yet to be extensively synthesized to address whether honeybees are effective pollinators. METHODS We conducted a hierarchical meta-analysis of 168 studies and extracted 1564 single visit effectiveness (SVE) measures for 240 plant species. We paired SVE data with visitation frequency data for 69 of these studies. We used these data to ask three questions: (1) Do honeybees (Apis mellifera) and other floral visitors differ in their SVE? (2) To what extent do plant and pollinator attributes predict differences in SVE between honeybees and other visitors? (3) Is there a correlation between visitation frequency and SVE? RESULTS Honeybees were significantly less effective than the most effective non-honeybee pollinators but were as effective as the average pollinator. The type of pollinator moderated these effects. Honeybees were less effective compared to the most effective and average bird and bee pollinators but were as effective as other taxa. Visitation frequency and SVE were positively correlated, but this trend was largely driven by data from communities where honeybees were absent. CONCLUSIONS Although high visitation frequencies make honeybees important pollinators, they were less effective than the average bee and rarely the most effective pollinator of the plants they visit. As such, honeybees may be imperfect substitutes for the loss of wild pollinators, and safeguarding pollination will benefit from conservation of non-honeybee taxa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen L Page
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Charlie C Nicholson
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Ross M Brennan
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
- Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Anna T Britzman
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Jessica Greer
- Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Jeremy Hemberger
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Hanna Kahl
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Uta Müller
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Youhong Peng
- Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
| | - Nick M Rosenberger
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
- Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Clara Stuligross
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
- Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Louie H Yang
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| | - Neal M Williams
- Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bergamo PJ, Wolowski M, Tambosi LR, Garcia E, Agostini K, Garibaldi LA, Knight TM, Nic Lughadha E, Oliveira PEAM, Marques MCM, Maruyama PK, Maués MM, Oppata AK, Rech AR, Saraiva AM, Silva FDS, Sousa G, Tsukahara RY, Varassin IG, Viana BF, Freitas L. Areas Requiring Restoration Efforts are a Complementary Opportunity to Support the Demand for Pollination Services in Brazil. Environ Sci Technol 2021; 55:12043-12053. [PMID: 34423633 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Crop pollination is one of Nature's Contributions to People (NCP) that reconciles biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. NCP benefits vary across space, including among distinct political-administrative levels within nations. Moreover, initiatives to restore ecosystems may enhance NCP provision, such as crop pollination delivered by native pollinators. We mapped crop pollination demand (PD), diversity of pollinator-dependent crops, and vegetation deficit (VD) (vis-a-vis Brazilian legal requirements) across all 5570 municipalities in Brazil. Pollinator-dependent crops represented ∼55% of the annual monetary value of agricultural production and ∼15% of the annual crop production. Municipalities with greater crop PD (i.e., higher degree of pollinator dependence of crop production) also had greater VD, associated with large properties and monocultures. In contrast, municipalities with a greater diversity of pollinator-dependent crops and predominantly small properties presented a smaller VD. Our results support that ecological restoration prompted by legal requirements offers great potential to promote crop productivity in larger properties. Moreover, conservation of vegetation remnants could support food security in small properties. We provided the first steps to identify spatial patterns linking biodiversity conservation and pollination service. Using Brazilian legal requirements as an example, we show that land-use management policies may be successfully used to ensure agricultural sustainability and crop production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro J Bergamo
- Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro 22460-030, Brazil
| | - Marina Wolowski
- Institute of Natural Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas 37130-001, Brazil
| | | | - Edenise Garcia
- Instituto de Conservação Ambiental The Nature Conservancy Brasil, São Paulo 01311-936, Brazil
| | - Kayna Agostini
- Department of Natural Science, Mathematics and Education, Federal University of São Carlos, Araras 13600-970, Brazil
| | - Lucas A Garibaldi
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Agroecología y Desarollo Rural, Instituto de Investigaciones em Recursos Naturales, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina
| | - Tiffany M Knight
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany
- Community Ecology Department, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, Halle 06120, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle 06099, Germany
| | - Eimear Nic Lughadha
- Conservation Science Department, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 9AE, U.K
| | - Paulo E A M Oliveira
- Institute of Biology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38405-302, Brazil
| | - Marcia C M Marques
- Botany Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, Brazil
| | - Pietro K Maruyama
- Centre of Ecological Synthesis and Conservation, Department of Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
| | - Márcia M Maués
- Laboratory of Entomology, Embrapa Eastern Amazon, Belém 66095-903, Brazil
| | - Alberto K Oppata
- Cooperativa Agrícola Mista de Tomé-Açu, Tomé-Açu 68682-000, Brazil
| | - André R Rech
- Centre of Advanced Studies on Functioning of Ecological Systems and Interactions (CAFESIN-MULTIFLOR), Federal University of the Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys, Diamantina 39100-000, Brazil
| | - Antônio M Saraiva
- Polythecnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 055-08-010, Brazil
| | - Felipe D S Silva
- Federal Institute of Mato Grosso, Barra do Garças, 78607-899, Brazil
| | - Gizele Sousa
- Cooperativa Agrícola Mista de Tomé-Açu, Tomé-Açu 68682-000, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Y Tsukahara
- Fundação ABC Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Agropecuário, Castro 84165-700, Brazil
| | - Isabela G Varassin
- Laboratório de Interações e Biologia Reprodutiva, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 81531-980, Brazil
| | - Blandina F Viana
- National Institute of Science and Technology in Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Studies in Ecology and Evolution, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40170-210, Brazil
| | - Leandro Freitas
- Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro 22460-030, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Miñarro M, García D. Complementary Contribution of Wild Bumblebees and Managed Honeybee to the Pollination Niche of an Introduced Blueberry Crop. Insects 2021; 12:insects12070595. [PMID: 34208929 PMCID: PMC8307808 DOI: 10.3390/insects12070595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The entomophilous pollination niche (abundance, phenotypic traits, foraging behaviours and environmental tolerances of insect pollinators) helps to understand and better manage crop pollination. We apply this niche approach to assess how an entomophilous crop (blueberry, Vaccinium ashei) can be expanded into new territories (i.e., northern Spain) far from their original area of domestication (North America). Insect visits to blueberry flowers were monitored in a plantation on 12 different days, at 8 different times during day and covering various weather conditions. Abundance, visitation rate, pollen gathering behaviour, and frequency of inter-plant and inter-row movements were recorded. The pollinator assemblage was basically composed of one managed honeybee species (50.8% of visits) and three native bumblebee species (48.3%). There was a marked pattern of seasonal segregation throughout bloom, with bumblebees dominating the early bloom and honeybee the late bloom. Pollinators also segregated along gradients of daily temperature and relative humidity. Finally, the two pollinator types differed in foraging behaviour, with bumblebees having a visitation rate double that of honeybee, collecting pollen more frequently and changing plant and row more frequently. The spatio-temporal and functional complementarity between honeybee and bumblebees suggested here encourages the consideration of an integrated crop pollination strategy for blueberries, based on the concurrence of both wild and managed bees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Miñarro
- Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Villaviciosa, 33300 Asturias, Spain
- Correspondence:
| | - Daniel García
- Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas, Universidad de Oviedo and Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Biodiversidad (CSIC-Uo-PA), 33004 Asturias, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ingwell LL, Ternest JJ, Pecenka JR, Kaplan I. Supplemental forage ameliorates the negative impact of insecticides on bumblebees in a pollinator-dependent crop. Proc Biol Sci 2021; 288:20210785. [PMID: 34187195 PMCID: PMC8242826 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Insecticide use and insufficient forage are two of the leading stressors to pollinators in agroecosystems. While these factors have been well studied individually, the experimental designs do not reflect real-world conditions where insecticide exposure and lack of forage occur simultaneously and could interactively suppress pollinator health. Using outdoor enclosures, we tested the effects of insecticides (imidacloprid + lambda-cyhalothrin) and non-crop forage (clover) in a factorial design, measuring the survival, behaviour and performance of bumblebees (Bombus impatiens), as well as pollination of the focal crop, watermelon. Colony survival was synergistically reduced to 17% in watermelon alone + insecticides (survival was 100% in all other treatments). However, behavioural shifts in foraging were mainly owing to insecticides (e.g. 95% reduced visitation rate to watermelon flowers), while impacts on hive performance were primarily driven by clover presence (e.g. 374% increase in the number of live eggs). Insecticide-mediated reductions in foraging decreased crop pollination (fruit set) by 32%. Altogether, these data indicate that both insecticides and non-crop forage play integral roles in shaping pollinator health in agricultural landscapes, but the relative importance and interaction of these two factors depend on which aspect of ‘health’ is being considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura L Ingwell
- Department of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - John J Ternest
- Department of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN, USA.,Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, 1881 Natural Area Drive, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jacob R Pecenka
- Department of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Ian Kaplan
- Department of Entomology, Purdue University, 901 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abbate AP, Campbell JW, Vinson EL, Williams GR. The Pollination and Fruit Quality of Two Kiwifruit Cultivars (Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis 'AU Golden Sunshine' and 'AU Gulf Coast Gold') (Ericales: Actinidiaceae) Grown in the Southeastern United States. J Econ Entomol 2021; 114:1234-1241. [PMID: 33885768 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toab075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Kiwifruit is a new emerging crop for the southeastern United States that requires cross-pollination to set fruit. However, the pollination requirements for varieties grown in the southeastern United States are unknown. Through insect surveys and a bagging experiment, we assessed the pollination requirements of two female kiwifruit cultivars (Actinidia chinensis var. chinensis 'AU Golden Sunshine' and A. chinensis var. chinensis 'AU Gulf Coast Gold'). For each, fruit quantity (fruit set) and fruit quality (weight, size, seed count, firmness, soluble solid content, and dry matter) were compared among three pollination treatments (wind, insect, and artificial pollination). Low abundances of insects were observed visiting female flowers of both kiwifruit cultivars, and therefore likely minimally influenced kiwifruit pollination. Artificial pollination resulted in the greatest percentages of fruit set and marketable fruits, followed by insect and wind pollination. Artificial pollination resulted in fruits that were greater in weight, size, and contained more seeds, than insect- and wind-pollinated fruits. Firmness and soluble solid content did not vary greatly between pollination treatments, yet were greater in 'AU Golden Sunshine'. Dry matter content did not vary greatly between pollination treatments or between each cultivar. To maximize yields and optimize fruit quality, these results suggest that kiwifruit producers should place more effort into artificial pollination compared to wind and insect pollination. Future research should explore the use of managed bees (e.g., honey bees and bumble bees) within kiwifruit orchards to determine ways to utilize them as a secondary source for pollination needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Abbate
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Joshua W Campbell
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
- USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, Sidney, MT, USA
| | - Edgar L Vinson
- Department of Horticulture, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
- Auburn University, Chilton Research and Extension Center, Clanton, AL, USA
| | - Geoffrey R Williams
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kati V, Karamaouna F, Economou L, Mylona PV, Samara M, Mitroiu MD, Barda M, Edwards M, Liberopoulou S. Sown Wildflowers Enhance Habitats of Pollinators and Beneficial Arthropods in a Tomato Field Margin. Plants (Basel) 2021; 10:plants10051003. [PMID: 34067935 PMCID: PMC8156626 DOI: 10.3390/plants10051003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated the capacity of selected plants, sown along a processing tomato field margin in central Greece and natural vegetation, to attract beneficial and Hymenoptera pollinating insects and questioned whether they can distract pollinators from crop flowers. Measurements of flower cover and attracted pollinators and beneficial arthropods were recorded from early-May to mid-July, during the cultivation period of the crop. Flower cover was higher in the sown mixtures compared to natural vegetation and was positively correlated with the number of attracted pollinators. The sown Glebionis coronaria, Coriandrum sativum, Anethum graveolens, and Fagopyrum esculentum attracted mainly wild bees, which were the most abundant pollinating insects. In the natural vegetation, Rapistrum rugosum attracted mainly honeybees, while Asteraceae, Convolvulaceae, and Apiaceae species attracted wild bees. Beneficial arthropod abundance and diversity were higher in the sown mixture. Tomato flowers were visited by a small number of wild bees. Their number was not affected by the distance from the field margin, indicating no distraction effect from the sown or natural vegetation flowering plants. Our results suggest that selected flowering plants can improve the field margin habitats for pollinating insects and beneficial arthropods, but more work is needed to elucidate the effect on crop pollination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaya Kati
- Scientific Directorate of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta Str., 14561 Kifissia, Greece; (L.E.); (M.S.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- Correspondence: (V.K.); (F.K.); Tel.: +30-210-8180-246 (V.K.); +30-210-8180-332 (F.K.)
| | - Filitsa Karamaouna
- Scientific Directorate of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta Str., 14561 Kifissia, Greece; (L.E.); (M.S.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
- Correspondence: (V.K.); (F.K.); Tel.: +30-210-8180-246 (V.K.); +30-210-8180-332 (F.K.)
| | - Leonidas Economou
- Scientific Directorate of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta Str., 14561 Kifissia, Greece; (L.E.); (M.S.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Photini V. Mylona
- HAO-DEMETER, Institute of Plant Breeding & Genetic Resources, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Maria Samara
- Scientific Directorate of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta Str., 14561 Kifissia, Greece; (L.E.); (M.S.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Mircea-Dan Mitroiu
- Faculty of Biology, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Bd. Carol I 20A, 700505 Iași, Romania;
| | - Myrto Barda
- Scientific Directorate of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta Str., 14561 Kifissia, Greece; (L.E.); (M.S.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Mike Edwards
- Mike Edwards Ecological and Data Services Ltd., Midhurst GU29 9NQ, UK;
| | - Sofia Liberopoulou
- Scientific Directorate of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 8 Stefanou Delta Str., 14561 Kifissia, Greece; (L.E.); (M.S.); (M.B.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Machado ACP, Barônio GJ, de Oliveira FF, Garcia CT, Rech AR. Does a coffee plantation host potential pollinators when it is not flowering? Bee distribution in an agricultural landscape with high biological diversity in the Brazilian Campo Rupestre. J Sci Food Agric 2021; 101:2345-2354. [PMID: 33006760 DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Natural environments within agricultural landscapes have been recognized as reservoirs of biodiversity and, therefore, providers of fundamental ecosystem services to human beings. Bees are the main providers of pollination and thus contribute to the production of food consumed worldwide. In this work, we evaluated the distribution of bees in an agricultural landscape of coffee plantation before and after coffee flowering. We aimed at understanding how richness, abundance and composition of bee communities vary among the different vegetation types within and around the coffee crops. RESULTS A total of 638 bees were collected - 312 in the dry season and 326 in the rainy season - totaling 85 species. The sampling methods collected different species, which provided complementary sampling. Only Euglossa leucotricha and Eulaema nigrita were recurrent in both seasons and vegetation types. There was no temporal difference in richness or abundance; however, both varied in relation to the vegetation type and were higher in the coffee-native transition area. Diverging from richness or abundance, the composition of the communities differed regarding season and vegetation types. CONCLUSION We reinforce the importance of maintaining native vegetation in areas surrounding coffee plantations since the crop poorly hosts pollinators when it is not flowering. Natural and semi-natural areas may act as reservoirs of floral visitors, thus maintaining potential cross-pollination services available to coffee production. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Carolina Pereira Machado
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil
| | - Gudryan Jackson Barônio
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Florestal, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil
| | - Favízia Freitas de Oliveira
- Laboratório de Bionomia, Biogeografia e Sistemática de Insetos (BIOSIS), Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Federal da Bahia (IBIO-UFBA), Salvador, Brazil
| | - Caroline Tito Garcia
- Laboratório de Bionomia, Biogeografia e Sistemática de Insetos (BIOSIS), Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Federal da Bahia (IBIO-UFBA), Salvador, Brazil
| | - André Rodrigo Rech
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Florestal, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil
- Faculdade Interdisciplinar em Humanidades, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bosch J, Osorio-Canadas S, Sgolastra F, Vicens N. Use of a Managed Solitary Bee to Pollinate Almonds: Population Sustainability and Increased Fruit Set. Insects 2021; 12:56. [PMID: 33440833 DOI: 10.3390/insects12010056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary Methods to rear Osmia bees to pollinate fruit trees have been developed in various parts of the world. These bees are excellent pollinators but evidence that their populations can be sustained in orchards and their use results in increased fruit production is scarce. We released an Osmia cornuta population at one end of an almond orchard. Then, we surveyed the pollinators visiting the almond flowers and measured fruit set in trees located at increasing distances from the nesting stations. We found that fruit production was higher in the trees that received more Osmia visits. Importantly, this result was obtained against a strong background of honeybees, which were 10 times more abundant than Osmia. The Osmia population obtained at the end of the flowering period was 1.28 larger than the population initially released. Our study demonstrates that Osmia populations can be sustained in orchard environments and that even a small population of a highly effective pollinator may have a significant impact on fruit set. Our results are encouraging for the use of Osmia populations and for the implementation of measures to promote wild pollinators in agricultural environments. Abstract Osmia spp. are excellent orchard pollinators but evidence that their populations can be sustained in orchard environments and their use results in increased fruit production is scarce. We released an Osmia cornuta population in an almond orchard and measured its population dynamics, as well as visitation rates and fruit set at increasing distances from the nesting stations. Honeybees were 10 times more abundant than O. cornuta. However, the best models relating fruit set and bee visitation included only O. cornuta visitation, which explained 41% and 40% of the initial and final fruit set. Distance from the nesting stations explained 27.7% and 22.1% of the variability in initial and final fruit set. Of the 198 females released, 99 (54.4%) established and produced an average of 9.15 cells. Female population growth was 1.28. By comparing our results with those of previous O. cornuta studies we identify two important populational bottlenecks (female establishment and male-biased progeny sex ratios). Our study demonstrates that even a small population of a highly effective pollinator may have a significant impact on fruit set. Our results are encouraging for the use of Osmia managed populations and for the implementation of measures to promote wild pollinators in agricultural environments.
Collapse
|
25
|
McGrady CM, Troyer R, Fleischer SJ. Wild Bee Visitation Rates Exceed Pollination Thresholds in Commercial Cucurbita Agroecosystems. J Econ Entomol 2020; 113:562-574. [PMID: 31815283 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toz295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Wild bees supply sufficient pollination in Cucurbita agroecosystems in certain settings; however, some growers continue to stock fields with managed pollinators due to uncertainties of temporal and spatial variation on pollination services supplied by wild bees. Here, we evaluate wild bee pollination activity in wholesale, commercial pumpkin fields over 3 yr. We identified 37 species of bees foraging in commercial pumpkin fields. Honey bees (Apis mellifera L. [Hymenoptera: Apidae]), squash bees (Eucera (Peponapis) Say, Dorchin [Hymenoptera: Apidae]), and bumble bees (Bombus spp., primarily B. impatiens Cresson [Hymenoptera: Apidae]) were the most active pollinator taxa, responsible for over 95% of all pollination visits. Preference for female flowers decreased as distance from field edge increased for several bee taxa. Visitation rates from one key pollinator was negatively affected by field size. Visitation rates for multiple taxa exhibited a curvilinear response as the growing season progressed and responded positively to increasing floral density. We synthesized existing literature to estimate minimum 'pollination thresholds' per taxa and determined that each of the most active pollinator taxa exceeded these thresholds independently. Under current conditions, renting honey bee hives may be superfluous in this system. These results can aid growers when executing pollination management strategies and further highlights the importance of monitoring and conserving wild pollinator populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M McGrady
- The Pennsylvania State University, Entomology Department, University Park, PA
| | - R Troyer
- The Pennsylvania State University, Entomology Department, University Park, PA
| | - S J Fleischer
- The Pennsylvania State University, Entomology Department, University Park, PA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Insects other than bees (i.e., non-bees) have been acknowledged as important crop pollinators, but our understanding of which crop plants they visit and how effective they are as crop pollinators is limited. To compare visitation and efficiency of crop-pollinating bees and non-bees at a global scale, we review the literature published from 1950 to 2018 concerning the visitors and pollinators of 105 global food crops that are known to benefit from animal pollinators. Of the 105 animal-pollinated crops, a significant proportion are visited by both bee and non-bee taxa (n = 82; 77%), with a total gross domestic product (GDP) value of US$780.8 billion. For crops with a narrower range of visitors, those that favor non-bees (n = 8) have a value of US$1.2 billion, compared to those that favor bees (n = 15), with a value of US$19.0 billion. Limited pollinator efficiency data were available for one or more taxa in only half of the crops (n = 61; 58%). Among the non-bees, some families were recorded visiting a wide range of crops (>12), including six families of flies (Syrphidae, Calliphoridae, Muscidae, Sarcophagidae, Tachinidae, and Bombyliidae), two beetle families (Coccinelidae and Nitidulidae), ants (Formicidae), wasps (Vespidae), and four families of moths and butterflies (Hesperiidae, Lycaenidae, Nymphalidae, and Pieridae). Among the non-bees, taxa within the dipteran families Syrphidae and Calliphoridae were the most common visitors to the most crops, but this may be an artifact of the limited data available. The diversity of species and life histories in these groups of lesser-known pollinators indicates that diet, larval requirements, and other reproductive needs will require alternative habitat management practices to bees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Rader
- School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia;
| | - S A Cunningham
- Fenner School of Environment and Society, College of Science, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
| | - B G Howlett
- The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| | - D W Inouye
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
- Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, Colorado 81224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Campbell JW, Bammer M, Bustamante TA, Ellis JD. The Health of Commercial Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Colonies After Foraging in Florida Watermelon and Blueberry. Environ Entomol 2019; 48:1197-1202. [PMID: 31237607 DOI: 10.1093/ee/nvz081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Bumble bees are commonly used to provide pollination services within crop fields and greenhouses, with Bombus impatiens Cresson; Hymenoptera: Apidae, a bee native to the eastern United States, being the only managed bumble bee available commercially in the United States. Although many researchers have explored managed bumble bees' ability to pollinate various crops and the potential spread of pathogens by managed bumble bees, scant research is available on how managed bumble bee colony health is affected after foraging within crop fields. We measured 10 B. impatiens colony health parameters: 1) colony weight; number of 2) honey/pollen pots, 3) workers, 4) queens, 5) drones, 6) immatures, 7) eggs; and weight of 8) workers, 9) drones, and 10) queens from colonies that foraged within blueberry or watermelon fields, and compared them to control colonies that were purchased and immediately frozen upon receipt. Bees that foraged within blueberry increased in colony weight and in the number of immatures and eggs during the bloom period compared to control colonies. In contrast, bee colonies placed within watermelon decreased in colony weight, number of workers and immature bees, and individual bee weight compared to control colonies. Blueberry appeared to provide bees with sufficient nectar and pollen, whereas watermelon may not have provided adequate resources for the bees. Bees foraging within watermelon were probably forced to search for other sources of pollen and nectar, resulting in colony health parameter declines. Our data suggest that some crops (e.g., blueberry) can support managed B. impatiens, potentially adding to localized bumble bee populations, while others (e.g., watermelon) cannot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua W Campbell
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
| | - Mary Bammer
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Steinmetz Hall, Gainesville, FL
| | - Tomas A Bustamante
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Steinmetz Hall, Gainesville, FL
| | - James D Ellis
- Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Steinmetz Hall, Gainesville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Topitzhofer E, Lucas H, Chakrabarti P, Breece C, Bryant V, Sagili RR. Assessment of Pollen Diversity Available to Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Major Cropping Systems During Pollination in the Western United States. J Econ Entomol 2019; 112:2040-2048. [PMID: 31237612 PMCID: PMC6756777 DOI: 10.1093/jee/toz168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Global western honey bee, Apis mellifera (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae), colony declines pose a significant threat to food production worldwide. Poor nutrition resulting from habitat loss, extensive monocultures, and agricultural intensification is among the several suggested drivers for colony declines. Pollen is the primary source of protein for honey bees; therefore, both pollen abundance and diversity are critical for colony growth and survival. Many cropping systems that employ honey bee colonies for pollination may lack sufficient pollen diversity and abundance to provide optimal bee nutrition. In this observational study, we documented the diversity and relative abundance of pollen collected by honey bees in five major pollinator-dependent crops in the western United States. We sampled pollen from pollen traps installed on honey bee colonies in the following cropping systems-almond, cherry, highbush blueberry, hybrid carrot, and meadowfoam. The pollen diversity was estimated by documenting the number of different pollen pellet colors and plant taxa found in each pollen sample. The lowest pollen diversity was found in almond crop. Relatively higher quantities of pollen collection were collected in almond, cherry, and meadowfoam cropping systems. The information gleaned from this study regarding pollen diversity and abundance may help growers, land managers, and beekeepers improve pollen forage available to bees in these cropping systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hannah Lucas
- Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | | | - Carolyn Breece
- Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| | - Vaughn Bryant
- Department of Anthropology, Palynology Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | - Ramesh R Sagili
- Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Badillo‐Montaño R, Aguirre A, Munguía‐Rosas MA. Pollinator-mediated interactions between cultivated papaya and co-flowering plant species. Ecol Evol 2019; 9:587-597. [PMID: 30680139 PMCID: PMC6342130 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Revised: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Many modern crop varieties rely on animal pollination to set fruit and seeds. Intensive crop plantations usually do not provide suitable habitats for pollinators so crop yield may depend on the surrounding vegetation to maintain pollination services. However, little is known about the effect of pollinator-mediated interactions among co-flowering plants on crop yield or the underlying mechanisms. Plant reproductive success is complex, involving several pre- and post-pollination events; however, the current literature has mainly focused on pre-pollination events in natural plant communities. We assessed pollinator sharing and the contribution to pollinator diet in a community of wild and cultivated plants that co-flower with a focal papaya plantation. In addition, we assessed heterospecific pollen transfer to the stigmatic loads of papaya and its effect on fruit and seed production. We found that papaya shared at least one pollinator species with the majority of the co-flowering plants. Despite this, heterospecific pollen transfer in cultivated papaya was low in open-pollinated flowers. Hand-pollination experiments suggest that heterospecific pollen transfer has no negative effect on fruit production or weight, but does reduce seed production. These results suggest that co-flowering plants offer valuable floral resources to pollinators that are shared with cultivated papaya with little or no cost in terms of heterospecific pollen transfer. Although HP reduced seed production, a reduced number of seeds per se are not negative, given that from an agronomic perspective the number of seeds does not affect the monetary value of the papaya fruit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raúl Badillo‐Montaño
- Laboratorio de Ecología TerrestreCinvestavMéridaMéxico
- Red de Interacciones MultitróficasInstituto de Ecología, A.C.XalapaMéxico
| | - Armando Aguirre
- Red de Interacciones MultitróficasInstituto de Ecología, A.C.XalapaMéxico
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fijen TPM, Scheper JA, Boom TM, Janssen N, Raemakers I, Kleijn D. Insect pollination is at least as important for marketable crop yield as plant quality in a seed crop. Ecol Lett 2018; 21:1704-1713. [PMID: 30189466 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The sustainability of agriculture can be improved by integrating management of ecosystem services, such as insect pollination, into farming practices. However, large-scale adoption of ecosystem services-based practices in agriculture is lacking, possibly because growers undervalue the benefits of ecosystem services compared to those of conventional management practices. Here we show that, under representative real-world conditions, pollination and plant quality made similar contributions to marketable seed yield of hybrid leek (Allium porrum). Relative to the median, a 25% improvement of plant quality and pollination increased crop value by an estimated $18 007 and $17 174 ha-1 respectively. Across five crop lines, bumblebees delivered most pollination services, while other wild pollinator groups made less frequent but nevertheless substantial contributions. Honeybees actively managed for pollination services did not make significant contributions. Our results show that wild pollinators are an undervalued agricultural input and managing for enhancing pollinators makes sense economically in high-revenue insect-pollinated cropping systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs P M Fijen
- Wageningen University, Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen A Scheper
- Wageningen University, Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands.,Animal Ecology Team, Wageningen Environmental Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands
| | - Timo M Boom
- Wageningen University, Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Janssen
- Wageningen University, Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo Raemakers
- Van Caldenborghstraat 26, Gronsveld, 6247CG, The Netherlands
| | - David Kleijn
- Wageningen University, Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sáez A, Morales JM, Morales CL, Harder LD, Aizen MA. The costs and benefits of pollinator dependence: empirically based simulations predict raspberry fruit quality. Ecol Appl 2018; 28:1215-1222. [PMID: 29575300 DOI: 10.1002/eap.1720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2017] [Revised: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Globally, agriculture increasingly depends on pollinators to produce many seed and fruit crops. However, what constitutes optimal pollination service for pollinator-dependent crops remains unanswered. We developed a simulation model to identify the optimal pollination service that maximizes fruit quality in crops. The model depicts the pollination (i.e., autonomous self-fertilization, pollen deposition) and post-pollination (i.e., pollen germination, and time from germination to ovule fertilization) processes leading to fruit and seed set and allows for negative flower-pollinator interactions, specifically pistil damage. We parameterized and validated the model based on empirical observations of commercial raspberry in western Argentina. To assess the effects of pollination intensity for fruit production, we conducted simulations over a range of visit number per flower by the two primary managed pollinators worldwide, Apis mellifera and Bombus terrestris. Simulations identified that ~15-35 visits per flower by A. mellifera or ~10-20 visits by B. terrestris provide adequate pollination and maximize raspberry fruit quality (i.e., estimated as the proportion of ovules that develop into drupelets). Visits in excess of these optima reduce simulated fruit quality, and flowers receiving >670 honey bee visits or >470 bumble bee visits would produce fruits of poorer quality than those receiving no bee visits. The simulations generated consistent, unbiased predictions of fruit quality for 12 raspberry fields. This model could be adapted easily to other animal-pollinated crops and used to guide efficient pollinator management in any agro-ecosystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agustín Sáez
- Grupo de Ecología de la Polinización, INIBIOMA (CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Comahue), San Carlos de Bariloche (CP8400), Rio Negro, Argentina
| | - Juan M Morales
- Grupo de Ecología Cuantitativa, INIBIOMA (CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Comahue), San Carlos de Bariloche (CP8400), Rio Negro, Argentina
| | - Carolina L Morales
- Grupo de Ecología de la Polinización, INIBIOMA (CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Comahue), San Carlos de Bariloche (CP8400), Rio Negro, Argentina
| | - Lawrence D Harder
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Marcelo A Aizen
- Grupo de Ecología de la Polinización, INIBIOMA (CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Comahue), San Carlos de Bariloche (CP8400), Rio Negro, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gaffney A, Bohman B, Quarrell SR, Brown PH, Allen GR. Frequent Insect Visitors Are Not Always Pollen Carriers in Hybrid Carrot Pollination. Insects 2018; 9:E61. [PMID: 29880773 DOI: 10.3390/insects9020061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Insect crop visitations do not necessarily translate to carriage or transfer of pollen. To evaluate the potential of the various insects visiting hybrid carrot flowers to facilitate pollen transfer, this study examines insect visitation rates to hybrid carrot seed crops in relation to weather, time of day and season, pollen carrying capacity, inter-row movement, and visitation frequency to male-fertile and male-sterile umbels. The highest pollen loads were carried by nectar scarabs, honey bees, and the hover fly Eristalis tenax (Linnaeus). Honey bees and muscoid flies were observed to forage mostly within the male fertile carrot row while nectar scarabs and E. tenax foraged across rows, carrying equal pollen loads regardless of their distance from the pollen source. All observed insect taxa were more frequently seen visiting male-fertile than male-sterile umbels. In contrast to other visiting insects, honey bees were abundant and frequent visitors and were observed carrying high pollen loads. Consequently, we suggest both optimizing honey bee management and improving the attraction of carrot lines to honey bees to improve pollination rates for hybrid carrot seed crops.
Collapse
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Fred L Stoddard
- Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Venturini EM, Drummond FA, Hoshide AK, Dibble AC, Stack LB. Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae). J Econ Entomol 2017; 110:333-346. [PMID: 28069631 PMCID: PMC5387985 DOI: 10.1093/jee/tow285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Pollinator-dependent agriculture heavily relies upon a single pollinator-the honey bee. To diversify pollination strategies, growers are turning to alternatives. Densely planted reservoirs of pollen- and nectar-rich flowers (pollination reservoirs, hereafter "PRs") may improve pollination services provided by wild bees. Our focal agroecosystem, lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton), exists in a simple landscape uniquely positioned to benefit from PRs. First, we contrast bee visitation rates and use of three types of PR. We consider the effects of PRs on wild bee diversity and the composition of bumble bee pollen loads. We contrast field-level crop pollination services between PRs and controls four years postestablishment. Last, we calculate the time to pay for PR investment. Social bees preferentially used clover plantings; solitary bees preferentially used wildflower plantings. On average, bumble bee pollen loads in treatment fields contained 37% PR pollen. PRs significantly increased visitation rates to the crop in year 4, and exerted a marginally significant positive influence on fruit set. The annualized costs of PRs were covered by the fourth year using the measured increase in pollination services. Our findings provide evidence of the positive impact of PRs on crop pollination services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Venturini
- School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469 (; ; )
| | - F A Drummond
- School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469 ( ; ; )
- University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 495 College Ave., Orono, ME 04469 ( )
| | - A K Hoshide
- School of Economics, University of Maine, 206 Winslow Hall, Orono, ME 04469
| | - A C Dibble
- School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469 (; ; )
| | - L B Stack
- University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 495 College Ave., Orono, ME 04469 ( )
- School of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Häussler J, Sahlin U, Baey C, Smith HG, Clough Y. Pollinator population size and pollination ecosystem service responses to enhancing floral and nesting resources. Ecol Evol 2017; 7:1898-1908. [PMID: 28331597 PMCID: PMC5355185 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2016] [Revised: 11/23/2016] [Accepted: 12/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Modeling pollination ecosystem services requires a spatially explicit, process-based approach because they depend on both the behavioral responses of pollinators to the amount and spatial arrangement of habitat and on the within- and between-season dynamics of pollinator populations in response to land use. We describe a novel pollinator model predicting flower visitation rates by wild central-place foragers (e.g., nesting bees) in spatially explicit landscapes. The model goes beyond existing approaches by: (1) integrating preferential use of more rewarding floral and nesting resources; (2) considering population growth over time; (3) allowing different dispersal distances for workers and reproductives; (4) providing visitation rates for use in crop pollination models. We use the model to estimate the effect of establishing grassy field margins offering nesting resources and a low quantity of flower resources, and/or late-flowering flower strips offering no nesting resources but abundant flowers, on bumble bee populations and visitation rates to flowers in landscapes that differ in amounts of linear seminatural habitats and early mass-flowering crops. Flower strips were three times more effective in increasing pollinator populations and visitation rates than field margins, and this effect increased over time. Late-blooming flower strips increased early-season visitation rates, but decreased visitation rates in other late-season flowers. Increases in population size over time in response to flower strips and amounts of linear seminatural habitats reduced this apparent competition for pollinators. Our spatially explicit, process-based model generates emergent patterns reflecting empirical observations, such that adding flower resources may have contrasting short- and long-term effects due to apparent competition for pollinators and pollinator population size increase. It allows exploring these effects and comparing effect sizes in ways not possible with other existing models. Future applications include species comparisons, analysis of the sensitivity of predictions to life-history traits, as well as large-scale management intervention and policy assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Häussler
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research Lund University Lund Sweden; Present address: Johanna Häussler German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig Leipzig Germany; Present address: Institute of Ecology Friedrich Schiller University Jena Jena Germany; Present address: Charlotte Baey Centrale Supélec MICS Laboratory Châtenay-Malabry France
| | - Ullrika Sahlin
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research Lund University Lund Sweden
| | - Charlotte Baey
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research Lund University Lund Sweden
| | - Henrik G Smith
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research Lund University Lund Sweden; Department of Biology, Biodiversity Lund University Lund Sweden
| | - Yann Clough
- Centre for Environmental and Climate Research Lund University Lund Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Holzschuh A, Dainese M, González-Varo JP, Mudri-Stojnić S, Riedinger V, Rundlöf M, Scheper J, Wickens JB, Wickens VJ, Bommarco R, Kleijn D, Potts SG, Roberts SPM, Smith HG, Vilà M, Vujić A, Steffan-Dewenter I. Mass-flowering crops dilute pollinator abundance in agricultural landscapes across Europe. Ecol Lett 2016; 19:1228-36. [PMID: 27531385 PMCID: PMC5031195 DOI: 10.1111/ele.12657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Mass-flowering crops (MFCs) are increasingly cultivated and might influence pollinator communities in MFC fields and nearby semi-natural habitats (SNHs). Across six European regions and 2 years, we assessed how landscape-scale cover of MFCs affected pollinator densities in 408 MFC fields and adjacent SNHs. In MFC fields, densities of bumblebees, solitary bees, managed honeybees and hoverflies were negatively related to the cover of MFCs in the landscape. In SNHs, densities of bumblebees declined with increasing cover of MFCs but densities of honeybees increased. The densities of all pollinators were generally unrelated to the cover of SNHs in the landscape. Although MFC fields apparently attracted pollinators from SNHs, in landscapes with large areas of MFCs they became diluted. The resulting lower densities might negatively affect yields of pollinator-dependent crops and the reproductive success of wild plants. An expansion of MFCs needs to be accompanied by pollinator-supporting practices in agricultural landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Holzschuh
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Matteo Dainese
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Juan P González-Varo
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio s/n, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Sonja Mudri-Stojnić
- Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 2, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Verena Riedinger
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maj Rundlöf
- Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jeroen Scheper
- Alterra, Animal Ecology Team, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.,Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer B Wickens
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AR, UK
| | - Victoria J Wickens
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AR, UK
| | - Riccardo Bommarco
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - David Kleijn
- Alterra, Animal Ecology Team, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.,Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Simon G Potts
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AR, UK
| | - Stuart P M Roberts
- Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AR, UK
| | - Henrik G Smith
- Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden.,Centre for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund University, 223 62, Lund, Sweden
| | - Montserrat Vilà
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio s/n, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Ante Vujić
- Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 2, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
- Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Koh I, Lonsdorf EV, Williams NM, Brittain C, Isaacs R, Gibbs J, Ricketts TH. Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113:140-5. [PMID: 26699460 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517685113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 172] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Wild bees are highly valuable pollinators. Along with managed honey bees, they provide a critical ecosystem service by ensuring stable pollination to agriculture and wild plant communities. Increasing concern about the welfare of both wild and managed pollinators, however, has prompted recent calls for national evaluation and action. Here, for the first time to our knowledge, we assess the status and trends of wild bees and their potential impacts on pollination services across the coterminous United States. We use a spatial habitat model, national land-cover data, and carefully quantified expert knowledge to estimate wild bee abundance and associated uncertainty. Between 2008 and 2013, modeled bee abundance declined across 23% of US land area. This decline was generally associated with conversion of natural habitats to row crops. We identify 139 counties where low bee abundances correspond to large areas of pollinator-dependent crops. These areas of mismatch between supply (wild bee abundance) and demand (cultivated area) for pollination comprise 39% of the pollinator-dependent crop area in the United States. Further, we find that the crops most highly dependent on pollinators tend to experience more severe mismatches between declining supply and increasing demand. These trends, should they continue, may increase costs for US farmers and may even destabilize crop production over time. National assessments such as this can help focus both scientific and political efforts to understand and sustain wild bees. As new information becomes available, repeated assessments can update findings, revise priorities, and track progress toward sustainable management of our nation's pollinators.
Collapse
|
38
|
Scheper J, Reemer M, van Kats R, Ozinga WA, van der Linden GT, Schaminée JH, Siepel H, Kleijn D. Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in The Netherlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:17552-7. [PMID: 25422416 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1412973111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence for declining populations of both wild and managed bees has raised concern about a potential global pollination crisis. Strategies to mitigate bee loss generally aim to enhance floral resources. However, we do not really know whether loss of preferred floral resources is the key driver of bee decline because accurate assessment of host plant preferences is difficult, particularly for species that have become rare. Here we examine whether population trends of wild bees in The Netherlands can be explained by trends in host plants, and how this relates to other factors such as climate change. We determined host plant preference of bee species using pollen loads on specimens in entomological collections that were collected before the onset of their decline, and used atlas data to quantify population trends of bee species and their host plants. We show that decline of preferred host plant species was one of two main factors associated with bee decline. Bee body size, the other main factor, was negatively related to population trend, which, because larger bee species have larger pollen requirements than smaller species, may also point toward food limitation as a key factor driving wild bee loss. Diet breadth and other potential factors such as length of flight period or climate change sensitivity were not important in explaining twentieth century bee population trends. These results highlight the species-specific nature of wild bee decline and indicate that mitigation strategies will only be effective if they target the specific host plants of declining species.
Collapse
|